BOTC BOTC
The UnD1sputed Showcase (Boys & Girls) in June & the Girls LI Showcase is Open for Registration on CBLaxers.com - Don't Miss Out as 88 Players Only Accepted! | Invest for Growth - ADVERTISE with us!
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY BACK OF THE CAGE
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY MOST RECENT POSTS
Boys High School
by Anonymous -
Boys High School Lax
by Anonymous -
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY Forum Statistics
Forums20
Topics3,821
Posts388,979
Members2,610
Most Online62,980
Feb 6th, 2020
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
Previous Thread
Next Thread
New Reply
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 87 of 101 1 2 85 86 87 88 89 100 101
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
JJCR is absolutely terrible, kids playing positions that have no business playing, goalie is a very good up and comer, decent fogo few good middies, attack are nonexistent --Rye is going to Roll

And yet, ran well with Manhasset, went down to the end with Yorktow, beat Pelham and did it with nearly all the same players that beat Rye in '22.
What's your real beef?

Like Reply Quote
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY BACK OF THE CAGE SPONSORS

Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
JJCR is absolutely terrible, kids playing positions that have no business playing, goalie is a very good up and comer, decent fogo few good middies, attack are nonexistent --Rye is going to Roll

And yet, ran well with Manhasset, went down to the end with Yorktow, beat Pelham and did it with nearly all the same players that beat Rye in '22.
What's your real beef?

With the exception of the with Manhasset game, you make good points with your games against Y and Pelham.

I was at that game (Manhasset) and the game was essentially over in the first Q (3-0), since the score was 8-3 beginning fourth Q. JJ's goalie kept them in the game, the kid was playing like a senior!

Rye only allowed JJ to score two goals through three Qs, this game was over in the first Q.

Has there been a game this year that JJ battled from behind, took the lead and win a game?

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we talk about the Pelham/Mamo game getting cancelled yesterday due to a lack of officials.

At a VARSITY game.

In Westchester

This is 2023.

This is happening nearly everyday in Section 1 and it's going to get worse before it gets better. Have you noticed the how old the officials are too?

Every year (January-March) the HVLOA offers training sessions. I recommend all former players/coaches consider taking on this new responsibility. Contact: president@hvloa.com

Also, the school districts are partial at fault for this problem. The staff at these games should have a zero tolerance policy for the spectators that openly abuse the officials.

They should be giving out cards to unruly parents! That parents kids team should have to take a penalty. Then you will see the other parents do something about shutting other parents up in the stands. Have schools security kick parents like that out already! Schools can do better with that!!

I fully agree that any fan, be it parent, student, whomever. The second there is anything said in the direction of officials you get one warning and then you're gone. A second ejection and you are gone for the season.
The problem with this is getting staff at the games to actually do this. I don't see any scenario - short of having a police presence at every game - where someone from the schools staff will be telling people to leave.

You're 100% correct on the staffing issue at games. Unfortunately, they are most likely teacher aide's or lunch/hall monitors that are not prepared to deal with rude/obnoxious adults.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we talk about the Pelham/Mamo game getting cancelled yesterday due to a lack of officials.

At a VARSITY game.

In Westchester

This is 2023.

This is happening nearly everyday in Section 1 and it's going to get worse before it gets better. Have you noticed the how old the officials are too?

Every year (January-March) the HVLOA offers training sessions. I recommend all former players/coaches consider taking on this new responsibility. Contact: president@hvloa.com

Also, the school districts are partial at fault for this problem. The staff at these games should have a zero tolerance policy for the spectators that openly abuse the officials.

They should be giving out cards to unruly parents! That parents kids team should have to take a penalty. Then you will see the other parents do something about shutting other parents up in the stands. Have schools security kick parents like that out already! Schools can do better with that!!

I fully agree that any fan, be it parent, student, whomever. The second there is anything said in the direction of officials you get one warning and then you're gone. A second ejection and you are gone for the season.
The problem with this is getting staff at the games to actually do this. I don't see any scenario - short of having a police presence at every game - where someone from the schools staff will be telling people to leave.

You're 100% correct on the staffing issue at games. Unfortunately, they are most likely teacher aide's or lunch/hall monitors that are not prepared to deal with rude/obnoxious adults.
Yes, because who would want to do that? You’d have to pay a lot more than the $50 or so staff get for the game. Even then, who wants to deal with it?

School administrators need to step up and do it themselves or pay for police/security to do it.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we talk about the Pelham/Mamo game getting cancelled yesterday due to a lack of officials.

At a VARSITY game.

In Westchester

This is 2023.

This is happening nearly everyday in Section 1 and it's going to get worse before it gets better. Have you noticed the how old the officials are too?

Every year (January-March) the HVLOA offers training sessions. I recommend all former players/coaches consider taking on this new responsibility. Contact: president@hvloa.com

Also, the school districts are partial at fault for this problem. The staff at these games should have a zero tolerance policy for the spectators that openly abuse the officials.

They should be giving out cards to unruly parents! That parents kids team should have to take a penalty. Then you will see the other parents do something about shutting other parents up in the stands. Have schools security kick parents like that out already! Schools can do better with that!!

I fully agree that any fan, be it parent, student, whomever. The second there is anything said in the direction of officials you get one warning and then you're gone. A second ejection and you are gone for the season.
The problem with this is getting staff at the games to actually do this. I don't see any scenario - short of having a police presence at every game - where someone from the schools staff will be telling people to leave.

You're 100% correct on the staffing issue at games. Unfortunately, they are most likely teacher aide's or lunch/hall monitors that are not prepared to deal with rude/obnoxious adults.
Yes, because who would want to do that? You’d have to pay a lot more than the $50 or so staff get for the game. Even then, who wants to deal with it?

School administrators need to step up and do it themselves or pay for police/security to do it.

Does anyone here really know the powers that officials have? This is a actually a serious question. I have thought for a couple of years now to get into officiating bc I see the way they are treated and I feel some of the officials are old and slow. BTW this is not an invitation to insult, yell and berate. They are doing an amazing service for our boys and girls. I am solely making an observation bc many officials are old and some of the hs athletes are future d1 stars so mistakes will be made bc they cant keep up. Mistakes will also be made bc they are human and deserve respect for the little money they earn and the service they provide. I was thinking about doing it bc l I am under 50 and can still run :-) and I love youth sports (3 kids who played a variety of sports and all played or play at some level in college). Yes I had my kids young. Getting back to my original question - CAN officials stop games, kick parents out, issues yellow or red cards for the conduct of parents?

Like Reply Quote
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY Sponsored Links
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we talk about the Pelham/Mamo game getting cancelled yesterday due to a lack of officials.

At a VARSITY game.

In Westchester

This is 2023.

This is happening nearly everyday in Section 1 and it's going to get worse before it gets better. Have you noticed the how old the officials are too?

Every year (January-March) the HVLOA offers training sessions. I recommend all former players/coaches consider taking on this new responsibility. Contact: president@hvloa.com

Also, the school districts are partial at fault for this problem. The staff at these games should have a zero tolerance policy for the spectators that openly abuse the officials.

They should be giving out cards to unruly parents! That parents kids team should have to take a penalty. Then you will see the other parents do something about shutting other parents up in the stands. Have schools security kick parents like that out already! Schools can do better with that!!

I fully agree that any fan, be it parent, student, whomever. The second there is anything said in the direction of officials you get one warning and then you're gone. A second ejection and you are gone for the season.
The problem with this is getting staff at the games to actually do this. I don't see any scenario - short of having a police presence at every game - where someone from the schools staff will be telling people to leave.

You're 100% correct on the staffing issue at games. Unfortunately, they are most likely teacher aide's or lunch/hall monitors that are not prepared to deal with rude/obnoxious adults.
Yes, because who would want to do that? You’d have to pay a lot more than the $50 or so staff get for the game. Even then, who wants to deal with it?

School administrators need to step up and do it themselves or pay for police/security to do it.

Does anyone here really know the powers that officials have? This is a actually a serious question. I have thought for a couple of years now to get into officiating bc I see the way they are treated and I feel some of the officials are old and slow. BTW this is not an invitation to insult, yell and berate. They are doing an amazing service for our boys and girls. I am solely making an observation bc many officials are old and some of the hs athletes are future d1 stars so mistakes will be made bc they cant keep up. Mistakes will also be made bc they are human and deserve respect for the little money they earn and the service they provide. I was thinking about doing it bc l I am under 50 and can still run :-) and I love youth sports (3 kids who played a variety of sports and all played or play at some level in college). Yes I had my kids young. Getting back to my original question - CAN officials stop games, kick parents out, issues yellow or red cards for the conduct of parents?

One the officials step on the field pregame until the LEAVE THE FACILITY - this is important because they can still make calls when the game is over e.g. they can eject players for a post-game fight. They 100% have the authority for the game. The facility managers are responsible as are the fans, players and officials themselves for maintianing a postiivie atmosphere. The game officials can ask for an unruly fan to be escorted off. More specifically, what they would do is tell the home team's coach or game admin to handle it. If it is particularly egregioous they could stop the game until the person is gone.

In practice, however, if an official had a fan kicked out, that will more than likely fire up the remaining fans and even if he/she is correct it then becomes the optics of the official making it about them.

There is what they have the power to do vs. managing the game on the field.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
JJCR is absolutely terrible, kids playing positions that have no business playing, goalie is a very good up and comer, decent fogo few good middies, attack are nonexistent --Rye is going to Roll

And yet, ran well with Manhasset, went down to the end with Yorktow, beat Pelham and did it with nearly all the same players that beat Rye in '22.
What's your real beef?

With the exception of the with Manhasset game, you make good points with your games against Y and Pelham.

I was at that game (Manhasset) and the game was essentially over in the first Q (3-0), since the score was 8-3 beginning fourth Q. JJ's goalie kept them in the game, the kid was playing like a senior!

Rye only allowed JJ to score two goals through three Qs, this game was over in the first Q.

Has there been a game this year that JJ battled from behind, took the lead and win a game?

Ii will take Leading from the 1st quarter on to a solid win against Scarsdale today. That is a solid a win as they come.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Some observations

A- Down to Scarsdale and Mamo. Scarsdale is really good but I expected them to be ahead of where they are right now. It's hard to win on the island but the loss to Massapequa was surprising to me. Mamo is trending in the right direction. The comeback win over LI power Wantagh was noteworthy. North Rockland is the third-best team but they would need a stellar performance from their goalie to take down one of the top two teams.

B- Yorktown is the clear favorite at this point. Their goalie has played very well so far, however, he is a freshman so be prepared for some inconsistency. Somers is not the team I thought they would be so far this year. I would say Mahopac and Horace Greeley have jumped them. The Somers vs Greeley matchup this Saturday will be interesting.

C- Down to Rye and Jay as predicted. I would give the edge to Rye as of now. Jay is not as good as I expected this year but still has room to grow. They are both fairly young teams so I expect them both to be firing on all cylinders by May. Pelham is a team to keep an eye on. They have a lot of talent and can take down Rye or Jay if they have an off day. A lot of the teams that I thought were going to be in the mix have underperformed. Byram Hills, Tappan Zee, Pearl River, and Hendrick Hudson are not in a position to compete for the title as of right now.

D- Nationally ranked Pleasantville is without a doubt the favorite as of now and may be the best team in Section 1. I predicted their offense would be great but their inexperienced defense deserves some respect. They bend but don't break. Bronxville and Briarcliff cannot be taken lightly. I would say Bronxville is the clear number two and have some close losses. They should trend upward. Briarcliff is trying to win rock fights with their zone defense and they have a surprising win over Mamo. Haldane is the team to watch and we have to wait until the last day of the regular season if they can surpass Briarcliff

A: Still Scarsdale and Mamo in my opinion. Though the recent losses to Yorktown and JJCR has be wondering if Scarsdale has the horses this year. THey have the attitude and the coaching to get it done and a FO that is dominating everyone, but as Yorktown showed, you can win a game losing every FO.

B: Still Yorktown on top. Greeley over Somers was not as a surprise as I orignally thought (more on this game below) It's moved from a 2 team to a 4 team class now with Yorktown, Somers Mahopac and Greeley at this point of the season.
I watched the Somers Greeley game. It was not great. Officials called a very close game and Greeley took advantage on man up. For a team that was scoring in the mid-teens all season to suddenly be held to 8 goals - with a bunch of that on man up - tells me there is more work needed. Somers played a little soft in the sense they didn't go after Greeley's D enough for my liking. The rare times they dodged 1v1 they won their matchups. I'd think they'd want to do that more? Kudos to Greeley - they got it done when many thought they couldn't. Somers, I think is still better than they are showing, but the time is running out for them to show it. It was getting chippy late and I think the rematch will be a good one.
Mahopac should be watched closely - by everyone.

C: JJCR with a good win over Scarsdale puts them back into the 'watch out' column. Rye won the matchup vs. JJCR and they are the team to beat right now. I think only JJCR has the squad to do it. i watched some of this game last night - it was a FO battle of the year. JJCR led their methodical approach and it payed off.

D: it's all Pleasentville right now. Not much has changed as Briarcliff and Bronxville are the only real challengers.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
For Class B, yeah it seems like Yorktown's to lose at this point.

Won't know how good Greeley or Somers are until they play John Jay later in their season.

Greeley specifically seem to have a chip on their shoulder with their new coach, was pretty surprised they beat North Rockland.

Somers if they can't pull it together could be looking at a real tough season Ridgefield, Rye, Greenwich, Yorktown and John Jay are their next five games.

Mahopac plays North Rockland this week so maybe it will be a decent matchup to see how they would shape up against Greeley.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
For Class B, yeah it seems like Yorktown's to lose at this point.

Won't know how good Greeley or Somers are until they play John Jay later in their season.

Greeley specifically seem to have a chip on their shoulder with their new coach, was pretty surprised they beat North Rockland.

Somers if they can't pull it together could be looking at a real tough season Ridgefield, Rye, Greenwich, Yorktown and John Jay are their next five games.

Mahopac plays North Rockland this week so maybe it will be a decent matchup to see how they would shape up against Greeley.
Agree on Somers and Greeley. Greeley hasn't played anyone other than Somers and North Rockland. Good wins on paper, but Somers seems not as strong as advertised and they only put up 8 on them when they've been scoring a ton in previous games. Somers have a much tougher schedule coming up John Jay will be the test for them both heading into the post-season since JJCR is in C, neither will see them again.

Mahopac vs. NR will be a good test as to where they are at and where they fit within class B

Like Reply Quote
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY Sponsored Links
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Can we start discussing JV teams?

I've seen Arlington, Carmel, Greeley, John Jay, Rye, Scarsdale and Wappingers.
Rye JV was the most impressive team. Nearly everyone on that team plays club too (shocker).

The Arlington and JJ staff seemed to be the best.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we start discussing JV teams?

I've seen Arlington, Carmel, Greeley, John Jay, Rye, Scarsdale and Wappingers.
Rye JV was the most impressive team. Nearly everyone on that team plays club too (shocker).

The Arlington and JJ staff seemed to be the best.

You are spot on with the JJ, Arlington and Rye staffs. Scarsdale I am sure is not that far behind.
Greeley tough to judge as I don't believe they have a true goalie. Carmel is thin but getting better.
Somers isn't too bad but has injuries. Pelham is decent as well

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we start discussing JV teams?

I've seen Arlington, Carmel, Greeley, John Jay, Rye, Scarsdale and Wappingers.
Rye JV was the most impressive team. Nearly everyone on that team plays club too (shocker).

The Arlington and JJ staff seemed to be the best.

You are spot on with the JJ, Arlington and Rye staffs. Scarsdale I am sure is not that far behind.
Greeley tough to judge as I don't believe they have a true goalie. Carmel is thin but getting better.
Somers isn't too bad but has injuries. Pelham is decent as well

Never mentioned Rye's JV staff. I don't know the HC of Rye, but anyone could lead that team; that team is like a fine tuned club lax team.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Rye is that streamlined BECAUSE of Coach Lennon and that staff.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Some interesting matchups today. The JJCR- Byram game will be a measuring stick for where Byram is at.
Mamo and Bronxville will be a fun one and I think North Rockland and Mahopac will be a battle

Hoping Somers can be a nice game against Ridgefield.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Mahopac is peaking at the right time. I like the win over North Rockland today. North Rockland and Greeley are very similar in that they have a nice record and are scoring a lot of goals, but neither has really played anyone of significance except each other. NR had Mahopac and lost today, Greeley won a close one over Somers.

Somers had a nice looking showing in a loss to Ridgefield - who so far has won every game against Section 1. I will be interested in seeing how the Yorktown games vs. Somers and Rye will look.

A is all Scarsdale and Mamo. I hope they land in the 1-2 spot so they are meeting in the Finals.

B is Yorktown followed by Mahopac, Greeely & Somers. Eastchester it nipping at the ankles, the game at Rye next week will be a good litmus test for them.

C is down to Rye and JJCR with Pelham hovering. I think Byram is on the outside looking in at this point, but this should be your final four

D I don't see who is topping Pleasentville this year, except for a weird upset. They are the best in the Section.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
The two biggest games on the docket today are Yorktown/Somers and John JayCR vs. Mahopac.

I'm hoping Somers can make some noise on this one. i think Yorktown has more horses in this one.

Mahopac is continuing to peak at the right times. JJCR has been up and down If they can get up for this, it will be a clash of styles with Mahopac preferring the up and down the field game and JJCR more deliberate. JJCR i think has the goalie advantage in this one.

And hello to scarsdale with the gigantic W over a REALLY good Stepinac team this week.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The two biggest games on the docket today are Yorktown/Somers and John JayCR vs. Mahopac.

I'm hoping Somers can make some noise on this one. i think Yorktown has more horses in this one.

Mahopac is continuing to peak at the right times. JJCR has been up and down If they can get up for this, it will be a clash of styles with Mahopac preferring the up and down the field game and JJCR more deliberate. JJCR i think has the goalie advantage in this one.

And hello to scarsdale with the gigantic W over a REALLY good Stepinac team this week.
That 7-1 Score in Yorktown over Somers is - something. on both sides.
JJCR in OT vs. Mahopac was a good win in crappy, crappy weather. Mahopac had a 2 goal lead in this one with a fool ending and OT.

In other news, according to Ossining's twitter - they had 2 goals waved off late in the second period vs. Westlake. Westlake went on to win by 1 I believe.

It's hard to think it, but we are in the last two weeks of the regular season already. A lot of lacrosse left to play but things will start to solidify here soon.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Yorktown Somers game was halted mid 3rd quarter after an injury. Somers player was hurt and coaches decided not to continue the game

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yorktown Somers game was halted mid 3rd quarter after an injury. Somers player was hurt and coaches decided not to continue the game
That would explain the tweet from Somers lacrosse. player was "home and resting comfortably"

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
After another quiet one yesterday, another solid slate of games for Thursday in early may.

I like the Somers/John Jay and Yorktown/Mahopac games. These have some big impact on Class B standings
Bronxville/Pleasentville could be another interesting one, with a preview of a class D Semi or Final depending on seedings but I think it's Pville with the W here.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Class A- Feels like Scarsdale's to lose at this point.

Class B- Yorktown, Mahopac or Greeley

Circle 5/12 on the calendar Greeley vs JJ-CR if they can play with or even beat JJ I think they can actually challenge for the section 1. But until then they are just a dark horse.

Greeley could lose the rest of their games and still get the first seed which means Mahopac and Yorktown will have to play each other before the final.

Class C- Rye or JJ-CR

Class D- Pleasantville

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Class A- Feels like Scarsdale's to lose at this point.

Class B- Yorktown, Mahopac or Greeley

Circle 5/12 on the calendar Greeley vs JJ-CR if they can play with or even beat JJ I think they can actually challenge for the section 1. But until then they are just a dark horse.

Greeley could lose the rest of their games and still get the first seed which means Mahopac and Yorktown will have to play each other before the final.

Class C- Rye or JJ-CR

Class D- Pleasantville
A & D are fairly locked up - I am with you there

B will be interesting. Greeley has the lock on 1, it just seems like who is the 2 or 3 between Mahopac and Yorktown. Somers will want another shot at Greeley. I don't know if they can make it happen, but I know they'll want to take it to them, so don't count that out. Classic trap game for Greeley but that's your final 4 matchups. Unless they kill each other in the semis, the winner of Mahopac/Yorktown will win it. Greeley has a nice win over Byram and Somers, but that's about it, they really haven't been challenged yet. John Jay will be a real test.

C It's down to JJCR and Rye. The only thing that can ruin that is some movement int he seedings that somehow puts JJCR in a 3 slot making the Rye/JJ a semi-final game rather than the final. JJCR should win their last three - the Greeley game next week is for the league as well Rye has a gauntlet of Yorktown, Ridgefield (no effect on seeding) Pelham Bronxville..

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we start discussing JV teams?

I've seen Arlington, Carmel, Greeley, John Jay, Rye, Scarsdale and Wappingers.
Rye JV was the most impressive team. Nearly everyone on that team plays club too (shocker).

The Arlington and JJ staff seemed to be the best.

You are spot on with the JJ, Arlington and Rye staffs. Scarsdale I am sure is not that far behind.
Greeley tough to judge as I don't believe they have a true goalie. Carmel is thin but getting better.
Somers isn't too bad but has injuries. Pelham is decent as well

Never mentioned Rye's JV staff. I don't know the HC of Rye, but anyone could lead that team; that team is like a fine tuned club lax team.

Let’s all be honest here. The Yorktown JV lead by Mike Solazzo and John Nichol is the best staff in the section if not the state. The Yorktown JV team is beating ever section 1 team by 10+, only loss was to Darien 5-4.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

The problem with factoring SOS is you arrive at the same result - the math doesn't know the difference between a 7-9 team with a loaded scheduled vs a 7-9 team with a cupcake schedule.

The system is fine as is - best team will always make it through. The only marquee game is the section final, and you can't you fake your way into there. Its much more important to ensure that all teams can manufacture a 16 game schedule that makes for fun and competitive games for all teams.

Also, keep in mind that the traditional powers don't often want to play the "others". So, it's not necessarily true that teams are purposely playing a soft schedule. It's sometimes true that the big teams are not returning calls.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

The problem with factoring SOS is you arrive at the same result - the math doesn't know the difference between a 7-9 team with a loaded scheduled vs a 7-9 team with a cupcake schedule.

The system is fine as is - best team will always make it through. The only marquee game is the section final, and you can't you fake your way into there. Its much more important to ensure that all teams can manufacture a 16 game schedule that makes for fun and competitive games for all teams.

Also, keep in mind that the traditional powers don't often want to play the "others". So, it's not necessarily true that teams are purposely playing a soft schedule. It's sometimes true that the big teams are not returning calls.

Except that it would... a 7-9 team vs. a soft schedule would otherwise be properly seeded. a 9-7 team with a strong schedule also would. Where SOS would be a factor would be more correctly ranking that 9-7 team who had a strong schedule versus a 12-4 team that played a weak one.
Just look at the classes, you look at A and B and tell me that those are the correct rankings after you look at everyone's schedule? And who their opponents played? You have arguably the two best D teams outside Pleasentville and they are at 6 and 8 right now. All due respect to those other teams above them, but do we honestly think they would beat either of them?

As it stands, and for the last couple of years it has been mostly true: the best thing you can do is load up on a soft schedule, lock in the 1 seed and make the 2-3 best teams play each other in the semis and you only have one to beat. Or if you want to challenge yourselves you have a soft section1 schedule but load up on tough opponents out of section since they don't have an impact on the seedings. In fact, the math works more in your favor doing that.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

The problem with factoring SOS is you arrive at the same result - the math doesn't know the difference between a 7-9 team with a loaded scheduled vs a 7-9 team with a cupcake schedule.

The system is fine as is - best team will always make it through. The only marquee game is the section final, and you can't you fake your way into there. Its much more important to ensure that all teams can manufacture a 16 game schedule that makes for fun and competitive games for all teams.

Also, keep in mind that the traditional powers don't often want to play the "others". So, it's not necessarily true that teams are purposely playing a soft schedule. It's sometimes true that the big teams are not returning calls.

Section 1 takes into account the SOS for section 1 teams only with its bonus points formula. Every team you play that has a .500-.749 record you receive 1 bonus point, and every team with a .750 record or better you receive 2 bonus points.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Yorktown JV was 8-0 vs Rye at the half and 13-5 final with mostly second string players from mid 3Q on. They also have a 7th grade goalie as the Varsity starter is a freshman.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

The problem with factoring SOS is you arrive at the same result - the math doesn't know the difference between a 7-9 team with a loaded scheduled vs a 7-9 team with a cupcake schedule.

The system is fine as is - best team will always make it through. The only marquee game is the section final, and you can't you fake your way into there. Its much more important to ensure that all teams can manufacture a 16 game schedule that makes for fun and competitive games for all teams.

Also, keep in mind that the traditional powers don't often want to play the "others". So, it's not necessarily true that teams are purposely playing a soft schedule. It's sometimes true that the big teams are not returning calls.

Section 1 takes into account the SOS for section 1 teams only with its bonus points formula. Every team you play that has a .500-.749 record you receive 1 bonus point, and every team with a .750 record or better you receive 2 bonus points.
I don't think the bonus point system works as it is meant to. Edgemont has 6 bonus points and they cancelled their season after 2 games. I think the bigger issue is the threshold for making playoffs is way too low. you need 26 points (4 points for a win) so basically 6 wins against .500 or better teams gets you in. That's the very definition of average. They're aren't a ton of teams when you break it down by section, I get that but when teams have 5 wins are in the playoffs, it waters it down a bit.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Pelham just put everyone in C on notice. They had a 6-1 lead early and held on to a 1 goal win over Pleasentville.
Yorktown did well over Rye who is struggling without their FO guy. C is now a 3 team race.
I don't think Byram is as strong to compete with those three, but in a one-game situation, anything it possible.

Yorktown looked really good vs. Rye. I believe at least the top 4 are locked in now in B.

Assuming everything else remains similar bracket-wise - and there will be a lot of movement yet:

A- North Rockland has a clear path to the finals. Shame that Mamo and Scarsdale will be a Semi-Final, that would be a great final game.

B- Greeley has the 1 seed mathematically locked up. Friday's game vs. JJCR will be the real litmus test to see if they can hang with the big boys. Only change I see is maybe Yorktown and Mahopac swapping the 2-3 seeds but they will still see each other in the semis. It's just a matter of which jersey they are wearing. I don't see a true 4th team at this point other than Somers, I detest to see they weren't as good this year as many thoguht they would be - never count them out though! Same for Fox Lane, but I don't think this is their year. Eastchester might shock someone. Somers would love the rematch vs. Greeley.

C - Rye has a clear path to the finals. Pelham/Tappan Zee quarterfinal matchup could be interesting and a Pelham/JJCR rematch in the semis will be a much different game than the week 1 game they had this season - both are much better than that game. Rye vs. Pelham i think Rye takes is. Rye vs. JJCR would be a great game: tossup

D - Still all Pleasentville despite yesterday's hiccup. If Bronxville and Briarcliff are both on the other side of the bracket, that will be a good semi matchup. One of them on the same side as Pleasentville gives the other a clearer path to the final.

Good luck to all as the regular season winds down!

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

The problem with factoring SOS is you arrive at the same result - the math doesn't know the difference between a 7-9 team with a loaded scheduled vs a 7-9 team with a cupcake schedule.

The system is fine as is - best team will always make it through. The only marquee game is the section final, and you can't you fake your way into there. Its much more important to ensure that all teams can manufacture a 16 game schedule that makes for fun and competitive games for all teams.

Also, keep in mind that the traditional powers don't often want to play the "others". So, it's not necessarily true that teams are purposely playing a soft schedule. It's sometimes true that the big teams are not returning calls.

Except that it would... a 7-9 team vs. a soft schedule would otherwise be properly seeded. a 9-7 team with a strong schedule also would. Where SOS would be a factor would be more correctly ranking that 9-7 team who had a strong schedule versus a 12-4 team that played a weak one.
Just look at the classes, you look at A and B and tell me that those are the correct rankings after you look at everyone's schedule? And who their opponents played? You have arguably the two best D teams outside Pleasentville and they are at 6 and 8 right now. All due respect to those other teams above them, but do we honestly think they would beat either of them?

As it stands, and for the last couple of years it has been mostly true: the best thing you can do is load up on a soft schedule, lock in the 1 seed and make the 2-3 best teams play each other in the semis and you only have one to beat. Or if you want to challenge yourselves you have a soft section1 schedule but load up on tough opponents out of section since they don't have an impact on the seedings. In fact, the math works more in your favor doing that.

The current system is fine, and no one seems to care about seeding. If they did, you would see the traditional powers scheduling cupcakes in order to climb the seeding ladder. Virtually none of them do. This tells you all you need to know about what they think about seeding.

As for SOS being used, it wouldn't help that much because the teams with the softer schedules are still playing plenty of teams with inflated records. There are winners and losers amongst this group, just like there are amongst the power teams. That is where the math makes no, or little difference.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pelham just put everyone in C on notice. They had a 6-1 lead early and held on to a 1 goal win over Pleasentville.
Yorktown did well over Rye who is struggling without their FO guy. C is now a 3 team race.
I don't think Byram is as strong to compete with those three, but in a one-game situation, anything it possible.

Yorktown looked really good vs. Rye. I believe at least the top 4 are locked in now in B.

Assuming everything else remains similar bracket-wise - and there will be a lot of movement yet:

A- North Rockland has a clear path to the finals. Shame that Mamo and Scarsdale will be a Semi-Final, that would be a great final game.

B- Greeley has the 1 seed mathematically locked up. Friday's game vs. JJCR will be the real litmus test to see if they can hang with the big boys. Only change I see is maybe Yorktown and Mahopac swapping the 2-3 seeds but they will still see each other in the semis. It's just a matter of which jersey they are wearing. I don't see a true 4th team at this point other than Somers, I detest to see they weren't as good this year as many thoguht they would be - never count them out though! Same for Fox Lane, but I don't think this is their year. Eastchester might shock someone. Somers would love the rematch vs. Greeley.

C - Rye has a clear path to the finals. Pelham/Tappan Zee quarterfinal matchup could be interesting and a Pelham/JJCR rematch in the semis will be a much different game than the week 1 game they had this season - both are much better than that game. Rye vs. Pelham i think Rye takes is. Rye vs. JJCR would be a great game: tossup

D - Still all Pleasentville despite yesterday's hiccup. If Bronxville and Briarcliff are both on the other side of the bracket, that will be a good semi matchup. One of them on the same side as Pleasentville gives the other a clearer path to the final.

Good luck to all as the regular season winds down!

North Rockland's path is a function of how weak A is. C, for instance, has 7 teams all better than whoever is the 4th team in A.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pelham just put everyone in C on notice. They had a 6-1 lead early and held on to a 1 goal win over Pleasentville.
Yorktown did well over Rye who is struggling without their FO guy. C is now a 3 team race.
I don't think Byram is as strong to compete with those three, but in a one-game situation, anything it possible.

Yorktown looked really good vs. Rye. I believe at least the top 4 are locked in now in B.

Assuming everything else remains similar bracket-wise - and there will be a lot of movement yet:

A- North Rockland has a clear path to the finals. Shame that Mamo and Scarsdale will be a Semi-Final, that would be a great final game.

B- Greeley has the 1 seed mathematically locked up. Friday's game vs. JJCR will be the real litmus test to see if they can hang with the big boys. Only change I see is maybe Yorktown and Mahopac swapping the 2-3 seeds but they will still see each other in the semis. It's just a matter of which jersey they are wearing. I don't see a true 4th team at this point other than Somers, I detest to see they weren't as good this year as many thoguht they would be - never count them out though! Same for Fox Lane, but I don't think this is their year. Eastchester might shock someone. Somers would love the rematch vs. Greeley.

C - Rye has a clear path to the finals. Pelham/Tappan Zee quarterfinal matchup could be interesting and a Pelham/JJCR rematch in the semis will be a much different game than the week 1 game they had this season - both are much better than that game. Rye vs. Pelham i think Rye takes is. Rye vs. JJCR would be a great game: tossup

D - Still all Pleasentville despite yesterday's hiccup. If Bronxville and Briarcliff are both on the other side of the bracket, that will be a good semi matchup. One of them on the same side as Pleasentville gives the other a clearer path to the final.

Good luck to all as the regular season winds down!

North Rockland's path is a function of how weak A is. C, for instance, has 7 teams all better than whoever is the 4th team in A.
I completely agree with you - I am just pointing out where things stand and predicting what is likely to happen

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Some good games with interesting outcomes today.
Mamo won Round 2 for the Battle of Class A upending Scarsdale at Scarsdale.
JJCR survived a scare in OT from Bronxville
Somers taking down Greenwich - considering Section 1's overall record playing out of section - esp CT teams - this is a nice one for them and much needed

Suffern with a win over South. Eastchester/Carmel is a nice matchup - waiting on that score.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pelham just put everyone in C on notice. They had a 6-1 lead early and held on to a 1 goal win over Pleasentville.
Yorktown did well over Rye who is struggling without their FO guy. C is now a 3 team race.
I don't think Byram is as strong to compete with those three, but in a one-game situation, anything it possible.

Yorktown looked really good vs. Rye. I believe at least the top 4 are locked in now in B.

Assuming everything else remains similar bracket-wise - and there will be a lot of movement yet:

A- North Rockland has a clear path to the finals. Shame that Mamo and Scarsdale will be a Semi-Final, that would be a great final game.

B- Greeley has the 1 seed mathematically locked up. Friday's game vs. JJCR will be the real litmus test to see if they can hang with the big boys. Only change I see is maybe Yorktown and Mahopac swapping the 2-3 seeds but they will still see each other in the semis. It's just a matter of which jersey they are wearing. I don't see a true 4th team at this point other than Somers, I detest to see they weren't as good this year as many thoguht they would be - never count them out though! Same for Fox Lane, but I don't think this is their year. Eastchester might shock someone. Somers would love the rematch vs. Greeley.

C - Rye has a clear path to the finals. Pelham/Tappan Zee quarterfinal matchup could be interesting and a Pelham/JJCR rematch in the semis will be a much different game than the week 1 game they had this season - both are much better than that game. Rye vs. Pelham i think Rye takes is. Rye vs. JJCR would be a great game: tossup

D - Still all Pleasentville despite yesterday's hiccup. If Bronxville and Briarcliff are both on the other side of the bracket, that will be a good semi matchup. One of them on the same side as Pleasentville gives the other a clearer path to the final.

Good luck to all as the regular season winds down!

North Rockland's path is a function of how weak A is. C, for instance, has 7 teams all better than whoever is the 4th team in A.
I completely agree with you - I am just pointing out where things stand and predicting what is likely to happen

No way North Rockland can be 1 with that weak schedule, look at who Scarsdale and Mamaroneck play.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Pelham just put everyone in C on notice. They had a 6-1 lead early and held on to a 1 goal win over Pleasentville.
Yorktown did well over Rye who is struggling without their FO guy. C is now a 3 team race.
I don't think Byram is as strong to compete with those three, but in a one-game situation, anything it possible.

Yorktown looked really good vs. Rye. I believe at least the top 4 are locked in now in B.

Assuming everything else remains similar bracket-wise - and there will be a lot of movement yet:

A- North Rockland has a clear path to the finals. Shame that Mamo and Scarsdale will be a Semi-Final, that would be a great final game.

B- Greeley has the 1 seed mathematically locked up. Friday's game vs. JJCR will be the real litmus test to see if they can hang with the big boys. Only change I see is maybe Yorktown and Mahopac swapping the 2-3 seeds but they will still see each other in the semis. It's just a matter of which jersey they are wearing. I don't see a true 4th team at this point other than Somers, I detest to see they weren't as good this year as many thoguht they would be - never count them out though! Same for Fox Lane, but I don't think this is their year. Eastchester might shock someone. Somers would love the rematch vs. Greeley.

C - Rye has a clear path to the finals. Pelham/Tappan Zee quarterfinal matchup could be interesting and a Pelham/JJCR rematch in the semis will be a much different game than the week 1 game they had this season - both are much better than that game. Rye vs. Pelham i think Rye takes is. Rye vs. JJCR would be a great game: tossup

D - Still all Pleasentville despite yesterday's hiccup. If Bronxville and Briarcliff are both on the other side of the bracket, that will be a good semi matchup. One of them on the same side as Pleasentville gives the other a clearer path to the final.

Good luck to all as the regular season winds down!

North Rockland's path is a function of how weak A is. C, for instance, has 7 teams all better than whoever is the 4th team in A.
I completely agree with you - I am just pointing out where things stand and predicting what is likely to happen

No way North Rockland can be 1 with that weak schedule, look at who Scarsdale and Mamaroneck play.


It’s pretty much locked in right now. That’s been my argument against the way the math works out. It rewards winning more games against weaker schedules.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

The problem with factoring SOS is you arrive at the same result - the math doesn't know the difference between a 7-9 team with a loaded scheduled vs a 7-9 team with a cupcake schedule.

The system is fine as is - best team will always make it through. The only marquee game is the section final, and you can't you fake your way into there. Its much more important to ensure that all teams can manufacture a 16 game schedule that makes for fun and competitive games for all teams.

Also, keep in mind that the traditional powers don't often want to play the "others". So, it's not necessarily true that teams are purposely playing a soft schedule. It's sometimes true that the big teams are not returning calls.

Sorry, but looking at the current brackets, that's exactly what is happening. Mamo and Scarsdale are head and shoulders the 2 best teams in A and that's going to be a semi final game. Compare their schedules with North Rockland schedule and it's not even close

Same in B - Mahopac and Yorktown are headed for a Semi Game - is there any real arguement they aren't the two best teams right now in B? Again, look at their schedules vs. Greeley's

C - JJCR and Rye are the top two, if they make it through to the finals, they will see each other - compare those schedules to others in section 1 Alot more balanced.

D - P'ville, Briarcliff and Bronxville all challenged themselves this year. yet 2 of them are middle of the pack. Someone else mentioned: are the 3-4 teams seeded ahead of them really better than them? I don't think so

Like Reply Quote
Re: Westchester NY Youth Lacrosse
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basically the last week of regular season

A- Mamo vs Scarsdale final game of season should be a good grudge match but not sure it matters much as they see each other later in playoffs. Scars owns mental edge, not sure how Mamo shakes that, maybe being away as underdog is better for them? Don't see how N Rockland can beat either one of them.

B- Yorktown seems to have the juice for this group but the brutal schedule shows they can lose. Greeley is a year ahead of schedule and will be a tough out. Hard to deny Pac when that team takes the field. Somers just can't hang with the top teams. Playoff seedings will be unusual and some early rounds will have top teams going at it.

C- Rye up there, then JJCR. Pelham seems like they shouldn't be in the mix but each year they come though in playoffs. Lack of FOGO for Rye matters with these teams. Rest of C teams just too thin to do damage to top teams.

D- Pleasantville has been so good. Can Bronxville, Briarcliff or even Haldane beat them? Yes. Maybe. But a lot has to go wrong for Pville. Interesting is how Bville and Bcliff played such tough schedules, so they'll be low in the brackets as teams like Blind Brook and Rye Neck grab higher seeds. So Round 1 could see top teams playing each other.
B and D are good examples of the inherent issue with the way rankings are currently done. And I say this without an alternative that I’d find better (yet). The way it is rewards teams for playing either: a) a weaker in-section schedule (Greeley, North Rockland) or b) a strong non-section 1 schedule (Yorktown, Pleasentville, JJCR, Scarsdale) which I’d prefer teams play.

We see too many early round matchups between what arguably are the two best teams because someone else in the class loaded up with a soft schedule and gamed the seed.

I’d have to crunch the numbers to include a strength of schedule component for the seedlings. The data is there we have Opponents win %. I’d have to do some further digging to get opponents-opponents win % to crunch the SOS for each team. But you look at D, and briarcliff and bronxvilles SOS would dwarf anyone else’s besides Pleasentville. B, Yorktown, Mahopac and Somers SOS would probably be too three easily.

There shouldn’t be an incentive for loading up a weaker schedule to get the higher seed.

The problem with factoring SOS is you arrive at the same result - the math doesn't know the difference between a 7-9 team with a loaded scheduled vs a 7-9 team with a cupcake schedule.

The system is fine as is - best team will always make it through. The only marquee game is the section final, and you can't you fake your way into there. Its much more important to ensure that all teams can manufacture a 16 game schedule that makes for fun and competitive games for all teams.

Also, keep in mind that the traditional powers don't often want to play the "others". So, it's not necessarily true that teams are purposely playing a soft schedule. It's sometimes true that the big teams are not returning calls.

Sorry, but looking at the current brackets, that's exactly what is happening. Mamo and Scarsdale are head and shoulders the 2 best teams in A and that's going to be a semi final game. Compare their schedules with North Rockland schedule and it's not even close

Same in B - Mahopac and Yorktown are headed for a Semi Game - is there any real arguement they aren't the two best teams right now in B? Again, look at their schedules vs. Greeley's

C - JJCR and Rye are the top two, if they make it through to the finals, they will see each other - compare those schedules to others in section 1 Alot more balanced.

D - P'ville, Briarcliff and Bronxville all challenged themselves this year. yet 2 of them are middle of the pack. Someone else mentioned: are the 3-4 teams seeded ahead of them really better than them? I don't think so

You may be complaining, but I don't think the teams care. For instance, if it was important for Scarsdale and Mamaroneck to ensure a top 2 seed, they would have scheduled as such. They prioritize playing peer teams over maximizing seeding.

The bonus point system is a way of trying to factor in SOS, but it is flawed. For instance, if you play all of Bronxville, BH, LP and Somers you get a total of zero bonus points. Yet all 4 of these teams are strong, and better than many teams against whom you would get bonus points. The bottom line is that there is no good way to factor in SOS, at least with the landscape that exists in Section 1 boys lacrosse.

The same seeding system is used in other sports. But it works better in these other sports because strong teams are more evenly distributed amongst the entire section, and tend to vary more year to year. This leads to more uniformity in quality of schedule. In lacrosse, the top teams tend to stay the same every year, and are concentrated in Westchester. This creates a more or less informal Westchester-based power league.

At the end of the day, the top Westchester programs are never going to agree to both travel more (regarding their section 1 games), and play worse schedules. Especially when they are constantly trying to keep talent out of the prep schools. If this means awkward seedings some of the time, so be it. The only way to maybe have perfect seedings is to have a committee meet and draw it up, kind of like the NCAA basketball tournament. But this will create a whole new set of complaints, and seems like a bad look for HS sports. And also stated elsewhere in this thread, the current seeding system can benefit a team that has a power schedule when they have a bit of a down year, get a lower seed, but then draw one (or maybe more than one) paper tiger in the playoffs.

Like Reply Quote
Page 87 of 101 1 2 85 86 87 88 89 100 101
Quick Reply

Options
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
CAPTCHA Verification



Link Copied to Clipboard












Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4