BL better get more boarders. SJC skull dragging up and down the field
The CT FOGO definitely didn't look dominant in that one, lmao. Jumbo Lump knows nothing!
Well he didn’t play due to injury. Nice try!! Lol
injury or no injury what is odd is that USA Magazine ranked BL with other non boarding schools. They are beginning to board many athletes including lacrosse players (CT fogo) and they should not be ranked. They are becoming similar to taft deerfield salisbury etc . . . Once you have boarders you should not be ranked in the USA rankings. Inside lax - yes bc they include all schools but it is silly that they are considered solely a "day" school. and if they rank BL then they should just rank ALL schools.
The correct distinction isn't day vs. boarding, it's day/boarding vs. schools that allow 5th year seniors.
If that is really what USA lacrosse considers the difference then that is just silly and splitting hairs. For example in NY Westminster has a DI committed fogo doing a PG year for this upcoming year and Loomis has a committed DI fogo reclassing and repeating his junior year. They're the identical thing to me. If this is the difference between one school being ranked and the other not that's just silly. I know neither are ranked but it would appear that USA Mag would rank one but not the other. IF BL, McD and others are having a dozen or so lax kids boarding, the powers that be should have a prep school ranking and a public school ranking OR just a single ranking system with all schools.
Reply
Quote
