Back Of The CAGE (BOTC) BOTC
Fall Season events are IN for Lacrosse players!!! | Join our Lacrosse Forum Community | Advertise & Generate more organic supporters for your business
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY BACK OF THE CAGE
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY MOST RECENT POSTS
Boys High School
by Anonymous -
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY Forum Statistics
Forums20
Topics3,802
Posts399,989
Members2,638
Most Online62,980
Feb 6th, 2020
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
Previous Thread
Next Thread
New Reply
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 191 of 273 1 2 189 190 191 192 193 272 273
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Hawks starting goalie (#99) gave up 6 goals to Tigers. Backup goalie gave up 2 goals. Get your facts straight.

Like Reply Quote
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY BACK OF THE CAGE SPONSORS

Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I still don't understand. Why is it that Lax is the only sport where you kid "holds back a year " to prove how good he is. every other sport I know of you "play up a year when you are good. My "real 2026" is competing for a starting job on his varsity team in the Rochester NY area. Maybe I should hold him back? That will definitely show everyone how good he is.. ROFL

So your 8th grader is competing for a varsity spot on his High School team? I am sure Duke is already giving him looks right? SMH

No, he said his 8th grade age kid, who is in 9th grade is competing for a starting spot.


and he goes to public since most privates have started already

How many 8 graders playing varsity in MIAA?

Not permitted in MIAA except for scrimmages.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
OK lets talk HOCO.

Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams:

Elite:
NL
MLC
91
DCE Black
VLC
Crabs
True Annapolis Green
Hawks

AAAA
Cannons
Crabs Hardshells
Sidewinders
HoCo
TRW
Top Caliber
Looney's
FCA

AAA
Zingos Black
Dark Horse
Coastal Academy
Breakers Blue
Roughriders
Team Maryland White
DEC Orange
Kooper's

AA

A

B

Hard core troll....we are probably 8-9 days away from finding out the week 1 match ups. Week 2, about 15 days.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
OK lets talk HOCO.

Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams:

Elite:
NL
MLC
91
DCE Black
VLC
Crabs
True Annapolis Green
Hawks

AAAA
Cannons
Crabs Hardshells
Sidewinders
HoCo
TRW
Top Caliber
Looney's
FCA

AAA
Zingos Black
Dark Horse
Coastal Academy
Breakers Blue
Roughriders
Team Maryland White
DEC Orange
Kooper's

AA

A

B

Hard core troll....we are probably 8-9 days away from finding out the week 1 match ups. Week 2, about 15 days.
I've heard these same teams and divisions, though I think some in the AAAA need to move to AAA and vice versa.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
OK lets talk HOCO.

Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams:

Elite:
NL
MLC
91
DCE Black
VLC
Crabs
True Annapolis Green
Hawks

AAAA
Cannons
Crabs Hardshells
Sidewinders
HoCo
TRW
Top Caliber
Looney's
FCA

AAA
Zingos Black
Dark Horse
Coastal Academy
Breakers Blue
Roughriders
Team Maryland White
DEC Orange
Kooper's

AA

A

B

Hard core troll....we are probably 8-9 days away from finding out the week 1 match ups. Week 2, about 15 days.
Not a troll. Predators were single A

Like Reply Quote
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY Sponsored Links
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
OK lets talk HOCO.

Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams:

Elite:
NL
MLC
91
DCE Black
VLC
Crabs
True Annapolis Green
Hawks

AAAA
Cannons
Crabs Hardshells
Sidewinders
HoCo
TRW
Top Caliber
Looney's
FCA

AAA
Zingos Black
Dark Horse
Coastal Academy
Breakers Blue
Roughriders
Team Maryland White
DEC Orange
Kooper's

AA

A

B

Hard core troll....we are probably 8-9 days away from finding out the week 1 match ups. Week 2, about 15 days.
I've heard these same teams and divisions, though I think some in the AAAA need to move to AAA and vice versa.
AAAA Ranking as of 2/14
Looney's 29
FCA 68
WolfPack 72
HoCo Pink 87
Sidewinders 94
Top Caliber 98
Cannons 118
Hardshells NA

AAA Ranking as of 2/14
Zingo's 69
Coastal Academy 75
Team Maryand White 119
Dark Horse 142
Breakers Blue 155
Roughriders 159
Koopers 169
DC Express Orange NA

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hawks starting goalie (#99) gave up 6 goals to Tigers. Backup goalie gave up 2 goals. Get your facts straight.

did anyone ask?

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
OK lets talk HOCO.

Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams:

Elite:
NL
MLC
91
DCE Black
VLC
Crabs
True Annapolis Green
Hawks

AAAA
Cannons
Crabs Hardshells
Sidewinders
HoCo
TRW
Top Caliber
Looney's
FCA

AAA
Zingos Black
Dark Horse
Coastal Academy
Breakers Blue
Roughriders
Team Maryland White
DEC Orange
Kooper's

AA

A

B

Seems strange they would keep NL Elite and move Looney's down. Looney's had a better record. They also played the best teams and played them tight.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hawks starting goalie (#99) gave up 6 goals to Tigers. Backup goalie gave up 2 goals. Get your facts straight.

did anyone ask?

Backup Goalie's Dad has entered the chat lol

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
NL dad making divisions

Like Reply Quote
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY Sponsored Links
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NL dad making divisions

<tik tok> How would they know....how would they know.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NL dad making divisions

<tik tok> How would they know....how would they know.
They're Gonna Know

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 16
Back of THE CAGE
Offline
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 16
Not duke. Prep schools.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 16
Back of THE CAGE
Offline
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 16
Correct about the HS talent.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
OK lets talk HOCO.

Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams:

Elite:
NL
MLC
91
DCE Black
VLC
Crabs
True Annapolis Green
Hawks

AAAA
Cannons
Crabs Hardshells
Sidewinders
HoCo
TRW
Top Caliber
Looney's
FCA

AAA
Zingos Black
Dark Horse
Coastal Academy
Breakers Blue
Roughriders
Team Maryland White
DEC Orange
Kooper's

AA

A

B

Seems strange they would keep NL Elite and move Looney's down. Looney's had a better record. They also played the best teams and played them tight.
Seems pretty cut and dry to me.

US Club Ranking Division
2 Elite
10 Elite
17 Elite
19 Elite
26 Elite
29 Elite
38 Elite
43 Elite
68 AAAA
69 AAAA
72 AAAA
75 AAAA
80 AAAA
87 AAAA
94 AAAA
98 AAAA
118 AAA
119 AAA
142 AAA
155 AAA
159 AAA
169 AAA
NA AAA
NA AAA

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
OK lets talk HOCO.

Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams:

Elite:
NL
MLC
91
DCE Black
VLC
Crabs
True Annapolis Green
Hawks

AAAA
Cannons
Crabs Hardshells
Sidewinders
HoCo
TRW
Top Caliber
Looney's
FCA

AAA
Zingos Black
Dark Horse
Coastal Academy
Breakers Blue
Roughriders
Team Maryland White
DEC Orange
Kooper's

AA

A

B

Seems strange they would keep NL Elite and move Looney's down. Looney's had a better record. They also played the best teams and played them tight.
Didn’t NL lose every game last spring?

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
OK lets talk HOCO.

Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams:

Elite:
NL
MLC
91
DCE Black
VLC
Crabs
True Annapolis Green
Hawks

AAAA
Cannons
Crabs Hardshells
Sidewinders
HoCo
TRW
Top Caliber
Looney's
FCA

AAA
Zingos Black
Dark Horse
Coastal Academy
Breakers Blue
Roughriders
Team Maryland White
DEC Orange
Kooper's

AA

A

B

Seems strange they would keep NL Elite and move Looney's down. Looney's had a better record. They also played the best teams and played them tight.
Didn’t NL lose every game last spring?
0-7 21 GF and 52 GA.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Yep. Four 1 goal losses. And Looney's had best goal differential (-9) by far of any team with a losing record. Team 91 had a -29. Next Level? -31, lmao. Looney's added great players and, more importantly, got back a starting attack man and big, fast middle who were out the past season and two seasons, respectively.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
OK lets talk HOCO.

Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams:

Elite:
NL
MLC
91
DCE Black
VLC
Crabs
True Annapolis Green
Hawks

AAAA
Cannons
Crabs Hardshells
Sidewinders
HoCo
TRW
Top Caliber
Looney's
FCA

AAA
Zingos Black
Dark Horse
Coastal Academy
Breakers Blue
Roughriders
Team Maryland White
DEC Orange
Kooper's

AA

A

B

Seems strange they would keep NL Elite and move Looney's down. Looney's had a better record. They also played the best teams and played them tight.
Didn’t NL lose every game last spring?

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500.

I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games?

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500.

I heard they got one of the best FOGO's in the state. 50/50? More like 90/10. Should put them in the top of their division.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500.

I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games?

Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500.

I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games?

Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent.

They also presume that a faceoff win leads to an offensive scoring opportunity (getting the ball in the box), which discounts a turnover which occurs before the team who wins the faceoff is able to get the ball into the box for a scoring possession.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
OK lets talk HOCO.

Looks like HoCo solved the 10 team division problem by adding a AAAA level and limiting each division to 8 teams:

Elite:
NL
MLC
91
DCE Black
VLC
Crabs
True Annapolis Green
Hawks

AAAA
Cannons
Crabs Hardshells
Sidewinders
HoCo
TRW
Top Caliber
Looney's
FCA

AAA
Zingos Black
Dark Horse
Coastal Academy
Breakers Blue
Roughriders
Team Maryland White
DEC Orange
Kooper's

AA

A

B

Seems strange they would keep NL Elite and move Looney's down. Looney's had a better record. They also played the best teams and played them tight.
Seems pretty cut and dry to me.

US Club Ranking Division
2 Elite
10 Elite
17 Elite
19 Elite
26 Elite
29 Elite
38 Elite
43 Elite
68 AAAA
69 AAAA
72 AAAA
75 AAAA
80 AAAA
87 AAAA
94 AAAA
98 AAAA
118 AAA
119 AAA
142 AAA
155 AAA
159 AAA
169 AAA
NA AAA
NA AAA
You're thinking too logically. I'm sure coaches are complaining where they've been placed.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500.

I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games?

Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent.

Ahhhh not all stats or correlations are linear.

Your claim is true in every sport with a faceoff as long as there is "basic parity" in FO wins per game. If you are winning 40% instead of 60%, no statistically significant impact on points scored, points surrendered, or wins. No real impact on time of possession either!

However the correlation is non linear and "possibly significant" when the FO wins heavily favors one team. A team winning 90% of FOs is highly correlated with wins. The triggering win/loss percentage on FO is likely around 2:1 or 70/30, etc.

You can really go down the rabbit hole on "why" but generally if you lose 100% of faceoffs, you are not winning that game.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500.

I heard they got one of the best FOGO's in the state. 50/50? More like 90/10. Should put them in the top of their division.

Looney Dads in the house; no one knows these Stats unless your part of the team. The kid they got is the old FCA FO; you can form your own opinion based on that info.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500.

I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games?

Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent.

Ahhhh not all stats or correlations are linear.

Your claim is true in every sport with a faceoff as long as there is "basic parity" in FO wins per game. If you are winning 40% instead of 60%, no statistically significant impact on points scored, points surrendered, or wins. No real impact on time of possession either!

However the correlation is non linear and "possibly significant" when the FO wins heavily favors one team. A team winning 90% of FOs is highly correlated with wins. The triggering win/loss percentage on FO is likely around 2:1 or 70/30, etc.

You can really go down the rabbit hole on "why" but generally if you lose 100% of faceoffs, you are not winning that game.

This 100%. From what I heard they maybe won 10% of their FO last year (or less). That’s not to say winning 50% or their FO would guarantee a win, but it would have improved their chances - especially with so many 1 goal games.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500.

I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games?

Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent.

Ahhhh not all stats or correlations are linear.

Your claim is true in every sport with a faceoff as long as there is "basic parity" in FO wins per game. If you are winning 40% instead of 60%, no statistically significant impact on points scored, points surrendered, or wins. No real impact on time of possession either!

However the correlation is non linear and "possibly significant" when the FO wins heavily favors one team. A team winning 90% of FOs is highly correlated with wins. The triggering win/loss percentage on FO is likely around 2:1 or 70/30, etc.

You can really go down the rabbit hole on "why" but generally if you lose 100% of faceoffs, you are not winning that game.

Loyola lost almost every face-off yesterday against Haverford and still won the game.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hawks starting goalie (#99) gave up 6 goals to Tigers. Backup goalie gave up 2 goals. Get your facts straight.

It says anonymous but it smells like the back up goalies dad.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500.

I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games?

Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent.

Ahhhh not all stats or correlations are linear.

Your claim is true in every sport with a faceoff as long as there is "basic parity" in FO wins per game. If you are winning 40% instead of 60%, no statistically significant impact on points scored, points surrendered, or wins. No real impact on time of possession either!

However the correlation is non linear and "possibly significant" when the FO wins heavily favors one team. A team winning 90% of FOs is highly correlated with wins. The triggering win/loss percentage on FO is likely around 2:1 or 70/30, etc.

You can really go down the rabbit hole on "why" but generally if you lose 100% of faceoffs, you are not winning that game.

Loyola lost almost every face-off yesterday against Haverford and still won the game.


Thanks for the *but actually!* moment. How many games would Loyola win this season by losing 90% of faceoffs in every game.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500.

I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games?

Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent.

Ahhhh not all stats or correlations are linear.

Your claim is true in every sport with a faceoff as long as there is "basic parity" in FO wins per game. If you are winning 40% instead of 60%, no statistically significant impact on points scored, points surrendered, or wins. No real impact on time of possession either!

However the correlation is non linear and "possibly significant" when the FO wins heavily favors one team. A team winning 90% of FOs is highly correlated with wins. The triggering win/loss percentage on FO is likely around 2:1 or 70/30, etc.

You can really go down the rabbit hole on "why" but generally if you lose 100% of faceoffs, you are not winning that game.

Loyola lost almost every face-off yesterday against Haverford and still won the game.


Thanks for the *but actually!* moment. How many games would Loyola win this season by losing 90% of faceoffs in every game.

If they have a defensive efficiency rating of 90% or higher, then statistically speaking almost all of them.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has Looney's upgraded their face off game? Last year they lost practically every face off but kept their games close. If they had gone 50/50 or even 40/60 on faceoffs their win/loss record probably would have .500.

I’d bet they would have been well over .500. Didn’t they lose something like 8 1 goal games?

Niether of you understand metrics, statistics, or correlational relationships. There is no direct, significant statistical correlation between FOW% and game winning %. The only statistic that is proven to show significant statistical correlation to game winning % is outscoring the opponent.

Ahhhh not all stats or correlations are linear.

Your claim is true in every sport with a faceoff as long as there is "basic parity" in FO wins per game. If you are winning 40% instead of 60%, no statistically significant impact on points scored, points surrendered, or wins. No real impact on time of possession either!

However the correlation is non linear and "possibly significant" when the FO wins heavily favors one team. A team winning 90% of FOs is highly correlated with wins. The triggering win/loss percentage on FO is likely around 2:1 or 70/30, etc.

You can really go down the rabbit hole on "why" but generally if you lose 100% of faceoffs, you are not winning that game.

Loyola lost almost every face-off yesterday against Haverford and still won the game.


Thanks for the *but actually!* moment. How many games would Loyola win this season by losing 90% of faceoffs in every game.

That same kid went 80% earlier in the year and Loyola lost 9-4

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I am the PP who wondered if Looney's has a new face off guy. Thank you to the person who actually answered my question.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hawks starting goalie (#99) gave up 6 goals to Tigers. Backup goalie gave up 2 goals. Get your facts straight.

It says anonymous but it smells like the back up goalies dad.

Hey Stunads - this was clearly a Tigers dad arguing that the goalie didn’t matter (in response to someone writing the game was close until the backup went it). Get your nose checked and get better at reading.

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hawks starting goalie (#99) gave up 6 goals to Tigers. Backup goalie gave up 2 goals. Get your facts straight.

It says anonymous but it smells like the back up goalies dad.

Hey Stunads - this was clearly a Tigers dad arguing that the goalie didn’t matter (in response to someone writing the game was close until the backup went it). Get your nose checked and get better at reading.

Says the Hawks Goalie dad lol

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hawks starting goalie (#99) gave up 6 goals to Tigers. Backup goalie gave up 2 goals. Get your facts straight.

It says anonymous but it smells like the back up goalies dad.

Hey Stunads - this was clearly a Tigers dad arguing that the goalie didn’t matter (in response to someone writing the game was close until the backup went it). Get your nose checked and get better at reading.

Says the Hawks Goalie dad lol

LOLOLOLOLOL! Crushing it!

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
What happened to Madlax?

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened to Madlax?

and VLC - dropping out of games at Spring Bloom

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Looneys getting dropped from Elite and not 91. Ridiculous...we kill them every year!!!

Like Reply Quote
Re: Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Looneys getting dropped from Elite and not 91. Ridiculous...we kill them every year!!!

Is this official? I have not seen the actual division breakdown from HOCO.

Like Reply Quote
Page 191 of 273 1 2 189 190 191 192 193 272 273
Quick Reply

Options
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
CAPTCHA Verification



Link Copied to Clipboard












Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4