Forums20
Topics3,802
Posts400,214
Members2,638
|
Most Online62,980 Feb 6th, 2020
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
No love for Stony Brook - 8th seed and a date with Maryland in the quarters.
Where else could they go? Conference schedule does not help them. They should dismantle Bryant and then play a competitive team in the next round. So you play Maryland in the quarters. You want to be champs just beat the teams you have to play. Simple. North Carolina, in my mind, has an easier bracket than Maryland. Not that Maryland cares. I agree with the schedule issues, but they've been ranked #4 in both polls for the past month or so - didn't expect them to be dropped 4 spots.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Who were the teams that were in the top 20 that didn't get a berth? Who should be the most upset? Other than automatic qualifiers, I believe Virginia Tech was only top 20 team from the 5/1 IWLCA poll that did not get a bid. Looks like Albany jumped them as a team not ranked in that poll. Ultimately a tough decision but Virginia Tech could not find another quality Win outside of beating BC and lost their last 6 games. They needed to get a win in OT over Elon, Louisville or Syracuse and that would have done it. No love for Denver or did I miss them?
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The word coming from the NCAA was that SB was a 7 seed and because of not being able to play in state of NC they had to be placed in different side of bracket How in the world did Louisville get in with an extremely high RPI
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
No love for Stony Brook - 8th seed and a date with Maryland in the quarters.
No one likes JS except JS. Any opportunity to push him back in his place will be taken by the powers that be. You have to know SB got put there so they'd never make it out of the quarters.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
No love for Stony Brook - 8th seed and a date with Maryland in the quarters.
Where else could they go? Conference schedule does not help them. They should dismantle Bryant and then play a competitive team in the next round. So you play Maryland in the quarters. You want to be champs just beat the teams you have to play. Simple. North Carolina, in my mind, has an easier bracket than Maryland. Not that Maryland cares. I agree with the schedule issues, but they've been ranked #4 in both polls for the past month or so - didn't expect them to be dropped 4 spots. Dont go by the polls. Not a factor.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
SBU will eating turtle soup on the 20th.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
"Generalized things? You have reduced an entire college to poetry readings and "raging against the man" and alternative lifestyles! I could care less about Amherst but your generalization that "most kids who go to Amherst could not survive socially at these schools" is ridiculous. I'm sorry you and your sister did not have a good experience there because obviously something occurred for you to make your "generalized" statements. You characterized the school as misfits, autistic and socially unfit. I never said any bad things about any school--Michigan, Penn St or otherwise. That was your implication. I simply said you have to pick the school that is the best fit and if your child could get into Amherst or any number of good schools go for it."
"A parent with a student/athlete that could get into Amherst (or any NESCAC school, outside of Trinity) would be stupid not to."
Sounds pretty generalized and definitely sounds like a knock of parents who have kids that go to Michigan, Penn State and every other school out there especially Trinity. It also comes across as pompous.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
No love for Stony Brook - 8th seed and a date with Maryland in the quarters.
Where else could they go? Conference schedule does not help them. They should dismantle Bryant and then play a competitive team in the next round. So you play Maryland in the quarters. You want to be champs just beat the teams you have to play. Simple. North Carolina, in my mind, has an easier bracket than Maryland. Not that Maryland cares. Agree, NC has a much easier path to finals than MD. Still believe Md will fake it all. SB got completely screwed. Penn State got a gift, maybe the biggest of all.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Who were the teams that were in the top 20 that didn't get a berth? Who should be the most upset? Other than automatic qualifiers, I believe Virginia Tech was only top 20 team from the 5/1 IWLCA poll that did not get a bid. Looks like Albany jumped them as a team not ranked in that poll. Ultimately a tough decision but Virginia Tech could not find another quality Win outside of beating BC and lost their last 6 games. They needed to get a win in OT over Elon, Louisville or Syracuse and that would have done it. No love for Denver or did I miss them? Denver had a low RPI, no quality wins and a bad loss to Georgetown down the regular season stretch. Only decent win was vs Louisville who was ranked below Denver when game was played.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
A full investigation should be requested , seeds 4 thru 8 are not justifiable . Also Louisville #31 rpi gets in is a joke.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
No love for Stony Brook - 8th seed and a date with Maryland in the quarters.
No one likes JS except JS. Any opportunity to push him back in his place will be taken by the powers that be. You have to know SB got put there so they'd never make it out of the quarters. It will be interesting to see what happens next year if they are in a similar position with the Final 4 back in Stony Brook.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The word coming from the NCAA was that SB was a 7 seed and because of not being able to play in state of NC they had to be placed in different side of bracket How in the world did Louisville get in with an extremely high RPI Louisville had low RPI but they had two quality wins, one (vs #7 Syracuse) came on last regular season game and had no significant losses. Of teams with better RPI: Hopkins had better RPI but didn't have a significant win. Loyola had no significant wins and lost to Navy. Duke was disqualified because of their record. Denver had a relatively low RPI and lost to unranked Georgetown in the regular season and no significant wins. Temple had no significant wins and one bad loss. Delaware had one significant win and two bad losses. Lehigh had no significant wins and one bad loss. Top 20, VA Tech lost their last 6 and had a lower RPI. Great to play a challenging schedule but you have to win at least one of them along the way. (Albany, Elon, Towson, NW). Towson was fortunate to have wins vs ND and Hopkins. Their losses to Hofstra and Elon the last few weeks could have hurt them without those.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Another year where strength of schedule is being rewarded and lack there of is being punished by seeding, bracket or being left out all together (see Stony Brook, Denver & Northwestern)
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
and by diversity you mean what exactly, David Duke? They mean that when athletic, hungry minority kids figure out that pasty white Mary from St A's is getting an athletic scholarship that they will start picking up sticks and playing the game too. Its just like what is happening in soccer. So, you better hurry up, they are on the way to steal that scholarship you were counting on. "They" are on the way.... Seriously??? You are disgusting! I truly hope you did not reproduce and further hope that you do not have the ability to spread your bigoted opinions to anyone young or old. Thank goodness, for your sake, BOTC allows you to post anonymously so you don't have to worry about publicly embarrassing your family and your friends! Seriously, yes, there are athletic and often minority kids in cities everywhere picking up sticks (due to great Grow the Game programs) who are now starting to have an impact on the landscape of the game. Hmmmm, take Miles Jones or Trevor Baptiste for just the tip of the iceberg of very athletic kids on the mens side who are creating diversity and taking up spots that plain Joe/Jane from suburbia (who are well trained from the $$$$ you have been shelling out for privates) would have taken in the past. It is not bigotry at all, its a fact. Baptiste went to a $40k/year high school and grew up in a pretty nice part of New Jersey. Miles Jones grew up in Huntington (granted, not the best part, but about as close as you can get to being "plain Joe/Jane from suburbia"). He also was lucky enough to do a PG year at a $40k/year prep school. I guess you just assumed they were both "minority kids in cities" because they were black? Give me a break. Ahem, can you say scholarship? Both didn't pay as they prepared for college, and there are a lot more minority kids that will be coming to the front in the men's and women's games. The broader the demographic, the better for the game. Maybe not better for Muffy and Chad and their offspring, but its better for Lacrosse.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The word coming from the NCAA was that SB was a 7 seed and because of not being able to play in state of NC they had to be placed in different side of bracket How in the world did Louisville get in with an extremely high RPI Where are you seeing this word, and why are they unable to play in NC ?
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
The word coming from the NCAA was that SB was a 7 seed and because of not being able to play in state of NC they had to be placed in different side of bracket How in the world did Louisville get in with an extremely high RPI Interesting as that was the only other seed I saw as possible for Stony Brook. Can't play in NC?
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The word coming from the NCAA was that SB was a 7 seed and because of not being able to play in state of NC they had to be placed in different side of bracket How in the world did Louisville get in with an extremely high RPI Interesting as that was the only other seed I saw as possible for Stony Brook. Can't play in NC? Bathroom Bill was rescinded, wasn't it?
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Where are the quarterfinals being played this year?
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The word coming from the NCAA was that SB was a 7 seed and because of not being able to play in state of NC they had to be placed in different side of bracket How in the world did Louisville get in with an extremely high RPI Interesting as that was the only other seed I saw as possible for Stony Brook. Can't play in NC? For the same reason the Final 4 was taken out of NC Albany and SB unable to play in North carolina
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Another year where strength of schedule is being rewarded and lack there of is being punished by seeding, bracket or being left out all together (see Stony Brook, Denver & Northwestern)
Denver women are not on the same league as the Denver men who don't shy away from anyone
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Where are the quarterfinals being played this year?
Home fields of top 4 seeds - MD, UNC, FL and PSU.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
The word coming from the NCAA was that SB was a 7 seed and because of not being able to play in state of NC they had to be placed in different side of bracket How in the world did Louisville get in with an extremely high RPI Interesting as that was the only other seed I saw as possible for Stony Brook. Can't play in NC? For the same reason the Final 4 was taken out of NC Albany and SB unable to play in North carolina So only NY schools? The NCAA has accepted the new law and allows play back in the state.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The word coming from the NCAA was that SB was a 7 seed and because of not being able to play in state of NC they had to be placed in different side of bracket How in the world did Louisville get in with an extremely high RPI Interesting as that was the only other seed I saw as possible for Stony Brook. Can't play in NC? For the same reason the Final 4 was taken out of NC Albany and SB unable to play in North carolina So only NY schools? The NCAA has accepted the new law and allows play back in the state. Why are Albany & SB not allowed to play in NC?
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
and by diversity you mean what exactly, David Duke? They mean that when athletic, hungry minority kids figure out that pasty white Mary from St A's is getting an athletic scholarship that they will start picking up sticks and playing the game too. Its just like what is happening in soccer. So, you better hurry up, they are on the way to steal that scholarship you were counting on. "They" are on the way.... Seriously??? You are disgusting! I truly hope you did not reproduce and further hope that you do not have the ability to spread your bigoted opinions to anyone young or old. Thank goodness, for your sake, BOTC allows you to post anonymously so you don't have to worry about publicly embarrassing your family and your friends! Seriously, yes, there are athletic and often minority kids in cities everywhere picking up sticks (due to great Grow the Game programs) who are now starting to have an impact on the landscape of the game. Hmmmm, take Miles Jones or Trevor Baptiste for just the tip of the iceberg of very athletic kids on the mens side who are creating diversity and taking up spots that plain Joe/Jane from suburbia (who are well trained from the $$$$ you have been shelling out for privates) would have taken in the past. It is not bigotry at all, its a fact. Baptiste went to a $40k/year high school and grew up in a pretty nice part of New Jersey. Miles Jones grew up in Huntington (granted, not the best part, but about as close as you can get to being "plain Joe/Jane from suburbia"). He also was lucky enough to do a PG year at a $40k/year prep school. I guess you just assumed they were both "minority kids in cities" because they were black? Give me a break. Ahem, can you say scholarship? Both didn't pay as they prepared for college, and there are a lot more minority kids that will be coming to the front in the men's and women's games. The broader the demographic, the better for the game. Maybe not better for Muffy and Chad and their offspring, but its better for Lacrosse. So what if they didn't pay? They're both great players and deserved their scholarships. Neither player was the beneficiary of any inner-city outreach program as you suggest, though -- they grew up in suburban lacrosse hotbeds. Your weird, fetishized desire to change the game's demographics likely won't ever actually happen. These "grow the game" charities exist less to serve their target audiences and more to give post-college kids in Manhattan something to do (and to bolster their resumes when it comes time to apply to business school). And all that talk about "Muffy and Chad"... Is there a reason why you seem to hate white kids so much? Is it just "rich" white kids?
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The word coming from the NCAA was that SB was a 7 seed and because of not being able to play in state of NC they had to be placed in different side of bracket How in the world did Louisville get in with an extremely high RPI Interesting as that was the only other seed I saw as possible for Stony Brook. Can't play in NC? For the same reason the Final 4 was taken out of NC Albany and SB unable to play in North carolina So only NY schools? The NCAA has accepted the new law and allows play back in the state. Why are Albany & SB not allowed to play in NC? Because we live in a stupid liberal State where we would force our daughters to share a public bathroom with a bearded 300 pound man in a dress who says he "identifies as a woman"....... instead of making the above mentioned bearded main a dress use the mens room. Unless your name is Cuomo then you get a bodyguard while in your privet restroom
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I am socially liberal but when only 0.3 to 0.6% of people are transgender in the USA it does seem that we have finally gone too far. I like what the politicians said in Texas to the NFL, you make us adhere to this over reaching rule in order to host a super bowl and WE the STATE will mandate that any of your NFL players that don't stand for the National Anthem can't play in our stadiums or state.
My question is would the NY teams forfeit if their bracket took them to NC?
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I am socially liberal but when only 0.3 to 0.6% of people are transgender in the USA it does seem that we have finally gone too far. I like what the politicians said in Texas to the NFL, you make us adhere to this over reaching rule in order to host a super bowl and WE the STATE will mandate that any of your NFL players that don't stand for the National Anthem can't play in our stadiums or state.
My question is would the NY teams forfeit if their bracket took them to NC? great points all. have some backbone like Carolina did. kids have rights too- even though they dont vote, which is why polititcians naturally side with transgenders. who cares about the NY teams anyway. a bygone state in lacrosse too.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I am socially liberal but when only 0.3 to 0.6% of people are transgender in the USA it does seem that we have finally gone too far. I like what the politicians said in Texas to the NFL, you make us adhere to this over reaching rule in order to host a super bowl and WE the STATE will mandate that any of your NFL players that don't stand for the National Anthem can't play in our stadiums or state.
My question is would the NY teams forfeit if their bracket took them to NC? great points all. have some backbone like Carolina did. kids have rights too- even though they dont vote, which is why polititcians naturally side with transgenders. who cares about the NY teams anyway. a bygone state in lacrosse too. Is that why like half of the girls on the watch list are from NY, because we're irrelevant?
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
"They" are on the way.... Seriously??? You are disgusting! I truly hope you did not reproduce and further hope that you do not have the ability to spread your bigoted opinions to anyone young or old. Thank goodness, for your sake, BOTC allows you to post anonymously so you don't have to worry about publicly embarrassing your family and your friends! [/quote]
Seriously, yes, there are athletic and often minority kids in cities everywhere picking up sticks (due to great Grow the Game programs) who are now starting to have an impact on the landscape of the game. Hmmmm, take Miles Jones or Trevor Baptiste for just the tip of the iceberg of very athletic kids on the mens side who are creating diversity and taking up spots that plain Joe/Jane from suburbia (who are well trained from the $$$$ you have been shelling out for privates) would have taken in the past. It is not bigotry at all, its a fact. [/quote]
Baptiste went to a $40k/year high school and grew up in a pretty nice part of New Jersey. Miles Jones grew up in Huntington (granted, not the best part, but about as close as you can get to being "plain Joe/Jane from suburbia"). He also was lucky enough to do a PG year at a $40k/year prep school.
I guess you just assumed they were both "minority kids in cities" because they were black? Give me a break. [/quote]
Ahem, can you say scholarship? Both didn't pay as they prepared for college, and there are a lot more minority kids that will be coming to the front in the men's and women's games. The broader the demographic, the better for the game. Maybe not better for Muffy and Chad and their offspring, but its better for Lacrosse. [/quote]
So what if they didn't pay? They're both great players and deserved their scholarships. Neither player was the beneficiary of any inner-city outreach program as you suggest, though -- they grew up in suburban lacrosse hotbeds.
Your weird, fetishized desire to change the game's demographics likely won't ever actually happen. These "grow the game" charities exist less to serve their target audiences and more to give post-college kids in Manhattan something to do (and to bolster their resumes when it comes time to apply to business school).
And all that talk about "Muffy and Chad"... Is there a reason why you seem to hate white kids so much? Is it just "rich" white kids? [/quote]
Don't hate anyone, I'm just a realist and the geography and demographic are changing. Get used to it.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
April 15th Cuse v NC in chapel hill , how was that permitted?
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
April 15th Cuse v NC in chapel hill , how was that permitted? Private University (SU).
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
April 15th Cuse v NC in chapel hill , how was that permitted? Syracuse is a private school. SB and Albany are SUNY's.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
April 15th Cuse v NC in chapel hill , how was that permitted? Syracuse is a private institution and isn't bound by Governor 's edicts.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
April 15th Cuse v NC in chapel hill , how was that permitted? Cuomo's ban on non-essential state travel to NC contained a specific exception for Syracuse since they are in the ACC
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
April 15th Cuse v NC in chapel hill , how was that permitted? Private college, they can do what they want. Albany and Stony brook are state schools controlled by state government. Topic is a complete joke
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
April 15th Cuse v NC in chapel hill , how was that permitted? SB and Albany state schools?
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Tewaaraton Award Presented By Under Armour Announces Five Men's & Women's 2017 Finalists
The Tewaaraton Foundation has announced the men’s and women’s finalists for the 2017 Tewaaraton Award, presented by Under Armour. Five men and five women were selected as finalists and will be invited to Washington, D.C., for the 17th annual Tewaaraton Award.
Ceremony on June 1.
The five men’s finalists are:
Trevor Baptiste, Denver - Jr., Faceoff Connor Fields, Albany - Jr., Attack Matt Rambo, Maryland - Sr., Attack Ben Reeves, Yale - Jr., Attack Patrick Spencer, Loyola - Soph., Attack
The five women’s finalists are:
Nadine Hadnagy, Maryland - Sr., Defense Olivia Hompe, Princeton - Sr., Attack Marie McCool, North Carolina - Jr., Midfield Kylie Ohlmiller, Stony Brook - Jr., Attack Zoe Stukenberg, Maryland - Sr., Midfield
Ben Reeves (Yale) is the only returning finalist from 2016, while Kylie Ohlmiller becomes Stony Brook’s first Tewaaraton finalist and Trevor Baptiste (Denver) is the first faceoff specialist to be a finalist for the award. All 10 finalists will compete in this month’s NCAA Tournament, at the conclusion of which the selection committees will vote on and select the 2017 winners.
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Tewaaraton Award Presented By Under Armour Announces Five Men's & Women's 2017 Finalists
The Tewaaraton Foundation has announced the men’s and women’s finalists for the 2017 Tewaaraton Award, presented by Under Armour. Five men and five women were selected as finalists and will be invited to Washington, D.C., for the 17th annual Tewaaraton Award.
Ceremony on June 1.
The five men’s finalists are:
Trevor Baptiste, Denver - Jr., Faceoff Connor Fields, Albany - Jr., Attack Matt Rambo, Maryland - Sr., Attack Ben Reeves, Yale - Jr., Attack Patrick Spencer, Loyola - Soph., Attack
The five women’s finalists are:
Nadine Hadnagy, Maryland - Sr., Defense Olivia Hompe, Princeton - Sr., Attack Marie McCool, North Carolina - Jr., Midfield Kylie Ohlmiller, Stony Brook - Jr., Attack Zoe Stukenberg, Maryland - Sr., Midfield
Ben Reeves (Yale) is the only returning finalist from 2016, while Kylie Ohlmiller becomes Stony Brook’s first Tewaaraton finalist and Trevor Baptiste (Denver) is the first faceoff specialist to be a finalist for the award. All 10 finalists will compete in this month’s NCAA Tournament, at the conclusion of which the selection committees will vote on and select the 2017 winners.
Marie McCool gets it, Fields on Men's side
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Tewaaraton Award Presented By Under Armour Announces Five Men's & Women's 2017 Finalists
The Tewaaraton Foundation has announced the men’s and women’s finalists for the 2017 Tewaaraton Award, presented by Under Armour. Five men and five women were selected as finalists and will be invited to Washington, D.C., for the 17th annual Tewaaraton Award.
Ceremony on June 1.
The five men’s finalists are:
Trevor Baptiste, Denver - Jr., Faceoff Connor Fields, Albany - Jr., Attack Matt Rambo, Maryland - Sr., Attack Ben Reeves, Yale - Jr., Attack Patrick Spencer, Loyola - Soph., Attack
The five women’s finalists are:
Nadine Hadnagy, Maryland - Sr., Defense Olivia Hompe, Princeton - Sr., Attack Marie McCool, North Carolina - Jr., Midfield Kylie Ohlmiller, Stony Brook - Jr., Attack Zoe Stukenberg, Maryland - Sr., Midfield
Ben Reeves (Yale) is the only returning finalist from 2016, while Kylie Ohlmiller becomes Stony Brook’s first Tewaaraton finalist and Trevor Baptiste (Denver) is the first faceoff specialist to be a finalist for the award. All 10 finalists will compete in this month’s NCAA Tournament, at the conclusion of which the selection committees will vote on and select the 2017 winners.
How is Mollie Stevens from Florida not a finalist?
|
|
|
Re: 2016 Women's College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Tewaaraton Award Presented By Under Armour Announces Five Men's & Women's 2017 Finalists
The Tewaaraton Foundation has announced the men’s and women’s finalists for the 2017 Tewaaraton Award, presented by Under Armour. Five men and five women were selected as finalists and will be invited to Washington, D.C., for the 17th annual Tewaaraton Award.
Ceremony on June 1.
The five men’s finalists are:
Trevor Baptiste, Denver - Jr., Faceoff Connor Fields, Albany - Jr., Attack Matt Rambo, Maryland - Sr., Attack Ben Reeves, Yale - Jr., Attack Patrick Spencer, Loyola - Soph., Attack
The five women’s finalists are:
Nadine Hadnagy, Maryland - Sr., Defense Olivia Hompe, Princeton - Sr., Attack Marie McCool, North Carolina - Jr., Midfield Kylie Ohlmiller, Stony Brook - Jr., Attack Zoe Stukenberg, Maryland - Sr., Midfield
Ben Reeves (Yale) is the only returning finalist from 2016, while Kylie Ohlmiller becomes Stony Brook’s first Tewaaraton finalist and Trevor Baptiste (Denver) is the first faceoff specialist to be a finalist for the award. All 10 finalists will compete in this month’s NCAA Tournament, at the conclusion of which the selection committees will vote on and select the 2017 winners.
How is Mollie Stevens from Florida not a finalist? because no one cares about Florida. except the on or two poster on this sight. or is it just one? you?
|
|
|
Moderated by A1Laxer, Abclax123, America's Game, Annoy., Anonymous 1, baldbear, Bearded_Kaos, BiggLax, BOTC_EVENTS, botc_ne, clax422, CP@BOTC, cp_botc, Gremelin, HammerOfJustice, hatimd80, JimSection1, Ladylaxer2609, lax516, Laxers412, LaxMomma, Liam Kassl, LILax15, MomOf6, Team BOTC, The Hop, TheBackOfTheCage, Thirdy@BOTC, TM@BOTC
|
|