Forums20
Topics3,799
Posts399,652
Members2,638
|
Most Online62,980 Feb 6th, 2020
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Was Murphy a top player in high school? Did she have lots of offers from Top 10 schools? How much of it is talent and how much is it the system she is in, the competition she plays against and stat padding? The fact that the all time NCAA leading scorer in goals and and the all time NCAA leader in points play on the same team during the same 3-4 years has to tell everyone something.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Was Murphy a top player in high school? Did she have lots of offers from Top 10 schools? How much of it is talent and how much is it the system she is in, the competition she plays against and stat padding? The fact that the all time NCAA leading scorer in goals and and the all time NCAA leader in points play on the same team during the same 3-4 years has to tell everyone something. so does beating teams by 15-20 routinely
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
IWLCA Poll for Division I, April 9 Rank Team Record Points First Previous 1 Stony Brook 12-0 619 21 1 2 Maryland 12-1 590 1 2 3 Boston College 14-0 588 3 3 4 James Madison 11-1 549 4 5 North Carolina 9-3 520 5 6 Florida 10-3 484 7 7 Northwestern 11-3 470 8 8 Towson 10-2 447 10 9 Penn 9-2 407 11 10 Loyola 9-3 383 9 11 Virginia 8-5 367 6 12 Stanford 11-3 340 13 13 Navy 9-3 333 12 14 Virginia Tech 11-4 303 17 15 Syracuse 8-6 255 14 16 Colorado 9-4 247 18 17 Penn State 9-4 240 19 18 Duke 7-5 234 15 19 Princeton 6-4 145 20 20 Southern California 7-7 133 16 21 Notre Dame 7-7 93 21 22 Johns Hopkins 8-5 80 24 23 Georgetown 8-4 71 NR 24 High Point 9-2 69 25 25 Denver 8-4 64 22
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
IWLCA Poll for Division II, April 9 Rank Team Record Points First Previous 1 Adelphi 11-1 593 9 2 2 Lindenwood 12-0 587 8 3 3 Le Moyne 11-0 583 6 4 4 Florida Southern 13-1 573 2 1 5 Florida Tech 12-1 536 5 6 Rollins 12-3 480 8 7 LIU Post 8-3 467 6 8 Limestone 12-2 450 7 9 Mercy 10-1 428 9 10 Pace 8-3 385 10 11 West Chester 11-0 372 12 12 Regis (CO) 10-2 365 11 13 Grand Valley State 9-2 341 13 14 Merrimack 8-3 281 14 15 Indianapolis 9-3 247 15 16 Tampa 9-5 230 16 17 NYIT 10-3 218 17 18 East Stroudsburg 7-2 181 20 19 New Haven 6-5 177 18 20 Bentley 7-2 109 22 21 Indiana (PA) 6-3 102 21 22 Mercyhurst 6-4 98 19 23 Lock Haven 8-3 80 24 24 Assumption 6-4 78 23 25 Tiffin 8-4 65 25
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
IWLCA Poll for Division III, April 9 Rank Team Record Points First Previous 1 Salisbury 12-0 622 22 2 2 Gettysburg 9-1 584 2 1 3 College of New Jersey 8-2 576 3 4 Amherst 9-1 529 6 5 Franklin & Marshall 9-3 491 1 10 6 Tufts 9-1 489 7 7 York 7-3 462 9 8 Trinity (CT) 9-2 450 8 9 Middlebury 9-2 447 4 10 Mary Washington 11-2 422 5 11 Washington & Lee 8-4 369 11 12 Geneseo 10-0 350 12 13 Messiah 8-3 313 13 14 Ithaca 8-3 273 16 15 Colby 6-4 269 21 16 Wesleyan (CT) 7-4 243 14 17 Catholic (DC) 7-4 209 17 18 Bowdoin 8-3 193 18 19 Stevens 8-2 178 20 20 William Smith 8-4 161 15 21 Cortland 7-4 159 19 22 Claremont-Mudd-Scripps 12-1 128 22 23 Rowan 7-1 99 23 24 St. John Fisher 7-2 62 24 25 Haverford 9-2 18 NR
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
IWLCA Poll for Division I, April 9 Rank Team Record Points First Previous 1 Stony Brook 12-0 619 21 1 2 Maryland 12-1 590 1 2 3 Boston College 14-0 588 3 3 4 James Madison 11-1 549 4 5 North Carolina 9-3 520 5 6 Florida 10-3 484 7 7 Northwestern 11-3 470 8 8 Towson 10-2 447 10 9 Penn 9-2 407 11 10 Loyola 9-3 383 9 11 Virginia 8-5 367 6 12 Stanford 11-3 340 13 13 Navy 9-3 333 12 14 Virginia Tech 11-4 303 17 15 Syracuse 8-6 255 14 16 Colorado 9-4 247 18 17 Penn State 9-4 240 19 18 Duke 7-5 234 15 19 Princeton 6-4 145 20 20 Southern California 7-7 133 16 21 Notre Dame 7-7 93 21 22 Johns Hopkins 8-5 80 24 23 Georgetown 8-4 71 NR 24 High Point 9-2 69 25 25 Denver 8-4 64 22
Time to revisit my predictions from first pre-season poll: Teams ranked too high: Penn St at #4, Navy at #7, ND at #15 Teams ranked too low: Northwestern #11 I seem to remember a bunch of people whining that how can you know that, it's all right because that's how they finished last season and nobody can know these things. Someone even threw out the "stat" that 75% of the rosters at each school are back so your best guess is to just go off of last year. All ridiculous. How are they looking now? Penn St was not then and is not now the #4 team in the land. Navy clinging to a somewhat dubious spot at #13, and ND coming off a 10-goal blowout loss to Northwestern and very likely going to miss the NCAAs. Speaking of that Northwestern team, sitting about right at #7, solidly in the top 10. If anyone wants the next PowerBall numbers, let me know.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Was Murphy a top player in high school? Did she have lots of offers from Top 10 schools? How much of it is talent and how much is it the system she is in, the competition she plays against and stat padding? The fact that the all time NCAA leading scorer in goals and and the all time NCAA leader in points play on the same team during the same 3-4 years has to tell everyone something. so does beating teams by 15-20 routinely #1 again this week, baby!!!!
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Duke freshman faceguarded well by BC. Duke did same to Appuzzo. Ok Apuzzo face guarded and scored 3 goals 2 assists. How did that happen, must be a special player. Can you spell Teewaartin ... She scored 9 against Navy in a face guard. She is special.... And yes I can... "Tewaaraton"
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
IWLCA Poll for Division I, April 9 Rank Team Record Points First Previous 1 Stony Brook 12-0 619 21 1 2 Maryland 12-1 590 1 2 3 Boston College 14-0 588 3 3 4 James Madison 11-1 549 4 5 North Carolina 9-3 520 5 6 Florida 10-3 484 7 7 Northwestern 11-3 470 8 8 Towson 10-2 447 10 9 Penn 9-2 407 11 10 Loyola 9-3 383 9 11 Virginia 8-5 367 6 12 Stanford 11-3 340 13 13 Navy 9-3 333 12 14 Virginia Tech 11-4 303 17 15 Syracuse 8-6 255 14 16 Colorado 9-4 247 18 17 Penn State 9-4 240 19 18 Duke 7-5 234 15 19 Princeton 6-4 145 20 20 Southern California 7-7 133 16 21 Notre Dame 7-7 93 21 22 Johns Hopkins 8-5 80 24 23 Georgetown 8-4 71 NR 24 High Point 9-2 69 25 25 Denver 8-4 64 22
High point vs Duke today !!!
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Duke freshman faceguarded well by BC. Duke did same to Appuzzo. Ok Apuzzo face guarded and scored 3 goals 2 assists. How did that happen, must be a special player. Can you spell Teewaartin ... She took 8 shots , not exactly a great performance.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Was Murphy a top player in high school? Did she have lots of offers from Top 10 schools? How much of it is talent and how much is it the system she is in, the competition she plays against and stat padding? The fact that the all time NCAA leading scorer in goals and and the all time NCAA leader in points play on the same team during the same 3-4 years has to tell everyone something. Good passer and good finisher?
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Honest question for those who watch SB religiously, what percent of Murphy's record breaking goal tally were a result of stat padding in games that were easily decided and what percent were clutch must have goals? And I don't fault the kid I fault the coach who loves this type of stuff In my opinion, their three most challenging games so far this season were USC, Northwestern, and Towson. USC - She scored the first two goals, and then scored to make is 5-2 and 6-4. All in the 1st half. Northwestern - She scored to make it 2-0, 3-1, and 6-2. All in the first half. Towson - She scored to make it 2-0 and 7-4. This season, they haven't had a real nail biter game that came down to the last 5 minutes. Is it because they are so good? Is it because they have a weak schedule? Time will tell. I can't speak to her other seasons - I'm sure they were a combination of some key goals and a lot of stat padding. Not her fault. She can flat out finish. You can't deny that. In your post you single out 6 goals, that does not break a scoring record. the question was , I think/ surmise, how many were "cheap" ( 2nd half game in hand) goals so lets count vs Stanford (won 15-9) goal at 15:53 in the 2nd (13-5 ) +1 vs Denver (won 16-3) goals at 25:11 (9-2) 19:00 (12-2) 5:17 (14-3) +3 vs Michigan (won 16-3) goal at 21:14 (13-2) +1 vs Delaware (won 20-8) goals at 23:37 (12-6) 10:44 (16-8) 9:53 (17-8) +3 vs. Lowell (all in 1st half) goals at 15:33,14:37, 14:18, 12:38, 11:14 (8,9,10,11,12-3, all in a row) +5 (even JS didn't let her score in the 2nd of this one) vs Vermont (won20-2) (again in 1st none in 2nd) 17:20 (8-1) 13:35 (10-2) 3:13(14-2) +3 vs Cornell (won 19-4) 6:12 1st (11-3) 00:58 1st (14-3, really a garbage goal no class)12:32 2nd (19-3, why is she even on the field?) +3 vs Hartford (won 21-3 really? couldn't JS play the 3rd string and win this one? did she even have to play?) all in 1st 22:21 (6-0) 21:50 (7-1)19:52 (9-0) 18:34 (10-0) + 5 (all her goals were garbage goals that day) vs Binghamton (won 18-5) 11:00 (15-4) +1 Thats 25 of her 50 goals this year. Is it her fault the schedule is easy? NO, is it her fault JS keeps her in in blowouts? NO, Do I blame her for getting hers? NO, Do I think that is player of the year heck NO!!!!!!
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So your analysis shows that off a small sample that 50% of her goals are padded. What a joke this is for the sport and her coach. She should honestly have half the goals that she does yet she is #1 all time. Go figure
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Duke freshman faceguarded well by BC. Duke did same to Appuzzo. Ok Apuzzo face guarded and scored 3 goals 2 assists. How did that happen, must be a special player. Can you spell Teewaartin ... She took 8 shots , not exactly a great performance. Yeah - her shooting percentage on the year is now down to .636. For most of the year it was above .700 which is insane.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Duke freshman faceguarded well by BC. Duke did same to Appuzzo. Ok Apuzzo face guarded and scored 3 goals 2 assists. How did that happen, must be a special player. Can you spell Teewaartin ... She took 8 shots , not exactly a great performance. Yeah - her shooting percentage on the year is now down to .636. For most of the year it was above .700 which is insane. Because you are a braggart , some facts , her shooting percentage is hovering around .400 in conference which is not bad but certainly not good . Yes against those cupcake teams she had really killed it but in conference averaging little over 2 goals per game is again not bad but not good either .If you are going to post how wonderful her 3 goal game against Duke was you should expect some to question how great a performance when 8 shots were taken .SA is a great player but if you do not see the ridiculous numbers disparity between the non conference cupcake schedule vs the in conference you are being willfully ignorant .
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
[quote=Anonymous]Duke freshman faceguarded well by BC. Duke did same to Appuzzo. Ok Apuzzo face guarded and scored 3 goals 2 assists. How did that happen, must be a special player. Can you spell Teewaartin ... She took 8 shots , not exactly a great performance. Yeah - her shooting percentage on the year is now down to .636. For most of the year it was above .700 which is insane. Because you are a braggart , some facts , her shooting percentage is hovering around .400 in conference which is not bad but certainly not good . Yes against those cupcake teams she had really killed it but in conference averaging little over 2 goals per game is again not bad but not good either .If you are going to post how wonderful her 3 goal game against Duke was you should expect some to question how great a performance when 8 shots were taken .SA is a great player but if you do not see the ridiculous numbers disparity between the non conference cupcake schedule vs the in conference you are being willfully ignorant . We have no comparison for KO or Murphy on SB cause all the teams they have played are cupcakes
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Duke freshman faceguarded well by BC. Duke did same to Appuzzo. Ok Apuzzo face guarded and scored 3 goals 2 assists. How did that happen, must be a special player. Can you spell Teewaartin ... She took 8 shots , not exactly a great performance. Yeah - her shooting percentage on the year is now down to .636. For most of the year it was above .700 which is insane. Because you are a braggart , some facts , her shooting percentage is hovering around .400 in conference which is not bad but certainly not good . Yes against those cupcake teams she had really killed it but in conference averaging little over 2 goals per game is again not bad but not good either .If you are going to post how wonderful her 3 goal game against Duke was you should expect some to question how great a performance when 8 shots were taken .SA is a great player but if you do not see the ridiculous numbers disparity between the non conference cupcake schedule vs the in conference you are being willfully ignorant . BC still has VT, Dartmouth and Syracuse on their schedule. If they run the table they will still have two tough games in ACC tournament (and an opening round game vs Louisville) and then the NCAA tournament. She will have plenty of opportunities to shine or implode. (My guess is that she will end up somewhere in the middle...solid performances... which is what great players do). If BC does well, she will have done well and she will be a strong Tewaaraton candidate. She will play against McCool again and if the stars align themselves, against KO and SBU. Should make for an exciting May!
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Lets keep this simple. SA overall shooting % higher than top SB girls while playing a much harder overall schedule and typically faceguarded. Better to focus on overall performance and schedule rather than isolated games.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Who outside the top five would scare you if your team was facing them in the NCAAs. Who the most?
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Who outside the top five would scare you if your team was facing them in the NCAAs. Who the most? Northwestern Towson Loyola VATech High Point 1st four mostly based on the completeness of the team...solid all around teams... don't know enough about High Point but they are 9-2 and beat Duke and ND, lost relatively close games to UNC and JMU.... IMO
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Who outside the top five would scare you if your team was facing them in the NCAAs. Who the most? I think just about all of those teams from 6 - 25 are capable of making it to the final 8. Getting to the final four will be a function of seeding and if any of the top 4-5 get upset early. Not sure any of those teams scare me but I think they are all pretty good.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
First RPI is out. America East:
RANK CONF RECORD ROAD NEUTRAL HOME
8 Stony Brook America East 12-0 7-0 1-0 4-0 52 Binghamton America East 5-7 2-4 1-0 2-3 61 UMBC America East 9-5 4-2 0-0 5-3 65 Albany (NY) America East 5-7 3-3 0-1 2-3 84 New Hampshire America East 6-6 2-3 0-0 4-3 88 UMass Lowell America East 4-8 1-4 0-0 3-4 97 Vermont America East 4-9 3-5 0-0 1-4 112 Hartford America East 1-9 0-5 0-0 1-4
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
You can start to get a feel for the post season seedings from the RPI.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
NCAA criteria is based on top 10 RPI games that’s why overall rpi is usually jaded So these rankings are actually misleading To confirm what I am saying is that the overall rpi changes w every game and result. Wins vs top 10 rpi wins vs top 25 rpi etc. NCAA stopped using overall due to the large volume of new programs every year. For instance JMU will play Elon William and Mary and Hofstra which will all lower their Overall RPI same with some other schools. Ncaa went to top 10 rpi games to avoid small conferences being seeded incorrectly because of games that teams must play.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
RANK SCHOOL CONFERENCE RECORD ROAD NEUTRAL HOME NON DIV I 1 Maryland Big Ten 12-1 5-1 0-0 7-0 0-0 2 North Carolina ACC 9-3 3-2 0-0 6-1 0-0 3 Boston College ACC 14-0 8-0 0-0 6-0 0-0 4 James Madison CAA 11-1 3-1 1-0 7-0 0-0 5 Florida Big East 10-3 4-1 0-0 6-2 0-0 6 Penn Ivy League 9-2 5-0 0-0 4-2 0-0 7 Towson CAA 10-2 4-2 0-0 6-0 0-0 8 Stony Brook America East 12-0 7-0 1-0 4-0 0-0 9 Northwestern Big Ten 11-3 2-1 0-0 9-2 0-0 10 Loyola Maryland Patriot 9-3 4-2 0-0 5-1 0-0 11 Virginia ACC 8-5 3-2 0-0 5-3 0-0 12 Navy Patriot 9-3 3-2 1-0 5-1 0-0 13 Dartmouth Ivy League 7-2 5-1 0-0 2-1 0-0 14 Colorado Pac-12 9-4 2-4 1-0 6-0 0-0 15 Georgetown Big East 8-4 3-2 0-0 5-2 0-0 16 Stanford Pac-12 11-3 5-2 0-0 6-1 0-0 17 Johns Hopkins Big Ten 8-5 2-3 0-0 6-2 0-0 18 Penn St. Big Ten 9-4 5-2 0-0 4-2 0-0 19 Syracuse ACC 8-6 3-4 2-0 3-2 0-0 20 Virginia Tech ACC 11-4 3-3 0-0 8-1 0-0 21 Southern California Pac-12 7-7 3-4 0-1 4-2 0-0 22 Cornell Ivy League 6-5 1-3 1-0 4-2 0-0 23 Princeton Ivy League 6-4 6-1 0-0 0-3 0-0 24 High Point Big South 9-2 4-0 0-0 5-2 0-0 25 Duke ACC 7-5 1-1 0-0 6-4 0-0 26 Denver Big East 8-4 3-2 0-0 5-2 0-0
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
REGION/ RANK SCHOOL OVERALL DII RECORD IN-REGION RECORD NORTH 1. Le Moyne 16-0 16-0 2. Adelphi 15-1 14-1 3. LIU Post 13-2 13-2 4. New Haven 13-3 13-3 5. NYIT 15-2 15-2 6. Mercy 15-2 15-2 7. McKendree 11-5 9-3 8. Stonehill 11-6 10-5 SOUTH 1. Lindenwood (MO) 19-0 19-0 2. Fla. Southern 19-2 16-1 3. East Stroudsburg 15-2 15-2 4. Queens (NC) 16-3 15-3 5. Florida Tech 13-3 10-3 6. Regis (CO) 15-2 14-2 7. Limestone 17-3 17-3 8. Rollins 12-5 8-5
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
Pay no attention to D2 Regional Rankings. That was last year.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
NCAA criteria is based on top 10 RPI games that’s why overall rpi is usually jaded So these rankings are actually misleading To confirm what I am saying is that the overall rpi changes w every game and result. Wins vs top 10 rpi wins vs top 25 rpi etc. NCAA stopped using overall due to the large volume of new programs every year. For instance JMU will play Elon William and Mary and Hofstra which will all lower their Overall RPI same with some other schools. Ncaa went to top 10 rpi games to avoid small conferences being seeded incorrectly because of games that teams must play. One more time in English and with punctuation?
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
RANK SCHOOL CONFERENCE RECORD ROAD NEUTRAL HOME NON DIV I 1 Maryland Big Ten 12-1 5-1 0-0 7-0 0-0 2 North Carolina ACC 9-3 3-2 0-0 6-1 0-0 3 Boston College ACC 14-0 8-0 0-0 6-0 0-0 4 James Madison CAA 11-1 3-1 1-0 7-0 0-0 5 Florida Big East 10-3 4-1 0-0 6-2 0-0 6 Penn Ivy League 9-2 5-0 0-0 4-2 0-0 7 Towson CAA 10-2 4-2 0-0 6-0 0-0 8 Stony Brook America East 12-0 7-0 1-0 4-0 0-0 9 Northwestern Big Ten 11-3 2-1 0-0 9-2 0-0 10 Loyola Maryland Patriot 9-3 4-2 0-0 5-1 0-0 11 Virginia ACC 8-5 3-2 0-0 5-3 0-0 12 Navy Patriot 9-3 3-2 1-0 5-1 0-0 13 Dartmouth Ivy League 7-2 5-1 0-0 2-1 0-0 14 Colorado Pac-12 9-4 2-4 1-0 6-0 0-0 15 Georgetown Big East 8-4 3-2 0-0 5-2 0-0 16 Stanford Pac-12 11-3 5-2 0-0 6-1 0-0 17 Johns Hopkins Big Ten 8-5 2-3 0-0 6-2 0-0 18 Penn St. Big Ten 9-4 5-2 0-0 4-2 0-0 19 Syracuse ACC 8-6 3-4 2-0 3-2 0-0 20 Virginia Tech ACC 11-4 3-3 0-0 8-1 0-0 21 Southern California Pac-12 7-7 3-4 0-1 4-2 0-0 22 Cornell Ivy League 6-5 1-3 1-0 4-2 0-0 23 Princeton Ivy League 6-4 6-1 0-0 0-3 0-0 24 High Point Big South 9-2 4-0 0-0 5-2 0-0 25 Duke ACC 7-5 1-1 0-0 6-4 0-0 26 Denver Big East 8-4 3-2 0-0 5-2 0-0 That is exactly where Stony Brook should be. In the top 10, but not top 6. NCAA got this one correct.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
RANK SCHOOL CONFERENCE RECORD ROAD NEUTRAL HOME NON DIV I 1 Maryland Big Ten 12-1 5-1 0-0 7-0 0-0 2 North Carolina ACC 9-3 3-2 0-0 6-1 0-0 3 Boston College ACC 14-0 8-0 0-0 6-0 0-0 4 James Madison CAA 11-1 3-1 1-0 7-0 0-0 5 Florida Big East 10-3 4-1 0-0 6-2 0-0 6 Penn Ivy League 9-2 5-0 0-0 4-2 0-0 7 Towson CAA 10-2 4-2 0-0 6-0 0-0 8 Stony Brook America East 12-0 7-0 1-0 4-0 0-0 9 Northwestern Big Ten 11-3 2-1 0-0 9-2 0-0 10 Loyola Maryland Patriot 9-3 4-2 0-0 5-1 0-0 11 Virginia ACC 8-5 3-2 0-0 5-3 0-0 12 Navy Patriot 9-3 3-2 1-0 5-1 0-0 13 Dartmouth Ivy League 7-2 5-1 0-0 2-1 0-0 14 Colorado Pac-12 9-4 2-4 1-0 6-0 0-0 15 Georgetown Big East 8-4 3-2 0-0 5-2 0-0 16 Stanford Pac-12 11-3 5-2 0-0 6-1 0-0 17 Johns Hopkins Big Ten 8-5 2-3 0-0 6-2 0-0 18 Penn St. Big Ten 9-4 5-2 0-0 4-2 0-0 19 Syracuse ACC 8-6 3-4 2-0 3-2 0-0 20 Virginia Tech ACC 11-4 3-3 0-0 8-1 0-0 21 Southern California Pac-12 7-7 3-4 0-1 4-2 0-0 22 Cornell Ivy League 6-5 1-3 1-0 4-2 0-0 23 Princeton Ivy League 6-4 6-1 0-0 0-3 0-0 24 High Point Big South 9-2 4-0 0-0 5-2 0-0 25 Duke ACC 7-5 1-1 0-0 6-4 0-0 26 Denver Big East 8-4 3-2 0-0 5-2 0-0 That is exactly where Stony Brook should be. In the top 10, but not top 6. NCAA got this one correct. Oh boy Spallina will be crying now. #8 He and his 2 girls get no respect. Well do something about it Joe. Not like last year when you and your girls choked a big one.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
If Maryland wins the whole thing, Whittle will win the TEW, it happens all the time w Maryland.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
RANK SCHOOL CONFERENCE RECORD ROAD NEUTRAL HOME NON DIV I 1 Maryland Big Ten 12-1 5-1 0-0 7-0 0-0 2 North Carolina ACC 9-3 3-2 0-0 6-1 0-0 3 Boston College ACC 14-0 8-0 0-0 6-0 0-0 4 James Madison CAA 11-1 3-1 1-0 7-0 0-0 5 Florida Big East 10-3 4-1 0-0 6-2 0-0 6 Penn Ivy League 9-2 5-0 0-0 4-2 0-0 7 Towson CAA 10-2 4-2 0-0 6-0 0-0 8 Stony Brook America East 12-0 7-0 1-0 4-0 0-0 9 Northwestern Big Ten 11-3 2-1 0-0 9-2 0-0 10 Loyola Maryland Patriot 9-3 4-2 0-0 5-1 0-0 11 Virginia ACC 8-5 3-2 0-0 5-3 0-0 12 Navy Patriot 9-3 3-2 1-0 5-1 0-0 13 Dartmouth Ivy League 7-2 5-1 0-0 2-1 0-0 14 Colorado Pac-12 9-4 2-4 1-0 6-0 0-0 15 Georgetown Big East 8-4 3-2 0-0 5-2 0-0 16 Stanford Pac-12 11-3 5-2 0-0 6-1 0-0 17 Johns Hopkins Big Ten 8-5 2-3 0-0 6-2 0-0 18 Penn St. Big Ten 9-4 5-2 0-0 4-2 0-0 19 Syracuse ACC 8-6 3-4 2-0 3-2 0-0 20 Virginia Tech ACC 11-4 3-3 0-0 8-1 0-0 21 Southern California Pac-12 7-7 3-4 0-1 4-2 0-0 22 Cornell Ivy League 6-5 1-3 1-0 4-2 0-0 23 Princeton Ivy League 6-4 6-1 0-0 0-3 0-0 24 High Point Big South 9-2 4-0 0-0 5-2 0-0 25 Duke ACC 7-5 1-1 0-0 6-4 0-0 26 Denver Big East 8-4 3-2 0-0 5-2 0-0 That is exactly where Stony Brook should be. In the top 10, but not top 6. NCAA got this one correct. Oh boy Spallina will be crying now. #8 He and his 2 girls get no respect. Well do something about it Joe. Not like last year when you and your girls choked a big one. Yeah I agree losing to Maryland by 1 is a major choke job especially after Maryland beat penn state by ten on the final 4 and throttled BC LOLOLOL
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
SB lost by one goal to Maryland last year. Can't see Stony Brook losing to them this year or anybody else for that matter. If they were in a tougher conference it would just give those other "good" teams more losses.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
These RPI are not what the NCAA uses to seed. They take the rpi vs TOP 10 opponents then place teams accordingly not entire schedule.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Why is Maryland struggling with Princeton??? Oh because they are not that good.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Why is Maryland struggling with Princeton??? Oh because they are not that good. This is the SB wins it, Spallina get's his title, then moves on to a bigger/better position.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Princeton just got screwed by a BS call that should clearly have been a charging call. Instead the D gets called again. Not allowed to play defense in this game.
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Just left that game the amount of flopping from Maryland is appalling it’s embarrassing. It was cold but a great game Princeton’s best player double yellowed or Princeton wins
|
|
|
Re: 2018 Women's DI, II & III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Just left that game the amount of flopping from Maryland is appalling it’s embarrassing. It was cold but a great game Princeton’s best player double yellowed or Princeton wins If our girl doesn’t care out that’s a Princeton win. My gut tells me Maryland will not win they free position themselves to every win. Maryland is extremely unsportsmanlike and get every call
|
|
|
Moderated by A1Laxer, Abclax123, America's Game, Annoy., Anonymous 1, baldbear, Bearded_Kaos, BiggLax, BOTC_EVENTS, botc_ne, clax422, CP@BOTC, cp_botc, Gremelin, HammerOfJustice, hatimd80, JimSection1, Ladylaxer2609, lax516, Laxers412, LaxMomma, Liam Kassl, LILax15, MomOf6, Team BOTC, The Hop, TheBackOfTheCage, Thirdy@BOTC, TM@BOTC
|
|