Forums20
Topics3,799
Posts399,683
Members2,638
|
Most Online62,980 Feb 6th, 2020
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Notre Dame is currently 4-6, and if things go as expected, will finish regular season 7-8, soo under .500 before ACC tourney, and have a 4-8 seed.. if they wind up winning a tourney game, they’ll still be 8-9 after losing the next game vs a higher seed. Alas, not found on IL schedule, but appearing on the NDwlax website is a challenging game against the vaunted Detroit mercy! Not sure how that game will turn out! When and where did that game pop up, to be missed by IL, and isn’t there and NCAA/Iwlca deadline to submit official schedules??? Then any team can pad their schedule if things don’t go as expected?! What gives? Why mock Detroit Mercy? Did that make you feel better? Detroit Mercy's RPI is 115 out of 118 D1 teams, it is simply a fact. As for Notre Dame's schedule, I made this post earlier this year and Detroit Mercy was not on Notre Dame's schedule. So while I am sure it is an official game, it was added well into the season from everything I can see. 2/23/2022 Post I think Notre Dame is in a much more difficult spot, I could see them easing the schedule in the future. Notre Dame will have to win 4 of their toss up games or upset Syracuse, UNC and/or BC. I do not see them making the NCAAs this season. PROJECTED LOSSES Michigan (L) Vanderbilt (L) Northwestern (L) Syracuse UNC BC PROJECTED WINS Central Michigan (W) Pitt Louisville Marquette TOSS UPS Jacksonville Duke Virginia Virginia Tech Yale Also, you can check Nortre Dame's instagram account and look at their 2022 schedule post from 12/13 that does not have Detroit Mercy on it. Sad they decided to add a game so far into the season because they are on the cusp of not qualifying for the playoffs with a below .500 record. The committee should take notice and skip them for an at large bid.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Nice day for the PAC12, USC takes down Michigan and Arizona State takes down Rutgers, both on the road.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Nice day for the PAC12, USC takes down Michigan and Arizona State takes down Rutgers, both on the road. Agee, two nice wins. Congratulations!
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Mid-Season IL Top 15 Freshmen. Very Impressive, Congratulations to all!
Ashley Humphrey, A, Stanford
If any team was going to start a ton of freshmen this season, Stanford was an easy bet. Inside Lacrosse ranked the Cardinal’s incoming class No. 1 in the nation. Humphrey, who redshirted last year, is considered part of that group. She has shown no signs of rust in her first season of competition since her junior year in high school in 2019. Humphrey leads Stanford in points (69) and assists (20) and the nation in assists per game (4.45). She is also second in points per game at 6.27.
Brooklyn Walker-Welch, D, North Carolina
With Boston College within one, the ball in Charlotte North’s stick and 25 seconds left, Brooklyn Walker-Welch caused a turnover that sealed UNC’s win and put them atop the national rankings. It was a senior-style play from a freshman who has carried a heavy load for a Tar Heel defense that had big cleats to fill heading into the season after the graduations of Caroline Wakefield and Catie Woodruff. Add in an injury to Emma Trenchard, and many teams would take a step back — but not a UNC team with depth for days. Having All-American and 2021 Tewaaraton finalist Taylor Moreno in net is, of course, a large part of the Heels’ success, but Walker-Welch’s smart and aggressive play has been instrumental. Walker-Welch ranks second on the team in caused turnovers (11) and has helped UNC limit opponents to an average of 8.82 goals per game, the sixth-fewest in the country.
Rachel Clark, A, Virginia
Entering fallball, defense appeared to be the area of the field where new Cavs had the best shot at getting immediate playing time. UVA returned top scorers from 2021 in Ashlyn McGovern and Lillie Kloak. But an injury to Kloak left a gap, and Rachel Clark has filled it. She leads the Cavs in goals (42) and points (50) and is first among DI freshmen in goals per game (3.50).
Emma LoPinto, A, Florida
Emma LoPinto arrived in Gainesville as Inside Lacrosse’s top incoming attacker, and she’s lived up to her advanced billing in the first half of her freshman year. She’s teamed up with fellow Long Island native and sophomore Danielle Pavinelli to lead a Florida offense that will likely be nearly unstoppable over the next several years. The multi-hammerhead offensive player, who won a state championship at Manhasset High School on Long Island, leads the Gators in assists (20) and is second in points (48) and is third among DI freshmen in assists per game (1.91). She shined bright in Florida’s win over Syracuse, posting six points on two goals and four assists.
Georgia Latch, A, Loyola
Georgia Latch has done a masterful job playing quarterback for the Loyola offense. The rookie from Melbourne, Australia, has a team-high 17 assists and has allowed Livy Rosenzweig, who tallied 33 goals and 50 helpers last season, to take on more of a scoring role. Latch excelled in Loyola’s loss to Syracuse, dishing four assists in the one-goal loss and has helped the Greyhounds stay in the top 10 nationally at 9-1 overall.
Annabelle Frist, M, Stanford
A true freshman, Annabel Frist has stood out on both ends of the field. She leads the team in goals (29) and is third among freshmen nationally in goals per game (2.90). Frist has also corralled a team-high 42 draws and caused 12 turnovers.
Emelia Bohi, G, Denver
It’s hard to believe that Emelia Bohi, the anchor of the top-ranked scoring defense in the land, is only in her fourth year playing lacrosse. The one-time soccer goalie picked up a stick in high school but is beginning to play with veteran-like confidence, unafraid to take risks in net. Bohi is second in DI in goals-against average (7.19) and is stopping shots at a .431 clip.
McKenzie Blake, M, Princeton
Princeton took the field in February for the first time since 2020, and the Tigers returned a veteran-heavy lineup of players who took a leave of absence in 2021 to extend their eligibility. But McKenzie Blake earned a starting spot and has proved why ever since. The rookie middie is second on the team in groundballs (16) and second in points (22) and goals (17). Also a threat on the defensive end, Blake has caused seven turnovers. Her best performance of the season came against USC, when she found the back of the cage five times in the Tigers’ 18-13 win.
Isabelle Vitale, A, USC
Isabelle Vitale is fifth among DI freshman in assists per game (1.89). Except for Stanford’s Humphrey, who leads the nation in the category, and Florida’s LoPinto, Vitale plays on a team with a stronger schedule (the others are Siena’s Grace Dobrynski and American’s Maddy Spratt). Vitale leads USC in assists (17) and is second in points (38).
Natalie Calandra-Ryan, A, Youngstown State
A dark horse for freshman of the year, Natalie Calandra-Ryan’s career at Youngstown State has gotten off to a strong start. The Auburn, N.Y., native is second in the country among freshmen in goals per game (3.36). Calandra-Ryan paces Youngstown State with 38 goals and 52 points. She broke a school record by posting eight goals and 12 points, including scoring the game-winner, in YSU’s comeback 21-20 win over Kent State.
Colleen Quinn, A, Richmond
Colleen Quinn is establishing herself as a formidable offensive threat for the Spiders. She’s second on the team in assists (13) and third in points (30). Quinn was a bright spot in Richmond’s loss to in-state rival Virginia, posting a hat trick and two assists.
Lauren Black, M, Denver
The Pioneers are known for their defense, but Lauren Black’s gritty play has fueled their offense. The freshman from British Columbia is second on the team in goals (24) and points (33). She scored the game-tying goal in Denver’s come-from-behind win against Michigan on March 13.
Olivia Vergano, M, Virginia Tech
Olivia Vergano has made an impact all over the field for a Virginia Tech squad that’s been in and out of the national rankings all season. She posted five points on four goals and an assist in Virginia Tech’s upset win over Notre Dame and a career-best eight points on six goals and two helpers against Furman. Vergano is third on the team in goals (27) and second in draws (49).
Kaylee Dyer, A, Michigan
Michigan returned an experienced attack that included Caitlin Muir and Kaitlyn Mead, but Kaylee Dyer has broken through anyway; Dyer has started all 11 games for the Wolverines, registering 12 goals and nine assists. Her best performance of the season came on a five-point day in a win over Cincy Feb. 20.
Nina Montes, M, Princeton
Another Tiger making an immediate impact, midfielder Nina Montes has been a valuable role player on a Princeton offense headlined by senior All-American Kyla Sears. Montes has played in all eight games, starting two, and chipped in 10 goals and two assists to help the Tigers jet off to a 6-2 start. No disrespect but it is hard to compare any player from the MAC conference with some of the others, there is no competition there, these same players very possible could not get the job done against decent defense.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Mid-Season IL Top 15 Freshmen. Very Impressive, Congratulations to all!
Ashley Humphrey, A, Stanford
If any team was going to start a ton of freshmen this season, Stanford was an easy bet. Inside Lacrosse ranked the Cardinal’s incoming class No. 1 in the nation. Humphrey, who redshirted last year, is considered part of that group. She has shown no signs of rust in her first season of competition since her junior year in high school in 2019. Humphrey leads Stanford in points (69) and assists (20) and the nation in assists per game (4.45). She is also second in points per game at 6.27.
Brooklyn Walker-Welch, D, North Carolina
With Boston College within one, the ball in Charlotte North’s stick and 25 seconds left, Brooklyn Walker-Welch caused a turnover that sealed UNC’s win and put them atop the national rankings. It was a senior-style play from a freshman who has carried a heavy load for a Tar Heel defense that had big cleats to fill heading into the season after the graduations of Caroline Wakefield and Catie Woodruff. Add in an injury to Emma Trenchard, and many teams would take a step back — but not a UNC team with depth for days. Having All-American and 2021 Tewaaraton finalist Taylor Moreno in net is, of course, a large part of the Heels’ success, but Walker-Welch’s smart and aggressive play has been instrumental. Walker-Welch ranks second on the team in caused turnovers (11) and has helped UNC limit opponents to an average of 8.82 goals per game, the sixth-fewest in the country.
Rachel Clark, A, Virginia
Entering fallball, defense appeared to be the area of the field where new Cavs had the best shot at getting immediate playing time. UVA returned top scorers from 2021 in Ashlyn McGovern and Lillie Kloak. But an injury to Kloak left a gap, and Rachel Clark has filled it. She leads the Cavs in goals (42) and points (50) and is first among DI freshmen in goals per game (3.50).
Emma LoPinto, A, Florida
Emma LoPinto arrived in Gainesville as Inside Lacrosse’s top incoming attacker, and she’s lived up to her advanced billing in the first half of her freshman year. She’s teamed up with fellow Long Island native and sophomore Danielle Pavinelli to lead a Florida offense that will likely be nearly unstoppable over the next several years. The multi-hammerhead offensive player, who won a state championship at Manhasset High School on Long Island, leads the Gators in assists (20) and is second in points (48) and is third among DI freshmen in assists per game (1.91). She shined bright in Florida’s win over Syracuse, posting six points on two goals and four assists.
Georgia Latch, A, Loyola
Georgia Latch has done a masterful job playing quarterback for the Loyola offense. The rookie from Melbourne, Australia, has a team-high 17 assists and has allowed Livy Rosenzweig, who tallied 33 goals and 50 helpers last season, to take on more of a scoring role. Latch excelled in Loyola’s loss to Syracuse, dishing four assists in the one-goal loss and has helped the Greyhounds stay in the top 10 nationally at 9-1 overall.
Annabelle Frist, M, Stanford
A true freshman, Annabel Frist has stood out on both ends of the field. She leads the team in goals (29) and is third among freshmen nationally in goals per game (2.90). Frist has also corralled a team-high 42 draws and caused 12 turnovers.
Emelia Bohi, G, Denver
It’s hard to believe that Emelia Bohi, the anchor of the top-ranked scoring defense in the land, is only in her fourth year playing lacrosse. The one-time soccer goalie picked up a stick in high school but is beginning to play with veteran-like confidence, unafraid to take risks in net. Bohi is second in DI in goals-against average (7.19) and is stopping shots at a .431 clip.
McKenzie Blake, M, Princeton
Princeton took the field in February for the first time since 2020, and the Tigers returned a veteran-heavy lineup of players who took a leave of absence in 2021 to extend their eligibility. But McKenzie Blake earned a starting spot and has proved why ever since. The rookie middie is second on the team in groundballs (16) and second in points (22) and goals (17). Also a threat on the defensive end, Blake has caused seven turnovers. Her best performance of the season came against USC, when she found the back of the cage five times in the Tigers’ 18-13 win.
Isabelle Vitale, A, USC
Isabelle Vitale is fifth among DI freshman in assists per game (1.89). Except for Stanford’s Humphrey, who leads the nation in the category, and Florida’s LoPinto, Vitale plays on a team with a stronger schedule (the others are Siena’s Grace Dobrynski and American’s Maddy Spratt). Vitale leads USC in assists (17) and is second in points (38).
Natalie Calandra-Ryan, A, Youngstown State
A dark horse for freshman of the year, Natalie Calandra-Ryan’s career at Youngstown State has gotten off to a strong start. The Auburn, N.Y., native is second in the country among freshmen in goals per game (3.36). Calandra-Ryan paces Youngstown State with 38 goals and 52 points. She broke a school record by posting eight goals and 12 points, including scoring the game-winner, in YSU’s comeback 21-20 win over Kent State.
Colleen Quinn, A, Richmond
Colleen Quinn is establishing herself as a formidable offensive threat for the Spiders. She’s second on the team in assists (13) and third in points (30). Quinn was a bright spot in Richmond’s loss to in-state rival Virginia, posting a hat trick and two assists.
Lauren Black, M, Denver
The Pioneers are known for their defense, but Lauren Black’s gritty play has fueled their offense. The freshman from British Columbia is second on the team in goals (24) and points (33). She scored the game-tying goal in Denver’s come-from-behind win against Michigan on March 13.
Olivia Vergano, M, Virginia Tech
Olivia Vergano has made an impact all over the field for a Virginia Tech squad that’s been in and out of the national rankings all season. She posted five points on four goals and an assist in Virginia Tech’s upset win over Notre Dame and a career-best eight points on six goals and two helpers against Furman. Vergano is third on the team in goals (27) and second in draws (49).
Kaylee Dyer, A, Michigan
Michigan returned an experienced attack that included Caitlin Muir and Kaitlyn Mead, but Kaylee Dyer has broken through anyway; Dyer has started all 11 games for the Wolverines, registering 12 goals and nine assists. Her best performance of the season came on a five-point day in a win over Cincy Feb. 20.
Nina Montes, M, Princeton
Another Tiger making an immediate impact, midfielder Nina Montes has been a valuable role player on a Princeton offense headlined by senior All-American Kyla Sears. Montes has played in all eight games, starting two, and chipped in 10 goals and two assists to help the Tigers jet off to a 6-2 start. No disrespect but it is hard to compare any player from the MAC conference with some of the others, there is no competition there, these same players very possible could not get the job done against decent defense. While it is definitely the exception to the rule, I would not discount the players ability out of hand. Every now and then an exceptional player falls through the cracks (for whatever reason) and does not end up at a Top 20 program. Inside Lacrosse does a pretty good job at evaluating and ranking players so I will assume she is very good. I will agree that in most cases a players performance vs MAC caliber teams will not translate to playing Top 10 - 20 caliber competition. Congratulations none the less.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Good for Duke but UVA is terrible (again). The alums and fans continue to tolerate that staff squandering talent year after year after year. More nonsense, if UVA is terrible, what does that say about the other 100 or so programs below them? There are currently 118 Division I women's lacrosse programs and UVA is certainly one of the Top 20 teams and probably one of the Top 10 to 15 best programs year in and year out. I will say however that the Virginia coaching staff needs to evaluate their schedule and make some adjustments going forward. Not only does Virginia play one of the most difficult schedules they also play way too many games on very short rest. Two or three days rest may not be a factor when competing against weaker teams but if you are playing a competitive team on two days rest and your opponent has had a week off you will be at a disadvantage. Short rest not only puts physical pressure on the athletes, it gives very little time to prepare (game plan) for your next opponent. Duke has been given a lot of garbage on here for their weak out of conference schedule but they needed to make the switch and lighten the load several years ago because they were a "Top 20" team and did not make the tournament. Virginia started their season with 6 games in 17 days, I don't think you will find another team that did that. During that stretch the Cavs played Maryland on 4 days rest (after playing Cal on 2 days rest), they then played Princeton on 2 days rest, then Boston College on 3 Days rest, then Stanford on 4 days rest. After that gauntlet they took a week off before playing 3 games in 7 days... Notre Dame then Richmond and Syracuse both on 3 days rest. After that they had a 5 day break before playing Pitt then 2 days before meeting up with JMU. Sorry, just not enough rest when playing the caliber of teams that they play. Virginia has too relax their schedule a bit in the future. UVA is hardly terrible, and maybe they do need to be more careful with OOC scheduling, but I sure hope they don’t go as lame with it as Duke. Duke has a strong, experienced roster this year and it’s a shame they didn’t play a few better OOC matchups. UVA should be able to handle it with all their top ranked recruits, but I don’t observe them to be as gritty and mentally tough as other teams. Yes, they played 6 games in 17 days but the first two were against Cal and Elon. Other teams play 3-4 tough games bunched together. Arizona State just played 4 ranked teams in 10 days, 2 of them cross country. They lost the first 3 but pulled off the upset in the 4th.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Good for Duke but UVA is terrible (again). The alums and fans continue to tolerate that staff squandering talent year after year after year. More nonsense, if UVA is terrible, what does that say about the other 100 or so programs below them? There are currently 118 Division I women's lacrosse programs and UVA is certainly one of the Top 20 teams and probably one of the Top 10 to 15 best programs year in and year out. I will say however that the Virginia coaching staff needs to evaluate their schedule and make some adjustments going forward. Not only does Virginia play one of the most difficult schedules they also play way too many games on very short rest. Two or three days rest may not be a factor when competing against weaker teams but if you are playing a competitive team on two days rest and your opponent has had a week off you will be at a disadvantage. Short rest not only puts physical pressure on the athletes, it gives very little time to prepare (game plan) for your next opponent. Duke has been given a lot of garbage on here for their weak out of conference schedule but they needed to make the switch and lighten the load several years ago because they were a "Top 20" team and did not make the tournament. Virginia started their season with 6 games in 17 days, I don't think you will find another team that did that. During that stretch the Cavs played Maryland on 4 days rest (after playing Cal on 2 days rest), they then played Princeton on 2 days rest, then Boston College on 3 Days rest, then Stanford on 4 days rest. After that gauntlet they took a week off before playing 3 games in 7 days... Notre Dame then Richmond and Syracuse both on 3 days rest. After that they had a 5 day break before playing Pitt then 2 days before meeting up with JMU. Sorry, just not enough rest when playing the caliber of teams that they play. Virginia has too relax their schedule a bit in the future. UVA is hardly terrible, and maybe they do need to be more careful with OOC scheduling, but I sure hope they don’t go as lame with it as Duke. Duke has a strong, experienced roster this year and it’s a shame they didn’t play a few better OOC matchups. UVA should be able to handle it with all their top ranked recruits, but I don’t observe them to be as gritty and mentally tough as other teams. Yes, they played 6 games in 17 days but the first two were against Cal and Elon. Other teams play 3-4 tough games bunched together. Arizona State just played 4 ranked teams in 10 days, 2 of them cross country. They lost the first 3 but pulled off the upset in the 4th. Find another team that plays on as little rest against top tier tams as UVA. As for their top ranked recruits, Maryland, Princeton, Boston College, Stanford, Notre Dame, Syracuse, Duke, North Carolina, all bring in their fair share of recruits JMU not too shabby either and Richmond, Louisville, Va Tech are all competitive, Pitt has plenty of experience with all of the transfers. It's not just the difficult schedule, the lack of rest and recovery. I'm guessing that you never competed at a high level, you also seem to want to knock the Virginia "recruits". As for Duke, even with their cupcake OOC schedule their overall strength of schedule is still more difficult than the vast majority of teams.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
A few Monday morning musings on the weekend.
1. At 4-7, I do not know how you justify Notre Dame being in the top 20. I don't care about "quality losses" they just don't belong in the top 25. Watching them play, they just don't look like a top team, either.
2. Michigan. Also overrated. They play well when moving the ball fast, but they tend to get stymied by solid defensive teams. No way they should be ranked in the top 20, either and to only drop one spot after losing the last three straight, I just don't see it. They have talent, but the defense overall is lacking. I think an argument can be made for somewhere 21-25, but that's it. There is a possibility they lose 2 of the next three games (Ohio State, Penn State, Maryland). I expected a lot more out of this team this season (yes, I know they were 3-9 in 2021 but it was a tough schedule).
3. Pitt. While they are only 6-7, as a first year team they are putting up some solid first halves in games--three of those losses are by 2 points or less. I'm pleasantly surprised with how this first year team looks and I suspect they could win 3 of the next 4 games.
4. Louisville. What a heartbreaking loss for the Cardinals on Thursday night. They dropped another close one in OT on a last second goal, moving to 5-7. I see only one possible win in their next 5 games. While Scott Teeter had quite the mess to clean up, I don't think he has the key Assistants on staff (as he did at Canisius) to keep this job. I wonder how much longer he can hold on at The Ville?
5. North Carolina. They look like the best all-around team in lacrosse right now, but they will have a good challenge against Syracuse on the 9th. Will they end the Cuse 4 game win streak on Saturday? (My guess is yes.)
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
Division I Women’s Lacrosse Rankings 4-4-2022
Rank Institution Points (FPV) Last Poll
1 North Carolina (12 - 0) 550 (22) 1 2 Boston College (11 - 1) 528 2 3 Northwestern (10 - 2) 497 3 4 Syracuse (10 - 2) 490 4 5 Stony Brook (8 - 2) 440 5 6 Loyola (10 - 1) 433 6 7 Duke (13 - 1) 415 7 8 Denver (11 - 1) 379 9 9 Maryland (10 - 1) 367 8 10 Florida (7 - 4) 366 10 11 James Madison (8 - 4) 321 12 12 Princeton (6 - 2) 310 11 13 USC (8 - 2) 249 17 14 Michigan (9 - 4) 234 13 15 Rutgers (10 - 2) 220 14 16 Virginia (6 - 7) 191 16 17 UMass (10 - 2) 187 18 18 Notre Dame (4 - 7) 183 15 19 Richmond (10 - 2) 157 19 20 UConn (10 - 1) 137 21 21 Jacksonville (7 - 3) 98 23 T22 Stanford (8 - 5) 97 25 T22 Johns Hopkins (6 - 6) 97 20 24 Navy (10 - 2) 78 22 T25 Arizona State (5 - 6) 34 NR T25 Colorado (9 - 3) 34 24 RV Temple, Yale, Drexel, Liberty, Vanderbilt, Virginia Tech, Georgetown,
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
Division II Women’s Lacrosse Rankings 4-4-2022
Rank Institution Points (FPV) Last Poll
1 Queens (11 - 0) 647 (23) 1 2 UIndy (8 - 1) 618 (1) 2 3 Adelphi (8 - 0) 603 (2) 3 4 East Stroudsburg (9 - 0) 568 4 5 Florida Southern (8 - 1) 521 6 6 Regis (CO) (9 - 0) 515 7 7 West Chester (7 - 1) 458 8 8 Lindenwood (8 - 2) 449 9 9 Rollins (10 - 0) 435 10 10 Le Moyne (6 - 3) 430 5 11 Grand Valley State (12 - 1) 416 11 12 Embry-Riddle (11 - 0) 353 13 13 Mercy (6 - 3) 293 12 14 Pace (6 - 3) 284 14 15 Tampa (5 - 5) 266 15 T16 Stonehill (6 - 2) 237 18 T16 Roberts Wesleyan (7 - 3) 237 17 18 Assumption (5 - 4) 188 19 19 Saint Anselm (6 - 2) 167 20 20 Bentley (4 - 3) 166 16 21 New Haven (6 - 3) 162 21 22 Seton Hill (8 - 3) 98 22 23 Limestone (8 - 3) 76 23 24 Wingate (9 - 2) 66 25 25 Saint Rose (7 - 2) 59 NR RV Davenport, Florida Tech, Southern New Hampshire, Mount Olive, Saint Leo, Colorado Mesa, Lynn, Lee, Concordia-St Paul, Bloomsburg
Last edited by baldbear; .
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Division II Women’s Lacrosse Rankings 4-4-2022
Ran Institution Points (FPV) Last Poll
1 Queens (11 - 0) 647 (23) 1 2 UIndy (8 - 1) 618 (1) 2 3 Adelphi (8 - 0) 603 (2) 3 4 East Stroudsburg (9 - 0) 568 4 5 Florida Southern (8 - 1) 521 6 6 Regis (CO) (9 - 0) 515 7 7 West Chester (7 - 1) 458 8 8 Lindenwood (8 - 2) 449 9 9 Rollins (10 - 0) 435 10 10 Le Moyne (6 - 3) 430 5 11 Grand Valley State (12 - 1) 416 11 12 Embry-Riddle (11 - 0) 353 13 13 Mercy (6 - 3) 293 12 14 Pace (6 - 3) 284 14 15 Tampa (5 - 5) 266 15 T16 Stonehill (6 - 2) 237 18 T16 Roberts Wesleyan (7 - 3) 237 17 18 Assumption (5 - 4) 188 19 19 Saint Anselm (6 - 2) 167 20 20 Bentley (4 - 3) 166 16 21 New Haven (6 - 3) 162 21 22 Seton Hill (8 - 3) 98 22 23 Limestone (8 - 3) 76 23 24 Wingate (9 - 2) 66 25 25 Saint Rose (7 - 2) 59 NR RV Davenport, Florida Tech, Southern New Hampshire, Mount Olive, Saint Leo, Colorado Mesa, Lynn, Lee, Con Pitt is filled with transfers.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
Division III Women’s Lacrosse Rankings 4-4-2022
Rank Institution Points (FPV) Last Poll
1 Middlebury (9 - 0) 561 (22) 1 2 Franklin & Marshall (9 - 1) 508 5 3 Washington and Lee (9 - 2) 489 3 4 Salisbury (10 - 2) 477 2 5 Colby (8 - 1) 464 6 6 Tufts (6 - 2) 448 7 7 TCNJ (7 - 1) 420 10 8 Gettysburg (7 - 3) 411 4 9 William Smith (8 - 1) 401 8 10 Ithaca (8 - 1) 342 9 11 Wesleyan (CT) (6 - 1) 333 11 12 Hamilton (5 - 1) 315 12 13 York (6 - 4) 275 13 14 Bowdoin (7 - 3) 239 16 15 Messiah (7 - 3) 233 15 16 Catholic (5 - 4) 188 17 17 St. Lawrence (8 - 1) 179 19 18 Trinity (5 - 3) 172 18 19 Brockport (4 - 3) 171 14 20 Amherst (5 - 2) 138 19 21 Denison (6 - 3) 108 21 22 Chicago (8 - 1) 105 22 23 Haverford (6 - 3) 66 23 24 St. John Fisher (2 - 5) 45 25 25 Pomona-Pitzer (7 - 0) 43 NR RV Cortland, Geneseo, UW-Eau Claire, Roger Williams, MIT, FDU
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I am glad to see the refs made the right call in Pitt v SU game on calling no charge on Pitt goal. They called this a charge on loyola player earlier in week. Same players flops a lot. Flopping is unsportsmanlike and should be yellow on the player.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I am glad to see the refs made the right call in Pitt v SU game on calling no charge on Pitt goal. They called this a charge on loyola player earlier in week. Same players flops a lot. Flopping is unsportsmanlike and should be yellow on the player. If we want to watch flopping we can always watch soccer.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I am glad to see the refs made the right call in Pitt v SU game on calling no charge on Pitt goal. They called this a charge on loyola player earlier in week. Same players flops a lot. Flopping is unsportsmanlike and should be yellow on the player. It is a very difficult game to officiate but the officials need to do a much better job. Not sure how to solve the problem but they have to come up with a solution because it has gotten bad. Some rule changes would be helpful maybe add an additional official. IDK, but it is hard to watch at times and in too many cases poor officiating impacts the outcome of the game.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
ND is a complete joke!!!! They shouldn’t be rewarded for NCAA tournament . Let’s hope someone beats them up soon
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
Division I Women’s Lacrosse Players of the Week 4-5-2022
Offensive Player of the Week
Ellie Masera – Stony Brook University
In a 16-8 victory against No. 10 Princeton, Masera recorded the fifth most draw controls in a single game in program history (12). The sophomore midfielder also added five goals in the 16-4 win over Arizona State, marking her third five-goal game of the season. After helping Stony Brook to a 2-0 week, Masera earned her third American East Offensive Player of the Week honor. Stony Brook is currently 8-2 and ranked No. 5 in the ILWomen/IWLCA Division I Poll.
Defensive Player of the Week
Taylor Moreno – University of North Carolina
Moreno made a season-high 16 saves in a 15-7 win against Notre Dame, two of which came on a spectacular sequence that earned her a SportsCenter Top 10 berth. She also caused a turnover and gathered a ground ball as the No. 1 Tar Heels improved to 12-0 overall and 5-0 in the ACC this season.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
Division II Women’s Lacrosse Players of the Week 4-5-2022
Offensive Player of the Week
Kiki Fitzpatrick – East Stroudsburg University
Fitzpatrick was responsible for 13 points in a 2-0 week for No. 4 East Stroudsburg. She posted a team-best eight assists over the two-game stretch and added five goals to boot. The junior also recorded 10 draw controls and caused four turnovers while scooping four ground balls in a balanced week. Her 49 points on the season rank second on the team for the tenth-ranked scoring offense in Division II.
Defensive Player of the Week
Dani Waters – University of Tampa
Waters tallied a game-high six caused turnovers in Tampa’s 20-8 win against Saint Leo. The senior also picked up a team-high four ground balls. Waters capped the week with her third Sunshine State Conference Defensive Player of the Week honor and currently leads the program in caused turnovers (26) and groundballs (22). Tampa is 5-5 and ranked No. 15 in this week’s ILWomen/IWLCA Division II Poll.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886
Back of THE CAGE
|
Back of THE CAGE
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 886 |
Division III Women’s Lacrosse Players of the Week 4-5-2022
Offensive Player of the Week
Fiona Bundy – Bowdoin College
In Bowdoin’s lone game of the week, Bundy scored a pair of goals, dished out three assists, won seven draw controls, and collected five ground balls in an 11-9 NESCAC win at Amherst. She assisted on the game-winning goal and added an insurance tally in the final 2:20 of the contest. Bundy leads the No. 14 Polar Bears, and ranks among the NESCAC leaders, in points (41), assists (17), draw controls (38) and ground balls (24) this season.
Defensive Player of the Week
Emily Kitchin – Franklin & Marshall University
Kitchin continued her stellar play on the field, registering 15 saves in a 16-10 win against defending national champion No. 2 Salisbury. Rolling off the momentum from the Diplomats upset road victory, Kitchin followed up with eight stopped shots in the win against Swarthmore. Kitchin allowed just four goals in the matchup and finished with a 7.32 GAA and 62.2% save percentage for the week. F&M is 9-1 and took over the second spot in this week’s ILWomen/IWLCA Division III Poll.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
ND is a complete joke!!!! They shouldn’t be rewarded for NCAA tournament . Let’s hope someone beats them up soon Notre Dame finds a way to add Detroit Mercy to their schedule mid season to potentially avoid a sub .500 record and missing a chance for the playoffs and then embarrasses them 27-2. Rooting for Pitt, Marquette and/or Louisville to beat Notre Dame and keep them out of consideration.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
ND is a complete joke!!!! They shouldn’t be rewarded for NCAA tournament . Let’s hope someone beats them up soon Notre Dame finds a way to add Detroit Mercy to their schedule mid season to potentially avoid a sub .500 record and missing a chance for the playoffs and then embarrasses them 27-2. Rooting for Pitt, Marquette and/or Louisville to beat Notre Dame and keep them out of consideration. Last interesting point on this matter, the Detroit Mercy head coach is a former men's lacrosse player of you guessed it Notre Dame...
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
ND is a complete joke!!!! They shouldn’t be rewarded for NCAA tournament . Let’s hope someone beats them up soon Notre Dame finds a way to add Detroit Mercy to their schedule mid season to potentially avoid a sub .500 record and missing a chance for the playoffs and then embarrasses them 27-2. Rooting for Pitt, Marquette and/or Louisville to beat Notre Dame and keep them out of consideration. Last interesting point on this matter, the Detroit Mercy head coach is a former men's lacrosse player of you guessed it Notre Dame... While this is certainly embarrassing for ND the NCAA should probably do away with the .500 record requirement. In Division I women's Lacrosse a teams record is not a very good measure of a teams strength. There isnot enough parity across all of DI.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I know a lot of people don’t mind it but I can’t stand the transfer portal. One good season and then boom off to somewhere else. Three kids from St Peter’s leaving the school to go to a bigger college. This year could have changed that program and now it won’t. I get it. If the coach can do it why can’t the kids. I think it just stinks. Deion Sanders talked about it saying that high school kids who play football are gonna have a hard time getting recruited to power colleges with the transfers. I wonder how this is gonna impact girls lax. Usually a team is looking for 6-8 freshman. Recruiting was impacted with the 5th year the last two years and next year. But I have a feeling girls are gonna have a hard time making a top ranked school going forward unless they are truly the top of their field. Then it’s gonna trickle down to every school and every division.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I know a lot of people don’t mind it but I can’t stand the transfer portal. One good season and then boom off to somewhere else. Three kids from St Peter’s leaving the school to go to a bigger college. This year could have changed that program and now it won’t. I get it. If the coach can do it why can’t the kids. I think it just stinks. Deion Sanders talked about it saying that high school kids who play football are gonna have a hard time getting recruited to power colleges with the transfers. I wonder how this is gonna impact girls lax. Usually a team is looking for 6-8 freshman. Recruiting was impacted with the 5th year the last two years and next year. But I have a feeling girls are gonna have a hard time making a top ranked school going forward unless they are truly the top of their field. Then it’s gonna trickle down to every school and every division. Transferring should absolutely be permitted. No student or student athlete should have to stay at a school if they are not happy with the school/team/coach etc... Transferring is nothing new, I was in school in the 80's and we had kids transfer in as well as transfer out for a variety of reasons (homesick, girlfriends, playing time, coach, academics, quality of team etc...) One of my brothers played football at what is now a Power 5 conference program (Top 20 National Power major Bowel Games) and transferred out after two years (had to sit out a year). The difference now is the extra year of eligibility, not sure that was the right call but it is definitely impacting players and the recruiting process. The extra year thing will run its course and things will be back to normal but it does stink for the HS kids going through the recruiting process as transfers especially 5th year transfers are surely taking roster spots. IMHO, "regular transfers" are not a problem i.e. the kid that realizes they are not happy for whatever reason and wants a change isn't really an issue. However, when the four year starter and captain of a team hits the portal, they will 100% take the roster spot that could have gone to a HS recruit and they will most likely take a starting/regular spot from an existing player. I think in some cases it will disrupt team chemistry and moral.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I know a lot of people don’t mind it but I can’t stand the transfer portal. One good season and then boom off to somewhere else. Three kids from St Peter’s leaving the school to go to a bigger college. This year could have changed that program and now it won’t. I get it. If the coach can do it why can’t the kids. I think it just stinks. Deion Sanders talked about it saying that high school kids who play football are gonna have a hard time getting recruited to power colleges with the transfers. I wonder how this is gonna impact girls lax. Usually a team is looking for 6-8 freshman. Recruiting was impacted with the 5th year the last two years and next year. But I have a feeling girls are gonna have a hard time making a top ranked school going forward unless they are truly the top of their field. Then it’s gonna trickle down to every school and every division. Transferring should absolutely be permitted. No student or student athlete should have to stay at a school if they are not happy with the school/team/coach etc... Transferring is nothing new, I was in school in the 80's and we had kids transfer in as well as transfer out for a variety of reasons (homesick, girlfriends, playing time, coach, academics, quality of team etc...) One of my brothers played football at what is now a Power 5 conference program (Top 20 National Power major Bowel Games) and transferred out after two years (had to sit out a year). The difference now is the extra year of eligibility, not sure that was the right call but it is definitely impacting players and the recruiting process. The extra year thing will run its course and things will be back to normal but it does stink for the HS kids going through the recruiting process as transfers especially 5th year transfers are surely taking roster spots. IMHO, "regular transfers" are not a problem i.e. the kid that realizes they are not happy for whatever reason and wants a change isn't really an issue. However, when the four year starter and captain of a team hits the portal, they will 100% take the roster spot that could have gone to a HS recruit and they will most likely take a starting/regular spot from an existing player. I think in some cases it will disrupt team chemistry and moral. the 5th year should have only gone to seniors that year. NCAA created this whole mess
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I know a lot of people don’t mind it but I can’t stand the transfer portal. One good season and then boom off to somewhere else. Three kids from St Peter’s leaving the school to go to a bigger college. This year could have changed that program and now it won’t. I get it. If the coach can do it why can’t the kids. I think it just stinks. Deion Sanders talked about it saying that high school kids who play football are gonna have a hard time getting recruited to power colleges with the transfers. I wonder how this is gonna impact girls lax. Usually a team is looking for 6-8 freshman. Recruiting was impacted with the 5th year the last two years and next year. But I have a feeling girls are gonna have a hard time making a top ranked school going forward unless they are truly the top of their field. Then it’s gonna trickle down to every school and every division. Transferring should absolutely be permitted. No student or student athlete should have to stay at a school if they are not happy with the school/team/coach etc... Transferring is nothing new, I was in school in the 80's and we had kids transfer in as well as transfer out for a variety of reasons (homesick, girlfriends, playing time, coach, academics, quality of team etc...) One of my brothers played football at what is now a Power 5 conference program (Top 20 National Power major Bowel Games) and transferred out after two years (had to sit out a year). The difference now is the extra year of eligibility, not sure that was the right call but it is definitely impacting players and the recruiting process. The extra year thing will run its course and things will be back to normal but it does stink for the HS kids going through the recruiting process as transfers especially 5th year transfers are surely taking roster spots. IMHO, "regular transfers" are not a problem i.e. the kid that realizes they are not happy for whatever reason and wants a change isn't really an issue. However, when the four year starter and captain of a team hits the portal, they will 100% take the roster spot that could have gone to a HS recruit and they will most likely take a starting/regular spot from an existing player. I think in some cases it will disrupt team chemistry and moral. There’s no sitting out any more. And yes a kid should be able to leave a college and go somewhere else. Back in the day you needed an exemption or you say out a year. And that exemption wouldn’t be because you wanted to leave Notre Dame for UNC or Maryland because they have a better shot at a title. Now they allow it for any reason. This will 100% hurt high school kids and any team no matter what rank or division. It’s more of a problem than just four year starters. Kids and teams are doing it early. It’s going to be a snowball effect through recruiting. Watch how many psycho parents of high school seniors start reclassifying their kids this year to avoid the 5th players. Is what it is. Not gonna change. And once again, they should be able to switch schools if they want.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Best case ND is 500 going into the ACC tournament. They will be underdogs in their 1st game against a team like Duke which could still put them below 500. If they manage to leave the ACC tournament with a 500 record they are still undeserving of an at large NCAA birth based on their overall rating, having few good wins and several bad losses. Their RPI will also hurt their case.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I Best case ND is 500 going into the ACC tournament. They will be underdogs in their 1st game against a team like Duke which could still put them below 500. If they manage to leave the ACC tournament with a 500 record they are still undeserving of an at large NCAA birth based on their overall rating, having few good wins and several bad losses. Their RPI will also hurt their case. They are currently 5-7 with three games to play (Pitt, Marquette, Louisville) Plus the ACC Tournament. If somehow they are .500 I really hope the selection committee does not offer them an at large bid. Normally, I would not have a problem with ND getting in with a .500 record but after the nonsense they just pulled I really hope they do not make the tournament. It was bad enough to add the game but then to go on and beat the team that is helping you 27 - 2 is just not right. Don't be surprised to see ND follow Duke's lead going forward. Classless!
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I Best case ND is 500 going into the ACC tournament. They will be underdogs in their 1st game against a team like Duke which could still put them below 500. If they manage to leave the ACC tournament with a 500 record they are still undeserving of an at large NCAA birth based on their overall rating, having few good wins and several bad losses. Their RPI will also hurt their case. They are currently 5-7 with three games to play (Pitt, Marquette, Louisville) Plus the ACC Tournament. If somehow they are .500 I really hope the selection committee does not offer them an at large bid. Normally, I would not have a problem with ND getting in with a .500 record but after the nonsense they just pulled I really hope they do not make the tournament. It was bad enough to add the game but then to go on and beat the team that is helping you 27 - 2 is just not right. Don't be surprised to see ND follow Duke's lead going forward. Classless! I agree, classless! Hope they feel good and pumped up now. Ridiculous.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I Best case ND is 500 going into the ACC tournament. They will be underdogs in their 1st game against a team like Duke which could still put them below 500. If they manage to leave the ACC tournament with a 500 record they are still undeserving of an at large NCAA birth based on their overall rating, having few good wins and several bad losses. Their RPI will also hurt their case. They are currently 5-7 with three games to play (Pitt, Marquette, Louisville) Plus the ACC Tournament. If somehow they are .500 I really hope the selection committee does not offer them an at large bid. Normally, I would not have a problem with ND getting in with a .500 record but after the nonsense they just pulled I really hope they do not make the tournament. It was bad enough to add the game but then to go on and beat the team that is helping you 27 - 2 is just not right. Don't be surprised to see ND follow Duke's lead going forward. Classless! I agree, classless! Hope they feel good and pumped up now. Ridiculous. and if any of you were the head coach of ND or any team in a similar position you would do the exact same thing
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I Best case ND is 500 going into the ACC tournament. They will be underdogs in their 1st game against a team like Duke which could still put them below 500. If they manage to leave the ACC tournament with a 500 record they are still undeserving of an at large NCAA birth based on their overall rating, having few good wins and several bad losses. Their RPI will also hurt their case. They are currently 5-7 with three games to play (Pitt, Marquette, Louisville) Plus the ACC Tournament. If somehow they are .500 I really hope the selection committee does not offer them an at large bid. Normally, I would not have a problem with ND getting in with a .500 record but after the nonsense they just pulled I really hope they do not make the tournament. It was bad enough to add the game but then to go on and beat the team that is helping you 27 - 2 is just not right. Don't be surprised to see ND follow Duke's lead going forward. Classless! I agree, classless! Hope they feel good and pumped up now. Ridiculous. and if any of you were the head coach of ND or any team in a similar position you would do the exact same thing That's just uninformed. Go watch the mens UVA vs Cuse game from this year. Even thou the game got chippy when it was clear that UVA had the game won they held the ball on offense and rolled the ball into the corner at the end of the shot clock instead trying to run up the score on multiple offensive possession's . That was in a relatively competitive game putting up 27 against a team who is completely over matched is an embarrassment for the coaches and players.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anyone who has any class and has done a bit of coaching knows that was an embarrassment for ND. They game was out of hand at the half. I’m sure they emptied the bench and all that, but as a coach you control what happens. There is a certain point where you need to shut it down. I get it, kids who don’t get to play want to score, but seriously?? Have some class and pull in the reigns a bit.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Syracuse needs to stop playing thug ball and looking surprised every time they get called for it. Gave the game away due to poor coaching!
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Syracuse needs to stop playing thug ball and looking surprised every time they get called for it. Gave the game away due to poor coaching! That’s just completely clueless , coaching kept them in the game . Sorry but the “Michael Jordan “ of womens lacrosse drops to ground every time someone touches her it’s ridiculous and the ND transfer grabs her head when clearly in the replay no contact was made , Cuse given several yellow cards simply because of the acting by the UNC team .
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Syracuse needs to stop playing thug ball and looking surprised every time they get called for it. Gave the game away due to poor coaching! That’s just completely clueless , coaching kept them in the game . Sorry but the “Michael Jordan “ of womens lacrosse drops to ground every time someone touches her it’s ridiculous and the ND transfer grabs her head when clearly in the replay no contact was made , Cuse given several yellow cards simply because of the acting by the UNC team . If that’s true, it’s terrible. Did not seem that way when I watched. I guess some girls may want to consider a career in acting!
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
What is going on at Syracuse? Seems like they have a ton of girls get hurt every year. Never seen anything like it.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I Best case ND is 500 going into the ACC tournament. They will be underdogs in their 1st game against a team like Duke which could still put them below 500. If they manage to leave the ACC tournament with a 500 record they are still undeserving of an at large NCAA birth based on their overall rating, having few good wins and several bad losses. Their RPI will also hurt their case. They are currently 5-7 with three games to play (Pitt, Marquette, Louisville) Plus the ACC Tournament. If somehow they are .500 I really hope the selection committee does not offer them an at large bid. Normally, I would not have a problem with ND getting in with a .500 record but after the nonsense they just pulled I really hope they do not make the tournament. It was bad enough to add the game but then to go on and beat the team that is helping you 27 - 2 is just not right. Don't be surprised to see ND follow Duke's lead going forward. Classless! I agree, classless! Hope they feel good and pumped up now. Ridiculous. and if any of you were the head coach of ND or any team in a similar position you would do the exact same thing Did Virginia add any late season games? Did any of the other bubble teams add games? Bad enough to add the game but just disgraceful to put up a 27 - 2 win. Shameful!
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
A lot of Lacrosse left but here's a Look at the NCAA Tournament.
29 Teams, top 3 seeds get a Bye, 15 Automatic Qualifiers, 14 At Large Bids.
Possible tournament field..
1 - AAC - Florida 2 - AE - Albany 3 - ASUN - Jacksonville 4 - A10 - Richmond 5 - ACC - North Carolina 6 - Big East - Denver 7 - Big South - Mercer 8 - Big 10 - Maryland 9 - CAA - Towson 10 - Ivy - Princeton 11 - MACC - Faiirfield 12 - MAC - Robert Morriss 13 - NEC - Bryant 14 - PAC12 - USC 15 - Patriot - Loyola
At Large bids...
1 - Boston College - ACC 2 - Northwestern - Big10 3 - Syracuse - ACC 4 - Duke - ACC 5 - Stony Brook 6 - James Madison 7 - Rutgers - Big10 8 - UMass - A10 9 - UConn - Big East 10 - Temple - AAC 11 - 4th Big 10 ? Michigan, Hopkins, PSU ?? 12 - 2nd PAC12 ? Stanford, ASU, Colorado ?? 13 - 2nd CAA ? Drexel? 14 - 2nd Patriot ? Navy
Above obviously speculating and assumes conference favorites win conference tournaments...
Traditionally Ivy's get two sometimes three teams but with Penn having an uncharacteristic off year they might only get one. Virginia and Notre Dame are in a tough spot. Can The PAC12 get three? Another ACC Team??
Any other teams have a chance without pulling off an upset in their conference championship?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Syracuse needs to stop playing thug ball and looking surprised every time they get called for it. Gave the game away due to poor coaching! That’s just completely clueless , coaching kept them in the game . Sorry but the “Michael Jordan “ of womens lacrosse drops to ground every time someone touches her it’s ridiculous and the ND transfer grabs her head when clearly in the replay no contact was made , Cuse given several yellow cards simply because of the acting by the UNC team . Noticing a ton of soccer flopping in the girls game lately. On both college and high school level. Hope this isn’t a growing trend.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Re: 2021-2022 Women's DI-III College Lacrosse Season
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
What is going on at Syracuse? Seems like they have a ton of girls get hurt every year. Never seen anything like it. Agreed…what’s going on there?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Moderated by A1Laxer, Abclax123, America's Game, Annoy., Anonymous 1, baldbear, Bearded_Kaos, BiggLax, BOTC_EVENTS, botc_ne, clax422, CP@BOTC, cp_botc, Gremelin, HammerOfJustice, hatimd80, JimSection1, Ladylaxer2609, lax516, Laxers412, LaxMomma, Liam Kassl, LILax15, MomOf6, Team BOTC, The Hop, TheBackOfTheCage, Thirdy@BOTC, TM@BOTC
|
|