Really should have been a group of coaches with no affiliations doing the evaluations. This would eliminate all the BS associated with these types of selctions.
Using people who have no affiliations with the boys will create a different type of bias. Such as-
-bigger is immediately perceived as better -A faster timed run is more imprtant than real field speed and angles -a good driller over a good gamer
The best scenario is a coalition of coaches who collectively have seen all the candidates and can objectively evaluate every boy. None should have child as part of the evaluation
Reply
Quote
