Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Has anyone else noticed that every year they take a west coast team and build them up in the rankings when they obviously don’t belong . This year it will be Stanford who literally play no good teams for a whole season . Got to watch their last game , good to see they had starters in up by 13 or so and still had them scoring with under a minute to play . They may not win a game in the ACC or big ten but lets promote them like a top team . Can’t we finally admit that the game has not reached the West Coast yet .

.

Oh boy......did you not read the starting quote of the thread. I will recap for you since you obviously didnt.....Western teams overhyped....the counter argument...No SBU most over-rated in wlax history....Soooo western teams overhyped vs SBU overhyped.....interesting question.....SBU will easily beat western teams....Therefore it appears the Western teams are most overhyped. Now go and watch some Perry Mason re-runs

The original post came out of the blue and attacked the west coast teams as a whole claiming they are overhyped in the rankings every year. It was then pointed out that Stony Brook has been the most overrated / overhyped team in the history (many years...) in all of women’s lacrosse. It was not argued that this particular year Stony Brook not beat the west coast teams. The point was simple, Stony Brook has been the most overrated / overhyped program of all.

The funny thing is that stony Brook is notorious for doing exactly what you say Stanford is doing which is running up the score on week teams and padding stats.

I’m not sure why the assessment upset you.