Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
JS says KO is the best player in college lacrosse, because she scored 7 points against Hadnagy. And because she has 164 points against awful teams. So Kenzie Kent score 10 points against her and gets 71 points in 12 games playing against way tougher competition. Think that shows that she is one of the best players in the country. Wait until this kid plays a full year.


Stop being a bitter. KO and Kent are both great players. [lacrosse], Kent is even better than Apuzzo but you can't take 164 points away from anyone in D1, especially one on a ranked team. Now go crawl back in your.


No one is, it's just Kent is better. Plays long hard season of hockey and then goes and lights up lax season against real teams. She and Apuzzo also get draws,CTs and GBs, KO is one sided. Was KO MVP? No because Kent is amazing.


One sided...Stop it
NCAA Points record
NCAA Assists record
2nd in the country in goals
340 points in 3 seasons

Nothing one sided about 80+ Assists and 70+ goals.



I think you just proved his "one sided" argument for him - scoring only.


Actually he was comparing Apuzzo, who gets plenty of DC's and CT's and Kent to KO. Kent is just a scorer like KO. Just not as prolific. Kent had only 3 CT's and averaged only one DC per game..she also averaged more TO's, per game then KO. Her game is scoring. Just the facts here, not opinions

Let's face it people, if you are from Boston you are a Kent fan and if you are from LI you are going with KO, and that is how it should be. End of the day both are incredible players.