Rankings are terrible and getting worse all the time. Not only are many of the same players on multiple teams (I heard from a parent the 2 red hot teams have about 40-50% crossover players), but there are teams that have played literally 1 tournament. (Project Midwest). Many teams with less than 10 games. There are teams in the 50’s that played 10 games against only terrible teams. There should be some minimum to count. At least three tournaments or at least 12-15 games. I’m not a Team Money fan, but no way they should be 50 slots below Team MD and Clippers. I know this group is only focused on top 25 rankings, but the whole thing is flawed top to bottom. It should hold no credence in anyone’s mind. And it is a fact if MD had 1 allstar team (like 2 Way in CT) we’d be top 1-2.
And it is a fact that if MD had 1 all star team with no holdbacks and reclasses they would not be in the top 10.
Let’s be honest. Certain clubs have figured out the hack. Beat a crappy team by ten to bust your rating. The rating system as is allows for manipulation. Or worse, if you do poorly or are missing some key players, just change your name. I’m less concerned with national teams being included because you can simply take them out of the equation. But I can see multiple examples 50-100 that just aren’t accurate.
Reply
Quote