About the hold back situation- we'll see less
since early recruiting rule changes in Lax;
the hold back was designed to allow a blue chip 6'7" basketball player time to grow that last 3" , NOT the 5'10 180lb HS Fresh LAX player to dominate for 2 years, with the hopes of duping the College lax coach into early commit -
The last 2 years proved "hold backs", early lax commits players do not continue to develop into impact players in college.
Is that last statement fact based or your assumptions? How did the holdbacks do as compared to non holdbacks? Please show your data to prove what you are writing or at least state that this is your opinion and in no way can it be verified. Thanks
draw your own conclusions....
you can agree - or agree to disagree.
not a problem- but why should anyone do spoon feed you.
the statement is perfectly reasonable and not outlandish. if you want to PROVE it is some how wrong, then you provide the the counter facts.
