Forums20
Topics3,799
Posts399,590
Members2,638
|
Most Online62,980 Feb 6th, 2020
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Calling out girls is not ok. Moderators you need to delete these posts ASAP. Whoever is posting these needs help too- I feel for your kids
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
McDongh SPSG was a great game of high level lacrosse but why does the newspaper say McDonugh pulled out a win over a young SPSG team. They're not young. They have a very experienced senior goalie, senior draw girl and senior defender as well as several juniors who have all been playing varsity and getting playing time since freshman year. Why are they considered young ? With the exception of one freshman i thought the two teams matched up in the number of seniors, juniors and sophomores out on the field. Neither of these teams have "young" rosters out there Did SPSG pull the goalie so she could throw elbows at the restraining line?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
McDongh SPSG was a great game of high level lacrosse but why does the newspaper say McDonugh pulled out a win over a young SPSG team. They're not young. They have a very experienced senior goalie, senior draw girl and senior defender as well as several juniors who have all been playing varsity and getting playing time since freshman year. Why are they considered young ? With the exception of one freshman i thought the two teams matched up in the number of seniors, juniors and sophomores out on the field. Neither of these teams have "young" rosters out there They use the word "young" as an excuse - same thing with UNC - they aren't doing well because they are "young" - they are far from young
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
McDongh SPSG was a great game of high level lacrosse but why does the newspaper say McDonugh pulled out a win over a young SPSG team. They're not young. They have a very experienced senior goalie, senior draw girl and senior defender as well as several juniors who have all been playing varsity and getting playing time since freshman year. Why are they considered young ? With the exception of one freshman i thought the two teams matched up in the number of seniors, juniors and sophomores out on the field. Neither of these teams have "young" rosters out there Because that is their head coach’s response in interviews every time she loses, that she lost because they are a young team. It’s laughable. And so predictable.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
SPRING HAS SPRUNG AND FLING HAS FLUNG!!!!
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The best goalie in IAAM…her before it’s too late. Seek help, asap. You clearly have major issues going on in your life
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
McDongh SPSG was a great game of high level lacrosse but why does the newspaper say McDonugh pulled out a win over a young SPSG team. They're not young. They have a very experienced senior goalie, senior draw girl and senior defender as well as several juniors who have all been playing varsity and getting playing time since freshman year. Why are they considered young ? With the exception of one freshman i thought the two teams matched up in the number of seniors, juniors and sophomores out on the field. Neither of these teams have "young" rosters out there Did SPSG pull the goalie so she could throw elbows at the restraining line? probably and i’m sure the dad with the cowbell was the first to leave the parking lot
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
SPRING HAS SPRUNG AND FLING HAS FLUNG!!!! Century High School just got a lot better next year! I look forward to watching them battle it out with Man Valley next year.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
McDongh SPSG was a great game of high level lacrosse but why does the newspaper say McDonugh pulled out a win over a young SPSG team. They're not young. They have a very experienced senior goalie, senior draw girl and senior defender as well as several juniors who have all been playing varsity and getting playing time since freshman year. Why are they considered young ? With the exception of one freshman i thought the two teams matched up in the number of seniors, juniors and sophomores out on the field. Neither of these teams have "young" rosters out there Did SPSG pull the goalie so she could throw elbows at the restraining line? Yes, but surprisingly the McDonogh players didn't dive /flop all over the line when barely touched. That is only a Maryvale/Reese thing.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The best goalie in IAAM…her before it’s too late. Seek help, asap. You clearly have major issues going on in your life This is random.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
McDongh SPSG was a great game of high level lacrosse but why does the newspaper say McDonugh pulled out a win over a young SPSG team. They're not young. They have a very experienced senior goalie, senior draw girl and senior defender as well as several juniors who have all been playing varsity and getting playing time since freshman year. Why are they considered young ? With the exception of one freshman i thought the two teams matched up in the number of seniors, juniors and sophomores out on the field. Neither of these teams have "young" rosters out there Did SPSG pull the goalie so she could throw elbows at the restraining line? Yes, but surprisingly the McDonogh players didn't dive /flop all over the line when barely touched. That is only a Maryvale/Reese thing. You forgot grab your head, run through 3-4 players, arms up, complaining, whining in a hoarse coaches voice.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
McDongh SPSG was a great game of high level lacrosse but why does the newspaper say McDonugh pulled out a win over a young SPSG team. They're not young. They have a very experienced senior goalie, senior draw girl and senior defender as well as several juniors who have all been playing varsity and getting playing time since freshman year. Why are they considered young ? With the exception of one freshman i thought the two teams matched up in the number of seniors, juniors and sophomores out on the field. Neither of these teams have "young" rosters out there Did SPSG pull the goalie so she could throw elbows at the restraining line? Yes, but surprisingly the McDonogh players didn't dive /flop all over the line when barely touched. That is only a Maryvale/Reese thing. I guess he has learned that from his wife since that is also a MD thing
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Fling is a flock of eagles. They are referring to Mcdonogh, and not the player going to Century.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Thoughts and prayers out to the MCD player. Looked like a bad knee injury. How many IAAM players have gone done this year due to knee injuries?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
McDongh SPSG was a great game of high level lacrosse but why does the newspaper say McDonugh pulled out a win over a young SPSG team. They're not young. They have a very experienced senior goalie, senior draw girl and senior defender as well as several juniors who have all been playing varsity and getting playing time since freshman year. Why are they considered young ? With the exception of one freshman i thought the two teams matched up in the number of seniors, juniors and sophomores out on the field. Neither of these teams have "young" rosters out there They use the word "young" as an excuse - same thing with UNC - they aren't doing well because they are "young" - they are far from young I didnt read it as an excuse, at some point a coach gets asked why they lost. Outside of saying the other team scored more you are asked to provide context. The context I read was very complimentary speaking of the poise that the senior MCD team showed and that they are setting the bar that she wants her team to reach towards.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Nope Referring to the player
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So much goalie talk on here and none of it is positive. It’s a tough position to play so lighten up on these kids. It seems that the negativity is directed more to hurt their parents than an accurate assessment of their play. FWIW the St. Mary’s keeper is excellent. Not a relative but someone who has seen her play.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Nope Referring to the player Definitely the player. The league is losing a great player.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
GFS must be that bad, why would she leave the school she was at for 3 years to go to a school for a year to get their diploma?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
GFS must be that bad, why would she leave the school she was at for 3 years to go to a school for a year to get their diploma?
Doesnt matter where she graduates from, she is committed already. And yes, its that bad at GFS
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
GFS must be that bad, why would she leave the school she was at for 3 years to go to a school for a year to get their diploma? I would do the same thing if my kid was committed and there was no guarantee they would have a team next year. Smart move on her part.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
GFS must be that bad, why would she leave the school she was at for 3 years to go to a school for a year to get their diploma? To make sure she has a team to play on. Century will have one with a competent coach. Gfs may not have a team and haven’t had a competent coach in quite a while.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Maybe she was the issue not garrison
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
IAAM playoff lines for 5/1:
#9 GCS (+0.5) @ #8 BMS (-0.5) #10 RPCS (+2.5) @ #7 St. Mary’s (-2.5)
I’ll take BMS to cover and RPCS with the points
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Why are you all so obsessed with other people’s kids? It’s pathetic. Are you so insecure about your own daughters that you just sit on this site all day ripping on every player and coach of the other teams? If you had the game knowledge you would know better but you don’t. And who cares where people hang out? The Valley Inn references wreak of envy. Sad. Targeting high school girls as an adult? Talk about bottom of the barrel. And yes BR is a dooshnozzle. Always has been always will be.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Well, the "investigation" at RPCS has concluded. No smoking gun and a competent, caring coach is the collateral damage. Make no mistake, this is about senior parents who are angry about their kids lack of playing time. Just so happens they have deep pockets and board positions.They've left the program in shambles for the ones who are willing to earn their spot and invest in getting better. Devastating is an understatement.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
IAAM playoff lines for 5/1:
#9 GCS (+0.5) @ #8 BMS (-0.5) #10 RPCS (+2.5) @ #7 St. Mary’s (-2.5)
I’ll take BMS to cover and RPCS with the points I'll take GCS moneyline
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Why are you all so obsessed with other people’s kids? It’s pathetic. Are you so insecure about your own daughters that you just sit on this site all day ripping on every player and coach of the other teams? If you had the game knowledge you would know better but you don’t. And who cares where people hang out? The Valley Inn references wreak of envy. Sad. Targeting high school girls as an adult? Talk about bottom of the barrel. And yes BR is a dooshnozzle. Always has been always will be. I would like to add MG is a snake and MHN is not nice either. Both only out there to rack up wins and promote themselves but I’m sure their real friends like them outside lax.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I would like to add MG is a snake and MHN is not nice either. Both only out there to rack up wins and promote themselves but I’m sure their real friends like them outside lax.
Be glad your kid didnt have TC as coach. Since she has left, the toxic culture is much improved and the girls are enjoying it!!!!
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Well, the "investigation" at RPCS has concluded. No smoking gun and a competent, caring coach is the collateral damage. Make no mistake, this is about senior parents who are angry about their kids lack of playing time. Just so happens they have deep pockets and board positions.They've left the program in shambles for the ones who are willing to earn their spot and invest in getting better. Devastating is an understatement. Some of the same parents that said they loved the coach two years ago
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Be glad your kid didnt have TC as coach. Since she has left, the toxic culture is much improved and the girls are enjoying it!!!! You’re kidding right? There’s more toxicity than ever, there’s more getting thrown under the rug than ever. TC at least had control of her team. New coach has no backbone and because of it, the camaraderie is nil. Don’t fool yourselves, four players run the team and are the reason they win. One of them is now done for the season. One of them should have been expelled from school four times over. It would be a gift to the team for TC to come back at this point, and I say that without liking the woman. But she is better than what is going on now.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Why are you all so obsessed with other people’s kids? It’s pathetic. Are you so insecure about your own daughters that you just sit on this site all day ripping on every player and coach of the other teams? If you had the game knowledge you would know better but you don’t. And who cares where people hang out? The Valley Inn references wreak of envy. Sad. Targeting high school girls as an adult? Talk about bottom of the barrel. And yes BR is a dooshnozzle. Always has been always will be. Yet here you are, reading and posting. And you even managed to throw in a jab at a coach. Hilarious.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Show me an IAAM team and I'll show you whiny, entitled parents. "But it is the schools fault, or the coaches fault, or the other kids on the team's fault, or the other parents on the team's fault, or the personal trainer you pay for's fault". It is never the parents fault! bahahahahahahaa!
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Well, the "investigation" at RPCS has concluded. No smoking gun and a competent, caring coach is the collateral damage. Make no mistake, this is about senior parents who are angry about their kids lack of playing time. Just so happens they have deep pockets and board positions.They've left the program in shambles for the ones who are willing to earn their spot and invest in getting better. Devastating is an understatement. Some of the same parents that said they loved the coach two years ago That is also a fun fact
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Well, the "investigation" at RPCS has concluded. No smoking gun and a competent, caring coach is the collateral damage. Make no mistake, this is about senior parents who are angry about their kids lack of playing time. Just so happens they have deep pockets and board positions.They've left the program in shambles for the ones who are willing to earn their spot and invest in getting better. Devastating is an understatement. This was never a doubt. Lost 3 coaches that didn’t want to deal with a school that supports parents over play time. Now they have a chance to get C2 who will drop the program even further.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Be glad your kid didnt have TC as coach. Since she has left, the toxic culture is much improved and the girls are enjoying it!!!! You’re kidding right? There’s more toxicity than ever, there’s more getting thrown under the rug than ever. TC at least had control of her team. New coach has no backbone and because of it, the camaraderie is nil. Don’t fool yourselves, four players run the team and are the reason they win. One of them is now done for the season. One of them should have been expelled from school four times over. It would be a gift to the team for TC to come back at this point, and I say that without liking the woman. But she is better than what is going on now. OMG enough bemoaning the off-the field activities of high school girls. We could do the same for every school. Who ever this is is the same person obsessed with the goalie's life outside of school. It's pathological at this point.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Be glad your kid didnt have TC as coach. Since she has left, the toxic culture is much improved and the girls are enjoying it!!!! You’re kidding right? There’s more toxicity than ever, there’s more getting thrown under the rug than ever. TC at least had control of her team. New coach has no backbone and because of it, the camaraderie is nil. Don’t fool yourselves, four players run the team and are the reason they win. One of them is now done for the season. One of them should have been expelled from school four times over. It would be a gift to the team for TC to come back at this point, and I say that without liking the woman. But she is better than what is going on now. Spot on. Last year was a love fest compared to how things are this year.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Well, the "investigation" at RPCS has concluded. No smoking gun and a competent, caring coach is the collateral damage. Make no mistake, this is about senior parents who are angry about their kids lack of playing time. Just so happens they have deep pockets and board positions.They've left the program in shambles for the ones who are willing to earn their spot and invest in getting better. Devastating is an understatement. Some of the same parents that said they loved the coach two years ago That is also a fun fact Does the coach still have her job at the school? I've only ever heard really positive things about this coach from RCPS and Coppermine parents who had direct experience. Really odd turn of events.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Spot on. Last year was a love fest compared to how things are this year.[/quote]
What’s the difference between last year and this year?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: Girls High School
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Well, the "investigation" at RPCS has concluded. No smoking gun and a competent, caring coach is the collateral damage. Make no mistake, this is about senior parents who are angry about their kids lack of playing time. Just so happens they have deep pockets and board positions.They've left the program in shambles for the ones who are willing to earn their spot and invest in getting better. Devastating is an understatement. This was never a doubt. Lost 3 coaches that didn’t want to deal with a school that supports parents over play time. Now they have a chance to get C2 who will drop the program even further. Whoever this is has an obsession with Garrison and C2. Did your kid get cut or something? they are taking up a lot of energy in your world.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Moderated by 1026ME, A1Laxer, Annoy., baldbear, BiggLax, BOTC_EVENTS, clax422, CP@BOTC, cp_botc, Gremelin, hatimd80, JimSection1, Ladylaxer2609, lax516, Laxers412, LaxMomma, LILax15, MomOf6, Team BOTC, The Hop, TheBackOfTheCage, Thirdy@BOTC, TM@BOTC
|
|