Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by thegoaliesdad
How much you only reference D1 and D3 commits and not D2? What is the constant [ChillLaxin] stigma with D2?

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
D1 commits are not a factor in how well a team will do.



Ehh I have to say talent plays a major roll in how a team does. If you have a good number of D1 and top D3 commits on a team it means there is talent. I dont care how good coaching is if you dont have talent you dont win games. I know there have been a few teams with a tremendous amount of talent but have been unsuccessful. Thats a poor mix of selfish players, parents who dont have a clue and push an all me type of game, and a coach who cant coach.




As per the reference to D1 and D3. D1 and D3 are historically the better programs. D2 does not have many strong teams and also not a long history in the game. The upper tier D3 teams can beat many of the lower tier D1 teams and give some of the upper tier teams a battle


The top 6 or so D II programs are very solid programs.