Forums20
Topics3,802
Posts400,025
Members2,638
|
Most Online62,980 Feb 6th, 2020
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hawks starting goalie (#99) gave up 6 goals to Tigers. Backup goalie gave up 2 goals. Get your facts straight.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I still don't understand. Why is it that Lax is the only sport where you kid "holds back a year " to prove how good he is. every other sport I know of you "play up a year when you are good. My "real 2026" is competing for a starting job on his varsity team in the Rochester NY area. Maybe I should hold him back? That will definitely show everyone how good he is.. ROFL So your 8th grader is competing for a varsity spot on his High School team? I am sure Duke is already giving him looks right? SMH No, he said his 8th grade age kid, who is in 9th grade is competing for a starting spot. and he goes to public since most privates have started already How many 8 graders playing varsity in MIAA? Not permitted in MIAA except for scrimmages.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams: Elite: NL MLC 91 DCE Black VLC Crabs True Annapolis Green Hawks AAAA Cannons Crabs Hardshells Sidewinders HoCo TRW Top Caliber Looney's FCA AAA Zingos Black Dark Horse Coastal Academy Breakers Blue Roughriders Team Maryland White DEC Orange Kooper's AA A B Hard core troll....we are probably 8-9 days away from finding out the week 1 match ups. Week 2, about 15 days.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams: Elite: NL MLC 91 DCE Black VLC Crabs True Annapolis Green Hawks AAAA Cannons Crabs Hardshells Sidewinders HoCo TRW Top Caliber Looney's FCA AAA Zingos Black Dark Horse Coastal Academy Breakers Blue Roughriders Team Maryland White DEC Orange Kooper's AA A B Hard core troll....we are probably 8-9 days away from finding out the week 1 match ups. Week 2, about 15 days. I've heard these same teams and divisions, though I think some in the AAAA need to move to AAA and vice versa.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams: Elite: NL MLC 91 DCE Black VLC Crabs True Annapolis Green Hawks AAAA Cannons Crabs Hardshells Sidewinders HoCo TRW Top Caliber Looney's FCA AAA Zingos Black Dark Horse Coastal Academy Breakers Blue Roughriders Team Maryland White DEC Orange Kooper's AA A B Hard core troll....we are probably 8-9 days away from finding out the week 1 match ups. Week 2, about 15 days. Not a troll. Predators were single A
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams: Elite: NL MLC 91 DCE Black VLC Crabs True Annapolis Green Hawks AAAA Cannons Crabs Hardshells Sidewinders HoCo TRW Top Caliber Looney's FCA AAA Zingos Black Dark Horse Coastal Academy Breakers Blue Roughriders Team Maryland White DEC Orange Kooper's AA A B Hard core troll....we are probably 8-9 days away from finding out the week 1 match ups. Week 2, about 15 days. I've heard these same teams and divisions, though I think some in the AAAA need to move to AAA and vice versa. AAAA Ranking as of 2/14 Looney's 29 FCA 68 WolfPack 72 HoCo Pink 87 Sidewinders 94 Top Caliber 98 Cannons 118 Hardshells NA AAA Ranking as of 2/14 Zingo's 69 Coastal Academy 75 Team Maryand White 119 Dark Horse 142 Breakers Blue 155 Roughriders 159 Koopers 169 DC Express Orange NA
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hawks starting goalie (#99) gave up 6 goals to Tigers. Backup goalie gave up 2 goals. Get your facts straight. did anyone ask?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams: Elite: NL MLC 91 DCE Black VLC Crabs True Annapolis Green Hawks AAAA Cannons Crabs Hardshells Sidewinders HoCo TRW Top Caliber Looney's FCA AAA Zingos Black Dark Horse Coastal Academy Breakers Blue Roughriders Team Maryland White DEC Orange Kooper's AA A B Seems strange they would keep NL Elite and move Looney's down. Looney's had a better record. They also played the best teams and played them tight.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hawks starting goalie (#99) gave up 6 goals to Tigers. Backup goalie gave up 2 goals. Get your facts straight. did anyone ask? Backup Goalie's Dad has entered the chat lol
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
<tik tok> How would they know....how would they know.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
<tik tok> How would they know....how would they know. They're Gonna Know
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 16
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 16 |
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 16
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 16 |
Correct about the HS talent.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams: Elite: NL MLC 91 DCE Black VLC Crabs True Annapolis Green Hawks AAAA Cannons Crabs Hardshells Sidewinders HoCo TRW Top Caliber Looney's FCA AAA Zingos Black Dark Horse Coastal Academy Breakers Blue Roughriders Team Maryland White DEC Orange Kooper's AA A B Seems strange they would keep NL Elite and move Looney's down. Looney's had a better record. They also played the best teams and played them tight. Seems pretty cut and dry to me. US Club Ranking Division 2 Elite 10 Elite 17 Elite 19 Elite 26 Elite 29 Elite 38 Elite 43 Elite 68 AAAA 69 AAAA 72 AAAA 75 AAAA 80 AAAA 87 AAAA 94 AAAA 98 AAAA 118 AAA 119 AAA 142 AAA 155 AAA 159 AAA 169 AAA NA AAA NA AAA
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams: Elite: NL MLC 91 DCE Black VLC Crabs True Annapolis Green Hawks AAAA Cannons Crabs Hardshells Sidewinders HoCo TRW Top Caliber Looney's FCA AAA Zingos Black Dark Horse Coastal Academy Breakers Blue Roughriders Team Maryland White DEC Orange Kooper's AA A B Seems strange they would keep NL Elite and move Looney's down. Looney's had a better record. They also played the best teams and played them tight. Didn’t NL lose every game last spring?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams: Elite: NL MLC 91 DCE Black VLC Crabs True Annapolis Green Hawks AAAA Cannons Crabs Hardshells Sidewinders HoCo TRW Top Caliber Looney's FCA AAA Zingos Black Dark Horse Coastal Academy Breakers Blue Roughriders Team Maryland White DEC Orange Kooper's AA A B Seems strange they would keep NL Elite and move Looney's down. Looney's had a better record. They also played the best teams and played them tight. Didn’t NL lose every game last spring? 0-7 21 GF and 52 GA.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Yep. Four 1 goal losses. And Looney's had best goal differential (-9) by far of any team with a losing record. Team 91 had a -29. Next Level? -31, lmao. Looney's added great players and, more importantly, got back a starting attack man and big, fast middle who were out the past season and two seasons, respectively. Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams: Elite: NL MLC 91 DCE Black VLC Crabs True Annapolis Green Hawks AAAA Cannons Crabs Hardshells Sidewinders HoCo TRW Top Caliber Looney's FCA AAA Zingos Black Dark Horse Coastal Academy Breakers Blue Roughriders Team Maryland White DEC Orange Kooper's AA A B Seems strange they would keep NL Elite and move Looney's down. Looney's had a better record. They also played the best teams and played them tight. Didn’t NL lose every game last spring?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500. I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500. I heard they got one of the best FOGO's in the state. 50/50? More like 90/10. Should put them in the top of their division.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500. I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games? Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500. I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games? Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent. They also presume that a faceoff win leads to an offensive scoring opportunity (getting the ball in the box), which discounts a turnover which occurs before the team who wins the faceoff is able to get the ball into the box for a scoring possession.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams: Elite: NL MLC 91 DCE Black VLC Crabs True Annapolis Green Hawks AAAA Cannons Crabs Hardshells Sidewinders HoCo TRW Top Caliber Looney's FCA AAA Zingos Black Dark Horse Coastal Academy Breakers Blue Roughriders Team Maryland White DEC Orange Kooper's AA A B Seems strange they would keep NL Elite and move Looney's down. Looney's had a better record. They also played the best teams and played them tight. Seems pretty cut and dry to me. US Club Ranking Division 2 Elite 10 Elite 17 Elite 19 Elite 26 Elite 29 Elite 38 Elite 43 Elite 68 AAAA 69 AAAA 72 AAAA 75 AAAA 80 AAAA 87 AAAA 94 AAAA 98 AAAA 118 AAA 119 AAA 142 AAA 155 AAA 159 AAA 169 AAA NA AAA NA AAA You're thinking too logically. I'm sure coaches are complaining where they've been placed.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500. I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games? Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent. Ahhhh not all stats or correlations are linear. Your claim is true in every sport with a faceoff as long as there is "basic parity" in FO wins per game. If you are winning 40% instead of 60%, no statistically significant impact on points scored, points surrendered, or wins. No real impact on time of possession either! However the correlation is non linear and "possibly significant" when the FO wins heavily favors one team. A team winning 90% of FOs is highly correlated with wins. The triggering win/loss percentage on FO is likely around 2:1 or 70/30, etc. You can really go down the rabbit hole on "why" but generally if you lose 100% of faceoffs, you are not winning that game.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500. I heard they got one of the best FOGO's in the state. 50/50? More like 90/10. Should put them in the top of their division. Looney Dads in the house; no one knows these Stats unless your part of the team. The kid they got is the old FCA FO; you can form your own opinion based on that info.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500. I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games? Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent. Ahhhh not all stats or correlations are linear. Your claim is true in every sport with a faceoff as long as there is "basic parity" in FO wins per game. If you are winning 40% instead of 60%, no statistically significant impact on points scored, points surrendered, or wins. No real impact on time of possession either! However the correlation is non linear and "possibly significant" when the FO wins heavily favors one team. A team winning 90% of FOs is highly correlated with wins. The triggering win/loss percentage on FO is likely around 2:1 or 70/30, etc. You can really go down the rabbit hole on "why" but generally if you lose 100% of faceoffs, you are not winning that game. This 100%. From what I heard they maybe won 10% of their FO last year (or less). That’s not to say winning 50% or their FO would guarantee a win, but it would have improved their chances - especially with so many 1 goal games.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500. I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games? Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent. Ahhhh not all stats or correlations are linear. Your claim is true in every sport with a faceoff as long as there is "basic parity" in FO wins per game. If you are winning 40% instead of 60%, no statistically significant impact on points scored, points surrendered, or wins. No real impact on time of possession either! However the correlation is non linear and "possibly significant" when the FO wins heavily favors one team. A team winning 90% of FOs is highly correlated with wins. The triggering win/loss percentage on FO is likely around 2:1 or 70/30, etc. You can really go down the rabbit hole on "why" but generally if you lose 100% of faceoffs, you are not winning that game. Loyola lost almost every face-off yesterday against Haverford and still won the game.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hawks starting goalie (#99) gave up 6 goals to Tigers. Backup goalie gave up 2 goals. Get your facts straight. It says anonymous but it smells like the back up goalies dad.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500. I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games? Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent. Ahhhh not all stats or correlations are linear. Your claim is true in every sport with a faceoff as long as there is "basic parity" in FO wins per game. If you are winning 40% instead of 60%, no statistically significant impact on points scored, points surrendered, or wins. No real impact on time of possession either! However the correlation is non linear and "possibly significant" when the FO wins heavily favors one team. A team winning 90% of FOs is highly correlated with wins. The triggering win/loss percentage on FO is likely around 2:1 or 70/30, etc. You can really go down the rabbit hole on "why" but generally if you lose 100% of faceoffs, you are not winning that game. Loyola lost almost every face-off yesterday against Haverford and still won the game. Thanks for the *but actually!* moment. How many games would Loyola win this season by losing 90% of faceoffs in every game.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500. I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games? Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent. Ahhhh not all stats or correlations are linear. Your claim is true in every sport with a faceoff as long as there is "basic parity" in FO wins per game. If you are winning 40% instead of 60%, no statistically significant impact on points scored, points surrendered, or wins. No real impact on time of possession either! However the correlation is non linear and "possibly significant" when the FO wins heavily favors one team. A team winning 90% of FOs is highly correlated with wins. The triggering win/loss percentage on FO is likely around 2:1 or 70/30, etc. You can really go down the rabbit hole on "why" but generally if you lose 100% of faceoffs, you are not winning that game. Loyola lost almost every face-off yesterday against Haverford and still won the game. Thanks for the *but actually!* moment. How many games would Loyola win this season by losing 90% of faceoffs in every game. If they have a defensive efficiency rating of 90% or higher, then statistically speaking almost all of them.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500. I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games? Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent. Ahhhh not all stats or correlations are linear. Your claim is true in every sport with a faceoff as long as there is "basic parity" in FO wins per game. If you are winning 40% instead of 60%, no statistically significant impact on points scored, points surrendered, or wins. No real impact on time of possession either! However the correlation is non linear and "possibly significant" when the FO wins heavily favors one team. A team winning 90% of FOs is highly correlated with wins. The triggering win/loss percentage on FO is likely around 2:1 or 70/30, etc. You can really go down the rabbit hole on "why" but generally if you lose 100% of faceoffs, you are not winning that game. Loyola lost almost every face-off yesterday against Haverford and still won the game. Thanks for the *but actually!* moment. How many games would Loyola win this season by losing 90% of faceoffs in every game. That same kid went 80% earlier in the year and Loyola lost 9-4
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I am the PP who wondered if Looney's has a new face off guy. Thank you to the person who actually answered my question.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hawks starting goalie (#99) gave up 6 goals to Tigers. Backup goalie gave up 2 goals. Get your facts straight. It says anonymous but it smells like the back up goalies dad. Hey Stunads - this was clearly a Tigers dad arguing that the goalie didn’t matter (in response to someone writing the game was close until the backup went it). Get your nose checked and get better at reading.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hawks starting goalie (#99) gave up 6 goals to Tigers. Backup goalie gave up 2 goals. Get your facts straight. It says anonymous but it smells like the back up goalies dad. Hey Stunads - this was clearly a Tigers dad arguing that the goalie didn’t matter (in response to someone writing the game was close until the backup went it). Get your nose checked and get better at reading. Says the Hawks Goalie dad lol
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hawks starting goalie (#99) gave up 6 goals to Tigers. Backup goalie gave up 2 goals. Get your facts straight. It says anonymous but it smells like the back up goalies dad. Hey Stunads - this was clearly a Tigers dad arguing that the goalie didn’t matter (in response to someone writing the game was close until the backup went it). Get your nose checked and get better at reading. Says the Hawks Goalie dad lol LOLOLOLOLOL! Crushing it!
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
and VLC - dropping out of games at Spring Bloom
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Looneys getting dropped from Elite and not 91. Ridiculous...we kill them every year!!!
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Looneys getting dropped from Elite and not 91. Ridiculous...we kill them every year!!! Is this official? I have not seen the actual division breakdown from HOCO.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Moderated by 1026ME, A1Laxer, Annoy., baldbear, BiggLax, BOTC_EVENTS, clax422, CP@BOTC, cp_botc, Gremelin, hatimd80, JimSection1, Ladylaxer2609, lax516, Laxers412, LaxMomma, LILax15, MomOf6, Team BOTC, The Hop, TheBackOfTheCage, Thirdy@BOTC, TM@BOTC
|
|