BOTC - US Lacrosse Community Forum Forums NORTHEAST LACROSSE BOTC MAIN FORUM (LI, CT, WC) Boys 2024 5th Grade Fall 2016/ Summer 2017

Express 2024 won in both brackets, great job to them. Really unsure why there win is getting broadcasted, they should have won. One express team played a town team and the other a multi town town. The Express B team had some players helping them out from their other team, not cheating at all, they needed to fill roster spots. Express A won in a really exciting game that came down to last few seconds. Let express enjoy the W, they don't get too many when wp or taz are playing in same bracket.

Haha ESM Mommy. Nice try but no cigar. Express B had no help at all from any outside team and they actually only had a 15 man roster for the finals due to other conflicts. Not one Express A kid played with them. Those boys were actually watching and cheering for them before they had to get ready for their own game. Leave the adding of players to the Longboards, that's their pathetic game.

Express played TAZ this weekend and won!

???
Columbus Day
Taz 13 - Express Oreilly 0
Taz 10 - Epress Schwalje 1

does anyone know when schedule will be out for Blatant& what teams are in. morning or afternoon?

LONGBOARDS=Napolean complex
LIttle dad & little sonns & will do anything to win at all costs even with his "TOWN " team
He needs to recruit as many horses as possible to make up for those little guys

Longboards is not a town team and those kids do not need any help. Also do you play lacrosse to lose sound like someone is a little bitter.

wont there always be a place for the very fast smaller kids with great sticks?

The sport is being played by bigger, stronger athletes. Can a small fast player make it? Yes but they are far and few between and are rarely seen anymore. They also need to be a ridiculous player. 6'1 210-225 is an average size for a lax player at the higher levels. Not hard to look this up, check out any college roster and you will see the #s

The sport is being played by bigger, stronger athletes. Can a small fast player make it? Yes but they are far and few between and are rarely seen anymore. They also need to be a ridiculous player. 6'1 210-225 is an average size for a lax player at the higher levels. Not hard to look this up, check out any college roster and you will see the #s

The sport is being played by bigger, stronger athletes. Can a small fast player make it? Yes but they are far and few between and are rarely seen anymore. They also need to be a ridiculous player. 6'1 210-225 is an average size for a lax player at the higher levels. Not hard to look this up, check out any college roster and you will see the #s

Matt Cavanaugh was considered tiny at 5'8" 175lbs. He was dominant. Dillan Molloy is listed at 6' 220 lbs. Lots of leg strength.

Thanks,took your advice. Looked at Stony Brook's roster and there are 20 players that are under 6' and 200lbs. So, you're correct that it certainly helps to be 6'+ and 200+ it definitely doesn't mean a smaller player doesn't have a shot to play at that level.

So 2 out of 3000 players? What?? Name 300 and you have an argument. C'mon now

So 2 out of 3000 players? What?? Name 300 and you have an argument. C'mon now

So 2 out of 3000 players? What?? Name 300 and you have an argument. C'mon now

NO, Please, not this argument again!!!!!

Look at all sports, are the players any of them getting smaller?

Football? Basketball? Baseball? NOPE.

But lacrosse will buck the trend so the average kid size wise can still have a chance at glory in his parents minds. CooCoo.

Look at all sports? You mean look at all NCAA sports.... what about wrestling and soccer???they are sports?no need for super big fellas. I watch quite a bit of college lax. The teams are not huge.

You really are thick headed aren't you? Nobody said that being a bigger player doesn't give them an advantage. But, about half of all college rosters are kids 6' and under. To say that 10 year olds that are on smaller side now will never have a chance, makes you sound stupid and uninformed.

duke has 16 kids below 6 feet this year - glad no one told them they were too small

You really are thick headed aren't you? Nobody said that being a bigger player doesn't give them an advantage. But, about half of all college rosters are kids 6' and under. To say that 10 year olds that are on smaller side now will never have a chance, makes you sound stupid and uninformed.

Out of Dukes "16" little kids 10 of them are 5'10' and 200 lbs..
50 man roster....6 kids under 5'10 & 200 lbs...nuff said