@BackOfTheCAGE
Here is a new thread.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
If your son is the 2022 age bracket, what are the best club teams in Westchester and Fairfield counties? Are they Primetime, Predators, Chargers and Eclipse? Or some other Ny or Ct team?

Which ones will give him the best training and ultimately the best recruiting opportunities? Thanks in advance for your help.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If your son is the 2022 age bracket, what are the best club teams in Westchester and Fairfield counties? Are they Primetime, Predators, Chargers and Eclipse? Or some other Ny or Ct team?

Which ones will give him the best training and ultimately the best recruiting opportunities? Thanks in advance for your help.


Express North should be a consideration.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I thought that long express north and team 91 tristate were too new and needed a couple more seasons for the teams and organizations to gel. The younger LIE north and 91 tristate teams seemed to play only in B level tournaments.

Any of these organizations play year round? Hard to compete against the top Long Island and Maryland teams when the Westchester and Fairfield teams really only practice together as a team in the summer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought that long express north and team 91 tristate were too new and needed a couple more seasons for the teams and organizations to gel. The younger LIE north and 91 tristate teams seemed to play only in B level tournaments.

Any of these organizations play year round? Hard to compete against the top Long Island and Maryland teams when the Westchester and Fairfield teams really only practice together as a team in the summer.


That is a lame excuse! My son plays on a couple teams as an invited player we never know which kids will be there, yet they usually win the tournament or come very close! If the talent is there, you will win.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
problem with northern westchester right now in general is a shrinking pool of players and a growing amount travel organizations. Superstars out of ridgefield has changed their whole offering. combination of box and field lacrosse, not sure how that will workout , but it is supposed to me more of a year round offering. I have heard fair number of complaints out of the younger Prime time parents this year, Apparently the 3/4 team, won 1 game, and got pretty much destroyed in every other. not sure if that will continue or if that has always been the case.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Thanks for the comments about Northern Westchester. Seems like the same thing is happening in Fairfield County. Chargers used to be strong but the talent pool is now being divided up as more teams enter (i.e. Eclipse).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I think the participation in lacrosse has slowed down. At the high school level, if you are not starting at one of the really competitive teams like Primetime, Express North or Eclipse and either starting on varsity or getting significant playing time at least by sophomore year, you're probably better off improving your skills at camps then watching others play from sidelines at both games and practices.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Should be interesting to see how things play out for the Fall 2015/Summer 2016 teams in Westchester. Seems every organization is having tryouts on August 30th. If kids can only go to one and don't make the team may be out of luck. Of course there probably will be one or two teams without enough boys at tryouts to take the other's leftovers.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought that long express north and team 91 tristate were too new and needed a couple more seasons for the teams and organizations to gel. The younger LIE north and 91 tristate teams seemed to play only in B level tournaments.

Any of these organizations play year round? Hard to compete against the top Long Island and Maryland teams when the Westchester and Fairfield teams really only practice together as a team in the summer.


Generally yes, but North 2019 made finals at last two tourneys of summer, all the big boys were there. 3d Tristate was better at end of summer than the start.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I am hearing that Primetime, which is based in Lewisboro, and has been traditionally very strong, is no longer going to be able to call John Jay HS their home. It seems like they are scrambling for field space and have not let anyone know where that may be. This could change alot of the dynamic as I am hearing Express North is calling the Harvey School in Katonah, their new home, Does anyone know where Prime Time will be going? some are saying down County but not confirmed
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express north beat crabs and dukes this summer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am hearing that Primetime, which is based in Lewisboro, and has been traditionally very strong, is no longer going to be able to call John Jay HS their home. It seems like they are scrambling for field space and have not let anyone know where that may be. This could change alot of the dynamic as I am hearing Express North is calling the Harvey School in Katonah, their new home, Does anyone know where Prime Time will be going? some are saying down County but not confirmed

On. 8/15 A new location for tryouts was announced. Don't know where practices will be held.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am hearing that Primetime, which is based in Lewisboro, and has been traditionally very strong, is no longer going to be able to call John Jay HS their home. It seems like they are scrambling for field space and have not let anyone know where that may be. This could change alot of the dynamic as I am hearing Express North is calling the Harvey School in Katonah, their new home, Does anyone know where Prime Time will be going? some are saying down County but not confirmed

On. 8/15 A new location for tryouts was announced. Don't know where practices will be held.


Not sure where practices will be, but second day of tryouts are at Purchase. The SUNY must be making some good coin as it seems nearly every travel team is having tryouts on campus on the 30th.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
sounds like Primetime is scrambling- should bode well for the EXPRESS NORTH which is setting up shop in Katonah-
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Is there not an inherent conflict of interest between Express LI and North? at the same age level, how can the Express organization get both teams into the best tournaments? I grant you that so far it appears that they've been successful, but isn't that only because the Express North 2018 team is very good and the means by which they are growing the Express North product offering. It would seem Younger Express North teams may be at a disadvantage. There are only limited spots in the best tournaments. Thoughts?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
zero conflict of interest
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is there not an inherent conflict of interest between Express LI and North? at the same age level, how can the Express organization get both teams into the best tournaments? I grant you that so far it appears that they've been successful, but isn't that only because the Express North 2018 team is very good and the means by which they are growing the Express North product offering. It would seem Younger Express North teams may be at a disadvantage. There are only limited spots in the best tournaments. Thoughts?


There is always room for more teams! More Teams = More $!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
but does weschester have enough talent at each age group to field that many "A" teams? I think not , therefore we are looking at multiple B level teams
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is there not an inherent conflict of interest between Express LI and North? at the same age level, how can the Express organization get both teams into the best tournaments? I grant you that so far it appears that they've been successful, but isn't that only because the Express North 2018 team is very good and the means by which they are growing the Express North product offering. It would seem Younger Express North teams may be at a disadvantage. There are only limited spots in the best tournaments. Thoughts?


Conflict of interest because they share the same name? They are 2 different teams serving 2 different geographical locations. If they are both good teams and can compete at a high level why shouldn't they be able to play in the same tournaments? The higher level tournaments want strong teams, they aren't going to say no to one Express team for a lower level team just so they don't have 2 teams with the same name.

The North 2018, 2019 and 2023/24 teams all had great summers, I don't think conflict of interest will be a problem.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
but does weschester have enough talent at each age group to field that many "A" teams? I think not , therefore we are looking at multiple B level teams


There may be a huge disparity in talent this year. Many of the Westchester teams are having tryouts the same day, Aug. 30. A couple teams will likely get the bulk of talent with the teams with light turnout getting the boys that didn't make those teams. PT is 9a, 91TS is 1030a and Express North is 1230p. Preds 2nd day is also Aug. 30 also at Purchase right after 91TS.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
did the 23/24 team compete in the higher brackets? will they be able to this year?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
but does weschester have enough talent at each age group to field that many "A" teams? I think not , therefore we are looking at multiple B level teams


There may be a huge disparity in talent this year. Many of the Westchester teams are having tryouts the same day, Aug. 30. A couple teams will likely get the bulk of talent with the teams with light turnout getting the boys that didn't make those teams. PT is 9a, 91TS is 1030a and Express North is 1230p. Preds 2nd day is also Aug. 30 also at Purchase right after 91TS.


Six clubs are having tryouts on Aug. 30th. The best you could do is pick three that don't overlap and are geographically close, and try to hit those.

But, how tired is your kid going to be after that first or second tryout -- especially if they give it their all?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
so how do people rank these organizations at the younger age brackets in terms of overall experience
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The arms race among the local clubs to stage early tryouts on same weekend is going to create a weird situation. It does not benefit players/parents at all. It forces you to pick 1-2 teams to try to make without being able to evaluate options.

some thoughts on the younger (2024-2021) levels:
91 Tri-State will rely on the name but fight for talent ... not pulling best kids yet even with HOS/High Impact consolidation
Predators solid but younger teams start new and that'll be tough
2Way is the quiet name that is in a good spot since they started last fall with some solid squads ... likely just trying to improve in spots.
PrimeTime hurting ... terrible 2023 team and too much competition
LIExpress North had good summer and like 2Way just filling key spots
Eclipse is mainly New Canaan/Brunswick kids ... solid and building

M11, Greenwich, Topside around but don't have presence at normal tourneys
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
i agree, i think the biggest problem with some of these clubs is that they place their B caliber 3/4 teams into the A brackets and get demolished. when you lose games 20-0 , i am not sure how that can be a great experience for any player. Imagine the 3 attack, sitting on the field, never even seeing the ball after driving to a tourney. or the goalies confidence as he spends an entire game digging the ball out of the net. Tristate was in the B division and they held their own, which is fine for a first year team. I believe, Express North was the same . at the younger ages, just giving players good coaching and reps in a game goes a long way
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
No conflicts.

Younger Express North teams will do well because coaching is top notch and 2018 North team are great role models and actively mentors younger players.

Harvey School facilities and location is big advantage as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No conflicts.

Younger Express North teams will do well because coaching is top notch and 2018 North team are great role models and actively mentors younger players.

Harvey School facilities and location is big advantage as well.


Who coached younger North teams last year? (I see that they have added some coaches from Iona. Interesting because the Predators have some connection with Fordham.)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No conflicts.

Younger Express North teams will do well because coaching is top notch and 2018 North team are great role models and actively mentors younger players.

Harvey School facilities and location is big advantage as well.


Who coached younger North teams last year? (I see that they have added some coaches from Iona. Interesting because the Predators have some connection with Fordham.)


just heard the tuition of those two: Iona and Fordham. How do they compare to Chaminade and St. Anthony's academically.

How do Stepinac and Kennedy Catholic compare (sports and academics) are they like St Marys, St Doms, Kelly, SJB.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
who is coaching the younger north teams this year?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Good insight on the younger ages. For what it's worth, here are thoughts on the 2020-2017 ages.
-Seems to be a geographic divide between northern and southern westchester as well as some strong teams/weaker teams amongst clubs depending on grad year. Express North (2018 and 2019 very strong) rule. Express North gets about half their kids from CT. In southern Westchester, Predators seem to dominate (2017 team is top notch). 3d Tri-state has mainly CT and second level Brunswick kids. Chargers and Eclipse rarely have Westchester kids anymore.
-91 Tri-state, HOS, Top Side, 2Way are B/B- level teams and don't compete for the elite players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
When looking at younger teams, find a program with a coach who you know will get the most out of your son.

No one is getting recruited before the 2019 year, so why parents think they need to go with a "big name" club is beyond me. Don't get me wrong, a good deal of "big name" clubs have great coaches at the younger levels as well, but a lot of time you can find great coaches at a lot of clubs.

Also, the final score of your son's 2023 game doesn't necessarily mean he isn't getting better. Is the 18th kid on the best 2023 team getting the same experience as the 6th 2023 kid on a "lower level" club? That is for you to decide.

Rule of thumb...if you think your kid is just being used as a roster filler...it might be best to explore another program. It's your money.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Found it interesting to see that Chargers moved their tryouts to Bridgeport and away from their traditional Darien location. Eclipse is having tryouts at Greens Farm not at a New Canaan location. Everyone is moving around. Primetime too.

Agreed: very few kids from Westchester go to Chargers anymore. I know of a couple who go to Eclipse.
Agreed: there is a north/south split with Predators drawing the best from the south (Bronxville, Pelham, Rye) and Express North and Primetime from north of I-287 and from Southwest CT, including Greewhich and Wilton. Primetime draws from a very wide area don't know about Express North.

Don't see any kids from Yorktown on any of these teams. They have the Ballers to play on, but I don't remember seeing them at any of the big tournaments. Has anyone else seen this team play anywhere? Where do they play?

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Maybe other towns should adopt the Yorktown model. Play with your high school teammates over the summer. Seems to work well for Yorktown.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
THAT WOULD IMPLY THAT THE PEOPLE THAT RUN THE TOWN TEAMS ARE NOT THE SAME ONES MAKING MONEY ON THE SUMMER TRAVEL PROGRAMS- LOOK AT PRIMETIME, JJ YOUTH LACROSSE WAS ALLOWING PRIMETIME TO USE THE HS FIELDS FOR FREE AND THEN THEY WERE CUTTING ALL JOHN JAY KIDS, CERTAINLY THAT IS NOT THE RECIPE FOR GROWING THE GAME IN YOUR OWN TOWN, AND WHATS WORSE IS THE YOUTH ORGANIZATION ALLOWED THIS KNOWING THEIR OWN KIDS WERE GETTING CUT. REALLY REALLY SAD
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I guess it's all about the money.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
JJ Youth lacrosse is not responsible for field use in the district. That is the responsibility of the Katonah Lewisboro School district Administration.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
jj yl does not say anything to the school district, because its the same people , therefore they must approve of a "for profit" entity cutting their players for kids out of the district, I am told they finally put an end to this .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Starting to explain why the public schools are hosting too many club teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
jj yl does not say anything to the school district, because its the same people , therefore they must approve of a "for profit" entity cutting their players for kids out of the district, I am told they finally put an end to this .


Probably why club teams are moving to private schools and SUNY Purchase.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
imagine being a tax payer and losing your fields to a group of people that are profiting from fields that you pay for and your kid gets cut- that is a not an organization that is looking out for the future of that towns lacrosse program
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Maybe if the John Jay coach had a summer team for the JJ players, same for Somers, Yorktown, Fox Lane, Bronxville, Pleasantville etc. We could all play each other over the summer and save time and money with expensive club fees, travel, personal trainers, etc.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Found it interesting to see that Chargers moved their tryouts to Bridgeport and away from their traditional Darien location. Eclipse is having tryouts at Greens Farm not at a New Canaan location. Everyone is moving around. Primetime too.

Agreed: very few kids from Westchester go to Chargers anymore. I know of a couple who go to Eclipse.
Agreed: there is a north/south split with Predators drawing the best from the south (Bronxville, Pelham, Rye) and Express North and Primetime from north of I-287 and from Southwest CT, including Greewhich and Wilton. Primetime draws from a very wide area don't know about Express North.

Don't see any kids from Yorktown on any of these teams. They have the Ballers to play on, but I don't remember seeing them at any of the big tournaments. Has anyone else seen this team play anywhere? Where do they play?


There are Yorktown kids on Express North
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
u probably could also play the club teams as well- good practice for both
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Predators are hands down the best program in Westchester. The coaches are incredibly devoted to the kids and are committed to making them great lacrosse players. These guys love to coach and train the boys and that makes it a very special environment.




Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I think all of us would love to see a genuine Westchester/Fairfield-only tourney this summer. Westchester Games was a start but only drew 91 teams really. Here's to hoping the program directors challenge each other to play in a local tourney. Not in a mean-spirited way but a "hey, let's see what you got" positive vibe.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Predators are hands down the best program in Westchester. The coaches are incredibly devoted to the kids and are committed to making them great lacrosse players. These guys love to coach and train the boys and that makes it a very special environment.


I Completely agree with this assessment.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That's funny
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
u probably could also play the club teams as well- good practice for both


I don't get the just play for your town scenario... it doesn't work. Staying with your town will not get you to be a better player. Yes it enhances the team concept tremendously but doesn't not elevate the play of individual players.

Playing for another coach also broadens your perspective of the game and gives you another voice in your cache of instructions.

Let me make this clear, I am not saying choose one or the other. I believe there is room to do both and we need to make sure we make room for both.

(the exception to the rule are the privates on LI but this is a Westchester link)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
let me be clear- all those points above are valid however, i am focusing on the younger age teams. at some point middle school maybe, it makes sense to play club lacrosse if your end goal is college lacrosse. here is the dilemma i see in westchester right now , too many club teams, not enough "A" players. however programs like Primetime will take their 3/4 team down to long island and get demolished. its not as if we dont have the high quality players, we do, its just that we dont have as many. primetime 3/4 last year got beat something like 160 goals against 50 goals scored. that cannot possibly be a good experience for most players. if you have a quality town team, that is a big if, then why not keep those kids together for as long as possible, put them in the B brackets and let them have a chance at winning while also teaching them . no reason you still cant pay for higher level coaching
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
let me be clear- all those points above are valid however, i am focusing on the younger age teams. at some point middle school maybe, it makes sense to play club lacrosse if your end goal is college lacrosse. here is the dilemma i see in westchester right now , too many club teams, not enough "A" players. however programs like Primetime will take their 3/4 team down to long island and get demolished. its not as if we dont have the high quality players, we do, its just that we dont have as many. primetime 3/4 last year got beat something like 160 goals against 50 goals scored. that cannot possibly be a good experience for most players. if you have a quality town team, that is a big if, then why not keep those kids together for as long as possible, put them in the B brackets and let them have a chance at winning while also teaching them . no reason you still cant pay for higher level coaching


If their aren't enough A players for club teams in Westchester, how do you expect Town programs to field quality club teams?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
let me be clear- all those points above are valid however, i am focusing on the younger age teams. at some point middle school maybe, it makes sense to play club lacrosse if your end goal is college lacrosse. here is the dilemma i see in westchester right now , too many club teams, not enough "A" players. however programs like Primetime will take their 3/4 team down to long island and get demolished. its not as if we dont have the high quality players, we do, its just that we dont have as many. primetime 3/4 last year got beat something like 160 goals against 50 goals scored. that cannot possibly be a good experience for most players. if you have a quality town team, that is a big if, then why not keep those kids together for as long as possible, put them in the B brackets and let them have a chance at winning while also teaching them . no reason you still cant pay for higher level coaching


I APOLOGIZE, IMHO TRAVEL SHOULD START AT 5TH GRADE. THE BELOW IS FOR 5TH AND ABOVE PLAYERS WILL COME AND GO ON THOSE TEAMS FOR THE NEXT 4/5 YEARS.

understand your points, lived through it. Just please do not limit your child's learning curve and experience if you can help it. If you have the means and the logistics work, you should try the travel route. Just be a wise consumer don't set your wallet or child up for failure.

Now, I just said don't do one or the other. I am a fan of doing both. Playing as a town does build a future and is great, nothing like playing with your friends; and if your child plays travel there is nothing better than playing against your travel buddies.

BUT, That good town team only has a handful of special players; those special players can and will benefit from playing with and against other players that are better. The worst thing you can do is make your child the best player on any team especially at the younger ages.

I will disagree with you about the term winning. When you play, whether it is sports, cards or tag, you play to win. I get that. You have fun in the pursuit to win. You just may not always win. That said, You wouldnt play a sport, cards or tag if you didn't think you had a chance to win or if you knew you'd lose all the time. You play something with the hopes you will win (if at least only once).

In any sport I don't care if you happen to lose every game. It is all relative, it is the spread of the win or loss that means something (score differential). IT IS ABOUT THE CHANCE TO WIN. Sure, it is good to blow team outs, but I also think it is healthy to get blown out, but it is the best when your teams play and the goal differential is within 5 your team, that means your placed against the correct opponents.

but as you said you don't have as much talented players, well if you don't have as much talented players on club then your town teams are just as diluted and the experiences for the better kids on town teams is just not going to enhance their play, as well, their being "forced" to play solely with the town... doesn't necessarily bring up the level for the developing players. That instead may led to those developing players taking aback seat and losing interest.

I love the concept of the town sticking together, but not at the detriment of advancing the better players. If each player plays a level above their usual play the town team will become that much better. Although you do need to become wary that some of those special players go another route all together and you may loose them forever, just remember that is their parents call and you cant dictate what one parent does for their child. where you think it is right wrong or indifferent)


Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
let me be clear- all those points above are valid however, i am focusing on the younger age teams. at some point middle school maybe, it makes sense to play club lacrosse if your end goal is college lacrosse. here is the dilemma i see in westchester right now , too many club teams, not enough "A" players. however programs like Primetime will take their 3/4 team down to long island and get demolished. its not as if we dont have the high quality players, we do, its just that we dont have as many. primetime 3/4 last year got beat something like 160 goals against 50 goals scored. that cannot possibly be a good experience for most players. if you have a quality town team, that is a big if, then why not keep those kids together for as long as possible, put them in the B brackets and let them have a chance at winning while also teaching them . no reason you still cant pay for higher level coaching


No we all know politics plays its part on both travel and Town. Did politics have anything to do with why the PT team was not as strong as it could have been? Additionally, don't fall into the trap of because you are the best team in Westchester you need to play the best teams and tournaments on LI. Call out to a few LI teams and have a friendly. Invite them up and treat for Pizza. See what you have after you do this 2 or 3 times you will know where you stand.

I am all for challenging your team and players, you never want to be the best; you always want to work for what you get. At the same time you never want to out class your team and players where they are out of their league and get demoralized. Because sometimes your best isn't good enough, and that is okay, you just dont need to be reminded every weekend.



Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
whats the difference at that point- in one scenario- you get a town team that plays in the b bracket of a tourney or you pay 2k to go to the same tourney? either way its a B team at best. as long as u get a quality coach. plenty of A players in Westchester, but not enough to field 3-5 teams at some age brackets .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT philosophy, "No one learns anything at a B tourney" i disagree
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
IF PT takes the best kids ( no politics)
they should be the top team ahead of Predators.
this should be the case now that they are not at JJ
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Good Luck to all the boys trying out this weekend and to the parents rushing around trying to get to as many as they can!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This is the blast email from the guy who runs superstars. Not sure if I totally respect his honest world view or just think he believes this helps his marketing efforts fully proving how nutty it has all become.


Dear Lacrosse Parent,

I am frequently asked questions about lacrosse player development and how your son or daughter can play lacrosse in college. There are many answers to this question, or maybe there is only one. If you want to know about the current recruiting landscape in the world of lacrosse and why developing skills NOW matters, please read on. I’ll try to keep it simple and more importantly brutally honest.

I saw a post on Facebook the other day where a woman was asking “why can’t sports go back to the way they were when we were kids. Now kids are so over-scheduled and have to play their sport year round…..”. When I saw the post, I wanted to reply with the answer, at least as it relates to lacrosse. I don’t think it’s all that complicated either, but I’ll get to that.

Let’s back up a bit (a lot further back than I want to actually admit), but let’s go back to the year 1990. In fact, let’s go back to November of 1990, just before Thanksgiving. It’s a Saturday. I am a high school senior. I have just completed a football game at Horace Greeley High School…it was a close game but we pulled out a win. I hustle to the locker room for the post game speech by Coach S. I quickly change my clothes and catch a ride directly to the airport. I am headed to my “official visit” to Syracuse University as a prospective lacrosse player. I have already visited Loyola College and Head Coach Dave Cottle has already come to my home the weekend before to have a beer with my father after watching me and 2 other Yorktown lacrosse players from our football team play in the game. As it turns out, those two other players, Matt Dwan and Jason Foley, both commit to Loyola in the weeks following this game, as HS Seniors. So I take my flight….arrive in Syracuse and spend 2 nights with Dom Fin, a freshman student-athlete at Syracuse University. I get the usual campus tour, trip to Marshall Street and visit a few of the lacrosse “houses” for various events. On the Monday morning before I leave, I have a meeting with Head Coach Roy Simmons Jr. We meet in the bleachers of Manley Field House and we have a brief conversation. After some small talk, he pulls out a manila envelope with an official scholarship offer from Syracuse University. As he explains to me, the offer is for a full scholarship. My parents will only be responsible for the cost of my books each semester. Everything else is covered. I smile and tell him I really appreciate the offer and that I am really excited about the idea of playing for Syracuse. However, I also tell him that Loyola College has also offered me a full scholarship, and they are willing to pay for my books as well. As I leave, I promise to speak with my parents and call him with an answer by the end of the week. He says that would be great and I catch a ride back to the airport. I am back in Yorktown in time to attend our football practice on Monday afternoon. And my decision to attend Syracuse University is made be the end of the evening.

We need to fast forward 25 years to get the “simple” answer to the Facebook post question I spoke of earlier. What has changed over 25 years and why? To start, think about this…I was a SENIOR in HS and still uncommitted. I was one of the most highly recruited players in the country that year. I had my pick of almost any school I wanted to attend….and yet, in November of my SENIOR YEAR, I was just beginning to get serious about an actual decision. And I’m lucky that decisions were made that late. TRUTH BE TOLD, IF SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HAD EVALUATED ME AS A FRESHMAN OR EVEN A SOPHOMORE IN HS, THERE IS LITTLE DOUBT THEY WOULD HAVE DISMISSED THE IDEA OF EVEN RECRUITING ME, LET ALONE OFFERING ME A FULL SCHOLARSHIP. As a sophomore player on Yorktown’s 1989 State Championship team, I was a hard working crease player in a 2-2-2- offense. I had no outside shot and I couldn’t have dodged a long pole for the life of me. Of course, between my sophomore year and my senior year I had the stick in my hands 24-7 and I spent a ton of time in the weight room and on the track working on my speed and agility. I became an excellent player through hard work and dedication in the last two years I spent at Yorktown HS. And the rest is history…..hard work and dedication and skill acquisition carried me all the way to the National Hall of Fame.

GREAT ROY, WHAT’S THE ANSWER?

I’m glad you asked. The answer is that Division 1 coaches are making recruiting decisions and doing their evaluations on players who have not yet spent a single day in their respective high school hallways, let alone on their varsity teams. THEREFORE, THE PRESSURE IS ON PLAYERS IN GRADES 6, 7 & 8 TO MAKE THE SAME PROGRESS IN THEIR SKILLS & LACROSSE ABILITIES THAT I MADE AS A HS JUNIOR AND SENIOR. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT IS DRIVING ALL OF THE MADNESS THAT WE ARE SEEING IN LACROSSE IN 2015. AND THIS IS WHY IF YOUR SON OR DAUGHTER HAS A DREAM OF PLAYING LACROSSE AT A DIVISION 1 SCHOOL, YOU NEED TO MAKE SOME VERY IMPORTANT DECISIONS WITH REGARD TO WHAT HE OR SHE DOES TO MAKE PROGRESS RIGHT NOW. IF YOU WAIT UNTIL THEY ARE IN HS TO FOCUS ON THIS ISSUE, YOU WILL BE LEFT BEHIND.

IS THERE ANY GOOD NEWS?

Sure. There is good news. The good news is that players who work extremely hard and eventually develop excellent skill sets and way above average lacrosse abilities while in 9th & 10th grade will eventually become excellent HS players and will enjoy playing a sport they love at the highest level, and maybe even garner some post-season awards. There are many excellent Division 2 and 3 schools that will be interested in attracting your child's services during their HS playing years. There are also likely to be some D-1 schools that are in the mix, but they are few and far between and they will be looking to fill very specific needs.

SO WHAT DO WE DO?

I can’t tell any of you what to do about an issue that quite frankly bothers me as much as it bothers you. Having to tell my 6th grade son that his “dream school” will in all likelihood make a final decision on him during the summer after his 8th grade school year makes me want to scream. But it’s reality and he has a plan.

I’D ENCOURAGE ALL OF YOU TO CONSIDER MAKING A PLAN AS WELL. GET BETTER NOW…GET BETTER RIGHT NOW! DON’T WAIT. DON’T PUT IT OFF. THE WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY IS GETTING SMALLER EVERY SINGLE DAY!

If your son or daughter has a dream of playing lacrosse at the D-1 level, help them to develop their skills in as many ways as you can. This isn’t a plug for any of the programs I run. There are many great programs out there that can help your son or daughter develop stick skills that will stand out among their peers. Because ultimately, that is how they are going to be judged….how good is your player compared to the players that they are surrounded by and compared to the players they are playing against.

WHAT ABOUT THE SCHOLARSHIP?

The full scholarship is almost a myth in 2015. They simply don’t exist! A few players in each recruiting class may get that type of offer, but it is extremely rare. If your son or daughter is an excellent player and garners the attention of multiple D-1 schools, he or she is likely to be offered a scholarship in the 25-30 percent range. A BIG scholarship is any offer over 50%. And the scholarship discussion still happens way, way after most verbal commitments are made.

WHAT EXACTLY IS A VERBAL COMMITMENT? DOES IT INCLUDE A SCHOLARSHIP OFFER?

A verbal offer is an offer for a prospective student-athlete to attend a D-1 school with the promise of a roster spot when they get there, assuming they maintain their grades and are able to get into the school when it comes time. That’s it. And it’s non-binding. The player and/or the coach can change their mind at ANY time, and sometimes they do. Coaches try very hard not to back out of verbal offers because it means future verbal offer carry less weight. Many players who “verbal” to a school do not discuss scholarship specifics at that point in time..they are simply thrilled to have been offered a roster spot and worry about the money later.

WHAT ABOUT A PG YEAR OR REPEATING 8TH GRADE?

The PG year has come and gone. Players who PG now only benefit if they are smart enough to announce their intention to do a PG as an 8th or 9th grader and then reclassify themselves on the recruiting circuit as a younger aged player....i.e. a 2019 player declares he will PG and begins to attend 2020 recruiting events or plays for a 2020 year club team the following summer.

Repeating 8th grade has become an incredibly common practice. In fact, some club teams actually recommend that ALL of their players repeat 8th grade if they are serious about attending a top tier division 1 school. I don't share this belief, but I will concede that repeating 8th grade gives a player another year to grow and develop as a player. To me, this is a last resort option, but I know plenty of players who have either repeated 8th grade or intend to repeat 8th grade in order to gain a year on their competition. If you look at the ages of the boys who are freshman in college playing lacrosse right now, you will find that most of them are significantly older than their non-athlete peers.


SO WHAT DO WE DO TO GET NOTICED?

DEVELOP SKILLS THAT ARE BETTER THAN ANYONE ELSE’S AND TAKE THEM ON THE ROAD. GET FASTER AND STRONGER NOW. PLAY FOR A QUALITY SUMMER TEAM. ATTEND SHOWCASES. GO TO THE PROSPECT DAYS OF INDIVIDUAL SCHOOLS. ATTEND THE SUMMER CAMP OF YOUR FAVORITE SCHOOL. GET IN FRONT OF THEIR COACHING STAFF AND MAKE IT COUNT…THE ONLY THING WORSE THAN NO EXPOSURE IS NEGATIVE EXPOSURE. IF YOU ARE GOING TO BE SEEN, BY ALL MEANS MAKE SURE YOU ARE READY TO PLAY!!!

There is plenty more to write about but I have taken up more than enough time for one afternoon….I wish you all the best on your journey…try to enjoy it and help your son or daughter embrace the hard work it will undoubtedly take to become a Division 1 Lacrosse Player!

DISCLAIMER- The opinions expressed in this email are exactly that, the opinions of one person. Your experience may be different. I would strongly encourage you to do your own research!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Blah, blah, blah. All of the Superstar teams are now weak except the 2022 AA team ... and that's just because Roy's son is on the team and he personally coaches it and devotes attention.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
His teams are weak and he's grasping for whatever he can to keep his league afloat. GREAT lacrosse player however.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IF PT takes the best kids ( no politics)
they should be the top team ahead of Predators.
this should be the case now that they are not at JJ

Prime Time does a good job placing strong players, they are not good at coaching though. Very hit or miss.

Predators are all about skill development. If you want your son to be a strong player go with the Predators. Your son will get hands on coaching from guys who are passionate.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Huge turnout for Express North for the younger grades. I think the 2022's had upwards of 60 kids. Not surprising there was a large contingent of John Jay kids at all grade levels. Seemed well run and organized.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Quite an impressive turnout. Very well run. Harvey facility is a home run.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It is incredibly clear who is fueling these Express North posts. Gotta promote yourself I guess.

Every tryout I heard about had good numbers. Players try out for multiple teams and often times you will see exhausted, sweaty kids get out of a car coming from another tryout.

Tryout numbers are great, but I am more concerned with who these players ultimately decide to play for.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I'm sure preedators coaches are passionate. Look at express North coaches and their backgrounds . Passion ,track records .word is half of 18 team is committed .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is incredibly clear who is fueling these Express North posts. Gotta promote yourself I guess.

Every tryout I heard about had good numbers. Players try out for multiple teams and often times you will see exhausted, sweaty kids get out of a car coming from another tryout.

Tryout numbers are great, but I am more concerned with who these players ultimately decide to play for.


I'm the father of a kid who is trying out for Express North. One of my sons played with them last year and had a great experience. Does every post have to be negative or confrontational? My sons coaches are intense, knowledgeable and 100% committed to the team and the kids. I can't ask for more and hope his brother makes the team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I have had kids play for both Teams coaches and experience was very positive in both cases.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Agreed.

No self promotion here. my kids have had a great experience with North.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Some things seen at SUNY-Purchase tryouts for lower Westchester clubs last weekend pertaining to 2022/2023/2024 ... (note- assembled from some local parents):
Predators had some great numbers and organization. Around 50 players for 2023 and 2022 on day 1. Many coaches and evaluators including older team stars. Some real talent out there. Could easily field 2 decent teams per age group.
91 Tri-State had less kids than Predators but organized, many coaches on hand. Setting up dedicated 2023 and 2024 teams after split squad. 2023 talent way less than Predators but many clubs will be in that boat.
2Way had less numbers than Predators and 91, not as organized and not many coaches or staff evaluating. Could not tell grades apart, all mixed together, so that upset parents. Several younger players also were at 91 or Predators. Talent very mixed.
No word on Topside or Express North or PT.
Overall, the impressions seem to mirror the comments on this board ... Predators very strong, 91 building, 2Way not major player.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
North the powers . Very predator biased above.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Any updates as to numbers for older kids?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Hopefully someone will tell us how the LIE North and Prinetime tryouts went.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I was at the Predators and Long Island Express North tryouts for 2022 and 23. Predators very good talent and yes about 50 kids in each group. LIE North good talent and 45 boys tried out.

The Predators 2022 boys, current 6th graders, are supposed to be 11 years old. I can not believe the amount of left back kids at Predator tryout. I would say almost half of the 2022 players on the field were 12 or 13 years old. Makes a big difference. Insane how the parents in Rye and Bronxville have brought their front running wall street antics to youth lacrosse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hopefully someone will tell us how the LIE North and Prinetime tryouts went.


Both of my boys attended the Express North tryouts so I was at the field for about 4 hours. It appeared the 2024 & 2025's had 50-60 kids trying out. I was vey impressed with the number of evaluators and coaches. They had coaches running drills while evaluators monitored and took notes. I've been to tryouts where one or two coaches are trying to run the drills and evaluate and that isn't effective. It looked like they had 4 guys running each tryout with a few additional floaters walking from group to group.

Bottom line, my kids had a chance to be seen and probably learned something because I heard them getting some coaching. I'm satisfied and my guys are looking forward to the next round. I won't compare the tryouts to the other my boys attended.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse, which is mostly CT but some Westchester, had really big numbers at the youth teams from 2024 - 2021 and ran very well organized tryouts.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Talent at Eclipse 2021 was off the charts
They weren't just CT kids either
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Talent at Eclipse 2021 was off the charts
They weren't just CT kids either


Agreed. Talent level was tops. It appears most of the kids making the team are New Canaan A team and Darien A team with some others sprinkled in. Not surprising. This is a NC driven program and they have not been shy about talking about how it is to develop NC kids. But the Darien kids are so good they can't ignore them!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Why are we talking ct lax in a west. forum. Plenty of CT programs to have their own thread. Same now with west.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Because some westchester kids play for Connecticut teams and some Connecticut kids play for westchester teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Our town team played NC and the NC kids, 8 or 9 of them towered over our tallest kid.

What is the left back policy in NC? Greenwich was the same way.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Our town team played NC and the NC kids, 8 or 9 of them towered over our tallest kid.

What is the left back policy in NC? Greenwich was the same way.


Like a lot of affluent hyper competitive towns there is a huge contingent that hold their kids back a year before entering kindergarten. Some will repeat the process in 7th or 8th grade when they move their kid to private school.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Our town team played NC and the NC kids, 8 or 9 of them towered over our tallest kid.

What is the left back policy in NC? Greenwich was the same way.


Like a lot of affluent hyper competitive towns there is a huge contingent that hold their kids back a year before entering kindergarten. Some will repeat the process in 7th or 8th grade when they move their kid to private school.


Super lame practice. When enough people hold their kids back a grade it will have no appreciable impact. Edge Lacrosse plays all of their teams down a grade/age bracket, really taking the hold back practice beyond the pale.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How is that ultra competitive? If you were competitive you would play your kid up, NOT down. Playing against better/older kids is more competitive not playing against younger kids. I know some of these people from these towns and they are controlling US Lacrosse not to implement an age (fair) based system like soccer, hockey and other sports.

In wrestling, there are weight classes for fair competition, in youth sports the best method of fair play is age.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Most of the parents in Connecticut also want age based teams. Grade based teams leads to hold backs and parents trying to game the system.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
HA sounds like you're kids on the team, not all people who played for preds feel this way.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Most of the parents in Connecticut also want age based teams. Grade based teams leads to hold backs and parents trying to game the system.


I was at the Express North tryouts. You had the real 2021's clocking in at about 5'. And then you had the holdbacks, already turning 13 clocking in at 5'4'' ore more. I saw a giant kid there, had to be 5'10". Wasn't that talented but he was running over kids and you could see the coaches scribbling notes. I am sure that despite the weak lax skills they were thinking, "I can work with that"....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I was at the Predators and Long Island Express North tryouts for 2022 and 23. Predators very good talent and yes about 50 kids in each group. LIE North good talent and 45 boys tried out.

The Predators 2022 boys, current 6th graders, are supposed to be 11 years old. I can not believe the amount of left back kids at Predator tryout. I would say almost half of the 2022 players on the field were 12 or 13 years old. Makes a big difference. Insane how the parents in Rye and Bronxville have brought their front running wall street antics to youth lacrosse.


Pure speculation. If it IS done it certainly is not done with the knowing cooperation of the Predators staff
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
End the speculation. Age verification. I have spoken with several coaches and parents that have verified the left back status of their kids but nothing is done about it. Go to the Yale Fall Bulldog tournament and you will see it on display. Unfortunately it may take a kid getting hurt to change.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
End the speculation. Age verification. I have spoken with several coaches and parents that have verified the left back status of their kids but nothing is done about it. Go to the Yale Fall Bulldog tournament and you will see it on display. Unfortunately it may take a kid getting hurt to change.


I agree but don't make baseless claims in an attempt to tarnish a program's reputation. Also not all (if any) families from bronxville or rye believe as you suggest.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It is real simple. Age verification. And play your age.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How do you know that
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That? what left back kids playing younger kids is that your question?

Simple solution, age verification and play kids their own age.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Meant how does the predator poster know kids are being held back without Predator coaches knowing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
End the speculation. Age verification. I have spoken with several coaches and parents that have verified the left back status of their kids but nothing is done about it. Go to the Yale Fall Bulldog tournament and you will see it on display. Unfortunately it may take a kid getting hurt to change.


I agree but don't make baseless claims in an attempt to tarnish a program's reputation. Also not all (if any) families from bronxville or rye believe as you suggest.


Any, I know at least 2 families in bronxville who strongly believe holding back is the way. As far as Rye, they never needed it, but I go back to the flood days.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Everyone stop with the back and forth, just age verify. It is done in hockey, soccer, baseball and it's time has come to age verify in lacrosse. It will end all arguments. Everyone should lobby US Lacrosse to enforce age appropriate playing rule.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Everyone stop with the back and forth, just age verify. It is done in hockey, soccer, baseball and it's time has come to age verify in lacrosse. It will end all arguments. Everyone should lobby US Lacrosse to enforce age appropriate playing rule.


Shouldn't this be moved to the Age Verification thread so the focus can return to Westchester Lacrosse?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Agreed. Move this convo to the age Verification thread. Any other thoughts on quality of tryouts or talent/numbers at them?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
End the speculation. Age verification. I have spoken with several coaches and parents that have verified the left back status of their kids but nothing is done about it. Go to the Yale Fall Bulldog tournament and you will see it on display. Unfortunately it may take a kid getting hurt to change.


This argument has been going on for years in the Long Island and Maryland threads. Bottom line, in high school you play against older kids and in college you play against men. Might as well get used to it now. Makes your son a better player.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
End the speculation. Age verification. I have spoken with several coaches and parents that have verified the left back status of their kids but nothing is done about it. Go to the Yale Fall Bulldog tournament and you will see it on display. Unfortunately it may take a kid getting hurt to change.


This argument has been going on for years in the Long Island and Maryland threads. Bottom line, in high school you play against older kids and in college you play against men. Might as well get used to it now. Makes your son a better player.


The HS kids can still play against older/younger kids- but why not attach a birth year to every player? A coach seeing a small 15 yr old, man handle a big18 yr old fully developed kid gives one food for thought. That smaller 15 yr old sure seems like a good bet if he can handle the older, stronger, bigger player and has yet to go through puberty. Tables turned as well- knowing an older, bigger player repeatedly gets best by kids 1-3 yrs younger gives one something to think about. As long as kids are fighting for a roster spot, and are allowed to play down, age should be connected to their name. Let them play- but also let it be known that they are playing younger opponents. The only people fighting a birthdate being attached or published is those players and their families that have been left back. If you are do proud- might as well flaunt it publicly for all to see!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
End the speculation. Age verification. I have spoken with several coaches and parents that have verified the left back status of their kids but nothing is done about it. Go to the Yale Fall Bulldog tournament and you will see it on display. Unfortunately it may take a kid getting hurt to change.


This argument has been going on for years in the Long Island and Maryland threads. Bottom line, in high school you play against older kids and in college you play against men. Might as well get used to it now. Makes your son a better player.


Absurd logic. Comparing a 12 year old to an 18 year old. Just stupid.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Go to another thread please
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
End the speculation. Age verification. I have spoken with several coaches and parents that have verified the left back status of their kids but nothing is done about it. Go to the Yale Fall Bulldog tournament and you will see it on display. Unfortunately it may take a kid getting hurt to change.


This argument has been going on for years in the Long Island and Maryland threads. Bottom line, in high school you play against older kids and in college you play against men. Might as well get used to it now. Makes your son a better player.


Absurd logic. Comparing a 12 year old to an 18 year old. Just stupid.

In high school good freshman play against Seniors. So your looking at 14-15 versus 18-19. And those good freshman were playing against older kids when they were 12 and 13. If you want to play at a high level that is what happens. I agree embrace playing up and you will be a better player.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
End the speculation. Age verification. I have spoken with several coaches and parents that have verified the left back status of their kids but nothing is done about it. Go to the Yale Fall Bulldog tournament and you will see it on display. Unfortunately it may take a kid getting hurt to change.


This argument has been going on for years in the Long Island and Maryland threads. Bottom line, in high school you play against older kids and in college you play against men. Might as well get used to it now. Makes your son a better player.


Absurd logic. Comparing a 12 year old to an 18 year old. Just stupid.

In high school good freshman play against Seniors. So your looking at 14-15 versus 18-19. And those good freshman were playing against older kids when they were 12 and 13. If you want to play at a high level that is what happens. I agree embrace playing up and you will be a better player.


One would think this but the holdback philosophy has them only playing up in name only. Many of These kids are older.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I agree with playing up to make your son better, I have done that. The problem is the left back kids playing down are now two years older than my son. It is a problem and therefor it should be age based and if your kid wants to play up a year, GREAT. But when you have deception the age thing gets out of control and I have seen it first hand at a few tournaments.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The holdback issue only comes into play when kids being held back are taking roster spots from kids playing age or grad year appropriate.

If there are 100 roster spots/ tuition assistance and 20 are taken by kids whop are heldback, that reduces an age appropriate players chances of getting into certain schools and receiving some $$$. Its really that simple.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The holdback issue only comes into play when kids being held back are taking roster spots from kids playing age or grad year appropriate.

If there are 100 roster spots/ tuition assistance and 20 are taken by kids whop are heldback, that reduces an age appropriate players chances of getting into certain schools and receiving some $$$. Its really that simple.


Curious...if you balance those 20 holdback kids in that age group (ie, 2020) with 20 other kids that are absent from tryouts are held back for a younger age group (2021) making tryouts easier for the 80 non-holdback 2020 kids, is it a wash?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This holdback issue is whack yo! There's a kid in my sons grade who will be 20 in his senior year of high school
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I know it's so crazy! There's a kid in my sons grade who somehow will be driving in 8th grade and 21 in his senior year of high school
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
does it make sense for a 4th grader(2024) to play with his friends on a B caliber team or up a grade 2023 if he or she is talented enough to make it?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
does it make sense for a 4th grader(2024) to play with his friends on a B caliber team or up a grade 2023 if he or she is talented enough to make it?


he or she would have more fun playing with friends in 4th grade right? Plenty of time to join the crazy train of elite travel teams and if the kid is elite they'll be a spot on those teams in 7 or 8th grade
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
does it make sense for a 4th grader(2024) to play with his friends on a B caliber team or up a grade 2023 if he or she is talented enough to make it?


Play with friends. Make it fun. The summer elite programs can suck the fun out of it pretty fast.
Folks,

If you do not see a post or it does get removed and you want to know why, know this....

We do not discuss publicly why that may happen for numerous reasons. One of those numerous reasons is we do not know who we are replying to. Also, we have no way of contacting you. If you want answers then step out of the shadows and email us since anons can not use our PM system, or simply take what you are given.

Membership (registering) has its privilages smile
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Anyone have any feedback on the express north tryouts?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
you mean results or how were they run and attended?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Well attended at all levels with quality kids.

It will be tough to make the 2018 or 2019 given those teams are very talented and have been playing together for a while However both teams have needs and can improve at all positions.

The younger teams will be wide open and Express North will have some tough choices to make given all the kids that showed up.

Not sure when they announce who made the Teams?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
i was at the 2022. 23, and 24 tryouts and was pleasantly surprised at the overall talent level given what I have seen at other tryouts
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My 2022 received a phone call from the express north coach yesterday letting him know he had made the team. Their last tryout was Saturday. I don't know about the other teams but 2022 had about 55-60 kids tryout out, many talented players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I heard a great story today, one that is very sad - talk about conflict of interest- john jay youth lacrosse president is calling up 9 year olds and trying to persuade them to play for Primetime. If this isnt wrong in so many ways, I dont know what is. whats the difference where they play at 9. If JJYL really cared about their kids, they would be doing more internally to keep them together and not worrying about making money . Shame on you !!!!!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
oh wow- i would have thought they would push for the greatest lax family in that area, the guy who runs the program out of purchase- all three brothers, sister are jj lax grads and father coaches - but regardless, definitely innapropriate to be flat out pushing for one program over another
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well attended at all levels with quality kids.

It will be tough to make the 2018 or 2019 given those teams are very talented and have been playing together for a while However both teams have needs and can improve at all positions.

The younger teams will be wide open and Express North will have some tough choices to make given all the kids that showed up.

Not sure when they announce who made the Teams?


My son attended the 2021 tryout yesterday and I can attest to the talent level. They could easily create two very talented teams. My son's friend was on the team last year and he and his parents have only had great things to say about the coaches and other parents. He will be very disappointed if he doesn't make the team.

Is it true most kids tryout for many different programs?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
yes kids do in may cases try out for more than 1 programs to enhance their chances of having at least one option for next season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Clubs must debate internally as to whether field 1 or 2 (or maybe even 3) teams per grade. Seems from my attending a few tryouts, input from others, and notes on this thread, that the turnouts for tryouts have been decent this fall in Westchester (and Fairfield). Anywhere in the 40-60 range per grade. Obviously that doesn't mean kids don't attend multiple tryouts. But there are still more kids wanting to play who won't find a home.

But not many clubs opt for a 2nd team. Guess it drains resources and lessens the club reputation from their POV.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My 2022 received a phone call from the express north coach yesterday letting him know he had made the team. Their last tryout was Saturday. I don't know about the other teams but 2022 had about 55-60 kids tryout out, many talented players.


My friends son got an invite tonight for Express North 2020AA
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Anyone have any insight on the status of the Express North 2021 team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have any insight on the status of the Express North 2021 team?


I don't think the 2021 invitations have been sent out. In fact I'm certain of it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Which clubs have offered at 2023 at this point?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have any insight on the status of the Express North 2021 team?


I don't think the 2021 invitations have been sent out. In fact I'm certain of it.


People, don't jump the gun on invites. Last season, our son didn't receive an invitation when his two buddies did. The next day an invitation from the same club was in my inbox. Thankfully I was patient and didn't commit to his #2 club choice and he was able to play with the team he really wanted.

Stay calm if you haven't heard from your #1.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Regarding younger teams (2024-21): I saw that the Predators announced their roster. Have any of the other teams (2way, PT, T91, Express North) announced anything yet? will they post names or send emails?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2way 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024 have chosen their rosters.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Regarding younger teams (2024-21): I saw that the Predators announced their roster. Have any of the other teams (2way, PT, T91, Express North) announced anything yet? will they post names or send emails?


At least some of those teams have issued offers. Based on past practices, I do not believe all such clubs will ever post rosters as Predators did. PT put up links to register for those that have been offered, so it seems clear that offers have gone out from them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Regarding younger teams (2024-21): I saw that the Predators announced their roster. Have any of the other teams (2way, PT, T91, Express North) announced anything yet? will they post names or send emails?


At least some of those teams have issued offers. Based on past practices, I do not believe all such clubs will ever post rosters as Predators did. PT put up links to register for those that have been offered, so it seems clear that offers have gone out from them.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Regarding younger teams (2024-21): I saw that the Predators announced their roster. Have any of the other teams (2way, PT, T91, Express North) announced anything yet? will they post names or send emails?


At least some of those teams have issued offers. Based on past practices, I do not believe all such clubs will ever post rosters as Predators did. PT put up links to register for those that have been offered, so it seems clear that offers have gone out from them.


Express North sent out invites between Sunday & Monday. I'm glad they don't post rosters, no one else's business where my son plays.
LIE North has the best Coaches in Westchester:

Entire Iona Prep staff
Savastano brothers,
Suno Hill
Tom Regan &
Chris Schreiber

Can't find anything better in Westchester.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Tycotian
LIE North has the best Coaches in Westchester:

Entire Iona Prep staff
Savastano brothers,
Suno Hill
Tom Regan &
Chris Schreiber

Can't find anything better in Westchester.


Do you mean Sunho Lee? And yes he's great and highly respected.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Tycotian
LIE North has the best Coaches in Westchester:

Entire Iona Prep staff
Savastano brothers,
Suno Hill
Tom Regan &
Chris Schreiber

Can't find anything better in Westchester.


Then we are all very glad that your son plays for the LIE North.

I think the coaching staffs at almost every club have good names and people who are doing great things.

Predators have the head coach of Fordham Prep and Yorktown legends.
PrimeTime has the head coach of Greenwich HS, Byram Hills, former Scarsdale etc...
T91 Tristate has Mike Bocklett head coach of Purchase
HOS has Ned Crotty, head coach of CW Post, head coach of Stepinac and Nyack
Top Side has head coach of Eastchester

There are head coaches coaching club teams in all programs which is great for the sport in the area. Again, worry about who is coaching YOUR sons team and not what people consider "big names" just because they are able to coach superior talent.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Tycotian
LIE North has the best Coaches in Westchester:

Entire Iona Prep staff
Savastano brothers,
Suno Hill
Tom Regan &
Chris Schreiber

Can't find anything better in Westchester.


Then we are all very glad that your son plays for the LIE North.

I think the coaching staffs at almost every club have good names and people who are doing great things.

Predators have the head coach of Fordham Prep and Yorktown legends.
PrimeTime has the head coach of Greenwich HS, Byram Hills, former Scarsdale etc...
T91 Tristate has Mike Bocklett head coach of Purchase
HOS has Ned Crotty, head coach of CW Post, head coach of Stepinac and Nyack
Top Side has head coach of Eastchester

There are head coaches coaching club teams in all programs which is great for the sport in the area. Again, worry about who is coaching YOUR sons team and not what people consider "big names" just because they are able to coach superior talent.


There is great coaching all around. Just because you were a college stud doesn't translate into being a great coach. Someone somewhere decided that in lacrosse if you were not an all star player you can't possibly be a good coach. So absurd but great marketing. Even many weaker clubs have excellent coaches but have not been as successful in attracting high quality players. And it is getting so diluted anyway. Whether a particular grad year on any one team is strong or not may become totally random. PT 2021 is very strong. Other PT grad years not so much. Random.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT 2018 is an extremely strong team. Probably one of the best out there. And I don't have a son who plays for them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT 2018 is an extremely strong team. Probably one of the best out there. And I don't have a son who plays for them.


Ok. Like I said. Random.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Tycotian
LIE North has the best Coaches in Westchester:

Entire Iona Prep staff
Savastano brothers,
Suno Hill
Tom Regan &
Chris Schreiber

Can't find anything better in Westchester.


Then we are all very glad that your son plays for the LIE North.

I think the coaching staffs at almost every club have good names and people who are doing great things.

Predators have the head coach of Fordham Prep and Yorktown legends.
PrimeTime has the head coach of Greenwich HS, Byram Hills, former Scarsdale etc...
T91 Tristate has Mike Bocklett head coach of Purchase
HOS has Ned Crotty, head coach of CW Post, head coach of Stepinac and Nyack
Top Side has head coach of Eastchester

There are head coaches coaching club teams in all programs which is great for the sport in the area. Again, worry about who is coaching YOUR sons team and not what people consider "big names" just because they are able to coach superior talent.

Have had experience with all of these programs. Predators brings very hands on coaching with guys who are committed to your kids. Nothing else compares.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Rumor on the street that PT 2021 lost some good players and was then lobbying hard to recruit some new kids, some of whom chose other programs. That is a solid team so hard to believe.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Rumor is correct we lost 4 of our top players to 3D & Eclipse. Calling us solid is a stretch. We played some good games but was very inconsistent and lost twice to a B team (igloo Avalanche)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
i have been told the the Primetime 2024 team has less than 10 kids - i know they were struggling to get players
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
To be honest Primetime is all about the high school teams. Nick Daniello does a great job recruiting for his HS but unfortunately most of the youth players are not there when it counts, during the HS years.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I'm not prime time guy. You guys need to stop referring to players . Moderater needs to step in. You are talking about 21 s . I'm sure you don't mean harm. Just too personal.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The only person mentioned is Nick Daniello and he is the owner/director of Primetime.
No kids were mentioned or spoken about in a negative way. Just stated the changes that were made.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The only person mentioned is Nick Daniello and he is the owner/director of Primetime.
No kids were mentioned or spoken about in a negative way. Just stated the changes that were made.


it is possible the moderators may have taken it off.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Rumor on the street that PT 2021 lost some good players and was then lobbying hard to recruit some new kids, some of whom chose other programs. That is a solid team so hard to believe.


Many parents don't want their son playing for a team that has very strong players at their position. They want their child to be a standout and its easier on a weaker team. Seems pretty lame to me, but I've heard the talk. I think practicing and playing in the toughest most competitive environment is best for a child to learn how to compete and play hard all the time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
"Many parents don't want their son playing for a team that has very strong players at their position."

That is ridiculous, and given the 125 kids that showed up to the PT 2019 tryout, proves you wrong. There are teams for every ability, and most kids want to play for the best. Kids dont want to play on weaker teams and lose, even if they stand out.

"I think practicing and playing in the toughest most competitive environment is best for a child to learn how to compete and play hard all the time."

Depends on the kid and unless you are a child psychologist, irrelevant.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
"Many parents don't want their son playing for a team that has very strong players at their position."

That is ridiculous, and given the 125 kids that showed up to the PT 2019 tryout, proves you wrong. There are teams for every ability, and most kids want to play for the best. Kids dont want to play on weaker teams and lose, even if they stand out.

"I think practicing and playing in the toughest most competitive environment is best for a child to learn how to compete and play hard all the time."

Depends on the kid and unless you are a child psychologist, irrelevant.


It's ridiculous that parents would be so manipulative, but its a fact that many parents are looking for a team that their son can be the standout.

I'm not a psychologist, just a long time coach and father of 4 boys. I have always encouraged my kids to be in a competitive environment--in an out of sports.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
"Many parents don't want their son playing for a team that has very strong players at their position."

That is ridiculous, and given the 125 kids that showed up to the PT 2019 tryout, proves you wrong. There are teams for every ability, and most kids want to play for the best. Kids dont want to play on weaker teams and lose, even if they stand out.

"I think practicing and playing in the toughest most competitive environment is best for a child to learn how to compete and play hard all the time."

Depends on the kid and unless you are a child psychologist, irrelevant.


How is a practice environment irrelevant? It makes all the difference.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
"Many parents don't want their son playing for a team that has very strong players at their position."

That is ridiculous, and given the 125 kids that showed up to the PT 2019 tryout, proves you wrong. There are teams for every ability, and most kids want to play for the best. Kids dont want to play on weaker teams and lose, even if they stand out.

"I think practicing and playing in the toughest most competitive environment is best for a child to learn how to compete and play hard all the time."

Depends on the kid and unless you are a child psychologist, irrelevant.


Depends on the kid? What type of practice environment do you think kids should be immersed...other than one that will challenge them?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I would like too see people's thoughts on the programs from the Westchetser County area where you rank them for year 2021.

1 - 3D Tristate
2 - Eclipse
3 - Long Island Express North
4 - 2 Way
5 - Predators
6 - Primetime
7 - 91 Tristate
8 - Superstars
9 - Ballers
10 - Chargers
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Surprised that 3D tristate and 2 way are so high and Primetime is so low.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I don't think the initial list was intended to be a ranking order.

I would think Prime Time and Eclipse at top, followed then by 2way, and then maybe Predators and LIE North. Others down lower.


Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I think the first 5 are correct maybe not in order but they are the top 5
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
3d had some very good additions
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Word on the street, lol is 3d Tristate, LIE North, & Eclipse all got much better players and Primetime lost 4 top players without replacing them. Maybe that's why PT is low but they still should be in top 3.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What local program will have the first Freshman commit?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What local program will have the first Freshman commit?


My guess is Primetime or LIE North. While I don't think Primetime is all that strong they do have a couple of extremely strong players. LIE North has several very strong players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What local program will have the first Freshman commit?


My guess is Primetime or LIE North. While I don't think Primetime is all that strong they do have a couple of extremely strong players. LIE North has several very strong players.


LI Express North. My guess is they are one of the top 3 teams that I've seen play and they have a bunch of highly skilled players. A joy to watch.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My son went to the Eclipse, Primetime & LIE North tryouts and to be honest Eclipse had the top talent. My son did not make the U13 team because those kids were all big, strong and fast. My guess would be Eclipse has the first freshman commit.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Primetime beat LIE North last summer by 10 goals. Unless they got better talent I don't see LIE North competing with PT.d
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
which westchester programs have a 2024 age group? 91, express, eclipse i saw. any others?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Primetime has no players. Tristate 91 is awful. Long Island express has 10 good players. Not sure superstars or eclipse
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That's not true. Primetime 2024 has 2 very good players and a kick [lacrosse] goalie. Tristate has 3/4 real players Bottom line every 24 team is aB team at best because they all have a load of c players
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PrimeTime 2019 tied LI EXpress North last yeAr. North beat crabs last year by 4 goals
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son went to the Eclipse, Primetime & LIE North tryouts and to be honest Eclipse had the top talent. My son did not make the U13 team because those kids were all big, strong and fast. My guess would be Eclipse has the first freshman commit.


Freshman is grad year 2019. Express North is the better team by a sizable margin. Didn't Eclipse lose to the New Fairfield town team last summer?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Primetime beat LIE North last summer by 10 goals. Unless they got better talent I don't see LIE North competing with PT.d


I don't know what year you are talking but the 2019 teams tied in their only meeting last summer at NYIT. LIE North beat Dukes and Crabs, they have talent.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I was talking about 2021. Things got a little confusing answering posts. Anyone paying attention knows LIE North 2019 is the class of this area. It was a great tie for PT last summer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I was talking about 2021. Things got a little confusing answering posts. Anyone paying attention knows LIE North 2019 is the class of this area. It was a great tie for PT last summer.


Regarding the 2021 teams, I believe PT and LIE North should be a terrific battle. My son plays on the LIE 2020 team and we watched the PT v LIE N game last summer. Overmatched by PT's size. From what I have seen, the LIE N 2021 team is a lot better and bigger. Should be fun to watch them play against each other.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Anyone playing on Columbus Day on Long Island?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Good to hear LIE North 2021 got better, unfortunately we (PT 2021) lost a few good midfielders but gained a couple. Can't wait for Yale to see how we look.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Primetime beat LIE North last summer by 10 goals. Unless they got better talent I don't see LIE North competing with PT.d


What age is this? If you think it was 2019 you were watching the wrong game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son went to the Eclipse, Primetime & LIE North tryouts and to be honest Eclipse had the top talent. My son did not make the U13 team because those kids were all big, strong and fast. My guess would be Eclipse has the first freshman commit.


Freshman is grad year 2019. Express North is the better team by a sizable margin. Didn't Eclipse lose to the New Fairfield town team last summer?


...and Team MN in Philly...didnt play in (m)any of the events with 91/Express/Crabs/Madlax/Edge/etc

This area is going to kill itself by diluting the talent pools - this isnt long island where Team 91's White team would crush most lower AA and upper A teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Amen. You got that right. The depth on Long Island at any age level is staggering. Take your kid to a tryout just to see how your kid stacks up. It's an eye opener
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Let's not count out 2022 Primetime! Primetime took 2 out of 3 against LI Express A team this past season. Primetime has some very good talent.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Primetime 2022 is a real real real team. As good as any. Seems like the last year for true aa team. I don't have a 22 nor a kid on pt. Their record says it alln
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
i would love to see a coach or coaches capable of putting together 1 team im each grade level that can truly compete with long island, 2022 PT has done that , question for all the directors in westchester- how can you get the best 5 from each team and get them on one team, especially at the younger ages where it is more fragmented .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
i would love to see a coach or coaches capable of putting together 1 team im each grade level that can truly compete with long island, 2022 PT has done that , question for all the directors in westchester- how can you get the best 5 from each team and get them on one team, especially at the younger ages where it is more fragmented .



Not going to happen. Who is going to give up their kids? Anyway there are several Westchester teams that can already play at the highest levels: PT 2016, Preds 2017, LIENorth 2018. Now that there is a critical mass of teams in Westchester, I would love to see a tournament of local teams. But that too is not likely to happen since team owners are fearful of losing kids to winning teams. A tournament including PT, Preds, LIExpNorth, Eclipse, CTChargers and some others - how great would that be? We could stay in our own beds too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
i agree- im more talking younger ages as these teams are a hodgepodge of a,b, and c players alot of the older teams are already established, but the ideas of a local tourney is a great idea, why travel to play the same team that is in your backyard.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Primetime 2022 has one player (Yorktown), take him away and the team is B level. That's why the never won anything no depth.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I agree with both of you. PT 2021 has real good talent but no depth so when the weaker players play the LI teams take advantage. We played some really good games against excellent competition 91, Sons & Express but always come out on the short end because a lack of depth.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
First off that's not the point. They compete very well against the best. And in west Chester that's an accomplishment
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It's nice to use LI as a benchmark, especially considering its proximity, but people must be realistic. Especially as it regards depth, the best lacrosse in the world is played on LI. Using lax power as a reference, there are 401 HS teams in NYS playing lacrosse. 101 are on LI. Thats a full 25%. Much of that is within driving range of each other. And a much higher percentage of their youth are playing, which provides them with more of the top athletes. This all means that LI will field more and better club teams.

The Westchester club scene does not need to focus on forming super teams to beat the best from LI. There has been a recent growth in the amount of clubs and teams. In the short term, especially at the younger levels, you will see the talent spread maybe too thin. But this will get more kids playing, and will help improve the overall talent pool, which should grow the game and increase participation numbers over all. The spring town season is very short. More kids need to be getting reps in June and July and in the Fall. The kids will get better, depth will improve, and you will start seeing more deeply talented and better HS teams.

Also, the increase in Westchester clubs has also created room for talent to come in from nearby counties, since these areas do not have developed clubs for the most part.

And BTW, as someone who has been at numerous tournaments over multiple years, there are plenty of mediocre to poor LI teams. My kids have played and beaten them. And this is fine. Having more kids play more lacrosse is never a bad thing.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Excellent last post about how to think about Westchester in the context of LI.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
great post , and very true, hopwever , i believe the one very important thing for these programs to do, is be realistic where their teams fit in the landscape talent wise. many would argue, but placing a b level team into a top tourney aginst the best teams is not always best at the younger ages where kids are looking for reps to build up their confidence. so if you are a team filled with B players - which is fine, then place them in a tourney or bracket where they can be competitive.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I get that LI is the mecca of lax, but why is Ct. High schools So much better than Westchester HS's.
Top Ct. teams Darien, New Canaan, Greenwich & Ridgefield are much better than any Section 1 team to include Yorktown. You cant say they have more players there. Whats the reason?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I get that LI is the mecca of lax, but why is Ct. High schools So much better than Westchester HS's.
Top Ct. teams Darien, New Canaan, Greenwich & Ridgefield are much better than any Section 1 team to include Yorktown. You cant say they have more players there. Whats the reason?


This is just an educated guess, but those might be 4 huge schools that also happen to be big time lacrosse towns. They have huge youth programs, and from what I have seen at tournaments, a lot more kids playing than any Westchester town. Of course someone can look up the enrollment numbers.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Could it be that they are 18 yr old juniors and 19 yr old senuors??
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Each of those CT towns mentioned have very large and extremely well run/organized youth programs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
As per Lax Power, they are the top 4 teams in all of CT from last season. So in addition to being better than all of Westchester, they are also better than all of CT.

Also, between the 4 of them, they collectively only lost to each other, plus Brunswick (a prep school), St Anthonys (LI), Ward Melville, Smithtown East, Chaminade and Bronxville. So quite literally, outside of lacrosse heavyweights, those schools are beating everyone.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Does that mean CT. Should have better travel teams than Westchester?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Possibly, but a lot of the good CT kids are sprinkled across the Westchester club teams including PT , LIE North, others. However, with respect to CT, Eclipse has the bulk ... though most from New Canaan and Darien. More Greenwich kids go to PT.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That is it. Left back 19 year old kids playing HS lax. Greenwich and New Canaan have all left back kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Wow. Thats another topic. Our kids playing against bigger older kids will only make them better. I'd rather see my son get better than win some meaningless tournament in his youth.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What concerns me most about the development club lacrosse in Westchester/CT is that many (nearly all) of the clubs are based on and run by the coaches and staffs of HS programs. Ask the folks from LI how that plays out particularly when one club is 'directed' by 3-4 private (powerhouse) HS coaches. The conflict of interest can become very troubling and politics are often more important than talent/skill.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
From what I've seen on BOTC regarding conflict of interest in the LI club scene, I think the dynamics in Westchester are different, particularly for the elite teams. That's not to say there aren't conflicts of interest. While there may be HS Coaches on club teams, at the elite programs, HS Coaches are not the club owners. Their compensation is not improved by getting more kids from the HS where they coach. While some of the elite programs have a core of players form one or two schools, they tend to draw from a much wider number of schools. Predators, Primetime, LIENorth draw from all over and there is a lot of interest to join and it’s difficult to make their teams. The first two only have one team at each level and appear more interested in performance than numbers, which from what I’ve read, is a source of conflict in LI.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What concerns me most about the development club lacrosse in Westchester/CT is that many (nearly all) of the clubs are based on and run by the coaches and staffs of HS programs. Ask the folks from LI how that plays out particularly when one club is 'directed' by 3-4 private (powerhouse) HS coaches. The conflict of interest can become very troubling and politics are often more important than talent/skill.


Primetime- yes, Predators and LIExpress North--no.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
You are spot on. One organization up in Dutchess County makes a unwritten prerequisite to play for the high school.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That comment about "one org up in dutchess county ..." seems totally off base and not accurate. Somebody with an agenda writing that.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse couldn't finish today. Lost to the LIE A team in the finals 7-5.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Good job Eclipse. Shows that some of the best Westchester/Fairfield teams are on par with the better Long Island teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That comment about "one org up in dutchess county ..." seems totally off base and not accurate. Somebody with an agenda writing that.


Would that be the same coach who would have players play down when the played better teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What Express North teams are you referring to?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse couldn't finish today. Lost to the LIE A team in the finals 7-5.


Which grade level?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express North had two teams in the Legacy Columbus Day Tournament on Long Island. Their 2020 B (or as they call it single 'A') team and their 2023 team. Their 2020 B team went 0-3 and their 2023 team went 0-2-1. You can see it on tourney machine. Its too early to tell anything about LIENorth yet. The first tournament for their 2020-2022 teams is next week at the Halloween Havoc. We'll get a better feel for the caliber of middle school players in this organization during the next two weeks.

I think some expected this organization to be the second coming given the success of their 2018 team, but the 2018 team wasn't a product of LIENorth. It was started by Superstar and moved to LIENorth. Don't know the exact story behind it. Only time will tell. I wish them luck and hope they play some of the other Westchester/CT teams. We need more local tournaments/scrimmages.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Just a positive spin on some things. We all want to compete and be on a great team etc. I get that but why do you have to bash another in the process. Express North is new to the area and still getting the younger teams in order. Superstars has been around a lot longer and has helped tons of kids develop and is led by a guy that has done more for the sport than just about if not anyone in the area. I'm sure PT and the others have quality people as well, just haven't had the opportunity to meet them. If you are happy where you are playing enjoy it, if not find a place where you are.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North had two teams in the Legacy Columbus Day Tournament on Long Island. Their 2020 B (or as they call it single 'A') team and their 2023 team. Their 2020 B team went 0-3 and their 2023 team went 0-2-1. You can see it on tourney machine. Its too early to tell anything about LIENorth yet. The first tournament for their 2020-2022 teams is next week at the Halloween Havoc. We'll get a better feel for the caliber of middle school players in this organization during the next two weeks.

I think some expected this organization to be the second coming given the success of their 2018 team, but the 2018 team wasn't a product of LIENorth. It was started by Superstar and moved to LIENorth. Don't know the exact story behind it. Only time will tell. I wish them luck and hope they play some of the other Westchester/CT teams. We need more local tournaments/scrimmages.


A "B" team playing in an "A" bracket, are the results a surprise? Do some of you people post just to stir up S*^*?


Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2018 Express North has always had the same coaching staff.

Those are the people who are driving the broader Express North program. Superstar (good club in their own right) had little/nothing to do with success of Express North 2018 team.

I suspect Express North will continue to be a highly competitive program overall in the years to come.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Chris Schreiber is the Director of Express North and started in March of last year and now has 2 teams at 2020. Giving kids a chance to play and learn from quality coaches. Unfortunately town programs lack quality coaching at every level.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
When are Havoc details to be published?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2018 Express North has always had the same coaching staff.

Those are the people who are driving the broader Express North program. Superstar (good club in their own right) had little/nothing to do with success of Express North 2018 team.

I suspect Express North will continue to be a highly competitive program overall in the years to come.


A good number of the players never even played for Superstar so it's true that Superstar had nothing to do with the success of the program. They used the name with permission of the director of Superstar but he didn't do anything with or for the program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
You are right the were called Superstars 365 and Colsey had nothing to do with them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How/who formed the original Express North 2018 team then if Superstar/Colsey weren't really involved? Who coaches that team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Chris Schreiber.
If you ever went to a game he coaches u couldnt miss him. Played for Hopkins and is uncle of Tom Schreiber.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
ExpressNorth 22AA struggled against top teams yesterday . 2020AA Express North won AA bracket . 2021 won A bracket by a large margin
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2 out of 3 is pretty darn good for a new program, i know the 2023 didnt fare well last weekend, so 2/4 not too shabby
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse couldn't finish today. Lost to the LIE A team in the finals 7-5.


What age?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse couldn't finish today. Lost to the LIE A team in the finals 7-5.

What age?


It was U/13 / 2021
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2021 was in the B bracket. Very disappointing as we think we are becoming a strong team. Won't know unless we play the A bracket.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I watched that 2021 LIE North Champ Game. They came down to LI to win an easy championship. Why are they afraid to play A. Whats the worst that can happen. You loose and learn from what went wrong.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
You are a jerk and on top of that u can't spell .go spread your misery to your family.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
guess i was correct
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Lets see what division they put themselves in this weekend @ Blatant. I believe last year they won it playing A. Imagine they play down in B
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I watched that 2021 LIE North Champ Game. They came down to LI to win an easy championship. Why are they afraid to play A. Whats the worst that can happen. You loose and learn from what went wrong.


What was the score?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
who gives a [lacrosse] - how about great job, kids working together as a team to achive a common goal- its a 2 year old program- primetime could not even put a 4th grade team together this year - li express north 2020 team as well. its fall lax- get a life people
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
ExpressNorth 22AA struggled against top teams yesterday . 2020AA Express North won AA bracket . 2021 won A bracket by a large margin


FYI.. there are no AA divisions on LI. They have A and B. A divisions generally have some legit teams but there is a precipitous drop in quality of the B divisions. I'm not taking anything away from the winners. As big as lax is on LI, there is still a massive amount of expansion so there are a large number of teams that are 1-2 years old. Staying competitive with those teams is a benchmark of success for northern teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
AA = A
A = B

People use that method so they can sell the program as not having a "B" team. No one wants to tell people their kid is on the "B" team and that is a problem. It's ok to have "B" teams, and it is also OK to play "B" lacrosse if that is the level you are currently at. Why we need to try to justify a lower level team is beyond me.

USA Hockey has AAA, AA, and A tiers, but that isn't the case in lacrosse, so program directors are doing their best to make this their model. Now a kid can choose program 1 because they gave him a spot on the "A" team over team 2 which gave him a spot on the "B" team, even though they are the same level.

I coach HS and club lacrosse. I played college lacrosse. My son isn't old enough to play organized yet but I check this site because my parents brought it to my attention and I wanted to see the madness for myself.

If my son decides to play lacrosse, I will pay for the team that he makes and deserves to be on. The team that he is comfortable on. The team he is excited to wake up and go to. If he is the best kid in the B bracket I will say that proudly. If he is a third line middie on the A team I will say that proudly (if asked). If he decides he doesn't like lacrosse anymore, I will say that proudly.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
AA = A
A = B

People use that method so they can sell the program as not having a "B" team. No one wants to tell people their kid is on the "B" team and that is a problem. It's ok to have "B" teams, and it is also OK to play "B" lacrosse if that is the level you are currently at. Why we need to try to justify a lower level team is beyond me.

USA Hockey has AAA, AA, and A tiers, but that isn't the case in lacrosse, so program directors are doing their best to make this their model. Now a kid can choose program 1 because they gave him a spot on the "A" team over team 2 which gave him a spot on the "B" team, even though they are the same level.

I coach HS and club lacrosse. I played college lacrosse. My son isn't old enough to play organized yet but I check this site because my parents brought it to my attention and I wanted to see the madness for myself.

If my son decides to play lacrosse, I will pay for the team that he makes and deserves to be on. The team that he is comfortable on. The team he is excited to wake up and go to. If he is the best kid in the B bracket I will say that proudly. If he is a third line middie on the A team I will say that proudly (if asked). If he decides he doesn't like lacrosse anymore, I will say that proudly.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Why don't you get a life. This website is for people to express their opinions. If you can't handle the truth stay off.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
AA = A
A = B

People use that method so they can sell the program as not having a "B" team. No one wants to tell people their kid is on the "B" team and that is a problem. It's ok to have "B" teams, and it is also OK to play "B" lacrosse if that is the level you are currently at. Why we need to try to justify a lower level team is beyond me.

USA Hockey has AAA, AA, and A tiers, but that isn't the case in lacrosse, so program directors are doing their best to make this their model. Now a kid can choose program 1 because they gave him a spot on the "A" team over team 2 which gave him a spot on the "B" team, even though they are the same level.

I coach HS and club lacrosse. I played college lacrosse. My son isn't old enough to play organized yet but I check this site because my parents brought it to my attention and I wanted to see the madness for myself.

If my son decides to play lacrosse, I will pay for the team that he makes and deserves to be on. The team that he is comfortable on. The team he is excited to wake up and go to. If he is the best kid in the B bracket I will say that proudly. If he is a third line middie on the A team I will say that proudly (if asked). If he decides he doesn't like lacrosse anymore, I will say that proudly.


And then one day he doesn't make the team you think he should because you are all knowing and bang you're in the thick of. It's okay you wouldn't be the first nor the last. noone know what the future holds. Good luck on your ride.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
AA = A
A = B

People use that method so they can sell the program as not having a "B" team. No one wants to tell people their kid is on the "B" team and that is a problem. It's ok to have "B" teams, and it is also OK to play "B" lacrosse if that is the level you are currently at. Why we need to try to justify a lower level team is beyond me.

USA Hockey has AAA, AA, and A tiers, but that isn't the case in lacrosse, so program directors are doing their best to make this their model. Now a kid can choose program 1 because they gave him a spot on the "A" team over team 2 which gave him a spot on the "B" team, even though they are the same level.

I coach HS and club lacrosse. I played college lacrosse. My son isn't old enough to play organized yet but I check this site because my parents brought it to my attention and I wanted to see the madness for myself.

If my son decides to play lacrosse, I will pay for the team that he makes and deserves to be on. The team that he is comfortable on. The team he is excited to wake up and go to. If he is the best kid in the B bracket I will say that proudly. If he is a third line middie on the A team I will say that proudly (if asked). If he decides he doesn't like lacrosse anymore, I will say that proudly.


That was a lot to say for someone with no kids playing travel or even of travel age. You're just weird. If you're already posting then guess what, you are going to be the WORST of them all! Good lord I feel bad for your kid already...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
If you rank lacrosse programs based on showcase invitations then Prime Time is #1. I'm very thankful I ignored the rhetoric being spewed by some loud mouths about which program has the most clout. We made the right choice.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
how is express north 2024?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
No doubt prime time in the hay day had the best players. But with all these new programs popping up. That is changing. It's really sad. But it's true. Primetime had a monopoly in the area. As an example. They were unable to field a 4th grade squad this year. Again. Sad. But reality
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No doubt prime time in the hay day had the best players. But with all these new programs popping up. That is changing. It's really sad. But it's true. Primetime had a monopoly in the area. As an example. They were unable to field a 4th grade squad this year. Again. Sad. But reality


Can't argue with the showcase numbers. Someone still believes PT is still the premiere program up here. If not PT, then who?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I'm saying that is 10000% true now. But won't be the case in 5 years as kids are now spread out. I'm not anti pt.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No doubt prime time in the hay day had the best players. But with all these new programs popping up. That is changing. It's really sad. But it's true. Primetime had a monopoly in the area. As an example. They were unable to field a 4th grade squad this year. Again. Sad. But reality


Can't argue with the showcase numbers. Someone still believes PT is still the premiere program up here. If not PT, then who?


Eclipse
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT is still strong. Their 2018 team can compete with anybody. 2022 really strong.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT does have a 4th grade team, all set with roster. They just aren't playing in the Fall, only Spring/Summer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Primetime does not have a fourth grade team they were unable to put enough kids together for fall tournament team. The kids that were signed up for the team are now practicing with the fifth grade team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT's high school team are very strong and can play with anyone. The youth has too many john jay kids as they are trying to strengthen the JJ HS program, but he weeds them out for his HS teams. I agree that 3d Tristate, Eclipse, LIE North & even Superstars will all get better and lax in this area will become much stronger.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The Fall program for the PT youth teams is optional. Many kids play other sports and choose not to do the Fall. As a result, they will often field a combined team (such as 2021/2022 or 2022/2023) depending on the numbers that choose to do Fall. Has been this way in the past and no diff this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No doubt prime time in the hay day had the best players. But with all these new programs popping up. That is changing. It's really sad. But it's true. Primetime had a monopoly in the area. As an example. They were unable to field a 4th grade squad this year. Again. Sad. But reality


Can't argue with the showcase numbers. Someone still believes PT is still the premiere program up here. If not PT, then who?


What showcase or showcases are you talking about?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I'm not anti pt. But the fact is that the 2024 team had 14 kids at each tryout and they were begging anyone with 4 limbs to play. The fact is Daniello has hurt as many kids as he has helped. In the future that program will not be what it was. I hear Daniello is on the john jay board now so maybe he will strong arm these poor kids into playing pt.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I'm not anti pt. But the fact is that the 2024 team had 14 kids at each tryout and they were begging anyone with 4 limbs to play. The fact is Daniello has hurt as many kids as he has helped. In the future that program will not be what it was. I hear Daniello is on the john jay board now so maybe he will strong arm these poor kids into playing pt.



express north 2024 coach is giner from JJ.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My son plays for superstar 2024. We attended pt , 91, and Long Island express as well as the team we picked. Express north had the greatest depth in talent. Not suggesting they can compete at the hughes level. But saying in the north they seemed to have the greatest number of better kids
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Giner is asst coach. Jay hill Harvey school is coach
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son plays for superstar 2024. We attended pt , 91, and Long Island express as well as the team we picked. Express north had the greatest depth in talent. Not suggesting they can compete at the hughes level. But saying in the north they seemed to have the greatest number of better kids



didn't 91 get beat up last weekend on LI? superstars doing a fall tourney
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
91 did not get beat up last weekend. They lost 2 games by 1 and 1 game by 5 and played with a kid that never played goalie
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If you rank lacrosse programs based on showcase invitations then Prime Time is #1. I'm very thankful I ignored the rhetoric being spewed by some loud mouths about which program has the most clout. We made the right choice.


Where is this #1 program playing this fall or next summer? Using clout or politics to get some kids into a several hundred player Showcase is one thing - getting the team to play in front of a slew a college coaches every week this fall and next summer is another thing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
91 did not get beat up last weekend. They lost 2 games by 1 and 1 game by 5 and played with a kid that never played goalie


They lost to a town team, a brand new b team program and million who is a low end B team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
im not a91 parent but give me a break- no one said they were a high level super team- that is ignorant- every team with the exception of the wolfpack, taz and a few others in LI are a glorified town team, lets look at westchester - 91- larchmont, scarsdale , john jay- express north- bedford, John jay, Primetime- John Jay, (if they even have a team) every single team has some combination of town kids. Last year PT lost to garden city 4th grade, big time teams get beat by Manhasset 32, the point is- 91 - did not get blown up, they competed and lost
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
91 did not get beat up last weekend. They lost 2 games by 1 and 1 game by 5 and played with a kid that never played goalie


They lost to a town team, a brand new b team program and million who is a low end B team.


What town team beat them
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
So called B teams from LI are as good, if not better than, top teams elsewhere. No shame in losing to LI teams. The lax is great out there, especially the depth. As for 91 TS, they had young teams out there. For instance, they played in the 2022 bracket with a team of mostly 2023 kids. In the summer they will be more on age and will do fine.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I'm saying that is 10000% true now. But won't be the case in 5 years as kids are now spread out. I'm not anti pt.


My son is a 2019 grad, I don't care about 5 years from now. Primetime made promises about showcases and they delivered.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
daniello works very very hard for his boys!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I'm saying that is 10000% true now. But won't be the case in 5 years as kids are now spread out. I'm not anti pt.


My son is a 2019 grad, I don't care about 5 years from now. Primetime made promises about showcases and they delivered.


Will be curious to see if this is one of those showcases where the all star games are picked before the games are even played. Tough to stand out - over 250 kids coming...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
As I said for HS showcases Daniello is the best. For youth not so much. 2020,2021,& 2023 were low grade B teams. 2022 was a solid A team. My suggestion play elsewhere for youth and play for PT in the HS years.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I'm saying that is 10000% true now. But won't be the case in 5 years as kids are now spread out. I'm not anti pt.


My son is a 2019 grad, I don't care about 5 years from now. Primetime made promises about showcases and they delivered.


Headed to a nice tourney next weekend should get a good sense of where we belong. Who can tell me which team is the better of the Laxachusetts teams White or Green. Do they have another team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I'm saying that is 10000% true now. But won't be the case in 5 years as kids are now spread out. I'm not anti pt.


My son is a 2019 grad, I don't care about 5 years from now. Primetime made promises about showcases and they delivered.


Headed to a nice tourney next weekend should get a good sense of where we belong. Who can tell me which team is the better of the Laxachusetts teams White or Green. Do they have another team?


They have many teams - Black being the best - no idea which colors come next, have a feeling those kids swap back and forth between all those teams depending on need.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I'm saying that is 10000% true now. But won't be the case in 5 years as kids are now spread out. I'm not anti pt.


My son is a 2019 grad, I don't care about 5 years from now. Primetime made promises about showcases and they delivered.


Headed to a nice tourney next weekend should get a good sense of where we belong. Who can tell me which team is the better of the Laxachusetts teams White or Green. Do they have another team?


They are absolutely known for swapping kids from team to team depending on the schedule. You may be scheduled to play their 3rd team, but if the black team is free, expect 7-8 of their kids to show up. They are a complete joke.

They have many teams - Black being the best - no idea which colors come next, have a feeling those kids swap back and forth between all those teams depending on need.




They are absolutely known for swapping kids from team to team depending on the schedule. You may be scheduled to play their 3rd team, but if the black team is free, expect 7-8 of their kids to show up. They are a complete joke.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Black will be with all the other top 2019 teams next weekend at Boys Latin - loaded group - Madlax, 91, Edge, Crabs, Express, Express North, HHH
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Black will be with all the other top 2019 teams next weekend at Boys Latin - loaded group - Madlax, 91, Edge, Crabs, Express, Express North, HHH


batch slapped
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Just came from the Blatant tournament. Looks like they had the express 2021 in the A bracket. They beat outlaws, 91 and igloo. Lost to Channy in the final pretty badly.. Looked like they were out of gas.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just came from the Blatant tournament. Looks like they had the express 2021 in the A bracket. They beat outlaws, 91 and igloo. Lost to Channy in the final pretty badly.. Looked like they were out of gas.


those are igloo and 91 B teams
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
North 2021 beat solid teams in Outlaws & Avalanche. They both are top ten teams on the Island. Channy's team has some real good athletes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That Avalanche team beat Primetime twice last summer,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just came from the Blatant tournament. Looks like they had the express 2021 in the A bracket. They beat outlaws, 91 and igloo. Lost to Channy in the final pretty badly.. Looked like they were out of gas.


those are igloo and 91 B teams


Thank you for being so predictable. If you are one of the over bearing LI Igloo parents who couldn't shut up and were berating their own players, you should be real proud. "This is embarrassing" was said more than once. The Igloo parents were more into the game than any of the players. Get a life and let the kids play the game and have just a little fun.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
other than 2022 tean- express north has fared pretty well for the most part
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT had well over 100 kids tryout for 2019 team. $70/per kid to have a shot and that many showed. There has to be a reason so many wanted to play there. Good pay day for them too. I'm not a fan of the pay to tryout but I'm also not a business type guy. Many parents not too happy with the amount of kids that showed up and in long run it hurts a progroam in my opinion.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT had well over 100 kids tryout for 2019 team.....

....Many parents not too happy with the amount of kids that showed up and in long run it hurts a progroam in my opinion.


More kids at tryouts indicates there is more interest and competition for spots. That generally favors the overall quality of the team if they have strong coaching (a big if).

Some parents may not like it because their kid may not get the call.

Welcome to the world of competitive club lacrosse. It is not always pleasant and there are plenty of 'life lessons' to be had.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
We will beat you guys next time. Everyone knows lacrosse is only played on LI. Upstate is B level lax
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
We will beat you guys next time. Everyone knows lacrosse is only played on LI. Upstate is B level lax


Tool.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Very impressed with north 2021. We spanked them last year at NLF and now they won 7 out of 8 games this fall only losing to a strong team in Express Channy. Guess we will have our hands full at Yale, lol
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Very impressed with north 2021. We spanked them last year at NLF and now they won 7 out of 8 games this fall only losing to a strong team in Express Channy. Guess we will have our hands full at Yale, lol


Who is "we"?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Very impressed with north 2021. We spanked them last year at NLF and now they won 7 out of 8 games this fall only losing to a strong team in Express Channy. Guess we will have our hands full at Yale, lol


and only beating B teams from igloo and 91
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
U and your agenda are funny your either miserable or I wonder who
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT had well over 100 kids tryout for 2019 team.....

....Many parents not too happy with the amount of kids that showed up and in long run it hurts a progroam in my opinion.


More kids at tryouts indicates there is more interest and competition for spots. That generally favors the overall quality of the team if they have strong coaching (a big if).

Some parents may not like it because their kid may not get the call.

Welcome to the world of competitive club lacrosse. It is not always pleasant and there are plenty of 'life lessons' to be had.


I think it came off as more of a money grab. They know only 4 maybe 5 spots will turnover and they see 124 kids sign up for the tryout. You can build brand equity by sending an email stating a high number of kids trying out for limited spots. In a perfect world at least.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT had well over 100 kids tryout for 2019 team.....

....Many parents not too happy with the amount of kids that showed up and in long run it hurts a progroam in my opinion.


More kids at tryouts indicates there is more interest and competition for spots. That generally favors the overall quality of the team if they have strong coaching (a big if).

Some parents may not like it because their kid may not get the call.

Welcome to the world of competitive club lacrosse. It is not always pleasant and there are plenty of 'life lessons' to be had.


I think it came off as more of a money grab. They know only 4 maybe 5 spots will turnover and they see 124 kids sign up for the tryout. You can build brand equity by sending an email stating a high number of kids trying out for limited spots. In a perfect world at least.


Or set up a b team and grab more bucks
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT had well over 100 kids tryout for 2019 team.....

....Many parents not too happy with the amount of kids that showed up and in long run it hurts a progroam in my opinion.


More kids at tryouts indicates there is more interest and competition for spots. That generally favors the overall quality of the team if they have strong coaching (a big if).

Some parents may not like it because their kid may not get the call.

Welcome to the world of competitive club lacrosse. It is not always pleasant and there are plenty of 'life lessons' to be had.


I think it came off as more of a money grab. They know only 4 maybe 5 spots will turnover and they see 124 kids sign up for the tryout. You can build brand equity by sending an email stating a high number of kids trying out for limited spots. In a perfect world at least.


Did they take the best of the hundred.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT


The current 2021 Express North team is completely different from the one you played last summer. Our guys were physically overmatched, not anymore. Should be a much more competitive game next time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yeah I did see the 6 foot middie. Quite tall for a 7th grader!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I get that LI is the mecca of lax, but why is Ct. High schools So much better than Westchester HS's.
Top Ct. teams Darien, New Canaan, Greenwich & Ridgefield are much better than any Section 1 team to include Yorktown. You cant say they have more players there. Whats the reason?


Bronxville, a small Class C school, destroyed Greenwich 14-4 last year. . CT teams don't really want to play the better Westchester teams. Yorktown is as good as anyone in the state.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Predators 2017 is a Nationally prominent team. They won a huge tournament this summer in Philly. Their coaches are very focused on player development. I think this is what sets the program apart from the others. I understand they are now focusing on the 2020 team. The previously focused on the 2014 group. this three year cycle really helps them develop a product that is attractive to colleges.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I agree, you guys got better and we lost a couple of decent players and added a few. Stayed the same.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Lol Bronxville was loaded with great talent. Even a blind squirrel gets a nut. Westchester lax does not compare to Ct. Lax and that's with Brunswick taking most of the best players. Darien & New Canaan are the class of the northeast.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Lol Bronxville was loaded with great talent. Even a blind squirrel gets a nut. Westchester lax does not compare to Ct. Lax and that's with Brunswick taking most of the best players. Darien & New Canaan are the class of the northeast.


This was discussed earlier in this thread - and discussed more maturely. Quite literally, the 4 or 5 best CT programs are all on Westchester's doorstep. Yes, these few programs are probably better than the best 4 or 5 from Westchester. As are maybe the best 4 or 5 from PA, MA and some other states. But as for the rest of CT - Westchester teams compare quite favorably.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
the school districts in CT are usually quite larger- Darien has a huge talent base to draw from, Ridgefield, etc.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The game has only been played in these so called "hotbeds" until very recently. You are not really accomplishing anything when you have no competition. It is starting to change, just take a look at U Denver's championship roster.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I guess quality lacrosse is still played north of the Throgs Neck Bridge? 2019 Express North 3-0 today with wins over The Edge (their edge is they are a year older than all the other teams they play), Crabs and True Blue.

The non-stop mouths on LI and elsewhere can pipe down now.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess quality lacrosse is still played north of the Throgs Neck Bridge? 2019 Express North 3-0 today with wins over The Edge (their edge is they are a year older than all the other teams they play), Crabs and True Blue.

The non-stop mouths on LI and elsewhere can pipe down now.


Prime time 1-2, North is the class of 2019 of over the bridge
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Legacy was a B tournament this weekend. All top teams in PA
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
wheres the PT poster who bashes Express Awfully quiet wonder why
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Top 2019s were in Maryland / Boys Latin today 91,express, express north,crabs Madlax edge,leading edge Laxachutes AA,Michigan Blue,Century /Texas .

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Legacy was a B tournament this weekend. All top teams in PA


So was that primetime's B team or they went 1-2 against b teams?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Legacy was a B tournament this weekend. All top teams in PA


So was that primetime's B team or they went 1-2 against b teams?


PT doesn't have B teams
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Primetime 2018 is their premier team going 4-0 this weekend. 2019 definitely cant play with the big boys but a quality organization.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
going forward - going to be very difficult for any westchester team to consistently put A teams on the field. too many teams,watered down. getting to be that way on LI as well. how many true A teams exist
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess quality lacrosse is still played north of the Throgs Neck Bridge? 2019 Express North 3-0 today with wins over The Edge (their edge is they are a year older than all the other teams they play), Crabs and True Blue.

The non-stop mouths on LI and elsewhere can pipe down now.


Prime time 1-2, North is the class of 2019 of over the bridge


Express North 2019 might be the class of 2019....period.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
going forward - going to be very difficult for any westchester team to consistently put A teams on the field. too many teams,watered down. getting to be that way on LI as well. how many true A teams exist


This is very true - biggest issue is that clubs want to market themselves as the "best" and "elite". If you market yourself for what you are - good opportunity for nice, but maybe not elite, players to play together with good coaches and get better (and have fun!) - they would be a lot better off IMO.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express north and Prime time 2018 combined have 15 to20 D1 commits ,both teams dominated this weekend .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
pretty amazing
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
going forward - going to be very difficult for any westchester team to consistently put A teams on the field. too many teams,watered down. getting to be that way on LI as well. how many true A teams exist


This is very true - biggest issue is that clubs want to market themselves as the "best" and "elite". If you market yourself for what you are - good opportunity for nice, but maybe not elite, players to play together with good coaches and get better (and have fun!) - they would be a lot better off IMO.


more parody is better for the game. its why the nfl is so great
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I concur express north 2019 is as good as any team in 2019
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse 2017,2018 & 2019 went a strong 7-1-1 at Legacy. Only loss was to a strong PT 2018 6-4. Their teams are full of D1 commits. Just shows how strong lax is north of LI.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I concur express north 2019 is as good as any team in 2019


How have you done against the top 4 -- Madlax, 91, Laxachusetts, HHH?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Not sure as my child is a 2021 player. The Coach and director of Express North (Schreiber) told me the have very few losses over the last few years. If I remember correctly it's only 5. They beat Crabs, True Michigan & Edge Canada yesterday. Very impressive.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not sure as my child is a 2021 player. The Coach and director of Express North (Schreiber) told me the have very few losses over the last few years. If I remember correctly it's only 5. They beat Crabs, True Michigan & Edge Canada yesterday. Very impressive.


They have come a long way in a short period, for sure. Impressive group, may be in top 5 of the age group
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Reclassification helps
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I concur express north 2019 is as good as any team in 2019


How have you done against the top 4 -- Madlax, 91, Laxachusetts, HHH?


Beat them all accept for 91. I believe we would now beat Team 91 handily.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Defenseman from Express North has committed to Michigan 2019
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Defenseman from Express North has committed to Michigan 2019


More Express North kids will follow. IMO. The players are too good and the team wins.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT 2019 have any potential commits?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse 2017,2018 & 2019 went a strong 7-1-1 at Legacy. Only loss was to a strong PT 2018 6-4. Their teams are full of D1 commits. Just shows how strong lax is north of LI.


No it doesn't!

Although you did well at a tournament that doesn't necessarily show how strong you are. North 2019 running the table shows how strong they are, everything is relative!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse 2017,2018 & 2019 went a strong 7-1-1 at Legacy. Only loss was to a strong PT 2018 6-4. Their teams are full of D1 commits. Just shows how strong lax is north of LI.


No it doesn't!

Although you did well at a tournament that doesn't necessarily show how strong you are. North 2019 running the table shows how strong they are, everything is relative!


Result is misleading - Eclipse 2018 and 2017 are in fact loaded. 2019 not so much - struggling both last summer and this past weekend and not playing the field that was at Boys Latin.
Every program has different strong ages - Superstar is leaving theirs once the strong Ridgefield teams graduate, younger ages not good (all the early HS kids now play for North). Eclipse is new as well, good owners and coaches...has promise but is not deep at all ages out of the box.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I am a north parent , one of our parents who is posting needs to stop with his arrogance / comments .Stop !

Apologies
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse 2017,2018 & 2019 went a strong 7-1-1 at Legacy. Only loss was to a strong PT 2018 6-4. Their teams are full of D1 commits. Just shows how strong lax is north of LI.


No it doesn't!

Although you did well at a tournament that doesn't necessarily show how strong you are. North 2019 running the table shows how strong they are, everything is relative!


Result is misleading - Eclipse 2018 and 2017 are in fact loaded. 2019 not so much - struggling both last summer and this past weekend and not playing the field that was at Boys Latin.
Every program has different strong ages - Superstar is leaving theirs once the strong Ridgefield teams graduate, younger ages not good (all the early HS kids now play for North). Eclipse is new as well, good owners and coaches...has promise but is not deep at all ages out of the box.


The 2017 Eclipse team is pretty much lights-out. I havent seen a better 2017 team anywhere so far. Eclipse 2018 strong as well, and also improving (not to mention they were missing two of their studs this past weekend too). I know 2019 has made number of changes from last year, and should be much improved this year given a few of their additions....2019 was 2-0-1 last weekend (albeit not against the same top-10 level competition that was down at BL), and the one tie was their first game of the day.....not bad for a team that I dont think has had a single practice together this fall, and had several newcomers. For the 2019 age group in CT/WChst, the talent is pretty evenly spread around between Eclipse, Chargers, and LIE N, so all three of those teams are strong, but not sure any of the 3 would be viewed as dominant at the top national level. LIE N may have the first 2019 commit (and to a great school at that), but both Chargers and Eclipse have kids of that same level talent that are getting similar early d1 interest.

And really, at the end of the day, does it matter to anyone other than SOME of the players Dads' who wins a 2-goal game? I would bet you that the Ivy and NESCAC coaches I saw on the sidelines of the games last weekend in MA couldnt tell you today who won the Eclipse/PT 2018 game or the Eclipse/Team11 2019 game. I want my kid to play on a team where he gets good coaching (club doesnt just focus on their 3 studs per class) to improve his game, goes to the right tournaments to get exposure to good competition and maybe a look from a few college coaches, has a coach who can advocate for him when he needs it with a college coach or an individual showcase director, and most importantly, a team where he actually enjoys playing with his teammates. My $.02 anyway.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Amen...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse 2017,2018 & 2019 went a strong 7-1-1 at Legacy. Only loss was to a strong PT 2018 6-4. Their teams are full of D1 commits. Just shows how strong lax is north of LI.


No it doesn't!

Although you did well at a tournament that doesn't necessarily show how strong you are. North 2019 running the table shows how strong they are, everything is relative!


Result is misleading - Eclipse 2018 and 2017 are in fact loaded. 2019 not so much - struggling both last summer and this past weekend and not playing the field that was at Boys Latin.
Every program has different strong ages - Superstar is leaving theirs once the strong Ridgefield teams graduate, younger ages not good (all the early HS kids now play for North). Eclipse is new as well, good owners and coaches...has promise but is not deep at all ages out of the box.


The 2017 Eclipse team is pretty much lights-out. I havent seen a better 2017 team anywhere so far. Eclipse 2018 strong as well, and also improving (not to mention they were missing two of their studs this past weekend too). I know 2019 has made number of changes from last year, and should be much improved this year given a few of their additions....2019 was 2-0-1 last weekend (albeit not against the same top-10 level competition that was down at BL), and the one tie was their first game of the day.....not bad for a team that I dont think has had a single practice together this fall, and had several newcomers. For the 2019 age group in CT/WChst, the talent is pretty evenly spread around between Eclipse, Chargers, and LIE N, so all three of those teams are strong, but not sure any of the 3 would be viewed as dominant at the top national level. LIE N may have the first 2019 commit (and to a great school at that), but both Chargers and Eclipse have kids of that same level talent that are getting similar early d1 interest.

And really, at the end of the day, does it matter to anyone other than SOME of the players Dads' who wins a 2-goal game? I would bet you that the Ivy and NESCAC coaches I saw on the sidelines of the games last weekend in MA couldnt tell you today who won the Eclipse/PT 2018 game or the Eclipse/Team11 2019 game. I want my kid to play on a team where he gets good coaching (club doesnt just focus on their 3 studs per class) to improve his game, goes to the right tournaments to get exposure to good competition and maybe a look from a few college coaches, has a coach who can advocate for him when he needs it with a college coach or an individual showcase director, and most importantly, a team where he actually enjoys playing with his teammates. My $.02 anyway.


I agree and disagree. I agree the talent may not have been as high in Ma. But I do think the college coaches absolutely took notice at some of the team's playing and winning. was great tournament and fit a nice for both clubs and coaches.i
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse 2019tied a LI Express B team plus the 17s are the old chargers kids my $.02
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse dad, I think you may be a bit blinded by the beautiful landscaping in New Canaan. In my opinion - In 2019, Chargers are a shell of their former self. Eclipse is a good team but not even close to Express North. I wouldn't go pounding your chest about tying LIE B team, beating Laxucheuttes C team and winning 5-4 over a team thrown together for the tournament(Team 11). Eclipse are similiar to Predators at 2019. Some elite players, some good players with great coaching. In 2018 - Prime Time and Express North are superior. In 2017, Eclipse and Predators are best of bunch in CT and Westchester. Good luck to everyone this weekend in PA, MA and MD.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse dad, I think you may be a bit blinded by the beautiful landscaping in New Canaan. In my opinion - In 2019, Chargers are a shell of their former self. Eclipse is a good team but not even close to Express North. I wouldn't go pounding your chest about tying LIE B team, beating Laxucheuttes C team and winning 5-4 over a team thrown together for the tournament(Team 11). Eclipse are similiar to Predators at 2019. Some elite players, some good players with great coaching. In 2018 - Prime Time and Express North are superior. In 2017, Eclipse and Predators are best of bunch in CT and Westchester. Good luck to everyone this weekend in PA, MA and MD.


I guess thats why they play the games...we will see who can hang and who cant. Would be surprised if Chargers 2019 are a "shell" given a few of their studs that as far as I know are still there, but I haven't seen them play in a while.

And for the record there was no "chest pounding" about the teams that Eclipse 2019 beat this weekend. Clearly stated before that the competition at 2019 was watered down vs the other grades. Although that didnt stop Deluca from watching the Eclipse/Team11 2019 game pretty much all the way thru.......must have been something he was interested in from either these "not top tier" or "thrown together" teams. Given the choice, I think i'd rather have Harvard watching my kid play in MA, than Maryland or Denver watching somewhere else.

And thank you, the view is beautiful here this time of year smile
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The key to all these relatively local programs is can they build behind good early success. Will take a while but folks have to be patient as most of these programs do, as others have said, have great coaching / contacts etc..

Eclipse has loaded 17 and 18 teams as New Canaan / Darien great at those ages.

Express North followed the success of the 18s with the 19s now.

Primetime, while not new, does have loaded 18s and up. Can the repeat the success at younger ages?

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
primetime doesnt even have a 4th grade team this year - they have killed their reputation in the john jay nhood, all the kids are going to express
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Prime Time did in fact select a fourth grade team from their tryouts. As for the reputation in the John Jay community they still have plenty of boys on their rosters from John Jay. Good for Prime Time taking the best players instead of being politically correct in taking inferior playears just because they love in the John Jay community.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT does have a 4th grade team this year. You are not informed. Full roster set. They are just not playing Fall.

Across a variety of ages, PT is also drawing more from other towns including Greenwich, Wilton, etc.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
well you can call it politically incorect all you want- but when you have used the john jay fields for free all these years and president of JJYL signs off on it, and then cut john jay kids , especially after they have played for 2-3,4 yaers , i would say that is morally disgusting- what has PT done for jjyl? free tryouts? no, freee clinics? no. just take take take - but lets get back to 2024- PT 2024 had 14 kids at each tryout and a good portion of them left for express north. a few are playing in Greenwich, so if they do have a 4th grade team, i am betting it one that will not be competitive or probably filled with 3rd graders.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
even more politically incorrect is that the director of PT is now on the youth lacrosse board. fact is , that area is a political nightmare for youth lacrosse and it all stems from the awful reputation of people that do not look out for the boys in the community
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
great stuff- my son played on PT 2023 last year - we got destroyed every single game, we even got beat by town teams, talent below 2022 is going somewhere else, not sure where
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
great stuff- my son played on PT 2023 last year - we got destroyed every single game, we even got beat by town teams, talent below 2022 is going somewhere else, not sure where
my son played for PT 2023 last year as well. Yes we got destroyed but I can tell you that all of the area teams in that age group did not do well. Prime Time and other local teams played in some talented brackets in some tough tournaments. My point is there are to many teams in a small area and the talent in watered down. Each team will have some serious holes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
pulling from Greenwich because of Bulkey. Hiring the Greenwich Coach was very smart. Daniello is always thinking about his brand. Only mistake is he keeps to many inferior JJ kids during youth years. These kids go elsewhere and helping other organizations, ie: North, 3d select, Eclipse and so on.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
JJ parents don't know how good they have it with Daniello. Without PT JJ lax would be brutal. They are always the bottom of the CONNY league
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
thats because - he needs those jj youth kids to pay the freight and then when he doesnt need them he throws them off the very fields that their parents pay taxes for,. i dont blame daniello , i blame past(EL) and the present president (FM) of jjyl. FM was begging kids to play PT this year , suggesting that Daniello really cared about the jj kids. what a crock. its all about the money- lets just be honest.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
thats a pretty stupid comment? what has daniello done for jjyl? u just said they are always at the bottom of the conny league? if he is so great, then why isnt jjyl better than the bottom? what has Primetime done for JJYL? absolutely nothing except charge high prices for useless programs while getting the facilities for free .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Bottom line if JJ kids are good then they won't get thrown off the team. PT is a travel program that boys have to tryout for, it is not a JJ town team that everyone makes and play. It is not fair to the boys who are better then the rest and don't get a spot on the team just because they are not from JJ. Parents should always remind themselves that competitive lacroose involves cuts to a roster.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
i completely agree with that above comment- its a travel team and the goal of that team is to win with the best players - what i am saying is that , PT should pay back the youth organization with free clinics, through out the year for the use of the free fields. Daniello should be working closely with the youth programs in order to help out the overall talent.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse dad, I think you may be a bit blinded by the beautiful landscaping in New Canaan. In my opinion - In 2019, Chargers are a shell of their former self. Eclipse is a good team but not even close to Express North. I wouldn't go pounding your chest about tying LIE B team, beating Laxucheuttes C team and winning 5-4 over a team thrown together for the tournament(Team 11). Eclipse are similiar to Predators at 2019. Some elite players, some good players with great coaching. In 2018 - Prime Time and Express North are superior. In 2017, Eclipse and Predators are best of bunch in CT and Westchester. Good luck to everyone this weekend in PA, MA and MD.


Prime Time came in 3rd in Ma and you're calling them superior. You are giving the teams that beat them to much credit. LB3 where are they from? and Outlaws are they strictly LI kids? or does Select mean they are pulling from all over the eastern seaboard like the rest do? Chargers a shell? I am sure they will have some players back every once in a while. For now lets just Say EN, then leave some room for everyone else; Eclipse, Predators (since they dint lose this weekend) then Prime-Time.

Predators 2017 didn't they have some talented 2018 on it? Are they a Jersey Rockland group? 2017 eclipse do they have "older" players?

A good question might be when will Westchester have an elite tournament or showcase, then and only then will you show the rest of the areas you have multiple elite teams and can be a hot bed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse dad, I think you may be a bit blinded by the beautiful landscaping in New Canaan. In my opinion - In 2019, Chargers are a shell of their former self. Eclipse is a good team but not even close to Express North. I wouldn't go pounding your chest about tying LIE B team, beating Laxucheuttes C team and winning 5-4 over a team thrown together for the tournament(Team 11). Eclipse are similiar to Predators at 2019. Some elite players, some good players with great coaching. In 2018 - Prime Time and Express North are superior. In 2017, Eclipse and Predators are best of bunch in CT and Westchester. Good luck to everyone this weekend in PA, MA and MD.


Prime Time came in 3rd in Ma and you're calling them superior. You are giving the teams that beat them to much credit. LB3 where are they from? and Outlaws are they strictly LI kids? or does Select mean they are pulling from all over the eastern seaboard like the rest do? Chargers a shell? I am sure they will have some players back every once in a while. For now lets just Say EN, then leave some room for everyone else; Eclipse, Predators (since they dint lose this weekend) then Prime-Time.

Predators 2017 didn't they have some talented 2018 on it? Are they a Jersey Rockland group? 2017 eclipse do they have "older" players?

A good question might be when will Westchester have an elite tournament or showcase, then and only then will you show the rest of the areas you have multiple elite teams and can be a hot bed.


for the record not saying you're not a hot bed just hate the turnpike. Wouldn't mind a trip to Westchester instead
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse dad, I think you may be a bit blinded by the beautiful landscaping in New Canaan. In my opinion - In 2019, Chargers are a shell of their former self. Eclipse is a good team but not even close to Express North. I wouldn't go pounding your chest about tying LIE B team, beating Laxucheuttes C team and winning 5-4 over a team thrown together for the tournament(Team 11). Eclipse are similiar to Predators at 2019. Some elite players, some good players with great coaching. In 2018 - Prime Time and Express North are superior. In 2017, Eclipse and Predators are best of bunch in CT and Westchester. Good luck to everyone this weekend in PA, MA and MD.


Prime Time came in 3rd in Ma and you're calling them superior. You are giving the teams that beat them to much credit. LB3 where are they from? and Outlaws are they strictly LI kids? or does Select mean they are pulling from all over the eastern seaboard like the rest do? Chargers a shell? I am sure they will have some players back every once in a while. For now lets just Say EN, then leave some room for everyone else; Eclipse, Predators (since they dint lose this weekend) then Prime-Time.

Predators 2017 didn't they have some talented 2018 on it? Are they a Jersey Rockland group? 2017 eclipse do they have "older" players?

A good question might be when will Westchester have an elite tournament or showcase, then and only then will you show the rest of the areas you have multiple elite teams and can be a hot bed.


Predators draws primarily from (lower) Westchester. Don't know of anyone from outside, but could be mistaken. Their 2017 team were all 2017s last year and same this year. Predators 2017-19 will be playing in their first tournament at Harvard this weekend. The schedule is posted. There are only a few games with local or LI teams. 2018 plays 3d Tristate and 2017 plays LI Sting and 3d Tristate. Would agree that Preds 2017 is top team along with 2017 Eclipse in WC/CT area. Preds 2017 won NXT Philly Summmer invitational and Adrenaline Summer invitational last year. Know many of the kids on Eclipse 2017. They are stacked! Preds 2018/19 teams have some elite players, but teams are probably not best in area. Will know more this weekend. Would love to see them play other local teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
i completely agree with that above comment- its a travel team and the goal of that team is to win with the best players - what i am saying is that , PT should pay back the youth organization with free clinics, through out the year for the use of the free fields. Daniello should be working closely with the youth programs in order to help out the overall talent.


and why should PT pay the youth organization. Isnt it school field not youth fields, I could be wrong. Maybe the school district shuld see the $$ but definitely not the youth organization.

what you are imply goes down the worst of roads.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
First. Off. Jjyl was signing an affidavit every year implying that pt was an extension of the youth program in order to gain access to fields that would not be normally be available to a "for profit " organization. And in term
S of payment. Well it doesn't have to be in the form of money. It could be instruction, clinics, maybe drop tryout fee for residents. Etc.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
First. Off. Jjyl was signing an affidavit every year implying that pt was an extension of the youth program in order to gain access to fields that would not be normally be available to a "for profit " organization. And in term
S of payment. Well it doesn't have to be in the form of money. It could be instruction, clinics, maybe drop tryout fee for residents. Etc.


And again your wrong. The field use is for July not for a profit to use as an extension. The $$ or any good will goes to school district pretty cut and dry in NYS. Looks like the more you push the more JJKL school district can even revolk the youth organization from using school field.

Now insurance is a separate issue. I am sure Prime Time has their own.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Daniello personally coached the 2020 team in JJYL last season and helped make a weak team much better. He also gets other coaches to help out. What more do you want, his blood. You JJ parents are nuts.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
First. Off. Jjyl was signing an affidavit every year implying that pt was an extension of the youth program in order to gain access to fields that would not be normally be available to a "for profit " organization. And in term
S of payment. Well it doesn't have to be in the form of money. It could be instruction, clinics, maybe drop tryout fee for residents. Etc.


And again your wrong. The field use is for July not for a profit to use as an extension. The $$ or any good will goes to school district pretty cut and dry in NYS. Looks like the more you push the more JJKL school district can even revolk the youth organization from using school field.

Now insurance is a separate issue. I am sure Prime Time has their own.


JJKL not July
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Does it really matter where it goes. Bottom line is pt wasn't paying for the fields at all. They were getting them for free.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
does tri state 91 have any committed kids yet?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Does it really matter where it goes. Bottom line is pt wasn't paying for the fields at all. They were getting them for free.


I think you are mistaken, The issue as I see it isn't they got the field for free the issue is JJYL cant broker the fields as they wish then expect something in return. Quid pro quo
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
i agree - jjyl should be in trouble as well - well that is why PT is no longer using school fields - point really was that PT was taking advantage of teh system and jjyl was helping them, they are both wrong - only difference is that PT is making money and technically JJYL is non profit, or so they say
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
best part is that daniello was giving 2k a year to the jj booster club to keep everyone quiet and when people started complaining, he stopped giving the money
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It's not like JJYL or any JJ school teams got thrown off school fields so PT could use them. It is coming off like sour grapes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It's not like JJYL or any JJ school teams got thrown off school fields so PT could use them. It is coming off like sour grapes.


exactly, pay a nominal fee for the use of the fields. do not be forced to take a certain amount of JJ kids, but offer clinics and camps and before you know it it will be a power house again.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It's not like JJYL or any JJ school teams got thrown off school fields so PT could use them. It is coming off like sour grapes.


exactly, pay a nominal fee for the use of the fields. do not be forced to take a certain amount of JJ kids, but offer clinics and camps and before you know it it will be a power house again.


This. Most municipal entities will give priority to local non-profit sports leagues that show that their participants are all, or nearly all, residents of the community. These organizations will get free use of the field. With whatever field use is left over, they will charge surprisingly low fees for organizations with outside membership.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yikes, talk about beating a dead horse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
good test for express 2024 tomorrow. outlaws and igloo down at princeton.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Igloo 6. Express north 3. Express north was missing some real firepower today I am told. Not too bad
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Igloo 6. Express north 3. Express north was missing some real firepower today I am told. Not too bad


And then got mauled by outlaws 11-2. Not a great day
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Igloo 6. Express north 3. Express north was missing some real firepower today I am told. Not too bad


And then got mauled by outlaws 11-2. Not a great day


4th grade? Sure, better panic about their quality of play. Nut jobs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I don't see any westchester 4th grade team coming close. Express north was missing 2/3 of their starting attack And a few more players. Starting goalie left after the 3rd game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
There's the angry PT guy very consistent.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Stop I am not angry just telling it like it is PT is the #1 organization north of Long Island and the 2nd best organization isn't close to us. We beat everyone in the area #1.

Happy PT parent
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That may have been true. And true for some teams. But clearly that is changing at a rapid pace. Especially at the younger ages
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Stop I am not angry just telling it like it is PT is the #1 organization north of Long Island and the 2nd best organization isn't close to us. We beat everyone in the area #1.

Happy PT parent


You don't think Express North is up there? I find that hard to believe, their 2018 just as good if not better than PT and the 2019 team far exceeds PT 2019. As far as the younger grades, it's a crapshoot for both organization.

I'm glad your happy with your program but let's not be delusional.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Things in Westchester/CT are changing very quickly. Every club will stumble in a given age/class.

To a certain extent this is a good thing. More/better competition helps the development of all the kids. But there is a point of saturation at which it all becomes watered down. You'll know that time has arrived when clubs merge and/or buy each other.

The clubs which can consistently add value will flourish. That includes quality instruction (first and foremost), scheduling, recruitment, and player promotion (college commitment). The clubs that just roll a ball out there and let the kids play will eventually fade away.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Unfortunately it's all our opinions, but PT has been on top since knocking Superstars off the perch years ago. Each organization may have a strong team at a certain age but PT overall is #1 north of LI. This summer will hopefully clear things up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
so - what i find really intersting and i heard this first hand- Daniello approached Roy Colsey and tries to merge the 2 organizations. Colsey told him no.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I bet that has a lot to do about the American Lacrosse Academy and also 2 teams per age group equals more money. Remember he quit his day job (attorney) to do PT full time. Now that he has to pay for fields he may be regretting that move.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Top teams north of LI

2016 -

Best team Primetime ever assembled.

2017 -
1 - Eclipse
2 - Primetime

2018 -
1 - Primetime
2 - Eclipse
3 - North

2019 -
1 - LIE North
2 - Eclipse

2020 -
1 - LIE North

2021 -
1 - Eclipse
2 - LIE North
3 - 2

2022 -
1 - Primetime
2 - North
3 - 91 tri-state
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Preds 2017 beat PT 2017 at Tristate two years ago, wasn't even close. Teams do change year to year and I will acknowledge PT team is good, but don't see how you can say PT is better than Preds 2017 based upon PT's 2014 loss to Preds and Pred's body of work in summer of 2015: Preds 2017 won the 2015 NXT (also attended by PT) and Adrenaline Summer Invitationals. Of course until they play this is all conjecture. Perhaps next summer they will.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
only one man's opinion. feel free to change or put your own view up for all to see. This was more to start a dialogue and see how other teams are doing. nothing would make me feel better than seeing this area kick Long Island butt.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT 2017 marginal at best
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Top teams north of LI

2016 -

Best team Primetime ever assembled.

2017 -
1 - Eclipse
2 - Primetime

2018 -
1 - Primetime
2 - Eclipse
3 - North

2019 -
1 - LIE North
2 - Eclipse

2020 -
1 - LIE North

2021 -
1 - Eclipse
2 - LIE North
3 - 2

2022 -
1 - Primetime
2 - North
3 - 91 tri-state


Primetime should be 1 or 2 in 2021 division. 2018- Express North should be higher. 2019 Express North is clearly the class of the region. 2020, no qualms
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
We will get an early read on many of the younger teams as I think lie north, predators, primetime and chargers are playing at Yale this weekend.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How did Westchester teams do at Harvard Crimson tourney last weekend?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Now this is a good post. Seems pretty solid though arguments can be made up and and down the line. Wish 2023 was included. Yale should help solidify this list. Though, really, we all know this area really needs a local tourney for these local teams to battle it out. Frustrating how team directors are so worried to play one another for fear of losing. They won't even scrimmage. Nuts to travel to Harvard when so many to face are within 30 minutes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Good news for 2021

Primetime vs. LIE North at Yale on Saturday.

We will find out who is #1 in Westchester.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now this is a good post. Seems pretty solid though arguments can be made up and and down the line. Wish 2023 was included. Yale should help solidify this list. Though, really, we all know this area really needs a local tourney for these local teams to battle it out. Frustrating how team directors are so worried to play one another for fear of losing. They won't even scrimmage. Nuts to travel to Harvard when so many to face are within 30 minutes.


get used to it, LI team rarely played each other when they were younger
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Also Prime Time 2023/2022 vs LI North 2022 at Yale this Saturday.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
They do not have LIE North in that division. The schedule I am looking at has #D Tri Stare, Necks 2021 & Primetime. They have LIE Express in Blue North
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The most up to date schedule is now posted on the Yale Bulldog website. Both PT 2021 and 2023/2022 teams are playing LI North
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2021 Yellow North PT and LI North. 2022 Brown North 2023/2022 PT and LI North. Both play each other.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This is great stuff. Two men that are doing a great job in Westchester Daniello & Schreiber. Let's see who comes out on top. A lot of these kids know each other and it should be two fun games. It's what sports is all about competition, rivalries and friendship.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This is great stuff. Two men that are doing a great job in Westchester Daniello & Schreiber. Let's see who comes out on top. A lot of these kids know each other and it should be two fun games. It's what sports is all about competition, rivalries and friendship.


Great post! Some may play school ball together many will play some region events together. Keep the rivalry and competition lively but make sure the friendships run deep!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Why is Express 2020 playing in the B division at Yale? I thought they were an A team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why is Express 2020 playing in the B division at Yale? I thought they were an A team.


No chance of winning and putting a pic on the wbsite
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why is Express 2020 playing in the B division at Yale? I thought they were an A team.


There are several teams in divisions that they don't belong in. This is going to be a trainwreck.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Problem is there are no A divisions at Yale. It has become a "B" level tournament.
Express North & Primetime should wipe up the competition.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Problem is there are no A divisions at Yale. It has become a "B" level tournament.
Express North & Primetime should wipe up the competition.



You could probably say the same for most of the fall tourneys. And rightly so. Kids have other sports to play.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
3d NE was very good over the summer
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Score from express north 2024 vs 91?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How did the Westchester & CT youth teams do today at the Yale tournament? I am especially interested to hear how the better Westchester & CT 2020, 2021 & 2022 teams did (such as Primetime, Predators, 3D Tristate, LIE North and Chargers). Thanks in advance for any updates.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express North 2020 went 4-0
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Below is a bunch scores noted from the board at Yale:

2020s:
PT beat 3D Tristate 9-2
TGNecks beat PT 7-1
91 Crush beat Chargers 16-1
Express N beat Superstar 8-2
91 Crush beat Preds 13-1
91 Crush beat NH tomahawks 6-3


2021s:
2way beat 3D NE 4-0
PT beat TG Necks 12-1
PT beat Express N 11-1
2way tie Preds 1-1
PT beat 91 Ambush 6-3
Express N beat TG Necks 6-3
91 Anbush beat Express N 6-3
Express N beat TG necks 6-3

2022s:
2way beat Preds 2-1
3D NE beat Preds 5-3
Superstar beat 2way 9-4
PT 22/23 beat 3D tristate 6-1
Superstar beat Preds 7-0
3D NE beat 2way 8-1
PT 22/23 beat Express N 5-3
Express N beat TG necks 7-1
TG Necks beat 3D tristate 8-3





Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -

Prime Time 2023/2022 went 4-0 won their bracket (Beat LI North 5-3)
Prime Time 2021 went 4-0 won their bracket (Beat LI North 11-1)
PT 2020 went 2-2
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Below is a bunch scores noted from the board at Yale:

2020s:
PT beat 3D Tristate 4-2
TGNecks beat PT 7-1
91 Crush beat Chargers 16-1
Express N beat Superstar 8-2
91 Crush beat Preds 13-1
91 Crush beat NH tomahawks 6-3




Fixed the PT v 3d TS score. 2020 PT, 3d, and Preds are all evenly matched.

At Yale, Tomahawks were the class of their bracket eventually losing to Crush in the final. Gave the Crush a decent game and not the usual 'walk over' to which Crush are accustomed. Congrats to them.

PT beat 3d, 3d beat the 'Necks, and the 'Necks beat PT. Rankings went down to goals allowed which resulted in... 2nd-Necks, 3rd-3d, 4th-PT. Good competition all day.

3d and Preds played at Harvard with 3d winning by one goal. Again, very evenly matched. Could go either way. So you have three teams who have faced off against each other and the games have been roughly even.

The Express North was placed, or choose to participate, in the lower bracket at Yale so it is very difficult to determine where they fit. They did win two tourneys on LI with relative ease, but those were primarily against town teams so the jury is still out. Similarly we don't really know much about Eclipse although they were invited to Denver last year. Hopefully they will add even more to the mix.

2020 in Westchester/CT is and will continue to be very competitive and I'm sure they all will win and lose to each other because I don't see any team with 'all the pieces'.

Potentially there are as many as five teams that can play with each other. That is great for the development of the kids as long as the teams don't dodge each other like some teams on LI do.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse 2021 is a strong team. Lost to icon today 5-4 in the championship round at a Maryland tournament. These two teams had beaten the crabs and edge in the playoffs to get to the finals. Eclipse had also beaten icon earlier in the day. Primetime and eclipse will definitely challenge Long Island for spots at the World Series tournament.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT 22/23 was in lower bracket so tough to say how good there 22 team is. It is the fall so who really cares who did what, many kids missing in Fall tourneys.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
True, I watched some 2022 games and I could say that PT 22 is going to have a good summer. They basically won very handily all the games at Yale despite having a team with about 40% of 2023 kids and 1 2024 on it. The younger PT teams look like they are improved from last year. LI North played very well also, giving PT a good game. quote=Anonymous]PT 22/23 was in lower bracket so tough to say how good there 22 team is. It is the fall so who really cares who did what, many kids missing in Fall tourneys. [/quote]
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Superstar 2022 easily in top 3
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How did Preds 2023 do at Yale?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How did Preds 2023 do at Yale?
If I am not mistaken they made it to the finals but lost big to Team 91.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express north beat crabs and dukes this summer.


Express North 2019 beat Edge, Crabs, Sweetlax..... time to gel? They are a top 3 2019 team in the country.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Wow props to Schreiber. Great wins and I agree they are definitely a top team in the country
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse got eclipsed
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express north beat crabs and dukes this summer.


Express North 2019 beat Edge, Crabs, Sweetlax..... time to gel? They are a top 3 2019 team in the country.


I saw the LI Express North 2019 game vs Sweatlax a few weekends ago and it made me question the entire early recruiting process. How can Sweatlax have 8...9...10? kids committed to big D1 programs and I don't think LIE North has a single kid committed yet. Express North was the better team up and down the field and could have won by 3-4 goals if they didn't slow the play down. It's a mystery.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express north beat crabs and dukes this summer.


Express North 2019 beat Edge, Crabs, Sweetlax..... time to gel? They are a top 3 2019 team in the country.


Its because they actually play like a team, and not like a bunch of kids just showing off how good their "split dodge/shoot on the run" showcase game is to college coaches. Its kinda nice to watch. Having a few notable 16 yo hold-backs doesnt hurt either (altho their predominantly age-appropriate D is pretty damn good). The LIE-N draw was really weak this past weekend tho (not their fault).

After watching a number of games this weekend, the matchup I would like to see is LIE-N vs Laxachusetts. That Laxa team is just downright nasty.

.....and no, im not an express parent....actually my kid plays on one of the LIE-N "local competitors". I'm just secure enough about myself (and my son) to not be afraid to praise other teams. Our team didnt win all our games this weekend in Philly, but there were multiple high-level D1 coaches on the sideline of EVERY game we played. So if your kid played well in a game or two in Philly this weekend, I guarantee that at least a few coaches noticed, even if your team lost. And I think thats why we bother paying the $$ and schlepping to PA, right?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wow props to Schreiber. Great wins and I agree they are definitely a top team in the country


Good man and coach. He has done wonders with that team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
In a time where many clubs are more focused on primarily recruiting great players to their program as a means to fielding a great team, CS actually develops a lot of good players into better players and takes ok teams and makes them into highly competitive teams. That is a great experience for a kid willing to put in the work. CS deserves a lot of credit for actually developing young players and building teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
CS recruits as hard as anyone else so let's not make him a saint. Nothing wrong with trying to make your team stronger. As said CS is doing a great job. He recruits for all grades to make Express North as strong as they can be. Once people realize he has as many connections if not more than PT and other clubs he will get even stronger.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express north beat crabs and dukes this summer.


Express North 2019 beat Edge, Crabs, Sweetlax..... time to gel? They are a top 3 2019 team in the country.


Its because they actually play like a team, and not like a bunch of kids just showing off how good their "split dodge/shoot on the run" showcase game is to college coaches. Its kinda nice to watch. Having a few notable 16 yo hold-backs doesnt hurt either (altho their predominantly age-appropriate D is pretty damn good). The LIE-N draw was really weak this past weekend tho (not their fault).

After watching a number of games this weekend, the matchup I would like to see is LIE-N vs Laxachusetts. That Laxa team is just downright nasty.

.....and no, im not an express parent....actually my kid plays on one of the LIE-N "local competitors". I'm just secure enough about myself (and my son) to not be afraid to praise other teams. Our team didnt win all our games this weekend in Philly, but there were multiple high-level D1 coaches on the sideline of EVERY game we played. So if your kid played well in a game or two in Philly this weekend, I guarantee that at least a few coaches noticed, even if your team lost. And I think thats why we bother paying the $$ and schlepping to PA, right?


We (I am an LIE North Dad) beat Laxachusetts this past summer and it was a battle. I think the team does so well is because they do actually play like a team. I noticed the other LI Express 2019 team has a few ball hogs and once the opponent figures out they are not passing, they get shut down and its why they lose. Some kids are showcase trained and do put on a good show, but is that what a college coach wants? I tell my son to play the game the right way regardless of who is watching.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express north beat crabs and dukes this summer.


Express North 2019 beat Edge, Crabs, Sweetlax..... time to gel? They are a top 3 2019 team in the country.


Its because they actually play like a team, and not like a bunch of kids just showing off how good their "split dodge/shoot on the run" showcase game is to college coaches. Its kinda nice to watch. Having a few notable 16 yo hold-backs doesnt hurt either (altho their predominantly age-appropriate D is pretty damn good). The LIE-N draw was really weak this past weekend tho (not their fault).

After watching a number of games this weekend, the matchup I would like to see is LIE-N vs Laxachusetts. That Laxa team is just downright nasty.

.....and no, im not an express parent....actually my kid plays on one of the LIE-N "local competitors". I'm just secure enough about myself (and my son) to not be afraid to praise other teams. Our team didnt win all our games this weekend in Philly, but there were multiple high-level D1 coaches on the sideline of EVERY game we played. So if your kid played well in a game or two in Philly this weekend, I guarantee that at least a few coaches noticed, even if your team lost. And I think thats why we bother paying the $$ and schlepping to PA, right?


We (I am an LIE North Dad) beat Laxachusetts this past summer and it was a battle. I think the team does so well is because they do actually play like a team. I noticed the other LI Express 2019 team has a few ball hogs and once the opponent figures out they are not passing, they get shut down and its why they lose. Some kids are showcase trained and do put on a good show, but is that what a college coach wants? I tell my son to play the game the right way regardless of who is watching.


I watched many teams, as long as Laxa is in the 2019 division they will win. I think they are the new "Edge" for the spring 2016.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express north beat crabs and dukes this summer.


Express North 2019 beat Edge, Crabs, Sweetlax..... time to gel? They are a top 3 2019 team in the country.


Its because they actually play like a team, and not like a bunch of kids just showing off how good their "split dodge/shoot on the run" showcase game is to college coaches. Its kinda nice to watch. Having a few notable 16 yo hold-backs doesnt hurt either (altho their predominantly age-appropriate D is pretty damn good). The LIE-N draw was really weak this past weekend tho (not their fault).

After watching a number of games this weekend, the matchup I would like to see is LIE-N vs Laxachusetts. That Laxa team is just downright nasty.

.....and no, im not an express parent....actually my kid plays on one of the LIE-N "local competitors". I'm just secure enough about myself (and my son) to not be afraid to praise other teams. Our team didnt win all our games this weekend in Philly, but there were multiple high-level D1 coaches on the sideline of EVERY game we played. So if your kid played well in a game or two in Philly this weekend, I guarantee that at least a few coaches noticed, even if your team lost. And I think thats why we bother paying the $$ and schlepping to PA, right?


We (I am an LIE North Dad) beat Laxachusetts this past summer and it was a battle. I think the team does so well is because they do actually play like a team. I noticed the other LI Express 2019 team has a few ball hogs and once the opponent figures out they are not passing, they get shut down and its why they lose. Some kids are showcase trained and do put on a good show, but is that what a college coach wants? I tell my son to play the game the right way regardless of who is watching.


I watched many teams, as long as Laxa is in the 2019 division they will win. I think they are the new "Edge" for the spring 2016.


When you write they are the new "Edge", are you inferring they are all older kids?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Don't forget Lourdes in Dutchess County. They are playing for the football State Championship in Class A in Syracuse. If they ever get a real lax Coach with those athletes skies the limit.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2022 - Hill

2021 - Regan

Two good coaches who need to do well today at a low level tournament.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How did 2024 Express North do today down on LI?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2022 - Hill

2021 - Regan

Two good coaches who need to do well today at a low level tournament.


How did Express North 2021 and 2022 do today?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
1-1-1. Tied oreilly. Lost to schwalje by 1
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Well done... Shows them Westchester can hang.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
[quote=Anonymous]Well done... Shows them Westchester can hang. [/quote
Ha hilarious.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Pt basher surfaces again. Must bother u a lot to consistently post. Wonder why
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pt basher surfaces again. Must bother u a lot to consistently post. Wonder why


Huh?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Where does PT come into this? Sounds like dad has some confidence issues.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Where does PT come into this? Sounds like dad has some confidence issues.


He should now that you mention it!!!! Ha ha here hee
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How did LIE North 2022 do yesterday?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pt basher surfaces again. Must bother u a lot to consistently post. Wonder why


Nah, just an LI dad trolling thinking you guys are funny. I like how the 2024 dad measures success by how little you lose by. Didn't the lose to Outlaws 11-2? yikes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pt basher surfaces again. Must bother u a lot to consistently post. Wonder why


Nah, just an LI dad trolling thinking you guys are funny. I like how the 2024 dad measures success by how little you lose by. Didn't the lose to Outlaws 11-2? yikes.


still don't get your point. Glad you get it and hope it has made you feel better. Whatever it is you are saying, I agree!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This thread is too quiet.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
who is coaching primetime 2024 this year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Will Yorktown own the Section once again this year?

I know they graduated a lot of players, who's stepping in to fill the void?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What is the best winter lax training (for middle school aged attackmen) in westchester and Connecticut? Looking for ideas for next winter. Thanks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is the best winter lax training (for middle school aged attackmen) in westchester and Connecticut? Looking for ideas for next winter. Thanks.


Go to Long Island
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I think John Jay, Pleasantville, Fox Lane, Rye and Bronxville will be in the hunt.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown has 2 defensemen that have committed to Maryland & Notre Dame. So does that answer your question about Yorktowns supremacy.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
not really - 2 guys does not make a whole team , but congrats to those boys
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
not really - 2 guys does not make a whole team , but congrats to those boys

Yorktown's supremacy is in question this year. While they should never be counted out, it should be noted that they lost 63.8% of total point scorers last year and most of that was from the midfield. Their returning juniors (seniors this year) contributed only 6.7% of last year's total points while their returning sophomores (juniors this year) contributed 29.5%. The sophomores were both at the attack position. They will be a very young team without much, if any, scoring potential from the midfield.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I agree. Yorktown should never be counted out. I think there is more parity in Westchester now and other programs like JJ, Fox Lane, Rye, Pleasantville and Bronxville have very strong returning starters. I think depth of the line up usually tilts towards Yorktown.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
not really - 2 guys does not make a whole team , but congrats to those boys

Yorktown's supremacy is in question this year. While they should never be counted out, it should be noted that they lost 63.8% of total point scorers last year and most of that was from the midfield. Their returning juniors (seniors this year) contributed only 6.7% of last year's total points while their returning sophomores (juniors this year) contributed 29.5%. The sophomores were both at the attack position. They will be a very young team without much, if any, scoring potential from the midfield.


I think we'll be fine. Our 2014 state championship was won in a supposedly "down" year after graduating players who were considered superstars that carried the team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Well said, believe me I am not a Yorktown fan but their dominance in Section 1 has been incredible and it's not ending anytime soon. The one team that has great talent is Fox Lane, but coaching is the biggest factor in sports and winning. Marr is a great coach under a great deal of pressure to win and he continually delivers. Bronxville has been great. John Jay & Rye are very good teams but will not win as consistently as Ytown.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What happens when these great or dominant teams go into the NY State Championships. Section 3 and 8 and 11 generally come home with the hardware. Yes they are good teams, not sure about dominant or great?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Tough to compare NYS titles, since some schools bounce from A to B or B to C. However, just looking at Class B, there have been 30 champions crowned. Section 8 has 11 (Garden City with 5 and South Side, Wantagh, Lynbrook, Bethpage, Manhasset and Elmont with 1 each), Section 1 has 6 (Yorktown), Section 3 has 5 (Jamesville-DeWitt with 4 and Cortland with 1), Section 11 has 5 (Huntington and Comsewogue with 2 each and Rocky Point with 1), Section 5 has 2 (Victor and Canandaigua) and Section 4 has 1 (Corning East).

Agreed, Yorktown doesn't get much support from other Section 1 schools (Mahopac has one A title and Bronxville has one C title), but Yorktown's 7 titles (they won an "A" title when there was only a single bracket) ranks 3rd to only West Genesee (15 A titles) and Ward Melville (8 A titles).

If Yorktown isn't considered dominant or great, then I guess only West Genesee has earned that label.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Tough to compare NYS titles, since some schools bounce from A to B or B to C. However, just looking at Class B, there have been 30 champions crowned. Section 8 has 11 (Garden City with 5 and South Side, Wantagh, Lynbrook, Bethpage, Manhasset and Elmont with 1 each), Section 1 has 6 (Yorktown), Section 3 has 5 (Jamesville-DeWitt with 4 and Cortland with 1), Section 11 has 5 (Huntington and Comsewogue with 2 each and Rocky Point with 1), Section 5 has 2 (Victor and Canandaigua) and Section 4 has 1 (Corning East).

Agreed, Yorktown doesn't get much support from other Section 1 schools (Mahopac has one A title and Bronxville has one C title), but Yorktown's 7 titles (they won an "A" title when there was only a single bracket) ranks 3rd to only West Genesee (15 A titles) and Ward Melville (8 A titles).

If Yorktown isn't considered dominant or great, then I guess only West Genesee has earned that label.


Yorktown is a consistently strong program always in the hunt for a state title. The coaches are dedicated, the players are dedicated and the town is supportive. Bronxville has modeled itself after Yorktown and even hired a bunch of Yorktown alumni to coach. Section 1 will strengthen and Yorktown's dominance will be challenged which is good for all involved.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Bronxville lost the best player in the team history. They will take Sec 1 C but if they are playing the same schedule as last year, expect a tougher slate.
They seemed to wear down as the season went on playing a very good out of section opponents.
The team will need to figure the post-Grass era Offense, probably more middie focused O dodging from up top. Should repeat as Sec 1 C champs and hopefully be healthy for state run.
A - Fox, Mamo, Pac
B - Town, Rye, JJ
C - Bville, Pvillle, Bcliff
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bronxville lost the best player in the team history. They will take Sec 1 C but if they are playing the same schedule as last year, expect a tougher slate.
They seemed to wear down as the season went on playing a very good out of section opponents.
The team will need to figure the post-Grass era Offense, probably more middie focused O dodging from up top. Should repeat as Sec 1 C champs and hopefully be healthy for state run.
A - Fox, Mamo, Pac
B - Town, Rye, JJ
C - Bville, Pvillle, Bcliff


Pleasantville was the section C champs, not Bronxville.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown is for sure in, I think the mention of Bronxville, Fox Lane, John Jay, Rye etc is where the question of great teams came from.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
You are correct, my bad. Great game by Panthers, actually beat them twice, once at Bville during season. Pville has some good young players as well. No slam dunk in C this year for Broncos.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
am I crazy to think this is more Sect one talk now. if so who thinks the wizard can do in Wappingers what he did in the Valley. Lets get even crazier how about in B can Hen Hud, Somers and Eastchester make some noise. Seems there are some athletes over there not sure if lacrosse players. Same when someone earlier this month mention Lourdes having good football players who played lax could they muddy the water a bit too.

Section 1 is so diverse it is crazy not sure and dark house can come out of the mix. [lacrosse] how about Pearl River
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
A good football team doesn't necessarily mean if those kids decided to play lacrosse they would be automatically good. Look at a powerhouse football program like New Rochelle. It's not easy to just give a kid in high school a stick, no matter how good of an athlete he is, and expect him to be able to adapt to the speed and decision making being made at the top of Sec 1. Maybe in the 80's and 90's this was more plausible, but the sport has grown tremendously.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A good football team doesn't necessarily mean if those kids decided to play lacrosse they would be automatically good. Look at a powerhouse football program like New Rochelle. It's not easy to just give a kid in high school a stick, no matter how good of an athlete he is, and expect him to be able to adapt to the speed and decision making being made at the top of Sec 1. Maybe in the 80's and 90's this was more plausible, but the sport has grown tremendously.



I hear ya (So you want to rule out Lourdes Pearl River and Eastchester) but what about Wappinger's? I find it very intriguing!

Where do the catholics fall in Westchester Lax. Iona Stepinac. Ill go to your if you are a good football school it may not translate into lax for Stepinac. I almost forgot Kennedy, I guess they are hoping your football comment is correct.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Lets not forget about Pleasantville and briarcliff, that could be a great border game. When will section 1 release their schedules
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Wappingers has a solid team but the 2017 season is where they will shine and then after that it gets ugly for a few years. WWYL has been run by some dads with no lax experience to speak of. Kuczma is a very good defensive coach so they will usually be in games but offensively his talent is subpar. Arlington has always been the jewel of Dutchess County and until Wappingers beats them!!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
2016 Sec 1:
Town - very good D and in the net, offense has to emerge from new faces
Bville - lost star power but has depth, needs dodgers to emerge
Fox Lane - on paper talent looks good, game is played on field, time will tell
Pville - returning champs had sophs and frosh playing last year, should compete
JJ - Defense looks good, need more offensive options
Mamo - O talent is there for another run in A, lost Fogo, needs better goalie play
Rye - lots of young talent, might be a year away from scaring Town
Bcliff - took a big step last year, could give a Pville or Bville a game
Pac - returns top 2 offensive players, needs to reload on D
North Rockland & White Plains - offense returns, but have to shore up D to beat good teams
Pelham - some very good players, is there depth to beat top programs?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Mamaroneck lost Malas an All-American who is now at Bucknell. Very hard to replace the best finisher on the team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wappingers has a solid team but the 2017 season is where they will shine and then after that it gets ugly for a few years. WWYL has been run by some dads with no lax experience to speak of. Kuczma is a very good defensive coach so they will usually be in games but offensively his talent is subpar. Arlington has always been the jewel of Dutchess County and until Wappingers beats them!!!!
Kuczma has been coaching the boys in WWYL for the last few years and he keeps involved in the organization.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wappingers has a solid team but the 2017 season is where they will shine and then after that it gets ugly for a few years. WWYL has been run by some dads with no lax experience to speak of. Kuczma is a very good defensive coach so they will usually be in games but offensively his talent is subpar. Arlington has always been the jewel of Dutchess County and until Wappingers beats them!!!!
Kuczma has been coaching the boys in WWYL for the last few years and he keeps involved in the organization.
and here I thought TP was the talk of lax in Dutchess
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Mamo brings back 2 leading scorers from playoffs, both playing at next level. D is solid but must replace FOGO and tighten up in the cage.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Harrison was one goal away from the Class B Sect 1 finals last year. They lost their goalie and a defender but have a ton coming back. They have beaten arch-rival Rye last two years (who would have thought Harrison beating Rye in lacrosse and continuing to get crushed in football). Don't have the broad talent of Town or JJ or Fox Lane but should be in the mix for Class B.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
you cant compare TP to section 1 public schools. They are on another level. Similar to Brunswick cmpared to Darien, NC, Grennwich.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Their goalie was a key reason for last season's success. Very solid keeper play.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
you cant compare TP to section 1 public schools. They are on another level. Similar to Brunswick cmpared to Darien, NC, Grennwich.


I am just curious is the Wappingers team a blend of the 2 high schools RCK and JJ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Yes RCK & JJEF just like Lakeland/Panas, same school district. Good news the best player from last season just came back to Wappingers from TP. Maybe they have a chance of being real good.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes RCK & JJEF just like Lakeland/Panas, same school district. Good news the best player from last season just came back to Wappingers from TP. Maybe they have a chance of being real good.


Such a crock joining the school. For shame especially Lakeland Panas. Kids loose
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Congrats to the 9th grader from North Rockland who just committed to Maryland.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Oh Boy another hater, get a life and be happy fo r b people.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Congrats to the 9th grader from North Rockland who just committed to Maryland!


And thanks to those parents for allowing a freshman (what is that, 15 years old) to make a huge decision long before he is really capable of doing so. Or should I say that it was great of those parents to do the right thing for their son and make that decision for him. This is not Yale so little incentive left to actually learn something in school since the only thing that will stop him from getting to Maryland is 1) failing out; and 2) jail. Yup, he can go to college and maybe graduate and have an education in only one thing, lacrosse.. You have to dream.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Congrats to the 9th grader from North Rockland who just committed to Maryland.


And thanks to those parents for allowing a freshman (what is that, 15 years old) to make a huge decision long before he is really capable of doing so. Or should I say that it was great of those parents to do the right thing for their son and make that decision for him. This is not Yale so little incentive left to actually learn something in school since the only thing that will stop him from getting to Maryland is 1) failing out; and 2) jail. Yup, he can go to college and maybe graduate and have an education in only one thing, lacrosse. You have to dream.


Listen I am no lover of PT, I didn't see any d1 players on their 2019 team this fall. That said why bash a family and student whose choice is theirs not yours. I can't believe all of these people who say that a 14 year is not ready.

Think back when you were 14 did you know of any friends classmates driven to Go to a particular school. I know I did. I also know 2019's (true ones that are 14 yo) who have HS experience, have the academic drive, focus and yes a cache of schools they are targeting.

Once again, DAMN, it is their decision not yours. Stop trying to control other people's decisions. They must all make the best of where they go.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Your an [lacrosse]. The lacrosse network is gigantic. Good student athletes who are smart enough to network can achieve way more in life than the average bookworm who goes to to an Ivy League school for academics alone
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Congrats to the 9th grader from North Rockland who just committed to Maryland..


And thanks to those parents for allowing a freshman (what is that, 15 years old) to make a huge decision long before he is really capable of doing so. Or should I say that it was great of those parents to do the right thing for their son and make that decision for him. This is not Yale so little incentive left to actually learn something in school since the only thing that will stop him from getting to Maryland is 1) failing out; and 2) jail. Yup, he can go to college and maybe graduate and have an education in only one thing, lacrosse. You have to dream.


Listen I am no lover of PT, I didn't see any d1 players on their 2019 team this fall. That said why bash a family and student whose choice is theirs not yours. I can't believe all of these people who say that a 14 year is not ready.

Think back when you were 14 did you know of any friends classmates driven to Go to a particular school. I know I did. I also know 2019's (true ones that are 14 yo) who have HS experience, have the academic drive, focus and yes a cache of schools they are targeting.

Once again, DAMN, it is their decision not yours. Stop trying to control other people's decisions. They must all make the best of where they go.


Not trying to control anyone. Free will baby. But that's the parents will, not the kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Congrats to the 9th grader from North Rockland who just committed to Maryland. I want to know who is better than Deleted No One!!!


I'm sure that family is very pleased for good reason. Congratulations to them.

The negative reactions come as a result of the shill for Deleted Buy an ad next time. enthusiasm is one thing, shilling is another. The above post is a shill, plain and simple and this type of post is likely to get a negative reaction no matter who the subject team/director might be.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Superstar, Express North, Chargers all of have kids going to some of the best programs in the country- Hopkins Syracuse, Maryland etc.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Superstar, Express North, Chargers all of have kids going to some of the best programs in the country- Hopkins Syracuse, Maryland etc.


None of these programs compare to a program like Sweetlax. Even combined they don't match Sweetlax, maybe that's an indictment of Westchester lacrosse more than the club programs abilities to place kids.

Is anyone developing players anymore or is it all about getting them seen?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is anyone developing players anymore or is it all about getting them seen?


3d is very strong in development of players, IMO.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Superstar, Express North, Chargers all of have kids going to some of the best programs in the country- Hopkins Syracuse, Maryland etc.


None of these programs compare to a program like Sweetlax. Even combined they don't match Sweetlax, maybe that's an indictment of Westchester lacrosse more than the club programs abilities to place kids.

Is anyone developing players anymore or is it all about getting them seen?


Short answer...NO. Club programs teach split dodge, shoot for middies and attack is same. Get hands free and shoot--they don't teach how to play the game. They teach how to be seen in a prospect day environment, IMO, not one in the same.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
question for all the youth town lacrosse people in Westchester- how much does it cost to play in your town and how many games are you playing - is your town holding winter leagues, clinics etc
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Superstar, Express North, Chargers all of have kids going to some of the best programs in the country- Hopkins Syracuse, Maryland etc.


None of these programs compare to a program like Sweetlax. Even combined they don't match Sweetlax, maybe that's an indictment of Westchester lacrosse more than the club programs abilities to place kids.

Is anyone developing players anymore or is it all about getting them seen?


Short answer...NO. Club programs teach split dodge, shoot for middies and attack is same. Get hands free and shoot--they don't teach how to play the game. They teach how to be seen in a prospect day environment, IMO, not one in the same.


Sweet Lax has some good teams and some great players, don’t get me wrong, but consider that they draw from a much wider and more populated area than Westchester. Also, there are far fewer teams with whom they compete for kids. Who exactly does Sweet Lax have to compete with in Upstate NY? There are at least four or five good teams in Westchester that compete for the same top players. Sweet Lax also has kids from Long Island and Connecticut. Sweet Lax is a very different animal than the Westchester clubs and really can’t be compared to them.

Based upon an IL Recruiting Invitational Spotlight article Sweet Lax has committed kids from the following towns: Niskayuna, Victor, Pittsford, Corning, Fairport, Penn Yan, Canandaigua, Wayne, Webster and Binghamton. These towns come from counties with a total population of 2.29 million (2012). Westchester has a population of only 991,670 (2012) so of course Sweet Lax has more commits. It’s just a numbers game. But that’s not all. Don’t forget that several of their committed players come from outside Upstate New [lacrosse]. They have kids from Smithtown (NY), Manhasset (NY), Salisbury School (CT), Syosset (NY) and Walt Whitman (NY). When you draw from such a large area, it’s nothing to brag about.

My son has played for a Westchester based team for the last several years and it’s been all about skill development and team play, not just how to show off at showcases. With essentially the same players his team went from a good B team three years ago to a solid A team last year. We couldn’t be happier with the team and coaching. They are always teaching the boys how to play a better team game. So yes, there are programs out there that teach kids how to play the right way. The lack of commitments is not always a good indicator of that.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Superstar, Express North, Chargers all of have kids going to some of the best programs in the country- Hopkins Syracuse, Maryland etc.


None of these programs compare to a program like Sweetlax. Even combined they don't match Sweetlax, maybe that's an indictment of Westchester lacrosse more than the club programs abilities to place kids.

Is anyone developing players anymore or is it all about getting them seen?


Short answer...NO. Club programs teach split dodge, shoot for middies and attack is same. Get hands free and shoot--they don't teach how to play the game. They teach how to be seen in a prospect day environment, IMO, not one in the same.


Sweet Lax has some good teams and some great players, don’t get me wrong, but consider that they draw from a much wider and more populated area than Westchester. Also, there are far fewer teams with whom they compete for kids. Who exactly does Sweet Lax have to compete with in Upstate NY? There are at least four or five good teams in Westchester that compete for the same top players. Sweet Lax also has kids from Long Island and Connecticut. Sweet Lax is a very different animal than the Westchester clubs and really can’t be compared to them.

Based upon an IL Recruiting Invitational Spotlight article Sweet Lax has committed kids from the following towns: Niskayuna, Victor, Pittsford, Corning, Fairport, Penn Yan, Canandaigua, Wayne, Webster and Binghamton. These towns come from counties with a total population of 2.29 million (2012). Westchester has a population of only 991,670 (2012) so of course Sweet Lax has more commits. It’s just a numbers game. But that’s not all. Don’t forget that several of their committed players come from outside Upstate New [lacrosse]. They have kids from Smithtown (NY), Manhasset (NY), Salisbury School (CT), Syosset (NY) and Walt Whitman (NY). When you draw from such a large area, it’s nothing to brag about.

My son has played for a Westchester based team for the last several years and it’s been all about skill development and team play, not just how to show off at showcases. With essentially the same players his team went from a good B team three years ago to a solid A team last year. We couldn’t be happier with the team and coaching. They are always teaching the boys how to play a better team game. So yes, there are programs out there that teach kids how to play the right way. The lack of commitments is not always a good indicator of that.


Express North 2019 beat the loaded Sweetlax team this Fall. FWIW.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Superstar, Express North, Chargers all of have kids going to some of the best programs in the country- Hopkins Syracuse, Maryland etc.


None of these programs compare to a program like Sweetlax. Even combined they don't match Sweetlax, maybe that's an indictment of Westchester lacrosse more than the club programs abilities to place kids.

Is anyone developing players anymore or is it all about getting them seen?


Short answer...NO. Club programs teach split dodge, shoot for middies and attack is same. Get hands free and shoot--they don't teach how to play the game. They teach how to be seen in a prospect day environment, IMO, not one in the same.


Sweet Lax has some good teams and some great players, don’t get me wrong, but consider that they draw from a much wider and more populated area than Westchester. Also, there are far fewer teams with whom they compete for kids. Who exactly does Sweet Lax have to compete with in Upstate NY? There are at least four or five good teams in Westchester that compete for the same top players. Sweet Lax also has kids from Long Island and Connecticut. Sweet Lax is a very different animal than the Westchester clubs and really can’t be compared to them.

Based upon an IL Recruiting Invitational Spotlight article Sweet Lax has committed kids from the following towns: Niskayuna, Victor, Pittsford, Corning, Fairport, Penn Yan, Canandaigua, Wayne, Webster and Binghamton. These towns come from counties with a total population of 2.29 million (2012). Westchester has a population of only 991,670 (2012) so of course Sweet Lax has more commits. It’s just a numbers game. But that’s not all. Don’t forget that several of their committed players come from outside Upstate New [lacrosse]. They have kids from Smithtown (NY), Manhasset (NY), Salisbury School (CT), Syosset (NY) and Walt Whitman (NY). When you draw from such a large area, it’s nothing to brag about.

My son has played for a Westchester based team for the last several years and it’s been all about skill development and team play, not just how to show off at showcases. With essentially the same players his team went from a good B team three years ago to a solid A team last year. We couldn’t be happier with the team and coaching. They are always teaching the boys how to play a better team game. So yes, there are programs out there that teach kids how to play the right way. The lack of commitments is not always a good indicator of that.


Express North 2019 beat the loaded Sweetlax team this Fall. FWIW.


Check the only scorecard that counts. Primetime 2019 has more committed players than Express North 2019!! How could that be if Express North is beating the top teams in the country? Inept program management? Lack of connections in the lacrosse community? Sweetlax has almost the entire starting roster committed and Express North has, I believe, only one kid committed? Pathetic. If Express North is so good, why hasn't the lacrosse coaches been knocking on their door?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Superstar, Express North, Chargers all of have kids going to some of the best programs in the country- Hopkins Syracuse, Maryland etc.


None of these programs compare to a program like Sweetlax. Even combined they don't match Sweetlax, maybe that's an indictment of Westchester lacrosse more than the club programs abilities to place kids.

Is anyone developing players anymore or is it all about getting them seen?


Short answer...NO. Club programs teach split dodge, shoot for middies and attack is same. Get hands free and shoot--they don't teach how to play the game. They teach how to be seen in a prospect day environment, IMO, not one in the same.


Sweet Lax has some good teams and some great players, don’t get me wrong, but consider that they draw from a much wider and more populated area than Westchester. Also, there are far fewer teams with whom they compete for kids. Who exactly does Sweet Lax have to compete with in Upstate NY? There are at least four or five good teams in Westchester that compete for the same top players. Sweet Lax also has kids from Long Island and Connecticut. Sweet Lax is a very different animal than the Westchester clubs and really can’t be compared to them.

Based upon an IL Recruiting Invitational Spotlight article Sweet Lax has committed kids from the following towns: Niskayuna, Victor, Pittsford, Corning, Fairport, Penn Yan, Canandaigua, Wayne, Webster and Binghamton. These towns come from counties with a total population of 2.29 million (2012). Westchester has a population of only 991,670 (2012) so of course Sweet Lax has more commits. It’s just a numbers game. But that’s not all. Don’t forget that several of their committed players come from outside Upstate New [lacrosse]. They have kids from Smithtown (NY), Manhasset (NY), Salisbury School (CT), Syosset (NY) and Walt Whitman (NY). When you draw from such a large area, it’s nothing to brag about.

My son has played for a Westchester based team for the last several years and it’s been all about skill development and team play, not just how to show off at showcases. With essentially the same players his team went from a good B team three years ago to a solid A team last year. We couldn’t be happier with the team and coaching. They are always teaching the boys how to play a better team game. So yes, there are programs out there that teach kids how to play the right way. The lack of commitments is not always a good indicator of that.


Express North 2019 beat the loaded Sweetlax team this Fall. FWIW.


Check the only scorecard that counts. Primetime 2019 has more committed players than Express North 2019!! How could that be if Express North is beating the top teams in the country? Inept program management? Lack of connections in the lacrosse community? Sweetlax has almost the entire starting roster committed and Express North has, I believe, only one kid committed? Pathetic. If Express North is so good, why hasn't the lacrosse coaches been knocking on their door?


It is great many have verbaled. But it is not the end game. Let's wait and see who actually plays at the next level and where. I get it, you say your connections may be superior, and it seems they are, but will that just be a let down for the kids when they go through hs and finally in college. Or will prime time gain traction if north proves to be one and done

Curious who did prime time beat and lose to this fall. Were the commits present at all events?
.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Superstar, Express North, Chargers all of have kids going to some of the best programs in the country- Hopkins Syracuse, Maryland etc.


None of these programs compare to a program like Sweetlax. Even combined they don't match Sweetlax, maybe that's an indictment of Westchester lacrosse more than the club programs abilities to place kids.

Is anyone developing players anymore or is it all about getting them seen?


Short answer...NO. Club programs teach split dodge, shoot for middies and attack is same. Get hands free and shoot--they don't teach how to play the game. They teach how to be seen in a prospect day environment, IMO, not one in the same.


Sweet Lax has some good teams and some great players, don’t get me wrong, but consider that they draw from a much wider and more populated area than Westchester. Also, there are far fewer teams with whom they compete for kids. Who exactly does Sweet Lax have to compete with in Upstate NY? There are at least four or five good teams in Westchester that compete for the same top players. Sweet Lax also has kids from Long Island and Connecticut. Sweet Lax is a very different animal than the Westchester clubs and really can’t be compared to them.

Based upon an IL Recruiting Invitational Spotlight article Sweet Lax has committed kids from the following towns: Niskayuna, Victor, Pittsford, Corning, Fairport, Penn Yan, Canandaigua, Wayne, Webster and Binghamton. These towns come from counties with a total population of 2.29 million (2012). Westchester has a population of only 991,670 (2012) so of course Sweet Lax has more commits. It’s just a numbers game. But that’s not all. Don’t forget that several of their committed players come from outside Upstate New [lacrosse]. They have kids from Smithtown (NY), Manhasset (NY), Salisbury School (CT), Syosset (NY) and Walt Whitman (NY). When you draw from such a large area, it’s nothing to brag about.

My son has played for a Westchester based team for the last several years and it’s been all about skill development and team play, not just how to show off at showcases. With essentially the same players his team went from a good B team three years ago to a solid A team last year. We couldn’t be happier with the team and coaching. They are always teaching the boys how to play a better team game. So yes, there are programs out there that teach kids how to play the right way. The lack of commitments is not always a good indicator of that.


Express North 2019 beat the loaded Sweetlax team this Fall. FWIW.


Check the only scorecard that counts. Primetime 2019 has more committed players than Express North 2019!! How could that be if Express North is beating the top teams in the country? Inept program management? Lack of connections in the lacrosse community? Sweetlax has almost the entire starting roster committed and Express North has, I believe, only one kid committed? Pathetic. If Express North is so good, why hasn't the lacrosse coaches been knocking on their door?


The game is only over if you were hellbent on having your kid goto Maryland or Hop. (BTW, Maryland has 6 middies already in THIS class - do you not understand how hard it is going to be to get time, ever?)

Call me in 2 years - when most of the dust settles - and the IVY kids are almost done, etc.

Then, and only then, can you call scoreboard. To say North < PT after one semester of freshman year is a bit much.


Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
it looks like PT 2019 and express north 2019 each have one recruit - am I missing something
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
it looks like PT 2019 and express north 2019 each have one recruit - am I missing something


I think PT 2019 has 2 which if my math is right is 1 more than Express North 2019, inept management for Express or a difference of 1.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
i see 1 pt to Maryland, 1 express north to Michigan where is the other PT commit going
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
PT2019 goalie going to Air Force
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT2019 goalie going to Air Force


Congrats on the verbal what HS will he be playing for.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
it looks like PT 2019 and express north 2019 each have one recruit - am I missing something


I think PT 2019 has 2 which if my math is right is 1 more than Express North 2019, inept management for Express or a difference of 1.


Again, you are trying to call the game in the third inning.
How many stud players, that everyone knows if you play vs them in tourneys all the time, do Team 91, Express LI, North etc have? A whole bunch. Do you honestly think these kids dont have multiple offers, are mostly done, or in some cases are in fact done but have not been announced?

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Absolutely right why rush to commit when you have several good offers. If you commit in 9th grade that's great but the more prudent thing is to take your time and make the best choice you can. Express North & Primetime are both good organizations and glad to see them having success.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Wilton
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wilton
. Wow Wilton has a few 2019 players huh.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
They have looked good in winter ball.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
When do tryouts begin for most Varsity programs? I see many teams have scrimmages in 2 or 3 weeks, I would think the teams need to be chosen well before those games.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When do tryouts begin for most Varsity programs? I see many teams have scrimmages in 2 or 3 weeks, I would think the teams need to be chosen well before those games.


I don't think coaches can officially do anything until after March 7th when the season officially starts. That doesn't mean they don't have a good idea from last year and winter practices who will be on varsity. I would imagine some of the deeper teams may use scrimmages to determine who is on varsity. Looking forward to a good season! Its getting closer!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When do tryouts begin for most Varsity programs? I see many teams have scrimmages in 2 or 3 weeks, I would think the teams need to be chosen well before those games.


I don't think coaches can officially do anything until after March 7th when the season officially starts. That doesn't mean they don't have a good idea from last year and winter practices who will be on varsity. I would imagine some of the deeper teams may use scrimmages to determine who is on varsity. Looking forward to a good season! Its getting closer!


Each year Westchester lacrosse takes another step towards parity like on LI where 6-7 teams have a legitimate chance to win the section. I think this year we will see more teams than ever competing for the title. Its great for the game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When do tryouts begin for most Varsity programs? I see many teams have scrimmages in 2 or 3 weeks, I would think the teams need to be chosen well before those games.


I don't think coaches can officially do anything until after March 7th when the season officially starts. That doesn't mean they don't have a good idea from last year and winter practices who will be on varsity. I would imagine some of the deeper teams may use scrimmages to determine who is on varsity. Looking forward to a good season! Its getting closer!


Each year Westchester lacrosse takes another step towards parity like on LI where 6-7 teams have a legitimate chance to win the section. I think this year we will see more teams than ever competing for the title. Its great for the game.


But how long before they are on par across the board with LI. Yes Yorktown is on the crest of the wave right now, but what about the rest. Is the great white northern suburb improving at a higher rate than their southern suburban cousins?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Favorites in each section title:
A; Mamo, Fox and Pac
B; Town and maybe JJ
C; Bville or Pville
.
7 or 8 teams competing for 3 section titles; not much parity really but next level is getting more talent; Rye & Pelham in B, Briarcliff in C, and maybe White Plains & North Rockland in A.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Favorites in each section title:
A; Mamo, Fox and Pac
B; Town and maybe JJ
C; Bville or Pville
.
7 or 8 teams competing for 3 section titles; not much parity really but next level is getting more talent; Rye & Pelham in B, Briarcliff in C, and maybe White Plains & North Rockland in A.


John Jay will be a very formidable opponent for Yorktown this year. JJ was young last year and Ytown graduated a lot of very talented players. Should be a great match up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Agree

But we have heard that tune before. JJ Gotta go out and prove it!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
JJ strong on back line and in net. both teams lost offensive firepower so may see a couple of low scoring slugfests.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Agree

But we have heard that tune before. JJ Gotta go out and prove it!


We've also heard the tune "Yorktown will have a down year" But they have the best youth program in the area and they reload without missing a beat. A few years a go they lost to Nisky with a team full of All Americans, then won the NYS title when everyone said..."Yorktown will be weak". Until someone knocks them off, Marr will keep reloading and I will give them the respect they are due. We keep hearing they will be unable to score, expect to see some youngsters step up and fill the void. I've watched them do it for 15 years. Looking forward to the JJ battle but others are in the hunt as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Agree

But we have heard that tune before. JJ Gotta go out and prove it!


We've also heard the tune "Yorktown will have a down year" But they have the best youth program in the area and they reload without missing a beat. A few years a go they lost to Nisky with a team full of All Americans, then won the NYS title when everyone said..."Yorktown will be weak". Until someone knocks them off, Marr will keep reloading and I will give them the respect they are due. We keep hearing they will be unable to score, expect to see some youngsters step up and fill the void. I've watched them do it for 15 years. Looking forward to the JJ battle but others are in the hunt as well.
Just curious, how does Yorktown operate their youth program? My son is a 2020 and we never see them. (ie. CONNY, where we see RYE, JJ, Bronxville, top Ct. teams etc.) Are they just 'in-house' or travel elsewhere?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
When you look for a website for Yorktown youth lacrosse, you can't really find anything. Does one exist? If you look for a CONNY town program, they are easy to find and you can see all the other towns they have played in past years, etc.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
[quote=Anonymous]When you look for a website for Yorktown youth lacrosse, you can't really find anything. Does one exist? If you look for a CONNY town program, they are easy to find and you can see all the other towns they have played in past years, etc.

Yorktown youth lacrosse is run under the Yorktown Athletic Club umbrella. Combination of in house and travel. We are a few towns away and emulated the structure, but you need the dedicated knowledgeable coaches to teach the game correctly.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When you look for a website for Yorktown youth lacrosse, you can't really find anything. Does one exist? If you look for a CONNY town program, they are easy to find and you can see all the other towns they have played in past years, etc.



If you google "Yorktown youth lacrosse" its the first hit that comes up. Why was it so hard for you to find?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Yorktown Youth lacrosse town teams play in the Hudson Valley league with teams from Westchester that do not play in CONNY and they also play town teams from Putnam and Dutchess who are also in the Hudson Valley league.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown Youth lacrosse town teams play in the Hudson Valley league with teams from Westchester that do not play in CONNY and they also play town teams from Putnam and Dutchess who are also in the Hudson Valley league.


Yorktown youth travel teams also play against 3-4 CONNY teams each season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
I am hearing but do not know the story that Tom Palasek, MLL lizards attackman had a falling out with Roy Colsey and no longer works at the lax academy. that is unfortunate as Tommy was great with the kids and brought a level of instruction and patience I have yet to see. I do not know Roy, but he seems super abrasive and cocky and its no wonder the Super star teams can not compete with Primetime, Express North etc... does anyone know the story?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am hearing but do not know the story that Tom Palasek, MLL lizards attackman had a falling out with Roy Colsey and no longer works at the lax academy. that is unfortunate as Tommy was great with the kids and brought a level of instruction and patience I have yet to see. I do not know Roy, but he seems super abrasive and cocky and its no wonder the Super star teams can not compete with Primetime, Express North etc... does anyone know the story?


Roy is cocky and will talk to you when he has time for you!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
control freak!!! sad really. how could anyone want their child to be associated with that, I don't care how good he was in the old days
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
will Yorktown have any freshman pulled up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am hearing but do not know the story that Tom Palasek, MLL lizards attackman had a falling out with Roy Colsey and no longer works at the lax academy. that is unfortunate as Tommy was great with the kids and brought a level of instruction and patience I have yet to see. I do not know Roy, but he seems super abrasive and cocky and its no wonder the Super star teams can not compete with Primetime, Express North etc... does anyone know the story?


Roy is cocky and will talk to you when he has time for you!!!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am hearing but do not know the story that Tom Palasek, MLL lizards attackman had a falling out with Roy Colsey and no longer works at the lax academy. that is unfortunate as Tommy was great with the kids and brought a level of instruction and patience I have yet to see. I do not know Roy, but he seems super abrasive and cocky and its no wonder the Super star teams can not compete with Primetime, Express North etc... does anyone know the story?


Roy is cocky and will talk to you when he has time for you!!!


It's his way or the highway and unfortunately for him most of the good players on superstars took the highway to other teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
will Yorktown have any freshman pulled up.


We'll find out after tryouts, you just never know. If I were forced to guess, I would say 2 Freshman will make Ytown varsity.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
2 maybe 3
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am hearing but do not know the story that Tom Palasek, MLL lizards attackman had a falling out with Roy Colsey and no longer works at the lax academy. that is unfortunate as Tommy was great with the kids and brought a level of instruction and patience I have yet to see. I do not know Roy, but he seems super abrasive and cocky and its no wonder the Super star teams can not compete with Primetime, Express North etc... does anyone know the story?


Roy is cocky and will talk to you when he has time for you!!!


He will talk to you when he needs something. Love the passion, not the execution.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
really just a super abrasive man- no wonder people run for the door
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
When do Varsity tryouts start in Westchester?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When do Varsity tryouts start in Westchester?


Isnt it a NY State rule about 3/7/16 being the first day for Public schools?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I graduated the same yr as Roy - played against him in high school and in college - was considering multiple schools but decided to go the Ivy route - I realize the recruiting landscape those days are completely different from today but agree 100% on what Roy wrote. Hard work and dedication is important - for me, the only thing I would add is passion - there comes a time that when a kid wants to get better, he has to do this on his own - can't keep having a parent push him - he has to love the game and want to get better...someone told me years ago this generally starts to happen in middle school (which is when recruiting is starting up today)...crazy that I am starting to see this with my older boy who is in 7th today...I have 4 younger boys below him
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When do Varsity tryouts start in Westchester?


Isnt it a NY State rule about 3/7/16 being the first day for Public schools?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When do Varsity tryouts start in Westchester?


Isnt it a NY State rule about 3/7/16 being the first day for Public schools?
Yes, for all spring sports. But most schools have had 'optional open gyms'for lax, baseball, & softball since Jan. 1. Pretty sure coaches are mentally keeping notes before the actual try-outs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Agree

But we have heard that tune before. JJ Gotta go out and prove it!


We've also heard the tune "Yorktown will have a down year" But they have the best youth program in the area and they reload without missing a beat. A few years a go they lost to Nisky with a team full of All Americans, then won the NYS title when everyone said..."Yorktown will be weak". Until someone knocks them off, Marr will keep reloading and I will give them the respect they are due. We keep hearing they will be unable to score, expect to see some youngsters step up and fill the void. I've watched them do it for 15 years. Looking forward to the JJ battle but others are in the hunt as well.


The Ytown youth program is stellar. The key is the dedication of the people who run it. A lot of time needs to be invested and in Yorktown every kid has many opportunities to learn the game from experienced lax people. The guy running the show is a gem.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When do tryouts begin for most Varsity programs? I see many teams have scrimmages in 2 or 3 weeks, I would think the teams need to be chosen well before those games.


I don't think coaches can officially do anything until after March 7th when the season officially starts. That doesn't mean they don't have a good idea from last year and winter practices who will be on varsity. I would imagine some of the deeper teams may use scrimmages to determine who is on varsity. Looking forward to a good season! Its getting closer!


Tryouts start today, but 95% of the roster is already chosen. There may be a few bubble kids that need to fight for a spot on the team. Good luck and safe season to all players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
any changes in Bronxville?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I graduated the same yr as Roy - played against him in high school and in college - was considering multiple schools but decided to go the Ivy route - I realize the recruiting landscape those days are completely different from today but agree 100% on what Roy wrote. Hard work and dedication is important - for me, the only thing I would add is passion - there comes a time that when a kid wants to get better, he has to do this on his own - can't keep having a parent push him - he has to love the game and want to get better...someone told me years ago this generally starts to happen in middle school (which is when recruiting is starting up today)...crazy that I am starting to see this with my older boy who is in 7th today...I have 4 younger boys below him


I have 3 boys and 1 girl, my daughter is a Freshman playing D1, my oldest son is being recruited as a HS Freshman and I can tell you the recruiting landscape has changed in just the last 3-4 years and it really needs to be throttled back. My oldest son hasn't played varsity yet but he should be able to decide his future? We are being told to just commit to a school and you can change your mind later. What is that teaching our kids? We told the last two coaches he will not make a decision until after summer season at the earliest. We do not want the pressure of college recruiting to ruin his HS experience.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Lost 2 All Americans including Sec 1 All Time leading scorer, a lock down D1 defensemen, most of their scoring save for 1 Jr Mid (UNC) and also lost another Jr D1 Pole to privates.

Very good FOGO, strong in net and good LSM will keep them in games and have a couple of mids but green on attack and D poles.

time will tell...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Lost 2 All Americans including Sec 1 All Time leading scorer, a lock down D1 defensemen, most of their scoring save for 1 Jr Mid (UNC) and also lost another Jr D1 Pole to privates.

Very good FOGO, strong in net and good LSM will keep them in games and have a couple of mids but green on attack and D poles.

time will tell...


Yorktown also lost a ton of talent from the offense to graduation. Bronxville and Ytown meet up later in the season so we'll see where they shake out. I still think this could be John Jay's year to knock off Ytown. Do tryouts end tomorrow?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Lost 2 All Americans including Sec 1 All Time leading scorer, a lock down D1 defensemen, most of their scoring save for 1 Jr Mid (UNC) and also lost another Jr D1 Pole to privates.

Very good FOGO, strong in net and good LSM will keep them in games and have a couple of mids but green on attack and D poles.

time will tell...


Yorktown also lost a ton of talent from the offense to graduation. Bronxville and Ytown meet up later in the season so we'll see where they shake out. I still think this could be John Jay's year to knock off Ytown. Do tryouts end tomorrow?


Tryouts are done chief, the team is picked. I guess we'll see if JJ is prepared to take the title belt from the champs. Huskers will be ready for the challenge.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
US Lacrosse adopting age based bracketing of youth leagues. How will we be able to verify the DOB of kids?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Upload a copy of the birth certificate right in your account on the US Lacrosse website. I did it yesterday for my son and got a confirmation email within a few hours. The email said the documentation has been approved and does not expire. It also said the documentation I submitted will be securely deleted.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
US Lacrosse adopting age based bracketing of youth leagues. How will we be able to verify the DOB of kids?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Upload a copy of the birth certificate right in your account on the US Lacrosse website. I did it yesterday for my son and got a confirmation email within a few hours. The email said the documentation has been approved and does not expire. It also said the documentation I submitted will be securely deleted.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
US Lacrosse adopting age based bracketing of youth leagues. How will we be able to verify the DOB of kids?


I just renewed by sons subscription and was not asked to upload a birth certificate. Will this be required for Spring 2017?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Good luck to the Yorktown Husker team heading down to Maryland to play St. Mary's!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
always good to see Westchester team do well out of County. Good luck Y town!

Scrimmage results were interesting over the weekend. Could see some competitive games with more parity this season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
First game of the season in HV. Arlington -12 Put.Valley -2. Tough times for PV without Kuczma.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
First game of the season in HV. Arlington -12 Put.Valley -2. Tough times for PV without Kuczma.


Starts with youth program... How long has Brian been out of Pv hs and youth. Give it time they will be back.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
always good to see Westchester team do well out of County. Good luck Y town!

Scrimmage results were interesting over the weekend. Could see some competitive games with more parity this season.


Is anyone streaming the Yorktown vs MD game?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Just my opinion here but have been playing with Roy and the SS program for a couple of years. He's been great and my kids have enjoyed playing there.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Yorktown 2-0 versus out of state competition. Good showing boys.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -

Congrats to Primetime & Eclipse for making it to Denver in the WSYL. They both had good days at the Regionals.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Darien 12 Yorktown 3. WOW!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
They must be taking more than 4 teams from the North if Primetime is going to the WSYL. They were third in their bracket and Eclipse was second in the other bracket.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They must be taking more than 4 teams from the North if Primetime is going to the WSYL. They were third in their bracket and Eclipse was second in the other bracket.
More teams more money.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Town has a great D but thin in middle and inexperienced at Attack. They will be fine in Sec 1 but could not run with the athletes from the Blue Wave.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Congrats to Primetime & Eclipse for making it to Denver in the WSYL. They both had good days at the Regionals.


primetime doesn't belong. they got beat up pretty good.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Congrats to Primetime & Eclipse for making it to Denver in the WSYL. They both had good days at the Regionals.


primetime doesn't belong. they got beat up pretty good.
They only had a few indoor practices, and at least they showed up with only their 2021 team as opposed to a couple of LI teams bringing 2020 age eligible players. An early spring qualifer really only benefits the so called 360 teams. I'm not saying they 'belong' with '91, Legacy or Black Ice, but congratulations to the PT 7th graders who get to go to Denver.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Yorktown over a much weaker Bronxville team from 2015. Yorktown still having some offensive issues (finishing) but the off-ball movement was improved from other game I saw. Bronxville needs better flow to the O, Quick middies can cause slides, but the other kids need to get open before slide reaches dodging middie. Yorktown, the motion offense looked good and the defense was lights out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
AFter Darien, Bronxville's D must have been a sight for sore eyes. They pack it in a zone and rely on goalie, forcing off ball movement and good passing.
Mids can alley dodge but good sliding teams and double poling the mids will cause them problems. Attack cannot break down better Dmen, more of a cutter O.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
PT had a much harder bracket than Eclipse. Eclipse was lucky to get 2nd place should of lost to a small Icon team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Yorktown vs John Jay Thursday is a big game. Two very young teams that are trying to find some flow on offense. Yorktown needs to minimize the turnovers and John Jay needs to control between the restraining boxes. Whoever scores the most unsettled goals will win.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT had a much harder bracket than Eclipse. Eclipse was lucky to get 2nd place should of lost to a small Icon team.


How is the 2020 Predator team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous

How is the 2020 Predator team?


Solid.

Predators, PrimeTime, and 3d Tri-State 2020's are all evenly matched based on fall tourney play. Not much more than 2 goals separate any of them. All have strengths and weaknesses.

Express North and Eclipse are unknowns having either not played or played in weaker tourneys/brackets.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

How is the 2020 Predator team?


Solid.

Predators, PrimeTime, and 3d Tri-State 2020's are all evenly matched based on fall tourney play. Not much more than 2 goals separate any of them. All have strengths and weaknesses.

Express North and Eclipse are unknowns having either not played or played in weaker tourneys/brackets.


Thanks
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
john jay imploded last night 3rd quarter up 5-1 - threw away their game plan , got cocky and Yorktown put 5 goals in the net 3rd quarter- have to blame the coaches for that one -
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
john jay imploded last night 3rd quarter up 5-1 - threw away their game plan , got cocky and Yorktown put 5 goals in the net 3rd quarter- have to blame the coaches for that one -


Neither team is going anywhere this year. Yorktown has no real offense, I'm really not sure what they run? JJ doesn't have a deep enough team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
true that both teams have room for improvement.

having said that - odds are one will win the section and then be difficult to beat thereafter.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Yorktown gave up a 3 goal lead over Ridgefield with 3 minutes to play. Three turnovers on odd calls doomed them. They need to clean up their play, finish around the goal and get something going on offense overall to go anywhere this season. Defense looked good but they seemed to be out of position at times and overall aggressive. Some slides were unnecessary. Goalie played great again. Young team, time to pick up overall play to contend.

Ridgefield has some crafty players with quick feet that can finish.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Chaminade made Yorktown look like Putnam Valley. Sloppy, bad decisions, trouble clearing. Some kids look lost on offense.

Maybe try something new on offense, what they run (?) doesn't seem to be working with this group.

Chaminade has 2-3 standouts, maybe. Shocking for a school that recruits kids form all over LI. Outstanding goalie.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Chaminade made Yorktown look like Putnam Valley. Sloppy, bad decisions, trouble clearing. Some kids look lost on offense.

Maybe try something new on offense, what they run (?) doesn't seem to be working with this group.

Chaminade has 2-3 standouts, maybe. Shocking for a school that recruits kids form all over LI. Outstanding goalie.


Thanks Goalie Dad!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Westchester lax is a mess. Can you really say who is good in A they play all B and C schools. Is this a power conference set up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Class A has never been the cream of the crop for section 1 (or Westchester) lacrosse. A, B and C are dictated soley by size of school. Some strong teams in Class A (Fox Lane, Lakeland Panas, Mamaroneck) and some very weak teams (New Rochelle, Clarkstown). Class B has always been the strongest (Yorktown, John Jay, Somers, Rye) and Class C has been very good recently (Bronxville and Pleasantville). Lots of parity in Westchester this year. Good to see some upsets and the better teams playing each other (regardless of size) and competing out of section. Should be fun Section 1 playoffs for all classes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
play most of your games in your division (A,B,C). If you want to go out of the division you should play the better teams like Yorktown, JJ, Pleasantville, Somers, Fox Lane, L/P. It would be a shame if you make the playoffs after beating up on the weak sisters of each division. IE: Mahopac plays a very hard schedule and they have a losing record. A team from Dutchess County plays a much easier schedule and they are undefeated. Those teams play Thursday and if Pac wins what does that tell us. I don't know, it is a little strange that division foes have such different schedules.
"Just a thought"
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Scheduling out of conference is determined by the coach, so weak or strong is a choice.

Some big games this week including Yorktown vs Fox Lane tomorrow and the Charlie Murphy Cup Lakeland vs Yorktown on Saturday.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Yorktown goalie could be the best in the area. Makes tough saves, very strong on low shots. I assume he also plays hockey. Lakeland v Yorktown should be a good game but I think Lakeland is over rated. Who have they played?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown goalie could be the best in the area. Makes tough saves, very strong on low shots. I assume he also plays hockey. Lakeland v Yorktown should be a good game but I think Lakeland is over rated. Who have they played?


both Lakeland(Panas) and Yorktown are overrated. Love the two school combined motto, not! All three schools should be B schools playing each other. Imagine if two LI High schools combined as one team. Smithtown East + West or Sachem East + North. (oh wait there is Middle country Newfield and Centerreach no excuse at close to 1200 kids in each school)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown goalie could be the best in the area. Makes tough saves, very strong on low shots. I assume he also plays hockey. Lakeland v Yorktown should be a good game but I think Lakeland is over rated. Who have they played?


both Lakeland(Panas) and Yorktown are overrated. Love the two school combined motto, not! All three schools should be B schools playing each other. Imagine if two LI High schools combined as one team. Smithtown East + West or Sachem East + North. (oh wait there is Middle country Newfield and Centerreach no excuse at close to 1200 kids in each school)


Lakeland was exposed over the weekend. Yorktown may not have a dynamic offense but Lakeland is stunted. They have a dominant long stick FOGO (actually drops down to play D) that allows them to control the time of possession, eventually you will score. It was a very entertaining game charged with emotion. Yorktown goalie was rock solid again, using every part of his body to make saves. Defense was suffocating at times. My little guys have really grown to love watching them play.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown goalie could be the best in the area. Makes tough saves, very strong on low shots. I assume he also plays hockey. Lakeland v Yorktown should be a good game but I think Lakeland is over rated. Who have they played?


both Lakeland(Panas) and Yorktown are overrated. Love the two school combined motto, not! All three schools should be B schools playing each other. Imagine if two LI High schools combined as one team. Smithtown East + West or Sachem East + North. (oh wait there is Middle country Newfield and Centerreach no excuse at close to 1200 kids in each school)


I've never heard the two school combined motto.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown goalie could be the best in the area. Makes tough saves, very strong on low shots. I assume he also plays hockey. Lakeland v Yorktown should be a good game but I think Lakeland is over rated. Who have they played?


both Lakeland(Panas) and Yorktown are overrated. Love the two school combined motto, not! All three schools should be B schools playing each other. Imagine if two LI High schools combined as one team. Smithtown East + West or Sachem East + North. (oh wait there is Middle country Newfield and Centerreach no excuse at close to 1200 kids in each school)


I've never heard the two school combined motto.


whats the mascot Hornets or Panthers
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown goalie could be the best in the area. Makes tough saves, very strong on low shots. I assume he also plays hockey. Lakeland v Yorktown should be a good game but I think Lakeland is over rated. Who have they played?


both Lakeland(Panas) and Yorktown are overrated. Love the two school combined motto, not! All three schools should be B schools playing each other. Imagine if two LI High schools combined as one team. Smithtown East + West or Sachem East + North. (oh wait there is Middle country Newfield and Centerreach no excuse at close to 1200 kids in each school)


I've never heard the two school combined motto.


Rebels
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown goalie could be the best in the area. Makes tough saves, very strong on low shots. I assume he also plays hockey. Lakeland v Yorktown should be a good game but I think Lakeland is over rated. Who have they played?


both Lakeland(Panas) and Yorktown are overrated. Love the two school combined motto, not! All three schools should be B schools playing each other. Imagine if two LI High schools combined as one team. Smithtown East + West or Sachem East + North. (oh wait there is Middle country Newfield and Centerreach no excuse at close to 1200 kids in each school)


I've never heard the two school combined motto.


Rebels


I have never heard a rational explanation as to why they have a combined team. Its always been a thriving, winning program, and the youth program appears to be excellent and well attended. In hockey you have issues concerning access to ice time and costs that may cause a district to have a combined team even though interest may be there to have a team at each school (Clarkstown hockey is an example of this). But it doesn't make sense in lacrosse. All other combined teams in all sports seem to only exist when participation and competitiveness is poor. Why not have a Lakeland team and a Panas team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Yorktown may not be as good as some of their teams in the past but it unclear who in NY B is materially better this year. They are capable of making a long run into NYS playoffs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown goalie could be the best in the area. Makes tough saves, very strong on low shots. I assume he also plays hockey. Lakeland v Yorktown should be a good game but I think Lakeland is over rated. Who have they played?


both Lakeland(Panas) and Yorktown are overrated. Love the two school combined motto, not! All three schools should be B schools playing each other. Imagine if two LI High schools combined as one team. Smithtown East + West or Sachem East + North. (oh wait there is Middle country Newfield and Centerreach no excuse at close to 1200 kids in each school)


I've never heard the two school combined motto.


Rebels


I have never heard a rational explanation as to why they have a combined team. Its always been a thriving, winning program, and the youth program appears to be excellent and well attended. In hockey you have issues concerning access to ice time and costs that may cause a district to have a combined team even though interest may be there to have a team at each school (Clarkstown hockey is an example of this). But it doesn't make sense in lacrosse. All other combined teams in all sports seem to only exist when participation and competitiveness is poor. Why not have a Lakeland team and a Panas team.


wonder if there is a mandate to take kids from a certain amount of kids from one school over another. if talent states it should be 80/20 is it really 60/40. How many on each team v/jv?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown may not be as good as some of their teams in the past but it unclear who in NY B is materially better this year. They are capable of making a long run into NYS playoffs.
I have to agree. And playing a tough out of sectional schedule will only help them in the play-offs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown may not be as good as some of their teams in the past but it unclear who in NY B is materially better this year. They are capable of making a long run into NYS playoffs.
I have to agree. And playing a tough out of sectional schedule will only help them in the play-offs.


The main reason it is bull[lacrosse] that LI sections have to play each other to move on in the state playoff picture. A stronger team many times is at home while they should be given the opportunity to play deep into the states.

I guess if you aint first your last!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown goalie could be the best in the area. Makes tough saves, very strong on low shots. I assume he also plays hockey. Lakeland v Yorktown should be a good game but I think Lakeland is over rated. Who have they played?


both Lakeland(Panas) and Yorktown are overrated. Love the two school combined motto, not! All three schools should be B schools playing each other. Imagine if two LI High schools combined as one team. Smithtown East + West or Sachem East + North. (oh wait there is Middle country Newfield and Centerreach no excuse at close to 1200 kids in each school)


There is no combined team. There is Yorktown HS and Lakeland HS.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown goalie could be the best in the area. Makes tough saves, very strong on low shots. I assume he also plays hockey. Lakeland v Yorktown should be a good game but I think Lakeland is over rated. Who have they played?


both Lakeland(Panas) and Yorktown are overrated. Love the two school combined motto, not! All three schools should be B schools playing each other. Imagine if two LI High schools combined as one team. Smithtown East + West or Sachem East + North. (oh wait there is Middle country Newfield and Centerreach no excuse at close to 1200 kids in each school)


There is no combined team. There is Yorktown HS and Lakeland HS.


Of course there is a combined team. Lakeland Panas. It's a combination of Lakeland HS and Walter Panas HS. I have never heard a rational explanation as to why each HS can't have their own team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown goalie could be the best in the area. Makes tough saves, very strong on low shots. I assume he also plays hockey. Lakeland v Yorktown should be a good game but I think Lakeland is over rated. Who have they played?


both Lakeland(Panas) and Yorktown are overrated. Love the two school combined motto, not! All three schools should be B schools playing each other. Imagine if two LI High schools combined as one team. Smithtown East + West or Sachem East + North. (oh wait there is Middle country Newfield and Centerreach no excuse at close to 1200 kids in each school)


There is no combined team. There is Yorktown HS and Lakeland HS.


Of course there is a combined team. Lakeland Panas. It's a combination of Lakeland HS and Walter Panas HS. I have never heard a rational explanation as to why each HS can't have their own team.


Who cares?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown goalie could be the best in the area. Makes tough saves, very strong on low shots. I assume he also plays hockey. Lakeland v Yorktown should be a good game but I think Lakeland is over rated. Who have they played?


both Lakeland(Panas) and Yorktown are overrated. Love the two school combined motto, not! All three schools should be B schools playing each other. Imagine if two LI High schools combined as one team. Smithtown East + West or Sachem East + North. (oh wait there is Middle country Newfield and Centerreach no excuse at close to 1200 kids in each school)


I've never heard the two school combined motto.


Rebels


I have never heard a rational explanation as to why they have a combined team. Its always been a thriving, winning program, and the youth program appears to be excellent and well attended. In hockey you have issues concerning access to ice time and costs that may cause a district to have a combined team even though interest may be there to have a team at each school (Clarkstown hockey is an example of this). But it doesn't make sense in lacrosse. All other combined teams in all sports seem to only exist when participation and competitiveness is poor. Why not have a Lakeland team and a Panas team.


It is done at the option of each school. They elected to have a merged team years ago and have stuck with it. Having another good to very good team to compete against each year is not a bad thing for the other teams in Westchester.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Very nice evening of Westchester lacrosse. Yorktown, Pleasantville and Lakeland with good wins. Good luck this Saturday.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown goalie could be the best in the area. Makes tough saves, very strong on low shots. I assume he also plays hockey. Lakeland v Yorktown should be a good game but I think Lakeland is over rated. Who have they played?


both Lakeland(Panas) and Yorktown are overrated. Love the two school combined motto, not! All three schools should be B schools playing each other. Imagine if two LI High schools combined as one team. Smithtown East + West or Sachem East + North. (oh wait there is Middle country Newfield and Centerreach no excuse at close to 1200 kids in each school)


I've never heard the two school combined motto.


Rebels


I have never heard a rational explanation as to why they have a combined team. Its always been a thriving, winning program, and the youth program appears to be excellent and well attended. In hockey you have issues concerning access to ice time and costs that may cause a district to have a combined team even though interest may be there to have a team at each school (Clarkstown hockey is an example of this). But it doesn't make sense in lacrosse. All other combined teams in all sports seem to only exist when participation and competitiveness is poor. Why not have a Lakeland team and a Panas team.


It is done at the option of each school. They elected to have a merged team years ago and have stuck with it. Having another good to very good team to compete against each year is not a bad thing for the other teams in Westchester.


Not a bad thing for the other teams in Westchester, I would agree. Just a bad thing for the 40+ (including jv) boys who don't get to play HS lacrosse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Good luck to Yorktown and Pleasantville in today's NYS semi finals. Its been a great season for both teams, keep it going.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Great season for both Lakeland Panas and Pleasantville. At least our section didn't get swept by LI, great job Yorktown. Young team coming of age. Could be a 2-3 year dynasty in the making.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Great season for both Lakeland Panas and Pleasantville. At least our section didn't get swept by LI, great job Yorktown. Young team coming of age. Could be a 2-3 year dynasty in the making.


Some would argue Yorktown is working on a 2-3 DECADE dynasty.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Great season for both Lakeland Panas and Pleasantville. At least our section didn't get swept by LI, great job Yorktown. Young team coming of age. Could be a 2-3 year dynasty in the making.


Some would argue Yorktown is working on a 2-3 DECADE dynasty.


Yorktown has won two state titles in the last 20+ years. Not a dynasty.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What happened to PT2020? 60 goals against and not competitive?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
You can go further 2 wins by 2018, 2019 & 2020 combined. How the mighty have fallen.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
And Express North 2019AA went 1-4. Not a great start to the summer for Westchester "elite" lacrosse teams. Heard Predators 2020 won a lower level fl$ tournament this weekend.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You can go further 2 wins by 2018, 2019 & 2020 combined. How the mighty have fallen.
I'm sorry, did any other Westchester teams do any better at Adrenaline ? Or maybe it's just the state of the actual talent coming out of Westchester these days
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened to PT2020? 60 goals against and not competitive?
They didn't belong in the Adrenaline Cup, but despite embarrasing results the kids got to see what the top teams in the country look and play like. Although I'm guessing in your mind if your son was on the team it would have made all the difference in the world
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened to PT2020? 60 goals against and not competitive?
They didn't belong in the Adrenaline Cup, but despite embarrasing results the kids got to see what the top teams in the country look and play like. Although I'm guessing in your mind if your son was on the team it would have made all the difference in the world


First tourney of the summer - relax. Surely many teams missing key kids as state playoffs still going on in the area. Primetime and Express North 2018s are both very good and have for a while. Both 2019 squads were competitive (PT way more so than last year) - North made the last two finals last summer. Let's just let the rest of the season play out.

One thing is for sure watching 18s and 19s - the best teams are still the best, but the group of top teams is more tightly bunched than ever.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened to PT2020? 60 goals against and not competitive?
They didn't belong in the Adrenaline Cup, but despite embarrasing results the kids got to see what the top teams in the country look and play like. Although I'm guessing in your mind if your son was on the team it would have made all the difference in the world


First tourney of the summer - relax. Surely many teams missing key kids as state playoffs still going on in the area. Primetime and Express North 2018s are both very good and have for a while. Both 2019 squads were competitive (PT way more so than last year) - North made the last two finals last summer. Let's just let the rest of the season play out.

One thing is for sure watching 18s and 19s - the best teams are still the best, but the group of top teams is more tightly bunched than ever.


Does LI Express North have any players from Yorktown? I am assuming they do and they were in the NYS finals on Saturday. These kids probably haven't practiced together since last Fall. Relax.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened to PT2020? 60 goals against and not competitive?
They didn't belong in the Adrenaline Cup, but despite embarrasing results the kids got to see what the top teams in the country look and play like. Although I'm guessing in your mind if your son was on the team it would have made all the difference in the world


First tourney of the summer - relax. Surely many teams missing key kids as state playoffs still going on in the area. Primetime and Express North 2018s are both very good and have for a while. Both 2019 squads were competitive (PT way more so than last year) - North made the last two finals last summer. Let's just let the rest of the season play out.

One thing is for sure watching 18s and 19s - the best teams are still the best, but the group of top teams is more tightly bunched than ever.


Does LI Express North have any players from Yorktown? I am assuming they do and they were in the NYS finals on Saturday. These kids probably haven't practiced together since last Fall. Relax.


Yes more than a few Yorktown kids, but you knew that!

as far as PT, someone's comment was they were better than LY. Did they get any better from the fall?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened to PT2020? 60 goals against and not competitive?
They didn't belong in the Adrenaline Cup, but despite embarrasing results the kids got to see what the top teams in the country look and play like. Although I'm guessing in your mind if your son was on the team it would have made all the difference in the world


First tourney of the summer - relax. Surely many teams missing key kids as state playoffs still going on in the area. Primetime and Express North 2018s are both very good and have for a while. Both 2019 squads were competitive (PT way more so than last year) - North made the last two finals last summer. Let's just let the rest of the season play out.

One thing is for sure watching 18s and 19s - the best teams are still the best, but the group of top teams is more tightly bunched than ever.


Does LI Express North have any players from Yorktown? I am assuming they do and they were in the NYS finals on Saturday. These kids probably haven't practiced together since last Fall. Relax.


Yes more than a few Yorktown kids, but you knew that!

as far as PT, someone's comment was they were better than LY. Did they get any better from the fall?


Obviously. My point was made.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened to PT2020? 60 goals against and not competitive?
They didn't belong in the Adrenaline Cup, but despite embarrasing results the kids got to see what the top teams in the country look and play like. Although I'm guessing in your mind if your son was on the team it would have made all the difference in the world


First tourney of the summer - relax. Surely many teams missing key kids as state playoffs still going on in the area. Primetime and Express North 2018s are both very good and have for a while. Both 2019 squads were competitive (PT way more so than last year) - North made the last two finals last summer. Let's just let the rest of the season play out.

One thing is for sure watching 18s and 19s - the best teams are still the best, but the group of top teams is more tightly bunched than ever.


Does LI Express North have any players from Yorktown? I am assuming they do and they were in the NYS finals on Saturday. These kids probably haven't practiced together since last Fall. Relax.


Yes more than a few Yorktown kids, but you knew that!

as far as PT, someone's comment was they were better than LY. Did they get any better from the fall?


Obviously. My point was made.


Did PT 2019 get any better than then in the fall?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express north went 3 an1 beat HHH , LC national and 3D .lost to crabs. PT lost to 3 d ,HHH ,
Express North went 2-2 this past weekend, how did PT 2020 do?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Bladerunner
Express North went 2-2 this past weekend, how did PT 2020 do?
Went 4-2. They Beat Edge, BBL, Mesa & LB3 National....lost to Crabs & Crush
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -


First tourney of the summer - relax. Surely many teams missing key kids as state playoffs still going on in the area. Primetime and Express North 2018s are both very good and have for a while. Both 2019 squads were competitive (PT way more so than last year) - North made the last two finals last summer. Let's just let the rest of the season play out.

One thing is for sure watching 18s and 19s - the best teams are still the best, but the group of top teams is more tightly bunched than ever. [/quote]

Does LI Express North have any players from Yorktown? I am assuming they do and they were in the NYS finals on Saturday. These kids probably haven't practiced together since last Fall. Relax. [/quote]

Yes more than a few Yorktown kids, but you knew that!

as far as PT, someone's comment was they were better than LY. Did they get any better from the fall? [/quote]

Obviously. My point was made. [/quote]

Did PT 2019 get any better than then in the fall? [/quote]

Primetime 2019 looked very mediocre last weekend in PA. They beat one team that I saw. PT lost to 3D tristate and Express North destroyed 3D Tristate. That about sums up the weekend.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Bladerunner
Express North went 2-2 this past weekend, how did PT 2020 do?


Express North 2019 went 3-1, tourney machine has been updated correctly. Won in sudden death overtime over HHH.
The 2-2 comment was for 2020
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Anyone else notice that the Express North teams at LI Laxfest all played in B brackets? All the talk during tryouts about Schreiber pulling together these great teams and they play in B, not the type of competition I would want.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Bladerunner
Express North went 2-2 this past weekend, how did PT 2020 do?


Express North 2019 went 3-1, tourney machine has been updated correctly. Won in sudden death overtime over HHH.

Yes they did, but we were talking about Express North 2020 and PT 2020
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Bladerunner
Express North went 2-2 this past weekend, how did PT 2020 do?


Express North 2019 went 3-1, tourney machine has been updated correctly. Won in sudden death overtime over HHH.

Yes they did, but we were talking about Express North 2020 and PT 2020


Primetime is in decline. Last really good team was 2018 but they haven't kept up either. It was inevitable.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Bladerunner
Express North went 2-2 this past weekend, how did PT 2020 do?


Express North 2019 went 3-1, tourney machine has been updated correctly. Won in sudden death overtime over HHH.

Yes they did, but we were talking about Express North 2020 and PT 2020


Primetime is in decline. Last really good team was 2018 but they haven't kept up either. It was inevitable.
A reflection of a general decline in Westchester lacrosse, a dilution of talent among more Summer teams and a belief that athletic middies can still go one on two and get the job done.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Bladerunner
Express North went 2-2 this past weekend, how did PT 2020 do?


Express North 2019 went 3-1, tourney machine has been updated correctly. Won in sudden death overtime over HHH.

Yes they did, but we were talking about Express North 2020 and PT 2020


Primetime is in decline. Last really good team was 2018 but they haven't kept up either. It was inevitable.


Not a lot of promise in the younger years. 2024 team got throttled two weekends in a row on Long Island
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
the growth of other teams is definitely hurting Prime time at the younger ages- express north 24 plays PT 2024 Saturday morning
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
that's ok, from what I have heard, Daniello is running the youth program now, he will figure out a way to make his money off of them- the president of the youth program is as spineless as a jelly fish, he will let it happen, his kids prob play for primetime for free
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
that's ok, from what I have heard, Daniello is running the youth program now, he will figure out a way to make his money off of them- the president of the youth program is as spineless as a jelly fish, he will let it happen, his kids prob play for primetime for free


Which youth program?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
john jay
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
that's ok, from what I have heard, Daniello is running the youth program now, he will figure out a way to make his money off of them- the president of the youth program is as spineless as a jelly fish, he will let it happen, his kids prob play for primetime for free
hahaha calling someone 'spineless' while doing so anonymously hahahaha...Although I'm guessing you've run so many youth programs in your lifetime, that in your feeble mind you get a free pass to criticize
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
truth hurts - overcharged from top to bottom, losing organization run by people that give nothing back to the town or players and are happy to feed the for- profit organization, yeh sounds like a great organization run by a guy that never played lacrosse at any level. if that's your idea of running a youth program , keep it up, no wonder you guys cant beat Yorktown EVER
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
ha ha - from what I hear - definitely lax mafia in that town
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I heard you guys pay the ex president $4k to schedule games ? maybe you should use that money for winter training and let parents do the scheduling
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
truth hurts - overcharged from top to bottom, losing organization run by people that give nothing back to the town or players and are happy to feed the for- profit organization, yeh sounds like a great organization run by a guy that never played lacrosse at any level. if that's your idea of running a youth program , keep it up, no wonder you guys cant beat Yorktown EVER


No varsity program thrives without a youth program that is run by people who are totally committed to the kids development. It's the reason why Pleasantville, Bronxville, etc have grown as legitimate varsity programs and why Yorktown is a consistent powerhouse. The director and coaches invest a lot of time and energy teaching the kids the game and instilling a desire to win. Its a culture, not just recreation.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
truth hurts - overcharged from top to bottom, losing organization run by people that give nothing back to the town or players and are happy to feed the for- profit organization, yeh sounds like a great organization run by a guy that never played lacrosse at any level. if that's your idea of running a youth program , keep it up, no wonder you guys cant beat Yorktown EVER


We all know plenty of former players who are terrible coaches and administrators. Some are lazy, bad communicators or just don't put the effort in that is required. Lack of experience on the field shouldn't preclude someone from being an effective coach or commissioner.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
truth hurts - overcharged from top to bottom, losing organization run by people that give nothing back to the town or players and are happy to feed the for- profit organization, yeh sounds like a great organization run by a guy that never played lacrosse at any level. if that's your idea of running a youth program , keep it up, no wonder you guys cant beat Yorktown EVER
'overcharged', sounds like a bitter parent who's son didn't make the A team. But yes you are right they should give something back like the local baseball and football programs do...participation trophies?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
truth hurts - overcharged from top to bottom, losing organization run by people that give nothing back to the town or players and are happy to feed the for- profit organization, yeh sounds like a great organization run by a guy that never played lacrosse at any level. if that's your idea of running a youth program , keep it up, no wonder you guys cant beat Yorktown EVER

Sounds like sour grapes
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
overcharged- well its 195 dollars for k-1 , its 450 for 6th grade and goes up from there- you be the judge , coaches of the 6th and 7th grade are top notch individuals -
Posted By: Anonymous Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Hoping one day the Westchester clubs actually play one another.

Realize much of the attention goes to 2017-2020, but for those of us with younger kids, the jungle of clubs proclaiming how "elite" they are is comical.

PT, Preds, Express North, 3D Tri-State, Eclipse, Dynasty, Superstar, Ballers, 2Way, 91 North should compete locally rather than paying high fees and journeying to LI or PA for the experience. Seems club directors fear parents will question their programs if they lose to local rival. So all avoid one another to play it safe.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
overcharged- well its 195 dollars for k-1 , its 450 for 6th grade and goes up from there- you be the judge , coaches of the 6th and 7th grade are top notch individuals -


I think Yorktown is $175 max. Does John Jay pay the coaches?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
who really needs to go anywhere to play at the younger ages - practice 2 days a week and play local round robins
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hoping one day the Westchester clubs actually play one another.

Realize much of the attention goes to 2017-2020, but for those of us with younger kids, the jungle of clubs proclaiming how "elite" they are is comical.

PT, Preds, Express North, 3D Tri-State, Eclipse, Dynasty, Superstar, Ballers, 2Way, 91 North should compete locally rather than paying high fees and journeying to LI or PA for the experience. Seems club directors fear parents will question their programs if they lose to local rival. So all avoid one another to play it safe.


Agreed. Clubs like playing teams from other regions because these teams are not in competition with each other for kids. Almost no one from Pleasantville is going to say "my kid will play for LI Outlaws next year because they looked real good when we played them." But they might move from PT to Express North. Another factor not mentioned is that some of these clubs are really just regional chapters of larger clubs that run their own tournaments on LI and elsewhere. So these clubs are required (I assume) to attend these tournaments, where a "true" fee is not paid, only an accounting one is.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
But we need to make sure to compensate the club owners, tournament companies, hotels and restaurants for all the lost revenue. I believe our kids would develop into fine lacrosse players by playing a few local teams during the summer. Many of these kids by the time the are sophomores in high school have been doing this for 5 or 6 summers on top of fall ball and high school season. Way too many games and travel.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This weekend there is the Crab Fest tournament in Baltimore. On Saturday, each team will play in 3 games, consisting of 4 -10 minute running time quarters. On Sunday, each team will most likely play in 2 games of equal length. So at most, each team will play 200 minutes of running time lacrosse. On your drive Friday afternoon from Westchester to Baltimore, 200 minutes may not get you out of New Jersey. It makes no logical sense, other than to enrich the clubs and tournament owners, to do this. Local league - 10 teams, no travel, no Holiday Inns, and weekends free to do other things. Didn't even factor in that many teams have 25 players on them so the 200 minutes of lacrosse goes down substantially.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
at this point in Westchester at he younger ages its a notch above town with so many teams- might as well just extend town another 2 months and play 3/4 jamborees
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Younger teams extend town programs. High School kids should have a high school league. May need to combine some teams but that shouldn't be a problem.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2 tourneys (one travel, one local) - $3,500 entrance fees
8 games vs local teams - Ref fees - $400 (we pay one ref, opponent pays the other)
1 paid coach - $10,000 ?? (2 dad coaches are assistants for free)
Uniforms - $600 ??
Rent practice space - ??? (not a lot of money if rent from a school or town park

Divide by 18 kids (20+ too many) = $805 plus 1/18th whatever it costs to rent practice space per kid.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
how did the Westchester teams do this weekend ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
tristate 91 2024, 2021 and varsity won their bracket in war games

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Prime Time 2019 was at the Crab Feast - went 3-0 in pool play and then beat 2019 Express North 6-4 to make it to the semi-final against Crabs. Lost that game
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
my son has never played travel before , im just curious what people think are the best teams we should tryout for in the 2024 age bracket
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
i have no idea of ability of your son, but- first off- very rarely do local teams ever play each other which is unfortunate , but I see it this way IN TERMS OF SKILL
EXPRESS NORTH- KATONAH
PRIMETIME- SOUTH SALEM
2 WAY- BRUNSWICK SCHOOL
ECLIPSE- NEW CANNAAN CT
sUPERSTARS- RIDGEFIELD
TRISTATE - PURCHASE

SEEMS LIKE PEOPLE ARE HAPPY WITH ALL PROGRAMS LISTED ABOVE, AND ALL OFFER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF PLAY , IN DIFFERENT LEVEL TOURNEYS
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Prime Time 2019 was at the Crab Feast - went 3-0 in pool play and then beat 2019 Express North 6-4 to make it to the semi-final against Crabs. Lost that game


Yes saw that PT 2019 win and was very confused by it. The 3-0 at Crab fest is not impressive but the win over E north is. Crabs Madlax and Laxachuessets top three
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
tristate 2024 won their tourney this weekend
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Not sure why the confusion. Both teams are very talented and play good lacrosse. Both teams were also missing a top offensive player so no excuses there. It seems you are familiar with the North team but maybe get familiar with PT and you will realize. Your opinion is your opinion so can't change that but objectively there's not much of a difference between both teams except the head to head match ups They tied each other in 2015 and PT won this. Maybe next year it's different result but that won't change the fact both teams are talented in good programs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not sure why the confusion. Both teams are very talented and play good lacrosse. Both teams were also missing a top offensive player so no excuses there. It seems you are familiar with the North team but maybe get familiar with PT and you will realize. Your opinion is your opinion so can't change that but objectively there's not much of a difference between both teams except the head to head match ups They tied each other in 2015 and PT won this. Maybe next year it's different result but that won't change the fact both teams are talented in good programs.


PT 2019 is a very good team and on Sunday they outplayed Express North. However, I think these 2 teams will be very similar to the 2018's and on any given day either team can win.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not sure why the confusion. Both teams are very talented and play good lacrosse. Both teams were also missing a top offensive player so no excuses there. It seems you are familiar with the North team but maybe get familiar with PT and you will realize. Your opinion is your opinion so can't change that but objectively there's not much of a difference between both teams except the head to head match ups They tied each other in 2015 and PT won this. Maybe next year it's different result but that won't change the fact both teams are talented in good programs.


PT 2019 is a very good team and on Sunday they outplayed Express North. However, I think these 2 teams will be very similar to the 2018's and on any given day either team

can win.


Has 2018 prime time ever beaten express north ??? I don't think so
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not sure why the confusion. Both teams are very talented and play good lacrosse. Both teams were also missing a top offensive player so no excuses there. It seems you are familiar with the North team but maybe get familiar with PT and you will realize. Your opinion is your opinion so can't change that but objectively there's not much of a difference between both teams except the head to head match ups They tied each other in 2015 and PT won this. Maybe next year it's different result but that won't change the fact both teams are talented in good programs.


PT 2019 is a very good team and on Sunday they outplayed Express North. However, I think these 2 teams will be very similar to the 2018's and on any given day either team can win.


I think PT being in more tourneys with tough teams will help them. They are now having the opportunity to do that. North has been there already there with Express' inclusion in NLF. Beating a rival is nice - but the measuring stick of progress for both programs should be beating Madlax, 91, Laxachusetts, Crabs, HHH.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Prime Time 2019 was at the Crab Feast - went 3-0 in pool play and then beat 2019 Express North 6-4 to make it to the semi-final against Crabs. Lost that game


Yes saw that PT 2019 win and was very confused by it. The 3-0 at Crab fest is not impressive but the win over E north is. Crabs Madlax and Laxachuessets top three


PT 2019 lost to 3d prior weekend and Express North crushed 3d at same tournament. Express North may be the better team but looks like PT has their number. Seems like PT plays weaker schedule at big tournaments.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I think the last name on your list should be Team 91. I believe Tri-State is a NJ team.

Also you forgot Predators (Purchase) and TopSide (Purchase)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT 2019 has played in the same tournaments this summer at the same level of play Express North 2019 AA and do play the same quality teams as Express North 2019 AA. Yes, results have been different, no argument there. But the schedule is not chosen, it is given to them, so you play who you have to. PT 2019 at Crab Feast had to play Express North 2019 AA to advance and they beat them, hands down, nothing more to be said. As said earlier, both teams have a lot of talent and play good lacrosse. I would be ignorant to say one team is better than other, but if you so choose to, the head to head match up is a nice indicator. This year PT 2019 beat Express North AA, last year the teams tied. So having said all that, I would concentrate on just enjoying the lacrosse being played this summer, as it is going by very quickly.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
at the 2024 level- primetime played express north this past weekend 9-3 express north - what's going on with Primetime
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
at the 2024 level- primetime played express north this past weekend 9-3 express north - what's going on with Primetime
I'm sorry ? you're concerned about a 4th/5th grade (Primetime) team? Damn. They should just disband now.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
at the 2024 level- primetime played express north this past weekend 9-3 express north - what's going on with Primetime
Since you are so concerned I'm hearing only good things about the 2026 level...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not sure why the confusion. Both teams are very talented and play good lacrosse. Both teams were also missing a top offensive player so no excuses there. It seems you are familiar with the North team but maybe get familiar with PT and you will realize. Your opinion is your opinion so can't change that but objectively there's not much of a difference between both teams except the head to head match ups They tied each other in 2015 and PT won this. Maybe next year it's different result but that won't change the fact both teams are talented in good programs.


PT 2019 is a very good team and on Sunday they outplayed Express North. However, I think these 2 teams will be very similar to the 2018's and on any given day either team

can win.


Has 2018 prime time ever beaten express north ??? I don't think so


Actually PT 2018 has beat express north. fl$ about 2-3 years ago, beat them pretty bad. Probably to avenge their loss the year before when the team was superstar 365.
Tri-State [part of the 91 group of lacrosse clubs] can't even compete at the 2019 level. Lack of commitment by many families, with coaches asking to bring friends at their own tournament.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
i have no idea of ability of your son, but- first off- very rarely do local teams ever play each other which is unfortunate , but I see it this way IN TERMS OF SKILL
EXPRESS NORTH- KATONAH
PRIMETIME- SOUTH SALEM
2 WAY- BRUNSWICK SCHOOL
ECLIPSE- NEW CANNAAN CT
sUPERSTARS- RIDGEFIELD
TRISTATE - PURCHASE

SEEMS LIKE PEOPLE ARE HAPPY WITH ALL PROGRAMS LISTED ABOVE, AND ALL OFFER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF PLAY , IN DIFFERENT LEVEL TOURNEYS
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Many of you are forgetting House of Sports (HOS) as well.

Their 2019 group is a strong team. Obviously not the caliber of PT or Express North, but arguably the third best team in Westchester/Rockland/NYC for that age group. Have kept the same core of kids for 4 years and added great pieces along the way.

Recently went undefeated at Westchester War games (weak tournament but shows their growth) and beat solid Ward Melville squad in championship.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I THINK DIRECTOR OF tristate mike bocklet is a world class guy and obviously hello of a player, but, the problem I see at that program is the way they position themselves in the lax universe, they play B tourneys against b/c teams and even though their teams at the younger levels are as good or as bad as the younger teams in Westchester like express or primetime, they will struggle to attract the players who are looking for the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, while I realize that pot of gold may never exist for some players or even most players , but it is what drives parents to craziness of travel lacrosse. even his 2020, 2019, 2018, etc teams all play in low level tourneys with zero chance of any scout ever being there. so why pay 1500-2000 dollars when you can pay less for the same with programs like warriors, ballers, etc... meaning town style programs
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I THINK DIRECTOR OF tristate mike bocklet is a world class guy and obviously hello of a player, but, the problem I see at that program is the way they position themselves in the lax universe, they play B tourneys against b/c teams and even though their teams at the younger levels are as good or as bad as the younger teams in Westchester like express or primetime, they will struggle to attract the players who are looking for the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, while I realize that pot of gold may never exist for some players or even most players , but it is what drives parents to craziness of travel lacrosse. even his 2020, 2019, 2018, etc teams all play in low level tourneys with zero chance of any scout ever being there. so why pay 1500-2000 dollars when you can pay less for the same with programs like warriors, ballers, etc... meaning town style programs
Everything you say is true, and I think for certain grade years can really only play tournaments based on talent. I would love to hear feedback about what their quality of instruction is? PrimeTime (especially) and Express North have become more about early recruitment than anything else. Team lacrosse is not in their vocabulary, watch the athletic middie go 1 on 2, and then shoot anyway & anywhere. So I think TriState and perhaps others can and should fill a niche for parents and players who aren't looking for the pot of gold in 7th and 8th grade but instead a solid summer team where players actually get better.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
at the 2024 level- primetime played express north this past weekend 9-3 express north - what's going on with Primetime


Easy big guy. Express North gets destroyed whenever they leave westchester.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I don't believe it is as much the organization as it is the commitments [lack thereof] from many of the families. Seems they treat this as summer camp, expensive at that, and only show when its convenient.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I THINK DIRECTOR OF tristate mike bocklet is a world class guy and obviously hello of a player, but, the problem I see at that program is the way they position themselves in the lax universe, they play B tourneys against b/c teams and even though their teams at the younger levels are as good or as bad as the younger teams in Westchester like express or primetime, they will struggle to attract the players who are looking for the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, while I realize that pot of gold may never exist for some players or even most players , but it is what drives parents to craziness of travel lacrosse. even his 2020, 2019, 2018, etc teams all play in low level tourneys with zero chance of any scout ever being there. so why pay 1500-2000 dollars when you can pay less for the same with programs like warriors, ballers, etc... meaning town style programs
Everything you say is true, and I think for certain grade years can really only play tournaments based on talent. I would love to hear feedback about what their quality of instruction is? PrimeTime (especially) and Express North have become more about early recruitment than anything else. Team lacrosse is not in their vocabulary, watch the athletic middie go 1 on 2, and then shoot anyway & anywhere. So I think TriState and perhaps others can and should fill a niche for parents and players who aren't looking for the pot of gold in 7th and 8th grade but instead a solid summer team where players actually get better.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
TS instruction that I have witnessed is ok. Nothing great or spectacular or unique, but certainly hits all the spots and not deficient in any way. I would be shocked if it were better than the instruction at PT or Express North, just based on reputation and pedigree of coaches. TS has been playing tournaments commiserate with their talent. Someone above indicated a problem with attendance and commitment at 2019. Similar problems exist at other grades, especially with regard to attendance at practice. Families are very wealthy (a generalization, I know, but I am basing it on what I see and where they live) and it means nothing to them to pay $1500 (or whatever it was) and have their kid miss tons of practice and some of the tournaments. The comparison to town summer programs is valid but most towns don't have such, so its not an option for many people. These programs seem to be in Northern Westchester and would be too far to travel for practice for most of who is at TS. Lower Westchester families are not driving their kids to Somers or Yorktown to play for Warriors or Ballers.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
at the 2024 level- primetime played express north this past weekend 9-3 express north - what's going on with Primetime


Easy big guy. Express North gets destroyed whenever they leave westchester.


well what does that say about primetime then? express north stinks, and pt 2024 stinks way worse - who cares -
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My last two cents and its very nit-picky.

TS does not really have a sense of comradery. The majority of other teams bring team tents and the boys typically hang out in between games. This really hasn't been the case. They should consider this as the boys come from a number of different towns and would help build a bit more cohesiveness on the field.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
TS instruction that I have witnessed is ok. Nothing great or spectacular or unique, but certainly hits all the spots and not deficient in any way. I would be shocked if it were better than the instruction at PT or Express North, just based on reputation and pedigree of coaches. TS has been playing tournaments commiserate with their talent. Someone above indicated a problem with attendance and commitment at 2019. Similar problems exist at other grades, especially with regard to attendance at practice. Families are very wealthy (a generalization, I know, but I am basing it on what I see and where they live) and it means nothing to them to pay $1500 (or whatever it was) and have their kid miss tons of practice and some of the tournaments. The comparison to town summer programs is valid but most towns don't have such, so its not an option for many people. These programs seem to be in Northern Westchester and would be too far to travel for practice for most of who is at TS. Lower Westchester families are not driving their kids to Somers or Yorktown to play for Warriors or Ballers.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My last two cents and its very nit-picky.

TS does not really have a sense of comradery. The majority of other teams bring team tents and the boys typically hang out in between games. This really hasn't been the case. They should consider this as the boys come from a number of different towns and would help build a bit more cohesiveness on the field.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
TS instruction that I have witnessed is ok. Nothing great or spectacular or unique, but certainly hits all the spots and not deficient in any way. I would be shocked if it were better than the instruction at PT or Express North, just based on reputation and pedigree of coaches. TS has been playing tournaments commiserate with their talent. Someone above indicated a problem with attendance and commitment at 2019. Similar problems exist at other grades, especially with regard to attendance at practice. Families are very wealthy (a generalization, I know, but I am basing it on what I see and where they live) and it means nothing to them to pay $1500 (or whatever it was) and have their kid miss tons of practice and some of the tournaments. The comparison to town summer programs is valid but most towns don't have such, so its not an option for many people. These programs seem to be in Northern Westchester and would be too far to travel for practice for most of who is at TS. Lower Westchester families are not driving their kids to Somers or Yorktown to play for Warriors or Ballers.
Not nit picky at all, in fact it's a small gesture of commitment from an organization to it's players and families. On a related topic I've always been a fan the Yorktown Ballers concept. Keeps many of it's players together, especially those at the mid-level, which I think has gone a long way in developing and keeping Yorktown's dominance in northern westchester
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
no tristate parent and I get the tent- but- its a 2 yr old program, im sure bocklett has it on his to-do list
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
to the poster that said express north 2024 is cream of the class, I saw express north 2024 play this summer, man did they look awful, could not win a faceoff, or win a ground ball, not sure what happened there or how they beat Primetime 9-3. the one midi that dominated in the fall, can barely get out of his own way . lost every game this weekend, they need help
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
to the poster that said express north 2024 is cream of the class, I saw express north 2024 play this summer, man did they look awful, could not win a faceoff, or win a ground ball, not sure what happened there or how they beat Primetime 9-3. the one midi that dominated in the fall, can barely get out of his own way . lost every game this weekend, they need help


What you're seeing at the younger ages is dilution of the talent as the number of programs grows. Long Island has more numbers to support 4-5 high quality teams. Westchester doesn't. They will all struggle to compete until some of these combine or fold.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What measuring stick are you guys using to compare programs? If you are talking just talent, I think LIE North is tops for the older teams, but Daniello at Prime Time does a better job of placing kids in colleges.

I agree, dilution hurts in Westchester and Western CT but natural selection will win out. Plus there is room for different types of programs- recruiting focused, development and just kids who want to play.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Are the clubs and where they mainly draw kids accurate?
Primetime- all over
Preds- Rye, Mamaroneck, Bronxville
Express North- Somers, Pleasantville
3D Tri-State- Greenwich
Eclipse- New Canaan, Westport, Weston
Dynasty- Mahopac
Rhino- Fairfield, Redding
Superstar- Ridgefield
Ballers- Yorktown
2Way- Rye, Mamaroneck, Pelham
19 TriState- Scarsdale, Mamaroneck,
Greenwich (club)- Scarsdale, Greenwich, White Plains
Topside- New Rochelle, Pelham
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Congratulations to the Long Island Express N 2021 team for taking another big step forward as a team. It was a pleasure watching the boys play so hard together to beat teams with men on their rosters.

How do these teams get away with playing older kids?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Congratulations Express North 2024 , another great weekend - 1-3 against mostly B teams up in Simsbury , makes their record 4-15 on the summer - way to go!! Maybe Schreiber isn't yelling enough
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Primetime looking pretty good now - lol
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PrimeTime went 2-3 at the NXT Cup. Lost to Taz and T91 from Maryland. Beat Superstar. So they weren't great either.

Who is the PT coach for this grade and how is the coaching? Will the coach change next year? My experience is that PT uses college kids as coaching.

Same for LIE North. Who is the coach and will he be the same next year? How is the coaching?

Have a son who may tryout for both. Want the best coaching. Want a coach that cares about the kids and makes a team out of them. Don't care about winning.

Any other suggestions would be appreciated.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Congratulations Express North 2024 , another great weekend - 1-3 against mostly B teams up in Simsbury , makes their record 4-15 on the summer - way to go!! Maybe Schreiber isn't yelling enough


Why would any grown man keep track of the record of a bunch of boys who have just finished the 4th grade????

You might be surprised what one can learn from a loss.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who is the PT coach for this grade and how is the coaching? Will the coach change next year? My experience is that PT uses college kids as coaching.

Same for LIE North. Who is the coach and will he be the same next year? How is the coaching?

Have a son who may tryout for both. Want the best coaching. Want a coach that cares about the kids and makes a team out of them. Don't care about winning.

Any other suggestions would be appreciated.


Check out 3d for really great instruction.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
pt- moves coaching around , but most are ex div 1 players or local hs coaches

li express is chris Schreiber/jay hill - very intense - good for some kids not so good for others -

both are good options

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Westchester warriors- Nick Savastano (Kennedy catholic)is expanding his program to the younger ages- Nick is a top notch pro- could be great !!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Congratulations to 2021 LI Express North for a huge come from behind (twice!) victory over the Edge to win the NLF Summer Championship. Everyone contributed to the TEAM victory and the successful summer experience. Can't wait for next season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
LIE North 2021 won the B (single a) bracket. Team 9+1 beat eclipse for the championship in the A (aa) bracket.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
ITS WAS THE B BRACKET- NICE TRY
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
ITS WAS THE B BRACKET- NICE TRY


Nice try?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yeh. If your gonna self promote. Be honest at least. You won the B bracket. Like 90+1 tristate saying they won the war games against b/c teams. It's not bad. But be honest
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yeh. If your gonna self promote. Be honest at least. You won the B bracket. Like 90+1 tristate saying they won the war games against b/c teams. It's not bad. But be honest


Get a life. Congratulating a bunch of 12 and 13 year olds on a hard fought tournament win, promoting nothing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
So many on here argue that this team is better than that as if being on the best team is somehow a ticket to playing in college and that kids should be embarrassed if they are playing on a team that is not super elite. Guess what? It's pathetic. It's your kids who are playing, not you. They're the ones who have to care at the end of the day and the minute they stop having fun, they won't care about it at all no matter how great their team is. And your status in the community and in life is not made better because little Johnny is a standout player. Whatever shortcomings you have that compel you to argue over the greatness of your kids youth lacrosse team will not diminish whether he plays at Hopkins or gets cut from his high school team. Much of what is on this board is good dialogue and exchange of information but those of you that are compelled to [lacrosse] on other programs while beating your chest about how great your son's program is have some serious character issues.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Well said
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So many on here argue that this team is better than that as if being on the best team is somehow a ticket to playing in college and that kids should be embarrassed if they are playing on a team that is not super elite. Guess what? It's pathetic. It's your kids who are playing, not you. They're the ones who have to care at the end of the day and the minute they stop having fun, they won't care about it at all no matter how great their team is. And your status in the community and in life is not made better because little Johnny is a standout player. Whatever shortcomings you have that compel you to argue over the greatness of your kids youth lacrosse team will not diminish whether he plays at Hopkins or gets cut from his high school team. Much of what is on this board is good dialogue and exchange of information but those of you that are compelled to [lacrosse] on other programs while beating your chest about how great your son's program is have some serious character issues.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Well said. That being the case why don't we all stop paying the middleman and get a summer league going. For these kids
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well said. That being the case why don't we all stop paying the middleman and get a summer league going. For these kids

because eit is a viscous cycle.

You get a summer league and it turns into rec because all the better players wants more they want better. then they leave then everyone wants better and bang back to club again.

Honestly the club route is MUCH better if you have the right club. Some clubs are just like rec but they call it club. Some are elite and are for the better players... but then comes the politics and that gets watered down.

Life is cyclical and cynical
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
ITS WAS THE B BRACKET- NICE TRY


What kind of troll spends his time knocking others who are congratulating a youth team on their success? Sneak back into the dark recesses of your pathetic little life.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Be interesting to see this coming year how many 2020's have miraculously morphed into 2021's through the wonders of private school.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Top teams for 19 and 20 in West/CT area?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
In no particular order... 3d, Primetime, Predators, Express, Eclipse

Too many if you ask me. Talent is diluted.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
agree. these teams all get pounded when they go the island. could compete if they combined
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
agree. these teams all get pounded when they go the island. could compete if they combined


Not true, Express North and Primetime do a pretty good of competing with the best teams all over, especially the older grades 2018, 2019 etc.

I keep seeing talk about the Predators but I have no idea who they are or where they compete. Have not seen them in the past 3-4 years anywhere on the island, PA or MD.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
In no particular order... 3d, Primetime, Predators, Express, Eclipse

Too many if you ask me. Talent is diluted.


Indeed. Rumor has it that Colsey is going to be seriously upgrading Superstars.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
one thing colsey does that no other program is doing is bring some fun back into the game for these younger players - 3x3 small area games , box lacrosse etc, I have to believe he will see the fruits of his labor in the future , bring the back yard , creativity back into the game
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Anyone have any insight into PT? Do they have much turnover in their rosters
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
WITH MORE OPTIONS ACROSS THE BOARD, IT SEEMS LIKE EVERYONE HAS TURNOVER - SEEING KIDS GO TO EXPRESS NORTH OR FROM EXPRESS NORTH TO PRIMETIME - SEEING KIDS LEAVE 91 TO OTHERS ETC. I think the new warrior program could be a contender in the future , the Savastano brothers are true pros with a gazillion connections
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Preds are strong 2017 and 2020. 2020's played on the island and won the fl$ tourney, went undefeated in MD at a Loyola Showcase, semi's at MVP Rising in Towson, and won NXT Cup in Philly. 17-2-1 over the summer. Good competition. Building Blocks, Iron Horse Georgia Thunder, Three Dee San Diego, Ninety Plus Maryland. Played lots of those recruited 2020's. Placed higher than PT in all tourneys where they competed together. Should be where talent collects in Westchester for the important recruiting year. Also should be playing the top teams competitively next year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
maybe in the future but for the HS level teams they play in low level tourrnaments
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2way out of Brunswick seems to have top tier coaching. They might be a good location for kids as is 3D Tri State.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
David Earl, who runs 2way, is great and David Bruce from Brunswick just joined on. I believe something good will be built over time there.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT takes the best players that tryout period. Everyone, regardless of if you were on the team the year before, has to earn their spot on the team. Only difference for existing players is you don't have to pay to tryout - you've earned your right to try to keep your spot.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
impressive. where else did prefators play besides NXT?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Is this their first year with multiple grad years. I have only seen youth teams in the past?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2way has coaches from top tier schools but I would not call the coaching top tier.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
David Earl, who runs 2way, is great and David Bruce from Brunswick just joined on. I believe something good will be built over time there.


Just another in an already crowded market. I'm pretty sure Bruce is making a mistake from a competitive standpoint, but it is probably more lucrative to run a team that will compete with NinetyOne North in the 'town' tourneys than to try and build a recruiting machine.

If I were a Brunswick family I'd be very concerned with feeling pressured to support the coach's new venture versus an established organization.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT had a VERYy rough year at 2020.
As far as taking the best kids period. Im sure for those that have been there realize that is far from the truth.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2way out of Brunswick seems to have top tier coaching. They might be a good location for kids as is 3D Tri State.


A resume does not equal top tier coaching. I have four sons, two have been through the club team system and are playing mid tier D1 (time flies!!). My younger two are playing club now and one conclusion we made a few years ago was forget the resume. My older boys were coached by a few guys who were stud players, had done some coaching but didn't teach them a thing and didn't stop yelling during games. Terrible experience. Their best coach was a guy who played D3 lax back in the day but loves the game and knows how to teach the kids the sport and ran VERY organized practices. Be open minded when considering a program and their coaches. Speak with parents or kids who have experienced the program. My youngest is coached by two guys that are passionate about the sport and the kids love playing for them. I have no idea nor do I care what their resume looks like. They know the game and how to teach the kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2way has coaches from top tier schools but I would not call the coaching top tier.


Coaches are often hired for marketing purposes. Don't expect a 23 year old kid to know how to coach 25 rambunctious lacrosse player. It takes time to learn techniques, organization.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT had a VERYy rough year at 2020.
As far as taking the best kids period. Im sure for those that have been there realize that is far from the truth.
And yet one of their players has gotten an early commitment. What 2020 team in this area played in similar elite tournaments and had a better year? Although I'm not a fan of the Top Ten lists posted on this forum, PT basically played all those teams on a regular basis in their tournaments and lost most of them. What will be interesting is what happens with their 4-5 Brunswick kids, and their hope for adding more this year, with this David Bruce/2Way team thing mentioned above.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Predators did as someone posted above. Would be good to see them play a game in the fall.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT had a VERYy rough year at 2020.
As far as taking the best kids period. Im sure for those that have been there realize that is far from the truth.
true statement, but where are all these 'best' players playing? The 2020 age group (without reclassified kids included) has not been a particularly strong group over the years...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT had a VERYy rough year at 2020.
As far as taking the best kids period. Im sure for those that have been there realize that is far from the truth.
true statement, but where are all these 'best' players playing? The 2020 age group (without reclassified kids included) has not been a particularly strong group over the years...


The PT 2020 team is terrible because many of the better kids reclassified to the 2021 team. Enjoy.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT had a VERYy rough year at 2020.
As far as taking the best kids period. Im sure for those that have been there realize that is far from the truth.
true statement, but where are all these 'best' players playing? The 2020 age group (without reclassified kids included) has not been a particularly strong group over the years...


Lot of rumors swirling that a number of 2020 kids are reclassing to 2021 in Westchester. Most if not all will be Catholic school kids chasing that D1 dream. Not sure what kind of numbers we are really talking about but is bound to impact some of the 2021s.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT had a VERYy rough year at 2020.
As far as taking the best kids period. Im sure for those that have been there realize that is far from the truth.
true statement, but where are all these 'best' players playing? The 2020 age group (without reclassified kids included) has not been a particularly strong group over the years...


The PT 2020 team is terrible because many of the better kids reclassified to the 2021 team. Enjoy.
Enjoy? Sounds like the usual parent of kid who PT cut. You don't even make sense. Maybe some kids will reclassify next summer to 2021 but highly unlikely PT 2020 had a rough summer this year because kids reclassified from 8th to 7th grade? And as far as next summer goes, a little early to call them 'terrible' without seeing which Brunswick kids Nick brings in, but if that makes you happy...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT had a VERYy rough year at 2020.
As far as taking the best kids period. Im sure for those that have been there realize that is far from the truth.
true statement, but where are all these 'best' players playing? The 2020 age group (without reclassified kids included) has not been a particularly strong group over the years...


The PT 2020 team is terrible because many of the better kids reclassified to the 2021 team. Enjoy.
Enjoy? Sounds like the usual parent of kid who PT cut. You don't even make sense. Maybe some kids will reclassify next summer to 2021 but highly unlikely PT 2020 had a rough summer this year because kids reclassified from 8th to 7th grade? And as far as next summer goes, a little early to call them 'terrible' without seeing which Brunswick kids Nick brings in, but if that makes you happy...


My buddy's son is on the 2021 team, there a plenty of "holdbacks", "reclassed" "Leftback"...however you want to describe them. Older kids on the team and not everyone is happy about it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
If you couldn't win with all the reclassified kids this past summer then the future does not look to good. You may also lose some of the precious Wick kids to 2way and their coach thay joined that program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT had a VERYy rough year at 2020.
As far as taking the best kids period. Im sure for those that have been there realize that is far from the truth.
true statement, but where are all these 'best' players playing? The 2020 age group (without reclassified kids included) has not been a particularly strong group over the years...


The PT 2020 team is terrible because many of the better kids reclassified to the 2021 team. Enjoy.
Enjoy? Sounds like the usual parent of kid who PT cut. You don't even make sense. Maybe some kids will reclassify next summer to 2021 but highly unlikely PT 2020 had a rough summer this year because kids reclassified from 8th to 7th grade? And as far as next summer goes, a little early to call them 'terrible' without seeing which Brunswick kids Nick brings in, but if that makes you happy...


My buddy's son is on the 2021 team, there a plenty of "holdbacks", "reclassed" "Leftback"...however you want to describe them. Older kids on the team and not everyone is happy about it.
Again, that may be true going forward, but if they were on the team this past summer and they went to the WSYL in Denver, then they were age appropriate for 2021 as that was an age based tournament.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT had a VERYy rough year at 2020.
As far as taking the best kids period. Im sure for those that have been there realize that is far from the truth.
true statement, but where are all these 'best' players playing? The 2020 age group (without reclassified kids included) has not been a particularly strong group over the years...


The PT 2020 team is terrible because many of the better kids reclassified to the 2021 team. Enjoy.
Enjoy? Sounds like the usual parent of kid who PT cut. You don't even make sense. Maybe some kids will reclassify next summer to 2021 but highly unlikely PT 2020 had a rough summer this year because kids reclassified from 8th to 7th grade? And as far as next summer goes, a little early to call them 'terrible' without seeing which Brunswick kids Nick brings in, but if that makes you happy...


My buddy's son is on the 2021 team, there a plenty of "holdbacks", "reclassed" "Leftback"...however you want to describe them. Older kids on the team and not everyone is happy about it.
Again, that may be true going forward, but if they were on the team this past summer and they went to the WSYL in Denver, then they were age appropriate for 2021 as that was an age based tournament.


cut the [lacrosse] about WSYL being age appropriate this past year. Age appropriate for what. Look how they went back to 9/1 for next year. Just fess up freakin pathetic! and mine are in college and later stages of High School now.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
cut the [****] about WSYL being age appropriate this past year. Age appropriate for what. Look how they went back to 9/1 for next year. Just fess up freakin pathetic! and mine are in college and later stages of High School now. ??? is that an answer to 3 different posts or one wine spritzer too many?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT had a VERYy rough year at 2020.
As far as taking the best kids period. Im sure for those that have been there realize that is far from the truth.
true statement, but where are all these 'best' players playing? The 2020 age group (without reclassified kids included) has not been a particularly strong group over the years...


The PT 2020 team is terrible because many of the better kids reclassified to the 2021 team. Enjoy.
Enjoy? Sounds like the usual parent of kid who PT cut. You don't even make sense. Maybe some kids will reclassify next summer to 2021 but highly unlikely PT 2020 had a rough summer this year because kids reclassified from 8th to 7th grade? And as far as next summer goes, a little early to call them 'terrible' without seeing which Brunswick kids Nick brings in, but if that makes you happy...


My buddy's son is on the 2021 team, there a plenty of "holdbacks", "reclassed" "Leftback"...however you want to describe them. Older kids on the team and not everyone is happy about it.
Again, that may be true going forward, but if they were on the team this past summer and they went to the WSYL in Denver, then they were age appropriate for 2021 as that was an age based tournament.


The phrase "age appropriate" has a very plastic definition. The DOB cutoff for WSYL was a joke.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
cut the [****] about WSYL being age appropriate this past year. Age appropriate for what. Look how they went back to 9/1 for next year. Just fess up freakin pathetic! and mine are in college and later stages of High School now. ??? is that an answer to 3 different posts or one wine spritzer too many?


Not a wine spritzer to many... A response to any comments saying WSYL is age appropriate for anything. They took a recognized date of 9/1 then moved it twice to an arbitrary date.

When you create or introduce a new cluster/environment/boundary you cannot make a general statement it is (age) appropriate. appropriate ( in this case age) is a term meant for established boundaries. You can't just define a boundary and say they are appropriate. You can work off a boundary as a beta test, but to recognize it as rule witout proper vetting, doesn't mean it is right
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
cut the [****] about WSYL being age appropriate this past year. Age appropriate for what. Look how they went back to 9/1 for next year. Just fess up freakin pathetic! and mine are in college and later stages of High School now. ??? is that an answer to 3 different posts or one wine spritzer too many?


Not a wine spritzer to many... A response to any comments saying WSYL is age appropriate for anything. They took a recognized date of 9/1 then moved it twice to an arbitrary date.

When you create or introduce a new cluster/environment/boundary you cannot make a general statement it is (age) appropriate. appropriate ( in this case age) is a term meant for established boundaries. You can't just define a boundary and say they are appropriate. You can work off a boundary as a beta test, but to recognize it as rule witout proper vetting, doesn't mean it is right


Especially when WSYL just reset it to 9/1 !!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
cut the [****] about WSYL being age appropriate this past year. Age appropriate for what. Look how they went back to 9/1 for next year. Just fess up freakin pathetic! and mine are in college and later stages of High School now. ??? is that an answer to 3 different posts or one wine spritzer too many?


Not a wine spritzer to many... A response to any comments saying WSYL is age appropriate for anything. They took a recognized date of 9/1 then moved it twice to an arbitrary date.

When you create or introduce a new cluster/environment/boundary you cannot make a general statement it is (age) appropriate. appropriate ( in this case age) is a term meant for established boundaries. You can't just define a boundary and say they are appropriate. You can work off a boundary as a beta test, but to recognize it as rule witout proper vetting, doesn't mean it is right


Especially when WSYL just reset it to 9/1 !!!


Yeah for now
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
cut the [****] about WSYL being age appropriate this past year. Age appropriate for what. Look how they went back to 9/1 for next year. Just fess up freakin pathetic! and mine are in college and later stages of High School now. ??? is that an answer to 3 different posts or one wine spritzer too many?


Not a wine spritzer to many... A response to any comments saying WSYL is age appropriate for anything. They took a recognized date of 9/1 then moved it twice to an arbitrary date.

When you create or introduce a new cluster/environment/boundary you cannot make a general statement it is (age) appropriate. appropriate ( in this case age) is a term meant for established boundaries. You can't just define a boundary and say they are appropriate. You can work off a boundary as a beta test, but to recognize it as rule witout proper vetting, doesn't mean it is right


Especially when WSYL just reset it to 9/1 !!!


Yeah for now


Reason #31 why the current lacrosse environment is atrocious. Why the heck can't everyone agree to use a DOB system like all of the other sports? If you're against it your are just trying to profit and exploit minors. Bottomline. In any other walk of life these actions would be demonized and possibly prosecuted. In lacrosse, we all acquiesce to the college coaches and clubs that feed into the broken system. Shameful.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
cut the [****] about WSYL being age appropriate this past year. Age appropriate for what. Look how they went back to 9/1 for next year. Just fess up freakin pathetic! and mine are in college and later stages of High School now. ??? is that an answer to 3 different posts or one wine spritzer too many?


Not a wine spritzer to many... A response to any comments saying WSYL is age appropriate for anything. They took a recognized date of 9/1 then moved it twice to an arbitrary date.

When you create or introduce a new cluster/environment/boundary you cannot make a general statement it is (age) appropriate. appropriate ( in this case age) is a term meant for established boundaries. You can't just define a boundary and say they are appropriate. You can work off a boundary as a beta test, but to recognize it as rule witout proper vetting, doesn't mean it is right


Especially when WSYL just reset it to 9/1 !!!


Yeah for now


Reason #31 why the current lacrosse environment is atrocious. Why the heck can't everyone agree to use a DOB system like all of the other sports? If you're against it your are just trying to profit and exploit minors. Bottomline. In any other walk of life these actions would be demonized and possibly prosecuted. In lacrosse, we all acquiesce to the college coaches and clubs that feed into the broken system. Shameful.
Early recruiting-grade based system-holdbacks-deterioration of 'team' play on summer travel are all interconnected and while I share your frustration (prosecution is a little extreme) your point about profit is what drives the current state of travel lacrosse. As long as there are parents willing to pay for that possibility of a golden commitment ticket, why change? (Although a recent quote by Tillman, from UMD .that if 6 of 12 of their early recruits work out, then that's a success? I'm sure there will be some on here who will say for the other 6 at least Maryland is a good education, which it is, but something is wrong in that early recruitment thinking) My biggest problem with all this, and I've heard this from a few, is that the actual lacrosse played is becoming dreadful to watch. (summer teams)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My biggest problem with all this, and I've heard this from a few, is that the actual lacrosse played is becoming dreadful to watch. (summer teams)


I've seen this written several times and while I agree that the overall level of play has fallen, the level of play at the top end is really quite good.

The simple reason why the overall quality has fallen is rise in numbers of kids and teams playing.

The truth is that the pool of really talented, physically gifted, and dedicated players and teams has not grown much. There are only a handful of teams with parents that will happily drive to practice 10 months of the year. Let's face it, you have to be kinda nutty to really be great at any one (single) thing.

Summer lacrosse among the top teams is really great to watch.

The expansion of the business to accommodate demand had a predictable impact. If you are disappointed with the play, chances are your team is not at the top end.

And frankly that is totally fine. Some kids love to play but may not have the physical gifts others do. Many families are not willing to work out the logistics of getting their kid to the field continually. That is OK.

Quality is just fine but more varied than ever before. Whether you believe all those kids on 'B' and 'C' clubs and teams should be bothering is a different discussion.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
i think one thing that would truly help out both parents and players is for directors to be willing to set up a summer league or winter league and let the boys play each other - no reason why pt shouldn't be playing express north, eclipse, etc through out the year in a relatively local setting - especially at the younger ages . and use these games as practice and as a teaching tool . I know the reasons they don't, but lets be honest, its not that hard to compare schedules etc and see who is better and kids will always move around, but in the meantime, set up a structuire where these kids can play without driving to every damn tourney 12 months a year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Well said. The reality is that if a few kids leave for a competing team no club is going to lose money when they are 100 kids trying out. If you lose a stud it shouldn't affect a top team anyway. Let them play each other locally in scrimmages or play days. No one is going to lose not even the directors. I would hope they have more confidence in themselves.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This post is spot on! perhaps as the sport continues to mature there will be more quality play top to bottom.

What also often gets missed is that many of us crazy parents/players enjoy the travel during the summer and have our expectations in check around recruiting. watching kids play, building friendships team dinners can be really a lot of fun.

don't like the prospect of going across the GWB on a Friday but the other stuff can be a blast.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My biggest problem with all this, and I've heard this from a few, is that the actual lacrosse played is becoming dreadful to watch. (summer teams)


I've seen this written several times and while I agree that the overall level of play has fallen, the level of play at the top end is really quite good.

The simple reason why the overall quality has fallen is rise in numbers of kids and teams playing.

The truth is that the pool of really talented, physically gifted, and dedicated players and teams has not grown much. There are only a handful of teams with parents that will happily drive to practice 10 months of the year. Let's face it, you have to be kinda nutty to really be great at any one (single) thing.

Summer lacrosse among the top teams is really great to watch.

The expansion of the business to accommodate demand had a predictable impact. If you are disappointed with the play, chances are your team is not at the top end.

And frankly that is totally fine. Some kids love to play but may not have the physical gifts others do. Many families are not willing to work out the logistics of getting their kid to the field continually. That is OK.

Quality is just fine but more varied than ever before. Whether you believe all those kids on 'B' and 'C' clubs and teams should be bothering is a different discussion.
I should have been a bit clearer, in declaring it dreadful, my point was more directed to the concept of 'team' lacrosse. I saw too much of it on PT and Express North AA 2020 + 2019 where athletic middies are taking ill advised, low lacrosse IQ shots in the hopes of being seen and recruited early. But as far as your last statement, I don't care if you want to call it 'B' or 'C' there should always be an opportunity somewhere for kids who love the game and just want to play during the summer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I should have been a bit clearer, in declaring it dreadful, my point was more directed to the concept of 'team' lacrosse. I saw too much of it on PT and Express North AA 2020 + 2019 where athletic middies are taking ill advised, low lacrosse IQ shots in the hopes of being seen and recruited early.


Fair point. But you must admit that those two programs in particular make recruiting their primary focus.

You reap what you sow.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I should have been a bit clearer, in declaring it dreadful, my point was more directed to the concept of 'team' lacrosse. I saw too much of it on PT and Express North AA 2020 + 2019 where athletic middies are taking ill advised, low lacrosse IQ shots in the hopes of being seen and recruited early.


Fair point. But you must admit that those two programs in particular make recruiting their primary focus.

You reap what you sow.


Have the two programs had many "early commits" in the 2019 and 2020 classes? How does one differentiate between a program that places kids and one that just has great players that should receive college attention? Contacts? Showcase appearances? Great coaching?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Anyone have any insight into who the Express North 2020 coaches are?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have any insight into who the Express North 2020 coaches are?


Good question. Also the 2021 team? Can't find anything on the website.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have any insight into who the Express North 2020 coaches are?


Good question. Also the 2021 team? Can't find anything on the website.


I got an email the other day with tryout information and coaches for years 2022-2026, maybe still confirming the other grades? I'd be surprised to see any changes for the 2019 & 2018's.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Nic Bell from Trinity-Pawling is Coaching the 2020 AA team

Rick Trizano from Iona Prep is Coaching the 2021 team

Chris Schreiber is doing everything he can to build a winning organization.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That was the best post on this site, great Job and hopefully these directors listen
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That was the best post on this site, great Job and hopefully these directors listen


Listen to what?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
so how were tryouts for everyone this weekend?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
so how were tryouts for everyone this weekend?


Wet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Numbers that showed up??
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Numbers that showed up??
I think numbers looked down for Express North & Primetime but could be just for 2020 & 2021...not sure for other grade years. But at close to 75-100$ per try-out doesn't make much sense to try out for 3 or 4 teams anymore.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Numbers that showed up??
I think numbers looked down for Express North & Primetime but could be just for 2020 & 2021...not sure for other grade years. But at close to 75-100$ per try-out doesn't make much sense to try out for 3 or 4 teams anymore.


Looked to be a number of kids at these tryouts for 2021 that had reclassed. Just nuts. And won't they get pushed back up by next year with the new age based rules? I don't get it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
They will be in HS next year as 9th graders (NOT 10th graders) so this won't effect them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What's the difference going into 9th vs going into 10th?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They will be in HS next year as 9th graders (NOT 10th graders) so this won't effect them.


It will for club teams that will be age based. If you reclassed to 2021 (14U), next year instead of 15U you will be pushed back up to 16U since that's reflective of their actual age.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
are club teams mandating age based teams?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
are club teams mandating age based teams?
They don't seem to be, and as long as tournaments and team 'recruiting' events are grade based, there wouldn't seem to be a rush to do so
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Numbers that showed up??
I think numbers looked down for Express North & Primetime but could be just for 2020 & 2021...not sure for other grade years. But at close to 75-100$ per try-out doesn't make much sense to try out for 3 or 4 teams anymore.


Looked to be a number of kids at these tryouts for 2021 that had reclassed. Just nuts. And won't they get pushed back up by next year with the new age based rules? I don't get it.
Wasn't at Express North try-outs, but Prime Time 2021 & 2020 teams could both be 50% holdbacks this year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Numbers that showed up??
I think numbers looked down for Express North & Primetime but could be just for 2020 & 2021...not sure for other grade years. But at close to 75-100$ per try-out doesn't make much sense to try out for 3 or 4 teams anymore.


Looked to be a number of kids at these tryouts for 2021 that had reclassed. Just nuts. And won't they get pushed back up by next year with the new age based rules? I don't get it.
Wasn't at Express North try-outs, but Prime Time 2021 & 2020 teams could both be 50% holdbacks this year


Chasing that dream of $3,000 in scholarship money.....Maybe.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Numbers that showed up??
I think numbers looked down for Express North & Primetime but could be just for 2020 & 2021...not sure for other grade years. But at close to 75-100$ per try-out doesn't make much sense to try out for 3 or 4 teams anymore.


Looked to be a number of kids at these tryouts for 2021 that had reclassed. Just nuts. And won't they get pushed back up by next year with the new age based rules? I don't get it.
Wasn't at Express North try-outs, but Prime Time 2021 & 2020 teams could both be 50% holdbacks this year


I would be curious to know if the new age based rules will impact club programs. Are clubs somehow bound by the US lacrosse rules or can they just say screw it and keep doing things as they have already done? Nothing on the US lax site addresses this. Anyone have any insight?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Numbers that showed up??
I think numbers looked down for Express North & Primetime but could be just for 2020 & 2021...not sure for other grade years. But at close to 75-100$ per try-out doesn't make much sense to try out for 3 or 4 teams anymore.


Looked to be a number of kids at these tryouts for 2021 that had reclassed. Just nuts. And won't they get pushed back up by next year with the new age based rules? I don't get it.
Wasn't at Express North try-outs, but Prime Time 2021 & 2020 teams could both be 50% holdbacks this year


I would be curious to know if the new age based rules will impact club programs. Are clubs somehow bound by the US lacrosse rules or can they just say screw it and keep doing things as they have already done? Nothing on the US lax site addresses this. Anyone have any insight?


I could be wrong but if alliances create their own tournaments like NLF who cares what US Lacrosse says. they will do things as they see fit and why shouldn't they. As long as it is competitive lacrosse. You want like teams playing like teams who cares what the individual age is.

Although I get it as a parent, some dont want to play against older bigger stronger, and some even do the anti sportsmanship thing and prefer their offspring to play down, but my kid always played up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
A lot of talent at tryouts today for Predators. They should be one of the top teams this year. Great consistant coaching every year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
As far as age limits impacting clubs, no way. They are in it to win it. We'd all love to see the birthdates of kids playing clubs at tourneys. Only when teams face the WSYL birthdate issue will some teams adjust their rosters to keep major holdbacks off the roster, if the 9/1 rumors are true.

NLF was supposed to have asked for birthdate checks for their tourneys but what that entailed who knows. Their clubs are mainly holdbacks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Please note. Every club program is the greatest. Just ask them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Please note. Every club program is the greatest. Just ask them.


Ah the ole Joe Flacco debate! What else do you expect them to say.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Please note. Every club program is the greatest. Just ask them.


Ah the ole Joe Flacco debate! What else do you expect them to say.
What's lacking in Westchester is a solid B program, (or A, if you're now using the AA model). But I would guess nobody would want to brag about being the best 2nd Tier program
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
tristate out of suny purchase is a solid A/B team, however you want to label it
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
tristate out of suny purchase is a solid A/B team, however you want to label it


Did they have good numbers yesterday? I just got an alert they reopened registration for day 2 of tryouts on Sept. 10.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Please note. Every club program is the greatest. Just ask them.


Ah the ole Joe Flacco debate! What else do you expect them to say.


The pandering to the parents is sickening. And all the parents are there starry eyed dreaming of there kid's offer from Brown at age 13. None of these programs sets realistic expectations. The game used be fun.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Hey Westchester, how many holdback you have playing in Sect 1 this year. and does anyone know if Ct ever pass the by law about age for HS sports in CT.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
In CT you cant turn 20 before 4/1 and play a sport.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
In CT you cant turn 20 before 4/1 and play a sport.


So you can be a 20 year old college freshman the following year. Or PG and be a 21 year old college freshman. Holy crow, you can play most of your lax season as a 20 year old senior if you birthday was4/2 wth.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Please note. Every club program is the greatest. Just ask them.


Ah the ole Joe Flacco debate! What else do you expect them to say.


The pandering to the parents is sickening. And all the parents are there starry eyed dreaming of there kid's offer from Brown at age 13. None of these programs sets realistic expectations. The game used be fun.
Everything you say is absolutely true, but that 'pandering' also equates to running a business and giving the paying customer what they want, or think they want. The first thing Schreiber said at Express North try-out mini-parent meeting is; they are a business. He comes off like he doesn't agree with early recruiting, reclassifying, grade based, etc... but then goes on to say they are part of NLF, kids will see recruiters at an early age, everything that starry eyed parent wants to hear....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Please note. Every club program is the greatest. Just ask them.


Ah the ole Joe Flacco debate! What else do you expect them to say.


The pandering to the parents is sickening. And all the parents are there starry eyed dreaming of there kid's offer from Brown at age 13. None of these programs sets realistic expectations. The game used be fun.
Everything you say is absolutely true, but that 'pandering' also equates to running a business and giving the paying customer what they want, or think they want. The first thing Schreiber said at Express North try-out mini-parent meeting is; they are a business. He comes off like he doesn't agree with early recruiting, reclassifying, grade based, etc... but then goes on to say they are part of NLF, kids will see recruiters at an early age, everything that starry eyed parent wants to hear....


I don't see anything wrong with that, gives honest opinion then gives the facts. You can have a feeling towards something and relay that message but also convey what is happening. reality vs perception.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am hearing that Primetime, which is based in Lewisboro, and has been traditionally very strong, is no longer going to be able to call John Jay HS their home. It seems like they are scrambling for field space and have not let anyone know where that may be. This could change alot of the dynamic as I am hearing Express North is calling the Harvey School in Katonah, their new home, Does anyone know where Prime Time will be going? some are saying down County but not confirmed

On. 8/15 A new location for tryouts was announced. Don't know where practices will be held.


Not sure where practices will be, but second day of tryouts are at Purchase. The SUNY must be making some good coin as it seems nearly every travel team is having tryouts on campus on the 30th.


Westchester Warriors, they play out of Kennedy Catholic HS. As we always see new teams come and go this may have some staying power. Good directors a school who has joined Catholic league, some good coaches could this gain traction?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Please note. Every club program is the greatest. Just ask them.


Ah the ole Joe Flacco debate! What else do you expect them to say.


The pandering to the parents is sickening. And all the parents are there starry eyed dreaming of there kid's offer from Brown at age 13. None of these programs sets realistic expectations. The game used be fun.
Everything you say is absolutely true, but that 'pandering' also equates to running a business and giving the paying customer what they want, or think they want. The first thing Schreiber said at Express North try-out mini-parent meeting is; they are a business. He comes off like he doesn't agree with early recruiting, reclassifying, grade based, etc... but then goes on to say they are part of NLF, kids will see recruiters at an early age, everything that starry eyed parent wants to hear....


I don't see anything wrong with that, gives honest opinion then gives the facts. You can have a feeling towards something and relay that message but also convey what is happening. reality vs perception.


I totally appreciate the honesty and that it is a business but the part that is always left out, especially for parents of younger kids, is that these programs are highly competitive and are geared towards grooming D1 players and that many of you will be playing elsewhere in a few years unless your child is exceptional. And that generally means an outstanding stick, very fast and big.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
IF YOUR GOAL IS TO PLAY college lacrosse at any level- it is no surprise that primetime, express north are geared toward that level of exposure , tristate, warriors, and town affiliated type programs can do the trick, but are not geared towards the best 10 players , in front of the best college s at the best tourneys etc. for now that is the way it is, although that is rapidly changing with the growth of new teams
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am hearing that Primetime, which is based in Lewisboro, and has been traditionally very strong, is no longer going to be able to call John Jay HS their home. It seems like they are scrambling for field space and have not let anyone know where that may be. This could change alot of the dynamic as I am hearing Express North is calling the Harvey School in Katonah, their new home, Does anyone know where Prime Time will be going? some are saying down County but not confirmed

On. 8/15 A new location for tryouts was announced. Don't know where practices will be held.


Not sure where practices will be, but second day of tryouts are at Purchase. The SUNY must be making some good coin as it seems nearly every travel team is having tryouts on campus on the 30th.


Westchester Warriors, they play out of Kennedy Catholic HS. As we always see new teams come and go this may have some staying power. Good directors a school who has joined Catholic league, some good coaches could this gain traction?
I hope so. Northern Westchester needs solid B+ type of program that is not just focused on early D1 recruiting, but actually teach the game the way it's meant to be played. (Team centric vs. showcasing individuals). I think Tri State 91 does this well in southern Westchester. Warriors had decent but not great numbers show for their first try-out. (Although very few 2019)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IF YOUR GOAL IS TO PLAY college lacrosse at any level- it is no surprise that primetime, express north are geared toward that level of exposure , tristate, warriors, and town affiliated type programs can do the trick, but are not geared towards the best 10 players , in front of the best college s at the best tourneys etc. for now that is the way it is, although that is rapidly changing with the growth of new teams
And with that being said it would not surprise me from what I saw the past 2 weeks that Express North & PT 9th grade teams (2020) are made up of close to 50- 75% reclassified kids. (and it's always entertaining to hear these parents say they didn't reclassify their kids for lacrosse purposes) So yes, I hope there is a growth of new teams for that next tier of player.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
how often are the best 5th /6th graders lets say- still the best in 9th grade? does it carry through ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
how often are the best 5th /6th graders lets say- still the best in 9th grade? does it carry through ?
that really depends, on the individual player's physical maturation, and then when hitting 9th grade for the elite lacrosse programs there is large influx of reclassified kids who may be 1 - 1 1/2 years older.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
DO KIDS JUST SAY - IM GONNA do a pg year and then play a year down ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IF YOUR GOAL IS TO PLAY college lacrosse at any level- it is no surprise that primetime, express north are geared toward that level of exposure , tristate, warriors, and town affiliated type programs can do the trick, but are not geared towards the best 10 players , in front of the best college s at the best tourneys etc. for now that is the way it is, although that is rapidly changing with the growth of new teams
You're absolutely right when it comes to Prime Time and Express. But it's also interesting to see how well Yorktown Ballers are placing their top players, while integrating mid level players which enables the High School to maintain it's dominance in Westchester. An interesting analysis I heard in the spring from a HS coach when Fox Lane was upset by Mahopac 2 years in a row, and John Jay not really competitive with Yorktown in recent years is part of the Prime Time Effect. (High Scoring Top recruits who are unable to play the team game when it matters most.) That being said , Prime Time does work really hard to get their players recruited which I guess in the end matters the most.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
the Primetime john jay way is great for recruiting, but horrible for the town- they have always focused on the top 5 kids in each grade and not on building the foundation of the youth program. at the younger ages in john jay- only a small fraction of kids play travel at any level. and rest do whatever. this is often a problem when travel and town are somewhat connected. kids that are not capable of playing travel will fall behind and quit at a young age, other towns are doing it smarter at the younger ages and keeping kids playing together - when a childs only instructional option outside the town season is Primetime, it makes it harder to build that foundation
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My kid needs to put on some size in order to compete. He's already re-classed but he needs a bit more help. Any of these teams have a doctor on staff to administer human growth hormone?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
DO KIDS JUST SAY - IM GONNA do a pg year and then play a year down ?
Usually a PG year is someone repeating senior year at a Prep School whereas reclassifying usually happens in 8th/9th grade when first enrolling at a Prep High School. Because lacrosse is grade based and not age based it will always look like playing down....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My kid needs to put on some size in order to compete. He's already re-classed but he needs a bit more help. Any of these teams have a doctor on staff to administer human growth hormone?
Might have to travel to Baltimore and join the Crabs Travel program...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
the Primetime john jay way is great for recruiting, but horrible for the town- they have always focused on the top 5 kids in each grade and not on building the foundation of the youth program. at the younger ages in john jay- only a small fraction of kids play travel at any level. and rest do whatever. this is often a problem when travel and town are somewhat connected. kids that are not capable of playing travel will fall behind and quit at a young age, other towns are doing it smarter at the younger ages and keeping kids playing together - when a childs only instructional option outside the town season is Primetime, it makes it harder to build that foundation
Which is a shame because the Bocklet's helped build that original foundation idea you mention, but has since disappeared.
Another stupid, uniformed post. Primetime and John Jay are not connected. Primetime is a business run by a former John Jay player and they take the best players, does not matter if you play for John Jay. I'm guessing your kid was cut by them....there are so many options for kids of all ages; Superstar, American Lax Academy, House of Sports, Team 91, Express North, Warriors, Brewster Sports Center, Danbury Sports...and the list goes on.
Quote " when a childs only instructional option outside the town season is Primetime, it makes it harder to build that foundation"
Well if that is the case it is a lazy parents fault, I just listed all of the above options and I'm sure I forgot some.
Another post from a C level parent that is bitter towards the world because his kid can't make an A team or a team like Primetime or Express.....May be time to move on to Choir or some non-athletic activity or just suck it up and play at the B/C level where your kid belongs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Bladerunner
Another stupid, uniformed post. Primetime and John Jay are not connected. Primetime is a business run by a former John Jay player and they take the best players, does not matter if you play for John Jay. I'm guessing your kid was cut by them....there are so many options for kids of all ages; Superstar, American Lax Academy, House of Sports, Team 91, Express North, Warriors, Brewster Sports Center, Danbury Sports...and the list goes on.
Quote " when a childs only instructional option outside the town season is Primetime, it makes it harder to build that foundation"
Well if that is the case it is a lazy parents fault, I just listed all of the above options and I'm sure I forgot some.
Another post from a C level parent that is bitter towards the world because his kid can't make an A team or a team like Primetime or Express.....May be time to move on to Choir or some non-athletic activity or just suck it up and play at the B/C level where your kid belongs.


Man that is angry. I'm not the one that made the post you are criticizing but I'm thinking you need some medication. I didn't think the JJ post was as critical as you read it but even if it is I think you are a bit too caught up in your own son's lacrosse prowess. If you have a son that is an A,B or C player and think that alone is going to define where they end up in life, I just feel bad for you. Most of the kids accepted to Princeton will not be athletes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Lots of people on this board criticizing programs, they need to look in the mirror. Go out and practice, stop blaming others for your shortcomings
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Bladerunner
Another stupid, uniformed post. Primetime and John Jay are not connected. Primetime is a business run by a former John Jay player and they take the best players, does not matter if you play for John Jay. I'm guessing your kid was cut by them....there are so many options for kids of all ages; Superstar, American Lax Academy, House of Sports, Team 91, Express North, Warriors, Brewster Sports Center, Danbury Sports...and the list goes on.
Quote " when a childs only instructional option outside the town season is Primetime, it makes it harder to build that foundation"
Well if that is the case it is a lazy parents fault, I just listed all of the above options and I'm sure I forgot some.
Another post from a C level parent that is bitter towards the world because his kid can't make an A team or a team like Primetime or Express.....May be time to move on to Choir or some non-athletic activity or just suck it up and play at the B/C level where your kid belongs.


Says the dad from "Lower Westchester" that has a hold back on the team. Although he may be half right, the turnaround could be attributed to coaching changes not club strategies.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Bladerunner
Another stupid, uniformed post. Primetime and John Jay are not connected. Primetime is a business run by a former John Jay player and they take the best players, does not matter if you play for John Jay. I'm guessing your kid was cut by them....there are so many options for kids of all ages; Superstar, American Lax Academy, House of Sports, Team 91, Express North, Warriors, Brewster Sports Center, Danbury Sports...and the list goes on.
Quote " when a childs only instructional option outside the town season is Primetime, it makes it harder to build that foundation"
Well if that is the case it is a lazy parents fault, I just listed all of the above options and I'm sure I forgot some.
Another post from a C level parent that is bitter towards the world because his kid can't make an A team or a team like Primetime or Express.....May be time to move on to Choir or some non-athletic activity or just suck it up and play at the B/C level where your kid belongs.
I guess if you were a bit more informed, you would have added, "run by a former John Jay player AND current JJ Varsity assistant coach". But that's ok you still get my vote for Lacrosse Dad of the Year vs the rest of the lazy B & C parents that must be out there. Btw. my original post was just an appreciation for the job the Yorktown Ballers do with all level of players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Well that makes a lot of sense....the top youth kids don't even play for the ballers and in HS the kids have basically been forced to play for them by Marr...but that's ok right?? No conflict there!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Any truth to the rumor that North 2022 team imploded over the summer? Played in B and then moved to A and got crushed so they brought in some ringers from LI to win games with 30 kids on team? Heard a bunch of kids never saw the field.....CS just trying to win games to make program look good and forcing coach to sit kids?? If true sounds terrible but somewhat expected
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
that story is 10000000% accurate about north22 - 1/2 the team or more went to the warriors
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
stupid and uninformed? your on crack, lets look at the facts here - yes Prime time and John Jay youth are separate organizations. one is for profit, one is not- however they are essentially run by the same people, Daniello, Lupinacci , macmahon. all of the paid pt coaches are also the same ones coaching youth . my point regarding john jay youth is very simple- when a child is forced to seek additional instruction, he or she must pay a travel organization to get that instruction. that price is often a premium. other towns are offering additional training for a reasonable price which naturally attracts more kids given the nature of a multi sport athlete that plays more than one sport . john jay should be offering winter training, fogo, goaltending and they don't. if you want to build an empire, you need to have as many kids playing as possible for a reasonable price. it is that simple, other towns are doing it, jjyl is not . look at towns like Yorktown, garden city, Manhasset, they all try and keep the kids from the town playing together
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
sounds like you have the wrong club
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
stupid and uninformed? your on crack, lets look at the facts here - yes Prime time and John Jay youth are separate organizations. one is for profit, one is not- however they are essentially run by the same people, Daniello, Lupinacci , macmahon. all of the paid pt coaches are also the same ones coaching youth . my point regarding john jay youth is very simple- when a child is forced to seek additional instruction, he or she must pay a travel organization to get that instruction. that price is often a premium. other towns are offering additional training for a reasonable price which naturally attracts more kids given the nature of a multi sport athlete that plays more than one sport . john jay should be offering winter training, fogo, goaltending and they don't. if you want to build an empire, you need to have as many kids playing as possible for a reasonable price. it is that simple, other towns are doing it, jjyl is not . look at towns like Yorktown, garden city, Manhasset, they all try and keep the kids from the town playing together


My kid plays for the JJ youth program and your facts are simply wrong. As far as I know Lupinacci and macmahon don't run primtime only Daniello does so thats simply incorrect. And my kid did attend fogo training by JJ, they brought the lizards guy in to teach and it helped tremendously. I also understand they hold goalie training with one of the varsity coaches every week, I also just signed my kid up for the JJ fall clinics run by the varsity guys. Winter is run by parents at Brewster. There are many, many options for the kids, my kid also goes to Colsey's program every week to workk on box skills. Your facts are just flat out wrong, sounds like a disgruntled parent or former coach that was replaced by a superior paid coach.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
that story is 10000000% accurate about north22 - 1/2 the team or more went to the warriors


Maybe that is the right place....stepping down from a B program to a C at best program would be a good choice for those kids that are still developmental. I was at warriors tryouts, they are getting all the kids that can't make the other programs. Hopefully NS and VS can find some C level tournaments to go win and brag about it on social media!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
that's funny - no one I know got special goalie training this year or fogo training from the beast and lupinacci is co director of primetime, also sits on the board of jjyl and gets paid to schedule - and jjyl is extremely expensive relative to it s peers so obviously you haven't stopped drinking the cool aid - does every grade get the Brewster winter option?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
THE SAVASTANO BROTHERS ARE very well respected , this is their first year , it will a good program and will thrive as it becomes more established, they got a late start and still managed to put it together - don't be so negative
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
that's funny - no one I know got special goalie training this year or fogo training from the beast and lupinacci is co director of primetime, also sits on the board of jjyl and gets paid to schedule - and jjyl is extremely expensive relative to it s peers so obviously you haven't stopped drinking the cool aid - does every grade get the Brewster winter option?


I heard they are expensive because they have all paid coaches now, no more Dad's which I wish they would do in our town where Johnny's Dad has the team feed him the ball for goals!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Didn't they coach for express north this past summer?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any truth to the rumor that North 2022 team imploded over the summer? Played in B and then moved to A and got crushed so they brought in some ringers from LI to win games with 30 kids on team? Heard a bunch of kids never saw the field.....CS just trying to win games to make program look good and forcing coach to sit kids?? If true sounds terrible but somewhat expected


May or may not be true but would be out of character with the older North teams who are some of the leanest club teams around - run with 20 kids tops
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
paid coaches is great at the older ages, but you do tend to lose the ability for that one dad or dads to keep the kiods playing together before or after the season when that paid coach, goes about his business
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well that makes a lot of sense....the top youth kids don't even play for the ballers and in HS the kids have basically been forced to play for them by Marr...but that's ok right?? No conflict there!
While you're absolutely right about a conflict of interest, that does seem to run prevalent in the lacrosse world with HS coaches running programs or coaching summer teams. Colsey/Ridgefield/Superstars Bruce/Brunswick/Two-Way Daniello/Prime-Time/JJ etc. I'd be curious to the Yorktown player and parent point of view. I just see the results of a winning (dominant?) high school program where the kids are playing the best teams on LI and Jersey while advancing to state play-off games and the top players seem to be (some early) committed to top colleges. Again, my first post had more to do with how programs (high school/summer) incorporate or improve that mid-level player...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
THE SAVASTANO BROTHERS ARE very well respected , this is their first year , it will a good program and will thrive as it becomes more established, they got a late start and still managed to put it together - don't be so negative
Agree !!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
paid coaches is great at the older ages, but you do tend to lose the ability for that one dad or dads to keep the kiods playing together before or after the season when that paid coach, goes about his business


How do you lose that ability? Why can't that one dad or dad's pull together the kids and go practice on a field or schedule a scrimmage with someone? It's all about stepping up, a lot of talk no action from most people.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Because coaches don't want dad's involved. They want control of the message.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Makes no sense, you just said paid coaches move on. Get a life.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well that makes a lot of sense....the top youth kids don't even play for the ballers and in HS the kids have basically been forced to play for them by Marr...but that's ok right?? No conflict there!
While you're absolutely right about a conflict of interest, that does seem to run prevalent in the lacrosse world with HS coaches running programs or coaching summer teams. Colsey/Ridgefield/Superstars Bruce/Brunswick/Two-Way Daniello/Prime-Time/JJ etc. I'd be curious to the Yorktown player and parent point of view. I just see the results of a winning (dominant?) high school program where the kids are playing the best teams on LI and Jersey while advancing to state play-off games and the top players seem to be (some early) committed to top colleges. Again, my first post had more to do with how programs (high school/summer) incorporate or improve that mid-level player...


be careful what you wish for, is the grass greener because it is watered and cared for, or they just use different manure.

Those Li and Nj program you talk about have there issues and distractions as well
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IF YOUR GOAL IS TO PLAY college lacrosse at any level- it is no surprise that primetime, express north are geared toward that level of exposure , tristate, warriors, and town affiliated type programs can do the trick, but are not geared towards the best 10 players , in front of the best college s at the best tourneys etc. for now that is the way it is, although that is rapidly changing with the growth of new teams
You're absolutely right when it comes to Prime Time and Express. But it's also interesting to see how well Yorktown Ballers are placing their top players, while integrating mid level players which enables the High School to maintain it's dominance in Westchester. An interesting analysis I heard in the spring from a HS coach when Fox Lane was upset by Mahopac 2 years in a row, and John Jay not really competitive with Yorktown in recent years is part of the Prime Time Effect. (High Scoring Top recruits who are unable to play the team game when it matters most.) That being said , Prime Time does work really hard to get their players recruited which I guess in the end matters the most.


Yorktown 2019 recently committed to Richmond. Looks like Marr and company are doing something right in Ytown.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well that makes a lot of sense....the top youth kids don't even play for the ballers and in HS the kids have basically been forced to play for them by Marr...but that's ok right?? No conflict there!
While you're absolutely right about a conflict of interest, that does seem to run prevalent in the lacrosse world with HS coaches running programs or coaching summer teams. Colsey/Ridgefield/Superstars Bruce/Brunswick/Two-Way Daniello/Prime-Time/JJ etc. I'd be curious to the Yorktown player and parent point of view. I just see the results of a winning (dominant?) high school program where the kids are playing the best teams on LI and Jersey while advancing to state play-off games and the top players seem to be (some early) committed to top colleges. Again, my first post had more to do with how programs (high school/summer) incorporate or improve that mid-level player...


Marr is a great coach, I don't believe he is involved in the administration of Ballers program. Its not right to smear his name on this board.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Makes no sense, you just said paid coaches move on. Get a life.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown 2019 recently committed to Richmond. Looks like Marr and company are doing something right in Ytown.

Not bad for a suspended coach!! Nice to see he is still working hard getting his players recruited no??
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown 2019 recently committed to Richmond. Looks like Marr and company are doing something right in Ytown.

Not bad for a suspended coach!! Nice to see he is still working hard getting his players recruited no??



You got me hook line and sinker

Who takes credit for that, HS or club? Just like North Rockland Kid earlier this year, HS or Club?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
that story is 10000000% accurate about north22 - 1/2 the team or more went to the warriors


The one's that left were not very good, will not be missed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown 2019 recently committed to Richmond. Looks like Marr and company are doing something right in Ytown.

Not bad for a suspended coach!! Nice to see he is still working hard getting his players recruited no??
although I'm guessing LI Express would like to take the credit for this
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown 2019 recently committed to Richmond. Looks like Marr and company are doing something right in Ytown.

Not bad for a suspended coach!! Nice to see he is still working hard getting his players recruited no??


Kids getting recruited isn't a singular transaction, its a long process of teaching and coaching.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown 2019 recently committed to Richmond. Looks like Marr and company are doing something right in Ytown.

Not bad for a suspended coach!! Nice to see he is still working hard getting his players recruited no??


Pretty sure the Yorktown 2019 plays for Express North, as do several others
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown 2019 recently committed to Richmond. Looks like Marr and company are doing something right in Ytown.

Not bad for a suspended coach!! Nice to see he is still working hard getting his players recruited no??



You got me hook line and sinker

Who takes credit for that, HS or club? Just like North Rockland Kid earlier this year, HS or Club?


Who gets credit? The player for working hard, parents for their DNA and dedicating time to the player, coaches starting in youth program (Yorktown may be the best around), club coaches and HS coaches. I think each experience is different. Did the player go to a showcase? How did he get invited? Was he seen at the showcase? etc. But, I'm sure the clubs will gladly take the credit.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown 2019 recently committed to Richmond. Looks like Marr and company are doing something right in Ytown.

Not bad for a suspended coach!! Nice to see he is still working hard getting his players recruited no??


Pretty sure the Yorktown 2019 plays for Express North, as do several others


A father's dream fulfilled.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown 2019 recently committed to Richmond. Looks like Marr and company are doing something right in Ytown.

Not bad for a suspended coach!! Nice to see he is still working hard getting his players recruited no??



You got me hook line and sinker

Who takes credit for that, HS or club? Just like North Rockland Kid earlier this year, HS or Club?


Who gets credit? The player for working hard, parents for their DNA and dedicating time to the player, coaches starting in youth program (Yorktown may be the best around), club coaches and HS coaches. I think each experience is different. Did the player go to a showcase? How did he get invited? Was he seen at the showcase? etc. But, I'm sure the clubs will gladly take the credit.


Takes and gets are different.

Kid (and yes parents) gets and deserves credit, absolutely. Who else deserves credit who knows. Maybe other family members; siblings, aunts, uncles cousins. Youth Coach maybe but not always, please stop that. Be proud you coached the player, player should always give thanks and S/O to youth coach but to take credit not so sure. Club coaches maybe a bit more depending on the club, HS not sure this day and age.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any truth to the rumor that North 2022 team imploded over the summer? Played in B and then moved to A and got crushed so they brought in some ringers from LI to win games with 30 kids on team? Heard a bunch of kids never saw the field.....CS just trying to win games to make program look good and forcing coach to sit kids?? If true sounds terrible but somewhat expected


Imploded? Far from it. That's the problem with rumors.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown 2019 recently committed to Richmond. Looks like Marr and company are doing something right in Ytown.

Not bad for a suspended coach!! Nice to see he is still working hard getting his players recruited no??



You got me hook line and sinker

Who takes credit for that, HS or club? Just like North Rockland Kid earlier this year, HS or Club?


Who gets credit? Are you serious? Is there any chance a few of you meatheads can celebrate the accomplishments of the youth in our area as opposed to always sniping and decrying and turning everything into a negative thread?

Congrats to the Yorktown kid, I'm sure he worked hard, practiced his butt off and got plenty of great coaching. Congrats to Yorktown, a lacrosse powerhouse that keeps producing lacrosse talent.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown 2019 recently committed to Richmond. Looks like Marr and company are doing something right in Ytown.

Not bad for a suspended coach!! Nice to see he is still working hard getting his players recruited no??



You got me hook line and sinker

Who takes credit for that, HS or club? Just like North Rockland Kid earlier this year, HS or Club?


Who gets credit? Are you serious? Is there any chance a few of you meatheads can celebrate the accomplishments of the youth in our area as opposed to always sniping and decrying and turning everything into a negative thread?

Congrats to the Yorktown kid, I'm sure he worked hard, practiced his butt off and got plenty of great coaching. Congrats to Yorktown, a lacrosse powerhouse that keeps producing lacrosse talent.
always appreciate when a self righteous Archie Bunker type scolds the forum. No one belittled the accomplishments of the early recruit and , if one took the time to read the thread, it began with a discussion about the Yorktown Ballers and their influence on the dominance of the Yorktown HS program. But in this recent age of early recruitment, club teams obviously play a role and they certainly like to promote and advertise how many commitments they have. In this case , I believe Express North.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My son was offered a spot on Express North 2021A. He played somewhere else last summer and it was not great. Recognizing that this is really a B team I am concerned about paying big money to find out that the team is horrendous. I don't need it to be AA ball but I need it not to suck. Any insight on that team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son was offered a spot on Express North 2021A. He played somewhere else last summer and it was not great. Recognizing that this is really a B team I am concerned about paying big money to find out that the team is horrendous. I don't need it to be AA ball but I need it not to suck. Any insight on that team?


What is your sons position? (it matters)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son was offered a spot on Express North 2021A. He played somewhere else last summer and it was not great. Recognizing that this is really a B team I am concerned about paying big money to find out that the team is horrendous. I don't need it to be AA ball but I need it not to suck. Any insight on that team?
From experience with North 2020 A, it will depend on the coaches, ours were a bit more rah rah than the intensity of the AA, which was fine for our team. I'm guessing will be playing in the more local tournaments of LI and Ct. and will be one of the better teams at those tournaments. Personally, wouldn't look at it as a B team, although it is the second team of Express North. The coaching is more 'adult' (age wise) than other Westchester programs. My son didn't make either AA or A this year, despite the cost Express North's reputation and talent is only getting stronger compared to other Northern Westchester programs
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son was offered a spot on Express North 2021A. He played somewhere else last summer and it was not great. Recognizing that this is really a B team I am concerned about paying big money to find out that the team is horrendous. I don't need it to be AA ball but I need it not to suck. Any insight on that team?


What is your sons position? (it matters)


Mid. By what should that matter if I'm trying to gauge the team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Are you looking for your son to be recruited, or just play at a higher level and improve his skills?

If you are looking for your son to improve his skills, you need to know the credentials of the "A" coach and weigh that against any alternatives your son may have.

If you are looking for your son to get recruited, you need to find out what tournaments the team will play in. For the most part, the level of tournaments an "A" team is entered into will not attract many college coaches.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son was offered a spot on Express North 2021A. He played somewhere else last summer and it was not great. Recognizing that this is really a B team I am concerned about paying big money to find out that the team is horrendous. I don't need it to be AA ball but I need it not to suck. Any insight on that team?


What is your sons position? (it matters)


Mid. By what should that matter if I'm trying to gauge the team?


Regardless of the team strength, middies and defense will see plenty of action. Sometimes attack on weaker teams rarely see the ball. So, if game experience matters, middies will always be in the mix. Are coaches experienced and committed? My oldest played on a team years ago that had two of the top players fresh out of college coaching the team and they didn't yet know how to coach. Great former players that needed to learn the coaching aspect of the game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown 2019 recently committed to Richmond. Looks like Marr and company are doing something right in Ytown.

Not bad for a suspended coach!! Nice to see he is still working hard getting his players recruited no??


Pretty sure the Yorktown 2019 plays for Express North, as do several others


He also plays for Yorktown Ballers.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son was offered a spot on Express North 2021A. He played somewhere else last summer and it was not great. Recognizing that this is really a B team I am concerned about paying big money to find out that the team is horrendous. I don't need it to be AA ball but I need it not to suck. Any insight on that team?


What is your sons position? (it matters)


Mid. By what should that matter if I'm trying to gauge the team?


Strong potential for them to suck. You just never know. Some chatter among the AA 2021 parents that some kids on the AA team because of politics/relationships and not for ability.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express North 2021 is a mid level B team...don't be fooled.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021 is a mid level B team...don't be fooled.


Absolutely not true.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021 is a mid level B team...don't be fooled.


And you know this because?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Prime Time 2020 could just as well be called PT2020 Re-Classified next summer, except for maybe 3 or 4 kids, made up of all hold-backs. Should have a better record this time around.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Problem is with reclass at this age is...
If you couldn't make it at 2019 you probably just not thay good.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
No hold backs for PT 2021 just the best players from Greenwhich who are older than their NY counterparts.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No hold backs for PT 2021 just the best players from Greenwhich who are older than their NY counterparts.


which means they are holdbacks! I'm sure it's due to "academic" reasons in Kindergarten, lol! No worries they still won't be able to compete with the elite! Westchester kids are soft
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I thought the best players from Greenwich and CT. played for Eclipse?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.


We won our last tournament on LI beating teams that had won other tournaments, including the Edge from Canada. The team progressed more than I've seen with any other team. Good players, good coaches= fun summer. My son is more skilled, more confident and really head and shoulders above his town teammates. The time and money has been worth it. Yes, it helps to have Yorktown guys coaching the players. They know their stuff and are passionate.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.


We won our last tournament on LI beating teams that had won other tournaments, including the Edge from Canada. The team progressed more than I've seen with any other team. Good players, good coaches= fun summer. My son is more skilled, more confident and really head and shoulders above his town teammates. The time and money has been worth it. Yes, it helps to have Yorktown guys coaching the players. They know their stuff and are passionate.


We? Are you one of the Yorktown coaches or just a dad living vicariously through his son and now considers himself on the team? How much Express clothing do you personally own?

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No hold backs for PT 2021 just the best players from Greenwhich who are older than their NY counterparts.


Is this a joke? Plenty of hold backs on that team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No hold backs for PT 2021 just the best players from Greenwhich who are older than their NY counterparts.


Is this a joke? Plenty of hold backs on that team.


Exactly. Who is anyone kidding.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.


We won our last tournament on LI beating teams that had won other tournaments, including the Edge from Canada. The team progressed more than I've seen with any other team. Good players, good coaches= fun summer. My son is more skilled, more confident and really head and shoulders above his town teammates. The time and money has been worth it. Yes, it helps to have Yorktown guys coaching the players. They know their stuff and are passionate.


This team won NLF 2021B. Stop kidding yourself. While these boys played well, they did not play the better teams that were in the A division. Stop spouting off about winning a tournament on LI. Time for a reality check.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.


We won our last tournament on LI beating teams that had won other tournaments, including the Edge from Canada. The team progressed more than I've seen with any other team. Good players, good coaches= fun summer. My son is more skilled, more confident and really head and shoulders above his town teammates. The time and money has been worth it. Yes, it helps to have Yorktown guys coaching the players. They know their stuff and are passionate.


This team won NLF 2021B. Stop kidding yourself. While these boys played well, they did not play the better teams that were in the A division. Stop spouting off about winning a tournament on LI. Time for a reality check.
And this is exactly what's wrong with youth lacrosse today. If you're not winning AA tournaments with a team half filled with holdbacks, then you might as well not play summer lacrosse. Otherwise the Lacrosse Daddy Police will knock you back down.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No hold backs for PT 2021 just the best players from Greenwhich who are older than their NY counterparts.


Is this a joke? Plenty of hold backs on that team.


Exactly. Who is anyone kidding.
Daniello should move his PT program to the Brunswick campus. Most of the holdbacks are from there, and perhaps then they would show up for the practices and clinics,instead of not making the trek to northern Westchester.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.


We won our last tournament on LI beating teams that had won other tournaments, including the Edge from Canada. The team progressed more than I've seen with any other team. Good players, good coaches= fun summer. My son is more skilled, more confident and really head and shoulders above his town teammates. The time and money has been worth it. Yes, it helps to have Yorktown guys coaching the players. They know their stuff and are passionate.


This team won NLF 2021B. Stop kidding yourself. While these boys played well, they did not play the better teams that were in the A division. Stop spouting off about winning a tournament on LI. Time for a reality check.

And this is exactly what's wrong with youth lacrosse today. If you're not winning AA tournaments with a team half filled with holdbacks, then you might as well not play summer lacrosse. Otherwise the Lacrosse Daddy Police will knock you back down.


What is wrong is misleading other people about the current ability of a team. I never said lacrosse should only be played at an "AA" level. Just that you should stop exaggerating and bragging about winning a B tournament. Also, I guarantee Express North has more hold backs than any 2021 team on LI. Additionally, I understand that some kids on an "A" or "B" team will continue to grow and develop and will eventually surpass kids on "AA" teams. My only point is stop bragging and misleading readers. Only knocking you down, not your boy. Only wish the best for him and his teammates.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Look at who returned to that team. Not many players from last year and coach is gone. Imploded is a fact. 3rd coach in 3 years for that team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.


We won our last tournament on LI beating teams that had won other tournaments, including the Edge from Canada. The team progressed more than I've seen with any other team. Good players, good coaches= fun summer. My son is more skilled, more confident and really head and shoulders above his town teammates. The time and money has been worth it. Yes, it helps to have Yorktown guys coaching the players. They know their stuff and are passionate.


We? Are you one of the Yorktown coaches or just a dad living vicariously through his son and now considers himself on the team? How much Express clothing do you personally own?



Proud Dad living vicariously through my son. I had my 11 years of playing lacrosse. Great experience and lifelong friends. I'm a "we" kinda guy. I guess you're a sad little guy who didn't have those great experiences? Lighten up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.


We won our last tournament on LI beating teams that had won other tournaments, including the Edge from Canada. The team progressed more than I've seen with any other team. Good players, good coaches= fun summer. My son is more skilled, more confident and really head and shoulders above his town teammates. The time and money has been worth it. Yes, it helps to have Yorktown guys coaching the players. They know their stuff and are passionate.


This team won NLF 2021B. Stop kidding yourself. While these boys played well, they did not play the better teams that were in the A division. Stop spouting off about winning a tournament on LI. Time for a reality check.

And this is exactly what's wrong with youth lacrosse today. If you're not winning AA tournaments with a team half filled with holdbacks, then you might as well not play summer lacrosse. Otherwise the Lacrosse Daddy Police will knock you back down.


What is wrong is misleading other people about the current ability of a team. I never said lacrosse should only be played at an "AA" level. Just that you should stop exaggerating and bragging about winning a B tournament. Also, I guarantee Express North has more hold backs than any 2021 team on LI. Additionally, I understand that some kids on an "A" or "B" team will continue to grow and develop and will eventually surpass kids on "AA" teams. My only point is stop bragging and misleading readers. Only knocking you down, not your boy. Only wish the best for him and his teammates.


You are an idiot not worthy of a serious response. This is indeed what's wrong with youth lacrosse. Adolf Lax decides what tournament wins are worthy of praise. I don't see the poster bragging nor deceiving.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Pt2021 was a low level A team and they beat Express North by more than 10 goals.

Pt just upgraded their Defense so we'll see how they do next summer. they have a very one dimensional offense...which doesn't work playing the better teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.


We won our last tournament on LI beating teams that had won other tournaments, including the Edge from Canada. The team progressed more than I've seen with any other team. Good players, good coaches= fun summer. My son is more skilled, more confident and really head and shoulders above his town teammates. The time and money has been worth it. Yes, it helps to have Yorktown guys coaching the players. They know their stuff and are passionate.


This team won NLF 2021B. Stop kidding yourself. While these boys played well, they did not play the better teams that were in the A division. Stop spouting off about winning a tournament on LI. Time for a reality check.

And this is exactly what's wrong with youth lacrosse today. If you're not winning AA tournaments with a team half filled with holdbacks, then you might as well not play summer lacrosse. Otherwise the Lacrosse Daddy Police will knock you back down.


What is wrong is misleading other people about the current ability of a team. I never said lacrosse should only be played at an "AA" level. Just that you should stop exaggerating and bragging about winning a B tournament. Also, I guarantee Express North has more hold backs than any 2021 team on LI. Additionally, I understand that some kids on an "A" or "B" team will continue to grow and develop and will eventually surpass kids on "AA" teams. My only point is stop bragging and misleading readers. Only knocking you down, not your boy. Only wish the best for him and his teammates.


You are an idiot not worthy of a serious response. This is indeed what's wrong with youth lacrosse. Adolf Lax decides what tournament wins are worthy of praise. I don't see the poster bragging nor deceiving.


Typical over reaction from you again.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.


We won our last tournament on LI beating teams that had won other tournaments, including the Edge from Canada. The team progressed more than I've seen with any other team. Good players, good coaches= fun summer. My son is more skilled, more confident and really head and shoulders above his town teammates. The time and money has been worth it. Yes, it helps to have Yorktown guys coaching the players. They know their stuff and are passionate.


We? Are you one of the Yorktown coaches or just a dad living vicariously through his son and now considers himself on the team? How much Express clothing do you personally own?



Proud Dad living vicariously through my son. I had my 11 years of playing lacrosse. Great experience and lifelong friends. I'm a "we" kinda guy. I guess you're a sad little guy who didn't have those great experiences? Lighten up.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.


We won our last tournament on LI beating teams that had won other tournaments, including the Edge from Canada. The team progressed more than I've seen with any other team. Good players, good coaches= fun summer. My son is more skilled, more confident and really head and shoulders above his town teammates. The time and money has been worth it. Yes, it helps to have Yorktown guys coaching the players. They know their stuff and are passionate.


We? Are you one of the Yorktown coaches or just a dad living vicariously through his son and now considers himself on the team? How much Express clothing do you personally own?



Proud Dad living vicariously through my son. I had my 11 years of playing lacrosse. Great experience and lifelong friends. I'm a "we" kinda guy. I guess you're a sad little guy who didn't have those great experiences? Lighten up.


You should be proud. I played. Had great experiences and continue to maintain relationships with my former teammates. I'm plenty light but smart enough to know its my son's journey not mine and think it's unwise to ever make his playing a "we." It's his playing, his practice and his team. I'm just a fan who writes the checks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.


We won our last tournament on LI beating teams that had won other tournaments, including the Edge from Canada. The team progressed more than I've seen with any other team. Good players, good coaches= fun summer. My son is more skilled, more confident and really head and shoulders above his town teammates. The time and money has been worth it. Yes, it helps to have Yorktown guys coaching the players. They know their stuff and are passionate.


We? Are you one of the Yorktown coaches or just a dad living vicariously through his son and now considers himself on the team? How much Express clothing do you personally own?



Proud Dad living vicariously through my son. I had my 11 years of playing lacrosse. Great experience and lifelong friends. I'm a "we" kinda guy. I guess you're a sad little guy who didn't have those great experiences? Lighten up.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.


We won our last tournament on LI beating teams that had won other tournaments, including the Edge from Canada. The team progressed more than I've seen with any other team. Good players, good coaches= fun summer. My son is more skilled, more confident and really head and shoulders above his town teammates. The time and money has been worth it. Yes, it helps to have Yorktown guys coaching the players. They know their stuff and are passionate.


We? Are you one of the Yorktown coaches or just a dad living vicariously through his son and now considers himself on the team? How much Express clothing do you personally own?



Proud Dad living vicariously through my son. I had my 11 years of playing lacrosse. Great experience and lifelong friends. I'm a "we" kinda guy. I guess you're a sad little guy who didn't have those great experiences? Lighten up.


You should be proud. I played. Had great experiences and continue to maintain relationships with my former teammates. I'm plenty light but smart enough to know its my son's journey not mine and think it's unwise to ever make his playing a "we." It's his playing, his practice and his team. I'm just a fan who writes the checks.


Lighten up Francis.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought the best players from Greenwich and CT. played for Eclipse?


They do in the 2021s. And by the way, that 2021 eclipse team is going to be even better this year with a few nice adds. And not holdbacks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
In 5th grade Prime Time had a proper age team and were B level. They lost to Long Island and other decent teams by a lot. They got rid of most of those players and replaced them with older kids. We saw they were an older team by looking at the World Series roster. Most of those kids would be 2020 on Long Island. Good team but older. Got better by getting older. Having said that it is more fun playing the older team than it was playing the Best kids from Greenwhich in fith grade when they where the proper age and beating them by a lot.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
No hold backs for PT 2021 just the best players from Greenwhich who are older than their NY counterparts.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I'm sorry about your son not making Express North 2020 this year. . . . We are new to the program, and my son was offered a spot on the 2020AA team, and I would appreciate any candid information anyone has about that team specifically as we are very torn about leaving our current program, primarily because we are unfamiliar with LIE North since not many players from our town play for them. Get a general sense that recruiting a key focus for that club, which would be important to us at this age but also looking for a general sense of strength of team, how many returning players fro LY, any info on new coach.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.


We won our last tournament on LI beating teams that had won other tournaments, including the Edge from Canada. The team progressed more than I've seen with any other team. Good players, good coaches= fun summer. My son is more skilled, more confident and really head and shoulders above his town teammates. The time and money has been worth it. Yes, it helps to have Yorktown guys coaching the players. They know their stuff and are passionate.


We? Are you one of the Yorktown coaches or just a dad living vicariously through his son and now considers himself on the team? How much Express clothing do you personally own?



Proud Dad living vicariously through my son. I had my 11 years of playing lacrosse. Great experience and lifelong friends. I'm a "we" kinda guy. I guess you're a sad little guy who didn't have those great experiences? Lighten up.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Because the first tournament of the summer at HHH in Pa. They got shellacked, after that the coach put the team in A level brackets. Nothing wrong with putting the kids in brackets where they will play other players comparable to their ability. Feel free to ask one of one the Ytown coaches. They are good guys building good players/team. Schreiber is doing a fantastic job at Express North.


We won our last tournament on LI beating teams that had won other tournaments, including the Edge from Canada. The team progressed more than I've seen with any other team. Good players, good coaches= fun summer. My son is more skilled, more confident and really head and shoulders above his town teammates. The time and money has been worth it. Yes, it helps to have Yorktown guys coaching the players. They know their stuff and are passionate.


We? Are you one of the Yorktown coaches or just a dad living vicariously through his son and now considers himself on the team? How much Express clothing do you personally own?



Proud Dad living vicariously through my son. I had my 11 years of playing lacrosse. Great experience and lifelong friends. I'm a "we" kinda guy. I guess you're a sad little guy who didn't have those great experiences? Lighten up.


You should be proud. I played. Had great experiences and continue to maintain relationships with my former teammates. I'm plenty light but smart enough to know its my son's journey not mine and think it's unwise to ever make his playing a "we." It's his playing, his practice and his team. I'm just a fan who writes the checks.


Lighten up Francis.


I'll look for you, the dad all decked out in your Express gear.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse is another team that get better when they added older kids. A lot of 2002 birthdates.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought the best players from Greenwich and CT. played for Eclipse?


They do in the 2021s. And by the way, that 2021 eclipse team is going to be even better this year with a few nice adds. And not holdbacks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse is another team that get better when they added older kids. A lot of 2002 birthdates.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought the best players from Greenwich and CT. played for Eclipse?


They do in the 2021s. And by the way, that 2021 eclipse team is going to be even better this year with a few nice adds. And not holdbacks.


LI Express North 2021 doesn't have any holdbacks that I'm aware of.
Does everyone else cheat? Where's the resident blowhard?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse is another team that get better when they added older kids. A lot of 2002 birthdates.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought the best players from Greenwich and CT. played for Eclipse?


They do in the 2021s. And by the way, that 2021 eclipse team is going to be even better this year with a few nice adds. And not holdbacks.


LI Express North 2021 doesn't have any holdbacks that I'm aware of.
Does everyone else cheat? Where's the resident blowhard?


There are absolutely reclassified kids. Maybe 3-5. They were Express 2020 last year and through the miracle of summer break and private school they are now 2021s. Abracadabra.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse is another team that get better when they added older kids. A lot of 2002 birthdates.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought the best players from Greenwich and CT. played for Eclipse?


They do in the 2021s. And by the way, that 2021 eclipse team is going to be even better this year with a few nice adds. And not holdbacks.


I don't have a team roster for LIE north 2021, but I'm pretty sure you are misinformed. None this past summer and I don't think the team added 3-5 new players (all holdbacks). How are you so certain?

LI Express North 2021 doesn't have any holdbacks that I'm aware of.
Does everyone else cheat? Where's the resident blowhard?


There are absolutely reclassified kids. Maybe 3-5. They were Express 2020 last year and through the miracle of summer break and private school they are now 2021s. Abracadabra.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse is another team that get better when they added older kids. A lot of 2002 birthdates.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought the best players from Greenwich and CT. played for Eclipse?


They do in the 2021s. And by the way, that 2021 eclipse team is going to be even better this year with a few nice adds. And not holdbacks.


LI Express North 2021 doesn't have any holdbacks that I'm aware of.
Does everyone else cheat? Where's the resident blowhard?


There are absolutely reclassified kids. Maybe 3-5. They were Express 2020 last year and through the miracle of summer break and private school they are now 2021s. Abracadabra.


Eclipse 2021 also added a number of held back 2020s. Hold backs are definitely a problem at many CT & Westchester clubs when kids hit eighth grade. Do any clubs in the area take a stance against hold backs? Could be a good way to differentiate yourself against other CT & Westchester clubs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
any reclass kids on 2020 express north?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
any reclass kids on 2020 express north?
of course there are, were already last year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Holdbacks probably but no reclass kids last year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse is another team that get better when they added older kids. A lot of 2002 birthdates.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought the best players from Greenwich and CT. played for Eclipse?


They do in the 2021s. And by the way, that 2021 eclipse team is going to be even better this year with a few nice adds. And not holdbacks.


LI Express North 2021 doesn't have any holdbacks that I'm aware of.
Does everyone else cheat? Where's the resident blowhard?


There are absolutely reclassified kids. Maybe 3-5. They were Express 2020 last year and through the miracle of summer break and private school they are now 2021s. Abracadabra.


I don't have a team roster for LIE north 2021, but I'm pretty sure you are misinformed. None this past summer and I don't think the team added 3-5 new players (all holdbacks). How are you so certain?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse is another team that get better when they added older kids. A lot of 2002 birthdates.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought the best players from Greenwich and CT. played for Eclipse?


They do in the 2021s. And by the way, that 2021 eclipse team is going to be even better this year with a few nice adds. And not holdbacks.


LI Express North 2021 doesn't have any holdbacks that I'm aware of.
Does everyone else cheat? Where's the resident blowhard?


There are absolutely reclassified kids. Maybe 3-5. They were Express 2020 last year and through the miracle of summer break and private school they are now 2021s. Abracadabra.


I don't have a team roster for LIE north 2021, but I'm pretty sure you are misinformed. None this past summer and I don't think the team added 3-5 new players (all holdbacks). How are you so certain?
When I see kids who were on 2020 last year and then this year are trying out for 2021 I'm only guessing they've reclassified ....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No hold backs for PT 2021 just the best players from Greenwhich who are older than their NY counterparts.


Is this a joke? Plenty of hold backs on that team.


Exactly. Who is anyone kidding.
Daniello should move his PT program to the Brunswick campus. Most of the holdbacks are from there, and perhaps then they would show up for the practices and clinics,instead of not making the trek to northern Westchester.


PT really picked 3d clean. Will it be any different or just further north?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse is another team that get better when they added older kids. A lot of 2002 birthdates.

They do in the 2021s. And by the way, that 2021 eclipse team is going to be even better this year with a few nice adds. And not holdbacks.


LI Express North 2021 doesn't have any holdbacks that I'm aware of.
Does everyone else cheat? Where's the resident blowhard?


There are absolutely reclassified kids. Maybe 3-5. They were Express 2020 last year and through the miracle of summer break and private school they are now 2021s. Abracadabra.


I don't have a team roster for LIE north 2021, but I'm pretty sure you are misinformed. None this past summer and I don't think the team added 3-5 new players (all holdbacks). How are you so certain?
When I see kids who were on 2020 last year and then this year are trying out for 2021 I'm only guessing they've reclassified .... [/quote]

Misinformed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
LI Express North 2021 doesn't have any holdbacks that I'm aware of.
Does everyone else cheat? Where's the resident blowhard?[/quote]

There are absolutely reclassified kids. Maybe 3-5. They were Express 2020 last year and through the miracle of summer break and private school they are now 2021s. Abracadabra. [/quote]

I don't have a team roster for LIE north 2021, but I'm pretty sure you are misinformed. None this past summer and I don't think the team added 3-5 new players (all holdbacks). How are you so certain?[/quote] When I see kids who were on 2020 last year and then this year are trying out for 2021 I'm only guessing they've reclassified .... [/quote]

Misinformed. [/quote]

So holdbacks attended tryouts? And your conclusion is the LIE 2021 has a roster full of holdbacks. I know the parent group well after 3 seasons and I'm pretty sure there are no kids that should be playing in 2020. In fact, many kids are very young for 2021. Please climb down off your soap box and take your agenda with you.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Who cares. All team have them. I you think not you are delisional. It is what it is just let the kids play and enjoy.
Some people sound like they are being robbed of something.n
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who cares. All team have them. I you think not you are delisional. It is what it is just let the kids play and enjoy.
Some people sound like they are being robbed of something.n


Agreed that no one is being robbed of anything and very true that it is what it is. That's life. But philosophically I think something is broken if this is where the state of the game is.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who cares. All team have them. I you think not you are delisional. It is what it is just let the kids play and enjoy.
Some people sound like they are being robbed of something.n


Agreed that no one is being robbed of anything and very true that it is what it is. That's life. But philosophically I think something is broken if this is where the state of the game is.


All teams do not have holdbacks. Of course the system can be changed so that we use an age based system. How can anyone defend the holdback?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Sorry you are just wrong or unaware.
ALL clubs have them some more than others
Its just the way it is. People have to deal with reality
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sorry you are just wrong or unaware.
ALL clubs have them some more than others
Its just the way it is. People have to deal with reality


I heard that Express North is providing there 2021s with Gillette razors this year in addition to gloves.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sorry you are just wrong or unaware.
ALL clubs have them some more than others
Its just the way it is. People have to deal with reality


I heard that Express North is providing there 2021s with Gillette razors this year in addition to gloves.


Seriously, I think you have LIE North confused with PT 2021.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Whether you kept your kid back a year in pre-school or he was reclassified when switching to private school or in some cases both, it's naive not to think all these teams dont have "holdbacks"! Pt 2021 does...maybe half the team at this point. I know Exress does as well...maybe not as many as PT...Eclipse even more than PT.

Club teams are based on graduation year not birth year, for these teams to even try to be competitive with Long Island teams they need BIG post puberty kids that graduate in 2021....and yes, some may be two years older!

It is what it is!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The only truth is Eclipse and Primetime have the best 2021 players in the area. For anyone to say they are full of holdbacks shows they are envious of the success of both programs. I personally know Express North did not have one hold backs on the team last season. This area is full of great coaches on a bunch of teams and everyone's main concern should be is my son getting better being on the team that he was on.

I do think Schreiber, Daniello, Hanford should get together and have a tournament in the spring for this area. They should be trying to get these kids playing at the level of the top teams on Long Island and in Baltimore.

God Bless to all on 9/11
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The only truth is Eclipse and Primetime have the best 2021 players in the area. For anyone to say they are full of holdbacks shows they are envious of the success of both programs. I personally know Express North did not have one hold backs on the team last season. This area is full of great coaches on a bunch of teams and everyone's main concern should be is my son getting better being on the team that he was on.

I do think Schreiber, Daniello, Hanford should get together and have a tournament in the spring for this area. They should be trying to get these kids playing at the level of the top teams on Long Island and in Baltimore.

God Bless to all on 9/11


Why do you equate people calling out programs for encouraging and promoting the holdback phenomenon and envy? Are you an LIE North parent who knows there were no holdbacks last year? How do you feel about parents holding their kids back a year to be able to better compete against your son? These programs are exploiting children and the parents are buying in. Very sad.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The only truth is Eclipse and Primetime have the best 2021 players in the area. For anyone to say they are full of holdbacks shows they are envious of the success of both programs. I personally know Express North did not have one hold backs on the team last season. This area is full of great coaches on a bunch of teams and everyone's main concern should be is my son getting better being on the team that he was on.

I do think Schreiber, Daniello, Hanford should get together and have a tournament in the spring for this area. They should be trying to get these kids playing at the level of the top teams on Long Island and in Baltimore.

God Bless to all on 9/11


Why do you equate people calling out programs for encouraging and promoting the holdback phenomenon and envy? Are you an LIE North parent who knows there were no holdbacks last year? How do you feel about parents holding their kids back a year to be able to better compete against your son? These programs are exploiting children and the parents are buying in. Very sad.


Agreed. Why are those who call it out as a problem get such vitriolic responses? If your kid is not a holdback but is on a team loaded with them good for you but don't convince yourself that your own son has risen to the ranks of an elite player because he is being propped up by a team of older kids. And if you held your kid back and it works out and he gets recruited, good for you too. But don't call the rest of us losers because 1) we wouldn't play chicken with our kid's life and 2) believe there is inherently something wrong with a system that allows this to happen in the first place. Yes, maybe your son will be a D1 recruit if you reclass him but don't for a second forget that he's been pimped out to get there. And how come the programs never talk about the reclassed kids that did not find the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My son is not a holdback or classified, he's a young 13 year old on a mostly older 2021 team. He's a bit big for his age but not overly so, he has struggled this year because of the huge disparity in height and weight but he knows it will even out eventually and in HS if he's good enough he will be playing with and against boys 2 and three years older. His focus now is his speed and stick work so when puberty finally does kick in he will once again be a strong dominant player.

It would be great if club teams were based on birth year...but they're not so we just make the best of it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is not a holdback or classified, he's a young 13 year old on a mostly older 2021 team. He's a bit big for his age but not overly so, he has struggled this year because of the huge disparity in height and weight but he knows it will even out eventually and in HS if he's good enough he will be playing with and against boys 2 and three years older. His focus now is his speed and stick work so when puberty finally does kick in he will once again be a strong dominant player.

It would be great if club teams were based on birth year...but they're not so we just make the best of it.


Similar situation for my son as well. Frustrating for the kid.

Not inclined to hold back because he does well in school and that is ultimately what will count most. However it would be really nice if the boy could enjoy the sport at which he works so hard and loves so much.

It's like yearning for that supermodel that would never give you the time of day.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The only truth is Eclipse and Primetime have the best 2021 players in the area. For anyone to say they are full of holdbacks shows they are envious of the success of both programs. I personally know Express North did not have one hold backs on the team last season. This area is full of great coaches on a bunch of teams and everyone's main concern should be is my son getting better being on the team that he was on.

I do think Schreiber, Daniello, Hanford should get together and have a tournament in the spring for this area. They should be trying to get these kids playing at the level of the top teams on Long Island and in Baltimore.

God Bless to all on 9/11


Why do you equate people calling out programs for encouraging and promoting the holdback phenomenon and envy? Are you an LIE North parent who knows there were no holdbacks last year? How do you feel about parents holding their kids back a year to be able to better compete against your son? These programs are exploiting children and the parents are buying in. Very sad.
The irony for Daniello, who, on the one hand is passionate about John Jay lacrosse, coaching both 8th grade youth and assistant on JJ Varsity, by going all-in with reclassified players on PT starting in 8th/9th grades, he's been forced to cut many JJ players who had been with PT for 3 or 4 years. Rightfully so, since many couldn't compete anymore against the older competition. The problem going forward is those B level players are now scattered on various B teams, and those 1 or 2 who are still with PT are resented as prima donnas. (Which, as an outsider, was already evident this year, and will get worse going forward because of the parents) I know some on this site have issues with the Yorktown Ballers program because of conflict of interests, but putting that aside , Yorktown will continue to clean John Jay's clock for the foreseeable future just because their A & B players bond as a team even during the summer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The only truth is Eclipse and Primetime have the best 2021 players in the area. For anyone to say they are full of holdbacks shows they are envious of the success of both programs. I personally know Express North did not have one hold backs on the team last season. This area is full of great coaches on a bunch of teams and everyone's main concern should be is my son getting better being on the team that he was on.

I do think Schreiber, Daniello, Hanford should get together and have a tournament in the spring for this area. They should be trying to get these kids playing at the level of the top teams on Long Island and in Baltimore.

God Bless to all on 9/11


Why do you equate people calling out programs for encouraging and promoting the holdback phenomenon and envy? Are you an LIE North parent who knows there were no holdbacks last year? How do you feel about parents holding their kids back a year to be able to better compete against your son? These programs are exploiting children and the parents are buying in. Very sad.
The irony for Daniello, who, on the one hand is passionate about John Jay lacrosse, coaching both 8th grade youth and assistant on JJ Varsity, by going all-in with reclassified players on PT starting in 8th/9th grades, he's been forced to cut many JJ players who had been with PT for 3 or 4 years. Rightfully so, since many couldn't compete anymore against the older competition. The problem going forward is those B level players are now scattered on various B teams, and those 1 or 2 who are still with PT are resented as prima donnas. (Which, as an outsider, was already evident this year, and will get worse going forward because of the parents) I know some on this site have issues with the Yorktown Ballers program because of conflict of interests, but putting that aside , Yorktown will continue to clean John Jay's clock for the foreseeable future just because their A & B players bond as a team even during the summer.


Sounds like "as an outsider" you aren't aware that many of the best Yorktown kids now play for Primetime which kills your theory! Although Yorktown may still "clean their clock" for other reasons!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The only truth is Eclipse and Primetime have the best 2021 players in the area. For anyone to say they are full of holdbacks shows they are envious of the success of both programs. I personally know Express North did not have one hold backs on the team last season. This area is full of great coaches on a bunch of teams and everyone's main concern should be is my son getting better being on the team that he was on.

I do think Schreiber, Daniello, Hanford should get together and have a tournament in the spring for this area. They should be trying to get these kids playing at the level of the top teams on Long Island and in Baltimore.

God Bless to all on 9/11


Why do you equate people calling out programs for encouraging and promoting the holdback phenomenon and envy? Are you an LIE North parent who knows there were no holdbacks last year? How do you feel about parents holding their kids back a year to be able to better compete against your son? These programs are exploiting children and the parents are buying in. Very sad.
The irony for Daniello, who, on the one hand is passionate about John Jay lacrosse, coaching both 8th grade youth and assistant on JJ Varsity, by going all-in with reclassified players on PT starting in 8th/9th grades, he's been forced to cut many JJ players who had been with PT for 3 or 4 years. Rightfully so, since many couldn't compete anymore against the older competition. The problem going forward is those B level players are now scattered on various B teams, and those 1 or 2 who are still with PT are resented as prima donnas. (Which, as an outsider, was already evident this year, and will get worse going forward because of the parents) I know some on this site have issues with the Yorktown Ballers program because of conflict of interests, but putting that aside , Yorktown will continue to clean John Jay's clock for the foreseeable future just because their A & B players bond as a team even during the summer.


Sounds like "as an outsider" you aren't aware that many of the best Yorktown kids now play for Primetime which kills your theory! Although Yorktown may still "clean their clock" for other reasons!


Maybe your perception of who "the best Yorktown kids..." is wrong. I can't think of one of Yorktown's best that plays for PT, not one.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The LSM for PT 2021 is a Yorktowner and is the best player on his PT & Yorktown team.
Absolute stud.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The only truth is Eclipse and Primetime have the best 2021 players in the area. For anyone to say they are full of holdbacks shows they are envious of the success of both programs. I personally know Express North did not have one hold backs on the team last season. This area is full of great coaches on a bunch of teams and everyone's main concern should be is my son getting better being on the team that he was on.

I do think Schreiber, Daniello, Hanford should get together and have a tournament in the spring for this area. They should be trying to get these kids playing at the level of the top teams on Long Island and in Baltimore.

God Bless to all on 9/11


Why do you equate people calling out programs for encouraging and promoting the holdback phenomenon and envy? Are you an LIE North parent who knows there were no holdbacks last year? How do you feel about parents holding their kids back a year to be able to better compete against your son? These programs are exploiting children and the parents are buying in. Very sad.
The irony for Daniello, who, on the one hand is passionate about John Jay lacrosse, coaching both 8th grade youth and assistant on JJ Varsity, by going all-in with reclassified players on PT starting in 8th/9th grades, he's been forced to cut many JJ players who had been with PT for 3 or 4 years. Rightfully so, since many couldn't compete anymore against the older competition. The problem going forward is those B level players are now scattered on various B teams, and those 1 or 2 who are still with PT are resented as prima donnas. (Which, as an outsider, was already evident this year, and will get worse going forward because of the parents) I know some on this site have issues with the Yorktown Ballers program because of conflict of interests, but putting that aside , Yorktown will continue to clean John Jay's clock for the foreseeable future just because their A & B players bond as a team even during the summer.


Sounds like "as an outsider" you aren't aware that many of the best Yorktown kids now play for Primetime which kills your theory! Although Yorktown may still "clean their clock" for other reasons!


Maybe your perception of who "the best Yorktown kids..." is wrong. I can't think of one of Yorktown's best that plays for PT, not one.


you are clueless!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The LSM for PT 2021 is a Yorktowner and is the best player on his PT & Yorktown team.
Absolute stud.


One little kid?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The LSM for PT 2021 is a Yorktowner and is the best player on his PT & Yorktown team.
Absolute stud.


I hear PT also has three of the best 2026 Yorktown players. You guys are hilarious.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The LSM for PT 2021 is a Yorktowner and is the best player on his PT & Yorktown team.
Absolute stud.


I hear PT also has three of the best 2026 Yorktown players. You guys are hilarious.


I heard they are so good they are playing up to 2021!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Nah, PT just added a bunch of older CT kids to the
2021 team, no room for those awesome 1st graders.
Maybe the Yorktowners will have to ride
the bench or were they cut? The holdback culture
really has become pathetic.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I wonder would you still have a problem if I held my kid back and he was still smaller than average?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The holdback issue bleeds into alot.

But there are 2 forces that may work to help curb it: 1 is CONNY town travel league putting age restrictions in place and other is WSYL age restrictions if changed to Sept 1st.

The most notorious abusers of dropping a grade to kick [lacrosse] are the rich competitive types in Greenwich, New Canaan, Rye. These are the kids on PT and Eclipse and Brunswick rosters. Maybe when CONNY makes them play against kids their own age they will have to endure not being able to cheat a system anymore. Let's see all the holdback 7th graders kick butt when forced to play against 8th graders.

And if they dream of playing in Denver for WSYL, clubs have to change rosters because Billy the holdback who was born in August of 2003 can't be used on a 2022 roster despite the claim he is a 7th grader.

The culture of holdback won't stop but these are 2 good checks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Private schools reclassify kids....it's a money thing having nothing to do with lacrosse or sports in general. It also happens to benefit the wealthy parents who feel the pathetic need to put their kid in Brunswick just to have him dominate on the lax field!

You can't blame Prime Time or Eclipse....blame all these college coaches that start poaching these boys at such an early age, blame all these 7/8th grade showcases that are really just money grabs, blame the Dad's that will do anything it takes....including spending $30-$40k a year in order to better his kids chance at playing in college.

A lot of pressure on these boys, why can't they just play, have fun, love the game and wherever they end up they end up!

There's no pot of gold at the end of the lacrosse rainbow, you play for the love of the game! That's what makes it so great!Yy


Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The holdback issue bleeds into alot.

But there are 2 forces that may work to help curb it: 1 is CONNY town travel league putting age restrictions in place and other is WSYL age restrictions if changed to Sept 1st.

The most notorious abusers of dropping a grade to kick [lacrosse] are the rich competitive types in Greenwich, New Canaan, Rye. These are the kids on PT and Eclipse and Brunswick rosters. Maybe when CONNY makes them play against kids their own age they will have to endure not being able to cheat a system anymore. Let's see all the holdback 7th graders kick butt when forced to play against 8th graders.

And if they dream of playing in Denver for WSYL, clubs have to change rosters because Billy the holdback who was born in August of 2003 can't be used on a 2022 roster despite the claim he is a 7th grader.

The culture of holdback won't stop but these are 2 good checks.


I would expect some roster adjustments before WSYL by Primetime. They may carry some extra kids who won't play much just to bolster roster for WSYL. Force everyone to play age appropriate, the sports become an embarrassment. Adults preying on minors for $$$$$$$$$$$$$.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Is it true the best player on Eclipse 2021 went to Primetime? If true Daniello owns this area.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
he was the 5th attack man
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is it true the best player on Eclipse 2021 went to Primetime? If true Daniello owns this area.


Primetime got one of the defenseman from Express North, I hear he's very good. PT doesn't seem to lose players, just kids getting cut as the holdbacks and larger kids move in.

What does Primetime offer that the other programs don't?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is it true the best player on Eclipse 2021 went to Primetime? If true Daniello owns this area.


Primetime got one of the defenseman from Express North, I hear he's very good. PT doesn't seem to lose players, just kids getting cut as the holdbacks and larger kids move in.

What does Primetime offer that the other programs don't?


My son was fortunate enough to keep his spot on the 21 team. PT simply offers great coaching and Nick takes great care in running the club. My son loves it and as a parent I'm very happy with the organization. I honestly believe it sells itself. The kids get better - period.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
They got one of the small attack from Eclipse, he was not one of their best and had a horrible year. He moved to PT because he wasn't going to start for Eclipse. Eclipse is only interested in winning, if you can't get it done you better find another team...so he did.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is it true the best player on Eclipse 2021 went to Primetime? If true Daniello owns this area.


Primetime got one of the defenseman from Express North, I hear he's very good. PT doesn't seem to lose players, just kids getting cut as the holdbacks and larger kids move in.

What does Primetime offer that the other programs don't?


My son was fortunate enough to keep his spot on the 21 team. PT simply offers great coaching and Nick takes great care in running the club. My son loves it and as a parent I'm very happy with the organization. I honestly believe it sells itself. The kids get better - period.


Lots of time to find an upgrade for your son between
now and summer 2017. It happens.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is it true the best player on Eclipse 2021 went to Primetime? If true Daniello owns this area.


Primetime got one of the defenseman from Express North, I hear he's very good. PT doesn't seem to lose players, just kids getting cut as the holdbacks and larger kids move in.

What does Primetime offer that the other programs don't?


Apparently that defenseman was dropped from Express AA to A making it an easy decision. Many AA Express parents are dumbfounded by the move and believe a smaller and much weaker defenseman got the AA spot as a result of non stop lobbying by the father. There's always politics, that's life.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is it true the best player on Eclipse 2021 went to Primetime? If true Daniello owns this area.


Primetime got one of the defenseman from Express North, I hear he's very good. PT doesn't seem to lose players, just kids getting cut as the holdbacks and larger kids move in.

What does Primetime offer that the other programs don't?


Apparently that defenseman was dropped from Express AA to A making it an easy decision. Many AA Express parents are dumbfounded by the move and believe a smaller and much weaker defenseman got the AA spot as a result of non stop lobbying by the father. There's always politics, that's life.


Can't blame the father, people in charge can always say NO and choose the better player. Coaches or whoever makes the decisions, not the father. Is the difference noticeable in the players?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
K
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is it true the best player on Eclipse 2021 went to Primetime? If true Daniello owns this area.


Primetime got one of the defenseman from Express North, I hear he's very good. PT doesn't seem to lose players, just kids getting cut as the holdbacks and larger kids move in.

What does Primetime offer that the other programs don't?


Good for the dad and kid. Bad for the team.

Apparently that defenseman was dropped from Express AA to A making it an easy decision. Many AA Express parents are dumbfounded by the move and believe a smaller and much weaker defenseman got the AA spot as a result of non stop lobbying by the father. There's always politics, that's life.


Can't blame the father, people in charge can always say NO and choose the better player. Coaches or whoever makes the decisions, not the father. Is the difference noticeable in the players?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
FYI Hudson Valley Lacrosse is going to an age based system for this upcoming season. Obviously it doesn't address club teams, but it is a step in the right direction. Hopefully other organizations will do the same.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
If the Westchester programs adhere to the HV email from yeaterday you might as well take the CONNY games off then schedule.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
FYI Hudson Valley Lacrosse is going to an age based system for this upcoming season. Obviously it doesn't address club teams, but it is a step in the right direction. Hopefully other organizations will do the same.
While definitely a step in the right direction, it really needs to be a country wide mandate.As long as club teams are the driving force in (early) recruiting, no Westchester teams would think of traveling to the main Mid-Atlantic recruiting events without reclassified kids in order to compete with similar teams there.
Again a nice first step that really only affects town teams and public school kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
FYI Hudson Valley Lacrosse is going to an age based system for this upcoming season. Obviously it doesn't address club teams, but it is a step in the right direction. Hopefully other organizations will do the same.
While definitely a step in the right direction, it really needs to be a country wide mandate.As long as club teams are the driving force in (early) recruiting, no Westchester teams would think of traveling to the main Mid-Atlantic recruiting events without reclassified kids in order to compete with similar teams there.
Again a nice first step that really only affects town teams and public school kids.


Recruiting tournaments couldn't care less about what's fair and obviously the college coaches don't either. They'd accept 20 year old Freshman all day long if they could. So, it falls on the youth programs and the governing bodies to protect the kids and ensure fair play. Oh, of course the pathetic parents are really those that are responsible for holdbacks. But teaching ethics to children really isn't the job of parents, just how to cheat your way to success.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
FYI Hudson Valley Lacrosse is going to an age based system for this upcoming season. Obviously it doesn't address club teams, but it is a step in the right direction. Hopefully other organizations will do the same.
While definitely a step in the right direction, it really needs to be a country wide mandate.As long as club teams are the driving force in (early) recruiting, no Westchester teams would think of traveling to the main Mid-Atlantic recruiting events without reclassified kids in order to compete with similar teams there.
Again a nice first step that really only affects town teams and public school kids.


Recruiting tournaments couldn't care less about what's fair and obviously the college coaches don't either. They'd accept 20 year old Freshman all day long if they could. So, it falls on the youth programs and the governing bodies to protect the kids and ensure fair play. Oh, of course the pathetic parents are really those that are responsible for holdbacks. But teaching ethics to children really isn't the job of parents, just how to cheat your way to success.
I can't speak for youth Hockey, which would be most similar to lacrosse as far as early recruiting/prep school imvolvment, is it grade based or age based? But generally speaking in baseball & basketball, while there are reclassified kids playing, it is age based, and if you want to be 'noticed' or taken serious by D1 schools you have to play up 1-2 years. When did lacrosse go so off the rails that parents and players think playing down is the way to go? I get that it's the current system, and pretty soon most elite teams will be one re-classified team playing against another....not sure how that will play out in the future for the growth of the game among public school players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
If US Lacrosse fully implements their age-based criteria AND refuses to offer coverage to tournaments/leagues/games that don't adhere to that policy, then maybe the sport can move in the right direction. That said, the fact the current USL age verification process relied upon submitting a digital copy of the player's COB, the opportunity for falsified COBs is larger than it should be. USL should have put the onus of verification on the state affiliates to verify hard copy COBs w/ raised seals in order to have any level of confidence that they were achieving what is desired.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Just heard from a PT parent that PT 2021 also got a 2020 AA Express North midfielder who reclassified.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If the Westchester programs adhere to the HV email from yeaterday you might as well take the CONNY games off then schedule.


It actually looks like CONNY team segmentation will change for this spring also. Any player born before sept 1 of the "previous" year (assuming a Jan 1 bday grade cutoff) has to play up with the next older grade. No longer will programs be allowed to,play up an entire team (moving 5a up to u13, 7a up to u15) so that older kids stay with their "grade-mates". This gets voted on next week at CONNY board meeting, and at least one of the "big 3" CONNY programs (of which those three are the biggest culprits of the over-age players) is supporting the new rules. Looks like it will likely pass.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Love the new US Lax Boys Rules.

http://www.uslacrosse.org/blog/us-lacrosse-announces-new-boys-youth-rules

All programs can now try to figure out how to line their fields in multiple directions and pay for all different size goals. And wait for the playing time complaints when your playing 5 v 5,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard from a PT parent that PT 2021 also got a 2020 AA Express North midfielder who reclassified.
And a 2020 PT Defenseman who also reclassified. 2021 is 9th grade, so it's not surprising and I'm sure there are a few more.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Although as proposed does not impact K-4th, will stay grade based. really only 5-7th impacted. For 8th they plan to move the date back to 3/1 but allow anyone who petitions that is older to play because if they are in 8th grade and older there is no where else to go. That is what CONNY is voting on.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Although as proposed does not impact K-4th, will stay grade based. really only 5-7th impacted. For 8th they plan to move the date back to 3/1 but allow anyone who petitions that is older to play because if they are in 8th grade and older there is no where else to go. That is what CONNY is voting on.
And the irony is 8th & 9th grade is where the
age based system is needed most. A combination of reclassifying, 9th grade early recruiting, some kids maturing earlier than others, and parents 'gaming' the current system convinced that playing down an age is the way to go....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I can't speak for youth Hockey, which would be most similar to lacrosse as far as early recruiting/prep school imvolvment, is it grade based or age based? But generally speaking in baseball & basketball, while there are reclassified kids playing, it is age based, and if you want to be 'noticed' or taken serious by D1 schools you have to play up 1-2 years. When did lacrosse go so off the rails that parents and players think playing down is the way to go? I get that it's the current system, and pretty soon most elite teams will be one re-classified team playing against another....not sure how that will play out in the future for the growth of the game among public school players.


The difference between baseball/basketball and lacrosse is that there is nothing beyond college for lax players (nothing really compelling at least).

This motivates families to position their kids in the best way possible for their college careers.

One's views on this situation probably most closely align with the combination of aspirations and physical maturation of one's kid.

For example, those who can dominate by playing down but are 'just a guy' while playing at the 'correct' grade level and have aspirations to play at a competitive college level are incentivized to play down.

To me, playing down would be humiliating. Using the logic that 'everyone is doing it' would hold very little water. However for many others, humility is simply not something they possess.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Although as proposed does not impact K-4th, will stay grade based. really only 5-7th impacted. For 8th they plan to move the date back to 3/1 but allow anyone who petitions that is older to play because if they are in 8th grade and older there is no where else to go. That is what CONNY is voting on.
And the irony is 8th & 9th grade is where the
age based system is needed most. A combination of reclassifying, 9th grade early recruiting, some kids maturing earlier than others, and parents 'gaming' the current system convinced that playing down an age is the way to go....


Yup. On the CONNY site it says the proposal is to move 8th grade back to 3/2001. I hope that's a typo and they meant 3/2002 or you will have 16 year olds playing with 13 year olds!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Although as proposed does not impact K-4th, will stay grade based. really only 5-7th impacted. For 8th they plan to move the date back to 3/1 but allow anyone who petitions that is older to play because if they are in 8th grade and older there is no where else to go. That is what CONNY is voting on.
And the irony is 8th & 9th grade is where the
age based system is needed most. A combination of reclassifying, 9th grade early recruiting, some kids maturing earlier than others, and parents 'gaming' the current system convinced that playing down an age is the way to go....


Yup. On the CONNY site it says the proposal is to move 8th grade back to 3/2001. I hope that's a typo and they meant 3/2002 or you will have 16 year olds playing with 13 year olds!


It is 3/02, however, anyone older can petition to play and it is expected they will be allowed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That is not correct. The CONNY proposal for 8th grade has a cutoff of 3/2001. If older than that, you can petition. If born in Mar/Apr 2001, players will be 16 during the Spring season. That is actually an appropriate age/birthdate for a 10th grader. Even allowing that is crazy, let alone being able to petition to play if the player is even older.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That is not correct. The CONNY proposal for 8th grade has a cutoff of 3/2001. If older than that, you can petition. If born in Mar/Apr 2001, players will be 16 during the Spring season. That is actually an appropriate age/birthdate for a 10th grader. Even allowing that is crazy, let alone being able to petition to play if the player is even older.

CT and holdbacks or overage kids are synonymous. I coach in N. Westchester
and we have always had problems with overage kids when playing CT teams. So, giving them the leeway to have 16 year olds play 8th graders is not surprising.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That is not correct. The CONNY proposal for 8th grade has a cutoff of 3/2001. If older than that, you can petition. If born in Mar/Apr 2001, players will be 16 during the Spring season. That is actually an appropriate age/birthdate for a 10th grader. Even allowing that is crazy, let alone being able to petition to play if the player is even older.


No, you are wrong. That is a typo its 3/2002. But again, anyone older than that can request to play and they are saying its most likely that they will be allowed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
OK, good to hear it is a typo. 3/2002 is still old, but a lot more reasonable.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The "2020" kid from Express North is actually a 2021 who always played up and is now playing on PT 2021 appropriately.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
was he ever in the school as a 2020?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The "2020" kid from Express North is actually a 2021 who always played up and is now playing on PT 2021 appropriately.


I've got a bridge for sale, great deal.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard from a PT parent that PT 2021 also got a 2020 AA Express North midfielder who reclassified.


What about the Greenwich kids who reclassed and are now on PT 2021?
PT is making push to add more.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard from a PT parent that PT 2021 also got a 2020 AA Express North midfielder who reclassified.
And a 2020 PT Defenseman who also reclassified. 2021 is 9th grade, so it's not surprising and I'm sure there are a few more.


Um - no. 2021 is 8th grade!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard from a PT parent that PT 2021 also got a 2020 AA Express North midfielder who reclassified.
And a 2020 PT Defenseman who also reclassified. 2021 is 9th grade, so it's not surprising and I'm sure there are a few more.


Um - no. 2021 is 8th grade!
yes as of now you are correct, but these were Summer tryouts for next year when the reclasses take effect. Our 2020 team went through it last year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard from a PT parent that PT 2021 also got a 2020 AA Express North midfielder who reclassified.
And a 2020 PT Defenseman who also reclassified. 2021 is 9th grade, so it's not surprising and I'm sure there are a few more.


Um - no. 2021 is 8th grade!
yes as of now you are correct, but these were Summer tryouts for next year when the reclasses take effect. Our 2020 team went through it last year.


Anyone have some idea how many 2021 Primetime kids are now holdbacks/reclassed/overage? The adults in the room should be embarrassed. Exploiting kids for money, that's all it is. Funny thing is there doesn't seem to be a stigma attached to the kid who is "leftback". Maybe our overly politically correct society is to blame. Kids aren't shamed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard from a PT parent that PT 2021 also got a 2020 AA Express North midfielder who reclassified.
And a 2020 PT Defenseman who also reclassified. 2021 is 9th grade, so it's not surprising and I'm sure there are a few more.


Um - no. 2021 is 8th grade!
yes as of now you are correct, but these were Summer tryouts for next year when the reclasses take effect. Our 2020 team went through it last year.


Anyone have some idea how many 2021 Primetime kids are now holdbacks/reclassed/overage? The adults in the room should be embarrassed. Exploiting kids for money, that's all it is. Funny thing is there doesn't seem to be a stigma attached to the kid who is "leftback". Maybe our overly politically correct society is to blame. Kids aren't shamed.


You are pathetic! Exploiting kids for money? Do you realize how many kids actually get money for college just for lacrosse?? Hardly anyone. AND...most private schools strongly encourage kids to repeat when going to their school for developmental purposes which has nothing to do with sports. Maybe you don't know how private schools work. Stop being jealous, if you kid isn't good enough to play with kids a year older then he probably just isn't good enough to get recruited or play at a high level, there are plenty of other teams for you. Go out and have fun. So tired of listening to all the whining about hold backs, re classed kids etc
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yep, I believe Hackley won't take a kid unless they repeat
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard from a PT parent that PT 2021 also got a 2020 AA Express North midfielder who reclassified.
And a 2020 PT Defenseman who also reclassified. 2021 is 9th grade, so it's not surprising and I'm sure there are a few more.


Um - no. 2021 is 8th grade!
yes as of now you are correct, but these were Summer tryouts for next year when the reclasses take effect. Our 2020 team went through it last year.


Anyone have some idea how many 2021 Primetime kids are now holdbacks/reclassed/overage? The adults in the room should be embarrassed. Exploiting kids for money, that's all it is. Funny thing is there doesn't seem to be a stigma attached to the kid who is "leftback". Maybe our overly politically correct society is to blame. Kids aren't shamed.


You are pathetic! Exploiting kids for money? Do you realize how many kids actually get money for college just for lacrosse?? Hardly anyone. AND...most private schools strongly encourage kids to repeat when going to their school for developmental purposes which has nothing to do with sports. Maybe you don't know how private schools work. Stop being jealous, if you kid isn't good enough to play with kids a year older then he probably just isn't good enough to get recruited or play at a high level, there are plenty of other teams for you. Go out and have fun. So tired of listening to all the whining about hold backs, re classed kids etc


Says the dad of the holdback who is shocked SHOCKED I TELL YOU! that people would have a philosophical issue with this. Wake up. Not one thing I have read here is anyone complaining that their kid got screwed b/c of a holdback. What they are frustrated with is that it is part of any discussion to begin with and that it is inherently becoming a game within the game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard from a PT parent that PT 2021 also got a 2020 AA Express North midfielder who reclassified.
And a 2020 PT Defenseman who also reclassified. 2021 is 9th grade, so it's not surprising and I'm sure there are a few more.


Um - no. 2021 is 8th grade!
yes as of now you are correct, but these were Summer tryouts for next year when the reclasses take effect. Our 2020 team went through it last year.


Anyone have some idea how many 2021 Primetime kids are now holdbacks/reclassed/overage? The adults in the room should be embarrassed. Exploiting kids for money, that's all it is. Funny thing is there doesn't seem to be a stigma attached to the kid who is "leftback". Maybe our overly politically correct society is to blame. Kids aren't shamed.


You are pathetic! Exploiting kids for money? Do you realize how many kids actually get money for college just for lacrosse?? Hardly anyone. AND...most private schools strongly encourage kids to repeat when going to their school for developmental purposes which has nothing to do with sports. Maybe you don't know how private schools work. Stop being jealous, if you kid isn't good enough to play with kids a year older then he probably just isn't good enough to get recruited or play at a high level, there are plenty of other teams for you. Go out and have fun. So tired of listening to all the whining about hold backs, re classed kids etc


Exactly my point. Club programs sell the dream of playing college ball to parents & kids and the kids suffer. What kid wants to be heldback? The system is pathetic and please have another martini with your lunch next time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yep, I believe Hackley won't take a kid unless they repeat
That my apply towards public school kids. My son went to a boys private, was at age and was accepted this year at Hackley. (He went elsewhere) It has more to do with writing skills not being taught strongly enough at the public school level. But yes there are plenty of repeaters at Hackley and most prep schools. And yes, not all repeaters are lacrosse players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How is the 3D tristate program in the area?
Are they on the same level as ExNorth Predaters, and PT?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard from a PT parent that PT 2021 also got a 2020 AA Express North midfielder who reclassified.
And a 2020 PT Defenseman who also reclassified. 2021 is 9th grade, so it's not surprising and I'm sure there are a few more.


Um - no. 2021 is 8th grade!
yes as of now you are correct, but these were Summer tryouts for next year when the reclasses take effect. Our 2020 team went through it last year.


Anyone have some idea how many 2021 Primetime kids are now holdbacks/reclassed/overage? The adults in the room should be embarrassed. Exploiting kids for money, that's all it is. Funny thing is there doesn't seem to be a stigma attached to the kid who is "leftback". Maybe our overly politically correct society is to blame. Kids aren't shamed.


You are pathetic! Exploiting kids for money? Do you realize how many kids actually get money for college just for lacrosse?? Hardly anyone. AND...most private schools strongly encourage kids to repeat when going to their school for developmental purposes which has nothing to do with sports. Maybe you don't know how private schools work. Stop being jealous, if you kid isn't good enough to play with kids a year older then he probably just isn't good enough to get recruited or play at a high level, there are plenty of other teams for you. Go out and have fun. So tired of listening to all the whining about hold backs, re classed kids etc
The stupidity of this statement is that we are talking about 8th/9th grade, when playing against kids 1-2 years older should not be the projection measurement for a kid "to be good enough" to play Varsity lacrosse let alone D1 recruitment. So if my son is just starting to mature in the 8th grade but yet is not good enough to play against 9/10th grade age kids, he might as well trade in his stick in for a squash racquet? Again, we're talking 8th/9th grade here, not a PG year in 12th grade. And my son goes to Avon, so yes I know how private schools work, and no he's not a repeat. Your grade based system basically says, you might as well give up competitive lacrosse or just play for fun, (which all kids should be doing anyway) if you're not good enough to compete with older kids by 9th grade? Nice way to grow the game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard from a PT parent that PT 2021 also got a 2020 AA Express North midfielder who reclassified.
And a 2020 PT Defenseman who also reclassified. 2021 is 9th grade, so it's not surprising and I'm sure there are a few more.


Um - no. 2021 is 8th grade!
yes as of now you are correct, but these were Summer tryouts for next year when the reclasses take effect. Our 2020 team went through it last year.


Anyone have some idea how many 2021 Primetime kids are now holdbacks/reclassed/overage? The adults in the room should be embarrassed. Exploiting kids for money, that's all it is. Funny thing is there doesn't seem to be a stigma attached to the kid who is "leftback". Maybe our overly politically correct society is to blame. Kids aren't shamed.


You are pathetic! Exploiting kids for money? Do you realize how many kids actually get money for college just for lacrosse?? Hardly anyone. AND...most private schools strongly encourage kids to repeat when going to their school for developmental purposes which has nothing to do with sports. Maybe you don't know how private schools work. Stop being jealous, if you kid isn't good enough to play with kids a year older then he probably just isn't good enough to get recruited or play at a high level, there are plenty of other teams for you. Go out and have fun. So tired of listening to all the whining about hold backs, re classed kids etc


A more moronic post I have not read. Disclaimer, my son is a 2019 who played varsity last year and is committed. Idiots like you are ruining the game of lacrosse. Why should kids be able to cheat by staying back a year in school? Why? No other sport permits cheating by playing younger kids but lacrosse is okay with it? I mean, the parents are okay with it. Kids must hate being heldback because Daddy wants to live vicariously through Little Johnny.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard from a PT parent that PT 2021 also got a 2020 AA Express North midfielder who reclassified.
And a 2020 PT Defenseman who also reclassified. 2021 is 9th grade, so it's not surprising and I'm sure there are a few more.


Um - no. 2021 is 8th grade!
yes as of now you are correct, but these were Summer tryouts for next year when the reclasses take effect. Our 2020 team went through it last year.


Anyone have some idea how many 2021 Primetime kids are now holdbacks/reclassed/overage? The adults in the room should be embarrassed. Exploiting kids for money, that's all it is. Funny thing is there doesn't seem to be a stigma attached to the kid who is "leftback". Maybe our overly politically correct society is to blame. Kids aren't shamed.


You are pathetic! Exploiting kids for money? Do you realize how many kids actually get money for college just for lacrosse?? Hardly anyone. AND...most private schools strongly encourage kids to repeat when going to their school for developmental purposes which has nothing to do with sports. Maybe you don't know how private schools work. Stop being jealous, if you kid isn't good enough to play with kids a year older then he probably just isn't good enough to get recruited or play at a high level, there are plenty of other teams for you. Go out and have fun. So tired of listening to all the whining about hold backs, re classed kids etc


George Carlin: "What kind of empty people need to validate themselves through the achievements of their children"
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -

You are pathetic! Exploiting kids for money? Do you realize how many kids actually get money for college just for lacrosse?? Hardly anyone. AND...most private schools strongly encourage kids to repeat when going to their school for developmental purposes which has nothing to do with sports. Maybe you don't know how private schools work. Stop being jealous, if you kid isn't good enough to play with kids a year older then he probably just isn't good enough to get recruited or play at a high level, there are plenty of other teams for you. Go out and have fun. So tired of listening to all the whining about hold backs, re classed kids etc [/quote]

George Carlin: "What kind of empty people need to validate themselves through the achievements of their children"[/quote]

Well said. This is all driven by the parents. Yeah, I get the days of riding your bike to practice on your own are gone. And so are the days of just playing in someone's backyard but we are at the point we parents are overly engaged. I hear stories of parents taking their kid to the field and standing over them while they practice. Parents who live right near the team's practice field don't drop their kid off. They sit and watch for 2 hours and have social time with the other nutty parents who can't leave and they chatter about the "weak players" on the team. So pathetic.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous

You are pathetic! Exploiting kids for money? Do you realize how many kids actually get money for college just for lacrosse?? Hardly anyone. AND...most private schools strongly encourage kids to repeat when going to their school for developmental purposes which has nothing to do with sports. Maybe you don't know how private schools work. Stop being jealous, if you kid isn't good enough to play with kids a year older then he probably just isn't good enough to get recruited or play at a high level, there are plenty of other teams for you. Go out and have fun. So tired of listening to all the whining about hold backs, re classed kids etc


George Carlin: "What kind of empty people need to validate themselves through the achievements of their children"[/quote]

Well said. This is all driven by the parents. Yeah, I get the days of riding your bike to practice on your own are gone. And so are the days of just playing in someone's backyard but we are at the point we parents are overly engaged. I hear stories of parents taking their kid to the field and standing over them while they practice. Parents who live right near the team's practice field don't drop their kid off. They sit and watch for 2 hours and have social time with the other nutty parents who can't leave and they chatter about the "weak players" on the team. So pathetic. [/quote]

Advice for parents: please don't tell me weekly how hard little Johnny worked on his game, please don't coach Little Johnny at water breaks during practice, please don't call out to players during games-cheer, do not instruct, try not to call out your sons name every time he touches the ball (its a team sport), try not to throw a sideline party when your son does something good and remain stoic the rest of the game (everyone notices and you really look like a jerk, team sport), congratulate the team on their effort after every game, please don't huddle up with your son for 30 minutes after each game at tournaments, let him spend time with teammates. Enjoy the games and cheer for the team, everyone will have a better experience.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Please change the name of this thread to " Westchester Youth Lacrosse - complain about Cheats, holdbacks, etc" That is what almost every post discusses. How about we talk about Westchester Youth Lacrosse...please
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Please change the name of this thread to " Westchester Youth Lacrosse - complain about Cheats, holdbacks, etc" That is what almost every post discusses. How about we talk about Westchester Youth Lacrosse...please
Hahaha, since this post,... nothing. I guess the reclassify epidemic really is stifling anything positive in Westchester lax. Should start talking about the best B teams then. (I actually think the Predators are the best team out there without the 'holdback' stigma hanging over them, but they don't seem to play in the big events)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Agree 19 and 20 preds are the best team by far in the west/ct area.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Agree 19 and 20 preds are the best team by far in the west/ct area.


Umm, ok. Don't know about the 20's but for '19s they played a B schedule (sorry, "single A") last summer and still went maybe .500 I would bet. Beating 3 knights as your only win one weekend at a second tier tourney makes a hard argument that the team can beat the best ct/west teams like ExpN, eclipse, PT.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
20 Preds were 17-2-1 won two tourneys and went undefeated in a Baltimore showcase this summer. Didn't play the top top, but beat some LI teams, some NJ teams, and played a lot of the non-crush/Baltimore 2020 commits--3d San Diego, BBL, fl$, Iron Horse, GA Thunder. Did better than PT in the tourney's they both played in.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
20 Preds were 17-2-1 won two tourneys and went undefeated in a Baltimore showcase this summer. Didn't play the top top, but beat some LI teams, some NJ teams, and played a lot of the non-crush/Baltimore 2020 commits--3d San Diego, BBL, fl$, Iron Horse, GA Thunder. Did better than PT in the tourney's they both played in.
I think everybody did better than PT in the tournaments they played in.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Agree 19 and 20 preds are the best team by far in the west/ct area.


19 Preds not close to North or PT...not at Eclipse level either
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I heard PT is picking up Trump if he loses.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Agree 19 and 20 preds are the best team by far in the west/ct area.


19 Preds not close to North or PT...not at Eclipse level either


Did Eclipse lose their big athletic 2019 middie to Express N?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
There was a 2020 middie who left Eclipse for Express N, but do not think anyone from 2019.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What do the varsity programs do for winter lacrosse? I understand it can't be organized by varsity staff but I'm told some are informally organized to play in leagues together? Seems like a good idea.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Agree 19 and 20 preds are the best team by far in the west/ct area.


19 Preds not close to North or PT...not at Eclipse level either


Did Eclipse lose their big athletic 2019 middie to Express N?


Yes, he is now playing for Express North, kid is a beast.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Agree 19 and 20 preds are the best team by far in the west/ct area.


19 Preds not close to North or PT...not at Eclipse level either


Did Eclipse lose their big athletic 2019 middie to Express N?


Is he a holdback? LOL

Yes, he is now playing for Express North, kid is a beast.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Agree 19 and 20 preds are the best team by far in the west/ct area.


19 Preds not close to North or PT...not at Eclipse level either


Did Eclipse lose their big athletic 2019 middie to Express N?


Is he a holdback? LOL

Yes, he is now playing for Express North, kid is a beast.


Pretty sure no eclipse 2019 middies moved to PT......or to anywhere else actually.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Agree 19 and 20 preds are the best team by far in the west/ct area.


19 Preds not close to North or PT...not at Eclipse level either


Did Eclipse lose their big athletic 2019 middie to Express N?


Is he a holdback? LOL

Yes, he is now playing for Express North, kid is a beast.


Pretty sure no eclipse 2019 middies moved to PT......or to anywhere else actually.


Not that you're aware of. Someone pointed him out to me at practice last Sunday. Big kid.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I am new to this thread and probably naive. Who determines if a team is AA or A, etc. and is there a set criteria? My son plays for CT Chargers 2023 blue. Chargers don't separate Blue and gold teams by Aa or A. You can watch the teams and tell quickly which one is the better(blue). Tnsk in advance for the advice.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
it really comes down to how the organization positions you in terms of tourneys and brackets - if the director places you in the best tourneys in the top brackets
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous

You are pathetic! Exploiting kids for money? Do you realize how many kids actually get money for college just for lacrosse?? Hardly anyone. AND...most private schools strongly encourage kids to repeat when going to their school for developmental purposes which has nothing to do with sports. Maybe you don't know how private schools work. Stop being jealous, if you kid isn't good enough to play with kids a year older then he probably just isn't good enough to get recruited or play at a high level, there are plenty of other teams for you. Go out and have fun. So tired of listening to all the whining about hold backs, re classed kids etc


George Carlin: "What kind of empty people need to validate themselves through the achievements of their children"[/quote]

Well said. This is all driven by the parents. Yeah, I get the days of riding your bike to practice on your own are gone. And so are the days of just playing in someone's backyard but we are at the point we parents are overly engaged. I hear stories of parents taking their kid to the field and standing over them while they practice. Parents who live right near the team's practice field don't drop their kid off. They sit and watch for 2 hours and have social time with the other nutty parents who can't leave and they chatter about the "weak players" on the team. So pathetic. [/quote]

My neighbor was offered money to have his son play lacrosse in his yard with this nut jobs son. This was because his son is a very good player but the kids are not friends, although same age, he said no. So now we are paying people to play with our kids because they are good lacrosse players. I will nominate this for Pathetic Parent of the Week award.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
New to the EX North program... They seem extremely unorganized with the information and team details. No reply to emails.
Did people have a good experience with them in the past?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Schreiber is a great coach, kids are clearly getting seen by colleges , but organizationally , he is the last to post his details etc, he gets it done, you just need patience
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
New to the EX North program... They seem extremely unorganized with the information and team details. No reply to emails.
Did people have a good experience with them in the past?


You take the good with the bad. You get some really good coaching, the indoor training could be greatly improved, communication gets a fail. Is your son with Ex North for the coaching and training or the opportunity for college exposure?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber is a great coach, kids are clearly getting seen by colleges , but organizationally , he is the last to post his details etc, he gets it done, you just need patience


While true, Express "South" on LI isnt much better - probably not helped by trying to figure out how many teams they can get into all the "elite" events.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
bottom line is Schreiber gets it together in more than enough time and runs a great program
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber is a great coach, kids are clearly getting seen by colleges , but organizationally , he is the last to post his details etc, he gets it done, you just need patience


While true, Express "South" on LI isnt much better - probably not helped by trying to figure out how many teams they can get into all the "elite" events.



Thats the problem. between 2 Li teams 2 north 1 CT and a DC team or 2 all in the same class you just cant get them all in to the elite tournaments. PT and Predators are both going to much better events this fall.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
look at tri state x1 in purchase they basically just fill spots on the paren't companies B tourneys - they don't even try and get into the good tourneys I just don't see how that program will ever grow without the allure of top tourneys in top brackets - even the higher classes don't go to the show case tourneys
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber is a great coach, kids are clearly getting seen by colleges , but organizationally , he is the last to post his details etc, he gets it done, you just need patience


While true, Express "South" on LI isnt much better - probably not helped by trying to figure out how many teams they can get into all the "elite" events.


Predators will not be at any of the events for 2019 where PT, Express North or Express LI will be.

Express CT, DC are not the same level as North or LI - same as team (88+3) outside of LI, is not overly competitive nor do they play in the same events as Orange does. Every program has its top team or two. (88+3), Madlax, Laxachussetts, Express...

Thats the problem. between 2 Li teams 2 north 1 CT and a DC team or 2 all in the same class you just cant get them all in to the elite tournaments. PT and Predators are both going to much better events this fall.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber is a great coach, kids are clearly getting seen by colleges , but organizationally , he is the last to post his details etc, he gets it done, you just need patience


While true, Express "South" on LI isnt much better - probably not helped by trying to figure out how many teams they can get into all the "elite" events.



Thats the problem. between 2 Li teams 2 north 1 CT and a DC team or 2 all in the same class you just cant get them all in to the elite tournaments. PT and Predators are both going to much better events this fall.


The Express L.I. program will always receive preferential treatment. The big profits must come from them with their bloated rosters so they will receive the choicest tournament slots and showcase invites. Its just good business. Plus, its where it all began.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Can anyone give me opinions about RevWestchester 2012 team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can anyone give me opinions about RevWestchester 2012 team?


Who? What year?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber is a great coach, kids are clearly getting seen by colleges , but organizationally , he is the last to post his details etc, he gets it done, you just need patience


While true, Express "South" on LI isnt much better - probably not helped by trying to figure out how many teams they can get into all the "elite" events.



Thats the problem. between 2 Li teams 2 north 1 CT and a DC team or 2 all in the same class you just cant get them all in to the elite tournaments. PT and Predators are both going to much better events this fall.


The Express L.I. program will always receive preferential treatment. The big profits must come from them with their bloated rosters so they will receive the choicest tournament slots and showcase invites. Its just good business. Plus, its where it all began.


What are the best showcases to attend? Are the best showcases invite only? What programs get their kids into these showcases?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
bottom line is Schreiber gets it together in more than enough time and runs a great program


Not really a ringing endorsement. I don't want the person that I'm handing $5-6k to coach and teach my son to "get it together in time".

These programs should be highly organized, not carry 25 players on each team, develop the players and be very active in getting these kids recruited. That's the sales pitch I was told and we should hold them accountable.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I THINK SCHREIBER GETS IT DONE - just look at the amount of express north kids on the recruiting lists
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
bottom line is Schreiber gets it together in more than enough time and runs a great program


Not really a ringing endorsement. I don't want the person that I'm handing $5-6k to coach and teach my son to "get it together in time".

These programs should be highly organized, not carry 25 players on each team, develop the players and be very active in getting these kids recruited. That's the sales pitch I was told and we should hold them accountable.


"Sales Pitch" Is exactly what it is!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
bottom line is Schreiber gets it together in more than enough time and runs a great program


Not really a ringing endorsement. I don't want the person that I'm handing $5-6k to coach and teach my son to "get it together in time".

These programs should be highly organized, not carry 25 players on each team, develop the players and be very active in getting these kids recruited. That's the sales pitch I was told and we should hold them accountable.


"Sales Pitch" Is exactly what it is!


Express on LI carries bloated rosters - 30+
Express North, both the 18s and 19s, are small rosters, barely 20 each. That is in fact the "sales pitch" - "your kid will play because we dont have 30 players."
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
prime time rosters can be 24 kids that seems high if your wanting to get exposure , I would rather pay extra and get the time
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
bottom line is Schreiber gets it together in more than enough time and runs a great program


Not really a ringing endorsement. I don't want the person that I'm handing $5-6k to coach and teach my son to "get it together in time".

These programs should be highly organized, not carry 25 players on each team, develop the players and be very active in getting these kids recruited. That's the sales pitch I was told and we should hold them accountable.


"Sales Pitch" Is exactly what it is!


Express on LI carries bloated rosters - 30+
Express North, both the 18s and 19s, are small rosters, barely 20 each. That is in fact the "sales pitch" - "your kid will play because we dont have 30 players."


These are businesses, everything you are told is a sales pitch. Question is, do you get what you were sold? Are kids developing their skills? Are they having fun? College exposure?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I THINK SCHREIBER GETS IT DONE - just look at the amount of express north kids on the recruiting lists


How many? Please tell us college and position
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
look at recruitingrundown, pretty self explanatory by year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
in all fairness relative to population , etc, primetime and express north have done extremely well in terms of recruiting
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I THINK SCHREIBER GETS IT DONE - just look at the amount of express north kids on the recruiting lists


How many? Please tell us college and position


2018 - Hopkins, Georgetown, Villanova, Fairfield, St. John's, Bryant (2), Providence, Brown, Colgate, Holy Cross, Boston University

2019 - Michigan (2), Lafayette, Princeton, Air Force, Richmond, High Point
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I THINK SCHREIBER GETS IT DONE - just look at the amount of express north kids on the recruiting lists


How many? Please tell us college and position


2018 - Hopkins, Georgetown, Villanova, Fairfield, St. John's, Bryant (2), Providence, Brown, Colgate, Holy Cross, Boston University

2019 - Michigan (2), Lafayette, Princeton, Air Force, Richmond, High Point


Pretty darn impressive. I wonder how many of these kids would have had a difficult time gaining entrance to the school without lacrosse. I'm sure the parents of these kids are very happy.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
All great players. Now let's see if the other 10 on the team get committed.
I think that's what people are looking for.
PT usually gets the full team committed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I THINK SCHREIBER GETS IT DONE - just look at the amount of express north kids on the recruiting lists


How many? Please tell us college and position


2018 - Hopkins, Georgetown, Villanova, Fairfield, St. John's, Bryant (2), Providence, Brown, Colgate, Holy Cross, Boston University

2019 - Michigan (2), Lafayette, Princeton, Air Force, Richmond, High Point


I've heard some HS coaches resent the fact that their kids are getting committed via club teams. Has anyone heard of backlash against these kids? My son is a 2021, uncommitted but hoping.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I DONT WANT TO BE MEAN - BUT with kids getting recruited earlier and earlier, not so sure hs even matters much as far as recruiting is concerned
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I DONT WANT TO BE MEAN - BUT with kids getting recruited earlier and earlier, not so sure hs even matters much as far as recruiting is concerned


We're all human, coaches have favorites and those they just don't like (for whatever reason). Varsity coaches do matter when it comes to allocating playing time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I DONT WANT TO BE MEAN - BUT with kids getting recruited earlier and earlier, not so sure hs even matters much as far as recruiting is concerned


Ahh the Westchester thread....home to more shills per page than any other on BOTC.

Get it together folks. The line between HS coaches and club teams is VERY thin.

You would all be well served to review the LI threads. At least there everyone knows who runs the game.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
if your getting recruited in 9th grade - most colleges are calling your club director
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Not every commit is that young - there is still a lot of recruiting of HS players, so, yeah, HS coaches would conceivably be in the mix there.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I DONT WANT TO BE MEAN - BUT with kids getting recruited earlier and earlier, not so sure hs even matters much as far as recruiting is concerned


Ahh the Westchester thread....home to more shills per page than any other on BOTC.

Get it together folks. The line between HS coaches and club teams is VERY thin.

You would all be well served to review the LI threads. At least there everyone knows who runs the game.

Ahhh yes, the famous Long Island Lacrosse parent. More in tune, and living through their lax son or daughter than the rest of the country. I guess if I had nothing else to do I could review all the gold star LI threads.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I DONT WANT TO BE MEAN - BUT with kids getting recruited earlier and earlier, not so sure hs even matters much as far as recruiting is concerned


Ahh the Westchester thread....home to more shills per page than any other on BOTC.

Get it together folks. The line between HS coaches and club teams is VERY thin.

You would all be well served to review the LI threads. At least there everyone knows who runs the game.

Ahhh yes, the famous Long Island Lacrosse parent. More in tune, and living through their lax son or daughter than the rest of the country. I guess if I had nothing else to do I could review all the gold star LI threads.


The amount of time spent by LI parents on BOTC forum is sad. Nothing posted matters or makes a difference. HS coaches removed for various reasons, who's not getting playing time because of a coaches bias, what lax Mom is sleeping with which lax Dad..... The Jersey Shore has nothing on LI Lax Life.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Our HS coach actually made generalized, derogatory comments about the boys playing travel. He has actually held it against these boys, tending to play boys with more size less skill and boys that have never played versus the boys that play travel. Nose meet face.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Our HS coach actually made generalized, derogatory comments about the boys playing travel. He has actually held it against these boys, tending to play boys with more size less skill and boys that have never played versus the boys that play travel. Nose meet face.


So long as there is no conflict, what exactly does a HS coach see about travel lax as being a problem??
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
News flash....HS coaches funnel their best players to their (the coach's) club teams. Why?

Short term - cash. More players more money.

Mid term - serving as a conduit in the recruiting process

long term - advertising recruiting commitments in order to further the club brand and attract more players (aka...Selling the hype).

repeat again, and again, and again.

Mike, Jack, and Keith are the masters of the game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This may be true in Long Island, but how many Lax Clubs in Westchester are owned by HS head coaches. I don't think there are many. I can name just two: Superstar and Westchester Warriors. Are there others?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2-way, chargers, ballers, eclipse, and I'm pretty sure express is a 'franchise' operator meaning the operators have significant upside in the financial performance of the unit.

Coffee time
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This may be true in Long Island, but how many Lax Clubs in Westchester are owned by HS head coaches. I don't think there are many. I can name just two: Superstar and Westchester Warriors. Are there others?
One could say Prime Time, which is run by a John Jay assistant coach, but other than a few token John Jay kids he carries, (who are generally the weakest on his teams) he's become all about the repeat/prep school player who are more apt to be recruited.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This may be true in Long Island, but how many Lax Clubs in Westchester are owned by HS head coaches. I don't think there are many. I can name just two: Superstar and Westchester Warriors. Are there others?
One could say Prime Time, which is run by a John Jay assistant coach, but other than a few token John Jay kids he carries, (who are generally the weakest on his teams) he's become all about the repeat/prep school player who are more apt to be recruited.


Sounds like a disgruntled John Jay parent whose kid was cut from Primetime..........
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This may be true in Long Island, but how many Lax Clubs in Westchester are owned by HS head coaches. I don't think there are many. I can name just two: Superstar and Westchester Warriors. Are there others?
One could say Prime Time, which is run by a John Jay assistant coach, but other than a few token John Jay kids he carries, (who are generally the weakest on his teams) he's become all about the repeat/prep school player who are more apt to be recruited.


That seems to be the new business model at PT, and please do not forget these are businesses. How do you attract kids to your program? Market the number of committed players you have on your rosters. Who is most likely to be committed and early? The holdbacks and they were obviously added to rosters this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This may be true in Long Island, but how many Lax Clubs in Westchester are owned by HS head coaches. I don't think there are many. I can name just two: Superstar and Westchester Warriors. Are there others?
One could say Prime Time, which is run by a John Jay assistant coach, but other than a few token John Jay kids he carries, (who are generally the weakest on his teams) he's become all about the repeat/prep school player who are more apt to be recruited.


Sounds like a disgruntled John Jay parent whose kid was cut from Primetime..........
Sorry, Ct. based, maybe you should have re-read the statement before posting. Disgruntled, yes. But more about the hold-back/repeat phenomena that IMO is affecting lacrosse in a negative way. In response to the original post, Yes PT owned by a coach of John Jay, but because of his business model to fill rosters with players more likely to get recruited, (nothing wrong with that) any conflict of interest with the John Jay program would be less than similar programs on Long Island.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This may be true in Long Island, but how many Lax Clubs in Westchester are owned by HS head coaches. I don't think there are many. I can name just two: Superstar and Westchester Warriors. Are there others?
One could say Prime Time, which is run by a John Jay assistant coach, but other than a few token John Jay kids he carries, (who are generally the weakest on his teams) he's become all about the repeat/prep school player who are more apt to be recruited.


Sounds like a disgruntled John Jay parent whose kid was cut from Primetime..........
Sorry, Ct. based, maybe you should have re-read the statement before posting. Disgruntled, yes. But more about the hold-back/repeat phenomena that IMO is affecting lacrosse in a negative way. In response to the original post, Yes PT owned by a coach of John Jay, but because of his business model to fill rosters with players more likely to get recruited, (nothing wrong with that) any conflict of interest with the John Jay program would be less than similar programs on Long Island.


Holdbacks are taking showcase spots from the deserving. So they couldn't cut it at their appropriate age (or just one year holdback), so they drop down to play younger kids. Lame. Cheating and taking showcase spots from kids who are age appropriate. Parents should be ashamed and please stop creating new reasons why it was necessary. "His Aunt's illness caused a bought of grief which affected his ability to perform and succeed in the classroom....YADA YADA YADA.." Translation: He is not the superstar on the field that we want him to be and we know he should be, so we will have him play against younger kids to provide that false sense of superiority..."

Lame. Please feel free to launch a holdback supporting retort and your unique stories of necessity.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I totally agree! Simple solution, make club teams/ tourneys age based...seems to work well in youth soccer. It eliminates parents/coaches ability to "stack" teams. The WSYL final game was a disgrace last July.

what percentage of 8th graders are getting recruited? 1%? Less? Those few boys are incredible athletes and incredibly talented and will end up at top D1 lax schools no matter what! The other 90 something percent feel the huge pressure to " get recruited", their parents spend $$$$ on ridiculous showcases.

Club coaches now look for the reclassifed kids and hold backs and now double hold backs....the poor age appropriate kid that does well in school but still hasn't hit puberty is screwed!
Posted By: Anonymous Fall Tourneys? -
Any area club teams play in any fall tourneys yet? What ones are teams attending?

Bulldog Bash always attracts a handful.
The Pumpkin SUNY Purchase this weekend didn't draw name clubs.

Would it be asking too much to have PT-Preds-Eclipse-2Way-ExpressNorth-Ballers do a local jam?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Fall Tourneys? -
***** went down to LI a week back to do an informal 4-team mini-'tournament' - $10 a kid for refs, 3 games for each team, and all was very even competition. That's what more teams should do a few weekends, especially in the fall!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Fall Tourneys? -
that is a great idea except the tourney directors (club owners) wont make nearly as much as they do now.
Would it be possible to change the name of this thread back to Westchester Youth Lacrosse or something with Westchester in it? Tks
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Fall Tourneys? -
Here-here to that.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Something With Westchester In It -
Not sure
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I totally agree! Simple solution, make club teams/ tourneys age based...seems to work well in youth soccer. It eliminates parents/coaches ability to "stack" teams. The WSYL final game was a disgrace last July.

what percentage of 8th graders are getting recruited? 1%? Less? Those few boys are incredible athletes and incredibly talented and will end up at top D1 lax schools no matter what! The other 90 something percent feel the huge pressure to " get recruited", their parents spend $$$$ on ridiculous showcases.

Club coaches now look for the reclassifed kids and hold backs and now double hold backs....the poor age appropriate kid that does well in school but still hasn't hit puberty is screwed!


This is all too true and quite lamentable.

The trouble is that college coaches want the most well developed players they can get. And because there is no upside after college, everyone positions for it.

Some parents and kids would sell their souls in order to be able to say they are a D1 commit.

The clubs have little interest in anything but getting kids committed because that is what drives the hype and therefore the money. And make no mistake about it, the money is the key. They are businesses and seek to maximize profits.

It is kinda sad and personally I'd be embarrassed if my son had to 'play down' to compete, as would my son. We generally laugh at the repeaters.

Some are probably poised to shoot arrows at me and say that my son is probably not good enough to compete. Well that is half true. He is a very solid player who is a bit undersized but doing very well academically at a top high school. His path to college includes good grades, ACT's, and SAT's and perhaps using lacrosse as a hook. Very little chance he is top ten D1 material. I'm OK with that and so is he. He loves the sport and keeps it in perspective.

The frustrating part is that "on age" he is really quite good.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I totally agree! Simple solution, make club teams/ tourneys age based...seems to work well in youth soccer. It eliminates parents/coaches ability to "stack" teams. The WSYL final game was a disgrace last July.

what percentage of 8th graders are getting recruited? 1%? Less? Those few boys are incredible athletes and incredibly talented and will end up at top D1 lax schools no matter what! The other 90 something percent feel the huge pressure to " get recruited", their parents spend $$$$ on ridiculous showcases.

Club coaches now look for the reclassifed kids and hold backs and now double hold backs....the poor age appropriate kid that does well in school but still hasn't hit puberty is screwed!


This is all too true and quite lamentable.

The trouble is that college coaches want the most well developed players they can get. And because there is no upside after college, everyone positions for it.

Some parents and kids would sell their souls in order to be able to say they are a D1 commit.

The clubs have little interest in anything but getting kids committed because that is what drives the hype and therefore the money. And make no mistake about it, the money is the key. They are businesses and seek to maximize profits.

It is kinda sad and personally I'd be embarrassed if my son had to 'play down' to compete, as would my son. We generally laugh at the repeaters.

Some are probably poised to shoot arrows at me and say that my son is probably not good enough to compete. Well that is half true. He is a very solid player who is a bit undersized but doing very well academically at a top high school. His path to college includes good grades, ACT's, and SAT's and perhaps using lacrosse as a hook. Very little chance he is top ten D1 material. I'm OK with that and so is he. He loves the sport and keeps it in perspective.

The frustrating part is that "on age" he is really quite good.
When I read this , I thought I wrote it myself. It is spot on for my son also, who after 5 years on a so-called A team lost his position to a kid almost 2 years older. Went to a B/C team's try-outs where most couldn't even do a line drill. Luckily his HS has intra-mural lax in Fall , Box in Winter, and 3 teams in the Spring, so he decided to skip playing summer lacrosse this year, which of course he may regret next June.
Originally Posted by stich2681
Would it be possible to change the name of this thread back to Westchester Youth Lacrosse or something with Westchester in it? Tks


here you go
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Fall Tourneys? -
Originally Posted by stich2681
Would it be possible to change the name of this thread back to Westchester Youth Lacrosse or something with Westchester in it? Tks
Unlike Long Island, not sure there is any pure Westchester Youth lacrosse. The AA & A Summer Travel teams have a large contingent of Ct. players on them, and most of the better spring town teams play in CONNY, or the Hudson Valley League.
Okay, the header joke was funny the first time but it is getting stale. Can we please label this thread "Westchester Lacrosse". Thanks.
here here!
Posted By: Anonymous Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
here here!


Have at it anyone couldve done it though
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Holdbacks deprive those kids of appropriate age of spots at the higher levels.

Exactly the opposite of growing the game, holdbacks are effectively shrinking the pool of players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Holdbacks deprive those kids of appropriate age of spots at the higher levels.

Exactly the opposite of growing the game, holdbacks are effectively shrinking the pool of players.


While this may true nothing is going happen till the college coaches get on board. You don't know how many times a college coach encouraged a player to repeat or declare a PG year. Happens all the time.

If the people who will end up being their coaches are telling them to do it, what are they supposed to do?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Holdbacks deprive those kids of appropriate age of spots at the higher levels.

Exactly the opposite of growing the game, holdbacks are effectively shrinking the pool of players.


While this may true nothing is going happen till the college coaches get on board. You don't know how many times a college coach encouraged a player to repeat or declare a PG year. Happens all the time.

If the people who will end up being their coaches are telling them to do it, what are they supposed to do?
Both of these posts are absolutely correct. Public school parents of very good players (not the 'great' player) have a bit of a dilemma if their son ever has hopes of playing at a D1. Just looking at D1 rosters filled with prep school players is all you need to know. (There are a few exceptions of course)
Posted By: Anonymous Purchase Tourney -
With few tourneys in Westchester, fall Pumpkin Shootout tourney was a good thing. Decent turnout of teams and players from the area. As this board has noted impossible to get local clubs to play one another but events like this one help.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Purchase Tourney -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With few tourneys in Westchester, fall Pumpkin Shootout tourney was a good thing. Decent turnout of teams and players from the area. As this board has noted impossible to get local clubs to play one another but events like this one help.


So we didn't have to drive 5 hours each way to play three short games in MD? I heard the Pumpkin Shootout was well run, congrats.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Purchase Tourney -
So you didn't have to drive 5 hours, but played a weak [lacrosse] tournament and created a link for it? Pathetic
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Purchase Tourney -
2024 had igloo and outlaw select. 2 better than average teams It would be nice to see express north and primetime join in.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Purchase Tourney -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So you didn't have to drive 5 hours, but played a weak [lacrosse] tournament and created a link for it? Pathetic
So what's pathetic about it? Yes I get it. Your son is the number one recruit out of Westchester, just waiting for that full scholarship to Johns Hopkins, and you personally enjoy sitting at the Delaware Mem. Bridge, but you know for the rest of us out there with mere B players compared to your superstar a few well run local tournaments is just what this area needs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Purchase Tourney -
Westchester can certainly be the base for a few very well run tournaments. Canada, Massachusetts, LI....all shorter drives than MD. I hope we see more of these.
Posted By: Anonymous Westchester Lacrosse -
Any local club teams going to the Yale tournament. I believe Predators will be there. How about any high school teams?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Good showing by Westchester teams this weekend. Both Primetime and Preds 2020s go 3-0 at Adrenaline DE.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
How did CT Chargers 2020 do?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How did CT Chargers 2020 do?
They only lost to 2019 Prime Time, I'm sorry, I meant 2020 Prime Time......
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
How many holdbacks on 2020 PT?

Everybody has a couple. Is PT particularly 'old'?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
As organizations, both did well. Both had teams playing in 2020, 2019 and 2018. Each team played three games. Preds went 8-1 and PT went 7-1-1


Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Dosnt sound like a very competitive tournament to have 2 local teams dominate like that, unless all the scores were tight games.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Out of all the programs in the area it is clear that Eclipse is in the top recruiting events..for 2020
NLF 2020
Big 4
NLF fall team

I would have thought a different big program North but they are not in ANY of the top 2020 events.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Why do you say that? Do you know the quality of the teams that they played? Can you say definitively that any of those teams they played are or are not good quality teams? Every year teams change their rosters. Its a well respected tournament with lots of teams wanting to participate. The Westchester teams did pretty well. No one is saying they are the best in the nation. Why belittle the accomplishment?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
My guess is that Eclipse and North will be at overlapping events next summer. Should be a good matchup as both teams appear strong IMO but have very different styles of play.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Out of all the programs in the area it is clear that Eclipse is in the top recruiting events..for 2020
NLF 2020
Big 4
NLF fall team

I would have thought a different big program North but they are not in ANY of the top 2020 events.

Eclipse 2020 will continue to lose around 80% of their games against NLF teams. They are not a strong team at all.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
How are the styles of play different between Eclipse and North?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
If North keeps getting blocked out of NLF events because of the other top 2 or 3 LIE teams then maybe some kids will move to Eclipse to reap the benefits of being a NLF member club.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If North keeps getting blocked out of NLF events because of the other top 2 or 3 LIE teams then maybe some kids will move to Eclipse to reap the benefits of being a NLF member club.

This doesnt happen at all at the older age groups
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Of course it does. 21, 20
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
maybe Trump will ban holdbacks...will give 99% of the people on this board nothing to complain about!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Of course it does. 21, 20


Older than 2020 would be 18s and 19s - they are in all the NLF events
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I would argue that after top 2020 LIE team from LI, 2020 North team is second best within the Express umbrella.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Why do you believe the NLF events define what teams/organizations are good?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Why are you assuming that 2020 North is blocked out when the 18's and 19's North teams are there? Maybe they are not going this weekend for other reasons. North is a charter member of the NLF, while Eclipse just joined. Makes no sense that Eclipse would get the nod and North get shut out
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why do you believe the NLF events define what teams/organizations are good?


Because they believe the hype.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why are you assuming that 2020 North is blocked out when the 18's and 19's North teams are there? Maybe they are not going this weekend for other reasons. North is a charter member of the NLF, while Eclipse just joined. Makes no sense that Eclipse would get the nod and North get shut out


True, it makes no sense but Eclipse 2020 was at Boys Latin (NLF)
and is going to Fall elite Invitational (NLF). Exp North 2020 is not at either. Eclipse also at Big4 this weekend with other top teams and I only see LIE on the schedule. so it seems LIE North is not getting in for whatever reasons. Maybe just 1 team allowed per event? Would be nice to see them compete with the top tier teams or is Eclipse that much better?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Preds 2020s putting together something special. Last fall 7-1 with only loss to Crush. Summer 17-2-1. This fall 6-0. Combined 30-2-1 in Fall/Summer/Fall. We'll see this weekend at Philly Freshman how they match up agains better competition, but in two decent (non NLF) tourneys this fall something like a 50 goal differential over 6 games. Competition wasn't tough, but they can only play the teams they play. Good team got better this fall. Certainly best 2020 in Westchester and should be able to play anywhere.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Preds are a solid team and will face a test this weekend. Let's see how it turns out before we announce the emergence of a super power.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
How did Eclipse do at Big 4 last weekend?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Eclipse 2021 got their [lacrosse] kicked but I'm sure they were missing players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Eclipse was missing 15 players..lets see this weekend with team back at NLF
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Missing 15 players? How did they even play then? There are only 18 kids on the top 2021 roster and then talent level drops off with second team....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Brought B team kids..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Will preds sweep agaian this weekend?

Next Level
BBL
fl$
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Lots of local teams playing at Yale this weekend. Should be a good time: 3D Tristate, Primetime, Chargers, Predators, House of Sports, Westchester warriors, Superstar. Good luck to all.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will preds sweep agaian this weekend?

Next Level
BBL
fl$
Is BBL a good team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The holdback issue came full circle this weekend. The LI Express 2019 team beat the Ed*e team from Canada and it wasn't very close. They played dirty after being down 3-4 goals early and were never in the game. But, what stood out to me was how some of these kids used to be so physically imposing and were now just cheap shot artists who could no longer compete with kids who have caught up in development. Yes, they are still a year or two older but it doesn't matter anymore. No one needs to wonder why programs like Hopkins have been struggling, they have been recruiting kids like these and hoping it works out. The JH commit was hitting kids late and futility slashing. The kids said their coach apologized after the game for the cheap shots but regardless, the page has turned on that team. The result of playing against younger kids is standing out in the short term, so I guess until colleges stop recruiting so early, this will continue.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yes. 2020 BBL beat 2020-ish Primetime last weekend in Del by one goal. Competitive but sloppy game for both sides.

FL$ 2020 made huge improvements last year and will be tough, but not un-beatable. They have played a cupcake schedule so far this fall.

Next Level is also very solid and on any given day could beat any of them.

This should be a very competitive bracket.

But bear in mind, it is only the fall season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will preds sweep agaian this weekend?

Next Level
BBL
fl$
Is BBL a good team?


Great battles last year with FL$. two one goal games and a tie.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
LIE or LIE North?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes. 2020 BBL beat 2020-ish Primetime last weekend in Del by one goal. Competitive but sloppy game for both sides.

FL$ 2020 made huge improvements last year and will be tough, but not un-beatable. They have played a cupcake schedule so far this fall.

Next Level is also very solid and on any given day could beat any of them.

This should be a very competitive bracket.

But bear in mind, it is only the fall season.

BBL also lost on Sunday to the Outlaws from L.I., and they are not strong in the 2020 year at all.. Outlaws got soundly beat in their other 2 games.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
BBL also lost on Sunday to the Outlaws from L.I., and they are not strong in the 2020 year at all.. Outlaws got soundly beat in their other 2 games.


So true. None of these teams has all the parts and answers. On any given day any of them can look terrific, or like crap, and often can do both on the same day!

And I think you find this often with teams a cut below the top level filled with kids trying to 'be seen'. Team concepts can get thrown out the window pretty quickly.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Next Level clearly the best team in this bracket by a very wide margin i would say goal dif should be +25
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
LIE or LIE North?


LIE North
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The holdback issue came full circle this weekend. The LI Express 2019 team beat the Ed*e team from Canada and it wasn't very close. They played dirty after being down 3-4 goals early and were never in the game. But, what stood out to me was how some of these kids used to be so physically imposing and were now just cheap shot artists who could no longer compete with kids who have caught up in development. Yes, they are still a year or two older but it doesn't matter anymore. No one needs to wonder why programs like Hopkins have been struggling, they have been recruiting kids like these and hoping it works out. The JH commit was hitting kids late and futility slashing. The kids said their coach apologized after the game for the cheap shots but regardless, the page has turned on that team. The result of playing against younger kids is standing out in the short term, so I guess until colleges stop recruiting so early, this will continue.


LIE North, not LIE.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will preds sweep agaian this weekend?

Next Level
BBL
fl$

Evidently no
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will preds sweep agaian this weekend?

Next Level
BBL
fl$

They beat the For the Love of Money team and lost their other games.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Prime time swept . 2021, 2022, 2023. Divisions and went 500 at 2025
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Prime time swept . 2021, 2022, 2023. Divisions and went 500 at 2025


Nick, are you posting again? Welcome back.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Next Level clearly the best team in this bracket by a very wide margin i would say goal dif should be +25


How did they do?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
PrimeTime at Fall Bulldog showed despite the slow starts of many of their young teams the past couple years, by the time they start getting to 6th grade, PT teams start to pull ahead of other clubs. Players want to go where other top players have gone. Other clubs chipping away but not there yet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PrimeTime at Fall Bulldog showed despite the slow starts of many of their young teams the past couple years, by the time they start getting to 6th grade, PT teams start to pull ahead of other clubs. Players want to go where other top players have gone. Other clubs chipping away but not there yet.


Leading the holdback push not really something to celebrate.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
You won a B tournament..Great job!!!!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PrimeTime at Fall Bulldog showed despite the slow starts of many of their young teams the past couple years, by the time they start getting to 6th grade, PT teams start to pull ahead of other clubs. Players want to go where other top players have gone. Other clubs chipping away but not there yet.


Leading the holdback push not really something to celebrate.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Relative to what. ? b tourney. ? Ok. So wasn't 91 crush. Or bandits or whatever. But good showing of local teams. Jerk off- wasn't empire , fighting ducks either
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Prime time swept . 2021, 2022, 2023. Divisions and went 500 at 2025


slow down. No eclipse, BBL, Express, 92, Igloo
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Is BBL a good program? First time I saw themn was at Trilogy Tournament, and people here said that it is a C tournament
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Philly Freshman (2020's)
Pool 6
Team.........W....L...T...GD...GA...GS
FL$............2....1...0...3....15...18
Next Level...2....1...0...6....11...17
BBL............1....2...0...-3...21...18
Predators....1....2...0...-6...19...13

As I expected, it was a very competitive pool.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The Yorktown boys had a fun day of lacrosse at the Gobbler Games on Sunday. Three exciting games and lots of laughs. Thanks to the John Jay guys for running the event and handing out those shiny trophies and medals.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Yorktown boys had a fun day of lacrosse at the Gobbler Games on Sunday. Three exciting games and lots of laughs. Thanks to the John Jay guys for running the event and handing out those shiny trophies and medals.


Nice day for Yorktown 8th grade upsetting Prime Time, I mean John Jay. Gobbler was a lot of fun but unfortunately many "town teams" had more than a few out of town elite club players. Once again proving that people have abandoned playing among their friends from town just so they can show how awesome their club buddies are. The fun continues to get sucked out of the game. Oh, and Yorktown won because despite being half the size they played like a team rather than the Prime Time, I mean John Jay, approach of just trying to pound it in one on one.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Interesting....heard it was a fun day...lots of touches..fast paced 7v7. Anyone witness the 7 th grade championship game? Heard it was pretty intense!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Yorktown boys had a fun day of lacrosse at the Gobbler Games on Sunday. Three exciting games and lots of laughs. Thanks to the John Jay guys for running the event and handing out those shiny trophies and medals.


Nice day for Yorktown 8th grade upsetting Prime Time, I mean John Jay. Gobbler was a lot of fun but unfortunately many "town teams" had more than a few out of town elite club players. Once again proving that people have abandoned playing among their friends from town just so they can show how awesome their club buddies are. The fun continues to get sucked out of the game. Oh, and Yorktown won because despite being half the size they played like a team rather than the Prime Time, I mean John Jay, approach of just trying to pound it in one on one.
I'm guessing most of the Yorktown kids play for the Ballers, no? But yes, the JJ/PT one on one style of lacrosse continues to serve them well against Yorktown at all levels. They always seem have one anointed superstar at each grade level. That being said, Gobbler Games are just meant to be a fun, fast paced day of lacrosse at the end of the season. Which they are, and getting better each year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Yorktown boys had a fun day of lacrosse at the Gobbler Games on Sunday. Three exciting games and lots of laughs. Thanks to the John Jay guys for running the event and handing out those shiny trophies and medals.


Nice day for Yorktown 8th grade upsetting Prime Time, I mean John Jay. Gobbler was a lot of fun but unfortunately many "town teams" had more than a few out of town elite club players. Once again proving that people have abandoned playing among their friends from town just so they can show how awesome their club buddies are. The fun continues to get sucked out of the game. Oh, and Yorktown won because despite being half the size they played like a team rather than the Prime Time, I mean John Jay, approach of just trying to pound it in one on one.
I'm guessing most of the Yorktown kids play for the Ballers, no? But yes, the JJ/PT one on one style of lacrosse continues to serve them well against Yorktown at all levels. They always seem have one anointed superstar at each grade level. That being said, Gobbler Games are just meant to be a fun, fast paced day of lacrosse at the end of the season. Which they are, and getting better each year.


I believe he was highlighting the JJ roster was far more PrimeTime than John Jay. Yorktown was all kids from YAC. Town team. I hope this fun little tournament doesn't turn into full blown, win at all cost rosters stuffed with club team players from all over the region. It should be town teams playing against other town teams as it was intended and advertised. If it does continue to morph into club rosters, it will ruin the spirit of the games. Our kids play in enough of those tournaments and we'd be inclined to stay home next year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Only 2-3 play for the Balllers, some play for Prime Time some for Express, some don't play travel at all.... but... they are all Yorktown kids.. Fun local tournament.. wish their were more like it
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
There was 3 non John Jay kids on the team, apparently because they couldn't get enough JJ kids to play.

Who cares anyway, Yorktown beat them fair and square, they played great as someone mentioned earlier. And its supposed to be a fun tournament which it is.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There was 3 non John Jay kids on the team, apparently because they couldn't get enough JJ kids to play.

Who cares anyway, Yorktown beat them fair and square, they played great as someone mentioned earlier. And its supposed to be a fun tournament which it is.


It should be pointed out that the JJ program does not organize teams for this event, parents in each grade do the organizing. The JJ program will stress the point of town teams only next year. Hopefully everyone had a fun day of lacrosse!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
6th grade had no ringers (or at least any that I could randomly figure out). I think the 2023 teams from this area know and respect each other well so pulling stuff to win nice little 7v7 tournament would get called out fast.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I guess you were there??? The John Jay team had 3 outside players, two that play on PT the other for Eclipse....so what? JJ did not have enough players due to the holiday, who else is out there that they should have called that would make you happy??

What you failed to see was that both teams were having a ball, they are all friends and it was a great, competitive game! Why are you looking to cause trouble where there is none? Parents hugged each other afterward...,you're a jaxkass.

Way to put a bad spin on what was a fun day of lacrosse!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess you were there??? The John Jay team had 3 outside players, two that play on PT the other for Eclipse....so what? JJ did not have enough players due to the holiday, who else is out there that they should have called that would make you happy??

What you failed to see was that both teams were having a ball, they are all friends and it was a great, competitive game! Why are you looking to cause trouble where there is none? Parents hugged each other afterward...,you're a jaxkass.

Way to put a bad spin on what was a fun day of lacrosse!


I thought it was interesting to contrast the two styles of play exhibited by the teams. One was fundamentally sound, the other was showboating at every opportunity. One team was playing "we" ball, the other "me" ball Guess who won?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yorktown won by 2, they played smarter / better lacrosse! JJ 8 took way many stupid shots shots which in a normal format they'd get the ball back and not cause the turnovers. Yorktown moved the ball well, also interesting to note the 2 biggest offenders were 2 of the outside kids...one a PT kid and the other from Eclipse. The jj8 kid with 4 goals in that game was 22 the JJ attack kid who was playing left and yes he's a PT kid too but was not "playing typical PT ball"

The fact remains that all the boys had fun win or lose!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess you were there??? The John Jay team had 3 outside players, two that play on PT the other for Eclipse....so what? JJ did not have enough players due to the holiday, who else is out there that they should have called that would make you happy??

What you failed to see was that both teams were having a ball, they are all friends and it was a great, competitive game! Why are you looking to cause trouble where there is none? Parents hugged each other afterward...,you're a jaxkass.

Way to put a bad spin on what was a fun day of lacrosse!


and so it begins, sure a fun day, love those, but if outsiders used it will be called out on here, try to justify it all you want...
just please try and keep the kids jersey numbers out of it, where they can be singled out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess you were there??? The John Jay team had 3 outside players, two that play on PT the other for Eclipse....so what? JJ did not have enough players due to the holiday, who else is out there that they should have called that would make you happy??

What you failed to see was that both teams were having a ball, they are all friends and it was a great, competitive game! Why are you looking to cause trouble where there is none? Parents hugged each other afterward...,you're a jaxkass.

Way to put a bad spin on what was a fun day of lacrosse!


and so it begins, sure a fun day, love those, but if outsiders used it will be called out on here, try to justify it all you want...
just please try and keep the kids jersey numbers out of it, where they can be singled out.
Wait..next someone will come on here and suggest JJ8 had a PT holdback playing for them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess you were there??? The John Jay team had 3 outside players, two that play on PT the other for Eclipse....so what? JJ did not have enough players due to the holiday, who else is out there that they should have called that would make you happy??

What you failed to see was that both teams were having a ball, they are all friends and it was a great, competitive game! Why are you looking to cause trouble where there is none? Parents hugged each other afterward...,you're a jaxkass.

Way to put a bad spin on what was a fun day of lacrosse!


and so it begins, sure a fun day, love those, but if outsiders used it will be called out on here, try to justify it all you want...
just please try and keep the kids jersey numbers out of it, where they can be singled out.
Wait..next someone will come on here and suggest JJ8 had a PT holdback playing for them.


Gobbler Games has always been viewed as a fun first, second and third tournament. Sure its competitive but its between town teams. If its morphing into a win at all cost event, we won't be back. Yorktown Dad & organizer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess you were there??? The John Jay team had 3 outside players, two that play on PT the other for Eclipse....so what? JJ did not have enough players due to the holiday, who else is out there that they should have called that would make you happy??

What you failed to see was that both teams were having a ball, they are all friends and it was a great, competitive game! Why are you looking to cause trouble where there is none? Parents hugged each other afterward...,you're a jaxkass.

Way to put a bad spin on what was a fun day of lacrosse!


and so it begins, sure a fun day, love those, but if outsiders used it will be called out on here, try to justify it all you want...
just please try and keep the kids jersey numbers out of it, where they can be singled out.
Wait..next someone will come on here and suggest JJ8 had a PT holdback playing for them.


Gobbler Games has always been viewed as a fun first, second and third tournament. Sure its competitive but its between town teams. If its morphing into a win at all cost event, we won't be back. Yorktown Dad & organizer.
Since the only Yorktown team that came was an 8th grade team, and as the Gobbler Games does not include 9th grade and higher....it's not too difficult to say you wont be back....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yorktown Dad AND organizer?? Maybe one... not both.. shame on you!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess you were there??? The John Jay team had 3 outside players, two that play on PT the other for Eclipse....so what? JJ did not have enough players due to the holiday, who else is out there that they should have called that would make you happy??

What you failed to see was that both teams were having a ball, they are all friends and it was a great, competitive game! Why are you looking to cause trouble where there is none? Parents hugged each other afterward...,you're a jaxkass.

Way to put a bad spin on what was a fun day of lacrosse!


and so it begins, sure a fun day, love those, but if outsiders used it will be called out on here, try to justify it all you want...
just please try and keep the kids jersey numbers out of it, where they can be singled out.
Wait..next someone will come on here and suggest JJ8 had a PT holdback playing for them.


Gobbler Games has always been viewed as a fun first, second and third tournament. Sure its competitive but its between town teams. If its morphing into a win at all cost event, we won't be back. Yorktown Dad & organizer.


I'm a Yorktown Dad with more than one son in the program. I'm hoping my younger son gets a chance to play in future Gobbler games. Keep it fun.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess you were there??? The John Jay team had 3 outside players, two that play on PT the other for Eclipse....so what? JJ did not have enough players due to the holiday, who else is out there that they should have called that would make you happy??

What you failed to see was that both teams were having a ball, they are all friends and it was a great, competitive game! Why are you looking to cause trouble where there is none? Parents hugged each other afterward...,you're a jaxkass.

Way to put a bad spin on what was a fun day of lacrosse!


and so it begins, sure a fun day, love those, but if outsiders used it will be called out on here, try to justify it all you want...
just please try and keep the kids jersey numbers out of it, where they can be singled out.
Wait..next someone will come on here and suggest JJ8 had a PT holdback playing for them.


Gobbler Games has always been viewed as a fun first, second and third tournament. Sure its competitive but its between town teams. If its morphing into a win at all cost event, we won't be back. Yorktown Dad & organizer.
Since the only Yorktown team that came was an 8th grade team, and as the Gobbler Games does not include 9th grade and higher....it's not too difficult to say you wont be back....


Another know it all that doesn't.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess you were there??? The John Jay team had 3 outside players, two that play on PT the other for Eclipse....so what? JJ did not have enough players due to the holiday, who else is out there that they should have called that would make you happy??

What you failed to see was that both teams were having a ball, they are all friends and it was a great, competitive game! Why are you looking to cause trouble where there is none? Parents hugged each other afterward...,you're a jaxkass.

Way to put a bad spin on what was a fun day of lacrosse!


and so it begins, sure a fun day, love those, but if outsiders used it will be called out on here, try to justify it all you want...
just please try and keep the kids jersey numbers out of it, where they can be singled out.
Wait..next someone will come on here and suggest JJ8 had a PT holdback playing for them.


Gobbler Games has always been viewed as a fun first, second and third tournament. Sure its competitive but its between town teams. If its morphing into a win at all cost event, we won't be back. Yorktown Dad & organizer.


I'm a Yorktown Dad with more than one son in the program. I'm hoping my younger son gets a chance to play in future Gobbler games. Keep it fun.


So am I. Please keep it fun, that's the draw.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What is the best HS level indoor league in the area?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I keep reading the LI guys bragging about how superior their brand of lax is. I think the population density skews the numbers of kids playing D1 lacrosse.

What % of HS players from each region play D1 lacrosse? I'd bet Westchester and Li are comparable, apples to apples.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I keep reading the LI guys bragging about how superior their brand of lax is. I think the population density skews the numbers of kids playing D1 lacrosse.

What % of HS players from each region play D1 lacrosse? I'd bet Westchester and Li are comparable, apples to apples.


<yawn>
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Happy holidays and New Year to all those people who volunteer their time to coach, manage, organize and positively impact the youth of Westchester. My boys learn so much from their coaches, especially the lessons they will need to succeed and be happy in life. As a coach, I hope that a similar impact is felt by those I am asked to teach and instruct.

Thanks again to all those who contribute.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
LI (well, really Nassau and Suffolk) has 3 million residents and Westchester has 1 million. LI def has more than 3x number of D1 players than Westchester.

Even if you (correctly) assume more than 3x number of kids on LI play lax than in Westchester, LI still has way higher % of D1 players.

Sure, some kids in Westchester are great and some clubs are good and some high school teams kick [lacrosse] but, overall, LI is way bigger, deeper, better.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
LI (well, really Nassau and Suffolk) has 3 million residents and Westchester has 1 million. LI def has more than 3x number of D1 players than Westchester.

Even if you (correctly) assume more than 3x number of kids on LI play lax than in Westchester, LI still has way higher % of D1 players.

Sure, some kids in Westchester are great and some clubs are good and some high school teams kick [lacrosse] but, overall, LI is way bigger, deeper, better.


Your overall point is correct, but keep in mind that Westchester has a much higher percentage of city residents (Yonkers, Mt Vernon, parts of New Rochelle, Peekskill) who, through demographics and the problems lacrosse has in urban areas, don't play lacrosse. LI, by contrast, is much more suburban by percentage. The pool of kids available in Westchester is much more than 3-1 less than on LI.

1 in 4 of every HS program in all of NYS is on LI. (I believe this excludes the Catholics)

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
LI (well, really Nassau and Suffolk) has 3 million residents and Westchester has 1 million. LI def has more than 3x number of D1 players than Westchester.

Even if you (correctly) assume more than 3x number of kids on LI play lax than in Westchester, LI still has way higher % of D1 players.

Sure, some kids in Westchester are great and some clubs are good and some high school teams kick [lacrosse] but, overall, LI is way bigger, deeper, better.


It's not like Queens and Brooklyn have a lot of players, and l ikewwise, they both aren't producing lots of talent. ;-)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Its purely a numbers game. Ward Melville has 100+ kids trying out for Varsity, a school like John Jay has less than half that number. I'm sure the ratios are very similar on LI and Westchester--kids playing HS to kids playing in college. The water doesn't make the players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Big Difference is Long Island teaches kids stick skills and tough nosed play from an early age. Lacrosse is about playing at high speed and getting ground balls. Long Island kids are trained to do that. Most of the best players from Westchester were actually trained in Long Island.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Maybe that's because westchester and Fairfield kids are spoiled brats
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Maybe that's because westchester and Fairfield kids are spoiled brats


As a LI parent, there are a fair amount of "spoiled brats' here also. Three of the top 3 Nassau HSs could easily be accused of being similalry very affluent areas, along with many others. So, that's not all of it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Wow. . . . It never ceases to amaze me when I read all the vicious posts on this blog, but most of them are reserved for the Long Island or MD forums.
The stereotype about Westchester and Fairfield kids being spoiled brats is clearly coming from someone who doesn't know them at all, or has had one bad experience and is generalizing all players from that area into that group.
There are bad seeds everywhere, and being spoiled has nothing to do with the socioeconomic bracket that you fall into. It has more to do with the entitled feeling you get from your parents, which has zero to do with income and everything to do with class.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Just ask college coaches. They will tell you, the work ethic and sense of entitlement from kids in westchester and Fairfield is horrifying . This does not include areas like yorktown, somers, mahopac. Hard nosed kids with a work ethic
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just ask college coaches. They will tell you, the work ethic and sense of entitlement from kids in westchester and Fairfield is horrifying . This does not include areas like yorktown, somers, mahopac. Hard nosed kids with a work ethic
This is almost comical. I'm sure that's the first thing college coaches will tell you while they're recruiting all those top laxers from Somers & Mahopac. And I'm guessing they're ignoring the 'entitled' (yes, reclassified & PG) kids from Brunswick, Deerfield, etc. ?? who actually make up the majority of the top D1 rosters of players from Westchester & Fairfield. Those 3 towns you mention are similar, except Yorktown has a rich tradition of lacrosse and a well run youth & travel program, while the other 2 clearly do not. The funny thing is I'm not sure who you're taking a shot at? John Jay? Bronxville ? Rye ? really not that many programs here in Westchester when compared to LI.....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just ask college coaches. They will tell you, the work ethic and sense of entitlement from kids in westchester and Fairfield is horrifying . This does not include areas like yorktown, somers, mahopac. Hard nosed kids with a work ethic
This is almost comical. I'm sure that's the first thing college coaches will tell you while they're recruiting all those top laxers from Somers & Mahopac. And I'm guessing they're ignoring the 'entitled' (yes, reclassified & PG) kids from Brunswick, Deerfield, etc. ?? who actually make up the majority of the top D1 rosters of players from Westchester & Fairfield. Those 3 towns you mention are similar, except Yorktown has a rich tradition of lacrosse and a well run youth & travel program, while the other 2 clearly do not. The funny thing is I'm not sure who you're taking a shot at? John Jay? Bronxville ? Rye ? really not that many programs here in Westchester when compared to LI.....


Please leave 'PAC out of this they are not Westchester.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Maybe that's because westchester and Fairfield kids are spoiled brats
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just ask college coaches. They will tell you, the work ethic and sense of entitlement from kids in westchester and Fairfield is horrifying . This does not include areas like yorktown, somers, mahopac. Hard nosed kids with a work ethic
Yeah those entitled & spoiled kids from Darien, New Canaan, Ridgefield & Greenwich, 3 of which in the National Top 30, not sure why college coaches aren't looking closer at their poor work ethic while recruiting ...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
You can buy your kid a spot into a college. But you can't buy these spoiled brats a set of brass balls. That comes from genetics , Fairfield kids , most westchester kids know daddy will be there to open his wallet and save the day. I will take yorktown and mahopac kids to a rumble. At least they won't run and drive away in their BMW.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
[quote=Anonymous]You can buy your kid a spot into a college. But you can't buy these spoiled brats a set of brass balls. That comes from genetics , Fairfield kids , most westchester kids know daddy will be there to open his wallet and save the day. I will take yorktown and mahopac kids to a rumble.

Oops, I stumbled onto the WWE forum....can you direct me to the lacrosse forum where all the putnam kids are getting recruited?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Bronxville (as affluent and spoiled as you can get) in Westchester County is a TINY place. School district is 1 square mile. The HS lax team is competing in NY Class D this year.

Bronxville, per capita, has got to be sending more kids to quality D1 programs than any other school around, LI, CT, NJ or Westchester. No Monmouths or UMASS Lowell either. ND, UNC, Yale, Brown, Harvard etc.

And no my kid does not go to Bronxville. Plays at a competing program but you've got to give credit where its due.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Plenty of "spoiled" kids in Yorktown and Somers. They are every where.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bronxville (as affluent and spoiled as you can get) in Westchester County is a TINY place. School district is 1 square mile. The HS lax team is competing in NY Class D this year.

Bronxville, per capita, has got to be sending more kids to quality D1 programs than any other school around, LI, CT, NJ or Westchester. No Monmouths or UMASS Lowell either. ND, UNC, Yale, Brown, Harvard etc.

And no my kid does not go to Bronxville. Plays at a competing program but you've got to give credit where its due.
Absolutely, and especially give credit on the academic side. Those are typical Prep School recruiting Universities you mention, and Bronxville has to be doing something better on the education side that other public schools are not. It's not just the lacrosse...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Oh, one more thing.....Bronxville beat Mahopac 10-8 last year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Oh, one more thing.....Bronxville beat Mahopac 10-8 last year.
I guess on that one particular afternoon Mahopac wasn't ready to rumble with their inherited genetically superior brass balls. But all in all Mahopac had a good year last year, program has been heading in the right direction.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Brass balls? Kids don't play that way anymore. Bro society? Flow? How about kicking some azz on the field and not worrying about style, BTB passes/shots, etc. Laughable. Funny thing is, some coaches encourage that type of play. That garbage doesn't cut it in D1, so lets let that die.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Go watch 90+1 crush. All flash. Most of the team going d1
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Go watch 90+1 crush. All flash. Most of the team going d1


Team is over-rated and under whelming.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Go watch 90+1 crush. All flash. Most of the team going d1


Team is over-rated and under whelming.


Lol. Probably best youth lacrosse team ever at every age they've played.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Go watch 90+1 crush. All flash. Most of the team going d1


Team is over-rated and under whelming.


Lol. Probably best youth lacrosse team ever at every age they've played.


Says daddy baller living vicariously through his son. Give me a break!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Go watch 90+1 crush. All flash. Most of the team going d1


Team is over-rated and under whelming.


Lol. Probably best youth lacrosse team ever at every age they've played.


Many of the top teams would be considered that good if they practiced 3-4+ hours. It takes a psycho coach to run that team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Go watch 90+1 crush. All flash. Most of the team going d1


Team is over-rated and under whelming.


Lol. Probably best youth lacrosse team ever at every age they've played.


Says daddy baller living vicariously through his son. Give me a break!


Unfortunately being a hater is not going to make it less true. Possibly the best youth lacrosse team ever.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Usually don't post . Lets just say been around the game along time . Enjoy these times with your sons and daughters . Regarding the dad who wrote best youth lax team ever . I suggest you watch a good movie , probably a comedy . That comment is pretty funny . another idea would be to watch a good sitcom - one with canned laughter. 70s I woulda suggest odd couple , 80s ALF, 90s Seinfeld.2000s Curb your enthusiasm .


Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Usually don't post . Lets just say been around the game along time . Enjoy these times with your sons and daughters . Regarding the dad who wrote best youth lax team ever . I suggest you watch a good movie , probably a comedy . That comment is pretty funny . another idea would be to watch a good sitcom - one with canned laughter. 70s I woulda suggest odd couple , 80s ALF, 90s Seinfeld.2000s Curb your enthusiasm .



I love a good 80s sitcom. You clearly have never seen them play. They probably would beat most westchester varsity teams this spring.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
100% could beat most varsity teams in westchester. The whole team is practically going major d1
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Go watch 90+1 crush. All flash. Most of the team going d1


Team is over-rated and under whelming.


Lol. Probably best youth lacrosse team ever at every age they've played.


Many of the top teams would be considered that good if they practiced 3-4+ hours. It takes a psycho coach to run that team.


If you want to be the best, you have to put in the effort.

By the way, they never practiced 3 or 4 hours a day. But make that part of the legend.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Go watch 90+1 crush. All flash. Most of the team going d1


Team is over-rated and under whelming.


Lol. Probably best youth lacrosse team ever at every age they've played.


Many of the top teams would be considered that good if they practiced 3-4+ hours. It takes a psycho coach to run that team.


If you want to be the best, you have to put in the effort.

By the way, they never practiced 3 or 4 hours a day. But make that part of the legend.


We both know you are lying or uninformed. More power to you.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Who the heck cares how many hours Crush practices?! No one can deny they are a great team with great athletes, IQ, and stick skills.

Let's face it, if any of our kids were good enough to get significant playing time on a team such as Crush you'd be proud as [lacrosse] and would likely already be committed to a D1 school.

All that said, few are good enough AND THAT IS OK! Allow your kid to enjoy the game no matter what level they play on.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I hear that they practice 15 hours a day and most are home schooled. Much like Paul Bunyon they carry lax sticks (instead of an axe) and they use them to dominate all in front of them. I am told, that when they get ready to play, they all wear the same custom Crush orange neon compression underoos.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who the heck cares how many hours Crush practices?! No one can deny they are a great team with great athletes, IQ, and stick skills.

Let's face it, if any of our kids were good enough to get significant playing time on a team such as Crush you'd be proud as [lacrosse] and would likely already be committed to a D1 school.

All that said, few are good enough AND THAT IS OK! Allow your kid to enjoy the game no matter what level they play on.


The best on that team but many hours a week whether in the gym or field. THEY PUT THE WORK IN!! GOTTA HAVE THE WANT!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
To the Crush writer .something tells me -You have never been there , you havent played , you havent won, if you did you wouldn't act the way you do . Listen when you leave a room , when you leave a field , you will hear laughter. There laughing at you .You know it. The owners of 91 are embarrassed by guys like you. YOU havent done anything , if your son is on Crush that's great for him . Too bad he has you acting like this .Really think about it .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
umm can we get back to the thread...westchester lacrosse?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
umm can we get back to the thread...westchester lacrosse?


Cross over sport question, how many westchester kids play both Hoops and lax? Which sport do you play losser in Hoops or Lax and why?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Not sure exactly what this question is asking. Speaking for my son and most of his teammates in both Westchester and CT, I find that most lacrosse players who play multiple sports and aren't already specializing choose hockey for their winter sport.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Can someone rank the travel programs in the Fairfield /westchester area?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Varies by graduation year, but I would rank as follows:
1. Express North or Prime Time
3. Eclipse
4. 3D
5. Predators
6 Chargers
Express North has an exceptional 2019AA team; Eclipse has an exceptional 2021 top team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Where does 2 way or tri state 9 d 1 fit in
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
9d1 tristate is an extremely well run program. 3 years old. Bocklet is a true pro and a world class family. But. This program is currently very low in talent and until they embrace a stronger tourney schedule, will remain weak. Recruiting is def not the focus
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
To the Crush writer .something tells me -You have never been there , you havent played , you havent won, if you did you wouldn't act the way you do . Listen when you leave a room , when you leave a field , you will hear laughter. There laughing at you .You know it. The owners of 91 are embarrassed by guys like you. YOU havent done anything , if your son is on Crush that's great for him . Too bad he has you acting like this .Really think about it .


I donated the proper chromosomes and genes. I think I pay the bills too. That's enough, I'm not embarrassed or apologizing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Varies by graduation year, but I would rank as follows:
1. Express North or Prime Time
3. Eclipse
4. 3D
5. Predators
6 Chargers
Express North has an exceptional 2019AA team; Eclipse has an exceptional 2021 top team.


I'm not sure why 3d is in this list. Don't see them doing too much.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I'm not sure why 3d is in this list. Don't see them doing too much.


They don't make the noise that Express and PT do with regard to emails, tweets, rah rah this and rah rah that. Easy to understand why you may not be fully aware of them. Not a lot of hype, just lacrosse.
Previously they were too "Greenwich-centric".
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Great point about the "best" local teams varying by grade (as many of the teams have several strong grades as well as several weaker grades).

I would put predators above 3D.

Also 2way is in the bottom half but it should improve given the addition of the Brunswick coaches (and thus more older Brunswick kids should join this program).

I would also add Superstars. A solid program but in the second half of the "local" teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I see superstars on the rise. Colsey has embraced the box lax in a real way. With the rise of box, I see Kids gravitating his way in the future
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
That's really a funny comment.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Why is that funny? How many other travel teams in westchester /Fairfield are offering a true box team environment. 4 of the teams qualified for the box championships in San Jose in August. At some point parents may start thinking, why play summer for one team and box for another.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Drop Express North down 2 slots, losing some of their best players
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2022 superstars team is very strong and top 10 in northeast , box program attracting top local talent
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Why are they leaving and to where
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2024 superstars box team finished 1st in their first box tourney and 2nd in last three. Lost to 91 Wolfpack 7-4 in last game. Anyone that knows 91 Wolfpack knows that a 3 goal game is amazing. Colsey's box teams are extremely respectable and will only help his field teams
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2024 superstars box team finished 1st in their first box tourney and 2nd in last three. Lost to 91 Wolfpack 7-4 in last game. Anyone that knows 91 Wolfpack knows that a 3 goal game is amazing. Colsey's box teams are extremely respectable and will only help his field teams


It could have been much worse, there are no moral victories.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Well it was damn close all the way through. 7-4 loss against arguably the 2nd best 24 team in the east coast is a win in my book. And shows improvement
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Problem with Superstars is Colsey has no people skills. Great player who knows the game in and out but he pushes kids away. Alienates himself with his own coaches. As for Box, 2 teams earned the invite to the Nationals the other two teams are going because they needed teams. Box is still in its infant stage for youth in the U.S. and not many real programs. Colsey does have an opportunity here to build his program back up. Let's see what he does.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
When you go to the tourneys in philly. You see a lot of teams. Good teams , 91, brotherly love, Mesa , Eclipse, express, legacy. Etc etc It is definitely growing and growing. In 2-3 years. I'm guessing every top team will be playing box as part of their program
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Problem with Superstars is Colsey has no people skills. Great player who knows the game in and out but he pushes kids away. Alienates himself with his own coaches. As for Box, 2 teams earned the invite to the Nationals the other two teams are going because they needed teams. Box is still in its infant stage for youth in the U.S. and not many real programs. Colsey does have an opportunity here to build his program back up. Let's see what he does.


It's worth noting that the only teams that do well for superstar are those that Colsey's kids play on. If you have a player the same age it's worth looking into. The other years don't get the same attention and are therefore can't compete at the same level. Many of those grades can't even field full teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
HS practices starting. Any early feedback from watching?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
HS practices starting. Any early feedback from watching?
I think you're a little early. Westchester public schools can't officially start until 2nd week of March. If you're talking about kids just hanging out, and throwing it around on the turf, then right now John Jay's looking unbeatable.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
HS practices starting. Any early feedback from watching?
I think you're a little early. Westchester public schools can't officially start until 2nd week of March. If you're talking about kids just hanging out, and throwing it around on the turf, then right now John Jay's looking unbeatable.


How many leagues are there? Brewster Danbury New rochelle. Think more West/ct kids play winter sports than some other areas.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
John Jay very good - yes, unbeatable -no.

They have talent but need all the other intangibles to come together to realize their full potential -

Leadership,intensity,coaching etc. will make the difference between another very good JJ team and a great one.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John Jay very good - yes, unbeatable -no.

They have talent but need all the other intangibles to come together to realize their full potential -

Leadership,intensity,coaching etc. will make the difference between another very good JJ team and a great one.


John Jay will represent Westchester this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John Jay very good - yes, unbeatable -no.

They have talent but need all the other intangibles to come together to realize their full potential -

Leadership,intensity,coaching etc. will make the difference between another very good JJ team and a great one.


John Jay will represent Westchester this year.


very good talent, just way too soft to really compete
with the very top teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
100% correct JJ has traditionally been soft and lets face it Yorktown is the class of Section 1, without the Savastanos & Booklets JJ lax is very good not great.
YTown is stacked for the next two seasons with insane talent and varsity (sectional) experience.
Go Huskers!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John Jay very good - yes, unbeatable -no.

They have talent but need all the other intangibles to come together to realize their full potential -

Leadership,intensity,coaching etc. will make the difference between another very good JJ team and a great one.


John Jay will represent Westchester this year.


very good talent, just way too soft to really compete
with the very top teams.

Two things have stood out to me over the last few years between these two perennial top teams. Strength of 'out of section' regular season games before the state play-offs. This year Yorktown plays Darien, Chaminade, St. Anthonys, Ridgefield & Jamesville-Dewitt. While I'm glad to see JJ picking it up a bit this year by playing Smithtown East, Manhasset, Cold Spring Harbor and Wilton. (JV plays Chaminade and St. Anthony's, but not Varsity) One could argue Yorktown may lose 3,4, or 5 of those games, but be better prepared come play-off time.
And I've had debates with others regarding the benefit of most Yorktown players playing for Ballers over the summer, versus JJ where 4-5 play for PrimeTime and the rest are scattered on other summer teams. This seems to benefit the Yorktown mid-level player more, and with that commraderie of playing as a team with the single goal of winning a State Championship every year. But where JJ is a bit 'soft', and not in a physical sense, but it's in those big game settings. (JJ had a 7 or 8 goal half-time lead over Yorktown last year when their PT stud? starts taking 20-25 yard shots on the best goalie in the section.) Yorktown wins.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
what's commraderie?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what's commraderie?
Yup, my apologies to the Back of the Cage spelling champion..should have been spelled 'camaraderie'.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what's commraderie?
Yup, my apologies to the Back of the Cage spelling champion..should have been spelled 'camaraderie'.


Much better, thank you for correcting this indiscretion.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
John jay high school is an extension of their youth program. Over priced [lacrosse]. They take the best 5 kids per grade and that's it. Zero community spirit because those 5 best kids play for prime time or express north The bottom 5 play down in purchase for nine d 1 tri state. The model should be to keep these kids together from the beginning like yorktown and then they will start winning. Jjyl does a horrible job of recruiting new kids because they price people out with paid coaches when all these kids need is a dad to teach them to catch throw and cradle . Jj yl does nothing to keep the bottom 15 kids playing beyond the 2 month spring season. That comes from the top. Schurr is no where in sight - they offer a fall clinic which is fine and cheap. But. Beyond that , they are happy letting you pay every coach in the area for extra instruction . It's just sad. Yorktown Does it right.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
so What is Bronxville's secret with 100 kids or so per class.

also Darien, ridgefield kids play all over
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Well ridgefield is not a great comp. Colsey rubs a lot of people the wrong way. These town kids should be playing together from day 1 at a young age. Winter spring etc. doesn't have to be mandatory. Throwing tennis balls around a gym is great for soft hands and for training goalies. If you want to be strong at the top, it starts with the foundation. For any youth organization to say, we are just spring, is doing a massive dis service to their town. It's just the way it is.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
so What is Bronxville's secret with 100 kids or so per class.

also Darien, ridgefield kids play all over
you're right, but this was just comparing Yorktown with John Jay ....and I'm sure we can come up with other lacrosse towns... Simsbury?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -

It all starts from a strong foundation created in the youth programs. Yorktown has strong coaching from Day 1, committed and knowledgeable people who teach the game the right way and invest a lot of time and effort. They run clinics in the Fall and Winter and run great practices. My sons have been in the Yorktown program and the instruction is top notch and every kid plays. That pays dividends at the varsity level.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Than their high school coach gets fired ,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Lets be honest, There is a ton of pressure Coaching at Yorktown. Did he lose his mind a few times yeah but most players and parents love him and that along with winning equals being a great coach.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
If Dave Marr coached Fox Lane he would bring that school a Sectional title and possible State title. It takes more than talent to win titles.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John jay high school is an extension of their youth program. Over priced [lacrosse]. They take the best 5 kids per grade and that's it. Zero community spirit because those 5 best kids play for prime time or express north The bottom 5 play down in purchase for nine d 1 tri state. The model should be to keep these kids together from the beginning like yorktown and then they will start winning. Jjyl does a horrible job of recruiting new kids because they price people out with paid coaches when all these kids need is a dad to teach them to catch throw and cradle . Jj yl does nothing to keep the bottom 15 kids playing beyond the 2 month spring season. That comes from the top. Schurr is no where in sight - they offer a fall clinic which is fine and cheap. But. Beyond that , they are happy letting you pay every coach in the area for extra instruction . It's just sad. Yorktown Does it right.


The problem with John Jay is simple, it’s the toxic entitled parents who post on this board and bad mouth JJHS, the youth program and the summer programs. They talk behind their backs because they do not have the backbone to say it to anyone’s face, they need to hide behind an anonymous post. It’s the same type of parents who ran the Savastano’s out of town, great guys and great coaches.

These parents are entitled trophy parents, always blaming someone else for their shortcomings. How dare you tell my kid he can’t play on the best team in town, how dare you cut my kid from the summer team. These are parents that are not used to hearing no, they think money can buy anything. Well sorry, it can’t….they baby and control their children and then when they get to JJHS and their kid does not play, they complain to the AD and point fingers at everyone and degrade other kids behind their backs. It’s only going to get worse as the demographics are moving in that direction. Yorktown has the gritty determined kids and parents who support their program and work hard to win!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
only a matter of time where town lax dies across the board. Kids and parents want to play with and against the best kids . The current offering of spring tourneys is a much better use of time and money. Travel programs in places like Long Island are playing 3-4 spring tourneys and 5 summer Plus they play all winter and fall. Only matter of time before westchester follows. And town as we know it will die. All the directors , Pt, eclipse, superstars. Express north etc should create a winter/spring league similar to Maryland and play each other Stop worrying about losing kids and do what's right in the big picture, which is getting these kids playing together as a team as much as possible. Let rec be rec 200 dollars. Dad coaches etc.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John jay high school is an extension of their youth program. Over priced [lacrosse]. They take the best 5 kids per grade and that's it. Zero community spirit because those 5 best kids play for prime time or express north The bottom 5 play down in purchase for nine d 1 tri state. The model should be to keep these kids together from the beginning like yorktown and then they will start winning. Jjyl does a horrible job of recruiting new kids because they price people out with paid coaches when all these kids need is a dad to teach them to catch throw and cradle . Jj yl does nothing to keep the bottom 15 kids playing beyond the 2 month spring season. That comes from the top. Schurr is no where in sight - they offer a fall clinic which is fine and cheap. But. Beyond that , they are happy letting you pay every coach in the area for extra instruction . It's just sad. Yorktown Does it right.


It seems getting rid of the dad coaches whose kids are goal hangers and their dads yelling on the sideline to get the ball to their kid is a great accomplishment.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
so What is Bronxville's secret with 100 kids or so per class.

also Darien, ridgefield kids play all over
you're right, but this was just comparing Yorktown with John Jay ....and I'm sure we can come up with other lacrosse towns... Simsbury?


Which shows why you have no idea what you are talking about, every town is different. You sound like another bitter parent whose kid got cut, get over it and play for a team that has the right skill for your child
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
When paid coaches come at a cost of 500 dollars per player and creates extremely low enrollment, I will take dad coaches any day. Let's keep it in perspective, it's town lax. And town sports should be cheap. The goal is to get kids playing. Your not teaching kids to build rockets. Dad coaches with oversight and management from a board of directors works just fine. Dad coaches in every other town sport . f
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
only a matter of time where town lax dies across the board. Kids and parents want to play with and against the best kids . The current offering of spring tourneys is a much better use of time and money. Travel programs in places like Long Island are playing 3-4 spring tourneys and 5 summer Plus they play all winter and fall. Only matter of time before westchester follows. And town as we know it will die. All the directors , Pt, eclipse, superstars. Express north etc should create a winter/spring league similar to Maryland and play each other Stop worrying about losing kids and do what's right in the big picture, which is getting these kids playing together as a team as much as possible. Let rec be rec 200 dollars. Dad coaches etc.


Not all LI travel club teams play spring tourneys - in fact most don't beyond the top teams. LI has PAL lax during the spring and most boys play in that league, with those also playing club having at least practices on a semi-regular basis in March and April. Boys in MS still even play PAL lax as another opportunity for touches - my 2021 son play PAL, MS, and club, as do most of his friends. My 2024 son plays PAL and club. PAL is recreational, and the cost is accordingly, but every community in LI plays in it, including the staid powerhouses: Manhasset, CSH, Garden City, etc. Their community programs that play in PAL are what build their dominance at the higher levels: the top programs have as many as three PAL teams per age group, every boy wants to play lax! The bottom line is that the communities that view lax as an overall program that encompasses both the youth organization and the local school are the most successful - travel club teams are where the top half of the talent go to further their game. Yes, there are some coaches who are affiliated with schools and club, and that is a double edged sword for a community and its school - some work well, some not as much, and some turn into unmitigated disasters as a result.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When paid coaches come at a cost of 500 dollars per player and creates extremely low enrollment, I will take dad coaches any day. Let's keep it in perspective, it's town lax. And town sports should be cheap. The goal is to get kids playing. Your not teaching kids to build rockets. Dad coaches with oversight and management from a board of directors works just fine. Dad coaches in every other town sport . f



You must not be familiar with the youth football program at John Jay, all Dad coaches and all their kids are QB or running back. Wait until those kids get to HS, they will be on the bench. The other kids get 4 minimum pLAYS Dads kid never leaves the field. And how has that turned out? Their teams are all horrible with kids leaving to go to other towns...the only good team is their 6th grade team where the Dads son is an athlete and can legitimately play QB. Program is imploding, many parents would be glad to pay more to get rid of Daddy ball. Soccer did it years ago.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
only a matter of time where town lax dies across the board. Kids and parents want to play with and against the best kids . The current offering of spring tourneys is a much better use of time and money. Travel programs in places like Long Island are playing 3-4 spring tourneys and 5 summer Plus they play all winter and fall. Only matter of time before westchester follows. And town as we know it will die. All the directors , Pt, eclipse, superstars. Express north etc should create a winter/spring league similar to Maryland and play each other Stop worrying about losing kids and do what's right in the big picture, which is getting these kids playing together as a team as much as possible. Let rec be rec 200 dollars. Dad coaches etc.


These better kids all started out in their Town programs. Get rid of the town programs and you get rid of the next generation of players. And if you keep the Town programs, but the top kids don't play, than the next level of athlete is less interested, and there will be a trickle down effect that will lead to the Town programs dying a slow death. The Town programs are the lifeblood of the sport and need to be maintained and populated with the best kids. A spring travel league can easily be organized without canabailizing the Town programs. Just play games at times that don't conflict with the Town schedules.

Also, there are still a ton of good athletes playing only Town lacrosse because they focus more on other sports and don't have the time, money and/or interest in playing travel. These players often become key players on good HS teams, and need to be playing Town with the top lax-centric athletes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I completely agree with doing away with dad coaches but football and lacrosse are 2 very different animals. One has travel. One does not. For those kids looking for more coaching, more competition etc. they get that with the various travel programs. Football struggles for many reasons, the biggest being fear of injury. Town sports is the opportunity to attract as many kids as you can to build the foundation and it needs to be affordable.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I completely agree with doing away with dad coaches but football and lacrosse are 2 very different animals. One has travel. One does not. For those kids looking for more coaching, more competition etc. they get that with the various travel programs. Football struggles for many reasons, the biggest being fear of injury. Town sports is the opportunity to attract as many kids as you can to build the foundation and it needs to be affordable.


So you agree with doing away with Dad coaches, what's your answer to making it "affordable" when you get paid coaches to replace Daddy?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
No easy answer but willing to deal with dad coaches if it means growing the program. This is John jay. Plenty of qualified parents. But here are a few answers- 1- parent coach education. 2- create a curriculum from k-8 covering fundamentals and systems. 3- set up clinic days and run players as well as coaches through station based , fundamental , position specific training. This ensures kids and parent coaches are learning properly. Not sure you ever want to eliminate all coaches. But let them work with all teams , Goalie coach, fogo training, etc etc.

Other solutions. First year discount tuition, Free tuition dedicated goalie. Etc etc. time to think out of the box and build the culture and the future.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]John Jay very good - yes, unbeatable -no.

They have talent but need all the other intangibles to come together to realize their full potential -

Leadership,intensity,coaching etc. will make the difference between another very good JJ team and a great one.


John Jay will represent Westchester this year.


very good talent, just way too soft to really compete

with the very top teams. [/quote

Soft is right and it comes from the parents, a perfect example is the 7v7 tournament in November. An otherwise great game of Ridgefield vs John Jay 2022 was ruined by JJ parents. At the end, a JJ player was pushed down by a Ridgefield kid half his size, a legitimate penalty but the parents of the JJ kid ran onto the field cursing and yelling at the referee, Ridgefield players, coach, and parents...really horrible. That is softness...when was the last time you saw a Town parent run on the field for a push?? Huskers will roll them in april!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2022 box team won 1 tourney and lost in final of the other 4 they entered, granted got smoked by 91 Blaze in one final but that's a team of 12 year olds playing against a team of 15 year olds
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
sorry but 5 teams earned entrance into the Nationals, not 2,
1 won the regionals, 1 came in 3rd and 3 came in 2nd
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2022 box team won 1 tourney and lost in final of the other 4 they entered, granted got smoked by 91 Blaze in one final but that's a team of 12 year olds playing against a team of 15 year olds


Blaze is 2021.... make up you own facts buddy, you know you can't beat them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
7/8 division tool box
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
They are 14 and its grade based, stop crying.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Express North 2020AA is a top 10 team nationally.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
That is hilarious. Only thing nationally ranked is your fogo.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Top team in the Westhester/Fairfield area but not top 10 nationaly
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Really good talent in addition to Fogo, particularly at the attack position, just not sure Top 10 nationally. . . . Guess we'll see this summer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2020AA is a top 10 team nationally.


Nice team, but not quite in the top 10. Did they get a new FOA? Last year was good but not quite elite level. No disrespect intended.

In fact, a round robin among 2020 Predators, Primetime, 3d, and Express would be a good day of lax without a long drive.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Express North 2020 lost to crabs by 1, beat both laxachusetts AA teams, etc... Their Fogo and second string fogo both placed top 10 in the FOA national showcase. They would destroy ALL local teams (except primetime, which would be a good game).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
North FOGO is from wepo, has numerous offers, and is the best uncommitted fogo. Destroyed at national showcase
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Scarsdale HS is elite
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
True!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2020 lost to crabs by 1, beat both laxachusetts AA teams, etc... Their Fogo and second string fogo both placed top 10 in the FOA national showcase. They would destroy ALL local teams (except primetime, which would be a good game).

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2020 lost to crabs by 1, beat both laxachusetts AA teams, etc... Their Fogo and second string fogo both placed top 10 in the FOA national showcase. They would destroy ALL local teams (except primetime, which would be a good game).

That there is some very strong kool aid. Channy must be so proud.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]John Jay very good - yes, unbeatable -no.

They have talent but need all the other intangibles to come together to realize their full potential -

Leadership,intensity,coaching etc. will make the difference between another very good JJ team and a great one.


John Jay will represent Westchester this year.


very good talent, just way too soft to really compete

with the very top teams. [/quote

Soft is right and it comes from the parents, a perfect example is the 7v7 tournament in November. An otherwise great game of Ridgefield vs John Jay 2022 was ruined by JJ parents. At the end, a JJ player was pushed down by a Ridgefield kid half his size, a legitimate penalty but the parents of the JJ kid ran onto the field cursing and yelling at the referee, Ridgefield players, coach, and parents...really horrible. That is softness...when was the last time you saw a Town parent run on the field for a push?? Huskers will roll them in april!!


How much an impact will Marr's suspension have on Huskers season?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The #1 fogo for Express North AA is a stud out of Fairfield, Ct. The 2nd fogo lost in the first round of the FOA Showcase.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
the best attack man plays for Eclipse
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Hmmmm. . . . Not sure who you are referring to on Eclipse. They do have some strong attacks (although at least 3 are holdbacks) but think LIEN AA would beat them. . . .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Too bad Express N , Eclipse , and PT hardly ever play each other. i think the only matchup was the summer before last when Express beat PT.
Hopefully they will all square off this summer a few times. Throw in Predators and 3d tristate as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Is tri state nine d one a good program ? I don't hear much about them, I have a 9 year old and want to get him involved in travel going forward.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Great coaching , great director.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Express North, Eclipse and Prime Time (2020's) will all compete at NLF Main Event in June, then there is overlap between 2/3 teams at Crabfeast, Big 4 and later NLF event in LI. Would love to see them matched up against each other.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Is there any place we can viewed a list of Westchester kids who are committed to play college lacrosse? It would be interesting to compare the schools rosters and the college commitments. Who has the most, the best, etc. Any guesses?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Look through recruiting rundown by year. And it will tell you what school and travel program they play for. It takes a bit of time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
And/or go on Laxpower.com and search their database of players that have committed to schools. They track a wider net that includes d2 and d3.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
11 commits for Yorktown, 6 for John Jay according to Laxpower. Oddly, all but one is in the junior class for JJ. We'll see if that will mean anything one they face each other. Depth perhaps.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The 11 committs for Yorktown, what are they by graduating class and are they all D1? Also Yorktown is split between Yorktown High and Lakeland\Panas (LP). Any LP kids lumped in there?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
All but one Yorktown player is committed to D1, no LP players included.

Yorktown: Sr- Notre Dame, Delaware, Albany, Albany, Tampa/Jr.- Maryland, Marist, Marist, St. Josephs/Soph- Richmond, Cornell
JJ: Sr- Binghamton/ Jr.- Syracuse, Duke, Colgate, Fairfield, Marist

Should be an interesting season for both teams. YT missing Marr and JJ still trying to topple YT.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Laxpower shows two more sophomores from Yorktown committed to DI schools - Princeton and Providence; only thing is that they are attending Iona Prep. Yorktown still producing the kids, but why are they going to Iona?

Is that any reflection on the HS Program? But its a good reflection on the Youth program for developing the kids. It's all about developing the kids at the youth and learning the fundamentals. You can not play this game with out fundamentals. Kudos to Yorktown Youth Lacrosse for that. High school level is where they can take it to the next level (although it seems the Club teams are where they do so also and get noticed these days, but that is not part of this particular discussion)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Laxpower shows two more sophomores from Yorktown committed to DI schools - Princeton and Providence; only thing is that they are attending Iona Prep. Yorktown still producing the kids, but why are they going to Iona?

Is that any reflection on the HS Program? But its a good reflection on the Youth program for developing the kids. It's all about developing the kids at the youth and learning the fundamentals. You can not play this game with out fundamentals. Kudos to Yorktown Youth Lacrosse for that. High school level is where they can take it to the next level (although it seems the Club teams are where they do so also and get noticed these days, but that is not part of this particular discussion)


I did the same search on laxpower and saw the two kids who play for Iona Prep. Could they be Lakeland school district kids, and not Yorktown? If yes, than maybe they played youth at shrub oak (youth program that typically includes Lakeland SD kids). "Yorktown Heights" as a home town mailing address can be in either Yorktown SD or Lakeland SD to the best of my knowledge.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Search using the High School, not the Town. When I see pre-sophomores being recruited, makes me think the varsity program has a deep pool of talent.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The Providence kid is from the Lakeland SD and the Princeton kid from Fox Lane.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Are CT Chargers still a good program? How do they compare with CT Express, SuperStar, other local clubs?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Providence kid is from the Lakeland SD and the Princeton kid from Fox Lane.


Interesting; the Providence kid probably lives in Yorktown but part of the Lakeland SD. Not sure about the Fox lane kid. Were they part of the Yorktown Youth program?

Not bad for Iona Prep then to have some sophomores committed to D1. How is there program and any insight as to why these would leave to attend Iona Prep?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The princeton kid left becuase of his father, Chris schreiber, who directs Express North. He also is defensive coach at Iona prep. not sure abt providence kid, however he is a defenseman that plays on primetime. The princeton one is an attackman
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Chargers are okay but are not as good as Express North or Superstars. Primetime is the dominant team for Westchester and Fairfield counties.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Primetime is not the dominant program in the area. I would say they have had good teams, but overall LI Express North has surpassed them and Superstars. That's just my observation. Seems like they have focused on the holdback so we'll see if that pays off.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Primetime is not the dominant program in the area. I would say they have had good teams, but overall LI Express North has surpassed them and Superstars. That's just my observation. Seems like they have focused on the holdback so we'll see if that pays off.


That's funny Chris S, shouldn't you be coaching the kids at Iona Prep and not posting on this board?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Primetime is not the dominant program in the area. I would say they have had good teams, but overall LI Express North has surpassed them and Superstars. That's just my observation. Seems like they have focused on the holdback so we'll see if that pays off.


That's funny Chris S, shouldn't you be coaching the kids at Iona Prep and not posting on this board?

Well, thank you for mistaking me for a legend within the lacrosse world, but I am actually the older brother of a kid on Preds.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Primetime is not the dominant program in the area. I would say they have had good teams, but overall LI Express North has surpassed them and Superstars. That's just my observation. Seems like they have focused on the holdback so we'll see if that pays off.


That's funny Chris S, shouldn't you be coaching the kids at Iona Prep and not posting on this board?

Well, thank you for mistaking me for a legend within the lacrosse world, but I am actually the older brother of a kid on Preds.

Enough of this crap already!!!!! Please !!!

What makes this site interesting is fact about Teams, programs, Coaches, tournaments, kids, where the kids are going... Not who is better than one another or which team is. Good banter is interesting (i.e. those two kids from Yorktown committed to D1 yet not going to Yorktown or Lakeland or Foxlane) Why aren't they? How's the youth program they were in? Where did they develop the fundamentals of the game?...Why Iona Prep? Is this a trend? ......... That's interesting stuff !!!

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Primetime is not the dominant program in the area. I would say they have had good teams, but overall LI Express North has surpassed them and Superstars. That's just my observation. Seems like they have focused on the holdback so we'll see if that pays off.


That's funny Chris S, shouldn't you be coaching the kids at Iona Prep and not posting on this board?

Well, thank you for mistaking me for a legend within the lacrosse world, but I am actually the older brother of a kid on Preds.

Enough of this crap already!!!!! Please !!!

What makes this site interesting is fact about Teams, programs, Coaches, tournaments, kids, where the kids are going... Not who is better than one another or which team is. Good banter is interesting (i.e. those two kids from Yorktown committed to D1 yet not going to Yorktown or Lakeland or Foxlane) Why aren't they? How's the youth program they were in? Where did they develop the fundamentals of the game?...Why Iona Prep? Is this a trend? ......... That's interesting stuff !!!


yes good question why Iona and not KC
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
kinda seems like Iona had a head start. Kennedy not quite at Iona level but the team at Kennedy as done an admirable job improving the program
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Primetime is not the dominant program in the area. I would say they have had good teams, but overall LI Express North has surpassed them and Superstars. That's just my observation. Seems like they have focused on the holdback so we'll see if that pays off.


That's funny Chris S, shouldn't you be coaching the kids at Iona Prep and not posting on this board?

Well, thank you for mistaking me for a legend within the lacrosse world, but I am actually the older brother of a kid on Preds.

Enough of this crap already!!!!! Please !!!

What makes this site interesting is fact about Teams, programs, Coaches, tournaments, kids, where the kids are going... Not who is better than one another or which team is. Good banter is interesting (i.e. those two kids from Yorktown committed to D1 yet not going to Yorktown or Lakeland or Foxlane) Why aren't they? How's the youth program they were in? Where did they develop the fundamentals of the game?...Why Iona Prep? Is this a trend? ......... That's interesting stuff !!!



Why would a good player in Yorktown drive 40 minutes to Iona Prep? Yorktown is still a hotbed for lacrosse with a great youth program and experienced coaches on Varsity and JV staffs. Why leave Yorktown?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Kennedy had great coaches that kids love to play for
Just ask JJ parents.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Guys, its real simple. The club coaches are now coaching on the HS level and recruiting their club players to these private schools. It aint brain surgery boys!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
so What is Bronxville's secret with 100 kids or so per class.

also Darien, ridgefield kids play all over

In the absence of quality coaches at Bronxville, the wealthy parents sent their kids out to Long Island to be trained. They got some results out of that. However, in recent years they have sent the kid s to local clubs and as a result the talent pool is shrinking back to what one would expect from a school their size. As the last of the long Island trained kids graduate, Bronxville will no longer be a powerhouse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
so What is Bronxville's secret with 100 kids or so per class.

also Darien, ridgefield kids play all over

In the absence of quality coaches at Bronxville, the wealthy parents sent their kids out to Long Island to be trained. They got some results out of that. However, in recent years they have sent the kid s to local clubs and as a result the talent pool is shrinking back to what one would expect from a school their size. As the last of the long Island trained kids graduate, Bronxville will no longer be a powerhouse.

Interesting and insightful

I believe where the true value is in the youth programs where you have buy-in from the varsity coaches. Varsity coaches wants kids they can teach the game at a high level, which means they want fundamental taught at the youth level. If a varsity coach has to spend time on stick skills, ground balls..... it is a waste of time and a formula for a season that will never be successful. That is why the programs where the head coach instills in the youth program fundamentals, terminology... it makes the transition smoother once they hit high school. Winning is nice at that level but what everyone looks at is the high school program success. Don't get me wrong as the club level and outside training has a lot to do with it, but as long as the town\youth program can focus on the fundamentals and develop kids, it will lead to success.

WHy is Yorktown so good? Look at their youth program, John Jay (CR), Somers, Lakeland-Panas, Rye, P'Ville, B'Ville, Larchmont-Mamaroneck, Darien, Wilton, New Canaan, Ridgefield.... (I now I am missing some)...... All have strong youth programs and look at their success. Yes there will be off years, but consistently at the top

Club teams definitely have their place and are a very important part of the game these days for the kids. I have heard comments they are more important than the high school teams ( I would disagree), but truth be told this where a majority of the recruiting process is done now a days for the kids. The exposure they get at the club level is second to none.

Anyway I can keep going but tried to keep it short and sweet. Would love to hear thoughts on this, but not the nonsense about who is better than one another, this coach is selfish, ....... JUst good lax talk.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Kennedy had great coaches that kids love to play for
Just ask JJ parents.



my question stemmed from KC was 9 miles away and Iona 20+ . A good lax player makes an impact @ KC dont think a good player makes that much of an impact @ IP. Was it education, I think there is also a big difference in cost? Either way Go Gaels.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
so What is Bronxville's secret with 100 kids or so per class.

also Darien, ridgefield kids play all over

In the absence of quality coaches at Bronxville, the wealthy parents sent their kids out to Long Island to be trained. They got some results out of that. However, in recent years they have sent the kid s to local clubs and as a result the talent pool is shrinking back to what one would expect from a school their size. As the last of the long Island trained kids graduate, Bronxville will no longer be a powerhouse.


some even sent their kids further, but lately many sent their kids to HS outside of BXvile.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I could not agree more about the roles of youth programs/high school teams/club teams. We live in one of the towns you mentioned and have an extremely strong youth program which provides a good foundation to kids, but also balances competition with fun and offers a broad range of team levels (house and travel) for younger kids since many develop and are interested at varying levels.
Once players decide whether they really want to devote extra time to lacrosse and challenge themselves at the next level (middle school age for the most part), club teams provide an excellent option to do just that, giving kids more exposure to other coaching styles, teammates from other towns and a broader range of strong competition. High school teams are certainly critical, particularly for those fortunate enough to have strong programs, but you are absolutely correct when you say that the emphasis has shifted to the club teams as far as recruiting is concerned. All players I am aware of (granted, there may be an exception here and there) who have been recruited in our town have done so based upon their club experience, with the support of the high school coach.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
When a local community has the following dynamics, the sport/kids thrive:A) organized youth program with invested parent coaches, B) travel program starting young with coaches who know the sport, C) local places for more intense training (domes, cages, fields, etc.), D) strong private club options, E) modified/high school that teaches a system, F) high school team with coach who knows the community, G) alums and parents who give back in ways that foster the sport.

That Mamaroneck hockey and baseball coach has his fingerprint on little leaguers, coaches, clinics, etc- they dominate on state level. Yorktown and Darien lax do the same. From my POV, Rye and Greenwich lose too many to private schools, the sense of community isn't as strong, teams are good but not elite.

The community fosters the sport with the high school program being the center.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
My kid went thru the LMYL program with Dad coaches who were awesome. Great guys with good knowledge who created a great environment. It shows in the high school program. A great experience for the boys.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My kid went thru the LMYL program with Dad coaches who were awesome. Great guys with good knowledge who created a great environment. It shows in the high school program. A great experience for the boys.


My kids went through the YAC in Yorktown and received very good coaching from parent coaches, but not every program has the experienced and dedicated parents to teach the game. I think the coaching in YAC has actually improved since my boys played and hopefully that results in championships. We've noticed too many of the Yorktown lacrosse alumni have been hired by other programs to teach their kids. Competition is good for the overall level of lacrosse in Westchester but it would be nice if a few more alumni came back to Town. Don't forget where you come from. Good luck to everyone this season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Primetime is not the dominant program in the area. I would say they have had good teams, but overall LI Express North has surpassed them and Superstars. That's just my observation. Seems like they have focused on the holdback so we'll see if that pays off.


That's funny Chris S, shouldn't you be coaching the kids at Iona Prep and not posting on this board?

Well, thank you for mistaking me for a legend within the lacrosse world, but I am actually the older brother of a kid on Preds.

Enough of this crap already!!!!! Please !!!

What makes this site interesting is fact about Teams, programs, Coaches, tournaments, kids, where the kids are going... Not who is better than one another or which team is. Good banter is interesting (i.e. those two kids from Yorktown committed to D1 yet not going to Yorktown or Lakeland or Foxlane) Why aren't they? How's the youth program they were in? Where did they develop the fundamentals of the game?...Why Iona Prep? Is this a trend? ......... That's interesting stuff !!!



Why would a good player in Yorktown drive 40 minutes to Iona Prep? Yorktown is still a hotbed for lacrosse with a great youth program and experienced coaches on Varsity and JV staffs. Why leave Yorktown?

Since you seem to know the kids recruited from Yorktown for the current sophmores and freshman, how is the recruiting going for the other sophomores from the surrounding northern towns (Lakeland, Somers, Mahopac, John Jay) ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Go to laxpower for the answers.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
His dad works at IONA Prep he is a coach, read the whole thread!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Somers v Yorktown was an interesting game. Yorktown is down one pole, yet it looked like total chaos on defense. May need time to gel as a unit. They looked good when the ball was moving, need to see more of that. Somers has a few very good players but they also need to keep the ball moving and work on finishing. Better shot selection will serve them well. Good luck to both teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yorktown SPANKED by Darien today. Not even close. . . .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
At least they have the balls to step on the field with a team like that
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
At least they have the balls to step on the field with a team like that


Why isn't Yorktown a "team like that" or maybe one that's even close to that talent level? So instead of posting how Yorktown is tough enough to schedule an embarrassing thrashing, maybe we could be debating how competitive the game was. John Jay wins the Section in 2017. Heck, need to get past Lakeland first.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
John Jay over Smithtown East, won it in OT on the Island. Great win for John Jay!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Coach schurr and his coaches have done a fantastic job so far of taking a group of solid players (not superstars) and playing like a team. Congrats to all the boys Keep up the great work
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Coach schurr and his coaches have done a fantastic job so far of taking a group of solid players (not superstars) and playing like a team. Congrats to all the boys Keep up the great work


John Jay has just as many top players as any area program and they play unselfish ball.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Ok. But what I am saying is that from an offensive perspective - on paper , smithtown is stacked with high level d1 commits , John jay has a high quality team , but your right, unselfish play, solid defense and hard work trumped the higher powered offense. Not to mention like 14 seniors while John jay has 4. Great job all around by the John jay team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Solid defense 16 goals?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Good coaching certainly helps and JJ is fortunate to have Schurr and the other coaches.

Having said that, anyone who has been following youth lacrosse over recent years knows that this group - junior class in particular - are as talented a group as any coach could hope for. Anthing short of a deep run into post season will be a disappointment. This is a year where coaches and players alike need to "prove it" and live up to expectations.

Great group that you can't help but root for.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
John Jay has a great youth program that feeds good players to the HS. Excellent coaching in the HS and players that work hard is paying off for them right now. They still have a few serious tests in Cold Spring Harbor and Yorktown coming up next week. Should be a fun season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John Jay has a great youth program that feeds good players to the HS. Excellent coaching in the HS and players that work hard is paying off for them right now. They still have a few serious tests in Cold Spring Harbor and Yorktown coming up next week. Should be a fun season.


It looks like this is John Jay's year to breakthrough and represent the Section. It's been building for a few years but the king is clearly wounded, its time to ascend to the throne.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
John Jay playing with heart and as a team, you see it on every play. No superstars, no hotdogs, and no me me me players. That will be the difference maker this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I guess we will see on Saturday.....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yorktown put it all together and overwhelmed Jamesville Dewitt. Saturday against JJ will be one heck of a game. Faceoffs might decide the game
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
WOW.....is that crickets I hear from the JJ camp. They blow a 10-5 lead to the HUSKERS, and everybody who was pumping the Indians disappears! TOWN is still the beast of section 1......
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
John Jay played with their backup goalie. Maybe you should hold off the celebration. Backup goalie, a ugly turnovers that resulted in goals. That was not a great win. John Jay coach sat the starting goalie for a team rule infraction. Character stands tall.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John Jay played with their backup goalie. Maybe you should hold off the celebration. Backup goalie, a ugly turnovers that resulted in goals. That was not a great win. John Jay coach sat the starting goalie for a team rule infraction. Character stands tall.


Ahhhh, going the moral victory route, Nice change in strategy.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
For Ytown a wins a win. Confidence builder
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Goalie was not the issue for JJ.

He played well against a good Yorktown team. He is a very talented kid that could start for most other teams in the County. Jay will need to look elsewhere for answers to their on going problem with Y town.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Goalie was not the issue for JJ.

He played well against a good Yorktown team. He is a very talented kid that could start for most other teams in the County. Jay will need to look elsewhere for answers to their on going problem with Y town.




as stated on other sites a 1 goal loss is not a problem. it is just that, a loss.

okay each team had some mishaps but i have rarely seen a flawless game. We all wish we would but there needs to be a winner and loser.

Although i would love to know the infraction.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Bottom line is Tim Schurr has lost 15 in a row to Yorktown. He has a hard time adjusting during the game.
When the Sav's Won 4 our of 7 to Yorktown everyone said anyone could win with that talent. Now they are rethinking that. Coaching matter folks!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bottom line is Tim Schurr has lost 15 in a row to Yorktown. He has a hard time adjusting during the game.
When the Sav's Won 4 our of 7 to Yorktown everyone said anyone could win with that talent. Now they are rethinking that. Coaching matter folks!!


and how is kennedy doing?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Goalie was not the issue for JJ.

He played well against a good Yorktown team. He is a very talented kid that could start for most other teams in the County. Jay will need to look elsewhere for answers to their on going problem with Y town.




as stated on other sites a 1 goal loss is not a problem. it is just that, a loss.

okay each team had some mishaps but i have rarely seen a flawless game. We all wish we would but there needs to be a winner and loser.

Although i would love to know the infraction.


Infraction was tardiness. Coach stuck to his guns and benched his star goalie, kudos. If you think the goalie didn't factor into outcome, think again. But, JJ slowed the game down too soon, had a few horrible turnovers that resulted in goals and couldn't score in the second half. Looking forward to the rematch.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Goalie was not the issue for JJ.

He played well against a good Yorktown team. He is a very talented kid that could start for most other teams in the County. Jay will need to look elsewhere for answers to their on going problem with Y town.




as stated on other sites a 1 goal loss is not a problem. it is just that, a loss.

okay each team had some mishaps but i have rarely seen a flawless game. We all wish we would but there needs to be a winner and loser.

Although i would love to know the infraction.


Infraction was tardiness. Coach stuck to his guns and benched his star goalie, kudos. If you think the goalie didn't factor into outcome, think again. But, JJ slowed the game down too soon, had a few horrible turnovers that resulted in goals and couldn't score in the second half. Looking forward to the rematch.


worry about Rye before you talk about rematches.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Stepinac taking down one of the Li catholics. IP FP and AS not so bad this year ey!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Tim schurr should start taking an interest in the youth program if he is going to bash the talent level of the John jay players. He does nothing to help. John jay youth lax is a mess.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I have thought about it again....

Every player who stepped on the field was a "factor" in the outcome but the JJ goalie was not the reason JJ lost this game.

Agree with comment above - JJ needs to worry about a lot of other games before thinking about a rematch. Hope JJ gets that shot - great bunch of kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bottom line is Tim Schurr has lost 15 in a row to Yorktown. He has a hard time adjusting during the game.
When the Sav's Won 4 our of 7 to Yorktown everyone said anyone could win with that talent. Now they are rethinking that. Coaching matter folks!!


Coach Schurr is molding men, not just lacrosse players. He is teaching kids how to be mature adults through the sport of lacrosse. No babying, no favoritism, no BS. Look at other towns around us, many kids peak in HS because they think their lacrosse gods. I want my son to learn from his lacrosse experience and then live a full and happy life, not one fixated on lacrosse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Tim schurr has one Job, win lax games and do it in a Professional and ethical fashion. I have to give him credit for sitting the goalie, but what about the other 13 games he lost against Yorktown. Great players are not always great coaches. If your son doesn't care about winning, than go play on jv. John jay needs leadership from the top down to the bottom - schurr needs to build the culture he grew up with in Yorktown and do it here .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Tim schurr has one Job, win lax games and do it in a Professional and ethical fashion. I have to give him credit for sitting the goalie, but what about the other 13 games he lost against Yorktown. Great players are not always great coaches. If your son doesn't care about winning, than go play on jv. John jay needs leadership from the top down to the bottom - schurr needs to build the culture he grew up with in Yorktown and do it here .


<eye roll>
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
U are a moron . The guy is a tremendous coach and person
On top of that a legend. The guys before him got thrown out for a reason. They have done nothing since than. Yorktown coach got thrown out. I'm not a JJ guy - be careful what u wish for.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
the only parents that make comments like this are parents living through their kid and guess what, their kid sucks at lacrosse so blame everyone but yourself. Get a life...Schurr and the rest of the varsity are very involved in JJyouth lax and it's a great program. Your kid is a rec player, get over it and maybe focus on video games. People bashing volunteers are the scum of the earth!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Nick daniello is doing an amazing job with the youth program. Schurr is not involved. Program is running very well
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
We just found out that Larry Miller is really Nick Daniello. Shame on you Nick for plugging your self on this site. How immature are you?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about , Mr. Daniello has been taking control of the program and doing an amazing job with coaching, communicating, etc etc. this guy spends his entire life on a lax field helping kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Why Jay stuff when.Ytiwn and Chaminade played. Where's the notes on that game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Tim schurr should start taking an interest in the youth program if he is going to bash the talent level of the John jay players. He does nothing to help. John jay youth lax is a mess.


Look at their website, coach Shurr is in many pictures working with the youth on his own dime, doesn't get paid just does it for the love of the game. You people are morons
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Tim schurr has one Job, win lax games and do it in a Professional and ethical fashion. I have to give him credit for sitting the goalie, but what about the other 13 games he lost against Yorktown. Great players are not always great coaches. If your son doesn't care about winning, than go play on jv. John jay needs leadership from the top down to the bottom - schurr needs to build the culture he grew up with in Yorktown and do it here .


I believe Coach Schurr and all coaches are helping teach kids how to be mature, responsible adults. Lacrosse is a blip in their lives but they can learn so much from the experience. I don't know the details of the benching but kudos to Coach Schurr.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Looks like Y-Town 7/8 is the best in class around the area! Taking the south Salem spring shootout.

What I can't understand is the organizers not having 2 officials for the older kids games. When you pulling in upwards of 25k for a tournament, at least run it right.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Looks like Y-Town 7/8 is the best in class around the area! Taking the south Salem spring shootout.

What I can't understand is the organizers not having 2 officials for the older kids games. When you pulling in upwards of 25k for a tournament, at least run it right.

Who's goign to Murphy tournament?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What was the score of the Yorktown 7/8 vs Darien game....best in class...right haha
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What was the score of the Yorktown 7/8 vs Darien game....best in class...right haha


Why don't you tell us what the score was?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I wouldn't consider Darien around the area. Because this was a westchester thread! But I would say they are a very good team, with plenty of 9th graders. If the game wasn't played in the freezing cold rain, it defintely would have been a much better game. Lets get a rematch going, so we can prove it on the field!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Will Yorktown and St Anthony's play each other or is that off the schedule now?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
ALOT to a little
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What was the score of the Yorktown 7/8 vs Darien game....best in class...right haha


Why don't you tell us what the score was?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What was the score of the Yorktown 7/8 vs Darien game....best in class...right haha



MS game?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Excuses are lame...14-4 beat down, I guess town doesn't like freezing cold rain what a joke
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Like I said schedule a rematch and we'll see
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Maybe you could keep it under 10??? Im sure NC would beat you by 15
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Like I said schedule a rematch and we'll see
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
South Salem Shootout was fun way to see local youth town teams. Got to see some fun games across a few divisions. Damn, those 8th graders look big, fast, and really good! The better teams in that division would beat a lot of weaker varsity teams I bet. The results for 8th grade division showed a lot of close games.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yorktown crushed Wilton last night. Score was 2-1 at half. They could.....go...all....the......way. When they share the ball, offense looks strong but they are nothing without the defense.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Crush is usually by more than 5 - and if Wilton didnt "Wilt - in" the 3rd quarter..likely different outcome - 2/1 at half, WIlton won 4th. That said, D much improved since beginning of the year and plenty of options for offense and FO.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Westchester lacrosse is so irrelevant that nobody posts for weeks. Who's the best team in the area? Yorktown. The last 10 years? same answer....Yorktown. It must be boring to play teams that don't have a chance of competing and a deep playoff run is guaranteed almost by default.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Who coaches the HS SUperstar teams?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
As for Westchester HS scene being irrelevant and boring as far as top teams go ... you are right. Yorktown then the other teams in their leagues like Bronxville, Lakeland-Panas, Pleasantville, JJ. It's going to require a very special team to bust through. It's too bad the season has to end just when it started to build momentum. Wish they'd condense playoffs to allow for more teams to play in June.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
As for Westchester HS scene being irrelevant and boring as far as top teams go ... you are right. Yorktown then the other teams in their leagues like Bronxville, Lakeland-Panas, Pleasantville, JJ. It's going to require a very special team to bust through. It's too bad the season has to end just when it started to build momentum. Wish they'd condense playoffs to allow for more teams to play in June.



that makes no sense. why would you play deeper in to June. Guess your HS team is out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Westchester lacrosse is so irrelevant that nobody posts for weeks. Who's the best team in the area? Yorktown. The last 10 years? same answer....Yorktown. It must be boring to play teams that don't have a chance of competing and a deep playoff run is guaranteed almost by default.


Road to the NYS semifinals for Yorktown --Brewster, Somers, John, Jay, Minisink Valley. Other than a diminished JJ team, this is a joke.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Not disagreeing that there are many "lay-ups" in this playoff run, but after Minisink Valley they will be facing Niskayuna (most likely) before the semifinal. To your point, Yorktown has reached the semifinal 31 times in the previous 40 NYSPHSAA tournaments, going 14 - 17, and going 7 - 7 in state finals.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Something is missing this year with Yorktown having a very good chance to win States. I don't sense the Town pride as in years past, even when it was misplaced. No chatter about Town's chances, does anyone care?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
SOMERS, N.Y. – Members of the Somers girls varsity lacrosse team said members of the Yorktown High School boys varsity lacrosse team harassed and intimidated them at the Section 1 Class B Girls Lacrosse championship game May 25, at Yorktown High School.
In two statements released June 6, Somers Central School District administrators said members of the Somers girls lacrosse team were preparing for the game in the Yorktown boys locker room when members of the Yorktown boys lacrosse team entered and “engaged in harassing and intimidating behavior,” which caused the girls lacrosse students to leave, and relocate to a different locker room.
The incident was investigated internally and follow-up conversations were had with Yorktown school officials to make them aware of the outcome of the investigation, said Somers Superintendent Dr. Raymond Blanch. He added that the information was also shared with the Section 1 Office of Interscholastic Athletics, and that an update will be released with any new information provided by either organization.
Sign Up for E-News

“We have considered all avenues available to address this situation, including consulting legal counsel,” Blanch, Somers High School Principal Mark Bayer and Somers Athletic Director Roman Catalino wrote in a statement to parents. They added that the school is available to support any students impacted by this incident, and encouraged any students to contact the Somers administration if they need assistance.
Messages left for Dr. Ralph Napolitano, superintendent of schools for Yorktown, and Fio Nardone, athletic director for Yorktown, were not immediately returned.
“As superintendent of the Somers Central School District, I find this incident to be both concerning and upsetting,” Blanch said. “Unfortunately, what should have been a day showcasing the competitive-spirit, athletic abilities and sportsmanship of both teams, was marred by the rude and disrespectful behavior of certain students.”
This story will be updated as more information becomes available.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Well that might explain why the Yorktown folks are quiet.....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
A few facts. This allegation was brought to the Somers Superintendent's attention via an anonymous letter, days after a situation that may now require counseling. Somers investigated the allegations "internally" and drew their conclusions, meaning they questioned the accusers to determine what happened, but not the accused.

What did the Somers coaching staff hear? It appears the Somers girls were unmonitored in a boys' locker room. Why? Why is the Somers Superintendent characterizing the behavior as "rude and disrespectful" when he has only heard one side of the story? Does innocent until proven guilty not apply in Somers? Did anyone in Somers question why it took nearly two weeks to disclose this information and doing it on the eve of the State Semifinals? Did anyone in Somers ever hear of the Duke lacrosse scandal?

I am not prejudging what happened in this situation, however, I think the Somers Superintendent could have conducted more than an internal investigation before potentially slandering high schoolers.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
It may have taken two weeks because they conducted a through investigation and didn't want to rush to judge. Questioning the accused? In what forum would that occur? How would the Super of Somers conduct a full fledged investigation? He is not a law enforcement officer. I'm wondering if the impending retirement of the Yorktown AD & Yorktown Superintendent have anything to do with a lacrosse program that may be going off the rails? There may be other issues behind the scenes that have not yet surfaced, there usually is when one problem becomes public. Win the states and make it all go away?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Where is Marr? Wasn't he suspended for one year. Steading force for Yorktown. I'm sure Town looking forward to his return.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A few facts. This allegation was brought to the Somers Superintendent's attention via an anonymous letter, days after a situation that may now require counseling. Somers investigated the allegations "internally" and drew their conclusions, meaning they questioned the accusers to determine what happened, but not the accused.

What did the Somers coaching staff hear? It appears the Somers girls were unmonitored in a boys' locker room. Why? Why is the Somers Superintendent characterizing the behavior as "rude and disrespectful" when he has only heard one side of the story? Does innocent until proven guilty not apply in Somers? Did anyone in Somers question why it took nearly two weeks to disclose this information and doing it on the eve of the State Semifinals? Did anyone in Somers ever hear of the Duke lacrosse scandal?

I am not prejudging what happened in this situation, however, I think the Somers Superintendent could have conducted more than an internal investigation before potentially slandering high schoolers.


Innocent until proven guilty is a concept that only applies in a criminal case. It has no applicability elsewhere.

From a Yorktown point of view, be grateful that none of the Yorktown players spoke with staff at Somers. If they did, they may have made admissions confirming some or all of the allegations, and such could be used against them if charges are filed in criminal court. If I was the father of one of these Yorktown players, the last thing I would want to see happen is for my son to be interviewed by someone at Somers.

I don't quite understand the relevance of the Somers' girls being unmonitored in a boys locker room (assuming such to be true for purposes of discussion). That is kind of like blaming a rape victim because she wore a short skirt. Are you trying to say that absent direct adult monitoring, male varsity athletes are free to behave any way they choose?

As noted by another poster, Somers SD is not a law enforcement agency. All they can do is conduct an internal investigation. They are permitted to report their findings to the media in the fashion that they did. Slander is not applicable because the report is in writing. Libel would be applicable, but for a variety of reasons not worth getting into in this forum, the Somers SD would not be worried about such claims.

As to your question as to why the Somers SD is characterizing the behavior as "rude and disrespectful", I think the simplest answer is most likely true. They characterize it as such simply because their investigation concluded it to be such. If the reported behavior is rude and disrespectful than its rude and disrespectful - it doesn't matter who is spoken to.

The complaint about waiting two weeks is specious. If they would have reported it immediately, your complaint would have been "why report it right away - this is a rush to judgment - where is the investigation?"
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Equating to a rape victim? The allegations are the boys unplugged the girls' music and told them this was their last game because they were going to lose. Let's get the crayons and coloring books and find a safe space.

It is my understanding that the girls were asking the boys to take their jerseys off, but I am sure that didn't come up in the Somers thorough internal investigation.

Somers Superintendent asking for both Yorktown boys and girls teams to forfeit their semifinal games. Definition of overreaction in this PC world.

The Yorktown High School Principal was also called out in the anonymous letter for retweeting a photo of the Yorktown girls celebrating because there was a Tusker crying in the background. A few snowflakes in Somers? No, you have a blizzard.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Equating to a rape victim? The allegations are the boys unplugged the girls' music and told them this was their last game because they were going to lose. Let's get the crayons and coloring books and find a safe space.

It is my understanding that the girls were asking the boys to take their jerseys off, but I am sure that didn't come up in the Somers thorough internal investigation.

Somers Superintendent asking for both Yorktown boys and girls teams to forfeit their semifinal games. Definition of overreaction in this PC world.

The Yorktown High School Principal was also called out in the anonymous letter for retweeting a photo of the Yorktown girls celebrating because there was a Tusker crying in the background. A few snowflakes in Somers? No, you have a blizzard.


You apparently don't understand what an analogy is.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Congrats to Yorktown on making it to the state final, let's hope the players don't spit in any girls mouths between now and the game. So much class......
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yorktown defense too strong, Victor doesn't have a chance.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Somers Superintendent apologizes to Yorktown boys lacrosse team for "rush to judgement", as after interviewing the accused, well wouldn't you know, the anonymous letter is deemed not credible.

Let's see if I can figure out what an analogy is:

Somers girls lacrosse team = Crystal Gail Mangum, or maybe Chicken Little, or the boy who cried wolf, or Pretty Little Liars... Should I go on or shall we just say spoiled brat sore losers.

Maybe you can come over to Yorktown and celebrate the boys' success, as I am sure you will never have that chance in your town. Bwahahaha.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yorktown same result as last year. Not enough offense. 3 goals?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Can we get some summer club youth chatter going? Any local clubs in the NLF super conference tourneys doing good? Saw the Preds across multiple ages won tourneys last week. What happened to the Superstars club from Ridgefield? Come on people!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Preds play B tournments. Superstar are a joke They only teams in the area that are playing the top teams are Prime Time and LI express North and they are holding their own in the top tournaments.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we get some summer club youth chatter going? Any local clubs in the NLF super conference tourneys doing good? Saw the Preds across multiple ages won tourneys last week. What happened to the Superstars club from Ridgefield? Come on people!

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Eclipse is in that mix with Prime Time and Express North. Not sure grade-by-grade if Eclipse can hang with those squads but they at least mix it up at top tourneys. But it's a shame to compete with top clubs nationwide area teams have to convert to holdback squads. Though interested to see how Prime Time does in the World Series thing where ages are actually enforced.

Tier 1: PT, Express North, Eclipse
Tier 2: Preds, 2Way, Chargers
Tier 3: HOS, 91 Tristate, Topside, Superstar

(not including town club teams like Ballers or Pride)


Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Preds play B tournments. Superstar are a joke They only teams in the area that are playing the top teams are Prime Time and LI express North and they are holding their own in the top tournaments.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we get some summer club youth chatter going? Any local clubs in the NLF super conference tourneys doing good? Saw the Preds across multiple ages won tourneys last week. What happened to the Superstars club from Ridgefield? Come on people!




None of the local programs are a joke. There is a place for every kid that wants to play summer lacrosse and some are highly focused on area kids. Predators are southern Westchester as is 2Way. Superstar has always been Ridgefield heavy and Ballers is Yorktown (almost exclusively I believe). LI Express North is Northern Westchester and Western CT. These programs all play in competitive tournaments.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Preds play B tournments. Superstar are a joke They only teams in the area that are playing the top teams are Prime Time and LI express North and they are holding their own in the top tournaments.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we get some summer club youth chatter going? Any local clubs in the NLF super conference tourneys doing good? Saw the Preds across multiple ages won tourneys last week. What happened to the Superstars club from Ridgefield? Come on people!




None of the local programs are a joke. There is a place for every kid that wants to play summer lacrosse and some are highly focused on area kids. Predators are southern Westchester as is 2Way. Superstar has always been Ridgefield heavy and Ballers is Yorktown (almost exclusively I believe). LI Express North is Northern Westchester and Western CT. These programs all play in competitive tournaments.

Referring to Superstar has nothing to do with the prayers. From what i hear from all the parenrs is the organization is poorly run with all the attention going to the the two teams the directors son are on.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
While it is true, their is a place for every child , only 2 teams are playing against the best teams, that is a fact. That certainly does not mean those kids are better , But the teams as a whole are better and tend to attract similar talent
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Between LIENorth, PT, Preds, 2way, and any others... can we compare practice/tourney schedules?

Keep in same format for easy comparison

Predators:
Fall: 6-7 1.5hr practices; 2 Tourneys
Winter: 7-8 1.5hr weekly practices; No Tourneys
Spring: 10 1.5hr practices (2/week); 3 Tourneys
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Between LIENorth, PT, Preds, 2way, and any others... can we compare practice/tourney schedules?

Keep in same format for easy comparison

Predators:
Fall: 6-7 1.5hr practices; 2 Tourneys
Winter: 7-8 1.5hr weekly practices; No Tourneys
Spring: 10 1.5hr practices (2/week); 3 Tourneys


Prime Time:
Fall 4 2hrs practices: 1 Tourney
Winter 12 1.5 hrs skills practices: No Tourneys
Summer 18 practices and 4 Tourneys
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Between LIENorth, PT, Preds, 2way, and any others... can we compare practice/tourney schedules?

Keep in same format for easy comparison

Predators (2025):
Fall: 6-7 1.5hr practices; 2 Tourneys
Winter: 7-8 1.5hr skill practices; No Tourneys
Spring: 10 1.5hr practices (2/week); 3 Tourneys


Prime Time:
Fall 4 2hrs practices: 1 Tourney
Winter 12 1.5 hrs skills practices: No Tourneys
Summer 18 practices and 4 Tourneys


Awesome, wanted to clarify a couple things so made a change. Note age group, if it makes a difference. Older groups at Predators may have one more tourney during the fall and 1 or 2 more during the summer than younger age groups. Schedule across age groups though are generally the same.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Between LIENorth, PT, Preds, 2way, and any others... can we compare practice/tourney schedules?

Keep in same format for easy comparison

Predators (2025):
Fall: 6-7 1.5hr practices; 2 Tourneys
Winter: 7-8 1.5hr skill practices; No Tourneys
Spring: 10 1.5hr practices (2/week); 3 Tourneys


Prime Time:
Fall 4 2hrs practices: 1 Tourney
Winter 12 1.5 hrs skills practices: No Tourneys
Summer 18 practices and 4 Tourneys


Awesome, wanted to clarify a couple things so made a change. Note age group, if it makes a difference. Older groups at Predators may have one more tourney during the fall and 1 or 2 more during the summer than younger age groups. Schedule across age groups though are generally the same.


Yes same with Prime Time. Older PT boys 2021 thru 2018 have a few more tourneys and showcases in the fall and summer. The above is for PT 2025 thru 2022 minus all the World Series extra practice and related tourneys for the 2022 team .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
If the westchester programs want to be as competitive as possible , they should playing more and practicing more. Scrimmages, play dates, winter league , etc. this is what the best teams are doing on Long Island.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Just to add a true LI perspective, my son's 2024 program is as follows:

Fall: 12 practices 1.5 hrs, 0 tourneys
Winter: 10 practices 1.5 hrs, 0 tourneys (extra cost)
Spring: 24 practices 1.5 hrs, 5 tourneys

my son's 2021 program:

Fall: 8 1.5 hr practices, 1 tourney
Winter: Winter: 10 practices 1.5 hrs, 0 tourneys (extra cost)
Spring: 12+ practices 2 hrs, 5 tourneys (less practices due to boys playing MS ball and many playing youth PAL as well)

Keep in mind, this is a better mid tier program, NOT one of the 'elite' programs, and with a cost of ~$1,600 and ~$200 for the winter.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Many teams "claiming " to be be top tier or wanting to be top tier are offereing 3/4 fall tourneys, winter indoor/box. 3 spring and 4/5 summer, Regardless. Most travel programs are way too short to truly build the "team" concepts . You travel all over and get stomped on by teams that practice 50 times a year. And played 3 tourneys before you play your first game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Most clubs share practice and tourney schedules.
2Way:
Fall 6 practices, 1 tourney
Winter 6-8 practices, 0 tourney
no Spring
Summer, 8 practices, 3 tourneys and 1 team overnight camp

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
As far as one post noting how his son's team has no "team" concepts and get stomped by teams who have been together, I completely agree. See it often. A lot of teams win just because they are organized, players know their roles, and coaches have deployed players the right way. So many club teams struggle to find their identity and it is too late once a tournament starts. You can tell which club teams are scrambling and which ones have a system. Team continuity is important. A lot of lower level club teams have shaky talent, true. But constant coaching changes and player turnover are the real kiss of death. Parents paying $2,000 should demand more than just falling for the word "elite" and the MLL player's impressive resume. I have seen many dad coaches who are much better youth game coaches than young lax dudes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Preds play B tournments. Superstar are a joke They only teams in the area that are playing the top teams are Prime Time and LI express North and they are holding their own in the top tournaments.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we get some summer club youth chatter going? Any local clubs in the NLF super conference tourneys doing good? Saw the Preds across multiple ages won tourneys last week. What happened to the Superstars club from Ridgefield? Come on people!


Our 2020 team from Long Island has played the Predators multiple times and Eclipse. Predators have been superior at this age level the last 2 years, regardless if Eclipse plays in NLF events.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Your funny
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What about LIE north? anybody care to share?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I don't have the exact information written down anymore, but would say for HS aged players for LIE North, it is roughly as follows, depending upon tier (there are AA and A teams for certain grades):

Fall ~6 1 1/2 hour practices, 2-3 tournaments
Winter ~6-8 1 1/2 hour practices, 0 tournaments
Spring 0 practices or tournaments (a few indoor box sessions offered)
Summer ~16 1 1/2 hour practices, 4-5 tournaments
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
For 2022

1.primetime
2.superstars
3.chargers
4.predators
5.two way
6.express north
7.tristate
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Garbage
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Any comments on the Eclipse program?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
How did all the Westchester teams do in all the different tournaments this past weekend.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
For 2023:
1. primetime
2. express north
3. eclipse
4. predators
5. twoway
then: Pride, CT Select, Rhino select, Topside, 81+10 tristate, 3D tristate, Ballers, Westchester Warriors, HOS

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For 2023:
1. primetime
2. express north
3. eclipse
4. predators
5. twoway
then: Pride, CT Select, Rhino select, Topside, 81+10 tristate, 3D tristate, Ballers, Westchester Warriors, HOS


Big gap between 2023 PT and the north. PT beat up on the north this weekend at the lax clash 13 to 4 and beat them last week at the big h by 4 or 5 goals.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
For 24.

Eclipse , prime time, express north. Fairly equal.

Everyone else below
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
At 2025, based on comparables:

1) PT
2) Express North (have only played in the fall so far I think)
3) nine d won tristate, ballers, superstars (count them as westchester??), predators

teams not listed - don't know anything about them, am not presuming them to be above or below any of the above.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For 2023:
1. primetime
2. express north
3. eclipse
4. predators
5. twoway
then: Pride, CT Select, Rhino select, Topside, 81+10 tristate, 3D tristate, Ballers, Westchester Warriors, HOS


Big gap between 2023 PT and the north. PT beat up on the north this weekend at the lax clash 13 to 4 and beat them last week at the big h by 4 or 5 goals.


In the age groups I've seen at two LI tourneys, HOS got spanked in every game they played. These were both 'A' tourneys, so maybe they shouldn't have chosen those.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Express North 2021A-just horrendous.

Express North 2021AA-not a real AA team. But at least not horrendous.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For 2023:
1. primetime
2. express north
3. eclipse
4. predators
5. twoway
then: Pride, CT Select, Rhino select, Topside, 81+10 tristate, 3D tristate, Ballers, Westchester Warriors, HOS


Big gap between 2023 PT and the north. PT beat up on the north this weekend at the lax clash 13 to 4 and beat them last week at the big h by 4 or 5 goals.


In the age groups I've seen at two LI tourneys, HOS got spanked in every game they played. These were both 'A' tourneys, so maybe they shouldn't have chosen those.


This "ranking" may be accurate but there are major levels between them. PT way up, then North and Eclipse on next level, then Preds and 2way on next level. Then, wow. There are so many "B" teams (or what Long Island considers C or D teams). Most of those teams are smart enough to stick to small tourneys like CT Cup or War Games to find similar competition but the ones that venture out of their element get slaughtered.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021A-just horrendous.

Express North 2021AA-not a real AA team. But at least not horrendous.



Express 2021AA Lost to PT 2021 by two goals and LIE North doesn't have any holdbacks (what % of PT roster is really 2020?). The team is AA.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Not sure only losing by 2 goals means anything. like I said. Not horrendous but not a real AA team. Politics impacts all teams but North 2021AA more than most. Some top notch players but also some that just shouldn't be there. They are somewhere between A and AA but cannot compete with the big boys. That doesn't mean that they are going to get blown out, only that they cannot consistently win.

I do stand by 2021A being totally horrendous. Some good players but too many on that team lacking basic skills. Hard to have success at this level when you have kids that can't catch and throw.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For 2023:
1. primetime
2. express north
3. eclipse
4. predators
5. twoway
then: Pride, CT Select, Rhino select, Topside, 81+10 tristate, 3D tristate, Ballers, Westchester Warriors, HOS


Big gap between 2023 PT and the north. PT beat up on the north this weekend at the lax clash 13 to 4 and beat them last week at the big h by 4 or 5 goals.


In the age groups I've seen at two LI tourneys, HOS got spanked in every game they played. These were both 'A' tourneys, so maybe they shouldn't have chosen those.


This "ranking" may be accurate but there are major levels between them. PT way up, then North and Eclipse on next level, then Preds and 2way on next level. Then, wow. There are so many "B" teams (or what Long Island considers C or D teams). Most of those teams are smart enough to stick to small tourneys like CT Cup or War Games to find similar competition but the ones that venture out of their element get slaughtered.


I agree with what you said, but its worth noting that the majority of the "B" teams are true NY 6th grade teams, meaning the large majority of players are 2005s. PT, Express N and Eclipse, due in part to having CT kids, have many 2004s, and maybe a few 2003s. The age difference means something. If these clubs would play in a 2005 division, the B teams will see nearly all of their roster eligible, while the top clubs will have to use a healthy mix of their 2023 and 2024 teams. PT, etc may still be better (who knows), because the kids are very talented, experienced and athletic, but the gap would close significantly - at least for the good B teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For 2023:
1. primetime
2. express north
3. eclipse
4. predators
5. twoway
then: Pride, CT Select, Rhino select, Topside, 81+10 tristate, 3D tristate, Ballers, Westchester Warriors, HOS


Big gap between 2023 PT and the north. PT beat up on the north this weekend at the lax clash 13 to 4 and beat them last week at the big h by 4 or 5 goals.


In the age groups I've seen at two LI tourneys, HOS got spanked in every game they played. These were both 'A' tourneys, so maybe they shouldn't have chosen those.


This "ranking" may be accurate but there are major levels between them. PT way up, then North and Eclipse on next level, then Preds and 2way on next level. Then, wow. There are so many "B" teams (or what Long Island considers C or D teams). Most of those teams are smart enough to stick to small tourneys like CT Cup or War Games to find similar competition but the ones that venture out of their element get slaughtered.


I agree with what you said, but its worth noting that the majority of the "B" teams are true NY 6th grade teams, meaning the large majority of players are 2005s. PT, Express N and Eclipse, due in part to having CT kids, have many 2004s, and maybe a few 2003s. The age difference means something. If these clubs would play in a 2005 division, the B teams will see nearly all of their roster eligible, while the top clubs will have to use a healthy mix of their 2023 and 2024 teams. PT, etc may still be better (who knows), because the kids are very talented, experienced and athletic, but the gap would close significantly - at least for the good B teams.


TRUE. If the club scene ever had to adhere to Sept 1st age limits like US Lacrosse, CONNY and even WSYL are doing, then PT, North and Eclipse would lose at least 50% of their players. I bet 2way with the Brunswick connection would also lose a lot of players, and Preds some as well. You make a good point-- the whole "A" vs "B" thing is totally skewed by clubs who grab older players and don't care about the morals involved. Shameful for parents to hold back kids for sports advantage yet they always justify it. Top clubs love it and claim its a necessary evil to compete against other top clubs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For 2023:
1. primetime
2. express north
3. eclipse
4. predators
5. twoway
then: Pride, CT Select, Rhino select, Topside, 81+10 tristate, 3D tristate, Ballers, Westchester Warriors, HOS


Big gap between 2023 PT and the north. PT beat up on the north this weekend at the lax clash 13 to 4 and beat them last week at the big h by 4 or 5 goals.


In the age groups I've seen at two LI tourneys, HOS got spanked in every game they played. These were both 'A' tourneys, so maybe they shouldn't have chosen those.


This "ranking" may be accurate but there are major levels between them. PT way up, then North and Eclipse on next level, then Preds and 2way on next level. Then, wow. There are so many "B" teams (or what Long Island considers C or D teams). Most of those teams are smart enough to stick to small tourneys like CT Cup or War Games to find similar competition but the ones that venture out of their element get slaughtered.


I agree with what you said, but its worth noting that the majority of the "B" teams are true NY 6th grade teams, meaning the large majority of players are 2005s. PT, Express N and Eclipse, due in part to having CT kids, have many 2004s, and maybe a few 2003s. The age difference means something. If these clubs would play in a 2005 division, the B teams will see nearly all of their roster eligible, while the top clubs will have to use a healthy mix of their 2023 and 2024 teams. PT, etc may still be better (who knows), because the kids are very talented, experienced and athletic, but the gap would close significantly - at least for the good B teams.


TRUE. If the club scene ever had to adhere to Sept 1st age limits like US Lacrosse, CONNY and even WSYL are doing, then PT, North and Eclipse would lose at least 50% of their players. I bet 2way with the Brunswick connection would also lose a lot of players, and Preds some as well. You make a good point-- the whole "A" vs "B" thing is totally skewed by clubs who grab older players and don't care about the morals involved. Shameful for parents to hold back kids for sports advantage yet they always justify it. Top clubs love it and claim its a necessary evil to compete against other top clubs.

My son plays on a so called A team with a total of 24 on the roster. Out of the 24 kids 4 or 5 don't make the Sept 1st deadline. That is hardly 1/2 the roster. Take the 4 or 5 kids off the team and guess what they still are a A team. They could hang and beat the most competitive teams in their grade level. It's about talent not age. Size can be intimidating but a true A player no matter how small plays big.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For 2023:
1. primetime
2. express north
3. eclipse
4. predators
5. twoway
then: Pride, CT Select, Rhino select, Topside, 81+10 tristate, 3D tristate, Ballers, Westchester Warriors, HOS


Big gap between 2023 PT and the north. PT beat up on the north this weekend at the lax clash 13 to 4 and beat them last week at the big h by 4 or 5 goals.


In the age groups I've seen at two LI tourneys, HOS got spanked in every game they played. These were both 'A' tourneys, so maybe they shouldn't have chosen those.


This "ranking" may be accurate but there are major levels between them. PT way up, then North and Eclipse on next level, then Preds and 2way on next level. Then, wow. There are so many "B" teams (or what Long Island considers C or D teams). Most of those teams are smart enough to stick to small tourneys like CT Cup or War Games to find similar competition but the ones that venture out of their element get slaughtered.


I agree with what you said, but its worth noting that the majority of the "B" teams are true NY 6th grade teams, meaning the large majority of players are 2005s. PT, Express N and Eclipse, due in part to having CT kids, have many 2004s, and maybe a few 2003s. The age difference means something. If these clubs would play in a 2005 division, the B teams will see nearly all of their roster eligible, while the top clubs will have to use a healthy mix of their 2023 and 2024 teams. PT, etc may still be better (who knows), because the kids are very talented, experienced and athletic, but the gap would close significantly - at least for the good B teams.


TRUE. If the club scene ever had to adhere to Sept 1st age limits like US Lacrosse, CONNY and even WSYL are doing, then PT, North and Eclipse would lose at least 50% of their players. I bet 2way with the Brunswick connection would also lose a lot of players, and Preds some as well. You make a good point-- the whole "A" vs "B" thing is totally skewed by clubs who grab older players and don't care about the morals involved. Shameful for parents to hold back kids for sports advantage yet they always justify it. Top clubs love it and claim its a necessary evil to compete against other top clubs.


You identified yet another reason to move to birth year. No incentive to hold a kid back. Kids will play based on when they were born, which is a fixed variable that can't be changed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not sure only losing by 2 goals means anything. like I said. Not horrendous but not a real AA team. Politics impacts all teams but North 2021AA more than most. Some top notch players but also some that just shouldn't be there. They are somewhere between A and AA but cannot compete with the big boys. That doesn't mean that they are going to get blown out, only that they cannot consistently win.

I do stand by 2021A being totally horrendous. Some good players but too many on that team lacking basic skills. Hard to have success at this level when you have kids that can't catch and throw.


How do you define the difference between AA and A? If PT 2021 is AA and they only beat Express North by 2 goals (especially considering PT has many holdbacks), then they are an even match. 2 goal difference is a very competitive game.

How does politics impact North 2021AA?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
i AGREE WITH That
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Be Realistic on the 2022's

1) PT
2) SS
3) Team 91 Tristate, Express N, Predators, 2 Way

Who cares about the Chargers- no consistency or anyone else


You have 4 teams in this year that are relatively equal with SS 2022 barely above them. I hear 91 Tristate is the team to watch. I was told by a parent who's son plays for another AA program on LI who saw them play that these kids are good and play well as a team- Glad to hear that a relatively newer program in Westchester run by a good guy is seeing results!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Political impact=kids on team that never tried out/related to coaches/agreed to reclass. Whatever. It happens everywhere.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Not saying ts 91 is good or bad. But how can you know if they never play any real teams in real tourneys.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
PT 2021 was missing 9 players at that tournament...could be why the margin wasn't larger!uyhphp
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021A-just horrendous.

Express North 2021AA-not a real AA team. But at least not horrendous.



Express 2021AA Lost to PT 2021 by two goals and LIE North doesn't have any holdbacks (what % of PT roster is really 2020?). The team is AA.


North AA is A+ at best.

North A is a C team that I'm sure the bosses could care less about. Just selling the dream.

Holdbacks or not PT and Eclipse AA only legit AA around here.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Again, PT2021 won by 2 goals but was playing without 9 of their players! Are there hold backs? Yes, show me a team without them!
Express North 2021AA is a decent team and with a few more good players will be competitive with PT and Eclipse. PT beat Eclipse by 4 at Sweetlax.

ExpressNorth 2021A is a total joke though, I guess parents prefer A over B or C....as they write the check!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For 2023:
1. primetime
2. express north
3. eclipse
4. predators
5. twoway
then: Pride, CT Select, Rhino select, Topside, 81+10 tristate, 3D tristate, Ballers, Westchester Warriors, HOS



For 2024, there isn't much. PT, Preds, Eclipse, Express North, Superstar, Two Way, Ballers cannot compete with LI A/B teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Pt , eclipse and express north 2024 are competitive with all but the best teams. Good solid games with. Crabs, Outlaws , bbl, laxachusetts, express Long Island, igloo. Not competitive with 91, legacy, madlax, etc.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pt , eclipse and express north 2024 are competitive with all but the best teams. Good solid games with. Crabs, Outlaws , bbl, laxachusetts, express Long Island, igloo. Not competitive with 91, legacy, madlax, etc.


maybe crabs and outlaws. Not close with the others and definitely blowouts with AA. Just look at NLF or HHH scores
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Like I said. Not competitive with true top teams. Only 2 top teams on the island, 1-2 in philly and then Maryland. But again. It's all relative. Around here pt , express north and eclipse would kick the crap out of. Ballers, superstars, tristate 91 and 3D. And predators. 2 way and Rhino, etc. so. What's your point? Outlaws gold just won the war games at purchase. Outlaws gold is a C team. So what does that make 91 and the ballers. Not to say good players aren't playing on those teams, Just that more play for pt eclipse and express north
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
To bad New England team took so many 2021 CT kids. no way they can compete with Baltimore oare LI teams which are loaded!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Methinks some of those CT choices were political. . . . Seems very "strange" to have an entire roster of attacks from same club. Hmmmmm. . . . . Something to do with evaluators rather than talent???
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Can you guys elaborate on what your talking about
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Eclipse 2024 won legacy tourney. Some quality opponents. Yes I know, no 91, legacy taz, madlax etc. but good win
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can you guys elaborate on what your talking about


UnderArmour Team New England 2020/2021 - roster selections a joke this year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Says the PT dad of the kid who got cut.....
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can you guys elaborate on what your talking about


UnderArmour Team New England 2020/2021 - roster selections a joke this year

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
UA 2020/2021 team went 6-2 only losing to Baltimore..Coached by the 2020 Express North AA coach...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Again, PT2021 won by 2 goals but was playing without 9 of their players! Are there hold backs? Yes, show me a team without them!
Express North 2021AA is a decent team and with a few more good players will be competitive with PT and Eclipse. PT beat Eclipse by 4 at Sweetlax.

ExpressNorth 2021A is a total joke though, I guess parents prefer A over B or C....as they write the check!


Show you a 2021AA team with out holdbacks? The LI Express 2021AA team. The team keeps beating teams with MANY holdbacks Laxachusetts, ADVNC San Fransisco.....physical maturity will come with time, how you guys can post on here proudly that "yeah, PT (or whoever) has holdbacks BUT....." give me a break. There is no shame in this sport anymore, what is that teaching the kids? I won't be forced to hold my son back because you people are so insecure and pathetic that you feel your kids must play against younger players to compete.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Political impact=kids on team that never tried out/related to coaches/agreed to reclass. Whatever. It happens everywhere.



That's just a flat out inaccurate statement. My sons been on the team since inception: all kids tried out, don't know what kids are related to coaches(?) other than their son and all kids belong on the team, there are no holdbacks. Enjoy your sons time on whatever program he's playing for, no need to attack another.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Hey Westchester, are you the next holdback haven. Seems like many I meet out of that area are knowingly using the holdback loophole.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Having that many evaluators from the same club couldn't possibly have anything to do with it (ya, right). Total joke. The sad thing is that it undermines the credibility of the event.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
As long as club lacrosse is grade based not aged based teams will have holdbacks. Should PT turn away the big Brunswick 2021's???
PT didn't make the rules, just following them like everyone else.

Hey, if LI had them they'd be taking them too!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Political impact=kids on team that never tried out/related to coaches/agreed to reclass. Whatever. It happens everywhere.



That's just a flat out inaccurate statement. My sons been on the team since inception: all kids tried out, don't know what kids are related to coaches(?) other than their son and all kids belong on the team, there are no holdbacks. Enjoy your sons time on whatever program he's playing for, no need to attack another.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Political impact=kids on team that never tried out/related to coaches/agreed to reclass. Whatever. It happens everywhere.



"Don't know what kids are related to the coaches other than their son." Did you seriously just write that? Unreal.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Political impact=kids on team that never tried out/related to coaches/agreed to reclass. Whatever. It happens everywhere.



That's just a flat out inaccurate statement. My sons been on the team since inception: all kids tried out, don't know what kids are related to coaches(?) other than their son and all kids belong on the team, there are no holdbacks. Enjoy your sons time on whatever program he's playing for, no need to attack another.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Political impact=kids on team that never tried out/related to coaches/agreed to reclass. Whatever. It happens everywhere.



"Don't know what kids are related to the coaches other than their son." Did you seriously just write that? Unreal.


Maybe he thought related to coaches meant 3rd cousin twice removed? Not sure about current holdbacks on that team but the rumor mill says that a number of current 2021s will be 2022s next year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Political impact=kids on team that never tried out/related to coaches/agreed to reclass. Whatever. It happens everywhere.



That's just a flat out inaccurate statement. My sons been on the team since inception: all kids tried out, don't know what kids are related to coaches(?) other than their son and all kids belong on the team, there are no holdbacks. Enjoy your sons time on whatever program he's playing for, no need to attack another.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Political impact=kids on team that never tried out/related to coaches/agreed to reclass. Whatever. It happens everywhere.



"Don't know what kids are related to the coaches other than their son." Did you seriously just write that? Unreal.


Maybe he thought related to coaches meant 3rd cousin twice removed? Not sure about current holdbacks on that team but the rumor mill says that a number of current 2021s will be 2022s next year.


Maybe it was sarcasm. You people are dense.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
As long as club lacrosse is grade based not aged based teams will have holdbacks. Should PT turn away the big Brunswick 2021's???
PT didn't make the rules, just following them like everyone else.

Hey, if LI had them they'd be taking them too!


While I hate the argument "if they aren't breaking a rule, you can't blame them" because it ignores the reality of social codes and ethics in order to game the system, I also will admit that PT is helping to train and develop some of the best talent. Making it to the finals of WSYL (which is age controlled!) is incredibly impressive and deserves praise.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Give Daniello lots of credit. He built prime time from scratch. Sure he has plenty of enemies. That is the nature of travel lax. When you look around at express or 91. These were and are satellite teams built by someone else. Not saying one is better than the other, But give credit where credit is due. Pt teams play against the best and seem to be fairly competitive against most teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Again, PT2021 won by 2 goals but was playing without 9 of their players! Are there hold backs? Yes, show me a team without them!
Express North 2021AA is a decent team and with a few more good players will be competitive with PT and Eclipse. PT beat Eclipse by 4 at Sweetlax.

ExpressNorth 2021A is a total joke though, I guess parents prefer A over B or C....as they write the check!


Show you a 2021AA team with out holdbacks? The LI Express 2021AA team. The team keeps beating teams with MANY holdbacks Laxachusetts, ADVNC San Fransisco.....physical maturity will come with time, how you guys can post on here proudly that "yeah, PT (or whoever) has holdbacks BUT....." give me a break. There is no shame in this sport anymore, what is that teaching the kids? I won't be forced to hold my son back because you people are so insecure and pathetic that you feel your kids must play against younger players to compete.


Express 2021AA is very good. Not great but they can compete. Express 2021A is an embarrassment. I saw kids out there that couldn't catch and throw. That guy who runs North is a blowhard and should have limited himself to only one team per grade considering the lack of talent. But of course he couldn't resist the $$.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Question: My son starts for CT Chargers 2023 Blue team. We played at PrimeTime tourney this weekend. How do we lose to Prime time 12-1 then only 7-6 same weekend? Also at what point do I let him switch clubs as he is somewhat bothered that chargers practices arent mandatory and tournaments are ala cart? He plays for SuperStar box in fall but has only played lax for 1 year so far. Any advise would be appreciated.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2017 summer club season basically done. A lot of good posts here on how the team in age groups rank. Clubs seem to be realistic in what they are and where they are going. Do like how the club at least are doing their own tourneys now to draw games to the area and playing each other more.

PT, Eclipse, Express North on top level with PT clear #1.
Preds, 2Way are second shelf with good organizations but not trying to compete with top level.
Topside, Superstar, Chargers hard to peg but flounder around
Most 80+11 nothing special but trying
Ballers, Westchester Warriors, HOS, so bad kids must love lacrosse and parents hate money.

In any given age group, an outlying club team may be stronger or weaker. Like 80+11 Tristate has some teams that do OK and others that are awful.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2017 summer club season basically done. A lot of good posts here on how the team in age groups rank. Clubs seem to be realistic in what they are and where they are going. Do like how the club at least are doing their own tourneys now to draw games to the area and playing each other more.

PT, Eclipse, Express North on top level with PT clear #1.
Preds, 2Way are second shelf with good organizations but not trying to compete with top level.
Topside, Superstar, Chargers hard to peg but flounder around
Most 80+11 nothing special but trying
Ballers, Westchester Warriors, HOS, so bad kids must love lacrosse and parents hate money.

In any given age group, an outlying club team may be stronger or weaker. Like 80+11 Tristate has some teams that do OK and others that are awful.


I don't think its a coincidence that by and large the better teams in your rankings get a fair number of CT kids (or depending on the club, a ton of CT kids). These CT kids are on the average a bit older, and over the course of a big roster, it makes a difference in competitiveness. If clubs were forced to play by birth year, the differences amongst these clubs would shrink. PT would still be much better than HOS, for instance, but amongst everyone else, teams would bunch up a bit more.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
With SuperStar closing field teams and sticking to box how does that change things for 2018? Any chance PT starts having 2nd teams at age levels? Anyone heard anything on Express CT? We live near Danbury but havent heard great things about the program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2017 summer club season basically done. A lot of good posts here on how the team in age groups rank. Clubs seem to be realistic in what they are and where they are going. Do like how the club at least are doing their own tourneys now to draw games to the area and playing each other more.

PT, Eclipse, Express North on top level with PT clear #1.
Preds, 2Way are second shelf with good organizations but not trying to compete with top level.
Topside, Superstar, Chargers hard to peg but flounder around
Most 80+11 nothing special but trying
Ballers, Westchester Warriors, HOS, so bad kids must love lacrosse and parents hate money.

In any given age group, an outlying club team may be stronger or weaker. Like 80+11 Tristate has some teams that do OK and others that are awful.



I'm not sure I agree that PT is a "clear #1". Yes, they have a strong U13 team, and even their 2021 can compete with Eclipse 2021 (which is that club's strongest team), but beyond that, each grade varies among clubs in terms of strongest. I would argue that Eclipse 2021 is actually stronger and that Express North superior for 2019 and 2020.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
PT 2021 played Eclipse 2021 last month and PT won 8-4. One game does not a trend make, and they unfortunately don't play each other very often at all, but in that game PT was clearly superior.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2017 summer club season basically done. A lot of good posts here on how the team in age groups rank. Clubs seem to be realistic in what they are and where they are going. Do like how the club at least are doing their own tourneys now to draw games to the area and playing each other more.

PT, Eclipse, Express North on top level with PT clear #1.
Preds, 2Way are second shelf with good organizations but not trying to compete with top level.
Topside, Superstar, Chargers hard to peg but flounder around
Most 80+11 nothing special but trying
Ballers, Westchester Warriors, HOS, so bad kids must love lacrosse and parents hate money.

In any given age group, an outlying club team may be stronger or weaker. Like 80+11 Tristate has some teams that do OK and others that are awful.



I'm not sure I agree that PT is a "clear #1". Yes, they have a strong U13 team, and even their 2021 can compete with Eclipse 2021 (which is that club's strongest team), but beyond that, each grade varies among clubs in terms of strongest. I would argue that Eclipse 2021 is actually stronger and that Express North superior for 2019 and 2020.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Why don't you let him tryout for prime time and express north this august and see where he stacks up? In my opinion, It's only going to get harder and harder to make the best teams going forward. Keep in mind, superstars kids will be looking for spots as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Warriors is 1 year old. Give them time, Great coaches. Had tryouts really late last year. Tristate 81 will never attract the best kids until they start going to better tourneys. It's like they are the step kids of that larger organization.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Eclipse must be nervous. . . . Tryouts staring next week already? Some teams not even done with summer tournaments - ridiculous!
Clearly an attempt to lock in players early before losing them to other clubs. . . .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Question: My son starts for CT Chargers 2023 Blue team. We played at PrimeTime tourney this weekend. How do we lose to Prime time 12-1 then only 7-6 same weekend? Also at what point do I let him switch clubs as he is somewhat bothered that chargers practices arent mandatory and tournaments are ala cart? He plays for SuperStar box in fall but has only played lax for 1 year so far. Any advise would be appreciated.

I would take it slow all of the boys on PT 2023 have been playing lax for 5 to 6 years. You do not want your boy to get discouraged or upset if he does not make the team. My advice is to try to a decent team with a strong emphasis on coaching. PT is to competitive for a boy just starting out. Good luck with your boy.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
With brine national classic next week, How do you even have tryouts for 2024 and older
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Question: My son starts for CT Chargers 2023 Blue team. We played at PrimeTime tourney this weekend. How do we lose to Prime time 12-1 then only 7-6 same weekend? Also at what point do I let him switch clubs as he is somewhat bothered that chargers practices arent mandatory and tournaments are ala cart? He plays for SuperStar box in fall but has only played lax for 1 year so far. Any advise would be appreciated.

I would take it slow all of the boys on PT 2023 have been playing lax for 5 to 6 years. You do not want your boy to get discouraged or upset if he does not make the team. My advice is to try to a decent team with a strong emphasis on coaching. PT is to competitive for a boy just starting out. Good luck with your boy.


From a practical standpoint, Chargers tends to hold their tryouts later than most (they have not posted tryout dates yet for next summer, but I would guess mid to late September) so you can have your son tryout for other club options and see how the chips fall.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Are you at all concerned that your director from chargers definitely knows who you are now? You pretty much gave everything but his name, my advice is you start trying out just in case
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The reason the second game was closer was that the coaches played the b players longer than they should have. The Chargers could be better but brameier doesn't focus on the younger kids. Eclipse is more competitive but give chargers another year, if you live near Darien then it's fine.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Has anyone seen if SuperStar tryouts are posted?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I'm going to assume your joking, but if not, superstars is shutting down their field teams and just doing box. Colsey is going to Prime time as director of Box, and coaching the 2024 team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Rumor has it that Roy is joining PT but keeping box lax??
You knew that already though.....right
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
According to their website, all tryouts are Tursday, July 25th. Don't know anything about this club but sounds interesting as a supplement to our regular club in terms of development - can anyone share their experience with it?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Heard that Superstars is going with box only and that Colsey is going to Primetime.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has anyone seen if SuperStar tryouts are posted?

They are a total joke. Who cares.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Colsey is going to PT as director of box and keeping SuperStar box as well. Closing field teams. His box teams are competitive and the program seems to be growing now he has PT kids for box so they should be good.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Superstars box is a home run in if your looking for competitive off season lax. You play against most of the best field teams at every tourney which are mostly 1 day events. It's a fast moving, physical game. The con of the program is the very small practice facility, but it does not seem to matter come game time as you have 30 seconds to get a shot off. Roy sends most of his teams to San Jose in August for the nationals which is a great event. He also sends kids out to Vancouver to play an amazing tourney with the us box national team. Those are the pros and cons.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
You are kidding right? Warriors gets all the leftovers after PT, LIE, preds, then 91N picks up some that drop them warriors get the kids who can't throw and catch. If that's your kids level of play, perfect.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Why bash on the warriors? Savastano's are great people and coaches
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Superstars box tryouts are 7/25. Field teams are done. This is real box lacrosse not just indoor lacrosse. Improves stick skills dramatically in a short time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Superstars box tryouts are 7/25. Field teams are done. This is real box lacrosse not just indoor lacrosse. Improves stick skills dramatically in a short time.


Field teams are terrible
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Terrible compared to who? In the tri state area they are competitive. Certainly better than tristate, 2 way , 3D , ballers.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Terrible compared to who? In the tri state area they are competitive. Certainly better than tristate, 2 way , 3D , ballers.


thats a low bar
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Correct , the bar is low, But other than pt, express and eclipse , who is better than them? Maybe predators at certain ages
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Can anyone give me some color on Prime Time, specifically the 2020 team? We are new to the area and have heard mixed - lots of great things about the skill set of that particular team, but also lots of rumbling that many of the players are not happy for some reason (specifically the Greenwich/Brunswick crowd) and are looking to leave the program next year.
Heard this happened at 3D a few years ago when several players joined and team was solid but then a large group left to join PT together, so 3D was left very weak.
Is this true? Why all the program hopping for this group? Frustrating when the team potential looks one way at tryouts but then you find out that many of the skilled players declined to go to another program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Field teams no longer exist at Superstars. Box is a great way to develop a young player. There's a reason every college coach looks for box players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
This weekend at the Philly Summer Invitational, the 2020 Primetime team played the Preds for the first time in a number of years. Preds won 9-2, shutting Primetime out deep into the 4th quarter of the pool play game. In bracket play Preds beat Clams and lost a decently contested game with Looneys 8-4 in the semis. This year's 2020 Preds were undefeated in pool play thru 4 tourney's, losing only 4 games all season. Only lost 3 games last season. So if you are a grumbling 2020 Primetimer tired of being on the wrong end of NLF beatdowns or simply looking for the best 2020 team in Westchester/CT, you might consider the Preds tryouts.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
this just
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can anyone give me some color on Prime Time, specifically the 2020 team? We are new to the area and have heard mixed - lots of great things about the skill set of that particular team, but also lots of rumbling that many of the players are not happy for some reason (specifically the Greenwich/Brunswick crowd) and are looking to leave the program next year.
Heard this happened at 3D a few years ago when several players joined and team was solid but then a large group left to join PT together, so 3D was left very weak.
Is this true? Why all the program hopping for this group? Frustrating when the team potential looks one way at tryouts but then you find out that many of the skilled players declined to go to another program.


This isn't a PT 2020 thing. Each year always a batch of players from a program look to switch to another one for various reasons (club folds, bad coach, one influential family, playing time, and so on) . Kids from certain towns/clubs move as a little pack because they know one another. And because many are lemmings. Haven't seen a tryout yet where all the top talent accept the invite. Just not reality.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can anyone give me some color on Prime Time, specifically the 2020 team? We are new to the area and have heard mixed - lots of great things about the skill set of that particular team, but also lots of rumbling that many of the players are not happy for some reason (specifically the Greenwich/Brunswick crowd) and are looking to leave the program next year.
Heard this happened at 3D a few years ago when several players joined and team was solid but then a large group left to join PT together, so 3D was left very weak.
Is this true? Why all the program hopping for this group? Frustrating when the team potential looks one way at tryouts but then you find out that many of the skilled players declined to go to another program.


All true. The grass is always greener.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Express North 2021AA continues to disappoint. 0-4 at NLF this past weekend. You can hear the parent grumbling throughout Westchester.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021AA continues to disappoint. 0-4 at NLF this past weekend. You can hear the parent grumbling throughout Westchester.



Tough to compete without holdbacks, but the team has been very successful in my book. As a parent of a player on the team, I'm very happy with my son's development and the teams progress. If you are not, there are other programs you can try out for in a few weeks. I believe I'm in the vast majority of very happy parents on this team, we understand winning tournaments will come with our kids eventual physical maturity.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Anyone hitting 2Way tryouts this week? They def jumped the gun on normal tryout period but "normal" no longer exists. Wonder how the turnout will be tonight for 2021/2022.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021AA continues to disappoint. 0-4 at NLF this past weekend. You can hear the parent grumbling throughout Westchester.


Isn't that team coached by the head coach of Iona Prep?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2Way had strong turnouts for 2023/2024 last night.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Happens..3D got hit when David Bruce left for 2Way and players went with him.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021AA continues to disappoint. 0-4 at NLF this past weekend. You can hear the parent grumbling throughout Westchester.



Tough to compete without holdbacks, but the team has been very successful in my book. As a parent of a player on the team, I'm very happy with my son's development and the teams progress. If you are not, there are other programs you can try out for in a few weeks. I believe I'm in the vast majority of very happy parents on this team, we understand winning tournaments will come with our kids eventual physical maturity.


No doubt that as long as your happy with your kid's team the discussion ends right there. But the team's physical maturity will never overcome the holdback issue. If teams are of equal skill the team that is older will always dominate anywhere in the teenage years and likely into the early twenties. Also, what makes you think that there are not a bunch of 2020AA's that are going to show up as 2021AAs for tryouts? Like you pointed out, hard to compete without holdbacks so why not increase the holdbacks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021AA continues to disappoint. 0-4 at NLF this past weekend. You can hear the parent grumbling throughout Westchester.


Isn't that team coached by the head coach of Iona Prep?


At least on paper.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Why the strong turnout for 2 way ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021AA continues to disappoint. 0-4 at NLF this past weekend. You can hear the parent grumbling throughout Westchester.



Tough to compete without holdbacks, but the team has been very successful in my book. As a parent of a player on the team, I'm very happy with my son's development and the teams progress. If you are not, there are other programs you can try out for in a few weeks. I believe I'm in the vast majority of very happy parents on this team, we understand winning tournaments will come with our kids eventual physical maturity.


No doubt that as long as your happy with your kid's team the discussion ends right there. But the team's physical maturity will never overcome the holdback issue. If teams are of equal skill the team that is older will always dominate anywhere in the teenage years and likely into the early twenties. Also, what makes you think that there are not a bunch of 2020AA's that are going to show up as 2021AAs for tryouts? Like you pointed out, hard to compete without holdbacks so why not increase the holdbacks.


I don't think 2020AA is losing any players to play on 2021AA next year. . . .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2Way had strong turnouts for 2023/2024 last night.


2025/2026/2027 2Way tryout on Mon first night had over 90 players. The 2023/2024 session after looked even bigger. They couldn't even fit on the field comfortably with those numbers (and size of the kids). Many helmets from different places. Timing, location, coaches, Brunswick, whatever the draw they pulled in kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Looks like all this talk of holdbacks and age restrictions isn't just talk. Posted on another thread. Nxt, 3D, Adrenaline all going to shift to age based. Very slowly of course. Not sure if it impacts beyond their club teams but must hit their tournaments, showcases, and stuff. This change is inevitable.

https://nxtlacrosse.com/blog/entry/...-to-adopt-us-lacrosse-age-segmentation-p
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021AA continues to disappoint. 0-4 at NLF this past weekend. You can hear the parent grumbling throughout Westchester.



Tough to compete without holdbacks, but the team has been very successful in my book. As a parent of a player on the team, I'm very happy with my son's development and the teams progress. If you are not, there are other programs you can try out for in a few weeks. I believe I'm in the vast majority of very happy parents on this team, we understand winning tournaments will come with our kids eventual physical maturity.


No doubt that as long as your happy with your kid's team the discussion ends right there. But the team's physical maturity will never overcome the holdback issue. If teams are of equal skill the team that is older will always dominate anywhere in the teenage years and likely into the early twenties. Also, what makes you think that there are not a bunch of 2020AA's that are going to show up as 2021AAs for tryouts? Like you pointed out, hard to compete without holdbacks so why not increase the holdbacks.


I have to strongly disagree regarding the holdback gap. By this time next summer the holdback gap will have closed based on my experience. The major difference today is player who have and have not gone through puberty. Will the older kids always have a little advantage? Sure, but once the physical maturity is somewhat equalized, the actual age teams will thrive. I think the experience makes them better players in the long run.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Looks like all this talk of holdbacks and age restrictions isn't just talk. Posted on another thread. Nxt, 3D, Adrenaline all going to shift to age based. Very slowly of course. Not sure if it impacts beyond their club teams but must hit their tournaments, showcases, and stuff. This change is inevitable.

https://nxtlacrosse.com/blog/entry/...-to-adopt-us-lacrosse-age-segmentation-p



I do think that's a positive move but do question whether it will create two different worlds. You can envision a group that transitions to age segmentation and a group like those in the NLF who don't as a way of differentiating themselves.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021AA continues to disappoint. 0-4 at NLF this past weekend. You can hear the parent grumbling throughout Westchester.



Tough to compete without holdbacks, but the team has been very successful in my book. As a parent of a player on the team, I'm very happy with my son's development and the teams progress. If you are not, there are other programs you can try out for in a few weeks. I believe I'm in the vast majority of very happy parents on this team, we understand winning tournaments will come with our kids eventual physical maturity.


No doubt that as long as your happy with your kid's team the discussion ends right there. But the team's physical maturity will never overcome the holdback issue. If teams are of equal skill the team that is older will always dominate anywhere in the teenage years and likely into the early twenties. Also, what makes you think that there are not a bunch of 2020AA's that are going to show up as 2021AAs for tryouts? Like you pointed out, hard to compete without holdbacks so why not increase the holdbacks.


I don't think 2020AA is losing any players to play on 2021AA next year. . . .


Until they do.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
How is the 2024 91 tristate team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
No need to drive all the way up to JJ anymore. Great coaching at Preds and now 2 way out of Brunswick with top notchi coaching.
PT and EXPN will take a big hit
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021AA continues to disappoint. 0-4 at NLF this past weekend. You can hear the parent grumbling throughout Westchester.



Tough to compete without holdbacks, but the team has been very successful in my book. As a parent of a player on the team, I'm very happy with my son's development and the teams progress. If you are not, there are other programs you can try out for in a few weeks. I believe I'm in the vast majority of very happy parents on this team, we understand winning tournaments will come with our kids eventual physical maturity.


No doubt that as long as your happy with your kid's team the discussion ends right there. But the team's physical maturity will never overcome the holdback issue. If teams are of equal skill the team that is older will always dominate anywhere in the teenage years and likely into the early twenties. Also, what makes you think that there are not a bunch of 2020AA's that are going to show up as 2021AAs for tryouts? Like you pointed out, hard to compete without holdbacks so why not increase the holdbacks.


I have to strongly disagree regarding the holdback gap. By this time next summer the holdback gap will have closed based on my experience. The major difference today is player who have and have not gone through puberty. Will the older kids always have a little advantage? Sure, but once the physical maturity is somewhat equalized, the actual age teams will thrive. I think the experience makes them better players in the long run.


Fair point.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No need to drive all the way up to JJ anymore. Great coaching at Preds and now 2 way out of Brunswick with top notchi coaching.
PT and EXPN will take a big hit


From what I have heard the biggest issue with Express North is some questionable coaching. The coaches apparently are all over the map to a much greater degree than some other programs. Some of the better programs seek to mentor and guide younger coaches and try (I said try) to impose some sort of consistent curriculum. LIE North looks to struggle with this if what I am told is accurate.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No need to drive all the way up to JJ anymore. Great coaching at Preds and now 2 way out of Brunswick with top notchi coaching.
PT and EXPN will take a big hit


From what I have heard the biggest issue with Express North is some questionable coaching. The coaches apparently are all over the map to a much greater degree than some other programs. Some of the better programs seek to mentor and guide younger coaches and try (I said try) to impose some sort of consistent curriculum. LIE North looks to struggle with this if what I am told is accurate.


Our experience has been the complete opposite. . . . I think (like everything else) coaching can vary dramatically from team to team, so it is possible that what you have heard is true for some of the teams. That said, this is our first year with Express North, and the coaching is superior to that which my son received at his prior club by far.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No need to drive all the way up to JJ anymore. Great coaching at Preds and now 2 way out of Brunswick with top notchi coaching.
PT and EXPN will take a big hit


From what I have heard the biggest issue with Express North is some questionable coaching. The coaches apparently are all over the map to a much greater degree than some other programs. Some of the better programs seek to mentor and guide younger coaches and try (I said try) to impose some sort of consistent curriculum. LIE North looks to struggle with this if what I am told is accurate.


Our experience has been the complete opposite. . . . I think (like everything else) coaching can vary dramatically from team to team, so it is possible that what you have heard is true for some of the teams. That said, this is our first year with Express North, and the coaching is superior to that which my son received at his prior club by far.


That's a positive. What graduation year?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021AA continues to disappoint. 0-4 at NLF this past weekend. You can hear the parent grumbling throughout Westchester.


Unless you're one of the parents, why even post? I'm a Dad of one of the LIE North 2021AA players and we are very happy with where the team is and how much development we've witnessed in our son. He enjoys playing on the team and looks forward to practice. What more can a Dad ask for? Worth every penny.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
agree....superstars box program is way to go for serious players, field teams not so much but box is legit
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021AA continues to disappoint. 0-4 at NLF this past weekend. You can hear the parent grumbling throughout Westchester.


Unless you're one of the parents, why even post? I'm a Dad of one of the LIE North 2021AA players and we are very happy with where the team is and how much development we've witnessed in our son. He enjoys playing on the team and looks forward to practice. What more can a Dad ask for? Worth every penny.


True Dat!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2021AA continues to disappoint. 0-4 at NLF this past weekend. You can hear the parent grumbling throughout Westchester.


I'm a LIE North parent at multiple age groups. We've been involved in more than a handful of clubs over the years and my sons have been guest players with others clubs. I am extremely pleased with LIE North vs other clubs and more importantly -- my sons are happy. They have had great experiences in practices, tournaments and their personal one on one connection with their coaches. Some of their teammates are probably lifelong friends that will visit each other at their D1 schools. smile

I was at the NLF *both days, both fields* this past weekend - aside from the usual parents with their pessimistic reputation that complain about everything - there was no serious grumbling going on as you are insinuating. Of course no one likes to walk away 0-4 from any tournament - but that's not cause to spread fake news.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
How were Eclipse tryouts at the 2024 - 2021 grades so far?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Your Clueless- your still talking potentially up to 2 year age gaps with older/ re-classed kids: 14 vs 16, 15 vs 17, 16 vs 18. If you think a 15 yr old has the same physical development as a 17yr, your nuts. 10% will have equal physical development , the rest wont. Age based is the only way to go. It levels the playing field and truly represents a kids skill. In 3 years, that's how it will fly
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Schreiber is running express north into the ground, people hate his ruthless personality and his win at all costs mentality. Screaming in the sidelines at his coaches, his players. People at the younger ages are running fast from him. Now he is diluting his talent pool with his bs Fairfield teams. Plenty of other programs to play at, I would avoid 2023 and younger
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -

We continue to have a positive experience with Schreiber and North.

I hope you find the right program fit for your son, that's what's most important. Good luck to him in his tryouts.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber is running express north into the ground, people hate his ruthless personality and his win at all costs mentality. Screaming in the sidelines at his coaches, his players. People at the younger ages are running fast from him. Now he is diluting his talent pool with his bs Fairfield teams. Plenty of other programs to play at, I would avoid 2023 and younger


I think he is passionate about lacrosse and definitely old school which I think kids need more of. But my sense is that some of that passion for lax has been replaced with a bigger passion for money and he does not appear to be a great manager from a business stance. I get that it's a business and that your AA teams and who you place in college is your marketing tool but don't pound your chest that you want players at all levels to develop when the overall quality of the A level coaching and structure is so weak. I applaud his dedication to the game but think he may have very quickly lost his way.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
[quote=Anonymous]Your Clueless- your still talking potentially up to 2 year age gaps with older/ re-classed kids: 14 vs 16, 15 vs 17, 16 vs 18. If you think a 15 yr old has the same physical development as a 17yr, your nuts. 10% will have equal physical development , the rest wont. Age based is the only way to go. It levels the playing field and truly represents a kids skill. In 3 years, that's how it will fly[/quote

No one is arguing against age based bracketing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Schreiber has no loyalty. He is as cuttthroat as they get and his teams are still average at best
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How is the 2024 91 tristate team?


They are OK for this area. One of the stronger 91TriState teams from the start though that doesn't mean too much. They do well in B tourneys and lose in A tourneys. They have continuity though unlike most local 2024 club teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber has no loyalty. He is as cuttthroat as they get and his teams are still average at best


He practically guaranteed that my son would play D1 as long as we were willing to reclassify through Iona Prep. Oh and maybe add a PG year too for the double reclassify.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
That averages out to 30 kids trying out per team, is that a strong turnout???? Am I missing something?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Looks like all this talk of holdbacks and age restrictions isn't just talk. Posted on another thread. Nxt, 3D, Adrenaline all going to shift to age based. Very slowly of course. Not sure if it impacts beyond their club teams but must hit their tournaments, showcases, and stuff. This change is inevitable.

https://nxtlacrosse.com/blog/entry/...-to-adopt-us-lacrosse-age-segmentation-p


I do think that's a positive move but do question whether it will create two different worlds. You can envision a group that transitions to age segmentation and a group like those in the NLF who don't as a way of differentiating themselves.


I like the grandfathered approach, as it would really stink to see legitimate long standing teams broken up because there's a Sept 1st birthday ending with the wrong year.

I also hope there is continuity amongst all the clubs/tournament rules - half the fun at these tournaments is playing rivalry teams and I would hate to not play certain teams bc of their team age makeups.

This is a great move -- although once it's all even playing field with age - what would everyone gripe about here on BOTC? lol....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Not being mean, just truthful, what A tourney has tristate 2024 played in? They play in C tourneys at best. Against mostly b/c teams
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber has no loyalty. He is as cuttthroat as they get and his teams are still average at best

No Loyalty? I don't think you know Schreiber. Old school coach whose players would run through a wall for
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
When you say loyalty, Is it loyal to bring in players in the middle of the season and replace existing kids? Is that the kind of loyalty you mean?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber has no loyalty. He is as cuttthroat as they get and his teams are still average at best

No Loyalty? I don't think you know Schreiber. Old school coach whose players would run through a wall for


They will run the through a wall because their parents are convinced he's the guy to get them to play in college. And no doubt he has that ability for some. His loyalty will be wholly dependent upon whether your kid has the chops to play in college. That's where his loyalty begins and ends. He's not your friend, he's running a business.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When you say loyalty, Is it loyal to bring in players in the middle of the season and replace existing kids? Is that the kind of loyalty you mean?

Not saying that is correct, but we have a wonderful experience with LIE North. He plays to win and I believe he is upfront with players/parents about playing time
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When you say loyalty, Is it loyal to bring in players in the middle of the season and replace existing kids? Is that the kind of loyalty you mean?

Not saying that is correct, but we have a wonderful experience with LIE North. He plays to win and I believe he is upfront with players/parents about playing time



Funny to watch lots of pros and cons on just one program -- in reality probably just from 2-3 families since everyone is able to post anonymously.

Different strokes for different folks.

If your player is happy with his season - that's great. If not, use it as a teaching moment. Tryout season is here and your player has the great ability to change his path if he chooses.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber has no loyalty. He is as cuttthroat as they get and his teams are still average at best

No Loyalty? I don't think you know Schreiber. Old school coach whose players would run through a wall for


They will run the through a wall because their parents are convinced he's the guy to get them to play in college. And no doubt he has that ability for some. His loyalty will be wholly dependent upon whether your kid has the chops to play in college. That's where his loyalty begins and ends. He's not your friend, he's running a business.


None of these guys are your friend - they are all running businesses. No different anywhere.

Given the amount of commits North has in the 18 and 19 classes it is difficult to argue that the teams are "average at best". In fact, the 18s just won NLF last weekend.

All of these programs have pros and cons. No sure North is any more or less cutthroat - PT cut plenty of kids last year too. The comment about replacing kids mid year? Not sure I have heard of that...adding kids due to many injuries? Absolutely, just like any other program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Just ask any 2024 express north parent how many new kids showed up mid year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just ask any 2024 express north parent how many new kids showed up mid year


That tends to happen when players don't show up for tournaments The roster count usually stays the same. When you have a high commitment level from your players, that usually won't happen.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Your probably right. Instead of 21 out of 25 showing, you add guest players in order to keep the necessary 10 middie & 6 attack requirement to get through a tourney. Remember though, it's the directors program . They can do what they want.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Of course they can do what they want. Especially when those guest players didn't try out and probably aren't paying
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Pretty certain LIE North at one tourn had a handful of 2023 players after they were done play the second day in a game for the 2024 team. A variety of people were pointing it out. And it wasn't because there were not enough 2024 players. Likely connected to the fact that Scheiber was coaching the team that day. And he was screaming like an absolute lunatic at the players in a nasty way.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I've
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Of course they can do what they want. Especially when those guest players didn't try out and probably aren't paying


My son has been a guest for 2 westchester clubs when they needed him, not North. Never paid. It's not unique to your club.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And he was screaming like an absolute lunatic at the players in a nasty way.


If you think that's unique to your current situation - you are sheltered. You need to open your ears when you watch the other local program directors coach their teams. It's clear you have an axe to grind and can't let it go. You need to get out of the club. Guaranteed all sides will be happier.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Unique? Here's one I heard from a parent who's son is with the club program at an older age group: Guest players showing for a tournament , then the coach asks the kids who start on the team to give the guest players their jerseys because the guests are now starting over them. And to top it off, I was told the guest players added no value.

Loyalty- zero, confidence in team= zero, wimp move= 100%

Sheltered? You were probably the kid growing up that was forced to brush your teeth with elmers glue and told it was toothpaste and good for you.

Your a moron and desperate if you think that's OK when a team is not down players and just brings in guests.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Unique? Here's one I heard from a parent who's son is with the club program at an older age group: Guest players showing for a tournament , then the coach asks the kids who start on the team to give the guest players their jerseys because the guests are now starting over them. And to top it off, I was told the guest players added no value.

Loyalty- zero, confidence in team= zero, wimp move= 100%

Sheltered? You were probably the kid growing up that was forced to brush your teeth with elmers glue and told it was toothpaste and good for you.

Your a moron and desperate if you think that's OK when a team is not down players and just brings in guests.



If your son's team brings in guest players when they don't NEED a kid here or there to cover some sort of numbers issue and you don't leave that team at your first legitimate opportunity - you really only have yourself to blame. If they asked kids to give up their jerseys to guests and you didn't quit that day - I simply can't understand why not. Maybe not make a scene and storm off, but my God - why would you ever go back? Sorry - I know switching teams can be a real pain but...

My kids have "helped" other teams at certain Tournaments. First question as a parent of an invited guest player should always be - "will he be taking time away from any of your kids or are you really that tight for kids?" Obviously, by being there, your son is taking some minutes, but if he is player 18+/- there's plenty of run for everyone. If greater than that #+/-, he is "taking minutes" and they weren't in need of anything - they just wanted to have a few stronger players. It's pretty obvious if they were telling the truth about it. Integrity is a [lacrosse] folks and it cuts both ways. Programs should have it - parents should too.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What you described Never happened.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
"......Sheltered? You were probably the kid growing up that was forced to brush your teeth with elmers glue and told it was toothpaste and good for you.

Your a moron......"

I hope your son has been equipped with handling conflict better than you. This has been an entertaining exchange for an otherwise boring Friday morning. You are so twisted about it. Chill out. Who looks like the moron?

Secondly - and much more importantly in the scheme of life - I wish your son nothing but good luck in his try outs in another program that will better suit your needs and makes him happy. Cheers.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I just have to respond to the post about the person who is "pretty certain" Express North 2024 added 2023 players to their team on the second day of a tournament. I am sure this "variety of people" are Primetime parents and they are referring to the last game of the Big 4 HHH tournament. It did not happen. It was the exact same team that Primetime beat earlier in the season. It is a healthy rivalry, please don't take the win away from the kids because they earned it
on the field.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
LarryM making it personal- no reason to call anyone a moron while you spread second hand information. Lets look at the situation another way. We now have 2way, Eclipse, Primetime, Chargers and Express North for our kids. All very different good programs that our kids get to choose from. Eclipse and North are part of the NLF so you get to play against the strongest teams each weekend. Primetime, Chargers and now 2way play tough schedules. Nice choices for our kids- sure beats 5 years ago when the Ct Chargers were the only team in town
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
"......Sheltered? You were probably the kid growing up that was forced to brush your teeth with elmers glue and told it was toothpaste and good for you.

Your a moron......"

I hope your son has been equipped with handling conflict better than you. This has been an entertaining exchange for an otherwise boring Friday morning. You are so twisted about it. Chill out. Who looks like the moron?

Secondly - and much more importantly in the scheme of life - I wish your son nothing but good luck in his try outs in another program that will better suit your needs and makes him happy. Cheers.


Really. Have an opinion but what benefit to anonymously attacking an anonymous person. That's just sad.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not being mean, just truthful, what A tourney has tristate 2024 played in? They play in C tourneys at best. Against mostly b/c teams


They play in B/C tourneys. As they should, as that fits the team. Not making a mean dig. No sense playing LI or Westchester teams just to get destroyed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Any feedback on Eclipse tryouts?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Couple pretty decent kids on that tristate 91 team, not sure why they pay all that money to play against mediocre to average teams
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Lot of LMYL kids on that 91tristate team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Primetime is also in the NLF.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I dont understand the gratuitous need to speak negatively about 91 TS 2024. The organization is only 3 years old, and its getting better. The 2024 team, which is being commented on, had a winning record by a considerable margin. Other than PT and Express North, which Westchester team is better at this age? I don't buy that Preds are. Preds play completely different tournaments and travel more - I don't know that they are at top tournaments either - just different tournaments. Some of the CT teams are better, but they are CT teams, and may not be proximate to the families on 91 TS.

Which tournaments should they have gone to? There are really only a handful of A teams up and down the coast from Boston to DC. Yes, those teams would crush them, as they would crush everyone else. Outside of that small, elite pool, 91 TS 2024 does more than fine.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I dont understand the gratuitous need to speak negatively about 91 TS 2024. The organization is only 3 years old, and its getting better. The 2024 team, which is being commented on, had a winning record by a considerable margin. Other than PT and Express North, which Westchester team is better at this age? I don't buy that Preds are. Preds play completely different tournaments and travel more - I don't know that they are at top tournaments either - just different tournaments. Some of the CT teams are better, but they are CT teams, and may not be proximate to the families on 91 TS.

Which tournaments should they have gone to? There are really only a handful of A teams up and down the coast from Boston to DC. Yes, those teams would crush them, as they would crush everyone else. Outside of that small, elite pool, 91 TS 2024 does more than fine.


Outside of one post saying 2024 91Tri only plays in "C tourneys", i don't think anyone was bashing this team. Statements match what you're stating here-- they are an OK team, have been together a while, do pretty well, and know their limitations. Actually, that should be the goal of all club teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Any idea where most of Superstar 2022 team is going? They were that programs strongest team. Core staying together or just scattering?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Interesting to see that Jeff Bramier (Darien) is joining up with Express North.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Interesting to see that Jeff Bramier (Darien) is joining up with Express North.


Is he folding Chargers?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Interesting to see that Jeff Bramier (Darien) is joining up with Express North.


Is he folding Chargers?


The Chargers site says he is stepping down as Director to return to coaching. Not sure when that was posted but hard to believe he will coach for another program but give up control of Chargers but still own them. I have to imagine whatever deal he cut with Express results in all of the Chargers coaches moving to Express along with the Chargers players. Looks to me he made a biz decision. Sold his book and cashed out. Good move by him.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
No word on that but it doesn't look good for Chargers. Are they now part of Express North in Westport?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
No tryouts posted yet although they always were late August so no surprise. Also no coaches listed on website so assumption is CT Chargers will be Express Westport and top players will slide over to Katonah or Eclipse. On my sons team 4 kids trying out at Eclipse and 2 trying out for PT. Rest going to Express Westport or hoping new Chargers rises from ashes...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Got an email from Express North with the Brameier announcement. It also notes that the 2018 and 2019 teams have more D1 commitments than any other programs in Weatchester and CT.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Looks like Chargers are done. I hope coaches can run Westport location like Chargers was run.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Anyone know anything about the Warrior All-American tourney? Supposed to be a nat'l tourney of region vs region. Happens this weekend at UMass. Tri-State has a 2021, 2022 and 2025 team entered. But no rosters or coaches shared unlike LI region. From the info gathered hard to know who was in charge or why certain ages left off.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The director of Superstars is now part of Prime Time and will be coaching their 2024 team. All their top players will be moving to PT or at least trying to.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Warrior all America games was a bust for every region but Long Island . They had to combine regions. Great concept. But triple the price of Brine.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The director of Superstars is now part of Prime Time and will be coaching their 2024 team. All their top players will be moving to PT or at least trying to.


Both teams terrible at 2024
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
both teams are terrible compared to which other local team? Express north 24 is a mess. , eclipse is very good. Best kids from superstars and best kids from prime time will be a great combination
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Can someone provide some honest information about their experience with PT 2020 this season? Coaches, team dynamics, player development, recruiting efforts?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Your comments are misguided at best.

2024 PT and Express North split during the summer and are good not great teams. Eclipse had to rally from 5 down to beat Express North by 1 in Mass Legacy Tourney. I suspect all will evolve into highly competitive teams next year.

None are terrible none among the elite yet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The list of elite 24,s is getting smaller, In the tristate area , including Long Island , only 2 elite teams, none in Boston and a bunch in Maryland. Eclipse , prime time and express north have some work to do, but getting better!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What happened to the CT Express from last summer ? They were in Danbury at Wooster. Anyone know anything?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Looks like Chargers are done. I hope coaches can run Westport location like Chargers was run.


I seriously hope you are kidding? The reason Chargers is now folding is BECAUSE of the way it was run. Second rate tournaments at best, players choosing to attend summer tournaments "a la carte" so that Mommy & Daddy can fit in their Nantucket vacation without being interrupted by lacrosse, three teams at certain grade levels (obvious money grab). That program was a joke.

I am hearing players are not happy about next year's situation and are jumping at the chance to play for other clubs if offered a spot.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Very good team and talent level. Coach is from JJ
Team will be better next year with some new muddies and a stud Pole or 2
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Has anyone been to CT Express tryouts this week? Any feedback?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
How were 2024 express north tryouts today?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Katonah workouts had about 50 per grade today. Solid but nothing spectacular. Mostly returning Express North.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Hey I'm new to this and I was wondering how many people show up to the predators tryouts? I don't think my son has a good chance. He has been playing for 1 year and I can only take him to one of the two tryouts. Don't get me wrong he plays a lot. He is pretty pod with both hands and good with all the basics. Just wondering what you guys think.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
My son is 2022 just so you know.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hey I'm new to this and I was wondering how many people show up to the predators tryouts? I don't think my son has a good chance. He has been playing for 1 year and I can only take him to one of the two tryouts. Don't get me wrong he plays a lot. He is pretty pod with both hands and good with all the basics. Just wondering what you guys think.


If you are only asking to wonder if he'd make the team, it seems the answer would be "no." Preds have solid squads, lots of kids will be there, and you will miss a key day. But if you view it as an opportunity to meet the coaches, measure your boy against other kids, and just play some lax (for some $), then why not?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hey I'm new to this and I was wondering how many people show up to the predators tryouts? I don't think my son has a good chance. He has been playing for 1 year and I can only take him to one of the two tryouts. Don't get me wrong he plays a lot. He is pretty pod with both hands and good with all the basics. Just wondering what you guys think.


If you are only asking to wonder if he'd make the team, it seems the answer would be "no." Preds have solid squads, lots of kids will be there, and you will miss a key day. But if you view it as an opportunity to meet the coaches, measure your boy against other kids, and just play some lax (for some $), then why not?


Agreed. If the tryouts are not overloaded with kids and you just want to see where things stand, these tryouts are often (not always) run like great clinics.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I think the predators will be moving up a notch this upcoming fall/summer. From what I hear, there is a nice group of kids still available and looking for a home.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
My son does not play on the team but if your son is a 2022 and does not make the Preds you should consider the Westchester WArriors. The 2022 team is coached by Nick Savestano so you aren't getting one of the best HS coaches in Westchester every day. The 2022 is by far their best and while they are not yet at A level I know a bunch of kids are moving over the that squad for the 2018 season so they are going to surprise a lot of people.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
100% correct...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Can anyone provide a little feedback about the Yorktown Ballers summer travel program? Tryouts?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
No tryout. Invite only
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No tryout. Invite only


How do they find kids if its invite only? Do they speak with coaches from around Westchester for recommendations?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No tryout. Invite only



Why would you care? Team gets spanked regularly
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I might be wrong and am not from that town, but I believe the Ballers are largely a Yorktown based program. My sense was most if not all players live in Yorktown.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Mostly Yorktown kids and they may not win every game at youth level in pretty sure the HS team does its share of spanking.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I saw a more than a couple Chargers helmets at Primetime's tryout yesterday.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I saw a more than a couple Chargers helmets at Primetime's tryout yesterday.


I don't think that is a surprise. . . . The uncertainty of the Chargers folding has left most players/teams divided among other viable options (Eclipse, Express CT, 2-Way, PrimeTime). Players need a place to play, so the card shuffling begins. . . .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Express North turnout at Harvey was very high yesterday for 23s and 24s. Seemed like a number of kids from both Westchester and Conn. Had to be close to 80+ for each. difficult to get a good look at all kids but manged well overall.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North turnout at Harvey was very high yesterday for 23s and 24s. Seemed like a number of kids from both Westchester and Conn. Had to be close to 80+ for each. difficult to get a good look at all kids but manged well overall.


Honestly, you may be the only person there that thinks it was well managed. It was the worst run tryout ever. Clearly Schreiber has his team picked already. Because you can't get a good feel for talent playing a bull [lacrosse] scrimmage. Any kid that plays on the B team is making a big mistake
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I thought express north was a B team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
That makes some sense - but really after the 3 previous tryouts - already having gone through skills, six on six etc. - coaches have a decent sense of who can play and really do need to see how kids run full field. Maybe some more time in smaller groups would have helped but full field scrimmage tells you a lot as well.

Only way to tell if team was already picked will be to see if new players join and others who played last year don't make it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Express North's A teams are B teams, their B teams are actually C/D teams! Don't be fooled!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North's A teams are B teams, their B teams are actually C/D teams! Don't be fooled!


And PT is the greatest! Yeah. Drop the mic......

Sad.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North's A teams are B teams, their B teams are actually C/D teams! Don't be fooled!


In the universe of lacrosse. These teams are B teams. Some are A. But in Weschester they are A. It's all relative.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That makes some sense - but really after the 3 previous tryouts - already having gone through skills, six on six etc. - coaches have a decent sense of who can play and really do need to see how kids run full field. Maybe some more time in smaller groups would have helped but full field scrimmage tells you a lot as well.

Only way to tell if team was already picked will be to see if new players join and others who played last year don't make it.


I'm not a fan of the full field considering how many kids there was. But for a small handful of studs, hard to get seen. For the 21s it was readily apparent that one field was the kids they were considering and one was not.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Anyone have a straight answer on how many teams will be in Katonah and Westport at 2023? Saw some good players on one field yesterday but no way is that enough for 2 AA squads.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have a straight answer on how many teams will be in Katonah and Westport at 2023? Saw some good players on one field yesterday but no way is that enough for 2 AA squads.


And THAT is the million dollar question they must be wrestling with at this very moment. Too many different tryout dates offered, too many different locations, too much uncertainty about how many teams and at what level, no clarity on how players will be assigned to the different teams (by the tryout they registered for? by where they live? by where they are needed based upon balancing teams by position?) and of course the wildcard that many players have already been offered spots on other clubs (Eclipse, 2-Way) or are signed up to try out for other clubs (PT, Predators).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I don't think they know or will for a while. Too many CT kids left w/o a home initially went Eclipse/2-Way/PT only to probably come back afterward so no way to know. My kid was put on Westport as that's where we registered but sounded like he could be moved if needed. We missed the first of 4 tryouts and never saw a coach for our grade other than the Katonah coach so who knows whats going on?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Having kids go to multiple tryout locations multiple timesis a way to try and bring 4-6 studs to beef up Katonah and validate having multiple a/b teams for $
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
On that note, I would strongly recommend any parents out there to vet these programs solidly to learn if they are really trying out for the desired spots on the squad.

I saw this last year with a "B" league outfit, where a coach heavily encouraged us to tryout and out of respect, we did. It was clear in the evening after the 1st practice when they sent out the 2nd day tryout call-back list that they had no interest in new middies or attack.

Is my post motivated by sour grapes .... not in the least. However, the tryout was the same weekend as for an "A" division club 2 day tryout, which was my son's first choice and for which my son made the squad.
Happy ending, sure..... But here is the thing; what if my son got injured at this useless "B" team tryout? He probably would not have made his first choice team..

Vetting these teams' tryouts out is really important.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What I notice is some kids trying out for clubs where they are wasting their time and parents' money. Ok, you want to give your kid a shot but if you are in middle school then you better be able to throw and catch with both hands equally well or close to it and be in decent shape. If you have good stick skills, strong, and fast then the coaches will notice you at the tryouts. Parents need to do a better job of keeping expectations tempered and making sure their kids are putting time in at wall ball and becoming stronger/better.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I don't think they know or will for a while. Too many CT kids left w/o a home initially went Eclipse/2-Way/PT only to probably come back afterward so no way to know. My kid was put on Westport as that's where we registered but sounded like he could be moved if needed. We missed the first of 4 tryouts and never saw a coach for our grade other than the Katonah coach so who knows whats going on?


When did you find out about team placement? I thought announcements have not been made yet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
At registration we are asked if we would be flexible where we played.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The never ending card game that is known as 'Express'.

I am completely amazed that information has not flowed from Long Island to Westchester.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Makes sense. Schreiber from Long Island. He and Channy are cut from same cloth. Although Schreiber may want to shed a few pounds. Guy is a walking heart attack.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Sounds like some people are getting nervous..... should have worked your boys harder, or better yet have them go out for math team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
[quote=Anonymous]Sounds like some people are getting nervous..... should have worked your boys harder, or better yet have them go out for math team.[/quote

Tell that to bill gates, mark zuckerberg you moron. Go read a book with your kid J-off.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Who did those two play for? I never heard of them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
In all seriousness, does anyone know whether any players (Katonah or Westport) for any graduation year have been notified about team placement yet?

Understandably, there are several grades with multiple levels (AA/A) in two different locations so will take a long time to complete the communication, but wondering whether it has even begun yet.

Sincere responses rather than more disparaging comments about Express program please.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
In all seriousness, does anyone know whether any players (Katonah or Westport) for any graduation year have been notified about team placement yet?

Understandably, there are several grades with multiple levels (AA/A) in two different locations so will take a long time to complete the communication, but wondering whether it has even begun yet.

Sincere responses rather than more disparaging comments about Express program please.


Apparently an email was sent out around 11 am today that they would start notifying tomorrow morning but would take longer for others. For whatever reason that email did not go to everyone, not sure why.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2023 Katonah team has been picked. 1 team. They are still deciding how many teams and who for Westport 2023.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2023 Katonah team has been picked. 1 team. They are still deciding how many teams and who for Westport 2023.


Apparently teams trickling out? Anyone have any insight?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Here is a question. Why would anyone want to play on a second team in any age bracket when you still could go to Predators, warriors and 91 TS? Once your a B player, it's tough to break that
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is a question. Why would anyone want to play on a second team in any age bracket when you still could go to Predators, warriors and 91 TS? Once your a B player, it's tough to break that


From a personal standpoint, I would say it depends upon the player. My oldest would never want to play on a second team, so we would decline and try to secure a spot on another team which was the first (or only) team for that organization. Our second son though is not the same level skill-wise OR drive-wise, and is quite happy playing on any team simply for the experience and the camaraderie.

Of course, not every family is willing/able to play $3-4K to play on a second team merely for the benefit of camaraderie.

Some will bank on the slim chance that there is an injury on the top team and hope their son might get pulled up, which may sway them toward the second team for Express North, while others may feel like their son will get better development from potentially practicing with the top team (assuming top and second teams practice together) which would not happen at Preds, Warriors or 91 Tri-state.

Timing is also a factor, with LIEN down payments due tomorrow ($800 - not cheap) but other tryouts not even scheduled to begin until later (Press earliest I believe which is next weekend). Clubs are well aware, hence they Friday deadline with a hefty down payment. Unless you are 100% confident you will get a spot, you are likely to commit, even if unhappy, which Schreiber is well aware of.

Some on the top teams may be able to get an extension, but many will not be able to as I am told there are many players who have not been notified yet, which could mean they are not getting a spot at all but could also mean they are being put aside as "backup" for players who are higher on the depth chart in case they bail.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Anyone here anything for Westport teams yet?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is a question. Why would anyone want to play on a second team in any age bracket when you still could go to Predators, warriors and 91 TS? Once your a B player, it's tough to break that


From a personal standpoint, I would say it depends upon the player. My oldest would never want to play on a second team, so we would decline and try to secure a spot on another team which was the first (or only) team for that organization. Our second son though is not the same level skill-wise OR drive-wise, and is quite happy playing on any team simply for the experience and the camaraderie.

Of course, not every family is willing/able to play $3-4K to play on a second team merely for the benefit of camaraderie.

Some will bank on the slim chance that there is an injury on the top team and hope their son might get pulled up, which may sway them toward the second team for Express North, while others may feel like their son will get better development from potentially practicing with the top team (assuming top and second teams practice together) which would not happen at Preds, Warriors or 91 Tri-state.

Timing is also a factor, with LIEN down payments due tomorrow ($800 - not cheap) but other tryouts not even scheduled to begin until later (Press earliest I believe which is next weekend). Clubs are well aware, hence they Friday deadline with a hefty down payment. Unless you are 100% confident you will get a spot, you are likely to commit, even if unhappy, which Schreiber is well aware of.

Some on the top teams may be able to get an extension, but many will not be able to as I am told there are many players who have not been notified yet, which could mean they are not getting a spot at all but could also mean they are being put aside as "backup" for players who are higher on the depth chart in case they bail.


I agree that it depends on the player, but it also depends on the team. The "second" team at one organization may be better (better coaching, players, tournaments, etc) than the top, or sole, team at another organization. Or maybe it isn't. Each team will be different. Parents shouldn't worry about whether a team is the second team at an organization. They should just vet the team vs other options for their kid. If the second team is the best option, than that is the direction they should go. But I do not think that a team's status as a "second" team, in and of itself, means anything.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I see all these discussions about contentious relationships with teams and I'm, frankly, surprised that anyone would put up with it. My son has played for two Westchester based clubs, Preds and 2Way, and I've been wonderfully impressed with the coaching and the direction of both clubs. McCall and Earl are two great instructors and we've found them to be honest and lovely. There really is no reason to be angry at the club when these guys are here in your backyard.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Has anyone heard anything from Eclipse since the tryouts?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Have heard good things about both 2 way and preds but could anyone tell me if they compete against the so called A clubs in CT/Long island? I don't see them much at the competitive tourneys.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has anyone heard anything from Eclipse since the tryouts?


Not sure what you mean. Rosters were posted, uniform orders were requested. Done deal.
Rosters have now been taken down.
Will not hear anything else for those rostered until September I am guessing....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Word is eclipse won't make it to Denver next year.
They are a great B club.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Have heard good things about both 2 way and preds but could anyone tell me if they compete against the so called A clubs in CT/Long island? I don't see them much at the competitive tourneys.



No they do not.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Have heard good things about both 2 way and preds but could anyone tell me if they compete against the so called A clubs in CT/Long island? I don't see them much at the competitive tourneys.


Both clubs tend to be pretty good but not as concerned with following model of teams like PT, Eclipse, Express etc. that play in same tourneys and league, rely on holdbacks, really push to create college recruits. Both will pop up at random LI "A" tourneys but then some random one in NJ or something. Think they go where they want as long as the players are happy and aren't too concerned with outside noise. They brag about being elite or competing against the best like everyone else. But also could change as these programs grow and if they want to challenge for things like WSYL.

As for competing versus A clubs in CT, only Eclipse would count as "A" in using LI terms. Maybe new Express Westport. Preds and 2Way if defined as "B" would beat every other club in CT in most grades.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Preds played in Platinum Cup, and Philly Summer Invitational. Good A level competition.(Clams/Madlax/PT/Looneys/NXT). Always put a number of kids into high end showcases.
PT plays in the big tourneys if that's important to you.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Have heard good things about both 2 way and preds but could anyone tell me if they compete against the so called A clubs in CT/Long island? I don't see them much at the competitive tourneys.


Both clubs tend to be pretty good but not as concerned with following model of teams like PT, Eclipse, Express etc. that play in same tourneys and league, rely on holdbacks, really push to create college recruits. Both will pop up at random LI "A" tourneys but then some random one in NJ or something. Think they go where they want as long as the players are happy and aren't too concerned with outside noise. They brag about being elite or competing against the best like everyone else. But also could change as these programs grow and if they want to challenge for things like WSYL.

As for competing versus A clubs in CT, only Eclipse would count as "A" in using LI terms. Maybe new Express Westport. Preds and 2Way if defined as "B" would beat every other club in CT in most grades.


A lot depends on what age group you are discussing.

Regarding Express Westport/Fairfield... Does anyone really know how good that is going to be?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Express CT is just Chargers with a new name. It will be a joke and in my humble opinion, a waste of time and money. But if little Johnny (and his parents) wants to tell his 2 friends that he plays for express then go for it. Total money grab and you are kidding yourself if you think otherwise. $3k+ for some b team. Forget about it, join 2 way or preds if you can.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Warriors is the way to go. The coaching is incredible and I am hearing over 200 kids trying out on the 27th. Savastano are great educators that know how to coach the boys up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Nick and vin Savastano are going to pick up an insane amount of quality kids this year. Express north is a disaster, no matter what Schreiber says, Playing on a B team when the AA team is a B team as far as lacrosse concerned is not the way to go. You will always be an afterthought to the most dis organized lax director around. Go to Warriors, predators or 91 TS. And get the coaching and attention you deserve for your money
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is a question. Why would anyone want to play on a second team in any age bracket when you still could go to Predators, warriors and 91 TS? Once your a B player, it's tough to break that


From a personal standpoint, I would say it depends upon the player. My oldest would never want to play on a second team, so we would decline and try to secure a spot on another team which was the first (or only) team for that organization. Our second son though is not the same level skill-wise OR drive-wise, and is quite happy playing on any team simply for the experience and the camaraderie.

Of course, not every family is willing/able to play $3-4K to play on a second team merely for the benefit of camaraderie.

Some will bank on the slim chance that there is an injury on the top team and hope their son might get pulled up, which may sway them toward the second team for Express North, while others may feel like their son will get better development from potentially practicing with the top team (assuming top and second teams practice together) which would not happen at Preds, Warriors or 91 Tri-state.

Timing is also a factor, with LIEN down payments due tomorrow ($800 - not cheap) but other tryouts not even scheduled to begin until later (Press earliest I believe which is next weekend). Clubs are well aware, hence they Friday deadline with a hefty down payment. Unless you are 100% confident you will get a spot, you are likely to commit, even if unhappy, which Schreiber is well aware of.

Some on the top teams may be able to get an extension, but many will not be able to as I am told there are many players who have not been notified yet, which could mean they are not getting a spot at all but could also mean they are being put aside as "backup" for players who are higher on the depth chart in case they bail.


Are you all up in Westchester paying 3+K for club lacrosse??
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Nick and vin Savastano are going to pick up an insane amount of quality kids this year. Express north is a disaster, no matter what Schreiber says, Playing on a B team when the AA team is a B team as far as lacrosse concerned is not the way to go. You will always be an afterthought to the most dis organized lax director around. Go to Warriors, predators or 91 TS. And get the coaching and attention you deserve for your money


I have to laugh. It's so obvious you didn't get the placement you wanted for your son.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I think Preds, 3Dtristate Warriors are the only tryouts still to come.
ExpressNorth got a lot unhappy 91TS boys with the lure of AA and A teams.Schrieber got greedy seeing the numbers at their tryouts hence multiple teams, can't imagine anyone being happy at the end of next summer.

All the programs in Westchester are getting stronger each year. PrimeTime being the most competitive. Warriors have the Savastano's coaching so given time developing, their younger teams will be strong by HS. 2Way plays in B/C level tourneys but as they get stronger I'm sure you'll start seeing them in the more competive tournaments. 91TS has to up their program to attract better talent or they will always be a catch all for the kids not making any other team.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Nick and vin Savastano are going to pick up an insane amount of quality kids this year. Express north is a disaster, no matter what Schreiber says, Playing on a B team when the AA team is a B team as far as lacrosse concerned is not the way to go. You will always be an afterthought to the most dis organized lax director around. Go to Warriors, predators or 91 TS. And get the coaching and attention you deserve for your money


Schreiber is a lot of things. Organized is not one of them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Express North is a solid program that offers kids at every level to play summer lax.
The 2018 & 2019 teams are very good. 2020AA is solid possibly top 20 team in country
The 2021AA team is good and will be much better next summer. They picked up several new bodies and will be much improved. 2022 & 2023 are works in progress.

Chris Schreiber has committed more 2018's and 2019's than Primetime. It's all about results and Schreiber gets them as does Daniello from Primetime. Let's see what 2way, 91 tri state, eclipse, predators and Warriors can do in the coming years.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Lets stop with the horse [lacrosse] that Schreiber committed kids......the kids committed themselves, along with their parents and HS coaches. He trys to sell that BS to unknowing parents like a snake oil salesman. Committed means nothing more then going to college, he trys to make it sound like they have scholarships which isn't the case, they are verbals which really mean nothing until they get the right SAT/ACT scores and a good GPA. 95+% of those kids would have gotten into those schools from any other program. Stop drinking the Kool Aid......
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Lets stop with the horse [lacrosse] that Schreiber committed kids......the kids committed themselves, along with their parents and HS coaches. He trys to sell that BS to unknowing parents like a snake oil salesman. Committed means nothing more then going to college, he trys to make it sound like they have scholarships which isn't the case, they are verbals which really mean nothing until they get the right SAT/ACT scores and a good GPA. 95+% of those kids would have gotten into those schools from any other program. Stop drinking the Kool Aid......


Isn't that case case with every program?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The talent at the 2nd PT tryout date was topflight. Really tight stick-work.

Sure you had a few rockstars going coast to coast to shoot at the scrimmage, but what impressed me was the amount of good sold give and go passes and tight feed passes that happened between the kids with different helmets.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
You are an idiot. You obviously have an axe to grind.
It's the clubs job to coach top players and pit them
vs top competition. All directors, including Schreiber
have the connections IF your kid has the talent and grades.
It is ultimately up to the college coaches. Don't be pissed that
he was brutally honest and said your kid wasn't skilled enough
for the AA team. And make no mistake, they are AA teams. All the other negative banter an this site is from disgruntled parents. Nobody is perfect, but if your kid has the mustard and your with Schreiber, it's a good place to be.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
When will PT tryout results be announced?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What a joke, nobody wants the Savastanos in Section 1 so they coach C level lacrosse at Kennedy. If your kid sucks go to Warriors, so tired of them promoting themselves on this board, it's REALLY bad Lax and it's not going to change.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When will PT tryout results be announced?


Wednesday
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Some kids know already but notice goes out mon or tues.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What a joke, nobody wants the Savastanos in Section 1 so they coach C level lacrosse at Kennedy. If your kid sucks go to Warriors, so tired of them promoting themselves on this board, it's REALLY bad Lax and it's not going to change.


Why the hatred for the Savastano's? Do they sell themselves as elite, or the best? They will grow each and every year and teach your child. It's really that simple.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Take a look around section 1 and the coaches. The Savastano's have an incredible record from JJ, Brewster, Hen Hud. Wherever they go they win..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
How do you explain since the Savastano's left JJ Yorktown has beat them 15 in a row.

The Sav's beat, Yorktown 4 in a row and one was the Class A section finals. I think Marr, Carney are happy the Sav's are not coaching at J.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Nick and vin Savastano are going to pick up an insane amount of quality kids this year. Express north is a disaster, no matter what Schreiber says, Playing on a B team when the AA team is a B team as far as lacrosse concerned is not the way to go. You will always be an afterthought to the most dis organized lax director around. Go to Warriors, predators or 91 TS. And get the coaching and attention you deserve for your money


Schreiber is a lot of things. Organized is not one of them.


Loud, crass, controlling egomaniac. Not organized. Are people attracted to the Express name? New coaches seem to be introduced each season, not sure if they are old cronies of his, new Prep affiliations or what. Some coaches show up to one or two tournaments. Stick with the programs that have coaches who are dedicated to the players. Present, committed to their success, caring.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
This response is simply not true. Strong clubs like Express North and Primetime are the primary influencers in the recruiting process. Of course it all starts with the kids but the clubs in many cases have been working with the kids for years before high school.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Schreiber may not be the right coach for every kid but to suggest he doesn't care about the kids is simple not true. If you ever get a chance to talk to some of the 2018 parents they can give you a good read.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Lets stop with the horse [lacrosse] that Schreiber committed kids......the kids committed themselves, along with their parents and HS coaches. He trys to sell that BS to unknowing parents like a snake oil salesman. Committed means nothing more then going to college, he trys to make it sound like they have scholarships which isn't the case, they are verbals which really mean nothing until they get the right SAT/ACT scores and a good GPA. 95+% of those kids would have gotten into those schools from any other program. Stop drinking the Kool Aid......


While it's true that the talent of the players is ultimately what gets them into a college I think that you are down playing the role of the coach or club director. You need to be on a competitive team that attends competitive tournaments and with a coach/director who has the right connections to get the colleges interested and help facilitate the commitments of their players.

There are 3 players from a CT town who played for a club team in the area but were not happy so they all moved together to Express North. Within a year of joining their competitive team with a connected coach/director they were all committed. Coincidence? I don't think so.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Bottom line is all these club team directors think they are the ones getting the kids into college. This is a slap in the face to the head coaches of teams like yorktown, bronxville, new cannan etc.

Botton line if you are that good you will get to the big college. These club directors pray on the people chasing the dream and then when 90% don't make it they steer them to div. 3

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bottom line is all these club team directors think they are the ones getting the kids into college. This is a slap in the face to the head coaches of teams like yorktown, bronxville, new cannan etc.

Botton line if you are that good you will get to the big college. These club directors pray on the people chasing the dream and then when 90% don't make it they steer them to div. 3



That may be true. But programs like express, pt, eclipse etc provide a forum for the best kids to compete together in front of college coaches . It is no different than taking AP classes in high school. Not every kid gets into an Ivy League school, but it brings the brightest kids together and hopefully they feed off each other. Iron sharpens iron, man sharpens man. Of course if you are Paul Rabil, it doesn't matter where you play, but college coaches can only get to so many tourneys, watch so many high light videos. And quite frankly not so sure they care to watch highlight videos of 2 b teams playing each other in the middle of June when they can watch 91 Long Island play some powerhouse from Baltimore. On the other side of this. If you take a good lax player, maybe he is middle to lower level D1. And that kid can use lacrosse to get into a nesc ac school, that is a home run. I would take bowdoin, middlebury, tufts, Amherst over many many d1 schools from an academic perspective. Leveraging athletics to give you an edge into a quality institution is still a Win.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bottom line is all these club team directors think they are the ones getting the kids into college. This is a slap in the face to the head coaches of teams like yorktown, bronxville, new cannan etc.

Botton line if you are that good you will get to the big college. These club directors pray on the people chasing the dream and then when 90% don't make it they steer them to div. 3



A lot of these kids were done before they had even hit a varsity field so HS coach had little input / influence.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Spot on.

Happy to see my kids at NESCAC school playing lacrosse. Quite an achievement.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bottom line is all these club team directors think they are the ones getting the kids into college. This is a slap in the face to the head coaches of teams like yorktown, bronxville, new cannan etc.

Botton line if you are that good you will get to the big college. These club directors pray on the people chasing the dream and then when 90% don't make it they steer them to div. 3



A lot of these kids were done before they had even hit a varsity field so HS coach had little input / influence.


This is true & completely negates the blanket statements above. There are rule changes this year- yes. But your blanket varsity coach statement is moot. A kid playing competitive club ball is getting much more frequency exposure to college coaches than just through his HS varsity coach. Tournaments with club teams are a much more cost efficient way for college coaches to see their prospects from different hometowns.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bottom line is all these club team directors think they are the ones getting the kids into college. This is a slap in the face to the head coaches of teams like yorktown, bronxville, new cannan etc.

Botton line if you are that good you will get to the big college. These club directors pray on the people chasing the dream and then when 90% don't make it they steer them to div. 3



What wrong with D III ? Some are better schools than DI
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I heard PT rosters are out, but nothing is posted. Is this true?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bottom line is all these club team directors think they are the ones getting the kids into college. This is a slap in the face to the head coaches of teams like yorktown, bronxville, new cannan etc.

Botton line if you are that good you will get to the big college. These club directors pray on the people chasing the dream and then when 90% don't make it they steer them to div. 3



What wrong with D III ? Some are better schools than DI


Better both academically AND lacrosse-wise!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I heard PT rosters are out, but nothing is posted. Is this true?


Which year(s)?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2019/2020/2021
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2019/2020/2021

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I heard PT rosters are out, but nothing is posted. Is this true?


Which year(s)?


Yes, out just not posted on website yet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2019/2020/2021

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I heard PT rosters are out, but nothing is posted. Is this true?


Which year(s)?


Yes, out just not posted on website yet.


So, if a family did not receive an email directly from PT earlier today, then their son was not selected for a team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Crickets.....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
No news is not good news in this case. Check website and look for your number.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No news is not good news in this case. Check website and look for your number.


Nothing is posted yet......
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Same for younger years too? 2023/2024?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2019/2020/2021

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I heard PT rosters are out, but nothing is posted. Is this true?


Which year(s)?


Yes, out just not posted on website yet.


So, if a family did not receive an email directly from PT earlier today, then their son was not selected for a team?


If that's case you are hoping some of the selected kids decline the invite and stay with their former team or others that he tried out for.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Same for younger years too? 2023/2024?


Has anyone received word for those years?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Anyone get a fall Westport Express schedule yet?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone get a fall Westport Express schedule yet?


Ha! Those will not come out for quite a while. . . . You need to have a committed team before you can have a practice schedule.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I thought it was done already? What's left?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Expecting quite a scene at SUNY Purchase this weekend between Preds and 91TS tryouts. Good luck to all the boys trying out! It will be interesting if a lot of familiar faces from Express and PT tryouts attend. I'm predicting Preds will have the most attendees in the area of any club tryouts. I bet they could get close to 100 each for 5th-7th grades.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
PT 2023 had about 95 kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Expecting quite a scene at SUNY Purchase this weekend between Preds and 91TS tryouts. Good luck to all the boys trying out! It will be interesting if a lot of familiar faces from Express and PT tryouts attend. I'm predicting Preds will have the most attendees in the area of any club tryouts. I bet they could get close to 100 each for 5th-7th grades.


I'm curious. Why you think the predators will have the most
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
95 kids x $95= no longer fun
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Was there a lot of turnover on the PT teams?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Im curious why these tryouts are so late. Both are good programs that would seem to benefit from having earlier tryout dates that better synch up with PT eclipse Ex north
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Im curious why these tryouts are so late. Both are good programs that would seem to benefit from having earlier tryout dates that better synch up with PT eclipse Ex north


Pt and express tryouts are over and they will pick up the kids that couldn't make either team. At least at the younger ages
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Any idea how the Express North teams are shaping up? Was the 2023 team good this past summer and was there any turnover? How do they compare to Prime Time and Eclipse?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Pt 2023 is the best of the 23,s locally. Based on scores. Eclipse is best 24 last year. Followed by PT. Pt 22 the best of the 3 and not sure after that
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Express north lost to PT twice this summer, it was 15-1 or something the last time.
PT picked up at least one attackman at tryouts from express north.
Eclipse didn't do that well either against PT. Not sure how they can carry 2 2023 teams and one just for Denver.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Anyone know anything about Swashbucklers in CT?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Swashbucklers is run by Bill Rexford who is 1 of the all time great people in the game of Lacrosse. Tryouts are this weekend.

Here's the link: https://sites.google.com/view/swashbucklerslacrosse

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Was for 2021. Daniello got rid of the John Jay kids. No fields no play
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Was for 2021. Daniello got rid of the John Jay kids. No fields no play


Can you be more specific please? What do you mean no fields, no play
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express north lost to PT twice this summer, it was 15-1 or something the last time.
PT picked up at least one attackman at tryouts from express north.
Eclipse didn't do that well either against PT. Not sure how they can carry 2 2023 teams and one just for Denver.


Is this all just 2023 you are talking about? Bc since you're comparing PT to all the local clubs- I distinctly recall a 2020 Preds win against PT this summer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yes, I was replying to above question specifically regading the 23 express north team compared to PT and eclipse. There are many other examples of PT teams losing to local clubs for sure.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express north lost to PT twice this summer, it was 15-1 or something the last time.
PT picked up at least one attackman at tryouts from express north.
Eclipse didn't do that well either against PT. Not sure how they can carry 2 2023 teams and one just for Denver.


Is this all just 2023 you are talking about? Bc since you're comparing PT to all the local clubs- I distinctly recall a 2020 Preds win against PT this summer.


You are correct 2020 PT is the weakest team in the program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I know it's a bit early to really know but how did the Westchester/CT 2026 team shake out? Is there 1 program better than any others?

My son is playing for Express North but I have no idea if the team is going to be good.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I am hearing that 91 TS program has better talent at the younger ages. You might want to check them out as well. I believe tryouts are tomorrow
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I think Preds will have most at tryouts because:
A. They have a good brand, solid reputation, & won a lot of games in summer
B. Have a great summer clinic and camp that draws high numbers
C. Timing is good and think a lot of families around now
D. Many other programs are done with tryouts so kids who didn't find a home have Preds circled
E. Some players who made other teams will still tryout here to keep options open
F. Great weather and location

PS- PT getting 95 kids for 1 grade impressive and not surprising-- the best will draw well. Preds is a good team and accessible for most. PT is aspirational for most.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Mike bocklet runs a great program, But they only attend B/C tourneys. Talent is average to below average
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Any one figure out if 2023 Express North is stronger in Westport or Katonah for 2023?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any one figure out if 2023 Express North is stronger in Westport or Katonah for 2023?



Schreiber will make sure katonah is stronger
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
95 at try out is BS there were 71 the first and 60 and change the second. It's called marketing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
95 at try out is BS there were 71 the first and 60 and change the second. It's called marketing.


For what grade?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I was there 95 kids seem correct over 50 middies alone tried out. Second tryout was about 80 kids as some boys joined other teams before second tryout.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
95 at try out is BS there were 71 the first and 60 and change the second. It's called marketing.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
95 at try out is BS there were 71 the first and 60 and change the second. It's called marketing.


For what grade?

2023
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
[quote=Anonymous]Was for 2021. Daniello got rid of the John Jay kids. No fields no play[/quote

You are an uninformed idiot, his teams still practice at John Jay
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I hear Daniello and Pt will be the last year at JJ. The school is taking away the fields and I hear he cannot coach the Varsity team at JJ any longer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I hear Daniello and Pt will be the last year at JJ. The school is taking away the fields and I hear he cannot coach the Varsity team at JJ any longer.


I hear your kid got cut from pt and your hoping daniello doesn't coach the hs anymore because you know your son won't play
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
95 at try out is BS there were 71 the first and 60 and change the second. It's called marketing.


For what grade?

2023


Did prime time 2023 team really lose that many players to express?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
PT beats ballers Ytown beats JJ at HS level. It's not rocket science
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I've come to realize club lacrosse is a bargain.

https://youtu.be/9ATwFkYpVys

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
[lacrosse] yeah. All the loyalty the John Jay parents showed Nick D was for not. So why should we go to bat for him with the school district. He cares about Fairfield County kids more than the Westchester kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
So let me get this straight. Just because you go to John jay, you think you should automatically make prime time? Why don't you get off your [lacrosse] and practice more. This is travel lax. Not jjyl. It should be no surprise that jj kids are struggling to make pt if you look at how badly they did in town lax.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
How were predators 2023 tryouts. How many kids, Was it well run?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Predators 2023? How many kids and was it well run? Kids get enough reps?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[lacrosse] yeah. All the loyalty the John Jay parents showed Nick D was for not. So why should we go to bat for him with the school district. He cares about Fairfield County kids more than the Westchester kids.


Every program no covets the older holdback player because of the physical advantage. Those kids come from CT predominantly. Its a business first, second and third.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I'm curious how many returning John jay kids got cut from various pt teams as well as how many are left.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
How many Fox Lane kids are left on express north? Isn't that where Schneider is from you idiot.... Who cares...PT is not John Jay, but just because your kid got cut you have an axe to grind...loser
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How many Fox Lane kids are left on express north? Isn't that where Schneider is from you idiot.... Who cares...PT is not John Jay, but just because your kid got cut you have an axe to grind...loser


I could not agree more. However. Don't compare Schreiber to daniello, the former is walking heart attack. And actually does not cut his Bedford youth lax kids even though he should . Travel lax is just that. It should not matter where your from
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How many Fox Lane kids are left on express north? Isn't that where Schneider is from you idiot.... Who cares...PT is not John Jay, but just because your kid got cut you have an axe to grind...loser


I could not agree more. However. Don't compare Schreiber to daniello, the former is walking heart attack. And actually does not cut his Bedford youth lax kids even though he should . Travel lax is just that. It should not matter where your from


Politics and "who knows who" plays a part in some decisions, I'm noticing those questionable roster decisions are becoming much more frequent. At some point you just have to do the right thing and choose the most deserving players. Of the two programs, I think Daniello runs the more organized and transparent organization. I attended both tryouts and the chaos at the Express tryout was ridiculous and parents are tiring of the coaching merry go round. Can you guess which program my boys play for? Its not PT (anymore).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
So if Schrieber or Daniello keep certain families because they are friends or they like them...guess what....look in the mirror and realize that you are a [lacrosse] and your kid sucks that's why your kid got cut. Move on....they run the programs they can do whatever they want! Maybe if you weren't such a winy big mouth your kid might still be on the team.....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Kids get cut for many many reasons. Pt takes the best kids, that's it. If your not playing box, or constantly hitting the wall, strength training, extra clinics, camps etc. you shouldn't be complaining , it is extremely competetive out there!!! The days of just playing 4 months a year is not enough
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The youth director for ** should be ashamed. This is why I think he will be fired from the district by the end of the month.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Kids get cut for many many reasons. Pt takes the best kids, that's it. If your not playing box, or constantly hitting the wall, strength training, extra clinics, camps etc. you shouldn't be complaining , it is extremely competetive out there!!! The days of just playing 4 months a year is not enough

With

If you believe any club takes the best kids plain and simple then your a fool.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Your a moron, why do JJ parents think it's their right to play PT . It's not town lacrosse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Can anyone shed some light on the best girls clubs in the area? There is so much information about the Long Island clubs for girls, but not much out there about the various girls clubs in Westchester or CT.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I thought Preds 2023 were well run. Id estimate ~100 kids were there. Kids were broken up in to enough manageable groups with enough evaluators for the program to get a good idea of the boys skills. Hard part is, did my son do enough to get noticed and was that enough to unseat a returning player. Since the 2023 team was pretty good last year its hard to know how many spots were actually open.

Short version, imho, great turn out, looked well run, music was a nice added feature and the weather was perfect.

Question- when did they say we would be notified? Is it email and phone call if offered a spot? No communication if no email or call?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Rosters already set and emailed
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
oh well, I guess that answers our question about doing enough to make the squad. Is 2024 set and out also?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Without causing controversy can someone rank the top 5 teams in each age bracket for Westchester/Fairfield Counties?

2024-2019
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Really? What is the purpose beside just "stirring the pot" !!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2024

Eclipse
Pt
Express north
Predators
2 way
91
Warriors
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2019 Express, PT
2020 Eclipse, Express
2021 Eclipse, PT
2022 PT
2023 PT
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought Preds 2023 were well run. Id estimate ~100 kids were there. Kids were broken up in to enough manageable groups with enough evaluators for the program to get a good idea of the boys skills. Hard part is, did my son do enough to get noticed and was that enough to unseat a returning player. Since the 2023 team was pretty good last year its hard to know how many spots were actually open.

Short version, imho, great turn out, looked well run, music was a nice added feature and the weather was perfect.

Question- when did they say we would be notified? Is it email and phone call if offered a spot? No communication if no email or call?

How much will PT 2023 be impacted by defectors to express
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What kids went to express?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
[quote=Anonymous]Without causing controversy can someone rank the top 5 teams in each age bracket for Westchester/Fairfield Counties?

2024-2019[/quote
Opinions were shared few posts ago ...
2023:
1. PT
2. Eclipse
3. Express North
4. Preds
5. 2way
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Without causing controversy can someone rank the top 5 teams in each age bracket for Westchester/Fairfield Counties?

2024-2019


2021
1. PT
2. Eclipse
3. Express North
4. 2Way
5. Predators
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Predators tryout results being posted tonight?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
LOL........
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Without causing controversy can someone rank the top 5 teams in each age bracket for Westchester/Fairfield Counties?

2024-2019


2021
1. PT
2. Eclipse
3. Express North
4. 2Way
5. Predators

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Why LOL?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I have two sons and I would like to see who runs the winning programs. When talking about coaching it's too much of a persons opinion. I think it's clear Primetime and Eclipse appear to be the better organizations in this area with the above posts.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have two sons and I would like to see who runs the winning programs. When talking about coaching it's too much of a persons opinion. I think it's clear Primetime and Eclipse appear to be the better organizations in this area with the above posts.



Is this a question or statement? Your post is antagonist, looking to stir the pot. Where is it clear these 2 are the better organizations as you've said above? I'm not disagreeing with you-but you were very specific on your criteria, so you need to back it up. Have you looked at Tourney Machine to compare each of the programs' records from their 5-6 tournaments for each grad year? Is that where your statement came from? Or are you basing your statements on others opinions?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Anyone know for certain how many teams at each location for Express North 2023? We got our team just curious.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have two sons and I would like to see who runs the winning programs. When talking about coaching it's too much of a persons opinion. I think it's clear Primetime and Eclipse appear to be the better organizations in this area with the above posts.



I don't get it. You don't want to talk about coaching because such just leads to people expressing their subjective opinions, but you want to talk about which organization is the best because such is void of person's subjective opinions????
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Why not ask the guy you are sending the fat check to? He might know how many teams if he responds at all. Now go get your shine box.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone know for certain how many teams at each location for Express North 2023? We got our team just curious.


It looks as though there are two teams in Katonah (Pearsall and Hallinan) and one team in CT (Brameier) for 2023.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone know for certain how many teams at each location for Express North 2023? We got our team just curious.


It looks as though there are two teams in Katonah (Pearsall and Hallinan) and one team in CT (Brameier) for 2023.


Hallinan is also coaching 2021?!

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone know for certain how many teams at each location for Express North 2023? We got our team just curious.


It looks as though there are two teams in Katonah (Pearsall and Hallinan) and one team in CT (Brameier) for 2023.


Hallinan is also coaching 2021?!



Yes - a few of the head coaches are coaching more than one grade level. . . .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Coaching multiple grade levels? How is that going to work when there is a conflict at a tournament?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Coaching multiple grade levels? How is that going to work when there is a conflict at a tournament?


I would assume that only 2021 will have November tournaments (not 2023), but for summer, guess that an assistant coach would oversee one of the teams in the case of conflict. Ideally though, the parent club would request non-conflicting schedules for those affected teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
With all the players trying out from CT surprised they didn't make a second team in Westport unless Brameier and Schreiber didn't want one?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
So did all Warriors get a bunch of good players this year with all the shuffling of clubs this summer? On level with TS 91 now?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
TS 91 upgraded big time. Not sure if Warriors at that level but they upgraded as well
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Not being mean when I say, I hope the Sav's are shooting higher than TS 91. Even their select teams play C level tourneys
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Anybody have insight on any large shift of players from team-to-team at the 2024,2023,2022 ages between Express North/CT, PT, Eclipse, 2Way, Preds?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anybody have insight on any large shift of players from team-to-team at the 2024,2023,2022 ages between Express North/CT, PT, Eclipse, 2Way, Preds?


Massive turnout at tryouts for all teams. Many many kids went from eclipse , 2 way express, pt and preds in that order and are now left with TS 91 and warriors. As a result of that, kids were bumped around big time. It felt like every lax player was trying out this year. I think kids that were bumped off of express or pt were shocked they were also cut from predators. Super competetive out there and 90 minutes is. Not a lot of time to make an impression
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I think Express North Katonah AA has a number of new players
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Don't think it's a surprise Express absorbed more players from Chargers in CT. Downsized from 2 or 3 teams per grade to 1. Some others went PT, Eclipse, 2-Way. Weren't many TS 91 or Oreds helmets at Wxpress or PT tryouts so probably not much movement there. Don't know where old SuperStar ended up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I didn't know Warriors even had a select team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I wouldn't say C level. The Westchester Warriors 2022 won the Yale Tournament in the A division.

That was last summer and they will have a major upgrade for next summer. I saw a few hundred kids at tryouts.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Westchester Warriors staff is incredible. My son plays on the 2023 team and all the coaches are Varsity Coaches. Tryouts were run like a well oiled machine.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Let me be very clear on my former posts. Ts 91 is c level and do not attempt to compete above that. Warriors is not much better, but the price is right and coaching is great and they will get there
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Has anyone heard anything about who will be the head coach for Yorktown next year? I've heard Marr was promised his job back and they are balking at rehiring him. Doesn't seem fair, they should do the right thing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Isnt there a required process underway by district to select between old coach and new coach
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anybody have insight on any large shift of players from team-to-team at the 2024,2023,2022 ages between Express North/CT, PT, Eclipse, 2Way, Preds?


Massive turnout at tryouts for all teams. Many many kids went from eclipse , 2 way express, pt and preds in that order and are now left with TS 91 and warriors. As a result of that, kids were bumped around big time. It felt like every lax player was trying out this year. I think kids that were bumped off of express or pt were shocked they were also cut from predators. Super competetive out there and 90 minutes is. Not a lot of time to make an impression


All very true. No one seems to mention 3d Tri-sate. Solid program with people who care. Defections have been a problem because 3d doesn't sell hype like the others do (which is sad because it winds up hurting the 3d program).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anybody have insight on any large shift of players from team-to-team at the 2024,2023,2022 ages between Express North/CT, PT, Eclipse, 2Way, Preds?


Massive turnout at tryouts for all teams. Many many kids went from eclipse , 2 way express, pt and preds in that order and are now left with TS 91 and warriors. As a result of that, kids were bumped around big time. It felt like every lax player was trying out this year. I think kids that were bumped off of express or pt were shocked they were also cut from predators. Super competetive out there and 90 minutes is. Not a lot of time to make an impression


All very true. No one seems to mention 3d Tri-sate. Solid program with people who care. Defections have been a problem because 3d doesn't sell hype like the others do (which is sad because it winds up hurting the 3d program).


Agreed on all points. The top clubs made real cuts/additions and some good talented players had to go find new homes, which had a ripple effect. Changing rosters makes it hard on clubs to get teams playing right. There have to be some very good players who don't have a home or have to decide if they want to play on a B/C team.

2022-2024 had high numbers across tryouts and clubs. 2023 seems to be the peak year for tryout participants at clubs. The WSYL effect? I like that kids who aren't too good can find a place to play. Theory: most kids who play travel for their local town now tryout for clubs. Westchester and Fairfield have very high follow-the-leader mentality among kids and parents. On one hand, that is positive as they like the sport and keep playing it. On other hand, the quality of play ranges from awesome to pathetic. They have the cash to burn so cost is not an issue. Supply and demand says new clubs will pop up. The demand is incredibly high and well funded.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anybody have insight on any large shift of players from team-to-team at the 2024,2023,2022 ages between Express North/CT, PT, Eclipse, 2Way, Preds?


Massive turnout at tryouts for all teams. Many many kids went from eclipse , 2 way express, pt and preds in that order and are now left with TS 91 and warriors. As a result of that, kids were bumped around big time. It felt like every lax player was trying out this year. I think kids that were bumped off of express or pt were shocked they were also cut from predators. Super competetive out there and 90 minutes is. Not a lot of time to make an impression


All very true. No one seems to mention 3d Tri-sate. Solid program with people who care. Defections have been a problem because 3d doesn't sell hype like the others do (which is sad because it winds up hurting the 3d program).


Can you shed some light on 3D. Tourneys. Etc.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anybody have insight on any large shift of players from team-to-team at the 2024,2023,2022 ages between Express North/CT, PT, Eclipse, 2Way, Preds?


Massive turnout at tryouts for all teams. Many many kids went from eclipse , 2 way express, pt and preds in that order and are now left with TS 91 and warriors. As a result of that, kids were bumped around big time. It felt like every lax player was trying out this year. I think kids that were bumped off of express or pt were shocked they were also cut from predators. Super competetive out there and 90 minutes is. Not a lot of time to make an impression


All very true. No one seems to mention 3d Tri-sate. Solid program with people who care. Defections have been a problem because 3d doesn't sell hype like the others do (which is sad because it winds up hurting the 3d program).


Can you shed some light on 3D. Tourneys. Etc.


Large emphasis on stick skills and ball movement. They really pound their field/box model which is a lot of two man game mixed with quick ball movement.

Tourneys are selected based on what they have at each level. They have gone to Maryland Young Guns, and Big 4-HHH (AAA tourneys) and they have gone to Stowe (B tourney). It all depends on the talent they have on a roster.

They also do a couple of their own and attract talented teams from around the country. You'd be surprised how much good lacrosse is played in places like Georgia, Colorado, NorCal, and or course New England.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has anyone heard anything about who will be the head coach for Yorktown next year? I've heard Marr was promised his job back and they are balking at rehiring him. Doesn't seem fair, they should do the right thing.


Mahopac looking for a new coach if one of those guys is looking
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
ditto on the 3D guys, they do a great job teaching, they do need to get more publicity in area, surprised they keep such a low profile for a national program. Bruce leaving for 2way set them back, but they have good guys in place if they can get kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Express holding more tryouts in Fairfield through 2020s. They couldn't fill their rosters!!!?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express holding more tryouts in Fairfield through 2020s. They couldn't fill their rosters!!!?


Where did you see that? I haven't seen that anywhere or in any emails?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Westchester Warriors staff is incredible. My son plays on the 2023 team and all the coaches are Varsity Coaches. Tryouts were run like a well oiled machine.


Vin please stop coming on here and self promoting, its embarrasing
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express holding more tryouts in Fairfield through 2020s. They couldn't fill their rosters!!!?


Where did you see that? I haven't seen that anywhere or in any emails?


Buddy told me he got it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express holding more tryouts in Fairfield through 2020s. They couldn't fill their rosters!!!?


Where did you see that? I haven't seen that anywhere or in any emails?


Buddy told me he got it.


Interesting, I'd ask your buddy to send it to you - as I seem to be on every other LIE/LIEN boys and girls email distribution -- except that one.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express holding more tryouts in Fairfield through 2020s. They couldn't fill their rosters!!!?


Where did you see that? I haven't seen that anywhere or in any emails?


Buddy told me he got it.


Interesting, I'd ask your buddy to send it to you - as I seem to be on every other LIE/LIEN boys and girls email distribution -- except that one.


There are very specific positions available for certain teams, although it does not mention which positions by grade level. They also made cuts, so apparently, not looking just to fill rosters with bodies but with similar caliber players.

Not a bad move at this stage since tryouts pretty much complete. As others have noted, many players moved throughout the tryout circuit from club to club, and some are still displaced.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express holding more tryouts in Fairfield through 2020s. They couldn't fill their rosters!!!?

They did the same for north A team a couple of weeks ago. Added kids from extra tryout. I think it's going to be a s**t show for them this year, to big to fast. But hope for the best for the players sake
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
We got the email for supplemental tryouts too. We get all LIEN emails so maybe this one only went to Westport families who haven't got a roster yet?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Nick Daniello Why are you commenting on here everyday. Also what do you have against Vin? Seem a little jealous of him.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Trivia question.... "What is Nick's favorite club team?"

answer.... 3d
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What does that mean??
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yeah what does that mean?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yeah what does that mean?

PT is expanding to 2 teams this year. Some sort of merger or buyout.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yeah what does that mean?

PT is expanding to 2 teams this year. Some sort of merger or buyout.


What are you talking about? If daniello wanted 2 teams he would have made 2 teams from the 70 kids at every grade level trying out
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Hmmm, well Roy Colsey ended the Superstar field teams and joined PT and is coaching a team. But still 1 team per grade for PT. Are you referring to something beyond that ... and connected to 3D??
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Stay tuned. Something in works no doubt but as far as this year PT is 1 team per grad year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
rumor that express, primetime, eclipse and predators are merging.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Colsey joined PT as a 2024 coach but most SuperStar players and coaches scattered. No merger.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
rumor that express, primetime, eclipse and predators are merging.


lol
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Now that rosters are finalized how do local 2023 shape up?
OT, Express Katonah/Westport, Preds, Eclipse, TS91, others?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yorktown administration: rehire Dave Marr to coach Yorktown boys varsity lacrosse. Great coach and a good man.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
seems like it is up for grabs between him and the Coach from last year that took Y town to state finals.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that rosters are finalized how do local 2023 shape up?
OT, Express Katonah/Westport, Preds, Eclipse, TS91, others?


Just a guess but Prime Time is likely the strongest of the group. I heard Eclipse had a fair amount of turnover on their roster so it should be improved. Not sure how the Express North teams look relative to the others - the Katonah teams should be pretty good. No idea on TS91 and Preds.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that rosters are finalized how do local 2023 shape up?
OT, Express Katonah/Westport, Preds, Eclipse, TS91, others?


Just a guess but Prime Time is likely the strongest of the group. I heard Eclipse had a fair amount of turnover on their roster so it should be improved. Not sure how the Express North teams look relative to the others - the Katonah teams should be pretty good. No idea on TS91 and Preds.



2023 Express North apparently pretty strong but time will tell. Apparently some screw ups with North 2020 and 2021. Was supposed to be AA, A and B in Westchester but there was a big exodus. AA still very solid but they were forced to distribute the B level kids to A in Westchester and A in Fairfield. Basically put some very weak kids on what would have been solid A teams. Folks not happy with the miscalculation.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that rosters are finalized how do local 2023 shape up?
OT, Express Katonah/Westport, Preds, Eclipse, TS91, others?


Just a guess but Prime Time is likely the strongest of the group. I heard Eclipse had a fair amount of turnover on their roster so it should be improved. Not sure how the Express North teams look relative to the others - the Katonah teams should be pretty good. No idea on TS91 and Preds.



2023 Express North apparently pretty strong but time will tell. Apparently some screw ups with North 2020 and 2021. Was supposed to be AA, A and B in Westchester but there was a big exodus. AA still very solid but they were forced to distribute the B level kids to A in Westchester and A in Fairfield. Basically put some very weak kids on what would have been solid A teams. Folks not happy with the miscalculation.


What does that mean? Are you saying that there are no longer 3 teams in Katonah for 2020 and 2021? And that there are two teams in Fairfield? I thought Fairfield only had 1 team each, and supposed to be AA?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that rosters are finalized how do local 2023 shape up?
OT, Express Katonah/Westport, Preds, Eclipse, TS91, others?


Just a guess but Prime Time is likely the strongest of the group. I heard Eclipse had a fair amount of turnover on their roster so it should be improved. Not sure how the Express North teams look relative to the others - the Katonah teams should be pretty good. No idea on TS91 and Preds.



2023 Express North apparently pretty strong but time will tell. Apparently some screw ups with North 2020 and 2021. Was supposed to be AA, A and B in Westchester but there was a big exodus. AA still very solid but they were forced to distribute the B level kids to A in Westchester and A in Fairfield. Basically put some very weak kids on what would have been solid A teams. Folks not happy with the miscalculation.


So, they miscalculated the number of quality players, tried to form two really solid 2021 and 2020 teams plus a B team and what happened? The kids who were supposed to be on A were discouraged and left? Its happened before. Its not easy to field two quality teams per division in Westchester. There are too many great options and we lack the population density to support multi-teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that rosters are finalized how do local 2023 shape up?
OT, Express Katonah/Westport, Preds, Eclipse, TS91, others?


Just a guess but Prime Time is likely the strongest of the group. I heard Eclipse had a fair amount of turnover on their roster so it should be improved. Not sure how the Express North teams look relative to the others - the Katonah teams should be pretty good. No idea on TS91 and Preds.



2023 Express North apparently pretty strong but time will tell. Apparently some screw ups with North 2020 and 2021. Was supposed to be AA, A and B in Westchester but there was a big exodus. AA still very solid but they were forced to distribute the B level kids to A in Westchester and A in Fairfield. Basically put some very weak kids on what would have been solid A teams. Folks not happy with the miscalculation.


What does that mean? Are you saying that there are no longer 3 teams in Katonah for 2020 and 2021? And that there are two teams in Fairfield? I thought Fairfield only had 1 team each, and supposed to be AA?


There is on 2020 and one 2021 in Fairfield and they are definitely not AA especially after the moved kids from the Westchester B team that fell apart from poor numbers. My friend whose kid plays in Fairfield is livid.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What a shame Daniello cuts kids much better than other people
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Or maybe your kid should practice more.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that rosters are finalized how do local 2023 shape up?
OT, Express Katonah/Westport, Preds, Eclipse, TS91, others?


Just a guess but Prime Time is likely the strongest of the group. I heard Eclipse had a fair amount of turnover on their roster so it should be improved. Not sure how the Express North teams look relative to the others - the Katonah teams should be pretty good. No idea on TS91 and Preds.



2023 Express North apparently pretty strong but time will tell. Apparently some screw ups with North 2020 and 2021. Was supposed to be AA, A and B in Westchester but there was a big exodus. AA still very solid but they were forced to distribute the B level kids to A in Westchester and A in Fairfield. Basically put some very weak kids on what would have been solid A teams. Folks not happy with the miscalculation.


What does that mean? Are you saying that there are no longer 3 teams in Katonah for 2020 and 2021? And that there are two teams in Fairfield? I thought Fairfield only had 1 team each, and supposed to be AA?


There is on 2020 and one 2021 in Fairfield and they are definitely not AA especially after the moved kids from the Westchester B team that fell apart from poor numbers. My friend whose kid plays in Fairfield is livid.


Your "friend" must have a son on 2021 because that is not the case for 2020. There are zero kids on the 2020 Fairfield team who have been moved from Katonah.
Now, I am not disagreeing with you that the skill sets are extremely broad- that is definitely the case. Not sure exactly what the thought process was when rostering Fairfield teams (if there even was a thought process beyond taking strongest players to put on Katonah AA and then dividing the remaining players by zip code and allocating to a team) but there are some players on this team that have NO business playing on ANY Express team. Could be that fact that is fueling the rumors.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
PT 2023 team is solid but they lose a bunch of talent for Denver but that's only one tourney.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
How much longer until Express gives out their schedule????
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT 2023 team is solid but they lose a bunch of talent for Denver but that's only one tourney.


If true, this is sad. Kids that can't make the WSYL age cut off should not be playing lacrosse on a 7th grade team. Yet another example of why youth lacrosse should be age-based.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Any word on the talent on the Express North 2024 Bluejays? I know they had a solid core of 6 - 8 quality kids from last year. Did they pick up any more? Great coaching staff.....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
For 2023 Express appears the top westchester players and a few Fairfield make up the Katonah AA, then Westport A+ is mostly Fairfield kids, then weak Katonah A is mostly westchester.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that rosters are finalized how do local 2023 shape up?
OT, Express Katonah/Westport, Preds, Eclipse, TS91, others?


Just a guess but Prime Time is likely the strongest of the group. I heard Eclipse had a fair amount of turnover on their roster so it should be improved. Not sure how the Express North teams look relative to the others - the Katonah teams should be pretty good. No idea on TS91 and Preds.



2023 Express North apparently pretty strong but time will tell. Apparently some screw ups with North 2020 and 2021. Was supposed to be AA, A and B in Westchester but there was a big exodus. AA still very solid but they were forced to distribute the B level kids to A in Westchester and A in Fairfield. Basically put some very weak kids on what would have been solid A teams. Folks not happy with the miscalculation.


What does that mean? Are you saying that there are no longer 3 teams in Katonah for 2020 and 2021? And that there are two teams in Fairfield? I thought Fairfield only had 1 team each, and supposed to be AA?


There is on 2020 and one 2021 in Fairfield and they are definitely not AA especially after the moved kids from the Westchester B team that fell apart from poor numbers. My friend whose kid plays in Fairfield is livid.


Your "friend" must have a son on 2021 because that is not the case for 2020. There are zero kids on the 2020 Fairfield team who have been moved from Katonah.
Now, I am not disagreeing with you that the skill sets are extremely broad- that is definitely the case. Not sure exactly what the thought process was when rostering Fairfield teams (if there even was a thought process beyond taking strongest players to put on Katonah AA and then dividing the remaining players by zip code and allocating to a team) but there are some players on this team that have NO business playing on ANY Express team. Could be that fact that is fueling the rumors.


It is indeed a friend. My kid is a 2023 and thus far I am pleased with how the team looks. Just want to know that the guys running express can attract and, more importantly, retain good players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT 2023 team is solid but they lose a bunch of talent for Denver but that's only one tourney.


That is an interesting factor.The Denver tourney is a great leveler in terms of holdbacks. It would be interesting to see if the 2023 programs pad their roster numbers to account for those who can't compete in Denver due to age restrictions.


Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any word on the talent on the Express North 2024 Bluejays? I know they had a solid core of 6 - 8 quality kids from last year. Did they pick up any more? Great coaching staff.....


what is the coaching staff??
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any word on the talent on the Express North 2024 Bluejays? I know they had a solid core of 6 - 8 quality kids from last year. Did they pick up any more? Great coaching staff.....


what is the coaching staff??


Schreiber is awful. He knows how to win yes. But... he takes all creativity away from kids and at this young age, it should be about development , building confidence, He does the opposite
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any word on the talent on the Express North 2024 Bluejays? I know they had a solid core of 6 - 8 quality kids from last year. Did they pick up any more? Great coaching staff.....


If BlueJay is the second team i would think the #1 team would have the better coaches.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
For Express North, what is the difference between 2022 teams and 2022 A team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
are there two 2022 teams in Westport?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For Express North, what is the difference between 2022 teams and 2022 A team?


Talent?!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
So which WSYL team is looking better after tryouts? Express North, Primetime, Eclipse, 2Way or Predators (not sure if the Predators are trying to qualify)? Are there any other teams from the Westchester or Fairfield area attempting to go to the WSYL?

I think Brameier is running the Express North 2023 team for the WSYL. How do they look since they are a brand new team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The Coach for Bluejay 2024 is the Wizard.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Coach for Bluejay 2024 is the Wizard.


More like a yelling screaming lunatic and a horrible director
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
We've got a friend who's kid tried out for Rhino U-13.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
understood, But which is the higher level? For example, is 2022 assumed to be AA?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
[quote=Anonymous]So which WSYL team is looking better after tryouts? Express North, Primetime, Eclipse, 2Way or Predators (not sure if the Predators are trying to qualify)? Are there any other teams from the Westchester or Fairfield area attempting to go to the WSYL?

Not sure anyone can know if team is better after tryouts yet. Suspect every team thinks they picked up more talent. Practices just started. Until you see players or new lineups in real games, its all speculation.

Think all those teams gunning for WSYL. Good for them. New for Preds and 2Way but in the past they claimed they would attend. If smart, they'd lobby to have a region separate from LI because only PT is likely going to qualify when you add 91, Express, Igloo, etc. to the pool. Maybe WSYL increases acceptance numbers for this area. Lucky Laxachusetts doesnt participate (only because their 7th grade teams are always too old for WSYL). Still good for kids to play vs other top teams. it's a good experience to attend qualifiers IMO.

Unsure how all 2023 club teams handle players on roster too old for WSYL. PT must do it right. It caused problems from experience when club did not think it out early enough and share info. Good teams already know their U13 roster right now and have that team train and play games together separate from 2023 team. Smart teams make a special WSYL U13 squad made up mostly of their 2023 team and fill in with some of the best holdback 2024 players. But holdbacks were playing and practicing on my kids team right up until qualifiers-- bad for planning and chemistry. Club stupidly thought it would just have holdbacks do everything but not play in qualifiers and that would not disrupt the U13 team. Team at WSYL qualifier needed fall-winter-spring season together. Holdbacks not allowed in WSYL roster were some of best players and took away from team prep when it counted. Club didn't want to exclude the holdbacks from much for fear of losing top players and $ even though parents and kids knew they were too old for WSYL.

Clubs doing WSYL for the first time always a step behind in planning. Don't focus on team chemistry and roles. Takes a lesson for them to get it right or realize comp is too tough. Couple squads each year lose each game 12-1. Tough lesson.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that rosters are finalized how do local 2023 shape up?
OT, Express Katonah/Westport, Preds, Eclipse, TS91, others?


Just a guess but Prime Time is likely the strongest of the group. I heard Eclipse had a fair amount of turnover on their roster so it should be improved. Not sure how the Express North teams look relative to the others - the Katonah teams should be pretty good. No idea on TS91 and Preds.



2023 Express North apparently pretty strong but time will tell. Apparently some screw ups with North 2020 and 2021. Was supposed to be AA, A and B in Westchester but there was a big exodus. AA still very solid but they were forced to distribute the B level kids to A in Westchester and A in Fairfield. Basically put some very weak kids on what would have been solid A teams. Folks not happy with the miscalculation.


What does that mean? Are you saying that there are no longer 3 teams in Katonah for 2020 and 2021? And that there are two teams in Fairfield? I thought Fairfield only had 1 team each, and supposed to be AA?


There is on 2020 and one 2021 in Fairfield and they are definitely not AA especially after the moved kids from the Westchester B team that fell apart from poor numbers. My friend whose kid plays in Fairfield is livid.


Your "friend" must have a son on 2021 because that is not the case for 2020. There are zero kids on the 2020 Fairfield team who have been moved from Katonah.
Now, I am not disagreeing with you that the skill sets are extremely broad- that is definitely the case. Not sure exactly what the thought process was when rostering Fairfield teams (if there even was a thought process beyond taking strongest players to put on Katonah AA and then dividing the remaining players by zip code and allocating to a team) but there are some players on this team that have NO business playing on ANY Express team. Could be that fact that is fueling the rumors.


Anyone who is surprised by this shell game is simply not listening.

If ANY club has more than one team at a grade level you can be darn sure they will work hard to make the 'A' squad as good as they can be and you can also be darn sure they will basically neglect the 'B' squad as they are there only to pay the bills.

This has been demonstrated time and time again.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Maybe WSYL should reconsider their age limit because what the NLF is doing will cut into the number of east coast programs heading to Denver. It was a great move by the NLF and more with FO it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


2023 Express North apparently pretty strong but time will tell. Apparently some screw ups with North 2020 and 2021. Was supposed to be AA, A and B in Westchester but there was a big exodus. AA still very solid but they were forced to distribute the B level kids to A in Westchester and A in Fairfield. Basically put some very weak kids on what would have been solid A teams. Folks not happy with the miscalculation.


What does that mean? Are you saying that there are no longer 3 teams in Katonah for 2020 and 2021? And that there are two teams in Fairfield? I thought Fairfield only had 1 team each, and supposed to be AA?


There is on 2020 and one 2021 in Fairfield and they are definitely not AA especially after the moved kids from the Westchester B team that fell apart from poor numbers. My friend whose kid plays in Fairfield is livid.


Your "friend" must have a son on 2021 because that is not the case for 2020. There are zero kids on the 2020 Fairfield team who have been moved from Katonah.
Now, I am not disagreeing with you that the skill sets are extremely broad- that is definitely the case. Not sure exactly what the thought process was when rostering Fairfield teams (if there even was a thought process beyond taking strongest players to put on Katonah AA and then dividing the remaining players by zip code and allocating to a team) but there are some players on this team that have NO business playing on ANY Express team. Could be that fact that is fueling the rumors.


Anyone who is surprised by this shell game is simply not listening.

If ANY club has more than one team at a grade level you can be darn sure they will work hard to make the 'A' squad as good as they can be and you can also be darn sure they will basically neglect the 'B' squad as they are there only to pay the bills.

This has been demonstrated time and time again.



Primetime's top two studs went down to LI Express. That pretty much makes the most the odds-on favorite to win the WSYL.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


2023 Express North apparently pretty strong but time will tell. Apparently some screw ups with North 2020 and 2021. Was supposed to be AA, A and B in Westchester but there was a big exodus. AA still very solid but they were forced to distribute the B level kids to A in Westchester and A in Fairfield. Basically put some very weak kids on what would have been solid A teams. Folks not happy with the miscalculation.


What does that mean? Are you saying that there are no longer 3 teams in Katonah for 2020 and 2021? And that there are two teams in Fairfield? I thought Fairfield only had 1 team each, and supposed to be AA?


There is on 2020 and one 2021 in Fairfield and they are definitely not AA especially after the moved kids from the Westchester B team that fell apart from poor numbers. My friend whose kid plays in Fairfield is livid.


Your "friend" must have a son on 2021 because that is not the case for 2020. There are zero kids on the 2020 Fairfield team who have been moved from Katonah.
Now, I am not disagreeing with you that the skill sets are extremely broad- that is definitely the case. Not sure exactly what the thought process was when rostering Fairfield teams (if there even was a thought process beyond taking strongest players to put on Katonah AA and then dividing the remaining players by zip code and allocating to a team) but there are some players on this team that have NO business playing on ANY Express team. Could be that fact that is fueling the rumors.


Anyone who is surprised by this shell game is simply not listening.

If ANY club has more than one team at a grade level you can be darn sure they will work hard to make the 'A' squad as good as they can be and you can also be darn sure they will basically neglect the 'B' squad as they are there only to pay the bills.

This has been demonstrated time and time again.



Primetime's top two studs went down to LI Express. That pretty much makes the most the odds-on favorite to win the WSYL.

It was only one middie that went to LI Express on the Island and yes he was a stud. Lets see how it all pans out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yes, a talented athlete
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes, a talented athlete


And a h/b so how good is he really
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yes, a talented athlete

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes, a talented athlete, but low lax IQ and primarily just does a bull dodge through a smaller player and tries to rip a 15 yd shot.

Also not a very good teammate and has a bad attitude from what I hear,


And got his girlfriend pregnant. And started smoking. Just saying.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes, a talented athlete




LOL
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes, a talented athlete


And a h/b so how good is he really


Every holdback has an advantage, you have to either get over it and move on or do the same with your son. I would chop my hand off before forcing my son to repeat a school year to give him an advantage on the lacrosse field. Deplorable IMO but many willing to do it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes, a talented athlete


And a h/b so how good is he really


Every holdback has an advantage, you have to either get over it and move on or do the same with your son. I would chop my hand off before forcing my son to repeat a school year to give him an advantage on the lacrosse field. Deplorable IMO but many willing to do it.


I have to say, your spot on view made me remember a TV interview on parents intentionally "red shirting" their kids to be better at sports. My now 11 year old kid was a baby at the time of viewing the program. I thought it was insane that any parent would intentionally do it just for sports.........but the reality is some parents really need to live through their kids
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes, a talented athlete


And a h/b so how good is he really


Every holdback has an advantage, you have to either get over it and move on or do the same with your son. I would chop my hand off before forcing my son to repeat a school year to give him an advantage on the lacrosse field. Deplorable IMO but many willing to do it.


I may be naive but I don't think many people reclass their 2023 kids for lacrosse purposes. I think it typically happens in kindergarten and is for maturity reasons. My understanding is the reclassifying happens in 8th / 9th grade years.

I am surprised someone from PT would shift to LI Express. PT looks like a pretty legit program to me.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes, a talented athlete


Does anyone think about the kid is 18/adult for two years in High School? One bad relationship with a 17 or 16-year-old whose parents have an ax to grind the boy is done.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
PT is good but kids still go to Express or 91 on the Island. The only other time I saw it happen the other way was a Kid playing fogo from Chaminade on Express North 2018. Kid was really good at end of last summer. Helped win NLF.
Anyone know what Express north is doing for 2033 U-13 Tran? Says Brameier isncoach but he coaches Westport team already?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Schreiber, love his enthusiasm. Hate his management skills. Overestimated his brand. Basically had to move B and C level kids that he promised a spot to his A teams when the numbers were week. Those A teams were not going to kill it but now he killed them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Express North is a joke. NLF dosnt mean anything if the teams dont even play in the events.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Not sure what that means? Express North 2018 won the NLF championship in August.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Real tough guy making fun of a 13 year old. I know this boy personally and he is a very hard worker who never puts the stick down. He is a stud lax player that will go far in his life, because of his work ethic.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Real tough guy making fun of a 13 year old. I know this boy personally and he is a very hard worker who never puts the stick down. He is a stud lax player that will go far in his life, because of his work ethic.

Ok mom
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Work ethic does get you a long way. Talent by itself can be very over rated.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Good scrimmage yesterday in Fairfield at Express North 2023. Hopefully both teams will be competitive next summer as both have strong coaches in Pearsall and Brameier.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes, a talented athlete


And a h/b so how good is he really


Every holdback has an advantage, you have to either get over it and move on or do the same with your son. I would chop my hand off before forcing my son to repeat a school year to give him an advantage on the lacrosse field. Deplorable IMO but many willing to do it.


You don’t even have to actually repeat the grade. Just say you’ll pg him later or do a gap year. Club owners will let him play down.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes, a talented athlete


And a h/b so how good is he really


Every holdback has an advantage, you have to either get over it and move on or do the same with your son. I would chop my hand off before forcing my son to repeat a school year to give him an advantage on the lacrosse field. Deplorable IMO but many willing to do it.


You don’t even have to actually repeat the grade. Just say you’ll pg him later or do a gap year. Club owners will let him play down.


You can even take it one step further. Just have your kid tryout for a team at a grade below what he actually is. In all my years of having multiple kids playing at multiple organizations (and trying out at even more of them), I have never once been asked to verify their grade level or age. With other sports, that do it on age, you have to submit a birth certificate.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
To be honest I think the average holdback is hurt in the long run. Once in HS size and physicality evens out much more than in middle school and below. If you are not working hard as u can u are going backwards in the elite divisions of summer lax.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Is it normal for Express North to have 1 coach per team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is it normal for Express North to have 1 coach per team?



An effective coaching staff is 2+. Any less and one group (offense or defense) is getting short changed.

I once saw a single coach run practice for two teams. Money grab of the highest level.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is it normal for Express North to have 1 coach per team?



An effective coaching staff is 2+. Any less and one group (offense or defense) is getting short changed.

I once saw a single coach run practice for two teams. Money grab of the highest level.


Hard to judge by fall lacrosse how many coaches there actually are. Just as many of the players have other fall sports or commitments coaches many also.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Express north,4 practices only one coach. Not what they sold us.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Coaching levels should not change with the season. We are paying for coaching at the youth level. Games are fun but are secondary. Preds have three coaches on most of their younger teams this fall.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is it normal for Express North to have 1 coach per team?



An effective coaching staff is 2+. Any less and one group (offense or defense) is getting short changed.

I once saw a single coach run practice for two teams. Money grab of the highest level.


Hard to judge by fall lacrosse how many coaches there actually are. Just as many of the players have other fall sports or commitments coaches many also.


Maybe they should hire coaches that don't have other commitments. That's what my company does.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
To be honest I think the average holdback is hurt in the long run. Once in HS size and physicality evens out much more than in middle school and below. If you are not working hard as u can u are going backwards in the elite divisions of summer lax.


Pediatric studies show holdbacks are hurt in the long run-- but that is emotionally and mentally. Science proves those kids get dumbed down and underperform. Basically data shows most kids will adjust to their environment. For kids who skip a grade or are younger, they learn to accelerate and fit in. For holdbacks, they learn to do less well to fit in. BUT that is for academics, social adjustments, etc. For sports, they have physical advantages and kick [lacrosse] on younger kids through high school.

in other words, if you're willing to sacrifice your kid's well being in hopes of him playing lacrosse in college, that path is there.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I don't understand all the hate for Express North and Schrieber. Have you all been personally wronged by him? Is he really a bad person?
All I've heard from the 2018 and 2019 parents is praise, he can't be all bad.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Pediatric studies show holdbacks are hurt in the long run-- but that is emotionally and mentally. Science proves those kids get dumbed down and underperform. Basically data shows most kids will adjust to their environment. For kids who skip a grade or are younger, they learn to accelerate and fit in. For holdbacks, they learn to do less well to fit in. BUT that is for academics, social adjustments, etc. For sports, they have physical advantages and kick [lacrosse] on younger kids through high school.

in other words, if you're willing to sacrifice your kid's well being in hopes of him playing lacrosse in college, that path is there.


While I generally agree with this, and would not hold my kid back even though he is, in the highly specialized world of lacrosse, a prime candidate, there are those who would cling to the writings of people such as Malcom Gladwell who observed that there is a disproportionate number of professional hockey players with January birthdays. The logic/reason offered is that those players were always at an advantage (ever so slight) by being the oldest in their division. Recall that hockey has a more structured age-based system with the cut off date of Jan 1.

Unless US Lacrosse wrestles back some influence from the clubs, lacrosse will continue to be a sport of holdbacks because that is what works for getting recruited to college College coaches would much rather have an older, more physically mature recruit. Remember, those coaches need to have winning programs or they get fired. And with no financially rewarding professional league, college is the apex of the sport.

Sadly the rise of the NLF, and eventual fall of WSYL (yes, I know NLF clubs participate but they are clearly on a path to create their own 'championship'), USLacrosse.org becomes less and less relevant.

USLacrosse has one card to play and that is the insurance policy which covers all these clubs and players. When Bollinger Insurance decides that having a 24 month age spread on the same field is not a good idea things will change. Until then,

"if you are not playing down, you are playing up"
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Pediatric studies show holdbacks are hurt in the long run-- but that is emotionally and mentally. Science proves those kids get dumbed down and underperform. Basically data shows most kids will adjust to their environment. For kids who skip a grade or are younger, they learn to accelerate and fit in. For holdbacks, they learn to do less well to fit in. BUT that is for academics, social adjustments, etc. For sports, they have physical advantages and kick [lacrosse] on younger kids through high school.

in other words, if you're willing to sacrifice your kid's well being in hopes of him playing lacrosse in college, that path is there.


While I generally agree with this, and would not hold my kid back even though he is, in the highly specialized world of lacrosse, a prime candidate, there are those who would cling to the writings of people such as Malcom Gladwell who observed that there is a disproportionate number of professional hockey players with January birthdays. The logic/reason offered is that those players were always at an advantage (ever so slight) by being the oldest in their division. Recall that hockey has a more structured age-based system with the cut off date of Jan 1.

Unless US Lacrosse wrestles back some influence from the clubs, lacrosse will continue to be a sport of holdbacks because that is what works for getting recruited to college College coaches would much rather have an older, more physically mature recruit. Remember, those coaches need to have winning programs or they get fired. And with no financially rewarding professional league, college is the apex of the sport.

Sadly the rise of the NLF, and eventual fall of WSYL (yes, I know NLF clubs participate but they are clearly on a path to create their own 'championship'), USLacrosse.org becomes less and less relevant.

USLacrosse has one card to play and that is the insurance policy which covers all these clubs and players. When Bollinger Insurance decides that having a 24 month age spread on the same field is not a good idea things will change. Until then,

"if you are not playing down, you are playing up"


Totally agree about the USL and the insurance card - they should play that card.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Pediatric studies show holdbacks are hurt in the long run-- but that is emotionally and mentally. Science proves those kids get dumbed down and underperform. Basically data shows most kids will adjust to their environment. For kids who skip a grade or are younger, they learn to accelerate and fit in. For holdbacks, they learn to do less well to fit in. BUT that is for academics, social adjustments, etc. For sports, they have physical advantages and kick [lacrosse] on younger kids through high school.

in other words, if you're willing to sacrifice your kid's well being in hopes of him playing lacrosse in college, that path is there.


While I generally agree with this, and would not hold my kid back even though he is, in the highly specialized world of lacrosse, a prime candidate, there are those who would cling to the writings of people such as Malcom Gladwell who observed that there is a disproportionate number of professional hockey players with January birthdays. The logic/reason offered is that those players were always at an advantage (ever so slight) by being the oldest in their division. Recall that hockey has a more structured age-based system with the cut off date of Jan 1.

Unless US Lacrosse wrestles back some influence from the clubs, lacrosse will continue to be a sport of holdbacks because that is what works for getting recruited to college College coaches would much rather have an older, more physically mature recruit. Remember, those coaches need to have winning programs or they get fired. And with no financially rewarding professional league, college is the apex of the sport.

Sadly the rise of the NLF, and eventual fall of WSYL (yes, I know NLF clubs participate but they are clearly on a path to create their own 'championship'), USLacrosse.org becomes less and less relevant.

USLacrosse has one card to play and that is the insurance policy which covers all these clubs and players. When Bollinger Insurance decides that having a 24 month age spread on the same field is not a good idea things will change. Until then,

"if you are not playing down, you are playing up"


Your second paragraph represents a common misconception in the holdback/college discussion. Yes, it is true that college coaches want older, more physically mature players. Players that are 20-24, not 18-22. And since there is not a financially rewarding league, they need not worry about the older player leaving early. However, the colleges can still have their older players even if the kids play on age at the youth level. Let the PA, MD, and MA players holdback, enter HS at 15-16, and enter college at 19-20. If this is what the parents want, and what the college coaches want, then so be it. But at the youth level, everyone should be on age. Their is nothing wrong with a 13 year old 7th grader playing against a 13 year old 6th grader, or a 15 year old 9th grader playing against a 15 year old 7th grader.

The misconception is that the entire holdback infrastructure requires the kids to play on grade as youth players. It does not. A public school kid in suburban NY can be born on September 30, 2003 and be in 9th grade. A kid from MD can be born on that same day and be in 7th grade. So what. But they should be competing against each other on the travel circuit. The MD kid should not be playing against kids born in 2005.

Hockey, which uses birth year, has a solution for the exceptional teenagers - the kids who project to be D1/professional. Such kids can, at age 16, leave the youth system (called minor in Canada) and enter junior hockey. At junior hockey, age no longer matters. 16 year olds play against 20 year olds, ect. For those who are a notch down (still very good players) and then some, they can stay in the youth system through 18U. Prior to 16, everyone plays on age.

College D1 hockey relies a lot on older, more mature, prep school and junior players. Similar mindset to lacrosse. Only difference is that the best of the best of the best (think Jack Eichel) might be one and done to the NHL, whereas in lacrosse that doesn't happen because their is no money at the pro level. College hockey, and the prep school/junior system, do just fine with age-based youth play. College lacrosse would do fine also.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Sounds like you are talking about doing a 'post graduate' year rather than 'hold back'. I hope the new recruiting regulation will indeed delay those 're-class' situations into later years and away from the youth (pre-HS) game.

I think we both agree that re-classing should not be acceptable until after they kids are in HS at a minimum and likely not until after they are 16.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Pediatric studies show holdbacks are hurt in the long run-- but that is emotionally and mentally. Science proves those kids get dumbed down and underperform. Basically data shows most kids will adjust to their environment. For kids who skip a grade or are younger, they learn to accelerate and fit in. For holdbacks, they learn to do less well to fit in. BUT that is for academics, social adjustments, etc. For sports, they have physical advantages and kick [lacrosse] on younger kids through high school.

in other words, if you're willing to sacrifice your kid's well being in hopes of him playing lacrosse in college, that path is there.


While I generally agree with this, and would not hold my kid back even though he is, in the highly specialized world of lacrosse, a prime candidate, there are those who would cling to the writings of people such as Malcom Gladwell who observed that there is a disproportionate number of professional hockey players with January birthdays. The logic/reason offered is that those players were always at an advantage (ever so slight) by being the oldest in their division. Recall that hockey has a more structured age-based system with the cut off date of Jan 1.

Unless US Lacrosse wrestles back some influence from the clubs, lacrosse will continue to be a sport of holdbacks because that is what works for getting recruited to college College coaches would much rather have an older, more physically mature recruit. Remember, those coaches need to have winning programs or they get fired. And with no financially rewarding professional league, college is the apex of the sport.

Sadly the rise of the NLF, and eventual fall of WSYL (yes, I know NLF clubs participate but they are clearly on a path to create their own 'championship'), USLacrosse.org becomes less and less relevant.

USLacrosse has one card to play and that is the insurance policy which covers all these clubs and players. When Bollinger Insurance decides that having a 24 month age spread on the same field is not a good idea things will change. Until then,

"if you are not playing down, you are playing up"


Your second paragraph represents a common misconception in the holdback/college discussion. Yes, it is true that college coaches want older, more physically mature players. Players that are 20-24, not 18-22. And since there is not a financially rewarding league, they need not worry about the older player leaving early. However, the colleges can still have their older players even if the kids play on age at the youth level. Let the PA, MD, and MA players holdback, enter HS at 15-16, and enter college at 19-20. If this is what the parents want, and what the college coaches want, then so be it. But at the youth level, everyone should be on age. Their is nothing wrong with a 13 year old 7th grader playing against a 13 year old 6th grader, or a 15 year old 9th grader playing against a 15 year old 7th grader.

The misconception is that the entire holdback infrastructure requires the kids to play on grade as youth players. It does not. A public school kid in suburban NY can be born on September 30, 2003 and be in 9th grade. A kid from MD can be born on that same day and be in 7th grade. So what. But they should be competing against each other on the travel circuit. The MD kid should not be playing against kids born in 2005.

Hockey, which uses birth year, has a solution for the exceptional teenagers - the kids who project to be D1/professional. Such kids can, at age 16, leave the youth system (called minor in Canada) and enter junior hockey. At junior hockey, age no longer matters. 16 year olds play against 20 year olds, ect. For those who are a notch down (still very good players) and then some, they can stay in the youth system through 18U. Prior to 16, everyone plays on age.

College D1 hockey relies a lot on older, more mature, prep school and junior players. Similar mindset to lacrosse. Only difference is that the best of the best of the best (think Jack Eichel) might be one and done to the NHL, whereas in lacrosse that doesn't happen because their is no money at the pro level. College hockey, and the prep school/junior system, do just fine with age-based youth play. College lacrosse would do fine also.


I am a big believer that lacrosse should use hockey as a model - I wouldn't follow everything they did, particularly not the exclusivity to a club a player has to commit to and vice versa. But they learned the hard way, and made the changes to address a lot of the same issues. Meanwhile, you will get a ton a people (especillay here on BOTC!) who somehow think lacrosse is different than other sports and it won't and/or doesn't have to adapt to address blatantly obvious issues.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like you are talking about doing a 'post graduate' year rather than 'hold back'. I hope the new recruiting regulation will indeed delay those 're-class' situations into later years and away from the youth (pre-HS) game.

I think we both agree that re-classing should not be acceptable until after they kids are in HS at a minimum and likely not until after they are 16.


I don't agree. I think a kid should be able to re-class whenever he wants. Be a 13 year old in kindergarten for all I care. I just think youth lacrosse should be organized by age, not grade. It should not matter what grade or kid is in at school, or even if he goes to school at all.

2005 birth years play against 2005 birth years; 2004 birth years vs 2004 birth years, and so on (or Sept 1 2005- August 31, 2006, ect). Kids can repeat 8th grade 10 times. So what.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like you are talking about doing a 'post graduate' year rather than 'hold back'. I hope the new recruiting regulation will indeed delay those 're-class' situations into later years and away from the youth (pre-HS) game.

I think we both agree that re-classing should not be acceptable until after they kids are in HS at a minimum and likely not until after they are 16.


I don't agree. I think a kid should be able to re-class whenever he wants. Be a 13 year old in kindergarten for all I care. I just think youth lacrosse should be organized by age, not grade. It should not matter what grade or kid is in at school, or even if he goes to school at all.

2005 birth years play against 2005 birth years; 2004 birth years vs 2004 birth years, and so on (or Sept 1 2005- August 31, 2006, ect). Kids can repeat 8th grade 10 times. So what.


I think he meant reclassing within the confines of sports only. There will always be kids in grades outside the 'norm' for their age due to starting late and/or repeating a grade for academic and/or social developmental deficiency.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
This should break it down for you. Long live the Holdback

Relative age effect - Wikipedia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_age_effect
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
Anyone know what Express north is doing for 2033 U-13 Tran? Says Brameier isncoach but he coaches Westport team already?


What happened to his program, the CT Chargers? Did the district finally crack down?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What do you mean by the district crack down?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
No crackdown! Chargers were sold/merged with LI Express North and Brameier is head coach of 2023 out of Westport. Katonah still stronger squad but IMO that will change if Brameier stays with Express as FairfieldWestchester county players will migrate to Express North Westport.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No crackdown! Chargers were sold/merged with LI Express North and Brameier is head coach of 2023 out of Westport. Katonah still stronger squad but IMO that will change if Brameier stays with Express as FairfieldWestchester county players will migrate to Express North Westport.


Chargers was not sold. They folded due to internal issues between the 2 owners but you are right, Brameir's team will eventually be better bc he is a great coach and will pull kids from his HS (Darien)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No crackdown! Chargers were sold/merged with LI Express North and Brameier is head coach of 2023 out of Westport. Katonah still stronger squad but IMO that will change if Brameier stays with Express as FairfieldWestchester county players will migrate to Express North Westport.


Could not disagree more - Chargers has been in decline for years...and Coach B has lost plenty of players to Eclipse and rival NC coaching staff. They dont play top events vs top teams any longer. The debate isnt Katonah v Westport....its whether B can keep those kids from Primetime and Eclipse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What do you mean by the district crack down?


Did they legislate restrictions on the number of Darien kids in the program. Thereby causing it to collapse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What do you mean by the district crack down?


Did they legislate restrictions on the number of Darien kids in the program. Thereby causing it to collapse.


Is that the same for Eclipse? Because it doesn’t seem that be affecting that program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Just making conversation: 2023 top area teams:

1.Primetime
2.Eclipse
3.Express North(Katonah/Westport)
4.Preds
5.2-Way
6.TS91
7.Rhino(CT)

I'm sure I'm missing some solid teams just getting the ball rolling...

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just making conversation: 2023 top area teams:

1.Primetime
2.Eclipse
3.Express North(Katonah/Westport)
4.Preds
5.2-Way
6.TS91
7.Rhino(CT)

I'm sure I'm missing some solid teams just getting the ball rolling...


Primetime?? Your talking 2023 not 2022 correct?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yep. Like I said just curious what others think.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Seems reasonable based on results from last year. Unclear yet how much teams have changed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Curious to see how Eclipse and Express North fair.
Both absorbed ex Chargers while adding to A teams.
Think the dilution of the talent pool helps PT.
Lower programs inching towards the middle
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What do you mean by the district crack down?


Did they legislate restrictions on the number of Darien kids in the program. Thereby causing it to collapse.


The CIAC which governs high school sports in CT restricted the number of players from a coaches district to play in their for profit programs. It was the direct cause of the Chargers demise and perhaps Superstars.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
When were CIAC restrictions put in place
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Looks like Schreiber 24 team and 23 team are pretty awful. So much for Schreiber being a great judge of talent
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When were CIAC restrictions put in place


More to the point, when were they enforced?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When were CIAC restrictions put in place


More to the point, when were they enforced?


https://www.casciac.org/pdfs/outofseason.pdf
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When were CIAC restrictions put in place


More to the point, when were they enforced?


https://www.casciac.org/pdfs/outofseason.pdf


Wow - so, if I am reading this right, essentially a school coach cannot really coach a club team where he would have student athletes from his school on the team? Thus, if a coach wants to coach club, he has to go to a different geographic region in order to make sure this isn't likely to happen?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Westchester could use rules similar to CIAC.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just making conversation: 2023 top area teams:

1.Primetime
2.Eclipse
3.Express North(Katonah/Westport)
4.Preds
5.2-Way
6.TS91
7.Rhino(CT)

I'm sure I'm missing some solid teams just getting the ball rolling...



Top teams #1 and #2 seem about right. Express North teams got trounced on LI in Halloween tourney. A poll would drop them below Preds and 2Way after those performances. New teams always take a while to figure it out. Rhino far better than TS91.

Praying these teams go to Bulldog Bash to finally play one another.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just making conversation: 2023 top area teams:

1.Primetime
2.Eclipse
3.Express North(Katonah/Westport)
4.Preds
5.2-Way
6.TS91
7.Rhino(CT)

I'm sure I'm missing some solid teams just getting the ball rolling...



Top teams #1 and #2 seem about right. Express North teams got trounced on LI in Halloween tourney. A poll would drop them below Preds and 2Way after those performances. New teams always take a while to figure it out. Rhino far better than TS91.

Praying these teams go to Bulldog Bash to finally play one another.


Express north 24 and 23 are horrible.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Keep telling yourself that.... The 2024's played The Longboard's and The Kingsmen and held their own. Both teams were loaded with top players from both Taz and Pack. Saying they are horrible when you do not have a clue shows how ignorant and bitter you are. We all know your boy got cut......
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Keep telling yourself that.... The 2024's played The Longboard's and The Kingsmen and held their own. Both teams were loaded with top players from both Taz and Pack. Saying they are horrible when you do not have a clue shows how ignorant and bitter you are. We all know your boy got cut......


That's the thing. You play against teams made up of 1/2 good players and half not and you still can't win. You guys stink, your coach is a walking heart attack and a poor judge of talent. Your attack is weak . And your middies are slow.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Westchester could use rules similar to CIAC.


Why do you post that claim without identifying where this restriction is most needed?

Many districts have self policed, but not all.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just making conversation: 2023 top area teams:

1.Primetime
2.Eclipse
3.Express North(Katonah/Westport)
4.Preds
5.2-Way
6.TS91
7.Rhino(CT)

I'm sure I'm missing some solid teams just getting the ball rolling...



Top teams #1 and #2 seem about right. Express North teams got trounced on LI in Halloween tourney. A poll would drop them below Preds and 2Way after those performances. New teams always take a while to figure it out. Rhino far better than TS91.

Praying these teams go to Bulldog Bash to finally play one another.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just making conversation: 2023 top area teams:

1.Primetime
2.Eclipse
3.Express North(Katonah/Westport)
4.Preds
5.2-Way
6.TS91
7.Rhino(CT)

I'm sure I'm missing some solid teams just getting the ball rolling...



Top teams #1 and #2 seem about right. Express North teams got trounced on LI in Halloween tourney. A poll would drop them below Preds and 2Way after those performances. New teams always take a while to figure it out. Rhino far better than TS91.

Praying these teams go to Bulldog Bash to finally play one another.


2-Way, TS91, and Preds are going to Yale for the fall classic in November. Not sure about the other teams.
At the end of the day, though, the LI teams are the real teams to beat in the area.

To start some BS rivalry and measure our programs against each other is pointless and keep us in the B league.... our teams need to work on improving to beat the top LI teams.


Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Any town teams doing Gobbler games this year?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Any LI teams coming to the Yale Bulldog Fall Classic, next month?
How about Express North
Express North 2021 is not playing in the Yale Bulldog Fall Classic. I do not believe the other grades are playing in it either.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Express North will be in Long Island at Blatant
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What are town varsity teams doing over the winter? I know some play in the Chelsea Pier league but there must be other options.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Can anyone tell me about the 2way 2024 team? Competitive?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can anyone tell me about the 2way 2024 team? Competitive?


I heard they are good and I think Bobby Lutz is the coach which is awesome!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Anyone going to the Prime Time College Experience Showcase coming up?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yes attending. Great exposure to top d1 schools without having to travel far. Just hope elite players attend.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Initial read on Yale Bulldog Fall Classic 2024 Teams attending
2-Way
BoneYard ('23/24)
Brotherhood ('24/25)
Central/Pioneer Kings
Mattabasset
Predators
Rhino CT
Team 91 Tristate

With 4 games guaranteed, it looks probable that all of the Westchester teams will play each other. Should be fun.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone going to the Prime Time College Experience Showcase coming up?


They are still trying to fill up the event, getting emails asking to signup every day still. Registration must be poor. No head coaches attending.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
There might be some over saturation with these events. Roughly within a month there is the PT one, the Igloo one, one at Yale, and a Preds one. See emails/postings continuing for all of them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Anyone have thought son the 2Way 2020 team? I hear they landed some studs for this summer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2way had a very good day at Purchase.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can anyone tell me about the 2way 2024 team? Competitive?


I heard they are good and I think Bobby Lutz is the coach which is awesome!!


They are better than before. Added a few good players plus that coach. Should be decent.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Initial read on Yale Bulldog Fall Classic 2024 Teams attending
2-Way
BoneYard ('23/24)
Brotherhood ('24/25)
Central/Pioneer Kings
Mattabasset
Predators
Rhino CT
Team 91 Tristate


Yup, will be good to see some of these area teams get after it. No killer LI team to wipe everyone. Brotherhood? Mattabasset?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2way had a very good day at Purchase.


Stay on that side of the sound, that's where the A teams live. Just sayin
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
fyi it was a very good event; well run; seemed to be high talent player level. yes, no head coaches, but FWIW the coaches did watch all the games and took notes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2way had a very good day at Purchase.


Stay on that side of the sound, that's where the A teams live. Just sayin


True. I've come to learn there are many reasons why a program enters a tournament. Won't bash them for doing so well. Yale will be better test. But LI remains the real place to prove it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
fyi it was a very good event; well run; seemed to be high talent player level. yes, no head coaches, but FWIW the coaches did watch all the games and took notes.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
fyi it was a very good event; well run; seemed to be high talent player level. yes, no head coaches, but FWIW the coaches did watch all the games and took notes.


Was it just games was did the coaches provide ongoing instruction?
CT 80 coming up as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
there was one hour of positional coaching before the games. Don't know anything about CT80.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2way had a very good day at Purchase.


Stay on that side of the sound, that's where the A teams live. Just sayin


True. I've come to learn there are many reasons why a program enters a tournament. Won't bash them for doing so well. Yale will be better test. But LI remains the real place to prove it.


North Schreiber tried it today. Lost to express a 11-3
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Initial read on Yale Bulldog Fall Classic 2024 Teams attending
2-Way
BoneYard ('23/24)
Brotherhood ('24/25)
Central/Pioneer Kings
Mattabasset
Predators
Rhino CT
Team 91 Tristate


Yup, will be good to see some of these area teams get after it. No killer LI team to wipe everyone. Brotherhood? Mattabasset?


2024 Patriots will be there
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Initial read on Yale Bulldog Fall Classic Teams attending ...


With 4 games guaranteed, it looks probable that all of the Westchester teams will play each other. Should be fun.


Nice to know it will be freezing temps for Bulldog. What is up with lacrosse being played in November and March in the northeast? Why are so many youth tournaments waiting for Nov, just for a better chance of having kids and parents freeze and be miserable?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Initial read on Yale Bulldog Fall Classic Teams attending ...


With 4 games guaranteed, it looks probable that all of the Westchester teams will play each other. Should be fun.


Nice to know it will be freezing temps for Bulldog. What is up with lacrosse being played in November and March in the northeast? Why are so many youth tournaments waiting for Nov, just for a better chance of having kids and parents freeze and be miserable?


Youth football runs to end of Oct. Also some of them play Sat. and some play Sundays. Hard to get all the kids to lax tournaments.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Initial read on Yale Bulldog Fall Classic Teams attending ...


With 4 games guaranteed, it looks probable that all of the Westchester teams will play each other. Should be fun.


Bulldog schedule out. Seems like there will be a lot of Preds vs 2Way vs Outlaws vs 91 across different divisions. Preds vs 2Way 2023 first game of the day should be good. But both team have to tackle 91 Bandits after- ouch. 2022 A Divsion has 91, Igloo, Outlaws, Preds-- there will be some strong players out there. The young bucks 2024-2025-2026 all get to see who is better in Westchester. Stay warm!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Initial read on Yale Bulldog Fall Classic Teams attending ...


With 4 games guaranteed, it looks probable that all of the Westchester teams will play each other. Should be fun.


Bulldog schedule out. Seems like there will be a lot of Preds vs 2Way vs Outlaws vs 91 across different divisions. Preds vs 2Way 2023 first game of the day should be good. But both team have to tackle 91 Bandits after- ouch. 2022 A Divsion has 91, Igloo, Outlaws, Preds-- there will be some strong players out there. The young bucks 2024-2025-2026 all get to see who is better in Westchester. Stay warm!


Stay warm? More like stay on that side of the sound and don't cross the Whitestone,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Can we take the Throgs Neck moron. Seriously, why post something so stupid. Id like to discuss that for a minute. The conversation about Bulldog makes sense and is good lacrosse banter.
However, the best you come up with is, stay warm, more like stay over there. DUH DUH DUH. Are you trying to prove how dumb you are or just reassure yourself every day that being a lonely loser was actually your choice.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What is Mattabassett? Pop up all over Yale schedule.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is Mattabassett? Pop up all over Yale schedule.


Google is your friend . . .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Initial read on Yale Bulldog Fall Classic Teams attending ...


With 4 games guaranteed, it looks probable that all of the Westchester teams will play each other. Should be fun.


Bulldog schedule out. Seems like there will be a lot of Preds vs 2Way vs Outlaws vs 91 across different divisions. Preds vs 2Way 2023 first game of the day should be good. But both team have to tackle 91 Bandits after- ouch. 2022 A Divsion has 91, Igloo, Outlaws, Preds-- there will be some strong players out there. The young bucks 2024-2025-2026 all get to see who is better in Westchester. Stay warm!


Stay warm? More like stay on that side of the sound and don't cross the Whitestone,


when the jerky sarcasm comes for a LI poster, that is sign a thread has some legs. As for crossing the mighty Whitestone, that parking lot of an island doesn't make the journey worth it most times.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Initial read on Yale Bulldog Fall Classic Teams attending ...


With 4 games guaranteed, it looks probable that all of the Westchester teams will play each other. Should be fun.


Bulldog schedule out. Seems like there will be a lot of Preds vs 2Way vs Outlaws vs 91 across different divisions. Preds vs 2Way 2023 first game of the day should be good. But both team have to tackle 91 Bandits after- ouch. 2022 A Divsion has 91, Igloo, Outlaws, Preds-- there will be some strong players out there. The young bucks 2024-2025-2026 all get to see who is better in Westchester. Stay warm!


Stay warm? More like stay on that side of the sound and don't cross the Whitestone,


when the jerky sarcasm comes for a LI poster, that is sign a thread has some legs. As for crossing the mighty Whitestone, that parking lot of an island doesn't make the journey worth it most times.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Initial read on Yale Bulldog Fall Classic Teams attending ...


With 4 games guaranteed, it looks probable that all of the Westchester teams will play each other. Should be fun.


Bulldog schedule out. Seems like there will be a lot of Preds vs 2Way vs Outlaws vs 91 across different divisions. Preds vs 2Way 2023 first game of the day should be good. But both team have to tackle 91 Bandits after- ouch. 2022 A Divsion has 91, Igloo, Outlaws, Preds-- there will be some strong players out there. The young bucks 2024-2025-2026 all get to see who is better in Westchester. Stay warm!


Stay warm? More like stay on that side of the sound and don't cross the Whitestone,


when the jerky sarcasm comes for a LI poster, that is sign a thread has some legs. As for crossing the mighty Whitestone, that parking lot of an island doesn't make the journey worth it most times.


Save your dignity and toll money and stay on that side of the sound.
Long Island is where the real “A” teams live
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we take the Throgs Neck moron. Seriously, why post something so stupid. Id like to discuss that for a minute. The conversation about Bulldog makes sense and is good lacrosse banter.
However, the best you come up with is, stay warm, more like stay over there. DUH DUH DUH. Are you trying to prove how dumb you are or just reassure yourself every day that being a lonely loser was actually your choice.


by the way you whine, sounds like youd prefer the fairy
sure you can bring your team over. It won't end too good. Will be a long sad ride home for ya

.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Initial read on Yale Bulldog Fall Classic Teams attending ...


With 4 games guaranteed, it looks probable that all of the Westchester teams will play each other. Should be fun.


Bulldog schedule out. Seems like there will be a lot of Preds vs 2Way vs Outlaws vs 91 across different divisions. Preds vs 2Way 2023 first game of the day should be good. But both team have to tackle 91 Bandits after- ouch. 2022 A Divsion has 91, Igloo, Outlaws, Preds-- there will be some strong players out there. The young bucks 2024-2025-2026 all get to see who is better in Westchester. Stay warm!


Preds 2023 beat 2Way then both ripped by Bandits. Then Preds lose to Outlaws. LI smacking Westchester around.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
LI Express North 2019 was 3-0 at the Big 4 tournament on Sunday. The team played well on offense and defense and everyone contributed. Congratulations.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
IMO updated rankings 2023

1. Primetime
2. Eclipse
3. 2-Way
3. Express North
5. Preds
6. Rhino
7. Lone Wolf
8. Everyone else in Westchester/Fairfield(Swash,3D,91TS, others)

Unfortunately looks like most of us have some catching up to do regards to LI (except Primetime,Eclipse)
Nothing shocking happened in MD as North went 1-2 vs. very strong competition and Primetime made playoffs losing to strong Bethesda club.
Yale offered nothing new other than mild surprise Rhino stayed with 2-Way 5-2. Thought lower rung teams would show better.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO updated rankings 2023

1. Primetime
2. Eclipse
3. 2-Way
3. Express North
5. Preds
6. Rhino
7. Lone Wolf
8. Everyone else in Westchester/Fairfield(Swash,3D,91TS, others)

Unfortunately looks like most of us have some catching up to do regards to LI (except Primetime,Eclipse)
Nothing shocking happened in MD as North went 1-2 vs. very strong competition and Primetime made playoffs losing to strong Bethesda club.
Yale offered nothing new other than mild surprise Rhino stayed with 2-Way 5-2. Thought lower rung teams would show better.



2023 Preds solidly beat 2way. Your ranking doesn't make sense.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO updated rankings 2023

1. Primetime
2. Eclipse
3. 2-Way
3. Express North
5. Preds
6. Rhino
7. Lone Wolf
8. Everyone else in Westchester/Fairfield(Swash,3D,91TS, others)

Unfortunately looks like most of us have some catching up to do regards to LI (except Primetime,Eclipse)
Nothing shocking happened in MD as North went 1-2 vs. very strong competition and Primetime made playoffs losing to strong Bethesda club.
Yale offered nothing new other than mild surprise Rhino stayed with 2-Way 5-2. Thought lower rung teams would show better.



2023 Preds solidly beat 2way. Your ranking doesn't make sense.


Preds up, 2Way down after this weekend.

1. PT
2. Eclipse
3. Preds
4. Express North (not sure which one is best or if they split up for top tourneys)
5. 2way
6. Rhino
7. everyone else
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I can go with these but during summer not sure top 2 will change until others can compete with LI top teams. Probably a jumble between 3-6 with Preds, 2-Way, Express North, Rhino.
Suprised that Express North slipping and Rhino, Preds gaining. Thought addition of Fairfield kids would boost North but seems like they took a step back.
Preds appear only a couple of strong players away from making leap. Not sure 2-Way as strong as advertised, maybe Rhino gaining?
Any info appreciated.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
IMO RANKINGS QUESTION?

Should I count all the Express North results as 1 team or separate 2 locations and multiple teams?

If counting all Express North results, not just Katonah rankings change a bit

1. Primetime
2. Eclipse
3. Preds
4. 2-Way
5. Express North
5. Rhino
7. Everyone else
8. Westchester Warriors( no fall schedule I can find)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO RANKINGS QUESTION?

Should I count all the Express North results as 1 team or separate 2 locations and multiple teams?

If counting all Express North results, not just Katonah rankings change a bit

1. Primetime
2. Eclipse
3. Preds
4. 2-Way
5. Express North
5. Rhino
7. Everyone else
8. Westchester Warriors( no fall schedule I can find)


Will any of these 23 teams be in Fairfield this weekend?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Preds, Rhino.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Which team isi better Preds or Preds black?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Which team isi better Preds or Preds black?

Preds. Black is the B team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
IMO rankings

Lots of action with almost everyone playing this weekend
Express North looked strong in LI while Eclipse didnt win a game(tied 2 so not terrible)
Preds beat Rhino by 4 then Rhino won next 2 so not much news there
2-Way, not active as far as I can find this weekend.

Rankings
1. Primetime
2. Express North(Katonah)
2. Preds
4. 2-Way
5. Eclipse
6. Rhino
7. Everyone Else
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO rankings

Lots of action with almost everyone playing this weekend
Express North looked strong in LI while Eclipse didnt win a game(tied 2 so not terrible)
Preds beat Rhino by 4 then Rhino won next 2 so not much news there
2-Way, not active as far as I can find this weekend.

Rankings
1. Primetime
2. Express North(Katonah)
2. Preds
4. 2-Way
5. Eclipse
6. Rhino
7. Everyone Else



I think express north and eclipse tied this weekend.....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO rankings


Rankings
1. Primetime
2. Express North(Katonah)
2. Preds
4. 2-Way
5. Eclipse
6. Rhino
7. Everyone Else


2023
Eclipse and Express North tied, plus had competitive games against solid squads that could've gone either way. Preds keeps being solid. 2Way slides down. Have a good winter.

1. PT
2 (tied) Express North, Eclipse, Preds
5. 2Way
6. Rhino
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
OK I'll by that.
IMO

Final Fall Rankings
1. Primetime
2. Express(KATONAH)
2a.Eclipse
2b.Preds
5. 2-Way
6. Rhino
7-10 any order(Lone Wolf, Express Westport, TS 91, Team CT)

Begs the question: Whats up with Express Westport Brameier Team? Saw them ata tourney on Island and looked pretty poor. A solid pole and goalie but nothing else at all.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Seen them all this Fall. Safe bet all Colorado bound 2023 teams are from LI. Just my opinion.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Oh ... and which LI teams are the safe bet? I’m sure there’ll be 3 or so LI teams definitely, but please list the 6 teams (or even 4) you think are the ones so likely ...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Oh ... and which LI teams are the safe bet? I’m sure there’ll be 3 or so LI teams definitely, but please list the 6 teams (or even 4) you think are the ones so likely ...


Bandits
Igloo
Express

These teams are in a different level than all westchester.

Warriors (91 B)
Nordic edge (igloo b)
Express B


These teams are on par with all westchester top teams. Primetime prob beats them all but close.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Oh ... and which LI teams are the safe bet? I’m sure there’ll be 3 or so LI teams definitely, but please list the 6 teams (or even 4) you think are the ones so likely ...


Bandits
Igloo
Express
These teams are in a different level than all westchester.
Warriors (91 B)
Nordic edge (igloo b)
Express B
These teams are on par with all westchester top teams. Primetime prob beats them all but close.


SPOT-ON!

Bandits, Igloo, Express 3 guaranteed. Then all of their B teams mostly better than any other teams cuz of depth, familiarity, and program coaching. So that is 6 right there. Then perhaps S2S or TrueBlue if they enter. And who knows what a team like Legacy can do but their program knows what it takes to go to Denver.

PT likely squeaks in as a 5 or 6. Eclipse and Express North can likely hang in some games but won't make it. Preds, 2Way getting an experience but nothing more as they get tuned up by decent LI squads. Heck, Outlaws destroyed Preds last week and they are a LI B team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Seen them all this Fall. Safe bet all Colorado bound 2023 teams are from LI. Just my opinion.

Agreed
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Unlikely those 2nd teams from the LI programs make it, so try not to build up the expectations too high
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
My son played in a couple of fall tournaments with Rhino and the this fall and his team lost to 2-Way and Preds to 3-4 goals. Does that make them C squad or still B?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son played in a couple of fall tournaments with Rhino and the this fall and his team lost to 2-Way and Preds to 3-4 goals. Does that make them C squad or still B?


Probably high D low C. Somewhere in the realm of who cares.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son played in a couple of fall tournaments with Rhino and the this fall and his team lost to 2-Way and Preds to 3-4 goals. Does that make them C squad or still B?


Probably high D low C. Somewhere in the realm of who cares.


Which Rhino team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Wow! So are 2-Way and Preds low B or C squads?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2023
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2023
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What do people think about 24 express north shrieber
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
24 noth Shrieber?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Strong team. Just behind Eclipse for area 24 teams
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What about Primetime 2024?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
i would think they are much improved given some kids coming over from Superstar and Roy C coaching the team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Curious to know what people think of Colsey. Is he as good of a coach as he was a player
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Curious to know what people think of Colsey. Is he as good of a coach as he was a player


I'm sure he's a great coach. Ridgefield High School has done very well with him as the head coach. I'm not sure he the most popular coach - I understand he is considered "polarizing".
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
He is a jerk. Doesn't care about anyone but himself. He is very knowledgeable in the game of lacrosse and does always have good teams, but most people hate him and I don't use that term lightly.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Two things regarding PT 2024:
They should be good.
Colsey-I have mixed feelings about him. I don't love him as a coach but he's obviously very good. However, my son LOVES him as a coach even though he yells a ton and can be tough sometimes. He's a very hard worker but relatively new to lacrosse. Colsey loves hard workers and kids who don't pout or drop their heads and will give them extra opportunities. As for parents, hes very blunt with no sugar coating and that definitely rubs people the wrong way. That's why so many think he's a jerk.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Does anyone know how the Express North practices at Danbury were? I did not sign my son up yet (just found about it a few days ago) but was thinking about it if it is well run and the kids are getting something out of it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I would expect the quality of the practices to be high given the coaches who will be running the show.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Practice was well run and high intensity.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I would expect the quality of the practices to be high given the coaches who will be running the show.


What coaches are running the show?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
If it's anything like their fall seasons there will be 27 kids and one coach.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If it's anything like their fall seasons there will be 27 kids and one coach.


That sounds about right!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Colsey is a blue collar guy coaching white collar kids. Sometimes those worlds don’t fit nicely together
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Colsey is a blue collar guy coaching white collar kids. Sometimes those worlds don’t fit nicely together


Blue collar, white collar. Give me a break , I know what you mean and it’s partially true, but has nothing to do with being a decent human being, the guy has almost no social skills. He yells at kids , but does nothing to teach them. He plays daddy ball like no one else I have ever seen. Which explains why he went to PrimeTime. He has zero tolerance for anyone and clearly could care less about anything lacrosse related other than box. Blue collar is no excuse , plenty of people get their hands dirty every day and come home and act like gentlemen. Guy is bi polar. He may have been a great player in his day, but great players sometimes don’t make great coaches.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express workout was 20 kids and 2 coaches.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Wow - sounds like your kid got cut from Superstar! How do you explain all the success he has had at Ridgefield if he was a great player but not a good coach and doesn't teach anything?? You are another pathetic ball less individual that has to go on message boards and post anonymous ripping someone. What a loser
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
well said
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Colsey is a blue collar guy coaching white collar kids. Sometimes those worlds don’t fit nicely together


Blue collar, white collar. Give me a break , I know what you mean and it’s partially true, but has nothing to do with being a decent human being, the guy has almost no social skills. He yells at kids , but does nothing to teach them. He plays daddy ball like no one else I have ever seen. Which explains why he went to PrimeTime. He has zero tolerance for anyone and clearly could care less about anything lacrosse related other than box. Blue collar is no excuse , plenty of people get their hands dirty every day and come home and act like gentlemen. Guy is bi polar. He may have been a great player in his day, but great players sometimes don’t make great coaches.


Your comments are out of line. Coach Colsey is the real deal. I could write a long case on why but that wouldn’t do it justice and considering your view wouldn’t register, anyway.

Diagnosing the man as bipolar and calling him names is juvenile. Take a fresh view of the experience and learn from it. Hopefully, your son has already.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Colsey is a Hall of Famer. Reached his potential as a player and wants the same out of kids he coaches. He coached my kids and I never cared if he talked to me or if he was stern w/my kids. I am a blue collar guy so maybe that’s why it’s ok w/me. I’m not a fan of the way the sport has changed to favor the white collar crowd (price of travel clubs and reclassified kids) so to see a blue collar type of guy coaching is fine w/me.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Colsey is a Hall of Famer. Reached his potential as a player and wants the same out of kids he coaches. He coached my kids and I never cared if he talked to me or if he was stern w/my kids. I am a blue collar guy so maybe that’s why it’s ok w/me. I’m not a fan of the way the sport has changed to favor the white collar crowd (price of travel clubs and reclassified kids) so to see a blue collar type of guy coaching is fine w/me.

White collar. Blue collar. Do your research off these boards. You will find the truth.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Colsey is a Hall of Famer. Reached his potential as a player and wants the same out of kids he coaches. He coached my kids and I never cared if he talked to me or if he was stern w/my kids. I am a blue collar guy so maybe that’s why it’s ok w/me. I’m not a fan of the way the sport has changed to favor the white collar crowd (price of travel clubs and reclassified kids) so to see a blue collar type of guy coaching is fine w/me.


Well said, brother.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Amen to that !
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Amen to that !

Again. Ask people who have had experience with him in the past. Talk to a few people. This should give you an idea of what to expect.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Amen to that !

Again. Ask people who have had experience with him in the past. Talk to a few people. This should give you an idea of what to expect.

Awesome coach, but weird guy to talk to.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Colsey is a Hall of Famer. Reached his potential as a player and wants the same out of kids he coaches. He coached my kids and I never cared if he talked to me or if he was stern w/my kids. I am a blue collar guy so maybe that’s why it’s ok w/me. I’m not a fan of the way the sport has changed to favor the white collar crowd (price of travel clubs and reclassified kids) so to see a blue collar type of guy coaching is fine w/me.


My son played 2 years for Colsey at RHS and 4 years at Superstar. Its really very simple, Colsey wants things done his way because he's had success doing things that way. I'm the same way with my business. But, what people really hated was the fact that they felt obligated to play summer lacrosse for Superstars, speaking as a Ridgefield resident. I know the people of Yorktown feel the same way about the Baller summer lacrosse program run by their head coach. No one should use tacit coercion to make money from kids. I know many of us in Ridgefield resented Colsey for putting us in that position. Bottomline, I think he's a great coach and mentor once you get past the bluster.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Reposted from 2021 thread since it’s applicable here....”Everyone complains about Holdbacks, but here’s a downright sandbag...how is it that Schreibr and Chan allow a kid that is currently in 9th grade play this past summer on Express North 2022?? Well, my kid got cut from that team and now I find out and have facts that a kid that didn’t hold back and is in HS is on 2022, these guys should be banned from all tournaments, it’s taking the holdback route to a new level! Pure cheating!”
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Reposted from 2021 thread since it’s applicable here....”Everyone complains about Holdbacks, but here’s a downright sandbag...how is it that Schreibr and Chan allow a kid that is currently in 9th grade play this past summer on Express North 2022?? Well, my kid got cut from that team and now I find out and have facts that a kid that didn’t hold back and is in HS is on 2022, these guys should be banned from all tournaments, it’s taking the holdback route to a new level! Pure cheating!”

They're the biggest person on long island. You haven't seen anything yet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Reposted from 2021 thread since it’s applicable here....”Everyone complains about Holdbacks, but here’s a downright sandbag...how is it that Schreibr and Chan allow a kid that is currently in 9th grade play this past summer on Express North 2022?? Well, my kid got cut from that team and now I find out and have facts that a kid that didn’t hold back and is in HS is on 2022, these guys should be banned from all tournaments, it’s taking the holdback route to a new level! Pure cheating!”

They're the biggest person on long island. You haven't seen anything yet.

the word was s c u m not "person".
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Reposted from 2021 thread since it’s applicable here....”Everyone complains about Holdbacks, but here’s a downright sandbag...how is it that Schreibr and Chan allow a kid that is currently in 9th grade play this past summer on Express North 2022?? Well, my kid got cut from that team and now I find out and have facts that a kid that didn’t hold back and is in HS is on 2022, these guys should be banned from all tournaments, it’s taking the holdback route to a new level! Pure cheating!”

They're the biggest person on long island. You haven't seen anything yet.


Still can't figure out what some folks are chasing? Scholarships, fame, ego/pride boosting, self-worth through their child, who knows...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Is it hold backs or Kids not making the team that is the issue? Comment seems a little muddled.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Any truth to the rumor Express North is putting together a U-13 team for WSYL?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any truth to the rumor Express North is putting together a U-13 team for WSYL?

yes, invites already went out a while ago.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any truth to the rumor Express North is putting together a U-13 team for WSYL?

yes, invites already went out a while ago.


Apologies for the dense question, but wouldn't that be their existing 2023 team? Why are they recruiting?
Is it because they have too many older kids on their existing 7th grade team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Funny how everyone just assumed this midfielder who left PT For LI is a h/b. R u sure about that...... looks to me like he is still eleigible to go to the World Series again this year. And my son has played with him for years. He is a VERY hard worker and leader on the field. Great teammate. A big loss for PT
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I think they are going to add a few Players as they have at least 3 age our kids. Spots will go to Brameier team first.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Funny how everyone just assumed this midfielder who left PT For LI is a h/b. R u sure about that...... looks to me like he is still eleigible to go to the World Series again this year. And my son has played with him for years. He is a VERY hard worker and leader on the field. Great teammate. A big loss for PT

OK Mom, keep telling yourself that. Your kid is very talented and yes a loss to PT but far from a great teammate. He is bull dodger and that's it, I am sure PT will be fine without him and the offensive will move the ball much better without a bull dodger trying to do it all himself. From what I hear it was well received by all that he left.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Is this the year John Jay takes Section 1? Ytown graduated many of their big time players. The defense will be solid with Makar (Maryland) and Morales (St. Josephs) anchoring, the Embury twins return and they'll have Dahlke (Marist) and presumably Doller (Richmond) but who else is going to score? John Jay graduated fewer contributors like Reiger and they have their own power twins with the Ford's returning and their defense is probably comparable or even better as a unit than Ytown with Adamac (Colgate), Shahe (Syracuse) and they get Burke (Duke) back. Should be an epic matchup this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Schreiber said invites for Express North U-13 going out soon. Has to get with Brameier and Pearsall first.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Funny how everyone just assumed this midfielder who left PT For LI is a h/b. R u sure about that...... looks to me like he is still eleigible to go to the World Series again this year. And my son has played with him for years. He is a VERY hard worker and leader on the field. Great teammate. A big loss for PT

OK Mom, keep telling yourself that. Your kid is very talented and yes a loss to PT but far from a great teammate. He is bull dodger and that's it, I am sure PT will be fine without him and the offensive will move the ball much better without a bull dodger trying to do it all himself. From what I hear it was well received by all that he left.

Kid is very talented NEVER passes. Kids on our team are already fed up the sideline is getting frustrated as well
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Funny how everyone just assumed this midfielder who left PT For LI is a h/b. R u sure about that...... looks to me like he is still eleigible to go to the World Series again this year. And my son has played with him for years. He is a VERY hard worker and leader on the field. Great teammate. A big loss for PT

OK Mom, keep telling yourself that. Your kid is very talented and yes a loss to PT but far from a great teammate. He is bull dodger and that's it, I am sure PT will be fine without him and the offensive will move the ball much better without a bull dodger trying to do it all himself. From what I hear it was well received by all that he left.

Kid is very talented NEVER passes. Kids on our team are already fed up the sideline is getting frustrated as well


Seems like every pretty good team has 1 or 2 talented, bigger, stronger middies who are big producers but also notorious ballhogs. Against weaker teams, they dominate and are celebrated. Against stronger teams, they turn the ball over and frustrate teammates and the sidelines. They are used to being "the man" and never learn or embrace team concepts. Pretty common.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Serious question to cub lacrosse parents. Our son is a strong club player but his town team is beyond awful as He's the only one playing high club level let alone any club ball or working out in winter or playing box. Should he still play with his town team in spring as it will just slow him down and making him less aggressive. Any advice would be appreciated.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Funny how everyone just assumed this midfielder who left PT For LI is a h/b. R u sure about that...... looks to me like he is still eleigible to go to the World Series again this year. And my son has played with him for years. He is a VERY hard worker and leader on the field. Great teammate. A big loss for PT

OK Mom, keep telling yourself that. Your kid is very talented and yes a loss to PT but far from a great teammate. He is bull dodger and that's it, I am sure PT will be fine without him and the offensive will move the ball much better without a bull dodger trying to do it all himself. From what I hear it was well received by all that he left.

Kid is very talented NEVER passes. Kids on our team are already fed up the sideline is getting frustrated as well


Seems like every pretty good team has 1 or 2 talented, bigger, stronger middies who are big producers but also notorious ballhogs. Against weaker teams, they dominate and are celebrated. Against stronger teams, they turn the ball over and frustrate teammates and the sidelines. They are used to being "the man" and never learn or embrace team concepts. Pretty common.


Glad we're not alone...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Chiming in on PT middie who moved to LIE... My son had to gaurd him a couple tournaments last summer and said the guy was a beast physically who either tried a bull dodge or a spin move and then shoot. He scored 3or 4 on us , then only 1 second time we played. He doesnt like to pass which lead to more ZTO's seconf game we played them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Serious question to cub lacrosse parents. Our son is a strong club player but his town team is beyond awful as He's the only one playing high club level let alone any club ball or working out in winter or playing box. Should he still play with his town team in spring as it will just slow him down and making him less aggressive. Any advice would be appreciated.


What is your alternative? I would think you want to do something while everyone else is practicing and playing. Having been in a similar situation your concern should be around development of your sons lacrosse IQ. In poor programs coaches are usually trying to babysit or teach basic catching and throwing. This in turn leads to no development of how the game is played, how to move the ball, ride, clear, cut through, get the ball to x, man up, man down, etc. Let me know if you find an alternative because we need the same.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Serious question to cub lacrosse parents. Our son is a strong club player but his town team is beyond awful as He's the only one playing high club level let alone any club ball or working out in winter or playing box. Should he still play with his town team in spring as it will just slow him down and making him less aggressive. Any advice would be appreciated.


What is your alternative? I would think you want to do something while everyone else is practicing and playing. Having been in a similar situation your concern should be around development of your sons lacrosse IQ. In poor programs coaches are usually trying to babysit or teach basic catching and throwing. This in turn leads to no development of how the game is played, how to move the ball, ride, clear, cut through, get the ball to x, man up, man down, etc. Let me know if you find an alternative because we need the same.


Play with friends and have fun. Maybe try to make team mates better.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Serious question to cub lacrosse parents. Our son is a strong club player but his town team is beyond awful as He's the only one playing high club level let alone any club ball or working out in winter or playing box. Should he still play with his town team in spring as it will just slow him down and making him less aggressive. Any advice would be appreciated.


What is your alternative? I would think you want to do something while everyone else is practicing and playing. Having been in a similar situation your concern should be around development of your sons lacrosse IQ. In poor programs coaches are usually trying to babysit or teach basic catching and throwing. This in turn leads to no development of how the game is played, how to move the ball, ride, clear, cut through, get the ball to x, man up, man down, etc. Let me know if you find an alternative because we need the same.


Play with friends and have fun. Maybe try to make team mates better.


Play where you can play when you can play and have fun. If you have options with surrounding towns look at those. However, I dont think anyone can be so arrogant as to say Im too good to play with you so Im not going to play at all. Re: Less aggressive. Thats crazy. The only results I see coming from the not playing approach is diminishing his stick skills and what the other poster said about lacrosse IQ. 90% of clubs dont overlap with town so leaving little Johnny on the side at the rest of the town doesnt seem to make sense.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Serious question to cub lacrosse parents. Our son is a strong club player but his town team is beyond awful as He's the only one playing high club level let alone any club ball or working out in winter or playing box. Should he still play with his town team in spring as it will just slow him down and making him less aggressive. Any advice would be appreciated.


What is your alternative? I would think you want to do something while everyone else is practicing and playing. Having been in a similar situation your concern should be around development of your sons lacrosse IQ. In poor programs coaches are usually trying to babysit or teach basic catching and throwing. This in turn leads to no development of how the game is played, how to move the ball, ride, clear, cut through, get the ball to x, man up, man down, etc. Let me know if you find an alternative because we need the same.


Play with friends and have fun. Maybe try to make team mates better.


Play where you can play when you can play and have fun. If you have options with surrounding towns look at those. However, I dont think anyone can be so arrogant as to say Im too good to play with you so Im not going to play at all. Re: Less aggressive. Thats crazy. The only results I see coming from the not playing approach is diminishing his stick skills and what the other poster said about lacrosse IQ. 90% of clubs dont overlap with town so leaving little Johnny on the side looking at the rest of the town doesnt seem to make sense.


Legit question. If your program allows it - play up. That’s what we do.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
if your sons club dosnt compete in spring they will soon. Town youth programs in general are going to struggle to remain relevant for most programs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Serious question to cub lacrosse parents. Our son is a strong club player but his town team is beyond awful as He's the only one playing high club level let alone any club ball or working out in winter or playing box. Should he still play with his town team in spring as it will just slow him down and making him less aggressive. Any advice would be appreciated.


What is your alternative? I would think you want to do something while everyone else is practicing and playing. Having been in a similar situation your concern should be around development of your sons lacrosse IQ. In poor programs coaches are usually trying to babysit or teach basic catching and throwing. This in turn leads to no development of how the game is played, how to move the ball, ride, clear, cut through, get the ball to x, man up, man down, etc. Let me know if you find an alternative because we need the same.


Play with friends and have fun. Maybe try to make team mates better.


Play where you can play when you can play and have fun. If you have options with surrounding towns look at those. However, I dont think anyone can be so arrogant as to say Im too good to play with you so Im not going to play at all. Re: Less aggressive. Thats crazy. The only results I see coming from the not playing approach is making your son the local d!ckh3@d, diminishing his stick skills and what the other poster said about lacrosse IQ. 90% of clubs dont overlap with town so leaving little Johnny on the side thumbing his nose at the rest of the town doesnt seem to make sense.


Legit question. If your program allows it - play up. That’s what we do.


Playing up is the way to go.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Serious question to cub lacrosse parents. Our son is a strong club player but his town team is beyond awful as He's the only one playing high club level let alone any club ball or working out in winter or playing box. Should he still play with his town team in spring as it will just slow him down and making him less aggressive. Any advice would be appreciated.


What is your alternative? I would think you want to do something while everyone else is practicing and playing. Having been in a similar situation your concern should be around development of your sons lacrosse IQ. In poor programs coaches are usually trying to babysit or teach basic catching and throwing. This in turn leads to no development of how the game is played, how to move the ball, ride, clear, cut through, get the ball to x, man up, man down, etc. Let me know if you find an alternative because we need the same.


Play with friends and have fun. Maybe try to make team mates better.


Play where you can play when you can play and have fun. If you have options with surrounding towns look at those. However, I dont think anyone can be so arrogant as to say Im too good to play with you so Im not going to play at all. Re: Less aggressive. Thats crazy. The only results I see coming from the not playing approach is making your son the local d!ckh3@d, diminishing his stick skills and what the other poster said about lacrosse IQ. 90% of clubs dont overlap with town so leaving little Johnny on the side thumbing his nose at the rest of the town doesnt seem to make sense.


Legit question. If your program allows it - play up. That’s what we do.


Playing up is the way to go.


Makes sense.... play up
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
No,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is this the year John Jay takes Section 1? Ytown graduated many of their big time players. The defense will be solid with Makar (Maryland) and Morales (St. Josephs) anchoring, the Embury twins return and they'll have Dahlke (Marist) and presumably Doller (Richmond) but who else is going to score? John Jay graduated fewer contributors like Reiger and they have their own power twins with the Ford's returning and their defense is probably comparable or even better as a unit than Ytown with Adamac (Colgate), Shahe (Syracuse) and they get Burke (Duke) back. Should be an epic matchup this year.


No, Town reloads every year, doesn't matter who they lose. Jay too soft against the hard nosed gritty Yorktown kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
John Jay has the talent. The team - including coaches - need to get focused, commit and go out and prove they are as good as people think.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Chiming in on PT middie who moved to LIE... My son had to gaurd him a couple tournaments last summer and said the guy was a beast physically who either tried a bull dodge or a spin move and then shoot. He scored 3or 4 on us , then only 1 second time we played. He doesnt like to pass which lead to more ZTO's seconf game we played them.


I was at the LIE tryouts and once someone his size switched to him he could not bull dodge his way to the goal anymore. Kids does not pass the ball for nothing. Very special player but good teams will double and force him to make a pass
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Chiming in on PT middie who moved to LIE... My son had to gaurd him a couple tournaments last summer and said the guy was a beast physically who either tried a bull dodge or a spin move and then shoot. He scored 3or 4 on us , then only 1 second time we played. He doesnt like to pass which lead to more ZTO's seconf game we played them.


I was at the LIE tryouts and once someone his size switched to him he could not bull dodge his way to the goal anymore. Kids does not pass the ball for nothing. Very special player but good teams will double and force him to make a pass
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Gotta love PT holding a separate tryout for their WS team. Love the loyalty to current 23 team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Gotta love PT holding a separate tryout for their WS team. Love the loyalty to current 23 team


Could it be that age based disqualifies a bunch of their players so they actually need kids and aren't looking to replace players?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
That is the exact reason. A chunk of players don’t meet the age cutoff, so some slots on the roster need to be filled.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Chiming in on PT middie who moved to LIE... My son had to gaurd him a couple tournaments last summer and said the guy was a beast physically who either tried a bull dodge or a spin move and then shoot. He scored 3or 4 on us , then only 1 second time we played. He doesnt like to pass which lead to more ZTO's seconf game we played them.


I was at the LIE tryouts and once someone his size switched to him he could not bull dodge his way to the goal anymore. Kids does not pass the ball for nothing. Very special player but good teams will double and force him to make a pass

That's were you are misinformed a special player passes the ball and is a team player He relies on size that will dry up soon
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Gotta love PT holding a separate tryout for their WS team. Love the loyalty to current 23 team

Current PT 2023 team is the WS Team . Only holding open tryout for fill ins for the 2023 boys who do not meet the age cut off. Same as last years PT 2022 team but this year opting for open tryout to fill some spots just for the WS.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Any update on those invites from Schreiber for the WSYL team ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is this the year John Jay takes Section 1? Ytown graduated many of their big time players. The defense will be solid with Makar (Maryland) and Morales (St. Josephs) anchoring, the Embury twins return and they'll have Dahlke (Marist) and presumably Doller (Richmond) but who else is going to score? John Jay graduated fewer contributors like Reiger and they have their own power twins with the Ford's returning and their defense is probably comparable or even better as a unit than Ytown with Adamac (Colgate), Shahe (Syracuse) and they get Burke (Duke) back. Should be an epic matchup this year.


No, Town reloads every year, doesn't matter who they lose. Jay too soft against the hard nosed gritty Yorktown kids.


Its not 2008, its 2018. JJ has plenty of talented players, maybe more than Town this year and Marr is gone. Does the new guy know what he's doing? Do the players respect him like they must have respected Marr? We all knew JJ would catch up at some point. I think Town could be a very ordinary team this year outside of their sectional schedule.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Just curious why spots will go to Brameier first ? Out of all 3 2023 North teams they seem to be the least talented team based on the fall season performance.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is this the year John Jay takes Section 1? Ytown graduated many of their big time players. The defense will be solid with Makar (Maryland) and Morales (St. Josephs) anchoring, the Embury twins return and they'll have Dahlke (Marist) and presumably Doller (Richmond) but who else is going to score? John Jay graduated fewer contributors like Reiger and they have their own power twins with the Ford's returning and their defense is probably comparable or even better as a unit than Ytown with Adamac (Colgate), Shahe (Syracuse) and they get Burke (Duke) back. Should be an epic matchup this year.


No, Town reloads every year, doesn't matter who they lose. Jay too soft against the hard nosed gritty Yorktown kids.


Its not 2008, its 2018. JJ has plenty of talented players, maybe more than Town this year and Marr is gone. Does the new guy know what he's doing? Do the players respect him like they must have respected Marr? We all knew JJ would catch up at some point. I think Town could be a very ordinary team this year outside of their sectional schedule.


"Does the new guy know what he's doing?" He's only been an assistant at town for 12 yrs or so and took them to the state final last year. I think the players respect him.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Are the Predators putting a WSYL team together?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is this the year John Jay takes Section 1? Ytown graduated many of their big time players. The defense will be solid with Makar (Maryland) and Morales (St. Josephs) anchoring, the Embury twins return and they'll have Dahlke (Marist) and presumably Doller (Richmond) but who else is going to score? John Jay graduated fewer contributors like Reiger and they have their own power twins with the Ford's returning and their defense is probably comparable or even better as a unit than Ytown with Adamac (Colgate), Shahe (Syracuse) and they get Burke (Duke) back. Should be an epic matchup this year.


No, Town reloads every year, doesn't matter who they lose. Jay too soft against the hard nosed gritty Yorktown kids.


Not sure that I get the disrespect for JJ. You are out of line.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are the Predators putting a WSYL team together?

The 2023 team was advertised as if they were going to try to qualify. As for open spots and supplemental try outs like PT is doing not sure. That team is good but dont think good enough to get through local teams like PT and Eclipse. Certainly not on par with the island power houses.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Should go as a different name if it’s not a true PT team. Like last year, w/out the extra kids helping for one tourney PT likely doesn’t even qualify.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Not sure invites go to entire teams. My impression was
Mostly Pearsalland some Breymeier players would
Get invites
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is this the year John Jay takes Section 1? Ytown graduated many of their big time players. The defense will be solid with Makar (Maryland) and Morales (St. Josephs) anchoring, the Embury twins return and they'll have Dahlke (Marist) and presumably Doller (Richmond) but who else is going to score? John Jay graduated fewer contributors like Reiger and they have their own power twins with the Ford's returning and their defense is probably comparable or even better as a unit than Ytown with Adamac (Colgate), Shahe (Syracuse) and they get Burke (Duke) back. Should be an epic matchup this year.


No, Town reloads every year, doesn't matter who they lose. Jay too soft against the hard nosed gritty Yorktown kids.


Its not 2008, its 2018. JJ has plenty of talented players, maybe more than Town this year and Marr is gone. Does the new guy know what he's doing? Do the players respect him like they must have respected Marr? We all knew JJ would catch up at some point. I think Town could be a very ordinary team this year outside of their sectional schedule.


"Does the new guy know what he's doing?" He's only been an assistant at town for 12 yrs or so and took them to the state final last year. I think the players respect him.


I'm not sure how you can know the players respect a coach but my point was Marr is a Yorktown guy that players could admire as one of their own, the new guy is not. Maybe it doesn't matter. I also think its just living in the past to think "Town reloads every year" is really a factor. All of the better programs now have excellent youth programs that allow the varsity programs to restock the shelves. Heck, the best team in the section this season might be Pleasantville.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The consistency of Yorktown being great will likely fall off going forward. While they still do a great job developing kids, other towns have kids being developed close to as well through various ways.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What will be different this year that leads you to believe JJ will finally realize its potential and that Y town will fall off?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The consistency of Yorktown being great will likely fall off going forward. While they still do a great job developing kids, other towns have kids being developed close to as well through various ways.




The growth of excellent town youth lacrosse programs and the proliferation of high quality club teams in the region (Express North, Primetime, Team 91, Predators, etc) has improved the quality of lacrosse overall. Rye, Bronxville, Larchmont and a few others have done a great job of growing their youth programs, bringing in excellent coaching and supporting the game in all ways. Yorktown has had a very long run of Section dominance without a great deal of resistance. We'll see if anyone can knock them off.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The consistency of Yorktown being great will likely fall off going forward. While they still do a great job developing kids, other towns have kids being developed close to as well through various ways.




The growth of excellent town youth lacrosse programs and the proliferation of high quality club teams in the region (Express North, Primetime, Team 91, Predators, etc) has improved the quality of lacrosse overall. Rye, Bronxville, Larchmont and a few others have done a great job of growing their youth programs, bringing in excellent coaching and supporting the game in all ways. Yorktown has had a very long run of Section dominance without a great deal of resistance. We'll see if anyone can knock them off.


Great post. A good question to ask ourselves, what is Darien and New Canaan's secret?
Very strong High School programs. What is setting their programs apart from the rest?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Most if not all of strong programs start with the highest rates of participation k-8. That wont change the outcome of varsity teams this year.

So what will be different this year that leads anyone to believe JJ will finally realize its potential and that Y town will fall off?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The consistency of Yorktown being great will likely fall off going forward. While they still do a great job developing kids, other towns have kids being developed close to as well through various ways.




The growth of excellent town youth lacrosse programs and the proliferation of high quality club teams in the region (Express North, Primetime, Team 91, Predators, etc) has improved the quality of lacrosse overall. Rye, Bronxville, Larchmont and a few others have done a great job of growing their youth programs, bringing in excellent coaching and supporting the game in all ways. Yorktown has had a very long run of Section dominance without a great deal of resistance. We'll see if anyone can knock them off.


Great post. A good question to ask ourselves, what is Darien and New Canaan's secret?
Very strong High School programs. What is setting their programs apart from the rest?


Holdbacks..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Weak answer.

There respective communities are very committed and youth numbers are high.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Weak answer.

There respective communities are very committed and youth numbers are high.


Actually not a very weak answer. Hadnt the State of CT come out with a proposal about HS sports and the Hold back phenomenon (and I believe Darian and New Cannan and another area were the focus on the study. Same goes with Bronxville Rye and Pleasentville.

Can there be a separate Westchester Youth and Westchester HS forum page. For that matter a sperate Ct youth and HS page
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I am not familiar with the proposal you mention, but live in one of the towns mentioned above (I have sons/daughters at both the HS and youth level), and do not agree at all that holdbacks are a factor for these programs.
In reality, players who become "holdbacks" actually tend to leave these public school programs after freshman/sophomore year and repeat at a private school (either day or boarding), so are not even part of the public HS teams after that.
While there may be 1-2 exceptions for New Canaan HS or Darien HS over the course of any 5 year period, those 1-2 players are hardly the "difference makers" for either program's success.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Below is an article that discusses the study in CT. Basically there is a wide age range that parents can choose to start kids in Kindergarten. On avg across CT, 1 in 12 kids start a year later than the earliest they could have. In New Britain (poorer than avg), 1 in 40 start later than could have. In a sample of wealthy towns (Darien, New Canaan, Wilton), 1 in 4 start a year later than they could have. I believe this is just data for public schools also.

https://ctmirror.org/2015/09/03/put-off-kindergarten-a-year-officials-want-to-end-redshirting/
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Below is an article that discusses the study in CT. Basically there is a wide age range that parents can choose to start kids in Kindergarten. On avg across CT, 1 in 12 kids start a year later than the earliest they could have. In New Britain (poorer than avg), 1 in 40 start later than could have. In a sample of wealthy towns (Darien, New Canaan, Wilton), 1 in 4 start a year later than they could have. I believe this is just data for public schools also.

https://ctmirror.org/2015/09/03/put-off-kindergarten-a-year-officials-want-to-end-redshirting/



Darien is great because they have more kids playing than any other program in the area. They focus on development over winning at the youth level. Because they have been so good people that are crazy about Lacrosse (like anyone on this website) choose to move to Darien over other towns in the greater NYC area. They may have some older kids but I would attribute their success to them running an incredible youth program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Below is an article that discusses the study in CT. Basically there is a wide age range that parents can choose to start kids in Kindergarten. On avg across CT, 1 in 12 kids start a year later than the earliest they could have. In New Britain (poorer than avg), 1 in 40 start later than could have. In a sample of wealthy towns (Darien, New Canaan, Wilton), 1 in 4 start a year later than they could have. I believe this is just data for public schools also.

https://ctmirror.org/2015/09/03/put-off-kindergarten-a-year-officials-want-to-end-redshirting/



Good article. I have a son with a December b-day who I "held back" but I don't really consider him a hold back. I'm not sure sending a 4 year old to kindergarten would have been great.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is this the year John Jay takes Section 1? Ytown graduated many of their big time players. The defense will be solid with Makar (Maryland) and Morales (St. Josephs) anchoring, the Embury twins return and they'll have Dahlke (Marist) and presumably Doller (Richmond) but who else is going to score? John Jay graduated fewer contributors like Reiger and they have their own power twins with the Ford's returning and their defense is probably comparable or even better as a unit than Ytown with Adamac (Colgate), Shahe (Syracuse) and they get Burke (Duke) back. Should be an epic matchup this year.


No, Town reloads every year, doesn't matter who they lose. Jay too soft against the hard nosed gritty Yorktown kids.


Its not 2008, its 2018. JJ has plenty of talented players, maybe more than Town this year and Marr is gone. Does the new guy know what he's doing? Do the players respect him like they must have respected Marr? We all knew JJ would catch up at some point. I think Town could be a very ordinary team this year outside of their sectional schedule.


"Does the new guy know what he's doing?" He's only been an assistant at town for 12 yrs or so and took them to the state final last year. I think the players respect him.


I'm not sure how you can know the players respect a coach but my point was Marr is a Yorktown guy that players could admire as one of their own, the new guy is not. Maybe it doesn't matter. I also think its just living in the past to think "Town reloads every year" is really a factor. All of the better programs now have excellent youth programs that allow the varsity programs to restock the shelves. Heck, the best team in the section this season might be Pleasantville.


Yorktown should be almost as good as last year's team and the offense might be improved. They have three kids going to Marist (H. Embury, J. Embury & Dalke) and one kid going to a top 20 school, Richmond (Doller). They lost two UAlbany players (one MID, one ATT) so Doller replaces the UAlbany MID (Richmond/Albany a wash) so they need to replace the ATT, I think he was the lefty and the third MID. I must assume Yorktown has a lefty attackman and a third middie to throw on the field. Defense? They lost their best pole (Boyer) so that will hurt, but everyone else is back. Can Yorktown reload again in 2018? Absolutely.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]The consistency of Yorktown being great will likely fall off going forward. While they still do a great job developing kids, other towns have kids being developed close to as well through various ways.




The growth of excellent town youth lacrosse programs and the proliferation of high quality club teams in the region (Express North, Primetime, Team 91, Predators, etc) has improved the quality of lacrosse overall. Rye, Bronxville, Larchmont and a few others have done a great job of growing their youth programs, bringing in excellent coaching and supporting the game in all ways. Yorktown has had a very long run of Section dominance without a great deal of resistance. We'll see if anyone can knock them off.


Great post. A good question to ask ourselves, what is Darien and New Canaan's secret?
Very strong High School programs. What is setting their programs apart from the rest?


Agree and disagree ... the lower Westchester HS teams are getting better mainly because their youth programs have been solid with great coaching and dedicated families. The local clubs are also helping improve talent but so many of them are pretty new (recent 2-4 years) that you won't see that full effect for a little while. But what Yorktown, Bronxville and Darien have that Rye, Mamaroneck, Greenwich don't is a commitment from families to stay in the system and also for HS coaches and players to develop youth talent. How many Yorktown kids go to private school to play lax? Not many. How many Rye and Greenwich kids go to private school to play? A lot. The rich holdbacks in many towns bolt to private schools. You cannot fake the environment Yorktown and Darien coaches and players foster.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Good post. Probably captures the difference in levels of success between Darien and say Greenwich.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I am not sure the BS some are trying to spin. Ct athletes are as old asTexas athletes. I will say one thing I mistakenly left off my Op was Wilton, the town with most older athletes.

I also believe there was a follow up stating the older students did do better academically. And the second study targets these areas where the 1:4 are holdbacks are the athletes. Where many go private making it 1:8 are "red shirting" I like to call it "blue shirting" because money really isn't involved.

So, a graduating class of 500, 60 are holdbacks and 70% are athletes. 42 kids, just breaking it 50/50; 20 per gender on avg per grade. (Although it is higher among males). Split amount across 3 sports, at least 12 older kids per team (rounded down). How many do you carry per team? And you tell me?

I will say it is what it is, but I always applaud that younger kid who breaks through and plays with the big boys. Not that 16 year old 9th grader. But that 13 year old no matter the conference!

Good luck to all of the boys out there, remember off season is what makes the post season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]The consistency of Yorktown being great will likely fall off going forward. While they still do a great job developing kids, other towns have kids being developed close to as well through various ways.




The growth of excellent town youth lacrosse programs and the proliferation of high quality club teams in the region (Express North, Primetime, Team 91, Predators, etc) has improved the quality of lacrosse overall. Rye, Bronxville, Larchmont and a few others have done a great job of growing their youth programs, bringing in excellent coaching and supporting the game in all ways. Yorktown has had a very long run of Section dominance without a great deal of resistance. We'll see if anyone can knock them off.


Great post. A good question to ask ourselves, what is Darien and New Canaan's secret?
Very strong High School programs. What is setting their programs apart from the rest?


Agree and disagree ... the lower Westchester HS teams are getting better mainly because their youth programs have been solid with great coaching and dedicated families. The local clubs are also helping improve talent but so many of them are pretty new (recent 2-4 years) that you won't see that full effect for a little while. But what Yorktown, Bronxville and Darien have that Rye, Mamaroneck, Greenwich don't is a commitment from families to stay in the system and also for HS coaches and players to develop youth talent. How many Yorktown kids go to private school to play lax? Not many. How many Rye and Greenwich kids go to private school to play? A lot. The rich holdbacks in many towns bolt to private schools. You cannot fake the environment Yorktown and Darien coaches and players foster.


The likelihood of 'staying' versus going private is less about the strength of the local public program and ALL about the nature of the people that live in the communities. You might keep a player here or there that otherwise would have gone private, but generally a community that thrives on private school as the "thing to do" for all of the OTHER reasons is going to keep doing that.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is this the year John Jay takes Section 1? Ytown graduated many of their big time players. The defense will be solid with Makar (Maryland) and Morales (St. Josephs) anchoring, the Embury twins return and they'll have Dahlke (Marist) and presumably Doller (Richmond) but who else is going to score? John Jay graduated fewer contributors like Reiger and they have their own power twins with the Ford's returning and their defense is probably comparable or even better as a unit than Ytown with Adamac (Colgate), Shahe (Syracuse) and they get Burke (Duke) back. Should be an epic matchup this year.


No, Town reloads every year, doesn't matter who they lose. Jay too soft against the hard nosed gritty Yorktown kids.


Its not 2008, its 2018. JJ has plenty of talented players, maybe more than Town this year and Marr is gone. Does the new guy know what he's doing? Do the players respect him like they must have respected Marr? We all knew JJ would catch up at some point. I think Town could be a very ordinary team this year outside of their sectional schedule.


"Does the new guy know what he's doing?" He's only been an assistant at town for 12 yrs or so and took them to the state final last year. I think the players respect him.


I'm not sure how you can know the players respect a coach but my point was Marr is a Yorktown guy that players could admire as one of their own, the new guy is not. Maybe it doesn't matter. I also think its just living in the past to think "Town reloads every year" is really a factor. All of the better programs now have excellent youth programs that allow the varsity programs to restock the shelves. Heck, the best team in the section this season might be Pleasantville.


Yorktown should be almost as good as last year's team and the offense might be improved. They have three kids going to Marist (H. Embury, J. Embury & Dalke) and one kid going to a top 20 school, Richmond (Doller). They lost two UAlbany players (one MID, one ATT) so Doller replaces the UAlbany MID (Richmond/Albany a wash) so they need to replace the ATT, I think he was the lefty and the third MID. I must assume Yorktown has a lefty attackman and a third middie to throw on the field. Defense? They lost their best pole (Boyer) so that will hurt, but everyone else is back. Can Yorktown reload again in 2018? Absolutely.


Get your facts right, Doller not going to Richmond anymore.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yeah but Still a good player, will land somewhere. Lots of '19 switching places. Doesn't diminish their play
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]No, [quote=Anonymous]Is this the year John Jay takes Section 1? Ytown graduated many of their big time players. The defense will be solid with Makar (Maryland) and Morales (St. Josephs) anchoring, the Embury twins return and they'll have Dahlke (Marist) and presumably Doller (Richmond) but who else is going to score? John Jay graduated fewer contributors like Reiger and they have their own power twins with the Ford's returning and their defense is probably comparable or even better as a unit than Ytown with Adamac (Colgate), Shahe (Syracuse) and they get Burke (Duke) back. Should be an epic matchup this year.


No, Town reloads every year, doesn't matter who they lose. Jay too soft against the hard nosed gritty Yorktown kids.


Its not 2008, its 2018. JJ has plenty of talented players, maybe more than Town this year and Marr is gone. Does the new guy know what he's doing? Do the players respect him like they must have respected Marr? We all knew JJ would catch up at some point. I think Town could be a very ordinary team this year outside of their sectional schedule.


Yorktown should be almost as good as last year's team and the offense might be improved. They have three kids going to Marist (H. Embury, J. Embury & Dalke) and one kid going to a top 20 school, Richmond (Doller). They lost two UAlbany players (one MID, one ATT) so Doller replaces the UAlbany MID (Richmond/Albany a wash) so they need to replace the ATT, I think he was the lefty and the third MID. I must assume Yorktown has a lefty attackman and a third middie to throw on the field. Defense? They lost their best pole (Boyer) so that will hurt, but everyone else is back. Can Yorktown reload again in 2018? Absolutely.


Get your facts right, Doller not going to Richmond anymore.


What's your point?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
If not Richmond. Then where
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I'm not a Yorktowner so I don't know where Doller is going if not Richmond. I do like the Yorktown & JJ back and forth. Seems like Ytown just needs to add a 3rd midfielder and a lefty attack. Someone asked "who else is going to score? You only need 3-4 really effective offensive players the other guys need to keep the ball moving and not turn the ball over. JJ has their best defender returning and Ytown lost their best defender. Looks like it will be a battle for Section title.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No, [quote=Anonymous]Is this the year John Jay takes Section 1? Ytown graduated many of their big time players. The defense will be solid with Makar (Maryland) and Morales (St. Josephs) anchoring, the Embury twins return and they'll have Dahlke (Marist) and presumably Doller (Richmond) but who else is going to score? John Jay graduated fewer contributors like Reiger and they have their own power twins with the Ford's returning and their defense is probably comparable or even better as a unit than Ytown with Adamac (Colgate), Shahe (Syracuse) and they get Burke (Duke) back. Should be an epic matchup this year.


No, Town reloads every year, doesn't matter who they lose. Jay too soft against the hard nosed gritty Yorktown kids.


Its not 2008, its 2018. JJ has plenty of talented players, maybe more than Town this year and Marr is gone. Does the new guy know what he's doing? Do the players respect him like they must have respected Marr? We all knew JJ would catch up at some point. I think Town could be a very ordinary team this year outside of their sectional schedule.


"Does the new guy know what he's doing?" He's only been an assistant at town for 12 yrs or so and took them to the state final last year. I think the players respect him.


Yorktown should be almost as good as last year's team and the offense might be improved. They have three kids going to Marist (H. Embury, J. Embury & Dalke) and one kid going to a top 20 school, Richmond (Doller). They lost two UAlbany players (one MID, one ATT) so Doller replaces the UAlbany MID (Richmond/Albany a wash) so they need to replace the ATT, I think he was the lefty and the third MID. I must assume Yorktown has a lefty attackman and a third middie to throw on the field. Defense? They lost their best pole (Boyer) so that will hurt, but everyone else is back. Can Yorktown reload again in 2018? Absolutely.


Get your facts right, Doller not going to Richmond anymore.


He's obviously a talented player, will be needed addition with the other kids graduating.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Each year kids have a lot to prove, this could be one thats dangerous. Look forward to hearing what they all do! Still miss a true Lakeland Yorktown game not the same since they blended with Panas. Was that the PV impact. Does Arlington have a team worth noting. Do they play any good teams. Or is it like the other blended teams JJEF and RC Ketchem. How is Suffern looking I guess I just long for the 80's
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is this the year John Jay takes Section 1? Ytown graduated many of their big time players. The defense will be solid with Makar (Maryland) and Morales (St. Josephs) anchoring, the Embury twins return and they'll have Dahlke (Marist) and presumably Doller (Richmond) but who else is going to score? John Jay graduated fewer contributors like Reiger and they have their own power twins with the Ford's returning and their defense is probably comparable or even better as a unit than Ytown with Adamac (Colgate), Shahe (Syracuse) and they get Burke (Duke) back. Should be an epic matchup this year.


No, Town reloads every year, doesn't matter who they lose. Jay too soft against the hard nosed gritty Yorktown kids.


Its not 2008, its 2018. JJ has plenty of talented players, maybe more than Town this year and Marr is gone. Does the new guy know what he's doing? Do the players respect him like they must have respected Marr? We all knew JJ would catch up at some point. I think Town could be a very ordinary team this year outside of their sectional schedule.


Yorktown needs more than the kid going to Richmond, lost a bunch of scoring to graduation.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
never thought about the Put Valley kids leaving L/P. PV has won 3 section titles and played in another 3 or so since breaking away. Wappingers lost a lot of talent from last year see if they can reload with one of the best coaches in the section. Arlington is puzzling,heard the coach was polarizing. They have always had 3 youth teams at each level, yet when they get to HS the don't gel.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Anyone know anything about Ultimate Orange?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Does anyone know which Westchester teams besides Prime Time are going to the WSYL qualifier in April?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Does anyone know which Westchester teams besides Prime Time are going to the WSYL qualifier in April?


Preds
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I believe Express North going to WSYL qualifier also.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
what tourneys is predators and 2 way going to this summer ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2 way and 91 tristate
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2 way and tri state 91 what?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what tourneys is predators and 2 way going to this summer ?


Check their web sites, they usually post the schedules online.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Just heard Pleasantville, Briarcliff and Putnam Valley all moved down to "D", To join Bronxville and Section champ Westlake. That should make for a good tournament.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard Pleasantville, Briarcliff and Putnam Valley all moved down to "D", To join Bronxville and Section champ Westlake. That should make for a good tournament.


You do realize that schools just can't decide to move down in classes? That classification is based upon the size of the respective school's student population and absolutely zero to do with team/program strength?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Preds is doing NXT, Long Island Lax Fest and Westchester War Games
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Does anyone know of any preseason tourneys for HS varsity teams? Preferably outdoor. Late Feb early March? Westchester based team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard Pleasantville, Briarcliff and Putnam Valley all moved down to "D", To join Bronxville and Section champ Westlake. That should make for a good tournament.


You do realize that schools just can't decide to move down in classes? That classification is based upon the size of the respective school's student population and absolutely zero to do with team/program strength?


Yes I realize that and they all are under the 424 population number. Never said they CHOSE to move down.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard Pleasantville, Briarcliff and Putnam Valley all moved down to "D", To join Bronxville and Section champ Westlake. That should make for a good tournament.


You do realize that schools just can't decide to move down in classes? That classification is based upon the size of the respective school's student population and absolutely zero to do with team/program strength?


Yes I realize that and they all are under the 424 population number. Never said they CHOSE to move down.


But, I believe schools can choose to move up, correct?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard Pleasantville, Briarcliff and Putnam Valley all moved down to "D", To join Bronxville and Section champ Westlake. That should make for a good tournament.


You do realize that schools just can't decide to move down in classes? That classification is based upon the size of the respective school's student population and absolutely zero to do with team/program strength?


Yes I realize that and they all are under the 424 population number. Never said they CHOSE to move down.


But, I believe schools can choose to move up, correct?


Yes they can move up, Yorktown did it a couple of years ago to avoid that strong John Jay team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Just heard Pleasantville, Briarcliff and Putnam Valley all moved down to "D", To join Bronxville and Section champ Westlake. That should make for a good tournament.


You do realize that schools just can't decide to move down in classes? That classification is based upon the size of the respective school's student population and absolutely zero to do with team/program strength?


But, I believe schools can choose to move up, correct?


Yes they can move up, Yorktown did it a couple of years ago to avoid that strong John Jay team.


Maybe Yorktown should move again. Only two NYS championships in the last quarter century tells the story. Other programs are ascending.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
when did yorktown move up to avoid JJ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
when did yorktown move up to avoid JJ?


2009 or 2010 I think
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
CT question. How good is SWC for lacrosse? They seem to have plenty of strong youth players but what happens in High School?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CT question. How good is SWC for lacrosse? They seem to have plenty of strong youth players but what happens in High School?


What is SWC?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
SWC is a HS conf in CT
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
New Fairfield best team in SWC
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard Pleasantville, Briarcliff and Putnam Valley all moved down to "D", To join Bronxville and Section champ Westlake. That should make for a good tournament.


You do realize that schools just can't decide to move down in classes? That classification is based upon the size of the respective school's student population and absolutely zero to do with team/program strength?


Yes I realize that and they all are under the 424 population number. Never said they CHOSE to move down.


But, I believe schools can choose to move up, correct?


Yes they can move up, Yorktown did it a couple of years ago to avoid that strong John Jay team.



Some changes in classes for a few teams this year.
Class "A"- Teams remain the same. Top teams L/P,mahopac,Wappingers,Mamaroneck.
Class "B"- Rye drops out of "B". Top teams Yorktown, John Jay, Somers
Class "C"- This should be Rye's title to lose. Top teams Rye, Hen Hud, Bryam Hills, Pelham
class "D" should be fun to watch this year with Putnam Valley,Briarcliff, Pleasantville moving down to "D" . Top teams P-ville, Briarcliff, bronxville, Westlake.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just heard Pleasantville, Briarcliff and Putnam Valley all moved down to "D", To join Bronxville and Section champ Westlake. That should make for a good tournament.


You do realize that schools just can't decide to move down in classes? That classification is based upon the size of the respective school's student population and absolutely zero to do with team/program strength?


Yes I realize that and they all are under the 424 population number. Never said they CHOSE to move down.


But, I believe schools can choose to move up, correct?


Yes they can move up, Yorktown did it a couple of years ago to avoid that strong John Jay team.



Some changes in classes for a few teams this year.
Class "A"- Teams remain the same. Top teams L/P,mahopac,Wappingers,Mamaroneck.
Class "B"- Rye drops out of "B". Top teams Yorktown, John Jay, Somers
Class "C"- This should be Rye's title to lose. Top teams Rye, Hen Hud, Bryam Hills, Pelham
class "D" should be fun to watch this year with Putnam Valley,Briarcliff, Pleasantville moving down to "D" . Top teams P-ville, Briarcliff, bronxville, Westlake.



L/P dropped to B
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
they have to many kids to drop the are combined 1,364 and cut off is 1,050
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
they have to many kids to drop the are combined 1,364 and cut off is 1,050


Maybe they are 'playing down' (holdback) smile
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Some changes in classes for a few teams this year.
Class "A"- Teams remain the same. Top teams L/P,mahopac,Wappingers,Mamaroneck.
Class "B"- Rye drops out of "B". Top teams Yorktown, John Jay, Somers
Class "C"- This should be Rye's title to lose. Top teams Rye, Hen Hud, Bryam Hills, Pelham
class "D" should be fun to watch this year with Putnam Valley,Briarcliff, Pleasantville moving down to "D" . Top teams P-ville, Briarcliff, bronxville, Westlake.[/quote]

Woah. Class D would beat Class A. Or hang very tough. Don't know of any other sport in Section 1 where tiny schools regularly play against and beat the huge schools.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Who is Going to Ice Breakers Tourney this spring?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
not trying to be sarcastic, but most teams from the tourney are up on tourney machine
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Oops! I hadn't checked. When we signed up they weren't. Thanks!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Some changes in classes for a few teams this year.
Class "A"- Teams remain the same. Top teams L/P,mahopac,Wappingers,Mamaroneck.
Class "B"- Rye drops out of "B". Top teams Yorktown, John Jay, Somers
Class "C"- This should be Rye's title to lose. Top teams Rye, Hen Hud, Bryam Hills, Pelham
class "D" should be fun to watch this year with Putnam Valley,Briarcliff, Pleasantville moving down to "D" . Top teams P-ville, Briarcliff, bronxville, Westlake.


Woah. Class D would beat Class A. Or hang very tough. Don't know of any other sport in Section 1 where tiny schools regularly play against and beat the huge schools.[/quote]

How will the power issues and potential snow effect the scheduling? Is Yorktown even been open or is it other areas off 202 without power?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Not sure about the scheduling but none of the schools up here including Yorktown have been open since last Thursday due to storm and loss of power and with the coming storm will probably not be open til Friday. Most of the power is back as of today but not all of it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Section Champs for 2018

A - Scarsdale
B - John Jay
C - Rye
D - Pleasantville
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Which are teams are going to WSYL qualifier?
Primetime
Eclipse
Express North
Preds
2-Way

Any others?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Section Champs for 2018

A - Scarsdale
B - John Jay
C - Rye
D - Pleasantville


Scarsdale was close last year lost in semi's bye one.
JJ is good but can never count out Town
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
when is qualifier?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
when is qualifier?

April 7th and 8th on Long Island
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
We are going Ice Breakers this weekend. We've never been but should be competitive. Teams from Westchester and Fairfield playing when its 35! Hopefully its on turf. Anyone ever been?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Which are teams are going to WSYL qualifier?
Primetime
Eclipse
Express North
Preds
2-Way
Any others?
--------------------------
Those are the teams.
PT should qualify, Eclipse maybe and others are longshots. Best teams have been together for years and cramming hard this month. Teams assembling pieces and trying to practice in a rush are easy prey.
For a "north" pool, the WSYL doesn't get any teams entering beyond Fairfield County and maybe 1 upstate NY team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Which are teams are going to WSYL qualifier?
Primetime
Eclipse
Express North
Preds
2-Way
Any others?
--------------------------
Those are the teams.
PT should qualify, Eclipse maybe and others are longshots. Best teams have been together for years and cramming hard this month. Teams assembling pieces and trying to practice in a rush are easy prey.
For a "north" pool, the WSYL doesn't get any teams entering beyond Fairfield County and maybe 1 upstate NY team.


Here's the breakdown:

Blue Division:
Shore2Shore
Sweetlax
True Blue
LI Express B

Green Division:
LI Outlaws
Prime Time
Igloo A
Express North

Red Division:
91 Bandits
Eclipse
2-Way
Igloo B

Yellow Division:
Predators
Legacy
Express A
91 Warriors

Top 3 move on to Wild Card Round (#1 seeds get a bye):
#1: Red 2 plays Blue 3
#2: Yellow 2 Plays Green 3
#3: Red 3 plays Blue 2
#4: Yellow 3 plays Green 2

Quarterfinals:
A: Winner of #1 above plays Yellow #1
B: Winner of #2 above plays Red #1
C: Winner of #3 above plays Green #1
D: Winner of #4 above plays Blue #1

Semis:
Winner of A above plays Winner of B
Winner of C above plays winner of D

Finals:
you get the point
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Which are teams are going to WSYL qualifier?
Primetime
Eclipse
Express North
Preds
2-Way
Any others?
--------------------------
Those are the teams.
PT should qualify, Eclipse maybe and others are longshots. Best teams have been together for years and cramming hard this month. Teams assembling pieces and trying to practice in a rush are easy prey.
For a "north" pool, the WSYL doesn't get any teams entering beyond Fairfield County and maybe 1 upstate NY team.


Here's the breakdown:

Blue Division:
Shore2Shore
Sweetlax
True Blue
LI Express B

Green Division:
LI Outlaws
Prime Time
Igloo A
Express North

Red Division:
91 Bandits
Eclipse
2-Way
Igloo B

Yellow Division:
Predators
Legacy
Express A
91 Warriors

Top 3 move on to Wild Card Round (#1 seeds get a bye):
#1: Red 2 plays Blue 3
#2: Yellow 2 Plays Green 3
#3: Red 3 plays Blue 2
#4: Yellow 3 plays Green 2

Quarterfinals:
A: Winner of #1 above plays Yellow #1
B: Winner of #2 above plays Red #1
C: Winner of #3 above plays Green #1
D: Winner of #4 above plays Blue #1

Semis:
Winner of A above plays Winner of B
Winner of C above plays winner of D

Finals:
you get the point


How many teams go to Denver?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Which are teams are going to WSYL qualifier?
Primetime
Eclipse
Express North
Preds
2-Way
Any others?
--------------------------
Those are the teams.
PT should qualify, Eclipse maybe and others are longshots. Best teams have been together for years and cramming hard this month. Teams assembling pieces and trying to practice in a rush are easy prey.
For a "north" pool, the WSYL doesn't get any teams entering beyond Fairfield County and maybe 1 upstate NY team.


Here's the breakdown:

Blue Division:
Shore2Shore
Sweetlax
True Blue
LI Express B

Green Division:
LI Outlaws
Prime Time
Igloo A
Express North

Red Division:
91 Bandits
Eclipse
2-Way
Igloo B

Yellow Division:
Predators
Legacy
Express A
91 Warriors

Top 3 move on to Wild Card Round (#1 seeds get a bye):
#1: Red 2 plays Blue 3
#2: Yellow 2 Plays Green 3
#3: Red 3 plays Blue 2
#4: Yellow 3 plays Green 2

Quarterfinals:
A: Winner of #1 above plays Yellow #1
B: Winner of #2 above plays Red #1
C: Winner of #3 above plays Green #1
D: Winner of #4 above plays Blue #1

Semis:
Winner of A above plays Winner of B
Winner of C above plays winner of D

Finals:
you get the point


How many teams go to Denver?

Six
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Section Champs for 2018

A - Scarsdale
B - John Jay
C - Rye
D - Pleasantville


Scarsdale was close last year lost in semi's bye one.
JJ is good but can never count out Town


JJ hammered Smithtown East, my money is on JJ this year. It had to happen and it may be the new norm--JJ and Town really battling for the Section.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Some good games this week

Bronxville at Mamaroneck
St. Anthony's at Yorktown
Mamaroneck at Pleasantville
John Jay at Manhasset
Darien at Yorktown
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Any questions about Yorktown were answered last night. My son plays for Yorktown so yes I am biased but if the team out hustles every team they play this year, could be a special year. I love nothing more than a hard working, high energy team that gives 100%. Big win Town, keep it up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any questions about Yorktown were answered last night. My son plays for Yorktown so yes I am biased but if the team out hustles every team they play this year, could be a special year. I love nothing more than a hard working, high energy team that gives 100%. Big win Town, keep it up.


Yes, great win but something brewing over in Huntington that's not good. Like Jay, you gotta move on to the next opponent. Good luck this season we are all watching.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any questions about Yorktown were answered last night. My son plays for Yorktown so yes I am biased but if the team out hustles every team they play this year, could be a special year. I love nothing more than a hard working, high energy team that gives 100%. Big win Town, keep it up.


<yawn>
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Some good games this week

Bronxville at Mamaroneck
St. Anthony's at Yorktown
Mamaroneck at Pleasantville
John Jay at Manhasset
Darien at Yorktown


Mamaroneck crushing Bronxville 16-4, wow
Great win by town
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Some good games this week

Bronxville at Mamaroneck
St. Anthony's at Yorktown
Mamaroneck at Pleasantville
John Jay at Manhasset
Darien at Yorktown


Mamaroneck crushing Bronxville 16-4, wow
Great win by town


Yeah but then beat by Pleasantville. For a D team, Pleasantville sure is loaded!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Darien looked awesome. Y town not that far behind - may be the best Y town team I have seen since Mariano graduated.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
i think Town is honestly going to crush jj this friday , Gritty gritty team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Darien looked awesome. Y town not that far behind - may be the best Y town team I have seen since Mariano graduated.


Town has a lot more firepower and balance on offense than I had expected. Both mid lines can score and move ball well. I'd like to see the attack pass to open mids when slides come, then the offense may be ready for a State run. Man up looked a little inept, where are the shooters?

Does anyone know how the injured Town plyer is doing? Looked like sure concussion. Scary hit.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Good luck to Westchester and Fairfield players in qualifier this weekend for World Series Youth Lacrosse. More area players than ever before are entered. Hope a few teams can qualify. Keep warm and dry!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Good luck to Westchester and Fairfield players in qualifier this weekend for World Series Youth Lacrosse. More area players than ever before are entered. Hope a few teams can qualify. Keep warm and dry!!


PT and Preds qualified for WSYL. 2way, Express North, Eclipse racked up wins but seemed to barely not qualify. According to WSYL scoreboard, they all played one another-- many close games. Realize there is no "Westchester pride" or cheesy stuff but think it is healthy for local lax community to have such a strong showing against top comp.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
i think Town is honestly going to crush jj this friday , Gritty gritty team


Yorktown was dominating games with their Seniors and Juniors, but against John Jay they played Freshman and Sophomores. What caused the change and why didn't they make the adjustment at halftime. Why not play kids who have been playing so well?

Anyone miss Marr?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Marc was on the sideline
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
[quote=Anonymous]Marc was on the sideline

Marr was on the sideline
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Marc was on the sideline

Marr was on the sideline


Handing out towels, not coaching.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Y town played their best players and just came up short.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Y town played their best players and just came up short.


They did not play their best players as they had been doing, that was obvious to many. The question is why? Save some dry powder for Section playoffs? Very odd.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Good luck to Westchester and Fairfield players in qualifier this weekend for World Series Youth Lacrosse. More area players than ever before are entered. Hope a few teams can qualify. Keep warm and dry!!


PT and Preds qualified for WSYL. 2way, Express North, Eclipse racked up wins but seemed to barely not qualify. According to WSYL scoreboard, they all played one another-- many close games. Realize there is no "Westchester pride" or cheesy stuff but think it is healthy for local lax community to have such a strong showing against top comp.


Congratulations PT and Preds!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Dry powder for the playoffs?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Completely innapropriate to specify a child. By name or #.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Student athlete , probably under 18. In high school. So yes. Innapropriate to highlight a specific player.
Updated IMO 2023 rankings for spring 2018

1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. 2-Way
4. Express North
5. Eclipse
6. Rhino TS
7. All others(TS91, 3d, WW, Swash)

Congrats Primetime and Preds on making WSYL!
2-Way was close to qualifying and Express North and Eclipse each won a couple of games.
Not sure rhino is far behind those 2 then a big drop to lower tier teams.
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
Updated IMO 2023 rankings for spring 2018

1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. 2-Way
4. Express North
5. Eclipse
6. Rhino TS
7. All others(TS91, 3d, WW, Swash)

Congrats Primetime and Preds on making WSYL!
2-Way was close to qualifying and Express North and Eclipse each won a couple of games.
Not sure rhino is far behind those 2 then a big drop to lower tier teams.


I agree but do you think Eclipse is 5 and shouldn't be higher than Express North and 2way?
At this time I can't put Express North or Eclipse higher than 4, possibly a coin flip tie. PT, Eclipse, Express North split ex Chargers which seemed to slightly favor Express North and even them with Eclipse. Problem is Preds, 2-Way continue to improve and stay focused. Eclipse 22 is much stronger than 23 unfortunately as 24 Express North is much stronger than 23 Express North. Just a weaker year for those two teams. Rhino is close to those two teams but doesn't play any NLF type events so hard to gain. Below that I have to admit I don't see Swash/Lone Wolf/91TS,3dTS/Warriors doing much.
Maybe Kirialdy taking TP coaching job will help 91TS in future?
At this time I can't put Express North or Eclipse higher than 4, possibly a coin flip tie. PT, Eclipse, Express North split ex Chargers which seemed to slightly favor Express North and even them with Eclipse. Problem is Preds, 2-Way continue to improve and stay focused. Eclipse 22 is much stronger than 23 unfortunately as 24 Express North is much stronger than 23 Express North. Just a weaker year for those two teams. Rhino is close to those two teams but doesn't play any NLF type events so hard to gain. Below that I have to admit I don't see Swash/Lone Wolf/91TS,3dTS/Warriors doing much.
Maybe Kirialdy taking TP coaching job will help 91TS in future?
Misspoke Kirkaldy is at 913d.
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
At this time I can't put Express North or Eclipse higher than 4, possibly a coin flip tie. PT, Eclipse, Express North split ex Chargers which seemed to slightly favor Express North and even them with Eclipse. Problem is Preds, 2-Way continue to improve and stay focused. Eclipse 22 is much stronger than 23 unfortunately as 24 Express North is much stronger than 23 Express North. Just a weaker year for those two teams. Rhino is close to those two teams but doesn't play any NLF type events so hard to gain. Below that I have to admit I don't see Swash/Lone Wolf/91TS,3dTS/Warriors doing much.
Maybe Kirialdy taking TP coaching job will help 91TS in future?


Makes sense and that's a good assessment. Are you a fan of the NLF events b/c I think they are over hyped and don't allow 'outsiders' in too much b/c if they lost, that would tarnish their reputation. Do you agree with me here?
There is quite a bot of logic to your line of reasoning. I've always believed there are 5-10 teams nationally that can play with NLF teams but aren't part of the "club". Rising Sons, Preds, 2-Way, a couple from CA, Iron Horse, 3d NE, 3d Georgia, a few others can play with NLF Teams. Probably a few others I missed. However the NLF does serve a great purpose in that it brings together a large group of very advanced players to play one another and that's important for recruiting at older ages as are the prospect days.
Anyone care to comment on Box lacrosse in the area? SuperStar is only game in town but Express North has a newish lower level box program as does Rhino. Any others in Westchester/Fairfield?
Question:
Anyone going to Warrior on May 20?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Congratulations John Jay, defeating Yorktown for the second time this season. When was the last time that happened?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Bring back Coach Marr? Carney didn't learn from the first game, going away from winning formula. Choke job as there was way too much talent on this Yorktown team to lose in Sectionals. Great job JJ and Coach Schurr.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
i think Town is honestly going to crush jj this friday , Gritty gritty team


Yorktown was dominating games with their Seniors and Juniors, but against John Jay they played Freshman and Sophomores. What caused the change and why didn't they make the adjustment at halftime. Why not play kids who have been playing so well?

Anyone miss Marr?



Great job this season Yorktown, the kids played their hearts out. Anyone miss Marr?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2006. Both games (regular season and sectional finals were at Yorktown.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yorktown was dominating games with their Seniors and Juniors, but against John Jay they played Freshman and Sophomores. What caused the change and why didn't they make the adjustment at halftime. Why not play kids who have been playing so well?


Which games? They lost to John Jay twice this year. Don't tell me Greeley. They played the same kids in both JJ games and lost.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown was dominating games with their Seniors and Juniors, but against John Jay they played Freshman and Sophomores. What caused the change and why didn't they make the adjustment at halftime. Why not play kids who have been playing so well?


Which games? They lost to John Jay twice this year. Don't tell me Greeley. They played the same kids in both JJ games and lost.


I think that's the point being made. John Jay games were coaches differently. I think the message was sent after the first lost to JJ, then Ytown made no changes in second game. Feel terrible for the players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown was dominating games with their Seniors and Juniors, but against John Jay they played Freshman and Sophomores. What caused the change and why didn't they make the adjustment at halftime. Why not play kids who have been playing so well?


Which games? They lost to John Jay twice this year. Don't tell me Greeley. They played the same kids in both JJ games and lost.


I think that's the point being made. John Jay games were coaches differently. I think the message was sent after the first lost to JJ, then Ytown made no changes in second game. Feel terrible for the players.

Please. Just stop it. Even though you're anonymous, we've all met you a thousand times, complaining about coaches, or the refs, or something. Two very good teams played two very good games, with two very good coaches, who certainly know more about lacrosse than most if not all of us.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown was dominating games with their Seniors and Juniors, but against John Jay they played Freshman and Sophomores. What caused the change and why didn't they make the adjustment at halftime. Why not play kids who have been playing so well?


Which games? They lost to John Jay twice this year. Don't tell me Greeley. They played the same kids in both JJ games and lost.


I think that's the point being made. John Jay games were coaches differently. I think the message was sent after the first lost to JJ, then Ytown made no changes in second game. Feel terrible for the players.

Please. Just stop it. Even though you're anonymous, we've all met you a thousand times, complaining about coaches, or the refs, or something. Two very good teams played two very good games, with two very good coaches, who certainly know more about lacrosse than most if not all of us.


One coach choked, no adjustments from first game. I don't call that good coaching.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Who really cares? High school lacrosse is a pimple on the azz of life when looking big picture. Move on, good luck to the players graduating and everyone gets a chance to battle again next year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who really cares? High school lacrosse is a pimple on the azz of life when looking big picture. Move on, good luck to the players graduating and everyone gets a chance to battle again next year.
So your kids team lost?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who really cares? High school lacrosse is a pimple on the azz of life when looking big picture. Move on, good luck to the players graduating and everyone gets a chance to battle again next year.
So your kids team lost?

Section 1 is weak
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Can we ...
1- recognize Pleasantville for winning states in dominating fashion?
2- figure out how Pville had maybe 17 seniors on that team, who also were on football state champs team, assembled that epic class in that small town?
3- talk up summer club circuit with tourneys starting this weekend?

On 3 above- PrimeTime 2023 lost by 1 goal to Team 80+11 Bandits. Woah. Rocking the boat before the World Series.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we ...
1- recognize Pleasantville for winning states in dominating fashion?
2- figure out how Pville had maybe 17 seniors on that team, who also were on football state champs team, assembled that epic class in that small town?
3- talk up summer club circuit with tourneys starting this weekend?

On 3 above- PrimeTime 2023 lost by 1 goal to Team 80+11 Bandits. Woah. Rocking the boat before the World Series.


Prime Time has, I am told, approximately 4 kids on the 2023 team who are not age eligible (i.e. they were born before 9/1/2004) for WSYL. They held open tryouts to fill these spots with age eligible kids. So going to Denver it will be a slightly different roster which is slightly younger. It is probably true that these overage kids are amongst the best players on the team, and are stronger than the younger players replacing them at WSYL. I don't know that Bandits have this problem. So if all of this is true, Prime Time will weaker in Denver relative to Bandits.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yes it is true. My son was at the Prime Time WSYL tryout and we were told there were at least 6-7 positions they needed to fill due to age requirements.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
every legit travel team has holdbacks, every single one of them
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
25-30 percent of a 7th grade team is born before 9/1/2004. This tells you all you need to know about why lacrosse should move to an age-based set up. Keep in mind that NY's school age classification places kids born from 12/1/2004 - 11/30/2005 in 7th grade for this current (and soon to be over) school year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
The WSYL can be knocked for many things. But it's very positive impact is the age restrictions conversation related to holdbacks flooding this sport on the youth level. Anyone who has attended WSYL qualifiers or tracked its results over the past couple years will tell you that making kids of the same age play and compete makes for a more balanced and level playing field for all.

Yes, every club team has holdbacks. Though our tristate (including LI) region teams are far from saints, other regions (Mass, Baltimore, out West) are worse in terms of gaming system to win with holdbacks. Too bad clubs don't want age restrictions but not surprising.

No changes coming soon. Only ones who want change are parents of kids losing playing time and games and recruitment slots to holdbacks. Even though that is the majority, those are not the people in charge.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
There are so many reasonable solutions to this, its hard to understand why change has not occurred yet. And many of these solutions involve the club/tournament (they are the same people) owners making more money.

"Travel" sports isn't what it used to be. In years past, the best kid in town (in whatever sport it was) played for some select team somewhere. That was it. Now, a TON of kids play "travel". I am not trying to disparage these kids. Its great that they are playing, and it beats xbox. But travel sports have now grown well beyond just the kids that will get college scholarships and/or go pro. An example of all of this is the fact that some kids are on travel lacrosse teams that would get smoked by their own town team - because the top kids on their town team (and other town teams) are playing for higher level travel teams.

Focusing on lacrosse - in northern climates, the town season is very short. Travel lets these kids play another 6-8 weeks or so, and the kids love the tournaments. Owners should capitalize on this growing market and gear their programing to these kids. You can still have it be grade based at the AAA (or elite, or AA, or whatever name you want to give), and make this level relatively shallow to ensure that only the top players get in and that it will be competitive for these kids. But for everyone else (and this includes the many teams that market themselves as AA or elite but really aren't) age based is much better. And it can be either calendar year of Sept-Aug, I don't care and I don't think it makes a difference.

The bottom line is that there is no more growth in the area of elite players. Every single elite player is already playing club lacrosse. But there is still more room for growth amongst every other level of player. June and July provide very little competition in terms of kids sports and activities. If the club owners were smart, they would be presiding over clubs and tournaments with all of the following teams - AAA (can still do it by grade), AA, A, B. But mediocre or newer players can not compete against older kids from some far away state, so it hasn't really gotten off the ground on the lower ends. But if you make sure that everyone is within a 12 mos. birth window, you can have competitive fun lacrosse amongst teams from all over the country at all kinds of levels of skill and athleticism.

And for the "sorry your kid got cut crowd", my kids have all made very good teams and played well. But I have seen too many people be one and done with a club due to holdbacks, and say things like "why should I spend money and do all of this travel to watch my kid play against 14 year olds when he is only 12".
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Some clubs like The Edge (Canadiens) play each and every team down one age division at tournaments. Justifying it by declaring every kid intends to PG. Its up to tournament directors to police the clubs, on an individual basis, people will always look for a way to cheat.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
IMO Rankings updates after this this weekend as tourney season begins.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are so many reasonable solutions to this, its hard to understand why change has not occurred yet. And many of these solutions involve the club/tournament (they are the same people) owners making more money.

"Travel" sports isn't what it used to be. In years past, the best kid in town (in whatever sport it was) played for some select team somewhere. That was it. Now, a TON of kids play "travel". I am not trying to disparage these kids. Its great that they are playing, and it beats xbox. But travel sports have now grown well beyond just the kids that will get college scholarships and/or go pro. An example of all of this is the fact that some kids are on travel lacrosse teams that would get smoked by their own town team - because the top kids on their town team (and other town teams) are playing for higher level travel teams.

Focusing on lacrosse - in northern climates, the town season is very short. Travel lets these kids play another 6-8 weeks or so, and the kids love the tournaments. Owners should capitalize on this growing market and gear their programing to these kids. You can still have it be grade based at the AAA (or elite, or AA, or whatever name you want to give), and make this level relatively shallow to ensure that only the top players get in and that it will be competitive for these kids. But for everyone else (and this includes the many teams that market themselves as AA or elite but really aren't) age based is much better. And it can be either calendar year of Sept-Aug, I don't care and I don't think it makes a difference.

The bottom line is that there is no more growth in the area of elite players. Every single elite player is already playing club lacrosse. But there is still more room for growth amongst every other level of player. June and July provide very little competition in terms of kids sports and activities. If the club owners were smart, they would be presiding over clubs and tournaments with all of the following teams - AAA (can still do it by grade), AA, A, B. But mediocre or newer players can not compete against older kids from some far away state, so it hasn't really gotten off the ground on the lower ends. But if you make sure that everyone is within a 12 mos. birth window, you can have competitive fun lacrosse amongst teams from all over the country at all kinds of levels of skill and athleticism.

And for the "sorry your kid got cut crowd", my kids have all made very good teams and played well. But I have seen too many people be one and done with a club due to holdbacks, and say things like "why should I spend money and do all of this travel to watch my kid play against 14 year olds when he is only 12".


I agree 100% but it is up to you guys on the east coast to fix it. These are your rules we are playing by.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO Rankings updates after this this weekend as tourney season begins.


Looking forward to it! As someone here noted recently, so hard to know quality of 2023 teams now that they added their holdbacks after WSYL.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
IMO Rankings 6/18/18

Decent showings by area boys for most part as PrimeTime did well at NALF post WSYL in MD and Express North won a couple of games too. Preds a solid showing on LI and compted with most national level LI teams as they looked much larger post WSYL qualifier. 2-Way and Eclipse on sidelines and Rhino got smacked around up in MA. Lower level teams all lost or played in B/C tourneys. Teams that have not played a real tournament yet hard to gauge how strong hold back team is. On that note backup teams or second teams are not factored in as its almost impossible to judge an entire organizations strength.

IMO Rankings 2023

1. Primetime
2. Predators

3. 2-Way
4. Express North, Eclipse

6. Rhino
7. LoneWolf

8. Warriors, Swash, Ballers, etc.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
prime time 2025 is horrible, 0-10 year to date
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
True but current rankings are for 2023. I will release 2024 rankings later this week.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Anyone doing that reginal thing that is supposed to be like the ole empires state games. (And not the ones 3/4 years ago - I mean like 35 years ago.)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2024 rankings

ECLIPSE
prime time
express north
2 way
predators
91 tri state
warriors
3d
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO Rankings 6/18/18

IMO Rankings 2023

1. Primetime
2. Predators
3. 2-Way
4. Express North, Eclipse
6. Rhino
7. LoneWolf
8. Warriors, Swash, Ballers, etc.


Can't argue except Eclipse seems better after WSYL now that they get all those holdbacks again while Express North lost a lot of games last 2 weeks. Might want add Pride tied #7 (no idea what LoneWolf is but they have a good name). Also TriState 91 Select tied at #7 seems about right.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I agree with the ties at #7 TS, 91 not bad. Eclipse hasn't played much yet so hard to gauge. LoneWolf is remnants of SuperStar and other teams. Who is Pride?

IMO Rankings 2023

1. Primetime
2. Predators
3. 2-Way
4. Eclipse, Express North
6. Rhino
7. TS 91 Select, LoneWolf,
9. 3d 91 Tri-State, Pride
11. Ballers, Swash, Warriors
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Pride is new out of Pleasantville and Yonkers. Saw them at a tournament a few weeks ago. Not bad for a brand new team but they mostly played B/C teams. Hard to fit them into this list when most of the second teams from the top 5 here would probably beat them. Should probably keep this list to the top AA teams in Westchester and maybe a separate list for A/B teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown was dominating games with their Seniors and Juniors, but against John Jay they played Freshman and Sophomores. What caused the change and why didn't they make the adjustment at halftime. Why not play kids who have been playing so well?


Which games? They lost to John Jay twice this year. Don't tell me Greeley. They played the same kids in both JJ games and lost.


I think that's the point being made. John Jay games were coaches differently. I think the message was sent after the first lost to JJ, then Ytown made no changes in second game. Feel terrible for the players.

Please. Just stop it. Even though you're anonymous, we've all met you a thousand times, complaining about coaches, or the refs, or something. Two very good teams played two very good games, with two very good coaches, who certainly know more about lacrosse than most if not all of us.


You sound like the guy who choked. Its called accountability, when you claim to be a great coach you had better deliver on the field and leave your agendas home.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Getting back to another contested issue:
town teams are age based and Most club teams have some hod backs as they are grade based. When kids get to a certain grade, not age colleges will notice some of them. They all want bigger, faster, stronger, more experienced plsyers. College coaches don't worry if a kid is a year older, in fact most appreciate the older recruits as they tend to be more college ready students and athletes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Westchester War Games tournament just happened. A nice "B" tourney that draws more teams each year. Where were the bigger area clubs? No Eclipse, Express N, 2W, PT. 9+1 there in force as they own the tourney I think. Perhaps club politics keeps area teams away. Some Preds teams there. Disappointed so many local clubs traveled so far away to other tourneys when this tournament happens in their backyards. Everyone has their reasons/excuses. Still, at least send B teams there! Glad a bunch of area clubs and smaller unknown clubs showed up though! Swashbucklers, Lone Wolf, Sharks, I like how new teams emerge.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2022 Predators are a very good team. There middies are beasts. Them and Outlaws battled out in fl$ tourney this weekend.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Anybody see that mom cat fight at that 6th grade game at Westchester War Games? What happened?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
IMO 2023 Rankings
6/25/18

Very tough weekend for most of our local teams. Primetime played very well against some of nations strongest teams in LI. Preds won a "A" braakcet at Ware Games but played weaker teams. Express North 2-3 at same event , not bad including win over Eclipse. 2-Way in lower toureny in NJ got spanked 1-4. Rest all playing cath up.

1 PrimeTime
2. Preds
3. 2-Way
4. Express North
5. Eclipse
6. Rhino
7. LoneWolf
8. Swash, Pride, 91 TS, 3d TS Ballers

2024 Rankings
1. Eclipse
2. PrimeTime
3. 2-Way
4. Express North
5. Preds
6. loneWolf
7. Rhino
8. All others
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Hard to believe 2023 rankings 2way would be ranked above eclipse and North??
It doesn’t matter but it appears these rankings are totally subjective
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I was trying to give 2Way benefit of a doubt but i have no problem putting them 5 as that's probabaly where they ought to be.

1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. Express North
4. Eclipse
5. 2-Way
6. Rhino
7. Lonewolf
8. Rest
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
preds moms cant handle there liquor. shame because both teams played a good game. even better game between team 24 east and preds in championship.preds very well coached and great sportsmanship. all good
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
express north not even in same league as preds
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
How will primetime do in World Series? How many boys that played this past weekend are ineligible teams play in Denver
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
who coaches predators 2024? any insight to quality of experience would be greatly appreciated !!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
if this is any help my sons team played them twice this past weekend and just from watching that team is very well coached. non stop teaching going on that sideline. tip my cap to there coaching staff!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Coaching staff of predators is on their website. 2024 team is coached by JJ Liang and Joe Capalbo (was HC at Westchester War games) and two assistants the older one from Notre Dame and the younger, a current UNC player. Great coaching.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anybody see that mom cat fight at that 6th grade game at Westchester War Games? What happened?


Now this board is getting good. I know, "what a lowbrow topic!" But perfect for the internet, Need info.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I was trying to give 2Way benefit of a doubt but i have no problem putting them 5 as that's probabaly where they ought to be.

1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. Express North
4. Eclipse
5. 2-Way
6. Rhino
7. Lonewolf
8. Rest


Good correction-- 2way lost games to mid-level teams in NJ according to scores.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I was trying to give 2Way benefit of a doubt but i have no problem putting them 5 as that's probabaly where they ought to be.

1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. Express North
4. Eclipse
5. 2-Way
6. Rhino
7. Lonewolf
8. Rest

Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO 2023 Rankings
6/25/18


2024 Rankings
1. Eclipse
2. PrimeTime
3. 2-Way
4. Express North
5. Preds
6. loneWolf
7. Rhino
8. All others


Can bump up the 2024 Preds to #3. All this chatter about Preds doing well isn't just talk. That program has been charging hard, winning, getting coverage, and getting the better players. Not saying better than PT but their model has them pushing past Eclipse, 2Way, Express North cleanly. By the time their 2023 WSYL team is in middle of HS, they will be the top.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How will primetime do in World Series? How many boys that played this past weekend are ineligible teams play in Denver

Anyone know actual number
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Primetime has 7 players not eligible for world series.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
On next weeks rankings We'll see where everyone lands although not much going on this weekend for most clubs as most top team laying low or just practicing. I know lots of backup teams have tourneys this weekend.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What difference does it make how many are ineligible? Are you scouting them?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I hear Colsey is taking his kids to express North, maybe he has burned his bridge with Daniello at PrimeTime, not sure if its true, but chatter is parents on the 24 team are not happy with him and his daddy ball nonsense and kids are looking around . makes sense, happened at superstars
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
think Jersey Shore meets Housewives of NJ meets the family dinner scene in the "The Heat"
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
if you want to avoid daddy ball and you should, then stay away from PT 24 and express North 24, both are coached by dads and both have unhappy players because of it. In my experience, daddy ball never works except maybe for the coach and his son.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anybody see that mom cat fight at that 6th grade game at Westchester War Games? What happened?


Now this board is getting good. I know, "what a lowbrow topic!" But perfect for the internet, Need info.


think Jersey Shore meets Housewives of NJ meets the family dinner scene in the "The Heat"
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
would love to hear from any pt 2024 parents how their experience has been with roy colsey this year as I am considering having my son tryout
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
any video of that around?...how great would that be?...for the rest of those gum-snappers lives, everyone w/b able to [ChillLaxin] themselves watching them throw down at their 8 year olds lax game....priceless..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Just remember that 2024 Express North Coach also coached Express North 2018. Express North 2018 ended up being one of the best 2018 teams in the Country with commits to Hopkins, Georgetown, Brown among others. 2024 team will likely end up the same.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Schreiber is a world class man that cares about his kids, you wont learn much from Roy unless you stand next to one of his kids and listen really closely as he whispers in their ears . -- Express North all the way , we are very happy with Express North and the level of instruction that is going on
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
That’s great about the instruction but it’s not translating into a lot of wins for the kids unless they travel to B tourneys. But none of these club teams mean much if your son attends a competitive HS that gets a lot attention from college scouts. Capisce
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
7 ps. Prior proper planning prevents [ChillLaxin] poor performance. This is not about winning in middle school. This is about properly planning for the future when it does matter. Or else what’s the point
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Wins are not a great indicator of player development at this age. Most high schools really don’t get the kind of attention club teams do when it comes to recruiting. Been that way for a while.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Wins give the team/players confidence. Why else would you play in b tourneys. Sure, player development is critical but if your team/ organization is not getting better like what the chargers went thru and now eclipse is going thru, then the parents will be looking for a new club. If you are happy with the level of instruction there, great it’s all relative.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Who plays in B tourneys?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Yeah. Good question. All of the big programs in westcheter have AA teams
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Someone on the board asked so i answered.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
2way, preds have already played in a couple of weak tourneys according to tourney machine. Eclipse might as well also, a total money grab with multiple teams getting decimated. Xpress north and Express CT both struggling during tourneys. Westchester Was Games is a juggernaut
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2way, preds have already played in a couple of weak tourneys according to tourney machine. Eclipse might as well also, a total money grab with multiple teams getting decimated. Xpress north and Express CT both struggling during tourneys. Westchester Was Games is a juggernaut


what is the answer then?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
What is a B team now ? Is it that the old C team? AA is that like "This goes to 11" from Spinal Tap?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I think the B team is just the second team in a particular year, not all tournaments use AA as a division just A and B. We were recently at a tourney that had an A and a B division. The A division were clearly AA teams , some were going to the world series. It's very confusing sometimes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That’s great about the instruction but it’s not translating into a lot of wins for the kids unless they travel to B tourneys. But none of these club teams mean much if your son attends a competitive HS that gets a lot attention from college scouts. Capisce

You couldn't be more wrong. Recruiting takes place primarily at premier tournaments attended by the top club programs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
How many spots at each age do teams like eclipse express north and primetime get for kids at the Maverick Showtime ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
I hear maverick is a waste of time and a lot of B clubs attend
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Maverick showtime is currently one of the most prestigious showcases ... there used to be a Maverick showtime tournament that was not high level. Different thing ...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Great job Yorktown Ballers this weekend on long island. Kids played so hard and so well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Long Island teams still dominate youth lax.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Long Island teams still dominate youth lax.



will never change until the local organizations make a change and keep these kids playing together all year - 91 bandits, LI express are constantly playing together all year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Long Island teams still dominate youth lax.



will never change until the local organizations make a change and keep these kids playing together all year - 91 bandits, LI express are constantly playing together all year


Disagree. True, play all the time and your team will be better. But look at Prime Time-- sure is a top program in the entire country. They play together a lot but don't take over the lives of their players. If that top player on Express from Westchester played for them, "dominate" might be the wrong word. Predators and Eclipse no jokes either. The Bandits are an exceptional team and have been since 2nd grade-- don't think they reflect "Long Island" on the whole. Express always been strong. But don't think players on LI are so much better than here.

Maybe it's more that Long Island has created a massive culture of playing competitive lacrosse and with so many kids/parents/coaches it is inevitable that the best ones will find one another and kick butt. It's not about playing year-round though of course that helps.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
That player from Westchester did play for prime time last year but transferred to express last fall. The announcers said it a couple of times during the wsyl game that he transferred to express’ for their coaching and player development based on his interviews. Everyone else that plays for express is from LI with the exception of Rockefeller.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
on an individual basis, westchester produces many many many top quality lax players and that is very obvious. but when you play against a team that works on their game nonstop as a team, and has committed coaching, they are tough to beat- 91 bandits is together all the time, they play box together, etc etc etc etc... 91 crush 2020, 91 2024, etc etc etc
IMO 2023 Rankings
1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. LI Express North
4. Eclipse
5. 2-Way
6. Lone Wolf, Rhino
8. 91 TS, 3d TS
10. Rest-ballers, Swash, Warriors

Primetime so far in front not even close. Preds solid 2 and surprsing Express North with strong tourney against top competition 3rd. Eclipse doesn't really play much so 4 by default as 2-Way struggling this season. Next tier teams both losing lots so they are farther back than expected especially Rhino. Rest seem to lose against lower level competition as season progresses.

2024 Rankings
1. PrimeTime
2. Express North
3. Preds
4. Eclipse
5. 2-Way

Top 3 are real close so changes almost weekly. Probably will be re-arranged based on next tourney.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
IMO 2023 Rankings
1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. LI Express North
4. Eclipse
5. 2-Way
6. Lone Wolf, Rhino
8. 91 TS, 3d TS
10. Rest-ballers, Swash, Warriors


2024 Rankings
1. PrimeTime
2. Express North
3. Preds
4. Eclipse
5. 2-Way


So who is going to help CTlAxdad with some opinions on other age groups? These 2023 and 2024 rankings are pretty solid. Need thoughts on 2025, 2022. Come on people, help this guy out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
first off - eclipse 24 beat prime time 7-6 , so the 24 rankings are completely wrong, and 2 way is better than Predators
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
first off - eclipse 24 beat prime time 7-6 , so the 24 rankings are completely wrong, and 2 way is better than Predators


well after 1/2 the Primetime 24 team leaves because of Roy, predators and 2way will be much better
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
first off - eclipse 24 beat prime time 7-6 , so the 24 rankings are completely wrong, and 2 way is better than Predators


well after 1/2 the Primetime 24 team leaves because of Roy, predators and 2way will be much better


Disagree. Preds 24 better than 2Way but want to see them battle. 91 TS 24 is not miles behind but def a step back of those two

And 2024 is major age for team changes, accelerated by polarizing coaches. Too bad we will all never see roster changes for all teams 3 weeks from now
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
We lost to pt 2024 4 times this summer, very strong team. But, If I had a dollar for every time the coach told his players to pass it to his son , I could retire. That said. We have some similar issues. Every coach is a dad. Does anyone out there love their situaton? 2way? Preds? Any comments.
As a parent without a 24 kid where would the PT kids go? Express North, 2Way? Are all the area teams basically trading kids at this point?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
first off - eclipse 24 beat prime time 7-6 , so the 24 rankings are completely wrong, and 2 way is better than Predators


well after 1/2 the Primetime 24 team leaves because of Roy, predators and 2way will be much better


Disagree. Preds 24 better than 2Way but want to see them battle. 91 TS 24 is not miles behind but def a step back of those two

And 2024 is major age for team changes, accelerated by polarizing coaches. Too bad we will all never see roster changes for all teams 3 weeks from now


At 2024,2way beat Preds by one goal when they played in the fall. More recently Preds lost to 24east twice, once in a bravheart, while 2way split with 24east. 2way also beat igloo which beat Preds at laxfest. Based on the 2 head to head and common opponent would make sense to have 2way above Preds. Preds has more hype but that’s not enough for me to have Oteds above a team they lost to.
91TS a few good players from closing the gap. So for me it is more of a bucket ranking system, in no particular order)

Top 3 (all going to NLF club championship next week so let’s see how they end up there)Eclipse, North and PT

Next 3- 2way, Preds, 91(gap is there but not insurmountable.)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT 2021 rolled Eclipse 9-3 at Naptown..wonder if PT will see a bunch of those Eclipse CT kids trying out for PT..Eclipse parents were furious as game was not close.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
problem with TS 91 is that they seem content on playing a very mediocre schedule, i am not sure that is enough to attract the few players they need to close that gap, parents want to know you are playing consistently good teams and when you play that schedule, its anything but consistent , not putting it down, but not sure why a good player would not want to be challenged
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
We lost to pt 2024 4 times this summer, very strong team. But, If I had a dollar for every time the coach told his players to pass it to his son , I could retire. That said. We have some similar issues. Every coach is a dad. Does anyone out there love their situaton? 2way? Preds? Any comments.


My two oldest are in college, summer lacrosse for them was much different than it is now. My two younger boys play for Express North and Predators. From my experience, your satisfaction with a program is directly tied to the coaching staff for your sons team. Are they engaged, knowledgeable, do they care about teaching or just cut throat winning? Watch the coaches during games when kids sub on/off the field--do they coaches talk to the kids, coaching them up? Do they coaches provide instruction between games and mingle with the team at tournaments or do they hide? The equation for "great coaching" includes many factors My boys have been fortunate in that their coaches have been wonderful, different personalities, but we know our kids improved greatly, the coaches cared and they established great friendships outside of town ball. Just one other thought. One of the best coaches my third son ever had was the father of a kid on the team, they don't all play Daddy ball.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
IMO

2023 Rankings

1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. Express North
4. Eclipse
5. 2-Way
6. Express North Brameier
7. Preds B
8. 91 TS
8. Everyone else

2-Way keeps losing ans does now defunct Rhino. Suddenly TS 91 starting to win some mid level games. 3 of Top 4 in action this week at NLF. Put Express North B at 6 simply because everyone else is losing and they've won a bunch lately. Probably will change this week.

2022 RANKINGS
1. Primetime
2. Express North
3. Eclipse
4. Preds
5. 2-Way
6. 91 TS
7. Who knows
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO

2023 Rankings

1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. Express North
4. Eclipse
5. 2-Way
6. Express North Brameier
7. Preds B
8. 91 TS
8. Everyone else

2-Way keeps losing ans does now defunct Rhino. Suddenly TS 91 starting to win some mid level games. 3 of Top 4 in action this week at NLF. Put Express North B at 6 simply because everyone else is losing and they've won a bunch lately. Probably will change this week.

2022 RANKINGS
1. Primetime
2. Express North
3. Eclipse
4. Preds
5. 2-Way
6. 91 TS
7. Who knows


With tryouts this week and next, get ready for some real roster moves. Happens after WSYL when good kids on teams who failed to qualify look across the fence and see green grass. Is Rhino dead? Then more players on the market.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
i think prime time is putting their players in interesting situation, they dont tell kids until august 15 after every other program has had tryouts
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
first off - eclipse 24 beat prime time 7-6 , so the 24 rankings are completely wrong, and 2 way is better than Predators


well after 1/2 the Primetime 24 team leaves because of Roy, predators and 2way will be much better


what's the beef about the PT Coach?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
problem with TS 91 is that they seem content on playing a very mediocre schedule, i am not sure that is enough to attract the few players they need to close that gap, parents want to know you are playing consistently good teams and when you play that schedule, its anything but consistent , not putting it down, but not sure why a good player would not want to be challenged


With the tie to the LI club they should be able to play a tougher schedule. We are thinking about 91TS for our 2024 and were told they will play a harder schedule next year . That team had results with a B schedule.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
how was the talent at the 24 preds tryouts?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
IMO 2023 Rankings
1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. LI Express North
4. Eclipse
5. 2-Way
6. Lone Wolf, Rhino
8. 91 TS, 3d TS
10. Rest-ballers, Swash, Warriors


2024 Rankings
1. PrimeTime
2. Express North
3. Preds
4. Eclipse
5. 2-Way


So who is going to help CTlAxdad with some opinions on other age groups? These 2023 and 2024 rankings are pretty solid. Need thoughts on 2025, 2022. Come on people, help this guy out.


Sons 2024 team has played north, primerime and eclipse multiple times. Eclipse best, prime time decent and north needs most work.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I would have to say you can't put Brameier on the list without including Express north 2023 Hallinan. Although I think Brameier is a great coach they've only been winning lately because they played in B tournaments. When faced with the same level of competition the Hallinan team does better. I also think Preds B does a little better than Hallinan. I would agree with the rest but all Express North teams at the 2023 level have some issues. It will be interesting to see if the Pearsall team brings on some new blood this year to change things up.
Tryouts underway with Preds done and Express North, 2-Way, and Eclipse this week. Saw lots of non club helmets at Express North 2024 and 2023 tryouts at Danbury Dome last night. We'll see how busy 2-Way and Eclipse are this week as well. Should be busy couple of weeks as Express North continues to grow its base and Eclipse tries to regain some of it's lost luster. PrimeTime very late this season. We'll see if that's urts/helps them for next season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Have Preds put out tryout results?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Have Preds put out tryout results?


Calls have been made.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
final 2024 rankings

Primetime
Eclipse
Express North
2Way
Predators
TS 91
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
good end of year 2024 Rankings. We'll see how teams change after tryouts.

Breaking News: Eclipse eliminating the backup teams at 2023 level so more players on market. My guess is they catch on with Express North backup teams or new CT Wolves.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
good end of year 2024 Rankings. We'll see how teams change after tryouts.

Breaking News: Eclipse eliminating the backup teams at 2023 level so more players on market. My guess is they catch on with Express North backup teams or new CT Wolves.


what is the rationale behind that ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
good end of year 2024 Rankings. We'll see how teams change after tryouts.

Breaking News: Eclipse eliminating the backup teams at 2023 level so more players on market. My guess is they catch on with Express North backup teams or new CT Wolves.


what is the rationale behind that ?

only at 23? Is it because they do not need to cover the hold backs for WSYL anymore? So the 2024 team should have the AA team with half age out kids then pull in from the A team to fill the roster out. How good can the 2024 Eclipse B team be if there is an AA and A ahead of it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2024 2Way has a lot of kids who are way too old to play in the WSYL qualifiers.

Will they have another recruiting tryout to fill out the team for the April qualifier or will they just tap into older pool of kids from the 2Way 2025 team who would be too old next year and give them a chance for Denver?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
final 2024 rankings

Primetime
Eclipse
Express North
2Way
Predators
TS 91


Eclipse is a better team than primetime
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
good end of year 2024 Rankings. We'll see how teams change after tryouts.

Breaking News: Eclipse eliminating the backup teams at 2023 level so more players on market. My guess is they catch on with Express North backup teams or new CT Wolves.


2Way was going to start doing A and B team for first time for 2023 but my son said the coach stated only one team at start of tryout then parents got the news after. No reason given why. Some decent players will be looking for new homes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
maybe teams are just deciding to go to the pt model- one team - should be good for teams that have later tryout dates
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Saw a couple of them at Express North tryouts this week.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Any word on when Express North and Eclipse will publish rosters?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
good end of year 2024 Rankings. We'll see how teams change after tryouts.

Breaking News: Eclipse eliminating the backup teams at 2023 level so more players on market. My guess is they catch on with Express North backup teams or new CT Wolves.


2Way was going to start doing A and B team for first time for 2023 but my son said the coach stated only one team at start of tryout then parents got the news after. No reason given why. Some decent players will be looking for new homes.


Are you serius? The reason is simple $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express sent out an email saying they will start early next week
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
If you are a decent player at 2way then u should make the team. Not sure how u r defining decent.
Teams should be 20 players max, anymore than 20 is more $$ for directors and less playing time for kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Got our Express North invite today.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I still do not understand the fixation on a teams record in tournaments. Can someone please explain. A parents sole focus should be on the development of your child's skills, lacrosse IQ and fun factor. Why fixate on one program winning two more games this summer than another? Who really cares?

Is the coach knowledgeable and does he teach the game and specific position skills to the players? From my experience I've watch 3x All Americans teach my son absolutely nothing and berate players during games without actually coaching. I've conversely watched coaches spend 1/2 their time during games teaching on the fly and actually watching the players gain in knowledge from game to game. Its truly amazing the disparity in coaching. PLaying experience when Seinfeld was a hit TV show is not an indicator of a good coach. Attend practice and listen to your son--is he learning, is he inspired by the coach? Does the coach give a S@&^?

Its coaching 1st, 2nd, 3rd and where these guys played 20 years ago is 100% meaningless from my experience.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
what programs are providing the best coaches and which ones are not
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Teams that carry more than 20 players is a joke. If you want your son to get better than he needs a good coach and playing time. If a team carries 10 middies and the coach doesn’t run lines than that is a problem. Sure, you want to play for good organizations but do your homework.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What are the fees for the teams that sent out invites?
Preds:
Express North:
2Way:
Prime time:
Eclipse:
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What are the fees for the teams that sent out invites?
Preds:
Express North:
2Way:
Prime time:
Eclipse:


and what do you get with that?

I believe this is tournament breakdown. Dont know about practices and trainings.

Preds 3 summer 2 fall,
Express North 5 summer 2 fall
2 way 4 summer 2 fall (1x 4hr practice pw)
Primetime 5 summer 1 fall
Eclipse
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Preds is $3500 - includes 3 fall, 4 summer and box in the winter
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How big is the 2Way roster?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How big is the 2Way roster?


This year their claim is 18-20 kids per team. That is the right number. Last year they claimed some model of 25 players but only certain ones selected for tournaments. Not sure how well that worked out if they changing model again.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
have rosters for 2 way gone out?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2way will have 1 team with no more than 20 which will allow max playing time. Teams that carry more than that benefit the directors only.
Look for teams where player development is important and playing time is crucial.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I heard invites for third tryout have gone out to several new Players for PT as they look for upgrades.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Which team were the kids on? Was it PT 2025?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Any word on what teams have yet to send out invitations?
Eclipse 2024 is an excellent team. 2023 doesn't have as much talent in the crop across the board for all clubs from what I hear, so I guess that may be a factor behind Eclipse dropping down to one 2023 team and only taking the best players. My other guess is that with all of the new clubs popping up and the coaching shortage, it thins out the herd and can water things down. But, that is just my guess. Eclipse 2023 will play in more AA tournaments. Eclipse rosters were posted last week when emails went out, but they don't stay up long.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2way will have 1 team with no more than 20 which will allow max playing time. Teams that carry more than that benefit the directors only.
Look for teams where player development is important and playing time is crucial.


Being in high school and on a B team for one of the local clubs is pointless. B teams usually cost the same as the A team but you get weaker coaches, inferior practices and most importantly, no college coaches are looking at B teams.

B teams are okay for younger grades when kids are learning the game. But for kids wanting to get recruited for college lacrosse, B teams are a waste of money.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Lax20323
Eclipse 2024 is an excellent team. 2023 doesn't have as much talent in the crop across the board for all clubs from what I hear, so I guess that may be a factor behind Eclipse dropping down to one 2023 team and only taking the best players. My other guess is that with all of the new clubs popping up and the coaching shortage, it thins out the herd and can water things down. But, that is just my guess. Eclipse 2023 will play in more AA tournaments. Eclipse rosters were posted last week when emails went out, but they don't stay up long.


Did the eclipse 23 team pick up any new talent because they had trouble getting very far in the AA tourneys like the NLF?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -

Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Lax20323]
Did the eclipse 23 team pick up any new talent because they had trouble getting very far in the AA tourneys like the NLF?


Eclipse 2023 combined the A and B teams so it is a huge team. They didn’t add too many new kids so 2023 should be even worse with the added B kids and less playing time for all (given the team’s huge size).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Lax20323]
Did the eclipse 23 team pick up any new talent because they had trouble getting very far in the AA tourneys like the NLF?


Eclipse 2023 combined the A and B teams so it is a huge team. They didn’t add too many new kids so 2023 should be even worse with the added B kids and less playing time for all (given the team’s huge size).


2023 teams with bad summers (Eclipse, 2Way, Express N) have the most changes in structure and roster, likely leading to more problems. Teams with good summers (Preds, PT) build momentum and get even better players. Club teams all about momentum and direction- positive and negative.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Why do parents continue to post about the record of youth club teams? Are you paying thousands of dollars for your son to be on a winning team or to improve his lacrosse skills?

Get some perspective people.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Being in high school and on a B team for one of the local clubs is pointless. B teams usually cost the same as the A team but you get weaker coaches, inferior practices and most importantly, no college coaches are looking at B teams.

B teams are okay for younger grades when kids are learning the game. But for kids wanting to get recruited for college lacrosse, B teams are a waste of money.


I agree - Single A teams (b teams) for high school age kids pad the pockets of club owners and don’t do much to help kids in terms of college recruiting. Express north, eclipse and 91 tristate have single A high school teams. Any other local clubs?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
so Prime Time is done , invites are out or going out , any thoughts?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
thinking about taking my kid to superstars box , i have heard a few complaints , lack of teaching, too many kids, roy seems to have a lot of enemies, anyone have any thoughts ? good? bad?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Final day of PT tryouts were excellent....2023 & 2024 groups in particular looked highly competitive.... didn't see much of earlier groups...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The superstar box program is excellent...best advice would be to go and see it for yourself and make your own judgement...first tryout was slammed with new players...I heard they did very well at nationals last week
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Being in high school and on a B team for one of the local clubs is pointless. B teams usually cost the same as the A team but you get weaker coaches, inferior practices and most importantly, no college coaches are looking at B teams.

B teams are okay for younger grades when kids are learning the game. But for kids wanting to get recruited for college lacrosse, B teams are a waste of money.


I agree - Single A teams (b teams) for high school age kids pad the pockets of club owners and don’t do much to help kids in terms of college recruiting. Express north, eclipse and 91 tristate have single A high school teams. Any other local clubs?


Need to separate college aspirations from having a good HS experience. Being on a B team in HS will still make you a better HS player, I think we can all agree. Seems like 95% of families think their kid has good chance of playing in college in 7th and 8th grade when they should just focus on HS.

But be honest-- what you call A or B teams are viewed as B or C teams compared to top clubs who are pipelines to colleges. PrimeTime is solid A. They are the only one in our area. All other clubs may claim they are the key to recruitment but the players/families are doing the heavy work.
My son plays for Roy and its a love/hate thing. He loves what box does for his stick and footwork in field lax but since hes not from Ridgefield or Primetime he's not one of the "guys". That being said Roy is very fair with my sons playing time and coaching. However, if you play attack and are on one of his sons teams then watch out. They just won the Nationals last week against very strong mostly Canadian teams. He must be doing something right.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
My son plays for Roy and its a love/hate thing. He loves what box does for his stick and footwork in field lax but since hes not from Ridgefield or Primetime he's not one of the "guys". That being said Roy is very fair with my sons playing time and coaching. However, if you play attack and are on one of his sons teams then watch out. They just won the Nationals last week against very strong mostly Canadian teams. He must be doing something right.


No doubt that having a real box program in westchester that competes at the national level allows you to scoop up a lot of good kids, I have been told, not much in the way of teaching, not much in the way of strategy and a heavy favoritism towards his 3 kids . seems like a tricky situation , outside of the benefits of small area games. seems like a lot of programs are promoting box, but lets be honest, small area games with or without boards is still building stick skills as well as reaction times -
Actually my sons team won Nationals because of Roy's strategy and bench coaching.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
Actually my sons team won Nationals because of Roy's strategy and bench coaching.


Roy seems to know how to win , I am new to the box scene , seems like a great differentiated product, but as i look at different options and decide whether or not to invest the time and money into a formal program, can you elaborate a bit on what that means in terms of strategy and bench coaching?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Roy is no doubt a great coach but as the parents on the PT 2024 team dealt with this past season, it was a bad experience. Whenever a parent/coach is involved with the team, like Roy was as head coach, it creates friction. Many parents left because they felt his son got more playing time than deserved. It’s a good lesson for everyone when evaluating a club team, even if the father is not a coach for his son’s team but on the payroll should raise red flags.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Roy is no doubt a great coach but as the parents on the PT 2024 team dealt with this past season, it was a bad experience. Whenever a parent/coach is involved with the team, like Roy was as head coach, it creates friction. Many parents left because they felt his son got more playing time than deserved. It’s a good lesson for everyone when evaluating a club team, even if the father is not a coach for his son’s team but on the payroll should raise red flags.


as a parent on the pt 2024 , I must disagree, playing time across the board was pretty equal in terms of minutes, that said, Roy was not shy about dictating where the ball should go when his son was on the field, at the expense of the team, this comes down to checks and balances. Assistant coaches were pretty vocal behind the scenes regarding this issue. Daniello seems very blinded about this , quite frankly, no dads should be coaching AA travel team with their sons - we lost some good players this year because of Roy
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Roy is no doubt a great coach but as the parents on the PT 2024 team dealt with this past season, it was a bad experience. Whenever a parent/coach is involved with the team, like Roy was as head coach, it creates friction. Many parents left because they felt his son got more playing time than deserved. It’s a good lesson for everyone when evaluating a club team, even if the father is not a coach for his son’s team but on the payroll should raise red flags.


I heard from some parents that the other PT 2024 coach has a son on another PT grade team and he made the team again this year while being the worst player on that team. Daddy ball at PT.
That may be true but since my son plays a different position it isn't a problem.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
That may be true but since my son plays a different position it isn't a problem.


ct lax dad - since you were in California playing box, 2 questions, 1- did his son ever get off the court? 2- how much was he coaching his kid over other kids?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Roy is no doubt a great coach but as the parents on the PT 2024 team dealt with this past season, it was a bad experience. Whenever a parent/coach is involved with the team, like Roy was as head coach, it creates friction. Many parents left because they felt his son got more playing time than deserved. It’s a good lesson for everyone when evaluating a club team, even if the father is not a coach for his son’s team but on the payroll should raise red flags.


Agree. Beyond coaches kids, you also need to watch out for kids and friends of club directors. Club teams will often add weak players who are “connected”.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
That may be true but since my son plays a different position it isn't a problem.


Yes your son got his but you are missing the point. To a family making a PT team should be aware of issues with coaches sons. They pay a lot of money only to find out that their son doesn't see the field as much as one of the PT coaches sons when their kid is clearly better, For the director to stand at tryouts and say otherwise is robbery.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Roy is no doubt a great coach but as the parents on the PT 2024 team dealt with this past season, it was a bad experience. Whenever a parent/coach is involved with the team, like Roy was as head coach, it creates friction. Many parents left because they felt his son got more playing time than deserved. It’s a good lesson for everyone when evaluating a club team, even if the father is not a coach for his son’s team but on the payroll should raise red flags.


Agree. Beyond coaches kids, you also need to watch out for kids and friends of club directors. Club teams will often add weak players who are “connected”.


I've seen this on our club team. Weak kids who don't have to tryout to make the team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Chances are your kid got cut because you are a [ChillLaxin] creating issues with the other parents on the sidelines. Shut your mouth and let your kid earn his/her playing time and perhaps you stick around much longer. So many of these parents are their kids worst nightmare
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The PT 23 and 24 teams are considerably stronger than they were this past summer and the top players were at the final tryouts. There is a lot of crying over spilt milk on this blog. If your son was cut get over it and move on. If PT didn’t work for your son find a new program. Don’t forget that you are the consumer and no one is forcing you to play for anyone.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Chances are your kid got cut because you are a [ChillLaxin] creating issues with the other parents on the sidelines. Shut your mouth and let your kid earn his/her playing time and perhaps you stick around much longer. So many of these parents are their kids worst nightmare


wow did someone strike a chord? Dad coaches on any level are never good and conflicts arise, its just the nature of the youth athletics these days,
pretty sure most people would agree- the best people can hope for are good directors , monitoring the situation , and if that doesnt happen, people should take their kids elsewhere - simple as that - people make the mistake of thinking they have to play for one program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Chances are your kid got cut because you are a [ChillLaxin] creating issues with the other parents on the sidelines. Shut your mouth and let your kid earn his/her playing time and perhaps you stick around much longer. So many of these parents are their kids worst nightmare


Typical answer from a tough guy who thinks the lax world revolves around him and his son.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Chances are your kid got cut because you are a [ChillLaxin] creating issues with the other parents on the sidelines. Shut your mouth and let your kid earn his/her playing time and perhaps you stick around much longer. So many of these parents are their kids worst nightmare


im not sure i read that anyones kids got got cut , unhappy maybe, but man you sure seem worked up, are you a coach? you seem to be taking this personally, i think what i just read was, dad coaches can create many different types of conflicts , and i m not sure anyone disagrees with that . i think i also just read that kids left because of those conflicts ,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Chances are your kid got cut because you are a [ChillLaxin] creating issues with the other parents on the sidelines. Shut your mouth and let your kid earn his/her playing time and perhaps you stick around much longer. So many of these parents are their kids worst nightmare


im not sure i read that anyones kids got got cut , unhappy maybe, but man you sure seem worked up, are you a coach? you seem to be taking this personally, i think what i just read was, dad coaches can create many different types of conflicts , and i m not sure anyone disagrees with that . i think i also just read that kids left because of those conflicts ,


Exactly. That was a well educated reply,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The PT 23 and 24 teams are considerably stronger than they were this past summer and the top players were at the final tryouts. There is a lot of crying over spilt milk on this blog. If your son was cut get over it and move on. If PT didn’t work for your son find a new program. Don’t forget that you are the consumer and no one is forcing you to play for anyone.


the addition of the attackman from the 23 will be a game changer for the 24 team - as well as add some some size
His kid played alot. Keep in mind my son is on an older team and we had a short bench in that my son and another only play D so really only playing with 4 transition/attack subs. The older son is a crazy good offensive player and frankly our best. Our one loss might have been a W if Roy didn't bench him for a good deal of the 3rd period. I'm not blind to the fact he hiks his "guys" and my son isn't on of them. Playing a totally different position from his son or his sons buddies kind of puts my guy on an island but he likes it and plays a ton so I don't have a beef with Roy. He is brutally honest with his critiques which I love but others can't handle.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My son has played for two years. It is definitely a rougher game but does wonders for their game when they go back to field lacrosse. Roy is demanding of his players and pushes them to be their best. He knows how to use the kids and puts them in a position to succeed. He does not like the kids that never come to practice and then are lost at the tourneys.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
His son was one of the top 5 or 6 players on the team and since he plays minimal defense his playing time was less than a few others. That being said the team played with 2 2024 kids (2 years younger) who got a decent amount of play time and his coaching won them the gold. With a 30 second shot clock and end to end action you need to constantly rotate players so everyone does get a good amount of play time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The PT 23 and 24 teams are considerably stronger than they were this past summer and the top players were at the final tryouts. There is a lot of crying over spilt milk on this blog. If your son was cut get over it and move on. If PT didn’t work for your son find a new program. Don’t forget that you are the consumer and no one is forcing you to play for anyone.


That’s an interesting opinion about the teams being stronger when they haven’t played a game yet? They could have been stronger this past season if the director/coaches made better decisions at the tryouts last summer. It’s a joke and it may attract the better players but they don’t know how to develop them into lacrosse players and that is why a lot of parents walked away on their own volition.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Its surprising and sad that parents pay so much money for this and directors hire dad coaches so they dont have to pay them and their kid plays for free and the playing field is set to their kids advantage. So the parents pay so that the coaches son gets better and has every advantage over all the other kids and the director gets a free coach and anyone who says anything will get buried all the while the parents foot the bill. Why be so cheap? Why not pay for coaches...not has beens who want to develop the team as a whole not one or two players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Word. The only way to have any input in your son's success is to either be a coach or be politically connected if not, pay-up and shut-up. And forget about asking questions
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Roy is not a great coach. He is a narcissist pig who only cares about one thing and one thing only...his kid...
Everyone has an opinion..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
Everyone has an opinion..


seems like an overwhelming amount of people have the same opinion of this guy
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
No just the parents of who's kids stink!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
So do you really think Roy will play his son over a better Attackman (please be specific), or did your son just get cut?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Or it’s just you posting over and over again....guess we will never know...you lost a lot of credibility when you claimed he isn’t a good coach
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Roy is not a great coach. He is a narcissist pig who only cares about one thing and one thing only...his kid...


Seems to me the only real pig is the Dad hiding behind an anonymous post with a statement like that, pretty sad. Grow a sack. And maybe you should ask the Ridgefield AD if he is a "good coach" he's obviously doing something right. Don't worry, your kid will be fine on Express B
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Roy is not a great coach. He is a narcissist pig who only cares about one thing and one thing only...his kid...


Seems to me the only real pig is the Dad hiding behind an anonymous post with a statement like that, pretty sad. Grow a sack. And maybe you should ask the Ridgefield AD if he is a "good coach" he's obviously doing something right. Don't worry, your kid will be fine on Express B


His kid couldn’t be a B team player...he plays for Dukes
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
only one kid on Pt that plays for dukes last i checked, and i am sure his dad is not unhappy , you people are all crazy, people up at 1 in the morning bashing coaches, and people bashing other parents or kids, get over it already , its youth sports , if you dont like a coach or a program , leave!!! 18 kids between 23 and 24 were either cut, or left , get over it already , nothing at 12 , 13 or 14 will matter if your kid wants to get better
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
could be a Mom lacking a sack too
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It's all anonymous statements. That's the point. Oh and btw his notIntelligent stars program is out of biz cause parents are sick of spending so much $$$$ to go to tournaments while his kid gets all the playing time. He's an absolute control freak on the field about moving the ball to his kid. All the GB plays are set up that way. It's nauseating. The only person lacking a sack would be a Ridgefield dad willing to eat his garbage on a plate that you are paying top dollar...have fun with that
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
A coach who looks to develop one or two players and not the team as a whole is not a good coach because he only cares about getting the ball to his kid. All the PT 24 parents heard him screaming pass the ball to kyle the whole entire season from the sidelines. He even told the kids if you dont know what to do with the ball pass it to kyle. Every game. If any kid had the ball he would tell the kid to move it to kyle. So I guess you get what you pay for in daddy ball. Scam 100 percent
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
FAKE NEWS
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A coach who looks to develop one or two players and not the team as a whole is not a good coach because he only cares about getting the ball to his kid. All the PT 24 parents heard him screaming pass the ball to kyle the whole entire season from the sidelines. He even told the kids if you dont know what to do with the ball pass it to kyle. Every game. If any kid had the ball he would tell the kid to move it to kyle. So I guess you get what you pay for in daddy ball. Scam 100 percent


Is this true?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yes. Ask the 24 kids and parents. It was so obvious.just no one from ridgefield will admit it cause he coaches the high school and if you question him or his program he will take it out on your kid. Many stories out there about that. . One kid even questioned something he did and he made him sit out rest of the game. Told him he was the coach not him. Imagine that your kid who you pay to play under him cant even ask a question or he has to sit out. Meanwhile he's screaming pass the ball to Kyle. Who's paying for that? That kid and the kids parent who was told to sit down.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
KYLE!!!!!!!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It wasn't kyle who was told to sit out. He didnt question the coach. It was some other kid who asked a question and Roy made him sit out of the game for questioning him. Roy would never sit kyle out in a game. Practice maybe but never a game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How did he win a state championship with a team that did not have his son on it?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Wow such hate. I have a kid on the PT 2024 team. Roy is an excellent coach. He's not passing out orange slices out at half time - but he will tell your kid what and how to do something better.

For all of you following this - this is one irate parent who's kid got cut. Those of us from PT 2024 know who it is. Roy is not perfect - but I think its hard to argue his place as a player and a coach in the national lacrosse community. My kid is getting better. I hope he stays good enough to continue on this team - because this team did get better. You take the bottom 4 kids off the team and add 4 really good kids - that is better.

His kid is one of the better players on the team, he deserves to play more. If anything Roy is harder on him than others. If you don't want to be on this team you can leave - but my understanding is that NO one left PT 2024 on their own because of any of this BS. They may have been cut, but no one left on their own accord.

To the irate parent - stop making it personal - it's not - have your kid get better.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How about you sick people stop shouting out a 12 yo kid by name!! If you have a beef with his father so be it, but to take it out on a great kid is unbelievable. And if I knew who you were I would crack every single one of you in your face. And no I’m not Roy, but I do know him and his family.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Obviously it's not one irate parent it's a few irate parents. So you cant really pinpoint one parent here. The truth is the truth. The people protecting himon this thread are his friends but if you look at all the comments people are coming out of the woodwork about bad experiences with the guy. I know one guy who said Roy came up to him and said you want to know why you kid doesn't play? It's because he stinks. Look if these kids made the team in the first place they don't stink. And who says that to a parents face after they just paid him to instruct his son. So no a lot of people dont like him and that's not being irate that's a fact. Ask around. Talk to parents in CT who had experience with him. Talk to people who worked for him. Former MLL guy Tommy P and trainer Larry as well as many other people who had serious conflicts. I think what you are seeing on this thread is that parents have had enough. It doesn't look like one irate parent not to hard to see that
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Really I mean so many people don't like him it could be anyone. I will tell the parents following this thread that my son has been working with Roy on and off for the past 5 years and he has gone out of his WAY to make things difficult for him. Was a real issue. Luckily he was good enough to work through it. If you get on his bad side he will take it out on your kid. Glad people are speaking up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Isn't it funny that on this thread and the 2022 that 2 of the biggest names in lacrosse and hall of famers are being called out for "daddy ball". I'm sure somewhere in the middle lies the truth.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Honestly who really cares about hall of famer and former MLL. Parents don't care. I'd rather have a coach who didn't have a son on the team who was non-biased and really cared about helping your kid get better. Not some ego driven dad who wants every pass to go to his kid. Especially when you pay for "elite" instruction.

It's definitely not encouraging as a parent to hear all this negativity going on the field. From the coaches friends and the parent complaints about the coach its disgusting and disturbing to hear parents and friends of the coach make such remarks. Especially targeting kids. all these kids want to do is play and who is anyone to take that away.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Roy only cares about his son playing attack and being the ONLY star on the team and Roy makes sure of it. I have seen it for years with him and he has made it very clear that is his agenda. Like his licence plate says "MY3BOYS" and they come first and will be first even though they are far better player at the same posiion. Roy will make sure those other players never get any shine over his son. Good luck with that and just pay your money. Daddyball One-O-One !!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Roy only cares about his son playing attack and being the ONLY star on the team and Roy makes sure of it. I have seen it for years with him and he has made it very clear that is his agenda. Like his licence plate says "MY3BOYS" and they come first and will be first even though they are far better player at the same posiion. Roy will make sure those other players never get any shine over his son. Good luck with that and just pay your money. Daddyball One-O-One !!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha parent who's kid got cut one-o-one
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Roy only cares about his son playing attack and being the ONLY star on the team and Roy makes sure of it. I have seen it for years with him and he has made it very clear that is his agenda. Like his licence plate says "MY3BOYS" and they come first and will be first even though they are far better player at the same posiion. Roy will make sure those other players never get any shine over his son. Good luck with that and just pay your money. Daddyball One-O-One !!!

why come on here and spew venom.lax clubs are a dime a dozen.move on. life is too short and so is your childs youth.enjoy the ride while it lasts.the same thing goes on everywhere.find the happy median.stop the hate
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Joke's on you pal. No one is mad about getting cut. Parents are mad because they pay money for this and its not a fair playing field. It's a crock of @#$%

Oh and here's some interesting news which every parent who has a kid on this team with Roy should know. The top five starting players are on a scholarship. Roy owns their a$$ they are not paying a dime which means nothing to complain about. The rest are recruits from his box program which he can control so called friends of his. So if the plays are pass to his kid constantly again next year no one is going to say a thing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
From what I read earlier it seems like Roys son was the best player on the ream last year and scored a ton. Is that true or was your son not as good as his and just got cut?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yeah well that won't fly with Westchester parents ever. That will change.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
He was good and is a good player. Not the best there were others that were and are better. Roy just sets up the field so that everyone has to pass to him so that he is the star. It's so transparent. Every single parent was commenting on the side. The CT parents had the most informative info. Most agree that He's been doing that forever on every team and if your kid is good and plays same position then forget it. It's not about getting cut for these parents. It's about a bully coach who wants to steer everything in his kids direction and so many people are not happy with that approach. I mean why would anyone be happy about that
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The owner of Prime Time I'm sure is not aware that Roy is directing the ball to his son on Attack to get him the ball so he is the scorer and ultimately the Star of the team. I know people say that Roy has been doing this for years. I just cannot believe the Owner or Director of Prime Time would tolerate that type of behavior since the 2024 record did not win many Championships with Roy as Head Coach. Were the parents okay with Daddyball?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
scholarship or not, the best players play!! Bottom line!!

I suggest you get off this site and take your kid to the field and work on his deficiencies!!

or you probably can't cause you never played the game and you are a typical Westchester know it all parent!!

LOL
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The owner of Prime Time I'm sure is not aware that Roy is directing the ball to his son on Attack to get him the ball so he is the scorer and ultimately the Star of the team. I know people say that Roy has been doing this for years. I just cannot believe the Owner or Director of Prime Time would tolerate that type of behavior since the 2024 record did not win many Championships with Roy as Head Coach. Were the parents okay with Daddyball?


As a parent of two kids that are and have been on Prime Time teams for years, Don't kid yourself Nick Daniello , the owner, knows everything that goes on with his teams. Nothing gets done without his okay including keeping and playing all the daddy coaches kids and connected kids. Meaning kids that are friends of friends or kids that are friends of coaches .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
He's getting a free MLL coach. And in return his sons play for free and Roy has control of the field making sure they get the most strategic opportunities on net. And the only way to control that is to put kids in there who can help his kid score and those kids have to parents who won't say anything. Like non paying parents or people he knows
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This is the most comical thread I've seen in while. Karma finally!!!!!!!! It's going down I'm yelling TIMBER you better move, you'd better dance. Maybe Bruno Mars will take over Roy's job. Please Roy don't come back to CT with a travel team all set-up for your kids success and parent's who pay for it. Stay in NY
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
He was good and is a good player. Not the best there were others that were and are better. Roy just sets up the field so that everyone has to pass to him so that he is the star. It's so transparent. Every single parent was commenting on the side. The CT parents had the most informative info. Most agree that He's been doing that forever on every team and if your kid is good and plays same position then forget it. It's not about getting cut for these parents. It's about a bully coach who wants to steer everything in his kids direction and so many people are not happy with that approach. I mean why would anyone be happy about that


I have no skin in the game here on this thread but I read it and find it funny about the animosity you have about Roy. My son plays with Roy's son on a winter team and I've seen Roy personally coach players not to ball hog, be a team player, pick and pass, etc., and he's the harshest on his own son. Also, his son can play up a grade against bigger players whereas many few can. He happens to be passionate about the game, and dad's who never played the game don't understand.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Roy's kids could be the worst on the team and i am taking roy over anyone....and that goes for the rest of the pt staff.

some os the best coaches around...nick has built a serious program bottom line!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Roy's kids could be the worst on the team and i am taking roy over anyone....and that goes for the rest of the pt staff.

some os the best coaches around...nick has built a serious program bottom line!!


Yes a good program but that's because of the directors marketing ability not PT developing skills , PT gets new talented kids every year that had already been developed from other teams, A very small percentage of PT kids who have been with the program from early stages stay with the team. Either they have been cut or left. So that tells me that they are just like every other organization . They just get better talent show up at tryouts in search of the golden apple that they promote.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My son plays on Roy’s team and these comments are a joke. He is tough but fair and a great coach. He doesn’t favor any individual including his own kid. This sounds like sour grapes from parents who coach their own kid from the sideline which is devastating for their own kid (you know who you are) and their kid probably didn’t make team this time around... Move on, the rest of us are happy w the great coaching and there areplenty of options for unhappy parents to go somewhere else.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It's funny how you comment you know who you are. Sounds like you have it out for one parent in particular when so many have indicated on this thread about bad coaching experiences with Roy. You must be his only friend.

As a dad who played lax in college and goes to both of my kids tourneys, I've never heard anybody yell as loud as he does to pass the ball to his kid then Roy. You are delliousional to think that Roy isn't doing this for free so he can coach his kid.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous

As a parent of two kids that are and have been on Prime Time teams for years, Don't kid yourself Nick Daniello , the owner, knows everything that goes on with his teams. Nothing gets done without his okay including keeping and playing all the daddy coaches kids and connected kids. Meaning kids that are friends of friends or kids that are friends of coaches .


It is not just primetime. Eclipse also has a problem with coaches kids and connected kids. One eclipse team this summer even had a daddy coach and granddaddy coach. Club teams could reduce this image of rampant nepotism by publicly mandating that coaches can’t be on the same teams as their sons.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Roy's kids could be the worst on the team and i am taking roy over anyone....and that goes for the rest of the pt staff.

some os the best coaches around...nick has built a serious program bottom line!!


Yes a good program but that's because of the directors marketing ability not PT developing skills , PT gets new talented kids every year that had already been developed from other teams, A very small percentage of PT kids who have been with the program from early stages stay with the team. Either they have been cut or left. So that tells me that they are just like every other organization . They just get better talent show up at tryouts in search of the golden apple that they promote.


Roy aside, what isn’t annual turnover for a club like PT rah year? Is it more active in the 6-8th grade teams and then asettles in hs? Is it a consistent bottom 6 or percentage are moved out?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Thanks for mentioning that you played in college. As if that has any current relevance.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
You guys sound like you signed and are locked into a 6 year contract with PT. If your kid isn’t happy, move on to another program. If he’s not good enough, work to improve. He can change programs (but not parents). Too much sour grapes here and trashing coaches and kids.

I can’t speak for 2024, but my son and our experience with PT has been awesome. I’m not from the area so I knew nothing about the program going in. Does he and us lose friends when players are cut due to better talent trying out? Sadly Yes, but that’s what makes it s strong program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My son plays box as well and Roy is always preaching take a good shot to everyone, not just his son. He is extremely passionate about teaching box lacrosse to all players even the ones who aren't as skilled. Granted he has his favorites and that's obvious but he cares about the kids who put forth the effort. As a parent shut up and watch and just thank him for coaching your son. If you are unhappy with his coaching style just find another program that fits your needs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You guys sound like you signed and are locked into a 6 year contract with PT. If your kid isn’t happy, move on to another program. If he’s not good enough, work to improve. He can change programs (but not parents). Too much sour grapes here and trashing coaches and kids.

I can’t speak for 2024, but my son and our experience with PT has been awesome. I’m not from the area so I knew nothing about the program going in. Does he and us lose friends when players are cut due to better talent trying out? Sadly Yes, but that’s what makes it s strong program.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thanks for mentioning that you played in college. As if that has any current relevance.


Oh there's a huge difference between PT and eclipse. Eclipse 24 moves the ball as a whole they have been developing that team to go to Denver for a long time. They are a machine. They kids on that time call out plays to each other.

PT totally one sided kids are not used to playing together and the dad coach runs it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thanks for mentioning that you played in college. As if that has any current relevance.


Actually it totally makes all the revelance because someone who's been there can see it with a different perspective that a [ChillLaxin] such as yourself
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thanks for mentioning that you played in college. As if that has any current relevance.


Actually it totally makes all the revelance because someone who's been there can see it with a different perspective that a [ChillLaxin] such as yourself


It really doesn't make a difference. I played in college, yet understand all of the nuances of baseball by observing the game. If I didn't continually improve my knowledge of the game, what I learned on the field would be almost irrelevant. One thing people need to stop getting hung up on are coaches playing credentials. One of the coaches I learned the most from (when I began coaching) never played the game of lacrosse. He was a football player who immersed himself in lacrosse and is simply the best varsity coach I've ever been around. Knowledgeable, great motivator, even handed--no special treatment, etc. So, regardless of a coaches playing experience, observe how a guy runs a practice, how he communicates, how the kids play for him. Then judge.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thanks for mentioning that you played in college. As if that has any current relevance.


Actually it totally makes all the revelance because someone who's been there can see it with a different perspective that a [ChillLaxin] such as yourself


It really doesn't make a difference. I played in college, yet understand all of the nuances of baseball by observing the game. If I didn't continually improve my knowledge of the game, what I learned on the field would be almost irrelevant. One thing people need to stop getting hung up on are coaches playing credentials. One of the coaches I learned the most from (when I began coaching) never played the game of lacrosse. He was a football player who immersed himself in lacrosse and is simply the best varsity coach I've ever been around. Knowledgeable, great motivator, even handed--no special treatment, etc. So, regardless of a coaches playing experience, observe how a guy runs a practice, how he communicates, how the kids play for him. Then judge.


This is so true. If a kid is intimidated and is not motivated they gain nothing but self doubt. An encouraging coach can make or break a kids development for any sport
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thanks for mentioning that you played in college. As if that has any current relevance.


Actually it totally makes all the revelance because someone who's been there can see it with a different perspective that a [ChillLaxin] such as yourself


It really doesn't make a difference. I played in college, yet understand all of the nuances of baseball by observing the game. If I didn't continually improve my knowledge of the game, what I learned on the field would be almost irrelevant. One thing people need to stop getting hung up on are coaches playing credentials. One of the coaches I learned the most from (when I began coaching) never played the game of lacrosse. He was a football player who immersed himself in lacrosse and is simply the best varsity coach I've ever been around. Knowledgeable, great motivator, even handed--no special treatment, etc. So, regardless of a coaches playing experience, observe how a guy runs a practice, how he communicates, how the kids play for him. Then judge.


Well said. I'm tired of talking to parents on the sideline who within 5 minutes manage to work into the conversation the fact that they played in college. Who cares. As if that somehow gives both them and their kid some sort of lacrosse street cred. The game played in the 80's and well into the 90s is absolutely nothing like the game today. Some of the best players I have seen in tournaments were produced by parents who didn't play, who acknowledged they were average athletes or non-athletes in their youth and who had the current appearance of only caring about the next beer in their cooler.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thanks for mentioning that you played in college. As if that has any current relevance.


Actually it totally makes all the revelance because someone who's been there can see it with a different perspective that a [ChillLaxin] such as yourself


It really doesn't make a difference. I played in college, yet understand all of the nuances of baseball by observing the game. If I didn't continually improve my knowledge of the game, what I learned on the field would be almost irrelevant. One thing people need to stop getting hung up on are coaches playing credentials. One of the coaches I learned the most from (when I began coaching) never played the game of lacrosse. He was a football player who immersed himself in lacrosse and is simply the best varsity coach I've ever been around. Knowledgeable, great motivator, even handed--no special treatment, etc. So, regardless of a coaches playing experience, observe how a guy runs a practice, how he communicates, how the kids play for him. Then judge.


Well said. I'm tired of talking to parents on the sideline who within 5 minutes manage to work into the conversation the fact that they played in college. Who cares. As if that somehow gives both them and their kid some sort of lacrosse street cred. The game played in the 80's and well into the 90s is absolutely nothing like the game today. Some of the best players I have seen in tournaments were produced by parents who didn't play, who acknowledged they were average athletes or non-athletes in their youth and who had the current appearance of only caring about the next beer in their cooler.


Yes agree you need not have played the game or be a former MLL player to be a good coach. Credentials like that are not what makes a good coach. What makes a good coach is someone who can motivate team unity and spirit and allow for individual talent to shine in each player by encouraging development and growth. Answering questions to players, parents and whomever else because that's part of it. Not told to sit down or for a parent to be told to leave the tournament and not come back because you asked a question. Not playing favorites and not taking dislike for the parents out on the kids who give 110 percent to the be there on the field because they love the game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Having played the sport at the college level does make a you little more atuned to what's going on the field when it comes to your kid. Essentially at some point or another, I've had to deal with conflict and I can tell you that Daddy Ball exists at the youth level but not so much when you move up grades.

When you get to high school and college, if you're good you'll move right past it and it will be a blip in the big picture. Lucky for me, I had the best high school and college coaches. I keep in touch with them frequently and have the most respect for them. They believed in me, put theirselves on the line for me and because of that, I love the game and want to give that same experience to my kid.

My advice to people dealing with daddy ball is to get out of it, your kid knows what's up and it's not helping his game and probably infuriates the parent and believe me the kids feel that stress
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It's funny how you comment you know who you are. Sounds like you have it out for one parent in particular when so many have indicated on this thread about bad coaching experiences with Roy. You must be his only friend.

As a dad who played lax in college and goes to both of my kids tourneys, I've never heard anybody yell as loud as he does to pass the ball to his kid then Roy. You are delliousional to think that Roy isn't doing this for free so he can coach his kid.


my "you know who you are" comment was meant as a general statement to all the sideline coaching parents who are disasters for their own kid and for lax in general... there are plenty on this team, and just about every team we play and in the youth programs too - it is the single biggest factor in kids not wanting to play according the Positive Coaching Alliance... if you don't like the coach, go somewhere else, bottom line, but first make sure you as a parent aren't the problem... the most noise I make on the sideline is cheering our team on -- all of the kids ... My son is doing great under Roy and call me delusional or not, but I am staying with him -- I dont fault anyone for not liking any coach, but there are many options.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Thank you for sharing that you are staying with Roy. Like that has any current revelance to the fact he's coaching for free so he can strategically set up plays so every pass is directed to his kid. Your kid must not care about that or you must be a really good friend of his. Either way I think parents moved on from it.

And yes every team has parents that are loud. And make no mistake about you may be cheering for the whole team, but Roy is telling the team to pass to his kid. He's cheering for his kid and if it came down to your kid or his, well it would be his. Congratulations on your decision!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
No one left the team unless they were cut! get your facts straight bud!

You are just upset your kid got cut and its very obvious here
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It’s been one week since I looked atthis thread and it’s the same crap. . But for the record., BUD - 2 middis went to 2 way along with 1 attackman. 1 defenseman left for 2 way. But honestly who gives a flying F. Move on. Daddy coaches on any team at any sport is never a good thing. It doesn’t matter who, what, where It’s a common theme in youth athletics. And it’s a common theme it seems on every forum at every age group on this website. It’s youth sports Not every program is a good fit for every kid , coach or parent. Luckily every parent here has an option. To leave. Pt 24 happens to be a very tricky situation. You have kids that play box for Roy, kids who play field for Roy. Dads who coach box who’s kids play field for pt. You have coaches who’s kids play on pt older teams . Kids playing one or the other or both teams for free. Kids that play town for Daniello So you can see it could be massive conflicts of interest with no checks and balances. Anyone who says otherwise is just plain not being realistic.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That last post with “No one left the team unless they were cut! ...” is ridiculous. I have read all this drama for the past several weeks and haven’t posted, but this is just wrong about PT for 2024 and other years. For 24, one kid who was getting played a ton and on manup and quit mid season. Multiple others played the season , but never signed up for tryouts and just left for other clubs. And it wasn’t all for the same reason. I am a PT parent and can state this with certainty.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
roy and staff are great coaches and we are lucky to have them at pt 24
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Sounds like the MOB. Never a good idea to have one guy in charge of everything. Should be a separate director for the town and separate for travel. Nothing should cross over
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
roy and staff are great coaches and we are lucky to have them at pt 24


Are you trying to do damage control? That was weak. And no my kid didn't get cut. C
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It’s been one week since I looked atthis thread and it’s the same crap. . But for the record., BUD - 2 middis went to 2 way along with 1 attackman. 1 defenseman left for 2 way. But honestly who gives a flying F. Move on. Daddy coaches on any team at any sport is never a good thing. It doesn’t matter who, what, where It’s a common theme in youth athletics. And it’s a common theme it seems on every forum at every age group on this website. It’s youth sports Not every program is a good fit for every kid , coach or parent. Luckily every parent here has an option. To leave. Pt 24 happens to be a very tricky situation. You have kids that play box for Roy, kids who play field for Roy. Dads who coach box who’s kids play field for pt. You have coaches who’s kids play on pt older teams . Kids playing one or the other or both teams for free. Kids that play town for Daniello So you can see it could be massive conflicts of interest with no checks and balances. Anyone who says otherwise is just plain not being realistic.


Compared to the Yorktown situation, the PT conflict of interest situation is nothing. So, you should count yourselves fortunate.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
whats going on in Yorktown?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Indulge us
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It’s been one week since I looked atthis thread and it’s the same crap. . But for the record., BUD - 2 middis went to 2 way along with 1 attackman. 1 defenseman left for 2 way. But honestly who gives a flying F. Move on. Daddy coaches on any team at any sport is never a good thing. It doesn’t matter who, what, where It’s a common theme in youth athletics. And it’s a common theme it seems on every forum at every age group on this website. It’s youth sports Not every program is a good fit for every kid , coach or parent. Luckily every parent here has an option. To leave. Pt 24 happens to be a very tricky situation. You have kids that play box for Roy, kids who play field for Roy. Dads who coach box who’s kids play field for pt. You have coaches who’s kids play on pt older teams . Kids playing one or the other or both teams for free. Kids that play town for Daniello So you can see it could be massive conflicts of interest with no checks and balances. Anyone who says otherwise is just plain not being realistic.


Compared to the Yorktown situation, the PT conflict of interest situation is nothing. So, you should count yourselves fortunate.


Big difference. Parents pay to play for PT. Only to have the director stand up in front of all parents and say otherwise about dad ball and connected people . Totally two faced and full of it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]It’s been one week since I looked atthis thread and it’s the same crap. . But for the record., BUD - 2 middis went to 2 way along with 1 attackman. 1 defenseman left for 2 way. But honestly who gives a flying F. Move on. Daddy coaches on any team at any sport is never a good thing. It doesn’t matter who, what, where It’s a common theme in youth athletics. And it’s a common theme it seems on every forum at every age group on this website. It’s youth sports Not every program is a good fit for every kid , coach or parent. Luckily every parent here has an option. To leave. Pt 24 happens to be a very tricky situation. You have kids that play box for Roy, kids who play field for Roy. Dads who coach box who’s kids play field for pt. You have coaches who’s kids play on pt older teams . Kids playing one or the other or both teams for free. Kids that play town for Daniello So you can see it could be massive conflicts of interest with no checks and balances. Anyone who says otherwise is just plain not being realistic.


Compared to the Yorktown situation, the PT conflict of interest situation is nothing. So, you should count yourselves fortunate.


Big difference. Parents pay to play for PT. Only to have the director stand up in front of all parents and say otherwise about dad ball and connected people . Totally two faced and full of it.

Some parents do not pay. Which instills loyalty to those parents. Those parents are not paying so they can't complain. If a kid wants his left attack spot back and the coaches kid is in that spot then there is no way that is ever going to happen and there is nothing that parent can say about it because their kid is playing for free. It's also about control. And they need parents they can control. Everyone is getting something out if it. Free tuition, free coaches, free fields at JJ that lewisboro residents pay and PT a for profit organization is using for free and they don't want parents who are vocal about these issues for obvious reasons
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
when one person or group of people controls youth, travel and high school , that is not a good situation. its very simple common sense . travel programs run by hs coaches have been a huge issue with people for years . it can destroy the chemistry needed for these boys and girls to win at the hs level collectively as a team especially when 1/3 of any given grade plays for one program, and 1/3 another etc etc. loyalty lies with the travel program at the expense of the HS. different travel swag in school or on the fields, almost like little gangs of kids instead of everyone wearing their school swag . Lax powerhouses like Garden City, Victor, and Yorktown are and have always been great because it starts at the bottom and they try and build a town culture of Lacrosse. Travel lacrosse in general creates a "ME" attitude because its about recruiting, but to win consistently as a team, you need chemistry .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Its sounds corrupt. Too many kickbacks and one person in control of Two teams in the same town. Same coaches in both programs in some cases getting double paid from town and travel and then free fields in the town where residents pay taxes for and a travel program that brings non residents in to play on fields that lewisboro tax payers pay for. Lots of field time given away to a travel program. Why doesn't the John Jay athletic director know about this. Why is it set up like this?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That's a really good question and totally messed up. As a tax payer, if you are a tax payer, you have the right to know. You should ask the athletic director at jjhs make him give you a reason
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Dude, we get it. You think Roy isn't a good coach - and PT isn't a good program. You are entitled to your opinion - but your opinion is laughable to most of us on this board. You aren't going to convince anyone - let it go.

Go find another program! How great is it that you get to pick where your kid plays in the summer.

If you are a tax payer you do have a right to know. Pick up the phone and call the AD. I would guess that all rules are being followed and the AD knows and support this. He obviously supports Daniello - he is one of his HS lacrosse coaches.

NET - Stop your grumbling and go find another program!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Talk to the town parks and recreation department. The AD is a waste of time. Follow the $$.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Im not sure who is laughing. Most of us on this board dont think its laughable. Most of us think it's scary that this crap exists and one guy controls so much in one town and is allowed to get away with so much.Scary that it's even supported. But what can you expect with small town politics. Lived here most of my life and nothing changes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Ok I'll bite what's the Yorktown situation?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It’s been one week since I looked atthis thread and it’s the same crap. . But for the record., BUD - 2 middis went to 2 way along with 1 attackman. 1 defenseman left for 2 way. But honestly who gives a flying F. Move on. Daddy coaches on any team at any sport is never a good thing. It doesn’t matter who, what, where It’s a common theme in youth athletics. And it’s a common theme it seems on every forum at every age group on this website. It’s youth sports Not every program is a good fit for every kid , coach or parent. Luckily every parent here has an option. To leave. Pt 24 happens to be a very tricky situation. You have kids that play box for Roy, kids who play field for Roy. Dads who coach box who’s kids play field for pt. You have coaches who’s kids play on pt older teams . Kids playing one or the other or both teams for free. Kids that play town for Daniello So you can see it could be massive conflicts of interest with no checks and balances. Anyone who says otherwise is just plain not being realistic.


Compared to the Yorktown situation, the PT conflict of interest situation is nothing. So, you should count yourselves fortunate.


Big difference. Parents pay to play for PT. Only to have the director stand up in front of all parents and say otherwise about dad ball and connected people . Totally two faced and full of it.


I assume he means the Ballers summer program. The Yorktown varsity coach also coaches the Ballers program. Its invite only, not sure a worse conflict exists in the area.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Dude, we get it. You think Roy isn't a good coach - and PT isn't a good program. You are entitled to your opinion - but your opinion is laughable to most of us on this board. You aren't going to convince anyone - let it go.

Go find another program! How great is it that you get to pick where your kid plays in the summer.

If you are a tax payer you do have a right to know. Pick up the phone and call the AD. I would guess that all rules are being followed and the AD knows and support this. He obviously supports Daniello - he is one of his HS lacrosse coaches.

NET - Stop your grumbling and go find another program!


How great is it that parents have a forum to share information about organizations they are paying for. Because that's what this information sharing and Its extremely condescending and defensive to suggest that issues of this nature are of no concern
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
You missed my main point. If you don't like it you can LEAVE. No one is making you play there. But that isn't the case here - is it. Your kid got cut, so it's all sour grapes.

You say the Head Coach is inferior, the Director is a liar and corrupt. Yet Prime Time still is successful on a national level, they place a dozen kids in D1 schools each year - and hundreds of kids come to try outs. So yes - many of us don't agree with you.

So if your goal is to anonymously (and you really aren't anonymous) throw stones at this program, go ahead. But you would be better served taking this passion and help your kid find a different program and become a better lacrosse player.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Wow there is no way I would ever subject my kid to this kind of hostility. You keep trying to pinpoint one person here. IT seems as if the coach and staff have targeted someone's kid.

Is it some kind of scare tactic to stop talking? Is this how you coach? By intimidating kids? Look at every post. It's not sour grapes. Then look at other forums. It's a common theme.

There is no way you can positively identify an anonymous post. In order to that with certainty, you would need a court order from the supreme court. There are privacy laws regarding anonymity. So in essence you are making the PT staff look like they are targeting one parent here when in reality you have no way of knowing for sure. It really looks bad.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
whats going on in Yorktown?


The Yorktown HS coaches also coach the Yorktown Ballers club teams. Hard to believe.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
whats going on in Yorktown?


The Yorktown HS coaches also coach the Yorktown Ballers club teams. Hard to believe.


Lakeland/ Panas also has a summer travel run by the school coaches. I have friends on both teams and they have no problem with it. It's also 1/3rd the cost of express north.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
whats going on in Yorktown?


The Yorktown HS coaches also coach the Yorktown Ballers club teams. Hard to believe.


Lakeland/ Panas also has a summer travel run by the school coaches. I have friends on both teams and they have no problem with it. It's also 1/3rd the cost of express north.


And Brunswick coaches run 2Way. Many other examples, too. Just a matter of whether you feel the club circuit is more important than the HS circuit. Those great players from Yorktown over the years got their recognition and due from HS performance, not summer club exposure or connections. I'd much prefer a local summer club option for my son without the flashy name and huge costs but tied to strong HS program, just not an option in our district. I see the potential for uncomfortable situations and messy politics tied to a HS coach running local club but I see that everywhere anyway.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
whats going on in Yorktown?


The Yorktown HS coaches also coach the Yorktown Ballers club teams. Hard to believe.


Lakeland/ Panas also has a summer travel run by the school coaches. I have friends on both teams and they have no problem with it. It's also 1/3rd the cost of express north.


I think you are missing the point. Conflict of interest. Talk to the Ridgefield guys about Superstar lacrosse. If you didn't play (pay) summer ball with them you didn't play for Colsey. So, it was banned.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Similar to the Chargers program that the HS coach from Darien ran before it folded. Chargers were good early on but kids started to go to eclipse. Now, eclipse is fading and kids are choosing the other club teams in the area.
If you go to a strong and competitive Lax HS than the summer club circuit is less important. Bottom line, if you are good schools will find you.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Similar to the Chargers program that the HS coach from Darien ran before it folded. Chargers were good early on but kids started to go to eclipse. Now, eclipse is fading and kids are choosing the other club teams in the area.
If you go to a strong and competitive Lax HS than the summer club circuit is less important. Bottom line, if you are good schools will find you.


Didn't CT make it illegal for a public HS sports coach to be a director of a club team ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
In CT, I believe it is set that a coach can be a Director and own/run a club program, but can’t be the Coach on a specific club team that has something like more than 6 of his players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Similar to the Chargers program that the HS coach from Darien ran before it folded. Chargers were good early on but kids started to go to eclipse. Now, eclipse is fading and kids are choosing the other club teams in the area.
If you go to a strong and competitive Lax HS than the summer club circuit is less important. Bottom line, if you are good schools will find you.


Chargers folded when the CIAC banned high school coaches from coaching/owning a for profit program in the sport they coach at HS level. I believe the criteria was 2/3 of the roster couldn't be from HS. Same thing happened to Superstar Lax at about the same time for the same reason.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Now that most dust has settled...Anyone care to chime in on 2023 or 2024 how teams look for 2018-2019?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2024- eclipse PT, EN, 2 way , predators, 91 TS,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Heard the 24 2way team has a shot qualifying to Denver after getting a couple of players from PT.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Heard the 24 2way team has a shot qualifying to Denver after getting a couple of players from PT.


When you pick up the worst players from PT it does not help your team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Heard the 24 2way team has a shot qualifying to Denver after getting a couple of players from PT.


When you pick up the worst players from PT it does not help your team.


that is just wrong in so many ways , but factually , 2 way grabbed 2 of the best middis from PT and had a respectable team last year . no one said they were better than PT, just that they had a chance to qualify with some new additions
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Heard the 24 2way team has a shot qualifying to Denver after getting a couple of players from PT.

Do you think 24 2way would take Roy from PT too?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Heard the 24 2way team has a shot qualifying to Denver after getting a couple of players from PT.


When you pick up the worst players from PT it does not help your team.


that is just wrong in so many ways , but factually , 2 way grabbed 2 of the best middis from PT and had a respectable team last year . no one said they were better than PT, just that they had a chance to qualify with some new additions


2way 2024 will be one of the best grade based teams around. When forced to fill half the WSYL roster from their 2025 team and practice squad they may not be as good. Are the two PT pick ups on age?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Folks get a little defensive after getting abused the last couple of weeks with daddy ball and use of town fields by directors/coaches.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
For 2023

PrimeTime
Preds
Express North
Eclipse
2-Way
Ct Wolves
91TS
Everyone else
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Folks get a little defensive after getting abused the last couple of weeks with daddy ball and use of town fields by directors/coaches.


Normally, when someone is defensive, they are hiding something or trying to save face. Either way the comments that were made were regarding daddy ball and use of town fields for a profit were true. A lot of parents felt compelled to comment on their own experiences with the same coach regarding that one subject.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
ok we get it, points were made, good and bad , lets move on please, sometimes people need to learn from their own experiences, travel programs are rotating doors for many reasons enough said
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
i am hearing CJ fleming formerly superstars box lacrosse is doing some box clinics/training , does anyone have any info on that? i cant seem to find anything on it


he is running some small box clinics at Somers sports , just getting going, but dont have any info beyond that ... maybe call somers sports
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Does anyone have opinions on any fall tourneys; good or bad. Hear good things about Yale tourney in nov?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yale Fall tourney is run well. 4 games in one day. Low to mid level competition with an occasional strong team here and there.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
ok we get it, points were made, good and bad , lets move on please, sometimes people need to learn from their own experiences, travel programs are rotating doors for many reasons enough said


Well said. However, it's an open forum so you can't dictate comments. 2nd amendment.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
whats going on in Yorktown?


The Yorktown HS coaches also coach the Yorktown Ballers club teams. Hard to believe.


So playing for their summer program (ballers) is like paying protection money to the mob. Glad CT made this type of extortion illegal.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For 2023

PrimeTime
Preds
Express North
Eclipse
--Preds B--
2-Way
Ct Wolves
91TS
Everyone else


Agreed. Top 2 teams got even stronger after tryouts, got best players from teams below them. Next 2 got weaker and better avoid tough comp this fall.

People ignore B teams but Preds B is better than most area teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
ok we get it, points were made, good and bad , lets move on please, sometimes people need to learn from their own experiences, travel programs are rotating doors for many reasons enough said


Well said. However, it's an open forum so you can't dictate comments. 2nd amendment.


The 2nd Amendment doesn't apply to private internet forums.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
get over it. your kid suc*s and will be benched on Yorktown.
How is the 2020 Predators Team? Saw they had a 2020 commit just a day or two after 9/1
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Did anyone see the PT 2024 attackman practicing with Schreibers 24 express north team last night? kid looked good, will be additive ... are we already seeing defections from Colsey? the first of many if any of those earlier posts are true is my guess
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
whats going on in Yorktown?


The Yorktown HS coaches also coach the Yorktown Ballers club teams. Hard to believe.


So playing for their summer program (ballers) is like paying protection money to the mob. Glad CT made this type of extortion illegal.


What self respecting AD would still permit this type of shenanigans? Parents don't complain?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
who runs the ballers? does it affect the youth program at all? do the ballers take field space away from the youth teams? do the ballers run a for profit tourney during the spring youth season? essentially taking money out of the pocket of the youth program?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Apparently the better 91Tristate 2022 team will be very solid this year. A bunch of very good core kids with new solid additions. I also heard they are moving up in tournament competition because they rocked many solid B teams last summer and even beat some very legitimate lower AA teams. Anyone know anything about this team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I have seen that 2022 91 TS team play as well as others in our area over the course of the summer. Very legit team and seems to be on par with most other 2022 teams in the area.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have seen that 2022 91 TS team play as well as others in our area over the course of the summer. Very legit team and seems to be on par with most other 2022 teams in the area.


Yeah, that squad has some players, goes hard. They are pretty good. Don't think they have the pure talent and athleticism of the (holdback stacked) 2Way, Eclipse, etc. teams but still solid squad.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
who runs the ballers? does it affect the youth program at all? do the ballers take field space away from the youth teams? do the ballers run a for profit tourney during the spring youth season? essentially taking money out of the pocket of the youth program?


The Ballers is run by Yorktown alumni including the current high school head coach.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Did anyone see the PT 2024 attackman practicing with Schreibers 24 express north team last night? kid looked good, will be additive ... are we already seeing defections from Colsey? the first of many if any of those earlier posts are true is my guess


well I guess it was a false alarm as the above boy was at the first PT practice, he and the other big lefty attackman were running the show. should be a good year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
We are new to the area from Juno Alaska. My son wants to play lacrosse and I was told he should join a club team. Although he is young(13) for his grade(8th) , he is 6’6” and 245 lbs. and pretty athletic. Any suggestions ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
We are new to the area from Juno Alaska. My son wants to play lacrosse and I was told he should join a club team. Although he is young(13) for his grade(8th) , he is 6’6” and 245 lbs. and pretty athletic. Any suggestions ?


Long island..Westchester lax is 2nd tier
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
We are new to the area from Juno Alaska. My son wants to play lacrosse and I was told he should join a club team. Although he is young(13) for his grade(8th) , he is 6’6” and 245 lbs. and pretty athletic. Any suggestions ?


yeah, call spalina!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]We are new to the area from Juno Alaska. My son wants to play lacrosse and I was told he should join a club team. Although he is young(13) for his grade(8th) , he is 6’6” and 245 lbs. and pretty athletic. Any suggestions ?


Play football!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
We are new to the area from Juno Alaska. My son wants to play lacrosse and I was told he should join a club team. Although he is young(13) for his grade(8th) , he is 6’6” and 245 lbs. and pretty athletic. Any suggestions ?



Sounds like the perfect situation to reclass.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
We are new to the area from Juno Alaska. My son wants to play lacrosse and I was told he should join a club team. Although he is young(13) for his grade(8th) , he is 6’6” and 245 lbs. and pretty athletic. Any suggestions ?


He is not young for his grade in NY. All 8th graders should be 13 right now. If not 13, than still 12. Any kid who is 14 or older was held back at some point - most commonly at entry to Kindergarten.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
We are new to the area from Juno Alaska. My son wants to play lacrosse and I was told he should join a club team. Although he is young(13) for his grade(8th) , he is 6’6” and 245 lbs. and pretty athletic. Any suggestions ?


yeah, call spalina!


That's funny. Sounds like you have a little Sasquatch in your family. Call wolf pack.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Blatant tourney looks like a lot of B teams. Where are the A teams playing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My son said he heard of a kid who fits those demensions. He said his nickname is actually “SQUACH”. Pretty funny.

Who is this Giant and what town is he from? With that size and his age this kid may Be a one of a kind player since he is almost the size of Alaska himself .

To the parent, Don’t worry about the club team, have himt train with the Lizards!

God Bless!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Not sure how long he will be around. he told my son that they move around a
A lot....my kid tells me that he’s “huge”
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Except Express North 23 won Blatant in Huntington.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Except Express North 23 won Blatant in Huntington.


Don't a few of them play on the 2024 team also? There's a few monsters out there on Express North.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Except Express North 23 won Blatant in Huntington.


Nice tourney win. Took out 2Way too, dropping them down area 2023 ladder.
Good win by Express North at Blatant tourney and beat 2-Way in process. Moves them closer to Preds at #2. No one else really in action so far this fall so little movement. Only other area team in action was Express North CT who made Halloween Havoc final. Probably makes them about even with Preds "B" team. They definitely have so holdbacks as they are pretty big. We'll see what happens in coming weeks.

"A"
1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. Express North
4. Eclipse
5. 2-Way
6. CT Wolves
7. 91 TS
8. All else.

"B:
1. Preds
2. Express North CT
3. All else
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
WESTCHESTER 2024

eclipse
express north
prime time
2 way
predators
91 ts

Eclipse, should be strong again this year and have been the tops in 2024 for the last 2 years. still some daddy ball issues on Express and PT , although Daniello told me "no more dad coaches at PT" I still see Colsey out there with his kid . should be stronger with 2 new additions on attack and an upgrade on size . see what happens there. very attack centric and weak up top at middi. Schreiber has 3 dad coaches and until that changes, will struggle, but they have added some big guns this year and will be much stronger and more well rounded that PT. should be a good year , lots of talent around
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
WESTCHESTER 2024

eclipse
express north
prime time
2 way
predators
91 ts

Eclipse, should be strong again this year and have been the tops in 2024 for the last 2 years. still some daddy ball issues on Express and PT , although Daniello told me "no more dad coaches at PT" I still see Colsey out there with his kid . should be stronger with 2 new additions on attack and an upgrade on size . see what happens there. very attack centric and weak up top at middi. Schreiber has 3 dad coaches and until that changes, will struggle, but they have added some big guns this year and will be much stronger and more well rounded that PT. should be a good year , lots of talent around


Express north got manhandled by the top LI teams last weekend
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
WESTCHESTER 2024

eclipse
express north
prime time
2 way
predators
91 ts

Eclipse, should be strong again this year and have been the tops in 2024 for the last 2 years. still some daddy ball issues on Express and PT , although Daniello told me "no more dad coaches at PT" I still see Colsey out there with his kid . should be stronger with 2 new additions on attack and an upgrade on size . see what happens there. very attack centric and weak up top at middi. Schreiber has 3 dad coaches and until that changes, will struggle, but they have added some big guns this year and will be much stronger and more well rounded that PT. should be a good year , lots of talent around


Express north got manhandled by the top LI teams last weekend

Ok but to be fair, they played the absolute top teams in the country and 2way performed far far worse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
WESTCHESTER 2024

eclipse
express north
prime time
2 way
predators
91 ts

Eclipse, should be strong again this year and have been the tops in 2024 for the last 2 years. still some daddy ball issues on Express and PT , although Daniello told me "no more dad coaches at PT" I still see Colsey out there with his kid . should be stronger with 2 new additions on attack and an upgrade on size . see what happens there. very attack centric and weak up top at middi. Schreiber has 3 dad coaches and until that changes, will struggle, but they have added some big guns this year and will be much stronger and more well rounded that PT. should be a good year , lots of talent around


Express north got manhandled by the top LI teams last weekend

Ok but to be fair, they played the absolute top teams in the country and 2way performed far far worse.


Which of the above teams are filled with holdbacks?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I know express north has a few holdbacks, 2 way as well , not sure about PT
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
In the 2024 bracket, most of the better teams have a few holdbacks but these holdbacks won’t play in the WSYL tournament (too old). However, the teams won’t cut them because they want these older holdbacks for next year when age doesn’t matter. Only WSYL checks birth dates.

The problem gets worse in the recruiting years for these teams. They dump most of the on-age kids to take lots of holdbacks and a few connected kids (friends and family of coaches and directors). The teams will do anything to show that they are elite & recruiting powerhouses and this means taking one or two year holdbacks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
In the 2024 bracket, most of the better teams have a few holdbacks but these holdbacks won’t play in the WSYL tournament (too old). However, the teams won’t cut them because they want these older holdbacks for next year when age doesn’t matter. Only WSYL checks birth dates.

The problem gets worse in the recruiting years for these teams. They dump most of the on-age kids to take lots of holdbacks and a few connected kids (friends and family of coaches and directors). The teams will do anything to show that they are elite & recruiting powerhouses and this means taking one or two year holdbacks.


Agreed.

We all know top teams flooded with holdbacks. Teams aren't too bashful about it though it is an ugly little mark they prefer no one inspect. 7th grade year funny with WSYL means teams bench holdbacks for a few months, scramble for on-age talent if they didn't plan well, and then go back to holdbacks for 8th.

WSYL is best way to prove which teams are the best in many ways. PT has proven they can thrive no matter what, and so have Preds now. Eclipse very year-to-year. Express North last year showed that were a whole other team without older kids. 2Way older teams all prep holdbacks but younger teams flounder.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2024 team would be younger, no? so how are there monsters on the 2023 team?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Except Express North 23 won Blatant in Huntington.


Don't a few of them play on the 2024 team also? There's a few monsters out there on Express North.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I think the landscape is changing and has changed drastically in Westchester- 5 years ago, the best players had to play for PT OR Superstars , now you have 2-5 other choices. if you live down county or Greenwich , why drive 40 mins to john Jay or H School when you can play for Preds or 2 way etc ....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
In the 2024 bracket, most of the better teams have a few holdbacks but these holdbacks won’t play in the WSYL tournament (too old). However, the teams won’t cut them because they want these older holdbacks for next year when age doesn’t matter. Only WSYL checks birth dates.

The problem gets worse in the recruiting years for these teams. They dump most of the on-age kids to take lots of holdbacks and a few connected kids (friends and family of coaches and directors). The teams will do anything to show that they are elite & recruiting powerhouses and this means taking one or two year holdbacks.


Agreed.

We all know top teams flooded with holdbacks. Teams aren't too bashful about it though it is an ugly little mark they prefer no one inspect. 7th grade year funny with WSYL means teams bench holdbacks for a few months, scramble for on-age talent if they didn't plan well, and then go back to holdbacks for 8th.

WSYL is best way to prove which teams are the best in many ways. PT has proven they can thrive no matter what, and so have Preds now. Eclipse very year-to-year. Express North last year showed that were a whole other team without older kids. 2Way older teams all prep holdbacks but younger teams flounder.


2way can’t field a 2024 WSYL team with its current roster.
The dirty secret is the team is mostly holdbacks.
Curious...if we are all interested in the best for our kids and most influential adults I know couldn't care less about the results of a made for TV youth lacrosse tourney why is a 13 year old playing vs. a 12 year old so bad? Most boys even out physically after puberty so what's the big deal?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
CTLaxDad we all know who you are and who your defense son is who is already an old 2023 (who is as big if not bigger than many 2023's) and now reclassing to 2024 per your advise from Colsey. guess being 2 plus years older than his competition "Is NO BIG DEAL. If your kid is as good as you always are telling people why don't you have him play up? I "
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
In the 2024 bracket, most of the better teams have a few holdbacks but these holdbacks won’t play in the WSYL tournament (too old). However, the teams won’t cut them because they want these older holdbacks for next year when age doesn’t matter. Only WSYL checks birth dates.

The problem gets worse in the recruiting years for these teams. They dump most of the on-age kids to take lots of holdbacks and a few connected kids (friends and family of coaches and directors). The teams will do anything to show that they are elite & recruiting powerhouses and this means taking one or two year holdbacks.


Agreed.

We all know top teams flooded with holdbacks. Teams aren't too bashful about it though it is an ugly little mark they prefer no one inspect. 7th grade year funny with WSYL means teams bench holdbacks for a few months, scramble for on-age talent if they didn't plan well, and then go back to holdbacks for 8th.

WSYL is best way to prove which teams are the best in many ways. PT has proven they can thrive no matter what, and so have Preds now. Eclipse very year-to-year. Express North last year showed that were a whole other team without older kids. 2Way older teams all prep holdbacks but younger teams flounder.


2way can’t field a 2024 WSYL team with its current roster.
The dirty secret is the team is mostly holdbacks.

It is not a secret. There is tryout for 2way ws team. It will be the 3 of age 24’s, kids from 2way north and the 25’s that are holdbacks. Age doesn’t matter in this sport. Sooner everyone accepts that the better.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
In the 2024 bracket, most of the better teams have a few holdbacks but these holdbacks won’t play in the WSYL tournament (too old). However, the teams won’t cut them because they want these older holdbacks for next year when age doesn’t matter. Only WSYL checks birth dates.

The problem gets worse in the recruiting years for these teams. They dump most of the on-age kids to take lots of holdbacks and a few connected kids (friends and family of coaches and directors). The teams will do anything to show that they are elite & recruiting powerhouses and this means taking one or two year holdbacks.


Agreed.

We all know top teams flooded with holdbacks. Teams aren't too bashful about it though it is an ugly little mark they prefer no one inspect. 7th grade year funny with WSYL means teams bench holdbacks for a few months, scramble for on-age talent if they didn't plan well, and then go back to holdbacks for 8th.

WSYL is best way to prove which teams are the best in many ways. PT has proven they can thrive no matter what, and so have Preds now. Eclipse very year-to-year. Express North last year showed that were a whole other team without older kids. 2Way older teams all prep holdbacks but younger teams flounder.


2way can’t field a 2024 WSYL team with its current roster.
The dirty secret is the team is mostly holdbacks.

It is not a secret. There is tryout for 2way ws team. It will be the 3 of age 24’s, kids from 2way north and the 25’s that are holdbacks. Age doesn’t matter in this sport. Sooner everyone accepts that the better.


At this point, there are so many teams with reclassed kids that everybody will end up playing kids their own age anyway. When you are one of the few teams doing it, then there is a distinct advantage, now that it is commonplace, there seems to be no point
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
hey ct lax dad, why would you reclass and go with Colsey over Schreiber? just curious
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
In the 2024 bracket, most of the better teams have a few holdbacks but these holdbacks won’t play in the WSYL tournament (too old). However, the teams won’t cut them because they want these older holdbacks for next year when age doesn’t matter. Only WSYL checks birth dates.

The problem gets worse in the recruiting years for these teams. They dump most of the on-age kids to take lots of holdbacks and a few connected kids (friends and family of coaches and directors). The teams will do anything to show that they are elite & recruiting powerhouses and this means taking one or two year holdbacks.


Agreed.

We all know top teams flooded with holdbacks. Teams aren't too bashful about it though it is an ugly little mark they prefer no one inspect. 7th grade year funny with WSYL means teams bench holdbacks for a few months, scramble for on-age talent if they didn't plan well, and then go back to holdbacks for 8th.

WSYL is best way to prove which teams are the best in many ways. PT has proven they can thrive no matter what, and so have Preds now. Eclipse very year-to-year. Express North last year showed that were a whole other team without older kids. 2Way older teams all prep holdbacks but younger teams flounder.


2way can’t field a 2024 WSYL team with its current roster.
The dirty secret is the team is mostly holdbacks.

It is not a secret. There is tryout for 2way ws team. It will be the 3 of age 24’s, kids from 2way north and the 25’s that are holdbacks. Age doesn’t matter in this sport. Sooner everyone accepts that the better.


Well I suppose the upside on that theory is that your son will be driving himself to practice soon and voting in 2020.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
In the 2024 bracket, most of the better teams have a few holdbacks but these holdbacks won’t play in the WSYL tournament (too old). However, the teams won’t cut them because they want these older holdbacks for next year when age doesn’t matter. Only WSYL checks birth dates.

The problem gets worse in the recruiting years for these teams. They dump most of the on-age kids to take lots of holdbacks and a few connected kids (friends and family of coaches and directors). The teams will do anything to show that they are elite & recruiting powerhouses and this means taking one or two year holdbacks.


Agreed.

We all know top teams flooded with holdbacks. Teams aren't too bashful about it though it is an ugly little mark they prefer no one inspect. 7th grade year funny with WSYL means teams bench holdbacks for a few months, scramble for on-age talent if they didn't plan well, and then go back to holdbacks for 8th.

WSYL is best way to prove which teams are the best in many ways. PT has proven they can thrive no matter what, and so have Preds now. Eclipse very year-to-year. Express North last year showed that were a whole other team without older kids. 2Way older teams all prep holdbacks but younger teams flounder.


2way can’t field a 2024 WSYL team with its current roster.
The dirty secret is the team is mostly holdbacks.

It is not a secret. There is tryout for 2way ws team. It will be the 3 of age 24’s, kids from 2way north and the 25’s that are holdbacks. Age doesn’t matter in this sport. Sooner everyone accepts that the better.


2Way did good in WSYL last year but didn't qualify. This year they are supposed to have more holdbacks which means WSYL team will do worse. The 2way north teams are awful.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Any coach or program director advocating a parent hold a kid back is giving bad advice. I know of a number of kids who suffered socially and it changed their personalities and parents came to regret the decision. Think twice people.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
So much drama in westchester for irrelevant 2024 teams. 2way which I’ve never heard of lost to a 2025 team. Express north and all the Schreiber yelling is embarrassing. Well see how PT and EN do in Delaware in a couple weeks. Guessing not good.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I’m I reading this accurately, that there are only three eligible “0n age” kids on 2024 2way?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I’m I reading this accurately, that there are only three eligible “0n age” kids on 2024 2way?


if that is true that is sad. They lost to a 2025 team full of 10/11 year olds and it wasn't even close
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CTLaxDad we all know who you are and who your defense son is who is already an old 2023 (who is as big if not bigger than many 2023's) and now reclassing to 2024 per your advise from Colsey. guess being 2 plus years older than his competition "Is NO BIG DEAL. If your kid is as good as you always are telling people why don't you have him play up? I "


hey ct lax dad, why would you reclass and go with Colsey over Schreiber? just curious
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Schreiber does a way better job on the recruiting front than Daniello .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Based on what?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Based on what?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Based on what?


the number of kids committed the last 3 years to div 1 schools is greater at Express North than Prime Time, not including this year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Maybe there is something to all his yelling after all. I thought coaches had more input into recruiting?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Maybe there is something to all his yelling after all. I thought coaches had more input into recruiting?



The guy can yell with the best of them. But my personal observations are that , through all that yelling is a man that cares about these boys and he will fight for those boys come crunch time. I can’t say that about Daniello as evidenced by the way he treats most people.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I think Schreiber has a bit more credibility with college coaches, he has played at a very high level, where as Daniello never really played at that level, not sure if that helps or not . Prime Time seems to have more than their fair share of top players going to top schools
Anyone know how Preds does with recruiting and helping players?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
Curious...if we are all interested in the best for our kids and most influential adults I know couldn't care less about the results of a made for TV youth lacrosse tourney why is a 13 year old playing vs. a 12 year old so bad? Most boys even out physically after puberty so what's the big deal?


Dude, it's sad you can't see you're part of the problem not th solution. Best players should always play up not down!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think Schreiber has a bit more credibility with college coaches, he has played at a very high level, where as Daniello never really played at that level, not sure if that helps or not . Prime Time seems to have more than their fair share of top players going to top schools


At the tryout last fall first thing Schreiber said to all the parents if you can have your son get left back do it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
Curious...if we are all interested in the best for our kids and most influential adults I know couldn't care less about the results of a made for TV youth lacrosse tourney why is a 13 year old playing vs. a 12 year old so bad? Most boys even out physically after puberty so what's the big deal?


Dude, it's sad you can't see you're part of the problem not th solution. Best players should always play up not down!


It’s not parents fault. It’s the entire club lacrosse world. 7th, 8th 9th grade teams are constantly cutting on age kids for older holdbacks. Happens every single year. Until you get a world where that doesn’t exist, it will never change. That said, this specific boy is more than big enough to stay on age.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
Anyone know how Preds does with recruiting and helping players?

Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
Anyone know how Preds does with recruiting and helping players?


Look to be doing ok. 3 2020 commits so far. Penn Dartmouth Colgate. Preds seem to be getting better and better every year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
Curious...if we are all interested in the best for our kids and most influential adults I know couldn't care less about the results of a made for TV youth lacrosse tourney why is a 13 year old playing vs. a 12 year old so bad? Most boys even out physically after puberty so what's the big deal?


Dude, it's sad you can't see you're part of the problem not th solution. Best players should always play up not down!


whats sad is guys like Colsey(hall of famer) told him to do it , so....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
Anyone know how Preds does with recruiting and helping players?

Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
Anyone know how Preds does with recruiting and helping players?


Look to be doing ok. 3 2020 commits so far. Penn Dartmouth Colgate. Preds seem to be getting better and better every year.



1 more today to Fairfield makes 4
Preds does fine with recruiting. They have their own show case that is successful which keeps the Pred's name in front of college coaches and allows Preds coaches to network with college coaches. Preds coaches are well connected and support their players in the recruiting process. They are also a great source of information to parents and players. If their player is good enough, they can generally get that player into the better individual showcases. The best thing about Preds is their coaching. Kids coming out of that program have received great coaching. They know the game well, are coachable, know what it means to be a team player and what it takes to play at the college level. College coaches know that.

If your child is good enough though, college coaches will find him. Have your kids play for the team that gives them the most joy. That way they will come to love the game and excel at it. If they don’t love the game, they won’t succeed at the college level. College lacrosse is a lot of hard work and sacrifice. There is little time for anything other than lacrosse and school.

Father of a Preds D-1 lax player.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
With the Preds, it really depends on the class year. If your child is on the 2020 team or previous 2017 team, they will get a ton of attention from the Preds organization. The 2019 class has been largely ignored by the Preds organization. As an example, a few 2019 Preds have committed to good D3 schools but no shout out from Preds on social media. As soon as one of the 2020 commits, instantaneous post.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With the Preds, it really depends on the class year. If your child is on the 2020 team or previous 2017 team, they will get a ton of attention from the Preds organization. The 2019 class has been largely ignored by the Preds organization. As an example, a few 2019 Preds have committed to good D3 schools but no shout out from Preds on social media. As soon as one of the 2020 commits, instantaneous post.


They probably don't view D3 commits as marketable as D1, which is a shame. Too many kids regret the decision which is driven by peers, coaches, programs, etc. Kids need to think about education first, having SOME free time to be a college student, playing time expectations, etc. I hve two sons, one in a midlevel D1 program and my little guy is going to great D3 school and playing lacrosse there. Find the best fit.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Preds cleaned up down in PA obviously not the same competition in LI but a great win. PT had trouble against bandits, but had a good day.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by ctlaxdad
Curious...if we are all interested in the best for our kids and most influential adults I know couldn't care less about the results of a made for TV youth lacrosse tourney why is a 13 year old playing vs. a 12 year old so bad? Most boys even out physically after puberty so what's the big deal?


Dude, it's sad you can't see you're part of the problem not th solution. Best players should always play up not down!


It’s not parents fault. It’s the entire club lacrosse world. 7th, 8th 9th grade teams are constantly cutting on age kids for older holdbacks. Happens every single year. Until you get a world where that doesn’t exist, it will never change. That said, this specific boy is more than big enough to stay on age.


Stop it! It is absolutely the parents fault.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Maybe there is something to all his yelling after all. I thought coaches had more input into recruiting?


The guy can yell with the best of them. But my personal observations are that , through all that yelling is a man that cares about these boys and he will fight for those boys come crunch time. I can’t say that about D as evidenced by the way he treats most people.


Very true its all about D's ego . His is good at marketing his product so HE could reap the benefits,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Maybe there is something to all his yelling after all. I thought coaches had more input into recruiting?


The guy can yell with the best of them. But my personal observations are that , through all that yelling is a man that cares about these boys and he will fight for those boys come crunch time. I can’t say that about D as evidenced by the way he treats most people.


Very true its all about D's ego . His is good at marketing his product so HE could reap the benefits,


I think the big guy's yelling causes players to be timid, afraid to make a mistake. Kids should be playing with confidence and that's not the environment he creates. I've heard him yell more than once when he was wrong. Just counter productive.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Maybe there is something to all his yelling after all. I thought coaches had more input into recruiting?


The guy can yell with the best of them. But my personal observations are that , through all that yelling is a man that cares about these boys and he will fight for those boys come crunch time. I can’t say that about D as evidenced by the way he treats most people.


Very true its all about D's ego . His is good at marketing his product so HE could reap the benefits,


Is this they guy that posted a video of himself playing lacrosse after someone questioned his playing career?
Who a .....!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Preds cleaned up down in PA obviously not the same competition in LI but a great win. PT had trouble against bandits, but had a good day.


Tourney Machine records many area teams this weekend. Results vary per class.

2025- 91Tristate almost won PA tourney (Preds there too)
2024- Preds did well in PA (91TS didn't at 0-3)
2023- PT played in Elite hardest tourney, lost 2 games to the top teams in country-- no other area team competed- telling. I assume post above is about this game- Preds won PA tourney beating Mesa who is legit. 91TS at same PA tourney (1-2).
2022- PT, Eclipse, Express, North, 2Way all at Elite tourney. All seemed to compete well except 2Way (0-3). Preds at IL Intitational and competed well.
2021- same as 2021's except Eclipse beat PT, all good records. 2Way won a game. Preds at IL tourney did well.
2020- Same as above except Express North beats PT. And no 2Way. Preds in IL do very well.

Younger teams are very random
Middle school teams all about Preds, PT
HS teams Preds, Eclipse, PT, Express North very solid, 2way full level below.

Where is 2023 2Way, Eclipse?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Preds cleaned up down in PA obviously not the same competition in LI but a great win. PT had trouble against bandits, but had a good day.


Tourney Machine records many area teams this weekend. Results vary per class.

2025- 91Tristate almost won PA tourney (Preds there too)
2024- Preds did well in PA (91TS didn't at 0-3)
2023- PT played in Elite hardest tourney, lost 2 games to the top teams in country-- no other area team competed- telling. I assume post above is about this game- Preds won PA tourney beating Mesa who is legit. 91TS at same PA tourney (1-2).
2022- PT, Eclipse, Express, North, 2Way all at Elite tourney. All seemed to compete well except 2Way (0-3). Preds at IL Intitational and competed well.
2021- same as 2021's except Eclipse beat PT, all good records. 2Way won a game. Preds at IL tourney did well.
2020- Same as above except Express North beats PT. And no 2Way. Preds in IL do very well.

Younger teams are very random
Middle school teams all about Preds, PT
HS teams Preds, Eclipse, PT, Express North very solid, 2way full level below.

Where is 2023 2Way, Eclipse?


2022 Express north went 0-3. 30 players plus 4 goalies on the roster.$$$$$
@ API 2022 Fall 2018 L 1-10
11/04 @ 24/7 2022 Fall 2018 L 5-7
11/04 vs Juiced Cherries White 2022 Fall 2018 L1-7
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
what the heck happened to the 2023 PT team- bandits destroyed them 14-2 , doesn't seem like big Nick D is moulding champions, more like destroying dreams and emptying wallets,, wow. lets see how they do this weekend, in kind of a weak bracket .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Maybe there is something to all his yelling after all. I thought coaches had more input into recruiting?


The guy can yell with the best of them. But my personal observations are that , through all that yelling is a man that cares about these boys and he will fight for those boys come crunch time. I can’t say that about D as evidenced by the way he treats most people.


Very true its all about D's ego . His is good at marketing his product so HE could reap the benefits,


I think the big guy's yelling causes players to be timid, afraid to make a mistake. Kids should be playing with confidence and that's not the environment he creates. I've heard him yell more than once when he was wrong. Just counter productive.



How are kids expected to play well when they have to worry about being screamed at or demeaned if they make a mistake? Its just wrong. I've seen it at all levels and friends, its absolutely counter productive and coaches needed to be called out for it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
every single organization has coaches that are great with kids and those that aren't- my advice is to stop worrying about AA, A, B and find a program that is competitive enough with a coach their child responds to. if he or she is good enough, they will be found, its that simple .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what the heck happened to the 2023 PT team- bandits destroyed them 14-2 , doesn't seem like big Nick D is moulding champions, more like destroying dreams and emptying wallets,, wow. lets see how they do this weekend, in kind of a weak bracket .


The line about destroying dreams is a good one. But PT 2023 loses one rough game to the best team in the country without us knowing background and this is the team you bash? That team is ONLY one in that year from our area to play in that tough tourney and otherwise did well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what the heck happened to the 2023 PT team- bandits destroyed them 14-2 , doesn't seem like big Nick D is moulding champions, more like destroying dreams and emptying wallets,, wow. lets see how they do this weekend, in kind of a weak bracket .


The line about destroying dreams is a good one. But PT 2023 loses one rough game to the best team in the country without us knowing background and this is the team you bash? That team is ONLY one in that year from our area to play in that tough tourney and otherwise did well.


I think was more of a jab at the director than the team, PT 2023 is a good group of kids, coach is a good guy, was a good first tourney for the boys
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what the heck happened to the 2023 PT team- bandits destroyed them 14-2 , doesn't seem like big Nick D is moulding champions, more like destroying dreams and emptying wallets,, wow. lets see how they do this weekend, in kind of a weak bracket .


The line about destroying dreams is a good one. But PT 2023 loses one rough game to the best team in the country without us knowing background and this is the team you bash? That team is ONLY one in that year from our area to play in that tough tourney and otherwise did well.


Did well? you only won one game and that was against a B team. You are suppose to have caught up by now. You couldn't even beat the other top Long Island team without their best player. Nick D did a good job for you. LOL
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what the heck happened to the 2023 PT team- bandits destroyed them 14-2 , doesn't seem like big Nick D is moulding champions, more like destroying dreams and emptying wallets,, wow. lets see how they do this weekend, in kind of a weak bracket .


The line about destroying dreams is a good one. But PT 2023 loses one rough game to the best team in the country without us knowing background and this is the team you bash? That team is ONLY one in that year from our area to play in that tough tourney and otherwise did well.


Not a PT parent, but I agree.
91 Bandit's are the best team in the country. Not a bad reflection on Prime Time.
You score on Bandits, keep the ball. It doesn't happen often.
Same goes for 2024 WP.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
the days of PT getting the best kids is over , too many other choices . 2022 could be his last great team . absolutely nothing to do with the players on these teams, they are all quality players, he is just not drawing kids from all over like in the past .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I heard they got rid of a lot of the players from last year's 2023 PT team maybe that wasn't a good move?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Nick D is a god, he walks on water. He doesn’t make mistakes. He got all his experience playing d 3 Lacrosse . He is the man. Every dog has their day. His days of being top dog are numbered.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Preds cleaned up down in PA obviously not the same competition in LI but a great win. PT had trouble against bandits, but had a good day.


Tourney Machine records many area teams this weekend. Results vary per class.

2025- 91Tristate almost won PA tourney (Preds there too)
2024- Preds did well in PA (91TS didn't at 0-3)
2023- PT played in Elite hardest tourney, lost 2 games to the top teams in country-- no other area team competed- telling. I assume post above is about this game- Preds won PA tourney beating Mesa who is legit. 91TS at same PA tourney (1-2).
2022- PT, Eclipse, Express, North, 2Way all at Elite tourney. All seemed to compete well except 2Way (0-3). Preds at IL Intitational and competed well.
2021- same as 2021's except Eclipse beat PT, all good records. 2Way won a game. Preds at IL tourney did well.
2020- Same as above except Express North beats PT. And no 2Way. Preds in IL do very well.

Younger teams are very random
Middle school teams all about Preds, PT
HS teams Preds, Eclipse, PT, Express North very solid, 2way full level below.

Where is 2023 2Way, Eclipse?


2022 Express north went 0-3. 30 players plus 4 goalies on the roster.$$$$$
@ API 2022 Fall 2018 L 1-10
11/04 @ 24/7 2022 Fall 2018 L 5-7
11/04 vs Juiced Cherries White 2022 Fall 2018 L1-7


This was the A team not the AA team, big roster but only 2 goalies were there and maybe 22 kids. Summer will be another story.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
You guys crack me up. You cannot draw any sound conclusions from the past weekend wherever you played. Many top players were not there and in football play-offs, a lot of random helmets...newly added players from the fall. Most teams won't be at full strength until June.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what the heck happened to the 2023 PT team- bandits destroyed them 14-2 , doesn't seem like big Nick D is moulding champions, more like destroying dreams and emptying wallets,, wow. lets see how they do this weekend, in kind of a weak bracket .


It is so fun reading posts from disgruntled parents whose marginal kid was cut...get on with your life Dad, your kid is finally playing on a lower level team where he belongs and will be fine. Of course you will continue to be a toxic parent on the sideline infesting all the other parents with you (lack of) knowledge.......................
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This weekend in Delaware has a few good teams playing. PT 23 should bounce back and make it to the finals. WRM82x
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Pt in general across the board will be fine, because honestly who gives a crap about youth lacrosse , being the #1 team in 8th grade will probably have no affect on a childs future if that child is good enough
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It’s not about the kids, it’s all about the parents’ bragging rights and of course, how much they can drink or smoke at the tourney.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what the heck happened to the 2023 PT team- bandits destroyed them 14-2 , doesn't seem like big Nick D is moulding champions, more like destroying dreams and emptying wallets,, wow. lets see how they do this weekend, in kind of a weak bracket .


It is so fun reading posts from disgruntled parents whose marginal kid was cut...get on with your life Dad, your kid is finally playing on a lower level team where he belongs and will be fine. Of course you will continue to be a toxic parent on the sideline infesting all the other parents with you (lack of) knowledge.......................


Agreed. Not only get on with your life, but get out of your kid's life.
My son tried out for PT (was very close, but got cut after the final invitation only tryout).It was a disappointment, but our kid learned a very valuable lesson.
8th grade is a great time to be learning to deal with unfavorable situations because the stakes are so low.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Did 2024 TS select lose kids?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Did 2024 TS select lose kids?

what team are you talking about?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This weekend in Delaware has a few good teams playing. PT 23 should bounce back and make it to the finals. WRM82x

That's because it is an easy tournament with no real competition. If they don't win the tournament, then that's a problem.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This weekend in Delaware has a few good teams playing. PT 23 should bounce back and make it to the finals. WRM82x

That's because it is an easy tournament with no real competition. If they don't win the tournament, then that's a problem.


Not that easy. Dc dogs are good, Sweetlax beat us last year, but honestly who cares. 8th grade lax. The boys will play hard and do their best.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Did 2024 TS select lose kids?


NO one that is relevant
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This weekend in Delaware has a few good teams playing. PT 23 should bounce back and make it to the finals. WRM82x

That's because it is an easy tournament with no real competition. If they don't win the tournament, then that's a problem.


Not that easy. Dc dogs are good, Sweetlax beat us last year, but honestly who cares. 8th grade lax. The boys will play hard and do their best.


DC Express is not DC Dogs
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The Preds 2022 is the best 2022 team in the area, hands down!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Preds 2022 is the best 2022 team in the area, hands down!!


such a strange thing to say , I don't know if its true or not , but why set yourself up , nothing but downside
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Preds 2022 is the best 2022 team in the area, hands down!!


such a strange thing to say , I don't know if its true or not , but why set yourself up , nothing but downside



Love a good pot stir every once in a while. LOL, Lets see who bites!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Prime Time 2023 Wins !!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Great win for PT 23 against some top teams. Too bad about the rest of their younger teams that had a rough day.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Great win for PT 23 against some top teams. Too bad about the rest of their younger teams that had a rough day.

No top teams played in that tournament.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That was a B tournament today in Delaware
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Great win for PT 23 against some top teams. Too bad about the rest of their younger teams that had a rough day.

No top teams played in that tournament.


Nice that this forum is getting some snarky donk comments like the LI boards. Finally! Westchester is too fancy and nice. PT 2023 wins a very solid tourney and the hate posts follow. Play your part, everybody.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Ok,top tourney for 23 would include laxachusetts, eclipse, PT, express, bandits, hawks, crabs for east coast. There could be 5 more teams that could challenge any of them and some that were in DE could be included.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Ok,top tourney for 23 would include laxachusetts, eclipse, PT, express, bandits, hawks, crabs for east coast. There could be 5 more teams that could challenge any of them and some that were in DE could be included.


Eclipse 2023 are you serious?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express north AA is really good too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Which predator 2023 team is playing on Long Island this weekend?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Which predator 2023 team is playing on Long Island this weekend?


the black team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Saw a few 2023 PrimeTime games. Solid overall talent, but middies try to do too much on the clears and fast breaks. Works against 2nd tier teams, but won't work against the big boys. PT was missing their goalies and a few others at Sachem so didn't get a good read of how they might match up this spring against LIE, Bandits and the like.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I saw a few of the Prime Time 2024 games this past weekend as well. Not much has changed from last year, solid overall effort, but offense is very one dimensional and attack centric skewed towards the lefty attack. definitely holding the ball too long at attack and taking some poor shots resulting in turnovers. Not sure this team will do very well until they incorporate the entire offense and utilize the middies . I see this team as probably #5 out of 6 in the regional qualifiers this year behind, 91, express, Legacy, Eclipse .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Whats the difference between predators 2023 and predators black?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Whats the difference between predators 2023 and predators black?

Black is the B team. One of the better B teams around.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Preds black is their money grab B team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Bulldog Bash looks chilly for Saturday. Preds 23 should win since PT is a no show. Now this is clearly a B tourney.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Primetime ranked 8th in the wsyl pre season rankings, 5th in the region out of 6 spots leaves express north, igloo, shore to shore 2 way and predators fighting for the 6th spot -
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Primetime ranked 8th in the wsyl pre season rankings, 5th in the region out of 6 spots leaves express north, igloo, shore to shore 2 way and predators fighting for the 6th spot -



How many ineligible holdbacks are on Preds, 2Way and Express N?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Primetime ranked 8th in the wsyl pre season rankings, 5th in the region out of 6 spots leaves express north, igloo, shore to shore 2 way and predators fighting for the 6th spot -



How many ineligible holdbacks are on Preds, 2Way and Express N?


My ranking for that 6th spot
Igloo- not sure it they are a hold back org or not.
Preds- 1-2 max. Just lost to BBL 14 year old 2024 team 4-3.
EN- Have a few but not many. One of their top players is 2 days ineligible.
2way- too many to count and didnt do well at Blatant against top teams
S2S- Should not be on that list at all. The Vikings team is an average A team at best
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I'm guessing 2 way has the most, followed by express followed by predators
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bulldog Bash looks chilly for Saturday. Preds 23 should win since PT is a no show. Now this is clearly a B tourney.


It is going to be 48 degrees. Balmy for end of November lax.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
After getting 6 inches of snow then rain, I’m sure the fields at Yale will be unplayable on Saturday.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I saw a few of the Prime Time 2024 games this past weekend as well. Not much has changed from last year, solid overall effort, but offense is very one dimensional and attack centric skewed towards the lefty attack. definitely holding the ball too long at attack and taking some poor shots resulting in turnovers. Not sure this team will do very well until they incorporate the entire offense and utilize the middies . I see this team as probably #5 out of 6 in the regional qualifiers this year behind, 91, express, Legacy, Eclipse .


Why do the favor the lefty attack so much K.H.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
any chance , any of the tourneys happen tomorrow?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Primetime ranked 8th in the wsyl pre season rankings, 5th in the region out of 6 spots leaves express north, igloo, shore to shore 2 way and predators fighting for the 6th spot -



How many ineligible holdbacks are on Preds, 2Way and Express N?


My ranking for that 6th spot
Igloo- not sure it they are a hold back org or not.
Preds- 1-2 max. Just lost to BBL 14 year old 2024 team 4-3.
EN- Have a few but not many. One of their top players is 2 days ineligible.
2way- too many to count and didnt do well at Blatant against top teams
S2S- Should not be on that list at all. The Vikings team is an average A team at best


Igloo always strong, just a matter of if that specific year as good as last year and 3 years ago. But they'll be good and using kids on age.
Preds- Solid, don't rely on holdbacks, not as good as their 2023 crew
Express North- yes, holdbacks but will still compete well at qualifier
2way- many holdbacks so WSYL team is major step down and many kids grabbed to fill holes from wherever
S2S- organization made for the 2023 team, 2024 drop off
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I thinking Igloo or express North takes that 6th spot- Express North can grab from their ct teams as well to fill in for any gaps
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
...


So where is the guy who ranks all the teams? Fall is over. Hit us with the latest polls. Bad weather and weird scheduling limited results. Here's crack at it

2023 can be put in levels:
PT
Preds
----------
Express North
----------
Eclipse
2Way
---------
91TS
Pride

2024 tougher because of WSYL coming up and rosters changing. Here is how I think they will do in qualifier (if they enter)
Eclipse
PT
Express North
Preds
2Way
91TS
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
IMO 2023 Fall Ranks

Top 3 local teams hadd success in fall. Large drop after #3. Primetime, Express North, and Preds all won or made fianls of solid tournaments. Usuall suspect 2-Way and Eclipse really fell off but summer is around the corner. Westchster/Fairfield B teams rising as overall pool evens out in middle.

1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. Express North
4 2-Way
5. Preds "B"
6. Eclipse
7. Express North CT
8. 91 TS Select
9. all others

2024

Tricky as all only Eclipse really did well although all played very tough schedules.

1. Eclipse
2. Primetime
3. Express North
4. Preds
5. 91 TS
6. 2-Way

Thoughts...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO 2023 Fall Ranks

Top 3 local teams hadd success in fall. Large drop after #3. Primetime, Express North, and Preds all won or made fianls of solid tournaments. Usuall suspect 2-Way and Eclipse really fell off but summer is around the corner. Westchster/Fairfield B teams rising as overall pool evens out in middle.

1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. Express North
4 2-Way
5. Preds "B"
6. Eclipse
7. Express North CT
8. 91 TS Select
9. all others

2024

Tricky as all only Eclipse really did well although all played very tough schedules.

1. Eclipse
2. Primetime
3. Express North
4. Preds
5. 91 TS
6. 2-Way

Thoughts...



Which Fall tourneys has Eclipse played?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO 2023 Fall Ranks

Top 3 local teams hadd success in fall. Large drop after #3. Primetime, Express North, and Preds all won or made fianls of solid tournaments. Usuall suspect 2-Way and Eclipse really fell off but summer is around the corner. Westchster/Fairfield B teams rising as overall pool evens out in middle.

1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. Express North
4 2-Way
5. Preds "B"
6. Eclipse
7. Express North CT
8. 91 TS Select
9. all others

2024

Tricky as all only Eclipse really did well although all played very tough schedules.

1. Eclipse
2. Primetime
3. Express North
4. Preds
5. 91 TS
6. 2-Way

Thoughts...



Which Fall tourneys has Eclipse played?

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO 2023 Fall Ranks

Top 3 local teams hadd success in fall. Large drop after #3. Primetime, Express North, and Preds all won or made fianls of solid tournaments. Usuall suspect 2-Way and Eclipse really fell off but summer is around the corner. Westchster/Fairfield B teams rising as overall pool evens out in middle.

1. Primetime
2. Preds
3. Express North
4 2-Way
5. Preds "B"
6. Eclipse
7. Express North CT
8. 91 TS Select
9. all others

2024

Tricky as all only Eclipse really did well although all played very tough schedules.

1. Eclipse
2. Primetime
3. Express North
4. Preds
5. 91 TS
6. 2-Way

Thoughts...



Which Fall tourneys has Eclipse played?

Preds 2024’s came in 2nd at Lehigh, losing 4-3 against a BBL team that was basically all 14 year old holdbacks.
Nothing tricky about that. They are are strong.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I saw a few of the Prime Time 2024 games this past weekend as well. Not much has changed from last year, solid overall effort, but offense is very one dimensional and attack centric skewed towards the lefty attack. definitely holding the ball too long at attack and taking some poor shots resulting in turnovers. Not sure this team will do very well until they incorporate the entire offense and utilize the middies . I see this team as probably #5 out of 6 in the regional qualifiers this year behind, 91, express, Legacy, Eclipse .


Why do the favor the lefty attack so much K.H.


K.H. is not on Prime Time anymore he went to Predators
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Now that fall is behind us in terms of tourneys, I would like to know what clinics, camps, leagues etc people are doing this winter. Any thoughts?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I have no problem with arguments 2024 Preds is as good as Express at this point. Very possible they overtake Express or even Primetime during summer 2019. For now they are a close 4th.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
at this point it really doesn't matter , who is the best, all the boys and girls will be working hard all winter and that's all that matters , its 7th grade lacrosse find a team that makes your child happy, and consider it a victory!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that fall is behind us in terms of tourneys, I would like to know what clinics, camps, leagues etc people are doing this winter. Any thoughts?


2 way 3v3, 2 way reps, - Greenwich boys and girls
superstar box- somers
91 ts - Tuesday at Armonk
Brewster Ultra league-
Vortex Lacrosse- Justin otto- Chelsea piers

what else is out there?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
ts 91 box
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse vs Express vs Laxachusetts next weekend
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that fall is behind us in terms of tourneys, I would like to know what clinics, camps, leagues etc people are doing this winter. Any thoughts?


2 way 3v3, 2 way reps, - Greenwich boys and girls
superstar box- somers
91 ts - Tuesday at Armonk
Brewster Ultra league-
Vortex Lacrosse- Justin otto- Chelsea piers

what else is out there?


Pat Jackson Gwich Lacrosse indoors reps for 6th grade and under
HOS box league
Eclipse would destroy Preds B
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse vs Express vs Laxachusetts next weekend


Which tournament?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse vs Express vs Laxachusetts next weekend


Which tournament?



play day. btw, express LI
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse vs Express vs Laxachusetts next weekend


Which tournament?



play day. btw, express LI


What and where is that?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
what year?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by yaboijeffy
Eclipse would destroy Preds B


True. That's a 12-2 game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse vs Express vs Laxachusetts next weekend


Which tournament?



play day. btw, express LI


What and where is that?


3 way scrimmage for 2024
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How are the Westchester girls teams? I watched my friends daughter's team play against HOS and Lady Predators at a tournament a few weeks back and it was ugly. And she's only on a mediocre Long Island Team (9D1 2025 OF).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse vs Express vs Laxachusetts next weekend


Which tournament?



play day. btw, express LI


What and where is that?


3 way scrimmage for 2024


When and where is this battle of the bands taking place?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This is funny
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express Northvs Express vs Shore 2 Shore tomorrow in LI.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express Northvs Express vs Shore 2 Shore tomorrow in LI.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Separate question? How can a player play down? I understand player with older kids but do clubs let kids play with younger kidsvs his/her age?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Separate question? How can a player play down? I understand player with older kids but do clubs let kids play with younger kidsvs his/her age?


its grade based not age based , so anyone that goes to K late or repeats a grade automatically could play down
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
So a 6th grader can play with 5th, 6th or 7th?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Or some programs like the Canadian Edge lacrosse club play entire teams down and explain the kids have all promised to PG after Senior year HS.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express Northvs Express vs Shore 2 Shore tomorrow in LI.


How did it turn out?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express North went 2-0 but very unorganized day. Players were from Pearsall and Brameier teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North went 2-0 but very unorganized day. Players were from Pearsall and Brameier teams.

If they didn't go 2-0 they should pull out of qualifying. S2S is a B team and it was not Express A either.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How did Eclipse do against LI Express
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North went 2-0 but very unorganized day. Players were from Pearsall and Brameier teams.

If they didn't go 2-0 they should pull out of qualifying. S2S is a B team and it was not Express A either.


S2S only has the 8th grade. All other grades are "B".
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This was 2023 so no qualifying later this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Recruiting question:
Seems Primetime and Eclipse are better teams than Express North in general but why does EN seem to get as many if not more players into college?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Recruiting question:
Seems Primetime and Eclipse are better teams than Express North in general but why does EN seem to get as many if not more players into college?


on average probably about the same and varies from class to class - its not anything other than that - they are all at the same tourneys, showcases etc
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yeah, how did Eclipse do against LI Express?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Recruiting question:
Seems Primetime and Eclipse are better teams than Express North in general but why does EN seem to get as many if not more players into college?


Prime Time and Eclipse develop UA All-Americans every year, but EN has some very solid recruits as well
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by yaboijeffy
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Recruiting question:
Seems Primetime and Eclipse are better teams than Express North in general but why does EN seem to get as many if not more players into college?


Prime Time and Eclipse develop UA All-Americans every year, but EN has some very solid recruits as well
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by yaboijeffy
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Recruiting question:
Seems Primetime and Eclipse are better teams than Express North in general but why does EN seem to get as many if not more players into college?


Prime Time and Eclipse develop UA All-Americans every year, but EN has some very solid recruits as well


EN first team were the 2018's and they had at least 1 UA All American, they also placed the majority of their players on D1 and strong D3 programs. Same with the 2019's, haven't heard as much about their 2020's and below.

Love him or hate him but Schreiber and his family name carry a lot of weight. He has contacts everywhere that are very beneficial to the EN program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Hearing Colsey has been let go by Primetime as coach of 2024
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hearing Colsey has been let go by Primetime as coach of 2024



Amen. Christmas came early to the primetime 2024
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Whoa!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hearing Colsey has been let go by Primetime as coach of 2024


How do you fire a hall of famer like Roy?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hearing Colsey has been let go by Primetime as coach of 2024



Amen. Christmas came early to the primetime 2024


Is this for real?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hearing Colsey has been let go by Primetime as coach of 2024


Fake News. He has most of Primetime on his Box teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hearing Colsey has been let go by Primetime as coach of 2024


How do you fire a hall of famer like Roy?


It's FAKE News.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Rumor has it he's going to coach Preds 2024
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
if this is in fact true , I am sure he will have many options for himself and his boys. unfortunately can only be one Chief in any business and tough decisions need to be made, regardless, everyone involved will be fine
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Rumor has it he's going to coach Preds 2024


He's not going there. He's made a promise to start and play his Primetime kids on the Box teams to favor his allegence to Primetime.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
you don't know him very well if you think he would promise starting positions to people based on field lax affiliations. he plays to win, plain and simple , yes it is true, a large influx of Prime time kids are playing for superstar box this year, buts that's because its a good product and a natural fit geographically
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
you don't know him very well if you think he would promise starting positions to people based on field lax affiliations. he plays to win, plain and simple , yes it is true, a large influx of Prime time kids are playing for superstar box this year, buts that's because its a good product and a natural fit geographically


If you know him so well then why would he be going to a "B" club with none of his players, and right before WSYL?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Not fake news. The email to parents read “it is in the best interest of my organization that we mutually part ways”. Not sure where he’s headed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
He is a cancer cell no matter where he goes. Alfredo is awesome and will step up to the plate. PT has some really good players who will step up too. That team will rise above and Roy will have to crawl back under the rock he came out of
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Rumor has it he's going to coach Preds 2024


Al Meola is going with him.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Anyone know if Meola is still coaching Primetime 2024?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
you don't know him very well if you think he would promise starting positions to people based on field lax affiliations. he plays to win, plain and simple , yes it is true, a large influx of Prime time kids are playing for superstar box this year, buts that's because its a good product and a natural fit geographically


If you know him so well then why would he be going to a "B" club with none of his players, and right before WSYL?


You had to do that, huh?
Don't be one of those stunads like those from the other boards and disparage another Westchester/CT team.
We have our work cut out for us to compete against LI teams.
If you are some kid, fine your entitled to be notIntelligent. But If you are a parent, take note that we are ALL competing to get to be at a premier LI team level
Disrespecting our local teams is idiotic. In a sense we are ALL B teams until we competently compete against LIE/WP/TAZ.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
kudos to Daniello for taking the bull by the horns , I am sure this was a very difficult decision for obvious reasons , but one that will be better for the organization in the long run. Head coach , Alfredo Meola is a world class person .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That was quick...one year?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That announcement wasn't made. Al doesn't even like him
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Meola is a great coach and person. If he is the head coach they'll will improve.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Daniello is an arrogant *rick who's product is declining very fast!!! A bunch of other teams are in disarray too. People are starting to get tired of his act. Once McCarthy grows a set and lets him go from JJ (conflict of interest), you will see how fast PT goes to mediocre.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Daniello is an arrogant *rick who's product is declining very fast!!! A bunch of other teams are in disarray too. People are starting to get tired of his act. Once McCarthy grows a set and lets him go from JJ (conflict of interest), you will see how fast PT goes to mediocre.


wow . sounds harsh- relax , its the holidays
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Daniello is an arrogant *rick who's product is declining very fast!!! A bunch of other teams are in disarray too. People are starting to get tired of his act. Once McCarthy grows a set and lets him go from JJ (conflict of interest), you will see how fast PT goes to mediocre.


and so are you.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Actually the fact that daniello acknowledged there was an issue in his organization and was proactive enough to make a change early in the year and not let it go to the spring says a lot about how he runs his organization. He just earned a huge amount of respect with that team. He's not going to get bullied by people like roy or psycho parents like you so you can relax cause his product will be around a lot longer now that he put his players first.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Daniello is an arrogant *rick who's product is declining very fast!!! A bunch of other teams are in disarray too. People are starting to get tired of his act. Once McCarthy grows a set and lets him go from JJ (conflict of interest), you will see how fast PT goes to mediocre.


wow . sounds harsh- relax , its the holidays


Really Harsh. Take a look at their commitments page, and they seem to be doing right by their players.
I'm not a PT parent, but I respect the program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Sounds like one of Roy's fan club members trying to get the heat off the fact that roy got FIRED
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Actually the fact that daniello acknowledged there was an issue in his organization and was proactive enough to make a change early in the year and not let it go to the spring says a lot about how he runs his organization. He just earned a huge amount of respect with that team. He's not going to get bullied by people like roy or psycho parents like you so you can relax cause his product will be around a lot longer now that he put his players first.



great post - tough decisions need to be made in any business , never easy , you have to respect that!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Actually the fact that daniello acknowledged there was an issue in his organization and was proactive enough to make a change early in the year and not let it go to the spring says a lot about how he runs his organization. He just earned a huge amount of respect with that team. He's not going to get bullied by people like roy or psycho parents like you so you can relax cause his product will be around a lot longer now that he put his players first.


Question is, will Roy pull his son as well. Losing both of them will be a net gain for the team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Actually the fact that daniello acknowledged there was an issue in his organization and was proactive enough to make a change early in the year and not let it go to the spring says a lot about how he runs his organization. He just earned a huge amount of respect with that team. He's not going to get bullied by people like roy or psycho parents like you so you can relax cause his product will be around a lot longer now that he put his players first.


Question is, will Roy pull his son as well. Losing both of them will be a net gain for the team.


The ship will go down when the captain and his commanders leave.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
no one is leaving , give me a break,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
no one is leaving , give me a break,


A hoy matie. Walk the plank.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Colsey and Meola to Eclipse
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Colsey and Meola to Eclipse

why would eclipse destroy and already very good team by changing the coaching staff
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Fact or fiction?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse 2024 already has coaches. maybe different year?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Colsey is going to reek havoc on PT. He's the man, not Danielo, and his son is going to Denver with their buddies.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CTLaxDad we all know who you are and who your defense son is who is already an old 2023 (who is as big if not bigger than many 2023's) and now reclassing to 2024 per your advise from Colsey. guess being 2 plus years older than his competition "Is NO BIG DEAL. If your kid is as good as you always are telling people why don't you have him play up? I "


hey ct lax dad, why would you reclass and go with Colsey over Schreiber? just curious


My son decided to continue to play with 2023 after reclassing. His best friends are all 2023. BTW we never would change grades or schools because Colsey said to. Only an stunad would assume that. At some point in High School all players will play on grade for showcase purposes so my guy probably will too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
[quote=Anonymous]Colsey is going to reek havoc on PT. He's the man, not Danielo, and his son is going to Denver with their buddies

You’re an !d10t

Can anyone share the letter from PT?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Colsey is going to reek havoc on PT. He's the man, not Danielo, and his son is going to Denver with their buddies.



sounds like a kid with that spelling and grammar
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Colsey is going to reek havoc on PT. He's the man, not Danielo, and his son is going to Denver with their buddies.



sounds like a kid with that spelling and grammar

Sounds like a dad didn't like his son's chances for WSYL and switched teams....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This drama with Pt/Colsey rivals and probably goes beyond the norm for LOng Island Lunacy. So what sparked this breakup??
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Colsey is going to reek havoc on PT. He's the man, not Danielo, and his son is going to Denver with their buddies.



sounds like a kid with that spelling and grammar

Sounds like a dad didn't like his son's chances for WSYL and switched teams....


Only the best go to WSYL. All else are pauns in this club scene. See you in Denver.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Colsey is going to reek havoc on PT. He's the man, not Danielo, and his son is going to Denver with their buddies.



sounds like a kid with that spelling and grammar

Sounds like a dad didn't like his son's chances for WSYL and switched teams....


Only the best go to WSYL. All else are pauns in this club scene. See you in Denver.



again- its pawns not paun- are you 12 ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Colsey is going to reek havoc on PT. He's the man, not Danielo, and his son is going to Denver with their buddies.



sounds like a kid with that spelling and grammar

Sounds like a dad didn't like his son's chances for WSYL and switched teams....


Only the best go to WSYL. All else are pauns in this club scene. See you in Denver.



again- its pawns not paun- are you 12 ?


nah, I'm 13 and won't see you in Denver.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I’m guessing you won’t see anyone in Denver, you will be in summer school learning how spell
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I heard daniello is starting a box program next year to get all his players back.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I heard daniello is starting a box program next year to get all his players back.

Yeah and he is going to charge $3000 for the two box tournaments.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
any update on Roy C? Is he out? Where is he going?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -

Coley doesn'y need to go anywhere. He has SuperStar box and doesn't need to coach field.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Coley doesn'y need to go anywhere. He has SuperStar box and doesn't need to coach field.


Thats correct.
I dont believe his son left the team so this ends with a coach has parted ways with a program. If its not Roy C no one discusses this.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Incorrect. All three boys left PT. And several KEY players have told their friends that they are leaving PT as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Incorrect. All three boys left PT. And several KEY players have told their friends that they are leaving PT as well.


Here’s why that won’t happen. - Daniello scholarships every KEY player. They aren’t leaving.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
If there was a falling out where Colsey is gone as a coach and you think Daniello is going to scholarship the Colsey kids, you are smoking the crack pipe. LOL to the extreme!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
They will get scholorshipped wherever they go since Roy will be going with them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Roy, if you're listening, START YOUR OWN FIELD CLUB". Bring your Box experience to the field and show them how it's done.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
what do the various local teams do in preparation for the WSYL? I have been told Prime Time does 10 practices and 3 tourneys before the qualifier? what about Express North, 2 way and predators? does anyone have any insight? does 91 tri state try to qualify?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do the various local teams do in preparation for the WSYL? I have been told Prime Time does 10 practices and 3 tourneys before the qualifier? what about Express North, 2 way and predators? does anyone have any insight? does 91 tri state try to qualify?


They're all doing a special WSYL team. The days of taking your 7th grade team to Denver is over. Now it's all about the club's reputation of winning the WSYL and they're going to have tryouts for this event only and anybody from any club is eligible to participate.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do the various local teams do in preparation for the WSYL? I have been told Prime Time does 10 practices and 3 tourneys before the qualifier? what about Express North, 2 way and predators? does anyone have any insight? does 91 tri state try to qualify?


They're all doing a special WSYL team. The days of taking your 7th grade team to Denver is over. Now it's all about the club's reputation of winning the WSYL and they're going to have tryouts for this event only and anybody from any club is eligible to participate.



so tri state 91 is trying to qualify this year ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do the various local teams do in preparation for the WSYL? I have been told Prime Time does 10 practices and 3 tourneys before the qualifier? what about Express North, 2 way and predators? does anyone have any insight? does 91 tri state try to qualify?


They're all doing a special WSYL team. The days of taking your 7th grade team to Denver is over. Now it's all about the club's reputation of winning the WSYL and they're going to have tryouts for this event only and anybody from any club is eligible to participate.



so tri state 91 is trying to qualify this year ?


They're not listed

https://worldseriesofyouthlacrosse.leagueapps.com/tournaments/773248/standings

Not even close to all of these teams are doing just WS teams
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do the various local teams do in preparation for the WSYL? I have been told Prime Time does 10 practices and 3 tourneys before the qualifier? what about Express North, 2 way and predators? does anyone have any insight? does 91 tri state try to qualify?


They're all doing a special WSYL team. The days of taking your 7th grade team to Denver is over. Now it's all about the club's reputation of winning the WSYL and they're going to have tryouts for this event only and anybody from any club is eligible to participate.


I think they go with the current team and add age eligible players as replacements for kids who are not "on age".
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do the various local teams do in preparation for the WSYL? I have been told Prime Time does 10 practices and 3 tourneys before the qualifier? what about Express North, 2 way and predators? does anyone have any insight? does 91 tri state try to qualify?


They're all doing a special WSYL team. The days of taking your 7th grade team to Denver is over. Now it's all about the club's reputation of winning the WSYL and they're going to have tryouts for this event only and anybody from any club is eligible to participate.



so tri state 91 is trying to qualify this year ?


They're not listed

https://worldseriesofyouthlacrosse.leagueapps.com/tournaments/773248/standings

Not even close to all of these teams are doing just WS teams

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do the various local teams do in preparation for the WSYL? I have been told Prime Time does 10 practices and 3 tourneys before the qualifier? what about Express North, 2 way and predators? does anyone have any insight? does 91 tri state try to qualify?


They're all doing a special WSYL team. The days of taking your 7th grade team to Denver is over. Now it's all about the club's reputation of winning the WSYL and they're going to have tryouts for this event only and anybody from any club is eligible to participate.


Preds isn't doing a special team tryout for WSYL.
It is an on-age squad
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2Way had a try-out for their special WSYL team last weekend.
Will PT and Eclipse need to recruit to have an on-age team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do the various local teams do in preparation for the WSYL? I have been told Prime Time does 10 practices and 3 tourneys before the qualifier? what about Express North, 2 way and predators? does anyone have any insight? does 91 tri state try to qualify?


They're all doing a special WSYL team. The days of taking your 7th grade team to Denver is over. Now it's all about the club's reputation of winning the WSYL and they're going to have tryouts for this event only and anybody from any club is eligible to participate.



so tri state 91 is trying to qualify this year ?


They're not listed

https://worldseriesofyouthlacrosse.leagueapps.com/tournaments/773248/standings

Not even close to all of these teams are doing just WS teams

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do the various local teams do in preparation for the WSYL? I have been told Prime Time does 10 practices and 3 tourneys before the qualifier? what about Express North, 2 way and predators? does anyone have any insight? does 91 tri state try to qualify?


They're all doing a special WSYL team. The days of taking your 7th grade team to Denver is over. Now it's all about the club's reputation of winning the WSYL and they're going to have tryouts for this event only and anybody from any club is eligible to participate.


Preds isn't doing a special team tryout for WSYL.
It is an on-age squad



What preparation does predators put in for the qualifier.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
nothing to do with a specific boy, but, why would Eclipse take a player(any player) mid year that did not try out and risk destroying the team chemistry that team has built over the last 3/4 years , seems very irresponsible to those kids that have tried out and put their time in
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
nothing to do with a specific boy, but, why would Eclipse take a player(any player) mid year that did not try out and risk destroying the team chemistry that team has built over the last 3/4 years , seems very irresponsible to those kids that have tried out and put their time in


Teams do this all the time. Perhaps your FOGO is not putting in the effort.
There are journeyman FOGOs that join teams midseason or just play as guest players.
Happens all the time for teams lacking depth in one area or another.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
nothing to do with a specific boy, but, why would Eclipse take a player(any player) mid year that did not try out and risk destroying the team chemistry that team has built over the last 3/4 years , seems very irresponsible to those kids that have tried out and put their time in


Teams do this all the time. Perhaps your FOGO is not putting in the effort.
There are journeyman FOGOs that join teams midseason or just play as guest players.
Happens all the time for teams lacking depth in one area or another.


In club lacrosse the program directors are always looking to get better players. Seems to me like they would cut the entire team if they could add a better team. All about the winning brand. I don't mean this to be critical.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
nothing to do with a specific boy, but, why would Eclipse take a player(any player) mid year that did not try out and risk destroying the team chemistry that team has built over the last 3/4 years , seems very irresponsible to those kids that have tried out and put their time in


Teams do this all the time. Perhaps your FOGO is not putting in the effort.
There are journeyman FOGOs that join teams midseason or just play as guest players.
Happens all the time for teams lacking depth in one area or another.


In club lacrosse the program directors are always looking to get better players. Seems to me like they would cut the entire team if they could add a better team. All about the winning brand. I don't mean this to be critical.


its funny- god forbid your kid tried out for another program, they woud cut your kid in a second, but its ok for them to bring in kids middle of year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT 2022 is crumbling after that move,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT 2022 is crumbling after that move,


what move exactly?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT 2022 is crumbling after that move,


what move exactly?


a prior post said that Colsey left PT.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT 2022 is crumbling after that move,


what move exactly?


a prior post said that Colsey left PT.


why would that affect the 2022 team ? colsey coached the 24 team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
His son and his buddies on 2022
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
His son and his buddies on 2022


So another team is just going to take a handful of new players?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
His son and his buddies on 2022


What buddies are those? I'm sure some other teams would love to poach those kids?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I guess I'm just not understanding why kids would choose to leave the best 22 team because Colsey parted ways with the organization.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess I'm just not understanding why kids would choose to leave the best 22 team because Colsey parted ways with the organization.


I don't think they are the best anymore.....maybe some of the best players, but if they can't play as a team what good is it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess I'm just not understanding why kids would choose to leave the best 22 team because Colsey parted ways with the organization.


I don't think they are the best anymore.....maybe some of the best players, but if they can't play as a team what good is it.



When did this breakdown start happening
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess I'm just not understanding why kids would choose to leave the best 22 team because Colsey parted ways with the organization.


I don't think they are the best anymore.....maybe some of the best players, but if they can't play as a team what good is it.


Wasn't the parting because PT couldn't run a team with chemistry? Colsey doesn't quit on his players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
what caused this team to go from #2 in Denver to breaking up?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what caused this team to go from #2 in Denver to breaking up?

THE DIRECTOR. Thats what happens when you always tinker with the roster. No chemistry.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2Way had a try-out for their special WSYL team last weekend.
Will PT and Eclipse need to recruit to have an on-age team.


2Way has to recruit many players as 2024 roster is full of holdbacks- they pick up scraps or from players from clubs who don't attend. PT and Eclipse much stronger rosters and fewer players to replace. TS91 has never entered.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT last year recruitef 8 players or a 1/3 of their team for wsyl and also had a tryout like this year. Most teams have players that don’t make the aug 31 cutoff, so they hold a tryout. More $$ for the directors.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Question for all parents of hs kids, college kids etc. if you could go back to 6th grade with your son, what would you do differently as it relates to travel programs, showcases , prospect days etc..., what was a waste, what was worthwhile. I think this would be very educational.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do the various local teams do in preparation for the WSYL? I have been told Prime Time does 10 practices and 3 tourneys before the qualifier? what about Express North, 2 way and predators? does anyone have any insight? does 91 tri state try to qualify?


It's a WSYL requirement that the team roster that is trying to qualify for Denver must play together in at least 3 tournaments. So if a team adds new players after the fall they have to schedule 3 tournaments with their new players before the qualifiers in the spring. If you are not adding new players then the team probably was covered by their fall tournaments.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My son started playing club lax in 6th grade. He is a current senior in HS (2019). Committed and accepted to a top 10 liberal arts school for next year. He did all the summer/ fall tourneys and showcases in 8th and 9th grade (Philly Freshman (when it meant something), Maverik Showtime and others) and tons of prospect days (Princeton, Yale, Georgetown, UNC, West Point, Penn) He thought he was going to Duke or Hopkins or Ivy. Then reality set in that he wasn't good enough to play high level D1 lacrosse. He stopped playing club lax after freshman year. He focused on high level academic D3 prospect days and camps (elite 180, good to great, D3 showcase) where his target schools were attending. And we hired an SAT tutor with money saved from club lax. This summer he chose between Bates, Bowdoin, Haverford, Amherst and Swarthmore. many kids on his path still played club throughout last summer but a few stopped after 9th/10th grade. Maybe we were lucky. Spots for high level D3 academic schools are tough but strong grades, excellent SAT scores and good lacrosse get you a look. Hope that is helpful.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do the various local teams do in preparation for the WSYL? I have been told Prime Time does 10 practices and 3 tourneys before the qualifier? what about Express North, 2 way and predators? does anyone have any insight? does 91 tri state try to qualify?


It's a WSYL requirement that the team roster that is trying to qualify for Denver must play together in at least 3 tournaments. So if a team adds new players after the fall they have to schedule 3 tournaments with their new players before the qualifiers in the spring. If you are not adding new players then the team probably was covered by their fall tournaments.




Its two tournaments or a league....with the WSYL being July 4th weekend most if not all of the teams will have normally played 2-4 tournaments by then. Someone mentioned that play days with in the age group count as well but i dont think those are run by a recognized third party so dont see how they count. Then again, I cant imagine wsyl checking anything.

https://worldseriesofyouthlacrosse.com/rules/

All players must compete with their team or program on a regular basis. Minimum requirements are that players must compete with their team/program for at least two tournaments (outside of a WSYL event), or in a seasonal league. These events do not need to precede the qualifier but must precede the Championship event. Tournaments or Leagues must be bona fide events operated by a third party. The legitimacy of a tournament or event is up to the discretion of WSYL. WSYL reserves the right to require proof of participation in these tournaments or leagues. Players cannot be added only to participate in the World Series.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Word is Colsey is coaching 2021 Eclipse
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
They already have a coach who happens to run the program...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
They already have a coach who happens to run the program...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son started playing club lax in 6th grade. He is a current senior in HS (2019). Committed and accepted to a top 10 liberal arts school for next year. He did all the summer/ fall tourneys and showcases in 8th and 9th grade (Philly Freshman (when it meant something), Maverik Showtime and others) and tons of prospect days (Princeton, Yale, Georgetown, UNC, West Point, Penn) He thought he was going to Duke or Hopkins or Ivy. Then reality set in that he wasn't good enough to play high level D1 lacrosse. He stopped playing club lax after freshman year. He focused on high level academic D3 prospect days and camps (elite 180, good to great, D3 showcase) where his target schools were attending. And we hired an SAT tutor with money saved from club lax. This summer he chose between Bates, Bowdoin, Haverford, Amherst and Swarthmore. many kids on his path still played club throughout last summer but a few stopped after 9th/10th grade. Maybe we were lucky. Spots for high level D3 academic schools are tough but strong grades, excellent SAT scores and good lacrosse get you a look. Hope that is helpful.


My son had a very similar experience. Committed to a top 25 D1 school early, older teammates began telling him D1 lacrosse was too intensive, way too many hours and many were transferring. He started getting burned out from year round lacrosse and decided he didn't want to keep it up in college. Grades good not great so the lacrosse helped him get into a fantastic D3 school and he can't wait to get there.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Word is Colsey is coaching 2021 Eclipse


That's correct, his 2024 kid is playing up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Word is Colsey is coaching 2021 Eclipse


That's correct, his 2024 kid is playing up.


Not surprised - Colsey - DADDY BALL at its Finest. LOL
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
well he's not coaching his kid this time so he won't have the same privilege of staging the field to his kid's advantage. This time his kid will colsey won't be on the sidelines yelling pass the ball to kyle. See how it works out for his kid playing up when the plays are maneuvered for him.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
is eclipse having their annual hybrid box tourney this year at Chelsea piers?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Question for all parents of hs kids, college kids etc. if you could go back to 6th grade with your son, what would you do differently as it relates to travel programs, showcases , prospect days etc..., what was a waste, what was worthwhile. I think this would be very educational. [/quote]

My advice to a 6th grade parent would be to be patient and let it develop on its own pace. Don't try to over manage it. Just let your kid learn the game correctly, play and ultimately the appropriate opportunities will present themselves. No need to scramble to get to prospect days or stress on making the premiere showcase in the 9th or 10th grade.

Now that the mania of early recruiting is no more it is somewhat easier than a couple of years ago when 9th graders were routinely being "committed" and parental anxiety was through the roof. Now, kids are not getting any sort of looks until the 11th grade, when they are more fully developed and their athletic and lacrosse abilities are more fairly judged. In spite of what many club coaches will tell you, you truly can be patient, sit back and see how it develops for you child.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
If I had to do it all over again, I wouldn't have signed my son up for any showcases prior to his soph. year. Being on a good club team is certainly important (and I would define a good club as one that has good coaching, plays a competitive schedule, and most importantly one my kid is happy being on and feels that he's improving). I wish I had sent him to more true instructional camps and clinics.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Colsey landed. All kids are are on a new club and everything is fine. Thanks for asking.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Where did he land? And what team is he coaching (2022 or 2024)?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Colsey's at Eclipse and NOT coaching 2022 or 2024.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Colsey's at Eclipse and NOT coaching 2022 or 2024.


Good for him, couldn't be happier for the kids. Eclipse will now be more dominant than Primetime. Do you think others will leave Primetime now?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Colsey's at Eclipse and NOT coaching 2022 or 2024.


Good for him, couldn't be happier for the kids. Eclipse will now be more dominant than Primetime. Do you think others will leave Primetime now?


I am glad they found a home, but what about the kids that tried out for eclipse last July in 100 degree weather, paid their money and are now possibly losing spots to kids that are only getting a spot because of their father - seems pretty crappy
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Only 1 kid added per team. Not a mass exodus. Teams always add additional players if they can help.
I would not do anything different from stand point of club or recruiting We put our son on the best club team and really built his skills. Also as far as recruiting I would stick to with what we did. Limited showcases and spent the time and dollars on the school camps and got to know the coaches on a more personal level. The one thing I learned from experience, is if your kid is a decent and player and can get in the school on his own he can literally walk on to any team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by CoachC Says
I would not do anything different from stand point of club or recruiting We put our son on the best club team and really built his skills. Also as far as recruiting I would stick to with what we did. Limited showcases and spent the time and dollars on the school camps and got to know the coaches on a more personal level. The one thing I learned from experience, is if your kid is a decent and player and can get in the school on his own he can literally walk on to any team.


So prospect days you think are a beneficial? did you communicate in anyway prior to those days , let them know you were coming etc?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Any insight on who is tops among the 2024 teams for WSYL? Word is Eclipse is tops ahead of Primetime and Express North, Perds.....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any insight on who is tops among the 2024 teams for WSYL? Word is Eclipse is tops ahead of Primetime and Express North, Perds.....


Yeah. Colsey made a good choice.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any insight on who is tops among the 2024 teams for WSYL? Word is Eclipse is tops ahead of Primetime and Express North, Perds.....


Yeah. Colsey made a good choice.


Eclipse will not only make it to Denver but do well. Picking up the Colsey kid will only help.

Primetime will be on the bubble. They're playing, practicing and know what it takes so dont rule them out. Not sure the Colsey departure is a positive or negative to the team but wouldnt rule them out.

EN- Playing plenty but based on Fall results against top teams they're a bit of a long shot...... but on any given day!

Preds- 1 fall tournament, limited practices and no expanded schedule before qualifiers. Combine limited talent and coaching with that approach and they're an also ran.

2way- The fall team was basically half hold backs and they weren't very good. Picked up some players from the area and north but does it make a team.....

First line D, Middies and attackman for all these teams can keep up with the big boys, for the most part, but can any of these teams win faceoffs and get the help they need between the pipes....

Should be interesting.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any insight on who is tops among the 2024 teams for WSYL? Word is Eclipse is tops ahead of Primetime and Express North, Perds.....


Yeah. Colsey made a good choice.


Eclipse will not only make it to Denver but do well. Picking up the Colsey kid will only help.

Primetime will be on the bubble. They're playing, practicing and know what it takes so dont rule them out. Not sure the Colsey departure is a positive or negative to the team but wouldnt rule them out.

EN- Playing plenty but based on Fall results against top teams they're a bit of a long shot...... but on any given day!

Preds- 1 fall tournament, limited practices and no expanded schedule before qualifiers. Combine limited talent and coaching with that approach and they're an also ran.

2way- The fall team was basically half hold backs and they weren't very good. Picked up some players from the area and north but does it make a team.....

First line D, Middies and attackman for all these teams can keep up with the big boys, for the most part, but can any of these teams win faceoffs and get the help they need between the pipes....

Should be interesting.


Wow, you sure do know a lot. Are you a lax commentator?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any insight on who is tops among the 2024 teams for WSYL? Word is Eclipse is tops ahead of Primetime and Express North, Perds.....


Yeah. Colsey made a good choice.


Eclipse will not only make it to Denver but do well. Picking up the Colsey kid will only help.

Primetime will be on the bubble. They're playing, practicing and know what it takes so dont rule them out. Not sure the Colsey departure is a positive or negative to the team but wouldnt rule them out.

EN- Playing plenty but based on Fall results against top teams they're a bit of a long shot...... but on any given day!

Preds- 1 fall tournament, limited practices and no expanded schedule before qualifiers. Combine limited talent and coaching with that approach and they're an also ran.

2way- The fall team was basically half hold backs and they weren't very good. Picked up some players from the area and north but does it make a team.....

First line D, Middies and attackman for all these teams can keep up with the big boys, for the most part, but can any of these teams win faceoffs and get the help they need between the pipes....

Should be interesting.


Wow, you sure do know a lot. Are you a lax commentator?


I asked my kids. That's their lay of the land.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any insight on who is tops among the 2024 teams for WSYL? Word is Eclipse is tops ahead of Primetime and Express North, Perds.....


Yeah. Colsey made a good choice.


Eclipse will not only make it to Denver but do well. Picking up the Colsey kid will only help.

Primetime will be on the bubble. They're playing, practicing and know what it takes so dont rule them out. Not sure the Colsey departure is a positive or negative to the team but wouldnt rule them out.

EN- Playing plenty but based on Fall results against top teams they're a bit of a long shot...... but on any given day!

Preds- 1 fall tournament, limited practices and no expanded schedule before qualifiers. Combine limited talent and coaching with that approach and they're an also ran.

2way- The fall team was basically half hold backs and they weren't very good. Picked up some players from the area and north but does it make a team.....

First line D, Middies and attackman for all these teams can keep up with the big boys, for the most part, but can any of these teams win faceoffs and get the help they need between the pipes....

Should be interesting.


Wow, you sure do know a lot. Are you a lax commentator?


I asked my kids. That's their lay of the land.


nice deflection
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
A month passes without a peep. This is how LAME and irrelevant Westchester lacrosse truly is.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A month passes without a peep. This is how LAME and irrelevant Westchester lacrosse truly is.


Are you the same TommyM that was looking for lacrosse opportunities for your 2023 son in the area?
Did your son make a team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT 2024 is looking for big athletic midis. Please reach out to Jason D., decision maker and ultimate recruiter for this team for more details. Attack need not inquire as his son already has this covered.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Oh and don't forget to mention as Daniello's TOP informant, everything gets run past him first. Phew, glad for those checks and balances.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I am just so appalled by the parents on this team. It's disgusting to me that as a parent on this team this is what we have to look forward too. Other parents calling the shots, recruiting for their benefit and going behind backs. It's under handed and sneaky. JUST LET THE KIDS PLAY. Don't get involved. YOU are not an expert. YOU only hurt you're kid.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Oh man...tough crowd
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Oh man...tough crowd
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That is a toxic team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That is a toxic team.


glad we left.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That is a toxic team.

That is a toxic organization. From the top to the bottom. Personally witnessed!!!!.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That is a toxic team.

That is a toxic organization. From the top to the bottom. Personally witnessed!!!!.


Is Eclipse any better?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A month passes without a peep. This is how LAME and irrelevant Westchester lacrosse truly is.


The insane loudmouth freaks on LI board surely not lame. Very relevant.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Let's talk ...


NEW TOPIC- which clubs are feeders for which high schools? All somewhat mixed and changes a lot per grade but help me out here:

PrimeTime- Brunswick, John Jay, Yorktown
2Way- Brunswick, Greenwich, Mamaroneck
Eclipse- New Canaan, Westport, Greenwich
Predators- Rye, Mamaroneck, Byram Hills, Bronxville
Pride- Scarsdale, New Rochelle
91TS- seems very random
Express North- Mahopac, Somers, L/P

Where do kids from Briarcliff, Irvington, WhitePlains, Harrison, Eastchster, Hen Hud, Arlington, Ardsley, etc. tend to play?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Let's talk ...


NEW TOPIC- which clubs are feeders for which high schools? All somewhat mixed and changes a lot per grade but help me out here:

PrimeTime- Brunswick, John Jay, Yorktown
2Way- Brunswick, Greenwich, Mamaroneck
Eclipse- New Canaan, Westport, Greenwich
Predators- Rye, Mamaroneck, Byram Hills, Bronxville
Pride- Scarsdale, New Rochelle
91TS- seems very random
Express North- Mahopac, Somers, L/P

Where do kids from Briarcliff, Irvington, WhitePlains, Harrison, Eastchster, Hen Hud, Arlington, Ardsley, etc. tend to play?


Several Exp. North kids are set to go to Stephinac or Iona Prep. this coming fall.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown has its own feeder club its called Ballers and its going to destroy a once great program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown has its own feeder club its called Ballers and its going to destroy a once great program.


Please explain how keeping the boys and girls together is bad for the community? Travel lacrosse has absolutely destroyed the team chemistry necessary to win high school championships on a consistent basis. When student athletes identify with their travel programs more than their town, Your culture is destroyed
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What are the best Prep showcases and when are they? When should 2024 kid go? This fall?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown has its own feeder club its called Ballers and its going to destroy a once great program.


Please explain how keeping the boys and girls together is bad for the community? Travel lacrosse has absolutely destroyed the team chemistry necessary to win high school championships on a consistent basis. When student athletes identify with their travel programs more than their town, Your culture is destroyed


The Ballers program is all about community, that's great. But, it doesn't help the players reach their potential. I don't see how playing lower level lacrosse together helps the program succeed. How is travel lacrosse destroying the Pleasantville and John Jay programs?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Speaking of Yorktown, did AOC go to a lot of Yorktown Lax games when she was a student?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Pretty amazing how that phenomenon doesn't happen in Maryland or Long Island. Westchester lacrosse is losing ground in a huge way. They all play in a petri dish wrapped in a bubble. Travel gives the kids the experience of integrating and playing with other kids from different styles. Which is exactly what they will have to do in college. The local kids are watered down. Especially on the girls level. Yes, every so often you will get an outlier that performs beyond the local talent. If you want to get better than play with better kids. If their mentality isn't strong enough to know that winning a state championship with their High School is important then there are much bigger issues. Culture is a state of mind not a comfort level. Lets all never leave the nest so everyone can be mediocre and comfortable. Sad !! The only way a Westchester team either boys or girls will win state is if the Long Island bus breaks down on the way to the tournament. We need to do what they do out there. Not fold to parental pressure and simply play the best kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What are the best Prep showcases and when are they? When should 2024 kid go? This fall?

Any input? Any thoughts?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown has its own feeder club its called Ballers and its going to destroy a once great program.


Please explain how keeping the boys and girls together is bad for the community? Travel lacrosse has absolutely destroyed the team chemistry necessary to win high school championships on a consistent basis. When student athletes identify with their travel programs more than their town, Your culture is destroyed


The Ballers program is all about community, that's great. But, it doesn't help the players reach their potential. I don't see how playing lower level lacrosse together helps the program succeed. How is travel lacrosse destroying the Pleasantville and John Jay programs?



Massapequa, Garden City, Smithtown West, Ward Melville and Mt Sinai all have kids playing on various club teams. But they also do a school/town team. These are some of the top publics in the country. Sure there is jealousy and there is jockeying but club makes the programs stronger. (and that would happen if there wasnt travel). The town structure just can't be an all or nothing proposal.

Iron forges Iron! In sports you want to challenge the players, mind and physical skill. You want to expose them to the best talent possible, to play both with and against. Saying otherwise is unsportsmen like!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
can someone please explain- what it is exactly the ballers is doing? I think at the end of the day- anytime a travel program is run out of a school district , it can get tricky , it just seems that all of the Yorktown greats of the past, did not play travel lacrosse and somehow they reached their "potential" im not discounting travel in anyway , its has its pros and cons , I just feel like if your child is genetically talented and puts the work in , he or she will get to where they need to go
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
When your towns high school coaching staff owns a travel summer program everyone feels pressured to sign up their kid or there will be consequences in HS. It was going on in Ridgefield until the parents got fed up and it was banned. So Yorktown people either do something about it or please stop complaining.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Wait kids from ytown aren't going to good schools to play lax? Most towns wish they had what they have. Winning States, going to finals, winning counties. Does JJ do this? It's not perfect, but it's a great way to run your program. Just like Mt Vernon hoops - they all play together.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown has its own feeder club its called Ballers and its going to destroy a once great program.


Please explain how keeping the boys and girls together is bad for the community? Travel lacrosse has absolutely destroyed the team chemistry necessary to win high school championships on a consistent basis. When student athletes identify with their travel programs more than their town, Your culture is destroyed


The Ballers program is all about community, that's great. But, it doesn't help the players reach their potential. I don't see how playing lower level lacrosse together helps the program succeed. How is travel lacrosse destroying the Pleasantville and John Jay programs?



Massapequa, Garden City, Smithtown West, Ward Melville and Mt Sinai all have kids playing on various club teams. But they also do a school/town team. These are some of the top publics in the country. Sure there is jealousy and there is jockeying but club makes the programs stronger. (and that would happen if there wasnt travel). The town structure just can't be an all or nothing proposal.

Iron forges Iron! In sports you want to challenge the players, mind and physical skill. You want to expose them to the best talent possible, to play both with and against. Saying otherwise is unsportsmen like!


I couldn't agree more. John Jay program has had its issues but we know Schurr plays the best players, plays to win and doesn't have summer lacrosse conflicts. Our guys play with LI Express and Prime Time primarily and we know it has made our program stronger, not weaker. Heck, Pleasantville has just as many NYS titles as Yorktown in the last decade and they have tons of kids playing club lacrosse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Speaking of Yorktown, did AOC go to a lot of Yorktown Lax games when she was a student?


Just the post game festivities. Featured.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Question/Advice from lacrosse families: my son plays club lax and loves it. However he tends to have the same knee issue keep hi out avery couple of years for a couple of months. He wants to have surgery to fix it but would miss 3-6 months and probably a high school season.. Is there a season or year which is least important? summer/school team, freshman, sphomore, etc.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wait kids from ytown aren't going to good schools to play lax? Most towns wish they had what they have. Winning States, going to finals, winning counties. Does JJ do this? It's not perfect, but it's a great way to run your program. Just like Mt Vernon hoops - they all play together.


We send our kids to better and more varied group of schools than Yorktown. Do you guys have compromising pictures of the Marist coach? Winning counties? We won last year and the past is just that. You guys are Bon Jovi.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Why so negative? Kids are going to collage and playing D1 lax. Know your sport - last I looked ND, SU, Maryland, Towson etc all have town players. It's just kids playing HS lax. You must be a fun guy at the games.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why so negative? Kids are going to collage and playing D1 lax. Know your sport - last I looked ND, SU, Maryland, Towson etc all have town players. It's just kids playing HS lax. You must be a fun guy at the games.


Who's being negative? Hard to follow
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When your towns high school coaching staff owns a travel summer program everyone feels pressured to sign up their kid or there will be consequences in HS. It was going on in Ridgefield until the parents got fed up and it was banned. So Yorktown people either do something about it or please stop complaining.


I find it very hard to believe the Yorktown coaches own a summer travel club in Yorktown. That is not permitted in New York state.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Looks like Yorktown may be back on top this year, John Jay CR got beat up by Manhasset and barely won against a young weak Rye team. Going to be a long season for Jay. Yorktown does what they do best, rebuild and win
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Except against Darien. Wonder why / how that program is that much better then the far and away best program in section 1? Wonder why that is???
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Except against Darien. Wonder why / how that program is that much better then the far and away best program in section 1? Wonder why that is???


Which program is far and away the best in Section 1? Yorktown? The team is beat up, bunch of kids playing hurt and was still a close game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Except against Darien. Wonder why / how that program is that much better then the far and away best program in section 1? Wonder why that is???


Please enlighten us
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Town embarrassed Jay on Saturday, wasn't as close as the score made it look! What a difference a year makes, Town clearly the team to beat once again! #THE_CROP
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Local teams did well at WSYL qualifier this weekend in LI

PrimeTime, Eclipse, Express North all qualified for tourney. Preds and 2-Way each had wins. As usual we just can't get over the LI hump.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Local teams did well at WSYL qualifier this weekend in LI

PrimeTime, Eclipse, Express North all qualified for tourney. Preds and 2-Way each had wins. As usual we just can't get over the LI hump.


No shame in not knocking off top LI teams, who are likely going to finish Top 3 in in the national tourney. Congrats to PT, Eclipse, Express North. Preds and 2Way weaker than last year's teams so no surprise they lost a lot.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It was a great weekend and I was surprised how evenly matched the top 3 teams from our area were. Noticeable drop in size and skill to next level with Preds/2-Way.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It was a great weekend and I was surprised how evenly matched the top 3 teams from our area were. Noticeable drop in size and skill to next level with Preds/2-Way.


That's because all of 2Way holdbacks can't play in Denver.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2 way looked as big as any other team and had a very respectable tourney - 3-3, did not by any stretch get blown out or embarrassed, Preds on the other hand is a different story obviously as 2 way beat them 8-0
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2 way looked as big as any other team and had a very respectable tourney - 3-3, did not by any stretch get blown out or embarrassed, Preds on the other hand is a different story obviously as 2 way beat them 8-0


2Way have been practicing since February and came in ready to play. Westchester Predators seemed to lack depth and had no FoGo, They used a long pole at face-offs and weren't prepared.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Is Lacrosse in Westchester dead? We are into Spring HS lacrosse and no talk on this board at all other than club lax and a few Yorktown comments......what's going on??
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Iona - Stephinac last night was a great game until the 3rd qtr.. Stephinac beat Fordham, Iona beat Don Bosco and Bergen Catholic for quality wins. Fun to watch the rivalry games
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2 way looked as big as any other team and had a very respectable tourney - 3-3, did not by any stretch get blown out or embarrassed, Preds on the other hand is a different story obviously as 2 way beat them 8-0


2Way have been practicing since February and came in ready to play. Westchester Predators seemed to lack depth and had no FoGo, They used a long pole at face-offs and weren't prepared.


Practicing since Feb? Decent teams have been together for years with on-age kids. 2way has a failed formula- relies on holdbacks until WSYL when they have to grab kids to make a team. You cannot win against good teams by grabbing lesser talent to make a temporary team. They looked good to me but a step below the A teams. They went 1-3 on day 1 and then won consolation games against bad teams- including Preds. I grant you point they didn't get wrecked. I also agree- these 2Way and Preds teams aren;'t close to equal. But both 24 teams way worse than past 23's, especially Preds. Seems best players in area on PT, Express North and Eclipse. last years North and eclipse teams didnt come close to qualifying.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
True about 2-Way. they did get 3 wins and showed well. All together Westchester/CT did get 3 teams into WSYL. Good showing most teams local area ever sent to WSYL.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is Lacrosse in Westchester dead? We are into Spring HS lacrosse and no talk on this board at all other than club lax and a few Yorktown comments......what's going on??


What is there to write? Yorktown best program in a tiny shallow pond content to win the Section. Westchester lacrosse is a level below LI and Maryland. More high level competition is needed in the area, you need fire to temper steel maybe dragon glass would help.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is Lacrosse in Westchester dead? We are into Spring HS lacrosse and no talk on this board at all other than club lax and a few Yorktown comments......what's going on??


What is there to write? Yorktown best program in a tiny shallow pond content to win the Section. Westchester lacrosse is a level below LI and Maryland. More high level competition is needed in the area, you need fire to temper steel maybe dragon glass would help.


The entire world is a level below Long Island and Maryland. Westchester is not unique in this regard. Also, LI has about 3x as many people, therefore it should have 3x as many good HS teams. And it has that, at least. But it also has 3x as many bad teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
LI has 20 to 25 very high quality lacrosse programs. Westchester has (maybe) four with Yorktown at the top of the list. At every level the premier LI teams are head and shoulders better than the premier Westchester teams. Look at post season results or the occasional out of league games. Its not just about population differentials.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown runs youth lacrosse with one objective--provide a fun and challenging environment in which kids can learn the game and life lessons. 100% of those involved in the program are volunteers and invest 100's of hours to organize the season, scheduling fields, games, practices, travel, etc. Their time is a gift to the kids of Yorktown. Club lacrosse has gotten too expensive, too serious, too cut throat. Let the kids play because they love the game and the comradery and support your local program. If you are ranking elementary school level teams, maybe get a life and take a step back from living through your sons endeavors .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown now healthy, John Jay has their full roster back. Both teams with impressive wins and a few stinkers. Section 1 is up for grabs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Town embarrassed Jay on Saturday, wasn't as close as the score made it look! What a difference a year makes, Town clearly the team to beat once again! #THE_CROP


Yorktown dominated by Wilton, JJ beat SWR. Programs headed in opposite directions. Town still hasn't cleaned up the dumb turnovers, JJ playing like a team. Right now, JJ the better program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is Lacrosse in Westchester dead? We are into Spring HS lacrosse and no talk on this board at all other than club lax and a few Yorktown comments......what's going on??


What is there to write? Yorktown best program in a tiny shallow pond content to win the Section. Westchester lacrosse is a level below LI and Maryland. More high level competition is needed in the area, you need fire to temper steel maybe dragon glass would help.


John Jay playing much better than Yorktown. When was the last time JJ one the Section two years in a row?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is Lacrosse in Westchester dead? We are into Spring HS lacrosse and no talk on this board at all other than club lax and a few Yorktown comments......what's going on??


What is there to write? Yorktown best program in a tiny shallow pond content to win the Section. Westchester lacrosse is a level below LI and Maryland. More high level competition is needed in the area, you need fire to temper steel maybe dragon glass would help.


John Jay playing much better than Yorktown. When was the last time JJ one the Section two years in a row?



We shall see in about 5 hrs!
GO TOWN!!!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is Lacrosse in Westchester dead? We are into Spring HS lacrosse and no talk on this board at all other than club lax and a few Yorktown comments......what's going on??


What is there to write? Yorktown best program in a tiny shallow pond content to win the Section. Westchester lacrosse is a level below LI and Maryland. More high level competition is needed in the area, you need fire to temper steel maybe dragon glass would help.


John Jay playing much better than Yorktown. When was the last time JJ one the Section two years in a row?



We shall see in about 5 hrs!
GO TOWN!!!!!


Yorktown lacrosse is consistently the least prepared team to step on the field. Darien, Wilton, Ridgefield, John Jay. Outcoached.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Convince me that I am wrong...

John Jay has just been better than Yorktown the last two years. Not by a lot - but better. I'm sure there are many reasons why.

It happens (just like in the mid 2000's). They don't have the storied history that Yorktown has - but they are a very good program and better than Yorktown in 2018 and 2019.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
John Jay won 4 in row from 2005-2008 (when Yorktown was in "A"). Jay also won in 2010.

Turning the question around - when was the last time Yorktown didn't win the section over a two year period? I'm not sure has happened in a very long time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Convince me that I am wrong...

John Jay has just been better than Yorktown the last two years. Not by a lot - but better. I'm sure there are many reasons why.

It happens (just like in the mid 2000's). They don't have the storied history that Yorktown has - but they are a very good program and better than Yorktown in 2018 and 2019.



I'll jump in here. If you've been watching Yorktown play, then you know they are unprepared. Why does Yorktown consistently give back leads in the second half of games? Still can't clear under pressure or beat a zone D? Giving up fast break goals because all the mids are subbing. Never having teams properly scouted. Team can't win with one arm tied behind their backs. None of this is up for debate, its just a question of denial or acceptance and a response.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I can't wait to hear the whining when Rye wins the class B section crown next year. Ytown coaches are arrogant and are behind the times.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Convince me that I am wrong...

John Jay has just been better than Yorktown the last two years. Not by a lot - but better. I'm sure there are many reasons why.

It happens (just like in the mid 2000's). They don't have the storied history that Yorktown has - but they are a very good program and better than Yorktown in 2018 and 2019.



I'll jump in here. If you've been watching Yorktown play, then you know they are unprepared. Why does Yorktown consistently give back leads in the second half of games? Still can't clear under pressure or beat a zone D? Giving up fast break goals because all the mids are subbing. Never having teams properly scouted. Team can't win with one arm tied behind their backs. None of this is up for debate, its just a question of denial or acceptance and a response.


Must disagree with first fella. John Jay is a good program but the 2018 and 2019 Yorktown squads were better, man for man. Seen a lot of games and the level of play last 2 years was embarrassing. Ytown needs change.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Convince me that I am wrong...

John Jay has just been better than Yorktown the last two years. Not by a lot - but better. I'm sure there are many reasons why.

It happens (just like in the mid 2000's). They don't have the storied history that Yorktown has - but they are a very good program and better than Yorktown in 2018 and 2019.



I'll jump in here. If you've been watching Yorktown play, then you know they are unprepared. Why does Yorktown consistently give back leads in the second half of games? Still can't clear under pressure or beat a zone D? Giving up fast break goals because all the mids are subbing. Never having teams properly scouted. Team can't win with one arm tied behind their backs. None of this is up for debate, its just a question of denial or acceptance and a response.


Must disagree with first fella. John Jay is a good program but the 2018 and 2019 Yorktown squads were better, man for man. Seen a lot of games and the level of play last 2 years was embarrassing. Ytown needs change.


Will not happen. There is a new athletic director who hired the current coach so they are tied at the hip. Rumor is players are jumping ship.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
where would they go?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
where would they go?


Prep schools. If this is true, its very sad. People used to move to Ytown to play lacrosse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
congrats to John jay and Briarcliff for getting it done, good luck in the finals
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Amen
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
First IMO Rankings for Summer 2019
Lots of changes since last year with new clubs and other traditional clubs falling depending on year.

Only one tourney to go on so far But overall Primetime Looked strong. Express North and Eclipse looked to have lost ground
and new teams i.e Pride, others seem to be gaining. I'm only doing 2023 and 2024 years so feedback regarding all years is welcome.

IMO 2023
1. Primetime
2. Express North Pearsall
3. Preds
4. 2-Way
5. Express North Brameier
6. Pride
7. Eclipse
8. Hudson Valley Express
9. Swashbucklers
10. Westchester Warriors

I dropped Eclipse due to not playing any fall tournaments and no word on the team this summer. No doubt there is some talent on the tat team, they just don't play much.

2024
1. Eclipse
2. Express North Schreiber
3. Primetime
4. 2-Way
5. Preds
6. Express North Lawrence
7. Pride
8. Warriors
9. Hudson Valley Express
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
First IMO Rankings for Summer 2019
Lots of changes since last year with new clubs and other traditional clubs falling depending on year.

Only one tourney to go on so far But overall Primetime Looked strong. Express North and Eclipse looked to have lost ground
and new teams i.e Pride, others seem to be gaining. I'm only doing 2023 and 2024 years so feedback regarding all years is welcome.

IMO 2023
1. Primetime
2. Express North Pearsall
3. Preds
4. 2-Way
5. Express North Brameier
6. Pride
7. Eclipse
8. Hudson Valley Express
9. Swashbucklers
10. Westchester Warriors

I dropped Eclipse due to not playing any fall tournaments and no word on the team this summer. No doubt there is some talent on the tat team, they just don't play much.

2024
1. Eclipse
2. Express North Schreiber
3. Primetime
4. 2-Way
5. Preds
6. Express North Lawrence
7. Pride
8. Warriors
9. Hudson Valley Express


I'm really only here for 2029 and 2030 class rankings. When will those be issued?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Additional classes will be added later this week.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Additional classes will be added later this week.


The 2029 and 2030 comment was meant to be sarcastic. Some of you guys need to get a life.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
funny!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Congratulations to all of the Section 1 honorees from last nights dinner. Special thank you to Coach Schurr for being the type of man we can all be proud to support and have guiding our young men.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
First IMO Rankings for Summer 2019
Lots of changes since last year with new clubs and other traditional clubs falling depending on year.

Only one tourney to go on so far But overall Primetime Looked strong. Express North and Eclipse looked to have lost ground
and new teams i.e Pride, others seem to be gaining. I'm only doing 2023 and 2024 years so feedback regarding all years is welcome.



2023
1. Primetime
2. Express North Pearsall
3. Preds
4. 2-Way
5. Express North Brameier
6. Preds B
7. 91Tristate
8. Pride
9. CT Wolves

You forgot 91TS. Dropped those other bottom teams you listed, they have no presence at all. Agreed on Eclipse, program has buried/hidden 2023 team despite very strong talent. Don't know how to rank a team that doesn't play ever, even in their NLF tourneys. Why kids haven't bolted to other programs in crucial period is weird.

2024
1. Eclipse
2. Express North Schreiber
3. Primetime
4. 2-Way
5. 91tristate
6. Preds
7. Express North Lawrence
8. Pride

Preds 2024 was awful at WSYL quals.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Don't sleep on Hudson valley Express. Not a bad team just not much pub and usually win the lower tournaments. No relation to LI Express North. Interesting that the Express North Brameier team is going to NALF this weekend instead of Pearsall. Maybe Express has plans for Fairfield/CT whatever its called to be as/more competitive than katonah version?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Agreed with the post about bottom teams just trying to be inclusinve and I did err on TS91.

Updated IMO 2023
1. Primetime
2. Express North Pearsall
3. Preds
4. 2-Way
5. Express North Brameier
6. Pride
7. 91 Tri-State
8. Eclipse
9. CT Wolves


I dropped Eclipse more due to not playing any fall tournaments and no word on the team this summer. No doubt there is some talent on the tat team, they just don't play much. Kept Eclipse in for now but dropped more. they are scheduled to play this weekend so we'll see how they do. Agree with the post they have some very talented players who seem to stick due to the Club name and rep although they missed all of fall and only played 3 tourneys last summer. CT Wolves may jump more than a couple as summer unfolds.

2024
1. Eclipse
2. Express North Schreiber
3. Primetime
4. 2-Way
5. 91 Tri-State
6. preds
7. Express North Lawrence
8. Pride
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Can’t wait to see the updated rankings this week. The 28s looked great.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
IMO Rankings Week 2

Not much changed as almost all teams were in action. Eclipse finally played and lost. Express North Bramier moved up with big boys and lost. Primetime competed well w strong competiton. 24's More of the same... Eclipse did very well. Schreiber solid, EN Lawrence continues to win lower end games and rest all did OK.

2023
1. Primetime
2. Express North Pearsall
3. Preds
4. 2-Way
5. Express North Bramier
6. CT Wolves
7. Preds B
8. pride
9. 91 TS

2024
1. Eclipse
2. Express North Schrieber
3. Primetime
4. 2-Way
5. Express North Lawrence
6. Preds
7. 91TS
8. Pride
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Does anyone want to rank the 2021's? Watched most of them play in Delaware and was amazed at the overall high level of play. I don't think I can differentiate between Primetime and Predators but I'm sure someone can. I saw dynamic team lacrosse not just one or two middies dodging through everyone.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Last week Pearsall lost to Warriors twice in the NLF and this past weekend at Laxfest Warriors lost and tied 2way.
Just something to think about.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I held off dropping Pearsall as they've only played 1 tourney but Express North brameier and other from our area have beaten Warriors so you may be on to something...We'll see how this weekend goes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
IMO 2022 Rankings
1. Primetime
2. Eclipse
3. Preds
4. 2-Way
4. Express North Kirkaldy
6. TS 91
7. Everyone else

This class isn't close as Primetime is way ahead of rest of our teams. Eclipse and Preds awfully similar then a drop.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO 2022 Rankings
1. Primetime
2. Eclipse
3. Preds
4. 2-Way
4. Express North Kirkaldy
6. TS 91
7. Everyone else

This class isn't close as Primetime is way ahead of rest of our teams. Eclipse and Preds awfully similar then a drop.


Preds will beat Primetime this year. FACT.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Underarmour tryouts last night and rosters out today - daddy ball, club lax politics at its finest - you people should be ashamed - no amount of politics is ever getting your kids 1 second of playing time on a real college team, your a disgrace , kudos to Daniello for throwing you out of his organization - all because you wanted to manipulate the offense through your 1 dimensional child who did nothing at tryouts last night - sickening -
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Underarmour tryouts last night and rosters out today - daddy ball, club lax politics at its finest - you people should be ashamed - no amount of politics is ever getting your kids 1 second of playing time on a real college team, your a disgrace , kudos to Daniello for throwing you out of his organization - all because you wanted to manipulate the offense through your 1 dimensional child who did nothing at tryouts last night - sickening -


Well hopefully we won't see any of you ball hog Primetime players any longer!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Underarmour tryouts last night and rosters out today - daddy ball, club lax politics at its finest - you people should be ashamed - no amount of politics is ever getting your kids 1 second of playing time on a real college team, your a disgrace , kudos to Daniello for throwing you out of his organization - all because you wanted to manipulate the offense through your 1 dimensional child who did nothing at tryouts last night - sickening -


Well hopefully we won't see any of you ball hog Primetime players any longer!


PT 22 vs eclipse 22 is not even a game - Pt is the CLEAR leader - keep on playing your daddy ball garbage, and we will keep beating you down !!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How many kids tried out for under Armour command group. 23 spots
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Underarmour tryouts last night and rosters out today - daddy ball, club lax politics at its finest - you people should be ashamed - no amount of politics is ever getting your kids 1 second of playing time on a real college team, your a disgrace , kudos to Daniello for throwing you out of his organization - all because you wanted to manipulate the offense through your 1 dimensional child who did nothing at tryouts last night - sickening -


Well hopefully we won't see any of you ball hog Primetime players any longer!


PT 22 vs eclipse 22 is not even a game - Pt is the CLEAR leader - keep on playing your daddy ball garbage, and we will keep beating you down !!


Guess Daniello is trolling the site!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Anyne know anything about Swash? Any good?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
There were six teams so around 150 kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It is one thing to criticize an adult but you are both wrong and unfair to his son. He scored more than 45 goals and had over 90 points as a freshman playing league games against Darien, New Canaan, Wilton, Staples and Greenwich and non league games against Briarcliff, Yorktown, John Jay and Duxbury, Ma. Unless your son was on the same time at tryouts you at best saw the son play one game against your son’s team and another in the final callback game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Underarmour tryouts last night and rosters out today - daddy ball, club lax politics at its finest - you people should be ashamed - no amount of politics is ever getting your kids 1 second of playing time on a real college team, your a disgrace , kudos to Daniello for throwing you out of his organization - all because you wanted to manipulate the offense through your 1 dimensional child who did nothing at tryouts last night - sickening -


Haven't seen a regional team tryout that isn't pre-rigged. Certain club and HS players flood reg, their coaches pick them, and also pick up big name players no matter what happens on the field.

Total disgrace. Given the coaches involved in UA Underclass the rigged factor must have been 11.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse 23 had a good weekend beating express north pearsall. Probably moving up to #2.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
IMO 2023

1.Primetime
2.Eclipse
3.Express North Pearsall
4.2 Way
5.Preds
6.Express North Brameier
7.CT Wolves
8.Pride
9.Swash
10.Preds B

Eclipse came out of hiding! Primetime still best. Sots 3-5 a notch above rest. Brameier team basically .500 vs LI A teams which are usually stronger than local A teams. Wolves, Pride, Swash all packed tightly.


2024

1.Eclipse
2.Express North Schreiber
3.Primetime
4.2-Way
5.91 TS
6.Preds
7.Express North Lawrence
8.Eclipse B
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Quiet weekend for teams. Don’t see a lot of teams playing other than the brawl on the hill.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Most team off for a couple of weeks until NLF at UMass
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO 2023

203 Preds remains much stronger than 2Way. Would like to see Eclipse play Preds.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Someone should put together a tournament for our local teams.
Express NorthPearsall, Brameier, Primetime, Eclipse, Preds, Preds B, 2-Way, 91TS, Pride, Swash, CT Wolves, can invite 2nd teams too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Can you give an example of why you think preds are better than 2way? The one team that beat both preds and 2way was sweetlax N.Y. the preds were doubled up and 2 way lost by a goal.


203 Preds remains much stronger than 2Way. Would like to see Eclipse play Preds.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Looks like Showtime Showcase has been taken over by Prep School players. It's a shame its become the feeding grounds for Holdback Central. I've always thought having kids compete in the most difficult environments (playing up not down) made them the best they could be as players and people. Now we teach them how to rig the system to compete against younger players so you can be a standout. These same kids will cry to Daddy when they don't get the expected promotion. Really sad. Before you post a [ChillLaxin], my youngest is off to college in about 3 weeks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How do we find 203 Showtime rosters?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
They will post all stars at noon today on Twitter. @showtime lacrosse
Rosters were posted at the event. Kids were from all over
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can you give an example of why you think preds are better than 2way? The one team that beat both preds and 2way was sweetlax N.Y. the preds were doubled up and 2 way lost by a goal.


203 Preds remains much stronger than 2Way. Would like to see Eclipse play Preds.


Why do I think Preds 2023 better than 2Way? Jus the facts: They have beaten them in every head-to-head. They made (and did pretty well) at WSYL when 2Way failed to qualify. The best 2Way players quit to join Preds and PT. Preds goes to harder tourneys. All undisputable.

If 2Way got some re-classed 2022's and are having a good summer, good for them. Trying to use one common opponent not good basis.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Preds have not played 2way this summer and anyone can sign up for “harder” tournaments. There’s a lot a weak teams there. No reclassed 22s either DB
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
North Salem ousts their longtime Hall of Fame and beloved AD; Yorktown CSD refuses to replace their detested, incompetent boys lacrosse coach. Perfect. If we can't mobilize to effect change we deserve to underachieve and for our kids to hate the Yorktown boys lacrosse experience.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
IMO Rankings
2023

1. Primetime
2. Eclipse
3. Express North Pearsall
4. 2-Way
5. Preds
6. Express North Bramier
7. CT Wolves
8. Pride
9. Swash

Top not much changed. this summer so far the bottom half much better than they looked before summer. CT Wolves may push for top 5 soon. 2-Way close to passing Pearsall

2024
1.Eclipse
2.Express North Schreiber
2. Primetime
4. 2-Way
5. Preds
6.Express North Lawrence
7.TS91
8.Pride

Primetime has slipped a bit losing more than usual. 2-Way gaining on top 3.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Is anyone heading to the trilogy tourney in Providence next weekend? Schedule not posted on TM yet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown Ballers kicking butt this summer. Add to your rankings. Kids really playing well and winning the hardware.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
https://expresslacrosse.com/tryout-north/

Passing the word on Express North tryouts in two weeks. Absolutely terrific club lacrosse program. Schreiber & Co do a great job developing kids and pushing to get them to the next level.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Some interesting scores from the weekend. Primetime and Eclipse lost in playoffs and Express North had some serious issues.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
IMO Rankings

2023
Weird weekend when just about everyone playing AA was under .500 vs national level competition. Primetime was strong as usual, Pearsall EN and Eclipse both under .500 but stiff competition. 2-Way solid vs lower competition. Lower teams lost except Swashbucklers who keep winning at B level. NLF this weekend has most of top teams except 2-Way.

1. Primetime
2. Eclipse
3. Express North Pearsall
4. 2-Way
5. Preds
6. Express North Brameier
7. CT Wolves
8. Pride
9. Swash

2024

Most of our local teams struggled vs national competition. 2-Way keeps winning lower tourneys and Preds hard to find.

1. Eclipse
2. Primetime
3..Express North Schreiber
4. 2-Way
5. Preds
6. Express North Lawrence
7. TS91
8. Pride
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2023: Not sure if you actually look at the tourney machine but eclipse lost to 2way in semis redeeming themselves from day earlier. So, not sure if you can have it both ways with stiffer competition comment. Eclipse is not better than 2way, at least not yesterday and EN should not be ahead of 2way.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -


2024 2Way beat eclipse. You need to look at tourney machine. Eclipse had 2 teams play at trilogy in the 2024 divisions. It wasn’t close
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -

Primetime 2023 could not even close the deal in a their own B tournament this weekend.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Final IMO Rankings for Summer 2023

1. Primetime
2. Eclipse
3. 2-Way
4. Express North Pearsall
5. Preds
6. CT Wolves
7. Express North Bramier
8. Swashbucklers

2024
1. Eclipse
2. Primetime
3. Express North Schreiber
4. 2-Way
5. Preds
6. Express North Lawrence
7. Pride
8. TS 91
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2023 Eclipse lost to 2way in their last game 8-1.
2024 Eclipse lost to 2way in their last game 8-3.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
For 2023, yes that is correct, but the day before Eclipse beat 2way 11-2. Who knows, they are probably equal.

For 2024, you are partially wrong. Yes, 2way beat Eclipse 8-3. But that was the 2nd Eclipse team, not their top 2024 team. Eclipse had 3 teams at 2024 this past summer. 2way beat the 2nd one easily. But did not play the top Eclipse team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Primetime 2023 could not even close the deal in a their own B tournament this weekend.


Why, is the town team double holdbacks?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Final IMO Rankings for Summer 2023

1. Primetime
2. Eclipse
3. 2-Way
4. Express North Pearsall
5. Preds
6. CT Wolves
7. Express North Bramier
8. Swashbucklers

2024
1. Eclipse
2. Primetime
3. Express North Schreiber
4. 2-Way
5. Preds
6. Express North Lawrence
7. Pride
8. TS 91


US Club lax doesnt rate 2way. Have heard questions about which tournaments they play.

2023- Reseeding based on US Club Lacrosse ratings.
1. Primetime #7 Nationally
2. Express North Pearsall #14
3. Eclipse #28
5. Express North Bramier #41
7. Preds #42
4. 2-Way
6. CT Wolves
8. Swashbuckler


2024- Not far off US Club Lacrosse rankings
1. Eclipse #6 Nationally
2. Express North Schreiber #17
3. Primetime #18
4. 2-Way #31
5. Preds #48
6. TS 91
7. Express North Lawrence
8. Ballers
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
ANY TRYOUT COMMENTARY ? good ? bad? run well? not well?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
And who has released their tryout results so far? Anyone other than Predators?

Gods luck to everyone who tried out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Prime Time sent out their call back list on Saturday for final evaluation on Sunday.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Prime time tryout - very organized and well staffed. Liked how they reduced the numbers for a smaller group tryout on the third day.

Express North tryout - not sure how they could accurately evaluate the boys. Seemed pretty chaotic.

North sent out invitations last week.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
North still having tryouts... invites already out?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
North still having tryouts... invites already out?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse tryouts very organized a well attended. Agree North was very chaotic at first tryout.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I attended three separate tryouts and was impressed by each. Kudos to the Westchester youth programs, I've never seen such a deep pool of talent in the area. Strong club programs will only benefit each town program. Play with kids from other towns and be coached by as many different coaches as possible and learn from each. Get out of your comfort zone and be exposed to all the lacrosse that you can.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse Teams out. What about Express?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express North 2025 is out as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express North 2023 is out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My son was invited to play for the Express North 2024 single A team, not AA. I realize he is not a top flight player and needs to improve his skills, but is a single A team and the Express North the best program for him? I don't know. Does anyone have any experience or input?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son was invited to play for the Express North 2024 single A team, not AA. I realize he is not a top flight player and needs to improve his skills, but is a single A team and the Express North the best program for him? I don't know. Does anyone have any experience or input?


IT ALL comes down to who is coaching your child and whether your son will get meaningful reps in both practice and games
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son was invited to play for the Express North 2024 single A team, not AA. I realize he is not a top flight player and needs to improve his skills, but is a single A team and the Express North the best program for him? I don't know. Does anyone have any experience or input?


IT ALL comes down to who is coaching your child and whether your son will get meaningful reps in both practice and games


Does your son have any other options besides EN? Yes, playing time and coaching are critical but remember if your son is on the B team for the 2024 group then you should confirm that he is totally committed to getting better and his goal should be to get on the A team next season. Otherwise, you may be disappointed with losing your weekends watching below avg youth lacrosse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son was invited to play for the Express North 2024 single A team, not AA. I realize he is not a top flight player and needs to improve his skills, but is a single A team and the Express North the best program for him? I don't know. Does anyone have any experience or input?


IT ALL comes down to who is coaching your child and whether your son will get meaningful reps in both practice and games


Does your son have any other options besides EN? Yes, playing time and coaching are critical but remember if your son is on the B team for the 2024 group then you should confirm that he is totally committed to getting better and his goal should be to get on the A team next season. Otherwise, you may be disappointed with losing your weekends watching below avg youth lacrosse.

Is the single A team the Darien team or is that the B team out of Katonah? Def different levels of play between the two. Ask how many players are returning from last year then find out where they went if they left. If a lot of players left and went to a different program that will tell you something. If several players moved up to the A team that will tell you something else. Then there is the question, what does your son want to do? EN 2024 (Katonah) AA is not for everyone.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son was invited to play for the Express North 2024 single A team, not AA. I realize he is not a top flight player and needs to improve his skills, but is a single A team and the Express North the best program for him? I don't know. Does anyone have any experience or input?


IT ALL comes down to who is coaching your child and whether your son will get meaningful reps in both practice and games


Does your son have any other options besides EN? Yes, playing time and coaching are critical but remember if your son is on the B team for the 2024 group then you should confirm that he is totally committed to getting better and his goal should be to get on the A team next season. Otherwise, you may be disappointed with losing your weekends watching below avg youth lacrosse.

Is the single A team the Darien team or is that the B team out of Katonah? Def different levels of play between the two. Ask how many players are returning from last year then find out where they went if they left. If a lot of players left and went to a different program that will tell you something. If several players moved up to the A team that will tell you something else. Then there is the question, what does your son want to do? EN 2024 (Katonah) AA is not for everyone.


In my experience with multiple kids in multiple sports, the kids are almost always placed at the correct level. It's the parents who think otherwise. Therefore, without knowing much about the specifics of this kid and these teams, it is probably true that he is on the right team for his skill/athleticsm. The question then will be whether the coaching will be good, will there be sufficient practices/games, will the team be placed in the correct brackets at the correct tournaments, and whether he will get sufficient playing time. Basically the same issues for AA team or any other team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
EN 2024 Katonah "B" had a tough time last year with some blowouts during the fall and in June but became much more competitive in July. the "A" team (which they call "AA") was pretty good but there was/is a huge gap in talent... Also... i think there was an issue with 2024 B team coach last year, I think his name was Doller, Heard from one parent that he missed at least one tournament and that the team was coached by a backup. Whatever the issue, their son tried out for EN 2024 again in July so they seem to be satisfied with the program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
EN 2024 Katonah "B" had a tough time last year with some blowouts during the fall and in June but became much more competitive in July. the "A" team (which they call "AA") was pretty good but there was/is a huge gap in talent... Also... i think there was an issue with 2024 B team coach last year, I think his name was Doller, Heard from one parent that he missed at least one tournament and that the team was coached by a backup. Whatever the issue, their son tried out for EN 2024 again in July so they seem to be satisfied with the program.


My son was on the 2024 Express North B team and they had two coaches this summer Coach Doller and Coach Thorton with a college player assistant--Coach Matt?, not sure who would be considered a backup. My son developed to the point that he was asked to play on the A team this season along with a few other kids from that team. You need to be realistic because kids develop at different speeds, have varying athleticism and aptitude. My son was actually considered a late bloomer, which I think is nuts, he just turned 13.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I'm looking for some guidance. My son was contacted by a division 1 coach via email and was told they watched him play at XYZ tournament this summer, liked what they saw and would like him to visit the campus and attend their prospect camp in October. It was very specific, he replied with a question and the coach answered it accurately. So, should we consider this a real overture or are they just trying to fill prospect camp slots? I'm a skeptic but he really did play well at that tournament. He's not even sure he would want to attend the college but it would be nice to know the process.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
C. is a nepotism king. All offensive runs through one of his kids on the Ridgefield HS team and 3 eclipse teams. I would detest to have my kid on one of these teams if he was an offensive player.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Pay $450 for 5 hours? That’s a joke. If he wants him, then ask coach to waive the entrance fee.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
[quote=Anonymous]Colsey is an Meanyquote]

99% of all people would agree with the statement above , but at least elaborate
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Everything Colsey does is for his own children. Everything!!! Whether it’s box , eclipse, under armour etc. he is the worst person in the world to let your children around. If you disagree. Then your son is a long pole or your just that dense !! I don’t give 2 craps how great he was 20 yeArs ago. Bad guy, Bad intentions. He has no idea how talk to kids or parents and 99% of the non lax world hates him.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Everything C. does is for his own children. Everything!!! Whether it’s box, eclipse, under armour etc. he is the worst person in the world to let your children around. If you disagree. Then your son is a long pole or your just that ignorant !! I don’t care how great he was 20 years ago. Bad guy, Bad intentions IMO. He has no idea how to talk to kids or parents and 99% of the non lax world dislikes him.


I definitely agree. I think he might be bi-polar.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Everything C. does is for his own children. Everything!!! Whether it’s box , eclipse, under armour etc. he is the worst person in the world to let your children around. If you disagree. Then your son is a long pole or your just that ignorant !! I don’t care how great he was 20 years ago. Bad guy, Bad intentions IMO. He has no idea how to talk to kids or parents and 99% of the non lax world dislikes him.


I definitely agree. I think he might be bi-polar.

Or clinically insane.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
IMO PRE-FALL RANKINGS

2023
1.PrimeTime
2.Eclipse
3.Express North Pearsall
4.2-Way
5.Express North Brameier
6. CT Wolves
7.91 TriState
8. Pride
9. Swash

This group is starting to bunch together more after EN Pearsall. Holdbacks bolster Eclipse and close gap with Primetime. Teams 4-6 all very close so well see how fall and summer shake out. Definite drop after #6.

2024
1. Eclipse Rushton
2. Express North SChreiber
3. Primetime
4. 2-Way
5. Express North Lawrence
6. Eclipse AA
7. 91 Tri-State
8. CT Wolves

Eclipse above EN Schreiber but not by much. Primetime roster thinned a bit this fall so well see about depth. EN Lawrence gains with additions of holdbacks so they may make some noise.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Why are so many Yorktown kids going to Pace and Marist?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Pace and Marist are day commutes for Yorktown. Save big$ and still go to quality schools and play D1.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pace and Marist are day commutes for Yorktown. Save big$ and still go to quality schools and play D1.


You are clueless.... Pace is not D1
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pace and Marist are day commutes for Yorktown. Save big$ and still go to quality schools and play D1.


You are clueless.... Pace is not D1


How about this poster was just mistaken. The vitriol never ends even in the most mundane of questions.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I am clueless. Sorry for offending you by saying Pace was D1. I know it's D2 but kids can still play college ball, live home, save big$ and get quality education.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IMO PRE-FALL RANKINGS

2023
1.PrimeTime
2.Eclipse
3.Express North Pearsall
4.2-Way
5.Express North Brameier
6. CT Wolves
7.91 TriState
8. Pride
9. Swash

This group is starting to bunch together more after EN Pearsall. Holdbacks bolster Eclipse and close gap with Primetime. Teams 4-6 all very close so well see how fall and summer shake out. Definite drop after #6.



Welcome back!
You forgot Predators for both ages.
2Way spanked Eclipse in title game in tourney last summer (though Eclipse spanked them day before, but winning championship has to give 2Way edge in rankings)
91TS lost to Swash last summer so they can be swapped
Agreed, #7 and lower are serious drop-offs

Any 2025-2026 gurus out there who can add to this?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Everything Colsey does is for his own children. Everything!!! Whether it’s box , eclipse, under armour etc. he is the worst person in the world to let your children around. If you disagree. Then your son is a long pole or your just that dense !! I don’t give 2 craps how great he was 20 yeArs ago. Bad guy, Bad intentions. He has no idea how talk to kids or parents and 99% of the non lax world hates him.


Is it just RC or is it the Yorktown has beens in general?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2023 IMO Rankings
1. Primetime
2.Eclipse
3.Express North Pearsall
4.2-Way
5.Express North Brameier
6. CT Wolves
7.91 TriState
8. Pride
9. Swash2024


2024 IMO Rankings
1. Eclipse Rushton
2. Express North SChreiber
3. Primetime
4. 2-Way
5. Preds
6 Eclipse AA
6. Express North Lawrence
7. 91 Tri-State
8. CT Wolves

2025 IMO Rankings
1. Express North Morgan
2. Primetime
3. Eclipse
4. Preds
5. 2-Way
6. Express North Brameier
7. 91 TS
8. Pride

Morgan head and shoulders above for now2-5 closer than you would think then a noticeable drop.

2026 IMO Rankings
1. 2-Way
2. Eclipse
3. Express North Lemma
4. Preds
5. Primetime
6.. Express North Brameier
7. Rest

This group is very closely bunched and will change a lot over the years. For now 2-Way is in lead and seem to be getting into better tournaments than other 2-Way teams. We'll see if it keeps up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Preds 2023 will compete right with PT. Those are the top teams. Hands down. Better add them
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2023 IMO Rankings-correction
1. Primetime
2.Eclipse
3.Express North Pearsall
4.Preds52-Way
5.Express North Brameier
6. CT Wolves
7.91 TriState
8. Pride
9. Swash2024

Error on my part omitting Preds. They have a strong crew and can move up with strong fall
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2023 IMO Rankings-correction
1. Primetime
2.Eclipse
3.Express North Pearsall
4.Preds52-Way
5.Express North Brameier
6. CT Wolves
7.91 TriState
8. Pride
9. Swash2024

Error on my part omitting Preds. They have a strong crew and can move up with strong fall
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Which Westchester teams are going down to Farmingdale on Nov 17th. Its always good competition.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It is going to be interesting to see what happens with the UA games this summer with this new Nationals thing being launched. It looks like they are trying to address all the many flaws of the UA games. Hopefully they can get it right and make the selection process truly fair and objective.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is going to be interesting to see what happens with the UA games this summer with this new Nationals thing being launched. It looks like they are trying to address all the many flaws of the UA games. Hopefully they can get it right and make the selection process truly fair and objective.


Likely to have the same problem with unfair tryouts and political picks. Look at the regions page - Eclipse is the director for the CT tryouts and Primetime is the director for the NY (westchester) tryouts. Express & Team 91 are running the Long Island tryouts.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
When will Primetime update their site with 2020 and 2021 commits? They seem to be really successful.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Does anyone know any winter indoor leagues that take free agents? Already tried Ultra and Chelsea Piers and got no response. I'm also in contact with house of sports. Just wondering if there are any others. It would be high school level.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Does anyone know any winter indoor leagues that take free agents? Already tried Ultra and Chelsea Piers and got no response. I'm also in contact with house of sports. Just wondering if there are any others. It would be high school level.


House of Sport says they will have a free agent team in HS league though I doubt it but far if you are't in Westchester
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Roy Colsey is the coach for the eclipse 2022aa team and runs many of the plays through his son. They went 1-2 at the NLF tournament this weekend and did poorly this fall season. In contrast, primetime 2022aa, who kicked Roy Colsey out as coach, went 3-0.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
He coaches teams so he can showcase his kids. If you play attack stay away. Middies beware he has his followers and their kids all play. Probably safe if your kids on D.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
END OF FALL 2023 IMO Rankings

1. Primetime
2.Eclipse
3.Express North Pearsall
4.2-Way
5.Express North Brameier
6. CT Wolves
7.91 TriState
8. Pride

Primetime still strongrst almost everyone else in this group struggled in fall. Hopefully Football and other fall activities contributed to less play.


2024 IMO Rankings
1. Eclipse Rushton
2. Express North Schreiber
3. Primetime
4. 2-Way
5. Preds
6 91 Tri-State
7. Eclipse AA
8. Exress North Lawrence
8. CT Wolves

24's are starting to sort out. Schreiber team just beat Wolfpack AND Eclipse in fall which is huge but it's fall so let's see how they do in summer. Still think Eclipse is a hair better at full strength but Express North has closed the gap. Primetime still strong and 2-Way is solid. Keep an eye on Tri-State as new additions could gel over summer.

2025 IMO Rankings
1. Express North Morgan
2. Primetime
3. Eclipse
4. Preds
5. 2-Way
6. Express North Potash
7. 91 TS
8. Pride

Morgan keeps top spot barely. Week fall season and Primetime and Eclipse closed the gap. My guess is one or both overtake Morgan after summer. Express North Potash team won an bunch at mid level but still have a steep climb to break top 3-4.Probably strongest Fairfield Express team so far.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Roy Colsey is the coach for the eclipse 2022aa team and runs many of the plays through his son. They went 1-2 at the NLF tournament this weekend and did poorly this fall season. In contrast, primetime 2022aa, who kicked Roy Colsey out as coach, went 3-0.


Colsey should not be allowed to coach kids!!! he is a cancer and is blinded his kids, Hanford should fire him now before its too late
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
sounds like your kid did not play or isn't as good as Roy's. Work harder and stop being a baby. roy is a world class coach who has won at every level.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Roy Colsey is the coach for the eclipse 2022aa team and runs many of the plays through his son. They went 1-2 at the NLF tournament this weekend and did poorly this fall season. In contrast, primetime 2022aa, who kicked Roy Colsey out as coach, went 3-0.


Colsey should not be allowed to coach kids!!! he is a cancer and is blinded his kids, Hanford should fire him now before its too late


Colsey is also a cancer at Superstar and CT Box. Constant club hopping for his kids and turnover of his players. Being bi-polar doesn't help either.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
as great as he WAS, he does not have the temperament to coach his own children , doesn't make him any less great, but when people are paying tons of money and they are this close to the recruiting age, Roy should not be involved , he has proven that time and time again by trying to run the offense through his children, its quite disgusting
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Daddyball usually doesn’t work during the recruiting years. The coach favors his own son and this hurts the looks for the rest of the offense. Better players from other teams do not join as they know that they will play behind the coach’s kid. Existing players on the team become more trigger happy with bad shots since they have limited playing time or they skip team events to do prospect days and showcases in order to get better looks. Overall team performance suffers and college coaches are less willing to look at a weaker team. Eclipse is shooting themselves in the foot with this problem. Guess they want access to the ridgefield players so they don’t care about the nepotism problem.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
With your comment I can safely say your son will NEVER play at any level in college. Man up and be a father not a mother to your kid. Sheesh....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Daddyball usually doesn’t work during the recruiting years. The coach favors his own son and this hurts the looks for the rest of the offense. Better players from other teams do not join as they know that they will play behind the coach’s kid. Existing players on the team become more trigger happy with bad shots since they have limited playing time or they skip team events to do prospect days and showcases in order to get better looks. Overall team performance suffers and college coaches are less willing to look at a weaker team. Eclipse is shooting themselves in the foot with this problem. Guess they want access to the ridgefield players so they don’t care about the nepotism problem.


Totally agree
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With your comment I can safely say your son will NEVER play at any level in college. Man up and be a father not a mother to your kid. Sheesh....



many kids will play in college despite the daddy ball BS that comes with the great Roy- the only ones that will never be able to deal with real life conflicts related to sports are his own kids who have never had to fight for a spot on a team or pay for mistakes made in a game - having your dad protect you at the expense of other kids is just not realistic - talk about manning up, pot calling the kettle black
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Handle your own business and stop being a whiny b1tch. You don’t have to have your son play on any team you don’t want to or don’t agree philosophically with. I got a feeling based on your weak posts that your son should give up the college lax dream and crack the open books. At least then there won’t be any nepotism or daddyball to worry about.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With your comment I can safely say your son will NEVER play at any level in college. Man up and be a father not a mother to your kid. Sheesh....



many kids will play in college despite the daddy ball BS that comes with the great Roy- the only ones that will never be able to deal with real life conflicts related to sports are his own kids who have never had to fight for a spot on a team or pay for mistakes made in a game - having your dad protect you at the expense of other kids is just not realistic - talk about manning up, pot calling the kettle black


I would agree. Too much coddling Roy gives his kids. He can't develop anyone outside of his own kids. He bounces around and his players quit on him.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Roy is definitely in it for his kids. He doesn't hide it. I personally dont love they guy but my son does so were in as long as my son is. However we are allowed to play on another team. It's our money and our kids are all free agents. Our sons will not die if they don't play for SuperStar Box or Eclipse 2022AA.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Roy is definitely in it for his kids. He doesn't hide it. I personally dont love they guy but my son does so were in as long as my son is. However we are allowed to play on another team. It's our money and our kids are all free agents. Our sons will not die if they don't play for SuperStar Box or Eclipse 2022AA.



here is the issue though- do you know how hard it would be for a kid to leave eclipse 22AA and go to another team at this point in the game? next to impossible for all but the best of the best of the best - so- it really stinks to deal with an ego maniac like this guy who is looking to tee up his boys . yes they can leave- but why should anyone have to deal with this - this is on Hanford, Daniello took care of his business and got rid of him- Hanford should follow
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Your 100% correct. Reality is only his kids and literally a couple switched to Eclipse. Thats being said I'm sure Primetime is thrilled with the results, Eclipse not so much. Curious to see how long he lasts at Eclipse. They were better last year as Colsey didn't coach his kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My sons club team ran their first off season training session this weekend. A few Dad's were talking about the current state of local lacrosse, specifically which programs are best, the best players, where would you want your son playing, etc. I was surprised these Dads seemed to agree John Jay and Rye are tops. Has losing Marr really had that much of an impact? Does losing two straight section finals mean they are no longer the dominant program. Growing up in Scarsdale, I was always in awe. Just wondering.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Who is “they”? I assume you mean Yorktown?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
John Jay is moving down to C this year. Pleasantville and Westlake move up to C. Rye moves up to B.

Final 4 each class?
A-
L/P
Pac
Wappingers
Mamaroneck

B-
Town
Rye
Somers
Fox Lane

C-
JJ(CR)
Pleasantville
Westlake
Byram Hills

D-
Briarcliff
Bronxville
Putnam Valley
Haldane
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who is “they”? I assume you mean Yorktown?


Yes. Scarsdale '92. Yorktown was so dominant.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Bottom line: Yorktown is a Dynasty program. This is a fact and undeniable. Other programs can be good but are are cyclical .That includes JJay with their 2 section1 runs. Things will change soon enough though but Yorktown will ALWAYS as has ALWAYS been there as the program to benchmark against regardless of who coaches.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bottom line: Yorktown is a Dynasty program. This is a fact and undeniable. Other programs can be good but are are cyclical .That includes JJay with their 2 section1 runs. Things will change soon enough though but Yorktown will ALWAYS as has ALWAYS been there as the program to benchmark against regardless of who coaches.



I have to agree with your bottomline. Yorktown has a history and tradition that others are trying to match, but we live in a new world. Everyone now plays lacrosse, lotsa fish in that pond. Lets see if John Jay departing gives Yorktown a path out of the section.
I’m not from Y, but I’ve rooted for them since 1985.
I do not follow them intently. I prefer to follow D1.

There is no question about Y’s history, its dominance in Sec 1 and the # of GREAT All-Time players it has produced. But, currently, I believe the biggest issue at Y is that they have not a had a signature WIN, over a top ranked opponent in a very long time.

If the Y faithful could provide the forum with date and score of the last big time win, it could end this debate (or not).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown beat St. Anthony's 2 years ago, don't recall the score. Yorktown will be good this season and very good next year. All of the other programs have really good youth programs so Yorktown does not have that advantage going for it anymore.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by LucyVanPelt
I’m not from Y, but I’ve rooted for them since 1985.
I do not follow them intently. I prefer to follow D1.

There is no question about Y’s history, its dominance in Sec 1 and the # of GREAT All-Time players it has produced. But, currently, I believe the biggest issue at Y is that they have not a had a signature WIN, over a top ranked opponent in a very long time.

If the Y faithful could provide the forum with date and score of the last big time win, it could end this debate (or not).


Yorktown was the better team player for player the last two years but couldn't win the big games. Lost to a weaker Ridgefield team, lost to Wilton, Darien....John Jay, the list goes on. Seems like unless they are the overwhelmingly better team, they lose. Hopefully they can turn it around. Great Yorktown teams are fun to watch.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
There are 4 to 5 really well coached teams with depth within their program. Yorktown is still in that top 5. I will say the best coaches in Section 1 coach for Prime Time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are 4 to 5 really well coached teams with depth within their program. Yorktown is still in that top 5. I will say the best coaches in Section 1 coach for Prime Time.


Based on my watching the last two section finals, I think Ytown could use an upgrade. Plenty of better coaches in the section. Plus, I think other programs are just hungrier. My little guy is a freshman and his youth team crushed the Ytown travel team last few years.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by LucyVanPelt
I’m not from Y, but I’ve rooted for them since 1985.
I do not follow them intently. I prefer to follow D1.

There is no question about Y’s history, its dominance in Sec 1 and the # of GREAT All-Time players it has produced. But, currently, I believe the biggest issue at Y is that they have not a had a signature WIN, over a top ranked opponent in a very long time.

If the Y faithful could provide the forum with date and score of the last big time win, it could end this debate (or not).


I think Yorktown needs to focus on winning section 1 before thinking about signature wins or a NYS title. The last few seasons were a major disappointment and we had the players to get it done. Get back to fundamentals and good coaching and forget about All American status, college recruiting and all of the other distractions. Win and the players will find a home in college lacrosse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are 4 to 5 really well coached teams with depth within their program. Yorktown is still in that top 5. I will say the best coaches in Section 1 coach for Prime Time.


Based on my watching the last two section finals, I think Ytown could use an upgrade. Plenty of better coaches in the section. Plus, I think other programs are just hungrier. My little guy is a freshman and his youth team crushed the Ytown travel team last few years.


Eh, their youth program is fractured and not reflective of what happens at HS level. Somehow when HS rolls around, their teams are VERY strong. But I do agree that, at some point, you'd see some very good young talent in youth travel play, but we also never saw any.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Colsey is a clown.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
He is but he's not associated with Yorktown.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are 4 to 5 really well coached teams with depth within their program. Yorktown is still in that top 5. I will say the best coaches in Section 1 coach for Prime Time.


Based on my watching the last two section finals, I think Ytown could use an upgrade. Plenty of better coaches in the section. Plus, I think other programs are just hungrier. My little guy is a freshman and his youth team crushed the Ytown travel team last few years.


Eh, their youth program is fractured and not reflective of what happens at HS level. Somehow when HS rolls around, their teams are VERY strong. But I do agree that, at some point, you'd see some very good young talent in youth travel play, but we also never saw any.


Town is playing one of the strongest schedules I've in awhile.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Are we going to get some chatter going, gents, or what? Let's start with some 2023 club rankings from this summer where we finally go to witness area clubs banging heads. Hurrah for local competition and play dates.

2023
1. PrimeTime
2. Eclipse
3. Predators
4. 2Way
5. Express North Pearsall
6. CT Wolves
7. Express North Brameier

Outside these top 7, not worth listing other clubs-- major separation

Will someone please start a Westchester vs Fairfield All-Star Game?
Since I have no direct contact with 2023 teams, there is no reason to disagree with your list, based upon each program's reputations.

Also, I'd like to start some chatter for all of the Boys programs throughout Westchester, since not every player is an AA caliber player.

Club programs that I'm aware of:

PrimeTime,
Eclipse,
Predators,
2Way,
Express North (Pearsall, Brameier and others?),
CT Wolves,
Team 91 Tristate,
Bombers,
Westchester Warriors,
Pride,
Gargoyle,
Ultimate Orange
Swashbucklers, and
845 North

What other programs are out there not on the list?

Sorry Rockland, just not familiar with your side.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Ranking the 2024's

1. Primetime
2. Eclipse
3. Express North Schreiber
4. 2-Way
5. Preds
6. 91 Tri-State
7. Eclipse AA
8. Express North Lawrence
9. Pride
10 Rest
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by LucyVanPelt
Since I have no direct contact with 2023 teams, there is no reason to disagree with your list, based upon each program's reputations.

Also, I'd like to start some chatter for all of the Boys programs throughout Westchester, since not every player is an AA caliber player.

Club programs that I'm aware of:

PrimeTime,
Eclipse,
Predators,
2Way,
Express North (Pearsall, Brameier and others?),
CT Wolves,
Team 91 Tristate,
Bombers,
Westchester Warriors,
Pride,
Gargoyle,
Ultimate Orange
Swashbucklers, and
845 North

What other programs are out there not on the list?

Sorry Rockland, just not familiar with your side.

Good idea ... all players/clubs ranked

Ranking of all 2023 teams
1. PrimeTime
2. Eclipse
3. Predators
4. 2Way
5. Express North best
6. CT Wolves
7. Express North next
8. Swashbucklers
9. 91TS
10. Pride (did they have a 2023 team this summer?)
11. Warriors
12. Bombers (do they still operate?)
13. 845
never heard of Ultimate Orange, Gargoyles
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
A Westchester-Fairfield All-Star game makes way too much sense so it will never happen. Plus there is no $ in it for whomever organizes the game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Since most of our kids will play D3 why isn't there any discussion on the 2nd tier teams in Westchester/Fairfield?
Clearly your not paying attention, as I specifically brought up all club teams, not just the AA programs.

Further to another response, Ultimate Orange, is lead by Matt Caione (Y-town/Cuse) and they did take the 2020 season off due to covid.

Pride seems like an upcoming program.

Warriors, have been around a long time, but doesn't seem to raise the team/player levels.

Bombers, as per the Instagram, are doing well.

It's a shame that 91 Tristate 2023 team has dropped so much.

Can we get anyone else to contribute in a meaningful way.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Did players leave or get passed by others?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Thoughts on Express North 2027?
Originally Posted by LucyVanPelt
Clearly your not paying attention, as I specifically brought up all club teams, not just the AA programs.

Further to another response, Ultimate Orange, is lead by Matt Caione (Y-town/Cuse) and they did take the 2020 season off due to covid.

Pride seems like an upcoming program.

Warriors, have been around a long time, but doesn't seem to raise the team/player levels.

Bombers, as per the Instagram, are doing well.

It's a shame that 91 Tristate 2023 team has dropped so much.

Can we get anyone else to contribute in a meaningful way.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thoughts on Express North 2027?

After the 2019 season, I heard that they scrapped the entire team. I have not heard anything about this summer's 2027 team.

Also, Express North had its share of turnover from the 2019 season with 2026 Lemma and 2023 Kuczma.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Thoughts on PrimeTime 2027?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thoughts on PrimeTime 2027?

From my experience, PT's coaching staff, Nic Daniello & Jackie/Stef are outstanding.

I know at least one parent of a 2027 PT player and he always spoke highly of the coaches, players and parents; it was a "good group".
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I think I saw on Instagram they won a tournament this summer. Team is Zusi (or something like that)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Since most of our kids will play D3 why isn't there any discussion on the 2nd tier teams in Westchester/Fairfield?

Uh, the top tier teams in the area send players to D3 (and D1 and D2). The lower tier club team players aren't playing in college. Seems like everyone who plays club think they will play in college.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Since most of our kids will play D3 why isn't there any discussion on the 2nd tier teams in Westchester/Fairfield?

Uh, the top tier teams in the area send players to D3 (and D1 and D2). The lower tier club team players aren't playing in college. Seems like everyone who plays club think they will play in college.


Wrong; last week, Westchester Warriors announced that Eugene Dilorenzo (Somers) is playing at D3 Virginia Wesleyan. Yes, it is only one player; but no need to detest the lower tier programs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Is the overall program good for player development? I don’t know too much about them.

What about Eclipse and Prime Time? Do they work with the kids to develop them as players? Or do they expect the kids to do all of the work outside and show up to “win”?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Since most of our kids will play D3 why isn't there any discussion on the 2nd tier teams in Westchester/Fairfield?

Uh, the top tier teams in the area send players to D3 (and D1 and D2). The lower tier club team players aren't playing in college. Seems like everyone who plays club think they will play in college.

Could you imagine the catastrophe if Colsey's kids play D2 or D3.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is the overall program good for player development? I don’t know too much about them.

What about Eclipse and Prime Time? Do they work with the kids to develop them as players? Or do they expect the kids to do all of the work outside and show up to “win”?

Programs like PT develop players to work within their systems and do not keep players who are developing. PT expects all players to be starters, even though they are not starters.

For individual development, find a strength/speed trainer and, or a post-graduate college lax player or HS coach,to help your kid.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Since most of our kids will play D3 why isn't there any discussion on the 2nd tier teams in Westchester/Fairfield?

Uh, the top tier teams in the area send players to D3 (and D1 and D2). The lower tier club team players aren't playing in college. Seems like everyone who plays club think they will play in college.

Could you imagine the catastrophe if Colsey's kids play D2 or D3.

Only time will tell this one.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express North 2027 Zusi won NALF tourney vs top teams in MD prior to quarantine rules.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
His older son is legit. Lights out attack. He will play D1 based on merit.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express North 2027 Westchester team was completely rebuilt last fall, all new coaches and a new roster. They had a good fall showing but this summer played really well. They won the NALF in PA about a month ago.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yes, this is true. With a new roster and coaches they 2027 Express North had a very good summer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
how are the Predators & 2Way teams and organization?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by LucyVanPelt
Since I have no direct contact with 2023 teams, there is no reason to disagree with your list, based upon each program's reputations.

Also, I'd like to start some chatter for all of the Boys programs throughout Westchester, since not every player is an AA caliber player.

Club programs that I'm aware of:

PrimeTime,
Eclipse,
Predators,
2Way,
Express North (Pearsall, Brameier and others?),
CT Wolves,
Team 91 Tristate,
Bombers,
Westchester Warriors,
Pride,
Gargoyle,
Ultimate Orange
Swashbucklers, and
845 North

What other programs are out there not on the list?

Sorry Rockland, just not familiar with your side.

Good idea ... all players/clubs ranked

Ranking of all 2023 teams
1. PrimeTime
2. Eclipse
3. Predators
4. 2Way
5. Express North best
6. CT Wolves
7. Express North next
8. Swashbucklers
9. 91TS
10. Pride (did they have a 2023 team this summer?)
11. Warriors
12. Bombers (do they still operate?)
13. 845
never heard of Ultimate Orange, Gargoyles


How are the Predators & 2Way teams and organization as a whole?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
how are the Predators & 2Way teams and organization?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by LucyVanPelt
Since I have no direct contact with 2023 teams, there is no reason to disagree with your list, based upon each program's reputations.

Also, I'd like to start some chatter for all of the Boys programs throughout Westchester, since not every player is an AA caliber player.

Club programs that I'm aware of:

PrimeTime,
Eclipse,
Predators,
2Way,
Express North (Pearsall, Brameier and others?),
CT Wolves,
Team 91 Tristate,
Bombers,
Westchester Warriors,
Pride,
Gargoyle,
Ultimate Orange
Swashbucklers, and
845 North

What other programs are out there not on the list?

Sorry Rockland, just not familiar with your side.

Good idea ... all players/clubs ranked

Ranking of all 2023 teams
1. PrimeTime
2. Eclipse
3. Predators
4. 2Way
5. Express North best
6. CT Wolves
7. Express North next
8. Swashbucklers
9. 91TS
10. Pride (did they have a 2023 team this summer?)
11. Warriors
12. Bombers (do they still operate?)
13. 845
never heard of Ultimate Orange, Gargoyles


How are the Predators & 2Way teams and organization as a whole?


IMO, Pred's have been progressing in the right direction and is definitely competing against PT. Of course Pred's is overwhelming being run by Yorktown Alum.

2Way is in the second tier of the AA programs in Westchester and Fairfield county. 2Way's website indicates that almost every grade has two teams (an A and B team i suppose); which indicates growth and a larger income flow to the Brunswick coaching staff.

So, I would definitely say Pred's have the advantage in the HV area.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How are the Predators & 2Way teams and organization as a whole?[/quote]


IMO, Pred's have been progressing in the right direction and is definitely competing against PT. Of course Pred's is overwhelming being run by Yorktown Alum.

2Way is in the second tier of the AA programs in Westchester and Fairfield county. 2Way's website indicates that almost every grade has two teams (an A and B team i suppose); which indicates growth and a larger income flow to the Brunswick coaching staff.

So, I would definitely say Pred's have the advantage in the HV area.[/quote]

2Way tends to be the richer, holdback prep kids. Preds more HV towns and Yorktown alums. Both chasing PT for top status and gaining but slowly. Preds has better HS age teams and 2Way better youth teams but time will tell if that changes. Both have decent programs but don't go overboard like PT.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How are the Predators & 2Way teams and organization as a whole?


IMO, Pred's have been progressing in the right direction and is definitely competing against PT. Of course Pred's is overwhelming being run by Yorktown Alum.

2Way is in the second tier of the AA programs in Westchester and Fairfield county. 2Way's website indicates that almost every grade has two teams (an A and B team i suppose); which indicates growth and a larger income flow to the Brunswick coaching staff.

So, I would definitely say Pred's have the advantage in the HV area.[/quote]

2Way tends to be the richer, holdback prep kids. Preds more HV towns and Yorktown alums. Both chasing PT for top status and gaining but slowly. Preds has better HS age teams and 2Way better youth teams but time will tell if that changes. Both have decent programs but don't go overboard like PT.[/quote]

2way is theBrunswick clubl program full of reclassed kids. They have a good year round curriculum and are trying to play at the top level. Unless youre invited by coaches to play your spot is always at risk of a hold back or new prep school kid taking it. 2way has really been building something over the last few years.

Preds are a good local program but seem to be stagnating, all coaches and directors have other careers so are not as invested or organized but they used to draw good talent. The teams below 2023 are not very good at all yet they keep trying to play all the top teams. Preds were early on the scene but have been going backwards imho.

The key question is, how is the program at the age you are looking for and how much do they play and practice. 2way put together a great summer offering while Preds were very limited. 2way has great field access with Brunswick and Greenwich for the winter while Preds are limited.

Express North and CT Wolves will both pass Preds (the Directors are better, more engaged and running the program as a primary purpose) at all age groups while 2way will hold their place based on the prep school pipeline.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Why are so many kids leaving express north 2023 AA for eclipse A?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Coach left for 2026AA. Also The new Eclipse A team is at least as good as old Brameier team. They peaked a couple of years ago but lost their best players to other teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Coach left for 2026AA. Also The new Eclipse A team is at least as good as old Brameier team. They peaked a couple of years ago but lost their best players to other teams.

Seems like a part of LIE North's modus operandi, to not retain players (good ones) or coaches.

Changing subject: Team 91 Tri-state (boys) is conducting a supplement tryout on Aug 26. Team 91 Tri-state is similar to LIE N., as it has name recognition and attractive swag, but struggles to compete against the other top AA hudson valley programs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Totally naive here, but why would Express get rid of good players? I get why some kids might leave to find a better team, but you make it sound like they are deliberately cutting good players. Unless I am misreading. Not being argumentative at all. I’m just so confused by this.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Totally naive here, but why would Express get rid of good players? I get why some kids might leave to find a better team, but you make it sound like they are deliberately cutting good players. Unless I am misreading. Not being argumentative at all. I’m just so confused by this.

My bad, LIE N., has a history of losing many (not all) good players and coaches.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Totally naive here, but why would Express get rid of good players? I get why some kids might leave to find a better team, but you make it sound like they are deliberately cutting good players. Unless I am misreading. Not being argumentative at all. I’m just so confused by this.

My bad, LIE N doesn't typically get rid of good players. Players (good and bad) and coaches, often leave LIE N., for various reason.

I know of one LIE n., player, who is definitely a very good, was asked not to come back due to his Father's over-involvement. The Father-son combo, has been on three teams in as many seasons (2018-2020). Also, there father was asked not to return to the town recreation program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Thanks for clarifying. So express north has dad coaches who coach their own kids?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thanks for clarifying. So express north has dad coaches who coach their own kids?

Yes, but not all LIE N teams are set-up like you asked. The Dad-son teams are not limited to LIE N too.

Just to be clear; the father-son situation (3 team in 3 seasons) previously mentioned, the father only coached the town recreation team that his son was on. It was the town rec. program that asked the father to step down from coaching.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I don't know about other grades at LIE n but the 2023's are a mess. Total overhaul at AA level.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Why is that? Why do people leave Express N (players and coaches)?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why is that? Why do people leave Express N (players and coaches)?

Totally varies by age group. Certain classes are solid with good continuity-- they are the better teams in terms wins/losses. Other classes have a lot of turnover, which is a reflection and cause of weaker teams, ex: 2023 team. When you lose, rotate players in/out every year, you will keep losing as best players jump to other club teams as weaker players replace them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
From Sec 1 and like to read most of the threads in the Forums.

Noticed the "Long Island Express Lacrosse" thread and the comment made yesterday about state of the LIE's 2nd (level?) teams and how those teams/players don't develop.

I know LIE North is on a smaller scale, compared to the LI market, but I was wondering how many 1st and 2nd level teams are there in LIE North? If you know of them, please include the teams yr, name and where they practice.

It would be nice to know LIE North's market share.

I know that '27 Zusi did well this summer, but i don't know where they practice.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
From Sec 1 and like to read most of the threads in the Forums.

Noticed the "Long Island Express Lacrosse" thread and the comment made yesterday about state of the LIE's 2nd (level?) teams and how those teams/players don't develop.

I know LIE North is on a smaller scale, compared to the LI market, but I was wondering how many 1st and 2nd level teams are there in LIE North? If you know of them, please include the teams yr, name and where they practice.

It would be nice to know LIE North's market share.

I know that '27 Zusi did well this summer, but i don't know where they practice.

North stradles the border between Westchester, NY/Fairfield, CT. At the younger levels they have two AA-level teams, one in CT one in NY and then as they get older they streamline down to 1 AA level team with the best of both those teams. They also have an A-level to develop those players that are right on the borderline of AA.

Practices have bounced back and forth this year due to COVID and rules. Darien HS, the old Trinity HS in Stamford and their usual spot at The H School or whever they can find a patch of grass.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why is that? Why do people leave Express N (players and coaches)?

Totally varies by age group. Certain classes are solid with good continuity-- they are the better teams in terms wins/losses. Other classes have a lot of turnover, which is a reflection and cause of weaker teams, ex: 2023 team. When you lose, rotate players in/out every year, you will keep losing as best players jump to other club teams as weaker players replace them.

Express North has always been a mess at 2023. Eclipse made the tough but correct move a couple of years ago to discontinue its 2023 A team and stick with a single 2023 team. The team stayed together for a couple of years and got much stronger. Now with the team nationally ranked reclasses are going to that team making it even stronger. So strong that the new A team is as strong as some 2023 AA teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why is that? Why do people leave Express N (players and coaches)?

Totally varies by age group. Certain classes are solid with good continuity-- they are the better teams in terms wins/losses. Other classes have a lot of turnover, which is a reflection and cause of weaker teams, ex: 2023 team. When you lose, rotate players in/out every year, you will keep losing as best players jump to other club teams as weaker players replace them.

Express North has always been a mess at 2023. Eclipse made the tough but correct move a couple of years ago to discontinue its 2023 A team and stick with a single 2023 team. The team stayed together for a couple of years and got much stronger. Now with the team nationally ranked reclasses are going to that team making it even stronger. So strong that the new A team is as strong as some 2023 AA teams.

Just curious why we're talking Sophomores on youth thread?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It’s the only thread for Westchester/CT.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It’s the only thread for Westchester/CT.

I totally agree with your statement; this thread shouldn't be limited to Youth and it should encompass all Hudson Valley lax (Boys/Girls youth and HS) matters.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It’s the only thread for Westchester/CT.

I totally agree with your statement; this thread shouldn't be limited to Youth and it should encompass all Hudson Valley lax (Boys/Girls youth and HS) matters.

High School and Youth are not so different. I think we can handle both on this thread.....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It’s the only thread for Westchester/CT.

I totally agree with your statement; this thread shouldn't be limited to Youth and it should encompass all Hudson Valley lax (Boys/Girls youth and HS) matters.

High School and Youth are not so different. I think we can handle both on this thread.....
Fair point. Lead on!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It’s the only thread for Westchester/CT.

I totally agree with your statement; this thread shouldn't be limited to Youth and it should encompass all Hudson Valley lax (Boys/Girls youth and HS) matters.

High School and Youth are not so different. I think we can handle both on this thread.....
Fair point. Lead on!

And leading on we shall. Did anyone see what happened today at lax nationals in Md. Oh how the mighty have fallen. I know people will say some kids couldn't make it, covid, they are at prep schiools, blah blah blah. REGARDLESS, Connecticut and NY in the 2022 went 0-6!! and in the 2023 went 1-5. This is what happens with NO TRYOUTS and COACHES who HANDPICK THEIR OWN PLAYERS. Embarrassing! something needs to change with the selection of these teams (and UA). Look at the majority of the rosters and they are all NLF teams to begin with or the coaches picks. This was supposedly to be an "open team" where NLF affiliation didn't matter.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The Lax Nationals are a joke. It is run/overseen by the NLF. It was done to try to replace the UA AA games so they can control it.


Each Region is run by an NLF program. You can see it clearly on their website. I think the signups for tryouts in most regions were very low and why most tryouts were canceled. Several of the teams had 16-18 player rosters. That is SO low. Also multiple regions that were supposed to have teams were not able to field them. This also costs a lot more $$ for each than UA.

From what I have seen, the UA games and talent are much more competitive and independent (though UA is not perfect).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It’s the only thread for Westchester/CT.

I totally agree with your statement; this thread shouldn't be limited to Youth and it should encompass all Hudson Valley lax (Boys/Girls youth and HS) matters.

High School and Youth are not so different. I think we can handle both on this thread.....
Fair point. Lead on!

And leading on we shall. Did anyone see what happened today at lax nationals in Md. Oh how the mighty have fallen. I know people will say some kids couldn't make it, covid, they are at prep schiools, blah blah blah. REGARDLESS, Connecticut and NY in the 2022 went 0-6!! and in the 2023 went 1-5. This is what happens with NO TRYOUTS and COACHES who HANDPICK THEIR OWN PLAYERS. Embarrassing! something needs to change with the selection of these teams (and UA). Look at the majority of the rosters and they are all NLF teams to begin with or the coaches picks. This was supposedly to be an "open team" where NLF affiliation didn't matter.

Agree. When you take the majority of players from a couple of teams like Primetime or Eclipse that's what happens. While these are obviously excellent teams with excellent players, other areas truly took from many local teams who have a individuals who are superior and is an actual all star team and not getting beaten handily. Lets see if they can win a game today.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It’s the only thread for Westchester/CT.

I totally agree with your statement; this thread shouldn't be limited to Youth and it should encompass all Hudson Valley lax (Boys/Girls youth and HS) matters.

High School and Youth are not so different. I think we can handle both on this thread.....
Fair point. Lead on!

And leading on we shall. Did anyone see what happened today at lax nationals in Md. Oh how the mighty have fallen. I know people will say some kids couldn't make it, covid, they are at prep schiools, blah blah blah. REGARDLESS, Connecticut and NY in the 2022 went 0-6!! and in the 2023 went 1-5. This is what happens with NO TRYOUTS and COACHES who HANDPICK THEIR OWN PLAYERS. Embarrassing! something needs to change with the selection of these teams (and UA). Look at the majority of the rosters and they are all NLF teams to begin with or the coaches picks. This was supposedly to be an "open team" where NLF affiliation didn't matter.

Agree. When you take the majority of players from a couple of teams like Primetime or Eclipse that's what happens. While these are obviously excellent teams with excellent players, other areas truly took from many local teams who have a individuals who are superior and is an actual all star team and not getting beaten handily. Lets see if they can win a game today.

In fairness to Eclipse and Primetime, COVID impacted the tryouts so it was not entirely possible to make it work. I think coaches from Eclipse ran all the teams so it was just easier to take their kids. Maybe next year it will work out better (maybe not....)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
A month and half without any chatter!

I got the news yesterday that the annual gobbler games (at SUNY Purchase) has been canceled, which stinks.

Fall ball is just about wrapped up.

On to box lacrosse!
I think Superstar lacrosse is the only program in the area that is not an in-house program.
Team 91 Tristate offers box training and 2Way does the same, with an in-house competition.

Is there any other box programs?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Not any others. SuperStar has best players but not the best coaching.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not any others. SuperStar has best players but not the best coaching.

I disagree! I'm not a fan of RC, but he is an excellent coach when he doesn't have one of his sons on the team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
To be fair you are right on the RC statement or if your son doesn't play attack.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
When did Pace U become the catch all for Yorktown lacrosse players? Used to send kids to Hopkins and 'Cuse now Pace and Marist? Lacrosse evolving and growing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
A few years ago. Especially with uncertainty these days due to covid many kids staying very close to home. Also cost less the 'Cuse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When did Pace U become the catch all for Yorktown lacrosse players? Used to send kids to Hopkins and 'Cuse now Pace and Marist? Lacrosse evolving and growing.

Y and Lakeland players have been attending and playing at Pace for a while. The draw to Pace started with Coach V (if you need to ask who is V, go back to Baseball) in the mid 90's and since Coach Mariano took over in 2014.

Also, Pace is a respected school in the metropolitan area and Marist is DI.

Y continues to send players to the top ten schools; unfortunately, Cuse and Hop haven't been what they use to be and that is a whole other topic.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When did Pace U become the catch all for Yorktown lacrosse players? Used to send kids to Hopkins and 'Cuse now Pace and Marist? Lacrosse evolving and growing.

Y and Lakeland players have been attending and playing at Pace for a while. The draw to Pace started with Coach V (if you need to ask who is V, go back to Baseball) in the mid 90's and since Coach Mariano took over in 2014.

Also, Pace is a respected school in the metropolitan area and Marist is DI.

Y continues to send players to the top ten schools; unfortunately, Cuse and Hop haven't been what they use to be and that is a whole other topic.

Let’s be honest here, Y has been falling off as of late. They do not send their kids to top D1 schools anymore, besides Boyer. Lacrosse around the country has become bigger and better, and the Y hasn’t kept up. I think they are living off their laurels, and not producing the top lax players from years past. Class of 2020 (3 recruits) class of 2021(4 recruits) class of 2022 (2 recruits)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
what do you attribute the drop off to? its not just yorktown- John jay is struggling with numbers from high school to youth
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do you attribute the drop off to? its not just yorktown- John jay is struggling with numbers from high school to youth

John Jay I think is attributed to the fact that the head coach likes a short bench and players want to play. Also, a lot of the team historically was Primetime as youth players who eventually got cut as late middle school and HS players so they stopped playing. The Assistant coach is PT head. Look at the make up of PT youth versus the PT HS teams. PT youth has many John Jay kids versus a few on the HS travel teams. Unfortuately many of these boys look at PT as the only team worth playing as they get older since they played with them at the younger age and stop playing. This has been happening for a few years now.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When did Pace U become the catch all for Yorktown lacrosse players? Used to send kids to Hopkins and 'Cuse now Pace and Marist? Lacrosse evolving and growing.

Y and Lakeland players have been attending and playing at Pace for a while. The draw to Pace started with Coach V (if you need to ask who is V, go back to Baseball) in the mid 90's and since Coach Mariano took over in 2014.

Also, Pace is a respected school in the metropolitan area and Marist is DI.

Y continues to send players to the top ten schools; unfortunately, Cuse and Hop haven't been what they use to be and that is a whole other topic.

Let’s be honest here, Y has been falling off as of late. They do not send their kids to top D1 schools anymore, besides Boyer. Lacrosse around the country has become bigger and better, and the Y hasn’t kept up. I think they are living off their laurels, and not producing the top lax players from years past. Class of 2020 (3 recruits) class of 2021(4 recruits) class of 2022 (2 recruits)


Let's stay focused on the purpose of this thread; it was about Pace being a landing spot for Y players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do you attribute the drop off to? its not just yorktown- John jay is struggling with numbers from high school to youth

John Jay I think is attributed to the fact that the head coach likes a short bench and players want to play. Also, a lot of the team historically was Primetime as youth players who eventually got cut as late middle school and HS players so they stopped playing. The Assistant coach is PT head. Look at the make up of PT youth versus the PT HS teams. PT youth has many John Jay kids versus a few on the HS travel teams. Unfortunately many of these boys look at PT as the only team worth playing as they get older since they played with them at the younger age and stop playing. This has been happening for a few years now.

Y's drop off, is still leading the Section and I agree that Y is no longer what it use to be. But the Y program has set the bar high and continues to be the dominate program within the section (and I'm not from Y).
I have posted before that the Y alumni are not happy and that there has been a signature win in a long time. The slow decline from the top is unavoidable.

J is just Y's younger brother that always wants to overcome it's sibling, especially since the J head coach is a Y (and Section I) legend. Also, I have heard from one J alumni that youth level has diminished due to the lack of lax experienced people/coaches moving into the school district. The housing market in that area is a huge hurdle for some to return.

PT - is an exceptional program! I have first hand experience, as my son WAS on the 2026 team. Brian Smith is a great HC and Nick is extremely organized.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do you attribute the drop off to? its not just yorktown- John jay is struggling with numbers from high school to youth

John Jay I think is attributed to the fact that the head coach likes a short bench and players want to play. Also, a lot of the team historically was Primetime as youth players who eventually got cut as late middle school and HS players so they stopped playing. The Assistant coach is PT head. Look at the make up of PT youth versus the PT HS teams. PT youth has many John Jay kids versus a few on the HS travel teams. Unfortuately many of these boys look at PT as the only team worth playing as they get older since they played with them at the younger age and stop playing. This has been happening for a few years now.

Westchester families need to know that the Predators are now TOP travel lacrosse program in the area. Get off the PT train and come to top class program, run by former Yorktown greats. Most of the teams coaches are HS coaches and educators. They build the program organically and love to develop their players, not cut them for bigger and better holdbacks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do you attribute the drop off to? its not just yorktown- John jay is struggling with numbers from high school to youth

John Jay I think is attributed to the fact that the head coach likes a short bench and players want to play. Also, a lot of the team historically was Primetime as youth players who eventually got cut as late middle school and HS players so they stopped playing. The Assistant coach is PT head. Look at the make up of PT youth versus the PT HS teams. PT youth has many John Jay kids versus a few on the HS travel teams. Unfortunately many of these boys look at PT as the only team worth playing as they get older since they played with them at the younger age and stop playing. This has been happening for a few years now.

Y's drop off, is still leading the Section and I agree that Y is no longer what it use to be. But the Y program has set the bar high and continues to be the dominate program within the section (and I'm not from Y).
I have posted before that the Y alumni are not happy and that there has been a signature win in a long time. The slow decline from the top is unavoidable.

J is just Y's younger brother that always wants to overcome it's sibling, especially since the J head coach is a Y (and Section I) legend. Also, I have heard from one J alumni that youth level has diminished due to the lack of lax experienced people/coaches moving into the school district. The housing market in that area is a huge hurdle for some to return.

PT - is an exceptional program! I have first hand experience, as my son WAS on the 2026 team. Brian Smith is a great HC and Nick is extremely organized.

Ytown is not leading the Section anymore and that's a sad development for all lacrosse fans. They should've won the last few Section finals. Is the varsity coaching job even settled? Seems like they could use a fresh perspective. I think we can expect to see more Y kids heading to Pace.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do you attribute the drop off to? its not just yorktown- John jay is struggling with numbers from high school to youth

John Jay I think is attributed to the fact that the head coach likes a short bench and players want to play. Also, a lot of the team historically was Primetime as youth players who eventually got cut as late middle school and HS players so they stopped playing. The Assistant coach is PT head. Look at the make up of PT youth versus the PT HS teams. PT youth has many John Jay kids versus a few on the HS travel teams. Unfortuately many of these boys look at PT as the only team worth playing as they get older since they played with them at the younger age and stop playing. This has been happening for a few years now.

Westchester families need to know that the Predators are now TOP travel lacrosse program in the area. Get off the PT train and come to top class program, run by former Yorktown greats. Most of the teams coaches are HS coaches and educators. They build the program organically and love to develop their players, not cut them for bigger and better holdbacks.
Is that why Colsey never came over to Predators?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do you attribute the drop off to? its not just yorktown- John jay is struggling with numbers from high school to youth

John Jay I think is attributed to the fact that the head coach likes a short bench and players want to play. Also, a lot of the team historically was Primetime as youth players who eventually got cut as late middle school and HS players so they stopped playing. The Assistant coach is PT head. Look at the make up of PT youth versus the PT HS teams. PT youth has many John Jay kids versus a few on the HS travel teams. Unfortuately many of these boys look at PT as the only team worth playing as they get older since they played with them at the younger age and stop playing. This has been happening for a few years now.

Westchester families need to know that the Predators are now TOP travel lacrosse program in the area. Get off the PT train and come to top class program, run by former Yorktown greats. Most of the teams coaches are HS coaches and educators. They build the program organically and love to develop their players, not cut them for bigger and better holdbacks.
Is that why Colsey never came over to Predators?

I thought Colsey did time with PT and Pred, prior to Eclipse?

holdbacks/reclassified players are and will always be part of every program. Unless, USL and NLF decides it's an aged based system, which will never happen.

Also, I thought LIE North was the only program that does not build/develop players "organically". LIE N seems to cut players, coaches or a whole team, in the blink of an eye, if not producing WINS or parents are unhappy with the coaches decisions.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do you attribute the drop off to? its not just yorktown- John jay is struggling with numbers from high school to youth

John Jay I think is attributed to the fact that the head coach likes a short bench and players want to play. Also, a lot of the team historically was Primetime as youth players who eventually got cut as late middle school and HS players so they stopped playing. The Assistant coach is PT head. Look at the make up of PT youth versus the PT HS teams. PT youth has many John Jay kids versus a few on the HS travel teams. Unfortuately many of these boys look at PT as the only team worth playing as they get older since they played with them at the younger age and stop playing. This has been happening for a few years now.

Westchester families need to know that the Predators are now TOP travel lacrosse program in the area. Get off the PT train and come to top class program, run by former Yorktown greats. Most of the teams coaches are HS coaches and educators. They build the program organically and love to develop their players, not cut them for bigger and better holdbacks.
This has to be one of the most delusional posts EVER on BOTC. By all important metrics; practices, training, tournaments, play days,coaching quality, communications, connections, etc, etc, etc Pred is the worst program around. They play the least, have the worst coaching, least contacts and branding. I bit on the post because lets be clear, if you’re not a Rye mommy or BXV daddy Pred are a JOKE! 2023 maybe but look below and they dont hold up against the basic local offerings. And yes, 100% a disgruntled former Preds parent. AWFUL experience. Ask any of the 2024, 2025 and 2026 parents if they like their coaches. Pay for the magnet.......if you get it. PT, Eclipse, EN for me and mine! Oh and 2wsy if you are in to the Prep school thing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Laughable that anyone would say Preds isn't filled with holdbacks. My son, who plays for Prime Time, has a bunch of friends on Preds - same year - every single one of them is a holdback at Brunswick. One of them is literally the oldest kid in the grade at Brunswick which is saying something. Anyone can say anything on this forum I guess, but it doesn't make it true.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Laughable that anyone would say Preds isn't filled with holdbacks. My son, who plays for Prime Time, has a bunch of friends on Preds - same year - every single one of them is a holdback at Brunswick. One of them is literally the oldest kid in the grade at Brunswick which is saying something. Anyone can say anything on this forum I guess, but it doesn't make it true.

This thread started with Ytown demise and ran into holdbacks at Brunswick. That is truly the main issue facing the Westchester lacrosse scene: the rise of preps. Every single public HS coach keeps fingers crossed his best players stay in his program but the formula of players transferring to a holdback prep year dominates the lax recruiting landscape right now. 95% of top recruits are holdbacks according to Inside Lacrosse's own lists.

Whichever clubs have the most preps will have the most holdbacks (2Way leads by far). I think PT and Preds still have way more public HS players than private. Compared to MD or Mass clubs where Id guess the vast, vast majority of players are holdbacks, Westchester still plays it straight.

Ytown and JJ were always more immune from the prep invasion than schools like Rye, New Canaan, Greenwich or Mamaroneck. I think the decline in spotlight talent for upper Westchester is tied to weaker youth programs and local preps getting more attention. If those rich lower Westchester towns didn't lose so many to preps each year, the balance of power would have flipped years ago.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This board is starting to devolve/rival the MD boards. Congrats?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This board is starting to devolve/rival the MD boards. Congrats?

I guess you spend a lot of time here then, to know what a MD board looks/sounds like. Lol
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Westchester families need to know that the Predators are now TOP travel lacrosse program in the area. Get off the PT train and come to top class program, run by former Yorktown greats. Most of the teams coaches are HS coaches and educators. They build the program organically and love to develop their players, not cut them for bigger and better holdbacks.[/quote]


Preds 2023 lost in OT to Express North 2023 B team on Nov. 8th at SUNY Purchase. Fact.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Westchester families need to know that the Predators are now TOP travel lacrosse program in the area. Get off the PT train and come to top class program, run by former Yorktown greats. Most of the teams coaches are HS coaches and educators. They build the program organically and love to develop their players, not cut them for bigger and better holdbacks.


Preds 2023 lost in OT to Express North 2023 B team on Nov. 8th at SUNY Purchase. Fact.[/quote]

which team? They have 2 teams. an A team and a B (black) team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Westchester families need to know that the Predators are now TOP travel lacrosse program in the area. Get off the PT train and come to top class program, run by former Yorktown greats. Most of the teams coaches are HS coaches and educators. They build the program organically and love to develop their players, not cut them for bigger and better holdbacks.


Preds 2023 lost in OT to Express North 2023 B team on Nov. 8th at SUNY Purchase. Fact.

which team? They have 2 teams. an A team and a B (black) team[/quote]

Predator's has two teams for the 2023 Class?
I know 2W has two teams per class on the lower levels and they call their B teams (Black), so are you confusing the two programs?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
While people in this forum have talked about the decline Y and to get a bit of perspective on Y, i recent found the following article in the NYT from 1981 about lax in Westchester:

LACROSSE BOOMING AT HIGH SCHOOLS https://www.nytimes.com/1981/04/26/nyre ... ools.html (https://www.nytimes.com/1981/04/26/nyregion/lacrosse-booming-at-high-schools.html)

Several interesting points are mentioned, but Y's competition in 1981 was Mamaroneck, Greeley WP, Fox Lane and Croton. None of these programs have reached the level of Y and they all have been around since the formation of Westchester lax.

Lets give Y the respect they deserve in setting the bar and maintaining a consistent program over 50 years!

FYI, the article was found in the reinvented laxpower forums. Also, i'm not from Y, but I've been involved in Westchester lax since 1984 and i know Y remains the top program in section 1.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Westchester families need to know that the Predators are now TOP travel lacrosse program in the area. Get off the PT train and come to top class program, run by former Yorktown greats. Most of the teams coaches are HS coaches and educators. They build the program organically and love to develop their players, not cut them for bigger and better holdbacks.


Preds 2023 lost in OT to Express North 2023 B team on Nov. 8th at SUNY Purchase. Fact.

which team? They have 2 teams. an A team and a B (black) team[/quote]
Preds develop players?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what do you attribute the drop off to? its not just yorktown- John jay is struggling with numbers from high school to youth

John Jay I think is attributed to the fact that the head coach likes a short bench and players want to play. Also, a lot of the team historically was Primetime as youth players who eventually got cut as late middle school and HS players so they stopped playing. The Assistant coach is PT head. Look at the make up of PT youth versus the PT HS teams. PT youth has many John Jay kids versus a few on the HS travel teams. Unfortuately many of these boys look at PT as the only team worth playing as they get older since they played with them at the younger age and stop playing. This has been happening for a few years now.

Westchester families need to know that the Predators are now TOP travel lacrosse program in the area. Get off the PT train and come to top class program, run by former Yorktown greats. Most of the teams coaches are HS coaches and educators. They build the program organically and love to develop their players, not cut them for bigger and better holdbacks.

Not a Preds parent but friends complain that one of the biggest challenges they have with Preds is that all the organizers and coaches have professional careers and have lacrosse coaching around 5th on their to do list (well behind playing golf and far behind being pompous buttheade$.) Developing players doesn't even make the list.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Predators have two 2023 teams. The second one is called 2023 Black. The first one does not have any unique name other than 2023. The Black team is a good competitive team. Just does not compete at the level that the 2023 team does.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Predators have two 2023 teams. The second one is called 2023 Black. The first one does not have any unique name other than 2023. The Black team is a good competitive team. Just does not compete at the level that the 2023 team does.

Very interesting that 2W also utilizes the "Black" for the second level team. Their top tier teams in four grades are called "Carolina".

Does anyone want to make a bet that they change the name from "black" to something else due to the racial injustice movement?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My son has been on PrimeTime for a number of years. What I like is that they have only one team at each grade level and the organization is fully committed to those players. The program director knows each player and family. There is no money grab secondary team distractions like many other programs. Yes, rosters are more fluid at the younger grades, but stabilize at the high school level with few roster changes in those years. It is much harder to crack the roster at the HS level.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son has been on PrimeTime for a number of years. What I like is that they have only one team at each grade level and the organization is fully committed to those players. The program director knows each player and family. There is no money grab secondary team distractions like many other programs. Yes, rosters are more fluid at the younger grades, but stabilize at the high school level with few roster changes in those years. It is much harder to crack the roster at the HS level.

I agree. 1 team keeps things cleaner, higher end, and better for organization focus. B teams can make kids feel like they are minor leaguers, they are no fools. But I think by high school age, the B team players are really playing because they love the sport and want to play more rather than only playing in their HS spring season. Or, in covid, B team play is the only way they get to play at all.

2Way started B teams because their popularity grew so much. I think Preds was gonna fold their 2023 B team but the players rallied to keep it going. Express North B team does well on numbers. i don't think any of those clubs feel having B teams hurts them but it does likely add a layer of work and complication but easily outweighed by some money and kids content to rep the team colors everywhere.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son has been on PrimeTime for a number of years. What I like is that they have only one team at each grade level and the organization is fully committed to those players. The program director knows each player and family. There is no money grab secondary team distractions like many other programs. Yes, rosters are more fluid at the younger grades, but stabilize at the high school level with few roster changes in those years. It is much harder to crack the roster at the HS level.
Couldn't agree more. My son was on PT from the fourth grade through graduation and he absolutely loved it. My experience was that it was as well run an organization you could ask for and the coaching was top notch.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2Way Black is the AA team as Carolina is the A team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
While people in this forum have talked about the decline Y and to get a bit of perspective on Y, i recent found the following article in the NYT from 1981 about lax in Westchester:

LACROSSE BOOMING AT HIGH SCHOOLS https://www.nytimes.com/1981/04/26/nyre ... ools.html (https://www.nytimes.com/1981/04/26/nyregion/lacrosse-booming-at-high-schools.html)

Several interesting points are mentioned, but Y's competition in 1981 was Mamaroneck, Greeley WP, Fox Lane and Croton. None of these programs have reached the level of Y and they all have been around since the formation of Westchester lax.

Lets give Y the respect they deserve in setting the bar and maintaining a consistent program over 50 years!

FYI, the article was found in the reinvented laxpower forums. Also, i'm not from Y, but I've been involved in Westchester lax since 1984 and i know Y remains the top program in section 1.

You might be a little out of touch with current reality. Ytown has lost its leadership and along with it, its enviable team play and superiority. Once its gone, very hard to get back.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Stop with the nonsense of Yorktown being so great. Reality is that last year they were worse than John Jay, Mamaroneck, and Rye. In the future, Rye, Mamaroneck and even teams like Bronxville will be better, with more young talent than Yorktown.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Why all the Y bashing? How about we give them credit for running a youth program that a lot of towns have modeled. Yorktown is mostly a blue collar town and parents do not have the resources to have their kids play on an elite travel team, The sport has evolved greatly since the 80,s and 90,s.
Kids these days are much better athletes. There was no such thing as speed and agility training back then. There is no doubt that other programs have caught up and possibly over taken Yorktown, but 1 or 2 mediocre seasons cannot take away years of success.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Stop with the nonsense of Yorktown being so great. Reality is that last year they were worse than John Jay, Mamaroneck, and Rye. In the future, Rye, Mamaroneck and even teams like Bronxville will be better, with more young talent than Yorktown.
Yorktown has had the better players but has been out coached in recent years. Watch the last two Section finals, especially the most recent or just ask the JJ coaches, they will tell you. I am a long time Yorktown resident.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Stop with the nonsense of Yorktown being so great. Reality is that last year they were worse than John Jay, Mamaroneck, and Rye. In the future, Rye, Mamaroneck and even teams like Bronxville will be better, with more young talent than Yorktown.
Yorktown has had the better players but has been out coached in recent years. Watch the last two Section finals, especially the most recent or just ask the JJ coaches, they will tell you. I am a long time Yorktown resident.

I agree with this sentiment and Rye and Mamaroneck should be dominant this year. The traditional powerhouses just don't have the same talent anymore. I cant speak for Yorktown but if you look at John Jay for years they were sending 5-10 kids a year to D1 and top D2 and D3 programs yearly. Last year they had one D1 commit and this year they have a one D1 commit as well. The 2022 class has zero commits to date. Eventually I am sure they will have a commit or two but the bottom line is in years past they has many players go on to top schools. Maybe its a temporary blip but times are a changing and the traditional powerhouses will be relying more on coaching if they don't have the talent..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Just a quick reminder, John Jay was in The state finals last lacrosse season and Yorktown beat Mamaroneck approx 9-6.
Lots more parity in the section but why the all or nothing comments
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown beat Rye that same season 8-4 and lost to JJ 7-6 after hitting 5 posts in the 2nd half of the sectional final
Important to keep some perspective
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just a quick reminder, John Jay was in The state finals last lacrosse season and Yorktown beat Mamaroneck approx 9-6.
Lots more parity in the section but why the all or nothing comments

Agreed. For Yorktown to even play and beat these teams in competitive games may be doom and gloom for Ytown but until south westchester actually win a game, it's forum talk.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Any good clinics for over the break? For a 2024 pole?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any good clinics for over the break? For a 2024 pole?

you should follow Ric Beardsley on Instagram. Hi is having at least two next week abd im sure they are both sold out.

He often comes back to the area and conducts long pole clinics
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Anyone have info on last night's Zoom meeting regarding the HV Youth League?

The league is finally considering in making changes and becoming a more structured league with standings and playoffs.

The league has been organized and led by John Hemsley, he does a great job too. But, with the new competitive youth league forming out of SUNY Purchase ($3k per team) and the 800 lb gorilla next door (CONNY), it seems that John is now pressured to make changes.

The elite and affluent programs will excel and the rest will be playing catch-up.

Good Luck John H
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have info on last night's Zoom meeting regarding the HV Youth League?

The league is finally considering in making changes and becoming a more structured league with standings and playoffs.

The league has been organized and led by John Hemsley, he does a great job too. But, with the new competitive youth league forming out of SUNY Purchase ($3k per team) and the 800 lb gorilla next door (CONNY), it seems that John is now pressured to make changes.

The elite and affluent programs will excel and the rest will be playing catch-up.

Good Luck John H

Hwy doesn't the HV League join CONNY? It is a really easy, mellow league to be apart of.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Anyone thought about spring rankings for Westchester schools, private and public? Always fun to see drama with rankings. Curious to see how young talent will effect schools two years after we got a good luck at the teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How do you rank when no one has even had a practice yet? most "normal" years you can look at returning players for some estimates... This year's seniors last played HS school lax as Sophomores. Most current sophomores have never played in a HS game and a good portion of them haven't held a stick in almost a year even at the club level, some in almost 2. Winter league lax was devoid of most football and basketball players...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How do you rank when no one has even had a practice yet? most "normal" years you can look at returning players for some estimates... This year's seniors last played HS school lax as Sophomores. Most current sophomores have never played in a HS game and a good portion of them haven't held a stick in almost a year even at the club level, some in almost 2. Winter league lax was devoid of most football and basketball players...

I do disagree with your statement that players haven't held a stick in almost a year (or 2). Club lacrosse did not shutdown in 2020.

While I do acknowledge that not all lax players play club ball, but, at least 25% of all section 1 lax players play club ball. Some communities it would be as high as 50% of the team that plays club lax.
I've seen Pelham, Larchmont and Briarcliff playing in a thriving winter HS league in Chelsea piers (CT). Briarcliff looks stacked too!

Also, I'm sure that the traditional programs like JJ, Lakeland, Somers, Mahopac and Yorktown are conducting winter practices.

I'm guessing that your son does play, but you guys are not from a lax town.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How do you rank when no one has even had a practice yet? most "normal" years you can look at returning players for some estimates... This year's seniors last played HS school lax as Sophomores. Most current sophomores have never played in a HS game and a good portion of them haven't held a stick in almost a year even at the club level, some in almost 2. Winter league lax was devoid of most football and basketball players...

I do disagree with your statement that players haven't held a stick in almost a year (or 2). Club lacrosse did not shutdown in 2020.

While I do acknowledge that not all lax players play club ball, but, at least 25% of all section 1 lax players play club ball. Some communities it would be as high as 50% of the team that plays club lax.
I've seen Pelham, Larchmont and Briarcliff playing in a thriving winter HS league in Chelsea piers (CT). Briarcliff looks stacked too!

Also, I'm sure that the traditional programs like JJ, Lakeland, Somers, Mahopac and Yorktown are conducting winter practices.

I'm guessing that your son does play, but you guys are not from a lax town.



"I do disagree with your statement that players haven't held a stick in almost a year (or 2). Club lacrosse did not shutdown in 2020."
"at least 25% of all section 1 lax players play club ball. Some communities it would be as high as 50% of the team that plays club lax."

Re-Read.... especially the part that says "***a good portion***" 50%-75% by your own estimate is "a good portion"
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How do you rank when no one has even had a practice yet? most "normal" years you can look at returning players for some estimates... This year's seniors last played HS school lax as Sophomores. Most current sophomores have never played in a HS game and a good portion of them haven't held a stick in almost a year even at the club level, some in almost 2. Winter league lax was devoid of most football and basketball players...

I do disagree with your statement that players haven't held a stick in almost a year (or 2). Club lacrosse did not shutdown in 2020.

While I do acknowledge that not all lax players play club ball, but, at least 25% of all section 1 lax players play club ball. Some communities it would be as high as 50% of the team that plays club lax.
I've seen Pelham, Larchmont and Briarcliff playing in a thriving winter HS league in Chelsea piers (CT). Briarcliff looks stacked too!

Also, I'm sure that the traditional programs like JJ, Lakeland, Somers, Mahopac and Yorktown are conducting winter practices.

I'm guessing that your son does play, but you guys are not from a lax town.



"I do disagree with your statement that players haven't held a stick in almost a year (or 2). Club lacrosse did not shutdown in 2020."
"at least 25% of all section 1 lax players play club ball. Some communities it would be as high as 50% of the team that plays club lax."

Re-Read.... especially the part that says "***a good portion***" 50%-75% by your own estimate is "a good portion"


Fair point and I should have analyzed every word.

But seriously, you are not from a lax town. Because your point was how to rank the programs when teams (like your son's) haven't done much.

Well, the tradition rich programs haven't missed a beat and they will remain top dogs and then the majority of programs will be below them.

Doesn't really matter this year anyway, especially since their is no state playoffs. I'm guessing that each team will get 8-10 games and the power teams will all play each other.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How do you rank when no one has even had a practice yet? most "normal" years you can look at returning players for some estimates... This year's seniors last played HS school lax as Sophomores. Most current sophomores have never played in a HS game and a good portion of them haven't held a stick in almost a year even at the club level, some in almost 2. Winter league lax was devoid of most football and basketball players...

I do disagree with your statement that players haven't held a stick in almost a year (or 2). Club lacrosse did not shutdown in 2020.

While I do acknowledge that not all lax players play club ball, but, at least 25% of all section 1 lax players play club ball. Some communities it would be as high as 50% of the team that plays club lax.
I've seen Pelham, Larchmont and Briarcliff playing in a thriving winter HS league in Chelsea piers (CT). Briarcliff looks stacked too!

Also, I'm sure that the traditional programs like JJ, Lakeland, Somers, Mahopac and Yorktown are conducting winter practices.

I'm guessing that your son does play, but you guys are not from a lax town.



"I do disagree with your statement that players haven't held a stick in almost a year (or 2). Club lacrosse did not shutdown in 2020."
"at least 25% of all section 1 lax players play club ball. Some communities it would be as high as 50% of the team that plays club lax."

Re-Read.... especially the part that says "***a good portion***" 50%-75% by your own estimate is "a good portion"


Fair point and I should have analyzed every word.

But seriously, you are not from a lax town. Because your point was how to rank the programs when teams (like your son's) haven't done much.

Well, the tradition rich programs haven't missed a beat and they will remain top dogs and then the majority of programs will be below them.

Doesn't really matter this year anyway, especially since their is no state playoffs. I'm guessing that each team will get 8-10 games and the power teams will all play each other.


My son and his HS team did play at Chelsea Pier CT for the winter league, although his HS wasn't one you mentioned above. The talent that you saw at CPCT does not reflect the true team compositions as many high level Football and Basketball players did not compete in the CP winter league so how can you get a good idea of ranking?
also.. parents were barred from the fieldhouse level at CP so most have no idea how "thriving & stacked" teams looked.
- Agreed that the top 25-50% of kids are fully involved with travel and winter teams... but, especially with travel, the HS teams are disperse across multiple A level programs... my son and his HS classmates (same grade) play for any one of the several Express North, Prime Time, Preds, etc teams... so it's tough to get a good read on say Bronxville HS when their top 10 player are separately on 6 different travel teams.. you'd be shocked at how good our town program is... guaranteed that if we played your town, we won almost every time.... of course we might play for the same "town"
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
HS schedules are available on BOCES website, but not all games are posted yet.

Y is in a league with Arlington, Pac, Carmel and Wappingers. They Also play JJ and the red head step child. I expect Y to go undefeated.

B'cliff has 4 games posted and the last game is against B'ville; that should be a good game to watch.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown will not go undefeated this year before playoffs. Already have scheduled games against JJ, Rye, and Bronxville. Good team but will not beat all 3 of those teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
just be happy the kids will get to play this year!! who cares what the record is
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown will not go undefeated this year before playoffs. Already have scheduled games against JJ, Rye, and Bronxville. Good team but will not beat all 3 of those teams.

seems like all the top teams from A-D will play one another. Only glaring missing game is Ytown vs Mamo. that would have been a good one to see.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Anyone know how the Westchester players did at Nike Nationals up in Albany ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone know how the Westchester players did at Nike Nationals up in Albany ?

Unfortunately, no way to know until rosters came out bc I believe some of the top kids could not make it bc of prep school and inability to leave but I am speculating.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone know how the Westchester players did at Nike Nationals up in Albany ?

Unfortunately, no way to know until rosters came out bc I believe some of the top kids could not make it bc of prep school and inability to leave but I am speculating.

I hope this is the reason for the lackluster play. Seemed to be average play at best and the elite boys in the age group didn't seem to be present. As yes I am saying this as the mother of a good but not elite lacrosse player who tried out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Like all those things, it has tons of behind-the-scenes politics. 1- whoever coaches the teams pulls in their guys and guys from their region, 2- connected HS coaches influence decision, 3- at this age, reputation starts to matter so guys chosen based on name. Half this team they end up choosing wont have attended evals.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone know how the Westchester players did at Nike Nationals up in Albany ?

Unfortunately, no way to know until rosters came out bc I believe some of the top kids could not make it bc of prep school and inability to leave but I am speculating.

I hope this is the reason for the lackluster play. Seemed to be average play at best and the elite boys in the age group didn't seem to be present. As yes I am saying this as the mother of a good but not elite lacrosse player who tried out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Like all those things, it has tons of behind-the-scenes politics. 1- whoever coaches the teams pulls in their guys and guys from their region, 2- connected HS coaches influence decision, 3- at this age, reputation starts to matter so guys chosen based on name. Half this team they end up choosing wont have attended evals.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone know how the Westchester players did at Nike Nationals up in Albany ?

Unfortunately, no way to know until rosters came out bc I believe some of the top kids could not make it bc of prep school and inability to leave but I am speculating.

I hope this is the reason for the lackluster play. Seemed to be average play at best and the elite boys in the age group didn't seem to be present. As yes I am saying this as the mother of a good but not elite lacrosse player who tried out.
Rosters anyone? Is it all Primetime?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
50% pt. Remember. If you live in ct. you could not tryout for ny. Rosters are on the website
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
50% pt. Remember. If you live in ct. you could not tryout for ny. Rosters are on the website

I thought this was exaggeration but the 2023 team has 11 PT members out of 22. and the 2024 team is 11/23.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
50% pt. Remember. If you live in ct. you could not tryout for ny. Rosters are on the website

I thought this was exaggeration but the 2023 team has 11 PT members out of 22. and the 2024 team is 11/23.
Is it a far reach though to say they have the majority of the best players in NY? Preds 3-4 kids per age group and Express North 3-4 per age group is probably the right regional breakdown.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I just looked at the roster and, boy, the 2022 team from NY is going to get SMOKED down in Baltimore. There are too many teams in LaxNationals. There should be 8-10 teams total.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I just looked at the roster and, boy, the 2022 team from NY is going to get SMOKED down in Baltimore. There are too many teams in LaxNationals. There should be 8-10 teams total.

Unfortunately, what you are seeing is probably going to be the case for most 2022's but especially NY. Many of the stars who have already committed play less lacrosse and want more personal summer time because as rising juniors they played all the time (even with COVID). Also I think it is what another poste noted -- the tryouts were pretty weak.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I just looked at the roster and, boy, the 2022 team from NY is going to get SMOKED down in Baltimore. There are too many teams in LaxNationals. There should be 8-10 teams total.

Unfortunately, what you are seeing is probably going to be the case for most 2022's but especially NY. Many of the stars who have already committed play less lacrosse and want more personal summer time because as rising juniors they played all the time (even with COVID). Also I think it is what another poste noted -- the tryouts were pretty weak.
It does show the hotbeds of lax are still LI and DMV. UA does it as CONNY. Does that make it more competitive? UA combines classes at 8th/9th.......more summer lax. NY should hope to pull Mid America to have a shot at a win.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Sorry, the 2022 NY and CT teams both got defeated this fall in LaxNationals too - it's nothing to do with committed kids playing less. There just isn't enough talent in these areas to field a great team. Granted it was a COVID year so the boarding schools couldn't make the event bc they weren't allowed to leave campus. If UA were run properly with better coaches it would still be the premier event of the summer, but Corrigan tries to make money out of it by not paying coaches. The girls' side does not have this problem.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
the only way these tryouts could ever possibly be fair or close to fair is if coaches from other regions picked the teams and even then , its questionable
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
the only way these tryouts could ever possibly be fair or close to fair is if coaches from other regions picked the teams and even then , its questionable
If it is about putting the best regional team on the field doesn't reputation and past performance (no indicator of future returns) factor in to the tryouts? At this point in the game, from 22-24, you know who the top players are. Will the CT team be all Eclipse and PT kids? Probably but arent those the best kids around?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
You folks are a funny!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
So...Yorktown loses its best player and JJs best player decides to sit out. What happens next?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
CT 24 team will probably be
8-10 Eclipse
3-4 EN
3-4 PrimeTime
3-4 2Way

Not much else
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Okay, let us now get some posts going on:
1. HS. Bville utterly destroyed JJ. Somers almost beat Pac. Pville racking up stats until they play tough comp. Pelham, Mamo, Scars all crushed weaker teams. Wish Ytown, Mmnk, Iona would play each other this season. How many underclassmen start at Stepinac?
2. How may HS are having modified seasons for 7/8? Seems better lax schools doing it but smaller or weaker schools skipping. Rich get richer. Can we change the name "modified" to anything else. Out of state family assume my kids are in special ed sports.
3. Does your town travel youth team have das coaches or hired guns?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Has JJ ever lost to Scarsdale before?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Okay, let us now get some posts going on:
1. HS. Bville utterly destroyed JJ. Somers almost beat Pac. Pville racking up stats until they play tough comp. Pelham, Mamo, Scars all crushed weaker teams. Wish Ytown, Mmnk, Iona would play each other this season. How many underclassmen start at Stepinac?
2. How may HS are having modified seasons for 7/8? Seems better lax schools doing it but smaller or weaker schools skipping. Rich get richer. Can we change the name "modified" to anything else. Out of state family assume my kids are in special ed sports.
3. Does your town travel youth team have das coaches or hired guns?


Two years ago i spoke with a Katonah lifer, who played in college and coaches both youth and club, that hardly anyone with lax experience and has the ability to coach, is moving into the area. As a result, he said that JJ HS will be on a downward cycle.

For the other teams you mentioned, B'ville, Pville, Pel, Mamo, Scar & Y, well they all play Briarcliff and I have said before, watch out for B'cliff. They may be the new power house that has stability.

I'm in a weaker school district and we have modified. The varsity level is BAD and it should consider folding the Varsity level in the coming years and just allow the modified level to develop. Since my son is on modified, i know that Carmel, Haldane and Pawling had to drop the modified teams this season.

I agree that the term "modified" is strange. I just refer to it as the Middle School team and my friends outside the area say that's cool that we have a middle school team.

Our Rec town program still relies upon volunteer parents to teach, which has directly led to the slow death of the HS team. However, the HV league is almost there in making all youth coaches be USL certified, which will help raise the level of player development in the weaker towns.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Okay, let us now get some posts going on:
1. HS. Bville utterly destroyed JJ. Somers almost beat Pac. Pville racking up stats until they play tough comp. Pelham, Mamo, Scars all crushed weaker teams. Wish Ytown, Mmnk, Iona would play each other this season. How many underclassmen start at Stepinac?
2. How may HS are having modified seasons for 7/8? Seems better lax schools doing it but smaller or weaker schools skipping. Rich get richer. Can we change the name "modified" to anything else. Out of state family assume my kids are in special ed sports.
3. Does your town travel youth team have das coaches or hired guns?

For the other teams you mentioned, B'ville, Pville, Pel, Mamo, Scar & Y, well they all play Briarcliff and I have said before, watch out for B'cliff. They may be the new power house that has stability.

Yup, Bcliff has a group of seniors an juniors who can really play. But then I think in future years will be in trouble with weaker pipeline. Byram also seems to be having consistent success across major sports and that means good athletes for lax too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Okay, let us now get some posts going on:
1. HS. Bville utterly destroyed JJ. Somers almost beat Pac. Pville racking up stats until they play tough comp. Pelham, Mamo, Scars all crushed weaker teams. Wish Ytown, Mmnk, Iona would play each other this season. How many underclassmen start at Stepinac?
2. How may HS are having modified seasons for 7/8? Seems better lax schools doing it but smaller or weaker schools skipping. Rich get richer. Can we change the name "modified" to anything else. Out of state family assume my kids are in special ed sports.
3. Does your town travel youth team have das coaches or hired guns?

For the other teams you mentioned, B'ville, Pville, Pel, Mamo, Scar & Y, well they all play Briarcliff and I have said before, watch out for B'cliff. They may be the new power house that has stability.

Yup, Bcliff has a group of seniors an juniors who can really play. But then I think in future years will be in trouble with weaker pipeline. Byram also seems to be having consistent success across major sports and that means good athletes for lax too.

Briarcliff v Yorktown May 21st 7:00 When the rubber meets the road.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Everyone always overhyping Yorktown. They are missing their best player and do not have the all around depth of these other teams, you will see very soon.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Everyone always overhyping Yorktown. They are missing their best player and do not have the all around depth of these other teams, you will see very soon.

Let's be fair, Y deserves the hype! They have established themselves a long time ago and the continue to be the program that produces high caliber players. Are they the powerhouse that they once were, NO.

I'm excited for their season to begin and it will be a great test for them. Their Rye game (5/17) should be the first true test, imo. After that game we should have enough to gage them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
To bad Ytown and Mamo are not playing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
To bad Ytown and Mamo are not playing.

You are RIGHT! But they both have the following 5 teams (Pac, Somers, Rye, B'cliff & Jay).

Y finishes with B'xville and that could be for unofficial Sect 1 bragging rights.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Not from Y, but have been a big fan of them since the 80's & 90's.

I went to the Y game and overheard that Y decided not to play Mamo this year, when it was their turn to go down county.

I checked my sources and Y last played Mamo 03/23/2019, at Y and won 9-7.

With all of this info, sure seems Y is avoiding Mamo. Could you have imagined the uproar if Y went down to Mamo and received a beating! Heads would roll IMO.

Maybe it is time for a change at Y
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I had heard the same...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It's time for Coach Carney to move on and let someone else raise the level.

Is Carney a school teacher in the district?

Marr will never come back, can't blame him or the school for getting rid of him years ago.

Who else would be candidates to take the helm?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
No one cares about Yorktown coach, but Briarcliff just beat Bronxville which is big deal. If there was a state tournament, winner of class d in the section wouldve likely won the state championship.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No one cares about Yorktown coach, but Briarcliff just beat Bronxville which is big deal. If there was a state tournament, winner of class d in the section wouldve likely won the state championship.


Having watched local lacrosse for about 15 years now (my youngest is graduating this year), I have 2 observations. (1) It is nice to see non-powerhouses becoming relevant and the "spreading of the wealth" is great for the game. However and maybe its just a down year but I don't feel the lacrosse does not looks very good this year and I feel the top teams of 3,4,5 years ago and especially older would absolutely destroy these top teams. I also feel this way about the top talent in general. it seemed like many more top D1 prospects were coming out of Westchester.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I agree with the last post that it's nice to see non-powerhouses becoming relevant!

Looking at Tuesday's scores:

I'm surprised that Fox Lane isn't more competitive. Only two goals scored against Y. What's going on in Bedford?

Mamo rocked L/P (17-3). It's looking like a good decision that Y ducked Mamo this year. How about the L/P's legacy names (Notico & Huf; two old school lax fathers) leading the way.

P'ville defeated JJ; is this the first time?

Rye knocked off B'cliff (15-14); the score does not reflect Rye's dominance at the faceoffs (25 out of 30). B'cliff is stewing over that loss.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I agree with the last post that it's nice to see non-powerhouses becoming relevant!

Looking at Tuesday's scores:

I'm surprised that Fox Lane isn't more competitive. Only two goals scored against Y. What's going on in Bedford?

Mamo rocked L/P (17-3). It's looking like a good decision that Y ducked Mamo this year. How about the L/P's legacy names (Notico & Huf; two old school lax fathers) leading the way.

P'ville defeated JJ; is this the first time?

Rye knocked off B'cliff (15-14); the score does not reflect Rye's dominance at the faceoffs (25 out of 30). B'cliff is stewing over that loss.

Agree as well. But also agree as to the talent level. I watched the Pleasantville/JJ game and it was like a JV game in terms of overall play. What has happened to local lacrosse?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
In regard to the level of play looking like a JV game, most 2021 players (seniors) last played as sophomores/JV.

Not every HS/program has a huge depth of club players. We are now witnessing the drop in level directly to the year off from lax. I coach a town U14 team in a non-traditional lax community and i was able to tell exactly who hasn't picked up a stick in 12+months when we started.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Most decent sophomores played varsity for the 2021 class, so they did have varsity experience. As for Y vs. Mamo, lohud rankings better put mamo up top, they would smoke Y this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Most decent sophomores played varsity for the 2021 class, so they did have varsity experience. As for Y vs. Mamo, lohud rankings better put mamo up top, they would smoke Y this year.

[ChillLaxin]. Until then, keep living off the fumes from the dirty LI sound.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Only two Boys HS marquee games on today's schedule:

Byram Hills @ JJ katonah

and

P'ville @ Somers

I believe BH and P'ville will succeed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Having watched local lacrosse for about 15 years now (my youngest is graduating this year), I have 2 observations. (1) It is nice to see non-powerhouses becoming relevant and the "spreading of the wealth" is great for the game. However and maybe its just a down year but I don't feel the lacrosse does not looks very good this year and I feel the top teams of 3,4,5 years ago and especially older would absolutely destroy these top teams. I also feel this way about the top talent in general. it seemed like many more top D1 prospects were coming out of Westchester.

I agree that 3-4 years ago there was an insane run on talent in Section 1. Some of those teams (Westlake, JJ) will need miracle players to get back there. That could be just the cycle of things. But many top players bolted to preps, which brings up COVID. COVID really changed things. No surprise that programs like Rye, Mamo, Bville, etc. thriving as they do constant stuff from youth travel to winter leagues to summer leagues. Teams without that $, resources or strong foundation are making up for lost time. This season so fast and short, no time to improve much.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
1. Mamo
2. Iona Prep
3. Town
4. Bcliff
5. Bville
6. LP
7. Rye
8. Pville
9. Scars
10. Step
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I went to the Y game and overheard that Y decided not to play Mamo this year, when it was their turn to go down county.

I checked my sources and Y last played Mamo 03/23/2019, at Y and won 9-7.

With all of this info, sure seems Y is avoiding Mamo.

Best non-secret in Section 1- Y ducked Mamo. They were due to play at Mamo and refused. Maybe they can meet after regular season and call it a scrimmage to get ready for playoffs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Only two Boys HS marquee games on today's schedule:

Byram Hills @ JJ katonah

and

P'ville @ Somers

I believe BH and P'ville will succeed.


And Bronxville @ Iona
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Touché; B'ville v Iona should have been on the marquee too. But, is usually look at the Prep' schools who have a clear recruiting advantage over the Town school programs. However, a big W (16-8) for Iona too. Wonder how many B'ville residents are on Iona? Will anyone provide some details in Iona's best players origins?

BH over a struggling JJ (9-6) was closer than I expected.

Somer's beat P'ville, only by 2 goals! Kudos to the Tuskers.

Not a big fan of the Rockland side, but how about Suffern getting spanked by Tappan Zee, WOW.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
No significant games listed on today's Lohud schedule.

But tomorrow, there are some good match ups:

Mamo v B'cliff: Can B'cliff bounce back and shock Mamo? That would take down Mamo's ego, especially since there was a nice write-up about LMYL and Mamo's transition to a higher level.

Rye should crush JJ.

The Murphy Cup! If Y loses, that should be the nail in Carney's coffin.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Touché; B'ville v Iona should have been on the marquee too. But, is usually look at the Prep' schools who have a clear recruiting advantage over the Town school programs. However, a big W (16-8) for Iona too. Wonder how many B'ville residents are on Iona? Will anyone provide some details in Iona's best players origins?

BH over a struggling JJ (9-6) was closer than I expected.

Somer's beat P'ville, only by 2 goals! Kudos to the Tuskers.

Not a big fan of the Rockland side, but how about Suffern getting spanked by Tappan Zee, WOW.

That being said about prep schools, it would have been really impressive if Bville had won yesterday's game, they held their own over the first half.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I went to the Y game and overheard that Y decided not to play Mamo this year, when it was their turn to go down county.

I checked my sources and Y last played Mamo 03/23/2019, at Y and won 9-7.

With all of this info, sure seems Y is avoiding Mamo.

Best non-secret in Section 1- Y ducked Mamo. They were due to play at Mamo and refused. Maybe they can meet after regular season and call it a scrimmage to get ready for playoffs.

Not really sure why Mamo is jocking Y-Town so much. Play your schedule and give it a rest, you have a very nice squad this year. When you catch up to Y-town's sectional and state championship victories then we will talk!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Time for Tim Schurr to go as well. Time to move on and rebuild.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Not so sure why the history matters, we're talking about the present. Yankees have a bunch of titles arent even close to best today. Irrelevant.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I think the overlap/influence of PrimeTime has doomed JJ. PT director has been a JJ HS asst coach. Over the past 7-8 years, lots of JJ kids have filled the PT rosters at the young grade levels (say 3rd - 6th). Then in middle school up to high school, most of those JJ players have gotten cut by PT as other talent rolls in each year (including many repeats) from surrounding towns and sometimes far away. Lots of JJ kids have gotten disillusioned and quit the sport through that process.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
1. Mamo
2. Iona Prep
3. Town
4. Bcliff
5. Bville
6. LP
7. Rye
8. Pville
9. Scars
10. Step

Why even put Iona Prep in rankings. They get to pull from all those towns so its not apples to apples. Rank them against the private school competition in the area 1- Wick, 2- St Anthony's 3- Chaminade 4- Iona Prep. 5- RCDS 6-Fairfield Prep 7- Stepinac 8-Kellenberg 9- Fordham 10- does it matter
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
1. Mamo
2. Iona Prep
3. Town
4. Bcliff
5. Bville
6. LP
7. Rye
8. Pville
9. Scars
10. Step

Why even put Iona Prep in rankings. They get to pull from all those towns so its not apples to apples. Rank them against the private school competition in the area 1- Wick, 2- St Anthony's 3- Chaminade 4- Iona Prep. 5- RCDS 6-Fairfield Prep 7- Stepinac 8-Kellenberg 9- Fordham 10- does it matter

Because this is the Westchester lacrosse thread not the Westchester public school lacrosse thread... In a normal year when any of the public HS beat up on Iona, Stepinac, RCDS, Fordham etc... you can bet those victories would be taken into account in determining rankings.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think the overlap/influence of PrimeTime has doomed JJ. PT director has been a JJ HS asst coach. Over the past 7-8 years, lots of JJ kids have filled the PT rosters at the young grade levels (say 3rd - 6th). Then in middle school up to high school, most of those JJ players have gotten cut by PT as other talent rolls in each year (including many repeats) from surrounding towns and sometimes far away. Lots of JJ kids have gotten disillusioned and quit the sport through that process.

I disagree. Look, PT is a top nationally ranked club team, JJ would be lucky to have 1 or 2 kids per year in the HS team. If kids get cut , need to get over themselves. You don’t need to be PT level to contribute on the HS team. THE issue is Timmy, not connected to the kids in any way throughout the year, doesn’t do any work out side practice and game day, just shows up and coaches. No investment in kids or program. Cuts anyone he thinks won’t contribute, shouldn’t a good coach develop kids? Coaching philosophy from 1980’s that doesn’t motivate or work in 2021. Yorktown would never allow only 24 kids on a team. He needs to go, let the alum take over. Daniello has done more for the program than anyone at this point, someone like him is connected to the kids, can recruit athletes and build back what Timmy crumbled.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
1. Mamo
2. Iona Prep
3. Town
4. Bcliff
5. Bville
6. LP
7. Rye
8. Pville
9. Scars
10. Step

Why even put Iona Prep in rankings. They get to pull from all those towns so its not apples to apples. Rank them against the private school competition in the area 1- Wick, 2- St Anthony's 3- Chaminade 4- Iona Prep. 5- RCDS 6-Fairfield Prep 7- Stepinac 8-Kellenberg 9- Fordham 10- does it matter

True. Sick of how polls and rankings, even a random dad post like this, includes private schools with their recruiting. It is not apples to apples. Just keep them separate.

1. Mamo
2. Town
3. Bcliff
4. Bville
5. Scars
6. LP
7. Rye
8. Pelham
9. Byram
10. JJ
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I went to the Y game and overheard that Y decided not to play Mamo this year, when it was their turn to go down county.

I checked my sources and Y last played Mamo 03/23/2019, at Y and won 9-7.

With all of this info, sure seems Y is avoiding Mamo.

Best non-secret in Section 1- Y ducked Mamo. They were due to play at Mamo and refused. Maybe they can meet after regular season and call it a scrimmage to get ready for playoffs.

Not really sure why Mamo is jocking Y-Town so much. Play your schedule and give it a rest, you have a very nice squad this year. When you catch up to Y-town's sectional and state championship victories then we will talk!

It's like 2-3 people posting YTown was due to play at Mamaroneck this year. I doubt it's Mamaroneck players and dads flooding this board. If so I'd expect way more smack. I'm not in Mamaroneck and I'm rooting for the matchup and have no problem echoing others that Ytown last played them in Ytown. But I have no idea what happened in scheduling this season. Fun to push the story. We need some new rivalry action in our area.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think the overlap/influence of PrimeTime has doomed JJ. PT director has been a JJ HS asst coach. Over the past 7-8 years, lots of JJ kids have filled the PT rosters at the young grade levels (say 3rd - 6th). Then in middle school up to high school, most of those JJ players have gotten cut by PT as other talent rolls in each year (including many repeats) from surrounding towns and sometimes far away. Lots of JJ kids have gotten disillusioned and quit the sport through that process.

I disagree. Look, PT is a top nationally ranked club team, JJ would be lucky to have 1 or 2 kids per year in the HS team. If kids get cut , need to get over themselves. You don’t need to be PT level to contribute on the HS team. THE issue is Timmy, not connected to the kids in any way throughout the year, doesn’t do any work out side practice and game day, just shows up and coaches. No investment in kids or program. Cuts anyone he thinks won’t contribute, shouldn’t a good coach develop kids? Coaching philosophy from 1980’s that doesn’t motivate or work in 2021. Yorktown would never allow only 24 kids on a team. He needs to go, let the alum take over. Daniello has done more for the program than anyone at this point, someone like him is connected to the kids, can recruit athletes and build back what Timmy crumbled.

The original poster is 100 percent correct. We are still part of the community and Schurr wants nothing to do with the town program and the extra time necessary. These programs are built on the youth and the town and he couldn't care. He also doesn't reach out to parents and try to keep them involved. He does nothing. BTW, he never did, rather he lucked out that JJ had very good kids who went to the HS. There is a reason that close to a dozen members of the 2022/2023 class have left the program to go to other private and PUBLIC schools. There is no unity and it starts with the youth program. Some of these boys would have left regardless but not all. Next year they may have a bit of a bounce back bc there are still a few decent 2022 grads but after that they are in for a looooong downfall unless new families move in OR the culture changes. With the boys who left, the program would be the best in the state and it wouldn't even be close. There have also been many boys who would be strong additions (maybe not D1 commits) who played PT but bc they did not make the upper level PT team have quit the sport. Some of these athletes who quit are excellent players. Unfortunately there is a stigma attached and having the butt't coach be the coach perpetuates that and the boys quit. PT is seen as the only team in town and why bother continuing playing if you are not on that team. Lastly, JJ does nothing as a team in the summer, fall or winter, no team lifting, nada, nyet. I have friends in other communities who tell me all that they do. For years JJ lived on the PT members who made up a substantial part of the varsity team but those days are over.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
1. Mamo
2. Iona Prep
3. Town
4. Bcliff
5. Bville
6. LP
7. Rye
8. Pville
9. Scars
10. Step

Why even put Iona Prep in rankings. They get to pull from all those towns so its not apples to apples. Rank them against the private school competition in the area 1- Wick, 2- St Anthony's 3- Chaminade 4- Iona Prep. 5- RCDS 6-Fairfield Prep 7- Stepinac 8-Kellenberg 9- Fordham 10- does it matter

True. Sick of how polls and rankings, even a random dad post like this, includes private schools with their recruiting. It is not apples to apples. Just keep them separate.

1. Mamo
2. Town
3. Bcliff
4. Bville
5. Scars
6. LP
7. Rye
8. Pelham
9. Byram
10. JJ

Well these rankings changed today.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not so sure why the history matters, we're talking about the present. Yankees have a bunch of titles arent even close to best today. Irrelevant.

I guess it’s not so irrelevant. You got knocked down a notch today huh?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
1. Mamo
2. Iona Prep
3. Town
4. Bcliff
5. Bville
6. LP
7. Rye
8. Pville
9. Scars
10. Step

Why even put Iona Prep in rankings. They get to pull from all those towns so its not apples to apples. Rank them against the private school competition in the area 1- Wick, 2- St Anthony's 3- Chaminade 4- Iona Prep. 5- RCDS 6-Fairfield Prep 7- Stepinac 8-Kellenberg 9- Fordham 10- does it matter

True. Sick of how polls and rankings, even a random dad post like this, includes private schools with their recruiting. It is not apples to apples. Just keep them separate.

1. Mamo
2. Town
3. Bcliff
4. Bville
5. Scars
6. LP
7. Rye
8. Pelham
9. Byram
10. JJ

Well these rankings changed today.
True dat, as the youth say
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
1. Mamo
2. Iona Prep
3. Town
4. Bcliff
5. Bville
6. LP
7. Rye
8. Pville
9. Scars
10. Step

Why even put Iona Prep in rankings. They get to pull from all those towns so its not apples to apples. Rank them against the private school competition in the area 1- Wick, 2- St Anthony's 3- Chaminade 4- Iona Prep. 5- RCDS 6-Fairfield Prep 7- Stepinac 8-Kellenberg 9- Fordham 10- does it matter

True. Sick of how polls and rankings, even a random dad post like this, includes private schools with their recruiting. It is not apples to apples. Just keep them separate.

1. Mamo
2. Town
3. Bcliff
4. Bville
5. Scars
6. LP
7. Rye
8. Pelham
9. Byram
10. JJ

Well these rankings changed today.
True dat, as the youth say

I don’t think they do. I have no idea what they say but I’m pretty sure it’s not “true dat” I can ask my son but then I open myself up to a long, arduous conversation about what “true dat” means and why I’m even asking.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Pretty quiet from the Mamo peanut gallery. Best of luck the rest of the way.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pretty quiet from the Mamo peanut gallery. Best of luck the rest of the way.

No idea who is "best team". Forget ranking these teams. Just group them. This is sort of year when any given game can go one way or the other for certain teams. Good for everybody.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Well now we don't have to hear about Yorktown's greatness, Rye was clearly the better team yesterday.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well now we don't have to hear about Yorktown's greatness, Rye was clearly the better team yesterday.

I have no horse in this race. But with an overtime win by one goal I think we can take the word "clearly" out of the analysis.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Well, I’m one of the 2-3 people posting about Y ducking Mamo this year and I’m not from Mamo.
I posted the non-secret and confirmed the last game played was in Y in 2019. Clearly (pun intended), Y decided not to go down to Mamo this year. Is Y playing any non-regional opponents this season? If so, why didn’t they schedule Mamo, if traveling and COVID was an issue for them. The non-regional opponent would raise the same concerns about Covid exposure.

Y continues to flex of the weaker programs; the combined score for the first 4 games is: 61-12.

They won a nail-biter against L/P, where they were up 6-1 in the 1stQ (and played like Princeton from the 90’s)
They lose another nail-biter, where they were up 5-2.

Last time Y lost to a section 1 team (JJ) was back in 2018.

Y has two more good games on the schedule; B’cliff and Bville. Could this be the year that Y’s dominance is shaken to the core?

I’ve said it before, I think it’s time for a new coach at Y. For the record, I’ve been a fan of Y teams from the 80’-90’s and early 00’s. So many GREAT guys and players from that era.

Talking about getting rid of a coach, JJ will not find a better coach than Tim Schurr in the near future. Nick will not take the HC role there. Maybe JJ is just coming back down to reality from a bunch of good grades under Sav.

Can you list the dozen or so JJ players that have gone to the private school side? Hopefully you won’t mention any Harvey players, because they would be going to H for other reasons.

Also, I said before to watch out for B’cliff this year!
Two interesting games on today's schedule:

Pleasantville at Briarcliff,

Lakeland/Panas at Fox Lane

Hope the P'ville game isn't a trap door, after a big win against Mamo. P'ville & B'cliff are so close, wonder how much animonsity there is between to programs.

L/P should win by 4.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Clearly other teams in the section are catching up to Yorktown. It was only a matter of time. Other towns have mirrored the youth program and travel ball amplifies the spread of good competition. It was odd for Yorktown to dominate for so long. Perhaps Section 1 becomes more like Long Island where there is a lot more parity but at a very high level. For Long Island teams getting out of the section is brutal and in many instances is like a state final. I’d expect section 1 to follow that path. Also teams have good and bad years, it’s a bit random as to what kids play in what grade. A year ago everyone thought john Jay was the new power. Not much of that conversation right now. Town team talent can be hit or miss in a given year.

One point to consider regarding Yorktown. How many other teams would be as competitive after losing their best player for the season? Boyer isn’t just a good player but the number two recruit in the country going to Duke. He’s a difference maker and probably is a 4-5 goal swing every game. He scores 1 or 2 and locks down every teams best scorer effectively nullifying them. High odds that if he’s playing, this is a different conversation
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Absolutely regarding Boyer, 4-5 goals could be a stretch but they probably would've beaten Rye yesterday. I feel bad for the kid given the missed opportunity.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
If you have a spare 6 minutes and you want to be entertained watch the Keith Boyer highlight recruiting video on YouTube. Watch what he does to the offensive players from John Jay and Rye. And most of the rest of the video is against teams like Chaminade, St Anthony’s, Darien and Mercer Island where he was going against some of the best offensive players in the country.
Then keep in mind this video is of him as a Sophomore playing like this at Varsity
I’ll stick with 4 or 5 goal swing but adults can respect each other’s opinions smile
All joking aside the video is fun to watch!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Fox Lane over L/P, What happened there?

B'cliff smackdown of P'ville is outright unfair. I expected better from P'ville, especially winning the State in 2018.


Today's predictions are:

Greeley over BH, but its a close game.

Y over Pac. If not, the coaching meltdown will begin.

Mamo over Rye, is likely since the loss to B'cliff and Rye's W over Y.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If you have a spare 6 minutes and you want to be entertained watch the Keith Boyer highlight recruiting video on YouTube. Watch what he does to the offensive players from John Jay and Rye. And most of the rest of the video is against teams like Chaminade, St Anthony’s, Darien and Mercer Island where he was going against some of the best offensive players in the country.
Then keep in mind this video is of him as a Sophomore playing like this at Varsity
I’ll stick with 4 or 5 goal swing but adults can respect each other’s opinions smile
All joking aside the video is fun to watch!

I did as noted. That was him as a sophomore! Unreal talent. He would be 4/5 goals a "game changer" especially with the lack of talent in Westchester it could even be more. Duke is getting a great one. A shame he could not compete for the past two years (Covid and an injury).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
a decisive W for BH of Greeley!
Suffern isn't what it use to be, losing to TZ and NR.
mamaroneck beats down Rye, while Rye still is enjoying its win over Y. It looks like mamaroneck will coast through the rest of their schedule.

Games on today's schedule:
JJ v Somers;
B'ville x P'ville.

I'm going with S and B
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
a decisive W for BH of Greeley!
Suffern isn't what it use to be, losing to TZ and NR.
mamaroneck beats down Rye, while Rye still is enjoying its win over Y. It looks like mamaroneck will coast through the rest of their schedule.

Games on today's schedule:
JJ v Somers;
B'ville x P'ville.

I'm going with S and B

On the Rockland side, where there are only 9 teams, Suffern, North Rockland, Pearl River, and Tappan Zee are head and shoulders above the other 5 teams. Amongst these top 4, games are more or less toss ups. This dynamic should stay true for the next 5 years (or more) based on what is coming up. These 4 teams, while very good, won't beat a Westchester or LI blue blood unless the team is down (like John Jay this year), and will occasionally stub their toe verses a middle of the road Westchester team. The jersey catholic schools take some good players out of Rockland just like CT and Iona Prep does on the Westchester side.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Bcliff mamo and rye in a triangle of wins right now, who is best?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bcliff mamo and rye in a triangle of wins right now, who is best?

Before anyone answers, consider the following schools classifications:
Mamo, A,
Rye, B, and
B'cliff C.

I think each team would have won the section I title, if it wasn't for COVID. But, my money is on B'cliff.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I would agree, with their strong zone on defense it is hard to score. Also, they have a combination of offensive players you'll rarely see from a class D team, I think they could've had a strong chance at the state championship.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I thought there were going to be section 1 playoffs ? just no states.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bcliff mamo and rye in a triangle of wins right now, who is best?

Before anyone answers, consider the following schools classifications:
Mamo, A,
Rye, B, and
B'cliff C.

I think each team would have won the section I title, if it wasn't for COVID. But, my money is on B'cliff.

What is even more impressive about Briarcliff is that they have zero presence at the faceoff. They have a long pole take faceoffs. I think they went 5/30 at the faceoff and still only lost by 1 goal! However that is the reason I also don't see them taking the section. At the end of the day you need someone who can win a faceoff.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
BIG game for B'cliff tonight, 7PM in Yorktown.
If they lose, it's be a razor thin margin.

If they win, oh no! the Y faithful/disciples will be in denial.

There are three other interesting games too;
BH at Fox; BH should win.
Pac at Carmel; Pac should win
Arlington v Wappingers; Arlington should win

Saturday:
Mamo should roll over JJ

Sunday:
St Anthony's visiting Yorktown. With this game looming, i wonder how focused Y is with B'cliff for tonight.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Bcliff may not have the strongest presence at the faceoff x, but with good wing play and overall talent, they will likely take the small school section 1 championship.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Possibly moving to the Nyack area for a new job. I have a 15 year Atk/Middie/Faceoff kid who will be a Sophomore in the fall. What are some of the best lacrosse HS in the area that I should have him attend to compete for states over the next 3 years? Also, what are the best club teams in the area. Thanks in advance for the advice.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Possibly moving to the Nyack area for a new job. I have a 15 year Atk/Middie/Faceoff kid who will be a Sophomore in the fall. What are some of the best lacrosse HS in the area that I should have him attend to compete for states over the next 3 years? Also, what are the best club teams in the area. Thanks in advance for the advice.

I would considered Don Bosco before any public HS in Rockland.

Top 4 clubs on the Westchester/Fairfield side are (alphabetically):
Eclipse
Predators
Prime Time
2Way
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
See post 331121 from a few days ago for some info on the Rockland programs. There are also 3 big catholic schools that are sports powerhouses - Bosco, Bergen and St Joe’s. Regarding club teams, all the best players play for either NJ or Westchester based teams. If your kid is truly elite Prime Time would be the best option but it’s a bit of a drive everyday to practice. Brotherhood, Riot, Patriot Stars and O2 are 4 NJ based programs that get a lot of Rockland kids which are much closer than Prime Time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Possibly moving to the Nyack area for a new job. I have a 15 year Atk/Middie/Faceoff kid who will be a Sophomore in the fall. What are some of the best lacrosse HS in the area that I should have him attend to compete for states over the next 3 years? Also, what are the best club teams in the area. Thanks in advance for the advice.

I would considered Don Bosco before any public HS in Rockland.

Top 4 clubs on the Westchester/Fairfield side are (alphabetically):
Eclipse
Predators
Prime Time
2Way

What level and club does he currently play for and whats your appetite for driving? .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
From Friday/Saturday games:

Briarcliff 9, Yorktown 6

Mamaroneck 12, John Jay 5

How the mighy have fallen!

Y plays St. Anthony's today; I expect another LOSS for Y.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
St. Anthony's 16, Yorktown 4;
That is an epic beat down.


Today’s games:
Scars at B’cliff: B’cliff by 5+
Iona at Fordham; IONA
B’ville at Mam;; mamo by 4
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
B'cliff won 11-3, yikes.
Mamo over B'ville 14-9, as expected.

Today's games:
Byram at B'cliff: B'cliff should win by 4+

Somers over Fox Lane

Y will cruise over Carmel and should win by a lot, but since the Carmel coach is a Y legend, it is no more more than 11 goals.

Rye over Pelham
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Lohud's top 10 ranking is fair.

Y #5 and L/P #6 are where they belong. Y also plays B'ville at the end of the season (06/02), could you imagine if they lose to them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Saw some bcliff kids claiming the no.1 spot in the lohud comment section. A bit immature but also fair given they beat mamo, I would like to see a rematch now that mamo has played more than a half of lacrosse with their starters and seen a decent zone defense.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Saw some bcliff kids claiming the no.1 spot in the lohud comment section. A bit immature but also fair given they beat mamo, I would like to see a rematch now that mamo has played more than a half of lacrosse with their starters and seen a decent zone defense.

I'd like to see Mamo play Iona.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
In my opinion, the top public schools would beat iona, such as bcliff, mamo, and rye
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Iona 18, Mamo 21, Bcliff 22... essentially even, statistically which is why i'd love to see them play. https://www.laxnumbers.com/ratings.php?y=2021&v=3346
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
B'cliff won 11-3, yikes.
Mamo over B'ville 14-9, as expected.

Today's games:
Byram at B'cliff: B'cliff should win by 4+

Somers over Fox Lane

Y will cruise over Carmel and should win by a lot, but since the Carmel coach is a Y legend, it is no more more than 11 goals.

Rye over Pelham

B'cliff wins by 3 goal,
Fox Lane surpassing Somers (and L/P last week too); looks like those boys are coming together.

Y wins a 9-6 game against Carmel. The score makes you wonder if Y is falling a part. Especially since Carmel losses to Wappingers in a 10-7 game, just two weeks ago. Y should have won by at least 7+.

Rye over pelham in a 11-6 game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
today's games:

Rye easily wins over East,
Pac v L/P; L/P SHOULD show up and take care of business. But L/P is unpredictable this season.

Iona over Kennedy, by 7+ goals

Y at JJ; Come on Tim Shurr, get those boys fired up and deliver the knockout punch. JJ wins by 2!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Y wins an easy game against JJ, 12-1.

On LOHUD.com, the most shocking thing about the loss was what the HC off JJ said afterwards :
"It’s been a struggle, but we are what we are. We’re just not especially talented this year. They’re a nice enough group of kids, but we’re just not playing well."

Yikes! "just not a talented team this year" This is a hard truth that many parents will not like to hear/read and blame the coach for not developing the players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
today's games:

Rye easily wins over East,
Pac v L/P; L/P SHOULD show up and take care of business. But L/P is unpredictable this season.

Iona over Kennedy, by 7+ goals

Y at JJ; Come on Tim Shurr, get those boys fired up and deliver the knockout punch. JJ wins by 2!

Rye wins (15-2)
Iona wins (14-4)
Y wins (12-1)

Pac v L/P; covid quarantine. Not sure which team has it, but the first round of the playoffs is 6/4 and it depends on the date of exposure, the team just might be able to make the first round.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
today's games:

Rye easily wins over East,
Pac v L/P; L/P SHOULD show up and take care of business. But L/P is unpredictable this season.

Iona over Kennedy, by 7+ goals

Y at JJ; Come on Tim Shurr, get those boys fired up and deliver the knockout punch. JJ wins by 2!

lost by 11... one can call it close
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Todays games:
Mamo over Scar, by 5
L/P v Hen Hud?
Carmel v Pawling; this is almost a like an in-town rivalry. Some of Carmel's School district covers Pawling and Stormville.
Pac v Greely ?
Somers at Rye; Rye wins by 3
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Todays games:
Mamo over Scar, by 5
L/P v Hen Hud?
Carmel v Pawling; this is almost a like an in-town rivalry. Some of Carmel's School district covers Pawling and Stormville.
Pac v Greely ?
Somers at Rye; Rye wins by 3

Mamo; 14-8 over Scar
Pac over G;
L/P at Hen Hud: well we now can conclude that something is up with LP now that two games have been canceled.

Carmel v pawling: canceled

Rye gives a big beat down on Somers 14-1, wow.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Today's games:
B'cliff at JJ; it will be ugly for JJ tonight. Another 10+ deficit.

Pelham at Y; another W for Y.

Lohud.com is reporting games for tomorrow, really?

Rye at B'xville; Rye should win by 4
Mamo v P'ville: Mamo should win by 7+
Nyack at Pac; that should be an interesting game for Nyack.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Saw some bcliff kids claiming the no.1 spot in the lohud comment section. A bit immature but also fair given they beat mamo, I would like to see a rematch now that mamo has played more than a half of lacrosse with their starters and seen a decent zone defense.

I'd like to see Mamo play Iona.

agreed. that's a good game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
A, C, D tourneys really doubt we see an upset as the champion. Think 'Town has been playing well lately and they'll get Rye back.

A- Mamaroneck
B- ?
C- Briarcliff
D- Bronxville
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Finals already set, I think we definitely know about mamo, bcliff, and bville, but hopefully the games will be close or entertaining. My feeling is that bville will absolutley roll in the chip. I think rye wins b, but that is the game to watch.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A, C, D tourneys really doubt we see an upset as the champion. Think 'Town has been playing well lately and they'll get Rye back.

A- Mamaroneck
B- ?
C- Briarcliff
D- Bronxville

I guess we know. Rye. Has Yorktown ever lost 3 section titles in a row?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A, C, D tourneys really doubt we see an upset as the champion. Think 'Town has been playing well lately and they'll get Rye back.

A- Mamaroneck
B- ?
C- Briarcliff
D- Bronxville

I guess we know. Rye. Has Yorktown ever lost 3 section titles in a row?
Has the talent gap ever been more evident than tonight. Town looked mediocre at best. Bad shots, bad clears, bad turn overs. Rye comfortable cruise to a W. Still trying to understand if there was a Town coach and/or game plan. Keep losing faceoffs but dont go to a pole or double pole? Clears, awful awful awful, leading to 1 def goal and 2 others after poor clear. Settled play when their only love was off the break or broken plays, attack bad shots with no one at x, ball dying in middie sticks, etc. Congrats Rye. The spirit of Town has left the section,.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Possibly moving to the Nyack area for a new job. I have a 15 year Atk/Middie/Faceoff kid who will be a Sophomore in the fall. What are some of the best lacrosse HS in the area that I should have him attend to compete for states over the next 3 years? Also, what are the best club teams in the area. Thanks in advance for the advice.

I would considered Don Bosco before any public HS in Rockland.

Top 4 clubs on the Westchester/Fairfield side are (alphabetically):
Eclipse
Predators
Prime Time
2Way


My son's a Rockland player who has played for Prime Time for years. Given the alternatives, no question PT is the best club program in the region. No B teams, all resources are focused on their one team at each level. All their teams are typically ranked in the top 10 in the country. Director knows all the families, well connected and is no nonsense. Your kid must be prepared to earn his spot every year (no Daddy coaches, all are highly qualified). Note practices are about a 45 min ride from Nyack, but any of the lesser programs are still a 30 minute drive and any reasonably comparable top program is an hour or more. Sounds like you're not from the area so note there is generally no TZ Bridge (uh em Cuomo Bridge) traffic to get to practices (evening rush hour traffic flows opposite, Westch to Rockland).

Also Nyack HS is very well coached. My son once played for their coach in another program. Top public HS teams in Rockland are usually Tappan Zee, North Rockland, Pearl River and Suffern (in no particular order)...Nyack prob the top of the next tier. None of them can compete with the top Westchester teams. Private schools are Don Bosco, Bergen Catholic & St. Josephs (all just over the NJ border). Best of luck.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Possibly moving to the Nyack area for a new job. I have a 15 year Atk/Middie/Faceoff kid who will be a Sophomore in the fall. What are some of the best lacrosse HS in the area that I should have him attend to compete for states over the next 3 years? Also, what are the best club teams in the area. Thanks in advance for the advice.

I would considered Don Bosco before any public HS in Rockland.

Top 4 clubs on the Westchester/Fairfield side are (alphabetically):
Eclipse
Predators
Prime Time
2Way


My son's a Rockland player who has played for Prime Time for years. Given the alternatives, no question PT is the best club program in the region. No B teams, all resources are focused on their one team at each level. All their teams are typically ranked in the top 10 in the country. Director knows all the families, well connected and is no nonsense. Your kid must be prepared to earn his spot every year (no Daddy coaches, all are highly qualified). Note practices are about a 45 min ride from Nyack, but any of the lesser programs are still a 30 minute drive and any reasonably comparable top program is an hour or more. Sounds like you're not from the area so note there is generally no TZ Bridge (uh em Cuomo Bridge) traffic to get to practices (evening rush hour traffic flows opposite, Westch to Rockland).

Also Nyack HS is very well coached. My son once played for their coach in another program. Top public HS teams in Rockland are usually Tappan Zee, North Rockland, Pearl River and Suffern (in no particular order)...Nyack prob the top of the next tier. None of them can compete with the top Westchester teams. Private schools are Don Bosco, Bergen Catholic & St. Josephs (all just over the NJ border). Best of luck.

This is a very fair rundown, although the gap between the top 4 Rockland teams you mentioned and the second tier is, and will be, huge, over the next 3 years, which is your kid's window if he is a 2024. Nyack will not be competing for anything over these years - I say this knowing nothing about their coaching staff. Ironically, the top 4 teams will have shots at section 1 championships in the coming years, if for no other reason than they seem to be in the classifications that are weakest in Westchester. North Rockland and Suffern are in Class A. The only team that is scary there is Mamaroneck, and they just lost to Scarsdale, which only beat NR by 1 in the semis. Although on a different day they may blow the doors off of all these teams. Tappan Zee and Pearl River are in C. The only team that is scary there is Briarcliff and they are very small. One would think they may have to drop to D. All other top teams are in B and D. None of these teams are likely to win Sections - but they have more of a chance than one would think.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I´d have to disagree about primetime being the best team. For HS certainly, but these other teams are extremely competitive and better in youth. Starting with 2024 and below, eclipse, express north, and 2way are equally as strong. With a variation for each year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I´d have to disagree about primetime being the best team. For HS certainly, but these other teams are extremely competitive and better in youth. Starting with 2024 and below, eclipse, express north, and 2way are equally as strong. With a variation for each year.

PT remains #1 and I do agree with you that the performance/talent gap is narrowing with programs like Eclipse, Preds and 2W. But LIE North has a wide spectrum of teams within Westchester/Fairfield and to many of those teams water down the success of a couple of teams.

Also, Tri-state 91 doesn't ever seem to be competing with the other programs.

The Pride looks like its starting to gain some traction and could be on the right path in becoming a stand alone A program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I´d have to disagree about primetime being the best team. For HS certainly, but these other teams are extremely competitive and better in youth. Starting with 2024 and below, eclipse, express north, and 2way are equally as strong. With a variation for each year.

PT remains #1 and I do agree with you that the performance/talent gap is narrowing with programs like Eclipse, Preds and 2W. But LIE North has a wide spectrum of teams within Westchester/Fairfield and to many of those teams water down the success of a couple of teams.

Also, Tri-state 91 doesn't ever seem to be competing with the other programs.

The Pride looks like its starting to gain some traction and could be on the right path in becoming a stand alone A program.

We will be able truly judge PT this weekend (Tri-Star Lax Clash), following games do not include playoff matchups.

2026 Primetime v 2way,
2027 Primetime v Eclipse,
2027 Primetime v Express North Orange,
2028 Primetime v 2way,
2028 Primetime v Eclipse,
2029/30 Primetime v 2029 2way

Let's go Boys!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I´d have to disagree about primetime being the best team. For HS certainly, but these other teams are extremely competitive and better in youth. Starting with 2024 and below, eclipse, express north, and 2way are equally as strong. With a variation for each year.

PT remains #1 and I do agree with you that the performance/talent gap is narrowing with programs like Eclipse, Preds and 2W. But LIE North has a wide spectrum of teams within Westchester/Fairfield and to many of those teams water down the success of a couple of teams.

Also, Tri-state 91 doesn't ever seem to be competing with the other programs.

The Pride looks like its starting to gain some traction and could be on the right path in becoming a stand alone A program.

Primetime- Perennial and original great program in the area. Consistently ranked, placing players D1 and playing top tournaments. Top age group down they have good teams. Daniello is the grand dad of club lacrosse with contacts and a product to match the experience.

Eclipse- Darien, New Canaan, Greenwich. etc More insular program to the areas they service with very good teams. Consistently ranked in top 20, placing players D1 and playing top tournaments. All age groups have very good teams.

2way- Brunswick prep school hold back program. Starting to build momentum and sometimes play top teams, generally competing but ultimately losing. Never seen at NLF or NAL tournaments. Building something interesting for a specific market.

Preds- Lower Westchester / Rye program with some prep and other local talent. Good teams end at 2023. Place a few kids, lose big to the top programs. Program is a side hustle.

Express North- Some good AA teams at different ages but some ages have 3 maybe 4 teams which means they have a market but not necessarily talent. Play a lot, usually at big tournaments.

91 Tristate- Best teams are mediocre A teams. The rest are average B teams. Have a solid offering but can not compete against any of the above, other than EN 2nd or 3rd teams depending on age group. Only play 91 owned B tournaments.

Pride-Westchester Warriors-Ballers all good B programs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I´d have to disagree about primetime being the best team. For HS certainly, but these other teams are extremely competitive and better in youth. Starting with 2024 and below, eclipse, express north, and 2way are equally as strong. With a variation for each year.

PT remains #1 and I do agree with you that the performance/talent gap is narrowing with programs like Eclipse, Preds and 2W. But LIE North has a wide spectrum of teams within Westchester/Fairfield and to many of those teams water down the success of a couple of teams.

Also, Tri-state 91 doesn't ever seem to be competing with the other programs.

The Pride looks like its starting to gain some traction and could be on the right path in becoming a stand alone A program.

Keep in mind Prime Time entered the discussion in the context of a guy saying he was moving to Nyack (or thereabouts) and looking for insight into the local scene. I don't know that the CT programs were considered by the poster when responding.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I´d have to disagree about primetime being the best team. For HS certainly, but these other teams are extremely competitive and better in youth. Starting with 2024 and below, eclipse, express north, and 2way are equally as strong. With a variation for each year.

PT remains #1 and I do agree with you that the performance/talent gap is narrowing with programs like Eclipse, Preds and 2W. But LIE North has a wide spectrum of teams within Westchester/Fairfield and to many of those teams water down the success of a couple of teams.

Also, Tri-state 91 doesn't ever seem to be competing with the other programs.

The Pride looks like its starting to gain some traction and could be on the right path in becoming a stand alone A program.

Primetime- Perennial and original great program in the area. Consistently ranked, placing players D1 and playing top tournaments. Top age group down they have good teams. Daniello is the grand dad of club lacrosse with contacts and a product to match the experience.

Eclipse- Darien, New Canaan, Greenwich. etc More insular program to the areas they service with very good teams. Consistently ranked in top 20, placing players D1 and playing top tournaments. All age groups have very good teams.

2way- Brunswick prep school hold back program. Starting to build momentum and sometimes play top teams, generally competing but ultimately losing. Never seen at NLF or NAL tournaments. Building something interesting for a specific market.

Preds- Lower Westchester / Rye program with some prep and other local talent. Good teams end at 2023. Place a few kids, lose big to the top programs. Program is a side hustle.

Express North- Some good AA teams at different ages but some ages have 3 maybe 4 teams which means they have a market but not necessarily talent. Play a lot, usually at big tournaments.

91 Tristate- Best teams are mediocre A teams. The rest are average B teams. Have a solid offering but can not compete against any of the above, other than EN 2nd or 3rd teams depending on age group. Only play 91 owned B tournaments.

Pride-Westchester Warriors-Ballers all good B programs.



Sorry to burst your primetime bubble but from 2027 and younger primetime gets smoked when they go to long island . Eclipse and 2way are much better . Not even in the same conversation.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I´d have to disagree about primetime being the best team. For HS certainly, but these other teams are extremely competitive and better in youth. Starting with 2024 and below, eclipse, express north, and 2way are equally as strong. With a variation for each year.

PT remains #1 and I do agree with you that the performance/talent gap is narrowing with programs like Eclipse, Preds and 2W. But LIE North has a wide spectrum of teams within Westchester/Fairfield and to many of those teams water down the success of a couple of teams.

Also, Tri-state 91 doesn't ever seem to be competing with the other programs.

The Pride looks like its starting to gain some traction and could be on the right path in becoming a stand alone A program.

Primetime- Perennial and original great program in the area. Consistently ranked, placing players D1 and playing top tournaments. Top age group down they have good teams. Daniello is the grand dad of club lacrosse with contacts and a product to match the experience.

Eclipse- Darien, New Canaan, Greenwich. etc More insular program to the areas they service with very good teams. Consistently ranked in top 20, placing players D1 and playing top tournaments. All age groups have very good teams.

2way- Brunswick prep school hold back program. Starting to build momentum and sometimes play top teams, generally competing but ultimately losing. Never seen at NLF or NAL tournaments. Building something interesting for a specific market.

Preds- Lower Westchester / Rye program with some prep and other local talent. Good teams end at 2023. Place a few kids, lose big to the top programs. Program is a side hustle.

Express North- Some good AA teams at different ages but some ages have 3 maybe 4 teams which means they have a market but not necessarily talent. Play a lot, usually at big tournaments.

91 Tristate- Best teams are mediocre A teams. The rest are average B teams. Have a solid offering but can not compete against any of the above, other than EN 2nd or 3rd teams depending on age group. Only play 91 owned B tournaments.

Pride-Westchester Warriors-Ballers all good B programs.


You absolutely nailed it!

But holdbacks are not limited to 2way, it's every team/program and school district.

Also, Westchester Warriors is way below Pride and Ballers.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I´d have to disagree about primetime being the best team. For HS certainly, but these other teams are extremely competitive and better in youth. Starting with 2024 and below, eclipse, express north, and 2way are equally as strong. With a variation for each year.

PT remains #1 and I do agree with you that the performance/talent gap is narrowing with programs like Eclipse, Preds and 2W. But LIE North has a wide spectrum of teams within Westchester/Fairfield and to many of those teams water down the success of a couple of teams.

Also, Tri-state 91 doesn't ever seem to be competing with the other programs.

The Pride looks like its starting to gain some traction and could be on the right path in becoming a stand alone A program.

Primetime- Perennial and original great program in the area. Consistently ranked, placing players D1 and playing top tournaments. Top age group down they have good teams. Daniello is the grand dad of club lacrosse with contacts and a product to match the experience.

Eclipse- Darien, New Canaan, Greenwich. etc More insular program to the areas they service with very good teams. Consistently ranked in top 20, placing players D1 and playing top tournaments. All age groups have very good teams.

2way- Brunswick prep school hold back program. Starting to build momentum and sometimes play top teams, generally competing but ultimately losing. Never seen at NLF or NAL tournaments. Building something interesting for a specific market.

Preds- Lower Westchester / Rye program with some prep and other local talent. Good teams end at 2023. Place a few kids, lose big to the top programs. Program is a side hustle.

Express North- Some good AA teams at different ages but some ages have 3 maybe 4 teams which means they have a market but not necessarily talent. Play a lot, usually at big tournaments.

91 Tristate- Best teams are mediocre A teams. The rest are average B teams. Have a solid offering but can not compete against any of the above, other than EN 2nd or 3rd teams depending on age group. Only play 91 owned B tournaments.

Pride-Westchester Warriors-Ballers all good B programs.


You absolutely nailed it!

But holdbacks are not limited to 2way, it's every team/program and school district.

Also, Westchester Warriors is way below Pride and Ballers.


Absolutely incorrect ....primetime is a joke from 2027 and younger . Gets smoked by long island teams . 2 way was at the NLF a few weeks ago and we're pretty good and very competitive. 2 way and eclipse are much better than prime time . Get your facts straight.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Update .....prime time is not good from 2025 and below
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Westchester lacrosse is the minor leagues of lacrosse
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Update .....prime time is not good from 2025 and below

I think Prime Time 2025 just won the NAL tournament. 2026 is OK. I think they better as time goes by. From the outside it looks like a very well run program. 1 team per age makes them focused. Might also be very expensive program.....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
As someone pointed out, the context of the question wherein I responded highlighting Prime Time was from a parent in Nyack NY looking for a HS level program in their area. There are certainly great alternatives for youth lacrosse in the region (though not much in Rockland) and obviously great HS level programs throughout the tristate area. I made the assumption the Nyack family might be seeking the best HS club program within a reasonable distance from Nyack. Generally speaking (and not knowing their son's class), IMO it is Prime Time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Guys follow who makes the World Series of lacrosse. Too many teams have a ridiculous amount of holdbacks. That doesn’t work in World Series where the cutoff is age based. Teams like express north can’t even field a team for 2026. Prime time makes it every year because the teams are almost predominantly of age.

This whole discussion is not apples to apples when comparing teams who not only have holdbacks but pull from other teams I. Their network for specific tournaments.
US lacrosse needs to get their act together like football, soccer and hockey and stop the madness
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Guys follow who makes the World Series of lacrosse. Too many teams have a ridiculous amount of holdbacks. That doesn’t work in World Series where the cutoff is age based. Teams like express north can’t even field a team for 2026. Prime time makes it every year because the teams are almost predominantly of age.

This whole discussion is not apples to apples when comparing teams who not only have holdbacks but pull from other teams I. Their network for specific tournaments.
US lacrosse needs to get their act together like football, soccer and hockey and stop the madness

The WSL use to be limited to just U13, but now they have added U14 to the mix.

So judging a program solely on the WSL is not fair because there are more teams than just the U13 and U14. However, it is a good litmus test.

So the WSL advancing local teams are:

U13; Primetime, 2Way and Eclipse
U14: Primetime, Express North and Eclipse

The following local teams were thanked for coming out and putting on a show (but failed to qualify):

U13: Predators
U14: CT wolves & Predators

this info is from the WSL website.

Primetime remains to be the Perennial and original great program in our local area.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Many 2Way families happy with the coaching but have heard complaints their recruiting director dangles promises he can't back up and has tread the fine line of conflict of interest between the club and Brunswick.
Eclipse strong program, very political parents/sidelines, send a lot of kids to good D1 programs. Lot of holdbacks and kids who reclass to go to Boarding School which is almost always Taft.
PT tough coaches, much broader geographic catchment and no guaranteed playing time. Kid's got to be up for a challenge every day to keep their spot as there aren't B teams.
Look at every club's record against the top teams (year to year those are the same for the most part - 91 LI, LI Express, Hawks, Laxachusettes, 91 MD, BBL, DC Express etc) and at their recruiting outcomes and you'll see a trend for each club.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The Tri Star Lax Clash, according to Tourney Machine results (does not always show playoff results):

2025 Primetime, went 2-3, did not play any Westchester/CT teams

2026 Primetime v 2way (9-2, PT won), PT did lose to Eclipse in a 8-6 game)

2027 Primetime v Express North Orange (8-2 LIE North won) and PT went 1-4.

2028 Primetime v 2way (11-5, 2Way Won) and played Eclipse twice, splitting the games 1-1 ,


2029/30 Primetime v Eclipse 2029 (13-4, Eclipse Won), PT went 0-4-1, only tying Rebels LC)


Overall, PT2026 was the only class with a winning record.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
HS done, lets rank these clubs by class. Share your changes

PT starts to absorb top talent by around 7th grade as their track record wins over players. Until they lose a couple of games to another program in any given age group, they are kings. Wonder if that will continue as other clubs try to hold good players. 2Way has strong young teams and formula (Brunswick + holdbacks) but weak college commit list and tourney choices. Preds 2022 is loaded with college commits and 2023 will have many that might attract younger players. Eclipse super solid up and down. Express North up and down on team quality, one team looks awesome, another cannot hang at all.

2022
1. PT
2. Preds
3. Eclipse
4. 2Way
5. Express North

2023
1. PT
2. Eclipse
3. Wolves
4. Preds
5. 2Way
major drop-off

2024
1. PT
2. Eclipse
3. 2Way
4. Preds
5. Express North
6. 91 Tristate

2025
1. Eclipse
2. 2Way
3. PT
4. Wolves
5. Preds

2026
1. 2Way
2. Eclipse
3. PT
4. Express North
5. Wolves
6. Preds

After that, just too young
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
the 24 rankings are way off

eclipse - multiple holdbacks
2 way- hold backs
PT/EN- tied for 3rd

preds and tri state 91 just got beat by a 2025 team this past weekend in Lax Fest

2025
PT/Eclipse - very close- top notch coaches on both squads
Express North- supposedly combining their 2 AA teams to one team- belive it when i see it
Wolves- very good squad
Preds
2way- do they even have a 25 team? have they played anywhere
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
the 24 rankings are way off

eclipse - multiple holdbacks
2 way- hold backs
PT/EN- tied for 3rd

preds and tri state 91 just got beat by a 2025 team this past weekend in Lax Fest

2025
PT/Eclipse - very close- top notch coaches on both squads
Express North- supposedly combining their 2 AA teams to one team- belive it when i see it
Wolves- very good squad
Preds
2way- do they even have a 25 team? have they played anywhere


Clearly you missed "Share your changes" and I think class club ranking post is a great conversation starter.

Nearly every program has holdbacks and it's time to put the "holdback" label to rest. Eclipse, PT and 2W have a separate WSL teams for 2026 from their 2026 AA teams.

For 2025 AAA teams,

PT & LIE North Morgan both played in the Red division at Tri star and PT had better results.
Pred's played at the Lax Fest the week before and went 1-2-1. The teams listed on the Lax Fest indicates that it is a B level tournament (maybe Pred's also has multi level teams?)
2Way: no games yet
Wolves:(Fay or Pierandri?); both teams played at Lax Fest, where clubs like Ballers, 845lax, Pride and Dragons were also in the mix.

So, 2025 looks like this:

1. PT,
2. LIEN Morgan,
3. 2W,
4. Wolves Pierandri
5 (tie) Pred's & Wolves Fay,
7. 845 lax (beat Ballers)
8 (tie) Pride & Dragons, since the head to head and it was 6-6 game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
For the 2026 club rankings:

1. 2Way
2. Eclipse
3. PT
4. Express North
5. Wolves
6. Preds

The only head to head WSL game is Eclipse v PT on 07/01.
2W is in a different division playing LIE CoachC, 2 California, a NJ and MD club.

Shame that all three weren't in the same division.

I predict PT over Eclipse.

First round, 5 games record will be
PT will go 3-2
Eclipse: 2-3
2W: 2-3
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This person who is predicting scores and rankings is sad and pathetic.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This person who is predicting scores and rankings is sad and pathetic.

No scores were mentioned and this is a forum. Since you did not explain why it's sad/pathetic, I'll give you the floor to provide your reasoning:
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This person who is predicting scores and rankings is sad and pathetic.

No scores were mentioned and this is a forum. Since you did not explain why it's sad/pathetic, I'll give you the floor to provide your reasoning:


Because you're an adult ranking teams and predicting outcomes of boys 13 year old lacrosse . Get a life or a hobby or maybe some mental help
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
You'll give me the floor ? Why thank you master of the forum . If you need someone to explain to you why you're sad and pathetic ranking 13 year old boys youth lacrosse as well as predicting outcomes of games that will be played you have more issues than I'm willing to list here .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
darn tough crowd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I find it an interesting read. But I'm in my mid 40s and retired so that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You'll give me the floor ? Why thank you master of the forum . If you need someone to explain to you why you're sad and pathetic ranking 13 year old boys youth lacrosse as well as predicting outcomes of games that will be played you have more issues than I'm willing to list here .

You'd have to explain it to me too because I don't see a problem with ranking lacrosse teams or predicting the outcome of youth lacrosse games on a youth lacrosse forum.

Anyone who ever starts any sentence ... "if you need someone to explain to you why you're a....... " loses all credibility.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You'll give me the floor ? Why thank you master of the forum . If you need someone to explain to you why you're sad and pathetic ranking 13 year old boys youth lacrosse as well as predicting outcomes of games that will be played you have more issues than I'm willing to list here .

You'd have to explain it to me too because I don't see a problem with ranking lacrosse teams or predicting the outcome of youth lacrosse games on a youth lacrosse forum.

Anyone who ever starts any sentence ... "if you need someone to explain to you why you're a....... " loses all credibility.



Get a life….you have to have something else to do rather than predict youth lacrosse game outcomes . Really sad and pathetic
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You'll give me the floor ? Why thank you master of the forum . If you need someone to explain to you why you're sad and pathetic ranking 13 year old boys youth lacrosse as well as predicting outcomes of games that will be played you have more issues than I'm willing to list here .

You'd have to explain it to me too because I don't see a problem with ranking lacrosse teams or predicting the outcome of youth lacrosse games on a youth lacrosse forum.

Anyone who ever starts any sentence ... "if you need someone to explain to you why you're a....... " loses all credibility.

Anyone want to take action on the 2way PT records? Would love to parley 2way and PT in the afternoon games with the over at +$250.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You'll give me the floor ? Why thank you master of the forum . If you need someone to explain to you why you're sad and pathetic ranking 13 year old boys youth lacrosse as well as predicting outcomes of games that will be played you have more issues than I'm willing to list here .

You'd have to explain it to me too because I don't see a problem with ranking lacrosse teams or predicting the outcome of youth lacrosse games on a youth lacrosse forum.

Anyone who ever starts any sentence ... "if you need someone to explain to you why you're a....... " loses all credibility.



Get a life….you have to have something else to do rather than predict youth lacrosse game outcomes . Really sad and pathetic

You're getting strangely angry over something so trivial.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
"Anyone want to take action on the 2way PT records? Would love to parley 2way and PT in the afternoon games with the over at +$250."

What does this even mean and what age group are you talking about? This has to be the club director or a parent whose kid jumped ship from one to the other.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
"Anyone want to take action on the 2way PT records? Would love to parley 2way and PT in the afternoon games with the over at +$250."

What does this even mean and what age group are you talking about? This has to be the club director or a parent whose kid jumped ship from one to the other.
It means it’s time to take it up a level and start betting on the kids games. A parley is when you combine bets. Kind of funny actually.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This person who is predicting scores and rankings is sad and pathetic.

Is it appropriate to discuss the lohud.com season ending rankings of HS teams, or will you get upset.


According to lohud.com, they top ten are:

1. Briarcliff (13-1)
2. Rye (14-2)
3. Iona (15-4)
4. Mamo (16-2)
5. Y (13-4)
6. Bxville (13-4)
7. Scar (13-4)
8. L/P (9-4)
9. Step (12-5)
10. Byram (12-5)

I think the rankings are fair.

Wonder if the northern schools will bounce back, because the following were once considered elite programs:

Mahopac, Somers and J/J?

Also, how about the lohud's indirect dig on Y's coach by saying they were not able to solve Rye's zone defense twice. If Y doesn't bounce back next year, Coach Carney will feel the heat and wrath of the alumni
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The lohud player of the year is John Mitchell of Iona.
He led the HV with 110 points (53 g & 57A) which indicates he is a well balanced player and is heading to Holy Cross.

The article goes on to say he lives in Rye. Could you imagine if he stayed put, played for Rye and competed against Y with Boyer. I'm guessing that Rye would still own Y.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The lohud player of the year is John Mitchell of Iona.
He led the HV with 110 points (53 g & 57A) which indicates he is a well balanced player and is heading to Holy Cross.

The article goes on to say he lives in Rye. Could you imagine if he stayed put, played for Rye and competed against Y with Boyer. I'm guessing that Rye would still own Y.

If someone did the "local players stayed at their public HS" scenario, that would be a great tourney as IP and Brunswick players would change the landscape playing for schools like Scarsdale, Rye, YTown, etc.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The lohud player of the year is John Mitchell of Iona.
He led the HV with 110 points (53 g & 57A) which indicates he is a well balanced player and is heading to Holy Cross.

The article goes on to say he lives in Rye. Could you imagine if he stayed put, played for Rye and competed against Y with Boyer. I'm guessing that Rye would still own Y.

He might not live in the Rye School District. I have no idea though, just pointing it out.

Pretty much every school in every sport can play the "imagine if so and so didn't go to XX".
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The lohud player of the year is John Mitchell of Iona.
He led the HV with 110 points (53 g & 57A) which indicates he is a well balanced player and is heading to Holy Cross.

The article goes on to say he lives in Rye. Could you imagine if he stayed put, played for Rye and competed against Y with Boyer. I'm guessing that Rye would still own Y.

If someone did the "local players stayed at their public HS" scenario, that would be a great tourney as IP and Brunswick players would change the landscape playing for schools like Scarsdale, Rye, YTown, etc.


100% correct.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2026 WSL going on today.

PT beat True MN and plays Eclipse at 11:45Am today.

2W beat Northern Pacific and plays Jersey Express next.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2026 WSL going on today.

PT beat True MN and plays Eclipse at 11:45Am today.

2W beat Northern Pacific and plays Jersey Express next.

Rain delay at WSL.

2026 Eclipse def. Prime Time 2026 7-2

Yikes
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2026 WSL going on today.

PT beat True MN and plays Eclipse at 11:45Am today.

2W beat Northern Pacific and plays Jersey Express next.


PT: (1-1), plays Alcatraz at 9AM

2W def. Jersey Express: 7-6 (2-0). plays Socal express at 9AM
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Prime Time 2023 team at Naptown was legit. They beat some seriously good teams on the way to their championship.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Prime Time 2023 team at Naptown was legit. They beat some seriously good teams on the way to their championship.

Kudos to PT 2023!

That is a great accomplishment.

Predators was the only other team from the HV area and they went 2-3-1.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For the 2026 club rankings:

1. 2Way
2. Eclipse
3. PT
4. Express North
5. Wolves
6. Preds

The only head to head WSL game is Eclipse v PT on 07/01.
2W is in a different division playing LIE CoachC, 2 California, a NJ and MD club.

Shame that all three weren't in the same division.

I predict PT over Eclipse.

First round, 5 games record will be
PT will go 3-2
Eclipse: 2-3
2W: 2-3


After a nice long holiday weekend, I want to compare the June 23 post with the WSL end results.

Eclipse spanked PT 7-2! didn't see that one coming.

Eclipse and PT both went 2-4 and 2W went 3-3 (and lost to the Champions, LIE CoachC in a 13-5 game).


While all three programs had a separate WSL team, than their AA 2026 teams, IMO the top 10 2026 club ranking for the HV (westchester) are:

1. Eclipse
2. PT
3. 2W
4. LIE North (since 2 members of this team were on the WSL LIE CoachC team, this team might be overcome 2way)
5. Wolves
6. Preds
7. 91 tri state
8. Pride
9. Westchester Warriors
10. ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Unfortunately none of these teams can hold a candle to long island and Maryland teams so what's the point of comparing the bottom of the barrel?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse and 2way are the only respectable teams on the list ...rest are garbage including prime time from 2026 and younger
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Unfortunately none of these teams can hold a candle to long island and Maryland teams so what's the point of comparing the bottom of the barrel?

It is hard, but not impossible to compete with the top LI, MD and Upstate programs. However, why would we discuss those programs on the "Westchester Youth Lacrosse" forum, DUH, because its where we are suppose too.

My son was a one timer for the PT 2026 team. Thought the coaching was worth every penny ($3,985 fall, winter & summer), I have no issues with how ND runs his program and see no reason to trash the younger teams. They do re-evaluate and reload each year. .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2way 2026 lost to Express North 2 times a few weeks back.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
2way 2026 lost to Express North 2 times a few weeks back.

Good point, wonder why they didn't have a team in the WSL, holdbacks or did the top players play for the other LIE WSL team?

top four 2026 teams in the HV area are:

1. Eclipse
2. PT
3. LIE North Brameier
4. 2Way
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Updated Summer 2021 Club Ranks. Haven't seen many 2022-2024 team results yet because HS season went late.

2022
1. PT
2. Preds
3. Eclipse
4. 2Way
5. Express North

2023
1. PT
2. Eclipse
3. Wolves
4. 2Way
5. Preds
6. Preds B
7. Pride
8. 91 TS

2024
1. PT
2. Eclipse
3. 2Way
4. Preds
5. Express North
6. 91 Tristate

2025
1. PT
2. Express North
3. 2Way
4. Wolves A
5. Preds
6. Wolves B
7. 845 Lax
8. Pride & Dragons

2026
1. Eclipse
2. PT
3. 2Way
4. Express North
5. Wolves
6. Preds
7. 91 TS
8. Pride
9. Warriors
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Primetime certainly is #1 in 2026. Take a gander at the summer and spring results. Tough to say other but E is also very good.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Primetime certainly is #1 in 2026. Take a gander at the summer and spring results. Tough to say other but E is also very good.
Long term success across multiple age groups, current results, quality and consistency of tournaments entered, results against quality opponents, etc lay out a clear hierarchy in the local club scene.
1-2 Eclipse and PT
3-4 2way and Express North
5-7 Preds, 91 and Wolves
8+ The rest
This is based on no actual facts but is confirmed by a 23 and a 25.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Mitchell is a very good player, but Keith Boyer is a day 1 starter at Duke. Boyer is a stud and if wasnt hurt Rye probably doesnt beat Ytown.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Updated 2024 rankings

1. Eclipse
2. Prime Time
3. Express North Schreiber
4. 2-Way
5. Preds
6. Everyone else
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Updated Summer 2021 Club Ranks. Haven't seen many 2022-2024 team results yet because HS season went late.

2022
1. PT
2. Preds
3. Eclipse
4. 2Way
5. Express North

2023
1. PT
2. Eclipse
3. Wolves
4. 2Way
5. Preds
6. Preds B
7. Pride
8. 91 TS

2024
1. PT
2. Eclipse
3. 2Way
4. Preds
5. Express North
6. 91 Tristate

2025
1. PT
2. Express North
3. 2Way
4. Wolves A
5. Preds
6. Wolves B
7. 845 Lax
8. Pride & Dragons

2026
1. Eclipse
2. PT
3. 2Way
4. Express North
5. Wolves
6. Preds
7. 91 TS
8. Pride
9. Warriors



In what universe are you pulling these rankings from . Very misleading to be ranking local teams off of us club lax when these teams don’t even crack the top 10 on the us club lax website . Is there a “ westchester” filter because from what I can see lo g island and Maryland have the top teams and then “ everyone else “
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
In what universe are you pulling these rankings from . Very misleading to be ranking local teams off of us club lax when these teams don’t even crack the top 10 on the us club lax website . Is there a “ westchester” filter because from what I can see lo g island and Maryland have the top teams and then “ everyone else “[/quote]

Instead of spouting off, read the room or know your audience!

It’s a rankings of local “westchester and Fairfield county” club teams. Oh, now you understand why there is no mention of any other programs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Very misleading to post from "us club lax rankings " when those are not the rankings . No Westchester team is #1. If your going to repost the rankings you can still do so in order buy with the correct USCL ranking number and they will still be ranked in order genius . Just don't go posting 1-10 USCL rankings that don't exist.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Very misleading to post from "us club lax rankings " when those are not the rankings . No Westchester team is #1. If your going to repost the rankings you can still do so in order buy with the correct USCL ranking number and they will still be ranked in order genius . Just don't go posting 1-10 USCL rankings that don't exist.


It's another trolling dumas from outside the HV that just cannot understand that back in mid-june, someone asked what are the best club teams in the area.

There is nothing misleading about ranking the local club teams within the westchester youth lax thread, which we also include Fairfield county, CT.

However, if you feel that we have slighted you in anyway, please go to another thread.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Hey some people on the interwebs are just lost to say it SJW like, LOL!!! Hey thanks for the "rankings" as it's good to hear what those in the area think of the various travel teams!!!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
In what universe are you pulling these rankings from . Very misleading to be ranking local teams off of us club lax when these teams don’t even crack the top 10 on the us club lax website . Is there a “ westchester” filter because from what I can see lo g island and Maryland have the top teams and then “ everyone else “

Instead of spouting off, read the room or know your audience!

It’s a rankings of local “westchester and Fairfield county” club teams. Oh, now you understand why there is no mention of any other programs.[/quote]


Apparently you even have a hard time transposing from the USCL website ....2026 is incorrect as primetime is ahead of eclipse . Also primetime is number 24 (essentially the minor leagues at that number ) and then the rest . Try a different sport for your kid
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What stunad said if you are on a team ranked less than 24 stop playing lacrosse? Rankings don't mean anything. They are all run by 91. What matters is how your son plays at showcases and prospect days, and most importantly his grades.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I have a real life hard lacrosse question: should a high level large athlete but lower IQ player should stay playing at highest club level due to athleticism and hopefully IQ develops or drop down a level and get tons of playing time to develop the IQ. Any real advice is appreciated
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have a real life hard lacrosse question: should a high level large athlete but lower IQ player should stay playing at highest club level due to athleticism and hopefully IQ develops or drop down a level and get tons of playing time to develop the IQ. Any real advice is appreciated
Play at the highest level. Great athletes aren’t pushed when you move down a level. It’s too easy to get by on athleticism alone against lesser comp. The skills/IQ will not develop as they aren’t as necessary. Stay at the top level, get pushed by better players in practice and he’ll develop quickly.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have a real life hard lacrosse question: should a high level large athlete but lower IQ player should stay playing at highest club level due to athleticism and hopefully IQ develops or drop down a level and get tons of playing time to develop the IQ. Any real advice is appreciated

My son played for a terrible team when he was younger, tons of playing time but he never learned much... Coaches either didn't coach or focused on those on the team that were either standout good or standout bad. He moved on to a much better team and he really developed, especially his game IQ because size and speed could no longer overcome mental lapses. I think you always want to be pushing the envelope and striving to get better. By dropping down a level to lower the competition, he might develop complacency or just not learn much. Experience is great, but not so much if you're reinforcing bad technique.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
He should play on the best team he can assuming he gets meaningful minutes. Better to get a lot of PT on a slightly lesser team vs very few minutes on a better team. Reps are more important than wins with club.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
LIE North chatter/rumblings;

its the second time, but different grade and in as many years, that I have heard that a LIE N team has been blown up a team, since they had one losing season.
This time it's a North 2027 team from CT.

Also, a year ago, LIE N asked a coach to step down and the coach happens to be a legendary Ytown/Hop/USA player, that coaches HS too.

I have no direct experience with LIE N, but do they really cut ties to a whole group (players and/or coaches) who have one bad season, or is it a few sour grapes parents?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
LIE North chatter/rumblings;

its the second time, but different grade and in as many years, that I have heard that a LIE N team has been blown up a team, since they had one losing season.
This time it's a North 2027 team from CT.

Also, a year ago, LIE N asked a coach to step down and the coach happens to be a legendary Ytown/Hop/USA player, that coaches HS too.

I have no direct experience with LIE N, but do they really cut ties to a whole group (players and/or coaches) who have one bad season, or is it a few sour grapes parents?

Exp. North is all about money.... I can see a massive overhaul with new coaches and players but to drop ~20 kids paying $2.5-3k each makes no sense.... could the coach have become disillusioned and found a better offer elsewhere and took half his team with him? complain to the right parents even if your complaints are BS and you'll have a group that follows you.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]LIE North chatter/rumblings;

its the second time, but different grade and in as many years, that I have heard that a LIE N team has been blown up a team, since they had one losing season.
This time it's a North 2027 team from CT.

Also, a year ago, LIE N asked a coach to step down and the coach happens to be a legendary Ytown/Hop/USA player, that coaches HS too.

I have no direct experience with LIE N, but do they really cut ties to a whole group (players and/or coaches) who have one bad season, or is it a few sour grapes parents?

I suspect what you have heard, in terms of a team being "blown up" is a situation where a large number of families on one team are leaving - with many of the them probably going to the same place. This, as opposed to the organization itself getting rid of them. What happens in all travel sports is that once there is rumblings that so and so is leaving, and this kid is leaving, and the group from Town XYZ is leaving, everyone else heads for the hills as well. People will then say "the team blew up".
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Just noticed on Instagram that there has been a HS summer league (Sound Shore) going on at the Granite Knolls and SUNY Purchase. I knew there was a men’s and Masters, but I’m happy to see the HS division up and running.

Some team names are obvious, but wondering the team make up of:

Rose Hill,

Nac Nation,

Camp Hillard, and

Rhino

Also, it’s good to see North Salem with a team. That district is so small and you don’t see much news about them, so they are often forgotten about.

Are the Rockland county teams and warwick really driving over to Westchester for games? If so, bravo!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just noticed on Instagram that there has been a HS summer league (Sound Shore) going on at the Granite Knolls and SUNY Purchase. I knew there was a men’s and Masters, but I’m happy to see the HS division up and running.

Some team names are obvious, but wondering the team make up of:

Rose Hill,

Nac Nation,

Camp Hillard, and

Rhino

Also, it’s good to see North Salem with a team. That district is so small and you don’t see much news about them, so they are often forgotten about.

Are the Rockland county teams and warwick really driving over to Westchester for games? If so, bravo!

They've had a HS division for a while. Always a very loose and casual thing. Rose Hill is Fordham Prep, Nac Nation is Stepinac, Rhino is a club team. Attendance always very random in summer. It's a cool vibe.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Did Eclipse cut their entire 2nd team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Heard a new club started in Fairfield County. Some CT Wolves coaches left, started it and brought over a bunch of players. Anyone have any more info on this club.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Cavalry. Graham niemi.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Heard a new club started in Fairfield County. Some CT Wolves coaches left, started it and brought over a bunch of players. Anyone have any more info on this club.

https://cavalrylacrosseclub.com/
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Heard a new club started in Fairfield County. Some CT Wolves coaches left, started it and brought over a bunch of players. Anyone have any more info on this club.

https://cavalrylacrosseclub.com/

Solid pedigree of coaches.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Did Eclipse cut their entire 2nd team?

Which grade/year?
If it's the 2026 A team, I was not impressed with the head coach at the Tri Star Lax Clash (June/Long Island) and I would start with him, before I get rid of any of those players. His side line conduct was bush league and not worth the money those parents paid.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Did Eclipse cut their entire 2nd team?

Heard they only have 1 2023 team going forward.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I thought they only had one 2023 team for the past few years.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought they only had one 2023 team for the past few years.
I heard the 2023 team is now the 2024 team........
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse comment about the 2023 team becoming the 2024 team is priceless.
And so true, the re-class factor within the club is huge. Feel bad for the on-age kids who didn't get the memo.
Now complaints about daddy ball there, now many dads coaching their own sons - who would pay for that at the High School level??
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse comment about the 2023 team becoming the 2024 team is priceless.
And so true, the re-class factor within the club is huge. Feel bad for the on-age kids who didn't get the memo.
Now complaints about daddy ball there, now many dads coaching their own sons - who would pay for that at the High School level??
Yes but one of the dads is a hall of famer and even if he werent coaching his kid shouldnt come off the field. So stop the noise making.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Except the Darien lefty 2024 is way better than his son. Everyone knows it. Politics at its finest.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eclipse comment about the 2023 team becoming the 2024 team is priceless.
And so true, the re-class factor within the club is huge. Feel bad for the on-age kids who didn't get the memo.
Now complaints about daddy ball there, now many dads coaching their own sons - who would pay for that at the High School level??

Eclipse 2023 was mismanaged, with good players re-classing to join the much better, relatively, 2024 team, and then older 2022's re-classing to join 2023. Top players fine, everyone else thrown into a blender.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Serious question here. Is their any club program around here that doesn’t have politics going on?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Serious question here. Is their any club program around here that doesn’t have politics going on?
Ballers, Warriors, 91TS and Pride are good programs that have less politics. Don’t think there can be none as adults and money are involved but they’re not like Preds who require you to be from Rye then be able to play lax, 2way that will cut you for holdbacks, EN who will take your money and say you are on one of their 20 AAA teams, Eclipse and all the mentions above snd then the grand daddy of them all PT and ND the Overlord. Just like life.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Serious question here. Is their any club program around here that doesn’t have politics going on?


Highly unlikely to answer your question, every program has some nut job parent(s), that will make baseless accusations about a coach, director or an alleged holdback.

US Club Lacrosse has posted the 2020-2021 final rankings for each grade/class. Locally speaking, a high level overview of most AA Westchester/Fairfield programs, it seems:

Eclipse is rising.
PT is slipping.
Express North, due to multiple teams on at level; it’s an up and down program.
2w is gaining.
Preds have fallen!
Team 91 Tri-State could be surging, with Greg Gurenlian being directly associated with club

What other A, B and C programs are worth mentioning?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Serious question here. Is their any club program around here that doesn’t have politics going on?
Ballers, Warriors, 91TS and Pride are good programs that have less politics. Don’t think there can be none as adults and money are involved but they’re not like Preds who require you to be from Rye then be able to play lax, 2way that will cut you for holdbacks, EN who will take your money and say you are on one of their 20 AAA teams, Eclipse and all the mentions above snd then the grand daddy of them all PT and ND the Overlord. Just like life.

Ballers? It's a Y town based program with some outsiders. But seriously, Ballers was established for Y players. There is most definitely inherent politics involved.

Westchester Warriors: they have a good business plan, but the development has fallen. What is shocking is that they have a loyalty program! No returning player is cut nor do they have to tryout for next years team (WHAT?!?). So they just keep adding players? How does that improve their teams?

Pride: You maybe right about this program.

91 Tristate: Charges AA rates, but doesn't seem to be able to compete and have much success.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Serious question here. Is their any club program around here that doesn’t have politics going on?

The problem with this question is what exactly is your definition of "politics"? 100 different lacrosse parents will have 100 different definitions.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Who's going to be the next Yorktown coach?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who's going to be the next Yorktown coach?

Did something happen to Coach Sean C?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
He retired
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
He retired
Just like John Desko retired
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Tim Schurr
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Tim Schurr should definitely get the heck out of John jay and go back to a winning program .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
He retired
Just like John Desko retired

Hysterical and correct, however, Desko WON championships. Unfortunately, Sean did not get Y to the level that was expected.

Y lost to Rye (2x) and Briarcliff and clearly avoided Mamaroneck this past spring. Sean's stepping down was anticipated by many.

I doubt Timmy will take the job.

I hope Coach Marr steps up and retakes his position
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown HS is without both varsity lacrosse coaches, Coach Carney (boys) and Coach McAuley (girls). Losing both, at the same time, is unusual.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Schurr leaving JJ would be tremendous news after he gutted the program. Time to bring in young blood...JJ alum and let Timmy go take 22 kids a year at Yorktown. Good luck with that.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schurr leaving JJ would be tremendous news after he gutted the program. Time to bring in young blood...JJ alum and let Timmy go take 22 kids a year at Yorktown. Good luck with that.


How has Timmy gutted the JJ program? the program starts at the foundation which is weaker than any program out there !! why is that? why do Kids at JJ not play lacrosse anymore?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schurr leaving JJ would be tremendous news after he gutted the program. Time to bring in young blood...JJ alum and let Timmy go take 22 kids a year at Yorktown. Good luck with that.


How has Timmy gutted the JJ program? the program starts at the foundation which is weaker than any program out there !! why is that? why do Kids at JJ not play lacrosse anymore?

Careful in what you say, b/c there are other programs weaker than JJ.

JJ has gotten rid of Kear and Sav, both were and continue to be good coaches too. Now some of the parents/players want to get rid of Timmy. Good luck in finding someone better than Tim.

A JJ alumni, who coaches club lax, said to me that the problem is that no JJ lax alumni can afford to move back to the area to help coach and with so many new residents (parent/coaches) without lax experience, the youth development is not where it use to be.

Y has been so fortunate to have so many alumni move back to Y and help keep the tradition rolling along. But Y has also faded a bit too.

Oh well, seems that parity will rule over HS, while club lax will be the powerhouses.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
You are wrong, MANY JJ alum have moved back to town, and they are coaching for various clubs. And MANY lacrosse guys have also moved to Katonah Lewisboro. They are out there, if he leaves JJ will end up in solid hands
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
John Jay has no players left . They went 4-11 last year and have maybe 2 kids moving up to varsity this year. The youth program barely wins at any age . The hs team could not get enough players for a fall league team. The question is, why is jj struggling to get kids playing? Is it the coaching, the parents? Why the lack of commitment ? Why are the coaches Mia while the program implodes?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John Jay has no players left . They went 4-11 last year and have maybe 2 kids moving up to varsity this year. The youth program barely wins at any age . The hs team could not get enough players for a fall league team. The question is, why is jj struggling to get kids playing? Is it the coaching, the parents? Why the lack of commitment ? Why are the coaches Mia while the program implodes?

100% accurate! Sounds as if you are someone on the inside of the Kat/boro area.

I posted the 5:31PM comment above. The JJ alumni that said that to me two seasons ago has so far been right about the diminishing lax skills and how bad the HS program will fall. But he was not critical of Timmy to me. His assessment in the problem was no one with a great level of lax knowledge/experience is helping out the JJYL program.

The Kool Aid drinker with the dissenting post, conveniently points out that the alum are coaching at various clubs, but not with JJYL. Which supports your comment about the youth program barely winning.

I predict the JJ HS will be stuck in this rut for another 4 years, regardless who coaches them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The JJ program is falling apart because of Prime Time club program. PT owner is intertwined with JJ youth program and also a JJ HS coach. JJ Kids get alienated from bad experiences with Prime Time and many end up either quitting lacrosse in middle school or switching out to other schools (often private).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Wrong again, JJYL is loaded with great coaches who played in college many are teachers and know how to work with kids. You also have a few Dads coaching who played and know what they are doing. Your comment "His assessment in the problem was no one with a great level of lax knowledge/experience is helping out the JJYL program" means that he has no clue. There are varsity level coaches coaching the kids in JJYL. Problem is the kids don't want to play for Timmy so many don't even try out when they get to HS or leave in 7th or 8th grade. It's time for a change, kids need someone that can relate to them. The analogy to Syracuse is interesting.....time to bring in new blood with new coaching ideas/coaches that can connect with the kids. Timmy may be a very good defensive coach but he's checked out as a head coach. Be careful what you wish for Yorktown peeps
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This statement is accurate - kids who could start or be excellent backups have quit. As to the private school angle. It has been repeated on this list before. Approximately 10 boys left to go to private (Hotchkiss, Kent, Avon, Berkshire, Salisbury and a cpl of others) and other public schools (Ridgefield). With these 10 or so boys JJ would be winning or state finalists for a 4 year period and this would invigorate the youth. I don’t know exactly why they are leaving but they are.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The JJ program is falling apart because of Prime Time club program. PT owner is intertwined with JJ youth program and also a JJ HS coach. JJ Kids get alienated from bad experiences with Prime Time and many end up either quitting lacrosse in middle school or switching out to other schools (often private).
If kids are not playing a HS sport because they dont like the coach or because they dont make PT I would argue those kids arent that good and dont have a passion to play. Kids leaving for private is def an impact but how do Briarcliff, Rye and Mamaroneck manage through the same challenge. Starts with the culture, the youth progrram and the parents. The rest of the county has caught up to and passed JJ for the most part. They were once one of the few programs around and now are just another program. Its not a bad thing but stop hoping for glory days.
P.S. If your kid isnt good enough to make PT even with the JJ connection then maybe he should hit the wall........its not like Preds where you only need a pulse and a Rye zip code to make it. Top team around! Stop hating!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown HS is without both varsity lacrosse coaches, Coach Carney (boys) and Coach McAuley (girls). Losing both, at the same time, is unusual.


Ytown needs fresh blood, new younger perspective and most importantly leaders without ties to the town, the past...the alumni. Too much living in the past and trying to satisfy agendas has run the program into the ground. The culture needs a huge refresh.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
He retired
Just like John Desko retired

Hysterical and correct, however, Desko WON championships. Unfortunately, Sean did not get Y to the level that was expected.

Y lost to Rye (2x) and Briarcliff and clearly avoided Mamaroneck this past spring. Sean's stepping down was anticipated by many.

I doubt Timmy will take the job.

I hope Coach Marr steps up and retakes his position

The 2018 squad couldn't win the Section?? Poor coaching, lets be honest and everyone knows it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Most of these jay kids left for lacrosse, they have crazy unrealistic parents. If Timmy was such a great coach, they wouldn’t leave they would want to play for him. It’s just a fact from a parent who knows. Time for a major change.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I read the Forum Rules, Purpose & General Guidelines. I’m a parent, asking a Q, so this post should be approved by the moderators;

Product review; ALL BALL PRO – THE STINGER X.

I’ve seen this rebounder used by multiple school districts throughout Westchester and by some individual consumers. Nearly every one I see, the wheels are off and frame work doesn’t seem to be secure.
Anyone else notice this?
I will say the actual rebounder’s net frame is rock-solid, I do like how the net frame is adjustable and the concept that it easily movable, via the wheels.

Any buyers out there with regret or love it?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Tim Schurr should definitely get the heck out of John jay and go back to a winning program .
What winning program would you suggest? I assume you don't mean Yorktown because they are old news. Hung on long enough for other more progressive programs to catch up and pass them. Down county will dominate going forward.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Why the detest for Yorktown? They’ve done their best to promote the game in all of Westchester including letting out of town kids join the youth program. The YAC website is informational as to how to get better
There are ex Yorktown coaches all over the county.

No they won’t dominate as they did because club ball has changed the landscape. Actually it is surprising it took this long for other to catch up. They will win some years and others they won’t.

Yorktown should be applauded for what they achieve without the money that the lower county parents have.

You sound like angry sour grapes. I’d rather see the positive
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why the detest for Yorktown? They’ve done their best to promote the game in all of Westchester including letting out of town kids join the youth program. The YAC website is informational as to how to get better
There are ex Yorktown coaches all over the county.

No they won’t dominate as they did because club ball has changed the landscape. Actually it is surprising it took this long for other to catch up. They will win some years and others they won’t.

Yorktown should be applauded for what they achieve without the money that the lower county parents have.

You sound like angry sour grapes. I’d rather see the positive

No sour grapes, no detest, just reality and disappointment. The program has been stuck in the mud while others have continued to improve. Club ball has absolutely changed the landscape and Ytown has refused to change. The down county programs especially have embraced club ball and their players have improved immensely as a result. Players playing in the most competitive environment possible with great coaching has enabled 3 or 4 programs like Rye, Larchmont, etc. to leap frog Ytown. Many thanks to all the coaches who volunteer their time, some things are impossible to overcome.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Maybe I’m misinformed but I’d be thrilled if my town had the program that Yorktown has
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
You’re not misinformed. Everyone should be so lucky. Don’t take any anonymous comment serious. You would be shocked if you knew who some of these people were.
Vin D’Andria
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Maybe I’m misinformed but I’d be thrilled if my town had the program that Yorktown has
What town do you live in?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Maybe I’m misinformed but I’d be thrilled if my town had the program that Yorktown has
What town do you live in?
John Jay.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You’re not misinformed. Everyone should be so lucky. Don’t take any anonymous comment serious. You would be shocked if you knew who some of these people were.
Vin D’Andria
Vin Dandria? Why do you guys care so much? A programs dominance in any sport won't last forever. Its time for others to shine.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why the detest for Yorktown? They’ve done their best to promote the game in all of Westchester including letting out of town kids join the youth program. The YAC website is informational as to how to get better
There are ex Yorktown coaches all over the county.

No they won’t dominate as they did because club ball has changed the landscape. Actually it is surprising it took this long for other to catch up. They will win some years and others they won’t.

Yorktown should be applauded for what they achieve without the money that the lower county parents have.

You sound like angry sour grapes. I’d rather see the positive

No sour grapes, no detest, just reality and disappointment. The program has been stuck in the mud while others have continued to improve. Club ball has absolutely changed the landscape and Ytown has refused to change. The down county programs especially have embraced club ball and their players have improved immensely as a result. Players playing in the most competitive environment possible with great coaching has enabled 3 or 4 programs like Rye, Larchmont, etc. to leap frog Ytown. Many thanks to all the coaches who volunteer their time, some things are impossible to overcome.

Are you disappointed in the Yorktown youth program or the high school program? Because the HS coach is being replaced.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Rumor is Shurr,Marr and Dooley are the final 3
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Did Town choose a coach yet?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Supposedly Tim schurr left John Jay for Yorktown. Who will coach John Jay
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Great news for John Jay!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Nick Savastano hopefully coming back to clean up the mess.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Didn't John Jay make the state final game in 2019? Who coached that team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Most of these jay kids left for lacrosse, they have crazy unrealistic parents. If Timmy was such a great coach, they wouldn’t leave they would want to play for him. It’s just a fact from a parent who knows. Time for a major change.

I don't know if "crazy unrealistic parents" would be accurate. Already some of the boys have committed to Lafayette, Bucknell, Colgate and Tufts. Seems pretty good to me. I am sure Tim Schurr or who ever is the new coach would have loved to have these commits. And this is just the beginning. John Jay would have been killing it for a few years with these boys as well as those who haven't committed yet. The bottom line is John Jay has recently had a poorly run town and HS program (and yes they made the state finals in 2019 but that was a senior laden team and the writing was on the wall). It will take a few years to turn around. Hopefully whoever they bring in understands that the youth program feeds into the HS and needs to be involved and make it fun and that its not just about being on Primetime.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Nick Savastano hopefully coming back to clean up the mess.

With 2 boys on the team I don't see this happening although he was a very good coach when he was there.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Find a coach with no conflict of interest.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Does anyone know what happened to Eclipse 23s, very impressive showing at NAL
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Does anyone know what happened to Eclipse 23s, very impressive showing at NAL

I think the DC Dogs won the NLF this past summer. The went 0-3 yesterday. Eclipse beat them. Who knows who was there and who was missing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Missing ALOT of kids
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
They took the top players from Express North and one from Wolves
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Missing ALOT of kids

DC Dogs that is.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Any news on the John Jay coaching vacancy?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yeah, Mike lungtree is the new coach!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yeah, Mike lungtree is the new coach!

Just did a google search on him - nothing came up. What is his back ground?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
He’s the brother of Joe bagodonuts you smuck!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
He’s the brother of Joe bagodonuts you smuck!

I guess it was a joke? I still don't get it but OK.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
So maybe the haters are right that Jay will never get another good coach once Schurr leaves….
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So maybe the haters are right that Jay will never get another good coach once Schurr leaves….
This didn't age well.... Solid Hire for John Jay. Going to be interested to see who the assistants are. I can't imagine the heads of 91 and PrimeTime coaching the same kids will go well
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Bocklet and Daniello have 2 different philosophies. Biggest issue for Bocklet is the lack of players in the school district. He has almost no players to work with. JJ does not have 1 D1 commit on their roster. cant imagine this program can win many games
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bocklet and Daniello have 2 different philosophies. Biggest issue for Bocklet is the lack of players in the school district. He has almost no players to work with. JJ does not have 1 D1 commit on their roster. cant imagine this program can win many games

Sorry - who is the new head coach at John Jay?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Mike Bocklet
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
He left purchase? Or is it Chris?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bocklet and Daniello have 2 different philosophies. Biggest issue for Bocklet is the lack of players in the school district. He has almost no players to work with. JJ does not have 1 D1 commit on their roster. cant imagine this program can win many games

This is partially true. While NOW there are not the boys in the school district its not bc the families are not here. As has been mentioned before approximately 10 boys (2022 and 2023 class) including many d1 and d3 commits have LEFT John Jay and much of it was attributed to coaching and lack of contact with the youth. About 10 boys left to go to private (Hotchkiss, Kent, Avon, Berkshire, Salisbury and a cpl of others) and other public schools (Ridgefield). With these 10 or so boys JJ would be winning or state finalists for a 4 year period. This happened bc these boys wanted to play the best HS lacrosse they could and under Schurr that was not possible. I think if Bocklett can connect with the youth and prevent them from quitting or leaving the team JJ can come back. It should be noted that with al of the talent that Schurr had he never won a a state title and he should have. He also should have beaten Yorkltown more. He is an average coach at best who for years was living off of the talent of the area without winning the big one. The year they got destroyed by GC in the playoffs I think they had something like 16 kids committed to d1-d3. No excuse not to win. Bocklett could be a great hire and exactly what john jay needs. Too bad he cant work with the 10 or so boys that left otherwise JJ would be state finalists this year and next.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bocklet and Daniello have 2 different philosophies. Biggest issue for Bocklet is the lack of players in the school district. He has almost no players to work with. JJ does not have 1 D1 commit on their roster. cant imagine this program can win many games

This is partially true. While NOW there are not the boys in the school district its not bc the families are not here. As has been mentioned before approximately 10 boys (2022 and 2023 class) including many d1 and d3 commits have LEFT John Jay and much of it was attributed to coaching and lack of contact with the youth. About 10 boys left to go to private (Hotchkiss, Kent, Avon, Berkshire, Salisbury and a cpl of others) and other public schools (Ridgefield). With these 10 or so boys JJ would be winning or state finalists for a 4 year period. This happened bc these boys wanted to play the best HS lacrosse they could and under Schurr that was not possible. I think if Bocklett can connect with the youth and prevent them from quitting or leaving the team JJ can come back. It should be noted that with al of the talent that Schurr had he never won a a state title and he should have. He also should have beaten Yorkltown more. He is an average coach at best who for years was living off of the talent of the area without winning the big one. The year they got destroyed by GC in the playoffs I think they had something like 16 kids committed to d1-d3. No excuse not to win. Bocklett could be a great hire and exactly what john jay needs. Too bad he cant work with the 10 or so boys that left otherwise JJ would be state finalists this year and next.

All of your points have been well documented in this forum already. We get it, you're not happy with Tim and now it's on Bocklet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Regarding JJCR lax with Mike Bocklet.
I'm guessing that Mike has left SUNY Purchase Lacrosse, which the timing isn't great (SUNY P's first game is March 5) and he is going to stay on as the Team 91 Tristate director. That is going to be awkward for Team 91 as they use the SUNY P facilities as their base location.

So can Directors of T91 and PT, who both are JJCR alumni work well with each other.

Coach N Daniello, has been a volunteer assistant coach at JJCR and so has Coach S. O'Rourke (who happens to be on the PT staff). You would think that ND has been providing supplemental compensation for O'Rourke through PT, because O'Rourke is NOT a JJ alumni and lives in CT.

The coaching staff and clubs will be interesting to watch going forward.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bocklet and Daniello have 2 different philosophies. Biggest issue for Bocklet is the lack of players in the school district. He has almost no players to work with. JJ does not have 1 D1 commit on their roster. cant imagine this program can win many games

This is partially true. While NOW there are not the boys in the school district its not bc the families are not here. As has been mentioned before approximately 10 boys (2022 and 2023 class) including many d1 and d3 commits have LEFT John Jay and much of it was attributed to coaching and lack of contact with the youth. About 10 boys left to go to private (Hotchkiss, Kent, Avon, Berkshire, Salisbury and a cpl of others) and other public schools (Ridgefield). With these 10 or so boys JJ would be winning or state finalists for a 4 year period. This happened bc these boys wanted to play the best HS lacrosse they could and under Schurr that was not possible. I think if Bocklett can connect with the youth and prevent them from quitting or leaving the team JJ can come back. It should be noted that with al of the talent that Schurr had he never won a a state title and he should have. He also should have beaten Yorkltown more. He is an average coach at best who for years was living off of the talent of the area without winning the big one. The year they got destroyed by GC in the playoffs I think they had something like 16 kids committed to d1-d3. No excuse not to win. Bocklett could be a great hire and exactly what john jay needs. Too bad he cant work with the 10 or so boys that left otherwise JJ would be state finalists this year and next.

All of your points have been well documented in this forum already. We get it, you're not happy with Tim and now it's on Bocklet.


I am surprised so many kids would leave their public school system just to get a better high school lax experience. At this point, I guess nothing in lacrosse shocks me including the ends I seem to go to.....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Can anyone here provide a recommendation for a sports psychologists in the Northern Westchester / Fairfield county?

I have a HS child that just texted me saying that isn't happy playing sports, not feeling like themselves and not doing school work. The kid is asking for help and I want find someone that has HS clients that play sports.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bocklet and Daniello have 2 different philosophies. Biggest issue for Bocklet is the lack of players in the school district. He has almost no players to work with. JJ does not have 1 D1 commit on their roster. cant imagine this program can win many games

This is partially true. While NOW there are not the boys in the school district its not bc the families are not here. As has been mentioned before approximately 10 boys (2022 and 2023 class) including many d1 and d3 commits have LEFT John Jay and much of it was attributed to coaching and lack of contact with the youth. About 10 boys left to go to private (Hotchkiss, Kent, Avon, Berkshire, Salisbury and a cpl of others) and other public schools (Ridgefield). With these 10 or so boys JJ would be winning or state finalists for a 4 year period. This happened bc these boys wanted to play the best HS lacrosse they could and under Schurr that was not possible. I think if Bocklett can connect with the youth and prevent them from quitting or leaving the team JJ can come back. It should be noted that with al of the talent that Schurr had he never won a a state title and he should have. He also should have beaten Yorkltown more. He is an average coach at best who for years was living off of the talent of the area without winning the big one. The year they got destroyed by GC in the playoffs I think they had something like 16 kids committed to d1-d3. No excuse not to win. Bocklett could be a great hire and exactly what john jay needs. Too bad he cant work with the 10 or so boys that left otherwise JJ would be state finalists this year and next.

All of your points have been well documented in this forum already. We get it, you're not happy with Tim and now it's on Bocklet.


I am surprised so many kids would leave their public school system just to get a better high school lax experience. At this point, I guess nothing in lacrosse shocks me including the ends I seem to go to.....


For many who have played their entire life and spent weekends at tourneys and weekdays on the field and in the weight room its more than just a means to an end. We all agree lacrosse is not going to EVER pay professionals like the other sports and as a result, most (if not all) should be using lacrosse as a springboard for a better college. However, we all know players that are going to syracuse, maryland, ohio state, denver over better educations at Lafayette, Bucknell, colgate, holy cross etc . . For most of these boys its temporarily about lacrosse. Most here would be hard pressed to say the big schools mentioned are better academically then the patriot league schools mentioned but many kids pick the better lacrosse bc that's what they want. (yes I am leaving ivy league, duke and Virginia out of the conversation). If you spend the majority of your waking hours thinking about a passion and playing at a high level it doesn't surprise me at all. Its the same for the arts and other sports as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Word I heard is that Daniello won't be on staff at JJ. He's still working with the youth program though for what all that is worth.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Great hire by John Jay to get an alum who can connect with the players. It’s going to take a few years to undo the damage as mentioned in posts last night. Looking forward to watching Ytown unravel with their new coach! smile
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bocklet and Daniello have 2 different philosophies. Biggest issue for Bocklet is the lack of players in the school district. He has almost no players to work with. JJ does not have 1 D1 commit on their roster. cant imagine this program can win many games

This is partially true. While NOW there are not the boys in the school district its not bc the families are not here. As has been mentioned before approximately 10 boys (2022 and 2023 class) including many d1 and d3 commits have LEFT John Jay and much of it was attributed to coaching and lack of contact with the youth. About 10 boys left to go to private (Hotchkiss, Kent, Avon, Berkshire, Salisbury and a cpl of others) and other public schools (Ridgefield). With these 10 or so boys JJ would be winning or state finalists for a 4 year period. This happened bc these boys wanted to play the best HS lacrosse they could and under Schurr that was not possible. I think if Bocklett can connect with the youth and prevent them from quitting or leaving the team JJ can come back. It should be noted that with al of the talent that Schurr had he never won a a state title and he should have. He also should have beaten Yorkltown more. He is an average coach at best who for years was living off of the talent of the area without winning the big one. The year they got destroyed by GC in the playoffs I think they had something like 16 kids committed to d1-d3. No excuse not to win. Bocklett could be a great hire and exactly what john jay needs. Too bad he cant work with the 10 or so boys that left otherwise JJ would be state finalists this year and next.

All of your points have been well documented in this forum already. We get it, you're not happy with Tim and now it's on Bocklet.


I am surprised so many kids would leave their public school system just to get a better high school lax experience. At this point, I guess nothing in lacrosse shocks me including the ends I seem to go to.....


For many who have played their entire life and spent weekends at tourneys and weekdays on the field and in the weight room its more than just a means to an end. We all agree lacrosse is not going to EVER pay professionals like the other sports and as a result, most (if not all) should be using lacrosse as a springboard for a better college. However, we all know players that are going to syracuse, maryland, ohio state, denver over better educations at Lafayette, Bucknell, colgate, holy cross etc . . For most of these boys its temporarily about lacrosse. Most here would be hard pressed to say the big schools mentioned are better academically then the patriot league schools mentioned but many kids pick the better lacrosse bc that's what they want. (yes I am leaving ivy league, duke and Virginia out of the conversation). If you spend the majority of your waking hours thinking about a passion and playing at a high level it doesn't surprise me at all. Its the same for the arts and other sports as well.

I guess I need to start making more money!! The cost of private schools on top of the cost of living in a solid school district is just too much for me to entertain.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bocklet and Daniello have 2 different philosophies. Biggest issue for Bocklet is the lack of players in the school district. He has almost no players to work with. JJ does not have 1 D1 commit on their roster. cant imagine this program can win many games

This is partially true. While NOW there are not the boys in the school district its not bc the families are not here. As has been mentioned before approximately 10 boys (2022 and 2023 class) including many d1 and d3 commits have LEFT John Jay and much of it was attributed to coaching and lack of contact with the youth. About 10 boys left to go to private (Hotchkiss, Kent, Avon, Berkshire, Salisbury and a cpl of others) and other public schools (Ridgefield). With these 10 or so boys JJ would be winning or state finalists for a 4 year period. This happened bc these boys wanted to play the best HS lacrosse they could and under Schurr that was not possible. I think if Bocklett can connect with the youth and prevent them from quitting or leaving the team JJ can come back. It should be noted that with al of the talent that Schurr had he never won a a state title and he should have. He also should have beaten Yorkltown more. He is an average coach at best who for years was living off of the talent of the area without winning the big one. The year they got destroyed by GC in the playoffs I think they had something like 16 kids committed to d1-d3. No excuse not to win. Bocklett could be a great hire and exactly what john jay needs. Too bad he cant work with the 10 or so boys that left otherwise JJ would be state finalists this year and next.

All of your points have been well documented in this forum already. We get it, you're not happy with Tim and now it's on Bocklet.


I am surprised so many kids would leave their public school system just to get a better high school lax experience. At this point, I guess nothing in lacrosse shocks me including the ends I seem to go to.....


For many who have played their entire life and spent weekends at tourneys and weekdays on the field and in the weight room its more than just a means to an end. We all agree lacrosse is not going to EVER pay professionals like the other sports and as a result, most (if not all) should be using lacrosse as a springboard for a better college. However, we all know players that are going to syracuse, maryland, ohio state, denver over better educations at Lafayette, Bucknell, colgate, holy cross etc . . For most of these boys its temporarily about lacrosse. Most here would be hard pressed to say the big schools mentioned are better academically then the patriot league schools mentioned but many kids pick the better lacrosse bc that's what they want. (yes I am leaving ivy league, duke and Virginia out of the conversation). If you spend the majority of your waking hours thinking about a passion and playing at a high level it doesn't surprise me at all. Its the same for the arts and other sports as well.

I guess I need to start making more money!! The cost of private schools on top of the cost of living in a solid school district is just too much for me to entertain.

Don't we all :-) but if your son is good enough and the school wants him bad enough they make it work.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What happened at Bronxville HS with the Girls coaching staff?

Brnxv was blessed with a huge coaching staff and often made it to the state semi's and/or finals.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
frown
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What is going on with 91 Tristate ? Why are they looking for so many players on 2024 ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened at Bronxville HS with the Girls coaching staff?

Brnxv was blessed with a huge coaching staff and often made it to the state semi's and/or finals.


Left for Sacred Heart
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Decent showing by the local teams at “World Series” qualifier. 2way and Eclipse top their brackets at 3-0. Express North 2-1 and Primetime with the tough schedule at 1-2….and oh yes, Preds ripping people off and doing what they do, looking and playing like they dont below. 0-3 for them which is about right. 91 will win this again but great to see our good local teams holding down the top spots in several brackets.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eclipse was the best team at the WS qualifier and won it. Real talented and could win it all.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I am so tired of hearing how TS is "all class" etc. None of the kids wanted to play for him. They need to be careful what they wish for as he will soon destroy their program. 1980s coaching doesn't work anymore. This artice written says it all. Although he only took one assistant but he has no class and is a terrible coach. Doesnt care about the kids.

A Fresh Start For Boys Lacrosse
Spencer Hadlock, Contributor|February 16, 2022

The John Jay Lacrosse team was led by the same four coaches over the last 10 years leading a dominant Hudson Valley lacrosse program. However, in 2021, the team had one of their worst seasons in recent memory finishing at a dismal 5-12. As a result, long time head coach Tim Schurr and his 3 assistants abandoned the team and agreed to coach Yorktown, John Jay’s longtime rival.
The seniors were left with a lack of closure as Schurr never addressed the team. The boys found out through a lohud twitter post and were left in the dark. John Jay junior Evan Weissleder said, “ He left so quickly, we had been practicing with him 3 days before and he said nothing.” However, strong leadership from upperclassman Andrew Minard, Finn O’Callaghan, and Nick Savastano kept the team motivated and working to have a strong 2022 season.

In December great news was given to the team, after a selective process of looking for a new coaching staff, former John Jay Student, Mike Bocklet was hired to lead the team. He was a former member of a strong lacrosse program that led to the state tournament year after year. Following his high school career he played in the MLL, the most watched professional lacrosse league.

The hope is that his experience and leadership can lead this year’s team back to their former glory and golden days. The work has just started and the team is getting fired up to prove their doubters wrong.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Y-Town is back….
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Well the HS season started last week and LOHUD posted their rankings and I’m most surprised with Y being #4.
The power shift from the northern West. programs to southern West. is not surprising, as the sport is dominated by the affluent communities.

An early season, big match-up with #2 (Mamo) and #3 (B’clff), with B’clff winning at home, by 1G. With last year’s season, I’m thinking that Mamo will always be in the mix, but never achieves the ultimate title by the end of the season.

How about Scar (#8) just getting by Hen Hud in a 3-2 OT game???? Scar maybe thinking they are the same team from last year. Obviously not.

P’ville walked all over Greeley (14-5), watch out for P’ville. They have a good coach (CK), who has a proven history of winning from his days at JJCR (hmm).

JJCR starts off with a W, while on the road against Pelham in a 10-9 game. Hope Coach MB has a longer career than the JJCR former coaches CK, NS and TS (hmm).

Today’s marquee match-ups are:
Bxvlle v Iona; I’m going with Iona by 4.
JJCR v Manhasset; Manhasset was 15-1 last year, I expect a beatdown by M. Good luck JJCR.

Other games:
Suffern should win,
P’ville wins big, again
Mpac Wins

Let’s go!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well the HS season started last week and LOHUD posted their rankings and I’m most surprised with Y being #4.
The power shift from the northern West. programs to southern West. is not surprising, as the sport is dominated by the affluent communities.

Let’s go!

Yup! Let's get some Section 1 HS Lax chatter going! LOVE that top teams are playing tough schedules in Section and out. Loads of great matchups every week.

Class A has Mamo as clear #1 until playoffs when teams like Mahopac play tougher and Mamo gets tighter
Class B has to be Rye again but it's not like Y is gonna disappear
Class C seems like Pelham's to lose but who knows
Class D is smallest but best somehow--the best team (Bcliff) + a top 5 team (Bville) and respectable Pville
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Today’s marquee match-ups are:
Bxvlle v Iona; I’m going with Iona by 4.
JJCR v Manhasset; Manhasset was 15-1 last year, I expect a beatdown by M. Good luck JJCR.

Other games:
Suffern should win,
P’ville wins big, again
Mpac Wins

Let’s go!


4-1 in yesterday's games.

I'm surprised that Iona didn't dominate and happy for B'ville.

P'ville, plays like a Class B program, among the D schools.

How about the B'ville, P'ville and B'cliff all play like big schools!

M'pac; Easy win.

JJCR: Nice to see that you are challenging yourself w/ LI teams.

Suffern: As expected.

Today's games are unremarkable, but here it goes:

Pelham, over NR
WP over Eastchester
Bwstr over NS,
Crtn over O.
TZ over PR

Saturday's marquee games:

Masspqa over Scar, by 5.
NC over mamao,
B'ville over Stap

Rye over B'cliff by 3.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Today’s marquee match-ups are:
Bxvlle v Iona; I’m going with Iona by 4.
JJCR v Manhasset; Manhasset was 15-1 last year, I expect a beatdown by M. Good luck JJCR.

Other games:
Suffern should win,
P’ville wins big, again
Mpac Wins

Let’s go!


4-1 in yesterday's games.

I'm surprised that Iona didn't dominate and happy for B'ville.

P'ville, plays like a Class B program, among the D schools.

How about the B'ville, P'ville and B'cliff all play like big schools!

M'pac; Easy win.

JJCR: Nice to see that you are challenging yourself w/ LI teams.

Suffern: As expected.

Today's games are unremarkable, but here it goes:

Pelham, over NR
WP over Eastchester
Bwstr over NS,
Crtn over O.
TZ over PR

Saturday's marquee games:

Masspqa over Scar, by 5.
NC over mamao,
B'ville over Stap

Rye over B'cliff by 3.
Flip the FCIAC/Section 1 scores. NC is down this year; Mamaroneck should take them. This may be Staples strongest team ever and I'd be very surprised if they lose to Bronxville.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Bronxville looked pretty good yesterday vs Iona, they won in 2nd OT... Bronxville defense, especially their goalie definitely knocked Iona off their game. Iona's offense looked disorganized then started to get desperate, shooting low percentage shots from long range while their defense seemed to get frustrated and committed some notIntelligent penalties later in the game. Bxville's defense didn't look great but it seemed like their offense kept the ball in the Iona zone for most of the game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]

4-1 in yesterday's games.

Today's games are unremarkable, but here it goes:

Pelham, over NR
WP over Eastchester
Bwstr over NS,
Crtn over O.
TZ over PR

Saturday's marquee games:

Masspqa over Scar, by 5.
NC over mamao,
B'ville over Stap

Rye over B'cliff by 3.

So Friday's games went as expected 4-0*.
*: the Croton v O game was postponed.

Saturday's results: 2-2, 10-3 overall.

Scar got slapped around by Masspqa.

New Canaan toyed with Mamo

Staples (Westport, CT) HS embarrassed B'ville.

B'cliff becomes the new king of Sect. 1.

in regard to B'cliff, enjoy the moment. They do have 4 upcoming non-region games on 4/9, 4/20, 4/23 and 5/11. Anybody know the non-region schools?
The rest of their schedule isn't a cake walk with P'ville (4/29), Y (5/5) and Bx'ville (5/9). But, it sure looks like their schedule is preparing them to make a run for the state title.

Two other Saturday games surprised me;
Byrm Hll over M-pac, by 1.

P'ville of HH, which I thought HH was going to going to challenge them a little more.

Looking forward to this weeks games,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Tuesday's games and predictions:

Byram Hills at O: BH wins easily

Lakeland/Panas at Carmel: L/P should win convincingly

Yorktown at Mahopac: I want Y, but going with M.

Rye at Scarsdale: Rye should win by 6

Harrison at White Plains: WP

John Jay at Arlington: Arlington wins a close one
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Arlington over JJ questionable, definitely more talent for JJ.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Any word on the Rye player taken to the hospital by that DIRTY hit from the Briarcliff player? Did the Briarcliff player get suspended beyond the 1 game?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any word on the Rye player taken to the hospital by that DIRTY hit from the Briarcliff player? Did the Briarcliff player get suspended beyond the 1 game?

Suspensions are typically handed down by BOCES after the lead game official completes the ejection form.

BOCES then notifies the AD, who in turn enforces the suspension.

Coaches are allowed to enforce their own penalty time on their players too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Arlington over JJ questionable, definitely more talent for JJ.

I never mentioned anything about talent. I prediction was more based upon HHH.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any word on the Rye player taken to the hospital by that DIRTY hit from the Briarcliff player? Did the Briarcliff player get suspended beyond the 1 game?

Suspensions are typically handed down by BOCES after the lead game official completes the ejection form.

BOCES then notifies the AD, who in turn enforces the suspension.

Coaches are allowed to enforce their own penalty time on their players too.

Totally understand the Boces responsibility, was just wondering if they handed down a harsher penalty for such an egregious hit.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Tuesday's games and predictions:

Byram Hills at O: BH wins easily

Lakeland/Panas at Carmel: L/P should win convincingly

Yorktown at Mahopac: I want Y, but going with M.

Rye at Scarsdale: Rye should win by 6

Harrison at White Plains: WP

John Jay at Arlington: Arlington wins a close one

5-1 yesterday, 15-4 overall.

tomorrow's game schedule is huge with ONE marquee game: Y at Mamo (7PM). It should be a huge crowd and a great atmosphere. I'm going with mamo.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Thursday’s games, 11 predictions.

Greeley at Lakeland/Panas: LP wins

Lourdes at Mahopac: M-pac wins

Pleasantville at Dobbs Ferry P’ville wins

Pawling at Rye Neck: RN b/c HHH.

Scarsdale at Pelham: Scars wins

Brewster at John Jay: JJ wins

North Salem at Blind Brook: Wow, never knew BB had a program. Isn’t BB mostly Port Chester? Toss up game.

Byram Hills at Stepinac: BHs Wins

White Plains at Rye: Rye wins a close game.

Hen Hud at Wappingers: Wapp wins

Irvington at Bronxville: Bxville wins

Croton at Ossining: CH wins
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
To the Rye parent commenting about the "unacceptable" hit, the attackman went for a cheapshot on the goalie and the defender had his back. Anything more than a 1 game suspension would be ridiculous. Nothing wrong with protecting your goalie.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I predict Stepinac beats Byram Hills because of depth, and Rye should beat WP convincingly.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Stepinac played pretty tough yesterday vs Bronxville, the game was a lot closer than the score would indicate... They got behind early and were down by 6 yet closed to 2 in the 4th quarter before Bronxville scored some late goals. Bronxville goalie was the difference again. Iona @ Chaminade today, I didn't see that one on the game schedule.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Unfortunately looks like bad weather for that Mamo/Ytown game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
To the Rye parent commenting about the "unacceptable" hit, the attackman went for a cheapshot on the goalie and the defender had his back. Anything more than a 1 game suspension would be ridiculous. Nothing wrong with protecting your goalie.

Not a Rye parent. But if the Rye player needed EMS and was brought to the ER from the field, heck yes, a suspension is in order.

It's up to the officials if a suspension is warranted. B'cliff already took care of CH, so a 1 game suspension is a moot point already.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Wow, Lohud reported that Greeley's varsity Head Coach was immediately let go, with Board of Ed approval, after Tuesday's overtime win (13-12) against Put Valley.

Can you imagine if Greeley lost the game (LOL),
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I heard the game was physical, and some jawing back and fourth between players. Feel bad for Brian, he’s a great guy
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Brian is a great guy, I knew him from his House of Sports days... I wonder what happened because it seems that there was a discipline issue that got him fired.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thursday’s games, 11 predictions.

Greeley at Lakeland/Panas: LP wins

Lourdes at Mahopac: M-pac wins

Pleasantville at Dobbs Ferry P’ville wins

Pawling at Rye Neck: RN b/c HHH.

Scarsdale at Pelham: Scars wins

Brewster at John Jay: JJ wins

North Salem at Blind Brook: Wow, never knew BB had a program. Isn’t BB mostly Port Chester? Toss up game.

Byram Hills at Stepinac: BHs Wins

White Plains at Rye: Rye wins a close game.

Hen Hud at Wappingers: Wapp wins

Irvington at Bronxville: Bxville wins

Croton at Ossining: CH wins


8-0 in games played today. Overall 23-4.

Tomorrow's marquee game: John Jay at Mahopac. Going with Mpac.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Mamaroneck easily takes to Town for its first ever win against them. The tides have changed for sure.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
While only 2 game examples, surprising how strong CT teams look against Westchester teams. New Canaan (which was thought to be in a down year) and Staples dominating Mamaroneck and Bronxville. And Mamaroneck and Bronxville have been very strong this season so far vs other Westchester teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
While only 2 game examples, surprising how strong CT teams look against Westchester teams. New Canaan (which was thought to be in a down year) and Staples dominating Mamaroneck and Bronxville. And Mamaroneck and Bronxville have been very strong this season so far vs other Westchester teams.
It's a particularly strong year for CT schools. Staples is legit; watched them scrimmage St. Anthony's and they played them almost to a draw -- I think they're a top 25 team nationally (and potentially only the third or fourth best team in the state).

The New Canaan blowout over Mamaroneck is kind of shocking to me. I still think Mamo is a good team, and New Canaan is probably the 6th best team in the FCIAC (they just got beaten by Fairfield Ludlowe).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
While only 2 game examples, surprising how strong CT teams look against Westchester teams. New Canaan (which was thought to be in a down year) and Staples dominating Mamaroneck and Bronxville. And Mamaroneck and Bronxville have been very strong this season so far vs other Westchester teams.
It's a particularly strong year for CT schools. Staples is legit; watched them scrimmage St. Anthony's and they played them almost to a draw -- I think they're a top 25 team nationally (and potentially only the third or fourth best team in the state).

The New Canaan blowout over Mamaroneck is kind of shocking to me. I still think Mamo is a good team, and New Canaan is probably the 6th best team in the FCIAC (they just got beaten by Fairfield Ludlowe).

I agree with both statements.

I believe the CONNY youth league is light years ahead of HV's youth league.

Also, I admit, several HV programs are active members of CONNY and those that I'm referring to our most likely the top Section 1 teams.
Unfortunately, after youth level concludes, those elite section 1 teams now face, on a regular basis, a lower level of competition.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Mamaroneck easily takes to Town for its first ever win against them. The tides have changed for sure.

Thanks Captain Obv. Please note, it's your "first time" in light of participating in Section 1 lacrosse since 1970s?

The tide truly changes in May/June, when championships are determined.

Let's not forget, Y set the bar a long time ago. Mamo has only now risen to the bar's level.

Also, I bet no one will disagree that it is the affluent communities (Larchmont/Mamo, Rye, B'ville and B'cliff) that definitely have the resources that others do not.
I always take note to the players travel bags on the HS sidelines and it's obvious those players have better training.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
1-1 yesterday, with the make-up of the P'ville /Dobbs game.
24-5 overall.


Sleepy Hollow at Haldane: SH

Westlake at Byram Hills: BH

Carmel at Irvington: Crml

Edgemont at Dobbs Ferry: Edgmnt

Harrison at Greeley: Greeley

Tappan Zee at Hen Hud: TZ

Briarcliff at St. Anthony's,: B'cliff

Yorktown at Somers: Y!

Hastings at New Rochelle: Hsgts

Bronxville vs. Fordham: Bxville

Ridgefield at Rye: Rdgfd.

Greenwich (Conn.) at Mamaroneck: G'wich

Putnam Valley at Brewster: Brwstr

Pleasantville at Pelham; Pville
.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
1-1 yesterday, with the make-up of the P'ville /Dobbs game.
24-5 overall.


Sleepy Hollow at Haldane: SH

Westlake at Byram Hills: BH

Carmel at Irvington: Crml

Edgemont at Dobbs Ferry: Edgmnt

Harrison at Greeley: Greeley

Tappan Zee at Hen Hud: TZ

Briarcliff at St. Anthony's,: B'cliff

Yorktown at Somers: Y!

Hastings at New Rochelle: Hsgts

Bronxville vs. Fordham: Bxville

Ridgefield at Rye: Rdgfd.

Greenwich (Conn.) at Mamaroneck: G'wich

Putnam Valley at Brewster: Brwstr

Pleasantville at Pelham; Pville
.
Bold pick B’cliff over #3 IL ranked team. If they take them down certainly would hope B’Cliff would break in to the national rankings.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
1-1 yesterday, with the make-up of the P'ville /Dobbs game.
24-5 overall.


Sleepy Hollow at Haldane: SH

Westlake at Byram Hills: BH

Carmel at Irvington: Crml

Edgemont at Dobbs Ferry: Edgmnt

Harrison at Greeley: Greeley

Tappan Zee at Hen Hud: TZ

Briarcliff at St. Anthony's,: B'cliff

Yorktown at Somers: Y!

Hastings at New Rochelle: Hsgts

Bronxville vs. Fordham: Bxville

Ridgefield at Rye: Rdgfd.

Greenwich (Conn.) at Mamaroneck: G'wich

Putnam Valley at Brewster: Brwstr

Pleasantville at Pelham; Pville
.
Bold pick B’cliff over #3 IL ranked team. If they take them down certainly would hope B’Cliff would break in to the national rankings.


Just taking a chance and hoping for a miracle.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
No. It’s toxic, over-entitled parents who got in the ear of the superintendent.
She was at the game. No other reason to be there unless you were trying to look for something. They’re going after the assistant too who is a beloved teacher in town. Players have been left hanging without explanation. They wouldn’t even let players speak at the school board meeting about it. The my shut down public comment after 10 minutes when it was clear there were a number of players and parents in attendance to show their support.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
1-1 yesterday, with the make-up of the P'ville /Dobbs game.
24-5 overall.


Sleepy Hollow at Haldane: SH

Westlake at Byram Hills: BH

Carmel at Irvington: Crml

Edgemont at Dobbs Ferry: Edgmnt

Harrison at Greeley: Greeley

Tappan Zee at Hen Hud: TZ

Briarcliff at St. Anthony's,: B'cliff

Yorktown at Somers: Y!

Hastings at New Rochelle: Hsgts

Bronxville vs. Fordham: Bxville

Ridgefield at Rye: Rdgfd.

Greenwich (Conn.) at Mamaroneck: G'wich

Putnam Valley at Brewster: Brwstr

Pleasantville at Pelham; Pville
.
Bold pick B’cliff over #3 IL ranked team. If they take them down certainly would hope B’Cliff would break in to the national rankings.


Just taking a chance and hoping for a miracle.
Worth a try. St Anthonys was pretty impressive. Depth and top talent at every position. Good part for B’Cliff is at least they get that game on the schedule and get to test themselves.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Brian is a great guy, I knew him from his House of Sports days... I wonder what happened because it seems that there was a discipline issue that got him fired.
This wasn't a disciplinary thing. This was crazy, entitled parents getting to the Superintendent to oust him so they can have a coach that would do what they want. This was in the works. Why else would a superintendent be at an away game? She was there to "find" things to use as reasons. That game was physical, and yes some chirping but nothing from either side that was out of the ordinary. Definitely nothing that a coach should be fired over. This was all done behind closed doors and specifically that day because there was a board meeting later that night. Players and parents went to go to speak on his behalf and after only 1-2 people spoke, they closed the meeting and kicked everyone out.

Good luck finding any coach that is wiling to put up with that.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Saturday's predictions 8-6, 32-11 overall.

Today's schedule and predictions:

Wapp at Y: Y

Bxvll at Scar: Bxvl

Nrth slm at Crml: W by 6+

Pwlng at Hrrsn: Hrrsn

Arlgntn at N Rock: Arlgntn

Wht plns at Clrk Sth: WP

In prp at Hckly: In prp

O at Dbbs Frry: O!

Smrs at Nyck: Somers
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I thought they had a new assistant coach this year?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Ben Potash- best coach in the area- hands down!!!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Never heard of him. Eclipse?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This wasn't a disciplinary thing. This was crazy, entitled parents getting to the Superintendent to oust him so they can have a coach that would do what they want. This was in the works. Why else would a superintendent be at an away game? She was there to "find" things to use as reasons. That game was physical, and yes some chirping but nothing from either side that was out of the ordinary. Definitely nothing that a coach should be fired over. This was all done behind closed doors and specifically that day because there was a board meeting later that night. Players and parents went to go to speak on his behalf and after only 1-2 people spoke, they closed the meeting and kicked everyone out.

Good luck finding any coach that is wiling to put up with that.

Seems how these things tend to go these days. Though I bet the coaches are no angels, when the Super and Board play this way they are just about undefeatable. The classic "no more comments" at public meetings is a cheap move. The players and their parents have to be willing to play chicken with the Board if they really support their coaches. Will they fight that fight? Hardly ever do. Greeley needs a Jimmy Chitwood.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Saturday's predictions 8-6, 32-11 overall.

Today's schedule and predictions:

Wapp at Y: Y

Bxvll at Scar: Bxvl

Nrth slm at Crml: W by 6+

Pwlng at Hrrsn: Hrrsn

Arlgntn at N Rock: Arlgntn

Wht plns at Clrk Sth: WP

In prp at Hckly: In prp

O at Dbbs Frry: O!

Smrs at Nyck: Somers


7-1 in yesterday’s games. (Missing the results of the Hrrsn v pwlng game).

39-12 Overall.

Today’s games:

Wppgrs at O: Wapp
Mamo at L/P: Mamo
Hud at JJ: JJ
Plhm at Grly: G
Rye at TZ: Rye should win.
Fox Lane at P’vlle: P’ville
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
They had a
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This wasn't a disciplinary thing. This was crazy, entitled parents getting to the Superintendent to oust him so they can have a coach that would do what they want. This was in the works. Why else would a superintendent be at an away game? She was there to "find" things to use as reasons. That game was physical, and yes some chirping but nothing from either side that was out of the ordinary. Definitely nothing that a coach should be fired over. This was all done behind closed doors and specifically that day because there was a board meeting later that night. Players and parents went to go to speak on his behalf and after only 1-2 people spoke, they closed the meeting and kicked everyone out.

Good luck finding any coach that is wiling to put up with that.

Seems how these things tend to go these days. Though I bet the coaches are no angels, when the Super and Board play this way they are just about undefeatable. The classic "no more comments" at public meetings is a cheap move. The players and their parents have to be willing to play chicken with the Board if they really support their coaches. Will they fight that fight? Hardly ever do. Greeley needs a Jimmy Chitwood.

They had him already. That's the guy that just go shown the door. The families and players are asking the questions and demanding answers. They aren't getting any. There isn't a card for them to play here. if there was, it would be played. Players were talking boycott playing at one point. The superintendent holds the power here and she uses it all the time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Saturday's predictions 8-6, 32-11 overall.

Today's schedule and predictions:

Wapp at Y: Y

Bxvll at Scar: Bxvl

Nrth slm at Crml: W by 6+

Pwlng at Hrrsn: Hrrsn

Arlgntn at N Rock: Arlgntn

Wht plns at Clrk Sth: WP

In prp at Hckly: In prp

O at Dbbs Frry: O!

Smrs at Nyck: Somers


7-1 in yesterday’s games. (Missing the results of the Hrrsn v pwlng game).

39-12 Overall.

Today’s games:

Wppgrs at O: Wapp
Mamo at L/P: Mamo
Hud at JJ: JJ
Plhm at Grly: G
Rye at TZ: Rye should win.
Fox Lane at P’vlle: P’ville


5-1 today, 44-13 overall.

Wonder if G is starting be effected by the coaching drama, or is Plhm that good.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Today's games and predictions:

Lrds at Arlgtn: A.
Scars at Y: Y
N Rock at Wh Pls: WP
M-W at Sffn: Sffn
SH at Nyck: N
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Brian is a great guy, I knew him from his House of Sports days... I wonder what happened because it seems that there was a discipline issue that got him fired.
This wasn't a disciplinary thing. This was crazy, entitled parents getting to the Superintendent to oust him so they can have a coach that would do what they want. This was in the works. Why else would a superintendent be at an away game? She was there to "find" things to use as reasons. That game was physical, and yes some chirping but nothing from either side that was out of the ordinary. Definitely nothing that a coach should be fired over. This was all done behind closed doors and specifically that day because there was a board meeting later that night. Players and parents went to go to speak on his behalf and after only 1-2 people spoke, they closed the meeting and kicked everyone out.

Good luck finding any coach that is wiling to put up with that.

Greeley just advertised that they are seeking a Boys JV head coach.

I'm guessing the bumped up the JV coach and now have no one for JV.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Saturday's predictions 8-6, 32-11 overall.

Today's schedule and predictions:

Wapp at Y: Y

Bxvll at Scar: Bxvl

Nrth slm at Crml: W by 6+

Pwlng at Hrrsn: Hrrsn

Arlgntn at N Rock: Arlgntn

Wht plns at Clrk Sth: WP

In prp at Hckly: In prp

O at Dbbs Frry: O!

Smrs at Nyck: Somers


7-1 in yesterday’s games. (Missing the results of the Hrrsn v pwlng game).

39-12 Overall.

Today’s games:

Wppgrs at O: Wapp
Mamo at L/P: Mamo
Hud at JJ: JJ
Plhm at Grly: G
Rye at TZ: Rye should win.
Fox Lane at P’vlle: P’ville


5-1 today, 44-13 overall.

Wonder if G is starting be effected by the coaching drama, or is Plhm that good.

Greeley was listless, no energy. If not for a late garbage time goal it would have been a shutout. It was running time 2 minutes into the 3rd quarter.
It's bad. But, this is what some parents wanted. Greeley will be lucky to get 1-2 more wins this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
4-1 in Wednesday's games, 48-14 overall.

Thursday's games:


Hen Hud at Pelham: Phlm

John Jay at Lakeland/Panas: L/P

White Plains at Somers: Smrs

Bronxville at New Canaan: NC

Mahopac at Putnam Valley: Pac.

North Rockland at Nyack: NR

Tappan Zee at Wappingers: TZ
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
John Jay easily over Lakeland…amazing what can happen when kids actually want to play for their coach… unlike last year…...Wolves are back!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John Jay easily over Lakeland…amazing what can happen when kids actually want to play for their coach… unlike last year…...Wolves are back!
I don't think 2021 should be held as a litmus test for anything. There was no preseason and what like 15 games in 6 weeks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John Jay easily over Lakeland…amazing what can happen when kids actually want to play for their coach… unlike last year…...Wolves are back!

I recognize that the poster is a lone wolf that continues to be bitter about JJ's past seasons and the statement definitely can be misconstrued. I believe HS players are suppose to "actually want to play" for their school (community), themselves and friends.

Also, can we put an end to any further negative posts about how the JJ HS lax program underachieved while under TS, because there is a pattern/history of JJ coaches being forced out by parents. CK is thriving at Pleasantville, NS is successful at Kennedy Catholic and Y is happy to have TS back home.

Coach MB, you are on the clock and 2028 parents will soon be talking.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
6-1 in Thursday’s games, 54-15 overall.

Some interesting games on Saturday, my predictions are:

Shenendehowa at Mamo: Mamo

Rye at Y: RYE

Briarcliff at L/P: B’cliff

N Rock at PR: NR

CHHS at Westlake: CHHS
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
TS wasn’t forced out, he left on his own. And Town has pushed out several coaches over the years, you can construe it in a different way but the parents were all over Coach C. Best of luck with your new guy, please report back in 2 years
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
4-1 in Saturday's games and 58-16 overall.

Since last season, isn't Rye on a 3-0 win streak over Y? If so, someone will have to check the record books and see when the last time Y lost 3 consecutive games to a single Section 1 opponent. Better look back to the pre-1980's.
Y's schedule this week is a true test; Home games against Darien and Cold Spring Harbor and away at Chaminade.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
4-1 in Saturday's games and 58-16 overall.

Since last season, isn't Rye on a 3-0 win streak over Y? If so, someone will have to check the record books and see when the last time Y lost 3 consecutive games to a single Section 1 opponent. Better look back to the pre-1980's.
Y's schedule this week is a true test; Home games against Darien and Cold Spring Harbor and away at Chaminade.

Y cannot live in the past. What happened 5-40 years ago is over and done with. High level lax has become a “rich man’s”sport. Look at the new landscape of top level lacrosse, Rye, Bronxville, Briarcliff, and all of the private schools. No knock on them, just the way it is.
Y is also becoming a baseball town too, tons of families moving into the town who have no understanding of lacrosse and dads grew up on baseball and are having their kids play that instead. Y still has a phenomenal youth program and will always be competitive but will not walk through section 1 anymore.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Prediction….Town 0-3 this week
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
4-1 in Saturday's games and 58-16 overall.

Since last season, isn't Rye on a 3-0 win streak over Y? If so, someone will have to check the record books and see when the last time Y lost 3 consecutive games to a single Section 1 opponent. Better look back to the pre-1980's.
Y's schedule this week is a true test; Home games against Darien and Cold Spring Harbor and away at Chaminade.

Y cannot live in the past. What happened 5-40 years ago is over and done with. High level lax has become a “rich man’s”sport. Look at the new landscape of top level lacrosse, Rye, Bronxville, Briarcliff, and all of the private schools. No knock on them, just the way it is.
Y is also becoming a baseball town too, tons of families moving into the town who have no understanding of lacrosse and dads grew up on baseball and are having their kids play that instead. Y still has a phenomenal youth program and will always be competitive but will not walk through section 1 anymore.

I agree (100%) that the landscape has been changing and Y will no longer be able to walk through Sect 1 anymore.

Also, Y going 0-3 this week is a safe bet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Prediction….Town 0-3 this week

WOW.....You really went out on a limb with that one. At least town has the guts to take on the top teams in the COUNTRY!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Ben Potash- best coach in the area- hands down!!!!!
The short term returns aren't exactly backing that up. But, he's now in a tough position now. He's the de facto head coach. the FB coach is basically the adult in the room, but won't be much lacrosse help. There is a JV coach helping where he can. He's a guy that is now thrust into a Head Coach role having never done it before. Add the crazy parent situation and it's a recipe for failure.
I hope he succeeds, but if I were him, I'd freshen up my resume and look elsewhere when the season is over. The parent issue and the administration aren't changing. The minute he does something a parent doesn't like, the superintendent will be breathing down his neck. Who wants to deal with that?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That would be my prediction also for every other Westchester team playing those 3 teams
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John Jay easily over Lakeland…amazing what can happen when kids actually want to play for their coach… unlike last year…...Wolves are back!

I recognize that the poster is a lone wolf that continues to be bitter about JJ's past seasons and the statement definitely can be misconstrued. I believe HS players are suppose to "actually want to play" for their school (community), themselves and friends.

Also, can we put an end to any further negative posts about how the JJ HS lax program underachieved while under TS, because there is a pattern/history of JJ coaches being forced out by parents. CK is thriving at Pleasantville, NS is successful at Kennedy Catholic and Y is happy to have TS back home.

Coach MB, you are on the clock and 2028 parents will soon be talking.

If John Jay underperformed during TS tenure, what can you say about Yorktown after Marr left? John Jay was well coached under TS and staff, be thankful.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That would be my prediction also for every other Westchester team playing those 3 teams

Stepinac & Iona too?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yes
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
54-15 overall.

Lots of games on the schedule today; my predictions are:


Carmel at Greeley: Carmel

Haldane at Pleasantville: P’ville

Ossining at Sleepy Hollow: O

Mahopac at Somers: Somers

Glen Rock (N.J.) at Pearl River: Hmm, a relative-family feud (uncle/coach v nephew); PR!

Westlake at North Salem: Wtlk

Arlington at Byram Hills: BH

Wappingers at Fox Lane: Wapp.

Bronxville at Putnam Valley: Bxvl

Cold Spring Harbor at Rye: CSH

Rye Neck at Brewster: Brstr

New Rochelle at Irvington: Irv

Darien (Conn.) at Yorktown: Darien
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John Jay easily over Lakeland…amazing what can happen when kids actually want to play for their coach… unlike last year…...Wolves are back!

I recognize that the poster is a lone wolf that continues to be bitter about JJ's past seasons and the statement definitely can be misconstrued. I believe HS players are suppose to "actually want to play" for their school (community), themselves and friends.

Also, can we put an end to any further negative posts about how the JJ HS lax program underachieved while under TS, because there is a pattern/history of JJ coaches being forced out by parents. CK is thriving at Pleasantville, NS is successful at Kennedy Catholic and Y is happy to have TS back home.

Coach MB, you are on the clock and 2028 parents will soon be talking.

If John Jay underperformed during TS tenure, what can you say about Yorktown after Marr left? John Jay was well coached under TS and staff, be thankful.

This is one of the biggest issues with parent complaints - they have very little true idea of what it take to run a program. All they see is what is on the field during games. If you truly listen to some of the comments coming form the stands, to anyone with half a lacrosse brain will tell you it's usually wrong, and without any understanding of underlying nuances. It's easy to be a complainer and point out what isn't working. Its a much different monster to be the one actually doing it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown loses a tough one to Darien 9-8 in 2OT. Was down 5-2 after one quarter and battled back. Good showing, but Darien looked very unimpressive. Their goalie had 2 saves by my count, and both were shots that hit him in the chest.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
54-15 overall.

Lots of games on the schedule today; my predictions are:


Carmel at Greeley: Carmel

Haldane at Pleasantville: P’ville

Ossining at Sleepy Hollow: O

Mahopac at Somers: Somers

Glen Rock (N.J.) at Pearl River: Hmm, a relative-family feud (uncle/coach v nephew); PR!

Westlake at North Salem: Wtlk

Arlington at Byram Hills: BH

Wappingers at Fox Lane: Wapp.

Bronxville at Putnam Valley: Bxvl

Cold Spring Harbor at Rye: CSH

Rye Neck at Brewster: Brstr

New Rochelle at Irvington: Irv

Darien (Conn.) at Yorktown: Darien


UGH, 6--6 without the results of the Westlake NS game! (60-21 overall)

Four games that I'm surprised about are:
Greeley with a road win,
Byram losing at home,
Fox winning at home, and
Y showing some grit in a double OT game.


Today's 2 games:

B'cliff over Ramapo, and
Pelham over WP
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
54-15 overall.

Lots of games on the schedule today; my predictions are:


Carmel at Greeley: Carmel

Haldane at Pleasantville: P’ville

Ossining at Sleepy Hollow: O

Mahopac at Somers: Somers

Glen Rock (N.J.) at Pearl River: Hmm, a relative-family feud (uncle/coach v nephew); PR!

Westlake at North Salem: Wtlk

Arlington at Byram Hills: BH

Wappingers at Fox Lane: Wapp.

Bronxville at Putnam Valley: Bxvl

Cold Spring Harbor at Rye: CSH

Rye Neck at Brewster: Brstr

New Rochelle at Irvington: Irv

Darien (Conn.) at Yorktown: Darien

Gotta give it to Greeley, that is a good win for them. Coming from behind late to pull it out. They haven't been a very strong fourth quarter team this year. Happy for those guys to pull that out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
No one talking about Rye over CSH ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown loses a tough one to Darien 9-8 in 2OT. Was down 5-2 after one quarter and battled back. Good showing, but Darien looked very unimpressive. Their goalie had 2 saves by my count, and both were shots that hit him in the chest.

Lets give a little credit where credit is due, maybe they looked unimpressive because Y-TOWN made them look that way. Goalie from Y had a great game, made them stop shooting from the outside and coaches had an awesome game plan.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown loses a tough one to Darien 9-8 in 2OT. Was down 5-2 after one quarter and battled back. Good showing, but Darien looked very unimpressive. Their goalie had 2 saves by my count, and both were shots that hit him in the chest.

Lets give a little credit where credit is due, maybe they looked unimpressive because Y-TOWN made them look that way. Goalie from Y had a great game, made them stop shooting from the outside and coaches had an awesome game plan.
Just calling it like I see it. Darien looked poor against a good not great NC team, and it continued in this game. Missing the net on open looks, and dropping the ball on simple and accurate passes. The goalie literally hasn't made a stick save on an outside shot all year. Yorktown played decently and the goalie played well, but just pointing out that I don't think a 2OT loss to Darien is as strong a signal as it might've seemed coming into the season. Also I disagree that they made them stop shooting from outside -- they went to zone precisely to invite Darien to shoot from distance, and their goalie was up to the task. Good coaching adjustment after a first quarter where they struggled in man-to-man.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Big win for Rye
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
4-1 in Saturday's games and 58-16 overall.

Since last season, isn't Rye on a 3-0 win streak over Y? If so, someone will have to check the record books and see when the last time Y lost 3 consecutive games to a single Section 1 opponent. Better look back to the pre-1980's.
Y's schedule this week is a true test; Home games against Darien and Cold Spring Harbor and away at Chaminade.

Y cannot live in the past. What happened 5-40 years ago is over and done with. High level lax has become a “rich man’s”sport. Look at the new landscape of top level lacrosse, Rye, Bronxville, Briarcliff, and all of the private schools. No knock on them, just the way it is.
Y is also becoming a baseball town too, tons of families moving into the town who have no understanding of lacrosse and dads grew up on baseball and are having their kids play that instead. Y still has a phenomenal youth program and will always be competitive but will not walk through section 1 anymore.

Yorktown’s not living in the past — washed up dads who got abused by the green & white for the better part of 60 years are. Don’t thrust the feelings of adults on kids. The kids on the team aren’t influenced by anything that’s happened in the past.

Town will be just fine moving forward and will be battling for a Sec 1 title in May, per usual.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Previous Anonymous poster is clearly a Kool aid drinker.

Y's frequency in losing games to sec 1 teams is at an all time high and this season looks to be it's worst season against Sec 1 teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Previous Anonymous poster is clearly a Kool aid drinker.

Y's frequency in losing games to sec 1 teams is at an all time high and this season looks to be it's worst season against Sec 1 teams.

It only took Sec 1 60 years to catch up! Not sure I’d be celebrating that fact.

Now, how many times did you lose to Yorktown in your HS career? The salt is flowing through your veins. That’s sad, man.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown didn’t have incredible teams every year for the past 40. Some teams won state championships and others lost handily to Long Island in the regionals. The competition was less in the section and when they won it, it was less obvious when they were stacked versus just good. As everyone knows the section is far more competitive across the board and the lesser Yorktown teams can’t skate through as easily. This is not one of their loaded teams with multiple D1 players. It’s a pretty good team but not dominant

Sometimes this is cyclical. 2018-2019 everyone thought John Jay was the new power. Now everyone is sure it is Bronxville, Briarcliff, Rye and Mamaroneck. They will all have down years at points in the future. The programs won’t be “broken”, it will be an indication that less lax athletes came through the system those few years.
Duke isn’t doing well this year. Are we ready to say they are washed up?

The Y has a very good youth program and will likely have some very good teams in the future that have success like those of old. The fact that the program is well above average each and every year should be more the focus and why every other succesful youth program has followed their model.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Nobody talking JJ over Rye?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Great win for the wolves…MB quickly rebuilding what the other guy destroyed…kids want to play and want to win!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Nobody talking JJ over Rye?
It just happened but that is a clutch win and the first big W of the MB tenure
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Looks like Greeley comes back down to earth, Somers had a 4-1 lead early and didn't look back. final of 12-4 or 12-6 i think.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Great win for the wolves…MB quickly rebuilding what the other guy destroyed…kids want to play and want to win!

Man, let it go. TS did not destroy anything. If he did, you think Yorktown hires him? Enough with trying to hammer TS, your bias is clear. No need to spoil a great win for the current staff and players that have nothing to do with the past. Enjoy it. it was a great win.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Nobody talking JJ over Rye?
It just happened but that is a clutch win and the first big W of the MB tenure

Great WIn and congratulations to the players and coaches!
Glad to see JJ is having a very good season so far.

I wonder if this game was a trap game for Rye, they just beat Cold Spring Harbor in a 7-3 game.
If JJ continues to have success, especially against Scar, Y, BH, Somers and TZ, then it wasn't a trap game.

It's safe to say that JJ should beat Greeley & Fox lane.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Nobody talking JJ over Rye?
It just happened but that is a clutch win and the first big W of the MB tenure

Great WIn and congratulations to the players and coaches!
Glad to see JJ is having a very good season so far.

I wonder if this game was a trap game for Rye, they just beat Cold Spring Harbor in a 7-3 game.
If JJ continues to have success, especially against Scar, Y, BH, Somers and TZ, then it wasn't a trap game.

It's safe to say that JJ should beat Greeley & Fox lane.

FL and Greeley are going to be a walk in the park. Greeley hasn't challenged them since 2019 and with everything going on there its not likely to happen for years.

FL is young I don't think they have it this year, but in a year or two they might be back up there.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Nobody talking JJ over Rye?

Surprised JJ beat Rye. But Rye def is off this year for some reason. They don't look right. On paper, they should be crushing it this year but they seem off. Barely beat TZ and WP.

CLASS A- Mmrnk seems to getting after getting destroyed by New Canaan- playing Farmingdale should be a great test. Arlington having a great year with lotsa close wins. Scarsdale tough to figure. White Plains quietly having good year.
CLASS B- tossup between Rye and YTown. Don't think JJ will win this but they make it real fun.
CLASS C- tough to know. 4 teams could win this- Pelham, TZ, Byram and darkhorse Hen Hud.
CLASS D- Briarcliff lost Waterhouse? Wow. Bronxville really playing well and tough comp. Pville playing really well. Powerhouse D programs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I was away vacation and i'm back with game predictions.
Overall, 66-21.

Today's games are:

White Plains at Carmel: CRML

Briarcliff at Pearl River: Brcff

Irvington at North Rockland NR

Mahopac at L/P: LP

Pawling at Putnam Valley: PV

Brewster at Clarkstown South: CS

Eastchester at Haldane: HD

Ossining at Fox Lane: FOX.

Harrison at Byram Hills: BH
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Nobody talking JJ over Rye?

Surprised JJ beat Rye. But Rye def is off this year for some reason. They don't look right. On paper, they should be crushing it this year but they seem off. Barely beat TZ and WP.

CLASS A- Mmrnk seems to getting after getting destroyed by New Canaan- playing Farmingdale should be a great test. Arlington having a great year with lotsa close wins. Scarsdale tough to figure. White Plains quietly having good year.
CLASS B- tossup between Rye and YTown. Don't think JJ will win this but they make it real fun.
CLASS C- tough to know. 4 teams could win this- Pelham, TZ, Byram and darkhorse Hen Hud.
CLASS D- Briarcliff lost Waterhouse? Wow. Bronxville really playing well and tough comp. Pville playing really well. Powerhouse D programs.

At class A North Rockland is in the mix. They have already beaten Arlington and White Plains, and will play Scarsdale soon. They have maybe the best goalie in the section, are very good at face-off (but not as good as Scarsdale), and have a coach who is a good game tactician. If they beat Scarsdale they will be the favorite to make CG vs Mamaroneck.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Nobody talking JJ over Rye?

Surprised JJ beat Rye. But Rye def is off this year for some reason. They don't look right. On paper, they should be crushing it this year but they seem off. Barely beat TZ and WP.

CLASS A- Mmrnk seems to getting after getting destroyed by New Canaan- playing Farmingdale should be a great test. Arlington having a great year with lotsa close wins. Scarsdale tough to figure. White Plains quietly having good year.
CLASS B- tossup between Rye and YTown. Don't think JJ will win this but they make it real fun.
CLASS C- tough to know. 4 teams could win this- Pelham, TZ, Byram and darkhorse Hen Hud.
CLASS D- Briarcliff lost Waterhouse? Wow. Bronxville really playing well and tough comp. Pville playing really well. Powerhouse D programs.

Class A: It's between Mamo, Scarsdale and NR. WP in the mix and also has a great GK, but I think they are on the outside looking in here. A Scarsdale/Mamo final rematch would make a FANTASTIC game.

Class B: I think you're sleeping on Somers. They lead class B thus far and have one loss - a close one to Yorktown. They still have JJ and Rye on the regular season, but I don't think it's as clear as Rye and Yorktown, especially after JJ beating the,. It's a 4-way between Jay, Rye, Yorktown and Somers. I don't think Mahopac has enough in the tank to challenge those 4, but in a one-game series who knows.

Class C is a complete toss up. TZ has been consistantly good all year, Pelham has a solid L to JJ, and have handled pretty much everyone else. They have certainly loaded up their schedule and will be well prepared going into the Playoffs. For my 2 cents, it's TZ, Pelham then everyone else with Byram a close second.

Class D is basically Bronxville's to lose. BUT Briarcliff has dominated everyone they've played with only losses to St. Anthony's and SWR. They play each other last game which will be your finals preview.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yesterday, 5-2 (with two game results pending: Irvgtn v NR and Hrrsn v BH), Overall, 71-23.
M-pac, WOW 12-5 win against L/P. Didn’t see that coming.

Today’s 5 game predictions:
Pelham at Bronxville: BXV

Wappingers at Arlington: Arlgtn

Eastchester at Rye: RYE

Somers at Fox Lane: Somers

John Jay at Yorktown. Some intangibles: Both teams are going into this game off a loss, JJ playing with chip, Y playing at Home, I expect a close game, with Y winning by 2.
I expect some post game chatter that Y is lucky to have won the game and that JJ was very close in winning the game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Iona just beat Staples in OT. 14-13
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
5-0 yesterday, plus a W with the BH results from Monday. Overall: 77-23.

Y slammed the door on JJ’s comeback to prominence, for this season.


Today’s game predictions:


Carmel at Mahopac: M-pac

Ossining at Lakeland/Panas: L/P

Putnam Valley at Croton: PV

Pleasantville at Byram Hills: Yikes, this one difficult. BH

New Rochelle at Scarsdale: Scar

White Plains at Mamaroneck: Mamo

Hen Hud at Lourde: HH

Pelham at Harrison: Plhm
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
...
Y slammed the door on JJ’s comeback to prominence, for this season. ...

I'm going to strongly disagree with you here. Yorktown is good, no doubt, but they are hardly the dominant force they have been in years past. This was a tighter game than the score implies with 2 late empty netters and JJ having issues clearing the ball. Clean that up and it's a much tighter game than we are led to believe. I don't think this is as cut and dry as this statement suggests. This is stil the JJ team that beat Rye who has 2 All Americans on the team. That is no easy task.

Again, Somers is lurking out there. They are much better than I think they are being given credit for. I will reserve my final thoughts until they have played both JJ and yorktown and head into the playoffs.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
...
Y slammed the door on JJ’s comeback to prominence, for this season. ...

I'm going to strongly disagree with you here. Yorktown is good, no doubt, but they are hardly the dominant force they have been in years past. This was a tighter game than the score implies with 2 late empty netters and JJ having issues clearing the ball. Clean that up and it's a much tighter game than we are led to believe. I don't think this is as cut and dry as this statement suggests. This is stil the JJ team that beat Rye who has 2 All Americans on the team. That is no easy task.

Again, Somers is lurking out there. They are much better than I think they are being given credit for. I will reserve my final thoughts until they have played both JJ and yorktown and head into the playoffs.

As I have stated before:

“wonder if this game was a trap game for Rye, they just beat Cold Spring Harbor in a 7-3 game.
If JJ continues to have success, especially against Scar, Y, BH, Somers and TZ, then it wasn't a trap game.”

And

“I expect some post game chatter that Y is lucky to have won the game and that JJ was very close in winning the game”

I’m on the belief that the JJ v Rye game was a TRAP game for Rye and post-game chatter advocating for a moral W against Y was anticipated.

JJ will definitely lose to Somers and League F will be won by Somers. JJ has a chance against with BH & TZ. But doubtful.

Class B will come down to Rye, Somers & Y. JJ is comfortable in 4th place.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by JimSection1
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
...
Y slammed the door on JJ’s comeback to prominence, for this season. ...

I'm going to strongly disagree with you here. Yorktown is good, no doubt, but they are hardly the dominant force they have been in years past. This was a tighter game than the score implies with 2 late empty netters and JJ having issues clearing the ball. Clean that up and it's a much tighter game than we are led to believe. I don't think this is as cut and dry as this statement suggests. This is stil the JJ team that beat Rye who has 2 All Americans on the team. That is no easy task.

Again, Somers is lurking out there. They are much better than I think they are being given credit for. I will reserve my final thoughts until they have played both JJ and yorktown and head into the playoffs.

As I have stated before:

“wonder if this game was a trap game for Rye, they just beat Cold Spring Harbor in a 7-3 game.
If JJ continues to have success, especially against Scar, Y, BH, Somers and TZ, then it wasn't a trap game.”

And

“I expect some post game chatter that Y is lucky to have won the game and that JJ was very close in winning the game”

I’m on the belief that the JJ v Rye game was a TRAP game for Rye and post-game chatter advocating for a moral W against Y was anticipated.

JJ will definitely lose to Somers and League F will be won by Somers. JJ has a chance against with BH & TZ. But doubtful.

Class B will come down to Rye, Somers & Y. JJ is comfortable in 4th place.

I agree with you on the 4 in Class B. I am not as worried about how JJ fairs agaisnt TZ or BH, they are class C teams so it's largely irrelevant come playoffs. I think it comes down to seedings. If JJ and Yorktown are the 1-4 or 2-3 with Rye vs. Somers in the other semi, it's going to get interesting.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I think it's a bit premature to say Class D is Bronxville's to lose given Briarcliff's season. Even without waterhouse, I predict Briarcliff will win. Also curious how Bville will deal with great zone d.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by JimSection1
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
...
Y slammed the door on JJ’s comeback to prominence, for this season. ...

I'm going to strongly disagree with you here. Yorktown is good, no doubt, but they are hardly the dominant force they have been in years past. This was a tighter game than the score implies with 2 late empty netters and JJ having issues clearing the ball. Clean that up and it's a much tighter game than we are led to believe. I don't think this is as cut and dry as this statement suggests. This is stil the JJ team that beat Rye who has 2 All Americans on the team. That is no easy task.

Again, Somers is lurking out there. They are much better than I think they are being given credit for. I will reserve my final thoughts until they have played both JJ and yorktown and head into the playoffs.

As I have stated before:

“wonder if this game was a trap game for Rye, they just beat Cold Spring Harbor in a 7-3 game.
If JJ continues to have success, especially against Scar, Y, BH, Somers and TZ, then it wasn't a trap game.”

And

“I expect some post game chatter that Y is lucky to have won the game and that JJ was very close in winning the game”

I’m on the belief that the JJ v Rye game was a TRAP game for Rye and post-game chatter advocating for a moral W against Y was anticipated.

JJ will definitely lose to Somers and League F will be won by Somers. JJ has a chance against with BH & TZ. But doubtful.

Class B will come down to Rye, Somers & Y. JJ is comfortable in 4th place.

I agree with you on the 4 in Class B. I am not as worried about how JJ fairs agaisnt TZ or BH, they are class C teams so it's largely irrelevant come playoffs. I think it comes down to seedings. If JJ and Yorktown are the 1-4 or 2-3 with Rye vs. Somers in the other semi, it's going to get interesting.

Somers will probably be the 1 seed in B with that cupcake schedule
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yesterday: 8-0, and 85-23 overall. Nearly, every game played in Sect 1 yesterday was a blow out, yikes.

Today’s prediction:

Pawling at Rye Neck: Pwlng
Rye vs. Fordham: Rye
Greeley at John Jay: JJ

Let's see how JJ responds today; I expect it to be a close game (within 4 goals). A blow-out WIN would make a statement.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yesterday: 8-0, and 85-23 overall. Nearly, every game played in Sect 1 yesterday was a blow out, yikes.

Today’s prediction:

Pawling at Rye Neck: Pwlng
Rye vs. Fordham: Rye
Greeley at John Jay: JJ

Let's see how JJ responds today; I expect it to be a close game (within 4 goals). A blow-out WIN would make a statement.
No chance this is a close game for JJ, this will be a blowout. Greeley has been running timed 3 or 4 times already by much lesser teams. Add in that it is also Senior night, this should be a clinic for JJ
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yesterday: 8-0, and 85-23 overall. Nearly, every game played in Sect 1 yesterday was a blow out, yikes.

Today’s prediction:

Pawling at Rye Neck: Pwlng
Rye vs. Fordham: Rye
Greeley at John Jay: JJ

Let's see how JJ responds today; I expect it to be a close game (within 4 goals). A blow-out WIN would make a statement.
No chance this is a close game for JJ, this will be a blowout. Greeley has been running timed 3 or 4 times already by much lesser teams. Add in that it is also Senior night, this should be a clinic for JJ

12-2 Jay and it wasn’t even close. A few pipes and the Greeley goalie making some nice saves it would have been a bigger margin. 2nd goal for Greeley was and empty netter on a 10-man ride. Jay had really good ball control on O and solid D.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2-1 in yesterday's game, 87-24 overall.

JJ beating Greeley like they are suppose too! Fox Lane is up next (Sat.) and should be another lopsided W.

Today's predictions:

Edgemont at Ardsley; Edg

Yorktown at Carmel: Y

Lourdes at Ossining: O

Irvington at Hastings: Irv

Rye Neck at Dobbs Ferry: Dobbs

Croton at North Salem: CHHS

Yonkers at Sleepy Hollow: SH

Briarcliff at Pleasantville: B!

Arlington at Clarkstown South: Arl

Suffern at White Plains: WP

Brewster at Hen Hud: HH

Kennedy at Putnam Valley: PV

Newtown (Conn.) at Scarsdale: Scars
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by JimSection1
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
...
Y slammed the door on JJ’s comeback to prominence, for this season. ...

I'm going to strongly disagree with you here. Yorktown is good, no doubt, but they are hardly the dominant force they have been in years past. This was a tighter game than the score implies with 2 late empty netters and JJ having issues clearing the ball. Clean that up and it's a much tighter game than we are led to believe. I don't think this is as cut and dry as this statement suggests. This is stil the JJ team that beat Rye who has 2 All Americans on the team. That is no easy task.

Again, Somers is lurking out there. They are much better than I think they are being given credit for. I will reserve my final thoughts until they have played both JJ and yorktown and head into the playoffs.

As I have stated before:

“wonder if this game was a trap game for Rye, they just beat Cold Spring Harbor in a 7-3 game.
If JJ continues to have success, especially against Scar, Y, BH, Somers and TZ, then it wasn't a trap game.”

And

“I expect some post game chatter that Y is lucky to have won the game and that JJ was very close in winning the game”

I’m on the belief that the JJ v Rye game was a TRAP game for Rye and post-game chatter advocating for a moral W against Y was anticipated.

JJ will definitely lose to Somers and League F will be won by Somers. JJ has a chance against with BH & TZ. But doubtful.

Class B will come down to Rye, Somers & Y. JJ is comfortable in 4th place.

I agree with you on the 4 in Class B. I am not as worried about how JJ fairs agaisnt TZ or BH, they are class C teams so it's largely irrelevant come playoffs. I think it comes down to seedings. If JJ and Yorktown are the 1-4 or 2-3 with Rye vs. Somers in the other semi, it's going to get interesting.

Somers will probably be the 1 seed in B with that cupcake schedule

TZ, Rye, Wappingers (ok, they're off this year, but traditionally tough), White Plains (Better than usual) P'ville, Rye, Yorktown, Lakeland and Greenwich....

Yes, cupcakes all.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by JimSection1
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
...
Y slammed the door on JJ’s comeback to prominence, for this season. ...

I'm going to strongly disagree with you here. Yorktown is good, no doubt, but they are hardly the dominant force they have been in years past. This was a tighter game than the score implies with 2 late empty netters and JJ having issues clearing the ball. Clean that up and it's a much tighter game than we are led to believe. I don't think this is as cut and dry as this statement suggests. This is stil the JJ team that beat Rye who has 2 All Americans on the team. That is no easy task.

Again, Somers is lurking out there. They are much better than I think they are being given credit for. I will reserve my final thoughts until they have played both JJ and yorktown and head into the playoffs.

As I have stated before:

“wonder if this game was a trap game for Rye, they just beat Cold Spring Harbor in a 7-3 game.
If JJ continues to have success, especially against Scar, Y, BH, Somers and TZ, then it wasn't a trap game.”

And

“I expect some post game chatter that Y is lucky to have won the game and that JJ was very close in winning the game”

I’m on the belief that the JJ v Rye game was a TRAP game for Rye and post-game chatter advocating for a moral W against Y was anticipated.

JJ will definitely lose to Somers and League F will be won by Somers. JJ has a chance against with BH & TZ. But doubtful.

Class B will come down to Rye, Somers & Y. JJ is comfortable in 4th place.

I agree with you on the 4 in Class B. I am not as worried about how JJ fairs agaisnt TZ or BH, they are class C teams so it's largely irrelevant come playoffs. I think it comes down to seedings. If JJ and Yorktown are the 1-4 or 2-3 with Rye vs. Somers in the other semi, it's going to get interesting.

Somers will probably be the 1 seed in B with that cupcake schedule

TZ, Rye, Wappingers (ok, they're off this year, but traditionally tough), White Plains (Better than usual) P'ville, Rye, Yorktown, Lakeland and Greenwich....

Yes, cupcakes all.

Yes, cupcake. The teams that you have beaten have an overall record of 47-51 and the team that you lost to has a 5-5 record. Come on man.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Somers will probably be the 1 seed in B with that cupcake schedule

TZ, Rye, Wappingers (ok, they're off this year, but traditionally tough), White Plains (Better than usual) P'ville, Rye, Yorktown, Lakeland and Greenwich....

Yes, cupcakes all.

Yes, cupcake. The teams that you have beaten have an overall record of 47-51 and the team that you lost to has a 5-5 record. Come on man.[/quote]

Ok, one: stop with the "you," I have no association with Somers, I am a fan of Section 1 Lax. Two: I can read stats from Kevin Devaney's blog too - at least give him the credit for putting together the info, rather than pass it off as your own.

Somers has no control over OLL, L/P, Greeley, or Fox Lane's records. They are league or crossover games they have to play. They added non-league games with Yorktown, Rye, Wappingers, Tappan Zee, P'ville and Greenwich which are traditionally solid opponents. Yorktown is a .500 team right now and it's not like they are playing a soft schedule themselves. Somers is already in arguably the toughest league in Section 1 and THEN they added those teams. You are way off base on this one.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
...the team that you lost to has a 5-5 record. Come on man.

That would be Yorktown who's losses are: Chaminade, CSH, Mamaroneck, Rye and Darien, 2 of whom are Top 25 in the Country.

Yeah - soft opponent.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
9-4 yesterday, 96-28 overall.

Most surprised about Suffern, they have been losing more games than I anticipated. They use to be the top dog in Rock.

Today’s predictions:

Ardsley at Nanuet: Nan

Keio at Briarcliff: B’f

Harrison at Warwick: WK (how about them apples)

Mamaroneck at Wantagh: Mamo

Clarkstown North at North Salem: CN

Byram Hills at Somers: Sms

Pelham at Tappan Zee: This should be a good game, it’s a toss up, but going with the home team, TZ

Fox Lane at John Jay: JJ, should win by 6, unless FX has more HHH.

Niskayuna at Lakeland/Panas: Nsk

Pawling at Pearl River: PR

Albertus Magnus at Blind Brook: AM

Bronxville at Rye: RY

Greeley at Haldane: G
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
9-4 in yesterday's games; 105-32 overall.

Most surprised with Pelham with a road win against TZ.
Byram Hills showed up and won a tight game against Somers,
Class C is will be interesting to watch now that Pelham and Byram are playing at a higher level. TZ has a shot, but I doubt they will come over the bridge and pull out a win during the playoffs.

Rye slapped BXV with a 6 goal differential

JJ wins, but only scores 7 and only wins by 4. I expected double digit scoring, an 8-1 score a halftime and a 9 goal differential, especially with the JJ's supporters on the forum.

First round of the playoffs start May 16!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
.

10 days left in the regular season and things are fun. Playoff seedings will be real interesting. Some top teams taking on off tough schedules will lose home field for some games.

A- Mamo took L on LI but good that top teams keep testing themselves. Arlington and N Rockland having great seasons. Can 1 of them make it to finals vs Mamo? Yup. Scarsdale doesn't seem to have that magic from '21 but never say never.

B- Rye getting wins but not pretty. Y working hard. Somers looking good. it'd be weird to see Rye vs Y in semis instead of finals. On serious note- Whaling of Rye taking headshot that knocked him out late in game was awful to see. Hope he recovers and has no ill effects.

C- Pelham on top for now but TZ, Byram and Hen Hud gonna be put in a playoff blender. cant predict. Fun class led mainly by the junior talent.

D- Pville fought hard but Bcliff vs Bville regular season battle is likely preview of the title match. Another division where top teams endure losses against great comp so it'll impact playoff seedings. Bcliff and Bville insane rough schedules last 4 games of season: Rye, Pville, Shoreham-Wading River, Bcliff, Y, Ridgfield, etc. Impressive but too much? Its a shame only 1 can advance to states.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
9-4 in yesterday's games; 105-32 overall.

Most surprised with Pelham with a road win against TZ.
Byram Hills showed up and won a tight game against Somers,
Class C is will be interesting to watch now that Pelham and Byram are playing at a higher level. TZ has a shot, but I doubt they will come over the bridge and pull out a win during the playoffs.

Rye slapped BXV with a 6 goal differential

JJ wins, but only scores 7 and only wins by 4. I expected double digit scoring, an 8-1 score a halftime and a 9 goal differential, especially with the JJ's supporters on the forum.

First round of the playoffs start May 16!

Pelham has been weird this year, they win a tight one against JJ ten drop ones you think they might win. Rye is a good if normally unsurprising w, but the year they are having who knows? I am not surprised there.

Not sure you are totally unbiased against JJ, you thought Greeley was going to be close and it was a blowout, now they win by 4 against Fox Lane - which while young aren't bad - and that's a miss on prediction too? Not sure what the aim is here, you got both W predictions correct.
Byram was a big win. They will see each other again in the playoffs, that will be one worth attending.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My predictions with JJ's games included the opponents intangibles. I thought Greeley would be better and I wasn't aware of it being senior night for JJ. So, after that win, I expected a similar blow out result and JJ didn't come through with a dominate score result.

Today's predictions:

Clarkstown North at Westlake: CN

Wappingers at Haldane: Wapp

Yonkers at Keio: Keio

Croton-Harmon at Nyack: Nyack

Blind Brook vs. North Salem: BB

Scarsdale at North Rockland: Scar

Dobbs Ferry at Albertus Magnus: AM

Ossining at White Plains: WP

Hastings at Nanuet: Nan

Edgemont vs. Eastchester: Ed
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
LoHud top 10 this week:
1- Iona
2- Briarcliff
3- Mamo
4- Rye
5- Yorktown
6- Bronxville
7- Stepinac
8- Scarsdale
9- JJ
10- Somers
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
6-3 in yesterday's games, 110-35 overall.

Today's predictions:


Yonkers at Edgemont: Ed

John Jay at Byram Hills: BH, If JJ shows up with HHH, it could be a close game.

Arlington at Mahopac: ARL

Hen Hud at Lakeland/Panas: HH

Haldane at Pawling: HD

Blind Brook at Keio: BB

North Salem at Putnam Valley: PV

Westlake at Briarcliff: B'f

Fordham Prep at Iona Prep: IP

Ardsley at Sleepy Hollow: SH

Lourdes at Brewster: Brwstr

Irvington at Rye Neck

Rye at Somers: RYE

Suffern at Warwick: WAR

Greeley at Fox Lane: FX

Pearl River at New Rochelle: PR

Tappan Zee at Clarkstown South: TZ

Yorktown at Wilton: Wilton
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Wow, some shocking results in yesterday's games.

JJ with a BIG WIN!
Mahopac with an easy win
Suffern, showing some HHH
Greeley, surprising FX (and me too).

Yesterday's results 13-4 (without Iona/Ford results), 123-39 overall.


Today's predictions:

Pleasantville at Bronxville: BX

Carmel at Ossining: Car

Eastchester at North Salem: ESTCHR
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wow, some shocking results in yesterday's games.

JJ with a BIG WIN!
Mahopac with an easy win
Suffern, showing some HHH
Greeley, surprising FX (and me too).

Agree with you on JJ. Thats a confidence booster going into the last week of the season and into playoffs. They seem to be peaking at just the right time.
Rye handled Somers, looks like Somers is back to earth. I'm not counting them out yet, but that was a bit of an eye-opener
Greeley over FL wasn't as much of a surprise as FL is down this year due to youth. Flag-filled game for both sides. I'd love to see how many goals were on man-up. Greeley had to have had 5-6.
Yorktown is Jekyll and Hyde this year. I have no idea what team is going to show up when.

For my money - as of today (and this can changed by Saturday) I think Class B is Rye vs JJ The seedings will be key. BIG WEEK to determine that! Right now Rye and J are a semi-final game. There will be a ton of movement in the next 7 days.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Are you trying to impress people with picking high school lacrosse winners. Please understand. Nobody cares.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are you trying to impress people with picking high school lacrosse winners. Please understand. Nobody cares.
You came on here, read what was written, typed this, click the "I'm not a robot" box and hit reply.
Seems like you care enough to do that much, so....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
In the vast, vast, and I mean vast, expanse of the internet, there is literally only one single place where its relevant to pick Section 1 HS boys lacrosse games. This is it. If you don't care, then by all means, find something else on the internet to consume.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
In the vast, vast, and I mean vast, expanse of the internet, there is literally only one single place where its relevant to pick Section 1 HS boys lacrosse games. This is it. If you don't care, then by all means, find something else on the internet to consume.
I love this. You have literally the entirety of the internet as a option, yet you chose this. LOL
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Great article by Mike Dougherty of LoHud on some recent extracurriculars in games resulting in some pretty significant injuries.

I went back and looked at both hits and they were bad. What was telling though is the vitriol coming from the stands. It is out of control. The adults need to be adults here.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Great article by Mike Dougherty of LoHud on some recent extracurriculars in games resulting in some pretty significant injuries.

I went back and looked at both hits and they were bad. What was telling though is the vitriol coming from the stands. It is out of control. The adults need to be adults here.

I too have seen the extracurricular HS activities and heard the parents and coaches complain way to much.

What Sect 1 (and everywhere else) needs is more former players, moving over to the officiating side. I've played HS, college, coached youth and now have joined the HVLOA. Haven't had any HS games due to work conflicts, but have done many Youth games. Love being on the field during the moment.

Also, I know of some new officials that have NO playing experience whatsoever and it's scary. They are trying to do a good job, so please step up and next February contact the HVLOA and become part of the solution.

CHHS forever.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
In case you were curious. I picked 87 games. I have 71 wins and 16 losses. My friend has 65 wins and 22 loses. My cousin is the best, he has 83 wins and 4 losses.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
In case you were curious. I picked 87 games. I have 71 wins and 16 losses. My friend has 65 wins and 22 loses. My cousin is the best, he has 83 wins and 4 losses.

I'll get the popcorn, wait anxiously for your mysterious predictions, because your results are truly spectacular!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
In case you were curious. I picked 87 games. I have 71 wins and 16 losses. My friend has 65 wins and 22 loses. My cousin is the best, he has 83 wins and 4 losses.
how are you against the money line? can you work in a parlay recommendation each day and will you be taking action on playoff games?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are you trying to impress people with picking high school lacrosse winners. Please understand. Nobody cares.


I like reading his picks and I think they will be more relevant as we approach the playoffs with more competitive games.
I think his abbreviations stink but I enjoy his thoughts and comments.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
BXV takes care of PLV in a close (12-9) game, while Lohud’s summary barely mentions PLV. So, I’m guessing BXV had a significant cushion and the entire bench was used.
The other 2 games were unremarkable.
Overall, 126-39.

Wow, 21 games on Lohud’s schedule.

I doubt the kid and his imaginary personalities will post any predictions, but we will post their wonderful results too.

The 5 marquee games are:

Scarsdale at Mamaroneck: Mamo should make statement Win, anything else will create some doubt that they are just bully that cannot take a punch.

Somers at John Jay: This game will decide the League F. JJ definitely has a chance and the momentum. JJ wins by 2

Yorktown at Briarcliff: BRF wins big

Rye at Pelham, League B championship on the line. Rye wins by 1 in a great game.

Mahopac at Hen Hud: HH

The rest:

Harrison at Eastchester: H
Blind Brook vs. Rye Neck: BB
Keio at Hastings: K
Albertus Magnus at Irvington: Irv
Sleepy Hollow at Edgemont: SH
Lakeland/Panas at Wappingers: L/P
Pawling at Greeley: G
Iona Prep at Stepinac: IP
Pearl River at Clarkstown North: CN
Yonkers at Ardsley: Ard
Clarkstown South at Suffern Suf
Putnam Valley at Dobbs Ferry: PV
Brewster at Fox Lane: FX
Haldane at Arlington: Arl
Nanuet at Nyack: Nan
North Rockland at Tappan Zee: TZ
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
BXV takes care of PLV in a close (12-9) game, while Lohud’s summary barely mentions PLV. So, I’m guessing BXV had a significant cushion and the entire bench was used.
The other 2 games were unremarkable.
Overall, 126-39.

Wow, 21 games on Lohud’s schedule.

I doubt the kid and his imaginary personalities will post any predictions, but we will post their wonderful results too.

The 5 marquee games are:

Scarsdale at Mamaroneck: Mamo should make statement Win, anything else will create some doubt that they are just bully that cannot take a punch.

Somers at John Jay: This game will decide the League F. JJ definitely has a chance and the momentum. JJ wins by 2

Yorktown at Briarcliff: BRF wins big

Rye at Pelham, League B championship on the line. Rye wins by 1 in a great game.

Mahopac at Hen Hud: HH

The rest:

Harrison at Eastchester: H
Blind Brook vs. Rye Neck: BB
Keio at Hastings: K
Albertus Magnus at Irvington: Irv
Sleepy Hollow at Edgemont: SH
Lakeland/Panas at Wappingers: L/P
Pawling at Greeley: G
Iona Prep at Stepinac: IP
Pearl River at Clarkstown North: CN
Yonkers at Ardsley: Ard
Clarkstown South at Suffern Suf
Putnam Valley at Dobbs Ferry: PV
Brewster at Fox Lane: FX
Haldane at Arlington: Arl
Nanuet at Nyack: Nan
North Rockland at Tappan Zee: TZ

BRF wins big.....Please tell me the name of the stuff your smoking, it must be some really good stuff! No disrespect to Briarcliff, but they have the 28th ranked schedule, as opposed to Y-Towns #1 ranked schedule. Yorktown has played a national out of league schedule, which is going to pay dividends come playoff time, do don't sleep on them. TOWN with the upset, but not really an upset!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Interesting Playoff considerations for Class B. L/P is in must-win mode today. They need at least one more win to get into the playoffs. After today the schedule is Yorktown, Somers & Brewster and they are missing the entire starting D.
Clarkstown South needs a win or some help, they are on the cusp. I see a tough, but possible win today. if not they should be able to get past New Rochelle for a playoff Berth.

That might have L/P and Harrison out of the playoffs leaving 8 teams who all get a first round bye.

Greeley should get past Pawling, but I don't see a Byram win. That leaves them 8 wins but only 7 count Clarkstown South will likely take the 7 spot pushing back Greeely to the 8 facing Rye.

TONS of movement coming in the next few days.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Interesting Playoff considerations for Class B. L/P is in must-win mode today. They need at least one more win to get into the playoffs. After today the schedule is Yorktown, Somers & Brewster and they are missing the entire starting D.
Clarkstown South needs a win or some help, they are on the cusp. I see a tough, but possible win today. if not they should be able to get past New Rochelle for a playoff Berth.

That might have L/P and Harrison out of the playoffs leaving 8 teams who all get a first round bye.

Greeley should get past Pawling, but I don't see a Byram win. That leaves them 8 wins but only 7 count Clarkstown South will likely take the 7 spot pushing back Greeely to the 8 facing Rye.

TONS of movement coming in the next few days.

You have to remember that teams pick up bonus points just for playing someone else, they do not need to beat them. Section 1 has set the number of points to qualify for the playoffs at 26, So South will definitely be in because they will play North Rockland who will give them 1 if not 2 bonus points.

Lakeland will most likely qualify too, they play Wappingers who the should beat. They currently have 23 points and need 3 more, a win will get them there, but If not, they play Yorktown and Somers who will give them at least 2 points and possibly 3.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Interesting Playoff considerations for Class B. L/P is in must-win mode today. They need at least one more win to get into the playoffs. After today the schedule is Yorktown, Somers & Brewster and they are missing the entire starting D.
Clarkstown South needs a win or some help, they are on the cusp. I see a tough, but possible win today. if not they should be able to get past New Rochelle for a playoff Berth.

That might have L/P and Harrison out of the playoffs leaving 8 teams who all get a first round bye.

Greeley should get past Pawling, but I don't see a Byram win. That leaves them 8 wins but only 7 count Clarkstown South will likely take the 7 spot pushing back Greeely to the 8 facing Rye.

TONS of movement coming in the next few days.

You have to remember that teams pick up bonus points just for playing someone else, they do not need to beat them. Section 1 has set the number of points to qualify for the playoffs at 26, So South will definitely be in because they will play North Rockland who will give them 1 if not 2 bonus points.

Lakeland will most likely qualify too, they play Wappingers who the should beat. They currently have 23 points and need 3 more, a win will get them there, but If not, they play Yorktown and Somers who will give them at least 2 points and possibly 3.

You are correct on the bonus points. But L/P are at 23 right now. They are getting 1 from Greeley, which is probably going to finish below .500 so they lose one point there. if they get the three from Yorktown, Somers and Brewster, that is still on 25 with all the bonus points. That makes the Wappingers game a must-win. And they're missing they're entire starting D on injuries.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Interesting Playoff considerations for Class B. L/P is in must-win mode today. They need at least one more win to get into the playoffs. After today the schedule is Yorktown, Somers & Brewster and they are missing the entire starting D.
Clarkstown South needs a win or some help, they are on the cusp. I see a tough, but possible win today. if not they should be able to get past New Rochelle for a playoff Berth.

That might have L/P and Harrison out of the playoffs leaving 8 teams who all get a first round bye.

Greeley should get past Pawling, but I don't see a Byram win. That leaves them 8 wins but only 7 count Clarkstown South will likely take the 7 spot pushing back Greeely to the 8 facing Rye.

TONS of movement coming in the next few days.

You have to remember that teams pick up bonus points just for playing someone else, they do not need to beat them. Section 1 has set the number of points to qualify for the playoffs at 26, So South will definitely be in because they will play North Rockland who will give them 1 if not 2 bonus points.

Lakeland will most likely qualify too, they play Wappingers who the should beat. They currently have 23 points and need 3 more, a win will get them there, but If not, they play Yorktown and Somers who will give them at least 2 points and possibly 3.

You are correct on the bonus points. But L/P are at 23 right now. They are getting 1 from Greeley, which is probably going to finish below .500 so they lose one point there. if they get the three from Yorktown, Somers and Brewster, that is still on 25 with all the bonus points. That makes the Wappingers game a must-win. And they're missing they're entire starting D on injuries.

L/P up 6 or 7 late int he third, so it's looking good for them
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
BRF wins big.....Please tell me the name of the stuff your smoking, it must be some really good stuff! No disrespect to Briarcliff, but they have the 28th ranked schedule, as opposed to Y-Towns #1 ranked schedule. Yorktown has played a national out of league schedule, which is going to pay dividends come playoff time, do don't sleep on them. TOWN with the upset, but not really an upset!!

B'cliff 12
Y 4

It's not what I'm smoking, it's the Kool-aid that you've been drinking.

When was the last time Y lost 3 games to sect 1 opponents in a single season. Someone will have to to look back to the 1979 season for details.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
14-6 in yesterday's games (Keio v Hast pending), 140-45, overall.

Mamo, is good, but definitely not a mature/experienced program. I believe they will lose in the Sect 1 finals, just like last year.
JJ is playing with HHH.
Rye took care of business.
Watch out for M-pac.

What happened to BB with their offensive juggernaut.
TZ losing again, wow, they are not what I anticipated.

Today's games and predictions:


Hastings at Blind Brook, (back to back game days for these teams?): BB

North Salem at Rye Neck,: RN, but could be a trap game for RN. RN needs some HHH from the AD today.

Pawling at Edgemont (Edge playing back to back days?): Edge

Pleasantville at Croton: Pv

Yonkers at Peekskill: Y

New Rochelle at White Plains: WP

Westlake at Ossining: West
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I’ll tell you again. Nobody, but yourself cares about your win, loss record. Not 1 person cares. Keep it in your head. You don’t need to list this every single day. You want to post your thoughts. Go ahead.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I’ll tell you again. Nobody, but yourself cares about your win, loss record. Not 1 person cares. Keep it in your head. You don’t need to list this every single day. You want to post your thoughts. Go ahead.

laugh
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Why do you care what this guy posts? Let him make his predictions and give us his "insights". It's more interesting than people talking about how Yorktown's program is so rich and everyone is good now because of them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I’ll tell you again. Nobody, but yourself cares about your win, loss record. Not 1 person cares. Keep it in your head. You don’t need to list this every single day. You want to post your thoughts. Go ahead.

And I will tell YOU: no one cares that you have an issue with it. He's doing his thing, no need for you to come along and lax in his cheerios about it.

This is the second time you've made a post to say you don't care. Happy for you that you don't. I happed to enjoy it and the ensuing debate it creates. You have the rest of the entire internet to bother. Go do that.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The thoughts and predictions are fine. We don’t need to know his weekly, daily, monthly, seasonal win and loss record. Just trying to help him out. He is keeping calculations on things nobody cares about.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The thoughts and predictions are fine. We don’t need to know his weekly, daily, monthly, seasonal win and loss record. Just trying to help him out. He is keeping calculations on things nobody cares about.
smirk
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I guess TS hiding in the zone D didn’t work against Briarcliff lol
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The thoughts and predictions are fine. We don’t need to know his weekly, daily, monthly, seasonal win and loss record. Just trying to help him out. He is keeping calculations on things nobody cares about.
No one else is complaining about it except you. Why do you keep pushing it? You do you, let him do what he does.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess TS hiding in the zone D didn’t work against Briarcliff lol
One issue with that argument: they played man most of that game....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The thoughts and predictions are fine. We don’t need to know his weekly, daily, monthly, seasonal win and loss record. Just trying to help him out. He is keeping calculations on things nobody cares about.
Go worry about yourself. I like the running total.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Great, run the total to yourself. Write it in on your nightstand or kitchen table. Please.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Today's predictions:

The 3 marquee games are:

Briarcliff at Ridgefield: Ridge. Bcf doesn’t have the depth to win this game.

John Jay at Tappan Zee: JJ,

Mamaroneck at Rye: Rye.


The rest:

Sleepy Hollow at Hastings: SH

Lourdes at Putnam Valley: PV

Pelham at Fox Lane: Plm

Clarkstown North at Ardsley: CN

Yonkers at North Salem: Y

Suffern at Wappingers: Sf

Warwick at Byram Hills: BH, should be a blow out

Pawling at Carmel: Crml, should be a blow out.

Dobbs Ferry at Irvington: Irv

Nyack at Pleasantville: Pv

Stepinac at Scarsdale: Scar

Croton at Hen Hud: HH

Brewster at Harrison, : Brw

Lakeland/Panas at Yorktown: (CM cup), Y.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I’ll tell you again. Nobody, but yourself cares about your win, loss record. Not 1 person cares. Keep it in your head. You don’t need to list this every single day. You want to post your thoughts. Go ahead.


Thanks for the reminded; i went 4-2 on Friday, 144-47 too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I went 7 and 3 wed
I went 9 and 4 Thursday
I went 8 and 2 Friday
I went 42 and 14 for May
I went 81 and 30 in April
Season I’m 164 and 57
A couple games are still pending because of weather cancellations. I’ll update those next week.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I went 7 and 3 wed
I went 9 and 4 Thursday
I went 8 and 2 Friday
I went 42 and 14 for May
I went 81 and 30 in April
Season I’m 164 and 57
A couple games are still pending because of weather cancellations. I’ll update those next week.
Did you write it out and put it on your nightstand though?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
12-2 on Saturday, 156-49 overall (for those that are not bothered with my accountability).

Today’s predictions:

Bronxville at Briarcliff: Bclf

Hastings at Dobbs Ferry: DF

Rye Neck at Albertus Magnus: RN

Brewster at Carmel: Car

Blind Brook at Eastchester: BB

L/Panas at Somers: Somers

Westlake at North Salem: West

Irvington at Keio: K

Mamaroneck at Mahopac: Mamo, unless they have no HHH

Scarsdale at Harrison: Scar

Arlington at Nyack: Arl

Nanuet at Tappan Zee: TZ

Hen Hud at Wappingers: HH

Haldane at Putnam Valley: PV
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I went 7 and 3 wed
I went 9 and 4 Thursday
I went 8 and 2 Friday
I went 42 and 14 for May
I went 81 and 30 in April
Season I’m 164 and 57
A couple games are still pending because of weather cancellations. I’ll update those next week.

Just talk the talk, step-up, identify your picks prior to your results. But you won't, because you couldn’t even go .500
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why do you care what this guy posts? Let him make his predictions and give us his "insights". It's more interesting than people talking about how Yorktown's program is so rich and everyone is good now because of them.

Exactly! I find it fun that a guy cares about picking scores and how he does. Caring about HS lax is fine by me.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
12-2 on Saturday, 156-49 overall (for those that are not bothered with my accountability).

Today’s predictions:

Bronxville at Briarcliff: Bclf

V

Can we talk about Bcliff vs Bville in final regular season game is a set-up for that Class D playoff clash? I would expect either team to make it to NY state finals vs Cold Spring Harbor but one is going to be sitting home.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
12-2 on Saturday, 156-49 overall (for those that are not bothered with my accountability).

Today’s predictions:

Bronxville at Briarcliff: Bclf

V

Can we talk about Bcliff vs Bville in final regular season game is a set-up for that Class D playoff clash? I would expect either team to make it to NY state finals vs Cold Spring Harbor but one is going to be sitting home.


I have no skin in the game, nor have i seen either team. But reading the tea leaves (lohuds scores and US Lacrosse magazine, which lists Briarcliff in the top 25 HS teams in the NE region), I believe Briarcliff rolls over Bronxville, just like the crushed Yorktown.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
A couple of very interesting games this week. The Briarcliff-Bronxville i think is a preview of the class D final. It does not have as much impact on standings going into the playoffs. This is the 1-2 regardless of who is in what position.

Lakeland vs. Somers and Brewster this week. A win in either of those - most likely the Brewster game - should move them to the 7th spot and a bye and (for now) a rematch with Yorktown... If Yorktown takes care of business

Arlington had some good upsets this year (JJ, Byram and a tight L to North Rockland) if they can pull off another at Yorktown, would push Town down to the 3 seed and having them face Rye in the Semis

Greeley/Clarkstown S looks like to be the lone first round game in B unless Harrison pulls out a miracle this week.

Class C is a tossup between about 5 teams so lots of movement this week.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Two solid games in the last week go to OT and have some questionable penalties called and the GWG is scored on the ensuing penalty.

Scarsdale-Mamo the only penalty of the game was a softy in OT when the Attacker fell and it was called a push. VERY questionable, espcially for the first one in the game

Today so a less-questionable hold on the Bears in OT, but a bang-bang play that the official could have swallowed the whistle on.

You have to execute to be sure, but two realtively soft calls in each case.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Clearly a biased opinion there, the briarcliff defenders did a terrible slide and definitely held the bxville player up high, right call for any ref.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Two solid games in the last week go to OT and have some questionable penalties called and the GWG is scored on the ensuing penalty.

Scarsdale-Mamo the only penalty of the game was a softy in OT when the Attacker fell and it was called a push. VERY questionable, espcially for the first one in the game

Today so a less-questionable hold on the Bears in OT, but a bang-bang play that the official could have swallowed the whistle on.

You have to execute to be sure, but two realtively soft calls in each case.

I have seen kids get wacked in the head with no calls, sometimes more than once on same possession, clear offsides with no call all season, clear passes get called shots, clear shots get called passes and we are talking about a soft call ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A couple of very interesting games this week. The Briarcliff-Bronxville i think is a preview of the class D final. It does not have as much impact on standings going into the playoffs. This is the 1-2 regardless of who is in what position.

Lakeland vs. Somers and Brewster this week. A win in either of those - most likely the Brewster game - should move them to the 7th spot and a bye and (for now) a rematch with Yorktown... If Yorktown takes care of business

Arlington had some good upsets this year (JJ, Byram and a tight L to North Rockland) if they can pull off another at Yorktown, would push Town down to the 3 seed and having them face Rye in the Semis

Greeley/Clarkstown S looks like to be the lone first round game in B unless Harrison pulls out a miracle this week.

Class C is a tossup between about 5 teams so lots of movement this week.

If Town moves down to the 3rd spot they still won’t have Rye until the finals. JJ and Town are locked into the 2/3 seeds no matter what.
One Side. Other side
1 v 8/9 2 v 7
4 v 5. 3 v 6
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Lots of movement potential.
Class A: Not much movement within A
Wapp will qualify this week - assuming they get the game in vs. Carmel they need at least the bonus point.
Suffern can help themselves with a W over Tappan Zee boosting them up to potentially the 5 if Wapp beats Carmel.
Carmel will probably keep their spot as will Arlington even with a W over Yorktown (a W would reek havoc on Class B tho - see below)
Scasrdale should beat WP and lock their spot.

Class B:
Yorktown beats Arlington, they move up to the 2 seed, lose and they drop to the 4 just behind Somers could drop as low as 5 (See below)
JJ and Somers Can't Help themselves as their remaining games are out of Sec1

Greely-Byram and Lakeland-Brewster will cause the most movement. A Greeley win puts them at .500 giving everyone a bonus - unlikely to happen. If Greeley wins and Yorktown loses, that could drop Yorktown all the way to the 5 spot(!)
Lakeland needs a win and Greeley Loss to lock the 7th. Both W or both L and things stay as they are with Greeley at the 7 and Lakeland the 8

Clarkstown North and South are firm in their spots.

Class C:
The top 6 are fairly locked in
Brewster can help themselves up 2-3 spots beating Lakeland.
Nyack needs a big W to qualify
Ardsley needs a least one win in two games to get it. That Edgemont game will be HUGE
Edgemont plays back-to-back against Dobbs and Ardsley with both teams needing to win to qualify

Class D:
This will be a max of 10 team bracket.
Top 5 are firm. Haldane can move up a spot with a W over Lourdes
Dobbs needs the W today against Edgemont to qualify.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Clearly a biased opinion there, the briarcliff defenders did a terrible slide and definitely held the bxville player up high, right call for any ref.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Two solid games in the last week go to OT and have some questionable penalties called and the GWG is scored on the ensuing penalty.

Scarsdale-Mamo the only penalty of the game was a softy in OT when the Attacker fell and it was called a push. VERY questionable, espcially for the first one in the game

Today so a less-questionable hold on the Bears in OT, but a bang-bang play that the official could have swallowed the whistle on.

You have to execute to be sure, but two realtively soft calls in each case.

I have seen kids get wacked in the head with no calls, sometimes more than once on same possession, clear offsides with no call all season, clear passes get called shots, clear shots get called passes and we are talking about a soft call ?

Yes, because while all of that is true, it doesn't take away from the point that they were consequential calls in two impactful games at important times.

As to the person who suggested I am biased, I don't have a rooting interest for either team. I said the Briarcliff foul was a hold, thought it could have been a no-call in that part of the game. I agree it was a bad slide. They also played the ensuing man-down VERY badly. As I said: you need to execute.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Clearly a biased reply as well - those refs were horrible and missed calls on both sides. Yet another example of a ref affecting the outcome of a game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Clearly a biased reply as well - those refs were horrible and missed calls on both sides. Yet another example of a ref affecting the outcome of a game.
There's nothing "clearly biased" I have no affiliation with any of the teams involved. I did not watch the entire games so I can't comment on how good they were called/not called. I know the Scarsdale game, the OT flag was the only one in the game.
The Briarcliff/Bronxville game was a foul, by the book - as i've stated - though I thought it was a little soft to make that call.

I'm not sure what else to say
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Kevin Devaney Jr.
@KDJmedia1·3h
Updating Section 1 boys lacrosse Bracketology with four forfeits that are becoming official today:

Pawling is forfeiting games to Greeley, Carmel and Edgemont. Yonkers is forfeiting to North Salem. Updates to come online

Imagine more forfeits in baseball and softball to come

Thats going to have some impact on Class B. If Greeley wins vs. Byram that puts them over 500 and everyone they play gets a bonus point. including lakeland
Carmel and Edgemont get 4 more points now as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
.[/quote]

HS Playoffs?!?!
CLASS A- Scars better not stumble and deny us the rematch vs Mamo in the finals
CLASS B- Rye vs Ytown is the matchup. Interested in Somers vs Pac early on too.
CLASS C- Who knows what will happen. Some upsets surely. Round 2 will likely have PV vs Byram, Hen Hud vs TZ. Doubt both top seeds will be in the finals. The higher seeds play grind defense lacrosse, 8-6 and 7-3 games coming!
CLASS D- Sorry to all the other teams but Bcliff vs Bville title match will happen to lax fans delight.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
.

HS Playoffs?!?!
CLASS A- Scars better not stumble and deny us the rematch vs Mamo in the finals
CLASS B- Rye vs Ytown is the matchup. Interested in Somers vs Pac early on too.
CLASS C- Who knows what will happen. Some upsets surely. Round 2 will likely have PV vs Byram, Hen Hud vs TZ. Doubt both top seeds will be in the finals. The higher seeds play grind defense lacrosse, 8-6 and 7-3 games coming!
CLASS D- Sorry to all the other teams but Bcliff vs Bville title match will happen to lax fans delight.[/quote]

A: Scarsdale is the scary one, but I don't think we can count out North Rockland, if their goalie is hot and they keep playing the way they are, that could be an upset. I would love to see a rematch of 2021 though
B: I don't think Yorktown is as a foregone conclusion as Rye is, JJ peaking at the right moment. That will be an interesting matchup in the Semis. Either way, it's Rye's trophy to lose now.
C: Total tossup Byram is down Rakower now so PV might be pulling the upset in the Quarters. TZ and Pelham on the other Semi is a fun game.
D: Totally agree, it's all about the B's that will be an epic game.

Good luck to all! Everyone is 0-0 right now.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Jumping on the picks bandwagon for the playoffs. Class B & C First rounders today. A&D are tomorrow.

Class B
No. 9 Clarkstown South (7-9) at No. 8 Lakeland/Panas (6-10). Tough one, but L/P Seeding is lower than their talent and I am going with the experience Pick: L/P
No. 10 Harrison (4-12) at No. 7 Greeley (9-7): regular season rematch. Harrison got some starters back and Greeley lost some. Pick: Harrison in a close one.

Class D
No. 9 Nanuet (8-7) at No. 8 Edgemont (8-7) This is a coin toss, but I think Edgemont has the edge Pick: Edgemont

No. 13 Nyack (3-13) at No. 4 Putnam Valley (11-5) Pick: PV Running away

No. 12 Ardsley (4-11) at No. 5 Byram Hills (9-5) Tougher as BH is without their goalie and Rakower, but still better Picl: BH

No. 10 Eastchester (7-8) at No. 7 Hen Hud (9-6) Pick: Hen Hud

No. 11 Brewster (6-10) at No. 6 Pelham (9-7) Pelham has had the better year, Brewster could put a scare in, but the talent lies with, Pick: Pelham
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Jumping on the picks bandwagon for the playoffs. Class B & C First rounders today. A&D are tomorrow.

Class B
No. 9 Clarkstown South (7-9) at No. 8 Lakeland/Panas (6-10). Tough one, but L/P Seeding is lower than their talent and I am going with the experience Pick: L/P
No. 10 Harrison (4-12) at No. 7 Greeley (9-7): regular season rematch. Harrison got some starters back and Greeley lost some. Pick: Harrison in a close one.

Class D
No. 9 Nanuet (8-7) at No. 8 Edgemont (8-7) This is a coin toss, but I think Edgemont has the edge Pick: Edgemont

No. 13 Nyack (3-13) at No. 4 Putnam Valley (11-5) Pick: PV Running away

No. 12 Ardsley (4-11) at No. 5 Byram Hills (9-5) Tougher as BH is without their goalie and Rakower, but still better Picl: BH

No. 10 Eastchester (7-8) at No. 7 Hen Hud (9-6) Pick: Hen Hud

No. 11 Brewster (6-10) at No. 6 Pelham (9-7) Pelham has had the better year, Brewster could put a scare in, but the talent lies with, Pick: Pelham


Great picks and write ups!

I agree that the L/P vCS will be a tough game, L/P has been decimated with injuries, but they should win by 4.

Hen Hud and Pelham should be a runaway WINS too

Harrison has an experienced, underclassman playing attack (35G-29A-64pts) and if Greely can limit him, they will win. This game comes down to coaching.

Wow, Byram lost their Goalie and BR (43G, 24A, 67pts), what happened?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Jumping on the picks bandwagon for the playoffs. Class B & C First rounders today. A&D are tomorrow.

Class B
No. 9 Clarkstown South (7-9) at No. 8 Lakeland/Panas (6-10). Tough one, but L/P Seeding is lower than their talent and I am going with the experience Pick: L/P
No. 10 Harrison (4-12) at No. 7 Greeley (9-7): regular season rematch. Harrison got some starters back and Greeley lost some. Pick: Harrison in a close one.

Class D
No. 9 Nanuet (8-7) at No. 8 Edgemont (8-7) This is a coin toss, but I think Edgemont has the edge Pick: Edgemont

No. 13 Nyack (3-13) at No. 4 Putnam Valley (11-5) Pick: PV Running away

No. 12 Ardsley (4-11) at No. 5 Byram Hills (9-5) Tougher as BH is without their goalie and Rakower, but still better Picl: BH

No. 10 Eastchester (7-8) at No. 7 Hen Hud (9-6) Pick: Hen Hud

No. 11 Brewster (6-10) at No. 6 Pelham (9-7) Pelham has had the better year, Brewster could put a scare in, but the talent lies with, Pick: Pelham

How you know Harrison got some starters back and Greeley lost some is amazing. And Byram lost their goalie. Etc. Love, keep it up!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Jumping on the picks bandwagon for the playoffs. Class B & C First rounders today. A&D are tomorrow.

Class B
No. 9 Clarkstown South (7-9) at No. 8 Lakeland/Panas (6-10). Tough one, but L/P Seeding is lower than their talent and I am going with the experience Pick: L/P
No. 10 Harrison (4-12) at No. 7 Greeley (9-7): regular season rematch. Harrison got some starters back and Greeley lost some. Pick: Harrison in a close one.

Class D
No. 9 Nanuet (8-7) at No. 8 Edgemont (8-7) This is a coin toss, but I think Edgemont has the edge Pick: Edgemont

No. 13 Nyack (3-13) at No. 4 Putnam Valley (11-5) Pick: PV Running away

No. 12 Ardsley (4-11) at No. 5 Byram Hills (9-5) Tougher as BH is without their goalie and Rakower, but still better Picl: BH

No. 10 Eastchester (7-8) at No. 7 Hen Hud (9-6) Pick: Hen Hud

No. 11 Brewster (6-10) at No. 6 Pelham (9-7) Pelham has had the better year, Brewster could put a scare in, but the talent lies with, Pick: Pelham

Agree with your picks except Greeley and Nanuet will win.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
for the Catholics, Stepinac plays Fordham tomorrow with the winner playing Iona..... Stepinac should cruise to an easy win vs Fordham and I wouldn't be surprised if they beat Iona @ Iona on thursday. Iona has ~20 seniors graduating from the lax team while Stepinac only has 3-4.. Iona's starters are almost exclusively seniors and they looked listless and undisciplined in the last several games with several freshman called up from JV playing quality minutes on attack against Seton Hall Prep. Iona defense was more interested in trash talking and cheap shots when tied 6-6 vs Seton Hall then playing half the 4th quarter man down (2 man down on the winning goal with 40 seconds left)

I think the 8 underclassmen who start for Stepinac are PO'd after the last Iona game they almost won, and they are hungry for the rematch.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Jumping on the picks bandwagon for the playoffs. Class B & C First rounders today. A&D are tomorrow.

Class B
No. 9 Clarkstown South (7-9) at No. 8 Lakeland/Panas (6-10). Tough one, but L/P Seeding is lower than their talent and I am going with the experience Pick: L/P
No. 10 Harrison (4-12) at No. 7 Greeley (9-7): regular season rematch. Harrison got some starters back and Greeley lost some. Pick: Harrison in a close one.

Class D
No. 9 Nanuet (8-7) at No. 8 Edgemont (8-7) This is a coin toss, but I think Edgemont has the edge Pick: Edgemont

No. 13 Nyack (3-13) at No. 4 Putnam Valley (11-5) Pick: PV Running away

No. 12 Ardsley (4-11) at No. 5 Byram Hills (9-5) Tougher as BH is without their goalie and Rakower, but still better Picl: BH

No. 10 Eastchester (7-8) at No. 7 Hen Hud (9-6) Pick: Hen Hud

No. 11 Brewster (6-10) at No. 6 Pelham (9-7) Pelham has had the better year, Brewster could put a scare in, but the talent lies with, Pick: Pelham

Agree with your picks except Greeley and Nanuet will win.
Well, we're going to have to wait. The Lacrosse Gods want thunderdome tomorrow with all 4 classes going at the same time. Good luck to all!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Jumping on the picks bandwagon for the playoffs. Class B & C First rounders today. A&D are tomorrow.

Class B
No. 9 Clarkstown South (7-9) at No. 8 Lakeland/Panas (6-10). Tough one, but L/P Seeding is lower than their talent and I am going with the experience Pick: L/P
No. 10 Harrison (4-12) at No. 7 Greeley (9-7): regular season rematch. Harrison got some starters back and Greeley lost some. Pick: Harrison in a close one.

Class D
No. 9 Nanuet (8-7) at No. 8 Edgemont (8-7) This is a coin toss, but I think Edgemont has the edge Pick: Edgemont

No. 13 Nyack (3-13) at No. 4 Putnam Valley (11-5) Pick: PV Running away

No. 12 Ardsley (4-11) at No. 5 Byram Hills (9-5) Tougher as BH is without their goalie and Rakower, but still better Picl: BH

No. 10 Eastchester (7-8) at No. 7 Hen Hud (9-6) Pick: Hen Hud

No. 11 Brewster (6-10) at No. 6 Pelham (9-7) Pelham has had the better year, Brewster could put a scare in, but the talent lies with, Pick: Pelham

I got Greeley wrong and still don't know who wont he Edgemont-Nanuet game
For B & C i went 5-1 with one remaining
A&D for what it's worth, i didn't get my picks up here with the weather delays...
My picks were White Plains & Fox Lane so went 1-1 in A, Westlake in Haldane in D so 2-0

Overall in Round 1 I was 8-2 awaiting the Edgemont-Nanuet game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Bandwagon Playoff Picks Quarterfinals
Class A: the only tough one here is the Arlington-Suffern game. I think it is a good one, Pick: Arlington
Mamo, Scarsdale and North Rockland easily advance

Class B: Again, the 4-5 game of Somers-Mahopac is the tight one. I think Somers pulls that out
Rye, JJCR & Yorktown in games everyone should play

Class C: If Rakower is back in the lineup, they win a 2-3 goals over PV, If not I think PV pulls it out. Pick: PV
TZ, Pelham and PR (Regardless of who won Nanuet-Edgemont

Class D: No real challenges here, I am going with irvington in my only "upset" pick: Irvington
Bronxville, Briarcliff & Pleasentville.

Quarters were way easier to pick than the first rounds. the 4-5 games the toughest call. Gotta play to win. Good luck to all!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
crickets on here... where'd everyone go?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
for the Catholics, Stepinac plays Fordham tomorrow with the winner playing Iona..... Stepinac should cruise to an easy win vs Fordham and I wouldn't be surprised if they beat Iona @ Iona on thursday. Iona has ~20 seniors graduating from the lax team while Stepinac only has 3-4.. Iona's starters are almost exclusively seniors and they looked listless and undisciplined in the last several games with several freshman called up from JV playing quality minutes on attack against Seton Hall Prep. Iona defense was more interested in trash talking and cheap shots when tied 6-6 vs Seton Hall then playing half the 4th quarter man down (2 man down on the winning goal with 40 seconds left)

I think the 8 underclassmen who start for Stepinac are PO'd after the last Iona game they almost won, and they are hungry for the rematch.


Stepinac beats Iona by 1 at Iona.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Today's games

No. 5 Mahopac at No. 1 Rye: Rye wins by 6

No. 3 John Jay at No. 2 Yorktown: Yikes, JJ has been improving since the first JJ/Y game, Y has had a roller coaster season and there is more pressure on Y to win. I'm going with JJ by 2, since they will be playing with more HHH in this game.

Ultimately, RYE WINS B.

Class C

No. 5 Byram Hills at No. 1 Pearl River: BH wins by 4.

No. 7 Hen Hud at No. 6 Pelham: Pelham in a blow out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Today's games

No. 5 Mahopac at No. 1 Rye: Rye wins by 6

No. 3 John Jay at No. 2 Yorktown: Yikes, JJ has been improving since the first JJ/Y game, Y has had a roller coaster season and there is more pressure on Y to win. I'm going with JJ by 2, since they will be playing with more HHH in this game.

Ultimately, RYE WINS B.

Class C

No. 5 Byram Hills at No. 1 Pearl River: BH wins by 4.

No. 7 Hen Hud at No. 6 Pelham: Pelham in a blow out.

I think Mahopac pulls off the upset. I’m taking Mahopac by 1 in a very tight game, if Whalen plays then Rye by 5.

As for the other B game, I don’t think JJ will be playing with more HHH as you say, this is a hungry Town team who wants/needs this section Chip more than ever. So I’m taking Y by 3.

In C, not sure if Byram can pull this off.

Totally agree with the Pelham pick, they will win C
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
2-2 in yesterday's games and only accurate with the Rye win.

Congratulations to Pearl River and Y.

How about JJ having a 3 goal lead in the 3Q, all while never winning a face-off (according to lohud). JJ was out played and maybe out coached too.

Pelham must have some depth, or HH doesn't, as the second half score was 5-1. I expect Pelham to roll over PR.

I'm still staying with Rye, over Y.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Today's games:

No. 5 Suffern (10-5) at No. 1 Mamaroneck (13-4): M by 6+

No. 2 North Rockland (15-2) at No. 3 Scarsdale (10-7): S by 4.

Class D

No. 5 Irvington (10-6) at No. 1 Briarcliff: B plays the bench and wins by 8, but no more than 10.

No. 3 Pleasantville (11-6) at No. 2 Bronxville (11-5): P plays tough, but doesn't have the depth. B by 5+
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Rye is going to end Town’s season again. Really unimpressed with both Town and JJ yesterday.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Today's games:

No. 5 Suffern (10-5) at No. 1 Mamaroneck (13-4): M by 6+

No. 2 North Rockland (15-2) at No. 3 Scarsdale (10-7): S by 4.

Class D

No. 5 Irvington (10-6) at No. 1 Briarcliff: B plays the bench and wins by 8, but no more than 10.

No. 3 Pleasantville (11-6) at No. 2 Bronxville (11-5): P plays tough, but doesn't have the depth. B by 5+


No surprise in yesterday's games.
However, Pleasantville was leading 6-4 at halftime, only to lose 11-7 to Bronxville. With this type of performance, I believe Bronxville doesn't have a chance against Briarcliff.


The championships games are:

Thursday, 4:00 and 6:30

Class B
Rye v Yorktown: Rye by 5.

Class C
Pearl River v Pelham: Pelham by 6+

Friday, 4:00 and 6:30

Class D

Briarcliff v Bronxville: Briarcliff by 5+

Class A

Mamaroneck v Scarsdale: Mamaroneck by 7+
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
And so it begins........Best of Luck to all the teams who are competing this weekend. You have run the gauntlet and are finally competing for the CHIP. Represent your towns well and have fun. Win or lose you are the best of the best!!

Town vs Rye is going to be EPIC!!
CAN'T WAIT
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Epic?. Nah, easy win for Rye. Town is not the town of old, down with no end in sight.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Epic?. Nah, easy win for Rye. Town is not the town of old, down with no end in sight.

I have no connection to Yorktown, but it has been reported that they have played in every Section 1 GC (at their enrollment classification) since 1980. This has to be one of the most significant achievements ever in local sports. If this is "down", I know of about 100 other schools who would want to be "down". Class B at present is fairly loaded with a lot of competitive teams. Section 1 is very close to the top of the heap in US HS lacrosse - which hasn't always been the case. This streak will likely come to an end sooner rather than later. So be it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Scarsdale over Mamaroneck! Credit to Scarsdale, they came out ready to play. Basically outworked Mamaroneck. Having that face-off kid helped. He was something to watch. I had hoped it would have been closer after last years thriller. The announcer said they were mostly Jrs? They should be the favorite going into next year. Good luck to them the rest of the way. It’s certainly been an interesting season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Scarsdale over Mamaroneck! Credit to Scarsdale, they came out ready to play. Basically outworked Mamaroneck. Having that face-off kid helped. He was something to watch. I had hoped it would have been closer after last years thriller. The announcer said they were mostly Jrs? They should be the favorite going into next year. Good luck to them the rest of the way. It’s certainly been an interesting season.

Scarsdale outplayed / outcoached Mamo. Can we stop with all the hype at Mamo now? Scars deserves the AA slots Mamo has been taking.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Epic?. Nah, easy win for Rye. Town is not the town of old, down with no end in sight.

Rye better team last year and this year. Easy? Come on now. But they are better. Great senior class. Finally starting to play better this year, has taken a while. Hope they go far in states.

Town will be OK in 2023. Rye will slip a lot. But we got a year until then.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
If you know anything about Town, underclassman and youth, they will be down significantly going forward. Add in the new coach and his ancient philosophy and it’s a rough road ahead. It’s just facts. But good luck to you all.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Scarsdale over Mamaroneck! Credit to Scarsdale, they came out ready to play. Basically outworked Mamaroneck. Having that face-off kid helped. He was something to watch. I had hoped it would have been closer after last years thriller. The announcer said they were mostly Jrs? They should be the favorite going into next year. Good luck to them the rest of the way. It’s certainly been an interesting season.

Scarsdale outplayed / outcoached Mamo. Can we stop with all the hype at Mamo now? Scars deserves the AA slots Mamo has been taking.

Not sure what that means ? If Mamo has won section titles in past, how did Scarsdale "deserve" them. Stay classy, face off kid won't be there forever.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If you know anything about Town, underclassman and youth, they will be down significantly going forward. Add in the new coach and his ancient philosophy and it’s a rough road ahead. It’s just facts. But good luck to you all.

Down significantly as in routinely making the Class B Section 1 final 4/final 2 in a loaded field, but not wining Section chips, or down significantly as in being a Harrison or Eastchester type of team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Town youth is fine and some solid talent coming up. Will take a year or two. That program focuses on letting a lot of kids play in youth and get in the game versus other towns who send their 12 best kids only so they can win in 6th and 7th grade.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Town youth is fine and some solid talent coming up. Will take a year or two. That program focuses on letting a lot of kids play in youth and get in the game versus other towns who send their 12 best kids only so they can win in 6th and 7th grade.
Do they still do combined age groups (5/6, 7/8) to drive team work and development?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That seems to be the case at Yorktown.

If you watched Scarsdale and Mamo, Scarsdale won on ball movement and teamwork. So much focus these days on trying to dodge individually. One of the downsides of club ball.
With Scarsdale and Mamaroneck this is now 2 years in a row that teamwork beat hero ball
I’m sure Mamaroneck parents aren’t happy, they expect to win all the time and are vocal letting everyone know it.

Scarsdale in 2023 smile
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Scarsdale over Mamaroneck! Credit to Scarsdale, they came out ready to play. Basically outworked Mamaroneck. Having that face-off kid helped. He was something to watch. I had hoped it would have been closer after last years thriller. The announcer said they were mostly Jrs? They should be the favorite going into next year. Good luck to them the rest of the way. It’s certainly been an interesting season.

Scarsdale outplayed / outcoached Mamo. Can we stop with all the hype at Mamo now? Scars deserves the AA slots Mamo has been taking.

Not sure what that means ? If Mamo has won section titles in past, how did Scarsdale "deserve" them. Stay classy, face off kid won't be there forever.

I think he was refering to AllAmerican slots. The top teams in biggest classes usually dominate the designations. His point of Scarsdale beating Mamo 2 years in a row is valid-- the Mamo players arent better than Scars so why cant Scarsdale players get the awards
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That seems to be the case at Yorktown.

If you watched Scarsdale and Mamo, Scarsdale won on ball movement and teamwork. So much focus these days on trying to dodge individually. One of the downsides of club ball.
With Scarsdale and Mamaroneck this is now 2 years in a row that teamwork beat hero ball
I’m sure Mamaroneck parents aren’t happy, they expect to win all the time and are vocal letting everyone know it.

Scarsdale in 2023 smile

Every time top seed loses, parents not happy and are vocal about it. Scarsdale is just better than Mamaroneck. So is Rye. So is Briarcliff. They would've lost in those class finals too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That seems to be the case at Yorktown.

If you watched Scarsdale and Mamo, Scarsdale won on ball movement and teamwork. So much focus these days on trying to dodge individually. One of the downsides of club ball.
With Scarsdale and Mamaroneck this is now 2 years in a row that teamwork beat hero ball
I’m sure Mamaroneck parents aren’t happy, they expect to win all the time and are vocal letting everyone know it.

Scarsdale in 2023 smile

Scarsdale won because of FOGO. Won nearly all draws and is a great all around player as well. Trade FOGOs and Mamo wins, despite the hero ball - wins two years in a row.

A is very weak in Sect 1 considering what exists elsewhere in the Section. Suffern will be worse, and for a while. North Rockland will be slightly worse/same, and then after 2023 drop when their FOGO (kills everyone except the Scarsdale kid) and goalie are gone. Don't know of anyone taking a step up. Most of the A schools are in Dutchess/Putnam where baseball is king, or in non-lax towns.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Agree on the FOGO, he’s outstanding
However, after he gets the ball you have to do something with it. Scarsdale kids were half the size of Mamo. Goals on back door cuts and lax IQ. couldn’t win the straight up physical match up but found other ways to get it done
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Agree on the FOGO, he’s outstanding
However, after he gets the ball you have to do something with it. Scarsdale kids were half the size of Mamo. Goals on back door cuts and lax IQ. couldn’t win the straight up physical match up but found other ways to get it done

Yes, but Mamo probably outscored them in each of the last 2 CG per possession, which is how you know that the FOGO won them the game. Again, if you traded FOGOs, Mamo is on a big Class A run now, and maybe you would be saying that Scarsdale's back door cuts and lax IQ made it a closer game than it should be. Game was still winnable for Mamo, but the #1 reason, by a large margin, that Scarsdale won is the FOGO - and it's a big help that he is an excellent player on both sides and therefore is not a drag on them if he gets stuck on the field.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Down significantly as in not making the section finals going forward…….
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Going forward for a year or two or for good?
Meaning rarely or never getting back there?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Big class A run? Didn’t Mamaroneck just lose 2 section finals in a row? If just getting to the finals equates a run, society is in bigger trouble than I thought.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Big class A run? Didn’t Mamaroneck just lose 2 section finals in a row? If just getting to the finals equates a run, society is in bigger trouble than I thought.

Read the entire post again. "if you traded FOGOs, Mamo is on a big Class A run now ..." Seems pretty obvious what the point being made is.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
To be fair, a FOGO is part of the team. You can’t “take” them away. Where would Rye be without Owen Kovacs?
Where would the patriots be without Tom Brady
Where would the Yankees be without Mariano Rivera.
The Rangers without Shisterkin.
I think the point is that the arrogance of the Mamaroneck fans knows no bounds. They lose two in a row and still act as if it was a fluke. Great teams find a way to win regardless if the other team has a standout player.
Mamaroneck had the ball on many positions and played sloppy and had a ton of turnovers.
Where are the social media posts now? They were pretty vocal before the game and crickets now.
When Mamo gets past Long Island they can start talking. Until then, humbly keep trying to improve
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
To be fair, a FOGO is part of the team. You can’t “take” them away. Where would Rye be without Owen Kovacs?
Where would the patriots be without Tom Brady
Where would the Yankees be without Mariano Rivera.
The Rangers without Shisterkin.
I think the point is that the arrogance of the Mamaroneck fans knows no bounds. They lose two in a row and still act as if it was a fluke. Great teams find a way to win regardless if the other team has a standout player.
Mamaroneck had the ball on many positions and played sloppy and had a ton of turnovers.
Where are the social media posts now? They were pretty vocal before the game and crickets now.
When Mamo gets past Long Island they can start talking. Until then, humbly keep trying to improve

True to the above. Whoever claims Scars FOGO was the only difference didn't see game. The Mamo defenders were getting beat all game. First middies then the longpoles who tried to apply pressure and gave up goal after goal. Mamo went backward this season when they expected much more.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Done with the politics of section 1 all Americans, glad to see the Briarcliff middie on there though, well deserved. Its all about what school they are attending and what they did last year. Mamaroneck should not have two all Americans after losing Section. Certain players given all American just because they got it last year. Even if a kid has the talent, you have to have an unbelievable season to become AA. Lastly as an unbiased 3rd party, Rye LSM snubbed because he is not going D1, was the best LSM in the section this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Very happy for a Pearl River program that made their first ever section final. Good to see Rockland county represented after a long hiatus. They were a young team this year and have many returners going into next year. They seem to be on the rise hopefully can win titles in the future.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Briarcliff middie will not be playing lacrosse in college. He is a D1 talent…
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Done with the politics of section 1 all Americans, glad to see the Briarcliff middie on there though, well deserved. Its all about what school they are attending and what they did last year. Mamaroneck should not have two all Americans after losing Section. Certain players given all American just because they got it last year. Even if a kid has the talent, you have to have an unbelievable season to become AA. Lastly as an unbiased 3rd party, Rye LSM snubbed because he is not going D1, was the best LSM in the section this year.

I don't have a real problem with those 9 AA Section 1 players. Wish there were more slots. I know there is some weird antiquated system but compared to other parts of the country, more than 9 slots should be made. Hopefully as game grows around here, spots expand.

BUT fully agree this post. Some juniors from last year who were AA automatically given it again this year but performed worse or missed bunch of games. Rye FOGO, Rye LSM and Briarcliff LSM couldve been named and surely were debated.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Done with the politics of section 1 all Americans, glad to see the Briarcliff middie on there though, well deserved. Its all about what school they are attending and what they did last year. Mamaroneck should not have two all Americans after losing Section. Certain players given all American just because they got it last year. Even if a kid has the talent, you have to have an unbelievable season to become AA. Lastly as an unbiased 3rd party, Rye LSM snubbed because he is not going D1, was the best LSM in the section this year.
Firstly, you do realize the AA status is determined based on the regular season and does not take in to account the post season correct? Lastly and most prominently, you're quite a whiney "unbiased 3rd party."
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The fact remains that Mamaroneck did not have a great regular season, numerous losses in which they underperformed expectations. Obviously you are angry as a Mamo parent that I would say this, but other players were more deserving.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Done with the politics of section 1 all Americans, glad to see the Briarcliff middie on there though, well deserved. Its all about what school they are attending and what they did last year. Mamaroneck should not have two all Americans after losing Section. Certain players given all American just because they got it last year. Even if a kid has the talent, you have to have an unbelievable season to become AA. Lastly as an unbiased 3rd party, Rye LSM snubbed because he is not going D1, was the best LSM in the section this year.
Firstly, you do realize the AA status is determined based on the regular season and does not take in to account the post season correct? Lastly and most prominently, you're quite a whiney "unbiased 3rd party."

...
BUT fully agree this post. Some juniors from last year who were AA automatically given it again this year but performed worse or missed bunch of games. Rye FOGO, Rye LSM and Briarcliff LSM couldve been named and surely were debated.

These are seriously misinformed takes.

AA does take into account post-season, it's why they meeting takes place after sectional finals.
Nothing is automatic. A returning AA is not automatically "given" it in senior year. They are earned. And only this year's accomplishments are considered. Maybe someone had a down year in comparison to last, but perhaps, so did the section as a whole (I am not arguing the truth of that, just giving an example)
The number of spots is determined by US Lacrosse based on a percentage of teams that play in their area. Section 1 has about 51 teams playing, they need 5-10 more teams to get a 10th spot.

The panel making this list is made entirely of section 1 head coaches with each class represented. Players are nominated by the coaches, stats, performance, opinions of opposing coaches are all considered. It is a thorough process. It is tough to get down to 9, but it would be hard to argue that the 9 on here aren't deserving. Every year there are more than 9 that probably deserve it, but the list is 9.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I find this hard to believe. There is no current info regarding his future so i am not coming at you. But there must be something we dont know
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
least important thing about lacrosse games involving 13 year olds is the final score. Idea is to get better, learn the game etc. Wins and losses should be irrelevant while players are still learning skills.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Done with the politics of section 1 all Americans, glad to see the Briarcliff middie on there though, well deserved. Its all about what school they are attending and what they did last year. Mamaroneck should not have two all Americans after losing Section. Certain players given all American just because they got it last year. Even if a kid has the talent, you have to have an unbelievable season to become AA. Lastly as an unbiased 3rd party, Rye LSM snubbed because he is not going D1, was the best LSM in the section this year.

I don't think anyone could make a post on here and say so many incorrect things in such a short burst.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Tomorrow's boys schedule:

State semifinals

Class D: Cold Spring Harbor (Section 8) vs. Briarcliff, 3 p.m.
Class A: Northport (Section 11) vs. Scarsdale, 4 p.m.
Class B: Garden City (Section 8) vs. Rye, 5:30 p.m.

Wish I could make a prediction, but I don’t know CSH or N whatsoever.

I don’t think Rye has a chance against GC, but that’s based upon a historical experience.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
As the HS season is coming to an end, let's start talking about club lax!

How about True Lacrosse is jumping into the Westchester pool of programs. After clicking on the IG link, it seems that the Pride Lacrosse Club been re-branded as True Lacrosse.

The 2023's are in their last days of club lax.

Let's start talking about the 2024 teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
As the HS season is coming to an end, let's start talking about club lax!

How about True Lacrosse is jumping into the Westchester pool of programs. After clicking on the IG link, it seems that the Pride Lacrosse Club been re-branded as True Lacrosse.

The 2023's are in their last days of club lax.

Let's start talking about the 2024 teams.

True is an interesting move in to the region.If anything it will eat in to the B teams (Pride, 91TS, Express B-Z teams, Preds left overs.) Theyre not going to compete with PT, Eclipse or 2way.

24's pecking order:

1- Eclipse
2- Primetime

BIG GAP

3- 2Way (though this is mostly a 2023 team now)
4- Express North Black (the rest of the teams fall in to the All the Rest category)

HUGE GAP

5- All the rest
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Primetime is a way better program on many levels than Express North, but the last time Primetime played express north, express beat them - so big gap? thats a bit of a stretch
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Primetime is a way better program on many levels than Express North, but the last time Primetime played express north, express beat them - so big gap? thats a bit of a stretch

I agree with you! PT has ben taken down from where it once was, but it still is the only program with a singular team on each class level (with the exception of the WSYL year).

Which LIEN team and when did they beat PT?

In regard to LIE North, there are so many teams (AA, A & B), can someone provide a list of the LIE North team names (including class and level)?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
LI express north 2024 Black, beat Primetime at the NLF fall tourney - - this means nothing, Daniello runs a top top top notch program and his recruiting track record is second to no one -
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
LI express north 2024 Black, beat Primetime at the NLF fall tourney - - this means nothing, Daniello runs a top top top notch program and his recruiting track record is second to no one -

Except maybe the PRED 2022 team......
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
LI express north 2024 Black, beat Primetime at the NLF fall tourney - - this means nothing, Daniello runs a top top top notch program and his recruiting track record is second to no one -

Except maybe the PRED 2022 team......

Congratulations Preds 2022. However, all prior class teams are irrelevant to the current status/conversation.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
LI express north 2024 Black, beat Primetime at the NLF fall tourney - - this means nothing, Daniello runs a top top top notch program and his recruiting track record is second to no one -

Except maybe the PRED 2022 team......

Congratulations Preds 2022. However, all prior class teams are irrelevant to the current status/conversation.

The topic was 2024 club. Typical Preds pointing to the one class that was good. 2024 Preds are awful. 2025 Preds are even worse. Preds are a program built to cater to Rye parents....and now Mamaroneck coach.
Re: EN beat PT in fall but fall doesnt really count as most teams miss kids to football, injuries, prep school, etc. If picking a club for this age group to move your kid to youre all going to PT. If cut from PT you go to EN.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
the original poster said , "massive dropoff or gap between PT and express North" the general response was - PT is a better organization from top to bottom, but the gap between 24 pt and 24 EN is not gran canyonesque by any stretch
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
the original poster said , "massive dropoff or gap between PT and express North" the general response was - PT is a better organization from top to bottom, but the gap between 24 pt and 24 EN is not gran canyonesque by any stretch
Big gap but not huge.

PT puts the boys in much better situation to be recruited and noticed. Between running the Nike team, having NLF ranked players and hosting the tournaments the coaches come to PT is a much better place to be than EN. Would say from top to bottom at each position PT is a better team but EN has some good players that could make a game of it. Of course tournament performance is what we will judge them on so lets see where they both play and end up. Neither are as good as Eclipse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
the original poster said , "massive dropoff or gap between PT and express North" the general response was - PT is a better organization from top to bottom, but the gap between 24 pt and 24 EN is not gran canyonesque by any stretch
Big gap but not huge.

PT puts the boys in much better situation to be recruited and noticed. Between running the Nike team, having NLF ranked players and hosting the tournaments the coaches come to PT is a much better place to be than EN. Would say from top to bottom at each position PT is a better team but EN has some good players that could make a game of it. Of course tournament performance is what we will judge them on so lets see where they both play and end up. Neither are as good as Eclipse.

Agreed. Ultimately the strength of a club falls not only to its record but also it’s recruiting and that’s where Express North falls way short to PT, eclipse and 2W. The EN 22 and 23 recruiting commits are non existent. Maybe it’s a talent issue, maybe the club just doesn’t help with recruiting? Who knows? Maybe it’s just not a focus of Express North as their teams in the field are somewhat competitive.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Need some posters who know younger club scene to rank em!


2023
PT
Eclipse
2Way
Preds
EN

2024
Eclipse
PT
EN
2Way

2025
?

2026
?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]LI express north 2024 Black, beat Primetime at the NLF

The topic was 2024 club. Typical Preds pointing to the one class that was good. 2024 Preds are awful. 2025 Preds are even worse. Preds are a program built to cater to Rye parents....and now Mamaroneck coach.
Re: EN beat PT in fall but fall doesnt really count as most teams miss kids to football, injuries, prep school, etc. If picking a club for this age group to move your kid to youre all going to PT. If cut from PT you go to EN.

2023 class looks weak on commits outside PT compared to 2022
2024 will be interesting - FULL of holdbacks including very recent ones. PT still gets the studs, Preds copying 2way holdback obsession but the Brunswick connection makes it hard to overcome in lower Westchester. Eclipse owns Fairfield County.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
the original poster said , "massive dropoff or gap between PT and express North" the general response was - PT is a better organization from top to bottom, but the gap between 24 pt and 24 EN is not gran canyonesque by any stretch
Big gap but not huge.

PT puts the boys in much better situation to be recruited and noticed. Between running the Nike team, having NLF ranked players and hosting the tournaments the coaches come to PT is a much better place to be than EN. Would say from top to bottom at each position PT is a better team but EN has some good players that could make a game of it. Of course tournament performance is what we will judge them on so lets see where they both play and end up. Neither are as good as Eclipse.

Agreed. Ultimately the strength of a club falls not only to its record but also it’s recruiting and that’s where Express North falls way short to PT, eclipse and 2W. The EN 22 and 23 recruiting commits are non existent. Maybe it’s a talent issue, maybe the club just doesn’t help with recruiting? Who knows? Maybe it’s just not a focus of Express North as their teams in the field are somewhat competitive.

Schreiber and Brameier are coaching the 2024 teams. I think it is the same coaching staff that coached 22's last year and now the 23's this year. Maybe they didnt care about the 22's and 23's and their focus is 24's and younger.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Need some posters who know younger club scene to rank em!


2023
PT
Eclipse
2Way
Preds
EN

2024
Eclipse
PT
EN
2Way

2025
?

2026
?

Can't really disagree with the above:

For 2023, I would maybe flip-flop Eclipse and PT. Eclipse consolidated down to 1 team for this year and they are strong

For 2024, Preds last then flip flop EN and PT based on EN winning in the fall but then again it is the fall...

For 2025, EN > PT > Eclipse >> 2W > Pred (the top 3 are bunched ahead of the last 2)

For 2026 PT > EN > Pred > 2W - I have no record on eclipse
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]LI express north 2024 Black, beat Primetime at the NLF

The topic was 2024 club. Typical Preds pointing to the one class that was good. 2024 Preds are awful. 2025 Preds are even worse. Preds are a program built to cater to Rye parents....and now Mamaroneck coach.
Re: EN beat PT in fall but fall doesnt really count as most teams miss kids to football, injuries, prep school, etc. If picking a club for this age group to move your kid to youre all going to PT. If cut from PT you go to EN.

2023 class looks weak on commits outside PT compared to 2022
2024 will be interesting - FULL of holdbacks including very recent ones. PT still gets the studs, Preds copying 2way holdback obsession but the Brunswick connection makes it hard to overcome in lower Westchester. Eclipse owns Fairfield County.

Keep forgetting about the holdbacks. Yes 2Way is a holdback club. Sounds like Pred has them as well. PT has some. I dont know about Eclipse. EN has less holdbacks
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Keep forgetting about the holdbacks. Yes 2Way is a holdback club. Sounds like Pred has them as well. PT has some. I dont know about Eclipse. EN has less holdbacks[/quote]

PT, 2Way and Eclipse are definitely holdback clubs, since they all had to carve-out and create a specific team for their WSYL teams.

Not sure if Team 91 Tri-State did the same, but I'll guess it's the norm because every program has holdbacks.

Even the B programs have them, because some players have issues and parents re-classed them years ago.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Keep forgetting about the holdbacks. Yes 2Way is a holdback club. Sounds like Pred has them as well. PT has some. I dont know about Eclipse. EN has less holdbacks

PT, 2Way and Eclipse are definitely holdback clubs, since they all had to carve-out and create a specific team for their WSYL teams.

Not sure if Team 91 Tri-State did the same, but I'll guess it's the norm because every program has holdbacks.

Even the B programs have them, because some players have issues and parents re-classed them years ago.[/quote]

Oh jeez. That would stink to hold back and not be on an A squad. I mean there is a lacrosse program for every kid out there if they want to play lacrosse and holding back is not always the answer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Wow, Rye and Briarcliff did a great job in hanging with the Long Island teams.

Briarcliff loses by 1 goal in a 8-7 game and they were shut out in the 1st and 4th Qs. Unbelievable.

Rye made it a great game, losing 6-4 (WHAT?!). You hardly ever see that score anymore.
I wonder how many times Garden City only scored 6 goals in a game.

Scarsdale dug itself a grave and never was able to close the gap. This game result was expected.


Looking to next year, what coaching changes will happen (if any) and what towns will be taking the next step?

JJHS: Rising
Somers: Rising
Y: next two years will be tough, according to someone on the inside.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wow, Rye and Briarcliff did a great job in hanging with the Long Island teams.

Briarcliff loses by 1 goal in a 8-7 game and they were shut out in the 1st and 4th Qs. Unbelievable.

Rye made it a great game, losing 6-4 (WHAT?!). You hardly ever see that score anymore.
I wonder how many times Garden City only scored 6 goals in a game.

Scarsdale dug itself a grave and never was able to close the gap. This game result was expected.


Looking to next year, what coaching changes will happen (if any) and what towns will be taking the next step?

JJHS: Rising
Somers: Rising
Y: next two years will be tough, according to someone on the inside.
Word always was that this was the last good year for Yorktown for a bit
Agree on JJHS and Somers
Rye won't drop off much Class B will be a juggernaut again.
Scarsdale only had 3 seniors this year, so they have to be the favorites in A
Mamo and Briarcliff will basically reload.
C will continue to be a tossup
D will be Briarcliff and Bronxville then everyone else.


Coaching Changes:
Tappan Zee will be opening. That's a great Rockland team who is relatively young still
We saw what happened at Greeley, They are bringing in a new AD already too. That will be a full rebuild.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Tomorrow's boys schedule:

State semifinals

Class D: Cold Spring Harbor (Section 8) vs. Briarcliff, 3 p.m.
Class A: Northport (Section 11) vs. Scarsdale, 4 p.m.
Class B: Garden City (Section 8) vs. Rye, 5:30 p.m.

Wish I could make a prediction, but I don’t know CSH or N whatsoever.

I don’t think Rye has a chance against GC, but that’s based upon a historical experience.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Tomorrow's boys schedule:

State semifinals

Class D: Cold Spring Harbor (Section 8) vs. Briarcliff, 3 p.m.
Class A: Northport (Section 11) vs. Scarsdale, 4 p.m.
Class B: Garden City (Section 8) vs. Rye, 5:30 p.m.

Wish I could make a prediction, but I don’t know CSH or N whatsoever.

I don’t think Rye has a chance against GC, but that’s based upon a historical experience.

Good games but Long Island lacrosse is still best in the state and probably the country. Will not be surprised if they sweep the states.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Heavily disagree with Briarcliff, they will be good next year but fall off. Lose every starting middie, AA attack, two defense and goalie. IMO Bronxville will be better next year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Heavily disagree with Briarcliff, they will be good next year but fall off. Lose every starting middie, AA attack, two defense and goalie. IMO Bronxville will be better next year.

with this statement, you must be Bronxville player who thinks the 2024/2025 Briarcliff players are up to the current players standards. Only time will tell if you're right.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Coaching Changes:
Tappan Zee will be opening. That's a great Rockland team who is relatively young still
We saw what happened at Greeley, They are bringing in a new AD already too. That will be a full rebuild.[/quote]


I'm really shocked to hear that Coach M is leaving TZ. He spoke at the 2020 IMLCA conference and I've been impressed with TZ success while under his guidance.
Is he leaving the school district or is no longer coaching at the HS level.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Pleasantville will be a team to watch out for next year. They were mostly composed of Sophomores and Freshmen on offense this year and was able to compete against Briarcliff and Bronxville.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pleasantville will be a team to watch out for next year. They were mostly composed of Sophomores and Freshmen on offense this year and was able to compete against Briarcliff and Bronxville.

Agreed. I don't know how they do it, but they are competing every year and the do it with really small numbers too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown will still be good but will need to replace a lot of production. Griff, Solazzo and DeBellis are tough losses. Most of the defense will be lost to graduation. Goalie is a position that is a question mark going into 2023. I believe their JV was very strong so hopefully some of their players will fill voids opened by graduation.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That loss to CSH really stings for Bcliff. They win if they have Waterhouse in the lineup. They will be good next year but lose a ton of offensive production. Lucas Proctor will be the lone offensive starter returning. They will need to shift to being a defensive minded team like they were in the past and rely on that zone. Expect to see senior LSM Meola on man up and maybe even playing offense if the 24/25’s aren’t up to par.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That loss to CSH really stings for Bcliff. They win if they have Waterhouse in the lineup.

yup- it was going to come down to Bcliff vs CSH, and they ALMOST go it down without Waterhouse. Very impressive but you know it stings. CSH deployed super slow strategy and it worked.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pleasantville will be a team to watch out for next year. They were mostly composed of Sophomores and Freshmen on offense this year and was able to compete against Briarcliff and Bronxville.

A
Scars comes back loaded with their best team ever (on paper)
Mamo comes back loaded but will miss top LSM but

B
Rye loses a ton of key players but they have returning talent scattered around field plus deep bench. Still, a drop.
Ytown same comment as Rye but less depth and less talent.
JJ and Somers should be better and can challenge
Pac has some players back

C
Pelham has depth and key players returning, should be better if they find a goalie
Byram thin but 2 best players in class returning
PV deep but needs scoring
Hen Hud best players returning
TZ deep and best player back

D
B'ville will be good, lost some big bodies but great feeder programs
Pville good young team, might go past Bcliff
Bcliff magical class gone, leaving 2-3 key players with amazing experience but talent drops off after that. Will play very different schedule next year or else will lose a lot and by a lot
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pleasantville will be a team to watch out for next year. They were mostly composed of Sophomores and Freshmen on offense this year and was able to compete against Briarcliff and Bronxville.

A
Scars comes back loaded with their best team ever (on paper)
Mamo comes back loaded but will miss top LSM but

B
Rye loses a ton of key players but they have returning talent scattered around field plus deep bench. Still, a drop.
Ytown same comment as Rye but less depth and less talent.
JJ and Somers should be better and can challenge
Pac has some players back

C
Pelham has depth and key players returning, should be better if they find a goalie
Byram thin but 2 best players in class returning
PV deep but needs scoring
Hen Hud best players returning
TZ deep and best player back

D
B'ville will be good, lost some big bodies but great feeder programs
Pville good young team, might go past Bcliff
Bcliff magical class gone, leaving 2-3 key players with amazing experience but talent drops off after that. Will play very different schedule next year or else will lose a lot and by a lot

Just a little FYI
Rye and JJCR are moving down to C next year, so you might need to adjust your Class rankings
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Looks like Putnam Valley down to D. Carmel down to B. Don't know of any other movements having just read the classification numbers for 2022-23. Interesting that Pleasantville is right at the highest number you can be in D, and Somers is only 3 above C. Look for Somers to be in C for 2024 maybe.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pleasantville will be a team to watch out for next year. They were mostly composed of Sophomores and Freshmen on offense this year and was able to compete against Briarcliff and Bronxville.

A
Scars comes back loaded with their best team ever (on paper)
Mamo comes back loaded but will miss top LSM but

B
Rye loses a ton of key players but they have returning talent scattered around field plus deep bench. Still, a drop.
Ytown same comment as Rye but less depth and less talent.
JJ and Somers should be better and can challenge
Pac has some players back

C
Pelham has depth and key players returning, should be better if they find a goalie
Byram thin but 2 best players in class returning
PV deep but needs scoring
Hen Hud best players returning
TZ deep and best player back

D
B'ville will be good, lost some big bodies but great feeder programs
Pville good young team, might go past Bcliff
Bcliff magical class gone, leaving 2-3 key players with amazing experience but talent drops off after that. Will play very different schedule next year or else will lose a lot and by a lot

Just a little FYI
Rye and JJCR are moving down to C next year, so you might need to adjust your Class rankings
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Looks like Putnam Valley down to D. Carmel down to B. Don't know of any other movements having just read the classification numbers for 2022-23. Interesting that Pleasantville is right at the highest number you can be in D, and Somers is only 3 above C. Look for Somers to be in C for 2024 maybe.


Rye and JJCR dropping to C makes it basically theirs for the taking with Pelham in that mix and TZ a possible threat. Hopefully TZ get a good coach in there to run things. McIntosh did a masterful job with that program.

B is now wide open, with the front runners easily now Somers and Yorktown with Mahopac and maybe Byram right behind. Everyone else is in the distances. Somers is the most loaded team coming back in B now.

Tough go for PV to be down in D. If all classes were same, they'd be a nice run for Class C
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
A
Scarsdale will be the team to beat. Ton of guys with experience return. Their FOGO is one of the best I’ve seen in section 1 in the past decade. Will be a very tough out.
Class A is a two horse race but Mamo will need to make an adjustment on the face off X to contend. Will be an uphill battle. They lose some D1 commits on both sides of the ball but return a good core.
Arlington always has strength of numbers but the drop off after the top two teams is drastic. I know they lose a lot to graduation but they will find a way to string a bunch of wins together in 2023.

B
Yorktown has the history but do they have the talent right now? Offense should be able to put the ball in the back of the net. Most important need for this team is to find a solid goalie to help an inexperienced defense. Still the favorite with that being said.
Somers is the challenger. A bunch of stud underclassmen stepped up on O this year for them. Expect them to take another step this year. Would not be surprised at all if they took down the Huskers this year.
Mahopac returns a ton of talent but loses two D1 commits. They have been building something in the past two years and look to take a step. They are a legit contender in B.
Not really sure what to think about L/P going into 2023. They lose a lot after having an underwhelming year. They did play some good teams hard. We know they are well coached so they can always suprise someone.
Greeley is a dark horse. Their 24/25 classes are strong and have cornerstone pieces to set them up for the future. They lose their LSM but that’s about it. They might be a year away but can make some noise in 2023.
Carmel is a program that has been quietly trending upward. If their talent doesn’t get poached by private schools they will be better than people think.
Fox lane has always had talent throughout the years but no championship to show for it. This stands true for next year. If the coaching improves they have a chance but it will be tough in a loaded field.

C
Rye is the favorite but loses two all Americans. They have a solid core going into next year but need to replace some holes on both sides of the ball.
John Jay is a very slight underdog and they can very well turn the tables. They have the talent and have beaten Rye before. They return many key players on both sides of the ball. Bocklet is a good coach and can take John Jay back to states.
There is a drop off after JJ and Rye but Pelham is a quality team. They return a lot from last year and have championship experience but did receive a gift in being in a thin class C this year. They will need to be more consistent in 2023 if they are going to knock off JJ or Rye.
Byram Hills is a team that got banged up at the wrong time this year. They have some good players returning but are still very top heavy. Their LSM played offense in the playoff run maybe they will keep doing that in 2023.
Tappan Zee was a young team and still managed to have a great season. They return their best player but will need to replace some key role players. Can be a tough out and Rye and JJ will need to take them seriously.
Pearl River made their first ever section final in program history. They lose two solid senior middies and some defenders but return a bunch of production. The program is trending upward so expect to see good players fill in holes lost to graduation.
Hen Hud played some close games versus some quality teams but also had some bad losses. They return some of their best players and can be a Cinderella in class C.

D
Class D is a 3 horse race but Bronxville is the favorite. They lose 3 senior offensive starters and their best long pole. Their goalie is good and return one of the best players in the section at attack. Bronxville doesn’t rebuild they reload so assume the players stepping in can ball.
Briarcliff is a team who had a great run but might get off to a slow start this season. They will need to figure out an offense that will have 5 new starters. Their zone has the potential to keep them in games and will want to win every game in a rock fight.
Pleasantville had a good year in a rebuild. One of their best offensive players who was a sophomore missed this past season due to injury. They only return one defensive starter however. Expect this team to be able to put the ball in the back of the net after all the experience they got this year but might need to win in shootouts early in the year as the defense may go through some growing pains.
There is a huge drop off after those three teams. 2023 may be a tough year for PV. Full on rebuild. They lose a ton of production but they are well coached.
Flashback to five or six years ago Westlake blew out Bronxville in the section final. This year they got blown out by Croton in the first round of the playoffs. Man has this program fallen off the face of the earth. Most likely has to do with their old coach Burnard leaving or a few dud classes. I assume they were young this year so maybe they are more experienced going into 2023.
Rye Neck actually has some talent. They return the section 1 leader in points. They return an LSM who was the section 1 leader in caused turnovers. They also have a good goalie. Might be a fun team to keep an eye on.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What do you guys mean by being a holdback club?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What do you guys mean by being a holdback club?

It’s an immature way to attack 2w and the relationship it has with Brunswick. Fact is, every club, HS and prep school has holdbacks. The BOTC Maryland main forum even has its own holdback thread.

There was a time that Brunswick players dominated 2W teams, but that isn’t the case anymore. The program is growing!

My son is on a 2W Carolina team, which is an A level team and he is not a holdback. No one on his 2w Carolina team attends Brunswick (middle school). The 2W Black teams all play on the AA level.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I think you just helped make the case that 2W is a bunch of holdbacks. Your son is 'on age' and plays for their B team, along with the other 'on age' kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think you just helped make the case that 2W is a bunch of holdbacks. Your son is 'on age' and plays for their B team, along with the other 'on age' kids.

True.

And of course its not a Brunswick only team but program is centered around Wick (owners, coaches, facilities, tourneys). Safe to call it a private school club, how's that? And we know we know there are public school players but the net worth of 2W families could buy most countries.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I’m not sure who was attacking 2way as a holdback club, it seemed people were merely staring the fact that they have a lot of holdbacks which isn’t false. Whether or not everyone in the mid Atlantic is doing it is irrelevant. Everyone knows that holdbacks are here to stay because no one that has power (college, clubs) wants it any other way. But it does turn the sport into an elite select few of haves and have nots on the collegiate and high school level. As goes the cliche, it is what it is.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I’m not sure who was attacking 2way as a holdback club, it seemed people were merely staring the fact that they have a lot of holdbacks which isn’t false. Whether or not everyone in the mid Atlantic is doing it is irrelevant. Everyone knows that holdbacks are here to stay because no one that has power (college, clubs) wants it any other way. But it does turn the sport into an elite select few of haves and have nots on the collegiate and high school level. As goes the cliche, it is what it is.

Reality is, if you want to play top D1 college lacrosse now… you will probably need to holdback. Develop more! Check out the top recruits! Majority are holdbacks that are the top recruits. Sad facts, but true. Just the way it is now.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I’m not sure who was attacking 2way as a holdback club, it seemed people were merely staring the fact that they have a lot of holdbacks which isn’t false. Whether or not everyone in the mid Atlantic is doing it is irrelevant. Everyone knows that holdbacks are here to stay because no one that has power (college, clubs) wants it any other way. But it does turn the sport into an elite select few of haves and have nots on the collegiate and high school level. As goes the cliche, it is what it is.

Reality is, if you want to play top D1 college lacrosse now… you will probably need to holdback. Develop more! Check out the top recruits! Majority are holdbacks that are the top recruits. Sad facts, but true. Just the way it is now.
That's more of a result of the COVID rules giving a blanket year of eligibility to college players. Many schools have bloated rosters as it is and it will take another year or two for that to level out.

If everyone is a hold back, than no one is.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I’m not sure who was attacking 2way as a holdback club, it seemed people were merely staring the fact that they have a lot of holdbacks which isn’t false. Whether or not everyone in the mid Atlantic is doing it is irrelevant. Everyone knows that holdbacks are here to stay because no one that has power (college, clubs) wants it any other way. But it does turn the sport into an elite select few of haves and have nots on the collegiate and high school level. As goes the cliche, it is what it is.

Reality is, if you want to play top D1 college lacrosse now… you will probably need to holdback. Develop more! Check out the top recruits! Majority are holdbacks that are the top recruits. Sad facts, but true. Just the way it is now.
That's more of a result of the COVID rules giving a blanket year of eligibility to college players. Many schools have bloated rosters as it is and it will take another year or two for that to level out.

If everyone is a hold back, than no one is.

Agree that covid has led to abnormal rosters and has really hurt the 22-23s for recruiting. But I would say the majority of kids are not holdbacks. The majority of mid low recruited kids are on age but the majority of top recruits are holdbacks for 1-3 years. What’s lost in all of that is the poor souls who hold back who don’t get a better college selection than if they just stayed in their normal year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I’m not sure who was attacking 2way as a holdback club, it seemed people were merely staring the fact that they have a lot of holdbacks which isn’t false. Whether or not everyone in the mid Atlantic is doing it is irrelevant. Everyone knows that holdbacks are here to stay because no one that has power (college, clubs) wants it any other way. But it does turn the sport into an elite select few of haves and have nots on the collegiate and high school level. As goes the cliche, it is what it is.

Reality is, if you want to play top D1 college lacrosse now… you will probably need to holdback. Develop more! Check out the top recruits! Majority are holdbacks that are the top recruits. Sad facts, but true. Just the way it is now.

This is true for a lot of sports. For instance, if you want to play D1 hockey, you almost always have to be a holdback. But in hockey, they play as per birth year as youths. The holdback infrastructure is not incompatible with age-based youth play.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
So, with June concluding how are the local Boys club teams programs doing?

Ballers:
Dragons (Fairfield):
Dragons (North):
Eclipse:
LIE North:
Predators:
Pride (soon to be call True Lacrosse Westchester):
Primetime:
Team 91 Tristate
Westchester Warriors:
2Way

Am I missing a club team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So, with June concluding how are the local Boys club teams programs doing?

Ballers:
Dragons (Fairfield):
Dragons (North):
Eclipse:
LIE North:
Predators:
Pride (soon to be call True Lacrosse Westchester):
Primetime:
Team 91 Tristate
Westchester Warriors:
2Way

Am I missing a club team?


Well the World Series Championship is taking place this weekend.

Only Eclipse, LIE North and 2Way are representing the area.
I'm guessing that 2way is only there because of holdbacks laugh.

LIEN has the biggest roster, with 30 players. The other teams have approximate 22-25 players.

Eclipse will most likely have the most success.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Lacrosse World Series Championship (fka World Series of Youth Lacrosse)

30 qualifying teams and our local teams:

Eclipse 5-1, finished in the top 4 teams. Great job!
2Way 4-2, wasn’t in the race after the first game loss to LIE. But left with a winning record, which is in the minority of the 30 teams.
LIEN 2-3, losses to Kings, Mass and So Cal and wins of Israel and True Michigan, is disappointing.

Primetime, Predators, Team 91 Tri-state and Cavalry never made it past the qualifiers.

Most surprised about PT not making it. Wondering if this year is an outlier or the beginning of a downward trend. It was 2017 when PT was in the championship game and being the top dog of Westchester.

Huge congratulations to Team 91 Machine and to one of its member, A.S., who is a 7th grader from White Plains!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Thought you had to live within so miles of the club to be in World Series?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thought you had to live within so miles of the club to be in World Series?

"All players must reside within 100 miles of the home field/HQ of their program"
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thought you had to live within so miles of the club to be in World Series?

And?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
But I would say the majority of kids are not holdbacks. The majority of mid low recruited kids are on age but the majority of top recruits are holdbacks for 1-3 years. What’s lost in all of that is the poor souls who hold back who don’t get a better college selection than if they just stayed in their normal year.[/quote]

Sorry but this is wrong. Majority of players on college rosters are not on age for their class. Top recruit lists are dominated by holdbacks. The lax world rewards holdbacks through clubs-preps-showcases-colleges. Competing with other players their age generally means failure or not standing out. Its really a pathetic system fueled by the wealthy who will game any system but justified of course.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
But I would say the majority of kids are not holdbacks. The majority of mid low recruited kids are on age but the majority of top recruits are holdbacks for 1-3 years. What’s lost in all of that is the poor souls who hold back who don’t get a better college selection than if they just stayed in their normal year.

Sorry but this is wrong. Majority of players on college rosters are not on age for their class. Top recruit lists are dominated by holdbacks. The lax world rewards holdbacks through clubs-preps-showcases-colleges. Competing with other players their age generally means failure or not standing out. Its really a pathetic system fueled by the wealthy who will game any system but justified of course.[/quote]


Always happy to see chatter/posts about HV/Sect 1, but last night's post was a head scratcher until I realized that it was a continuation from June 19.
You're so bitter and resentful to in regard to holdbacks and ironically, the audience/area that you are a member of, Westchester/Fairfield Counties are full of wealth. The final rankings of Lohud lists Rye, Briarcliff, Scarsdale, Mamaroneck/Larchmont, Bronxville and Katonah; you 're truly tone deaf.

There is a holdback thread/conversation within the Maryland main forum, which you should be directed to.

The moderators should consider your posts to be problematic in nature.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
But I would say the majority of kids are not holdbacks. The majority of mid low recruited kids are on age but the majority of top recruits are holdbacks for 1-3 years. What’s lost in all of that is the poor souls who hold back who don’t get a better college selection than if they just stayed in their normal year.

Sorry but this is wrong. Majority of players on college rosters are not on age for their class. Top recruit lists are dominated by holdbacks. The lax world rewards holdbacks through clubs-preps-showcases-colleges. Competing with other players their age generally means failure or not standing out. Its really a pathetic system fueled by the wealthy who will game any system but justified of course.


Always happy to see chatter/posts about HV/Sect 1, but last night's post was a head scratcher until I realized that it was a continuation from June 19.
You're so bitter and resentful to in regard to holdbacks and ironically, the audience/area that you are a member of, Westchester/Fairfield Counties are full of wealth. The final rankings of Lohud lists Rye, Briarcliff, Scarsdale, Mamaroneck/Larchmont, Bronxville and Katonah; you 're truly tone deaf.

There is a holdback thread/conversation within the Maryland main forum, which you should be directed to.

The moderators should consider your posts to be problematic in nature.[/quote]

There is a 2-part problem. 1. the growing trend of re-classing going into and at High School and 2. COVID and the NCAA.

It's a bit tough to gauge how many college players are "holdbacks" per se since everyone was given at least one extra year and most got 2 years of extra eligibility (sorry ivies). the result of that has been all the college rosters got bloated and you see 23, 24 and 25 year old "senior" and grad level players that you haven't seen much in the past. I hardly blame them. If I was given one more year to play college lacrosse, I don't know many that would turn that down. Some did, of course, but that combination has been a huge issues for the last 2-3 recruiting classes and will take maybe 2-3 years more to level out.

I can't say I blame some kids for trying to maximize their opportunities to get on a college roster by re-classing now. Some rosters in college have over 60 kids on them when a "normal" roster is in the 40-45 range. There's just more people for less spots.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It is simply supply and demand. Same amount of high level D1 program and more and more kids fighting for those spots. Programs will take the best players regardless of age
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is simply supply and demand. Same amount of high level D1 program and more and more kids fighting for those spots. Programs will take the best players regardless of age

Veteran comment and right. Must have older kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
But I would say the majority of kids are not holdbacks. The majority of mid low recruited kids are on age but the majority of top recruits are holdbacks for 1-3 years. What’s lost in all of that is the poor souls who hold back who don’t get a better college selection than if they just stayed in their normal year.

Sorry but this is wrong. Majority of players on college rosters are not on age for their class. Top recruit lists are dominated by holdbacks. The lax world rewards holdbacks through clubs-preps-showcases-colleges. Competing with other players their age generally means failure or not standing out. Its really a pathetic system fueled by the wealthy who will game any system but justified of course.[/quote]

Fairly myopic point of view. You are only looking at the top D1 and D3 schools. You said it yourself “top recruit lists”. There are ~190,000 high schoolers playing lacrosse and let’s estimate there are 40,000 graduating lacrosse players. The majority won’t go on to play lacrosse but I would imagine that the majority of ones that go on are on-age. This is because there are a 250 D3 programs and 75 D2 programs, the majority of which, I guarantee you, are not holdbacks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
But I would say the majority of kids are not holdbacks. The majority of mid low recruited kids are on age but the majority of top recruits are holdbacks for 1-3 years. What’s lost in all of that is the poor souls who hold back who don’t get a better college selection than if they just stayed in their normal year.

Sorry but this is wrong. Majority of players on college rosters are not on age for their class. Top recruit lists are dominated by holdbacks. The lax world rewards holdbacks through clubs-preps-showcases-colleges. Competing with other players their age generally means failure or not standing out. Its really a pathetic system fueled by the wealthy who will game any system but justified of course.


Always happy to see chatter/posts about HV/Sect 1, but last night's post was a head scratcher until I realized that it was a continuation from June 19.
You're so bitter and resentful to in regard to holdbacks and ironically, the audience/area that you are a member of, Westchester/Fairfield Counties are full of wealth. The final rankings of Lohud lists Rye, Briarcliff, Scarsdale, Mamaroneck/Larchmont, Bronxville and Katonah; you 're truly tone deaf.

There is a holdback thread/conversation within the Maryland main forum, which you should be directed to.

The moderators should consider your posts to be problematic in nature.

There is a 2-part problem. 1. the growing trend of re-classing going into and at High School and 2. COVID and the NCAA.

It's a bit tough to gauge how many college players are "holdbacks" per se since everyone was given at least one extra year and most got 2 years of extra eligibility (sorry ivies). the result of that has been all the college rosters got bloated and you see 23, 24 and 25 year old "senior" and grad level players that you haven't seen much in the past. I hardly blame them. If I was given one more year to play college lacrosse, I don't know many that would turn that down. Some did, of course, but that combination has been a huge issues for the last 2-3 recruiting classes and will take maybe 2-3 years more to level out.

I can't say I blame some kids for trying to maximize their opportunities to get on a college roster by re-classing now. Some rosters in college have over 60 kids on them when a "normal" roster is in the 40-45 range. There's just more people for less spots.[/quote]

Westchester, LI and CT used to be insulated from the holdback trend that happens in the mid-Atlantic and Boston area but that is becoming more the norm for the aforementioned reasons you listed. But that is why holdback talk have and will infiltrate all the forums as it ain’t just limited to MD. I am not for holdbacks but it is necessary for most to enter the top schools. What is lost are all those who do hold back where the extra year doesn’t benefit them because all we see are the successes. But it’s never going away because College coaches want the older player as do Clubs and those two entities govern the sport for the foreseeable future, not public high schools or US Lacrosse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
But I would say the majority of kids are not holdbacks. The majority of mid low recruited kids are on age but the majority of top recruits are holdbacks for 1-3 years. What’s lost in all of that is the poor souls who hold back who don’t get a better college selection than if they just stayed in their normal year.

Sorry but this is wrong. Majority of players on college rosters are not on age for their class. Top recruit lists are dominated by holdbacks. The lax world rewards holdbacks through clubs-preps-showcases-colleges. Competing with other players their age generally means failure or not standing out. Its really a pathetic system fueled by the wealthy who will game any system but justified of course.


Always happy to see chatter/posts about HV/Sect 1, but last night's post was a head scratcher until I realized that it was a continuation from June 19.
You're so bitter and resentful to in regard to holdbacks and ironically, the audience/area that you are a member of, Westchester/Fairfield Counties are full of wealth. The final rankings of Lohud lists Rye, Briarcliff, Scarsdale, Mamaroneck/Larchmont, Bronxville and Katonah; you 're truly tone deaf.

There is a holdback thread/conversation within the Maryland main forum, which you should be directed to.

The moderators should consider your posts to be problematic in nature.

There is a 2-part problem. 1. the growing trend of re-classing going into and at High School and 2. COVID and the NCAA.

It's a bit tough to gauge how many college players are "holdbacks" per se since everyone was given at least one extra year and most got 2 years of extra eligibility (sorry ivies). the result of that has been all the college rosters got bloated and you see 23, 24 and 25 year old "senior" and grad level players that you haven't seen much in the past. I hardly blame them. If I was given one more year to play college lacrosse, I don't know many that would turn that down. Some did, of course, but that combination has been a huge issues for the last 2-3 recruiting classes and will take maybe 2-3 years more to level out.

I can't say I blame some kids for trying to maximize their opportunities to get on a college roster by re-classing now. Some rosters in college have over 60 kids on them when a "normal" roster is in the 40-45 range. There's just more people for less spots.

Westchester, LI and CT used to be insulated from the holdback trend that happens in the mid-Atlantic and Boston area but that is becoming more the norm for the aforementioned reasons you listed. But that is why holdback talk have and will infiltrate all the forums as it ain’t just limited to MD. I am not for holdbacks but it is necessary for most to enter the top schools. What is lost are all those who do hold back where the extra year doesn’t benefit them because all we see are the successes. But it’s never going away because College coaches want the older player as do Clubs and those two entities govern the sport for the foreseeable future, not public high schools or US Lacrosse.[/quote]

Yes, the college coaches want the older (and therefore, better) players. The same is true in college hockey. Yet in hockey youth is played via birth year. Having a BY youth system is not inconsistent with college coaches using older players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Only on age kids can play on the World Series Teams. They require birth certificate submission & photos of the kids to be submitted along with their jersey numbers.

Some kids age out. 2 Way 27's only had 2 kids age out of this year's World Series. Same goes for Eclipse. They are both solid teams in their own right.

I hear you, though.

Birth certificate requirement for lax teams in general should be required, just like soccer & baseball.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So, with June concluding how are the local Boys club teams programs doing?

Ballers:
Dragons (Fairfield):
Dragons (North):
Eclipse:
LIE North:
Predators:
Pride (soon to be call True Lacrosse Westchester):
Primetime:
Team 91 Tristate
Westchester Warriors:
2Way

Am I missing a club team?

Cavalry Lacrosse Club -- started last summer with cores of players from CT Wolves and overall have had a very successful first year. The 2027s are a AA-level team with wins over Igloo Kodiak Rush, Legacy Gators (twice), Team Ten (out of the Philly area) and DC Express, among others. Very strong at the 28 and other years also. Tryouts this week and next at Fairfield U. Practice/academy sessions typically held in Ridgefield, Danbury or Fairfield, CT. Primarily run by the Fairfield Prep coaching staff.

https://cavalrylacrosseclub.com/
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So, with June concluding how are the local Boys club teams programs doing?

Ballers:
Dragons (Fairfield):
Dragons (North):
Eclipse:
LIE North:
Predators:
Pride (soon to be call True Lacrosse Westchester):
Primetime:
Team 91 Tristate
Westchester Warriors:
2Way

Am I missing a club team?

Cavalry Lacrosse Club -- started last summer with cores of players from CT Wolves and overall have had a very successful first year. The 2027s are a AA-level team with wins over Igloo Kodiak Rush, Legacy Gators (twice), Team Ten (out of the Philly area) and DC Express, among others. Very strong at the 28 and other years also. Tryouts this week and next at Fairfield U. Practice/academy sessions typically held in Ridgefield, Danbury or Fairfield, CT. Primarily run by the Fairfield Prep coaching staff.

https://cavalrylacrosseclub.com/

While at the Yale tournament this past w/e, Cavalry was brought up among a mixed group and one person mentioned that a Cavalry team, failed to show up on day 2 for a playoff game earlier this summer.

Anyone else hear about this?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So, with June concluding how are the local Boys club teams programs doing?

Ballers:
Dragons (Fairfield):
Dragons (North):
Eclipse:
LIE North:
Predators:
Pride (soon to be call True Lacrosse Westchester):
Primetime:
Team 91 Tristate
Westchester Warriors:
2Way

Am I missing a club team?

Cavalry Lacrosse Club -- started last summer with cores of players from CT Wolves and overall have had a very successful first year. The 2027s are a AA-level team with wins over Igloo Kodiak Rush, Legacy Gators (twice), Team Ten (out of the Philly area) and DC Express, among others. Very strong at the 28 and other years also. Tryouts this week and next at Fairfield U. Practice/academy sessions typically held in Ridgefield, Danbury or Fairfield, CT. Primarily run by the Fairfield Prep coaching staff.

https://cavalrylacrosseclub.com/

While at the Yale tournament this past w/e, Cavalry was brought up among a mixed group and one person mentioned that a Cavalry team, failed to show up on day 2 for a playoff game earlier this summer.

Anyone else hear about this?

What year? The 27s played in (1) Tristar on LI, (2) King Street Invite, (3) NXT (Philly) and (4) Pinnacle Championships (MD). All 2-day tourneys and the 27s were there both days. My understanding is that the 25s, 26s and 28s were also at the same tourneys both days. Can't speak to younger years, but I have not heard anything about anyone not showing up to anything.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This thread has been quiet. What's been happening during CONNY-region club tryouts?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Not Youth news, but it will indirectly impact the local youth lacrosse community.

Iona University will be the newest school to be playing DI, in the 2025 season. Iona will be in the MAAC lacrosse league.
Iona already has DI women's lacrosse, which has 5 local players on that team.

The potential trickle-down effect of this will be game-day youth activities, camps and prospect days.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Time to think about spring time. Lots of fall/winter coaching moves with some vacancies still out there. Schedules seem to be delayed until after the new year - going to be interesting into the spring.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Looks like schedules are finally coming out. Head Coaches are set with Eastchester finally getting their guy in the door, some good sectional matchups and non-sectional games. Practice is not far off and many teams doing winter training.

Who wants to start the way-to-early-but-really-not predictions...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
A- Scarsdale
B- Somers
C- Rye
D- Bronxville
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A- Scarsdale
B- Somers
C- Rye
D- Bronxville

No comments on the predictions although I think with Scarsdale’s FOGO they are likely favorites. I am commenting just to say what has happened to Westchester lacrosse. These are the commits among these teams (per IL) and then I just added a cpl more historical powerhouses for reference. I remember as recently as 3/4 years ago when Yorktown played John Jay you could have 30 commits from that one game alone! Now it looks like 1 or 2 a class.

Scarsdale - Amherst, Penn State, Union
Somers- Susquehanna, Iona
Rye - Colby, Washington & Lee, Virginia
Bronxville - Hobart, Colby, North Carolina

Yorktown - Union, Wesleyan, Monmouth, Lehigh
John Jay - Ithaca, Colgate, Umass
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A- Scarsdale
B- Somers
C- Rye
D- Bronxville

A - I like Scarsdale but the battle between them and Mamaroneck I think will be a good one for a few years to come. Arlington was a fantastic bright spot last year and Wappingers can always do some damage.White Plains is a dark horse in A
B - Somers I don't think is as a done deal with Yorktown always hanging around - though they will drop from the dominant teams of the past. A battle looms for the top spot with Mahopac. Many others battling for the mid-pack there. This is the best Somers team in years and it's a perfect storm for them Dark Horse: Fox Lane
C - This will be the grinder class this year with Rye the team to beat But the threat of John Jay, Byram as a sleeper - with new coaching staff, and never counting out Pelham is formidable. This could be any one of those 4 teams. Dark horse here is Sleepy Hollow
D - Will be down to Briarcliff and Bronxville again. Like A, I don't see that changing much in the next few years. There will be individual talent in D but I don't see a team taking either of them down. Dark Horse: Pleasentville always seems to find a way to get it done.

There was a lot of coaching movement this off-season. Seeing programs adjust to new ways versus teams that have established staffs will be interesting to see what happens. I will take the experience this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A- Scarsdale
B- Somers
C- Rye
D- Bronxville

A - Two-horse race here with Mamaroneck and Scarsdale. Scarsdale is going to be even better than they were last year, don't expect a slow start from them this time around. I think Mamo has a shot, they need to have a great game plan but they also have a great FOGO so maybe they can steal a few possessions. Arlington and North Rockland will be decent and have some talent. The dark horse nobody is talking about is Carmel. They return almost everybody on both sides of the ball and were hanging around with Scarsdale until the 4th quarter in the playoffs last year. It wouldnt suprise me if they ended up being the 3rd best team in A.

B - It's shaping up to be Somers vs Yorktown in the final. They have contrasting styles as Somers has offensive firepower and Yorktown has a stout defense with 3 divison 1 commits respectively. The deciding factor will be goalie play for Yorktown. I think Mahopac is the clear number 3 and are a talented bunch but are clearly a step behind the top dogs in the class. Lakeland and Fox Lane will be an interesting watches, talent is there but not sure what to make of them in 2023. I think the dark horse is Horace Greeley. They were a young team last year with underclassmen starting on both sides of the ball and can take a step foward to competing with the top dogs in section 1.

C - Most depth out of all the classes. In my opinion, I think John Jay is the team to beat. They have a lethal offense but can they get stops? Rye is considered by most to be the favorites and there is no doubting their talent. They lost a lot of talent to graduation but they have a good feeder program. Pelham is the defending champ and the 3rd best team, they return a lot from last year. Some teams who could be considered dark horses are Tappan Zee, Byram Hills, Pearl River, Hendrick Hudson, and Sleepy Hollow. All of those teams have talent and you can't expect to roll over any of them.

D - There are three teams vying for the Class D title. I would say Bronxville is the favorite. They return some studs on both sides of the ball and may have the best goalie in the section. Briarcliff is the defending champ and will be a tough out. Their 2022 senior class may have been the best in the section and those guys will be tough to replace. They have a stout defense and will want to win ugly. Pleasantville will be solid this year and will surprise a lot of people. They return their entire offense but will need to figure out the defense as they lost a ton to graduation on that side of the ball. Putnam Valley is a solid team and will need to be taken seriously but is a notch below the three teams above. Haldane is always feisty and has some talent. The dark horse is Rye Neck. They return the Section 1 points leader on offense and the Section 1 caused turnover leader on defense. They also have more firepower on offense than you'd expect on offense and a great goalie. Look out for these guys they should be a very interesting watch in 2023
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A- Scarsdale
B- Somers
C- Rye
D- Bronxville

No comments on the predictions although I think with Scarsdale’s FOGO they are likely favorites. I am commenting just to say what has happened to Westchester lacrosse. These are the commits among these teams (per IL) and then I just added a cpl more historical powerhouses for reference. I remember as recently as 3/4 years ago when Yorktown played John Jay you could have 30 commits from that one game alone! Now it looks like 1 or 2 a class.

Scarsdale - Amherst, Penn State, Union
Somers- Susquehanna, Iona
Rye - Colby, Washington & Lee, Virginia
Bronxville - Hobart, Colby, North Carolina

Yorktown - Union, Wesleyan, Monmouth, Lehigh
John Jay - Ithaca, Colgate, Umass

Is the drop in public commits tied to the rise of the privates? Stepinac is poised to be a power for some time, Iona has been around for a bit and continues to bring in local players from far and wide via their paid to play football and basketball model. Note: Do not go there for lacrosse unless you play for EN and have been asked by the coach. Brunswick is taking kids from Rye, Mahopac and all over while sending the entire roster to top 10 schools and teams. In years past these kids were playing for their local HS teams and would have been the top recruits. Avon Old Farms, Berkshire and TP are also pulling in local kids now as well…..with that view it is even more impressive what a town like Darien does year in and year out. Great to see the game growing and kids getting opportunities.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
John jay has no offensive firepower - come on
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I think
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A- Scarsdale
B- Somers
C- Rye
D- Bronxville

No comments on the predictions although I think with Scarsdale’s FOGO they are likely favorites. I am commenting just to say what has happened to Westchester lacrosse. These are the commits among these teams (per IL) and then I just added a cpl more historical powerhouses for reference. I remember as recently as 3/4 years ago when Yorktown played John Jay you could have 30 commits from that one game alone! Now it looks like 1 or 2 a class.

Scarsdale - Amherst, Penn State, Union
Somers- Susquehanna, Iona
Rye - Colby, Washington & Lee, Virginia
Bronxville - Hobart, Colby, North Carolina

Yorktown - Union, Wesleyan, Monmouth, Lehigh
John Jay - Ithaca, Colgate, Umass

Is the drop in public commits tied to the rise of the privates? Stepinac is poised to be a power for some time, Iona has been around for a bit and continues to bring in local players from far and wide via their paid to play football and basketball model. Note: Do not go there for lacrosse unless you play for EN and have been asked by the coach. Brunswick is taking kids from Rye, Mahopac and all over while sending the entire roster to top 10 schools and teams. In years past these kids were playing for their local HS teams and would have been the top recruits. Avon Old Farms, Berkshire and TP are also pulling in local kids now as well…..with that view it is even more impressive what a town like Darien does year in and year out. Great to see the game growing and kids getting opportunities.

This is probably a more "fair" point. Who are the kids that are committing from private that would otherwise be a Section 1 player? There is some validity there. You also have to consider that the last few years of NCAA covid rules caused bloated rosters at the college level and limited slots for HS kids so Schools can afford to be more picky. It's all cyclical.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John jay has no offensive firepower - come on

Jay Returns almost their entire O. The question will be on the D end and goalie.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]

B - It's shaping up to be Somers vs Yorktown in the final. They have contrasting styles as Somers has offensive firepower and Yorktown has a stout defense with 3 divison 1 commits respectively. The deciding factor will be goalie play for Yorktown. I think Mahopac is the clear number 3 and are a talented bunch but are clearly a step behind the top dogs in the class. Lakeland and Fox Lane will be an interesting watches, talent is there but not sure what to make of them in 2023. I think the dark horse is Horace Greeley. They were a young team last year with underclassmen starting on both sides of the ball and can take a step foward to competing with the top dogs in section 1.

B is the Group of Death this year. It's Yorktown vs. Somers barring a shocker. Both are solid teams with experienced coaches . I don't see anyone else pulling that off. Lakeland might stir something up and Fox Lane is always hanging around. Mahopac are always gritty enough to challenge some. They had a good game vs. Somers last year, but their FOGO is gone as is their goalie I believe I agree Greeley has some young talent, but it's still a mess behind the scenes and that's not changing soon
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John jay has no offensive firepower - come on

They beat Rye last year and return almost everyone on that side of the ball so we'll have to agree to disagree on that one.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A- Scarsdale
B- Somers
C- Rye
D- Bronxville

No comments on the predictions although I think with Scarsdale’s FOGO they are likely favorites. I am commenting just to say what has happened to Westchester lacrosse. These are the commits among these teams (per IL) and then I just added a cpl more historical powerhouses for reference. I remember as recently as 3/4 years ago when Yorktown played John Jay you could have 30 commits from that one game alone! Now it looks like 1 or 2 a class.

Scarsdale - Amherst, Penn State, Union
Somers- Susquehanna, Iona
Rye - Colby, Washington & Lee, Virginia
Bronxville - Hobart, Colby, North Carolina

Yorktown - Union, Wesleyan, Monmouth, Lehigh
John Jay - Ithaca, Colgate, Umass

Is the drop in public commits tied to the rise of the privates? Stepinac is poised to be a power for some time, Iona has been around for a bit and continues to bring in local players from far and wide via their paid to play football and basketball model. Note: Do not go there for lacrosse unless you play for EN and have been asked by the coach. Brunswick is taking kids from Rye, Mahopac and all over while sending the entire roster to top 10 schools and teams. In years past these kids were playing for their local HS teams and would have been the top recruits. Avon Old Farms, Berkshire and TP are also pulling in local kids now as well…..with that view it is even more impressive what a town like Darien does year in and year out. Great to see the game growing and kids getting opportunities.

More of a factor, I think, is that lacrosse has become a lot more popular very recently in many other areas of the country. Local kids are no longer competing with just MD and LI for college spots. The rest of the country, especially in warm weather areas, are producing a lot more players, and I think kids that are older than Section 1 public schools kids - which may be precipitating a slight move to the private schools.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Final Four for each class:
A - Scarsdale, Mamaroneck, Carmel, Arlington
B - Somers, Mahopac, Yorktown, Lakeland/Panas
C- JJ, Rye, TZ, PR
D - Bronxville, Briarcliff, Pleasantville, Putnam Valley
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A- Scarsdale
B- Somers
C- Rye
D- Bronxville

No comments on the predictions although I think with Scarsdale’s FOGO they are likely favorites. I am commenting just to say what has happened to Westchester lacrosse. These are the commits among these teams (per IL) and then I just added a cpl more historical powerhouses for reference. I remember as recently as 3/4 years ago when Yorktown played John Jay you could have 30 commits from that one game alone! Now it looks like 1 or 2 a class.

Scarsdale - Amherst, Penn State, Union
Somers- Susquehanna, Iona
Rye - Colby, Washington & Lee, Virginia
Bronxville - Hobart, Colby, North Carolina

Yorktown - Union, Wesleyan, Monmouth, Lehigh
John Jay - Ithaca, Colgate, Umass

Is the drop in public commits tied to the rise of the privates? Stepinac is poised to be a power for some time, Iona has been around for a bit and continues to bring in local players from far and wide via their paid to play football and basketball model. Note: Do not go there for lacrosse unless you play for EN and have been asked by the coach. Brunswick is taking kids from Rye, Mahopac and all over while sending the entire roster to top 10 schools and teams. In years past these kids were playing for their local HS teams and would have been the top recruits. Avon Old Farms, Berkshire and TP are also pulling in local kids now as well…..with that view it is even more impressive what a town like Darien does year in and year out. Great to see the game growing and kids getting opportunities.

More of a factor, I think, is that lacrosse has become a lot more popular very recently in many other areas of the country. Local kids are no longer competing with just MD and LI for college spots. The rest of the country, especially in warm weather areas, are producing a lot more players, and I think kids that are older than Section 1 public schools kids - which may be precipitating a slight move to the private schools.
Very fair point. The lacrosse world is small with many more events than before so kids far and wide are being seen outside the hotbeds. Local teams like 91 have players from Texas, the National teams are a part of every club and lord knows there is a showcase for anyone and everyone with coaches at it. Do Yorktown kids play top club or still focus on their town/club team?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A- Scarsdale
B- Somers
C- Rye
D- Bronxville

No comments on the predictions although I think with Scarsdale’s FOGO they are likely favorites. I am commenting just to say what has happened to Westchester lacrosse. These are the commits among these teams (per IL) and then I just added a cpl more historical powerhouses for reference. I remember as recently as 3/4 years ago when Yorktown played John Jay you could have 30 commits from that one game alone! Now it looks like 1 or 2 a class.

Scarsdale - Amherst, Penn State, Union
Somers- Susquehanna, Iona
Rye - Colby, Washington & Lee, Virginia
Bronxville - Hobart, Colby, North Carolina

Yorktown - Union, Wesleyan, Monmouth, Lehigh
John Jay - Ithaca, Colgate, Umass

Is the drop in public commits tied to the rise of the privates? Stepinac is poised to be a power for some time, Iona has been around for a bit and continues to bring in local players from far and wide via their paid to play football and basketball model. Note: Do not go there for lacrosse unless you play for EN and have been asked by the coach. Brunswick is taking kids from Rye, Mahopac and all over while sending the entire roster to top 10 schools and teams. In years past these kids were playing for their local HS teams and would have been the top recruits. Avon Old Farms, Berkshire and TP are also pulling in local kids now as well…..with that view it is even more impressive what a town like Darien does year in and year out. Great to see the game growing and kids getting opportunities.

More of a factor, I think, is that lacrosse has become a lot more popular very recently in many other areas of the country. Local kids are no longer competing with just MD and LI for college spots. The rest of the country, especially in warm weather areas, are producing a lot more players, and I think kids that are older than Section 1 public schools kids - which may be precipitating a slight move to the private schools.

I am not going to argue with the fact that many kids are going private because of better education and much better lacrosse but in my opinion it doesn't speak to the drastic and literally overnight downgrade in Westchester lacrosse. As I mentioned in my earlier post watching Yorktown vs John Jay as recently as 3/4 years ago enabled one to see the best players around. Over 30 players going D1-D3. The private schools exist on LI/CT including St Anthony's and Chaminade as well as traveling to the Founders league with the AOF, Salisbury and Taft, etc but their teams still seem to be producing at a high level. Manhasset this year shows 11 players committed (including Duke, Harvard, BU), Garden City 7 (including Duke, Princeton, Virginia), South Side 10 (Cornell, BU), Ridgefield 7 (Virginia, Brown, Notre Dame). I will add that it appears Ct and Long Island have taken a hit as well but the drop doesn't seem as drastic as Westchester. Its actually insane when you look at St Anthonys and Chaminade and their commits and there is no comparison for Westchester. St. Anthony's has 26 D1 commits and Chaminade has 18. Also, I know stars are not the end all and be all but Westchester has ONLY 3 four star recruits in its public schools for both the 2023 and 2024 class COMBINED. Very surprising if you ask me especially wtht the traditional powerhouses in Westchester and historically the overall play of the game here.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
New to the forum and club lax in Section 1.

What's pro / cons of True Westchester?

It was Pride and they evolved to True last summer. It's a program on my son's radar for tryouts for the 2023/2024 season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PR... seriously?
Pelham had them in running time in the 3rd quarter of the section finals last year. They only got there because of some big injuries to top BH players. Pelham also returns more starters than PR. But you must be from Rockland so that makes sense..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Good luck first day to everyone! Looks like some snow ahead. Break out the hoods and the vinyl gloves!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What happened to daily predictions guy ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
kid likely graduated, and he took laxpower with him
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It's crickets in here... I don't know if anyone else has this issue, but optimum seems to be blocking this website - could that be the issue?
Or could it be the new posting rules - i've tried to make a few and they never make it up here. What gives?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Congrats to Pleasentville on cracking the Top 25 nationally list.

Incidentally, some of the lone bright spots in Section 1 teams playing non-section opponents.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
So it looks like Pleasentville is the tops in Section 1. I want to be surprised but I am not.
Yorktown over Scarsdale was a heck of a game. It does not take the luster of Scarsdale and I think it makes Yorktown more formidable than anyone anticipated. We may be surprised by that but we shouldn't be.
Here is what I think after 3.5 weeks...

A - Still down to MAMO and Scarsdale. I don't see anyone making a serious run at either. Dark Horse: Arlington

B - Also a two horse race between Yorktown and Somers. L/P maybe if they can put it together. Mahopac perhaps but based on the early season I don't think so. Dark horse: I am not really seeing one in B. It's all Yorktown and Somers

C - this is the fun class now. Pelham has the tools to get it going, but their two losses were the only strong competition they have this season. Byram putting up big numbers in their games and the Bronxville game this weekend will be a good barometer of where they are at. Tappan Zee is hot and cold. I'd like to see them threaten here but I think is a JJCR/Rye final unless they somehow meet in the semis. Dark Horse: Pelham

D - It's all Pleasentville right now. The only real competition is Briarcliff and Bronxville. The later part of the season will fill this out but if the season ended today, Its P'Ville all the way. Putnam Valley is the Dark Horse in D.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened to daily predictions guy ?
I'll pick up the baton....

Thursday 4/13
Blind Brook over Pawling
PV over Croton
Hastings over Yonkers
Pleasentville big over Rye Neck
Dobbs over Ossining

Friday 4/14
Westlake over Harrison
Ardsley over Blind Brook
TZ over Clarks N
Arlington over Haldane
JJCR over Yorktown in OT. Two phenomenal freshman goalies. Whoever has the better game will win this game. Yorktown doesn't have a FO guy, but it didn't hurt them vs. Scarsdale. Savastano is a bigger O threat IMO
Mercer Island over L/P
Somers of Mahopac
Pelham over New Ro
North Rockland over Nanuet
Dobbs over N. Salem
Ossining over Sleepy Hollow
Suffern Pearl river TOSSUP picking Suffern
Eastchester over WP

Saturday 4/15
Greeley over Brewster Though I would not be surprised at a Brewster upset here
P'ville over HH
PV over Irvington
Mamo over Wantagh (heart over head pick here)
Scarsdale over Massapequa in a tough one
Suffern over Pawling
Pelham over Warwick
TZ over Kingston

Sunday 4/16
Haldane over Greeley
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Forgot some...
Bronxville over Byram
Wapp over FL
Suffern over Pawling
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened to daily predictions guy ?
I'll pick up the baton....

Thursday 4/13
Blind Brook over Pawling. W
PV over Croton. L
Hastings over Yonkers. W
Dobbs over Ossining. W

3-1 on the first day. Not too bad
Croton with a nail biter in a win over PV for the game of the day.
Let’s see what tomorrow brings!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
kid likely graduated, and he took laxpower with him

No, I'm still here and I'm far from a kid (I'm 55). Job change has limited my free time and employer's firewall blocks BOTC.

Incredible win for Y (over Scar) and Capt. America. It's been a long time since Y has had a signature WIN. Back in the day, signature wins for Y where only over non-regional teams (LI/CT).
Tonight's Y v JJ game is epic for both programs. JJ has the advantage (HOME) and Y is still enjoying the moment over Scar. JJ by 2.

Today's other marquee games:

Bronxville at Byram Hills, BH

Somers at Mahopac, SMS

Suffern at Pearl River, PR (PR's coach is a Suffern school teacher; he will bring the intensity).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Other picker here... Gentlemen's wager for the rest of the season?

I look forward to the competition!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Other picker here... Gentlemen's wager for the rest of the season?

I look forward to the competition!


LFG!

Let's limit the selection to 4 games; you're 3-1 and after my 4 games above, we can then start round 2.
Winner of each round gets first selection of games.

We can met at Dunne's pub for the collection of the season results.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened to daily predictions guy ?

Friday 4/14
Westlake over Harrison
Ardsley over Blind Brook
TZ over Clarks N
Arlington over Haldane
JJCR over Yorktown in OT. Two phenomenal freshman goalies. Whoever has the better game will win this game. Yorktown doesn't have a FO guy, but it didn't hurt them vs. Scarsdale. Savastano is a bigger O threat IMO
Mercer Island over L/P
Somers of Mahopac
Pelham over New Ro
North Rockland over Nanuet
Dobbs over N. Salem
Ossining over Sleepy Hollow
Suffern Pearl river TOSSUP picking Suffern
Eastchester over WP

Ooof 6-8 on the day moves me to 9-9 on the season since 4/13

Missed some tight ones in White Plains/Eastchester, JJCR/Yorktown - great game if you go back and watch it, Dobbs over N Salem in 2OT and I think the surprise of the day was Mahopac over Somers.

Look out Class B, We have a new contender in Mahopac. This may not be the runaway for Yorktown and Somers it once looked like.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Some observations

A- Down to Scarsdale and Mamo. Scarsdale is really good but I expected them to be ahead of where they are right now. It's hard to win on the island but the loss to Massapequa was surprising to me. Mamo is trending in the right direction. The comeback win over LI power Wantagh was noteworthy. North Rockland is the third-best team but they would need a stellar performance from their goalie to take down one of the top two teams.

B- Yorktown is the clear favorite at this point. Their goalie has played very well so far, however, he is a freshman so be prepared for some inconsistency. Somers is not the team I thought they would be so far this year. I would say Mahopac and Horace Greeley have jumped them. The Somers vs Greeley matchup this Saturday will be interesting.

C- Down to Rye and Jay as predicted. I would give the edge to Rye as of now. Jay is not as good as I expected this year but still has room to grow. They are both fairly young teams so I expect them both to be firing on all cylinders by May. Pelham is a team to keep an eye on. They have a lot of talent and can take down Rye or Jay if they have an off day. A lot of the teams that I thought were going to be in the mix have underperformed. Byram Hills, Tappan Zee, Pearl River, and Hendrick Hudson are not in a position to compete for the title as of right now.

D- Nationally ranked Pleasantville is without a doubt the favorite as of now and may be the best team in Section 1. I predicted their offense would be great but their inexperienced defense deserves some respect. They bend but don't break. Bronxville and Briarcliff cannot be taken lightly. I would say Bronxville is the clear number two and have some close losses. They should trend upward. Briarcliff is trying to win rock fights with their zone defense and they have a surprising win over Mamo. Haldane is the team to watch and we have to wait until the last day of the regular season if they can surpass Briarcliff
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Some observations

A- Down to Scarsdale and Mamo. Scarsdale is really good but I expected them to be ahead of where they are right now. It's hard to win on the island but the loss to Massapequa was surprising to me. Mamo is trending in the right direction. The comeback win over LI power Wantagh was noteworthy. North Rockland is the third-best team but they would need a stellar performance from their goalie to take down one of the top two teams.

B- Yorktown is the clear favorite at this point. Their goalie has played very well so far, however, he is a freshman so be prepared for some inconsistency. Somers is not the team I thought they would be so far this year. I would say Mahopac and Horace Greeley have jumped them. The Somers vs Greeley matchup this Saturday will be interesting.

C- Down to Rye and Jay as predicted. I would give the edge to Rye as of now. Jay is not as good as I expected this year but still has room to grow. They are both fairly young teams so I expect them both to be firing on all cylinders by May. Pelham is a team to keep an eye on. They have a lot of talent and can take down Rye or Jay if they have an off day. A lot of the teams that I thought were going to be in the mix have underperformed. Byram Hills, Tappan Zee, Pearl River, and Hendrick Hudson are not in a position to compete for the title as of right now.

D- Nationally ranked Pleasantville is without a doubt the favorite as of now and may be the best team in Section 1. I predicted their offense would be great but their inexperienced defense deserves some respect. They bend but don't break. Bronxville and Briarcliff cannot be taken lightly. I would say Bronxville is the clear number two and have some close losses. They should trend upward. Briarcliff is trying to win rock fights with their zone defense and they have a surprising win over Mamo. Haldane is the team to watch and we have to wait until the last day of the regular season if they can surpass Briarcliff

A - Spot on, I said much of the same last week. It's going to be a slugfest and I do hope they meet in the final for A.

B- I am leaning Yorktown more than Somers now, but I wouldn't count Somers out yet. Mahopac is turning heads and the only other real threat in B. Greeley hasn't played anyone of note yet, so the Somers game this weekend will set the stage for where they really are. I don't see them surviving league play very well.

C- Agree with you on Rye and Jay. Jay had an OT scare from L/P yesterday which is uncharacteristic for Jay. Pelham can come back around, but they already lost to Jay, they don't see Rye until late in the season and they have Scarsdale this weekend - which will let us know where they are at right now. I wouldn't count out Byram either.

D- Pleasentville all the way. the battle here is for #2 and it's Briarcliff or Bronxville. I am disappointed in where PV is at, I thought they would be better by now.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Can we talk about the Pelham/Mamo game getting cancelled yesterday due to a lack of officials.

At a VARSITY game.

In Westchester

This is 2023.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we talk about the Pelham/Mamo game getting cancelled yesterday due to a lack of officials.

At a VARSITY game.

In Westchester

This is 2023.

This is happening nearly everyday in Section 1 and it's going to get worse before it gets better. Have you noticed the how old the officials are too?

Every year (January-March) the HVLOA offers training sessions. I recommend all former players/coaches consider taking on this new responsibility. Contact: president@hvloa.com

Also, the school districts are partial at fault for this problem. The staff at these games should have a zero tolerance policy for the spectators that openly abuse the officials.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we talk about the Pelham/Mamo game getting cancelled yesterday due to a lack of officials.

At a VARSITY game.

In Westchester

This is 2023.

This is happening nearly everyday in Section 1 and it's going to get worse before it gets better. Have you noticed the how old the officials are too?

Every year (January-March) the HVLOA offers training sessions. I recommend all former players/coaches consider taking on this new responsibility. Contact: president@hvloa.com

Also, the school districts are partial at fault for this problem. The staff at these games should have a zero tolerance policy for the spectators that openly abuse the officials.

They should be giving out cards to unruly parents! That parents kids team should have to take a penalty. Then you will see the other parents do something about shutting other parents up in the stands. Have schools security kick parents like that out already! Schools can do better with that!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we talk about the Pelham/Mamo game getting cancelled yesterday due to a lack of officials.

At a VARSITY game.

In Westchester

This is 2023.

This is happening nearly everyday in Section 1 and it's going to get worse before it gets better. Have you noticed the how old the officials are too?

Every year (January-March) the HVLOA offers training sessions. I recommend all former players/coaches consider taking on this new responsibility. Contact: president@hvloa.com

Also, the school districts are partial at fault for this problem. The staff at these games should have a zero tolerance policy for the spectators that openly abuse the officials.

They should be giving out cards to unruly parents! That parents kids team should have to take a penalty. Then you will see the other parents do something about shutting other parents up in the stands. Have schools security kick parents like that out already! Schools can do better with that!!

I fully agree that any fan, be it parent, student, whomever. The second there is anything said in the direction of officials you get one warning and then you're gone. A second ejection and you are gone for the season.
The problem with this is getting staff at the games to actually do this. I don't see any scenario - short of having a police presence at every game - where someone from the schools staff will be telling people to leave.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
There are 4 really compelling games today that will shape the season as we start getting into competitive & league Games:

JJCR @ Rye
Pelham @ Scarsdale
Mahopac @ Byram
Yorktown @ Bronxville

Let's see what the day brings!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
JJCR is absolutely terrible, kids playing positions that have no business playing, goalie is a very good up and comer, decent fogo few good middies, attack are nonexistent --Rye is going to Roll
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
JJCR is absolutely terrible, kids playing positions that have no business playing, goalie is a very good up and comer, decent fogo few good middies, attack are nonexistent --Rye is going to Roll

And yet, ran well with Manhasset, went down to the end with Yorktow, beat Pelham and did it with nearly all the same players that beat Rye in '22.
What's your real beef?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
JJCR is absolutely terrible, kids playing positions that have no business playing, goalie is a very good up and comer, decent fogo few good middies, attack are nonexistent --Rye is going to Roll

And yet, ran well with Manhasset, went down to the end with Yorktow, beat Pelham and did it with nearly all the same players that beat Rye in '22.
What's your real beef?

With the exception of the with Manhasset game, you make good points with your games against Y and Pelham.

I was at that game (Manhasset) and the game was essentially over in the first Q (3-0), since the score was 8-3 beginning fourth Q. JJ's goalie kept them in the game, the kid was playing like a senior!

Rye only allowed JJ to score two goals through three Qs, this game was over in the first Q.

Has there been a game this year that JJ battled from behind, took the lead and win a game?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we talk about the Pelham/Mamo game getting cancelled yesterday due to a lack of officials.

At a VARSITY game.

In Westchester

This is 2023.

This is happening nearly everyday in Section 1 and it's going to get worse before it gets better. Have you noticed the how old the officials are too?

Every year (January-March) the HVLOA offers training sessions. I recommend all former players/coaches consider taking on this new responsibility. Contact: president@hvloa.com

Also, the school districts are partial at fault for this problem. The staff at these games should have a zero tolerance policy for the spectators that openly abuse the officials.

They should be giving out cards to unruly parents! That parents kids team should have to take a penalty. Then you will see the other parents do something about shutting other parents up in the stands. Have schools security kick parents like that out already! Schools can do better with that!!

I fully agree that any fan, be it parent, student, whomever. The second there is anything said in the direction of officials you get one warning and then you're gone. A second ejection and you are gone for the season.
The problem with this is getting staff at the games to actually do this. I don't see any scenario - short of having a police presence at every game - where someone from the schools staff will be telling people to leave.

You're 100% correct on the staffing issue at games. Unfortunately, they are most likely teacher aide's or lunch/hall monitors that are not prepared to deal with rude/obnoxious adults.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we talk about the Pelham/Mamo game getting cancelled yesterday due to a lack of officials.

At a VARSITY game.

In Westchester

This is 2023.

This is happening nearly everyday in Section 1 and it's going to get worse before it gets better. Have you noticed the how old the officials are too?

Every year (January-March) the HVLOA offers training sessions. I recommend all former players/coaches consider taking on this new responsibility. Contact: president@hvloa.com

Also, the school districts are partial at fault for this problem. The staff at these games should have a zero tolerance policy for the spectators that openly abuse the officials.

They should be giving out cards to unruly parents! That parents kids team should have to take a penalty. Then you will see the other parents do something about shutting other parents up in the stands. Have schools security kick parents like that out already! Schools can do better with that!!

I fully agree that any fan, be it parent, student, whomever. The second there is anything said in the direction of officials you get one warning and then you're gone. A second ejection and you are gone for the season.
The problem with this is getting staff at the games to actually do this. I don't see any scenario - short of having a police presence at every game - where someone from the schools staff will be telling people to leave.

You're 100% correct on the staffing issue at games. Unfortunately, they are most likely teacher aide's or lunch/hall monitors that are not prepared to deal with rude/obnoxious adults.
Yes, because who would want to do that? You’d have to pay a lot more than the $50 or so staff get for the game. Even then, who wants to deal with it?

School administrators need to step up and do it themselves or pay for police/security to do it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we talk about the Pelham/Mamo game getting cancelled yesterday due to a lack of officials.

At a VARSITY game.

In Westchester

This is 2023.

This is happening nearly everyday in Section 1 and it's going to get worse before it gets better. Have you noticed the how old the officials are too?

Every year (January-March) the HVLOA offers training sessions. I recommend all former players/coaches consider taking on this new responsibility. Contact: president@hvloa.com

Also, the school districts are partial at fault for this problem. The staff at these games should have a zero tolerance policy for the spectators that openly abuse the officials.

They should be giving out cards to unruly parents! That parents kids team should have to take a penalty. Then you will see the other parents do something about shutting other parents up in the stands. Have schools security kick parents like that out already! Schools can do better with that!!

I fully agree that any fan, be it parent, student, whomever. The second there is anything said in the direction of officials you get one warning and then you're gone. A second ejection and you are gone for the season.
The problem with this is getting staff at the games to actually do this. I don't see any scenario - short of having a police presence at every game - where someone from the schools staff will be telling people to leave.

You're 100% correct on the staffing issue at games. Unfortunately, they are most likely teacher aide's or lunch/hall monitors that are not prepared to deal with rude/obnoxious adults.
Yes, because who would want to do that? You’d have to pay a lot more than the $50 or so staff get for the game. Even then, who wants to deal with it?

School administrators need to step up and do it themselves or pay for police/security to do it.

Does anyone here really know the powers that officials have? This is a actually a serious question. I have thought for a couple of years now to get into officiating bc I see the way they are treated and I feel some of the officials are old and slow. BTW this is not an invitation to insult, yell and berate. They are doing an amazing service for our boys and girls. I am solely making an observation bc many officials are old and some of the hs athletes are future d1 stars so mistakes will be made bc they cant keep up. Mistakes will also be made bc they are human and deserve respect for the little money they earn and the service they provide. I was thinking about doing it bc l I am under 50 and can still run :-) and I love youth sports (3 kids who played a variety of sports and all played or play at some level in college). Yes I had my kids young. Getting back to my original question - CAN officials stop games, kick parents out, issues yellow or red cards for the conduct of parents?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we talk about the Pelham/Mamo game getting cancelled yesterday due to a lack of officials.

At a VARSITY game.

In Westchester

This is 2023.

This is happening nearly everyday in Section 1 and it's going to get worse before it gets better. Have you noticed the how old the officials are too?

Every year (January-March) the HVLOA offers training sessions. I recommend all former players/coaches consider taking on this new responsibility. Contact: president@hvloa.com

Also, the school districts are partial at fault for this problem. The staff at these games should have a zero tolerance policy for the spectators that openly abuse the officials.

They should be giving out cards to unruly parents! That parents kids team should have to take a penalty. Then you will see the other parents do something about shutting other parents up in the stands. Have schools security kick parents like that out already! Schools can do better with that!!

I fully agree that any fan, be it parent, student, whomever. The second there is anything said in the direction of officials you get one warning and then you're gone. A second ejection and you are gone for the season.
The problem with this is getting staff at the games to actually do this. I don't see any scenario - short of having a police presence at every game - where someone from the schools staff will be telling people to leave.

You're 100% correct on the staffing issue at games. Unfortunately, they are most likely teacher aide's or lunch/hall monitors that are not prepared to deal with rude/obnoxious adults.
Yes, because who would want to do that? You’d have to pay a lot more than the $50 or so staff get for the game. Even then, who wants to deal with it?

School administrators need to step up and do it themselves or pay for police/security to do it.

Does anyone here really know the powers that officials have? This is a actually a serious question. I have thought for a couple of years now to get into officiating bc I see the way they are treated and I feel some of the officials are old and slow. BTW this is not an invitation to insult, yell and berate. They are doing an amazing service for our boys and girls. I am solely making an observation bc many officials are old and some of the hs athletes are future d1 stars so mistakes will be made bc they cant keep up. Mistakes will also be made bc they are human and deserve respect for the little money they earn and the service they provide. I was thinking about doing it bc l I am under 50 and can still run :-) and I love youth sports (3 kids who played a variety of sports and all played or play at some level in college). Yes I had my kids young. Getting back to my original question - CAN officials stop games, kick parents out, issues yellow or red cards for the conduct of parents?

One the officials step on the field pregame until the LEAVE THE FACILITY - this is important because they can still make calls when the game is over e.g. they can eject players for a post-game fight. They 100% have the authority for the game. The facility managers are responsible as are the fans, players and officials themselves for maintianing a postiivie atmosphere. The game officials can ask for an unruly fan to be escorted off. More specifically, what they would do is tell the home team's coach or game admin to handle it. If it is particularly egregioous they could stop the game until the person is gone.

In practice, however, if an official had a fan kicked out, that will more than likely fire up the remaining fans and even if he/she is correct it then becomes the optics of the official making it about them.

There is what they have the power to do vs. managing the game on the field.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
JJCR is absolutely terrible, kids playing positions that have no business playing, goalie is a very good up and comer, decent fogo few good middies, attack are nonexistent --Rye is going to Roll

And yet, ran well with Manhasset, went down to the end with Yorktow, beat Pelham and did it with nearly all the same players that beat Rye in '22.
What's your real beef?

With the exception of the with Manhasset game, you make good points with your games against Y and Pelham.

I was at that game (Manhasset) and the game was essentially over in the first Q (3-0), since the score was 8-3 beginning fourth Q. JJ's goalie kept them in the game, the kid was playing like a senior!

Rye only allowed JJ to score two goals through three Qs, this game was over in the first Q.

Has there been a game this year that JJ battled from behind, took the lead and win a game?

Ii will take Leading from the 1st quarter on to a solid win against Scarsdale today. That is a solid a win as they come.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Some observations

A- Down to Scarsdale and Mamo. Scarsdale is really good but I expected them to be ahead of where they are right now. It's hard to win on the island but the loss to Massapequa was surprising to me. Mamo is trending in the right direction. The comeback win over LI power Wantagh was noteworthy. North Rockland is the third-best team but they would need a stellar performance from their goalie to take down one of the top two teams.

B- Yorktown is the clear favorite at this point. Their goalie has played very well so far, however, he is a freshman so be prepared for some inconsistency. Somers is not the team I thought they would be so far this year. I would say Mahopac and Horace Greeley have jumped them. The Somers vs Greeley matchup this Saturday will be interesting.

C- Down to Rye and Jay as predicted. I would give the edge to Rye as of now. Jay is not as good as I expected this year but still has room to grow. They are both fairly young teams so I expect them both to be firing on all cylinders by May. Pelham is a team to keep an eye on. They have a lot of talent and can take down Rye or Jay if they have an off day. A lot of the teams that I thought were going to be in the mix have underperformed. Byram Hills, Tappan Zee, Pearl River, and Hendrick Hudson are not in a position to compete for the title as of right now.

D- Nationally ranked Pleasantville is without a doubt the favorite as of now and may be the best team in Section 1. I predicted their offense would be great but their inexperienced defense deserves some respect. They bend but don't break. Bronxville and Briarcliff cannot be taken lightly. I would say Bronxville is the clear number two and have some close losses. They should trend upward. Briarcliff is trying to win rock fights with their zone defense and they have a surprising win over Mamo. Haldane is the team to watch and we have to wait until the last day of the regular season if they can surpass Briarcliff

A: Still Scarsdale and Mamo in my opinion. Though the recent losses to Yorktown and JJCR has be wondering if Scarsdale has the horses this year. THey have the attitude and the coaching to get it done and a FO that is dominating everyone, but as Yorktown showed, you can win a game losing every FO.

B: Still Yorktown on top. Greeley over Somers was not as a surprise as I orignally thought (more on this game below) It's moved from a 2 team to a 4 team class now with Yorktown, Somers Mahopac and Greeley at this point of the season.
I watched the Somers Greeley game. It was not great. Officials called a very close game and Greeley took advantage on man up. For a team that was scoring in the mid-teens all season to suddenly be held to 8 goals - with a bunch of that on man up - tells me there is more work needed. Somers played a little soft in the sense they didn't go after Greeley's D enough for my liking. The rare times they dodged 1v1 they won their matchups. I'd think they'd want to do that more? Kudos to Greeley - they got it done when many thought they couldn't. Somers, I think is still better than they are showing, but the time is running out for them to show it. It was getting chippy late and I think the rematch will be a good one.
Mahopac should be watched closely - by everyone.

C: JJCR with a good win over Scarsdale puts them back into the 'watch out' column. Rye won the matchup vs. JJCR and they are the team to beat right now. I think only JJCR has the squad to do it. i watched some of this game last night - it was a FO battle of the year. JJCR led their methodical approach and it payed off.

D: it's all Pleasentville right now. Not much has changed as Briarcliff and Bronxville are the only real challengers.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
For Class B, yeah it seems like Yorktown's to lose at this point.

Won't know how good Greeley or Somers are until they play John Jay later in their season.

Greeley specifically seem to have a chip on their shoulder with their new coach, was pretty surprised they beat North Rockland.

Somers if they can't pull it together could be looking at a real tough season Ridgefield, Rye, Greenwich, Yorktown and John Jay are their next five games.

Mahopac plays North Rockland this week so maybe it will be a decent matchup to see how they would shape up against Greeley.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For Class B, yeah it seems like Yorktown's to lose at this point.

Won't know how good Greeley or Somers are until they play John Jay later in their season.

Greeley specifically seem to have a chip on their shoulder with their new coach, was pretty surprised they beat North Rockland.

Somers if they can't pull it together could be looking at a real tough season Ridgefield, Rye, Greenwich, Yorktown and John Jay are their next five games.

Mahopac plays North Rockland this week so maybe it will be a decent matchup to see how they would shape up against Greeley.
Agree on Somers and Greeley. Greeley hasn't played anyone other than Somers and North Rockland. Good wins on paper, but Somers seems not as strong as advertised and they only put up 8 on them when they've been scoring a ton in previous games. Somers have a much tougher schedule coming up John Jay will be the test for them both heading into the post-season since JJCR is in C, neither will see them again.

Mahopac vs. NR will be a good test as to where they are at and where they fit within class B
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Can we start discussing JV teams?

I've seen Arlington, Carmel, Greeley, John Jay, Rye, Scarsdale and Wappingers.
Rye JV was the most impressive team. Nearly everyone on that team plays club too (shocker).

The Arlington and JJ staff seemed to be the best.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we start discussing JV teams?

I've seen Arlington, Carmel, Greeley, John Jay, Rye, Scarsdale and Wappingers.
Rye JV was the most impressive team. Nearly everyone on that team plays club too (shocker).

The Arlington and JJ staff seemed to be the best.

You are spot on with the JJ, Arlington and Rye staffs. Scarsdale I am sure is not that far behind.
Greeley tough to judge as I don't believe they have a true goalie. Carmel is thin but getting better.
Somers isn't too bad but has injuries. Pelham is decent as well
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we start discussing JV teams?

I've seen Arlington, Carmel, Greeley, John Jay, Rye, Scarsdale and Wappingers.
Rye JV was the most impressive team. Nearly everyone on that team plays club too (shocker).

The Arlington and JJ staff seemed to be the best.

You are spot on with the JJ, Arlington and Rye staffs. Scarsdale I am sure is not that far behind.
Greeley tough to judge as I don't believe they have a true goalie. Carmel is thin but getting better.
Somers isn't too bad but has injuries. Pelham is decent as well

Never mentioned Rye's JV staff. I don't know the HC of Rye, but anyone could lead that team; that team is like a fine tuned club lax team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Rye is that streamlined BECAUSE of Coach Lennon and that staff.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Some interesting matchups today. The JJCR- Byram game will be a measuring stick for where Byram is at.
Mamo and Bronxville will be a fun one and I think North Rockland and Mahopac will be a battle

Hoping Somers can be a nice game against Ridgefield.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Mahopac is peaking at the right time. I like the win over North Rockland today. North Rockland and Greeley are very similar in that they have a nice record and are scoring a lot of goals, but neither has really played anyone of significance except each other. NR had Mahopac and lost today, Greeley won a close one over Somers.

Somers had a nice looking showing in a loss to Ridgefield - who so far has won every game against Section 1. I will be interested in seeing how the Yorktown games vs. Somers and Rye will look.

A is all Scarsdale and Mamo. I hope they land in the 1-2 spot so they are meeting in the Finals.

B is Yorktown followed by Mahopac, Greeely & Somers. Eastchester it nipping at the ankles, the game at Rye next week will be a good litmus test for them.

C is down to Rye and JJCR with Pelham hovering. I think Byram is on the outside looking in at this point, but this should be your final four

D I don't see who is topping Pleasentville this year, except for a weird upset. They are the best in the Section.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The two biggest games on the docket today are Yorktown/Somers and John JayCR vs. Mahopac.

I'm hoping Somers can make some noise on this one. i think Yorktown has more horses in this one.

Mahopac is continuing to peak at the right times. JJCR has been up and down If they can get up for this, it will be a clash of styles with Mahopac preferring the up and down the field game and JJCR more deliberate. JJCR i think has the goalie advantage in this one.

And hello to scarsdale with the gigantic W over a REALLY good Stepinac team this week.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The two biggest games on the docket today are Yorktown/Somers and John JayCR vs. Mahopac.

I'm hoping Somers can make some noise on this one. i think Yorktown has more horses in this one.

Mahopac is continuing to peak at the right times. JJCR has been up and down If they can get up for this, it will be a clash of styles with Mahopac preferring the up and down the field game and JJCR more deliberate. JJCR i think has the goalie advantage in this one.

And hello to scarsdale with the gigantic W over a REALLY good Stepinac team this week.
That 7-1 Score in Yorktown over Somers is - something. on both sides.
JJCR in OT vs. Mahopac was a good win in crappy, crappy weather. Mahopac had a 2 goal lead in this one with a fool ending and OT.

In other news, according to Ossining's twitter - they had 2 goals waved off late in the second period vs. Westlake. Westlake went on to win by 1 I believe.

It's hard to think it, but we are in the last two weeks of the regular season already. A lot of lacrosse left to play but things will start to solidify here soon.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown Somers game was halted mid 3rd quarter after an injury. Somers player was hurt and coaches decided not to continue the game
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown Somers game was halted mid 3rd quarter after an injury. Somers player was hurt and coaches decided not to continue the game
That would explain the tweet from Somers lacrosse. player was "home and resting comfortably"
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
After another quiet one yesterday, another solid slate of games for Thursday in early may.

I like the Somers/John Jay and Yorktown/Mahopac games. These have some big impact on Class B standings
Bronxville/Pleasentville could be another interesting one, with a preview of a class D Semi or Final depending on seedings but I think it's Pville with the W here.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Class A- Feels like Scarsdale's to lose at this point.

Class B- Yorktown, Mahopac or Greeley

Circle 5/12 on the calendar Greeley vs JJ-CR if they can play with or even beat JJ I think they can actually challenge for the section 1. But until then they are just a dark horse.

Greeley could lose the rest of their games and still get the first seed which means Mahopac and Yorktown will have to play each other before the final.

Class C- Rye or JJ-CR

Class D- Pleasantville
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Class A- Feels like Scarsdale's to lose at this point.

Class B- Yorktown, Mahopac or Greeley

Circle 5/12 on the calendar Greeley vs JJ-CR if they can play with or even beat JJ I think they can actually challenge for the section 1. But until then they are just a dark horse.

Greeley could lose the rest of their games and still get the first seed which means Mahopac and Yorktown will have to play each other before the final.

Class C- Rye or JJ-CR

Class D- Pleasantville
A & D are fairly locked up - I am with you there

B will be interesting. Greeley has the lock on 1, it just seems like who is the 2 or 3 between Mahopac and Yorktown. Somers will want another shot at Greeley. I don't know if they can make it happen, but I know they'll want to take it to them, so don't count that out. Classic trap game for Greeley but that's your final 4 matchups. Unless they kill each other in the semis, the winner of Mahopac/Yorktown will win it. Greeley has a nice win over Byram and Somers, but that's about it, they really haven't been challenged yet. John Jay will be a real test.

C It's down to JJCR and Rye. The only thing that can ruin that is some movement int he seedings that somehow puts JJCR in a 3 slot making the Rye/JJ a semi-final game rather than the final. JJCR should win their last three - the Greeley game next week is for the league as well Rye has a gauntlet of Yorktown, Ridgefield (no effect on seeding) Pelham Bronxville..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we start discussing JV teams?

I've seen Arlington, Carmel, Greeley, John Jay, Rye, Scarsdale and Wappingers.
Rye JV was the most impressive team. Nearly everyone on that team plays club too (shocker).

The Arlington and JJ staff seemed to be the best.

You are spot on with the JJ, Arlington and Rye staffs. Scarsdale I am sure is not that far behind.
Greeley tough to judge as I don't believe they have a true goalie. Carmel is thin but getting better.
Somers isn't too bad but has injuries. Pelham is decent as well

Never mentioned Rye's JV staff. I don't know the HC of Rye, but anyone could lead that team; that team is like a fine tuned club lax team.

Let’s all be honest here. The Yorktown JV lead by Mike Solazzo and John Nichol is the best staff in the section if not the state. The Yorktown JV team is beating ever section 1 team by 10+, only loss was to Darien 5-4.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

The problem with factoring SOS is you arrive at the same result - the math doesn't know the difference between a 7-9 team with a loaded scheduled vs a 7-9 team with a cupcake schedule.

The system is fine as is - best team will always make it through. The only marquee game is the section final, and you can't you fake your way into there. Its much more important to ensure that all teams can manufacture a 16 game schedule that makes for fun and competitive games for all teams.

Also, keep in mind that the traditional powers don't often want to play the "others". So, it's not necessarily true that teams are purposely playing a soft schedule. It's sometimes true that the big teams are not returning calls.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

The problem with factoring SOS is you arrive at the same result - the math doesn't know the difference between a 7-9 team with a loaded scheduled vs a 7-9 team with a cupcake schedule.

The system is fine as is - best team will always make it through. The only marquee game is the section final, and you can't you fake your way into there. Its much more important to ensure that all teams can manufacture a 16 game schedule that makes for fun and competitive games for all teams.

Also, keep in mind that the traditional powers don't often want to play the "others". So, it's not necessarily true that teams are purposely playing a soft schedule. It's sometimes true that the big teams are not returning calls.

Except that it would... a 7-9 team vs. a soft schedule would otherwise be properly seeded. a 9-7 team with a strong schedule also would. Where SOS would be a factor would be more correctly ranking that 9-7 team who had a strong schedule versus a 12-4 team that played a weak one.
Just look at the classes, you look at A and B and tell me that those are the correct rankings after you look at everyone's schedule? And who their opponents played? You have arguably the two best D teams outside Pleasentville and they are at 6 and 8 right now. All due respect to those other teams above them, but do we honestly think they would beat either of them?

As it stands, and for the last couple of years it has been mostly true: the best thing you can do is load up on a soft schedule, lock in the 1 seed and make the 2-3 best teams play each other in the semis and you only have one to beat. Or if you want to challenge yourselves you have a soft section1 schedule but load up on tough opponents out of section since they don't have an impact on the seedings. In fact, the math works more in your favor doing that.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

The problem with factoring SOS is you arrive at the same result - the math doesn't know the difference between a 7-9 team with a loaded scheduled vs a 7-9 team with a cupcake schedule.

The system is fine as is - best team will always make it through. The only marquee game is the section final, and you can't you fake your way into there. Its much more important to ensure that all teams can manufacture a 16 game schedule that makes for fun and competitive games for all teams.

Also, keep in mind that the traditional powers don't often want to play the "others". So, it's not necessarily true that teams are purposely playing a soft schedule. It's sometimes true that the big teams are not returning calls.

Section 1 takes into account the SOS for section 1 teams only with its bonus points formula. Every team you play that has a .500-.749 record you receive 1 bonus point, and every team with a .750 record or better you receive 2 bonus points.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown JV was 8-0 vs Rye at the half and 13-5 final with mostly second string players from mid 3Q on. They also have a 7th grade goalie as the Varsity starter is a freshman.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

The problem with factoring SOS is you arrive at the same result - the math doesn't know the difference between a 7-9 team with a loaded scheduled vs a 7-9 team with a cupcake schedule.

The system is fine as is - best team will always make it through. The only marquee game is the section final, and you can't you fake your way into there. Its much more important to ensure that all teams can manufacture a 16 game schedule that makes for fun and competitive games for all teams.

Also, keep in mind that the traditional powers don't often want to play the "others". So, it's not necessarily true that teams are purposely playing a soft schedule. It's sometimes true that the big teams are not returning calls.

Section 1 takes into account the SOS for section 1 teams only with its bonus points formula. Every team you play that has a .500-.749 record you receive 1 bonus point, and every team with a .750 record or better you receive 2 bonus points.
I don't think the bonus point system works as it is meant to. Edgemont has 6 bonus points and they cancelled their season after 2 games. I think the bigger issue is the threshold for making playoffs is way too low. you need 26 points (4 points for a win) so basically 6 wins against .500 or better teams gets you in. That's the very definition of average. They're aren't a ton of teams when you break it down by section, I get that but when teams have 5 wins are in the playoffs, it waters it down a bit.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Pelham just put everyone in C on notice. They had a 6-1 lead early and held on to a 1 goal win over Pleasentville.
Yorktown did well over Rye who is struggling without their FO guy. C is now a 3 team race.
I don't think Byram is as strong to compete with those three, but in a one-game situation, anything it possible.

Yorktown looked really good vs. Rye. I believe at least the top 4 are locked in now in B.

Assuming everything else remains similar bracket-wise - and there will be a lot of movement yet:

A- North Rockland has a clear path to the finals. Shame that Mamo and Scarsdale will be a Semi-Final, that would be a great final game.

B- Greeley has the 1 seed mathematically locked up. Friday's game vs. JJCR will be the real litmus test to see if they can hang with the big boys. Only change I see is maybe Yorktown and Mahopac swapping the 2-3 seeds but they will still see each other in the semis. It's just a matter of which jersey they are wearing. I don't see a true 4th team at this point other than Somers, I detest to see they weren't as good this year as many thoguht they would be - never count them out though! Same for Fox Lane, but I don't think this is their year. Eastchester might shock someone. Somers would love the rematch vs. Greeley.

C - Rye has a clear path to the finals. Pelham/Tappan Zee quarterfinal matchup could be interesting and a Pelham/JJCR rematch in the semis will be a much different game than the week 1 game they had this season - both are much better than that game. Rye vs. Pelham i think Rye takes is. Rye vs. JJCR would be a great game: tossup

D - Still all Pleasentville despite yesterday's hiccup. If Bronxville and Briarcliff are both on the other side of the bracket, that will be a good semi matchup. One of them on the same side as Pleasentville gives the other a clearer path to the final.

Good luck to all as the regular season winds down!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

The problem with factoring SOS is you arrive at the same result - the math doesn't know the difference between a 7-9 team with a loaded scheduled vs a 7-9 team with a cupcake schedule.

The system is fine as is - best team will always make it through. The only marquee game is the section final, and you can't you fake your way into there. Its much more important to ensure that all teams can manufacture a 16 game schedule that makes for fun and competitive games for all teams.

Also, keep in mind that the traditional powers don't often want to play the "others". So, it's not necessarily true that teams are purposely playing a soft schedule. It's sometimes true that the big teams are not returning calls.

Except that it would... a 7-9 team vs. a soft schedule would otherwise be properly seeded. a 9-7 team with a strong schedule also would. Where SOS would be a factor would be more correctly ranking that 9-7 team who had a strong schedule versus a 12-4 team that played a weak one.
Just look at the classes, you look at A and B and tell me that those are the correct rankings after you look at everyone's schedule? And who their opponents played? You have arguably the two best D teams outside Pleasentville and they are at 6 and 8 right now. All due respect to those other teams above them, but do we honestly think they would beat either of them?

As it stands, and for the last couple of years it has been mostly true: the best thing you can do is load up on a soft schedule, lock in the 1 seed and make the 2-3 best teams play each other in the semis and you only have one to beat. Or if you want to challenge yourselves you have a soft section1 schedule but load up on tough opponents out of section since they don't have an impact on the seedings. In fact, the math works more in your favor doing that.

The current system is fine, and no one seems to care about seeding. If they did, you would see the traditional powers scheduling cupcakes in order to climb the seeding ladder. Virtually none of them do. This tells you all you need to know about what they think about seeding.

As for SOS being used, it wouldn't help that much because the teams with the softer schedules are still playing plenty of teams with inflated records. There are winners and losers amongst this group, just like there are amongst the power teams. That is where the math makes no, or little difference.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pelham just put everyone in C on notice. They had a 6-1 lead early and held on to a 1 goal win over Pleasentville.
Yorktown did well over Rye who is struggling without their FO guy. C is now a 3 team race.
I don't think Byram is as strong to compete with those three, but in a one-game situation, anything it possible.

Yorktown looked really good vs. Rye. I believe at least the top 4 are locked in now in B.

Assuming everything else remains similar bracket-wise - and there will be a lot of movement yet:

A- North Rockland has a clear path to the finals. Shame that Mamo and Scarsdale will be a Semi-Final, that would be a great final game.

B- Greeley has the 1 seed mathematically locked up. Friday's game vs. JJCR will be the real litmus test to see if they can hang with the big boys. Only change I see is maybe Yorktown and Mahopac swapping the 2-3 seeds but they will still see each other in the semis. It's just a matter of which jersey they are wearing. I don't see a true 4th team at this point other than Somers, I detest to see they weren't as good this year as many thoguht they would be - never count them out though! Same for Fox Lane, but I don't think this is their year. Eastchester might shock someone. Somers would love the rematch vs. Greeley.

C - Rye has a clear path to the finals. Pelham/Tappan Zee quarterfinal matchup could be interesting and a Pelham/JJCR rematch in the semis will be a much different game than the week 1 game they had this season - both are much better than that game. Rye vs. Pelham i think Rye takes is. Rye vs. JJCR would be a great game: tossup

D - Still all Pleasentville despite yesterday's hiccup. If Bronxville and Briarcliff are both on the other side of the bracket, that will be a good semi matchup. One of them on the same side as Pleasentville gives the other a clearer path to the final.

Good luck to all as the regular season winds down!

North Rockland's path is a function of how weak A is. C, for instance, has 7 teams all better than whoever is the 4th team in A.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pelham just put everyone in C on notice. They had a 6-1 lead early and held on to a 1 goal win over Pleasentville.
Yorktown did well over Rye who is struggling without their FO guy. C is now a 3 team race.
I don't think Byram is as strong to compete with those three, but in a one-game situation, anything it possible.

Yorktown looked really good vs. Rye. I believe at least the top 4 are locked in now in B.

Assuming everything else remains similar bracket-wise - and there will be a lot of movement yet:

A- North Rockland has a clear path to the finals. Shame that Mamo and Scarsdale will be a Semi-Final, that would be a great final game.

B- Greeley has the 1 seed mathematically locked up. Friday's game vs. JJCR will be the real litmus test to see if they can hang with the big boys. Only change I see is maybe Yorktown and Mahopac swapping the 2-3 seeds but they will still see each other in the semis. It's just a matter of which jersey they are wearing. I don't see a true 4th team at this point other than Somers, I detest to see they weren't as good this year as many thoguht they would be - never count them out though! Same for Fox Lane, but I don't think this is their year. Eastchester might shock someone. Somers would love the rematch vs. Greeley.

C - Rye has a clear path to the finals. Pelham/Tappan Zee quarterfinal matchup could be interesting and a Pelham/JJCR rematch in the semis will be a much different game than the week 1 game they had this season - both are much better than that game. Rye vs. Pelham i think Rye takes is. Rye vs. JJCR would be a great game: tossup

D - Still all Pleasentville despite yesterday's hiccup. If Bronxville and Briarcliff are both on the other side of the bracket, that will be a good semi matchup. One of them on the same side as Pleasentville gives the other a clearer path to the final.

Good luck to all as the regular season winds down!

North Rockland's path is a function of how weak A is. C, for instance, has 7 teams all better than whoever is the 4th team in A.
I completely agree with you - I am just pointing out where things stand and predicting what is likely to happen
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Some good games with interesting outcomes today.
Mamo won Round 2 for the Battle of Class A upending Scarsdale at Scarsdale.
JJCR survived a scare in OT from Bronxville
Somers taking down Greenwich - considering Section 1's overall record playing out of section - esp CT teams - this is a nice one for them and much needed

Suffern with a win over South. Eastchester/Carmel is a nice matchup - waiting on that score.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pelham just put everyone in C on notice. They had a 6-1 lead early and held on to a 1 goal win over Pleasentville.
Yorktown did well over Rye who is struggling without their FO guy. C is now a 3 team race.
I don't think Byram is as strong to compete with those three, but in a one-game situation, anything it possible.

Yorktown looked really good vs. Rye. I believe at least the top 4 are locked in now in B.

Assuming everything else remains similar bracket-wise - and there will be a lot of movement yet:

A- North Rockland has a clear path to the finals. Shame that Mamo and Scarsdale will be a Semi-Final, that would be a great final game.

B- Greeley has the 1 seed mathematically locked up. Friday's game vs. JJCR will be the real litmus test to see if they can hang with the big boys. Only change I see is maybe Yorktown and Mahopac swapping the 2-3 seeds but they will still see each other in the semis. It's just a matter of which jersey they are wearing. I don't see a true 4th team at this point other than Somers, I detest to see they weren't as good this year as many thoguht they would be - never count them out though! Same for Fox Lane, but I don't think this is their year. Eastchester might shock someone. Somers would love the rematch vs. Greeley.

C - Rye has a clear path to the finals. Pelham/Tappan Zee quarterfinal matchup could be interesting and a Pelham/JJCR rematch in the semis will be a much different game than the week 1 game they had this season - both are much better than that game. Rye vs. Pelham i think Rye takes is. Rye vs. JJCR would be a great game: tossup

D - Still all Pleasentville despite yesterday's hiccup. If Bronxville and Briarcliff are both on the other side of the bracket, that will be a good semi matchup. One of them on the same side as Pleasentville gives the other a clearer path to the final.

Good luck to all as the regular season winds down!

North Rockland's path is a function of how weak A is. C, for instance, has 7 teams all better than whoever is the 4th team in A.
I completely agree with you - I am just pointing out where things stand and predicting what is likely to happen

No way North Rockland can be 1 with that weak schedule, look at who Scarsdale and Mamaroneck play.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pelham just put everyone in C on notice. They had a 6-1 lead early and held on to a 1 goal win over Pleasentville.
Yorktown did well over Rye who is struggling without their FO guy. C is now a 3 team race.
I don't think Byram is as strong to compete with those three, but in a one-game situation, anything it possible.

Yorktown looked really good vs. Rye. I believe at least the top 4 are locked in now in B.

Assuming everything else remains similar bracket-wise - and there will be a lot of movement yet:

A- North Rockland has a clear path to the finals. Shame that Mamo and Scarsdale will be a Semi-Final, that would be a great final game.

B- Greeley has the 1 seed mathematically locked up. Friday's game vs. JJCR will be the real litmus test to see if they can hang with the big boys. Only change I see is maybe Yorktown and Mahopac swapping the 2-3 seeds but they will still see each other in the semis. It's just a matter of which jersey they are wearing. I don't see a true 4th team at this point other than Somers, I detest to see they weren't as good this year as many thoguht they would be - never count them out though! Same for Fox Lane, but I don't think this is their year. Eastchester might shock someone. Somers would love the rematch vs. Greeley.

C - Rye has a clear path to the finals. Pelham/Tappan Zee quarterfinal matchup could be interesting and a Pelham/JJCR rematch in the semis will be a much different game than the week 1 game they had this season - both are much better than that game. Rye vs. Pelham i think Rye takes is. Rye vs. JJCR would be a great game: tossup

D - Still all Pleasentville despite yesterday's hiccup. If Bronxville and Briarcliff are both on the other side of the bracket, that will be a good semi matchup. One of them on the same side as Pleasentville gives the other a clearer path to the final.

Good luck to all as the regular season winds down!

North Rockland's path is a function of how weak A is. C, for instance, has 7 teams all better than whoever is the 4th team in A.
I completely agree with you - I am just pointing out where things stand and predicting what is likely to happen

No way North Rockland can be 1 with that weak schedule, look at who Scarsdale and Mamaroneck play.


It’s pretty much locked in right now. That’s been my argument against the way the math works out. It rewards winning more games against weaker schedules.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

The problem with factoring SOS is you arrive at the same result - the math doesn't know the difference between a 7-9 team with a loaded scheduled vs a 7-9 team with a cupcake schedule.

The system is fine as is - best team will always make it through. The only marquee game is the section final, and you can't you fake your way into there. Its much more important to ensure that all teams can manufacture a 16 game schedule that makes for fun and competitive games for all teams.

Also, keep in mind that the traditional powers don't often want to play the "others". So, it's not necessarily true that teams are purposely playing a soft schedule. It's sometimes true that the big teams are not returning calls.

Sorry, but looking at the current brackets, that's exactly what is happening. Mamo and Scarsdale are head and shoulders the 2 best teams in A and that's going to be a semi final game. Compare their schedules with North Rockland schedule and it's not even close

Same in B - Mahopac and Yorktown are headed for a Semi Game - is there any real arguement they aren't the two best teams right now in B? Again, look at their schedules vs. Greeley's

C - JJCR and Rye are the top two, if they make it through to the finals, they will see each other - compare those schedules to others in section 1 Alot more balanced.

D - P'ville, Briarcliff and Bronxville all challenged themselves this year. yet 2 of them are middle of the pack. Someone else mentioned: are the 3-4 teams seeded ahead of them really better than them? I don't think so
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

The problem with factoring SOS is you arrive at the same result - the math doesn't know the difference between a 7-9 team with a loaded scheduled vs a 7-9 team with a cupcake schedule.

The system is fine as is - best team will always make it through. The only marquee game is the section final, and you can't you fake your way into there. Its much more important to ensure that all teams can manufacture a 16 game schedule that makes for fun and competitive games for all teams.

Also, keep in mind that the traditional powers don't often want to play the "others". So, it's not necessarily true that teams are purposely playing a soft schedule. It's sometimes true that the big teams are not returning calls.

Sorry, but looking at the current brackets, that's exactly what is happening. Mamo and Scarsdale are head and shoulders the 2 best teams in A and that's going to be a semi final game. Compare their schedules with North Rockland schedule and it's not even close

Same in B - Mahopac and Yorktown are headed for a Semi Game - is there any real arguement they aren't the two best teams right now in B? Again, look at their schedules vs. Greeley's

C - JJCR and Rye are the top two, if they make it through to the finals, they will see each other - compare those schedules to others in section 1 Alot more balanced.

D - P'ville, Briarcliff and Bronxville all challenged themselves this year. yet 2 of them are middle of the pack. Someone else mentioned: are the 3-4 teams seeded ahead of them really better than them? I don't think so

You may be complaining, but I don't think the teams care. For instance, if it was important for Scarsdale and Mamaroneck to ensure a top 2 seed, they would have scheduled as such. They prioritize playing peer teams over maximizing seeding.

The bonus point system is a way of trying to factor in SOS, but it is flawed. For instance, if you play all of Bronxville, BH, LP and Somers you get a total of zero bonus points. Yet all 4 of these teams are strong, and better than many teams against whom you would get bonus points. The bottom line is that there is no good way to factor in SOS, at least with the landscape that exists in Section 1 boys lacrosse.

The same seeding system is used in other sports. But it works better in these other sports because strong teams are more evenly distributed amongst the entire section, and tend to vary more year to year. This leads to more uniformity in quality of schedule. In lacrosse, the top teams tend to stay the same every year, and are concentrated in Westchester. This creates a more or less informal Westchester-based power league.

At the end of the day, the top Westchester programs are never going to agree to both travel more (regarding their section 1 games), and play worse schedules. Especially when they are constantly trying to keep talent out of the prep schools. If this means awkward seedings some of the time, so be it. The only way to maybe have perfect seedings is to have a committee meet and draw it up, kind of like the NCAA basketball tournament. But this will create a whole new set of complaints, and seems like a bad look for HS sports. And also stated elsewhere in this thread, the current seeding system can benefit a team that has a power schedule when they have a bit of a down year, get a lower seed, but then draw one (or maybe more than one) paper tiger in the playoffs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
There will be some movement before the seedings come out, but mostly in the middle of the pack.

A - Top 4 are pretty much locked in. Scarsdale took care of business against North Rockland. I don't think that should be a big surprise to anyone. North Rockland has the easiest path to the final but I think that's where it ends. The Mamo/Scarsdale winner should be in the states.

B - Top 4 also locked. Only movement I really see is who is the 2 or 3 between Mahopac an Yorktown. Much like A, one of these two go on to states. Greeley played a tough one against John Jay, but that was the most realistic game of their season. Somers will not be as easy this time around but they do have the easiest path to the Final for the first time in a few years. B was the group of death the last few years, C looks like it is now the toughest.

C- This is probably the class with the most realistic seeding. Pelham has been an enigma all season: beating Pleasentville and Briarcliff, but losing to JJCR and Rye - so it depends on which team shows up. I think it is still JJCR vs Rye for the final. Tappan Zee could be an interesting Semi-final matchup. they always seem to turn it up come playoff time

D - Its all P'ville to lose. They have to get through a somewhat-resurging Bronxville first and then Briarcliff in the finals - barring any major shuffling in the seedings
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Class A- Scarsdale or Mamo, I am gonna lean Scarsdale because they seem to get hot in playoffs.

Class B- Pretty impressed by Greeley in their game against JJ-CR, if they play like that they will at least have a shot against Mahopac and Yorktown. They are very Pleasantville like in the sense they have zero commits, but play together very well. However, I still favor Yorktown overall even if they lost to Mahopac earlier. All that said I wonder what happens with the Greeley Coach after this year; from what people have told me no one expected him to turn around the team this fast, albeit it was a soft schedule. However, 14-2 with only two one goals losses is way above what anyone expect with this team. Last guy that had Greeley playing that well was Colsey who left for Ridgefield who I would say is doing pretty well for himself and Ridgefield.

Class C- I really think that Rye is the favorite considering they beat JJ-CR, but who knows anything could happen.

Class D- Pleasantville no question
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Class B- Pretty impressed by Greeley in their game against JJ-CR, if they play like that they will at least have a shot against Mahopac and Yorktown. They are very Pleasantville like in the sense they have zero commits, but play together very well. However, I still favor Yorktown overall even if they lost to Mahopac earlier. All that said I wonder what happens with the Greeley Coach after this year; from what people have told me no one expected him to turn around the team this fast, albeit it was a soft schedule. However, 14-2 with only two one goals losses is way above what anyone expect with this team. Last guy that had Greeley playing that well was Colsey who left for Ridgefield who I would say is doing pretty well for himself and Ridgefield.

That's incredibly generous on greeley considering just how soft that schedule is. Any team would have gone 14-2. They can score in bunches against average teams, but the gaudy scoring comes crashing back down against better teams like Somers and Jay and even Carmel held them to 6 or 7. JJ was a good game for them, they stepped up and were in it at the end and may have won with another possession or two.

Colsey wasn't the only good coach to run from that place (and he is still a teacher there - so what does that tell you?) The current Somers coach was coach of the year when he was pushed out from Greeley then they had a bunch of coaches every year until the last guy and he was run out too. They can score, but can they play D? they have their basketball and soccer coaches as assistants because no one wants to coach there. Even with this season going so well on paper, parents & fans are still grumbling and players transfering out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Potash is building a culture there from bottom to top, just play their youth teams , in years to come, Greeley will continue to be competitive while others like John Jay are about to hit a brick wall for 4-5 years as they have nothing in the pipeline
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Potash is building a culture there from bottom to top, just play their youth teams , in years to come, Greeley will continue to be competitive while others like John Jay are about to hit a brick wall for 4-5 years as they have nothing in the pipeline
The dominance in youth that the parents love to hear themselves talk about has yet to translate to the high school level. They brag about beating yorktown in 7/8 all the time and then get their butts handed to them in high school. Maybe in the next few years they can make it work as Jay drops off and we've been hearing for years that Yorktown is about to take a drop off as well. It may happen. But they are losing more of their better players to private school and playing this soft a schedule is not exactly challenging themselves to beat those better teams. Don't forget the parents influence there too - lax off the wrong ones and he'll be out just like all the rest. I don't doubt the possibility exists, but I will believe it when I see it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I'm interested in Class B and why does Lakeland/Panas get approval to play down a class when they should be in A?

Looking at Lohud, L/P was in the Class finals in 2018 & 2019.But now they are back in Class B.

Using US News World Report for my data, the following schools enrollment are:

Class A – Scarsdale (1,508), Mamaroneck (1,644), North Rockland (2,597) .

Class B – Yorktown (1,067) , Mahopac (1,324) , Greeley (1,168) , Lakeland (963)/Panas (926); 1,889, Somers (1,056).

Sure seems that L/P is receiving a favorable ruling by the Section leaders. It would be fair to Section 1 to put them back Class A or have them be stand alone programs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I'm interested in Class B and why does Lakeland/Panas get approval to play down a class when they should be in A?

Looking at Lohud, L/P was in the Class finals in 2018 & 2019.But now they are back in Class B.

Using US News World Report for my data, the following schools enrollment are:

Class A – Scarsdale (1,508), Mamaroneck (1,644), North Rockland (2,597) .

Class B – Yorktown (1,067) , Mahopac (1,324) , Greeley (1,168) , Lakeland (963)/Panas (926); 1,889, Somers (1,056).

Sure seems that L/P is receiving a favorable ruling by the Section leaders. It would be fair to Section 1 to put them back Class A or have them be stand alone programs.

Those numbers are not what NYS uses, if Kevin Devaney's site is to be believed, although your conclusion would still be correct. On his site, for 2023/24, L and P combined would be above all schools except for New Ro, NR, Arl, MV, WP, JJEF. Maybe they will be in A next year.

The more important question is why do they play as a combined team. Both schools are rather large, and you would be able to double the amount of boys participating in a varsity sport. Even if participation is largely from the Lakeland side (just a guess), it would be a chance to get Panas kids involved and there are plenty of schools for them to play while they get up to speed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I'm interested in Class B and why does Lakeland/Panas get approval to play down a class when they should be in A?

Looking at Lohud, L/P was in the Class finals in 2018 & 2019.But now they are back in Class B.

Using US News World Report for my data, the following schools enrollment are:

Class A – Scarsdale (1,508), Mamaroneck (1,644), North Rockland (2,597) .

Class B – Yorktown (1,067) , Mahopac (1,324) , Greeley (1,168) , Lakeland (963)/Panas (926); 1,889, Somers (1,056).

Sure seems that L/P is receiving a favorable ruling by the Section leaders. It would be fair to Section 1 to put them back Class A or have them be stand alone programs.
The class split is odd too... for the last few years JJCR, Rye, Tappan Zee, Brewster were all in B as well.

A has 11 teams, B has 10, C has 14 and D has 15. Seems to me that some C teams should be up in B
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
the one difference this time around is that Potash coaches a lot of these kids in travel- they are loyal to Potash, well most are anyway and even though some will leave for greener pastures , they should still be competitive,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
the one difference this time around is that Potash coaches a lot of these kids in travel- they are loyal to Potash, well most are anyway and even though some will leave for greener pastures , they should still be competitive,
So youre saying he plays mainly the guys he has on his club team, at the expense of some older guys who have been there? And I’ve starters are still in that late games of blowouts to pad their stats and this is the “culture” you are promoting? Thats basically like a mid A level club team playing against lesser competition and claiming it’s some sort of resurgence.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Last day of games saw some big swings in the seedings:

A - unless something fool happens, we will get the Mamo/Scarsdale final we (maybe just me) thought we'd miss out on. We will see if North Rockland is for real, but they have to get through Arlington - which has prove in the past to be a giant-slayer.

B - Yorktown sniped the 1 seed over Greeley at the buzzer by virtue of Briarcliff's win over Haldane, giving them the extra bonus point they needed. Greeley's path to the final just got a lot tougher - a rematch with Clarkstown South and then a surging Mahopac. Get through that and it's Yorktown. Again. At least this time they will have the added bounce of it being the final. The stats on Yorktown appearing in the section final is staggering. The Somers-Lakeland game is interesting though.

C - Jay locks down the 1 seed and Rye - who lost another starter to injury - is the 2. I'd argue Rye has the slight edge on the path to the final. Let's see what Pearl River or Tappan Zee can muster and Rye has Byram to battle first. Jay looks like they have another date with Pelham. Which Pelham team will show up for that one? looking Like a Jay/Rye final

D - No Surprise on the 1 seed. Final 4 is P'ville/Bronxville and Haldane/Briarcliff I would think. (Bronxville and Briarcliff as 5 & 6 seeds just looks silly)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
A couple of upsets and one big surprise in the start of the Quarters:
JJCR, Mahopac, Greeley and Yorktown all won easily.

The 2 big upsets are the L/P win over Somers and Pelham going home at the hands of Hen Hud. Pearl River with a solid win as well.

BIG surprise was Rye needing OT and a comeback to overcome Byram who had a 2 goal lead late in the 4th and had two great looks in OT as well.

C is probably the most balanced class this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Great win for Pearl River today over TZ. 16-11 was the final. An 8th grader went 18-20 facing off and gave them the edge. Looks like lacrosse is taking off in that town. If they can keep kids from leaving for jersey prep schools they can be relevant for a while.

Bad news is, they run into Rye…
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Great win for Pearl River today over TZ. 16-11 was the final. An 8th grader went 18-20 facing off and gave them the edge. Looks like lacrosse is taking off in that town. If they can keep kids from leaving for jersey prep schools they can be relevant for a while.

Bad news is, they run into Rye…
That FO work could be the key vs. Rye. They are down 2 starters and a FO guy and they've struggled at the dot. They may have the advantage in the rest of the game but a smart ball possession game and keeping it close - you're not out of it!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A couple of upsets and one big surprise in the start of the Quarters:
JJCR, Mahopac, Greeley and Yorktown all won easily.

The 2 big upsets are the L/P win over Somers and Pelham going home at the hands of Hen Hud. Pearl River with a solid win as well.

BIG surprise was Rye needing OT and a comeback to overcome Byram who had a 2 goal lead late in the 4th and had two great looks in OT as well.

C is probably the most balanced class this year.

Sure seems that Somers wasn't ready/prepared for L/P. One L/P parent was shocked Somers, especially since Somers has more talented players than L/P.

Has the countdown clock started for Coach VD. His coaching career involves New Canaan, Put Valley, Greeley and Somers.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A couple of upsets and one big surprise in the start of the Quarters:
JJCR, Mahopac, Greeley and Yorktown all won easily.

The 2 big upsets are the L/P win over Somers and Pelham going home at the hands of Hen Hud. Pearl River with a solid win as well.

BIG surprise was Rye needing OT and a comeback to overcome Byram who had a 2 goal lead late in the 4th and had two great looks in OT as well.

C is probably the most balanced class this year.

Sure seems that Somers wasn't ready/prepared for L/P. One L/P parent was shocked Somers, especially since Somers has more talented players than L/P.

Has the countdown clock started for Coach VD. His coaching career involves New Canaan, Put Valley, Greeley and Somers.
No Way. Vin is one of the top coaches in Section 1. Tell me any other coach in the section that does not have multiple stops?
He was pushed out of Greeley by the administration when he was coach of the year and went to the finals (broken record much?)
True, Somers did not live up to their preseason hype, but I wonder if that was players relying on that hype and not living up to it? I don't have insider knowledge but I can't believe he's on the hot seat after 1 down-ish year. They were relatively young this year too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It is crickets in here... where did everyone go?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
No real surprises in the win/loss column yesterday.

Yorktown is going to need more offensive firepower than the 8-5 edge they had on L/P to beat Mahopac in the finals.

Mahopac is peaking perfectly and they are more ready for this final than any other team is across all classes. It's hard to beat Yorktown twice in a season, it's going to be even harder in the finals AT Yorktown, no less but I think they are the best team to make it happen. Greeley - I can't say it's a real surprise, that schedule was not very strong and when they ran up against even a decent team their scoring numbers dropped and yesterday it happened again. There is not a lot of long-term success playing high school like it's a summer club team. They have the ta

Rye and JJCR are headed for a battle. They each had a relatively light day in the semi-finals. My money right now is on Jay but it should be a great one. Nice B/C double header next week at 'Town

Today is the A/D semis and some good games on tap!
I don't think I am coming off my prediction that it's a Mamo/Scarsdale final in A and D it's Pleasentville and Briarcliff. Today will not be an easy one for the Panthers, but i think they pull it out by 2-3.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No real surprises in the win/loss column yesterday.

Yorktown is going to need more offensive firepower than the 8-5 edge they had on L/P to beat Mahopac in the finals.

Mahopac is peaking perfectly and they are more ready for this final than any other team is across all classes. It's hard to beat Yorktown twice in a season, it's going to be even harder in the finals AT Yorktown, no less but I think they are the best team to make it happen.

Rye and JJCR are headed for a battle. They each had a relatively light day in the semi-finals. My money right now is on Jay but it should be a great one.

I don't think I am coming off my prediction that it's a Mamo/Scarsdale final in A and D it's Pleasentville and Briarcliff. Today will not be an easy one for the Panthers, but i think they pull it out by 2-3.

A few things:
1. So the playoff seeds ended up being fair despite a lot of worry as up until last game, top teams vaulted into top seeds. The system works!
2. Yorktown over Mahopac but maybe not
3. JJ beats Rye due to faceoff, no McCarthy, and JJ having some more finishers
4. Pville again defeats Bcliff, maybe not in a blowout like regular season but with some buffer.
5. Scars vs Mamo who the heck knows? Scarsdale owns faceoff and coaching, Mamo has the playmakers
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No real surprises in the win/loss column yesterday.

Yorktown is going to need more offensive firepower than the 8-5 edge they had on L/P to beat Mahopac in the finals.

Mahopac is peaking perfectly and they are more ready for this final than any other team is across all classes. It's hard to beat Yorktown twice in a season, it's going to be even harder in the finals AT Yorktown, no less but I think they are the best team to make it happen.

Rye and JJCR are headed for a battle. They each had a relatively light day in the semi-finals. My money right now is on Jay but it should be a great one.

I don't think I am coming off my prediction that it's a Mamo/Scarsdale final in A and D it's Pleasentville and Briarcliff. Today will not be an easy one for the Panthers, but i think they pull it out by 2-3.

A few things:
1. So the playoff seeds ended up being fair despite a lot of worry as up until last game, top teams vaulted into top seeds. The system works!
2. Yorktown over Mahopac but maybe not
3. JJ beats Rye due to faceoff, no McCarthy, and JJ having some more finishers
4. Pville again defeats Bcliff, maybe not in a blowout like regular season but with some buffer.
5. Scars vs Mamo who the heck knows? Scarsdale owns faceoff and coaching, Mamo has the playmakers

1. I'll concede that I was one of the ones banging on the seedings. Last day of the season and things cleared up a little. I do think it rewards softer scheduling but the on-field play almost always trumps it.
2. I think Yorktown is more of a tossup now than ever. Mahopac is on a roll BUT it will be really hard to go into Yorktown's home field and pull it off. Today will have two really good games...
3. I'll give JJCR the edge with everything you pointed out - Rye tends to figure it out though so it will be a good game I think. JJCR missed out by a goal next year and they are hungrier than ever!
4. P'ville i agree, but that Bronxville game was too close for comfort for me.
5. Mamo/Scarsdale will be another epic one.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

A few things:
1. So the playoff seeds ended up being fair despite a lot of worry as up until last game, top teams vaulted into top seeds. The system works!
2. Yorktown over Mahopac but maybe not
3. JJ beats Rye due to faceoff, no McCarthy, and JJ having some more finishers
4. Pville again defeats Bcliff, maybe not in a blowout like regular season but with some buffer.
5. Scars vs Mamo who the heck knows? Scarsdale owns faceoff and coaching, Mamo has the playmakers

1. I'll concede that I was one of the ones banging on the seedings. Last day of the season and things cleared up a little. I do think it rewards softer scheduling but the on-field play almost always trumps it.
2. I think Yorktown is more of a tossup now than ever. Mahopac is on a roll BUT it will be really hard to go into Yorktown's home field and pull it off. Today will have two really good games...
3. I'll give JJCR the edge with everything you pointed out - Rye tends to figure it out though so it will be a good game I think. JJCR missed out by a goal next year and they are hungrier than ever!
4. P'ville i agree, but that Bronxville game was too close for comfort for me.
5. Mamo/Scarsdale will be another epic one.

Saw a lot of good team defense, very few transition chances, and some uninspiring offense in championship games. No games were great from neutral fan POV. For their class, Pville def looked like best team that could go far.

A- Scarsdale does it again. Not a pretty game. Scarsdale got nice Q1 lead and rode that to the W. They messed up less and had FO dominance. Mamo cut it to 8-7 but it didn't feel like they rallied, more like got some random goals. Lotsa soft calls on both sides kept slowing the game. Mamo goalie looked very scared, Scarsdale goalie did not. 3 in a row this way, wow.
B- Yorktown too good. They looked better throughout. So much good pressure on D.
C- Like Scarsdale, Rye grabbed a fast lead and it held up with good pressure D all game. Rye short fast middie dominated the ball. JJCR got nothing going on offense despite winning faceoffs easily.
D- Pville wins it as expected. Chippy stuff at end led to super weird triple man-down and ejections. Bcliff then could find some room and hit the goal to make it close. Never seen a faceoff with no players on the wings for either team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

A few things:
1. So the playoff seeds ended up being fair despite a lot of worry as up until last game, top teams vaulted into top seeds. The system works!
2. Yorktown over Mahopac but maybe not
3. JJ beats Rye due to faceoff, no McCarthy, and JJ having some more finishers
4. Pville again defeats Bcliff, maybe not in a blowout like regular season but with some buffer.
5. Scars vs Mamo who the heck knows? Scarsdale owns faceoff and coaching, Mamo has the playmakers

1. I'll concede that I was one of the ones banging on the seedings. Last day of the season and things cleared up a little. I do think it rewards softer scheduling but the on-field play almost always trumps it.
2. I think Yorktown is more of a tossup now than ever. Mahopac is on a roll BUT it will be really hard to go into Yorktown's home field and pull it off. Today will have two really good games...
3. I'll give JJCR the edge with everything you pointed out - Rye tends to figure it out though so it will be a good game I think. JJCR missed out by a goal next year and they are hungrier than ever!
4. P'ville i agree, but that Bronxville game was too close for comfort for me.
5. Mamo/Scarsdale will be another epic one.

Saw a lot of good team defense, very few transition chances, and some uninspiring offense in championship games. No games were great from neutral fan POV. For their class, Pville def looked like best team that could go far.

A- Scarsdale does it again. Not a pretty game. Scarsdale got nice Q1 lead and rode that to the W. They messed up less and had FO dominance. Mamo cut it to 8-7 but it didn't feel like they rallied, more like got some random goals. Lotsa soft calls on both sides kept slowing the game. Mamo goalie looked very scared, Scarsdale goalie did not. 3 in a row this way, wow.
B- Yorktown too good. They looked better throughout. So much good pressure on D.
C- Like Scarsdale, Rye grabbed a fast lead and it held up with good pressure D all game. Rye short fast middie dominated the ball. JJCR got nothing going on offense despite winning faceoffs easily.
D- Pville wins it as expected. Chippy stuff at end led to super weird triple man-down and ejections. Bcliff then could find some room and hit the goal to make it close. Never seen a faceoff with no players on the wings for either team.

A- No horse in the race but that was the absolute worst refereed game I have ever watched. Anyone able to explain the offensive charge on Mamaroneck when the defender ran through the riding midfielder that was initiating contact. The passes being called shots and being given to the wrong team. The late clear that was somehow deemed to have been tipped. His foot was in bounds but the ball was in bounds but one ref calls him out and they somehow it is overturned. How many huddles and confusing calls did they have to change or confirm.......and WOW someone should have mentioned that this is no longer a contact sport because every touch or knockdown was called. Scarsdale wins that game 10 out of 10 due to FOGO but the refs really ruined what could have been a good hard hitting battle like Mondays NCAA Final......and please add a shot clock to public lacrosse. Holding the ball for 3 minutes and no stall calls is boring. HORRIBLE GAME TO WATCH. I know no one wants to ref but for Sectional finals maybe try to find a crew with a clue.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

A few things:
1. So the playoff seeds ended up being fair despite a lot of worry as up until last game, top teams vaulted into top seeds. The system works!
2. Yorktown over Mahopac but maybe not
3. JJ beats Rye due to faceoff, no McCarthy, and JJ having some more finishers
4. Pville again defeats Bcliff, maybe not in a blowout like regular season but with some buffer.
5. Scars vs Mamo who the heck knows? Scarsdale owns faceoff and coaching, Mamo has the playmakers

1. I'll concede that I was one of the ones banging on the seedings. Last day of the season and things cleared up a little. I do think it rewards softer scheduling but the on-field play almost always trumps it.
2. I think Yorktown is more of a tossup now than ever. Mahopac is on a roll BUT it will be really hard to go into Yorktown's home field and pull it off. Today will have two really good games...
3. I'll give JJCR the edge with everything you pointed out - Rye tends to figure it out though so it will be a good game I think. JJCR missed out by a goal next year and they are hungrier than ever!
4. P'ville i agree, but that Bronxville game was too close for comfort for me.
5. Mamo/Scarsdale will be another epic one.

Saw a lot of good team defense, very few transition chances, and some uninspiring offense in championship games. No games were great from neutral fan POV. For their class, Pville def looked like best team that could go far.

A- Scarsdale does it again. Not a pretty game. Scarsdale got nice Q1 lead and rode that to the W. They messed up less and had FO dominance. Mamo cut it to 8-7 but it didn't feel like they rallied, more like got some random goals. Lotsa soft calls on both sides kept slowing the game. Mamo goalie looked very scared, Scarsdale goalie did not. 3 in a row this way, wow.
B- Yorktown too good. They looked better throughout. So much good pressure on D.
C- Like Scarsdale, Rye grabbed a fast lead and it held up with good pressure D all game. Rye short fast middie dominated the ball. JJCR got nothing going on offense despite winning faceoffs easily.
D- Pville wins it as expected. Chippy stuff at end led to super weird triple man-down and ejections. Bcliff then could find some room and hit the goal to make it close. Never seen a faceoff with no players on the wings for either team.

A- No horse in the race but that was the absolute worst refereed game I have ever watched. Anyone able to explain the offensive charge on Mamaroneck when the defender ran through the riding midfielder that was initiating contact. The passes being called shots and being given to the wrong team. The late clear that was somehow deemed to have been tipped. His foot was in bounds but the ball was in bounds but one ref calls him out and they somehow it is overturned. How many huddles and confusing calls did they have to change or confirm.......and WOW someone should have mentioned that this is no longer a contact sport because every touch or knockdown was called. Scarsdale wins that game 10 out of 10 due to FOGO but the refs really ruined what could have been a good hard hitting battle like Mondays NCAA Final......and please add a shot clock to public lacrosse. Holding the ball for 3 minutes and no stall calls is boring. HORRIBLE GAME TO WATCH. I know no one wants to ref but for Sectional finals maybe try to find a crew with a clue.

Scarsdale Coach > Mamaroneck Coach
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

A few things:
1. So the playoff seeds ended up being fair despite a lot of worry as up until last game, top teams vaulted into top seeds. The system works!
2. Yorktown over Mahopac but maybe not
3. JJ beats Rye due to faceoff, no McCarthy, and JJ having some more finishers
4. Pville again defeats Bcliff, maybe not in a blowout like regular season but with some buffer.
5. Scars vs Mamo who the heck knows? Scarsdale owns faceoff and coaching, Mamo has the playmakers

1. I'll concede that I was one of the ones banging on the seedings. Last day of the season and things cleared up a little. I do think it rewards softer scheduling but the on-field play almost always trumps it.
2. I think Yorktown is more of a tossup now than ever. Mahopac is on a roll BUT it will be really hard to go into Yorktown's home field and pull it off. Today will have two really good games...
3. I'll give JJCR the edge with everything you pointed out - Rye tends to figure it out though so it will be a good game I think. JJCR missed out by a goal next year and they are hungrier than ever!
4. P'ville i agree, but that Bronxville game was too close for comfort for me.
5. Mamo/Scarsdale will be another epic one.

Saw a lot of good team defense, very few transition chances, and some uninspiring offense in championship games. No games were great from neutral fan POV. For their class, Pville def looked like best team that could go far.

A- Scarsdale does it again. Not a pretty game. Scarsdale got nice Q1 lead and rode that to the W. They messed up less and had FO dominance. Mamo cut it to 8-7 but it didn't feel like they rallied, more like got some random goals. Lotsa soft calls on both sides kept slowing the game. Mamo goalie looked very scared, Scarsdale goalie did not. 3 in a row this way, wow.
B- Yorktown too good. They looked better throughout. So much good pressure on D.
C- Like Scarsdale, Rye grabbed a fast lead and it held up with good pressure D all game. Rye short fast middie dominated the ball. JJCR got nothing going on offense despite winning faceoffs easily.
D- Pville wins it as expected. Chippy stuff at end led to super weird triple man-down and ejections. Bcliff then could find some room and hit the goal to make it close. Never seen a faceoff with no players on the wings for either team.

A- No horse in the race but that was the absolute worst refereed game I have ever watched. Anyone able to explain the offensive charge on Mamaroneck when the defender ran through the riding midfielder that was initiating contact. The passes being called shots and being given to the wrong team. The late clear that was somehow deemed to have been tipped. His foot was in bounds but the ball was in bounds but one ref calls him out and they somehow it is overturned. How many huddles and confusing calls did they have to change or confirm.......and WOW someone should have mentioned that this is no longer a contact sport because every touch or knockdown was called. Scarsdale wins that game 10 out of 10 due to FOGO but the refs really ruined what could have been a good hard hitting battle like Mondays NCAA Final......and please add a shot clock to public lacrosse. Holding the ball for 3 minutes and no stall calls is boring. HORRIBLE GAME TO WATCH. I know no one wants to ref but for Sectional finals maybe try to find a crew with a clue.

Scarsdale Coach > Mamaroneck Coach
Stop it. A 3 goal win with 90% possession after being up 6-1 at half and youre gonna call that a coaches win? This board ceases to amaze me with the ridiculous comments. This was Dals game plan, FOGO get us the ball and then we can hold it for 3-4 minute possessions and rip shots at a freshman goalie when you get bored. Coaches made no difference in this game. Talent at specialty positions, fogo and goalie, were the difference.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

A few things:
1. So the playoff seeds ended up being fair despite a lot of worry as up until last game, top teams vaulted into top seeds. The system works!
2. Yorktown over Mahopac but maybe not
3. JJ beats Rye due to faceoff, no McCarthy, and JJ having some more finishers
4. Pville again defeats Bcliff, maybe not in a blowout like regular season but with some buffer.
5. Scars vs Mamo who the heck knows? Scarsdale owns faceoff and coaching, Mamo has the playmakers

1. I'll concede that I was one of the ones banging on the seedings. Last day of the season and things cleared up a little. I do think it rewards softer scheduling but the on-field play almost always trumps it.
2. I think Yorktown is more of a tossup now than ever. Mahopac is on a roll BUT it will be really hard to go into Yorktown's home field and pull it off. Today will have two really good games...
3. I'll give JJCR the edge with everything you pointed out - Rye tends to figure it out though so it will be a good game I think. JJCR missed out by a goal next year and they are hungrier than ever!
4. P'ville i agree, but that Bronxville game was too close for comfort for me.
5. Mamo/Scarsdale will be another epic one.

Saw a lot of good team defense, very few transition chances, and some uninspiring offense in championship games. No games were great from neutral fan POV. For their class, Pville def looked like best team that could go far.

A- Scarsdale does it again. Not a pretty game. Scarsdale got nice Q1 lead and rode that to the W. They messed up less and had FO dominance. Mamo cut it to 8-7 but it didn't feel like they rallied, more like got some random goals. Lotsa soft calls on both sides kept slowing the game. Mamo goalie looked very scared, Scarsdale goalie did not. 3 in a row this way, wow.
B- Yorktown too good. They looked better throughout. So much good pressure on D.
C- Like Scarsdale, Rye grabbed a fast lead and it held up with good pressure D all game. Rye short fast middie dominated the ball. JJCR got nothing going on offense despite winning faceoffs easily.
D- Pville wins it as expected. Chippy stuff at end led to super weird triple man-down and ejections. Bcliff then could find some room and hit the goal to make it close. Never seen a faceoff with no players on the wings for either team.

A- No horse in the race but that was the absolute worst refereed game I have ever watched. Anyone able to explain the offensive charge on Mamaroneck when the defender ran through the riding midfielder that was initiating contact. The passes being called shots and being given to the wrong team. The late clear that was somehow deemed to have been tipped. His foot was in bounds but the ball was in bounds but one ref calls him out and they somehow it is overturned. How many huddles and confusing calls did they have to change or confirm.......and WOW someone should have mentioned that this is no longer a contact sport because every touch or knockdown was called. Scarsdale wins that game 10 out of 10 due to FOGO but the refs really ruined what could have been a good hard hitting battle like Mondays NCAA Final......and please add a shot clock to public lacrosse. Holding the ball for 3 minutes and no stall calls is boring. HORRIBLE GAME TO WATCH. I know no one wants to ref but for Sectional finals maybe try to find a crew with a clue.

Scarsdale Coach > Mamaroneck Coach
Stop it. A 3 goal win with 90% possession after being up 6-1 at half and youre gonna call that a coaches win? This board ceases to amaze me with the ridiculous comments. This was Dals game plan, FOGO get us the ball and then we can hold it for 3-4 minute possessions and rip shots at a freshman goalie when you get bored. Coaches made no difference in this game. Talent at specialty positions, fogo and goalie, were the difference.
Put Scarsdale FOGO on Mamaroneck and Mamaroneck wins by more than 3. Even with the bad refs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yup hard game to watch, not great lacrosse.
Yup the refs weren't good. Everyone who has seen Section 1 lacrosse knows whoever falls on the ground gets the ball. So that ridiculous trend continued.
Don't think Scarsdale stalled. We've all seen real stalling and that didnt happen. Mamo had their chances but goalie stopped a lot and Mamo committed tons of TOs especially on clears.
Yup extreme gap on FO and goalie positions was the difference.
Yup coaching gap exists. 3 years and running. Scars def was better prepared for this game, see Q1. They played with more poise. Thats coaching.
Yup the game was all about Quarter 1.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Why is it that Mamo fans always have excuses?
"Put that goalie on Mamo and they win by 3".
That's like saying put Tom Brady on the Jets and even they would win

Mamo is all over social media when they win and crickets when they lose

Parents are entitled and always whining at the refs in the stands

Perhaps that comes from the newer assistant coach who used to coach the youth. He was always ranting about something when the kids were in 5th and 6th grade, seriously?

There are ups and down, try to have some class
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Perhaps Scarsdale fans could try to have some class. Their fans were filming the Mamaroneck players crying as they walked to the bus, standing in their path mocking them until a Yorktown policeman made them get out of the way, and berated them for their behavior with a "Where were you raised that you would behave this way? What is wrong with you?" Their behavior was disgusting.

Scarsdale played well from the start. Their FOGO is amazing and their goalie played well. What would you like Mamaroneck to put on social media to appease you ders faithful?? You're still upset Eric Grenberg crushed you when he was in High School? Move on.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why is it that Mamo fans always have excuses?
"Put that goalie on Mamo and they win by 3".
That's like saying put Tom Brady on the Jets and even they would win

Mamo is all over social media when they win and crickets when they lose

Parents are entitled and always whining at the refs in the stands

Perhaps that comes from the newer assistant coach who used to coach the youth. He was always ranting about something when the kids were in 5th and 6th grade, seriously?

There are ups and down, try to have some class

Ok troll,

I'm honestly not from Mamaroneck or Larchmont but watched the game as a neutral and firmly believed that if possession was more even at the X Mamaroneck would have won. Dale was 19/21 on faceoffs. That means they were playing make it take it. Flip that stat and Mamaroneck would win imho. That said, he is not on Mamaroneck so Scarsdale is the better team.

We can also say this, since youre not very nice, Scarsdale is done. The generational golden goose is off to Happy Valley and you will never have another one like that. We will see how good the coach is now.

Also, do many kids post about their losses? and re: ranting in 5th or 6th grade, in my 12 years with 3 boys playing town lacrosse I have never come across a worse group of parents than those in Scarsdale. The parent coaches were rude, obnoxious and ridiculously caught up in their bravado that comes with all the camouflage. Learn to win with class......though its too late because the ride is over. LOVE IT!!!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Also, do many kids post about their losses? and re: ranting in 5th or 6th grade, in my 12 years with 3 boys playing town lacrosse I have never come across a worse group of parents than those in Scarsdale. The parent coaches were rude, obnoxious and ridiculously caught up in their bravado that comes with all the camouflage. Learn to win with class......though its too late because the ride is over. LOVE IT!!!!!

Does one really need to point out the obvious that your last sentence is no better than the behavior you came on here to complain about? It's always someone else, never you guys.

Yes Scarsdale fans can be awful at times and the behavior at the finals was unacceptable. I can say with some significant knowledge knowing that coaching staff, they would not stand for that, but their reach and authority goes so far.

Boorish behavior is not only in one school or a handful. Take a random sampling on a local live game and you will hear it everywhere. so many referees in the stands, it's a wonder there is such a shortage of them on the field.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

A few things:
1. So the playoff seeds ended up being fair despite a lot of worry as up until last game, top teams vaulted into top seeds. The system works!
2. Yorktown over Mahopac but maybe not
3. JJ beats Rye due to faceoff, no McCarthy, and JJ having some more finishers
4. Pville again defeats Bcliff, maybe not in a blowout like regular season but with some buffer.
5. Scars vs Mamo who the heck knows? Scarsdale owns faceoff and coaching, Mamo has the playmakers

1. I'll concede that I was one of the ones banging on the seedings. Last day of the season and things cleared up a little. I do think it rewards softer scheduling but the on-field play almost always trumps it.
2. I think Yorktown is more of a tossup now than ever. Mahopac is on a roll BUT it will be really hard to go into Yorktown's home field and pull it off. Today will have two really good games...
3. I'll give JJCR the edge with everything you pointed out - Rye tends to figure it out though so it will be a good game I think. JJCR missed out by a goal next year and they are hungrier than ever!
4. P'ville i agree, but that Bronxville game was too close for comfort for me.
5. Mamo/Scarsdale will be another epic one.

Saw a lot of good team defense, very few transition chances, and some uninspiring offense in championship games. No games were great from neutral fan POV. For their class, Pville def looked like best team that could go far.

A- Scarsdale does it again. Not a pretty game. Scarsdale got nice Q1 lead and rode that to the W. They messed up less and had FO dominance. Mamo cut it to 8-7 but it didn't feel like they rallied, more like got some random goals. Lotsa soft calls on both sides kept slowing the game. Mamo goalie looked very scared, Scarsdale goalie did not. 3 in a row this way, wow.
B- Yorktown too good. They looked better throughout. So much good pressure on D.
C- Like Scarsdale, Rye grabbed a fast lead and it held up with good pressure D all game. Rye short fast middie dominated the ball. JJCR got nothing going on offense despite winning faceoffs easily.
D- Pville wins it as expected. Chippy stuff at end led to super weird triple man-down and ejections. Bcliff then could find some room and hit the goal to make it close. Never seen a faceoff with no players on the wings for either team.

A- No horse in the race but that was the absolute worst refereed game I have ever watched. Anyone able to explain the offensive charge on Mamaroneck when the defender ran through the riding midfielder that was initiating contact. The passes being called shots and being given to the wrong team. The late clear that was somehow deemed to have been tipped. His foot was in bounds but the ball was in bounds but one ref calls him out and they somehow it is overturned. How many huddles and confusing calls did they have to change or confirm.......and WOW someone should have mentioned that this is no longer a contact sport because every touch or knockdown was called. Scarsdale wins that game 10 out of 10 due to FOGO but the refs really ruined what could have been a good hard hitting battle like Mondays NCAA Final......and please add a shot clock to public lacrosse. Holding the ball for 3 minutes and no stall calls is boring. HORRIBLE GAME TO WATCH. I know no one wants to ref but for Sectional finals maybe try to find a crew with a clue.
So much to break down on this....

You can't bull dodge anymore. They've effectively ruled that out of the game. I detest it, but that's probably what was called (I'm guessing because I am not sure the specific play you mean let me know when it was in the game and ill see what the play looked like)

I like a good hitting game too but the rules in HS are different than NCAA. I agree with you that it was too softly called.

Shot clock.. NO WAY. You want to ruin HS lacrosse, put a shot clock in and it will turn into 1 of 2 things: Give the ball to the fastest guy and take 100 shots a game hoping to land 20. or teams take it to the corner, kill 60 seconds of clock and then 1-2 pass or force a dodge to a -mediocre - shot. clock is great for PLL, I don't really like it in college to be honest.

If you complain about stalling teams in HS - everyone that makes that argument ignores the obvious: there is nothing stopping the defense from challenging the ball. And if you understand the stall rule correctly, the defense has to be playing the ball for the refs to call it. I say this while also conceding refs are often way too slow to put it on. When there is an obvious change in the tempo of the Offense, it should be on within 30second to a minute at most. I felt the late game stall on Scarsdale took way too long to put on.

Fun fact on multiple man downs like at the end. The most you can do down is 3 and only three can be serving a penalty at one time so if there are more penalities than that, the 4th guy can't start serving his penalty until one of the first three are released. Also: if you get 5:00 of personal fouls in a game, you have to sit the rest of the game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Good list of Section 1 AA's. Congratulations to those players. Some very good players get let off the list but no way around that. As always, teams that go the furthest get the most nominations. Makes sense.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Also, do many kids post about their losses? and re: ranting in 5th or 6th grade, in my 12 years with 3 boys playing town lacrosse I have never come across a worse group of parents than those in Scarsdale. The parent coaches were rude, obnoxious and ridiculously caught up in their bravado that comes with all the camouflage. Learn to win with class......though its too late because the ride is over. LOVE IT!!!!!

Does one really need to point out the obvious that your last sentence is no better than the behavior you came on here to complain about? It's always someone else, never you guys.

Yes Scarsdale fans can be awful at times and the behavior at the finals was unacceptable. I can say with some significant knowledge knowing that coaching staff, they would not stand for that, but their reach and authority goes so far.

Boorish behavior is not only in one school or a handful. Take a random sampling on a local live game and you will hear it everywhere. so many referees in the stands, it's a wonder there is such a shortage of them on the field.

Im not complaining and Im not from either town but I have no issue with my statement. Look at the posts and behavior of Scarsdale coaches and fans. Very happy they come back to earth with the loss of their fogo. Show no class, receive no class. Had you been humble no comments will be made.

I mean, you all needed police officers to intervene due your behavior and then come on here and call out Mamaroneck for losing and handling it well? Glass houses, mirrors, etc.

As an aside, I am happy to see someone in Scarsdale acknowledging that the behavior was unacceptable but to say the coaches wont stand for it? Cmon now. It starts with them and the classless entitled parents. The kids are just following what they see and learn every day.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

A few things:
1. So the playoff seeds ended up being fair despite a lot of worry as up until last game, top teams vaulted into top seeds. The system works!
2. Yorktown over Mahopac but maybe not
3. JJ beats Rye due to faceoff, no McCarthy, and JJ having some more finishers
4. Pville again defeats Bcliff, maybe not in a blowout like regular season but with some buffer.
5. Scars vs Mamo who the heck knows? Scarsdale owns faceoff and coaching, Mamo has the playmakers

1. I'll concede that I was one of the ones banging on the seedings. Last day of the season and things cleared up a little. I do think it rewards softer scheduling but the on-field play almost always trumps it.
2. I think Yorktown is more of a tossup now than ever. Mahopac is on a roll BUT it will be really hard to go into Yorktown's home field and pull it off. Today will have two really good games...
3. I'll give JJCR the edge with everything you pointed out - Rye tends to figure it out though so it will be a good game I think. JJCR missed out by a goal next year and they are hungrier than ever!
4. P'ville i agree, but that Bronxville game was too close for comfort for me.
5. Mamo/Scarsdale will be another epic one.

Saw a lot of good team defense, very few transition chances, and some uninspiring offense in championship games. No games were great from neutral fan POV. For their class, Pville def looked like best team that could go far.

A- Scarsdale does it again. Not a pretty game. Scarsdale got nice Q1 lead and rode that to the W. They messed up less and had FO dominance. Mamo cut it to 8-7 but it didn't feel like they rallied, more like got some random goals. Lotsa soft calls on both sides kept slowing the game. Mamo goalie looked very scared, Scarsdale goalie did not. 3 in a row this way, wow.
B- Yorktown too good. They looked better throughout. So much good pressure on D.
C- Like Scarsdale, Rye grabbed a fast lead and it held up with good pressure D all game. Rye short fast middie dominated the ball. JJCR got nothing going on offense despite winning faceoffs easily.
D- Pville wins it as expected. Chippy stuff at end led to super weird triple man-down and ejections. Bcliff then could find some room and hit the goal to make it close. Never seen a faceoff with no players on the wings for either team.

A- No horse in the race but that was the absolute worst refereed game I have ever watched. Anyone able to explain the offensive charge on Mamaroneck when the defender ran through the riding midfielder that was initiating contact. The passes being called shots and being given to the wrong team. The late clear that was somehow deemed to have been tipped. His foot was in bounds but the ball was in bounds but one ref calls him out and they somehow it is overturned. How many huddles and confusing calls did they have to change or confirm.......and WOW someone should have mentioned that this is no longer a contact sport because every touch or knockdown was called. Scarsdale wins that game 10 out of 10 due to FOGO but the refs really ruined what could have been a good hard hitting battle like Mondays NCAA Final......and please add a shot clock to public lacrosse. Holding the ball for 3 minutes and no stall calls is boring. HORRIBLE GAME TO WATCH. I know no one wants to ref but for Sectional finals maybe try to find a crew with a clue.
So much to break down on this....

You can't bull dodge anymore. They've effectively ruled that out of the game. I detest it, but that's probably what was called (I'm guessing because I am not sure the specific play you mean let me know when it was in the game and ill see what the play looked like)

I like a good hitting game too but the rules in HS are different than NCAA. I agree with you that it was too softly called.

Shot clock.. NO WAY. You want to ruin HS lacrosse, put a shot clock in and it will turn into 1 of 2 things: Give the ball to the fastest guy and take 100 shots a game hoping to land 20. or teams take it to the corner, kill 60 seconds of clock and then 1-2 pass or force a dodge to a -mediocre - shot. clock is great for PLL, I don't really like it in college to be honest.

If you complain about stalling teams in HS - everyone that makes that argument ignores the obvious: there is nothing stopping the defense from challenging the ball. And if you understand the stall rule correctly, the defense has to be playing the ball for the refs to call it. I say this while also conceding refs are often way too slow to put it on. When there is an obvious change in the tempo of the Offense, it should be on within 30second to a minute at most. I felt the late game stall on Scarsdale took way too long to put on.

Fun fact on multiple man downs like at the end. The most you can do down is 3 and only three can be serving a penalty at one time so if there are more penalities than that, the 4th guy can't start serving his penalty until one of the first three are released. Also: if you get 5:00 of personal fouls in a game, you have to sit the rest of the game.
4:28 of the second quarter.
Totally disagree on the shotclock. It has been terrific for college and prep school. Do you think it will ruin HS because in Section 1 there isnt the depth of quality players? Too many variables in the stall rule. A clock is clean and clear.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
John Jay junior varsity and varsity have great coaching staff and the teams are solid. However, the John Jay Youth Lacrosse program is a joke and robs the kids of the sport. Zero practice, zero oversight, zero care for the middle school boys. Can't wait til the school changes things and goes to modified like all other schools in the district. Our middle school looks like a bunch of kindergartners against others when there's competition.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John Jay junior varsity and varsity have great coaching staff and the teams are solid. However, the John Jay Youth Lacrosse program is a joke and robs the kids of the sport. Zero practice, zero oversight, zero care for the middle school boys. Can't wait til the school changes things and goes to modified like all other schools in the district. Our middle school looks like a bunch of kindergartners against others when there's competition.
Have you tried speaking with the people that run JJYL or even the HS coaching staff. I know they are really involved at the youth level. That might affect change better then coming on a forum and anonymously bashing they program.

Im not saying you're wrong, but there is more effective ways to make change happen than this.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Some section final observations

A - Scarsdale gets it done for the 3 peat. Everyone can say the fogo won them the game and he played a huge part. Their offense has to score goals though and they got it done. It will be interesting to see how they do next year without him. Not the greatest lacrosse in this one. Mamaroneck will be good next year I would think they are the favorite going into next year.

B - Yorktown finally gets one for the first time in what feels like an eternity for them. People counted out Ytown this year and I can’t figure out why. Their whole defense is going D1. Their goalie is amazing and they have some good talent on offense. They played a bunch of good teams out of conference and it prepared them for the moment. Great season for Mahopac they had some great wins I have to tip my cap.

C - Rye did it without their star player. Their role players were good all year and got the job done. This was the only game I predicted wrong I thought Jay had the edge going in. Rye has very good poles and their goalie play has been good all year. This is unfortunate for Jay because this may have been their best chance to get a title. Next year is do or die because they will fall off a cliff once their 2024’s graduate.

D - Pleasantville wins its first title since their 4 peat (2015-2018). They dominated early. It was interesting that Briarcliff played man to man against them. They are known for their zone but went away from it. The game got chippy in the end and two bcliff players got ejected. It fueled the fire for them and they made a mini run at the end to make it an interesting game. Both teams clearly do not like each other. If the classes remain the same I would say that Haldane will be the second best team in D behind Pville going into next year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Using KD jr's blog for data, in sect 1, there are 50 HS Boys teams, 11 leagues (A -K), the end of the regular season results are:

20 teams are above .500
4 teams at .500
26 teams below .500

P'ville with a 19-1 record, only loss to Pelham (in a 8-7 game; it appears to be a trap game too).

Teams with losing records that I'm surprised about is : Brnxv (8-11), Brclf (9-11), Suffern (8-9), Somers (8-9) and L/P (8-10).
I'm sure all of these teams played non-regional games, which contributed to the record (good for them too).

It will be interesting to start comparing Sect 1 results on a season to season basis going forward (with the help of KD's blog too).

I predict the following schools to be on the upward trajectory:

Arlington (6-10), Carmel (9-9), Greeley and Somers (8-9).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Anyone with experience with the HV Excelsior team?

The cost is $499 for a 2 day (5 game) tournament, which is inexpensive.

Just wondering if the teams are bloated with unnecessary players that dilute playing time?

Sec 1 coaches involved seem legit (Kuczma, Lindsay, Mamo HC, & Pville).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Using KD jr's blog for data, in sect 1, there are 50 HS Boys teams, 11 leagues (A -K), the end of the regular season results are:

20 teams are above .500
4 teams at .500
26 teams below .500

P'ville with a 19-1 record, only loss to Pelham (in a 8-7 game; it appears to be a trap game too).

Teams with losing records that I'm surprised about is : Brnxv (8-11), Brclf (9-11), Suffern (8-9), Somers (8-9) and L/P (8-10).
I'm sure all of these teams played non-regional games, which contributed to the record (good for them too).

It will be interesting to start comparing Sect 1 results on a season to season basis going forward (with the help of KD's blog too).

I predict the following schools to be on the upward trajectory:

Arlington (6-10), Carmel (9-9), Greeley and Somers (8-9).

Arlington had a fantastic year in 2022, so this is a down year on paper, but they are always competitive. In 23, they beat the teams they should have and they lost to the better teams. They had a tough league schedule with Mahopac and Yorktown and their non-league was good for them. I think they improve for 2024

Carmel is vertically on the rise. They get better every year and are still young. They were in the same league with Arlington and had a bit more competitive schedule. Expect them to turn some heads in 24

Somers was down for what I think expectations were for this year. They don't lose a lot i believe, but they should me much better in 24. I think it was an on-paper disappointment this season.

Greeley needs to step their scheduling up. They say they are going to, but based on this year, it doesn't seem like they will be able to hang with tougher opponents unless they improve the D and find ways to score against better teams. Once they played even a decent team this year (Carmel, Somers, JJCR...) the scoring dropped by half. They aren't going to be able to put up big numbers against better teams. And are the 'fans' patient enough to endure a 6-8 win season against better teams?

Other interesting ones for 24 will be Mamaroneck now that they don't have Baldwin and Lehrman to face. JJCR is probably in it's last year of talent before a rebuild is coming. Yorktown who a lot of people wrote off as too young proved otherwise. Bronxville with now a full season under the new staff will have a lot to build on. And who can forget Pleasentville? I look forward to it already.

Shh.... there are some solid Rockland teams too....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
its been a thing for a little while without much momentum. New name and packaging this year. Not many top players as they're at other tourneys. Bunch of players who werent at tryouts will appear. pretty typical summer lax thing. if you do it for fun, good. If you do it for recruiting, bad.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This unsafe air situation better not end the season for Scarsdale, Rye and Pville. They need to have these games in a dome because the air quality will be the same at this time tomorrow.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This unsafe air situation better not end the season for Scarsdale, Rye and Pville. They need to have these games in a dome because the air quality will be the same at this time tomorrow.

It was announced mid-day today that they moved to Friday and the finals to Sunday. Expectation is things will be clearing up into the weekend.
There is NO WAY they are not getting this done this close to 2020....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Clean sweep by LI in the state semifinals.

A - The battle of the â€dales resulted in a Farmingdale win. Scarsdale hung around for a while but ultimately didn’t have the firepower. Great season for Scarsdale and it will be interesting to see how they fare next year without their FOGO. They do bring back a bunch of pieces so I believe they will still be able to be in the mix for a section title.

C - Rye gave Manhasset all they had. The Indians are a legit top 10 team in the nation and they had a great first half and surprised a lot of people. They did all this without their star player. A lot of pieces will be coming back for Rye assuming they don’t leave for a prep school.

D - Pleasantville falls to CSH in a boring and ugly game. The Panthers were in it the whole time. CSH got the lead in the 2nd quarter and held the ball for the rest of the game. Pville will not forget this and brings back their entire team next year. They will be a fun team to follow as some consider them the best in the section going into next year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Now that the HS season is over, let's start discussing summer and club lax.


Ossining is running a HS summer league, mostly river town teams. Also, there is a HS summer league on Friday nights in Fairfield CT. I definitely miss the good old days of Sound Shore and Van Cortlandt summer leagues.


In regard to the club, whenever I asked others about the state of club in Westchester/CT, I have heard rumors about PT & 2w. However, I always ignored the chatter, because it was always secondhand info.

Well recently, outside of lacrosse and in the professional world, I met a current assistant PT coach and he assured me that it’s not rumors!

Early on, PT worked with 2w when 2w started. PT even loaned players to DE. Eventually, there was a falling out between the directors, ND and DE. Since PT is an affiliate member of the National Lacrosse Federation, 2w is black listed for all NLF events. Which I just started to follow and noticed that they are not in NLF events (hmmm).

Well that [Censored] for the 2w players and shame on ND. I understand this is a business, but clearly ND is ultimately punishing the 2w players and limiting club lax growth in the area.

Obviously, ND feels threatened by 2ws growth and appeal to players/parents.

Please reframe from 2w bashing in regard to holdbacks and country club privileges. Because it’s evident throughout nearly all programs in the CT/NJ/NY area.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that the HS season is over, let's start discussing summer and club lax.


Ossining is running a HS summer league, mostly river town teams. Also, there is a HS summer league on Friday nights in Fairfield CT. I definitely miss the good old days of Sound Shore and Van Cortlandt summer leagues.


In regard to the club, whenever I asked others about the state of club in Westchester/CT, I have heard rumors about PT & 2w. However, I always ignored the chatter, because it was always secondhand info.

Well recently, outside of lacrosse and in the professional world, I met a current assistant PT coach and he assured me that it’s not rumors!

Early on, PT worked with 2w when 2w started. PT even loaned players to DE. Eventually, there was a falling out between the directors, ND and DE. Since PT is an affiliate member of the National Lacrosse Federation, 2w is black listed for all NLF events. Which I just started to follow and noticed that they are not in NLF events (hmmm).

Well that [Censored] for the 2w players and shame on ND. I understand this is a business, but clearly ND is ultimately punishing the 2w players and limiting club lax growth in the area.

Obviously, ND feels threatened by 2ws growth and appeal to players/parents.

Please reframe from 2w bashing in regard to holdbacks and country club privileges. Because it’s evident throughout nearly all programs in the CT/NJ/NY area.
So to summarize... Let's Bash Prime Time and their director by name - cmon with the initials - BUT DON'T BASH 2Way!

What, exactly is the point of this?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
who’s in westchester war games next week 2030?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that the HS season is over, let's start discussing summer and club lax.


Ossining is running a HS summer league, mostly river town teams. Also, there is a HS summer league on Friday nights in Fairfield CT. I definitely miss the good old days of Sound Shore and Van Cortlandt summer leagues.


In regard to the club, whenever I asked others about the state of club in Westchester/CT, I have heard rumors about PT & 2w. However, I always ignored the chatter, because it was always secondhand info.

Well recently, outside of lacrosse and in the professional world, I met a current assistant PT coach and he assured me that it’s not rumors!

Early on, PT worked with 2w when 2w started. PT even loaned players to DE. Eventually, there was a falling out between the directors, ND and DE. Since PT is an affiliate member of the National Lacrosse Federation, 2w is black listed for all NLF events. Which I just started to follow and noticed that they are not in NLF events (hmmm).

Well that [Censored] for the 2w players and shame on ND. I understand this is a business, but clearly ND is ultimately punishing the 2w players and limiting club lax growth in the area.

Obviously, ND feels threatened by 2ws growth and appeal to players/parents.

Please reframe from 2w bashing in regard to holdbacks and country club privileges. Because it’s evident throughout nearly all programs in the CT/NJ/NY area.
So to summarize... Let's Bash Prime Time and their director by name - cmon with the initials - BUT DON'T BASH 2Way!

What, exactly is the point of this?
Youre nuts. ND is not hampering growth and runs the best program around. You can bash what you want, maybe try an anti trust suit or be upset at DE for whatever he did but PT's results speak for what they do. 2 way seems more than fine doing the Great 8 and their other TV event. Also, 2way are not the only team that not invited to NLF events. Most likely due to local market clubs being NLF Members. Taz is out because of 91LI, Next Level is out because of Madlax, 2way is out because of 91 Tristate, lol! Knowing which tournaments your club will play at should be part of your selection process.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that the HS season is over, let's start discussing summer and club lax.


Ossining is running a HS summer league, mostly river town teams. Also, there is a HS summer league on Friday nights in Fairfield CT. I definitely miss the good old days of Sound Shore and Van Cortlandt summer leagues.


In regard to the club, whenever I asked others about the state of club in Westchester/CT, I have heard rumors about PT & 2w. However, I always ignored the chatter, because it was always secondhand info.

Well recently, outside of lacrosse and in the professional world, I met a current assistant PT coach and he assured me that it’s not rumors!

Early on, PT worked with 2w when 2w started. PT even loaned players to DE. Eventually, there was a falling out between the directors, ND and DE. Since PT is an affiliate member of the National Lacrosse Federation, 2w is black listed for all NLF events. Which I just started to follow and noticed that they are not in NLF events (hmmm).

Well that [Censored] for the 2w players and shame on ND. I understand this is a business, but clearly ND is ultimately punishing the 2w players and limiting club lax growth in the area.

Obviously, ND feels threatened by 2ws growth and appeal to players/parents.

Please reframe from 2w bashing in regard to holdbacks and country club privileges. Because it’s evident throughout nearly all programs in the CT/NJ/NY area.
This is an idiotic take and clearly you have an issue with the Prime Time Director. Take it up with him. No one is stifling club growth anywhere, if they could it would be a brilliant business decision to do so. I have direct knowledge of the club landscape in westchester and there is more cooperation to grow the game than there is to stifle competition. Is there competition between 2way and PT for the best players? Yes. As there is with all the other clubs. Might there be some animosity between those two particular clubs? Possibly, but if there is, it's been kept relatively quiet and behind the scenes. Thanks to you coming on here to blow that out of proportion for no particular reason, they will both likely have to address it.
I hope this self-serving post worked in your favor, because it contributed nothing to the overall landscape of Westchester/CT club programs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
you want to get recruited div1- you play for PT , it is that simple . the guy is a genius - the guy hustles his a ss off
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I raised the post that has caused so much angst. To address some comments:

“What, exactly is the point of this?” It’s on a forum discussing lax in the appropriate thread. Also, if you read the forum rules; No names can be used.

“ (ND) runs the best program around”. I agree with. My niece played on PT and she went on to DI. According to my brother, one of the best business decisions by PT is having a singular team, per grade. Nearly all of the other AA programs run multiple teams, which can cause envy and wrath. So kudos to ND on being focused.

“ Also, 2way are not the only team that not invited to NLF events”. Excellent point.

“ Knowing which tournaments your club will play at should be part of your selection process”: Knowing which tournaments a program does isn’t as easy as you make it think.

“I hope this self-serving post worked in your favor, because it contributed nothing to the overall landscape of Westchester/CT club programs” Get a grip buddy. Of course it contributed something. It at least created 4 responses (most likely by the same person too).

“the guy is a genius - the guy hustles his a ss off”; Wow, a genius?!? That’s a far stretch; maybe a little narcissistic OR please do tell us why you think he’s a genius. I highly doubt you’ll be able to make a case that ND is a genius. However, I do agree 100% that he works his [Censored] off.

I started the post because I heard directly from a PT assistant coach, which validated the rumors that I have heard before. It was refreshing to hear from someone on PT talk about it.

I met the coach randomly and outside of lacrosse, he was genuine and informative.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I would be very surprised if PT merged with 2w, ND is a bit of a control freak, so sharing control and decisions with someone like DE doesn't really fit the bill, but on paper, would be a powerhouse program.

genius is prob not the correct word, but, he has pretty much cornered the mkt in lacrosse

1- gets more committed d1 than pretty much anyone around- just understands how the system works and understands how to get it done
2- runs some of the biggest recruiting events in the summer and fall circuit
3- runs the hospitality company that sells you the rooms for every tourney and showcase etc.

so yeh genius may be a stretch, but savvy biz man at a minmum
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I raised the post that has caused so much angst. To address some comments:

“What, exactly is the point of this?” It’s on a forum discussing lax in the appropriate thread. Also, if you read the forum rules; No names can be used.

“ (ND) runs the best program around”. I agree with. My niece played on PT and she went on to DI. According to my brother, one of the best business decisions by PT is having a singular team, per grade. Nearly all of the other AA programs run multiple teams, which can cause envy and wrath. So kudos to ND on being focused.

“ Also, 2way are not the only team that not invited to NLF events”. Excellent point.

“ Knowing which tournaments your club will play at should be part of your selection process”: Knowing which tournaments a program does isn’t as easy as you make it think.

“I hope this self-serving post worked in your favor, because it contributed nothing to the overall landscape of Westchester/CT club programs” Get a grip buddy. Of course it contributed something. It at least created 4 responses (most likely by the same person too).

“the guy is a genius - the guy hustles his a ss off”; Wow, a genius?!? That’s a far stretch; maybe a little narcissistic OR please do tell us why you think he’s a genius. I highly doubt you’ll be able to make a case that ND is a genius. However, I do agree 100% that he works his [Censored] off.

I started the post because I heard directly from a PT assistant coach, which validated the rumors that I have heard before. It was refreshing to hear from someone on PT talk about it.

I met the coach randomly and outside of lacrosse, he was genuine and informative.
And I'm the guy who asked what the point of your post was and you haven't answered that either. You heard a rumor then happen to bump into one of the assistants on PT that "confirmed" that rumor. Okay, so what? What does coming on here and running with that information do? What are you hoping to accomplish in doing this?

You also said, "Well that [Censored] for the 2w players and shame on ND. I understand this is a business, but clearly ND is ultimately punishing the 2w players and limiting club lax growth in the area."

In no way is that happening, and you saying it, doesn't make it true. This entire conversation seems like a salty parent who didn't get what they wanted and are trying to make PT look bad.

Then again, this is BOTC, so par for the course I guess?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
you want to get recruited div1- you play for PT , it is that simple . the guy is a genius - the guy hustles his a ss off

2way does very well. PT does great. Clearly both are doing a good job
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I raised the post that has caused so much angst. To address some comments:

“What, exactly is the point of this?” It’s on a forum discussing lax in the appropriate thread. Also, if you read the forum rules; No names can be used.

“ (ND) runs the best program around”. I agree with. My niece played on PT and she went on to DI. According to my brother, one of the best business decisions by PT is having a singular team, per grade. Nearly all of the other AA programs run multiple teams, which can cause envy and wrath. So kudos to ND on being focused.

“ Also, 2way are not the only team that not invited to NLF events”. Excellent point.

“ Knowing which tournaments your club will play at should be part of your selection process”: Knowing which tournaments a program does isn’t as easy as you make it think.

“I hope this self-serving post worked in your favor, because it contributed nothing to the overall landscape of Westchester/CT club programs” Get a grip buddy. Of course it contributed something. It at least created 4 responses (most likely by the same person too).

“the guy is a genius - the guy hustles his a ss off”; Wow, a genius?!? That’s a far stretch; maybe a little narcissistic OR please do tell us why you think he’s a genius. I highly doubt you’ll be able to make a case that ND is a genius. However, I do agree 100% that he works his [Censored] off.

I started the post because I heard directly from a PT assistant coach, which validated the rumors that I have heard before. It was refreshing to hear from someone on PT talk about it.

I met the coach randomly and outside of lacrosse, he was genuine and informative.
You make no sense, "Knowing which tournaments a program does isn’t as easy as you make it think."
Another absurd statement, google and youll find it and more specifically usclub lax gives you scores, tournaments, websites and more. So basically you had a bone to pick and came on here to act the f00l
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT has had best teams for a while now-- PT get best players for the most part, hit the key tourneys, does their own tourney and get players recruited.
2W learned to create their own alternate world-- it's been successful recently, fully leaning into Brunswick partnership for players, doing own tourney, hitting non-NLF tourneys, building hype for good players.

To original poster, kudos for stirring the pot. To add salt to your wound 2W is country clubs, prep schools and holdbacks, check the rosters, they seem to embrace it, you should too but appreciate you bringing up a banned talking point.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Wow, there is lax going on or is it taboo to discuss lax in the HV/CT thread.

How about Express North winning the World Series of lacrosse. Congrats to at least the two Bedford players on Express North.
Also, congrats to the program-who-must-not-be-named, which is also in our backyard.

Anyone playing in the Ulax summer league down on MV?

I do miss Soundshore and Cortlandt men's league.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
what time are you referring who must not be named
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT has had best teams for a while now-- PT get best players for the most part, hit the key tourneys, does their own tourney and get players recruited.
2W learned to create their own alternate world-- it's been successful recently, fully leaning into Brunswick partnership for players, doing own tourney, hitting non-NLF tourneys, building hype for good players.

To original poster, kudos for stirring the pot. To add salt to your wound 2W is country clubs, prep schools and holdbacks, check the rosters, they seem to embrace it, you should too but appreciate you bringing up a banned talking point.

PT has some great old teams on their way out. 27s and below are amongst the weakest in the area. PT hasn't made the world series several years in a row while Eclipse, Express North, 2W always there now. PT youth teams are not strong and do not bode well for the future of PT. Rest of the clubs seem to be thriving. Eclipse and 2W very strong at youth ages. North just won the world series. Hard to argue.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT has had best teams for a while now-- PT get best players for the most part, hit the key tourneys, does their own tourney and get players recruited.
2W learned to create their own alternate world-- it's been successful recently, fully leaning into Brunswick partnership for players, doing own tourney, hitting non-NLF tourneys, building hype for good players.

To original poster, kudos for stirring the pot. To add salt to your wound 2W is country clubs, prep schools and holdbacks, check the rosters, they seem to embrace it, you should too but appreciate you bringing up a banned talking point.

PT has some great old teams on their way out. 27s and below are amongst the weakest in the area. PT hasn't made the world series several years in a row while Eclipse, Express North, 2W always there now. PT youth teams are not strong and do not bode well for the future of PT. Rest of the clubs seem to be thriving. Eclipse and 2W very strong at youth ages. North just won the world series. Hard to argue.

I recognize that you are referring to PT's Boys side and you're correct about their world series track record. However, the Girls side of PT is thriving and many of their teams are ranked in the top 20, so don't paint PT with a broad stroke.

Also, let's include Preds and True to the subject. With so many Boys programs in the area and with the upcoming (2023-2024) age based verification to the youth levels, it's going to be interesting and nearly impossible to replicate program's past performances.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT has had best teams for a while now-- PT get best players for the most part, hit the key tourneys, does their own tourney and get players recruited.
2W learned to create their own alternate world-- it's been successful recently, fully leaning into Brunswick partnership for players, doing own tourney, hitting non-NLF tourneys, building hype for good players.

To original poster, kudos for stirring the pot. To add salt to your wound 2W is country clubs, prep schools and holdbacks, check the rosters, they seem to embrace it, you should too but appreciate you bringing up a banned talking point.

PT has some great old teams on their way out. 27s and below are amongst the weakest in the area. PT hasn't made the world series several years in a row while Eclipse, Express North, 2W always there now. PT youth teams are not strong and do not bode well for the future of PT. Rest of the clubs seem to be thriving. Eclipse and 2W very strong at youth ages. North just won the world series. Hard to argue.

I recognize that you are referring to PT's Boys side and you're correct about their world series track record. However, the Girls side of PT is thriving and many of their teams are ranked in the top 20, so don't paint PT with a broad stroke.

Also, let's include Preds and True to the subject. With so many Boys programs in the area and with the upcoming (2023-2024) age based verification to the youth levels, it's going to be interesting and nearly impossible to replicate program's past performances.
Not necessarily. Isn't the age grouping for "age based lacrosse" an 18 month window?
PT HS will surpass those other youth teams. Just look at recruiting performance and all the good kids will move on to PT.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT has had best teams for a while now-- PT get best players for the most part, hit the key tourneys, does their own tourney and get players recruited.
2W learned to create their own alternate world-- it's been successful recently, fully leaning into Brunswick partnership for players, doing own tourney, hitting non-NLF tourneys, building hype for good players.

To original poster, kudos for stirring the pot. To add salt to your wound 2W is country clubs, prep schools and holdbacks, check the rosters, they seem to embrace it, you should too but appreciate you bringing up a banned talking point.

PT has some great old teams on their way out. 27s and below are amongst the weakest in the area. PT hasn't made the world series several years in a row while Eclipse, Express North, 2W always there now. PT youth teams are not strong and do not bode well for the future of PT. Rest of the clubs seem to be thriving. Eclipse and 2W very strong at youth ages. North just won the world series. Hard to argue.

I recognize that you are referring to PT's Boys side and you're correct about their world series track record. However, the Girls side of PT is thriving and many of their teams are ranked in the top 20, so don't paint PT with a broad stroke.

Also, let's include Preds and True to the subject. With so many Boys programs in the area and with the upcoming (2023-2024) age based verification to the youth levels, it's going to be interesting and nearly impossible to replicate program's past performances.
Not necessarily. Isn't the age grouping for "age based lacrosse" an 18 month window?
PT HS will surpass those other youth teams. Just look at recruiting performance and all the good kids will move on to PT.

Exactly this. PT HS teams, at present, are top notch in large part because the best players from other teams moved there in their late middle school years. While there are no guarantees and no one can claim to know what will happen, it will surprise no one if around 5-10 of the best players spread out amongst these other programs move there.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PT has had best teams for a while now-- PT get best players for the most part, hit the key tourneys, does their own tourney and get players recruited.
2W learned to create their own alternate world-- it's been successful recently, fully leaning into Brunswick partnership for players, doing own tourney, hitting non-NLF tourneys, building hype for good players.

To original poster, kudos for stirring the pot. To add salt to your wound 2W is country clubs, prep schools and holdbacks, check the rosters, they seem to embrace it, you should too but appreciate you bringing up a banned talking point.

PT has some great old teams on their way out. 27s and below are amongst the weakest in the area. PT hasn't made the world series several years in a row while Eclipse, Express North, 2W always there now. PT youth teams are not strong and do not bode well for the future of PT. Rest of the clubs seem to be thriving. Eclipse and 2W very strong at youth ages. North just won the world series. Hard to argue.

I recognize that you are referring to PT's Boys side and you're correct about their world series track record. However, the Girls side of PT is thriving and many of their teams are ranked in the top 20, so don't paint PT with a broad stroke.

Also, let's include Preds and True to the subject. With so many Boys programs in the area and with the upcoming (2023-2024) age based verification to the youth levels, it's going to be interesting and nearly impossible to replicate program's past performances.
Not necessarily. Isn't the age grouping for "age based lacrosse" an 18 month window?
PT HS will surpass those other youth teams. Just look at recruiting performance and all the good kids will move on to PT.

Exactly this. PT HS teams, at present, are top notch in large part because the best players from other teams moved there in their late middle school years. While there are no guarantees and no one can claim to know what will happen, it will surprise no one if around 5-10 of the best players spread out amongst these other programs move there.

Not true. Check with PT families first. No one moves in high school. Boys 22's, 23's, and 24's have always been good. Studs on the teams in high school were all there in youth. 25's are the only team that came together "late", but that was middle school. No team miraculously becomes elite in high school. When the stakes are the highest. After middle school, it's impossible to revive a team and ask people to take a chance when it matters the most. PT 27 to 32 are not anywhere close to as good as their HS teams. None of them are top 20 teams. None of them are able to really compete against the top youth clubs in the area (North, Eclipse, and 2W). Hoping they will be saved by 5-10 elite players deciding to move to PT in high school is a big big ask.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
With tryouts in the Westchester/CT area now completed, what's the word?

Any clubs rising/falling?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With tryouts in the Westchester/CT area now completed, what's the word?

Any clubs rising/falling?

Well, as per the kool aid drinker(s), all of the top HS players have migrated to PT.

Joking aside, PT's 2025 is the best. Come September 1, let the fun begin.

For the 2026, the top five are : 2w black, Eclipse Black, Express North Black, Preds AA and PT (alphabetical order).
Cavalry and True are trending upwards.

2027: Eclipse Black stands alone on top, followed by 2w, PT, Express North Black and Preds.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Thoughts on True Westchester? I believe this was their first year in the area but it seems everyone I speak to has nothing but great things to say about the program and how its run. Wonder if they can make another leap next year in a tough market.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thoughts on True Westchester? I believe this was their first year in the area but it seems everyone I speak to has nothing but great things to say about the program and how its run. Wonder if they can make another leap next year in a tough market.

Yes, first year completed. My son is not a member, but we did have an extended tryout.

Very impressed with the Director (BB) and with most of the staff. Haven't looked up all of their the coaches, but the ones I have; they are excellent.

I appreciate the year round team practices and Pace University's facilities. True Westchester is trending upward.

I only wish they started 4 years ago.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Copied/pasted from the Boys 2028 2022-2023 thread:

Any word on the CT / Westchester teams?

2 Way- always solid and should get better as we get closer to HS as this team feeds Brunswick.
Express North- Have to imagine that being World Series Champs helped them at tryouts / made it hard for their best players to leave.
Eclipse- Always good but seemed to fall off a bit towards the end of the year.
Primetime- Definitely got better towards the end of the year.
Preds- Only know they have a bunch of reclass kids and still didn't do very well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PT has some great old teams on their way out. 27s and below are amongst the weakest in the area. PT hasn't made the world series several years in a row while Eclipse, Express North, 2W always there now. PT youth teams are not strong and do not bode well for the future of PT. Rest of the clubs seem to be thriving. Eclipse and 2W very strong at youth ages. North just won the world series. Hard to argue.[/quote]

I recognize that you are referring to PT's Boys side and you're correct about their world series track record. However, the Girls side of PT is thriving and many of their teams are ranked in the top 20, so don't paint PT with a broad stroke.

Also, let's include Preds and True to the subject. With so many Boys programs in the area and with the upcoming (2023-2024) age based verification to the youth levels, it's going to be interesting and nearly impossible to replicate program's past performances.[/quote]
Not necessarily. Isn't the age grouping for "age based lacrosse" an 18 month window?
PT HS will surpass those other youth teams. Just look at recruiting performance and all the good kids will move on to PT.[/quote]

Exactly this. PT HS teams, at present, are top notch in large part because the best players from other teams moved there in their late middle school years. While there are no guarantees and no one can claim to know what will happen, it will surprise no one if around 5-10 of the best players spread out amongst these other programs move there.[/quote]

Not true. Check with PT families first. No one moves in high school. Boys 22's, 23's, and 24's have always been good. Studs on the teams in high school were all there in youth. 25's are the only team that came together "late", but that was middle school. No team miraculously becomes elite in high school. When the stakes are the highest. After middle school, it's impossible to revive a team and ask people to take a chance when it matters the most. PT 27 to 32 are not anywhere close to as good as their HS teams. None of them are top 20 teams. None of them are able to really compete against the top youth clubs in the area (North, Eclipse, and 2W). Hoping they will be saved by 5-10 elite players deciding to move to PT in high school is a big big ask.[/quote]

Not correct, the best PT players for 26, 27, 28, 29 are playing up a year on 25,26, 27,28. And the tryouts for all these years had hundreds of new players from all the local teams. Was impressed with my two boys teams and the quality of the tryout. Reasons given for influx was coaching, tournament quality, practices, and the ability for high school and college advancement. We have a lot of good local options with PT, Eclipse, Express North, 2W so no downside at any. Smart parents come to PT early. Good to see loyalty pays off
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Copied/pasted from the Boys 2028 2022-2023 thread:

Any word on the CT / Westchester teams?

2 Way- always solid and should get better as we get closer to HS as this team feeds Brunswick.
Express North- Have to imagine that being World Series Champs helped them at tryouts / made it hard for their best players to leave.
Eclipse- Always good but seemed to fall off a bit towards the end of the year.
Primetime- Definitely got better towards the end of the year.
Preds- Only know they have a bunch of reclass kids and still didn't do very well.

PREDS ON THE RISE!!!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It’s pretty sad to see 91 tristate become a B level program over the last few years. With 91 LI being such a powerhouse, you would’ve thought the name and success would cary over, much like it did with Express. I hear they are now trying to tell people it’s an AA program. I think it’s a little too late for that. Too many other great programs around with better offerings.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Overall:

Doing well: Preds, 2way, Eclipse, Express North 28’s

Falling: Every other express north team, 91 tristate, PT

Rising fast: True Westchester
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Overall:

Doing well: Preds, 2way, Eclipse, Express North 28’s

Falling: Every other express north team, 91 tristate, PT

Rising fast: True Westchester
This is an emotional post and/or focused on b level player with an axe to grind.
True is Pride. No big advancement here other than ala carte purchasing of everything and yet another national team. True, WW and 91ts know their nitch and do very well with their family friendly basic lax offering. 91TS will try to offer that NLF path and say AA but against the local teams they are B.
Preds are a joke top to bottom. If you live in Rye you need to play for Preds is breaking up a bit with the reclasses but it is a disjointed program offering no ins to showcases or top tournaments and recruiting is a non existent. In fairness, it is the second job for all the staff.
2way- yes, facilities, pipeline and prep schools but recruiting and tournament selection leave a bit to be desired.
Eclipse and PT always solid, hard to rise when you're always at the top. and as previous poster said, half of the 25 team is playing up right now.
EN- congrats on Wolrd Series but how many teams in the program at each age class and have always wondered why they do not place anyone in top D1 or place several kids anywhere for that matter.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Overall:

Doing well: Preds, 2way, Eclipse, Express North 28’s

Falling: Every other express north team, 91 tristate, PT

Rising fast: True Westchester
This is an emotional post and/or focused on b level player with an axe to grind.
True is Pride. No big advancement here other than ala carte purchasing of everything and yet another national team. True, WW and 91ts know their nitch and do very well with their family friendly basic lax offering. 91TS will try to offer that NLF path and say AA but against the local teams they are B.
Preds are a joke top to bottom. If you live in Rye you need to play for Preds is breaking up a bit with the reclasses but it is a disjointed program offering no ins to showcases or top tournaments and recruiting is a non existent. In fairness, it is the second job for all the staff.
2way- yes, facilities, pipeline and prep schools but recruiting and tournament selection leave a bit to be desired.
Eclipse and PT always solid, hard to rise when you're always at the top. and as previous poster said, half of the 25 team is playing up right now.
EN- congrats on Wolrd Series but how many teams in the program at each age class and have always wondered why they do not place anyone in top D1 or place several kids anywhere for that matter.

Agree with most of this. Not a 2way fan as they have been reclass central but objectively they do very well with recruiting. They play in decent tournaments and they even host their own and attract good teams
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
kudos to Tri state 91 to finally enter real AA tourneys - this will help them attract and retain players

EN- has significant talent with very little college placement, those that do make it to the next level are somehow doing it on their own. on average, they sell you AA schedule , but deliver B- results in terms of recruiting . Schreiber should consider hiring a college recruiter
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
what will age based do to the landscape?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
kudos to Tri state 91 to finally enter real AA tourneys - this will help them attract and retain players

EN- has significant talent with very little college placement, those that do make it to the next level are somehow doing it on their own. on average, they sell you AA schedule , but deliver B- results in terms of recruiting . Schreiber should consider hiring a college recruiter

Totally agree that they could do much better on placement and much of it is driven by the athlete themselves.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
kudos to Tri state 91 to finally enter real AA tourneys - this will help them attract and retain players

EN- has significant talent with very little college placement, those that do make it to the next level are somehow doing it on their own. on average, they sell you AA schedule , but deliver B- results in terms of recruiting . Schreiber should consider hiring a college recruiter

Totally agree that they could do much better on placement and much of it is driven by the athlete themselves.

Definitely something strange with EN ability to get kids placed. I think the 2025 team is pretty solid. Will be interested to see how it plays out come September and October. 2023 and 2024 team lagged in recruiting. I do think recruiting is less a function of the program than it is of the kids on the field but EN still lags.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
kudos to Tri state 91 to finally enter real AA tourneys - this will help them attract and retain players

EN- has significant talent with very little college placement, those that do make it to the next level are somehow doing it on their own. on average, they sell you AA schedule , but deliver B- results in terms of recruiting . Schreiber should consider hiring a college recruiter

Totally agree that they could do much better on placement and much of it is driven by the athlete themselves.

Definitely something strange with EN ability to get kids placed. I think the 2025 team is pretty solid. Will be interested to see how it plays out come September and October. 2023 and 2024 team lagged in recruiting. I do think recruiting is less a function of the program than it is of the kids on the field but EN still lags.

I would agree with this for the most part. However I would say that recruiting is really all about connections once you get to a certain level and if you have two equivalent kids, one from EN and one from another club, let’s say PT or 2W, the latter is more likely to get recruited to a school as EN just didn’t put in the work. They do need a full time recruiter.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
can someone please explain why EN is unable to get kids placed to high-quality d1 schools when their teams are always highly ranked?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
can someone please explain why EN is unable to get kids placed to high-quality d1 schools when their teams are always highly ranked?

Grades must be a factor.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
as the poster above mentioned, relationships matter, if you want to get recruited D1, you go to PT , you want to go to D3, go to Express, 91 TS , etc...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
as the poster above mentioned, relationships matter, if you want to get recruited D1, you go to PT , you want to go to D3, go to Express, 91 TS , etc...

In regard to the post above, brought to you by friends of PT.

PT: 2 commits from 2024: Cuse and Colgate. I admit, PT 2025 will be significant.

However, disregard the following DI details.

Eclipse: 17 commits from 2024s: Including ND, Cuse, UNC, UVA, Michigan, Brown, Boston, Utah, Richmond, Bryant & SHU
Preds (NY): 6 commits from 2024: Johns Hop, UNC, Bucknell, Dartmouth, Hofstra & Holy Cross
2W (only showing â€23’s): 17 commits: Princeton, ND, Yale, Harvard, Ohio, UNC, Marquette & Providence

Hmm, seems that PT has definitely lost the title of king of the West/CT. PT set the bar and sure seems others have surpassed PT.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
appreciate the data points re pt 2024 but your mistaken and the post was really about Express Norths inability to place kids at the d1 level

div 1 Prime time 2024

syracuse, cogate, umass, uvm, airforce, yale brown, georgetown, richmond 2x, johns Hopkins, lehigh st johns cornell, monmouth princeton lafayette and army
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
appreciate the data points re pt 2024 but your mistaken and the post was really about Express Norths inability to place kids at the d1 level

div 1 Prime time 2024

syracuse, cogate, umass, uvm, airforce, yale brown, georgetown, richmond 2x, johns Hopkins, lehigh st johns cornell, monmouth princeton lafayette and army

Interested in your data, because mine was from PT's website (https://ptlacrosse.com/boys/commitments/?grad=2024).

I also agree that the convo was about EN, but you brought PT into it.

How much compensation do you get from PT, you know, in passing out the kool aid.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
if I was getting paid, the website would be up to date - lol . the data I gave was from inside lacrosse, it goes without saying that PT eclipse, preds 2 way all do better in placement up to this point in time
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
can someone please explain why EN is unable to get kids placed to high-quality d1 schools when their teams are always highly ranked?

It’s the work put in by the club and their connections. PT and 2W are much better at it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
as the poster above mentioned, relationships matter, if you want to get recruited D1, you go to PT , you want to go to D3, go to Express, 91 TS , etc...

In regard to the post above, brought to you by friends of PT.

PT: 2 commits from 2024: Cuse and Colgate. I admit, PT 2025 will be significant.

However, disregard the following DI details.

Eclipse: 17 commits from 2024s: Including ND, Cuse, UNC, UVA, Michigan, Brown, Boston, Utah, Richmond, Bryant & SHU
Preds (NY): 6 commits from 2024: Johns Hop, UNC, Bucknell, Dartmouth, Hofstra & Holy Cross
2W (only showing â€23’s): 17 commits: Princeton, ND, Yale, Harvard, Ohio, UNC, Marquette & Providence

Hmm, seems that PT has definitely lost the title of king of the West/CT. PT set the bar and sure seems others have surpassed PT.

I think you are grossly misinformed bout PT What I have for 2024 PT:
Yale
Cornell
Georgetown
Princeton
Brown
Hopkins
Syracuse
Army
Lehigh
Air Force
uMass
Tufts
Salisbury
Richmond x2
Lafayette
Vermont
Colgate
Monmouth
St John’s

That’s much more than your list of Cuse and Colgate. Much if this is no doubt built on relationships as many of those are great players but there are great players who don’t have the college commitment because they don’t have the connection.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
can someone please explain why EN is unable to get kids placed to high-quality d1 schools when their teams are always highly ranked?

Grades must be a factor.

A lot of these kids go to very high performing high schools: Ct prep schools, Darien, ridge field, new Canaan etc. I guess they could have bad grades at those schools but chances are not all of them have bad grades. One of the 2022 recruits decommitted from Yale to go to MIT. That seems like a smart person.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
As for PT: The website isn’t up to date. Go to Instagram. You’re insane to try arguing that PT isn’t the best club to play for in westchester for boys and girls. The commits are top notch for the past 3 years. And yes, my kid played for PT and I thank God we were smart enough to make that decision years ago. Otherwise, my kid would probably not be playing at a top D1 school.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
As for PT: The website isn’t up to date. Go to Instagram. You’re insane to try arguing that PT isn’t the best club to play for in westchester for boys and girls. The commits are top notch for the past 3 years. And yes, my kid played for PT and I thank God we were smart enough to make that decision years ago. Otherwise, my kid would probably not be playing at a top D1 school.

Ask any of your kids if they want to play for PT or 2way or Preds or EN. None of them are saying, ooooh please make Preds my top choice thats for sure. Eclipse and PT if you want high D1. 2way if you want mid. Preds if you want to hope for D3 and deal with a bunch of Meanyclown egos taking your money while they go to their other jobs. 2W if you are prep and holdback that doesnt make PT or Eclipse. Theres a place for everyone but PT and Eclipse deliver on the recruiting and exposure side on a different level.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
As for PT: The website isn’t up to date. Go to Instagram. You’re insane to try arguing that PT isn’t the best club to play for in westchester for boys and girls. The commits are top notch for the past 3 years. And yes, my kid played for PT and I thank God we were smart enough to make that decision years ago. Otherwise, my kid would probably not be playing at a top D1 school.

Ask any of your kids if they want to play for PT or 2way or Preds or EN. None of them are saying, ooooh please make Preds my top choice thats for sure. Eclipse and PT if you want high D1. 2way if you want mid. Preds if you want to hope for D3 and deal with a bunch of Meanyclown egos taking your money while they go to their other jobs. 2W if you are prep and holdback that doesnt make PT or Eclipse. Theres a place for everyone but PT and Eclipse deliver on the recruiting and exposure side on a different level.

Not a 2way fan here as they are reclass central but they have done a little better than “mid-d1”. Yes a lot of average d1 but some pretty good schools as well. Maybe not up to what PT has done but better than EN. Maybe equal to eclipse depending on the year)

Here are the d1 commits for 2way (yes I included the “mid d1” as beauty is in the run of the beholder”. Left out some of the real good D3 schools they have committed to.

2024: UNC, Michigan, Brown x 2, Lafayettex2, Colgate, Marist, Bryant , Hobart
2023: Princeton, Ohio State, yale x2, notre dame, Harvard, UNC, Air Force x2, providence, Marquette, Binghamton
2022: notre dame, Utah, Marquette, sacred heart, monmouth x2
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Box lacrosse landscape in Westchester/CT? It is getting very popular now which is awesome.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
As for PT: The website isn’t up to date. Go to Instagram. You’re insane to try arguing that PT isn’t the best club to play for in westchester for boys and girls. The commits are top notch for the past 3 years. And yes, my kid played for PT and I thank God we were smart enough to make that decision years ago. Otherwise, my kid would probably not be playing at a top D1 school.

In light of the forum rules; Named Individuals….Identification of adults …in posts should be accompanied by substantiated facts, sources, and details.

Let’s Pivot from the convo about where your son should NOW play club lax, let’s talk about HV adults that had significant success on the colligate level.

Currently, only the Boyer brothers and Makar, are the HV player has made a significant impact on the college level. JB lists Ballers as his club team and KB lists PT. I could not find where Makar played club.

It seems that YHS remains on top in producing high profile/caliber players, with Lakeland in 2nd (with too many historical great players). I’m guessing JJHS with the Bocklet brothers and NYACK with Hess.

Most if not all of these HV GOATS played for HV in the ESG.

Can we start naming the now adults who had significant colligate field success, where they played HS and Club in the HV area?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Box lacrosse landscape in Westchester/CT? It is getting very popular now which is awesome.

Superstars - Colsey
Warthogs- Justin Otto

Primetime- is starting a box program with Kirkaldy
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Superstars always good, been around a while.

845 Box been around a couple years, very very good coaching and affordable. Family atmosphere.

Not sure about the other newer programs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
1 season with Tri State was more than enough.
Total S...Show.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
As for PT: The website isn’t up to date. Go to Instagram. You’re insane to try arguing that PT isn’t the best club to play for in westchester for boys and girls. The commits are top notch for the past 3 years. And yes, my kid played for PT and I thank God we were smart enough to make that decision years ago. Otherwise, my kid would probably not be playing at a top D1 school.

Ask any of your kids if they want to play for PT or 2way or Preds or EN. None of them are saying, ooooh please make Preds my top choice thats for sure. Eclipse and PT if you want high D1. 2way if you want mid. Preds if you want to hope for D3 and deal with a bunch of Meanyclown egos taking your money while they go to their other jobs. 2W if you are prep and holdback that doesnt make PT or Eclipse. Theres a place for everyone but PT and Eclipse deliver on the recruiting and exposure side on a different level.


Don't have thoughts on 2way but can speak a bit to PT. They have "lost" a bunch of kids in the younger years to the other programs. I think they will struggle with the 2027's and younger going forward. They have a fantastic track record with the colleges but that's because they won a lot. They aren't winning (at all) with these younger classes.

As for EN, the Director either doesn't have the connections or doesn't think the kids are good enough. My understanding is that Express as a whole is pretty connected so if CoachC thinks your good, he can make a call and coaches listen to him.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
1 season with Tri State was more than enough.
Total S...Show.

[Censored] show ? ( new person here and just interested in relative comparison of them all )
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
As for EN, the Director either doesn't have the connections or doesn't think the kids are good enough. My understanding is that Express as a whole is pretty connected so if CoachC thinks your good, he can make a call and coaches listen to him.[/quote]


if an Express North parent is paying 4k a year for the sole purpose of trying to get recruited, why should they have to call CoachC down on long island to make a call?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
What happened with tri state?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
As for PT: The website isn’t up to date. Go to Instagram. You’re insane to try arguing that PT isn’t the best club to play for in westchester for boys and girls. The commits are top notch for the past 3 years. And yes, my kid played for PT and I thank God we were smart enough to make that decision years ago. Otherwise, my kid would probably not be playing at a top D1 school.

Ask any of your kids if they want to play for PT or 2way or Preds or EN. None of them are saying, ooooh please make Preds my top choice thats for sure. Eclipse and PT if you want high D1. 2way if you want mid. Preds if you want to hope for D3 and deal with a bunch of Meanyclown egos taking your money while they go to their other jobs. 2W if you are prep and holdback that doesnt make PT or Eclipse. Theres a place for everyone but PT and Eclipse deliver on the recruiting and exposure side on a different level.


Don't have thoughts on 2way but can speak a bit to PT. They have "lost" a bunch of kids in the younger years to the other programs. I think they will struggle with the 2027's and younger going forward. They have a fantastic track record with the colleges but that's because they won a lot. They aren't winning (at all) with these younger classes.

As for EN, the Director either doesn't have the connections or doesn't think the kids are good enough. My understanding is that Express as a whole is pretty connected so if CoachC thinks your good, he can make a call and coaches listen to him.

For EN it’s a little of both. Connections are not as good as one would think. Players are not as good as one would think although they are still very good with only 1-2 exceptionally great players per year. They simply don’t put resources towards recruiting; don’t know if they are trying to save money or what; it’s just never been a focus. More of a family run business ether than a Club Juggernaut. Nice enough people.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
As for PT: The website isn’t up to date. Go to Instagram. You’re insane to try arguing that PT isn’t the best club to play for in westchester for boys and girls. The commits are top notch for the past 3 years. And yes, my kid played for PT and I thank God we were smart enough to make that decision years ago. Otherwise, my kid would probably not be playing at a top D1 school.

Ask any of your kids if they want to play for PT or 2way or Preds or EN. None of them are saying, ooooh please make Preds my top choice thats for sure. Eclipse and PT if you want high D1. 2way if you want mid. Preds if you want to hope for D3 and deal with a bunch of Meanyclown egos taking your money while they go to their other jobs. 2W if you are prep and holdback that doesnt make PT or Eclipse. Theres a place for everyone but PT and Eclipse deliver on the recruiting and exposure side on a different level.


Don't have thoughts on 2way but can speak a bit to PT. They have "lost" a bunch of kids in the younger years to the other programs. I think they will struggle with the 2027's and younger going forward. They have a fantastic track record with the colleges but that's because they won a lot. They aren't winning (at all) with these younger classes.

As for EN, the Director either doesn't have the connections or doesn't think the kids are good enough. My understanding is that Express as a whole is pretty connected so if CoachC thinks your good, he can make a call and coaches listen to him.

For EN it’s a little of both. Connections are not as good as one would think. Players are not as good as one would think although they are still very good with only 1-2 exceptionally great players per year. They simply don’t put resources towards recruiting; don’t know if they are trying to save money or what; it’s just never been a focus. More of a family run business ether than a Club Juggernaut. Nice enough people.

Coming from a parent (not a coach), my strong advice to parents of young lacrosse players in westchester - have your kid tryout for the youngest PT lacrosse team possible and start out at the ground floor. Will be easier to get on board, will be trained at a high level, will play at a high level, will have the best chance to grow as a player, and will be part of a family, which means easier to maintain your position and not get cut as time goes on unless it’s just not meant to be. It’s very hard to try out for a new team like PT and make it as an older player unless you’re a student. Rosters get settled as kids gets older. This advice goes for boys and girls. Playing at the highest level on a national playing field means more visibility to college coaches and more of a chance to get recruited.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
B- for college recruiting for EN is a generous grade.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
For EN recruiting just isn't really part of the model. You are paying for the right to play in AA tournaments, nothing more, nothing less. If you understand this and do your own recruiting assuming you have good video and strong grades your son can get recruited.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For EN recruiting just isn't really part of the model. You are paying for the right to play in AA tournaments, nothing more, nothing less. If you understand this and do your own recruiting assuming you have good video and strong grades your son can get recruited.

Agree with this. They sell themselves on tournaments. Though I feel like with the money that one pays they should get recruiting help and shouldn’t have to rely on their own video and good grades.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For EN recruiting just isn't really part of the model. You are paying for the right to play in AA tournaments, nothing more, nothing less. If you understand this and do your own recruiting assuming you have good video and strong grades your son can get recruited.

Agree with this. They sell themselves on tournaments. Though I feel like with the money that one pays they should get recruiting help and shouldn’t have to rely on their own video and good grades.

Have to disagree, EN gets it done and works hard. They are doing some good things.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Schreiber is old school gritty long island lacrosse, good things ahead for EN
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber is old school gritty long island lacrosse, good things ahead for EN

Schreiber a good guy. Hope they are getting things done but in all honesty for then 2023 classes and older, recruiting simply was not their thing. Maybe this changes with this 2024 class? So far I see ND, Lafayette and Iona and for d3: Stevens, Dickinson. In total only 7 for the class of 2024. Great for those kids but when talking about it in the context of PT, 2W and eclipse, it falls very short in the area. But like you said, maybe good things ahead for the class of 2025. There’s a Virginia commit reclass from 2024.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber is old school gritty long island lacrosse, good things ahead for EN

Schreiber a good guy. Hope they are getting things done but in all honesty for then 2023 classes and older, recruiting simply was not their thing. Maybe this changes with this 2024 class? So far I see ND, Lafayette and Iona and for d3: Stevens, Dickinson. In total only 7 for the class of 2024. Great for those kids but when talking about it in the context of PT, 2W and eclipse, it falls very short in the area. But like you said, maybe good things ahead for the class of 2025. There’s a Virginia commit reclass from 2024.

I think Virginia commit plays for Prime Time now.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber is old school gritty long island lacrosse, good things ahead for EN

Schreiber a good guy. Hope they are getting things done but in all honesty for then 2023 classes and older, recruiting simply was not their thing. Maybe this changes with this 2024 class? So far I see ND, Lafayette and Iona and for d3: Stevens, Dickinson. In total only 7 for the class of 2024. Great for those kids but when talking about it in the context of PT, 2W and eclipse, it falls very short in the area. But like you said, maybe good things ahead for the class of 2025. There’s a Virginia commit reclass from 2024.

I think Virginia commit plays for Prime Time now.

Yikes. Well there goes that one for EN. Anyways, good people but lacking in the recruiting dept. To those who say good things to come, I hope so but based on their history, in comparison to the other 3 clubs, they are last
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
well as predicted, PT crushing Express North on the recruiting front(not surprising)

3 big commits so

Princeton-2
Notre Dame -1


granted Express will have a few- its peanuts compared to PT
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
well as predicted, PT crushing Express North on the recruiting front(not surprising)

3 big commits so

Princeton-2
Notre Dame -1


granted Express will have a few- its peanuts compared to PT

Stirring the pot already, no one is surprised with PT's 2025 team commits. All of those Boys will do very well.

However, have you seen the recent US Club Lax top 50 rankings of programs? Seems that they too agree that PT has slipped a little. The local results are:

Eclipse #6,
PT #18,
2W #20,
EN #22,
Preds #43
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Spring Coaching Carousel beginning already in Section 1 - Somers and Arlington among the current vacancies. I'm a little surprised at both. Somers had an off year last year, but to have that staff step away seems to be indicative of what is becoming all-too familiar in HS sports, catering to the unhappy minority of parent-mobs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Add Briarcliff to the list
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Any predictions for Somers & Bcliff jobs?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any predictions for Somers & Bcliff jobs?
Someone will coach them.
But seriously, folks... It may be a bit early in the year, but Somers does do a lot of off-season work that the previous coaches were heavily involved with so there will be some pressure to get someone in place to start winter and pre-season ball.

Briarcliff may be in a better position as I believe it was just the HC that left as opposed to Somers who reportedly lost their entire staff.

These are two very good teams on paper and we may see some shuffling around as other programs might be losing a head coach or top assistant. OB the former Eastchester Head Coach who is now a top assistant at JJCR would be a good candidate, but he may want to stay where he is.

Parents need to start realizing that pushing the coach out may not get you the type of new coach you want, There aren't a glut of top-quality coaches so they have their choice of where to go. No one wants to deal with out-of-control parents. Coaches talk and if there is any of that even suspected, you will have a very hard time getting anyone of quality in your school.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any predictions for Somers & Bcliff jobs?
Someone will coach them.
But seriously, folks... It may be a bit early in the year, but Somers does do a lot of off-season work that the previous coaches were heavily involved with so there will be some pressure to get someone in place to start winter and pre-season ball.

Briarcliff may be in a better position as I believe it was just the HC that left as opposed to Somers who reportedly lost their entire staff.

These are two very good teams on paper and we may see some shuffling around as other programs might be losing a head coach or top assistant. OB the former Eastchester Head Coach who is now a top assistant at JJCR would be a good candidate, but he may want to stay where he is.

Parents need to start realizing that pushing the coach out may not get you the type of new coach you want, There aren't a glut of top-quality coaches so they have their choice of where to go. No one wants to deal with out-of-control parents. Coaches talk and if there is any of that even suspected, you will have a very hard time getting anyone of quality in your school.

I think the "out of control" parents story is kind of overdone. I know people get frustrated with coaches but I've not really seen it boil all the way up to the coach. In my experience it is people like me chatting to other parents about what they would do differently. In the end it's just boring chatter among parents. I guess the Somers and Briarcliff situations could be different. I think it is hard to get a quality coach at any school at this point.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any predictions for Somers & Bcliff jobs?
Someone will coach them.
But seriously, folks... It may be a bit early in the year, but Somers does do a lot of off-season work that the previous coaches were heavily involved with so there will be some pressure to get someone in place to start winter and pre-season ball.

Briarcliff may be in a better position as I believe it was just the HC that left as opposed to Somers who reportedly lost their entire staff.

These are two very good teams on paper and we may see some shuffling around as other programs might be losing a head coach or top assistant. OB the former Eastchester Head Coach who is now a top assistant at JJCR would be a good candidate, but he may want to stay where he is.

Parents need to start realizing that pushing the coach out may not get you the type of new coach you want, There aren't a glut of top-quality coaches so they have their choice of where to go. No one wants to deal with out-of-control parents. Coaches talk and if there is any of that even suspected, you will have a very hard time getting anyone of quality in your school.

I think the "out of control" parents story is kind of overdone. I know people get frustrated with coaches but I've not really seen it boil all the way up to the coach. In my experience it is people like me chatting to other parents about what they would do differently. In the end it's just boring chatter among parents. I guess the Somers and Briarcliff situations could be different. I think it is hard to get a quality coach at any school at this point.


I agree with both statements above.

Without tipping my hand, I’m a fool parent. But, I don’t want the high school head coach out.

I want him to recognize how poorly the program is running and make significant changes. But, he won’t because he is an average school teacher (in the district) , collecting his pay, is not vested into the sport, lacks specific lax knowledge and experience, has divided priorities and lastly, no desire to be go beyond average.

In this age and within our area, to be an above average coach is rare. Can’t blame the school districts, as most schools are limited with compensation, resources and people with lacrosse experience. Too many schools don’t have specific lacrosse only coaches.

Can we start a list of lacrosse specific coaching staff:
Yorktown: Shurr / Guski
JJ: Bocklet / Bernabo
Kennedy: Savs
Carmel: Caione,
Wappingers: Kuz,
Pleasantville: Kear

Armonk, Bronxville, Chappaqua, Mamaroneck/Larchmont, Rye, Scarsdale, Rye: Affluent + robust youth programs = win, win, for anyone who walks into these high school coaching positions.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Is anyone in Section 1 going to have a more stacked 2025 class than Rye? 4 D1 Commits so far and its only September: Notre Dame, Princeton, Princeton and Villanova.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
can anyone explain how the #11 2025 team in the country only has 2 commits?

Express North has 2 commits so far - UNC, John Hopkins

Prime Time - 8 commits - Duke, Notre Dame x4. Princeton, Georgetown, Airforce

Eclipse- 8- ND, Michigan x2, Yale, UNC, Villanova, Princeton, St Johns

as a dad with a middle schooler, i would like to know what the real issues are
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
And 2way has Princeton, Briwn, Yale, UVM so far
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
can anyone explain how the #11 2025 team in the country only has 2 commits?

Express North has 2 commits so far - UNC, John Hopkins

Prime Time - 8 commits - Duke, Notre Dame x4. Princeton, Georgetown, Airforce

Eclipse- 8- ND, Michigan x2, Yale, UNC, Villanova, Princeton, St Johns

as a dad with a middle schooler, i would like to know what the real issues are
Quality, connections and effort. Best players play for PT, Eclipse and 2 way (likely in that order) but the differentiation is in the program directors.
PT Director- Hussles like no one else, has the connections and track record with college coaches.
Eclipse Directors- All Americans, Captains, Team USA, Darien, etc. Look at their connections and effort and again consistent delivery of players from a hotbed of lacrosse
2Way- Former ND Captain, tied to every prep school in the area, Brunswick pipeline, and smarts.
EN- Mrs S is very nice and you play a lot but there are no connections, effort or track record.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
can anyone explain how the #11 2025 team in the country only has 2 commits?

Express North has 2 commits so far - UNC, John Hopkins

Prime Time - 8 commits - Duke, Notre Dame x4. Princeton, Georgetown, Airforce

Eclipse- 8- ND, Michigan x2, Yale, UNC, Villanova, Princeton, St Johns

as a dad with a middle schooler, i would like to know what the real issues are
Quality, connections and effort. Best players play for PT, Eclipse and 2 way (likely in that order) but the differentiation is in the program directors.
PT Director- Hussles like no one else, has the connections and track record with college coaches.
Eclipse Directors- All Americans, Captains, Team USA, Darien, etc. Look at their connections and effort and again consistent delivery of players from a hotbed of lacrosse
2Way- Former ND Captain, tied to every prep school in the area, Brunswick pipeline, and smarts.
EN- Mrs S is very nice and you play a lot but there are no connections, effort or track record.

I wonder if it more a function of minimal effort rather than an actual lack of connections. My son played for EN - noone from the "head office" ever had a recruiting conversation with us (as a larger group or with my family). Nothing about the process was communiated to us. We were not asked about my sons interest in colleges. In retrospect, it was very strange but at the time I had no idea what was normal.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]can anyone explain how the #11 2025 team in the country only has 2 commits?

Express North has 2 commits so far - UNC, John Hopkins

Prime Time - 8 commits - Duke, Notre Dame x4. Princeton, Georgetown, Airforce

Eclipse- 8- ND, Michigan x2, Yale, UNC, Villanova, Princeton, St Johns

as a dad with a middle schooler, i would like to know what the real issues are


Team rank is irrelevant for recruiting!!!! Training and recruiting track record of the club is all that matters.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
can anyone explain how the #11 2025 team in the country only has 2 commits?

Express North has 2 commits so far - UNC, John Hopkins

Prime Time - 8 commits - Duke, Notre Dame x4. Princeton, Georgetown, Airforce

Eclipse- 8- ND, Michigan x2, Yale, UNC, Villanova, Princeton, St Johns

as a dad with a middle schooler, i would like to know what the real issues are

I think it’s multifactorial each with a different weight. I will say first of all that it is a good tournament club run by well meaning people. They always play in the best tournaments and you get a lot of them, both fall and summer.

However for recruiting it is an combination of three things ranked from most likely to least likely:

1) recruiting effort - it just falls flat. The effort is not there. I don’t know if it’s a lack of caring or lack of personnel to put in the groundwork but the other clubs definitely outwork them on effort. I remember a yale commit a few years back who was doing all the work themselves.

2) recruiting connections - I believe they have them. Maybe not as deep as the other clubs which becomes a self fulfilling prophecy year after year as clubs ahead of them lengthen their recruiting lead and leverage which each year that goes by

3) talent - maybe not as talented as the other clubs. But they are a program that will have 1-2 high D1s, 1-2 mid/low d1s, 1-2 high d3 and the rest lower d2 / d3.

TL:DR - great tournament club as you get a lot of tourneys for your money. But don’t expect as much help on the recruiting side and expect to put the work in yourself through video, email, prospect days and showcases. But in my opinion, I still feel like your high school is much more important for recruiting than club with some exceptions, if you want to go to a high level program. I actually think it is very unlikely to play high d1 (top 15) without a solid connection, either high school or club assuming the talent is also there
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Schreiber should get rid of Morgan and bring back Potash - that 2025 team is a mess
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
3 more commits for pt

Michigan, loyolax2 makes 11
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Primetime is a 15 to 20 lock per year quality. The kids who keep at it every year get the results. No complaints for this 3x kid paying customer hoping for 3 for 3 girls and boys.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My son plays for a lower level club. Team was at Prime Time's tournament this year though. I literally saw with my own eyes the hustle and effort the prime time coaches/directors (really just people with PT golf shirts from my point of view) had with college coaches from all over.

Also keep in mind that announced commits don't always mean a lot. Many of these kids come from families with money, and there is not a lot of scholarship money available for lax anyway. All D1 teams have absolutely huge rosters, and if your lax playing son wants to go to a certain school, the school will take him. Just like the school will take anyone who applies and gets in. All of these commits are subject to admission anyway. Whether or not the kid ever plays is not something the school really cares about. The best players will play, whoever they are or wherever they come from. By way of example, I know of a kid who never played a meaningful minute in HS, only played at the lowest of the lowest levels for club, and at the town level was basically the worst kid on the team. He committed to a D-3 program with all the typical instagram fan fair. He will never step on the field while a game is still contested. I get that kids at Prime Time, Two Way, etc are not this, but there is a bit of "so what" to the commit game. Without a doubt, some of these commits will never see the field at a meaningful time in a game. But if the kid is going to the school he wants to go to, does well academically, and is happy, so what.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
i dont know what you are smoking but your wrong- you cant just commit to a top lax / academic school
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
i dont know what you are smoking but your wrong- you cant just commit to a top lax / academic school

You are the one who is "smoking". Your reading comprehension is horrible. So is your statement, which makes little to no sense. Isn't this forum moderated?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son plays for a lower level club. Team was at Prime Time's tournament this year though. I literally saw with my own eyes the hustle and effort the prime time coaches/directors (really just people with PT golf shirts from my point of view) had with college coaches from all over.

Also keep in mind that announced commits don't always mean a lot. Many of these kids come from families with money, and there is not a lot of scholarship money available for lax anyway. All D1 teams have absolutely huge rosters, and if your lax playing son wants to go to a certain school, the school will take him. Just like the school will take anyone who applies and gets in. All of these commits are subject to admission anyway. Whether or not the kid ever plays is not something the school really cares about. The best players will play, whoever they are or wherever they come from. By way of example, I know of a kid who never played a meaningful minute in HS, only played at the lowest of the lowest levels for club, and at the town level was basically the worst kid on the team. He committed to a D-3 program with all the typical instagram fan fair. He will never step on the field while a game is still contested. I get that kids at Prime Time, Two Way, etc are not this, but there is a bit of "so what" to the commit game. Without a doubt, some of these commits will never see the field at a meaningful time in a game. But if the kid is going to the school he wants to go to, does well academically, and is happy, so what.

I agree with a lot of this except strongly disagree that any school will take anyone and never play them. There are only so many slots despite the hugs roster size. There are plenty of lacrosse kids who get in academically but don’t get a walk on slot. That is more the norm. These schools don’t just take anyone, even if they have the academics + money
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son plays for a lower level club. Team was at Prime Time's tournament this year though. I literally saw with my own eyes the hustle and effort the prime time coaches/directors (really just people with PT golf shirts from my point of view) had with college coaches from all over.

Also keep in mind that announced commits don't always mean a lot. Many of these kids come from families with money, and there is not a lot of scholarship money available for lax anyway. All D1 teams have absolutely huge rosters, and if your lax playing son wants to go to a certain school, the school will take him. Just like the school will take anyone who applies and gets in. All of these commits are subject to admission anyway. Whether or not the kid ever plays is not something the school really cares about. The best players will play, whoever they are or wherever they come from. By way of example, I know of a kid who never played a meaningful minute in HS, only played at the lowest of the lowest levels for club, and at the town level was basically the worst kid on the team. He committed to a D-3 program with all the typical instagram fan fair. He will never step on the field while a game is still contested. I get that kids at Prime Time, Two Way, etc are not this, but there is a bit of "so what" to the commit game. Without a doubt, some of these commits will never see the field at a meaningful time in a game. But if the kid is going to the school he wants to go to, does well academically, and is happy, so what.

I agree with a lot of this except strongly disagree that any school will take anyone and never play them. There are only so many slots despite the hugs roster size. There are plenty of lacrosse kids who get in academically but don’t get a walk on slot. That is more the norm. These schools don’t just take anyone, even if they have the academics + money

Never play vs never play in a meaningful part of the game are two different things. I qualified my statement to include only the later. It is absolutely true that some of these 2025 already announced D1 commits will not see the field at a meaningful time in a game. A certain number of those in this category will transfer somewhere, where they may or may not get meaningful time, while others will stay on the team or just stay at the school.

The programs mentioned in recent posts push D1, and have kids who want D1. These kids are all exceptional players to varying degrees, and they all have the potential to be contributors at the D1 level. If scholarship money is used up on players deemed better by the coaches, and the kid can get admitted and pay on his own, nearly all, if not all, D1 programs will take a kid with a Prime Time, Eclipse, etc pedigree. And if the coach is a good guy, and I think most of them are, it will come with a disclaimer such as "as of now you are not projected to get meaningful playing time, but if you work hard, practice well, and earn time, you will get it"
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
"All D1 teams have absolutely huge rosters, and if your lax playing son wants to go to a certain school, the school will take him. Just like the school will take anyone who applies and gets in. "

you are wrong!!!! is that clear enough for you!! you cannot just write a check and go to harvard, duke princeton unc
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
"All D1 teams have absolutely huge rosters, and if your lax playing son wants to go to a certain school, the school will take him. Just like the school will take anyone who applies and gets in. "

you are wrong!!!! is that clear enough for you!! you cannot just write a check and go to harvard, duke princeton unc

"... who applies AND GETS IN".

Why is this so hard to understand?? If your kid wants to go to D1 school XYZ and be on the lax team, and he can get admitted academically to the school without any help from the lax coach, and you can pay full tuition and board (either with $ or loans), and he plays on one of the blue blood travel lax teams, the coach will take him, and the kid and the travel lax program can promote the "commit". There is not a coach in America who is telling a Prime Time kid "no, you can't be on my team" when the kid calls and says "yours is my dream school, I can get in on my own, I don't need scholarship money, and I will work my [Censored] off to earn playing time". That is why Prime Time kids (and kids from programs like them) largely dictate where they go, not the other way around. Keep in mind that this dynamic exists because of how little scholarship money is available. Sure, some of these elite talents come from more modest backgrounds and have no choice but to follow the money. And many of them may be driven by where the playing time seems maximized. But at the end of the day, these kids can largely pick their own school (if they want to), subject to admission.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
"All D1 teams have absolutely huge rosters, and if your lax playing son wants to go to a certain school, the school will take him. Just like the school will take anyone who applies and gets in. "

you are wrong!!!! is that clear enough for you!! you cannot just write a check and go to harvard, duke princeton unc

"... who applies AND GETS IN".

Why is this so hard to understand?? If your kid wants to go to D1 school XYZ and be on the lax team, and he can get admitted academically to the school without any help from the lax coach, and you can pay full tuition and board (either with $ or loans), and he plays on one of the blue blood travel lax teams, the coach will take him, and the kid and the travel lax program can promote the "commit". There is not a coach in America who is telling a Prime Time kid "no, you can't be on my team" when the kid calls and says "yours is my dream school, I can get in on my own, I don't need scholarship money, and I will work my [Censored] off to earn playing time". That is why Prime Time kids (and kids from programs like them) largely dictate where they go, not the other way around. Keep in mind that this dynamic exists because of how little scholarship money is available. Sure, some of these elite talents come from more modest backgrounds and have no choice but to follow the money. And many of them may be driven by where the playing time seems maximized. But at the end of the day, these kids can largely pick their own school (if they want to), subject to admission.
How does that kid coach convo go? Hi Coach, you didnt want me as a recruit but Im here anyway. What time is practice?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son plays for a lower level club. Team was at Prime Time's tournament this year though. I literally saw with my own eyes the hustle and effort the prime time coaches/directors (really just people with PT golf shirts from my point of view) had with college coaches from all over.

Also keep in mind that announced commits don't always mean a lot. Many of these kids come from families with money, and there is not a lot of scholarship money available for lax anyway. All D1 teams have absolutely huge rosters, and if your lax playing son wants to go to a certain school, the school will take him. Just like the school will take anyone who applies and gets in. All of these commits are subject to admission anyway. Whether or not the kid ever plays is not something the school really cares about. The best players will play, whoever they are or wherever they come from. By way of example, I know of a kid who never played a meaningful minute in HS, only played at the lowest of the lowest levels for club, and at the town level was basically the worst kid on the team. He committed to a D-3 program with all the typical instagram fan fair. He will never step on the field while a game is still contested. I get that kids at Prime Time, Two Way, etc are not this, but there is a bit of "so what" to the commit game. Without a doubt, some of these commits will never see the field at a meaningful time in a game. But if the kid is going to the school he wants to go to, does well academically, and is happy, so what.

I agree with a lot of this except strongly disagree that any school will take anyone and never play them. There are only so many slots despite the hugs roster size. There are plenty of lacrosse kids who get in academically but don’t get a walk on slot. That is more the norm. These schools don’t just take anyone, even if they have the academics + money

Never play vs never play in a meaningful part of the game are two different things. I qualified my statement to include only the later. It is absolutely true that some of these 2025 already announced D1 commits will not see the field at a meaningful time in a game. A certain number of those in this category will transfer somewhere, where they may or may not get meaningful time, while others will stay on the team or just stay at the school.

The programs mentioned in recent posts push D1, and have kids who want D1. These kids are all exceptional players to varying degrees, and they all have the potential to be contributors at the D1 level. If scholarship money is used up on players deemed better by the coaches, and the kid can get admitted and pay on his own, nearly all, if not all, D1 programs will take a kid with a Prime Time, Eclipse, etc pedigree. And if the coach is a good guy, and I think most of them are, it will come with a disclaimer such as "as of now you are not projected to get meaningful playing time, but if you work hard, practice well, and earn time, you will get it"


Don’t disagree that the bottom of the roster has a bunch of kids who will never or rarely see the field. My disagreement is that these schools and/or teams will take anyone just because you applied. Any even if you are fortunate enough to get in, not all walk ons make the team. In fact it’s quite the opposite.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
at the end of the day- the issue is really that a kid from Westchester/Fairfield county will have almost an impossible time getting into an ivy. Lacrosse is opening doors, look at RYe - Villanova, Princeton, ND . Somers- Brown, ND. etc.

so when you say "if a kid can get in on his own" thats not the norm at an Ivy or top ranked school.
zero pot of gold at the end of the rainbow unless you can leverage athleticism for admission to a good school

If a kid plays for PT , or Eclipse etc, are many kids going to just show up at lehigh and try and play? especially when they can go to Nescac maybe or a really good lax school salisbury etc
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
"All D1 teams have absolutely huge rosters, and if your lax playing son wants to go to a certain school, the school will take him. Just like the school will take anyone who applies and gets in. "

you are wrong!!!! is that clear enough for you!! you cannot just write a check and go to harvard, duke princeton unc

"... who applies AND GETS IN".

Why is this so hard to understand?? If your kid wants to go to D1 school XYZ and be on the lax team, and he can get admitted academically to the school without any help from the lax coach, and you can pay full tuition and board (either with $ or loans), and he plays on one of the blue blood travel lax teams, the coach will take him, and the kid and the travel lax program can promote the "commit". There is not a coach in America who is telling a Prime Time kid "no, you can't be on my team" when the kid calls and says "yours is my dream school, I can get in on my own, I don't need scholarship money, and I will work my [Censored] off to earn playing time". That is why Prime Time kids (and kids from programs like them) largely dictate where they go, not the other way around. Keep in mind that this dynamic exists because of how little scholarship money is available. Sure, some of these elite talents come from more modest backgrounds and have no choice but to follow the money. And many of them may be driven by where the playing time seems maximized. But at the end of the day, these kids can largely pick their own school (if they want to), subject to admission.

No. You could not be further from the truth. There are far more dynamics at play. Roster size is not unlimited, particularly in lacrosse. You have budgets, space, travel limits, roster size restrictions, Title IX and more all to contend with. Simply playing for a blue-chip club team and getting in the school on your own does not mean he has a spot on the team. IT DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY.
Full Stop.
Putting this out there does not make it true and is factually incorrect. Please stop saying this, it is patently false.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
"All D1 teams have absolutely huge rosters, and if your lax playing son wants to go to a certain school, the school will take him. Just like the school will take anyone who applies and gets in. "

you are wrong!!!! is that clear enough for you!! you cannot just write a check and go to harvard, duke princeton unc

"... who applies AND GETS IN".

Why is this so hard to understand?? If your kid wants to go to D1 school XYZ and be on the lax team, and he can get admitted academically to the school without any help from the lax coach, and you can pay full tuition and board (either with $ or loans), and he plays on one of the blue blood travel lax teams, the coach will take him, and the kid and the travel lax program can promote the "commit". There is not a coach in America who is telling a Prime Time kid "no, you can't be on my team" when the kid calls and says "yours is my dream school, I can get in on my own, I don't need scholarship money, and I will work my [Censored] off to earn playing time". That is why Prime Time kids (and kids from programs like them) largely dictate where they go, not the other way around. Keep in mind that this dynamic exists because of how little scholarship money is available. Sure, some of these elite talents come from more modest backgrounds and have no choice but to follow the money. And many of them may be driven by where the playing time seems maximized. But at the end of the day, these kids can largely pick their own school (if they want to), subject to admission.

No. You could not be further from the truth. There are far more dynamics at play. Roster size is not unlimited, particularly in lacrosse. You have budgets, space, travel limits, roster size restrictions, Title IX and more all to contend with. Simply playing for a blue-chip club team and getting in the school on your own does not mean he has a spot on the team. IT DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY.
Full Stop.
Putting this out there does not make it true and is factually incorrect. Please stop saying this, it is patently false.
Can Mr This is True give an example across an ACC or Ivy where this actually happened. Your sceario is, no conversation with the coach during recruiting, get in to the school on own, played for any club at this point and made the team. Playing time not relevant but actually on the roster.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Any news on Somers, Arlington, Briarlciff HC hirings?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any news on Somers, Arlington, Briarlciff HC hirings?
Arlington still vacant
Somers, haven't heard anything, likely nothing official until after the new year.
Briarcliff - assistant is taking over with AM perhaps coming back after his son finishes college?

Tough time to have a vacancy. Schedules just came out and it's this is when non-league matchups are put together. Tough to do if you don't have a coach to speak with. Typically, most districts don't formally make the hire until Jan Feb board meetings so who knows?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
"All D1 teams have absolutely huge rosters, and if your lax playing son wants to go to a certain school, the school will take him. Just like the school will take anyone who applies and gets in. "

you are wrong!!!! is that clear enough for you!! you cannot just write a check and go to harvard, duke princeton unc

"... who applies AND GETS IN".

Why is this so hard to understand?? If your kid wants to go to D1 school XYZ and be on the lax team, and he can get admitted academically to the school without any help from the lax coach, and you can pay full tuition and board (either with $ or loans), and he plays on one of the blue blood travel lax teams, the coach will take him, and the kid and the travel lax program can promote the "commit". There is not a coach in America who is telling a Prime Time kid "no, you can't be on my team" when the kid calls and says "yours is my dream school, I can get in on my own, I don't need scholarship money, and I will work my [Censored] off to earn playing time". That is why Prime Time kids (and kids from programs like them) largely dictate where they go, not the other way around. Keep in mind that this dynamic exists because of how little scholarship money is available. Sure, some of these elite talents come from more modest backgrounds and have no choice but to follow the money. And many of them may be driven by where the playing time seems maximized. But at the end of the day, these kids can largely pick their own school (if they want to), subject to admission.

No. You could not be further from the truth. There are far more dynamics at play. Roster size is not unlimited, particularly in lacrosse. You have budgets, space, travel limits, roster size restrictions, Title IX and more all to contend with. Simply playing for a blue-chip club team and getting in the school on your own does not mean he has a spot on the team. IT DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY.
Full Stop.
Putting this out there does not make it true and is factually incorrect. Please stop saying this, it is patently false.
Can Mr This is True give an example across an ACC or Ivy where this actually happened. Your sceario is, no conversation with the coach during recruiting, get in to the school on own, played for any club at this point and made the team. Playing time not relevant but actually on the roster.
I have numerous kids that played for me. High level club programs, got to the schools on their own and tried to walk on. A few made it, more didn't.

The point is this: you don't just get a spot because you showed up. There are recruited/scholarship then preferred walk-on spots all in-line in front of you THEN you still need to tryout and earn your spot.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any news on Somers, Arlington, Briarlciff HC hirings?
Somers is going to have the toughest time as they have to replace the entire staff - JV Included. When the admin gives the parents too much power - or any for that matter - that word gets around the coaching community real quick.

We are at a time now where there are more high-quality coaches in the stands than on the sidelines. Admins and Districts are shooting themselves in the foot by trying to placate demanding parents instead of supporting their coaching staffs. We are seeing it more and more and its across many sports. Yeah you can get a person to occupy the position of "coach" but that doesn't mean you will be successful.

Push to fire the coach because your kid didn't get playing time he didn't earn last year? Okay. Now he has the playing time, for a "coach" will limited experience and isn't developing players/teams. This year the team is worse off because shockingly, the players on the field didn't magically get better, the better players saw the writing on the wall and 1-2 left for private school, the coach can't adjust because he doesn't have the experience or he's trying to make sure everyone get's playing time to quiet the - largely small, but loud - group of parents. AD or Superintendents detest getting complaint emails all season, so they let that coach go. Third coach in 3 years....

Rinse, repeat.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
"All D1 teams have absolutely huge rosters, and if your lax playing son wants to go to a certain school, the school will take him. Just like the school will take anyone who applies and gets in. "

you are wrong!!!! is that clear enough for you!! you cannot just write a check and go to harvard, duke princeton unc

"... who applies AND GETS IN".

Why is this so hard to understand?? If your kid wants to go to D1 school XYZ and be on the lax team, and he can get admitted academically to the school without any help from the lax coach, and you can pay full tuition and board (either with $ or loans), and he plays on one of the blue blood travel lax teams, the coach will take him, and the kid and the travel lax program can promote the "commit". There is not a coach in America who is telling a Prime Time kid "no, you can't be on my team" when the kid calls and says "yours is my dream school, I can get in on my own, I don't need scholarship money, and I will work my [Censored] off to earn playing time". That is why Prime Time kids (and kids from programs like them) largely dictate where they go, not the other way around. Keep in mind that this dynamic exists because of how little scholarship money is available. Sure, some of these elite talents come from more modest backgrounds and have no choice but to follow the money. And many of them may be driven by where the playing time seems maximized. But at the end of the day, these kids can largely pick their own school (if they want to), subject to admission.

No. You could not be further from the truth. There are far more dynamics at play. Roster size is not unlimited, particularly in lacrosse. You have budgets, space, travel limits, roster size restrictions, Title IX and more all to contend with. Simply playing for a blue-chip club team and getting in the school on your own does not mean he has a spot on the team. IT DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY.
Full Stop.
Putting this out there does not make it true and is factually incorrect. Please stop saying this, it is patently false.
Can Mr This is True give an example across an ACC or Ivy where this actually happened. Your sceario is, no conversation with the coach during recruiting, get in to the school on own, played for any club at this point and made the team. Playing time not relevant but actually on the roster.
I have numerous kids that played for me. High level club programs, got to the schools on their own and tried to walk on. A few made it, more didn't.

The point is this: you don't just get a spot because you showed up. There are recruited/scholarship then preferred walk-on spots all in-line in front of you THEN you still need to tryout and earn your spot.

Truth. I have no idea what the guy is saying about getting into school and just showing up to practice and bam, you are the team. That’s just fool talk.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
ok - Commitment update

Prime time: 4 kids Notre Dame , Airforce, Michigan, Loyola x2, Georgetown, 2 princeton , Duke, =12

Eclipse- 2 ND, BU, St Johns, Yale, Princeton, UNC, Villanova, Michigan x2= 11

Express North- UNC, Hopkins, Yale- 3
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Dont forget 2 way - Yale, ND, Brownx2, Princeton, Vermont=6
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Dont forget 2 way - Yale, ND, Brownx2, Princeton, Vermont=6
7 local kids to the defending National Champions, wow! That has to be more than half ND's recruiting class.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Noticed on IG that Westchester Warriors are having a mid-week (11/14-15) sixes HS tournament and they have at least 8 schools signed up.
I think it's a great opportunity to add in the fall.

Also, heard that Fox Lane lacrosse had a 6v6 or 8v8 play-day this past weekend.

To bad there are only a few coaches willing to break from tradition and introduce different opportunities, especially in the off season.
My son's HS coach wants to only teach and reinforce spring season drills/concepts. Even though he cannot get enough players to do full field drills.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any predictions for Somers & Bcliff jobs?
Someone will coach them.
But seriously, folks... It may be a bit early in the year, but Somers does do a lot of off-season work that the previous coaches were heavily involved with so there will be some pressure to get someone in place to start winter and pre-season ball.

Briarcliff may be in a better position as I believe it was just the HC that left as opposed to Somers who reportedly lost their entire staff.

These are two very good teams on paper and we may see some shuffling around as other programs might be losing a head coach or top assistant. OB the former Eastchester Head Coach who is now a top assistant at JJCR would be a good candidate, but he may want to stay where he is.

Parents need to start realizing that pushing the coach out may not get you the type of new coach you want, There aren't a glut of top-quality coaches so they have their choice of where to go. No one wants to deal with out-of-control parents. Coaches talk and if there is any of that even suspected, you will have a very hard time getting anyone of quality in your school.

I think the "out of control" parents story is kind of overdone. I know people get frustrated with coaches but I've not really seen it boil all the way up to the coach. In my experience it is people like me chatting to other parents about what they would do differently. In the end it's just boring chatter among parents. I guess the Somers and Briarcliff situations could be different. I think it is hard to get a quality coach at any school at this point.
Then you are not paying attention. It is happening across multiple sports and has been a issue in lacrosse in several programs. When you look at coaches leaving a program, its a safe bet - though not always - that a disgruntled yet ill-informed parent(s) is/are involved.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Coaching Carousel updates:

Somers - No news
Briarcliff - seems like the asst will be keeping the seat warm until AM's kid graduates college
Arlington - no one yet
Bronxville - according to their social media. This is a bit surprising as he was there only 1 season. That is a solid program with great returning talent and Spillane is a great coach.

These are all contending programs without head coaches. I think you are going to see some HC movement here with these openings.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Somers with a solid hire. Jordan Hirsch as HC and Chris Spillane over from Bronxville.
Just announced on twitter.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Coaching Carousel updates:

Somers - No news
Briarcliff - seems like the asst will be keeping the seat warm until AM's kid graduates college
Arlington - no one yet
Bronxville - according to their social media. This is a bit surprising as he was there only 1 season. That is a solid program with great returning talent and Spillane is a great coach.

These are all contending programs without head coaches. I think you are going to see some HC movement here with these openings.

Somers - Jordan Hirsch
Briarcliff - may NOT have a new HC this year - it depends on who you ask
Arlington - Bryan O'Gorman per Arlington twitter.
Bronxville - open, but early in the process. This should attract a solid hire, there is a lot of talent there and would contend for a Sectional Title vs. Pleasantviille.

Anyone else missing?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Great to see new (and old) upcoming local fall HS lax events:

Battle of Yorktown, Section One Sixis and Annual Battle at the Big House are happening next month.

Battle of Y, Nov. 10, brings West Genny down to play Iona, Step, Greeley, L/P, Pelham and Y.
It will be interesting to see who is running the sidelines for the public schools. Will it be the school coaches or parents. I believe Greeley will have the best results.

Section1sixes, Nov 14-15 at Lakeland HS: Looks to be a fun event and they have 8 teams already. Money on the P’ville team to win that

The 7th Annual Battle at the Big House (O Town) is a youth & HS tournament on Nov 4.

Kudos to those that are leading these opportunities.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
lol .. Greeley!! lets see them play a real schedule first..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
interesting thing about Greeley, while every program with the exception of Rye is dying , Potash is building a culture at Greeley !!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
interesting thing about Greeley, while every program with the exception of Rye is dying , Potash is building a culture at Greeley !!!

Wow, the Kool-Aid you're drinking is silly. So, please think about these points:

1. Has Greeley ever won or even competed for a chip? (talk about being a dying program),
2. Potash has lead the revitalization of the youth program?!? I'll give that credit to Gashi, despite not liking him.
3. Every program...is dying. So, let me guess what your excuse will be for not winning the 2024 chip; "blame the refs"

I'm the person that picked Greeley at the Y battle. Because, I believe their Jr class and grades below are stacked.

Take the compliment, enjoy the moment and do not put down other programs, just to pump-up your insecurities.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
i think you have misunderstood the comment - while many programs are losing quality players to boarding schools or local schools like Wick, Iona, Stepinac, Greeley has been doing a very strong job. I for one see Greeley youth lacrosse all over the place 12 months a year , Potash is always coaching these kids, Potash is coaching those juniors at Express North, point is, Greeley is def on the rise up . no one is implying they will win the championship . but making great strides
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I’m not sure how he picks Greeley against the likes of Iona and Stepinac. Greeley had a very weak schedule last year. Iona and Step played very tough ones. Building takes time. Test yourself against tough opponents. See where you stand. Making that type of prediction is a bit early.. kudos to those guys putting the time in to better the program, it takes a lot of time and work.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
You can’t compare a school district to a private school like step or Iona
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
exactly.. so how can someone say Greeley will have the best results?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
exactly.. so how can someone say Greeley will have the best results?

Well, I did not say the most wins. Of course, what my definition of best results differs from yours.

I believe Greeley’s field performance will raise the needle of the awareness and some people might consider them a little more seriously.

It's just a guess and I don’t have a dog in the fight (or in that tournament). Just an avid HV laxer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
exactly.. so how can someone say Greeley will have the best results?
Because, like the parents of these young Greeley classes have been espousing about multiple state championships coming - none of it matters until you do it on the field. And you do it against quality opponents. The youth teams have been good the last couple of years, but once they hit high school and are suddenly playing outside their own age group they don't do as well.

I give them credit for jumping in this stacked group of teams. While it is fall ball and won't be the full roster for anyone, it will be a nice early test for 2025. Listening to mom and dad - who are also the same people running the youth program - constantly tell you how good you are because you beat Yorktown in 7th grade and then not getting the coaching needed in high school is not going to be a successful combination.

The idea that there is some fool culture building at Greeley is laughable. It's being run like a club team, which isn't going to be a long-term success. They loaded up goals against weaker teams and there is no substantive defense. Maybe it gets better this year but Potash is one of the only people on that staff that knows lacrosse. The best players have defected to private school and it remains to be seen whether they can put a more competative schedule for 2025 - and if they do and then lose to those tougher teams, then what?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
exactly.. so how can someone say Greeley will have the best results?

Well, I did not say the most wins. Of course, what my definition of best results differs from yours.

I believe Greeley’s field performance will raise the needle of the awareness and some people might consider them a little more seriously.

It's just a guess and I don’t have a dog in the fight (or in that tournament). Just an avid HV laxer.
If they try to play 2025 like they did 2024 against a tougher schedule - they won't. There is little development there, no defense and coaches playing favorites for their club players, it will not work.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
lets assume for a moment that everything above about greeley is true, weak schedule etc etc etc , other than Rye, who else is actually any good anymore?

John Jay is sliding off a cliff
Yorktown is the same

who has a good team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
exactly.. so how can someone say Greeley will have the best results?
Because, like the parents of these young Greeley classes have been espousing about multiple state championships coming - none of it matters until you do it on the field. And you do it against quality opponents. The youth teams have been good the last couple of years, but once they hit high school and are suddenly playing outside their own age group they don't do as well.

I give them credit for jumping in this stacked group of teams. While it is fall ball and won't be the full roster for anyone, it will be a nice early test for 2025. Listening to mom and dad - who are also the same people running the youth program - constantly tell you how good you are because you beat Yorktown in 7th grade and then not getting the coaching needed in high school is not going to be a successful combination.

The idea that there is some fool culture building at Greeley is laughable. It's being run like a club team, which isn't going to be a long-term success. They loaded up goals against weaker teams and there is no substantive defense. Maybe it gets better this year but Potash is one of the only people on that staff that knows lacrosse. The best players have defected to private school and it remains to be seen whether they can put a more competative schedule for 2025 - and if they do and then lose to those tougher teams, then what?
.

Let's pivot, let's discuss Potash and similar like minded HS coaches.

Seems to me that more schools (Yorktown, John Jay, Somers and Arlington) are going outside the school district pool of candidates for hires. Good for them.

Is Potash in the Chapp school district?

Also, it's good to see singular sport coaching going on! Too many school districts rely upon their own staff to field coaches and it's a mixed bag of talent.

What other schools have outsiders and/or specific lacrosse coaches?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You can’t compare a school district to a private school like step or Iona

They do it in the FCIAC all the time. They play Chaminade, St. Anthony's, Brunswick, Ione Prep, Step, Fairfield prep, etc.

win some, lose some but don't shy away from it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
lets assume for a moment that everything above about greeley is true, weak schedule etc etc etc , other than Rye, who else is actually any good anymore?

John Jay is sliding off a cliff
Yorktown is the same

who has a good team
There is plenty....
John Jay maybe has 1-2 more good years and then it's rebuilding for them - which is still a good team for Section 1
Yorktown's demise has been predicted for years and yet they are still in the Sectional Final every year. I believe the demise there when I see it.
Pleasentville has almost everyone back from last year
Scarsdale has to make up some graduations, but the barn is stacked there
Mamaroneck reloads
Bronxville has a lot of talent back
Rye is loaded
Briarcliff? Could be an interesting matchup for people
Mahopac is a threat to everyone
What is Somers going to be?
Can the middle of the road teams step up? Byram, Carmel, Lakeland, Haldane, North Rockland, Tappan Zee, etc. It's gonna be an interesting 2025.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
exactly.. so how can someone say Greeley will have the best results?
Because, like the parents of these young Greeley classes have been espousing about multiple state championships coming - none of it matters until you do it on the field. And you do it against quality opponents. The youth teams have been good the last couple of years, but once they hit high school and are suddenly playing outside their own age group they don't do as well.

I give them credit for jumping in this stacked group of teams. While it is fall ball and won't be the full roster for anyone, it will be a nice early test for 2025. Listening to mom and dad - who are also the same people running the youth program - constantly tell you how good you are because you beat Yorktown in 7th grade and then not getting the coaching needed in high school is not going to be a successful combination.

The idea that there is some fool culture building at Greeley is laughable. It's being run like a club team, which isn't going to be a long-term success. They loaded up goals against weaker teams and there is no substantive defense. Maybe it gets better this year but Potash is one of the only people on that staff that knows lacrosse. The best players have defected to private school and it remains to be seen whether they can put a more competative schedule for 2025 - and if they do and then lose to those tougher teams, then what?
.

Let's pivot, let's discuss Potash and similar like minded HS coaches.

Seems to me that more schools (Yorktown, John Jay, Somers and Arlington) are going outside the school district pool of candidates for hires. Good for them.

Is Potash in the Chapp school district?

Also, it's good to see singular sport coaching going on! Too many school districts rely upon their own staff to field coaches and it's a mixed bag of talent.

What other schools have outsiders and/or specific lacrosse coaches?
This isn't exactly new... The last in-district coach for Greeley was probably Colesy - which should be everything you need to know about coaching there.
Many districts have coaches that aren't teaching/working in the district in other capacities. Some are though but that is more the exception than the rule.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Agreed with Yorktown,been hearing about there demise, then they go win a section. Their whole defense is coming back this year. They will probably be the favorites this year. I think Somers is the big question. They disappointed last season. They have the horses, hopefully the new coach will get them straight.
The lower westchester teams all reload. Mahopac is well coached. Can’t count JJ out with Bocklet there.
Should be a good year with good competition
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Fall ball starts this weekend, 2025 Prime Time, Eclipse and 2 Way are at Igloo on Long Island, and Express North is in Maryland.

Recruiting results so far

PT -12 commits
Eclipse- 12 commits
2 way -9
Express North - 4
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
why the heck would you go to Maryland when all the college coaches are on Long Island? no wonder ..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Get over this express nonsense and leave. Morgan is an ego maniac. Schreiber is not going to get rid of him! Leave asap
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
An interesting combination of teams this week for the Battle of Yorktown. Obviously, no one is at full strength and it's fall ball so expectations should be dialed back a bit, but what are we all thinking of who will show well?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Its nice to see a competitive LOCAL tournament. Apparently 20 plus college coaches will be in attendance . Great for the kids
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
20 college coaches?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
20 college coaches?

I'm guessing at least the following (local) schools:

DI: Albany, Marist, Manhattan, Iona, Sacred Heart & Fairfield.
DII: Mercy & Pace
DIII: Manhattanville, West Conn & Vassar.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Anyone at Yorktown today? How’d everyone look?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Stepinac missing kids for football. Iona probably looked the best. Beat town 7-5. They also beat west Genny not sure who else they played
Greeley won 3 games they looked gassed by the 4 th game against West Genny
Town beat Step, WestGenny and Lakeland lost to Iona
Not sure how Pelham and Lakeland did.
Nice little tournament about 25 coaches on the sideline.
Notables were Loyola, holy cross, Fairfield, Albany, Marist.
Good opportunity for those kids who don’t have a chance to play in front of a lot of coaches.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Any insight as to why Bronxville coach left? Solid program with talent so a bit confusing
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any insight as to why Bronxville coach left? Solid program with talent so a bit confusing
I'm guessing here, but he lives in Somers so going there as an assistant makes it a much easier to make work for him and his family?

This may be a shocker, but coaches aren't paid a ton especially compared to the time needed to put into it so not having to drive to Bronxville to somers twice a day adds up over the course of a season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
what the heck happened to John Jay in the sixes tourney 0-5?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what the heck happened to John Jay in the sixes tourney 0-5?

Wouldn't stress over their results (or Arlington's too). Unfortunately, this exhibition also conflicted with the beginning of Section 1 Winter sports and everyone should know, that Basketball and Wrestling are highly regarded at JJ.

Next year, Savs' should consider hosting this on Tuesday, Nov 5 (election day; school is not in session) and it won't conflict with Winter Sports.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Potash is building something special!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Coaching Carousel Updates.

There's some interesting new(er) vacancies in Section 1.

New for 2024
Somers - Hired Jordan Hirsch, Chris Spillane (Bronxville) as Assistant
Arlington - Bryan O'Gorman
Briarcliff - Ryan Tirelli

Vacancies
Bronxville - this has to be the most desired vacancy. It will be interesting to see who they get and will it mean more movement?
Harrison
Hastings/Combo

Another point that is often not as public is there are a number of assistant coaching vacancies across Section 1. They have been harder to fill each year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Potash is building something special!!
Congrats to Greeley on the Sixes trophy. But let's ease up on the celebration. Greeley under Potash has shown they can score goals in high numbers against teams with little defense. Sixes is a purely offensive mindset and it plays to their strength. Good on them for capitalizing and a good showing. It takes nothing away from that accomplishment for a fall tourney.

Jay had a not-great showing and that is not going to be reflective of where they are come spring. Arlington too. It is a good measure of what the teams look like in the fall. Panas had two teams and battled each other going deep.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
its not about winning or losing, but what this is about is town culture and kids showing up in a fun environment . With that said, is it true the seniors at JJ decided not to play in this event?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Potash is building something special!!
Congrats to Greeley on the Sixes trophy. But let's ease up on the celebration. Greeley under Potash has shown they can score goals in high numbers against teams with little defense. Sixes is a purely offensive mindset and it plays to their strength. Good on them for capitalizing and a good showing. It takes nothing away from that accomplishment for a fall tourney.

Jay had a not-great showing and that is not going to be reflective of where they are come spring. Arlington too. It is a good measure of what the teams look like in the fall. Panas had two teams and battled each other going deep.

To your point, sixes has no poles, and depending on who shows up, a team may be playing a ton of kids who haven't touched a short stick since 4th grade. Also has no FO. The lacrosse that counts is tactical with FO and D (with of course 4 poles) paramount. Also, I could be wrong, but everyone shows up for the games in the Spring.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Lots of excuses. Everyone is in the same boat with missing normal players. If you going to make excuses when you lose, don't compete. I'm surprised someone has commented that Greeley had a soft schedule in the sixes like their spring season. Coming off a few years of bad losses to the likes of Pville, Arlington, Yorktown, Mahopac, none of those teams would play Greeley in the 2023 season. Ask those coaches. They scheduled who they could schedule. The schedule will be much different this year. For those who think the formula at Greeley doesn't work in High School, the talent just got to high school... The youth program kicked in when the 2025 class was in kindergarten. Do the math, they are here now. 2025s and down. The script has yet to be written.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Potash for President
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Oh boy…
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Are we witnessing the downfall of 91 tristate? They seem to be getting worse and worse every year. They claim to be “AA” but still play in low level tournaments and still don’t win anything. Won’t be surprised if they aren’t around in 4-5 years IMO.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
not trying to be mean, but 91 has never told anyone they were AA , if thats what you believed when you joined, then your not paying attention - Mike B is a great coach and a great teacher
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
not trying to be mean, but 91 has never told anyone they were AA , if thats what you believed when you joined, then your not paying attention - Mike B is a great coach and a great teacher
#facts. Great PEOPLE run that program so there will always be a place for them. Maybe youre not AA and thats your problem.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are we witnessing the downfall of 91 tristate? They seem to be getting worse and worse every year. They claim to be “AA” but still play in low level tournaments and still don’t win anything. Won’t be surprised if they aren’t around in 4-5 years IMO.

I have never heard TrIState 91 claim to be AA or anyone else say they are AA. Not sure who you were talking to but they are a solid local team, nothing more
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Express North 2025. Only team not going to Imlca in Orlando ? How can you only have 5 commits and not be there? When will they get rid of that coach. N2Ty
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
yeh IMLCA is a huge recruiting event, every coach in the country will be there , that is a big miss
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Express North 2025. Only team not going to Imlca in Orlando ? How can you only have 5 commits and not be there? When will they get rid of that coach. N2Ty
Originally Posted by Anonymous
yeh IMLCA is a huge recruiting event, every coach in the country will be there , that is a big miss

My only guess, is this is a big nut of an expense for players and families to travel and maybe they didn't have a critical mass of player willing to put that money up to go? I'm the last person to defending EN, but I'd give them a pass on this, for that reason along.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
IMLCA is on par with NLF. Must do.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I guess the 2026 EN team is attending , strange
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
absolutely mind-boggling Express North 2025 was not down in Florida this weekend. I feel bad for the kids on that team who are not committed yet which is pretty much the whole team . Rumours of EN kids playing on other teams so they can get some kind of exposure. what do you get for 4k dollars?

Prime Time crushed it 5-0 - most of their big boys were down there.

EN 2026 had a good weekend, 4-1 and not one IG video or picture of any of their star players. almost every single organization had a videographer. it's just sad, no one is advocating for these kids.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Now that the club season is over for most (Besides kids that are on national) I want to drop a pre-season Section 1 top-ten list

1. Rye - 5 high-level D1 commits, kept it close with Manhasset in the state semis without losing much going into this year.
2. Yorktown - Whole D1 defense returns, a bunch of very good offensive pieces back from last year. Goalie is exceptional.
3. Pleasantville - A smaller school but the whole team from last year returns after going 19-2. Can the role players take a step?
4. John Jay - Very good senior class but it's do or die. After this year it's a rebuild. The offense is good but can they get stops?
5. Scarsdale - FOGO is gone but there is still lots of talent left on the roster. They are well-coached but do they have the firepower?
6. Mamaroneck - I want to put them over Scaradale but I can't until they can take them down on the biggest stage. Lots of depth.
7. Somers - Underachieved last year. Should be hungry with a new coaching staff. Championship experience gained from football.
8. Horace Greeley - Whole team returns from last year. Need to see them against good comp. Talented, but are they well-coached?
9. Mahopac - Always a gritty bunch. They lose some firepower but are still a team you'd rather not see come playoffs.
10. Bronxville - Anchored by the best goalie in Section 1. Lots lost to graduation but there is always talent. Haldane is coming for them...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Best goalie in the section is the John Jay goalie from PT 2026!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown 2028 Express North goalie is the best in the section.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown 2028 Express North goalie is the best in the section.

8th grade goalie is best in Section1? kid must be GOOD!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown 2028 Express North goalie is the best in the section.

8th grade goalie is best in Section1? kid must be GOOD!
Lol
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Hearing a bunch of predators staff is leaving due to the new leadership and lack of structure. Any truth to these rumors?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hearing a bunch of predators staff is leaving due to the new leadership and lack of structure. Any truth to these rumors?
There was leadership and structure? Preds are the definition of disorganized. If not for the Rye crowd and their FOMO they would exist. Over promise, under deliver, everyone has a different job. In fact, I would say, Preds is the example of how far Town lacrosse has fallen. MM is a joke. Biggest Broseph hammerhead out there.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown 2028 Express North goalie is the best in the section.

8th grade goalie is best in Section1? kid must be GOOD!
Bronxville kid is hands down #1 in section and the torch will be passed to Yorktown 26. Simple as that. Both have proven themselves on every stage.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that the club season is over for most (Besides kids that are on national) I want to drop a pre-season Section 1 top-ten list

1. Rye - 5 high-level D1 commits, kept it close with Manhasset in the state semis without losing much going into this year.
2. Yorktown - Whole D1 defense returns, a bunch of very good offensive pieces back from last year. Goalie is exceptional.
3. Pleasantville - A smaller school but the whole team from last year returns after going 19-2. Can the role players take a step?
4. John Jay - Very good senior class but it's do or die. After this year it's a rebuild. The offense is good but can they get stops?
5. Scarsdale - FOGO is gone but there is still lots of talent left on the roster. They are well-coached but do they have the firepower?
6. Mamaroneck - I want to put them over Scaradale but I can't until they can take them down on the biggest stage. Lots of depth.
7. Somers - Underachieved last year. Should be hungry with a new coaching staff. Championship experience gained from football.
8. Horace Greeley - Whole team returns from last year. Need to see them against good comp. Talented, but are they well-coached?
9. Mahopac - Always a gritty bunch. They lose some firepower but are still a team you'd rather not see come playoffs.
10. Bronxville - Anchored by the best goalie in Section 1. Lots lost to graduation but there is always talent. Haldane is coming for them...

Hard to argue much of this list, especially top 5-6. I think this is the year Mamo breaks the Scarsdale curese, but it is down to those 2. Somers and Greeley are paper tigers right now. Somers underachieved and new coaching staff should put in some new energy - but that only goes so far if the admin doesn't stop listening to parents. i think they are better on paper than.... Greeley who needs to show something other than loading up goals on lesser teams. They committed to a stronger schedule, so let's see what that looks like and can they overcome it? Based on 2023 I'm skeptical until they show me otherwise - they need more seasoned coaching on that staff too.
Mahopac should scare everyone
Bronxville has the tools, but no coach yet. This will be an important hire for them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that the club season is over for most (Besides kids that are on national) I want to drop a pre-season Section 1 top-ten list

1. Rye - 5 high-level D1 commits, kept it close with Manhasset in the state semis without losing much going into this year.
2. Yorktown - Whole D1 defense returns, a bunch of very good offensive pieces back from last year. Goalie is exceptional.
3. Pleasantville - A smaller school but the whole team from last year returns after going 19-2. Can the role players take a step?
4. John Jay - Very good senior class but it's do or die. After this year it's a rebuild. The offense is good but can they get stops?
5. Scarsdale - FOGO is gone but there is still lots of talent left on the roster. They are well-coached but do they have the firepower?
6. Mamaroneck - I want to put them over Scaradale but I can't until they can take them down on the biggest stage. Lots of depth.
7. Somers - Underachieved last year. Should be hungry with a new coaching staff. Championship experience gained from football.
8. Horace Greeley - Whole team returns from last year. Need to see them against good comp. Talented, but are they well-coached?
9. Mahopac - Always a gritty bunch. They lose some firepower but are still a team you'd rather not see come playoffs.
10. Bronxville - Anchored by the best goalie in Section 1. Lots lost to graduation but there is always talent. Haldane is coming for them...

Dont know if JJ is even top 10....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
John Jay. Has great offense , great fogo, and the best 2026 goalie in the section!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that the club season is over for most (Besides kids that are on national) I want to drop a pre-season Section 1 top-ten list

1. Rye - 5 high-level D1 commits, kept it close with Manhasset in the state semis without losing much going into this year.
2. Yorktown - Whole D1 defense returns, a bunch of very good offensive pieces back from last year. Goalie is exceptional.
3. Pleasantville - A smaller school but the whole team from last year returns after going 19-2. Can the role players take a step?
4. John Jay - Very good senior class but it's do or die. After this year it's a rebuild. The offense is good but can they get stops?
5. Scarsdale - FOGO is gone but there is still lots of talent left on the roster. They are well-coached but do they have the firepower?
6. Mamaroneck - I want to put them over Scaradale but I can't until they can take them down on the biggest stage. Lots of depth.
7. Somers - Underachieved last year. Should be hungry with a new coaching staff. Championship experience gained from football.
8. Horace Greeley - Whole team returns from last year. Need to see them against good comp. Talented, but are they well-coached?
9. Mahopac - Always a gritty bunch. They lose some firepower but are still a team you'd rather not see come playoffs.
10. Bronxville - Anchored by the best goalie in Section 1. Lots lost to graduation but there is always talent. Haldane is coming for them...

Dont know if JJ is even top 10....

If they're not, then who is instead?

Bronxville should be higher. Somers and Greeley too high here, they might be in the next 10, but if I follow my own questions, I am not sure who i bring in to this top 10 from the rest of the section. Briarcliff should be in here Pelham too, they were an enigma last year but still a good team. I guess those two?
Haldane, Tappan Zee, Carmel, Lakeland in the mix but based on 2023, they'd still be behind Somers and Greeley but I think that is a group of the 11-20 for section 1
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
John Jay. Has great offense , great fogo, and the best 2026 goalie in the section!!
Agree... to an extent. This is a big year for them they have to get it done in 2024, i don't think the talent is there behind this senior class.

GK is definitely top 3 in the section. Bronxville is the top I think, Yorktown and JJ the next two up then it's everyone else. There are a lot of good goalies to be fair: Scarsdale, Mamaroneck, Somers, Greeley, Mahopac but those three are top of the section.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If they're not, then who is instead?

Bronxville should be higher. Somers and Greeley too high here, they might be in the next 10, but if I follow my own questions, I am not sure who i bring in to this top 10 from the rest of the section. Briarcliff should be in here Pelham too, they were an enigma last year but still a good team. I guess those two?
Haldane, Tappan Zee, Carmel, Lakeland in the mix but based on 2023, they'd still be behind Somers and Greeley but I think that is a group of the 11-20 for section 1


Briarcliff and Pelham are not better than Greeley and Somers. Briarcliff had a good run but everyone from those championship classes are gone including their coach. I would put them as the 4th best team in class D. Pelham will be better than Briarcliff but they still lose a lot from last year. Greeley and Somers are both stacked with talent we just need to see if they can win big games. It’s not a copy and paste list from last year it’s projecting which teams will be better.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Does Express North run 1% showcase? wondering if its a worthwhile event for 9th grader
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Does Express North run 1% showcase? wondering if its a worthwhile event for 9th grader
No, it is run by Matt Chandick who is tied to the NLF which EN is a part of. The reason youre seeing the EN highlights from the event is because the EN kid being highlighted is insane. Otherwise, the reason you probably see so many EN kids there is because its one of the few showcases Schrieber gets them in to.....or that they can get in to, Other than the kid being highlighted who is absurd and should probably leave EN. But i digress.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
it sounds to me like you think shooting the ball 50x a game and scoring 2-4 goals a game is how lacrosse should be played? and furthermore is that sustainable ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
seems like the kids that leave , are better off for it, that is very smart observation
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
absolutely mind-boggling Express North 2025 was not down in Florida this weekend. I feel bad for the kids on that team who are not committed yet which is pretty much the whole team . Rumours of EN kids playing on other teams so they can get some kind of exposure. what do you get for 4k dollars?

Prime Time crushed it 5-0 - most of their big boys were down there.

EN 2026 had a good weekend, 4-1 and not one IG video or picture of any of their star players. almost every single organization had a videographer. it's just sad, no one is advocating for these kids.

Confirmed, 2025 players played for other clubs such as Eclipse-
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
EN is infected with a virus. That virus from Yorktown has infiltrated the organization for the sole benefit of his child and his child’s bff. That virus has taken control from a man suffering from illness, back door deals with showcases etc. . CS is one of the greatest humans on the planet. One of the greatest teachers around. But , he is loyal to a fault. He needs to cut the virus asap .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
This has been true from the beginning of time, DONT detest THE PLAYER , detest THE GAME. kudos to anyone who is looking after the best interests of their children
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
EN is infected with a virus. That virus from Yorktown has infiltrated the organization for the sole benefit of his child and his child’s bff. That virus has taken control from a man suffering from illness, back door deals with showcases etc. . CS is one of the greatest humans on the planet. One of the greatest teachers around. But , he is loyal to a fault. He needs to cut the virus asap .
Is the goalie, the attackman or the middie the problem? That said, EN has to be some of the worst parents we have played against. Will never forget one of the moms cheering because one of our players was knocked down by a cheap shot to the head. She was very proud. They still didn’t win but this low class organization has shown their stripes everytime we play them. CS super nice guy but the 2025 parents are ANIMALS!!!!! I guess they just follow the coaches behavior.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
EN is infected with a virus. That virus from Yorktown has infiltrated the organization for the sole benefit of his child and his child’s bff. That virus has taken control from a man suffering from illness, back door deals with showcases etc. . CS is one of the greatest humans on the planet. One of the greatest teachers around. But , he is loyal to a fault. He needs to cut the virus asap .

Wow, sounds like someone’s dad has a major axe to grind. Are you pissed that your son didn’t get an invite to the 1% showcase? and the invite was given to arguably the best goalie in the class of 2026? Get a life, go tryout for PT or Preds, maybe you will get invite from them. #CLOWN
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
EN is infected with a virus. That virus from Yorktown has infiltrated the organization for the sole benefit of his child and his child’s bff. That virus has taken control from a man suffering from illness, back door deals with showcases etc. . CS is one of the greatest humans on the planet. One of the greatest teachers around. But , he is loyal to a fault. He needs to cut the virus asap .
I'm sorry but havign been around the club scene for a long time - including in EN - this just reeks of a pissed off parent who didn't get what he felt his son deserved.
If it's who I think you are talking about and I have no interest in this argument either way, you are talking about probably the best two players in their respective positions not only in their own class, but probably all of section 1. If it's the GK - then easily he's top 3 in section 1 regardless of his class, but his is probably one of the top ones in his recruiting class. Attackman is the same.

So what did you not get that you think you deserve?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
just reading the above posts, nowhere does it talk badly about the kids? what it seems to be saying is that someone with a kid in the program is leveraging that platform for his kid, deservedly or not. That is the way of the world now and forever, parents protecting their children at all costs , deal with it or leave
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I'm trying to understand why there is so much talk, negativity about Express North. Disgruntled parent, got it. There are so many issues, bad coaches, horrible parents in every program. Heads of programs, HA! Its a pay to play Club with a tremendous amount of politics. then there are politics about getting in to college. Have a thick skin and move on. Its a cesspool everywhere. The NY/CT producing a tremendous amount of national talent and with that comes the competition to get kids into the respective programs. If your going to bash 1 program, spread the love. Is all roses at PT, 2Way, HA! Tri-state/preds, no one cares as both haven't produced a quality class in a while, tri-state, maybe never.

Lets get back to Section 1 talk, club is over until June, Thank God!

Good competition happening at Chelsea Piers Winter League- Darien, Iona, Greeley, Mamo, Greenwich, Brunswick. Fairfield
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
EN is a solid program in the area who attend great tournaments. CS is a great guy as well. I think the criticism comes from college placement and recruiting support compared to other programs in the area. They do ok but not anything close to 2W, PT or eclipse. I think the guy above definitely has an axe to grind.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
EN is infected with a virus. That virus from Yorktown has infiltrated the organization for the sole benefit of his child and his child’s bff. That virus has taken control from a man suffering from illness, back door deals with showcases etc. . CS is one of the greatest humans on the planet. One of the greatest teachers around. But , he is loyal to a fault. He needs to cut the virus asap .

Wow, sounds like someone’s dad has a major axe to grind. Are you pissed that your son didn’t get an invite to the 1% showcase? and the invite was given to arguably the best goalie in the class of 2026? Get a life, go tryout for PT or Preds, maybe you will get invite from them. #CLOWN
Ok let’s not get fool with nonsense. Predators will get you nowhere fast. PT will get you to D1 but lets be really clear, Preds is one of the worst run organization in the nation. Just look at how rag tag they show up and look wherever they are. Better off going out to NJ than playing for Preds.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Couldn’t agree more with the last comment on preds. Don’t really see the benefit of playing in the program. So many other clubs in the area with better offerings / better training / better leadership. Interesting to see where they will be in a couple of years and also interested to hear what others experience with them has been.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Couldn’t agree more with the last comment on preds. Don’t really see the benefit of playing in the program. So many other clubs in the area with better offerings / better training / better leadership. Interesting to see where they will be in a couple of years and also interested to hear what others experience with them has been.
Same. Communication was non existent and player development is not gonna happen. We paid our money, suffered and left.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
when people sign up and pay 4k per year at any of these organizations, PT, EN Preds , eclipse etc etc etc. what are the expecations? specifically when it comes to recruiting? why is PT so good? what makes others bad? lots of complaining about certain programs, so what are the specific issues
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Couldn’t agree more with the last comment on preds. Don’t really see the benefit of playing in the program. So many other clubs in the area with better offerings / better training / better leadership. Interesting to see where they will be in a couple of years and also interested to hear what others experience with them has been.
Same. Communication was non existent and player development is not gonna happen. We paid our money, suffered and left.
If you live in Rye and arent very good you MUST play for Preds. Otherwise you are an outsider. The good Rye kids all play for PT or Eclipse. MM whats up Broseph, dude, man, guy give me your money and I wont even email you or get you the gear but yo bro I went to UNC, Im savage Broman yo! Holy worst experience ever, Not a single member of the organization has basic communication skills.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Couldn’t agree more with the last comment on preds. Don’t really see the benefit of playing in the program. So many other clubs in the area with better offerings / better training / better leadership. Interesting to see where they will be in a couple of years and also interested to hear what others experience with them has been.
Same. Communication was non existent and player development is not gonna happen. We paid our money, suffered and left.
Is it a sign that no one ever has anything good to say about Preds? When every other team is attacked on this thread a few will always defend the club. Look at the EN debate. Some for, some against. Preds never has anything good said about them. Never played with them but never considered them anything more than they take up space.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
They don’t even have a prime offering. If you are a very high level player there are better clubs in WC/CT and you shouldn’t be playing with preds. If you are looking for better training/player development/better overall experience for your son there are MUCH better options than preds. Each club has their calling, I just don’t see what Preds brings to the table against competition. Too much politics and drama for a mid tier club.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Preds survive off the fact they had been very good a few years ago but if everything is true what people have been saying above that explains their inability to maintain excellence.

Unfortunately in this club atmosphere, as time goes on, it becomes a game of haves and have nots as colleges learn to build a pipeline with clubs like PT, 2way, and eclipse and trust the players from those clubs. The rest don’t have that pipeline and so colleges (the top ones) don’t have that same level of trust. Though every now and then you have a few very good players come from the “other” clubs as their talent stands out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Preds survive off the fact they had been very good a few years ago but if everything is true what people have been saying above that explains their inability to maintain excellence.

Unfortunately in this club atmosphere, as time goes on, it becomes a game of haves and have nots as colleges learn to build a pipeline with clubs like PT, 2way, and eclipse and trust the players from those clubs. The rest don’t have that pipeline and so colleges (the top ones) don’t have that same level of trust. Though every now and then you have a few very good players come from the “other” clubs as their talent stands out.
No doubt a world of what have you done for me lately and network. McCaul and Preds are not a name college coaches or showcase directors know or care about. Locally he is well known as a total Meanyhole. If not for the not good Rye people who need to play for them they would fade to oblivion. They are the ultimate money grab [Censored] show…..and the name is a bit creepy.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
5 express North kids on the lax magazine rankings tonight !! I would say Schreiber doing a pretty amazing job!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Schreiber hopefully righting the ship and climbing out the of the second tier in the region but please let’s not mistake Lax Magazine with unbiased rankings and reporting. Maybe one of the worst ranking services.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber hopefully righting the ship and climbing out the of the second tier in the region but please let’s not mistake Lax Magazine with unbiased rankings and reporting. Maybe one of the worst ranking services.
Who peed on your breakfast today? darn. The kids got ranked, good on them for working hard and gaining recognition. Why do you care if it's not a good enough ranking list for you?
Ill use the same arguement I do for any ranking, If you think it's not a good list, then who do you put in their place? or What ranking system should we be looking at that's better?

Man, the negativity on this forum is so unnecessary. Kids worked hard and get recogniized, how about we celebrate that.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Now that the club season is over for most (Besides kids that are on national) I want to drop a pre-season Section 1 top-ten list

1. Rye - 5 high-level D1 commits, kept it close with Manhasset in the state semis without losing much going into this year.
2. Yorktown - Whole D1 defense returns, a bunch of very good offensive pieces back from last year. Goalie is exceptional.
3. Pleasantville - A smaller school but the whole team from last year returns after going 19-2. Can the role players take a step?
4. John Jay - Very good senior class but it's do or die. After this year it's a rebuild. The offense is good but can they get stops?
5. Scarsdale - FOGO is gone but there is still lots of talent left on the roster. They are well-coached but do they have the firepower?
6. Mamaroneck - I want to put them over Scaradale but I can't until they can take them down on the biggest stage. Lots of depth.
7. Somers - Underachieved last year. Should be hungry with a new coaching staff. Championship experience gained from football.
8. Horace Greeley - Whole team returns from last year. Need to see them against good comp. Talented, but are they well-coached?
9. Mahopac - Always a gritty bunch. They lose some firepower but are still a team you'd rather not see come playoffs.
10. Bronxville - Anchored by the best goalie in Section 1. Lots lost to graduation but there is always talent. Haldane is coming for them...

I agree with this list. The only thing I disagree with is JJ at 4. I would slide them down below Scarsdale and Mamaroneck at 6. Rye Yorktown and Pville are very close at the top. It’s going to be an interesting season in Section 1.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
With the best 2026 goalie in the country. JJ should have a great year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber hopefully righting the ship and climbing out the of the second tier in the region but please let’s not mistake Lax Magazine with unbiased rankings and reporting. Maybe one of the worst ranking services.
Who peed on your breakfast today? darn. The kids got ranked, good on them for working hard and gaining recognition. Why do you care if it's not a good enough ranking list for you?
Ill use the same arguement I do for any ranking, If you think it's not a good list, then who do you put in their place? or What ranking system should we be looking at that's better?

Man, the negativity on this forum is so unnecessary. Kids worked hard and get recogniized, how about we celebrate that.

Sounds like you are affiliated with EN so I understand your defensiveness and bias but calling something for what it is is not negative . I think your reply is much more negative than mine. I said I hope he’s righting the ship but rankings from lacrosse
Magazine are to be taken with a grain of salt as it is not a thorough nor unbiased publication. And it is great for the kids but like I said, it’s lacrosse magazine. It’s the same with inside lacrosse ratings as well as others, they are suspect at best and far behind other sports rankings systems as well. But my post was in response to EN doing an amazing job in the previous post which was not simply “about the kids”. Hopefully they are doing an amazing job by lacrosse magazine neither validates nor invalidates their successes
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
who runs Lacrosse magazine ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
EN no?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Been hearing nothing but great things from parents about the True Westchester program the last year or so. I know they are newish but might be a solid program to look out for in the future.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Schreiber hopefully righting the ship and climbing out the of the second tier in the region but please let’s not mistake Lax Magazine with unbiased rankings and reporting. Maybe one of the worst ranking services.
Who peed on your breakfast today? darn. The kids got ranked, good on them for working hard and gaining recognition. Why do you care if it's not a good enough ranking list for you?
Ill use the same arguement I do for any ranking, If you think it's not a good list, then who do you put in their place? or What ranking system should we be looking at that's better?

Man, the negativity on this forum is so unnecessary. Kids worked hard and get recogniized, how about we celebrate that.

Sounds like you are affiliated with EN so I understand your defensiveness and bias but calling something for what it is is not negative . I think your reply is much more negative than mine. I said I hope he’s righting the ship but rankings from lacrosse
Magazine are to be taken with a grain of salt as it is not a thorough nor unbiased publication. And it is great for the kids but like I said, it’s lacrosse magazine. It’s the same with inside lacrosse ratings as well as others, they are suspect at best and far behind other sports rankings systems as well. But my post was in response to EN doing an amazing job in the previous post which was not simply “about the kids”. Hopefully they are doing an amazing job by lacrosse magazine neither validates nor invalidates their successes
Not affiliated with EN and I am not defensive about them or anyone else. But you came on here basically bashing the existence of a ranking system that put up a few of EN players. Players who are very good. Why did you find it necessary to make a post denigrating the ranking? The kids worked hard and were recognized. The only takeaway you seem to have from that is that the ranking itself. You also take issue with inside lacrosse's ranking. What other ranking is really out there? Please let us all know what one we should be following. The only way to really read your post is that we should take the ranking with a grain of salt which means the kids don't deserve it. How is anyone to read it differently?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Teams starting to release their schedules. Somers and Yorktown not going to see each other until the playoffs is an interesting tid-bit....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Somers, yawn? Who are the LI teams they put on their schedule? Soft schedule. They have a lot of team “chemistry” to work on. I mean , they need a scientist in the kitchen. Goalie is mid, who plays D for them?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Somers, yawn? Who are the LI teams they put on their schedule? Soft schedule. They have a lot of team “chemistry” to work on. I mean , they need a scientist in the kitchen. Goalie is mid, who plays D for them?
I want whatever this guy is on. It seems like fun!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Has anyone seen the enrollment classifications for 2024? Same as 2023?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has anyone seen the enrollment classifications for 2024? Same as 2023?
Class A: Yonkers, Wappingers, Ossinig/Peekskill, New Rochelle, North Rockland, Arlington, White Plains, Mamaroneck, Scarsdale, Suffern, Carmel

Class B: L/P, Fox Lane, Clarkstown North & South, Mahopac, Harrison, Greeley, Yorktown, Brewster, Somers

Class C: Eastchester, Pelham JJCR, Tappan Zee, Nyack, Rye, Byram, Nauet, Sleepy Hollow, Pearl River, Ardsley, Hen Hud, Edgemont,

Class D: Hastings, Irvington Pleasantville, PV, Briarcliff, Rye Neck, Croton, Bronxville, Westlake, Albertus Magnus, Dobbs, Blind Brook, Pawling, North Salem, Haldane, Keio, Valhalla, Port Chester (I believe they are an A school playing in D?) Tuckahoe

Not much class movement from 2023: Eastchester moves from B to C, with Brewster going the other way moving up to B. Other thing is three new schools: Valhalla, Tuckahoe and Port Chester but I believe they are planning on a JV only schedule for 2024. Ossining and Peekskill continue their merged team from 2023. Hastings is not a merged team this year and hopefully Edgemont can field a team again.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Thanks for the classifications.

Class A; I predict it will be Arlington's year. It is very interesting to hear that Peekskill & Ossining (P/O) are merging. Hope Coach Hallinan is still in charge.

One interesting thing to me is that P/O gets moved up to A, based upon HS enrollment of a combined 2,540. Looking at the NYSED data, the following is A HS enrollment #s (2022-23):
Arlington: 2,515
WP: 2,193
Mamaro: 1,614
Suffern: 1,480
Scars: 1,438
Carm: 1,338

Why does Lakeland/Panas get to stay in B, when their combined HS enrollment is 1,814.

It's been something bothering me since they lost to Scarsdale, back to back seasons for Class A.
If P/O has to move up, so should L/P.

Pivoting, does anyone have the League breakdowns?
Want to bet L/P is in a League that they shouldn't be in.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The formula is complicated, and I have never fully understood it, but they do not simply add the two schools enrollments. For L/P, it is the higher of the two's enrollment, plus a percentage of the smaller. The NYSPHSAA website has the chart listed.

For my purposes, the bigger beef is the existence of the combined teams. It limits opportunities for kids to play. You see this being abused in hockey, for instance.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thanks for the classifications.

Class A; I predict it will be Arlington's year. It is very interesting to hear that Peekskill & Ossining (P/O) are merging. Hope Coach Hallinan is still in charge.

One interesting thing to me is that P/O gets moved up to A, based upon HS enrollment of a combined 2,540. Looking at the NYSED data, the following is A HS enrollment #s (2022-23):
Arlington: 2,515
WP: 2,193
Mamaro: 1,614
Suffern: 1,480
Scars: 1,438
Carm: 1,338

Why does Lakeland/Panas get to stay in B, when their combined HS enrollment is 1,814.

It's been something bothering me since they lost to Scarsdale, back to back seasons for Class A.
If P/O has to move up, so should L/P.

Pivoting, does anyone have the League breakdowns?
Want to bet L/P is in a League that they shouldn't be in.

Ossining is firmly an A team so that is why. Other teams - L/P as an example - swing between classes based on enrollment. Some middle-pack B teams were in class C only 3-4 years ago and vice versa.

As to the combined teams, I don't think it limits anyone. The teams combine so there are ones to play on - they combine because on their own they'd never have enough to field a program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pivoting, does anyone have the League breakdowns?
Want to bet L/P is in a League that they shouldn't be in.

League breakdowns haven't been determined for 2024 yet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pivoting, does anyone have the League breakdowns?
Want to bet L/P is in a League that they shouldn't be in.

League breakdowns haven't been determined for 2024 yet.
I should clearer - the leagues have been determined because teams have been doing the scheduling and league is given to them, I don't know if a full list is put out for lacrosse. BOCES has the overall list, but lacrosse doesn't always follow it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
US Club Lacrosse latest rankings out. 2025 and 2026 Prime Time in top 10 for both years. Interesting ranking levels for both years.
I have no skin in this game for any club.

Westchester/CT Teams
2025:
4 Prime Time (2025)
10 Eclipse Black (2025)
32 LI Express Schreiber (2025)
35 Express North Black (2025)
81 2Way Black (2025)
93 Team 91 Tristate Select (2025)
145 Westchester Predators (2025)
154 3d NE South (2025)

2026:
10 Prime Time (2026)
13 Eclipse Black (2026)
21 2Way Black (2026)
41 Express North Black (2026)
88 Westchester Predators AA (2026)
140 2Way North Black (2026)
144 Eclipse Orange (2026)
146 True Blue (2026)
160 2way Carolina (2026)
162 Express North Orange Saracino (2026)
164 True Westchester (2026)
185 3d NE South (2026)
188 Team 91 Tristate Select (2026)
229 Westchester Predators A (2026)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
[quote=Anonymous]Thanks for the classifications.

Class A; I predict it will be Arlington's year.

This is a joke right ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Thanks for the classifications.

Class A; I predict it will be Arlington's year.

This is a joke right ?
It's not too far fetched given what they did a few years ago: beating a 12 win season, beating really good Byram and Jay teams, and loosing a heartbreaker in like 2 or 3 OT to Suffern in the playoffs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
looking at the rankings posted above

EN 2026 ranked 41st? how do you get 5 kids ranked top 60 when your ranked 41st? that is quite impressive
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
looking at the rankings posted above

EN 2026 ranked 41st? how do you get 5 kids ranked top 60 when your ranked 41st? that is quite impressive

for all the Haters , that is the power of a great director, Schreiber and his co-director Coach Mezz, getting it done- hardwork pays off
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
looking at the rankings posted above

EN 2026 ranked 41st? how do you get 5 kids ranked top 60 when your ranked 41st? that is quite impressive
Because individual player rankings are done differently and by an entirely different entity?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
True... the actuality is.. no one really cares what the one percent director thinks..Colleges want to see your son play live.. not be a number on paper. They invest a lot of resources to their commits. They want to make sure they make the right call. Even after they " commit" they still want the kid to play.. remember they can always change their mind!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
You realize the highest nationally ranked goalie in the 2026 class is in section 1, Mezz? There are a lot of good goalies in the section. Dont sleep on Express N freshman goalie Kaplow pushing for starting job at Greeley out of the gate this season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The above comment was a reply to:
With the best 2026 goalie in the country. JJ should have a great year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The above comment was a reply to:
With the best 2026 goalie in the country. JJ should have a great year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You realize the highest nationally ranked goalie in the 2026 class is in section 1, Mezz? There are a lot of good goalies in the section. Dont sleep on Express N freshman goalie Kaplow pushing for starting job at Greeley out of the gate this season.
Ah… it’s good to see the sane and sage parents of Greeley Lacrosse are getting an early start to the season.
This comment won’t ruffle any feathers on the varsity team who have two very good and experienced goalies on staff already.
No pressure on a freshman goalie who’s not seen a second on a varsity field.
Nice to see some things never change
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Stating the obvious view of all of section 1, nice try with Greeley parent. Get off your computer and get out and watch what is going on. Stating the JJ goalie is the best in the section is out of touch, but, as a JJ parent, makes sense as that is probably the only goalie you have seen in the last year. I feel your anger with the Greeley program's success and with a coaching staff that actually gives a dam.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Stating the obvious view of all of section 1, nice try with Greeley parent. Get off your computer and get out and watch what is going on. Stating the JJ goalie is the best in the section is out of touch, but, as a JJ parent, makes sense as that is probably the only goalie you have seen in the last year. I feel your anger with the Greeley program's success and with a coaching staff that actually gives a dam.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Wow, you guys are all pumped up. Can't wait for the season to start.

How about the Greeley detest. It's borderline resentful.

The goalie talk is hysterical. The Coach of EN 2026 is Mezz. Based upon his lax playing experience, I would say this situation reeks of daddy ball.
I look forward to see where the #1 2026 goalie ends up. Based upon this forum, it should be a top 10 lax program (or Marist).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wow, you guys are all pumped up. Can't wait for the season to start.

How about the Greeley detest. It's borderline resentful.

The goalie talk is hysterical. The Coach of EN 2026 is Mezz. Based upon his lax playing experience, I would say this situation reeks of daddy ball.
I look forward to see where the #1 2026 goalie ends up. Based upon this forum, it should be a top 10 lax program (or Marist).
Daddy ball or not, the kid is legit and has proven it at a high level for Yorktown and on the club circuit. I put him up there with the JJ goalie and the Bronxville goalie as the 3 best in Section 1. Point is - they've proven it on the field. This is why most people roll their eyes at the Greely talk because they've been saying for a few years now that this youth movement is the second coming of lacrosse. They have yet to prove it on the field. Maybe this year will be different? the post talking about a freshman - that hasn't seen high level section 1 action yet - should put everyone on alert tells me things still haven't changed there, sadly.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Eye Roll and Most People and sadly.....ha...... what the fascination and talk about how things haven't changed at Greeley. like what are you talking about. would love to understand. From what I know, they had a clown show coaching staff that got fired 2 years ago.. New crew was 13-3 last year with a lite schedule, lost in the semis to Mahopac. Are all juniors and down on the team,, graduated no one..... Seems like a lot of good changes have gone on there. That said, got to put up or shut up. Will be an interesting year in section 1. if you know, you know...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Eye Roll and Most People and sadly.....ha...... what the fascination and talk about how things haven't changed at Greeley. like what are you talking about. would love to understand. From what I know, they had a clown show coaching staff that got fired 2 years ago.. New crew was 13-3 last year with a lite schedule, lost in the semis to Mahopac. Are all juniors and down on the team,, graduated no one..... Seems like a lot of good changes have gone on there. That said, got to put up or shut up. Will be an interesting year in section 1. if you know, you know...
This is a really bad take and you don't have any clue what you are talking about. The administration at greely has been a mess for awhile now - they've been through like 3 or 4 ADs, the superintendent fires everyone for little or no reasons. They can't hire coaches there. The new guy was on that same staff you called a clown show - and they've had football and other sport's coaches helping because they can't get anyone worthwhile to help out there. The parents run the show there - and when people say things haven't changed, just look at the post about the freshman goalie - it's the same nonsense the parents have been running around about. How now that their kids are in high school, they are gonna be winning championships every year. The parents keep running their mouths when the team hasn't accomplished anything on the field yet. That puts unnecessary pressure on the kids who have to play the games.

It has nothing to do with the players, there is some talent there, and yes, they are young but last year by any measure was a soft schedule - even they recognized it. They did graduate players, but you'd never know it because the coach played all his younger guys who were on his EN team. That pissed a LOT of people off. So we'll see what they can do this year. They haven't released the schedule yet and then they have to go out and get it done. I'll be the first one to congratulate them when they do. But until then, maybe the parents should do a little less talking?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Potash for president 2024 LFG
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Potash for president 2024 LFG
Thank you for proving the previous post correct.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
All this animonsity and out of touch information has to come from someone that was on the wrong side of the firing at Greeley. The clown himself
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
let me say this, Greeley is lucky to have a coach who cares deeply for every single player in that organization. this guy is not just collecting a paycheck. Potash is the type of coach that will change kids lives. he is all in,. so just stop the nonsense, win lose or draw , who cares, the district is moving in a positive direction, how many other districts are growing at this point at the HS level
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
NYSPHSAA approves permitting boys (JV/V) and girls (V) to request experiment of shot clock

This would be huge for NYS lacrosse. No more stall ball and will make games way more entertaining. Hoping this is in effect for this upcoming season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My understanding is that it goes into effect for the 2025 season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Class A, B, C, D predictions for this year??
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Class A, B, C, D predictions for this year??

A. Mamaroneck will take down Scarsdale. Mamaroneck will have more possessions than previous years and that will give them the edge. Look out for Carmel though. They are an experienced squad that could make some noise and potentially make the final.

B. Yorktown will take down Somers. Somers will have some fight but it will be tough to score against Yorktown in 2024. Greeley will be good but is 1 year away. They are talented but I am not sure if their coach is any good despite what the people on this forum say.

C. Rye will roll in Class C. I think John Jay is good but is nowhere near as talented as Rye. Their goalie will need to have the game of his life if they want to take down the Garnets. Pelham has a chance to upset Jay but it’s unlikely.

D. This is Pleasantville’s year, the whole team returns after going 19-2. It’s state title or bust and their brutal regular season schedule will prepare them for CSH. Bronxville and Haldane will battle to face them in the chip. I give the edge to Bronxville because of the goalie.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
If Carmel makes the final it will be more because A is weak than anything else. Yes, they return most of their team, but the team was just decent last year. Nowadays, these kids don't magically become Paul Rabil just because they have aged a year. Their game experience and stick skills are very well versed at younger and younger ages. North Rockland will take a step back and Carmel may jump them. Other than maybe Arlington, there is nothing else at A, other than of course Mamo and Dale.

C might have the most good teams. Rye will be head and shoulders above every one else, but there are a lot of teams that can make semis.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Class A, B, C, D predictions for this year??

A. Mamaroneck will take down Scarsdale. Mamaroneck will have more possessions than previous years and that will give them the edge. Look out for Carmel though. They are an experienced squad that could make some noise and potentially make the final.

B. Yorktown will take down Somers. Somers will have some fight but it will be tough to score against Yorktown in 2024. Greeley will be good but is 1 year away. They are talented but I am not sure if their coach is any good despite what the people on this forum say.

C. Rye will roll in Class C. I think John Jay is good but is nowhere near as talented as Rye. Their goalie will need to have the game of his life if they want to take down the Garnets. Pelham has a chance to upset Jay but it’s unlikely.

D. This is Pleasantville’s year, the whole team returns after going 19-2. It’s state title or bust and their brutal regular season schedule will prepare them for CSH. Bronxville and Haldane will battle to face them in the chip. I give the edge to Bronxville because of the goalie.
A - Scarsdale will always be strong and while this is a rebuild year for them, they're still one of the top teams in Section 1. But this is Mamo's year to make it happen. I don't see anyone else topping them in A. Carmel will be a formidable force, but they aren't quite there yet, but don't be surprised if they have some eyebrow-raising wins. Arlington same thing.

B - It's Yorktown then everyone else. Somers might be the only team to challenge them, but I don't see the streak of consecutive finals appearances ending this year. There might be some surprise upsets during the season, but unless there is a fluke in the rankings, Yorktown/Somers is your B final

C - It's Rye. That's the take. They are stacked and no one in C is going to top them. The best team that has the chance is John Jay, but they better get it done this year. Pelham always makes it interesting, but I wouldn't expect to see Rye play a large Section 1 schedule this year, they need to test themselves an prep for states.

D - Pleasentville and Bronxville, who I believe is still without a Head Coach. P'ville reloads so I think they are everyone's target this year, but I don't know who has the firepower to upend them. Haldane and Briarcliff should keep things interesting.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Ooh, boy that Iona Prep schedule is a beast, Is anyone else playing a schedule this loaded?
https://x.com/ionapreplax/status/1754593046287548608?s=20
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
- Iona cant run with the big boys Wick, chaminade, st anthonys
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Trizano has done an amazing job at Iona prep. those 2 way 2026's are top not athletes. future looks bright
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I guess we will find out 2 out of your three, but iron sharpens iron. IP will get better from those games regardless.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
D - Pleasentville and Bronxville, who I believe is still without a Head Coach. P'ville reloads so I think they are everyone's target this year, but I don't know who has the firepower to upend them. Haldane and Briarcliff should keep things interesting.

----Bronxville hired a coach I believe.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I think PVille is dominant this year and they fall off big time after seniors graduate. Haldane is good and should have a battle with Bronxville for runner up.

Bronxville hired an assistant coach more than a month ago and he will serve under their AD who is the temporary head coach. Assistant is True Westchester director/coach, blake. Interesting hire??
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How do people like/dislike true so far. How are the tourneys etc.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
True westchester- trying very hard. But very low level team for the area. But like teams like 91tri-state , will offer their best players a national spot and either entice or keep decent players because they are now on the 91 national or true national teams. At the end of the day, those kids are still on a very low level club team and well below high level lax players. The national club game is what is exactly wrong with lacrosse. But when 91 is very strong in most areas other than tri-state as well as true out in the Midwest , they hook players offering national spots. Facts
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
True westchester- trying very hard. But very low level team for the area. But like teams like 91tri-state , will offer their best players a national spot and either entice or keep decent players because they are now on the 91 national or true national teams. At the end of the day, those kids are still on a very low level club team and well below high level lax players. The national club game is what is exactly wrong with lacrosse. But when 91 is very strong in most areas other than tri-state as well as true out in the Midwest , they hook players offering national spots. Facts

ty for the candid response, if your child was not AAA caliber , but not A/B caliber, what is best program in the area ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Not every kid is a AA player right, so, my experience is that 91 tri-state and True would be a good option. They run good programs, good people and an option you may consider. Predators is about the same, however, they will have a team or two that may play at the AA level, just not as consistent throughout the grades. The 2029's are solid, but, most of the other grades are not near them. It is hit or miss. I would take a look at Tri-state and go from there.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
True westchester- trying very hard. But very low level team for the area. But like teams like 91tri-state , will offer their best players a national spot and either entice or keep decent players because they are now on the 91 national or true national teams. At the end of the day, those kids are still on a very low level club team and well below high level lax players. The national club game is what is exactly wrong with lacrosse. But when 91 is very strong in most areas other than tri-state as well as true out in the Midwest , they hook players offering national spots. Facts

ty for the candid response, if your child was not AAA caliber , but not A/B caliber, what is best program in the area ?

There is no such thing as "best program in the area", even for a certain level of player. They are all very different, and even teams within a club can be very different from each other. I have had multiple kids play on multiple clubs over many years and have seen it all - not just with my kids but with other kids' teams. There are teams where all the kids play exactly the same minutes, while there are teams where the best players play a lot more at the expense of others. There are teams with great coaching and instruction but they don't win because they lack speed/athletism. There are teams with great athletes that win with minimum coaching and learning. There are teams that are very structured and run well-versed plays all game long, while there are teams that just roll the balls out and play street ball. There are teams where the volunteer parent team manager has an outsized effect on your kid's experience (both good and bad) while there are teams where everything is centralized through the owner/director. There are teams where everything runs through one kid on offense, while there are teams that are very balanced in approach. There are teams where everything is perfect but they don't win because they are weak at goalie and FO, and everything sours as a result. There are teams that are dominant at FO and the polls get limited game action, which means your kid wins, but if he is a poll he stands around a lot. I can go on and on.

The bottom line is that you just need a team where you kid is happy, wants to go to practice and the tournaments, is getting playing time, and improving and learning the game - this is especially true the younger he is. It is very difficult to find out where this is until you jump in.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
awesome answers !!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
True Westchester is building a solid program, give them some time. Very well organized and run by great people who care about the kids. Plus they offer much more practices/tournaments compared to anyone else in this area for a very similar price.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
[quote=Anonymous]I think PVille is dominant this year and they fall off big time after seniors graduate. Haldane is good and should have a battle with Bronxville for runner up.

Pville will not fall off after this year. They have good players in the 25/26 classes. They won’t be what they were this year but they will always be in the mix. They are one of the best small school programs in NY and it’s because of their youth programs and kids staying in the district instead of going private.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Not to argue, remove one of the best players in the section and there will be a considerable fall off. I know many of the 25s and know the youth and still think there will be a considerable fall off. The team lost two regular season games last year, and yes a powerhouse small school. You said it yourself, "They won’t be what they were this year but they will always be in the mix." I think they could beat anyone in section 1, they will not be able to do that after this year and not close.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Two things can be true at the same time. Pleasantville will drop considerably 24 to 25. Pleasantville will also be one of the 2 or 3 best Class D teams in the Section in 25.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Greeley Schedule Out- Carmel, McMahon, Tappan Zee, Cold Spring Harbor, Arlington, Briarcliff, Greenwich, Brewster, Fox Lane, Bronxville, John Jay, Mahopac, Somers, Byram Hills, Mamaroneck, North Rockland...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Predicted record?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
10-5
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
13-3 could be better and could be worse with injuries
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
How is John Jay looking this year?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I have to think Greeley will beat Somers & John Jay? Right?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Beat Somers last year, Somers is the same team, new coach. John Jay not the same team as last year, graduated quite a bit, left with Duva and Kiefer and goalie. I think they decline from last year and greeley lost to them by 1. They are done after this year. I think Somers rebounds a bit, but, there is an internal problem that continues to exist that may be the reason why the team cannot get it together again this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Greeley Schedule Out- Carmel, McMahon, Tappan Zee, Cold Spring Harbor, Arlington, Briarcliff, Greenwich, Brewster, Fox Lane, Bronxville, John Jay, Mahopac, Somers, Byram Hills, Mamaroneck, North Rockland...

Give them credit for upping their schedule.

Carmel tossup, but W
McMahon, they lost a winnable game last year should be a W
TZ. W
Cold Spring Harbor, L
Arlington, could go either way? Long bus ride. W
Briarcliff, W
Greenwich, L
Brewster, W
Fox Lane, W
Bronxville, L
JJ, L could go either way. FO will be tough wins
Mahopac, L
Somers, L. Both teams are virtually the same. Somers have a lot to prove especially in this one. Could go either way
Byram, L this will be a battle.
Mamaroneck, L
North Rockland, W


This could be an 8 win team it could be a 12-13 win team. There’s about 5 games here that are tossups right now.

Battle is really the playoffs anyway. They’ll solidly be in and they’ll be battle tested for sure. They have a more competitive schedule, now go win the games.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Could be a good year for Greeley. A lot of talk about Yorktown repeating. Yes they have a returning defense ,but not much on the offensive side. Somers, Greeley will be tough outs. Going to be fun to watch
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The "Thread Title" indicates Westchester NY/Fairfield CT Youth Lacrosse, but I have never seen a post/comment about Fairfield CT lax.

Where are the CT posts/forums or websites that cover CT (RI, MA, VT & NH)?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Beat Somers last year, Somers is the same team, new coach. John Jay not the same team as last year, graduated quite a bit, left with Duva and Kiefer and goalie. I think they decline from last year and greeley lost to them by 1. They are done after this year. I think Somers rebounds a bit, but, there is an internal problem that continues to exist that may be the reason why the team cannot get it together again this year.
Somers lost a very winnable game against Greeley. They were man-down way too much in that game - if I remember the refs were calling alot. Greeley won where it counted

Greeley also played probably their best game against John Jay and still lost by one. Jay did not play a great game and nearly gave it away - Greely is a year better and more experienced, JJ graduated a lot but they still have a solid goalie and can possess the ball. Greeley needs to show they can win games when they aren't scoring a lot. It's definitely doable in 2024.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
The Greeley Somers game was not very winnable for Somers and it was not as close as the scoreboard read. Greeley was up 4 with 3 mins to go and gave back two at the end. They dominated every part of that game, just saying. I think Somers rebounds a bit though this year. Greeley has as very high powered offense and it needs to show up against the best competition and get it done this year...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Greeley Somers game was not very winnable for Somers and it was not as close as the scoreboard read. Greeley was up 4 with 3 mins to go and gave back two at the end. They dominated every part of that game, just saying. I think Somers rebounds a bit though this year. Greeley has as very high powered offense and it needs to show up against the best competition and get it done this year...
Im going to disagree with you here. I was at this game. Greeley put up a bunch of goals against ok-to-mediocre teams. Against Somers almost all their goals were man-up or fast breaks and it was one of their lowest scoring games. Somers slowed them down in even strength and Greely struggled to clear the ball. I think everyone agrees Somers did not play up to their capabilites/expectations at all last year and they did not play particularly well and it was still a close game.

Both teams return the bulk of their rosters. This game will be a good one either team can win it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Could be a good year for Greeley. A lot of talk about Yorktown repeating. Yes they have a returning defense ,but not much on the offensive side. Somers, Greeley will be tough outs. Going to be fun to watch

Not much on the Offensive side, they have a few D1 middies, a sophomore who will definitely be recruited and a bunch of very good sophomores who will be contributing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
World Series predictions?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
A couple of mid level D1 commits ans a bunch of sophomores? Not too exciting. Probably good enough for sec 1
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A couple of mid level D1 commits ans a bunch of sophomores? Not too exciting. Probably good enough for sec 1

It doesn’t matter what level they are, are they going to play in college? Enough said! Yorktown is going to be the best team in Section 1 at any level, so yes, Definitely good enough. #Clown
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A couple of mid level D1 commits ans a bunch of sophomores? Not too exciting. Probably good enough for sec 1

It doesn’t matter what level they are, are they going to play in college? Enough said! Yorktown is going to be the best team in Section 1 at any level, so yes, Definitely good enough. #Clown

<Rye> Enters the Chat.
<Mamaronek> Enters the Chat.
<Bronxville> Enters the Chat.
<Pleasantville> Enters the Chat

Yorktown is going to be the usual self they are. They will play a tough schedule, they will handle the teams they need to and will be in the Class B Final again. Best team in Section 1? That's a tough argument for anyone outside of Yorktown to make before the first practice starts. They will 100% be in the mix for it, but to claim it outright on March 8th is a bit much, even for Yorktown
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown has no offense, couple good poles , 2nd best 2026 goalie

John Jay has great offense, no poles, and best 2026 goalie in the section.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown plays 3 out of the 4 listed above. It’s great that nobody is avoiding anyone this year.
Opinion…. I keep hearing that section 1 is “ watered down” 4-5 years ago nobody said that.. are there really that many Section 1 kids going to private school?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Ha, Yorktown no offense, low level D1 poles, top 5 goalie in the country.
John jay has decent offense, no D, good goalie, not great and is going to private school next year. you heard it.
JJ bottoms out next next year and many may ditch as the re-build will be a massive effort. FACTS!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Ha, Yorktown no offense, low level D1 poles, top 5 goalie in the country.
John jay has decent offense, no D, good goalie, not great and is going to private school next year. you heard it.
JJ bottoms out next next year and many may ditch as the re-build will be a massive effort. FACTS!
Not talking about next year.. You can make an argument for both the JJ and Yorktown goalies. They are both very good. Love how you throw around the term low level d1..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
If you have put your eyes on both the Yorktown and the JJ goalie, you could NEVER say there is an argument. Sorry, there isnt. Not from Yorktown either. That said, both their squad are deficient in key areas, so, they both have to be ridiculous to win the section this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If you have put your eyes on both the Yorktown and the JJ goalie, you could NEVER say there is an argument. Sorry, there isnt. Not from Yorktown either. That said, both their squad are deficient in key areas, so, they both have to be ridiculous to win the section this year.


Agree John Jay goalie is far superior.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Then who beats them?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The "Thread Title" indicates Westchester NY/Fairfield CT Youth Lacrosse, but I have never seen a post/comment about Fairfield CT lax.

Where are the CT posts/forums or websites that cover CT (RI, MA, VT & NH)?
Probably in the Prep School forum……blahahhahaha
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Then who beats them?
Could be Greeley, Mahopac .................. Somers
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I’ve seen them both play quite a bit and they are each very very good. However I don’t understand the “far superior” comment. The Yorktown goalie is the number one ranked goalie recruit in the country and is likely going top 5 or 10 D1 school. Those rankings can be nonsense but college recruiting is not. Not sure how anyone is far superior to that although will agree the JJ goalie is excellent as well
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
But assuming Yorktown is the favorite in B correct? Or am I missing something
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
But assuming Yorktown is the favorite in B correct? Or am I missing something
The won the section last year, so, they should be the favorite. But, things are a bit different this year. It will be at battle at the top..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
But assuming Yorktown is the favorite in B correct? Or am I missing something
The won the section last year, so, they should be the favorite. But, things are a bit different this year. It will be at battle at the top..
It will be more of a battle than in the past, but the demise or fall off for Yorktown has been predicted for like 2-3 years now and it hasn't happened. Are they down compared to Yorktown teams of the past, yes. But they are still one of the best programs in Section 1. They have another year under their belt and B is a bit easier of a path. They'll be in the final again.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown plays 3 out of the 4 listed above. It’s great that nobody is avoiding anyone this year.
Opinion…. I keep hearing that section 1 is “ watered down” 4-5 years ago nobody said that.. are there really that many Section 1 kids going to private school?

I would argue that more teams have gotten better than it being watered down.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Gotcha, was just curious if I missed something in the section. The comment about having to be ridiculous to win kind of threw me.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The "Thread Title" indicates Westchester NY/Fairfield CT Youth Lacrosse, but I have never seen a post/comment about Fairfield CT lax.

Where are the CT posts/forums or websites that cover CT (RI, MA, VT & NH)?
Probably in the Prep School forum……blahahhahaha

The way to get more comments about CT lax is to post about it. I am interested in CT lax but it seems like jsut the 2 of us.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
CT folks just know that Brunswick, Taft, Loomis, Choate, Avon and Salisbury wouod smoke any CT public school so there’s no point. And before anyone references last years Darien win, that was an anomaly. Anyone who has watched this me teams can attest.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CT folks just know that Brunswick, Taft, Loomis, Choate, Avon and Salisbury wouod smoke any CT public school so there’s no point. And before anyone references last years Darien win, that was an anomaly. Anyone who has watched this me teams can attest.


There are a couple of good posters on LaxFans. They seem pretty plugged in to CT lax.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CT folks just know that Brunswick, Taft, Loomis, Choate, Avon and Salisbury wouod smoke any CT public school so there’s no point. And before anyone references last years Darien win, that was an anomaly. Anyone who has watched this me teams can attest.

Those schools are all really, really good. They would likely smoke every public school in every state. CT has lots of good public school. I think Staples High School is ranked as the top public school in the country going into this year. Other good programs are Darien, Cheshire, New Canaan, Wilton, Greenwich, Ridgefield, etc....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Inside Lacrosse top 25 public school rankings:

Fairfield County:
1. Staples (wesport)
4. Darien
11. New Canaan
23. Wilton
24. Ridgefield

Wilton and Ridgefield are based on rep IMO, don't think either will be very good this year.

Westchester County:


Would argue that Rye belongs in the top 25 this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CT folks just know that Brunswick, Taft, Loomis, Choate, Avon and Salisbury wouod smoke any CT public school so there’s no point. And before anyone references last years Darien win, that was an anomaly. Anyone who has watched this me teams can attest.

Those schools are all really, really good. They would likely smoke every public school in every state. CT has lots of good public school. I think Staples High School is ranked as the top public school in the country going into this year. Other good programs are Darien, Cheshire, New Canaan, Wilton, Greenwich, Ridgefield, etc....


This whole notion that CT Public schools can't compete with the private/prep schools is a bit off base. On the whole, the Prep/private schools are better for sure and a lot of that is the recruiting and the holding kids back to go to prep school + the additional gift of a PG at the end.

Darien, Ridgefield, New Canaan, Wilton and Staples play a mix of Brunswick, Don Bosco, St. Anthony's, Chaminade, Bishop Guertin, St. Johns, etc. They have beaten these teams in the past too..

Maybe they aren't as good...they clearly aren't afraid.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Inside Lacrosse top 25 public school rankings:

Fairfield County:
1. Staples (wesport)
4. Darien
11. New Canaan
23. Wilton
24. Ridgefield

Wilton and Ridgefield are based on rep IMO, don't think either will be very good this year.

Westchester County:


Would argue that Rye belongs in the top 25 this year.
Rye is stacked this year. Pleasantville should be considered as well as they return everyone from last year's campaign.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
First glimpse of scrimmage action in Section 1. Pville starters beat Mamaroneck 11-1. Sloppy, but that is to be expected 1 week out from the first day of practice.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
F
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CT folks just know that Brunswick, Taft, Loomis, Choate, Avon and Salisbury wouod smoke any CT public school so there’s no point. And before anyone references last years Darien win, that was an anomaly. Anyone who has watched this me teams can attest.
Darien and Brunswick have played 4 times. Brunswick's 3 wins have come by a combined 5 goals (including one in OT where they trailed the entire game). That was no fluke, that's just par for the course between these two. In fact, Darien has had a tougher time with Staples than Brunswick lately.

And it's not just Darien. In 2016 New Canaan blew Brunswick off their home field, sandwiched between two 2 goal losses in 2015 and 2017. They've fallen off since, but even in 2021 a pretty meh NC squad played Brunswick tougher than everyone's anointed pre-season champ Taft.

Also love that you threw Loomis, Choate, and AOF in there as if they've accomplished remotely anything compared to any of the other three. Loomis should be good this year and Choate was good last year -- but by and large those programs have been riding the coat tails of Wick/Salisbury/Deerfield/Taft for the better part of two decades.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
First glimpse of scrimmage action in Section 1. Pville starters beat Mamaroneck 11-1. Sloppy, but that is to be expected 1 week out from the first day of practice.
On paper this is a little surprising to me, however, Mamo had some big graduation losses but they are in reload mode, P'ville are basically whole from last year. Combine that with being 1 week in, it's really not.

If we see these offensive numbers for Mamo in the first couple of games, then it's time to be concerned.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thanks for the classifications.
Pivoting, does anyone have the League breakdowns?
Want to bet L/P is in a League that they shouldn't be in.

LEAGUES

A: Mamaroneck, New Ro, Scarsdale, White Plains
B: Harrison, Rye, Pelham, Eastchester
C: North Rockland, Clarkstown South, Suffern, TZ
D: Nanuet, Clarkstown North, Nyack, PR
E: Byram, Greeley Fox Lane, Brewster, Somers, John Jay
F: Arlington, Wappingers, Yorktown, Mahopac, Carmel
G: Hen Hud, Ossining/Peekskill, Brewster, Put Valley, Lakeland/Panas
H: North Salem, Yonkers, Keio, Briarcliff, Westlake, Haldane, Rye Neck
I: Croton, P'ville, Dobbs, Sleepy Hallow, Ardsley, Pawling
J: Edgemont, Albertus Magnus, Bronxville, Irvington, Blind Brook, Hastings,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Heard that Carmel went toe-to-toe with Somers in a scrimmage and that Carmel was impressive.

Anyone else hear results from this scrimmage or any others?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Heard that Carmel went toe-to-toe with Somers in a scrimmage and that Carmel was impressive.

Anyone else hear results from this scrimmage or any others?
No surprise here. Carmel gritty squad and Somers struggled all last year with chemistry and a very weak D. More of the same...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Somers was supposed to scrimmage Bronxville today but bailed out last minute. Interesting!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Heard that Carmel went toe-to-toe with Somers in a scrimmage and that Carmel was impressive.

Anyone else hear results from this scrimmage or any others?
Carmel was VERY young about 2-3 years ago, but the talent was evident. They've continued to get better each year so this isn't really a surprise.
Still week one for everyone, so let's not get down on teams that struggle now.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Somers was supposed to scrimmage Bronxville today but bailed out last minute. Interesting!!
its 30 something degrees with wind gust of 30 mph, many scrimmages got moved.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Somers was supposed to scrimmage Bronxville today but bailed out last minute. Interesting!!
They had a scrimmage yesterday, going back-to-back days wouldn't make much sense - plus they backed out of it a couple of days ago, so this shouldn't be a surprise.

I have no rooting interest here, but let's go easy - it's still early in the season, new staff, figuring things out still. You're reading WAY too much into this.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Did Mahopac lose their entire defense and goalie last year. I watched them scrimmage Pville and no bueno. Pac looks WAY down this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Did Mahopac lose their entire defense and goalie last year. I watched them scrimmage Pville and no bueno. Pac looks WAY down this year.
I wonder if that’s more of a function of P’ville returning everyone from a dominant year last year.

I don’t know though
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
- Iona cant run with the big boys Wick, chaminade, st anthonys

Iona has seen 1 goal losses to Chaminade in 21 & 22 and is probably as deep offensively & at midfield as they ever have been in program history. Nearly all key contributors offensively will be juniors or underclassmen their sophomore attack duo broke freshman points and goals record respectively with each leading the team in those categories, one of which is more than likely a top 20 for 26’s if not higher. The soph class will not be getting their first varsity minutes come game 1 this time around. My guess Their O will be able to put in goals even against the tougher defenses. A largely underclass O from last year most seeing their first varsity minutes will probably look a lot different from the freshman campaign.

Will be a much bigger question mark at the D end outside of two solid close guys and losing a game changing Dmid but have seen turnover in the past two seasons basically putting senior poles who were virtually non contributors in years prior but have gone through the program and putting out solid D squads and rope unit has been very tough b/w very strong ssdm classes and tough two way middies.

Iona is not near the top 5-10 bubble nationally and is usually missing one or two key pieces in one position or another but I’ll predict they will pick up a good handful of high caliber wins incl chaminade if not this year the next 1 or 2 following
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
- Iona cant run with the big boys Wick, chaminade, st anthonys

Iona has seen 1 goal losses to Chaminade in 21 & 22 and is probably as deep offensively & at midfield as they ever have been in program history. Nearly all key contributors offensively will be juniors or underclassmen their sophomore attack duo broke freshman points and goals record respectively with each leading the team in those categories, one of which is more than likely a top 20 for 26’s if not higher. The soph class will not be getting their first varsity minutes come game 1 this time around. My guess Their O will be able to put in goals even against the tougher defenses. A largely underclass O from last year most seeing their first varsity minutes will probably look a lot different from the freshman campaign.

Will be a much bigger question mark at the D end outside of two solid close guys and losing a game changing Dmid but have seen turnover in the past two seasons basically putting senior poles who were virtually non contributors in years prior but have gone through the program and putting out solid D squads and rope unit has been very tough b/w very strong ssdm classes and tough two way middies.

Iona is not near the top 5-10 bubble nationally and is usually missing one or two key pieces in one position or another but I’ll predict they will pick up a good handful of high caliber wins if not this year the next 1 or 2 following
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
- Iona cant run with the big boys Wick, chaminade, st anthonys

Iona has seen 1 goal losses to Chaminade in 21 & 22 and is probably as deep offensively & at midfield as they ever have been in program history. Nearly all key contributors offensively will be juniors or underclassmen their sophomore attack duo broke freshman points and goals record respectively with each leading the team in those categories, one of which is more than likely a top 20 for 26’s if not higher. The soph class will not be getting their first varsity minutes come game 1 this time around. My guess Their O will be able to put in goals even against the tougher defenses. A largely underclass O from last year most seeing their first varsity minutes will probably look a lot different from the freshman campaign.

Will be a much bigger question mark at the D end outside of two solid close guys and losing a game changing Dmid but have seen turnover in the past two seasons basically putting senior poles who were virtually non contributors in years prior but have gone through the program and putting out solid D squads and rope unit has been very tough b/w very strong ssdm classes and tough two way middies.

Iona is not near the top 5-10 bubble nationally and is usually missing one or two key pieces in one position or another but I’ll predict they will pick up a good handful of high caliber wins if not this year the next 1 or 2 following

Yawn
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I dont think that is it..for sure taking that into consideration .. I think the entire D and goalie are new.. Looks like they have A LOT of work to do.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Games start counting this week in Section 1. Looks like Scarsdale getting us going today and a bunch of others getting it going tomorrow. Good luck to everyone. Looking forward to seeing who does what.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
- Iona cant run with the big boys Wick, chaminade, st anthonys

Iona has seen 1 goal losses to Chaminade in 21 & 22 and is probably as deep offensively & at midfield as they ever have been in program history. Nearly all key contributors offensively will be juniors or underclassmen their sophomore attack duo broke freshman points and goals record respectively with each leading the team in those categories, one of which is more than likely a top 20 for 26’s if not higher. The soph class will not be getting their first varsity minutes come game 1 this time around. My guess Their O will be able to put in goals even against the tougher defenses. A largely underclass O from last year most seeing their first varsity minutes will probably look a lot different from the freshman campaign.

Will be a much bigger question mark at the D end outside of two solid close guys and losing a game changing Dmid but have seen turnover in the past two seasons basically putting senior poles who were virtually non contributors in years prior but have gone through the program and putting out solid D squads and rope unit has been very tough b/w very strong ssdm classes and tough two way middies.

Iona is not near the top 5-10 bubble nationally and is usually missing one or two key pieces in one position or another but I’ll predict they will pick up a good handful of high caliber wins if not this year the next 1 or 2 following

Yawn
Iona is an interesting program. Not nearly as good as prep schools and only marginally better than town programs. Though one could argue that Rye would give them a run for their money. IP will win state championships for the next 3 years but that only means they have to beat Stepinac. Great they have Chaminade and St Anthonys on the calendar to see where they measure. Will be interesting to see these sophomores go against future top tier d1 defenders and specialists. Does Iona have any committed players…….guessing no since they are aligned with Express North (which would also explain how they are mid tier at best.)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
100% agree with your first few statements, however your last one : Does Iona have any committed players…….guessing no since they are aligned with Express North (which would also explain how they are mid tier at best.) shows your true colors. What does EN have to do with the kids that currently play for IP? the current kids on the team play for many clubs (in fact there are only a few on EN) so not sure what that has to do with your previous points. They do have commits, and will have more no doubt so stop, time will tell like you said when they play SA, chaminade, Ridgefield, SHP, DB, Cheshire, etc. People on this forum can speculate and predict all they want but IP must perform period.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Town beat Iona in OT today in a scrimmage.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
FWIW, I heard Yorktown beat Iona 8-7 in a scrimmage today. Doesn’t matter until the real games start
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I don't read too much into scores on a scrimmage. Yeah it's good to win, but it's about prepping for the season. We don't know if it was just a game - most likely didn't play the main guys as if it were a real game because your trying to get everyone some time, work on situations, etc.

Still good that it was played close.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Greeley 15-7 over Carmel

Kind of surprised it was so lopsided, Carmel has at least three commits which are two high D3 and one middle pack D1.

But man the Greeley schedules looks tough, Cold Spring Harbor, Greenwich, Mamo, Somers, and Bronxville will all be tests.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Somers 17-3 over Scarsdale might be the biggest eye-opener on a few years.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Greeley 15-7 over Carmel

Kind of surprised it was so lopsided, Carmel has at least three commits which are two high D3 and one middle pack D1.

But man the Greeley schedules looks tough, Cold Spring Harbor, Greenwich, Mamo, Somers, and Bronxville will all be tests.
And if they play like they did today - they’re all gonna be fat Ls. I didn’t see anything that shows that they are any better than last year. This is the same team with a tougher schedule they’d better improve quick if they want to hang with those teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Somers 17-3 over Scarsdale might be the biggest eye-opener on a few years.
Eye opener that Scaresdale is way down. Heard more of the same at somers in house fighting. Give it a minute to see where both these teams go.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Greeley 15-7 over Carmel

Kind of surprised it was so lopsided, Carmel has at least three commits which are two high D3 and one middle pack D1.

But man the Greeley schedules looks tough, Cold Spring Harbor, Greenwich, Mamo, Somers, and Bronxville will all be tests.
And if they play like they did today - they’re all gonna be fat Ls. I didn’t see anything that shows that they are any better than last year. This is the same team with a tougher schedule they’d better improve quick if they want to hang with those teams.
The game was never in question..... Gave up to late goals to make it 7 for Carmel. All you heard was how gritty and tough Carmel is. Well, says something about Greeley then. Could be the best offense is section 1. Played all their guys too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Carmel is overrated. They are an ok team and that is it. Above average Section 1 team. Everyone who rates them does so solely on the "everyone is coming back theory". Kids don't turn into Paul Rabil just because 12 months have passed. They will have a nice successful season, and because class A lacks depth, and North Rockland is down, they may be the third best team in A. But not on the same level as the top shelf teams. Greeley is probably at that level now, albeit at the bottom of it - unless proven otherwise.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Greeley 15-7 over Carmel

Kind of surprised it was so lopsided, Carmel has at least three commits which are two high D3 and one middle pack D1.

But man the Greeley schedules looks tough, Cold Spring Harbor, Greenwich, Mamo, Somers, and Bronxville will all be tests.
And if they play like they did today - they’re all gonna be fat Ls. I didn’t see anything that shows that they are any better than last year. This is the same team with a tougher schedule they’d better improve quick if they want to hang with those teams.
The game was never in question..... Gave up to late goals to make it 7 for Carmel. All you heard was how gritty and tough Carmel is. Well, says something about Greeley then. Could be the best offense is section 1. Played all their guys too.
Did we see the same game? They did not play all their guys - this has been one of the biggest issues within the team. "Could be the best offense in Section 1" is one of the most laughable things anyone has posted here in awhile.

They do have some talent and they've shown they can put up goals against mediocre teams. That much hasn't changed - all due respect to Carmel. They did beef up their schedule so we'll see how this offense does against those better teams. But to say it's the best in Section 1?

That's not a serious take. One things for sure, a lot of people are talking about them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Carmel is overrated. They are an ok team and that is it. Above average Section 1 team. Everyone who rates them does so solely on the "everyone is coming back theory". Kids don't turn into Paul Rabil just because 12 months have passed. They will have a nice successful season, and because class A lacks depth, and North Rockland is down, they may be the third best team in A. But not on the same level as the top shelf teams. Greeley is probably at that level now, albeit at the bottom of it - unless proven otherwise.

I would say they are the second best team in Class A. Scarsdale just got beat to a pulp and their best player is out for the season. Obviously kids won't turn into Paul Rabil but a year of experience under the belt goes a long way. Kids do improve a lot from junior to senior year. It's still very early in the season and some teams need time to gel.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
As someone with no skin in the game, I will try to be objective. Respectfully, Carmel has 2 good players so Greeley winning that game is no surprise. Carmel is very average. Greeley has a legit team now, and maybe more importantly, finally a coach that cares about the boys&program, does his homework, and knows his matchups. That wasn't the case for the previous decade. And yes Greeley has some good tests this year to see if they are truly Sec1 elite now. No doubt it is easy to say Rye a top program and Yorktown has a great defense, but to put the perennial top class A schools near the top of Sec1 this year is not just a joke but someone having little clue of current rosters and going off of history (regardless of their #1 player going down in Scarsdale for example). Top 3 Class B schools (Yorktown, Somers and Greeley) all beat the top 3 Class A schools this year imho. Goin to be fun to see how it unfolds though
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Pelham continuing its enigmatic ways from last year . After a lackluster game vs. John Jay the go goal for goal with Pleasantville until a 3-spot in the 3rd quarter by Pleasentville opened it up. Pelham looked like a different team in 2 days.

John Jay boatraced Briarcliff tonight. I don’t think they’ve lost a FO in 2 games. Briarcliff may have had 2 total offensive possessions in the 1st half. Running time by the 4th quarter. Jay is an early juggernaut. Saturday should be a fun one.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
As someone with no skin in the game, I will try to be objective. Respectfully, Carmel has 2 good players so Greeley winning that game is no surprise. Carmel is very average. Greeley has a legit team now, and maybe more importantly, finally a coach that cares about the boys&program, does his homework, and knows his matchups. That wasn't the case for the previous decade. And yes Greeley has some good tests this year to see if they are truly Sec1 elite now. No doubt it is easy to say Rye a top program and Yorktown has a great defense, but to put the perennial top class A schools near the top of Sec1 this year is not just a joke but someone having little clue of current rosters and going off of history (regardless of their #1 player going down in Scarsdale for example). Top 3 Class B schools (Yorktown, Somers and Greeley) all beat the top 3 Class A schools this year imho. Goin to be fun to see how it unfolds though

With respect, you can’t say you don’t have skin in the game then make a blatantly false comment that Greely hasn’t had a coach that cares in a decade. You either have no clue what went on with the previous staff or you’re trying to paint a narrative for whatever reason. You don’t have entire teams of players fight the administration on two separate occasions to keep their coaches if they didn’t feel the coaches cared about them. Those guys had decades of experience took a middling program to places it hadn’t been in years prior.

That doesn’t take anything away from the current guys who I’m sure care and do a great job as well. But we don’t need to [Censored] on one coach to make the next one look good.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
FWIW, I heard Yorktown beat Iona 8-7 in a scrimmage today. Doesn’t matter until the real games start
What would this be interpreted as? Town is a perennial power but IP is private and gets to recruit. Shouldn't Iona win this with out any issue? Yes a scrimmage but thats a close score for what you would think is a bigger gap. Great result for Town. Quick Iona question, are they really playing 13 road games and 4 home games? 8 of the first 10 on the road? Are they redoing the field?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
As someone with no skin in the game, I will try to be objective. Respectfully, Carmel has 2 good players so Greeley winning that game is no surprise. Carmel is very average. Greeley has a legit team now, and maybe more importantly, finally a coach that cares about the boys&program, does his homework, and knows his matchups. That wasn't the case for the previous decade. And yes Greeley has some good tests this year to see if they are truly Sec1 elite now. No doubt it is easy to say Rye a top program and Yorktown has a great defense, but to put the perennial top class A schools near the top of Sec1 this year is not just a joke but someone having little clue of current rosters and going off of history (regardless of their #1 player going down in Scarsdale for example). Top 3 Class B schools (Yorktown, Somers and Greeley) all beat the top 3 Class A schools this year imho. Goin to be fun to see how it unfolds though

With respect, you can’t say you don’t have skin in the game then make a blatantly false comment that Greely hasn’t had a coach that cares in a decade. You either have no clue what went on with the previous staff or you’re trying to paint a narrative for whatever reason. You don’t have entire teams of players fight the administration on two separate occasions to keep their coaches if they didn’t feel the coaches cared about them. Those guys had decades of experience took a middling program to places it hadn’t been in years prior.

That doesn’t take anything away from the current guys who I’m sure care and do a great job as well. But we don’t need to [Censored] on one coach to make the next one look good.

Are you implying that the previous coaching staff too a middling program to places it hadn't been in years? ha... Vin DeGregoria did a great job with the program and built it up... every coach since then demolished the program. Previous head was the biggest clown. Scared to compete and would sabotage games, put players in the didn't deserve to step on a lacrosse field. Put non-starters in at man-down to get them time on the field. And of course a team is going to fight for their coach... that coach is all they know and they dont want there season disturbed, but, there is absolutely no question the administration did undeniably the best things for those kids and program by cutting ties with a coach that only showed up for a paycheck, didn't do any work out side of the spring season and had absolutely no business being a coach at ANY level. Youth through high school. Previous coach had 1 good year as he inherited a good team and well coached, then it all went to heck in handbasket the years following.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Ok. Maybe you know more than I do abt previous coach at Horace Greeley HS. Certainly I don’t know the details and you seemingly do. I just look at the record. I don’t understand the comment though that the previous coach took a middling program to places it hadn’t been in years prior?? Greeley was good back in the 90s and some decent yrs in mid 2000s but it hasn’t been good since. Fact. Thus my statement that the previous decade was sub par, and yes I believe it starts and ends with the coach. Somers is a good example too. They needed new leadership and I suspect they will be a better team this year because of it.

I am not even in the district though and not sure why I am defending a team I am indifferent about. But my son will actually play Horace Greeley once again this year, we will lose, and I expect HG is better than last yr and a real contender for Sectional title.

Honestly though, not sure what you mean by taking them to places they haven’t been in yrs prior??? Like he took them to the playoffs? Virtually every team makes the playoffs, I just know 5 yrs ago with my oldest that the Greeley game was marked as a win before it happened, whereas this season I expect Greeley will be winning a lot of games and beating us.

Maybe you meant that the coach took them to a restaurant they have never been too? Ha. Anyway, all good and not sure why so defensive about yrs past, I just remember being told that Greeley program was not run well, and this year my understanding is team is better than last yr and just seems like it is turning around with new leadership. Let’s move forward, Happy holiday
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Laughable, just laughable jajajaja. This team has “frat boy/lax bro” mentality written all over it. Undisciplined from the top down as the head talks [Censored] to opposing players. Very unprofessional and of course it’s the club ball testosterone style of the game that people detest. I’ve spent time with some of you at summer tournaments and some of you love to talk as you sip from your Yeti’s jajajaja. Listening to you plan and brag how your getting the coach fired and complain to the school, you should be ashamed of yourself as a “coach” yourself EK. Word on the turf is that they will actually have a real coach next year and not a puppet controlled by club parents when Roy Colsey takes over. A lot of the God squad middle school parents want him or their kids are going prep school but who knows, maybe he’ll refuse to work in a chaotic and toxic environment?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Laughable, just laughable jajajaja. This team has “frat boy/lax bro” mentality written all over it. Undisciplined from the top down as the head talks [Censored] to opposing players. Very unprofessional and of course it’s the club ball testosterone style of the game that people detest. I’ve spent time with some of you at summer tournaments and some of you love to talk as you sip from your Yeti’s jajajaja. Listening to you plan and brag how your getting the coach fired and complain to the school, you should be ashamed of yourself as a “coach” yourself EK. Word on the turf is that they will actually have a real coach next year and not a puppet controlled by club parents when Roy Colsey takes over. A lot of the God squad middle school parents want him or their kids are going prep school but who knows, maybe he’ll refuse to work in a chaotic and toxic environment?
You’re on a ledge fat boy, you have really lost it. Roy Colsey is retiring from Ridgefield to watch his sons play at Virginia , oh no he isn’t going to do that to placate greeley families and coach for a second time and not watch his two sons play and why he is moving on from Ridgefield. You are a complete a.clown. Always were. You have a god complex with 0 lacrosse IQ. Dig a hole. You shouldn’t be allowed anything lacrosse ever.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Hi All, Since this is an anonymous board, I have no way to prove who I am except that I am the "Clown" who was the previous coach at Greeley. If you know me, then you know i have a 516 phone number and grew up in NJ - that should be sufficient enough. Lacrosse is a small world, so it didn't take long for word to get to me about this "discussion."

2 years on - I can't believe I still have to address my time and departure from Greeley, but here we are. There's a saying, "those who know, don't care and those who care, don't know."

There are maybe 5 or 6 people who have a grasp on the full scope of what went on over the course of my entire tenure there - the mostly good and the small minority of times that were bad. None of those people are on here talking about it - or talking about it at all. For those that "heard" what happen or are going off on what they "know" went on and seem to care so much that they are still talking about it - you don't know and you are simply wrong. I said my piece at the end of that season. You can probably get my email it's probably still out there. I am not going to go into it again. I'm also not going to counterpoint the inaccurate things written here - for starters there's just too much of it. Except to say this: no one can honestly say I or my coaches didn't care and we were there just for paycheck - Any coach will tell you it isn't about the money. I am just a guy from NJ who loves lacrosse and have a passion for coaching it and have done so at every level. I have no connection to Greeley other than I was hired to be an assistant at first and then the Head Coach. I fully dove into it like I do all my coaching positions. I built some great relationships that endure to this day as a result. I was there for nearly all the fall and winter league games, ran virtual trainings during the covid lockdowns in 2020, did youth clinics and more. My second and third child were both born during my time there and not that it's anyone's business, the pregnancies were less than ideal - everyone is healthy now, thankfully. Winter ball or fall ball i may have missed a small amount of times, because: life. But when it come to spring, I never missed one practice and on ONE occasion I had to leave a game early because my daughter was taken to the ER. After 15 years of doing summer travel balI, I wanted to take some time to spend summer with my family. I was asked to coach a younger Express team because it was heavy with Greeley youth players and we all wanted to help continue to build the relationship from youth to HS guys and so I did.

It's telling that it is all still done anonymously. Just like it was done when I was at Greeley. Just like it was done at Express - I've seen the emails. People were so righteous that the few that were written all start with some version of 'don't let my son know I am writing this and I don't want the coach to know, but...' The same people that to my face feigned support while writing fabricated emails to the administration.

What you also aren't realizing is that all of this is also a backhand insult to the current coach who was an assistant to me my final year. It's his program now. I wished him luck then and still do now. He should be measured like any of us: by what he does now and going forward, not by comparing him to me or anyone else. Let's also not forget there are a large group of HS kids that are putting the work in to get better every day. Most of whom I had the privilege of coaching at one time or another. I want them all to succeed.

Anyone else that still seems to have an issue, call or text me and we can discuss it. If you don't have my number than frankly, you aren't important enough to me to worry about your opinion. I won't hold my breath for the phone to ring. It didn't then and it doubt it will now.

Let's refocus on talking about Section 1 lacrosse. The season is off to a great start and Good luck to everyone this season. Hopefully this is the last of it.

It will be for me.

BZ
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Fat boy? I’m confused, I thought you handpicked the current coach and like him? Why backstab this coach also? So confused by this. You bully your way through the youth association to install a new assistant coach with the goal being to overthrow the then current coach, get what you want and now call him “fat boy” - that Yeti tumbler must be getting an extra workout today! Please don’t drive today because you are a mess enough texting and drinking as you most likely are wearing your varsity letter jacket jajajaja.

You are right, I don’t know anything about lax Jajajajaja, I’m just a basketball dad who’s kids enjoy lax and I’ve never played a day in my life. Didn’t know the rules until 4 years ago and I’m still confused by them and please don’t get me started on my daughters game and those rules where good defense is a penalty jajajaja! But I wouldn’t say I’m fat, a touch under 6 feet and about 76 kg (that’s about 170 to you in the US) doesn’t qualify me as “fat boy” so why the detest for your handpicked coach? As I think about it, I guess you are thinking that this is the old coach here? Jajajajaja, again listening to you boldly blather your detest for a coach and your plans to coordinate complaints to the school, whether at the Dome or at the sidelines of games or tournaments the word gets around of who to avoid and of course it’s usually the frat boys with their Yetis and their glory days being relived through their kids (most unfortunately.

Rumor still is that Coach C will be coaching that team next year - that will be a problem for the section as a real knowledgeable coach will be in charge of a talented team. A coach that could go uptempo or slow it down as he has proven in his state titles over superior Darien teams who were NATIONALLY ranked.

This is not a job for frat boys, but as a frat boy you wouldn’t know that, and the school would be negligent if they didn’t pursue a real coach like Colsey. Also, don’t say you don’t have a “horse in the race” when you do. Im not a betting man but I bet you wouldn’t even insure that horse? If Roy Colsey is the coach of Greely they win a few section tiles and maybe states in the immediate future. If not it stays daddy club ball and kids go away on spring break and blame everyone around them.

Those around you have ears, and the reputation of certain parents gets around, that’s why I now keep my rocking lawn chair far away from the pack and I just get the gossip afterwards.

~Go PAC!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Somers with the nice W at Wilton today, they seem to be on the right side of things.
John Jay going toe-to-toe with Manhasset in a 1-goal loss.
Yorktown and Bronxville in an OT thriller.

1st week wrapping up nicely.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Fat boy? I’m confused, I thought you handpicked the current coach and like him? Why backstab this coach also? So confused by this. You bully your way through the youth association to install a new assistant coach with the goal being to overthrow the then current coach, get what you want and now call him “fat boy” - that Yeti tumbler must be getting an extra workout today! Please don’t drive today because you are a mess enough texting and drinking as you most likely are wearing your varsity letter jacket jajajaja.

You are right, I don’t know anything about lax Jajajajaja, I’m just a basketball dad who’s kids enjoy lax and I’ve never played a day in my life. Didn’t know the rules until 4 years ago and I’m still confused by them and please don’t get me started on my daughters game and those rules where good defense is a penalty jajajaja! But I wouldn’t say I’m fat, a touch under 6 feet and about 76 kg (that’s about 170 to you in the US) doesn’t qualify me as “fat boy” so why the detest for your handpicked coach? As I think about it, I guess you are thinking that this is the old coach here? Jajajajaja, again listening to you boldly blather your detest for a coach and your plans to coordinate complaints to the school, whether at the Dome or at the sidelines of games or tournaments the word gets around of who to avoid and of course it’s usually the frat boys with their Yetis and their glory days being relived through their kids (most unfortunately.

Rumor still is that Coach C will be coaching that team next year - that will be a problem for the section as a real knowledgeable coach will be in charge of a talented team. A coach that could go uptempo or slow it down as he has proven in his state titles over superior Darien teams who were NATIONALLY ranked.

This is not a job for frat boys, but as a frat boy you wouldn’t know that, and the school would be negligent if they didn’t pursue a real coach like Colsey. Also, don’t say you don’t have a “horse in the race” when you do. Im not a betting man but I bet you wouldn’t even insure that horse? If Roy Colsey is the coach of Greely they win a few section tiles and maybe states in the immediate future. If not it stays daddy club ball and kids go away on spring break and blame everyone around them.

Those around you have ears, and the reputation of certain parents gets around, that’s why I now keep my rocking lawn chair far away from the pack and I just get the gossip afterwards.

~Go PAC!
this is the most idiotic rant. this is a tough read. Mahopac is 0-2, lost to a class D school and 8 seniors quit last week. Time to regroup big fella, but, your smoke screen doesn't work, like your diet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hi All, Since this is an anonymous board, I have no way to prove who I am except that I am the "Clown" who was the previous coach at Greeley. If you know me, then you know i have a 516 phone number and grew up in NJ - that should be sufficient enough. Lacrosse is a small world, so it didn't take long for word to get to me about this "discussion."

2 years on - I can't believe I still have to address my time and departure from Greeley, but here we are. There's a saying, "those who know, don't care and those who care, don't know."

There are maybe 5 or 6 people who have a grasp on the full scope of what went on over the course of my entire tenure there - the mostly good and the small minority of times that were bad. None of those people are on here talking about it - or talking about it at all. For those that "heard" what happen or are going off on what they "know" went on and seem to care so much that they are still talking about it - you don't know and you are simply wrong. I said my piece at the end of that season. You can probably get my email it's probably still out there. I am not going to go into it again. I'm also not going to counterpoint the inaccurate things written here - for starters there's just too much of it. Except to say this: no one can honestly say I or my coaches didn't care and we were there just for paycheck - Any coach will tell you it isn't about the money. I am just a guy from NJ who loves lacrosse and have a passion for coaching it and have done so at every level. I have no connection to Greeley other than I was hired to be an assistant at first and then the Head Coach. I fully dove into it like I do all my coaching positions. I built some great relationships that endure to this day as a result. I was there for nearly all the fall and winter league games, ran virtual trainings during the covid lockdowns in 2020, did youth clinics and more. My second and third child were both born during my time there and not that it's anyone's business, the pregnancies were less than ideal - everyone is healthy now, thankfully. Winter ball or fall ball i may have missed a small amount of times, because: life. But when it come to spring, I never missed one practice and on ONE occasion I had to leave a game early because my daughter was taken to the ER. After 15 years of doing summer travel balI, I wanted to take some time to spend summer with my family. I was asked to coach a younger Express team because it was heavy with Greeley youth players and we all wanted to help continue to build the relationship from youth to HS guys and so I did.

It's telling that it is all still done anonymously. Just like it was done when I was at Greeley. Just like it was done at Express - I've seen the emails. People were so righteous that the few that were written all start with some version of 'don't let my son know I am writing this and I don't want the coach to know, but...' The same people that to my face feigned support while writing fabricated emails to the administration.

What you also aren't realizing is that all of this is also a backhand insult to the current coach who was an assistant to me my final year. It's his program now. I wished him luck then and still do now. He should be measured like any of us: by what he does now and going forward, not by comparing him to me or anyone else. Let's also not forget there are a large group of HS kids that are putting the work in to get better every day. Most of whom I had the privilege of coaching at one time or another. I want them all to succeed.

Anyone else that still seems to have an issue, call or text me and we can discuss it. If you don't have my number than frankly, you aren't important enough to me to worry about your opinion. I won't hold my breath for the phone to ring. It didn't then and it doubt it will now.

Let's refocus on talking about Section 1 lacrosse. The season is off to a great start and Good luck to everyone this season. Hopefully this is the last of it.

It will be for me.

BZ
honestly, this is is a smoke screen like the next post... more craziness
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hi All, Since this is an anonymous board, I have no way to prove who I am except that I am the "Clown" who was the previous coach at Greeley. If you know me, then you know i have a 516 phone number and grew up in NJ - that should be sufficient enough. Lacrosse is a small world, so it didn't take long for word to get to me about this "discussion."

2 years on - I can't believe I still have to address my time and departure from Greeley, but here we are. There's a saying, "those who know, don't care and those who care, don't know."

There are maybe 5 or 6 people who have a grasp on the full scope of what went on over the course of my entire tenure there - the mostly good and the small minority of times that were bad. None of those people are on here talking about it - or talking about it at all. For those that "heard" what happen or are going off on what they "know" went on and seem to care so much that they are still talking about it - you don't know and you are simply wrong. I said my piece at the end of that season. You can probably get my email it's probably still out there. I am not going to go into it again. I'm also not going to counterpoint the inaccurate things written here - for starters there's just too much of it. Except to say this: no one can honestly say I or my coaches didn't care and we were there just for paycheck - Any coach will tell you it isn't about the money. I am just a guy from NJ who loves lacrosse and have a passion for coaching it and have done so at every level. I have no connection to Greeley other than I was hired to be an assistant at first and then the Head Coach. I fully dove into it like I do all my coaching positions. I built some great relationships that endure to this day as a result. I was there for nearly all the fall and winter league games, ran virtual trainings during the covid lockdowns in 2020, did youth clinics and more. My second and third child were both born during my time there and not that it's anyone's business, the pregnancies were less than ideal - everyone is healthy now, thankfully. Winter ball or fall ball i may have missed a small amount of times, because: life. But when it come to spring, I never missed one practice and on ONE occasion I had to leave a game early because my daughter was taken to the ER. After 15 years of doing summer travel balI, I wanted to take some time to spend summer with my family. I was asked to coach a younger Express team because it was heavy with Greeley youth players and we all wanted to help continue to build the relationship from youth to HS guys and so I did.

It's telling that it is all still done anonymously. Just like it was done when I was at Greeley. Just like it was done at Express - I've seen the emails. People were so righteous that the few that were written all start with some version of 'don't let my son know I am writing this and I don't want the coach to know, but...' The same people that to my face feigned support while writing fabricated emails to the administration.

What you also aren't realizing is that all of this is also a backhand insult to the current coach who was an assistant to me my final year. It's his program now. I wished him luck then and still do now. He should be measured like any of us: by what he does now and going forward, not by comparing him to me or anyone else. Let's also not forget there are a large group of HS kids that are putting the work in to get better every day. Most of whom I had the privilege of coaching at one time or another. I want them all to succeed.

Anyone else that still seems to have an issue, call or text me and we can discuss it. If you don't have my number than frankly, you aren't important enough to me to worry about your opinion. I won't hold my breath for the phone to ring. It didn't then and it doubt it will now.

Let's refocus on talking about Section 1 lacrosse. The season is off to a great start and Good luck to everyone this season. Hopefully this is the last of it.

It will be for me.

BZ
there is no doubt, any positive Greeley post there is a negative response and there is little doubt it isnt coming you, who also lives in Katonah/john jay. It isnt hard to figure out. Just shoot straight, move on with your life and leave Greeley WAY back in your rear mirror and there will be no more rebuttal to your nonsense.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hi All, Since this is an anonymous board, I have no way to prove who I am except that I am the "Clown" who was the previous coach at Greeley. If you know me, then you know i have a 516 phone number and grew up in NJ - that should be sufficient enough. Lacrosse is a small world, so it didn't take long for word to get to me about this "discussion."

2 years on - I can't believe I still have to address my time and departure from Greeley, but here we are. There's a saying, "those who know, don't care and those who care, don't know."

There are maybe 5 or 6 people who have a grasp on the full scope of what went on over the course of my entire tenure there - the mostly good and the small minority of times that were bad. None of those people are on here talking about it - or talking about it at all. For those that "heard" what happen or are going off on what they "know" went on and seem to care so much that they are still talking about it - you don't know and you are simply wrong. I said my piece at the end of that season. You can probably get my email it's probably still out there. I am not going to go into it again. I'm also not going to counterpoint the inaccurate things written here - for starters there's just too much of it. Except to say this: no one can honestly say I or my coaches didn't care and we were there just for paycheck - Any coach will tell you it isn't about the money. I am just a guy from NJ who loves lacrosse and have a passion for coaching it and have done so at every level. I have no connection to Greeley other than I was hired to be an assistant at first and then the Head Coach. I fully dove into it like I do all my coaching positions. I built some great relationships that endure to this day as a result. I was there for nearly all the fall and winter league games, ran virtual trainings during the covid lockdowns in 2020, did youth clinics and more. My second and third child were both born during my time there and not that it's anyone's business, the pregnancies were less than ideal - everyone is healthy now, thankfully. Winter ball or fall ball i may have missed a small amount of times, because: life. But when it come to spring, I never missed one practice and on ONE occasion I had to leave a game early because my daughter was taken to the ER. After 15 years of doing summer travel balI, I wanted to take some time to spend summer with my family. I was asked to coach a younger Express team because it was heavy with Greeley youth players and we all wanted to help continue to build the relationship from youth to HS guys and so I did.

It's telling that it is all still done anonymously. Just like it was done when I was at Greeley. Just like it was done at Express - I've seen the emails. People were so righteous that the few that were written all start with some version of 'don't let my son know I am writing this and I don't want the coach to know, but...' The same people that to my face feigned support while writing fabricated emails to the administration.

What you also aren't realizing is that all of this is also a backhand insult to the current coach who was an assistant to me my final year. It's his program now. I wished him luck then and still do now. He should be measured like any of us: by what he does now and going forward, not by comparing him to me or anyone else. Let's also not forget there are a large group of HS kids that are putting the work in to get better every day. Most of whom I had the privilege of coaching at one time or another. I want them all to succeed.

Anyone else that still seems to have an issue, call or text me and we can discuss it. If you don't have my number than frankly, you aren't important enough to me to worry about your opinion. I won't hold my breath for the phone to ring. It didn't then and it doubt it will now.

Let's refocus on talking about Section 1 lacrosse. The season is off to a great start and Good luck to everyone this season. Hopefully this is the last of it.

It will be for me.

BZ
there is no doubt, any positive Greeley post there is a negative response and there is little doubt it isnt coming you, who also lives in Katonah/john jay. It isnt hard to figure out. Just shoot straight, move on with your life and leave Greeley WAY back in your rear mirror and there will be no more rebuttal to your nonsense.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
That is a very decent and honorable reply by your former coach and of course you attack it as a fake. I would bet you were all buddy buddy when you were face to face, jajajaja, you’re a fraud, a backstabbing fraud. It is no wonder why your team, parents and coaches have a miserable reputation with the other teams and officials throughout the section. There is no doubt by the tone of the responses who I would believe. Back to debate, yes we lost 2, but I do recall our kids teams did meet up in a scrimmage last year and Mahopac came out on top. Anyhow there is no shame in losing to a Mamaroneck or a quality small school like Haldane and I will still root for my child and their friends/teammates. Unlike you who threatens coaches, sends out emails to round up parents against a coach, bullies school admin, threatens to go to private schools, shamefully drinks on school grounds and lives for a silly college window decal to display to your neighbors, you are all show.

Back to the rumors, friends wife subs in the district, also a lax family, Coach Colsey will bring that team to the promise land, and it says a lot that you disparage him because you ultimately fear him. You couldn’t control him and that worries you because you want to bully and control your kids coach (probably teachers too) like the current coach who you hand picked to backstab the former coach. The current coach is to busy being “bro’s” with the players. No discipline, he talks [Censored] to opposing teams players. Totally unprofessional but that is par for the course in country club land. Lax bro frat boy testosterone [Censored].

Go Pac!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Crickets on here...

Tuesday had a few teams putting up some 15-spot numbers.
Bronxville over Stepinac is a good early season one for them.
Lakeland with the OT win over Mahopac in the rain
Rye with a solid win over Victor - that is a statement early season W.
Great OT game between John Jay and Yorktown last night. Traded goals for most of the game, I think the largest lead was 3-1 Yorktown early on. Yorktown needs to clean up the turnovers. Great goalie battle. Jay has excellent ball control. Either team could have come away with this. (Interesting no call at the end of regulation with Jay going to the goal. I'm not 100% convinced it should have been a flag, but very surprised it was not called. To be fair, it was in-line with the way they called this game.)
Somers looks like the real deal so far, lots of O and the Scarsdale opener and a win at Wilton has to open some eyes. When's the last time we saw a shutout?

Bronxville at Iona will be the game of the night tonight.
The weekend has some fun matchups to watch. Yorktown at Ridgefield is probably the game to catch. If you believe - loosely - in transitivity: Jay played Manhasset and Yorktown to 1 goal games. Ridgefield handled Manhasset by 8. (All of this means nothing of course)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
It'll be interesting to see how Rye-Staples goes on Saturday. My money is on Rye,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Crickets on here...

Tuesday had a few teams putting up some 15-spot numbers.
Bronxville over Stepinac is a good early season one for them.
Lakeland with the OT win over Mahopac in the rain
Rye with a solid win over Victor - that is a statement early season W.
Great OT game between John Jay and Yorktown last night. Traded goals for most of the game, I think the largest lead was 3-1 Yorktown early on. Yorktown needs to clean up the turnovers. Great goalie battle. Jay has excellent ball control. Either team could have come away with this. (Interesting no call at the end of regulation with Jay going to the goal. I'm not 100% convinced it should have been a flag, but very surprised it was not called. To be fair, it was in-line with the way they called this game.)
Somers looks like the real deal so far, lots of O and the Scarsdale opener and a win at Wilton has to open some eyes. When's the last time we saw a shutout?

Bronxville at Iona will be the game of the night tonight.
The weekend has some fun matchups to watch. Yorktown at Ridgefield is probably the game to catch. If you believe - loosely - in transitivity: Jay played Manhasset and Yorktown to 1 goal games. Ridgefield handled Manhasset by 8. (All of this means nothing of course)
Is Don Bosco really good or Iona really not? 17-5 is quite the lopsided score.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Iona has not done well in recent years agains the NJ Catholic/Private Schools. Don Bosco has been up there as one of the best too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown / John Jay instant classic game last night!
Last years game was a nail biter as well. Still a great rivalry. The two mids on Jay were impressive. Yorktown D is legit. Town needs to clean up its offense. Ball not moving as quickly as in past years
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Is Don Bosco really good or Iona really not? 17-5 is quite the lopsided score.[/quote]

My Synopsis
DB looked very strong all over the field and also just came off a 11-2 win vs Victor, they look well coached as well w/ new coach hire

Iona's virtually brand new D did not keep up with DB especially off ball and got peppered in goal, Iona has had strong D units in the past but are not deep at D this year, a handful of preventable giveaway off ball goals could have kept DB from running away with the game early

IMO Iona's O were able to produce more chances than a 17-5 scoreline (can be called 17-4 with a last minute [Censored] goal) reflected, better shooting and not hitting post on one or two sure goals would have helped the scoreline. the offense while I would say is plenty deep is still young and will need to grow

Iona could have used more fo wins and saves but this is probably a much needed early season loss before they face the rest of their schedule
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Crickets on here...

Tuesday had a few teams putting up some 15-spot numbers.
Bronxville over Stepinac is a good early season one for them.
Lakeland with the OT win over Mahopac in the rain
Rye with a solid win over Victor - that is a statement early season W.
Great OT game between John Jay and Yorktown last night. Traded goals for most of the game, I think the largest lead was 3-1 Yorktown early on. Yorktown needs to clean up the turnovers. Great goalie battle. Jay has excellent ball control. Either team could have come away with this. (Interesting no call at the end of regulation with Jay going to the goal. I'm not 100% convinced it should have been a flag, but very surprised it was not called. To be fair, it was in-line with the way they called this game.)
Somers looks like the real deal so far, lots of O and the Scarsdale opener and a win at Wilton has to open some eyes. When's the last time we saw a shutout?

Bronxville at Iona will be the game of the night tonight.
The weekend has some fun matchups to watch. Yorktown at Ridgefield is probably the game to catch. If you believe - loosely - in transitivity: Jay played Manhasset and Yorktown to 1 goal games. Ridgefield handled Manhasset by 8. (All of this means nothing of course)

No disrespect to the JJ goalie, but it wasn’t a goalie battle at all.
One went (town) 19/26 73% SA and the other went 6/14 43% SA.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]

No disrespect to the JJ goalie, but it wasn’t a goalie battle at all.
One went (town) 19/26 73% SA and the other went 6/14 43% SA.
I don’t have a reason to doubt you as specific as those stats seem, but I tend to generally question any save stats in high school. Nothing against you or these guys. It’s just my experience that any shot that doesn’t go in = save.
But, given the attention both these goalies rightfully draw I’ll defer to you!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is Don Bosco really good or Iona really not? 17-5 is quite the lopsided score.

My Synopsis
DB looked very strong all over the field and also just came off a 11-2 win vs Victor, they look well coached as well w/ new coach hire

Iona's virtually brand new D did not keep up with DB especially off ball and got peppered in goal, Iona has had strong D units in the past but are not deep at D this year, a handful of preventable giveaway off ball goals could have kept DB from running away with the game early

IMO Iona's O were able to produce more chances than a 17-5 scoreline (can be called 17-4 with a last minute [Censored] goal) reflected, better shooting and not hitting post on one or two sure goals would have helped the scoreline. the offense while I would say is plenty deep is still young and will need to grow

Iona could have used more fo wins and saves but this is probably a much needed early season loss before they face the rest of their schedule[/quote]
Thats right. DB shooters were allowed to shoot with no one in their face. Duke commit torched them for 7. Once behind IP offense was rushed and inconsistent. IP will do well against the public’s but not looking like they can run with the privates..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Marquee game: Greeley at Cold Spring Harbor: HG wins!

The rest:

Bronxville at Haldane : BXV, sets the tone.
Scarsdale at Pelham : Scarsdale, in a close game
Monroe-Woodbury vs. North Rockland : NR

Sleepy Hollow at Nanuet: SH
Putnam Valley at Pawling : PV
Rye Neck at Ardsley: ARD
Ossining/Peekskill at Arlington : A
Edgemont at Croton-Harmon : CH
Blind Brook at Eastchester : E
Hastings at Nyack : NK
Brewster at Carmel Car
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Marquee game: Greeley at Cold Spring Harbor: HG wins!

The rest:

Bronxville at Haldane : BXV, sets the tone.
Scarsdale at Pelham : Scarsdale, in a close game
Monroe-Woodbury vs. North Rockland : NR

Sleepy Hollow at Nanuet: SH
Putnam Valley at Pawling : PV
Rye Neck at Ardsley: ARD
Ossining/Peekskill at Arlington : A
Edgemont at Croton-Harmon : CH
Blind Brook at Eastchester : E
Hastings at Nyack : NK
Brewster at Carmel Car

I like most of these predictions. HG win would be a very big win for their program. Will be a battle.

Bronxville at Haldane is interesting. Have a confident experienced Haldane team and a Bronxville team still trying to figure out who they are. Would be a statement win for H...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
I've seen multiple local sports fitness trainers on socal media; D1 training, Deiana RAW and Velocity.

Has anyone used just a speed trainer? If so, any recommendations?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yesterday: 7-3 record, but still waiting on the following 2 games NR/MW and Hast/Nyack ?

Greeley got smacked around, Kudos for the improved schedule, now it's shut-up time until they get a signature win.
BXV dominated the box score.
Scarsdale, whew, that was close.
Blind Brook and RyeNeck, who knew they had it in them.

Wondering when Pawling will merger with another school (should be North Salem, but that's a commute); last season, Pawling forfeited many games too.

TODAY'S 7 GAMES:


Up on the Marquee:

John Jay-Cross River at Mahopac: JJCR (wins by 3+), if the righty attackman from JJ improves.
Wappingers at Yorktown: Y, in a close one. (It's a battle of two Y legendary defenders; Shurr and Kuczma);


New Fairfield, Conn. at Carmel: NF, should win this game (another battle of Y players; Kuczma and Caione)

Mercer Island, Wa. At Rye: Rye, based solely on Rye's DI commits.


New Rochelle at Irvington IRV
Briarcliff at Hen Hud HH
Westlake at Suffern: Suffern
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Big one in Class D on Friday. Pleasantville vs Bronxville. What do we think?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Bville is going to smack them
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Big one in Class D on Friday. Pleasantville vs Bronxville. What do we think?
This will be a good one. Hard to predict as Bville has had three staffs in three years and P'ville just had a stumble. Should be a good one either way. Game of D this year one of the top Section 1 games too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
PV by 4, Bville is very very young and PV is experienced.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown and JJCR with big-margin wins yesterday.
Rye with the close one.
Westlake in a good battle
Iona bounces back.

Today we have:
Croton at North Salem. Croton by a few
Pelham at Mamaroneck Pelham playing really well, goalie has been solid, I think Mamo pulls this off
Somers at Fox Lane League rivals, but on different trajectories. Somers comfortably
Pleasantville at Byram Hills Could be interesting if P'ville looking ahead, but they get the job done
Blind Brook at Westlake Westlake been up recently, I am going with them, but could go either way
Harrison at White Plains White Plains has the experience edge here
Eastchester at Scarsdale Scarsdale should handle this one
North Rockland at Nyack NR
Nanuet at Clarkstown South, Clarkstown S
Clarkstown North at Tappan Zee if TZ can figure out the D struggles, they could pull of one, but I am thinking CN
Ossining at Sleepy Hollow Tossup, leaning SH
Rye Neck at Dobbs Ferry, Rye Neck here, they have some momentum
Keio at Albertus Magnus I like Keio in this one
Edgemont at Putnam Valley PV went from 0 to 17 goals quickly, Edgemont stil in rebound - tough call but leaning Edgemont
Greeley at Arlington, Greeley smarting after Cold Spring Harbor and that's a long bus ride. Which team gets off the bus? Greeley in a tight one (I would not be surprised if Arlington pulls it off, they are always good for a few surprise Ws)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown and JJCR with big-margin wins yesterday.
Rye with the close one.
Westlake in a good battle
Iona bounces back.

Today we have:
Croton at North Salem. Croton by a few
Pelham at Mamaroneck Pelham playing really well, goalie has been solid, I think Mamo pulls this off
Somers at Fox Lane League rivals, but on different trajectories. Somers comfortably
Pleasantville at Byram Hills Could be interesting if P'ville looking ahead, but they get the job done
Blind Brook at Westlake Westlake been up recently, I am going with them, but could go either way
Harrison at White Plains White Plains has the experience edge here
Eastchester at Scarsdale Scarsdale should handle this one
North Rockland at Nyack NR
Nanuet at Clarkstown South, Clarkstown S
Clarkstown North at Tappan Zee if TZ can figure out the D struggles, they could pull of one, but I am thinking CN
Ossining at Sleepy Hollow Tossup, leaning SH
Rye Neck at Dobbs Ferry, Rye Neck here, they have some momentum
Keio at Albertus Magnus I like Keio in this one
Edgemont at Putnam Valley PV went from 0 to 17 goals quickly, Edgemont stil in rebound - tough call but leaning Edgemont
Greeley at Arlington, Greeley smarting after Cold Spring Harbor and that's a long bus ride. Which team gets off the bus? Greeley in a tight one (I would not be surprised if Arlington pulls it off, they are always good for a few surprise Ws)

TZ will beat CN by a comfortable score. Their D has only struggled in one game - vs Greeley. Greeley has the type of offense where if they are better than your D, the floodgates are opened.
Putnam Valley will beat Edgemont. I don't think Edgemont is competitive this year.
Greeley will score a lot of goals against Arlington and win comfortably.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Have you heard about the horiffic, freak incident at yesreday's Y at JJEF JV game.

A Yortown player impaled himself. EMS arrived and brought him to ER with the stick still in his leg.
Heard it was a GB scrum, players stick head came off just before making contact with the ground, driving the @ChillLaxin end into his leg, which went through to the other side.

The end-cap was not a traditional one, it could have been one of the adjustable rings to close the hand range on the shaft., which exposes the shaft ending.

Surgery was successful too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Have you heard about the horiffic, freak incident at yesreday's Y at JJEF JV game.

A Yortown player impaled himself. EMS arrived and brought him to ER with the stick still in his leg.
Heard it was a GB scrum, players stick head came off just before making contact with the ground, driving the @ChillLaxin end into his leg, which went through to the other side.

The end-cap was not a traditional one, it could have been one of the adjustable rings to close the hand range on the shaft., which exposes the shaft ending.

Surgery was successful too.
Glad to hear player is okay.
Put a proper @ChillLaxin end on your stick. In fact, make sure all your equipment is properly worn!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
hey Mods:
how is writing "b u t t end" translating to @ChillLaxin here?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Why is Somers playing such a weak schedule with a really good senior team? No Y Town?

Played a down Wilton team...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why is Somers playing such a weak schedule with a really good senior team? No Y Town?

Played a down Wilton team...
They'll see Yorktown in the playoffs, most likely anyway...

Remember a few things:
a) schedules usually start to be put together in November, the league schedules were a month late this year so not as much time to put together games
b) both teams have to agree to play - since Somers and Yorktown aren't in a league together this year, they had to schedule it as an at-large.
c) after last years game, Yorktown didn't want to give them a game (that's one rumor I've heard).
d) I don't think anyone could have predicted in November/December that Scarsdale, Mahopac and Briarcliff would be as down as they are. Add on Rye, South Side, Pelham, Pleasentville, Carey, I wouldn't say that's a soft schedule just because they don't play Yorktown in he regular season.

Somers is having a great year so far. This isn't a weak schedule.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown and JJCR with big-margin wins yesterday.
Rye with the close one.
Westlake in a good battle
Iona bounces back.

Today we have:
Croton at North Salem. Croton by a few
Pelham at Mamaroneck Pelham playing really well, goalie has been solid, I think Mamo pulls this off
Somers at Fox Lane League rivals, but on different trajectories. Somers comfortably
Pleasantville at Byram Hills Could be interesting if P'ville looking ahead, but they get the job done
Blind Brook at Westlake Westlake been up recently, I am going with them, but could go either way
Harrison at White Plains White Plains has the experience edge here
Eastchester at Scarsdale Scarsdale should handle this one
North Rockland at Nyack NR
Nanuet at Clarkstown South, Clarkstown S
Clarkstown North at Tappan Zee if TZ can figure out the D struggles, they could pull of one, but I am thinking CN
Ossining at Sleepy Hollow Tossup, leaning SH
Rye Neck at Dobbs Ferry, Rye Neck here, they have some momentum
Keio at Albertus Magnus I like Keio in this one
Edgemont at Putnam Valley PV went from 0 to 17 goals quickly, Edgemont stil in rebound - tough call but leaning Edgemont
Greeley at Arlington, Greeley smarting after Cold Spring Harbor and that's a long bus ride. Which team gets off the bus? Greeley in a tight one (I would not be surprised if Arlington pulls it off, they are always good for a few surprise Ws)

TZ will beat CN by a comfortable score. Their D has only struggled in one game - vs Greeley. Greeley has the type of offense where if they are better than your D, the floodgates are opened.
Putnam Valley will beat Edgemont. I don't think Edgemont is competitive this year.
Greeley will score a lot of goals against Arlington and win comfortably.
Greeley Arlington game pushed to the back of the schedule, not playing today.. Got moved last week
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Somers has not beat at team with a winning record.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Somers has not beat at team with a winning record.
That doesn't mean much of anything, with a lot of season left yet to play. They way they play/win those games mean a lot too.
Yorktown has a win over Arlington, who I don't think was +.500 when they played and needed OT to beat Jay. What does that mean?
Jay hasn't beat anyone with a winning record either, but close games against Manhasset and Yorktown
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Was close , at one pt it was 8-5 but PV dominated the face off x and was just to big/physical for bville. Bville if very young and gets pushed around physically so they don’t do well vs those types of teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Was close , at one pt it was 8-5 but PV dominated the face off x and was just to big/physical for bville. Bville if very young and gets pushed around physically so they don’t do well vs those types of teams.
Neither team is big physical at all. Bville young only on O. They have dudes on D. Pville just more experienced overall and it wasn’t that close. Pville the class of D.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Outside of the goalie, a bulk of bville O & D is made up of freshmen/sophomores. Pville is full of experienced seniors.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
4 Marquee games:

Rye at John Jay: Rye needs to flex and win big. Anything less than a 4 point differential will be a disappointment for Rye.

Darien at Yorktown: Darien by 3

Fordham at Bronxville: Bxv by 2

L/P at Somers: Somers by 1

The rest


Ridgefield. at Mahopac: Ridge by 6

Greeley at Greenwich: Greenwich by 2

Carmel at Arlington: Carmel by 6

Mamaroneck at Eastchester: Mamaroneck

Briarcliff at Scarsdale: Scarsdale

Sleepy Hollow at Westlake: Westlake

Harrison at Hastings: Harrison

Edgemont at Dobbs Ferry: Dobbs

New Rochell at Pelham: Pelham

Wappingers at White Plains: Wapp

Putnam Valley at North Salem: PV

Clarkstown South at Clarkstown North: South

Suffern at Nanuet: Suffern

North Rockland at Pearl River: S/b Pearl

Iona at St. Peter’s: Iona by 4

St. John at Stepinac Stepincrap
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
4 Marquee games:

Rye at John Jay: Rye needs to flex and win big. Anything less than a 4 point differential will be a disappointment for Rye.

Darien at Yorktown: Darien by 3

Fordham at Bronxville: Bxv by 2

L/P at Somers: Somers by 1

The rest


Ridgefield. at Mahopac: Ridge by 6

Greeley at Greenwich: Greenwich by 2

Carmel at Arlington: Carmel by 6

Mamaroneck at Eastchester: Mamaroneck

Briarcliff at Scarsdale: Scarsdale

Sleepy Hollow at Westlake: Westlake

Harrison at Hastings: Harrison

Edgemont at Dobbs Ferry: Dobbs

New Rochell at Pelham: Pelham

Wappingers at White Plains: Wapp

Putnam Valley at North Salem: PV

Clarkstown South at Clarkstown North: South

Suffern at Nanuet: Suffern

North Rockland at Pearl River: S/b Pearl

Iona at St. Peter’s: Iona by 4

St. John at Stepinac Stepincrap

Hard to argue with the picks here.
Rye/Jay is the matchup of the season so far. Rye has not been giving up many goals and their D presses you all over the field. Jay has the horses to compete and a FO advantage. I think Rye has it but I would not be surprised to see Jay pull this off.

If Ridgefield only wins by 6 I’ll be surprised. Mahopac is really down this year.

Somers L/P. I’m not sure it will be this close L/P does pull out surprises so I can’t say completely no, but the way Somers has been playing I think it’s a slightly larger GD.

Yorktown can surprise. But I’m not sure they beat Darien. It’s either going to be well in hand or another down to the wire game.

Greenwich Greeley will be a shootout. Take the over, I agree with the pick here

All the rest are fairly spot on. I don’t know if it was intentional or an autocorrect failure but “Stepincrap” was a nice laugh this morning.

Gorgeous day for lacrosse!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown cannot touch a team like Darien, its at least a 10 goal spread. Darien is elite in all positions, Yorktown is barely elite in a talentless section1. Yorktown should stay in their lane
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown cannot touch a team like Darien, its at least a 10 goal spread. Darien is elite in all positions, Yorktown is barely elite in a talentless section1. Yorktown should stay in their lane
You seem fun.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown cannot touch a team like Darien, its at least a 10 goal spread. Darien is elite in all positions, Yorktown is barely elite in a talentless section1. Yorktown should stay in their lane
You seem fun.


it will be a beat down no doubt - #99 going to make swiss cheese out of that goalie
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Yorktown outclassed tonight. Swiss cheese !!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Greeley v Greenwich score?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown outclassed tonight. Swiss cheese !!
Better team won. That’s why the games are played. Calm yourself man - it’s high school lacrosse.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
My reference to Stepinac was intentional: ode to my WP time and friends.

The Yorktown hater was spot on, too. Wonder if he's just dailed into Darien, or will he be back?

Kudos to JJ, score seems that it was a good game.

WPHS with a surprise win over Wapp!

Pearly White River with another loss, they are having a down year so far. Still time to get hot and bothered.

16-3 and 1 unknown (Fordham v Bronxv)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Fordham Prep at Bronxville BRNXV, pulling for you BB!

Putnam Valley at Croton, both small schools are rolling along. Croton wins by 2.

Irvington at Rye Neck: Irv

Albertus Magnus at Pawling: A/M,

Ossining at Fox Lane, Fox by 6+
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
13-11 Greenwich over HG.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
did the Y town starting goalie play last night? 18 goals is a lot , something seems off - i know D is good, but,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My reference to Stepinac was intentional: ode to my WP time and friends.

The Yorktown hater was spot on, too. Wonder if he's just dailed into Darien, or will he be back?

Kudos to JJ, score seems that it was a good game.

WPHS with a surprise win over Wapp!

Pearly White River with another loss, they are having a down year so far. Still time to get hot and bothered.

16-3 and 1 unknown (Fordham v Bronxv)

JJ/Rye was one of the best Section 1 games in awhile. Traded goals all game and it was never more than 1-2 goal separation. JJ can hang their hats on this one, it's a preview of what should be a great Class C championship game. Either team could have won this one.

Nice W for White Plains.

Looks like Yorktown struggled. I wasn't able to watch it, hoping to catch a replay. They've struggled with turnovers a few games this year, if that was similar in this game, Darien will make you pay dearly. Seems like they did.

"Stepincrap" - Funny either way

Greenwich/HG was a wider gap than the score indicates.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Watched the Yorktown game on hudl....WOW.

If this is a "down" Darien team as some have said, just WOW. This game wasn't close. Darien was faster, more skilled, better coached, more talented...all of it. The Darien long-poles are the best collective unit I have seen and the ball movement on offense is at a very high level. The only team I have seen that I think can play with them is Rye and I don't think that would be particularly close. I don't think this is a great Yorktown team but it's not a bad one. Darien was something else.

Next up a "down" Wilton team (although the loss to Step tells me they are down).
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Up on the marquee:
Mamaroneck at Rye Rye, in a close game.
John Jay-CR at Scarsdale: JJCR

The rest

Haldane at Pleasantville Pvll
Carmel at Blind Brook: Carmel, shouldn’t be close
Arlington at Byram Hills: BH
Hen Hud vs. Wapp: Should be Wapp.
Mahopac at Pelham Pel

Eastchester at Clarkstown N: CN
Harrison at Pearl River: Pearly White River
Pawling vs. Yonkers: Should be Pawling, if not they really need to consider merging with another school.
North Salem vs. Dobbs Ferry: DF
Nanuet at White Plains: WP
Brewster at Greeley Greeley

Tappan Zee at Nyack: TZ, could turn into a good game if Nyack plays A game.
Valley Central vs. North Rock: NR, isn’t VC a section 9 team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Watched the Yorktown game on hudl....WOW.

If this is a "down" Darien team as some have said, just WOW. This game wasn't close. Darien was faster, more skilled, better coached, more talented...all of it. The Darien long-poles are the best collective unit I have seen and the ball movement on offense is at a very high level. The only team I have seen that I think can play with them is Rye and I don't think that would be particularly close. I don't think this is a great Yorktown team but it's not a bad one. Darien was something else.

Next up a "down" Wilton team (although the loss to Step tells me they are down).

Don't know the state playoff brackets this year, but Warwick will have a chance this year for a very rare Section 9 win over Section 1 in playoffs at Class B. Very talented team that will be likely be undefeated but not hugely tested. They play a lot of Section 1 teams but all of them are down this year, although predictably so.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Watched the Yorktown game on hudl....WOW.

If this is a "down" Darien team as some have said, just WOW. This game wasn't close. Darien was faster, more skilled, better coached, more talented...all of it. The Darien long-poles are the best collective unit I have seen and the ball movement on offense is at a very high level. The only team I have seen that I think can play with them is Rye and I don't think that would be particularly close. I don't think this is a great Yorktown team but it's not a bad one. Darien was something else.

Next up a "down" Wilton team (although the loss to Step tells me they are down).
I'd say this is not a down Darien team -- probably standard/slightly above average by their standards (if not a vintage, elite edition). They came inot the season missing two starting attackmen (including Pokorny, who is a top 5 player nationally IMO) and their top defenseman, so they were rusty and got off to a slow start, but they're rounding into form.

If they played Fairfield Prep (who is solid this year) again today, there's no doubt they would beat them. And while they're not as good as Brunswick, I think that would have been a tight game if they'd played them a week later than they did.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Mamaroneck up 8-3 at half was the most glaring thing I’ve seen all year. They pulled it off 9-7 but that is a statement win for Mamo.

Haldane kept it close for a bit but P’ville pulled away.

Everything else looks to have gone as expected.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Weekend picks:

Somers at South Side (on long Island) Going w/ Somers, since SS is not recognizable school)

Suffern at Blind Brook Suffern
Sleepy Hollow at Irvington, Irv
Ossining at Clarkstown South CS


Saturday's Marquee games

Yorktown at Wilton, Wilton, sorry TS.
Bronxville at Greenwich: Greenwich, sorry BB.
Pelham at Tappan Zee: TZ, could be a good game.

.* there are other games, but non-region opponents are not listed on lohud, so those games get passed over.


Mahopac at Byram Hills: BH, but wouldn’t be surprised if Pac wins.
Clarkstown North at Brewster Brew
Clarkstown South at Harrison: CS
Eastchester at Hen Hud HH
Rye Neck vs. Yonkers at Roosevelt RN, if not, JC better take over.
Hastings at Sleepy Hollow: SH
New Rochelle at White Plains: WP
Putnam Valley vs. Dobbs Ferry: PV
Briarcliff at Westlake: West
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Weekend picks:

Somers at South Side (on long Island) Going w/ Somers, since SS is not recognizable school)

Suffern at Blind Brook Suffern
Sleepy Hollow at Irvington, Irv
Ossining at Clarkstown South CS


Saturday's Marquee games

Yorktown at Wilton, Wilton, sorry TS.
Bronxville at Greenwich: Greenwich, sorry BB.
Pelham at Tappan Zee: TZ, could be a good game.

.* there are other games, but non-region opponents are not listed on lohud, so those games get passed over.


Mahopac at Byram Hills: BH, but wouldn’t be surprised if Pac wins.
Clarkstown North at Brewster Brew
Clarkstown South at Harrison: CS
Eastchester at Hen Hud HH
Rye Neck vs. Yonkers at Roosevelt RN, if not, JC better take over.
Hastings at Sleepy Hollow: SH
New Rochelle at White Plains: WP
Putnam Valley vs. Dobbs Ferry: PV
Briarcliff at Westlake: West

Do your homework on South Side, and then come back and edit your pick.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Southside is one of the best teams on LI.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
No homework neccessary; I have never claimed to know (or disrecpect) any team that I'm no familair with.
Glad to hear that Somers is playing against the correct level too.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Southside is one of the best teams on LI.
THEY ARE LEGIT, if Somers can hang, give them some more cred. Don't think that will happen though.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Weekend game thoughts?

Big games this week?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Wednesday’s Marquee:

Garden City at Pleasantville: Most likely GC
Mamaroneck at Lakeland/Panas: Mamo
Pelham at Somers: Somers, by 5
Cold Spring Harbor at Yorktown: CSH, by 6

The rest

Haldane at Rye Neck: H by 8
Yonkers at Keio: K
Bronxville at Albertus Magnus: Brnxv, by a lot
Irvington at Edgemont: Irv
Pawling at Dobbs Ferry Dobbs
North Rockland at White Plains S/B WP
Eastchester at Rye: Rye, why are the playing each other?
Putnam Valley at Sleepy Hollow: Should be PV
Harrison at Ossining Should be O
Arlington at Brewster Arlington
Cardinal Hayes at Hen Hud: Should be HH
North Salem at Briarcliff: Briar
Greeley at Fox Lane: Greeley
Clarkstown North at Wappinger Should be Wapp
Pearl River at Tappan Zee TZ
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wednesday’s Marquee:

Garden City at Pleasantville: Most likely GC
Mamaroneck at Lakeland/Panas: Mamo
Pelham at Somers: Somers, by 5
Cold Spring Harbor at Yorktown: CSH, by 6

The rest

Haldane at Rye Neck: H by 8
Yonkers at Keio: K
Bronxville at Albertus Magnus: Brnxv, by a lot
Irvington at Edgemont: Irv
Pawling at Dobbs Ferry Dobbs
North Rockland at White Plains S/B WP
Eastchester at Rye: Rye, why are the playing each other?
Putnam Valley at Sleepy Hollow: Should be PV
Harrison at Ossining Should be O
Arlington at Brewster Arlington
Cardinal Hayes at Hen Hud: Should be HH
North Salem at Briarcliff: Briar
Greeley at Fox Lane: Greeley
Clarkstown North at Wappinger Should be Wapp
Pearl River at Tappan Zee TZ


CSH not as good as people think they are. i wld be surprised at all if Yorktown beats them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wednesday’s Marquee:

Garden City at Pleasantville: Most likely GC
Mamaroneck at Lakeland/Panas: Mamo
Pelham at Somers: Somers, by 5
Cold Spring Harbor at Yorktown: CSH, by 6

The rest

Haldane at Rye Neck: H by 8
Yonkers at Keio: K
Bronxville at Albertus Magnus: Brnxv, by a lot
Irvington at Edgemont: Irv
Pawling at Dobbs Ferry Dobbs
North Rockland at White Plains S/B WP
Eastchester at Rye: Rye, why are the playing each other?
Putnam Valley at Sleepy Hollow: Should be PV
Harrison at Ossining Should be O
Arlington at Brewster Arlington
Cardinal Hayes at Hen Hud: Should be HH
North Salem at Briarcliff: Briar
Greeley at Fox Lane: Greeley
Clarkstown North at Wappinger Should be Wapp
Pearl River at Tappan Zee TZ

GC/P'ville I think could go either way.
I don't think the CSH/Town game will be as far apart as that.
Somers I think depends on which Pelham team shows up, but it should be a Somers W
Greeley/FL is a classic rivalry game that could be a trap game for Greeley, but I don't see Greely losing.

The rest is pretty spot on.

Rye/Eastchester is a league game - they have to play it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wednesday’s Marquee:

Garden City at Pleasantville: Most likely GC
Mamaroneck at Lakeland/Panas: Mamo
Pelham at Somers: Somers, by 5
Cold Spring Harbor at Yorktown: CSH, by 6

The rest

Haldane at Rye Neck: H by 8
Yonkers at Keio: K
Bronxville at Albertus Magnus: Brnxv, by a lot
Irvington at Edgemont: Irv
Pawling at Dobbs Ferry Dobbs
North Rockland at White Plains S/B WP
Eastchester at Rye: Rye, why are the playing each other?
Putnam Valley at Sleepy Hollow: Should be PV
Harrison at Ossining Should be O
Arlington at Brewster Arlington
Cardinal Hayes at Hen Hud: Should be HH
North Salem at Briarcliff: Briar
Greeley at Fox Lane: Greeley
Clarkstown North at Wappinger Should be Wapp
Pearl River at Tappan Zee TZ

Brewster over Arlington would be the upset of the week, if not for one thing:

Fox Lane over Greeley in OT.
That is not a typo.
A varsity lacrosse game in section 1 was won 3-2.
It was almost a controversial ending as FL looked to have scored the go ahead goal less than a minute to go, but was waved off by the officials.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Is it me or is section 1 very mediocre this season ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Glad someone said a while back HG had the best offense in section 1.....2 goals against FL, WOW.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is it me or is section 1 very mediocre this season ?
P'ville and Rye are on a tear, Mamo is dominating A, John Jay is playing at a high level and went toe-to-toe with Manhasset, Rye and Yorktown. Yorktown is slightly down for them, which is still a top 5 team. Somers has been exceeding expectations, Bronxville is playing well.

The surprises to me are Scarsdale and Briarcliff coming down so much off the last few years but the mid-level teams are all better than in the past.

So, I don't think so? But that is one man's opinion
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Agreed, those who know Dale, knew this was coming. Having great FOGO and goalie keeps you in EVERY game. They can control the tempo, losing those kids and not having depth have hurt them. Not expected to get better in the next 2-3 years but who knows.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Glad someone said a while back HG had the best offense in section 1.....2 goals against FL, WOW.
And now they have Bronxville tonight and John Jay tomorrow - 2 of the best goalies in Section 1 on little rest.
Who let that schedule happen.

Looking ahead they'll be lucky to come out of the next two weeks with 2 wins
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Agreed, those who know Dale, knew this was coming. Having great FOGO and goalie keeps you in EVERY game. They can control the tempo, losing those kids and not having depth have hurt them. Not expected to get better in the next 2-3 years but who knows.
I don't think it was any large suprise thate afte having such high level play from both a GK and FOGO, they would take a step back, but I don't think it was expected to be this much.
They did lose their top player at the beginning, so that couldn't have helped either.

However, I don't think it will take that long to rebound for them. They are a very well managed program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse -
Their FOGO was also an elite player otherwise. They lost basically 2 top kids when he graduated.
© US Lacrosse Community Forum