Dukes - 9 SweetLax - 6 Long Island Express - 5 Madlax - 3 Crabs - 3 Prime Time - 2 Apex - 2 91 - 2 FCA - 2 WCS - 2 NHT - 2 LB3 - 1 3d - 1 VLC - 1 Mustangs - 1
For the past 4/5 years people have been saying how great the 91 extreme team was/is just like we are now continually hearing about the Crush, The Honey Badgers and the Bandits. Truth is; having a winning seasonal record and winning games at these tournaments means nothing. The Dukes and Sweetlax lose to 91 Extreme all the time yet more 2018 kids have verbally committed from Sweetlax and the Dukes (15 total) than 91 (2 total)
and yeah yeah, there are kids who already are "secretly" committed to the Ivy's and can't report it yet but every clubs has those kids so that just evens out.
Better to play on a winning team and get lost in the crowd or play on a club where each kid is being developed as a player?
Just a question here? How many Dukes players were 2017's last year? 5? 6? Might have something to do with why they have 9 recruits, yet their players aren't good enough to beat 91. Who has far less. Is there another explanation for this?
to be honest hold backs do have a lot to do with current commits, also Dukes probably carries 30-40 kids in this class and sweetlax takes credit for any kid who ever came to a clinic.
The point the original poster was making is slipping away here. Regardless of 2017's, HB's etc... 91 Xtreme claims to be the best team but yet 9 kids from other clubs went before "the best teams" kids. Point is, you don't need to be on a team who is "undefeated"; you need to be with an organization who can get your recruited and the numbers tell me DUKES, SWEETLAX AND EXPRESS are doing a better job.
