Back Of The CAGE (BOTC) BOTC
Fall Season events are IN for Lacrosse players!!! | Join our Lacrosse Forum Community | Advertise & Generate more organic supporters for your business
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY BACK OF THE CAGE
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY MOST RECENT POSTS
Boys High School
by Anonymous -
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY Forum Statistics
Forums20
Topics3,813
Posts400,731
Members2,638
Most Online89,378
11 minutes ago
BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 14 of 18 1 2 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
So of the 2021s in the close-in DC area, anyone care to rank the teams (Madlax, VLC, DC Express, NL)?

BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY BACK OF THE CAGE SPONSORS

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So the on age player that is on an elite team with many holdbacks and double holdbacks, but is a back up should feel grateful that he is behind a holdback on the depth chart?


Yes, you get better in practice, and those other kids are in a league with rules too. You always play against the best possible competition. To worry about the age of the kid ahead of you is a waste of time, as again, you are in a league with rules. You either want to get better over time, or you already want to appear to be the best. In today's generation, this is not popular, but it is fact. Even if there was an exact birth year age group in MS, it wouldn't be realistic, as when you get to HS, you play against all years. Having an age spread is better for the younger kids. This is why the holdback argument is no longer in the threads above 2021. Next year, there will be no mention of this in the 2021.
Not exactly a great point.... Varsity kids play Varsity kids.... JV kids play JV kids.... It would be mentioned if Varsity kids played against Freshman teams.... Basically what happening around town in youth 7th and 8th grade lacrosse... Men vs Boys....


JV teams have average 2 year age spread, Varsity teams have average 2-3 year age spread, sometimes 4 if you have some really good Freshman. No, dude, not comparable to 7th and 8th grade club ball at all, where folks are whining about average 1-2 year age spreads because of the mix of private and public school kids. Again, get your whining in this year, because a big old dose of reality sets in next year.
No mention of it because those holdback kids have reaped the benefits of playing younger kids and get recruited by MIAA hold back schools and go directly on to a Varsity program as a 16yrold Freshman (Who should be a sophmore /junior)...Don't kid yourself

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So the on age player that is on an elite team with many holdbacks and double holdbacks, but is a back up should feel grateful that he is behind a holdback on the depth chart?


Yes, you get better in practice, and those other kids are in a league with rules too. You always play against the best possible competition. To worry about the age of the kid ahead of you is a waste of time, as again, you are in a league with rules. You either want to get better over time, or you already want to appear to be the best. In today's generation, this is not popular, but it is fact. Even if there was an exact birth year age group in MS, it wouldn't be realistic, as when you get to HS, you play against all years. Having an age spread is better for the younger kids. This is why the holdback argument is no longer in the threads above 2021. Next year, there will be no mention of this in the 2021.

So how come the holdback parents don't worry about making their kids get better? Don't the holdback parents who chose to play their kids against younger kids want their kids to get better too? How are they going to do this playing smaller, younger competition? They are not choosing to play the best competition but according to many it is still working to get their kids seen and playing. What you are saying is that the parents of holdbacks and the kids who are holdbacks are not competitive nor do they care about getting better. Which of course is not true and neither is your argument.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So of the 2021s in the close-in DC area, anyone care to rank the teams (Madlax, VLC, DC Express, NL)?
DC Express is dope.... Whole 2021 roster is driving to the games.....Entire roster is 15/16 yrs old

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So the on age player that is on an elite team with many holdbacks and double holdbacks, but is a back up should feel grateful that he is behind a holdback on the depth chart?


Yes, you get better in practice, and those other kids are in a league with rules too. You always play against the best possible competition. To worry about the age of the kid ahead of you is a waste of time, as again, you are in a league with rules. You either want to get better over time, or you already want to appear to be the best. In today's generation, this is not popular, but it is fact. Even if there was an exact birth year age group in MS, it wouldn't be realistic, as when you get to HS, you play against all years. Having an age spread is better for the younger kids. This is why the holdback argument is no longer in the threads above 2021. Next year, there will be no mention of this in the 2021.

So how come the holdback parents don't worry about making their kids get better? Don't the holdback parents who chose to play their kids against younger kids want their kids to get better too? How are they going to do this playing smaller, younger competition? They are not choosing to play the best competition but according to many it is still working to get their kids seen and playing. What you are saying is that the parents of holdbacks and the kids who are holdbacks are not competitive nor do they care about getting better. Which of course is not true and neither is your argument.
This makes them better because they are more experienced and more developed physically and mentally and beat up on younger kids....They are not necessarily better but just look good playing younger kids....If anything that fact will be more apparent when these kids get to high school....

BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY Sponsored Links
Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So of the 2021s in the close-in DC area, anyone care to rank the teams (Madlax, VLC, DC Express, NL)?


DC Express
Madlax
VLC
NL


Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
The motivation to hold your kid back is: 1) to be able to compete with the many other holdbacks at his elite club team and private school. 2) hopefully standout and be recruited.
My son played with kids on the elite teams that were very good players, repeated 8th grade and were superstars the following season. Most of these kids were already D1 caliber kids that probably would have committed as on age 10th graders. Parents egos! The system works for those that are in position economically and egotistically to do so! If there is a clear advantage for those that reclassify, conversely there is a clear disadvantage for those that don't. Otherwise there would be no reason to do so! With 60% of the D1 kids committed by 10th grade and probably 80% by the top 20 D1 teams - age still matters!

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The motivation to hold your kid back is: 1) to be able to compete with the many other holdbacks at his elite club team and private school. 2) hopefully standout and be recruited.
My son played with kids on the elite teams that were very good players, repeated 8th grade and were superstars the following season. Most of these kids were already D1 caliber kids that probably would have committed as on age 10th graders. Parents egos! The system works for those that are in position economically and egotistically to do so! If there is a clear advantage for those that reclassify, conversely there is a clear disadvantage for those that don't. Otherwise there would be no reason to do so! With 60% of the D1 kids committed by 10th grade and probably 80% by the top 20 D1 teams - age still matters!


A good, succinct summary of the motivation behind "regrading" and the push-back to it.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Sorry to spoil your day, but not a single kid on team 15 yet. Couple not 14 yet. I know makes people feel better when they have an excuse......

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Would put Club Blue ahead of VLC and Next Level

BOTC GIRLS BOTC BOY Sponsored Links
Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
referring to DCE 2021 Black

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
DC Express
VLC
Madlax
Club Blue
Next Level

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The motivation to hold your kid back is: 1) to be able to compete with the many other holdbacks at his elite club team and private school. 2) hopefully standout and be recruited.
My son played with kids on the elite teams that were very good players, repeated 8th grade and were superstars the following season. Most of these kids were already D1 caliber kids that probably would have committed as on age 10th graders. Parents egos! The system works for those that are in position economically and egotistically to do so! If there is a clear advantage for those that reclassify, conversely there is a clear disadvantage for those that don't. Otherwise there would be no reason to do so! With 60% of the D1 kids committed by 10th grade and probably 80% by the top 20 D1 teams - age still matters!

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The motivation to hold your kid back is: 1) to be able to compete with the many other holdbacks at his elite club team and private school. 2) hopefully standout and be recruited.
My son played with kids on the elite teams that were very good players, repeated 8th grade and were superstars the following season. Most of these kids were already D1 caliber kids that probably would have committed as on age 10th graders. Parents egos! The system works for those that are in position economically and egotistically to do so! If there is a clear advantage for those that reclassify, conversely there is a clear disadvantage for those that don't. Otherwise there would be no reason to do so! With 60% of the D1 kids committed by 10th grade and probably 80% by the top 20 D1 teams - age still matters!


A good, succinct summary of the motivation behind "regrading" and the push-back to it.


Or 3), and most common reason, kid transfers to private school and realizes how much public really really sucked, so parents bite the bullet after carefully vetting the prospect of repeating, inclusive of the school's thoughtful recommendations.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
DC Express
VLC
Madlax
Club Blue
Next Level


Must be a VLC parent
VLC lost to Peninsula and beat NL by one goal
Madlax is 2 - 0 in the top HoCo bracket

My son plays for NL so I have no bias

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
DCE
Madlax
Club Blue
VLC
NL

DCE beat Madlax couple weeks ago. Madlax getting better. Club Blue lost to Crabs 19-6 on Sunday - but at least they are playing in Top Division and trying to compete.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Weekend results:

Club Blue: 6 - Crabs: 19
Hawks Green: 5 - API Diamondbacks: 4
Madlax - Capital: 8 - Kooper's: 7
Greene Turtle: 8 - Lax Factory: 7
DC Express - Black: 14 - Bitmore: 4

Are DC Express and Crabs playing on a different level or should Bitmore and Club Blue have played down a division?


Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The motivation to hold your kid back is: 1) to be able to compete with the many other holdbacks at his elite club team and private school. 2) hopefully standout and be recruited.
My son played with kids on the elite teams that were very good players, repeated 8th grade and were superstars the following season. Most of these kids were already D1 caliber kids that probably would have committed as on age 10th graders. Parents egos! The system works for those that are in position economically and egotistically to do so! If there is a clear advantage for those that reclassify, conversely there is a clear disadvantage for those that don't. Otherwise there would be no reason to do so! With 60% of the D1 kids committed by 10th grade and probably 80% by the top 20 D1 teams - age still matters!

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The motivation to hold your kid back is: 1) to be able to compete with the many other holdbacks at his elite club team and private school. 2) hopefully standout and be recruited.
My son played with kids on the elite teams that were very good players, repeated 8th grade and were superstars the following season. Most of these kids were already D1 caliber kids that probably would have committed as on age 10th graders. Parents egos! The system works for those that are in position economically and egotistically to do so! If there is a clear advantage for those that reclassify, conversely there is a clear disadvantage for those that don't. Otherwise there would be no reason to do so! With 60% of the D1 kids committed by 10th grade and probably 80% by the top 20 D1 teams - age still matters!


A good, succinct summary of the motivation behind "regrading" and the push-back to it.


Or 3), and most common reason, kid transfers to private school and realizes how much public really really sucked, so parents bite the bullet after carefully vetting the prospect of repeating, inclusive of the school's thoughtful recommendations.


Maybe most "common" for kids going there for academic reasons. Holding you kid back for HS sports does not get no where near the same response as kids that are playing down and always the oldest among other players in YOUTH lacrosse. Huge difference

Playing down and being the oldest works in Youth lacrosse and in some ways even HS ( not as much) ! This trend will only continue and get bigger as days go by.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Probably need couple more weeks of results under whether DCE and Crabs at different level.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Anybody hear anything re NCAA early recruiting ruling yet ? Supposed to be today or tomorrow.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anybody hear anything re NCAA early recruiting ruling yet ? Supposed to be today or tomorrow.


Wasnt it supposed to after season?

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anybody hear anything re NCAA early recruiting ruling yet ? Supposed to be today or tomorrow.


Wasnt it supposed to after season?


This from another thread..Just out..No ,more ER

http://www.syracuse.com/orangelacro..._to_new_ncaa_rul.html#incart_river_index

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
vlc was missing a fogo, goalie, and a handful of midfielders due to spring break vacations. they beat nl 9-2 at full strength this spring

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anybody hear anything re NCAA early recruiting ruling yet ? Supposed to be today or tomorrow.


Wasnt it supposed to after season?


This from another thread..Just out..No ,more ER

http://www.syracuse.com/orangelacro..._to_new_ncaa_rul.html#incart_river_index



Takes effect 4/26. Could be a lot of verbals this week. Igloo 2021 had a verbal today

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Summer Birthday Boys 2021 have got the shaft again. WSYL changed their rules so they are to old this year. The were due to be the oldest out on field at WSYL this year before age change.

Now ER has been banned after all the money spent on clubs and ID camps this summer. Now no shot at ER.

But I do agree with both changes.


Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Igloo verbal is a lie. ER rule take effect immediately not 4-26. Unless kid had verbal before ruling was made final.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Igloo verbal is a lie. ER rule take effect immediately not 4-26. Unless kid had verbal before ruling was made final.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
vlc was missing a fogo, goalie, and a handful of midfielders due to spring break vacations. they beat nl 9-2 at full strength this spring


I saw VLC 2021 play at full strength. They definitely have talent and may be one day as heralded as 2017. But a third of the team seems to have low lacrosse IQ and skills that may have looked good for rec, but won't sustain them at the next level. That's probably why the VLC dudes play the team at AA not AAA. Next year, with real tryouts and tough cuts, they might be able to beat Madlax or Crabs or DC Express. Until then, they'll have to grapple with the second tier teams.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Igloo verbal is a lie. ER rule take effect immediately not 4-26. Unless kid had verbal before ruling was made final.


If it's a lie, igloo and ty Xander's are proliferating it on Twitter.


Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Igloo verbal is a lie. ER rule take effect immediately not 4-26. Unless kid had verbal before ruling was made final.


Not true. 4/26 is when it takes effect, at the BOD mtg.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Igloo verbal is a lie. ER rule take effect immediately not 4-26. Unless kid had verbal before ruling was made final.


Not true. 4/26 is when it takes effect, at the BOD mtg.


Wrong. NCAA clarified that it was effective last Friday. The rule doesn't say a kid can't commit though.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
NCAA has yet to clarify anything. Still nothing released officially.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I play for VLC 2021 we play in the AA division because unlike madlax we start in 7th grade not 3rd and make a lot of cuts also unlike madlax's capital team. We are also still adjusting to/creating chemistry with our teammates; however you are right we do have a few kids(2-3) that are just average players and would be better suited in a rec situation.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
vlc was missing a fogo, goalie, and a handful of midfielders due to spring break vacations. they beat nl 9-2 at full strength this spring


Guess they are missing players every week since their only win is still by 1 goal vs NL


Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Just saw the news that Nat Lax Fed added new member clubs (including MadLax)... Anyone have access to the press release? I can't seem to get it from the natlaxfed site. Thanks!

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Took effect immediately. Doesn't mean you can't announce a previously offered scholarship. Also under NCAA rules a player doesn't become a PSA until he or she starts 9th grade, although hopefully that isn't a real loophole turning this Summer into a 2021 sh**show

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Took effect immediately. Doesn't mean you can't announce a previously offered scholarship. Also under NCAA rules a player doesn't become a PSA until he or she starts 9th grade, although hopefully that isn't a real loophole turning this Summer into a 2021 sh**show


This Summer is now about finishing 19's, and getting recruiting boards up in the offices for 20's. 21's can just have some fun this Summer, just with empty sidelines.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Took effect immediately. Doesn't mean you can't announce a previously offered scholarship. Also under NCAA rules a player doesn't become a PSA until he or she starts 9th grade, although hopefully that isn't a real loophole turning this Summer into a 2021 sh**show


This Summer is now about finishing 19's, and getting recruiting boards up in the offices for 20's. 21's can just have some fun this Summer, just with empty sidelines.


I wish that was true.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Took effect immediately. Doesn't mean you can't announce a previously offered scholarship. Also under NCAA rules a player doesn't become a PSA until he or she starts 9th grade, although hopefully that isn't a real loophole turning this Summer into a 2021 sh**show


This Summer is now about finishing 19's, and getting recruiting boards up in the offices for 20's. 21's can just have some fun this Summer, just with empty sidelines.


I wish that was true.


It is true, but go ahead and play for as many showcase events as you want to - just don't expect anyone to see you.


Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Took effect immediately. Doesn't mean you can't announce a previously offered scholarship. Also under NCAA rules a player doesn't become a PSA until he or she starts 9th grade, although hopefully that isn't a real loophole turning this Summer into a 2021 sh**show


This Summer is now about finishing 19's, and getting recruiting boards up in the offices for 20's. 21's can just have some fun this Summer, just with empty sidelines.


Coaches will still be at every showcase watching '21's, making notes. If they see someone they want, they will then find loopholes. Don't kid yourself. This new ruling means nothing.

Re: Boys 2021
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Took effect immediately. Doesn't mean you can't announce a previously offered scholarship. Also under NCAA rules a player doesn't become a PSA until he or she starts 9th grade, although hopefully that isn't a real loophole turning this Summer into a 2021 sh**show


This Summer is now about finishing 19's, and getting recruiting boards up in the offices for 20's. 21's can just have some fun this Summer, just with empty sidelines.


Coaches will still be at every showcase watching '21's, making notes. If they see someone they want, they will then find loopholes. Don't kid yourself. This new ruling means nothing.


If you build it, they will come.

Page 14 of 18 1 2 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Link Copied to Clipboard












Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4