How do classify dominant? How many kids dominate any sport on age? Maybe 1-2 per team or maybe less? This is a notIntelligent argument. If you want to holdback you are welcome to, any parent who doesnt see the value for their child is a m@ron. Seems like a lot of jealous 2029 parents. I would be upset as well, 2029 is an awful class on the island, very little talent.
This may be the densest statement yet. People are “fools and jealous” because they don’t see the “value” in holding back. So let’s start a new thread about “value” vs “cost”
Value -gets to dominate against younger kids -an extra year of maturity and maybe get their academics in order -maybe, just maybe, but unlikely to translate into getting into a top d1 school -parents get a sense a pride and boast how awesome their kid is
Cost -you are telling their kid they can’t compete on a level playing field. Usually the parent and maybe the kid won’t ever realize this -less skill development because you are competing against a less skilled cohort rather than on age -all those friends he grew up with, say goodbye and here’s a whole new group of players -this actually a literal cost as holding back may cost in the form of an extra year of tuition and extra year of club -another literal cost of deferring a year’s worth of income down the road -teaching a life’s lesson to game the system and cut corners to get ahead. Again most won’t realize it.
Everybody has different goals in life but to me, the “value” just doesn’t outweigh the “costs”. t’s lacrosse. It just makes no sense. Maybe basketball or football but makes zero sense for lacrosse.
Who wants to add to the list of perceived value and costs?
The value vs cost conversation was key for our decision to reclass. Nothing to with knucklehead above but here is the reality of how we looked at it:
Value - Lost a year of education due to Covid, reclassing gives this back - Move to a better (Prep) school and get a better education with better network - Better school provides better pipeline into colleges - Higher academic standards will push him to be his best. - Education, education, education. - Play against better competition. - Go from a 50-100 IL recruit to a top 25 (Patriot League to ACC) - I love boasting how great my kid is.
Cost - do I want to pay for an extra year of school + the additional uptick in cost for Prep School - School gave FA though dont really quality so that offset the additional cost - 50% scholarship to a top academic University made up for the extra year and then some
Net net, we looked at the overall value and cost of reclassing while balancing the risk. It was a low-risk high reward for us based on the different value propositions.
Education could have been had by transferring without releasing. Cheater. Cheater. Cheater.
Not really. He wasn’t going to get in to the school with out lacrosse and they werent going to give financial aid. Also, the lost COVID year and being able to give that back wasn’t an option by transferring……also the team didnt need him in the class so again nope, couldn’t get the education by just transferring. I do love that it pisses you off though. Add that to the value propisition. darn, the more I type it out the more it was a low cost high value decision.
What a weasel.
How and why is he a weasel but I have a new question. Can someone explain to me how football and basketball players reclass to the grade ahead of them? Have seen a few NCAA basketball and football programs announce kids reclassing from 25 to 24 and its making my head explode.
I think lacrosse (maybe baseball?) it is the norm to reclass back but not so much for soccer football or basketball because truly transcendent players can and should play up. There is a $$ component as well as their earnings and NIL money start early.
No future pro $$ in lax. NIL money is nonexistent compared to other sports. So it’s better to reclass back so as better to compete with younger kids because you aren’t losing future dollars.
Reply
Quote