@BackOfTheCAGE
It's the start of the Fall 2017/Summer 2018 season. Use this thread for your posts regarding this age group
Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?




The girls all talk to each other. Many girls who left TG for YJ are going back to TG.
A few Liberty girls are also going to TG. Grass is greener mentality
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?




The girls all talk to each other. Many girls who left TG for YJ are going back to TG.
A few Liberty girls are also going to TG. Grass is greener mentality


Word is two of the negative parents from TG are packing up and going to the Leg uh sea program. Two spots open on Black to fill.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?




The girls all talk to each other. Many girls who left TG for YJ are going back to TG.
A few Liberty girls are also going to TG. Grass is greener mentality


Until it comes to recruiting time...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?




The girls all talk to each other. Many girls who left TG for YJ are going back to TG.
A few Liberty girls are also going to TG. Grass is greener mentality


Word is two of the negative parents from TG are packing up and going to the Leg uh sea program. Two spots open on Black to fill.

There are more than that going from TG to Legacy. At least 3 in addition. Maybe your daughter will now make it onto purple from white, with all the openings being created.
Moving to Legacy....I have heard that, I just don't get it, but to each his own I guess
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?




The girls all talk to each other. Many girls who left TG for YJ are going back to TG.
A few Liberty girls are also going to TG. Grass is greener mentality


Word is two of the negative parents from TG are packing up and going to the Leg uh sea program. Two spots open on Black to fill.

There are more than that going from TG to Legacy. At least 3 in addition. Maybe your daughter will now make it onto purple from white, with all the openings being created.



Leg***? please give more info as to why anyone would go there?
Liberty and TG tryouts are the same day, only 1/2 hour apart, which is pretty much the travel time between the fields. Fully attending both with be a challenge...
[quote=Anonymous]Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?

Of course there will always be players moving up and down. If you didn't get significant playing time your spot may be in jeopardy.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?


Yes, YJ B should be overhauled, especially on Def and attack. Five or six C girls (Def and mids) and one or two D (mids) should be moved up while one or two from A will be moved down with the displaced 8 or so B girls filling in the C roster. That's what should happen if you watched all the teams play and look at the names on the roster. Will it? Mt Sinai and the F&F plan on B is no longer cutting it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?


Yes, YJ B should be overhauled, especially on Def and attack. Five or six C girls (Def and mids) and one or two D (mids) should be moved up while one or two from A will be moved down with the displaced 8 or so B girls filling in the C roster. That's what should happen if you watched all the teams play and look at the names on the roster. Will it? Mt Sinai and the F&F plan on B is no longer cutting it.


Word is YJA will drop 1 attack and 1 defender and one current mid moving to def to make room for new girl. B will look to pull up 2-3. Roster change of 5 unless some B walk away.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?


Yes, YJ B should be overhauled, especially on Def and attack. Five or six C girls (Def and mids) and one or two D (mids) should be moved up while one or two from A will be moved down with the displaced 8 or so B girls filling in the C roster. That's what should happen if you watched all the teams play and look at the names on the roster. Will it? Mt Sinai and the F&F plan on B is no longer cutting it.


Word is YJA will drop 1 attack and 1 defender and one current mid moving to def to make room for new girl. B will look to pull up 2-3. Roster change of 5 unless some B walk away.


Says who?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?


Yes, YJ B should be overhauled, especially on Def and attack. Five or six C girls (Def and mids) and one or two D (mids) should be moved up while one or two from A will be moved down with the displaced 8 or so B girls filling in the C roster. That's what should happen if you watched all the teams play and look at the names on the roster. Will it? Mt Sinai and the F&F plan on B is no longer cutting it.


Word is YJA will drop 1 attack and 1 defender and one current mid moving to def to make room for new girl. B will look to pull up 2-3. Roster change of 5 unless some B walk away.


Says who?


detailed texts usually are right. But moving down 2 and only taking 1 seems unlikely and where is the new one coming from? Missing details lacks truth....
Says a wishful C daddy. No ones getting bumped off A
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Says a wishful C daddy. No ones getting bumped off A


You would be delusional if you don't think A will drop
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?


Yes, YJ B should be overhauled, especially on Def and attack. Five or six C girls (Def and mids) and one or two D (mids) should be moved up while one or two from A will be moved down with the displaced 8 or so B girls filling in the C roster. That's what should happen if you watched all the teams play and look at the names on the roster. Will it? Mt Sinai and the F&F plan on B is no longer cutting it.


Word is YJA will drop 1 attack and 1 defender and one current mid moving to def to make room for new girl. B will look to pull up 2-3. Roster change of 5 unless some B walk away.


Says who?


detailed texts usually are right. But moving down 2 and only taking 1 seems unlikely and where is the new one coming from? Missing details lacks truth....


Nobody said only taking one? Just that one new player has been identified. If anyone on A thinks that there won't be any changes they are delusional. New player will show up just in time for fall tourneys before tryouts.YJ A mids are solid and won't be cut, weakest players are on A and D. Someone needs to go
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Says a wishful C daddy. No ones getting bumped off A


You would be delusional if you don't think A will drop
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?


Yes, YJ B should be overhauled, especially on Def and attack. Five or six C girls (Def and mids) and one or two D (mids) should be moved up while one or two from A will be moved down with the displaced 8 or so B girls filling in the C roster. That's what should happen if you watched all the teams play and look at the names on the roster. Will it? Mt Sinai and the F&F plan on B is no longer cutting it.


Word is YJA will drop 1 attack and 1 defender and one current mid moving to def to make room for new girl. B will look to pull up 2-3. Roster change of 5 unless some B walk away.


Says who?


detailed texts usually are right. But moving down 2 and only taking 1 seems unlikely and where is the new one coming from? Missing details lacks truth....


Nobody said only taking one? Just that one new player has been identified. If anyone on A thinks that there won't be any changes they are delusional. New player will show up just in time for fall tourneys before tryouts.YJ A mids are solid and won't be cut, weakest players are on A and D. Someone needs to go


The weakest are f&f and will never go.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?


Yes, YJ B should be overhauled, especially on Def and attack. Five or six C girls (Def and mids) and one or two D (mids) should be moved up while one or two from A will be moved down with the displaced 8 or so B girls filling in the C roster. That's what should happen if you watched all the teams play and look at the names on the roster. Will it? Mt Sinai and the F&F plan on B is no longer cutting it.


Word is YJA will drop 1 attack and 1 defender and one current mid moving to def to make room for new girl. B will look to pull up 2-3. Roster change of 5 unless some B walk away.


Says who?


detailed texts usually are right. But moving down 2 and only taking 1 seems unlikely and where is the new one coming from? Missing details lacks truth....

New one is Mid from Liberty. CR was talking to parent at U14. Played at Igloo, then at Liberty.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will there be girls from YJ teams looking to leave, especially the non-favorite B team girls? One Liberty standout (non-Manhasset) girl looking to move to YJ (would be her third club in three years though). Will some of the girls who sat the bench in the big games on Rose's team get bumped to B team, especially as they move more middies to defense. Will there be any movement between B and the C,D teams?


Yes, YJ B should be overhauled, especially on Def and attack. Five or six C girls (Def and mids) and one or two D (mids) should be moved up while one or two from A will be moved down with the displaced 8 or so B girls filling in the C roster. That's what should happen if you watched all the teams play and look at the names on the roster. Will it? Mt Sinai and the F&F plan on B is no longer cutting it.


Word is YJA will drop 1 attack and 1 defender and one current mid moving to def to make room for new girl. B will look to pull up 2-3. Roster change of 5 unless some B walk away.


Says who?


detailed texts usually are right. But moving down 2 and only taking 1 seems unlikely and where is the new one coming from? Missing details lacks truth....

New one is Mid from Liberty. CR was talking to parent at U14. Played at Igloo, then at Liberty.


She is not going anywhere. doesn't want to sit on a bench.
CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes.

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes.

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.


Post is spot on but they will never trim the roster. Probably add one next year because there is too much $$ at stake. Roster size doesn't matter because the bottom half never see the field in critical games anyway.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes.

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.


Most of the game changing talent from the island has already drifted to this team. Don't get excited, there are other girls on other teams that are plenty good, but most any addition would just be a swap of talent with others that could play on the team. The only real stand out player that I think would make a big improvement would be the big liberty draw girl at nationals, but most of those girls are sorta stuck playing for the varsity/club coach.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes.

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.


Most of the game changing talent from the island has already drifted to this team. Don't get excited, there are other girls on other teams that are plenty good, but most any addition would just be a swap of talent with others that could play on the team. The only real stand out player that I think would make a big improvement would be the big liberty draw girl at nationals, but most of those girls are sorta stuck playing for the varsity/club coach.

What ever happened to coaching, not poaching?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes.

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.


My daughter is an attack on C. We have two defenders that should move up to B (tall/physical girl and a smaller bulldog), they barely sat and when they did we noticed the difference. Not sure they are ready for A though. I do agree, the Def on B is a weak point (along with the no pass/go to goal attack) and they wouldn't cut it on A. Best thing for A to do would be to move a mid back to D.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes.

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.


Most of the game changing talent from the island has already drifted to this team. Don't get excited, there are other girls on other teams that are plenty good, but most any addition would just be a swap of talent with others that could play on the team. The only real stand out player that I think would make a big improvement would be the big liberty draw girl at nationals, but most of those girls are sorta stuck playing for the varsity/club coach.


Game changing that's funny.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes.

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.


Most of the game changing talent from the island has already drifted to this team. Don't get excited, there are other girls on other teams that are plenty good, but most any addition would just be a swap of talent with others that could play on the team. The only real stand out player that I think would make a big improvement would be the big liberty draw girl at nationals, but most of those girls are sorta stuck playing for the varsity/club coach.

What ever happened to coaching, not poaching?

Not the YJ way, they only poach. That is why they will probably lose to 4-5 teams next year. Everyone else is catching up and passing them.
Look how bad their B team is, even their super coach doesn't do much with the "unpoached" girls on that team. That team probably isn't even in the top 15-20. Probably 10 in MD/Va alone who could beat them. Then there is NJ, Pa. and Mass.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes.

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.


Most of the game changing talent from the island has already drifted to this team. Don't get excited, there are other girls on other teams that are plenty good, but most any addition would just be a swap of talent with others that could play on the team. The only real stand out player that I think would make a big improvement would be the big liberty draw girl at nationals, but most of those girls are sorta stuck playing for the varsity/club coach.

What ever happened to coaching, not poaching?

Not the YJ way, they only poach. That is why they will probably lose to 4-5 teams next year. Everyone else is catching up and passing them.
Look how bad their B team is, even their super coach doesn't do much with the "unpoached" girls on that team. That team probably isn't even in the top 15-20. Probably 10 in MD/Va alone who could beat them. Then there is NJ, Pa. and Mass.



Proves the point, all the training and coaching in the world can't turn your daughter into a shannon unless kid is an stud athlete to begin with. A good coach can only get them to play as a team and cover up deficiencies with good strategy.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes.

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes.

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.


The Middies on this team are definitely the blue chip girls with the most athleticism. They are one of the strongest and fastest group I have watched outside of some of the MD teams.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes.

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.


Most of the game changing talent from the island has already drifted to this team. Don't get excited, there are other girls on other teams that are plenty good, but most any addition would just be a swap of talent with others that could play on the team. The only real stand out player that I think would make a big improvement would be the big liberty draw girl at nationals, but most of those girls are sorta stuck playing for the varsity/club coach.

What ever happened to coaching, not poaching?

Not the YJ way, they only poach. That is why they will probably lose to 4-5 teams next year. Everyone else is catching up and passing them.
Look how bad their B team is, even their super coach doesn't do much with the "unpoached" girls on that team. That team probably isn't even in the top 15-20. Probably 10 in MD/Va alone who could beat them. Then there is NJ, Pa. and Mass.

Not to mention at least 4-5 on LI that can beat them. Not even in top 20.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes.

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.


My daughter is an attack on C. We have two defenders that should move up to B (tall/physical girl and a smaller bulldog), they barely sat and when they did we noticed the difference. Not sure they are ready for A though. I do agree, the Def on B is a weak point (along with the no pass/go to goal attack) and they wouldn't cut it on A. Best thing for A to do would be to move a mid back to D.


you do realize that C plays in very low brackets so not really compareable? your d wouldn't cut it on B. as for B Many good players on the team, one or two mid/attack moving up. Its the F&F that have ruined that team. Lots looking for something better so maybe room for those c girls.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.


My daughter is an attack on C. We have two defenders that should move up to B (tall/physical girl and a smaller bulldog), they barely sat and when they did we noticed the difference. Not sure they are ready for A though. I do agree, the Def on B is a weak point (along with the no pass/go to goal attack) and they wouldn't cut it on A. Best thing for A to do would be to move a mid back to D.


you do realize that C plays in very low brackets so not really compareable? your d wouldn't cut it on B. as for B Many good players on the team, one or two mid/attack moving up. Its the F&F that have ruined that team. Lots looking for something better so maybe room for those c girls.[/quot

You do realize that C played up in the B brackets and won 3 tournaments, so very comparable. Not only should those two defenders move up but a couple of the attack should as well. C did not give up many goals, very difficult defense to beat. When they did, their goalie made the stop. Same can't be said of B. The B teams D struggled all summer, how many goal lead did they blow in the QFs at Nationals? I saw the game winning goal in OT, 5 girls got beat by one. Not sure why you wouldn't want changes, B had a horrific summer, barely won games. Nobody from B is moving up to A, the A team is light years ahead of our girls on B, C and D. They play at a completely different speed. Don't worry, with the 6-8 girls moving down from B to C, the C team is still going to be very good. Don't leave, your daughter will enjoy it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.


My daughter is an attack on C. We have two defenders that should move up to B (tall/physical girl and a smaller bulldog), they barely sat and when they did we noticed the difference. Not sure they are ready for A though. I do agree, the Def on B is a weak point (along with the no pass/go to goal attack) and they wouldn't cut it on A. Best thing for A to do would be to move a mid back to D.


you do realize that C plays in very low brackets so not really compareable? your d wouldn't cut it on B. as for B Many good players on the team, one or two mid/attack moving up. Its the F&F that have ruined that team. Lots looking for something better so maybe room for those c girls.[/quot

You do realize that C played up in the B brackets and won 3 tournaments, so very comparable. Not only should those two defenders move up but a couple of the attack should as well. C did not give up many goals, very difficult defense to beat. When they did, their goalie made the stop. Same can't be said of B. The B teams D struggled all summer, how many goal lead did they blow in the QFs at Nationals? I saw the game winning goal in OT, 5 girls got beat by one. Not sure why you wouldn't want changes, B had a horrific summer, barely won games. Nobody from B is moving up to A, the A team is light years ahead of our girls on B, C and D. They play at a completely different speed. Don't worry, with the 6-8 girls moving down from B to C, the C team is still going to be very good. Don't leave, your daughter will enjoy it.



The B team has lots of weak D, most f+f, but Enlighten us, which B teams did your C team beaT?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.


My daughter is an attack on C. We have two defenders that should move up to B (tall/physical girl and a smaller bulldog), they barely sat and when they did we noticed the difference. Not sure they are ready for A though. I do agree, the Def on B is a weak point (along with the no pass/go to goal attack) and they wouldn't cut it on A. Best thing for A to do would be to move a mid back to D.


you do realize that C plays in very low brackets so not really compareable? your d wouldn't cut it on B. as for B Many good players on the team, one or two mid/attack moving up. Its the F&F that have ruined that team. Lots looking for something better so maybe room for those c girls.[/quot

You do realize that C played up in the B brackets and won 3 tournaments, so very comparable. Not only should those two defenders move up but a couple of the attack should as well. C did not give up many goals, very difficult defense to beat. When they did, their goalie made the stop. Same can't be said of B. The B teams D struggled all summer, how many goal lead did they blow in the QFs at Nationals? I saw the game winning goal in OT, 5 girls got beat by one. Not sure why you wouldn't want changes, B had a horrific summer, barely won games. Nobody from B is moving up to A, the A team is light years ahead of our girls on B, C and D. They play at a completely different speed. Don't worry, with the 6-8 girls moving down from B to C, the C team is still going to be very good. Don't leave, your daughter will enjoy it.


You all need a reality check, other than the top 5-10 players on a handful of the top teams (LI, MD, NJ, PA, etc) at every age group it's all the same when it come to recruiting. If your goal is to play for a national title in college and you're not a top 5-10 player on a legit "A" team it's time to move on and start looking for SAT prep courses
Originally Posted by Anonymous


You all need a reality check, other than the top 5-10 players on a handful of the top teams (LI, MD, NJ, PA, etc) at every age group it's all the same when it come to recruiting. If your goal is to play for a national title in college and you're not a top 5-10 player on a legit "A" team it's time to move on and start looking for SAT prep courses


harsh
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


You all need a reality check, other than the top 5-10 players on a handful of the top teams (LI, MD, NJ, PA, etc) at every age group it's all the same when it come to recruiting. If your goal is to play for a national title in college and you're not a top 5-10 player on a legit "A" team it's time to move on and start looking for SAT prep courses


harsh


I don't see anyone comments with people looking for national titles. So thanks for the reality check but completely out of context for the dialogue.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]CR is definetly dropping players off this team. Will be defenders getting moved though, replacing with middies. The Attack is a strong group. She wants players who can handle the ball, too many mistakes on clears. She made a comment about this on the side line a few weeks ago that was easily heard by anyone around.


Probably the most accurate post so far and weakest link has always been D. Need to find girls who can stop ball and not cause so many turnovers. Some good options on B and C if they open their eyes

I wrote the original post, and I cannot comment on defenders on C, but I have seen B defenders and they are even a step down from the A defenders. Probably one of the reasons for the B team's horrendous season (besides the entire team's inability to catch throw under any sort of pressure) was extremely poor defense. None of those players are an option. Better off just trimming the roster to 20-21 if outside talent does not try out. CR had her scouts at the Liberty and TG U14 games scouting players and tracking down parents. She definitely approached at least one family, probably more herself. Middies need to replace most of the defenders, after all most defenders in college are middies who get put on the defensive side.


My daughter is an attack on C. We have two defenders that should move up to B (tall/physical girl and a smaller bulldog), they barely sat and when they did we noticed the difference. Not sure they are ready for A though. I do agree, the Def on B is a weak point (along with the no pass/go to goal attack) and they wouldn't cut it on A. Best thing for A to do would be to move a mid back to D.


you do realize that C plays in very low brackets so not really compareable? your d wouldn't cut it on B. as for B Many good players on the team, one or two mid/attack moving up. Its the F&F that have ruined that team. Lots looking for something better so maybe room for those c girls.[/quot

You do realize that C played up in the B brackets and won 3 tournaments, so very comparable. Not only should those two defenders move up but a couple of the attack should as well. C did not give up many goals, very difficult defense to beat. When they did, their goalie made the stop. Same can't be said of B. The B teams D struggled all summer, how many goal lead did they blow in the QFs at Nationals? I saw the game winning goal in OT, 5 girls got beat by one. Not sure why you wouldn't want changes, B had a horrific summer, barely won games. Nobody from B is moving up to A, the A team is light years ahead of our girls on B, C and D. They play at a completely different speed. Don't worry, with the 6-8 girls moving down from B to C, the C team is still going to be very good. Don't leave, your daughter will enjoy it.


You all need a reality check, other than the top 5-10 players on a handful of the top teams (LI, MD, NJ, PA, etc) at every age group it's all the same when it come to recruiting. If your goal is to play for a national title in college and you're not a top 5-10 player on a legit "A" team it's time to move on and start looking for SAT prep courses

Tell that to the Stony Brook girls, many of them never met this criteria, and they will be a top 5 team next year. Your top 5-10 players on a handful of teams theory doesn't hold to much weight; injuries, and off field distractions, cause them to lose ground and get passed by girls who work harder.
I would tell the SB girls that there are literally a handful of teams that have won a division 1 championship in the last 25 years and SB isn't one of them. Surely you must realize that polls are meaningless and the only one that matters is the one declaring a national champion after the final game is played. I bet you also think the MSG and US Lacrosse high school player and team rankings are gospel as well - lol. With new recruiting rules the college coaches will be able to wait and judge much more accurately the players they're recruiting instead of having CR or SS jam some 9th grader down their throat before they commit to another school, many will not be the player they thought they were getting by the time they get to college - that 4 years is a long time...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I would tell the SB girls that there are literally a handful of teams that have won a division 1 championship in the last 25 years and SB isn't one of them. Surely you must realize that polls are meaningless and the only one that matters is the one declaring a national champion after the final game is played. I bet you also think the MSG and US Lacrosse high school player and team rankings are gospel as well - lol. With new recruiting rules the college coaches will be able to wait and judge much more accurately the players they're recruiting instead of having CR or SS jam some 9th grader down their throat before they commit to another school, many will not be the player they thought they were getting by the time they get to college - that 4 years is a long time...


Jeolous much? What a loser. Go look at the starters on Maryland , UNC, NW, UVA etc ,many were not the top players on the top club teams you are just too ignorant to realize that .
How is the leg team in this age group I never hear anyone talk about them on this forum?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I would tell the SB girls that there are literally a handful of teams that have won a division 1 championship in the last 25 years and SB isn't one of them. Surely you must realize that polls are meaningless and the only one that matters is the one declaring a national champion after the final game is played. I bet you also think the MSG and US Lacrosse high school player and team rankings are gospel as well - lol. With new recruiting rules the college coaches will be able to wait and judge much more accurately the players they're recruiting instead of having CR or SS jam some 9th grader down their throat before they commit to another school, many will not be the player they thought they were getting by the time they get to college - that 4 years is a long time...


Jeolous much? What a loser. Go look at the starters on Maryland , UNC, NW, UVA etc ,many were not the top players on the top club teams you are just too ignorant to realize that .


I don't know much about the starters current and former on NW and UVA. But, of the most current national champions - MD and UNC - you are so way off base that all I can do is laugh. The fact that Maryland's bench is loaded with the girls who were the top players on their various club teams and high schools sums it up quite nicely.

[quote=Anonymous]How is the leg team in this age group I never hear anyone talk about them on this forum?

Mediocre at best
Prob the best LI travel team at this age
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Prob the best LI travel team at this age

YJ or Liberty? The edge has to go to Liberty when it is only 2021 players. Better middies and better on the draw circle than YJ. Plus Liberty won the only head to head match up when they were team only without the older girls taking the draw for YJ.
Beach Bums 21' are the best/most dominant
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Prob the best LI travel team at this age

YJ or Liberty? The edge has to go to Liberty when it is only 2021 players. Better middies and better on the draw circle than YJ. Plus Liberty won the only head to head match up when they were team only without the older girls taking the draw for YJ.


While I will agree you have the right to say Liberty 2021 is best team on LI as you won the one head to head match-up I think the U14 outcome may be closer to the truth. YJ had 1 non 2021 player at the nationals and she did not take the draw in that game ever.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]How is the leg team in this age group I never hear anyone talk about them on this forum?

Mediocre at best




Beach Bums beat them....that should give you an indication.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Prob the best LI travel team at this age

YJ or Liberty? The edge has to go to Liberty when it is only 2021 players. Better middies and better on the draw circle than YJ. Plus Liberty won the only head to head match up when they were team only without the older girls taking the draw for YJ.



Please stop with Liberty already......they got blown out and compete in low level tournaments.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Prob the best LI travel team at this age

YJ or Liberty? The edge has to go to Liberty when it is only 2021 players. Better middies and better on the draw circle than YJ. Plus Liberty won the only head to head match up when they were team only without the older girls taking the draw for YJ.



Doe it really matter who is the best? No. If your daughter is good enough to choose between the two than you should be deciding which is a better fit for her. Who has better coaching, will she like her teammates and have a good experience? Where will she get more playing time? If she wants to play in college which organization will be more useful? Being on the best team shouldn't be a deciding factor as both teams are the tops on LI. Peas and carrots.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Prob the best LI travel team at this age

YJ or Liberty? The edge has to go to Liberty when it is only 2021 players. Better middies and better on the draw circle than YJ. Plus Liberty won the only head to head match up when they were team only without the older girls taking the draw for YJ.


The same age girl who graduates in the year ahead of these girls did not take the draws at all. And Liberty dominated the draw circle and still got completely crushed in the game. How does that happen if their middies are better? Hard to notice if the middies were better when they are getting completely blown out.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I would tell the SB girls that there are literally a handful of teams that have won a division 1 championship in the last 25 years and SB isn't one of them. Surely you must realize that polls are meaningless and the only one that matters is the one declaring a national champion after the final game is played. I bet you also think the MSG and US Lacrosse high school player and team rankings are gospel as well - lol. With new recruiting rules the college coaches will be able to wait and judge much more accurately the players they're recruiting instead of having CR or SS jam some 9th grader down their throat before they commit to another school, many will not be the player they thought they were getting by the time they get to college - that 4 years is a long time...


Jeolous much? What a loser. Go look at the starters on Maryland , UNC, NW, UVA etc ,many were not the top players on the top club teams you are just too ignorant to realize that .


I don't know much about the starters current and former on NW and UVA. But, of the most current national champions - MD and UNC - you are so way off base that all I can do is laugh. The fact that Maryland's bench is loaded with the girls who were the top players on their various club teams and high schools sums it up quite nicely.


Very true and most teams play about 15-16 kids, the rest see very little action in competitive games
Top Guns 2021 is better than Liberty 2021. They did not get a chance to play Liberty this year to prove themselves. They did beat them last year at the Hofstra Tournament and only lost to YJ at Nationals by two. Definitely the team to watch!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Top Guns 2021 is better than Liberty 2021. They did not get a chance to play Liberty this year to prove themselves. They did beat them last year at the Hofstra Tournament and only lost to YJ at Nationals by two. Definitely the team to watch!


Too many 2020s at that event to make a comparison for TG at 2021.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]How is the leg team in this age group I never hear anyone talk about them on this forum?

Mediocre at best




Beach Bums beat them....that should give you an indication.

That never happened.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Top Guns 2021 is better than Liberty 2021. They did not get a chance to play Liberty this year to prove themselves. They did beat them last year at the Hofstra Tournament and only lost to YJ at Nationals by two. Definitely the team to watch!

Didn't TG have 5 2020 girls in this game, and still lost by 2? Don't think the actual 2021 team can even be in the ame conversation with 2021 YJ. Don't think any team on LI can be in the conversation with them.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Top Guns 2021 is better than Liberty 2021. They did not get a chance to play Liberty this year to prove themselves. They did beat them last year at the Hofstra Tournament and only lost to YJ at Nationals by two. Definitely the team to watch!

Didn't TG have 5 2020 girls in this game, and still lost by 2? Don't think the actual 2021 team can even be in the ame conversation with 2021 YJ. Don't think any team on LI can be in the conversation with them.


The age group in general is just not very strong and that is why no one team has pulled away from the pack, it's that simple
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Top Guns 2021 is better than Liberty 2021. They did not get a chance to play Liberty this year to prove themselves. They did beat them last year at the Hofstra Tournament and only lost to YJ at Nationals by two. Definitely the team to watch!

Didn't TG have 5 2020 girls in this game, and still lost by 2? Don't think the actual 2021 team can even be in the ame conversation with 2021 YJ. Don't think any team on LI can be in the conversation with them.


The age group in general is just not very strong and that is why no one team has pulled away from the pack, it's that simple

Please stick to the Facts people- top guns did not play Liberty at Hofstra last year. Elevate beat liberty in playoffs and then top guns beat elevate in championship game. This year neither team even bothered to attend the Hofstra tourney. Top guns has beaten elevate a few times in the past 2 years but has not faced Liberty. I am 99% sure (trying to jog my memory) that Summer of 2015 was last time top guns vs Liberty in a shortened playoff game and I think Liberty was the victor. But imo it's tough to claim bragging rights in a 20 min playoff game from 3 years ago so it's anyone's guess which team is better now. My money would be on TG.
Regarding the u14's, yes top guns had some 20's (as did other teams) but top guns also had a few of their top 21's out with injuries.
All in all, if I had to put money on a yj/tg game, my money would be on YJ in a close game that yj "out coaches" tg. And I'm sure you have figured out by now that I am a long time tg parent. Lastly, imo the reason that the top Long Island teams have been having a tough time with the top md teams is not because "the age group in general is not very strong", first, I believe that Long Island's top players are more spread out among many teams. Sorry YJ families but I just don't think the top 24 girls in the 2021 age group are all playing on YJ blue. In fact, I don't think YJ even has the top 10 players and second, I think the MD teams practice more and are coached better.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Top Guns 2021 is better than Liberty 2021. They did not get a chance to play Liberty this year to prove themselves. They did beat them last year at the Hofstra Tournament and only lost to YJ at Nationals by two. Definitely the team to watch!

Didn't TG have 5 2020 girls in this game, and still lost by 2? Don't think the actual 2021 team can even be in the ame conversation with 2021 YJ. Don't think any team on LI can be in the conversation with them.


The 2021 YJ team lost to the Liberty 2021 team the only time they played this past season .That has to put Liberty in the conversation.To the people that keep saying it does not matter who the best team is then why even keep score .
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Top Guns 2021 is better than Liberty 2021. They did not get a chance to play Liberty this year to prove themselves. They did beat them last year at the Hofstra Tournament and only lost to YJ at Nationals by two. Definitely the team to watch!

Didn't TG have 5 2020 girls in this game, and still lost by 2? Don't think the actual 2021 team can even be in the ame conversation with 2021 YJ. Don't think any team on LI can be in the conversation with them.


The age group in general is just not very strong and that is why no one team has pulled away from the pack, it's that simple


With the infusion of new talent on the way and shuffling of some positions YJA will be just fine.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Prob the best LI travel team at this age

YJ or Liberty? The edge has to go to Liberty when it is only 2021 players. Better middies and better on the draw circle than YJ. Plus Liberty won the only head to head match up when they were team only without the older girls taking the draw for YJ.


Pretty sure the original post was a sarcastic response to the question about Leg (though we will never know because the poster doesn't know how to use the Quote button), but thanks for the response Liberty mom.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Prob the best LI travel team at this age

YJ or Liberty? The edge has to go to Liberty when it is only 2021 players. Better middies and better on the draw circle than YJ. Plus Liberty won the only head to head match up when they were team only without the older girls taking the draw for YJ.


While I will agree you have the right to say Liberty 2021 is best team on LI as you won the one head to head match-up I think the U14 outcome may be closer to the truth. YJ had 1 non 2021 player at the nationals and she did not take the draw in that game ever.


Yeah, 1 non 2021 who was on the circle (arguably more important than the girl actually taking the draw) and made the all tournament team and was highlighted in the US Lacrosse write-up of the game.

YJ had 2

you have no idea what your talking about, so stop, YJ had 1!!!!
23 coach kid and mattituck kid. That's 2
you are completely wrong!!!just the mattituck kid!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Top Guns 2021 is better than Liberty 2021. They did not get a chance to play Liberty this year to prove themselves. They did beat them last year at the Hofstra Tournament and only lost to YJ at Nationals by two. Definitely the team to watch!

Didn't TG have 5 2020 girls in this game, and still lost by 2? Don't think the actual 2021 team can even be in the ame conversation with 2021 YJ. Don't think any team on LI can be in the conversation with them.


The 2021 YJ team lost to the Liberty 2021 team the only time they played this past season .That has to put Liberty in the conversation.To the people that keep saying it does not matter who the best team is then why even keep score .


12-4 final
Originally Posted by Anonymous
23 coach kid and mattituck kid. That's 2


Coach kid was rostered but don not play in the tourney. That is fact.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
you are completely wrong!!!just the mattituck kid!



Regardless if it's 1 or 2......it's sad that CR felt she had to bring in a ringer to help the team win. That player was responsible for 33% of the scoring in the final game. CR obviously had no confidence in the team.
you are completely wrong! there was not one coaches kid that was older on the roster!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
you are completely wrong!!!just the mattituck kid!



Regardless if it's 1 or 2......it's sad that CR felt she had to bring in a ringer to help the team win. That player was responsible for 33% of the scoring in the final game. CR obviously had no confidence in the team.


Okay , so according to you if she did not play YJ would have just doubled up the score 8-4 against Liberty, feel better . Was is as sad last year when DG had a few 2018 kids playing ,or even more sad because they lost to YJ.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Please stick to the Facts people- top guns did not play Liberty at Hofstra last year. Elevate beat liberty in playoffs and then top guns beat elevate in championship game. This year neither team even bothered to attend the Hofstra tourney. Top guns has beaten elevate a few times in the past 2 years but has not faced Liberty. I am 99% sure (trying to jog my memory) that Summer of 2015 was last time top guns vs Liberty in a shortened playoff game and I think Liberty was the victor. But imo it's tough to claim bragging rights in a 20 min playoff game from 3 years ago so it's anyone's guess which team is better now. My money would be on TG.
Regarding the u14's, yes top guns had some 20's (as did other teams) but top guns also had a few of their top 21's out with injuries.
All in all, if I had to put money on a yj/tg game, my money would be on YJ in a close game that yj "out coaches" tg. And I'm sure you have figured out by now that I am a long time tg parent. Lastly, imo the reason that the top Long Island teams have been having a tough time with the top md teams is not because "the age group in general is not very strong", first, I believe that Long Island's top players are more spread out among many teams. Sorry YJ families but I just don't think the top 24 girls in the 2021 age group are all playing on YJ blue. In fact, I don't think YJ even has the top 10 players and second, I think the MD teams practice more and are coached better.



Only the lefty attack would have made a difference on the U 14 for TG.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Please stick to the Facts people- top guns did not play Liberty at Hofstra last year. Elevate beat liberty in playoffs and then top guns beat elevate in championship game. This year neither team even bothered to attend the Hofstra tourney. Top guns has beaten elevate a few times in the past 2 years but has not faced Liberty. I am 99% sure (trying to jog my memory) that Summer of 2015 was last time top guns vs Liberty in a shortened playoff game and I think Liberty was the victor. But imo it's tough to claim bragging rights in a 20 min playoff game from 3 years ago so it's anyone's guess which team is better now. My money would be on TG.
Regarding the u14's, yes top guns had some 20's (as did other teams) but top guns also had a few of their top 21's out with injuries.
All in all, if I had to put money on a yj/tg game, my money would be on YJ in a close game that yj "out coaches" tg. And I'm sure you have figured out by now that I am a long time tg parent. Lastly, imo the reason that the top Long Island teams have been having a tough time with the top md teams is not because "the age group in general is not very strong", first, I believe that Long Island's top players are more spread out among many teams. Sorry YJ families but I just don't think the top 24 girls in the 2021 age group are all playing on YJ blue. In fact, I don't think YJ even has the top 10 players and second, I think the MD teams practice more and are coached better.



Only the lefty attack would have made a difference on the U 14 for TG.



That's your take from that passage. Agenda much? Nice job mum. Lol
Start watching the whole field of play at games and not just the 15 yards that your superstar covers. You may learn something.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Please stick to the Facts people- top guns did not play Liberty at Hofstra last year. Elevate beat liberty in playoffs and then top guns beat elevate in championship game. This year neither team even bothered to attend the Hofstra tourney. Top guns has beaten elevate a few times in the past 2 years but has not faced Liberty. I am 99% sure (trying to jog my memory) that Summer of 2015 was last time top guns vs Liberty in a shortened playoff game and I think Liberty was the victor. But imo it's tough to claim bragging rights in a 20 min playoff game from 3 years ago so it's anyone's guess which team is better now. My money would be on TG.
Regarding the u14's, yes top guns had some 20's (as did other teams) but top guns also had a few of their top 21's out with injuries.
All in all, if I had to put money on a yj/tg game, my money would be on YJ in a close game that yj "out coaches" tg. And I'm sure you have figured out by now that I am a long time tg parent. Lastly, imo the reason that the top Long Island teams have been having a tough time with the top md teams is not because "the age group in general is not very strong", first, I believe that Long Island's top players are more spread out among many teams. Sorry YJ families but I just don't think the top 24 girls in the 2021 age group are all playing on YJ blue. In fact, I don't think YJ even has the top 10 players and second, I think the MD teams practice more and are coached better.



Only the lefty attack would have made a difference on the U 14 for TG.


aren't there 2 lefty attacks?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Please stick to the Facts people- top guns did not play Liberty at Hofstra last year. Elevate beat liberty in playoffs and then top guns beat elevate in championship game. This year neither team even bothered to attend the Hofstra tourney. Top guns has beaten elevate a few times in the past 2 years but has not faced Liberty. I am 99% sure (trying to jog my memory) that Summer of 2015 was last time top guns vs Liberty in a shortened playoff game and I think Liberty was the victor. But imo it's tough to claim bragging rights in a 20 min playoff game from 3 years ago so it's anyone's guess which team is better now. My money would be on TG.
Regarding the u14's, yes top guns had some 20's (as did other teams) but top guns also had a few of their top 21's out with injuries.
All in all, if I had to put money on a yj/tg game, my money would be on YJ in a close game that yj "out coaches" tg. And I'm sure you have figured out by now that I am a long time tg parent. Lastly, imo the reason that the top Long Island teams have been having a tough time with the top md teams is not because "the age group in general is not very strong", first, I believe that Long Island's top players are more spread out among many teams. Sorry YJ families but I just don't think the top 24 girls in the 2021 age group are all playing on YJ blue. In fact, I don't think YJ even has the top 10 players and second, I think the MD teams practice more and are coached better.



Only the lefty attack would have made a difference on the U 14 for TG.


Yep, attack. The laziest position on the field, but at least they get to go to goal.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Please stick to the Facts people- top guns did not play Liberty at Hofstra last year. Elevate beat liberty in playoffs and then top guns beat elevate in championship game. This year neither team even bothered to attend the Hofstra tourney. Top guns has beaten elevate a few times in the past 2 years but has not faced Liberty. I am 99% sure (trying to jog my memory) that Summer of 2015 was last time top guns vs Liberty in a shortened playoff game and I think Liberty was the victor. But imo it's tough to claim bragging rights in a 20 min playoff game from 3 years ago so it's anyone's guess which team is better now. My money would be on TG.
Regarding the u14's, yes top guns had some 20's (as did other teams) but top guns also had a few of their top 21's out with injuries.
All in all, if I had to put money on a yj/tg game, my money would be on YJ in a close game that yj "out coaches" tg. And I'm sure you have figured out by now that I am a long time tg parent. Lastly, imo the reason that the top Long Island teams have been having a tough time with the top md teams is not because "the age group in general is not very strong", first, I believe that Long Island's top players are more spread out among many teams. Sorry YJ families but I just don't think the top 24 girls in the 2021 age group are all playing on YJ blue. In fact, I don't think YJ even has the top 10 players and second, I think the MD teams practice more and are coached better.



Only the lefty attack would have made a difference on the U 14 for TG.



That's your take from that passage. Agenda much? Nice job mum. Lol
Start watching the whole field of play at games and not just the 15 yards that your superstar covers. You may learn something.


Yep, attack. The laziest position on the field, but at least they get to go to goal.
Not sure lefty attacker would have made difference. BS favors her immensely and she stands out due to her size and left handedness but when she was hurt at the end of the season the team did just fine without her. She is very good but just not sure she is a game changer.
How was the leg a sea tryouts this week?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How was the leg a sea tryouts this week?


If you weren't there don't worry about it
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How was the leg a sea tryouts this week?


Was anybody there.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How was the leg a sea tryouts this week?


Was anybody there.

Why does it matter?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How was the leg a sea tryouts this week?


Was anybody there.


40 kids not enough for two teams.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How was the leg a sea tryouts this week?


Was anybody there.


40 kids not enough for two teams.


Doesn't everyone on here complain that there's too many kids on the roster? I would love two teams of 18 kids each and would be willing to pay a little extra for the smaller roster
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How was the leg a sea tryouts this week?


Was anybody there.


40 kids not enough for two teams.

What age? In 2021 the director told the parents one team of 18-21 max, in the beginning. But they told the girls may make 2 teams at the end of tryouts.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How was the leg a sea tryouts this week?


Was anybody there.


40 kids not enough for two teams.


Doesn't everyone on here complain that there's too many kids on the roster? I would love two teams of 18 kids each and would be willing to pay a little extra for the smaller roster


Or you can go to YJ and pay a lot extra for a roster of 25. But, you get a opportunity to purchase a lot of really nice swag.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How was the leg a sea tryouts this week?


Was anybody there.


40 kids not enough for two teams.


Doesn't everyone on here complain that there's too many kids on the roster? I would love two teams of 18 kids each and would be willing to pay a little extra for the smaller roster


Or you can go to YJ and pay a lot extra for a roster of 25. But, you get a opportunity to purchase a lot of really nice swag.


Exactly. If your daughter is on a team with a roster of 25, you should have "sucker" tattooed on your forehead. Complete money grab -- from the pockets of #21 to #25 directly into the pockets of the club owner. Does not cost more than the price of a uniform kit to add an additional player to a roster. Do the math.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How was the leg a sea tryouts this week?


Was anybody there.


40 kids not enough for two teams.


Doesn't everyone on here complain that there's too many kids on the roster? I would love two teams of 18 kids each and would be willing to pay a little extra for the smaller roster


18 huh....ok, try that during a long hot tournament when 2 girls are hurt and 2 are on vacation. So now playing with 14.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How was the leg a sea tryouts this week?


Was anybody there.


40 kids not enough for two teams.



I'm sure a number of them have no intention of actually playing with that organization. Practice tryout before the better teams have their tryouts.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How was the leg a sea tryouts this week?


Was anybody there.


40 kids not enough for two teams.


Doesn't everyone on here complain that there's too many kids on the roster? I would love two teams of 18 kids each and would be willing to pay a little extra for the smaller roster


18 huh....ok, try that during a long hot tournament when 2 girls are hurt and 2 are on vacation. So now playing with 14.


Their tryout results are posted. One team of 22.
Any New additions, any surprise leave?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any New additions, any surprise leave?

Yes and Yes
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any New additions, any surprise leave?


How did this team do this past summer. Do they play in A brackets. I have never heard of them and I don't see a commitment list on their website
Just wondering as I debated going to them this year, i see this team getting better and better every year, what positions did you lose key players?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any New additions, any surprise leave?


How did this team do this past summer. Do they play in A brackets. I have never heard of them and I don't see a commitment list on their website



They are a non-factor/non-competitive at tournaments. They do not play in A brackets.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just wondering as I debated going to them this year, i see this team getting better and better every year, what positions did you lose key players?


Better and better? They lost their best player last year to YJA.
I received an email this weekend from Igloo about an annual elite clinic where they name 14 Head coaches that are confirmed as being committed to being in attendance for this event (November 5th). YJ teams are attending a recruiting tournament in Maryland that same date and those coaches are also listed as being there. Which one is correct? Igloo or YJ?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just wondering as I debated going to them this year, i see this team getting better and better every year, what positions did you lose key players?


Better and better? They lost their best player last year to YJA.



Too late...tryouts are done, team is full and will be absolutely awful.
So bad that they will probably play in C brackets.
There u go...all wrapped up for u in two neat sentences.
Now u can move on to trashing other clubs. Enjoy ur miserable life.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just wondering as I debated going to them this year, i see this team getting better and better every year, what positions did you lose key players?


Better and better? They lost their best player last year to YJA.

Defender who rarely saw the field for YJ Blue. Doesn't say much for Legacy.
[quote=Anonymous]I received an email this weekend from Igloo about an annual elite clinic where they name 14 Head coaches that are confirmed as being committed to being in attendance for this event (November 5th). YJ teams are attending a recruiting tournament in Maryland that same date and those coaches are also listed as being there. Which one is correct? Igloo or YJ?

Do you really think college coaches are bypassing a recruiting tournament in Maryland to run a clinic on Long Island?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just wondering as I debated going to them this year, i see this team getting better and better every year, what positions did you lose key players?


Better and better? They lost their best player last year to YJA.

Defender who rarely saw the field for YJ Blue. Doesn't say much for Legacy.




Does it make you feel better about your dejected, troglodytic, ignominious little life when you anonymously put down teenage girls. You are the true problem with this forum. Put a name to your posts you nefarious coward. Or simply crawl back into the hole you came out of.
the team will not be awful, they have alot of great players on that team, seem to keep adding great players every year!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just wondering as I debated going to them this year, i see this team getting better and better every year, what positions did you lose key players?


Better and better? They lost their best player last year to YJA.

Defender who rarely saw the field for YJ Blue. Doesn't say much for Legacy.




Does it make you feel better about your dejected, troglodytic, ignominious little life when you anonymously put down teenage girls. You are the true problem with this forum. Put a name to your posts you nefarious coward. Or simply crawl back into the hole you came out of.

You are a bit sesquipedalian. Maybe when you post your name he will post his.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just wondering as I debated going to them this year, i see this team getting better and better every year, what positions did you lose key players?


Better and better? They lost their best player last year to YJA.

Defender who rarely saw the field for YJ Blue. Doesn't say much for Legacy.




Does it make you feel better about your dejected, troglodytic, ignominious little life when you anonymously put down teenage girls. You are the true problem with this forum. Put a name to your posts you nefarious coward. Or simply crawl back into the hole you came out of.

You are a bit sesquipedalian. Maybe when you post your name he will post his.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just wondering as I debated going to them this year, i see this team getting better and better every year, what positions did you lose key players?


Better and better? They lost their best player last year to YJA.

Defender who rarely saw the field for YJ Blue. Doesn't say much for Legacy.




Does it make you feel better about your dejected, troglodytic, ignominious little life when you anonymously put down teenage girls. You are the true problem with this forum. Put a name to your posts you nefarious coward. Or simply crawl back into the hole you came out of.




You are a bit sesquipedalian. Maybe when you post your name he will post his.



I admit I had to look up the definition of sesquipedalian, but when I did, I literally laughed out loud. What a great touché!! Very clever and apropos.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any New additions, any surprise leave?


How did this team do this past summer. Do they play in A brackets. I have never heard of them and I don't see a commitment list on their website



They are a non-factor/non-competitive at tournaments. They do not play in A brackets.

Played all A brackets last year except one tourn. Have beaten mid level decent clubs such as Phantastics, Mass Elite, Steps Elite, Ultimate NJ, (each clubs a team's), etc. in the past. Mostly close games. Played all top level MD clubs with less success. But they are out there playing Heros Green, TLC Red and Skywalkers Blue etc. Yellow Jackets game rained out at Maryland Tournament this summer, but have played and lost to them before. Tryouts are over, team has been selected, team is mainly intact, maybe a few new girls. No reason to bash the girls, they work hard and love the game, as do most of your daughters. Good luck this fall and spring.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]I received an email this weekend from Igloo about an annual elite clinic where they name 14 Head coaches that are confirmed as being committed to being in attendance for this event (November 5th). YJ teams are attending a recruiting tournament in Maryland that same date and those coaches are also listed as being there. Which one is correct? Igloo or YJ?

Do you really think college coaches are bypassing a recruiting tournament in Maryland to run a clinic on Long Island?


Head coach will be at one, assistant usually at the other.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any New additions, any surprise leave?


How did this team do this past summer. Do they play in A brackets. I have never heard of them and I don't see a commitment list on their website



They are a non-factor/non-competitive at tournaments. They do not play in A brackets.

Played all A brackets last year except one tourn. Have beaten mid level decent clubs such as Phantastics, Mass Elite, Steps Elite, Ultimate NJ, (each clubs a team's), etc. in the past. Mostly close games. Played all top level MD clubs with less success. But they are out there playing Heros Green, TLC Red and Skywalkers Blue etc. Yellow Jackets game rained out at Maryland Tournament this summer, but have played and lost to them before. Tryouts are over, team has been selected, team is mainly intact, maybe a few new girls. No reason to bash the girls, they work hard and love the game, as do most of your daughters. Good luck this fall and spring.

Meant last season (this past season) rather than last year.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any New additions, any surprise leave?


How did this team do this past summer. Do they play in A brackets. I have never heard of them and I don't see a commitment list on their website



They are a non-factor/non-competitive at tournaments. They do not play in A brackets.

Played all A brackets last year except one tourn. Have beaten mid level decent clubs such as Phantastics, Mass Elite, Steps Elite, Ultimate NJ, (each clubs a team's), etc. in the past. Mostly close games. Played all top level MD clubs with less success. But they are out there playing Heros Green, TLC Red and Skywalkers Blue etc. Yellow Jackets game rained out at Maryland Tournament this summer, but have played and lost to them before. Tryouts are over, team has been selected, team is mainly intact, maybe a few new girls. No reason to bash the girls, they work hard and love the game, as do most of your daughters. Good luck this fall and spring.

Meant last season (this past season) rather than last year.


don't pay attention to the nay sayers, If your kid is happy and you are happy who cares? The better each li team gets ,the better the rest get. Have a great season.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any New additions, any surprise leave?


How did this team do this past summer. Do they play in A brackets. I have never heard of them and I don't see a commitment list on their website



They are a non-factor/non-competitive at tournaments. They do not play in A brackets.

Played all A brackets last year except one tourn. Have beaten mid level decent clubs such as Phantastics, Mass Elite, Steps Elite, Ultimate NJ, (each clubs a team's), etc. in the past. Mostly close games. Played all top level MD clubs with less success. But they are out there playing Heros Green, TLC Red and Skywalkers Blue etc. Yellow Jackets game rained out at Maryland Tournament this summer, but have played and lost to them before. Tryouts are over, team has been selected, team is mainly intact, maybe a few new girls. No reason to bash the girls, they work hard and love the game, as do most of your daughters. Good luck this fall and spring.


I heard a couple girls are attending other tryouts.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any New additions, any surprise leave?


How did this team do this past summer. Do they play in A brackets. I have never heard of them and I don't see a commitment list on their website



They are a non-factor/non-competitive at tournaments. They do not play in A brackets.

Played all A brackets last year except one tourn. Have beaten mid level decent clubs such as Phantastics, Mass Elite, Steps Elite, Ultimate NJ, (each clubs a team's), etc. in the past. Mostly close games. Played all top level MD clubs with less success. But they are out there playing Heros Green, TLC Red and Skywalkers Blue etc. Yellow Jackets game rained out at Maryland Tournament this summer, but have played and lost to them before. Tryouts are over, team has been selected, team is mainly intact, maybe a few new girls. No reason to bash the girls, they work hard and love the game, as do most of your daughters. Good luck this fall and spring.


I heard a couple girls are attending other tryouts.


One M going to YJA
ok! heard YJA was looking for defenders and draw girl!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any New additions, any surprise leave?


How did this team do this past summer. Do they play in A brackets. I have never heard of them and I don't see a commitment list on their website



They are a non-factor/non-competitive at tournaments. They do not play in A brackets.

Played all A brackets last year except one tourn. Have beaten mid level decent clubs such as Phantastics, Mass Elite, Steps Elite, Ultimate NJ, (each clubs a team's), etc. in the past. Mostly close games. Played all top level MD clubs with less success. But they are out there playing Heros Green, TLC Red and Skywalkers Blue etc. Yellow Jackets game rained out at Maryland Tournament this summer, but have played and lost to them before. Tryouts are over, team has been selected, team is mainly intact, maybe a few new girls. No reason to bash the girls, they work hard and love the game, as do most of your daughters. Good luck this fall and spring.


I heard a couple girls are attending other tryouts.


One M going to YJA

LOL.... Bored rainy day, so you figured you will see who you can rile up.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
ok! heard YJA was looking for defenders and draw girl!


Why so sensitive? Just because somebody plays a certainly position at one club doesn't guarantee where they will play at another? Defenders will most likely come from existing midfielders. Doubt there are better options out there.
That's a good point
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any New additions, any surprise leave?


How did this team do this past summer. Do they play in A brackets. I have never heard of them and I don't see a commitment list on their website



They are a non-factor/non-competitive at tournaments. They do not play in A brackets.

Played all A brackets last year except one tourn. Have beaten mid level decent clubs such as Phantastics, Mass Elite, Steps Elite, Ultimate NJ, (each clubs a team's), etc. in the past. Mostly close games. Played all top level MD clubs with less success. But they are out there playing Heros Green, TLC Red and Skywalkers Blue etc. Yellow Jackets game rained out at Maryland Tournament this summer, but have played and lost to them before. Tryouts are over, team has been selected, team is mainly intact, maybe a few new girls. No reason to bash the girls, they work hard and love the game, as do most of your daughters. Good luck this fall and spring.


I heard a couple girls are attending other tryouts.


No. some realize that Leg.. is not getting looks and the commit list doesn't exist, moving on is all. At this age you need something that's proven to work. next year is critical and playing for a club that's promising to be lagit one day Is just dumb. But to each their own
Just an FYI every girl that committed did it on there own! Went to college camps clinics etc! Had nothing to do with playing with her team! Don't drink the coolaide!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any New additions, any surprise leave?


How did this team do this past summer. Do they play in A brackets. I have never heard of them and I don't see a commitment list on their website



They are a non-factor/non-competitive at tournaments. They do not play in A brackets.

Played all A brackets last year except one tourn. Have beaten mid level decent clubs such as Phantastics, Mass Elite, Steps Elite, Ultimate NJ, (each clubs a team's), etc. in the past. Mostly close games. Played all top level MD clubs with less success. But they are out there playing Heros Green, TLC Red and Skywalkers Blue etc. Yellow Jackets game rained out at Maryland Tournament this summer, but have played and lost to them before. Tryouts are over, team has been selected, team is mainly intact, maybe a few new girls. No reason to bash the girls, they work hard and love the game, as do most of your daughters. Good luck this fall and spring.


I heard a couple girls are attending other tryouts.


No. some realize that Leg.. is not getting looks and the commit list doesn't exist, moving on is all. At this age you need something that's proven to work. next year is critical and playing for a club that's promising to be lagit one day Is just dumb. But to each their own

Did your kid get cut from Legacy? You seem to be on here often bashing them when there hasn't been any boastful statements, or claims that the club is superior to anyone. No one is even saying to come play or recommending the club to anyone. So for you to randomly troll shows you have some issues.
How are tryouts coming along? Amazing turnout at Skywalker last evening. Lots of talent on the blue field including a stud from M&D. I wonder how many new players will be added to the new squad?
When do area teams set there rosters? Seems crazy to keep tryouts going year after year. Is M&D set? Hero's?, TLC?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When do area teams set there rosters? Seems crazy to keep tryouts going year after year. Is M&D set? Hero's?, TLC?


Why should they openly tell everyone that they have it set? They are getting at the minimum $50 a head for parents to chase dreams. Got cash, bring it.
Why are you on the Northeast post???!!
Expecting big numbers today at both TG and liberty tryouts. Lots of kids looking to crack into the top teams.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Expecting big numbers today at both TG and liberty tryouts. Lots of kids looking to crack into the top teams.

There are some deserving purple girls and even a white girl who deserves to be on this team. Hopefully they are rewarded for their hard work and the purple girls can move up as the group that deserves to be up there.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Expecting big numbers today at both TG and liberty tryouts. Lots of kids looking to crack into the top teams.

There are some deserving purple girls and even a white girl who deserves to be on this team. Hopefully they are rewarded for their hard work and the purple girls can move up as the group that deserves to be up there.


I think that always the case but sometimes politics and connections prevail over deserving. I do think you will see some movement though.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Expecting big numbers today at both TG and liberty tryouts. Lots of kids looking to crack into the top teams.

There are some deserving purple girls and even a white girl who deserves to be on this team. Hopefully they are rewarded for their hard work and the purple girls can move up as the group that deserves to be up there.


West Babylon gang isn't going anywhere...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Expecting big numbers today at both TG and liberty tryouts. Lots of kids looking to crack into the top teams.

There are some deserving purple girls and even a white girl who deserves to be on this team. Hopefully they are rewarded for their hard work and the purple girls can move up as the group that deserves to be up there.


West Babylon gang isn't going anywhere...


Liberty only had 40 girls, down from 70 last year. TG looked to be about 70 girls at the tryout.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Expecting big numbers today at both TG and liberty tryouts. Lots of kids looking to crack into the top teams.

There are some deserving purple girls and even a white girl who deserves to be on this team. Hopefully they are rewarded for their hard work and the purple girls can move up as the group that deserves to be up there.


West Babylon gang isn't going anywhere...


Are you a Smith? No. So your hypothesis means nothing.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Expecting big numbers today at both TG and liberty tryouts. Lots of kids looking to crack into the top teams.

There are some deserving purple girls and even a white girl who deserves to be on this team. Hopefully they are rewarded for their hard work and the purple girls can move up as the group that deserves to be up there.


West Babylon gang isn't going anywhere...

West Islip the new West Babylon or shall we say new cash cow.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Expecting big numbers today at both TG and liberty tryouts. Lots of kids looking to crack into the top teams.

There are some deserving purple girls and even a white girl who deserves to be on this team. Hopefully they are rewarded for their hard work and the purple girls can move up as the group that deserves to be up there.


West Babylon gang isn't going anywhere...


Liberty only had 40 girls, down from 70 last year. TG looked to be about 70 girls at the tryout.

And you were at both?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Expecting big numbers today at both TG and liberty tryouts. Lots of kids looking to crack into the top teams.

There are some deserving purple girls and even a white girl who deserves to be on this team. Hopefully they are rewarded for their hard work and the purple girls can move up as the group that deserves to be up there.


West Babylon gang isn't going anywhere...


Liberty only had 40 girls, down from 70 last year. TG looked to be about 70 girls at the tryout.

And you were at both?


Actually, there were a few at both. But no, I know people who were at the one is wasn't. You aren't friendly with others in the lacrosse world?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Expecting big numbers today at both TG and liberty tryouts. Lots of kids looking to crack into the top teams.

There are some deserving purple girls and even a white girl who deserves to be on this team. Hopefully they are rewarded for their hard work and the purple girls can move up as the group that deserves to be up there.


West Babylon gang isn't going anywhere...

West Islip the new West Babylon or shall we say new cash cow.

wi left
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Expecting big numbers today at both TG and liberty tryouts. Lots of kids looking to crack into the top teams.

There are some deserving purple girls and even a white girl who deserves to be on this team. Hopefully they are rewarded for their hard work and the purple girls can move up as the group that deserves to be up there.


West Babylon gang isn't going anywhere...

West Islip the new West Babylon or shall we say new cash cow.

wi left

WI is infested all over TG (in a few ages), only a few left but a bunch of the purple players and coach remain. It will be a shame if they all move up over the WB girls.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Expecting big numbers today at both TG and liberty tryouts. Lots of kids looking to crack into the top teams.

There are some deserving purple girls and even a white girl who deserves to be on this team. Hopefully they are rewarded for their hard work and the purple girls can move up as the group that deserves to be up there.


West Babylon gang isn't going anywhere...

West Islip the new West Babylon or shall we say new cash cow.

wi left

WI is infested all over TG (in a few ages), only a few left but a bunch of the purple players and coach remain. It will be a shame if they all move up over the WB girls.


Your answering yourself is comical. Stop trying to stir the pot. You left. Go be happy if possible. Stop trying to cause division where there is none

There are some deserving purple girls and even a white girl who deserves to be on this team. Hopefully they are rewarded for their hard work and the purple girls can move up as the group that deserves to be up there.[/quote]

West Babylon gang isn't going anywhere...[/quote]
West Islip the new West Babylon or shall we say new cash cow.[/quote]
wi left[/quote]
WI is infested all over TG (in a few ages), only a few left but a bunch of the purple players and coach remain. It will be a shame if they all move up over the WB girls. [/quote]

Your answering yourself is comical. Stop trying to stir the pot. You left. Go be happy if possible. Stop trying to cause division where there is none[/quote]

Exactly.
Yes many wi girls play tg just like many manhasset girls
Play liberty or np girls play yj. It's called not jackassing an hour to practice
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes many wi girls play tg just like many manhasset girls
Play liberty or np girls play yj. It's called not jackassing an hour to practice


NP would be an hour to get to practice.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Expecting big numbers today at both TG and liberty tryouts. Lots of kids looking to crack into the top teams.


Do you have any idea how crazy you sound?
At this stage of the game you would think that most of would at least have a bit of clue, but I guess you really can't fix stupid
And this guy commenting and then replying to his own comment is even crazier.
Is it true that Liberty did not have enough girls at the tryout to field two teams? Word is they will create a combo 2020-21 as the B team.
face it on LI the talent level in this age group is not strong. Too many dads yelling for princess to go to goal rather than make the next play.
Listen talent level is there but I do agree with you too many parents just want their girls go to goal.
Liberty did not have enough 2020 girls either...last year 2 teams, this year looks like just 1...curious why the Liberty drop-off...anything to DG leaving Manhasset rumor ?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Listen talent level is there but I do agree with you too many parents just want their girls go to goal.


On TG it's not the parents, it BS himself. Coaching certain girls to be ball hogs. Too bad bc the talent is there but only a chosen few are developed.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Listen talent level is there but I do agree with you too many parents just want their girls go to goal.


On TG it's not the parents, it BS himself. Coaching certain girls to be ball hogs. Too bad bc the talent is there but only a chosen few are developed.



Well....the troll is be back. PAL tryouts over?????
Liberty drop off perhaps not because DG may be leaving but more because of the reasons people would want her to be gone.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Liberty drop off perhaps not because DG may be leaving but more because of the reasons people would want her to be gone.



Care to shed any light on the "reasons"?
Without going into a lengthy diatribe, the bottom line is that HS varsity coaches who also direct travel programs should not EXPECT kids to play for them in both arenas. Nothing but problems, punishment, resentments, favoritism, dysfunction and bad blood. Unhappy kids and parents are stuck. Kids just quit. Zero fun.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Without going into a lengthy diatribe, the bottom line is that HS varsity coaches who also direct travel programs should not EXPECT kids to play for them in both arenas. Nothing but problems, punishment, resentments, favoritism, dysfunction and bad blood. Unhappy kids and parents are stuck. Kids just quit. Zero fun.



In towns like Manhasset and GC, some really good players will not be starters until senior year - if then even. Do the math - lots of kids on travel teams and limited spots on HS team with 4 years competing for time. And everyone thinks their kids the best player at their position. You can't all be right!
Same can be said at top colleges. Really talented high school middies end up playing attack or defense to get on the field.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Liberty did not have enough 2020 girls either...last year 2 teams, this year looks like just 1...curious why the Liberty drop-off...anything to DG leaving Manhasset rumor ?


Drop off just really that year, but if you saw the team you would know why.
Did TG field 2 or 3 teams this year?
Who coaches the leg A team
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who coaches the leg A team

Three Varsity coaches and the director (part time).
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Did TG field 2 or 3 teams this year?


Just 2 teams a B team and a c team
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who coaches the leg A team

Three Varsity coaches and the director (part time).


What schools are the 3 varsity coaches from?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who coaches the leg A team



Huh....they don't have an A team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just wondering as I debated going to them this year, i see this team getting better and better every year, what positions did you lose key players?


Better and better? They lost their best player last year to YJA.

Defender who rarely saw the field for YJ Blue. Doesn't say much for Legacy.



Legacy has one of the best players on LI. Plus you know Jack about the interest already shown in her. Say what you may, they will be a good solid team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just wondering as I debated going to them this year, i see this team getting better and better every year, what positions did you lose key players?


Better and better? They lost their best player last year to YJA.

Defender who rarely saw the field for YJ Blue. Doesn't say much for Legacy.



Legacy has one of the best players on LI. Plus you know Jack about the interest already shown in her. Say what you may, they will be a good solid team.


Lol! Amazing how many moms claim their kid is "one of the best players on the Island"!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just wondering as I debated going to them this year, i see this team getting better and better every year, what positions did you lose key players?


Better and better? They lost their best player last year to YJA.

Defender who rarely saw the field for YJ Blue. Doesn't say much for Legacy.



Legacy has one of the best players on LI. Plus you know Jack about the interest already shown in her. Say what you may, they will be a good solid team.

Don't take the troll bait. Never a good idea to say any team has the best player on LI, only invites more critism. The team will do fine and your daughter's play will speak for itself (if you are really a parent on the team). Focus on your kid, it's a shame that others can't do the same.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just wondering as I debated going to them this year, i see this team getting better and better every year, what positions did you lose key players?


Better and better? They lost their best player last year to YJA.

Defender who rarely saw the field for YJ Blue. Doesn't say much for Legacy.



Legacy has one of the best players on LI. Plus you know Jack about the interest already shown in her. Say what you may, they will be a good solid team.


Lol! Amazing how many moms claim their kid is "one of the best players on the Island"!



Why do u people keep falling for the same nonsense?
Don't u realize that this poster has been trying to stir the pot and trash on legacy for a while now. Not sure why all the hatred.
My bet is that this entire conversation is actually one person.
There is just no legitimate reason to knock teams, players, families, coaches, etc.
BOC is becoming a waste of time. I used to actually get decent info and insight on these threads but not any more. It's become a platform for jealous and unhappy parents to bash on others and I predict BOC will soon b served with a judges order to provide users' IP addresses and may even b held liable when one of these parents cross the line (it will happen) and cud cause a teenage player to do something drastic.
Please let's hope that doesn't ever happen but if it does, I know that BOC would b the first place I'd tell detectives to start their investigation. Just sayin'.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just wondering as I debated going to them this year, i see this team getting better and better every year, what positions did you lose key players?


Better and better? They lost their best player last year to YJA.

Defender who rarely saw the field for YJ Blue. Doesn't say much for Legacy.



Legacy has one of the best players on LI. Plus you know Jack about the interest already shown in her. Say what you may, they will be a good solid team.


Lol! Amazing how many moms claim their kid is "one of the best players on the Island"!



Why do u people keep falling for the same nonsense?
Don't u realize that this poster has been trying to stir the pot and trash on legacy for a while now. Not sure why all the hatred.
My bet is that this entire conversation is actually one person.
There is just no legitimate reason to knock teams, players, families, coaches, etc.
BOC is becoming a waste of time. I used to actually get decent info and insight on these threads but not any more. It's become a platform for jealous and unhappy parents to bash on others and I predict BOC will soon b served with a judges order to provide users' IP addresses and may even b held liable when one of these parents cross the line (it will happen) and cud cause a teenage player to do something drastic.
Please let's hope that doesn't ever happen but if it does, I know that BOC would b the first place I'd tell detectives to start their investigation. Just sayin'.


What????? Hit happy hour a little early.
The YJ 2021 Primetime rosters are posted and I see that Bert is bringing down the same team to MD this fall. Same attack and D (the mids can play).....will this guy ever learn??? They barely won a game this summer with that attack and D and now he's keeping them together? Man, I sure hope CR forces some changes on him at tryouts otherwise another long summer awaits the "B" team. Mt Sinai forever I guess, what a mess. Plenty of better options available but the "great coach" won't open his eyes. But I'm sure he'll post plenty of Twitter selfies with the team, so that will be great.
Sounds like someone is a little unhappy that his daughter didn't make the YJ team he wanted her to. I guess she got bumped out of the fall tournaments? Maybe the coach knows the type of parent you are and didn't take your daughter because of that? Maybe stick skills and the inability to take direction from a coach was the problem? Who knows.

I'm fairly certain this team won a few more games that you think they did and at a much higher level of play than previous seasons. This team will be tight this coming season. Changes may or may not be made. Let's leave that to YJ. There is more than enough talent on this team to be quite successful.

As far as the MT Sinai comments, Where do you get this from? You haven't a clue. There are only 3 kids from MT Sinai on the team and they all deserve to be there. When they are on the field, They're all heart and hustle. Oh yeah and they can play the game too.

Why be so invested in bashing a team that your not even involved with? Or are you? Please, Just get a life beyond High School Girls Lacrosse. From the looks of it, You could use a break!!!
Amen, brother
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like someone is a little unhappy that his daughter didn't make the YJ team he wanted her to. I guess she got bumped out of the fall tournaments? Maybe the coach knows the type of parent you are and didn't take your daughter because of that? Maybe stick skills and the inability to take direction from a coach was the problem? Who knows.

I'm fairly certain this team won a few more games that you think they did and at a much higher level of play than previous seasons. This team will be tight this coming season. Changes may or may not be made. Let's leave that to YJ. There is more than enough talent on this team to be quite successful.

As far as the MT Sinai comments, Where do you get this from? You haven't a clue. There are only 3 kids from MT Sinai on the team and they all deserve to be there. When they are on the field, They're all heart and hustle. Oh yeah and they can play the game too.

Why be so invested in bashing a team that your not even involved with? Or are you? Please, Just get a life beyond High School Girls Lacrosse. From the looks of it, You could use a break!!!


The best attack left.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like someone is a little unhappy that his daughter didn't make the YJ team he wanted her to. I guess she got bumped out of the fall tournaments? Maybe the coach knows the type of parent you are and didn't take your daughter because of that? Maybe stick skills and the inability to take direction from a coach was the problem? Who knows.

I'm fairly certain this team won a few more games that you think they did and at a much higher level of play than previous seasons. This team will be tight this coming season. Changes may or may not be made. Let's leave that to YJ. There is more than enough talent on this team to be quite successful.

As far as the MT Sinai comments, Where do you get this from? You haven't a clue. There are only 3 kids from MT Sinai on the team and they all deserve to be there. When they are on the field, They're all heart and hustle. Oh yeah and they can play the game too.

Why be so invested in bashing a team that your not even involved with? Or are you? Please, Just get a life beyond High School Girls Lacrosse. From the looks of it, You could use a break!!!


We are all going invested in our kids, It’s disappointing to spend all your that travel money to play with a sub par group to f girls. It’s not fun losing, and that’s what’s going to happen with that bunch.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like someone is a little unhappy that his daughter didn't make the YJ team he wanted her to. I guess she got bumped out of the fall tournaments? Maybe the coach knows the type of parent you are and didn't take your daughter because of that? Maybe stick skills and the inability to take direction from a coach was the problem? Who knows.

I'm fairly certain this team won a few more games that you think they did and at a much higher level of play than previous seasons. This team will be tight this coming season. Changes may or may not be made. Let's leave that to YJ. There is more than enough talent on this team to be quite successful.

As far as the MT Sinai comments, Where do you get this from? You haven't a clue. There are only 3 kids from MT Sinai on the team and they all deserve to be there. When they are on the field, They're all heart and hustle. Oh yeah and they can play the game too.

Why be so invested in bashing a team that your not even involved with? Or are you? Please, Just get a life beyond High School Girls Lacrosse. From the looks of it, You could use a break!!!


The best attack left.




Usually when a parent thinks their kid is the best and the kid thinks they're the best, They are not! Not a team player. Not a team leader. Just my opinion. One player does not make a winning team. Parents yelling at the refs and the coach doesn't either.



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like someone is a little unhappy that his daughter didn't make the YJ team he wanted her to. I guess she got bumped out of the fall tournaments? Maybe the coach knows the type of parent you are and didn't take your daughter because of that? Maybe stick skills and the inability to take direction from a coach was the problem? Who knows.

I'm fairly certain this team won a few more games that you think they did and at a much higher level of play than previous seasons. This team will be tight this coming season. Changes may or may not be made. Let's leave that to YJ. There is more than enough talent on this team to be quite successful.

As far as the MT Sinai comments, Where do you get this from? You haven't a clue. There are only 3 kids from MT Sinai on the team and they all deserve to be there. When they are on the field, They're all heart and hustle. Oh yeah and they can play the game too.

Why be so invested in bashing a team that your not even involved with? Or are you? Please, Just get a life beyond High School Girls Lacrosse. From the looks of it, You could use a break!!!


We are all going invested in our kids, It’s disappointing to spend all your that travel money to play with a sub par group to f girls. It’s not fun losing, and that’s what’s going to happen with that bunch.

Well you kept drinking the kool-aide ignoring better club options and now you are paying the price with your daughters happiness and relegated to a weak team. Wake up. You did this not the club. Make better choices.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like someone is a little unhappy that his daughter didn't make the YJ team he wanted her to. I guess she got bumped out of the fall tournaments? Maybe the coach knows the type of parent you are and didn't take your daughter because of that? Maybe stick skills and the inability to take direction from a coach was the problem? Who knows.

I'm fairly certain this team won a few more games that you think they did and at a much higher level of play than previous seasons. This team will be tight this coming season. Changes may or may not be made. Let's leave that to YJ. There is more than enough talent on this team to be quite successful.

As far as the MT Sinai comments, Where do you get this from? You haven't a clue. There are only 3 kids from MT Sinai on the team and they all deserve to be there. When they are on the field, They're all heart and hustle. Oh yeah and they can play the game too.

Why be so invested in bashing a team that your not even involved with? Or are you? Please, Just get a life beyond High School Girls Lacrosse. From the looks of it, You could use a break!!!


No, my daughter is on A but we have a couple of friends on B and I know how frustrated they are with the direction over the last two years. And I did watch your team play a time or two last summer, it's clear where the issues are.
If you can't see it perhaps your child is one of the go to the goal/no pass attack or the struggling D (and/or Mt Sinai)? The friends and family plan isn't working. But if you are happy there, more power to you. I just know others that aren't. Mids that bust their butts but aren't being rewarded, they're in a tough spot. Let's see what tryouts bring, the fall tourney rosters mean nothing.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like someone is a little unhappy that his daughter didn't make the YJ team he wanted her to. I guess she got bumped out of the fall tournaments? Maybe the coach knows the type of parent you are and didn't take your daughter because of that? Maybe stick skills and the inability to take direction from a coach was the problem? Who knows.

I'm fairly certain this team won a few more games that you think they did and at a much higher level of play than previous seasons. This team will be tight this coming season. Changes may or may not be made. Let's leave that to YJ. There is more than enough talent on this team to be quite successful.

As far as the MT Sinai comments, Where do you get this from? You haven't a clue. There are only 3 kids from MT Sinai on the team and they all deserve to be there. When they are on the field, They're all heart and hustle. Oh yeah and they can play the game too.

Why be so invested in bashing a team that your not even involved with? Or are you? Please, Just get a life beyond High School Girls Lacrosse. From the looks of it, You could use a break!!!


The best attack left.


Lots from this team at other tryouts.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like someone is a little unhappy that his daughter didn't make the YJ team he wanted her to. I guess she got bumped out of the fall tournaments? Maybe the coach knows the type of parent you are and didn't take your daughter because of that? Maybe stick skills and the inability to take direction from a coach was the problem? Who knows.

I'm fairly certain this team won a few more games that you think they did and at a much higher level of play than previous seasons. This team will be tight this coming season. Changes may or may not be made. Let's leave that to YJ. There is more than enough talent on this team to be quite successful.

As far as the MT Sinai comments, Where do you get this from? You haven't a clue. There are only 3 kids from MT Sinai on the team and they all deserve to be there. When they are on the field, They're all heart and hustle. Oh yeah and they can play the game too.

Why be so invested in bashing a team that your not even involved with? Or are you? Please, Just get a life beyond High School Girls Lacrosse. From the looks of it, You could use a break!!!


The best attack left.


Lots from this team at other tryouts.



As long as it wasn't the mids then this team will only get better with the replacements.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like someone is a little unhappy that his daughter didn't make the YJ team he wanted her to. I guess she got bumped out of the fall tournaments? Maybe the coach knows the type of parent you are and didn't take your daughter because of that? Maybe stick skills and the inability to take direction from a coach was the problem? Who knows.

I'm fairly certain this team won a few more games that you think they did and at a much higher level of play than previous seasons. This team will be tight this coming season. Changes may or may not be made. Let's leave that to YJ. There is more than enough talent on this team to be quite successful.

As far as the MT Sinai comments, Where do you get this from? You haven't a clue. There are only 3 kids from MT Sinai on the team and they all deserve to be there. When they are on the field, They're all heart and hustle. Oh yeah and they can play the game too.

Why be so invested in bashing a team that your not even involved with? Or are you? Please, Just get a life beyond High School Girls Lacrosse. From the looks of it, You could use a break!!!


The best attack left.


Lots from this team at other tryouts.



As long as it wasn't the mids then this team will only get better with the replacements.

Some middies left and found new homes already.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like someone is a little unhappy that his daughter didn't make the YJ team he wanted her to. I guess she got bumped out of the fall tournaments? Maybe the coach knows the type of parent you are and didn't take your daughter because of that? Maybe stick skills and the inability to take direction from a coach was the problem? Who knows.

I'm fairly certain this team won a few more games that you think they did and at a much higher level of play than previous seasons. This team will be tight this coming season. Changes may or may not be made. Let's leave that to YJ. There is more than enough talent on this team to be quite successful.

As far as the MT Sinai comments, Where do you get this from? You haven't a clue. There are only 3 kids from MT Sinai on the team and they all deserve to be there. When they are on the field, They're all heart and hustle. Oh yeah and they can play the game too.

Why be so invested in bashing a team that your not even involved with? Or are you? Please, Just get a life beyond High School Girls Lacrosse. From the looks of it, You could use a break!!!


The best attack left.


Lots from this team at other tryouts.



As long as it wasn't the mids then this team will only get better with the replacements.

Some middies left and found new homes already.


The non starting mids left. Some d and a tried but couldn't find a home and will be back, others did and won't be back.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like someone is a little unhappy that his daughter didn't make the YJ team he wanted her to. I guess she got bumped out of the fall tournaments? Maybe the coach knows the type of parent you are and didn't take your daughter because of that? Maybe stick skills and the inability to take direction from a coach was the problem? Who knows.

I'm fairly certain this team won a few more games that you think they did and at a much higher level of play than previous seasons. This team will be tight this coming season. Changes may or may not be made. Let's leave that to YJ. There is more than enough talent on this team to be quite successful.

As far as the MT Sinai comments, Where do you get this from? You haven't a clue. There are only 3 kids from MT Sinai on the team and they all deserve to be there. When they are on the field, They're all heart and hustle. Oh yeah and they can play the game too.

Why be so invested in bashing a team that your not even involved with? Or are you? Please, Just get a life beyond High School Girls Lacrosse. From the looks of it, You could use a break!!!


The best attack left.


Lots from this team at other tryouts.



As long as it wasn't the mids then this team will only get better with the replacements.

Some middies left and found new homes already.


The non starting mids left. Some d and a tried but couldn't find a home and will be back, others did and won't be back.

Funny how it's the non-starters when they leave, studs when the a new team.

This team was a pretty poor performing team last year. Whether it be the players or coaching (or lack there-of). Doubtful anything can be done to make this team competitive.
Value the ball
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Value the ball


The team has talented players. It just doesn't have chemistry. The Friend group is the problem bc they think there kid actually belongs and just blame everyone else when things go wrong. Team is stacked with nprt an ms.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Value the ball


The team has talented players. It just doesn't have chemistry. The Friend group is the problem bc they think there kid actually belongs and just blame everyone else when things go wrong. Team is stacked with nprt an ms.


No new talent at tryouts! And some returned after striking out everywhere else.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Value the ball


The team has talented players. It just doesn't have chemistry. The Friend group is the problem bc they think there kid actually belongs and just blame everyone else when things go wrong. Team is stacked with nprt an ms.


No new talent at tryouts! And some returned after striking out everywhere else.

I really don't understand you or this post. So, YOU and your daughter I assume were at YJ tryouts because you evaluated the many girls that were there in red pinnies and determined that there was "no new talent". Furthermore, you knew where every girl tried out and the results of those tryouts from other organizations, their failure to make the other team, and identifying them and their humiliating return back to YJ. If YJ is a horrible place, why the [lacrosse] are YOU at tryouts.
No, you are just a troll and an internet tough guy.
Anyone else notice that the only team Bert wouldn't let his team scrimmage against at YJ tryouts on Sunday was the 2021 "C" team? Bert's team scrimmaged A and got whooped, they then scrimmaged the "D" team and then a team of the new red pinnie girls. But the C team was kept far away and was never brought over. Hmmmm, very odd. Why would that be? Why wouldn't you want to scrimmage the "C" team? I can only think of one reason.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone else notice that the only team Bert wouldn't let his team scrimmage against at YJ tryouts on Sunday was the 2021 "C" team? Bert's team scrimmaged A and got whooped, they then scrimmaged the "D" team and then a team of the new red pinnie girls. But the C team was kept far away and was never brought over. Hmmmm, very odd. Why would that be? Why wouldn't you want to scrimmage the "C" team? I can only think of one reason.


I agree, why would he want to scrimmage a team that obviously has such clueless big mouth parents.
He's already plucked out the MS girls that he wants to develop from that team. All the new MS girls to the program were wearing Red Pinnies.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone else notice that the only team Bert wouldn't let his team scrimmage against at YJ tryouts on Sunday was the 2021 "C" team? Bert's team scrimmaged A and got whooped, they then scrimmaged the "D" team and then a team of the new red pinnie girls. But the C team was kept far away and was never brought over. Hmmmm, very odd. Why would that be? Why wouldn't you want to scrimmage the "C" team? I can only think of one reason.


I'm sorry, if you didn't move up at tryout you're not moving. Every age group has a C team filled with dads that think their kids are being cheated out of their rightful spot on B. Last, your chances of moving after 9th grade is slim.
Any good match-ups this weekend in this age group?
Chesapeake Invitational: Skywalkers versus M&D Black Sunday at 12:00. I say M&D wins by 6 goals. Payback
YJ vs MD this weekend at Prime Time YJ wins by 2
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Chesapeake Invitational: Skywalkers versus M&D Black Sunday at 12:00. I say M&D wins by 6 goals. Payback


Stop it. That's silly. Both teams could be missing kids for other sports. Fall lacrosse no time to judge teams.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ vs MD this weekend at Prime Time YJ wins by 2


Maybe you meant YJ would only win 2 if their 4 games today. In that case you would have been correct
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ vs MD this weekend at Prime Time YJ wins by 2


Maybe you meant YJ would only win 2 if their 4 games today. In that case you would have been correct


No resukts posted for prime time
Why is it that M and D has teams at the Chesapeake Invitational today with the exception of the 21's? And if is the best of the best, which it is, where are the YJ's?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why is it that M and D has teams at the Chesapeake Invitational today with the exception of the 21's? And if is the best of the best, which it is, where are the YJ's?



Wasn't just he 2021s. The 2021s and older were at Prime Time today. YJ was there today because they run it. Lot more coaches at Prime Time then Chesapeake. Most the good teams were there today.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ vs MD this weekend at Prime Time YJ wins by 2


Maybe you meant YJ would only win 2 if their 4 games today. In that case you would have been correct


No resukts posted for prime time


They never do post results. YJ lost to M&D and MD United today
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ vs MD this weekend at Prime Time YJ wins by 2


Maybe you meant YJ would only win 2 if their 4 games today. In that case you would have been correct


No resukts posted for prime time


They never do post results. YJ lost to M&D and MD United today

Only beat C2 lax by a goal or two as well. YJ looks to have taken a little downswing from previous years. They had trouble in the draw circle, goalie and defense were out of sync. Some botched clears that hurt them, and defensively getting getting beat 1 on 1. The offense was productive and scored consistently when they did have the ball.
Any Legacy results?
CR post the Prime Time scores on tourney machine and take your lumps like a man!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why is it that M and D has teams at the Chesapeake Invitational today with the exception of the 21's? And if is the best of the best, which it is, where are the YJ's?



Wasn't just he 2021s. The 2021s and older were at Prime Time today. YJ was there today because they run it. Lot more coaches at Prime Time then Chesapeake. Most the good teams were there today.


What are you talking about? The top teams were at Chesapeake, especially in the 2021 division. They were not at Prime Time.
https://www.tourneymachine.com/Publ...ivision=h201710061457421646c523dd0af884d
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Any Legacy results?


Not good. Not good for any LI teams. But we appreciate the tax dollars and thank CR for hosting her tournament in the real hotbed.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ vs MD this weekend at Prime Time YJ wins by 2


Maybe you meant YJ would only win 2 if their 4 games today. In that case you would have been correct

.

No resukts posted for prime time


They never do post results. YJ lost to M&D and MD United today

Only beat C2 lax by a goal or two as well. YJ looks to have taken a little downswing from previous years. They had trouble in the draw circle, goalie and defense were out of sync. Some botched clears that hurt them, and defensively getting getting beat 1 on 1. The offense was productive and scored consistently when they did have the ball.


The D has been a problem for them for some time. Goalies are top notch, maybe just a bad day for them
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ vs MD this weekend at Prime Time YJ wins by 2


Maybe you meant YJ would only win 2 if their 4 games today. In that case you would have been correct


No resukts posted for prime time


They never do post results. YJ lost to M&D and MD United today



I'm pretty sure BBL 2021 beat YJ Blue also. And M&D black was at Prime Time yesterday, not Chesapeake.
YJ went 4-3 this weekend in MD. Losses to M&D, TLC and Md United. They did beat Md United the second time they played. So I guess that’s good.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ went 4-3 this weekend in MD. Losses to M&D, TLC and Md United. They did beat Md United the second time they played. So I guess that’s good.

Beating MD United is no feather in one's cap. I want to see them with wins over Skywalkers, M&D, Heros, etc. YJ hasn't done that consistently for a few years.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ went 4-3 this weekend in MD. Losses to M&D, TLC and Md United. They did beat Md United the second time they played. So I guess that’s good.

Beating MD United is no feather in one's cap. I want to see them with wins over Skywalkers, M&D, Heros, etc. YJ hasn't done that consistently for a few years.


Would an undefeated fall, winter spring and summer tournament season satisfy you. Just wondering.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ went 4-3 this weekend in MD. Losses to M&D, TLC and Md United. They did beat Md United the second time they played. So I guess that’s good.

Beating MD United is no feather in one's cap. I want to see them with wins over Skywalkers, M&D, Heros, etc. YJ hasn't done that consistently for a few years.


You're right. MDU is in the second level of teams in MD so beating them is to be expected for YJ. The surprise is that they lost to them. YJ hasn't beaten M&D in 3 years nor have they beaten Skywalkers since they got good a couple years ago when the girls moved down that were playing up on the 2020 team. 2021 is a down year on LI. As tough a time as YJ has had, they are still heads and shoulders better than any other club on LI
Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


Agree both Liberty and TG did look good this weekend. I was much more impressed than I thought I would be with those two teams from Long Island. I dont think Elevate belongs playing at this level - they just looked clueless in some games. I think Elevate's best days are about 2 years behind them!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


YJ is by far the top team at every age group. Without YJ, Long Island may as well be Wisconsin Lax.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


YJ is by far the top team at every age group. Without YJ, Long Island may as well be Wisconsin Lax.

Every age group but 2023 the YJ team is the 3rd best on Long Island.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


YJ is by far the top team at every age group. Without YJ, Long Island may as well be Wisconsin Lax.


Legacy 2021 is closing the gap
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


Agree both Liberty and TG did look good this weekend. I was much more impressed than I thought I would be with those two teams from Long Island. I dont think Elevate belongs playing at this level - they just looked clueless in some games. I think Elevate's best days are about 2 years behind them!


Elevate is just struggling. Their Blue teams are just mediocre and the players on their Red teams really shouldn't be playing travel lacrosse. I saw the Elevate 2020 Red team lose 20-2 last weekend to a B team. I honestly think that if your B team is losing that badly to another B team - you probably shouldn't be going down to MD or PA to play lax. Stay home and work on your skills! Parents need to just wake up!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


YJ is by far the top team at every age group. Without YJ, Long Island may as well be Wisconsin Lax.


Legacy 2021 is closing the gap

Not really Legacy still just a B club
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


YJ is by far the top team at every age group. Without YJ, Long Island may as well be Wisconsin Lax.


Legacy 2021 is closing the gap


Legacy played at Prime Time last weekend and wasn't impressive at all. Not even close to YJ
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


YJ is by far the top team at every age group. Without YJ, Long Island may as well be Wisconsin Lax.


Legacy 2021 is closing the gap


Hate to admit it. Legacy is the team to beat. They will smack YJ around. Good attack and goalies. Middies are weak but still better than YJ mids.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


YJ is by far the top team at every age group. Without YJ, Long Island may as well be Wisconsin Lax.


2021yj lost to a bunch of out of town teams last summer but also
Lost to a Long Island team. That said I am sure there are many excuses why they lost the game.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


YJ is by far the top team at every age group. Without YJ, Long Island may as well be Wisconsin Lax.


Legacy 2021 is closing the gap


Legacy played at Prime Time last weekend and wasn't impressive at all. Not even close to YJ


A few of the other LI clubs seem to have an age group here and there that are decent, TG, Liberty, Igloo all have one, and yes even Legacy has a decent age group, but it ain't 2021, it's 2020.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


YJ is by far the top team at every age group. Without YJ, Long Island may as well be Wisconsin Lax.


2021yj lost to a bunch of out of town teams last summer but also
Lost to a Long Island team. That said I am sure there are many excuses why they lost the game.


Come on. YJ has lost ONE GAME to another LI team since 5th grade. Pretty sure they are still the best team and will stay that way. No other LI team is even close to competitive with the top MD teams.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


YJ is by far the top team at every age group. Without YJ, Long Island may as well be Wisconsin Lax.


2021yj lost to a bunch of out of town teams last summer but also
Lost to a Long Island team. That said I am sure there are many excuses why they lost the game.


Come on. YJ has lost ONE GAME to another LI team since 5th grade. Pretty sure they are still the best team and will stay that way. No other LI team is even close to competitive with the top MD teams.


YJ will lose to Legacy this year. Legacy on the rise. You watch!!! They have players committed already.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


YJ is by far the top team at every age group. Without YJ, Long Island may as well be Wisconsin Lax.


2021yj lost to a bunch of out of town teams last summer but also
Lost to a Long Island team. That said I am sure there are many excuses why they lost the game.


Come on. YJ has lost ONE GAME to another LI team since 5th grade. Pretty sure they are still the best team and will stay that way. No other LI team is even close to competitive with the top MD teams.


YJ will lose to Legacy this year. Legacy on the rise. You watch!!! They have players committed already.


Who cares. So does YJ. M&D only has one and Skywalkers doesn't have any and I'm pretty sure it's generally accepted that they are the top two teams at this age.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


YJ is by far the top team at every age group. Without YJ, Long Island may as well be Wisconsin Lax.


2021yj lost to a bunch of out of town teams last summer but also
Lost to a Long Island team. That said I am sure there are many excuses why they lost the game.


Come on. YJ has lost ONE GAME to another LI team since 5th grade. Pretty sure they are still the best team and will stay that way. No other LI team is even close to competitive with the top MD teams.


YJ will lose to Legacy this year. Legacy on the rise. You watch!!! They have players committed already.


Who cares. So does YJ. M&D only has one and Skywalkers doesn't have any and I'm pretty sure it's generally accepted that they are the top two teams at this age.


Legacy doesn't have any 2021 committed.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Teams are short handed this time of year. Though they lost Liberty, Monster, and Top Guns looked pretty good against Skywalkers, Elevate did not play well and was smoked. Yellow Jackets are coming up this week.

Who has the top 2021 team on LI? Yellow Jackets still?


YJ is by far the top team at every age group. Without YJ, Long Island may as well be Wisconsin Lax.


2021yj lost to a bunch of out of town teams last summer but also
Lost to a Long Island team. That said I am sure there are many excuses why they lost the game.


Come on. YJ has lost ONE GAME to another LI team since 5th grade. Pretty sure they are still the best team and will stay that way. No other LI team is even close to competitive with the top MD teams.


YJ will lose to Legacy this year. Legacy on the rise. You watch!!! They have players committed already.


Really? To which schools? And when did they commit? is this one of those super secret wink wink under the table commits? Keep talking about it and then pretty soon a schools name will come out and that coach will deny it.
This post is not from a Legacy parent. We have no one committed. Someone is stirring the pot. The girls are playing well, they like each other and are enjoying themselves.
So CR took over YJ 2021 Blue last year and now they are going 4-3 in a weekend in Maryland......
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So CR took over YJ 2021 Blue last year and now they are going 4-3 in a weekend in Maryland......


Fall ball folks, why all the fuss? CR was not there and neither were six of the girls. This weekend might even have less at Mid-Atlantic.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So CR took over YJ 2021 Blue last year and now they are going 4-3 in a weekend in Maryland......


Fall ball folks, why all the fuss? CR was not there and neither were six of the girls. This weekend might even have less at Mid-Atlantic.


They did so well against MD teams last summer too....Pretty sure I recall seeing him, sorry her, on the sidelines when they were losing at LFTC and G8
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So CR took over YJ 2021 Blue last year and now they are going 4-3 in a weekend in Maryland......


Fall ball folks, why all the fuss? CR was not there and neither were six of the girls. This weekend might even have less at Mid-Atlantic.


They did so well against MD teams last summer too....Pretty sure I recall seeing him, sorry her, on the sidelines when they were losing at LFTC and G8



They lost to one MD team last year Skywalkers (multiple times). So did everyone else. If you were at Primetime, short six players they had M&D beat. It is Skywalkers and everyone else.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So CR took over YJ 2021 Blue last year and now they are going 4-3 in a weekend in Maryland......


Fall ball folks, why all the fuss? CR was not there and neither were six of the girls. This weekend might even have less at Mid-Atlantic.


They did so well against MD teams last summer too....Pretty sure I recall seeing him, sorry her, on the sidelines when they were losing at LFTC and G8



They lost to one MD team last year Skywalkers (multiple times). So did everyone else. If you were at Primetime, short six players they had M&D beat. It is Skywalkers and everyone else.


Right because YJ is the only team missing players in the fall. SW only beat Renegades by a goal a couple weeks ago. New year is here.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So CR took over YJ 2021 Blue last year and now they are going 4-3 in a weekend in Maryland......


Fall ball folks, why all the fuss? CR was not there and neither were six of the girls. This weekend might even have less at Mid-Atlantic.

YJ wasn't missing 6 girls, they had at least 9-10 subs. at most missing 2-3.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So CR took over YJ 2021 Blue last year and now they are going 4-3 in a weekend in Maryland......


Fall ball folks, why all the fuss? CR was not there and neither were six of the girls. This weekend might even have less at Mid-Atlantic.

YJ wasn't missing 6 girls, they had at least 9-10 subs. at most missing 2-3.


Missing #5, #13, #19, #20 and #73 off the top of my head, 25 players on that roster...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This post is not from a Legacy parent. We have no one committed. Someone is stirring the pot. The girls are playing well, they like each other and are enjoying themselves.


New girls on Legacy (came from TG) supposedly had "wink, wink" commits to Stony Brook.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This post is not from a Legacy parent. We have no one committed. Someone is stirring the pot. The girls are playing well, they like each other and are enjoying themselves.


New girls on Legacy (came from TG) supposedly had "wink, wink" commits to Stony Brook.
they should worry about being 13
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This post is not from a Legacy parent. We have no one committed. Someone is stirring the pot. The girls are playing well, they like each other and are enjoying themselves.


New girls on Legacy (came from TG) supposedly had "wink, wink" commits to Stony Brook.


Surprised dad hasn't made a video about it and posted it on social media, LOL.
Another 1-3 weekend in MD for YJ.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Another 1-3 weekend in MD for YJ.

YJ had zero offense this weekend, girls look lost unable to execute plays, unable to play as a unit. Looks like this team has stopped developing from almost two years ago. This team had some potential a few seasons ago. Not so much now.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Another 1-3 weekend in MD for YJ.

YJ had zero offense this weekend, girls look lost unable to execute plays, unable to play as a unit. Looks like this team has stopped developing from almost two years ago. This team had some potential a few seasons ago. Not so much now.


Welcome to daddy coach who is clueless ,terrible coach , horrible person , thinks get the ball to his own kid wins games when kid is average at best .
The anger in this site is unbelievable. I am not from the NE and I don’t have a dog in this fight but you all are embarrassing. These are kids. Stop with all your bs and let them develop.
Not a normal YJ squad fall, spring, summer or winter. Has to be other teams on the island better?
BBL making appearance in most competitive bracket doing very well MidA this weekend. Any other surprises ?
The 2021 group on Long Island is not very strong
Take the best girls regardless who they know from YJ, Legacy, TG, Elevate, and liberty and you could make 2 incredible teams at 2021 age group. Then another 2 real good teams.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Take the best girls regardless who they know from YJ, Legacy, TG, Elevate, and liberty and you could make 2 incredible teams at 2021 age group. Then another 2 real good teams.


not really
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Take the best girls regardless who they know from YJ, Legacy, TG, Elevate, and liberty and you could make 2 incredible teams at 2021 age group. Then another 2 real good teams.


Well MD already has 3 or 4 teams better than any LI team. Could make your statement about just about any region
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Take the best girls regardless who they know from YJ, Legacy, TG, Elevate, and liberty and you could make 2 incredible teams at 2021 age group. Then another 2 real good teams.


You, my friend, are truly the silliest person on BOTC...what is your point exactly?
Silliest?? They were saying 2021 age group is weak tough guy or girl. So to point out if you took the best girls from these teams and made 2 teams from Long Island we would give Skywalker's M & D black run for their money. That is a fact
Yeah, silly..and if the Yankees, Indians and Red Sox took their best players and had one team, they would beat the Astros...reality doesn't work that way...but that's ok...keep on imagining a world where all-star teams exist in Travel Lax....
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yeah, silly..and if the Yankees, Indians and Red Sox took their best players and had one team, they would beat the Astros...reality doesn't work that way...but that's ok...keep on imagining a world where all-star teams exist in Travel Lax....


Um, they do exist in travel lax.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yeah, silly..and if the Yankees, Indians and Red Sox took their best players and had one team, they would beat the Astros...reality doesn't work that way...but that's ok...keep on imagining a world where all-star teams exist in Travel Lax....


They do on the Boys' side. There are a bunch of regional and national all-star teams. Dukes Nationals, FCA National Team, True National...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yeah, silly..and if the Yankees, Indians and Red Sox took their best players and had one team, they would beat the Astros...reality doesn't work that way...but that's ok...keep on imagining a world where all-star teams exist in Travel Lax....


They do on the Boys' side. There are a bunch of regional and national all-star teams. Dukes Nationals, FCA National Team, True National...


Is Skywalker a National "best of the best" team?..or is it a regular travel team?...
I think ding-bat was saying that if all of the best 21's on LI were on the same TRAVEL team (NOT National ALL STAR team), then they could beat a Skywalker team....that's just tupid'
If you created a new team with the top 10 players from Skywalkers and M&D, they would probably beat half of the DII and DIII schools. Now that would be fun to watch.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Silliest?? They were saying 2021 age group is weak tough guy or girl. So to point out if you took the best girls from these teams and made 2 teams from Long Island we would give Skywalker's M & D black run for their money. That is a fact


It is a silly notion because A) the best girls already play for YJ and B) if we did that we wouldnt have anyone to bash.
That is a fact.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Another 1-3 weekend in MD for YJ.

YJ had zero offense this weekend, girls look lost unable to execute plays, unable to play as a unit. Looks like this team has stopped developing from almost two years ago. This team had some potential a few seasons ago. Not so much now.


Both the M&D and Skywalkers losses were very tight 1-2 goal losses right down to the very end. Agree team has issues, but not with offense. Considering they are competing with both of these teams despite the fact that they lost over 90% of the draws actually tells a different story. Would you imagine any team still being in a game after losing nearly every single draw control? Yet they were! If they ever get there act together on the circle, these games go the other way.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If you created a new team with the top 10 players from Skywalkers and M&D, they would probably beat half of the DII and DIII schools. Now that would be fun to watch.


Time to take your meds again
I do not think the LI teams are weak at 2021, I think the MD teams are exceptionally strong. M&D, SW, Heros, TLC, MD United and Nems are all competitive. I am assuming that the parity is greater and that LI is better across the board than MD at other ages.
50-50 on draw circle and lost to Heros 7-1 and Heros are not at the same level as SW or MnD
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Silliest?? They were saying 2021 age group is weak tough guy or girl. So to point out if you took the best girls from these teams and made 2 teams from Long Island we would give Skywalker's M & D black run for their money. That is a fact


It is a silly notion because A) the best girls already play for YJ and B) if we did that we wouldnt have anyone to bash.
That is a fact.




Hardly true now.The self-proclaimed "GOATS" are more like the TOAD'S now (Turn Over Again Dam) lol .
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I do not think the LI teams are weak at 2021, I think the MD teams are exceptionally strong. M&D, SW, Heros, TLC, MD United and Nems are all competitive. I am assuming that the parity is greater and that LI is better across the board than MD at other ages.



I love that - you mentioned NEMS in the same sentence as SW and MnD. That was good. Thank you for brightening my day. That was great!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If you created a new team with the top 10 players from Skywalkers and M&D, they would probably beat half of the DII and DIII schools. Now that would be fun to watch.



Well....it didn't take long for a new "silliest" statement. Of course from Biff in MD.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I do not think the LI teams are weak at 2021, I think the MD teams are exceptionally strong. M&D, SW, Heros, TLC, MD United and Nems are all competitive. I am assuming that the parity is greater and that LI is better across the board than MD at other ages.


Whatever you say TLC, NEMS, or MD United dad.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I do not think the LI teams are weak at 2021, I think the MD teams are exceptionally strong. M&D, SW, Heros, TLC, MD United and Nems are all competitive. I am assuming that the parity is greater and that LI is better across the board than MD at other ages.


Whatever you say TLC, NEMS, or MD United dad.


I was not inferring that TLC, NEMS or MD United could beat SW or M&D. However, those three teams are very competitive when playing teams outside of central Maryland and usually play in the most difficult or second most difficult pool in a tournament. I would venture a guess that the top 2021 central Maryland teams have very good win loss records against the teams outside of this area. If you look at last weekend as an example, I am sure that TLC or NEMS would have won or gone 3-1 in any other pool.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I do not think the LI teams are weak at 2021, I think the MD teams are exceptionally strong. M&D, SW, Heros, TLC, MD United and Nems are all competitive. I am assuming that the parity is greater and that LI is better across the board than MD at other ages.


Whatever you say TLC, NEMS, or MD United dad.


I was not inferring that TLC, NEMS or MD United could beat SW or M&D. However, those three teams are very competitive when playing teams outside of central Maryland and usually play in the most difficult or second most difficult pool in a tournament. I would venture a guess that the top 2021 central Maryland teams have very good win loss records against the teams outside of this area. If you look at last weekend as an example, I am sure that TLC or NEMS would have won or gone 3-1 in any other pool.


MD United lost to LI Liberty last weekend. Guess I am confused.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
50-50 on draw circle and lost to Heros 7-1 and Heros are not at the same level as SW or MnD


50-50? Not sure you watched the same game. Green dominated the circle the entire game.. It was t even a fair fight.
You may be right but I just don't remember a dominant draw advantage.
What makes the Skywalker team so dominant? Speed? On ball defensive aggression all over the field?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
50-50 on draw circle and lost to Heros 7-1 and Heros are not at the same level as SW or MnD


50-50? Not sure you watched the same game. Green dominated the circle the entire game.. It was t even a fair fight.



Fall Ball. Do you really think Hero's miraculously dominates YJ after losing to them during the summer just a few short months ago? YJ was short many players. Summer ball folks, all that matters in the fall is did your daughter garner any interest from college coaches...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
50-50 on draw circle and lost to Heros 7-1 and Heros are not at the same level as SW or MnD


50-50? Not sure you watched the same game. Green dominated the circle the entire game.. It was t even a fair fight.



Fall Ball. Do you really think Hero's miraculously dominates YJ after losing to them during the summer just a few short months ago? YJ was short many players. Summer ball folks, all that matters in the fall is did your daughter garner any interest from college coaches...


well since there was literally like 5 coaches watching the 2021s all weekend, may as well win the games. good job going 1-3
Biggest question is how did Summit elite beat M&D black?
I guess there are no injuries in the summer? Fall is the only time that injuries and teams don't have a full squad? Accept the beating and move on.
No clue.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
50-50 on draw circle and lost to Heros 7-1 and Heros are not at the same level as SW or MnD


50-50? Not sure you watched the same game. Green dominated the circle the entire game.. It was t even a fair fight.



Fall Ball. Do you really think Hero's miraculously dominates YJ after losing to them during the summer just a few short months ago? YJ was short many players. Summer ball folks, all that matters in the fall is did your daughter garner any interest from college coaches...


Can you explain why The tournament rosters are posted on YJ webjste have All YJ A players listed. Are u saying the girls on the list didn't play? You guys have Excuses for every loss, every time. Maybe the B team can help you out. The won all their fall games in the D bracket.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Biggest question is how did Summit elite beat M&D black?


As stated earlier Fall Ball teams are not showing up with their full squad. No excuses next women up. Minutes are distributed more evenly in Showcases as well , in comparison to Championship format.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Biggest question is how did Summit elite beat M&D black?


As stated earlier Fall Ball teams are not showing up with their full squad. No excuses next women up. Minutes are distributed more evenly in Showcases as well , in comparison to Championship format.


That's funny. Say "No Excuses", but surround it with excuses.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]50-50 on draw circle and lost to Heros 7-1 and Heros are not at the same level as SW or MnD


50-50? Not sure you watched the same game. Green dominated the circle the entire game.. It was t even a fair fight.



Fall Ball. Do you really think Hero's miraculously dominates YJ after losing to them during the summer just a few short months ago? YJ was short many players. Summer ball folks, all that matters in the fall is did your daughter garner any interest from college coaches...


Can you explain why The tournament rosters are posted on YJ webjste have All YJ A players listed. Are u saying the girls on the list didn't play? You guys have Excuses for every loss, every time. Maybe the B team can help you out. The won all their fall games in the D bracket. [/quot

Just the facts,the following players did not attend 5,7,8,13,19,20,73.
7,8,13,19 are starters.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]50-50 on draw circle and lost to Heros 7-1 and Heros are not at the same level as SW or MnD


50-50? Not sure you watched the same game. Green dominated the circle the entire game.. It was t even a fair fight.



Fall Ball. Do you really think Hero's miraculously dominates YJ after losing to them during the summer just a few short months ago? YJ was short many players. Summer ball folks, all that matters in the fall is did your daughter garner any interest from college coaches...


Can you explain why The tournament rosters are posted on YJ webjste have All YJ A players listed. Are u saying the girls on the list didn't play? You guys have Excuses for every loss, every time. Maybe the B team can help you out. The won all their fall games in the D bracket. [/quot

Just the facts,the following players did not attend 5,7,8,13,19,20,73.
7,8,13,19 are starters.


That sounds like a legitimate reason and the remaining players on the team are only there because of the F&F deals.
Bingo ! ! !
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bingo ! ! !



Is a great game, my grandmother loves playing it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Biggest question is how did Summit elite beat M&D black?


As stated earlier Fall Ball teams are not showing up with their full squad. No excuses next women up. Minutes are distributed more evenly in Showcases as well , in comparison to Championship format.


That's funny. Say "No Excuses", but surround it with excuses.


No excuses. The M&D girls played terrible that morning. Whether they just overlooked them or whatever they didn't play with any intensity. It happens. Coaches lit a fire under them and they won the next 3 games. YJ lost to Liberty last year. SW lost to Monster. Sometimes the girls just don't play well and the games go by so quick. Part of what makes all the more amazing that they managed to go over a whole year without losing.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]50-50 on draw circle and lost to Heros 7-1 and Heros are not at the same level as SW or MnD


50-50? Not sure you watched the same game. Green dominated the circle the entire game.. It was t even a fair fight.



Fall Ball. Do you really think Hero's miraculously dominates YJ after losing to them during the summer just a few short months ago? YJ was short many players. Summer ball folks, all that matters in the fall is did your daughter garner any interest from college coaches...


Can you explain why The tournament rosters are posted on YJ webjste have All YJ A players listed. Are u saying the girls on the list didn't play? You guys have Excuses for every loss, every time. Maybe the B team can help you out. The won all their fall games in the D bracket. [/quot

Just the facts,the following players did not attend 5,7,8,13,19,20,73.
7,8,13,19 are starters.


That sounds like a legitimate reason and the remaining players on the team are only there because of the F&F deals.


The roster deal is simple, you submit your full roster and not have to deal with adjustments. When you have 26 teams going to tournaments, just makes it easier to administer.
That's Garbage ,YJ submits rosters when the organization gets everyone's payment including the processing fee. They never submit all kids on team
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]50-50 on draw circle and lost to Heros 7-1 and Heros are not at the same level as SW or MnD


50-50? Not sure you watched the same game. Green dominated the circle the entire game.. It was t even a fair fight.



Fall Ball. Do you really think Hero's miraculously dominates YJ after losing to them during the summer just a few short months ago? YJ was short many players. Summer ball folks, all that matters in the fall is did your daughter garner any interest from college coaches...


Can you explain why The tournament rosters are posted on YJ webjste have All YJ A players listed. Are u saying the girls on the list didn't play? You guys have Excuses for every loss, every time. Maybe the B team can help you out. The won all their fall games in the D bracket. [/quot

Just the facts,the following players did not attend 5,7,8,13,19,20,73.
7,8,13,19 are starters.


That sounds like a legitimate reason and the remaining players on the team are only there because of the F&F deals.


The roster deal is simple, you submit your full roster and not have to deal with adjustments. When you have 26 teams going to tournaments, just makes it easier to administer.

First of all, these tournaments require self rostering. 2nd CR only list girls on the YJ page who paid for that specific tournament. Notice that rosters of blue and gold can be different at different ages (some tournaments the 2021 team has different girls listed). Maybe a few girls were missing but not 6. Stop making excuses, you got whooped, almost all of your girls were there to take the beating (and a few of the ones who weren't, aren't coming back to your team). Missing starters might account for a few goals, but there where a game of two where you lost by a lot last weekend. Stop making excuses and tell your daughters to start training again because everyone else is passing you guys.
First of all, these tournaments require self rostering. 2nd CR only list girls on the YJ page who paid for that specific tournament. Notice that rosters of blue and gold can be different at different ages (some tournaments the 2021 team has different girls listed). Maybe a few girls were missing but not 6. Stop making excuses, you got whooped, almost all of your girls were there to take the beating (and a few of the ones who weren't, aren't coming back to your team). Missing starters might account for a few goals, but there where a game of two where you lost by a lot last weekend. Stop making excuses and tell your daughters to start training again because everyone else is passing you guys.

Angry much , what a loser . Just love when some [lacrosse] comes on here stating things like they are facts when in reality they are clueless.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]50-50 on draw circle and lost to Heros 7-1 and Heros are not at the same level as SW or MnD



50-50? Not sure you watched the same game. Green dominated the circle the entire game.. It was t even a fair fight.



Fall Ball. Do you really think Hero's miraculously dominates YJ after losing to them during the summer just a few short months ago? YJ was short many players. Summer ball folks, all that matters in the fall is did your daughter garner any interest from college coaches...


Can you explain why The tournament rosters are posted on YJ webjste have All YJ A players listed. Are u saying the girls on the list didn't play? You guys have Excuses for every loss, every time. Maybe the B team can help you out. The won all their fall games in the D bracket. [/quot

Just the facts,the following players did not attend 5,7,8,13,19,20,73.
7,8,13,19 are starters.


That sounds like a legitimate reason and the remaining players on the team are only there because of the F&F deals.


The roster deal is simple, you submit your full roster and not have to deal with adjustments. When you have 26 teams going to tournaments, just makes it easier to administer.

First of all, these tournaments require self rostering. 2nd CR only list girls on the YJ page who paid for that specific tournament. Notice that rosters of blue and gold can be different at different ages (some tournaments the 2021 team has different girls listed). Maybe a few girls were missing but not 6. Stop making excuses, you got whooped, almost all of your girls were there to take the beating (and a few of the ones who weren't, aren't coming back to your team). Missing starters might account for a few goals, but there where a game of two where you lost by a lot last weekend. Stop making excuses and tell your daughters to start training again because everyone else is passing you guys.
[/quote

Since you have figured out the YJ secret why don't you tell everyone which of the players indicated by their number was in fact playing this past weekend. Please do not name a player merely indicate which number,in fact did play this past weekend in MD.

Haters have to Hate !



Fall Ball. Do you really think Hero's miraculously dominates YJ after losing to them during the summer just a few short months ago? YJ was short many players. Summer ball folks, all that matters in the fall is did your daughter garner any interest from college coaches...[/quote]

Can you explain why The tournament rosters are posted on YJ webjste have All YJ A players listed. Are u saying the girls on the list didn't play? You guys have Excuses for every loss, every time. Maybe the B team can help you out. The won all their fall games in the D bracket. [/quot

Just the facts,the following players did not attend 5,7,8,13,19,20,73.
7,8,13,19 are starters.
[/quote]

That sounds like a legitimate reason and the remaining players on the team are only there because of the F&F deals.
[/quote]

The roster deal is simple, you submit your full roster and not have to deal with adjustments. When you have 26 teams going to tournaments, just makes it easier to administer.[/quote]
First of all, these tournaments require self rostering. 2nd CR only list girls on the YJ page who paid for that specific tournament. Notice that rosters of blue and gold can be different at different ages (some tournaments the 2021 team has different girls listed). Maybe a few girls were missing but not 6. Stop making excuses, you got whooped, almost all of your girls were there to take the beating (and a few of the ones who weren't, aren't coming back to your team). Missing starters might account for a few goals, but there where a game of two where you lost by a lot last weekend. Stop making excuses and tell your daughters to start training again because everyone else is passing you guys.
[/quote

Since you have figured out the YJ secret why don't you tell everyone which of the players indicated by their number was in fact playing this past weekend. Please do not name a player merely indicate which number,in fact did play this past weekend in MD.

Haters have to Hate !
[/quote]

Ok we get it, the best girls were missing and the second string stinks. Here’s a suggestion, hit the wall, practice the draw and enough with the excuses! The more you respond the more you embarrass yourself.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I do not think the LI teams are weak at 2021, I think the MD teams are exceptionally strong. M&D, SW, Heros, TLC, MD United and Nems are all competitive. I am assuming that the parity is greater and that LI is better across the board than MD at other ages.


Whatever you say TLC, NEMS, or MD United dad.


I was not inferring that TLC, NEMS or MD United could beat SW or M&D. However, those three teams are very competitive when playing teams outside of central Maryland and usually play in the most difficult or second most difficult pool in a tournament. I would venture a guess that the top 2021 central Maryland teams have very good win loss records against the teams outside of this area. If you look at last weekend as an example, I am sure that TLC or NEMS would have won or gone 3-1 in any other pool.


MD United lost to LI Liberty last weekend. Guess I am confused.


And this weekend Liberty 2019 took down Capital Blue so I do think that Long Island teams can compete!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I do not think the LI teams are weak at 2021, I think the MD teams are exceptionally strong. M&D, SW, Heros, TLC, MD United and Nems are all competitive. I am assuming that the parity is greater and that LI is better across the board than MD at other ages.


Whatever you say TLC, NEMS, or MD United dad.


I was not inferring that TLC, NEMS or MD United could beat SW or M&D. However, those three teams are very competitive when playing teams outside of central Maryland and usually play in the most difficult or second most difficult pool in a tournament. I would venture a guess that the top 2021 central Maryland teams have very good win loss records against the teams outside of this area. If you look at last weekend as an example, I am sure that TLC or NEMS would have won or gone 3-1 in any other pool.


MD United lost to LI Liberty last weekend. Guess I am confused.


And this weekend Liberty 2019 took down Capital Blue so I do think that Long Island teams can compete!


Looks like a good fall for Liberty 2019 - Skywalkers and Capital are nice wins.
In what universe did Liberty beat Skywalkers?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
In what universe did Liberty beat Skywalkers?


If you must know and you can probably still look up the score online, Liberty beat Skywalkers on 11/4/7 at the Chesapeake invitational. Liberty 2019 Black beat SW Blue 7-6. That would be the universe - Thanks
Liberty is ridiculous . Seriously you are bragging about beating teams who have virtually all their players committed so they no longer show up to showcase tournaments ,desperation.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Liberty is ridiculous . Seriously you are bragging about beating teams who have virtually all their players committed so they no longer show up to showcase tournaments ,desperation.


So if they would have beat them when they were in 5th grade that would have been more meaningful? You sound like you spend your life making excuses, must be interesting to be you and being able to rationalize all of your failures in life. Don't pass that on to your child.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Liberty is ridiculous . Seriously you are bragging about beating teams who have virtually all their players committed so they no longer show up to showcase tournaments ,desperation.


You definitely do not know anything about the Maryland teams. They keep their teams together through the year - there are no differences between the spring, summer or fall rosters, especially once they get into the high school years. Liberty 2019 black played really well against a solid skywalkers team and won by 1 goal. And as far as trying to say that skywalkers had no players - look at the score after their game against TG black. They won by 4.
An example of the way Maryland teams keep their players together throughout the year - Liberty followed up the win against Skywalkers by losing 5-13 against heros. The game was actually close up until the half. I would say that overall - Liberty had a respectable weekend and I have no involvement with Liberty.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Liberty is ridiculous . Seriously you are bragging about beating teams who have virtually all their players committed so they no longer show up to showcase tournaments ,desperation.


So if they would have beat them when they were in 5th grade that would have been more meaningful? You sound like you spend your life making excuses, must be interesting to be you and being able to rationalize all of your failures in life. Don't pass that on to your child.


Don't pass your ignorance onto your child . You are bragging about beating a team in a showcase tournament down in Florida when almost every top team in the age does not have their normal rosters . I looked at my kids team 2 players from her summer team were rostered . Beat them in a championship summer tournament that will have some meaning and even then don't come on this site bragging about it as that's just weak.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Liberty is ridiculous . Seriously you are bragging about beating teams who have virtually all their players committed so they no longer show up to showcase tournaments ,desperation.


So if they would have beat them when they were in 5th grade that would have been more meaningful? You sound like you spend your life making excuses, must be interesting to be you and being able to rationalize all of your failures in life. Don't pass that on to your child.


Don't pass your ignorance onto your child . You are bragging about beating a team in a showcase tournament down in Florida when almost every top team in the age does not have their normal rosters . I looked at my kids team 2 players from her summer team were rostered . Beat them in a championship summer tournament that will have some meaning and even then don't come on this site bragging about it as that's just weak.


This Liberty person is on several threads, yelling from the rooftops about this 2019 Skywalkers beat down. Why is it even on 2021? Take it to 2019.
Sorry I was confused since this is a 9th grade thread, not 11th. Hop on the correct one..,
YJ rosters being posted this weekend....any thoughts on the B team making some much needed attack and D changes?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ rosters being posted this weekend....any thoughts on the B team making some much needed attack and D changes?


I do have some thoughts on this.... I think you must be the obnoxious parent of a midfielder.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ rosters being posted this weekend....any thoughts on the B team making some much needed attack and D changes?

Scrap the whole team and start all over. The best this team will be is King of the C's.
This is my first and last visit to this forum. You folks are ruining your kids. I see you on the sidelines coaching your daughter to "go to the goal" I see you at the tents over indulging with your red cups and preaching like you coached D1 women in a prior life when you never even picked the stick up in the men's game. Let alone have an understanding of how the women's game works.

To see you fools trying to handicap a freshman fall ball game by predicting a team will win or lose by a X number of points proves that you are completely unhinged and need to check your crazy self into South Oaks like right now.

For the special brand of fool who sees this as an "investment" do yourself a favor and take the money you are spending on travel lacrosse and put it in a 529 account, you will see a greater ROI.

The true role of Lacrosse in my mind is making the difference between your daughter and other students who are "similar." In other terms if my daughter has a 98 average, and 690/720 board scores, active in LoTE and Science Honor Societies as well as GS. She adds varsity lacrosse to her CV as something that will set her aside from her 15 other classmates who putting up similar numbers and activities.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This is my first and last visit to this forum. You folks are ruining your kids. I see you on the sidelines coaching your daughter to "go to the goal" I see you at the tents over indulging with your red cups and preaching like you coached D1 women in a prior life when you never even picked the stick up in the men's game. Let alone have an understanding of how the women's game works.

To see you fools trying to handicap a freshman fall ball game by predicting a team will win or lose by a X number of points proves that you are completely unhinged and need to check your crazy self into South Oaks like right now.

For the special brand of fool who sees this as an "investment" do yourself a favor and take the money you are spending on travel lacrosse and put it in a 529 account, you will see a greater ROI.

The true role of Lacrosse in my mind is making the difference between your daughter and other students who are "similar." In other terms if my daughter has a 98 average, and 690/720 board scores, active in LoTE and Science Honor Societies as well as GS. She adds varsity lacrosse to her CV as something that will set her aside from her 15 other classmates who putting up similar numbers and activities.


Your an [ChillLaxin], admissions could not care less that your kid plays lacrosse and if a coach has interest in your kid those other 15 classmates will have no impact. I see travel lacrosse as an investment and if you don't you are a fool, its too expensive and time consuming not to be looked at as an investment. Not as a way to get a scholarship but an investment into making my kid a better player, learning lessons that sports provide, making friends , helping get into a school she may otherwise not be able to get in, and most of all spending time together.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This is my first and last visit to this forum. You folks are ruining your kids. I see you on the sidelines coaching your daughter to "go to the goal" I see you at the tents over indulging with your red cups and preaching like you coached D1 women in a prior life when you never even picked the stick up in the men's game. Let alone have an understanding of how the women's game works.

To see you fools trying to handicap a freshman fall ball game by predicting a team will win or lose by a X number of points proves that you are completely unhinged and need to check your crazy self into South Oaks like right now.

For the special brand of fool who sees this as an "investment" do yourself a favor and take the money you are spending on travel lacrosse and put it in a 529 account, you will see a greater ROI.

The true role of Lacrosse in my mind is making the difference between your daughter and other students who are "similar." In other terms if my daughter has a 98 average, and 690/720 board scores, active in LoTE and Science Honor Societies as well as GS. She adds varsity lacrosse to her CV as something that will set her aside from her 15 other classmates who putting up similar numbers and activities.


nah, you'll be back...BOTC is the fix you need for your Lax jones....
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ rosters being posted this weekend....any thoughts on the B team making some much needed attack and D changes?

Scrap the whole team and start all over. The best this team will be is King of the C's.


Looks like that's is how it will be. No improvement, it may be worse
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ rosters being posted this weekend....any thoughts on the B team making some much needed attack and D changes?

Scrap the whole team and start all over. The best this team will be is King of the C's.


Looks like that's is how it will be. No improvement, it may be worse


But they added 2 coaches Daughters. They are now the D team.
YJ at 2021 continues to head straight towards mediocrity. The top team added no one, lost 1 possibly two girls. No one to do the draw. Second team gained no one, third team is gaining if not passing the 2nd team here. Very weak age group for YJ. Even in the 4th and 5th level of tourns the 2nd and 3rd team play in, the will still be a 500team. The top team will be looking at more loses that any other year, and may lose again to at least one, if not two LI teams (I won’t pick who, leave that up to speculation).
Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ at 2021 continues to head straight towards mediocrity. The top team added no one, lost 1 possibly two girls. No one to do the draw. Second team gained no one, third team is gaining if not passing the 2nd team here. Very weak age group for YJ. Even in the 4th and 5th level of tourns the 2nd and 3rd team play in, the will still be a 500team. The top team will be looking at more loses that any other year, and may lose again to at least one, if not two LI teams (I won’t pick who, leave that up to speculation).


The C team won three tourneys last year and they have now passed the B team, especially because Bert was stubborn and made no changes. There's a reason the C team was the only team not to scrimmage Bert's during tryouts......
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ at 2021 continues to head straight towards mediocrity. The top team added no one, lost 1 possibly two girls. No one to do the draw. Second team gained no one, third team is gaining if not passing the 2nd team here. Very weak age group for YJ. Even in the 4th and 5th level of tourns the 2nd and 3rd team play in, the will still be a 500team. The top team will be looking at more loses that any other year, and may lose again to at least one, if not two LI teams (I won’t pick who, leave that up to speculation).


The C team won three tourneys last year and they have now passed the B team, especially because Bert was stubborn and made no changes. There's a reason the C team was the only team not to scrimmage Bert's during tryouts......


Two years of moaning and your kid still hasn’t moved up! Maybe Bert is just a better judge of talent then you give him credit for? Time to stop the drivel and accept your daughters place in the YJ organization or move on....
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.


TG 2021 Black never played YJ last year. Not sure what your talking about.
[quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!


YJ "D" would beat them now.. Most of their middies are from TG. LOL B,C, and D are all pretty equal.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!

Legacy picked up the best TG players from last year and YJ got one of their attack players and the stud goalie the year before.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.

TG only had (6) 2020 girls I heard it was a lot more than that or they wouldn't have been able to compete with YJ Blue a juggernaut of a team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.

TG only had (6) 2020 girls I heard it was a lot more than that or they wouldn't have been able to compete with YJ Blue a juggernaut of a team.


YJ 2021 Blue is a juggernaut of a team? Maybe if they stay on LI. Can't beat any top MD club. Haven't in years.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.

TG only had (6) 2020 girls I heard it was a lot more than that or they wouldn't have been able to compete with YJ Blue a juggernaut of a team.


YJ 2021 Blue is a juggernaut of a team? Maybe if they stay on LI. Can't beat any top MD club. Haven't in years.


Pretty sure you missed the sarcasm !
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.

TG only had (6) 2020 girls I heard it was a lot more than that or they wouldn't have been able to compete with YJ Blue a juggernaut of a team.


And since you are ignorant of the facts your opinion is stupid and uninformed.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!

Legacy picked up the best TG players from last year and YJ got one of their attack players and the stud goalie the year before.


Legacy is the Long Island team to beat. The 2 TG additions have turned the whole program around. Even the younger ages will be better now that they have arrived.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!


YJ "D" would beat them now.. Most of their middies are from TG. LOL B,C, and D are all pretty equal.


YJ "C" would beat "B" (B only has an advantage in goal, both B goalies are very good), YJ "D" is a notch below but has some talent
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!

Legacy picked up the best TG players from last year and YJ got one of their attack players and the stud goalie the year before.

Easy now Daddy. .
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!


YJ "D" would beat them now.. Most of their middies are from TG. LOL B,C, and D are all pretty equal.


YJ "C" would beat "B" (B only has an advantage in goal, both B goalies are very good), YJ "D" is a notch below but has some talent


We know already YJC is secretly the best YJ team! They win lots of tournaments playing other C teams that are secretly A teams! Seriosy why else would anyone pay to play on a C team? You really should stop telling everyone or they will all be lining up to be on the C team and your kid may lose her spot to a family or friend of CR.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!

Legacy picked up the best TG players from last year and YJ got one of their attack players and the stud goalie the year before.

Easy now Daddy. .

Don't underestimate Legacy they are a solid group.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!

Legacy picked up the best TG players from last year and YJ got one of their attack players and the stud goalie the year before.

Easy now Daddy. .

Don't underestimate Legacy they are a solid group.


I agree. Legacy may be top team on LI this year. Will give MD teams big time trouble. Mids and attack are on the weaker side but team is solid. Will beat YJ this year.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!


YJ "D" would beat them now.. Most of their middies are from TG. LOL B,C, and D are all pretty equal.


YJ "C" would beat "B" (B only has an advantage in goal, both B goalies are very good), YJ "D" is a notch below but has some talent


Thanks goalie mom.


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!

Legacy picked up the best TG players from last year and YJ got one of their attack players and the stud goalie the year before.
[/quote]
Easy now Daddy. .

Don't underestimate Legacy they are a solid group.
[/quote]
they are a solid group, not underestimating that team at all. Just saying you don't need to keep telling us how great your kid is.
Originally Posted by Anonymous


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!

Legacy picked up the best TG players from last year and YJ got one of their attack players and the stud goalie the year before.

Easy now Daddy. .

Don't underestimate Legacy they are a solid group.
[/quote]
they are a solid group, not underestimating that team at all. Just saying you don't need to keep telling us how great your kid is.[/quote]

It sounded like they did add some quality players and were expecting a big difference for the fall ball. I know several of the parents and they were very disappointed with how the team played this past fall. Maybe they get it together, maybe not, but last game I saw them play, they still have a ways to go, so the self proclaiming of the "team to beat" may be premature.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.





This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!

Legacy picked up the best TG players from last year and YJ got one of their attack players and the stud goalie the year before.



I agree. Legacy may be top team on LI this year. Will give MD teams big time trouble. Mids and attack are on the weaker side but team is solid. Will beat YJ this year.

Both of these are most likely from the guy who stalks the WI girls here on this forum (especially the latter comment). He stalked them on the TG discussion, now stalks them here, now the are playing for Legacy. (They left TG and found a new place to play, let them be, they are no longer around you.) How could a team be a top team and have a realistic chance of competing with Md teams if the Mids and Attack are on the weaker side. They wouldn't be able to, but as an agitator he/she must come on here and try to stir up problems for them and who-ever they associate with. Please crawl back into your hole of misery and ineptitude.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!

Legacy picked up the best TG players from last year and YJ got one of their attack players and the stud goalie the year before.

Easy now Daddy. .

Don't underestimate Legacy they are a solid group.


I agree. Legacy may be top team on LI this year. Will give MD teams big time trouble. Mids and attack are on the weaker side but team is solid. Will beat YJ this year.


Having played Legacy and YJ this fall the Legacy parents are being delusional here. The teams aren't close. Not to say that it's impossible that Legacy could beat YJ in a game as things like that happen. But the teams are not close. Legacy cannot compete with the top MD teams. YJ on the other hand may not have beaten them in a while, but they are always very competitive in MD.
Someone is stirring the pot that is not a Legacy parent. We did get better with the new additions and will continue to improve individually and collectively.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!

Legacy picked up the best TG players from last year and YJ got one of their attack players and the stud goalie the year before.

Easy now Daddy. .

Don't underestimate Legacy they are a solid group.


I agree. Legacy may be top team on LI this year. Will give MD teams big time trouble. Mids and attack are on the weaker side but team is solid. Will beat YJ this year.


Having played Legacy and YJ this fall the Legacy parents are being delusional here. The teams aren't close. Not to say that it's impossible that Legacy could beat YJ in a game as things like that happen. But the teams are not close. Legacy cannot compete with the top MD teams. YJ on the other hand may not have beaten them in a while, but they are always very competitive in MD.


All of the top teams at this age are very even. YJ has not figured out the draw and that has been the difference.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Jimmy the great you ant. They do well on the top team against the MD clubs. They beat top guns black bad the only time they played last year. No one on Long Island will beat the A or B team. The will have a hard time with yj c team.

Are you referring to the Nationals when YJ Blue beat TG Black 8-6? Oh yeah that was old fashioned beat down.


Top Gun Black was very competitive at Nationals they did have (6) players from their 2020 team while YJ had (1) who were age eligible joining them. Not exactly representative of either teams normal 2021 squads.


This year's TG black team is not beating YJA. They lost all of their talent in the past 2 years and picked up a lot of B players. They would beat JYB but not A. And they would def beat YJC lol!


YJ "D" would beat them now.. Most of their middies are from TG. LOL B,C, and D are all pretty equal.


YJ "C" would beat "B" (B only has an advantage in goal, both B goalies are very good), YJ "D" is a notch below but has some talent


We know already YJC is secretly the best YJ team! They win lots of tournaments playing other C teams that are secretly A teams! Seriosy why else would anyone pay to play on a C team? You really should stop telling everyone or they will all be lining up to be on the C team and your kid may lose her spot to a family or friend of CR.


Enjoy another long summer on B dad, it has got to frustrate you. Travel all that way for another summer of beatdowns, ugh. But at least your daughter will be in a bunch of Bert's selfies on Twitter, lol
Apparently YJ is getting an attack from Legacy. Now we are roster of 25. Where is playing time coming from?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Apparently YJ is getting an attack from Legacy. Now we are roster of 25. Where is playing time coming from?


So 24 was OK, but you're worried about 25?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Apparently YJ is getting an attack from Legacy. Now we are roster of 25. Where is playing time coming from?


So 24 was OK, but you're worried about 25?




CR wants more chrome on her next truck and bigger tires - she's going to try and get 27 players for that team. Quantity over quality seems to be the new motto.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Apparently YJ is getting an attack from Legacy. Now we are roster of 25. Where is playing time coming from?


Not getting. Got. It really speaks to the level the YJ has fallen.
Fallen. That’s funny. Name one LI club outside 2023 that can beat YJs
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Fallen. That’s funny. Name one LI club outside 2023 that can beat YJs


Interesting. When did YJ become satisfied with being the best team on LI? I guess when they stopped being able to beat any top MD teams. Yes YJ has fallen. No grade prior to 2021 went 3 years without beating M&D or Skywalkers.
False. 18, 19 and 20s beat plenty of MD teams( M&D, Skywalkers, MD United Hero's). Please get you facts straight
Just for the record YJ 2023 beat Skywalker's, Hero's Green and MD United at the Lax for the Cure Tournament . I think the Long Island players are better. I would just like to play those Maryland teams in a birth year only tournament and see what's up. This holding back and having kids on the field that are 12 to 16 months older is ridiculous. At this age for girls and makes a massive difference.
I thought she was going to SB so why jump teams now?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
False. 18, 19 and 20s beat plenty of MD teams( M&D, Skywalkers, MD United Hero's). Please get you facts straight


Read much? I said that no grade prior to 2021 went 3 years WITHOUT beating the top MD teams. Point was that YJ are slipping as the 2021 team has not been able to have the same success as the teams you listed.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just for the record YJ 2023 beat Skywalker's, Hero's Green and MD United at the Lax for the Cure Tournament . I think the Long Island players are better. I would just like to play those Maryland teams in a birth year only tournament and see what's up. This holding back and having kids on the field that are 12 to 16 months older is ridiculous. At this age for girls and makes a massive difference.


Knock it off. Girls don't holdback like boys do. The girls schools don't allow it. I know the LI club directors feed you that excuse on why you can't beat the MD teams consistently, but it's just not true.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
False. 18, 19 and 20s beat plenty of MD teams( M&D, Skywalkers, MD United Hero's). Please get you facts straight


LOL I think that's what they were saying, ie they were bashing 2021 saying they have not beaten the better MD teams .
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
False. 18, 19 and 20s beat plenty of MD teams( M&D, Skywalkers, MD United Hero's). Please get you facts straight


LOL I think that's what they were saying, ie they were bashing 2021 saying they have not beaten the better MD teams .


It seems to be a two horse race in MD between Skywalkers and MnD. Everyone else seems to be trying to catch up.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
False. 18, 19 and 20s beat plenty of MD teams( M&D, Skywalkers, MD United Hero's). Please get you facts straight


LOL I think that's what they were saying, ie they were bashing 2021 saying they have not beaten the better MD teams .


It seems to be a two horse race in MD between Skywalkers and MnD. Everyone else seems to be trying to catch up.



That's not just the race in MD. They are clearly the top two teams in the country.
Not a strong team to begin with, so where does Legacy stand now?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not a strong team to begin with, so where does Legacy stand now?


Did one of the new kids defect or already?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
False. 18, 19 and 20s beat plenty of MD teams( M&D, Skywalkers, MD United Hero's). Please get you facts straight


LOL I think that's what they were saying, ie they were bashing 2021 saying they have not beaten the better MD teams .


It seems to be a two horse race in MD between Skywalkers and MnD. Everyone else seems to be trying to catch up.



That's not just the race in MD. They are clearly the top two teams in the country.


Clearly
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not a strong team to begin with, so where does Legacy stand now?


Did one of the new kids defect or already?

No different kid.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought she was going to SB so why jump teams now?

There were no commits from legacy on 2021, maybe one in 2020
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Apparently YJ is getting an attack from Legacy. Now we are roster of 25. Where is playing time coming from?


Not getting. Got. It really speaks to the level the YJ has fallen.


Which team? Will stink for whoever becomes the ninth attacker. Might be time to look at some other options, not a good age to ride the bench. Sounds like legacy might have an opening.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just for the record YJ 2023 beat Skywalker's, Hero's Green and MD United at the Lax for the Cure Tournament . I think the Long Island players are better. I would just like to play those Maryland teams in a birth year only tournament and see what's up. This holding back and having kids on the field that are 12 to 16 months older is ridiculous. At this age for girls and makes a massive difference.


Knock it off. Girls don't holdback like boys do. The girls schools don't allow it. I know the LI club directors feed you that excuse on why you can't beat the MD teams consistently, but it's just not true.


Then explain why two years ago when UA posted players DOB more than half the Baltimore metro and 3/4 of the DC team would be considered hold back ages. Long Island had a few 2-3 but also had a few that would have been considered normal for the age below if they lived in MD.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just for the record YJ 2023 beat Skywalker's, Hero's Green and MD United at the Lax for the Cure Tournament . I think the Long Island players are better. I would just like to play those Maryland teams in a birth year only tournament and see what's up. This holding back and having kids on the field that are 12 to 16 months older is ridiculous. At this age for girls and makes a massive difference.


Knock it off. Girls don't holdback like boys do. The girls schools don't allow it. I know the LI club directors feed you that excuse on why you can't beat the MD teams consistently, but it's just not true.


Then explain why two years ago when UA posted players DOB more than half the Baltimore metro and 3/4 of the DC team would be considered hold back ages. Long Island had a few 2-3 but also had a few that would have been considered normal for the age below if they lived in MD.


This is actually true news. Is that what they call it now? Anyway, yes Under Armour prints up the All American book every year with info on every player selected, and yes they included the age group and the region and the date of birth. It caused a big stir. Notice last year they deliberately left the date of birth out! I really could care less if the kids are several months older on average. Don't need to make up an excuse as to why the md kids are so competitive. Bottom line is they are good lacrosse players, just like many of the girls from LI, NJ, CT, VA, NC, MA....... let's get passed the age thing.
If they played by birth years and there are no holdbacks, then why aren't these teams at the Nationals. The folks at the NATIONALS cited that age discrepancy was the reason the big MD teams where not there. I really could give a [ChillLaxin], but 12 months is a huge thing when we are discussing 11/12 year olds. Especially girls. I still think the Maryland girls are very good lax players. Very good.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If they played by birth years and there are no holdbacks, then why aren't these teams at the Nationals. The folks at the NATIONALS cited that age discrepancy was the reason the big MD teams where not there. I really could give a [ChillLaxin], but 12 months is a huge thing when we are discussing 11/12 year olds. Especially girls. I still think the Maryland girls are very good lax players. Very good.


The age rule has nothing to do with why the MD teams don't go to the nationals. M&D plays in 5 summer tournaments already. There is no reason to play in more. I can tell you at 2021 there is not a single girl on M&D or Skywalkers that have repeated a grade or went to prefirst or anything like that. There is no competition at the "Nationals" and it's not worth making everyone travel to wherever they have them each year to play crappy teams from other parts of the country.
This topic is so done. Here is the deal, MD as a state has a different cut off date for entering a school year. It is a few months earlier than other regions. So while a girl may never have skipped a year or have been held back, there are a percentage of girls who would had to of been held back in other regions in order to be in the age group. They are not to be considered holdbacks, but they are older, and they would miss the cut offs for nationals. Who cares, move on.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This topic is so done. Here is the deal, MD as a state has a different cut off date for entering a school year. It is a few months earlier than other regions. So while a girl may never have skipped a year or have been held back, there are a percentage of girls who would had to of been held back in other regions in order to be in the age group. They are not to be considered holdbacks, but they are older, and they would miss the cut offs for nationals. Who cares, move on.


That's fair, but stop with they play 5 tournaments, no competition and too far to travel.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This topic is so done. Here is the deal, MD as a state has a different cut off date for entering a school year. It is a few months earlier than other regions. So while a girl may never have skipped a year or have been held back, there are a percentage of girls who would had to of been held back in other regions in order to be in the age group. They are not to be considered holdbacks, but they are older, and they would miss the cut offs for nationals. Who cares, move on.


The reason people don't move on is because your explanation is [ChillLaxin]. It does not explain the large numbers of players at UA who were not on age no matter what state they were from. The truth is there are many who have held their kids back for competitive advantage and it is a major advantage. The other truth is there are parents who are mad that they did not do the same or are mad because they view it as cheating. Take five or so players from any LI UA team play them down in age and those games will not even be close.
The we do five tournaments thing is a joke as the MD clubs attended the event years ago when it was in Florida its just they would rarely win it so they gave up.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This topic is so done. Here is the deal, MD as a state has a different cut off date for entering a school year. It is a few months earlier than other regions. So while a girl may never have skipped a year or have been held back, there are a percentage of girls who would had to of been held back in other regions in order to be in the age group. They are not to be considered holdbacks, but they are older, and they would miss the cut offs for nationals. Who cares, move on.


That's fair, but stop with they play 5 tournaments, no competition and too far to travel.


The age cutoff for nationals is the same as MD school cutoff. The ages of the girls is not why we don’t go. It is the travel, cost, lack of competition, and the fact that the girls can use a break
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just for the record YJ 2023 beat Skywalker's, Hero's Green and MD United at the Lax for the Cure Tournament . I think the Long Island players are better. I would just like to play those Maryland teams in a birth year only tournament and see what's up. This holding back and having kids on the field that are 12 to 16 months older is ridiculous. At this age for girls and makes a massive difference.


Knock it off. Girls don't holdback like boys do. The girls schools don't allow it. I know the LI club directors feed you that excuse on why you can't beat the MD teams consistently, but it's just not true.


Then explain why two years ago when UA posted players DOB more than half the Baltimore metro and 3/4 of the DC team would be considered hold back ages. Long Island had a few 2-3 but also had a few that would have been considered normal for the age below if they lived in MD.


This is actually true news. Is that what they call it now? Anyway, yes Under Armour prints up the All American book every year with info on every player selected, and yes they included the age group and the region and the date of birth. It caused a big stir. Notice last year they deliberately left the date of birth out! I really could care less if the kids are several months older on average. Don't need to make up an excuse as to why the md kids are so competitive. Bottom line is they are good lacrosse players, just like many of the girls from LI, NJ, CT, VA, NC, MA....... let's get passed the age thing.

Don't ever list NC ahead of MA in women's lacrosse. Thank you.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This topic is so done. Here is the deal, MD as a state has a different cut off date for entering a school year. It is a few months earlier than other regions. So while a girl may never have skipped a year or have been held back, there are a percentage of girls who would had to of been held back in other regions in order to be in the age group. They are not to be considered holdbacks, but they are older, and they would miss the cut offs for nationals. Who cares, move on.


That's fair, but stop with they play 5 tournaments, no competition and too far to travel.


The age cutoff for nationals is the same as MD school cutoff. The ages of the girls is not why we don’t go. It is the travel, cost, lack of competition, and the fact that the girls can use a break


How much to attend Mcdonough a year?
Just a matter of safety. If they are supposed to be a certain birth year, then they should be . Maybe if these teams showed to an event such as Nationals, perhaps it would kill this argument . I know one parent (cousin) and her daughter is 13 months older than my daughter. That's why people care. It size , bone density and speed that makes all the difference in the world . If you think it doesn't , thats because you are probably violating it. But don't tell me they don't hold girls back because it happens .
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just a matter of safety. If they are supposed to be a certain birth year, then they should be . Maybe if these teams showed to an event such as Nationals, perhaps it would kill this argument . I know one parent (cousin) and her daughter is 13 months older than my daughter. That's why people care. It size , bone density and speed that makes all the difference in the world . If you think it doesn't , thats because you are probably violating it. But don't tell me they don't hold girls back because it happens .

Safety is not a valid argument, at least at this age. The top girls (like the ones typically found on these level of teams) have are about to play with girls that are 3-4 years older than them during the HS season. Most of the same parents who complain about the holdbacks are the same parents that complain when their daughter doesn't get pulled up to Varsity in 8th grade. Can't have it both ways
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If they played by birth years and there are no holdbacks, then why aren't these teams at the Nationals. The folks at the NATIONALS cited that age discrepancy was the reason the big MD teams where not there. I really could give a [ChillLaxin], but 12 months is a huge thing when we are discussing 11/12 year olds. Especially girls. I still think the Maryland girls are very good lax players. Very good.


The age rule has nothing to do with why the MD teams don't go to the nationals. M&D plays in 5 summer tournaments already. There is no reason to play in more. I can tell you at 2021 there is not a single girl on M&D or Skywalkers that have repeated a grade or went to prefirst or anything like that. There is no competition at the "Nationals" and it's not worth making everyone travel to wherever they have them each year to play crappy teams from other parts of the country.


You are also forgetting that everyone from other parts of the country have helped to condition the MD teams so that they are not motivated to go down to Nationals. I really cannot blame the MD teams for not wanting to go down to Richmond, or NC or any of those other destinations to play. Yeah - there is a chance to play some great games - but, there are also crappy games. And who will they end up playing down there - YJ or TG or Steps? That's funny, they're passing. Why do they need to go down there and leave MD? Everyone else goes to MD for at least 4, 5 or maybe 6 tournaments. They don't need to go anywhere to find the good games. Unlike YJ - who has to go to MD to play MnD, heros, skywalkers, TLC and Capital - those guys don't need to go far and can have some really competitive games. I don't think it's 100% because of the age cut off. Why do they need to leave home and pay for hotels and etc - when LI and everyone else will come to them. Did you ever notice at Nationals there are some MD teams that do show up that you've never heard of.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If they played by birth years and there are no holdbacks, then why aren't these teams at the Nationals. The folks at the NATIONALS cited that age discrepancy was the reason the big MD teams where not there. I really could give a [ChillLaxin], but 12 months is a huge thing when we are discussing 11/12 year olds. Especially girls. I still think the Maryland girls are very good lax players. Very good.


The age rule has nothing to do with why the MD teams don't go to the nationals. M&D plays in 5 summer tournaments already. There is no reason to play in more. I can tell you at 2021 there is not a single girl on M&D or Skywalkers that have repeated a grade or went to prefirst or anything like that. There is no competition at the "Nationals" and it's not worth making everyone travel to wherever they have them each year to play crappy teams from other parts of the country.


You are also forgetting that everyone from other parts of the country have helped to condition the MD teams so that they are not motivated to go down to Nationals. I really cannot blame the MD teams for not wanting to go down to Richmond, or NC or any of those other destinations to play. Yeah - there is a chance to play some great games - but, there are also crappy games. And who will they end up playing down there - YJ or TG or Steps? That's funny, they're passing. Why do they need to go down there and leave MD? Everyone else goes to MD for at least 4, 5 or maybe 6 tournaments. They don't need to go anywhere to find the good games. Unlike YJ - who has to go to MD to play MnD, heros, skywalkers, TLC and Capital - those guys don't need to go far and can have some really competitive games. I don't think it's 100% because of the age cut off. Why do they need to leave home and pay for hotels and etc - when LI and everyone else will come to them. Did you ever notice at Nationals there are some MD teams that do show up that you've never heard of.


Actually, M&D and SW are playing out of town all summer with the exception of 1. Summer Genesis in Hershey, Champions Cup in Richmond, Lax for the Cure in NJ and G8 in NJ. None of those girls have repeated a grade, it's just not worth going to nationals to play another out of town tournament that late in the summer. They can play all the top teams in all 5 of the tournaments they already play in. Why go out of state to play teams from Michigan and Indiana and other places that can't compete with them. Yes, they may play YJ in the playoffs, but they will have already played them a few times already. What's the point other than to post it on your website that you are National Champions. That's funny when YJ hasn't beaten SW or M&D for years, but sure, they are the National Champions.

In terms of the safety argument....Don't LI girls start playing Varsity lacrosse in 8th and sometimes 7th grade? Our girls can't do that. So you are telling me you aren't worried about their safety playing against girls 4 or 5 years older but you are worried about playing girls that may be 3 or 4 months olders? Makes no sense.
The legacy team picked up the best TG players last year from the black team. Really my daughter is on the TG black and I know a few girls left but they were not the best players. Daddy keep drinking the Kool Aid and get a grip your kid is pretty good but not the best. LMAO You keep screeming from the sidelin
Understood. But by your comments you are admitting the girls are older. You got suckered right into admitting it without even knowing it. Thanks for playing come again. I'll be here all week. But just a touch on your point. If a team is labeled a certain year whether it be a 2021, 2022 or 2023, then that is the age that should be playing on the field. You can't lable yourself as one of the best teams in the country at a certain age group and have kids that are older. Remember you can't have it both ways.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Understood. But by your comments you are admitting the girls are older. You got suckered right into admitting it without even knowing it. Thanks for playing come again. I'll be here all week. But just a touch on your point. If a team is labeled a certain year whether it be a 2021, 2022 or 2023, then that is the age that should be playing on the field. You can't lable yourself as one of the best teams in the country at a certain age group and have kids that are older. Remember you can't have it both ways.


You're a knucklehead. I don't think anybody has ever denied that the MD girls are, on average, 3 months older - that's the difference in cut off to start school. And just a reminder because you seem to be confused - 2021, 2022 and 2023 are graduation years, not birth years. Whether you agree with school cut off dates, holdbacks or anything else, if the girls are scheduled to graduate in a given year they are allowed to play in that age bracket. If it's a birth year system like hockey, it's different.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Understood. But by your comments you are admitting the girls are older. You got suckered right into admitting it without even knowing it. Thanks for playing come again. I'll be here all week. But just a touch on your point. If a team is labeled a certain year whether it be a 2021, 2022 or 2023, then that is the age that should be playing on the field. You can't lable yourself as one of the best teams in the country at a certain age group and have kids that are older. Remember you can't have it both ways.


2021, 2022, 2023 is merely the class graduation year. And yes the girls on the class grad teams will in fact be graduating in those years. And most tournaments (all?) obviously run the grad year teams. Why? Because that's how the colleges need to see them, based on entering class. Nationals is a different system. It is a U15, U14, etc..... Not all kids, especially hold backs, will be allowed to to play with their grad class based teams. This goes for Md teams as well as anyone else. Then there are some regions that the grad years are actually under the cut off for age based U15 style tournaments. Where decent numbers of players from teams a grad year ahead are eligible to play for the grad class a year down. All depends what state you come from and how they let the kids enter school. Point is, what you may be referring to as a hold back is just a situation of circumstance.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Understood. But by your comments you are admitting the girls are older. You got suckered right into admitting it without even knowing it. Thanks for playing come again. I'll be here all week. But just a touch on your point. If a team is labeled a certain year whether it be a 2021, 2022 or 2023, then that is the age that should be playing on the field. You can't lable yourself as one of the best teams in the country at a certain age group and have kids that are older. Remember you can't have it both ways.


Not from MD, but to be honest, I think this is one of those LI excuses. The school age cutoff for Maryland is calendar year, Jan 1 to Dec 31. On LI and some other places, it's Sept 1 to Sept 1. My daughter has played in the UA tournament the last few years. I remember looking at the birthdates two years ago out of curiosity and while there were quite a few Maryland girls that were on the older side of their grade (that is born Oct-Dec), the two Maryland teams, Baltimore and DC, to my recollection, were almost entirely "on age". Just about every other region, including our own, had several girls that were a year older due to staying back/starting late. If you went to a calendar year age bracketing like soccer for instance, the Maryland girls that I saw would all still make the cutoff. The ones that wouldn't were from other regions.

I think the holdback/age thing is just sour grapes. The Maryland girls are good. Give them their due.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Understood. But by your comments you are admitting the girls are older. You got suckered right into admitting it without even knowing it. Thanks for playing come again. I'll be here all week. But just a touch on your point. If a team is labeled a certain year whether it be a 2021, 2022 or 2023, then that is the age that should be playing on the field. You can't lable yourself as one of the best teams in the country at a certain age group and have kids that are older. Remember you can't have it both ways.


Not from MD, but to be honest, I think this is one of those LI excuses. The school age cutoff for Maryland is calendar year, Jan 1 to Dec 31. On LI and some other places, it's Sept 1 to Sept 1. My daughter has played in the UA tournament the last few years. I remember looking at the birthdates two years ago out of curiosity and while there were quite a few Maryland girls that were on the older side of their grade (that is born Oct-Dec), the two Maryland teams, Baltimore and DC, to my recollection, were almost entirely "on age". Just about every other region, including our own, had several girls that were a year older due to staying back/starting late. If you went to a calendar year age bracketing like soccer for instance, the Maryland girls that I saw would all still make the cutoff. The ones that wouldn't were from other regions.

I think the holdback/age thing is just sour grapes. The Maryland girls are good. Give them their due.


Sorry, I think i reversed the school cutoff dates. But the point holds.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Understood. But by your comments you are admitting the girls are older. You got suckered right into admitting it without even knowing it. Thanks for playing come again. I'll be here all week. But just a touch on your point. If a team is labeled a certain year whether it be a 2021, 2022 or 2023, then that is the age that should be playing on the field. You can't lable yourself as one of the best teams in the country at a certain age group and have kids that are older. Remember you can't have it both ways.


Not from MD, but to be honest, I think this is one of those LI excuses. The school age cutoff for Maryland is calendar year, Jan 1 to Dec 31. On LI and some other places, it's Sept 1 to Sept 1. My daughter has played in the UA tournament the last few years. I remember looking at the birthdates two years ago out of curiosity and while there were quite a few Maryland girls that were on the older side of their grade (that is born Oct-Dec), the two Maryland teams, Baltimore and DC, to my recollection, were almost entirely "on age". Just about every other region, including our own, had several girls that were a year older due to staying back/starting late. If you went to a calendar year age bracketing like soccer for instance, the Maryland girls that I saw would all still make the cutoff. The ones that wouldn't were from other regions.

I think the holdback/age thing is just sour grapes. The Maryland girls are good. Give them their due.

They are good however the age is a factor. A Maryland team called Elite went to Nationals last summer and got beat handily by YJ, TG and Igloo in the 23 age group. Earlier in the summer when we played them in Maryland they were a completely different team far better than the one we played at Nationals. Coincidence?
Age means a lot when the girls are younger. That is stating the obvious. You can just look at MD and LI teams and see that some of the MD girls are older. Much of it may be because of the school cut-off dates. It is less of an issue as the girls get older. Perhaps that is why Long Island won Under Armour at both age groups this past year.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Age means a lot when the girls are younger. That is stating the obvious. You can just look at MD and LI teams and see that some of the MD girls are older. Much of it may be because of the school cut-off dates. It is less of an issue as the girls get older. Perhaps that is why Long Island won Under Armour at both age groups this past year.


Your statement almost makes it sound like you believe that the UA teams are actually the best players from each region and that there is not bias involved with who makes those teams.
The Maryland girls are great. In fact I think it's the epicenter of Lacrosse right now and I'm not from Maryland. But to say that at that age , whether it be a 7 to even 12-months difference, in that age group is insignificant, then you're being disingenuous. This isn't a discussion who the better kids are. We are simply saying is that at this age bracket and in this point of these young women's lives 6 to 12 months is quite significant and a lot of changes happen in that time period. If you're playing for one of the bigger programs whether it be Long Island and or Maryland or wherever for that matter, then chances are the kids are skilled enough we're good enough to be considering College as a possibility. This discussion is simply with regards to growth spurt timing for adolescent girls. And the differences of girls who have already experienced at growth spurt do the age and those who have not. That's all
That's your mentality. Simply stated by your first initial response. You must be a millennial because you take things so literal. you know what's being discussed here you [ChillLaxin]. Girls with a birth year of 2003 graduate in 2021 and girls with a birth year of 2005 graduate in 2023. It should be a birth year thing for each of those respective age groups. Oh wait a minute ..it is with the Nationals , and that's why the teams from Maryland do not show up. You would have to send teams up that aren't used to playing with each other because there are girls who would not qualify for that tournament does having to play with replacements. If you wanted to debunk that... go to Nationals. Until then deal with it. You know so much about hockey which means you probably travel everywhere for it ,yet you won't travel 3 hrs for a tournament in the next state. I'm not buying it. I know there's a three-month cutoff difference but the simple fact is there are girls who are up to a year older on those teams.
Agree with the last post. I also think it is fair to say that UA teams and results are a fair indication of what regions are the strongest. None of the regional teams are perfect and each region has politics and questionable selections but the best players are there for the most part and teams are playing to win.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The legacy team picked up the best TG players last year from the black team. Really my daughter is on the TG black and I know a few girls left but they were not the best players. Daddy keep drinking the Kool Aid and get a grip your kid is pretty good but not the best. LMAO You keep screeming from the sidelin


Legacy picked up the best TG players.......more like they left because they weren't the best players
The reason the older LI girls possibly won UA was because in the semi final game, the refs took over. Called four yellow cards on New England in the first 12 minutes of the game. At least 2, maybe 3 were phantom. 1 was legit. New England played a player down for over 45 minutes. In pool play, New England beat LI, albeit in OT. So two evenly matched teams. LI still might have won the semi final game. But the girls did not get a chance to resolve it on the field. Shameful. Know the facts, they will set you free.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That's your mentality. Simply stated by your first initial response. You must be a millennial because you take things so literal. you know what's being discussed here you [ChillLaxin]. Girls with a birth year of 2003 graduate in 2021 and girls with a birth year of 2005 graduate in 2023. It should be a birth year thing for each of those respective age groups. Oh wait a minute ..it is with the Nationals , and that's why the teams from Maryland do not show up. You would have to send teams up that aren't used to playing with each other because there are girls who would not qualify for that tournament does having to play with replacements. If you wanted to debunk that... go to Nationals. Until then deal with it. You know so much about hockey which means you probably travel everywhere for it ,yet you won't travel 3 hrs for a tournament in the next state. I'm not buying it. I know there's a three-month cutoff difference but the simple fact is there are girls who are up to a year older on those teams.


Nationals aren't done by birth year. They have a 9/1 cutoff which is the same as the MD school cutoff. All the M&D and SW 2021 girls would be able to play there. They choose not to because it's a waste of time and money after a long summer and the programs don't feel the need to post on their website that they are "National Champs". They spend the summer proving they are the two best teams in front of hundreds of college coaches. Why go to one more tournament, where there are no college coaches, to prove it again. Instead our girls actually get to spend a few weeks relaxing, going to the beach, hanging with friends, etc... You know, actually be a teenage girl.
Both you dopey LI and MD parents do not get why UA was brought up. Prior to this past summer the players DOB was listed on the players bios . The percentage of players from the Baltimore Metro and Washington DC who would be considered hold backs using their respective States school age cutoffs was ridiculously high. It was also evident when the MD teams attended the nationals tournaments in the past they were not nearly as successful , why do you think that is.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Both you dopey LI and MD parents do not get why UA was brought up. Prior to this past summer the players DOB was listed on the players bios . The percentage of players from the Baltimore Metro and Washington DC who would be considered hold backs using their respective States school age cutoffs was ridiculously high. It was also evident when the MD teams attended the nationals tournaments in the past they were not nearly as successful , why do you think that is.


Not true. The MD girls looked all on age.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Both you dopey LI and MD parents do not get why UA was brought up. Prior to this past summer the players DOB was listed on the players bios . The percentage of players from the Baltimore Metro and Washington DC who would be considered hold backs using their respective States school age cutoffs was ridiculously high. It was also evident when the MD teams attended the nationals tournaments in the past they were not nearly as successful , why do you think that is.


Wrong. Very few girls at UA had birthdays prior to 9/1. And the last time either SW or M&D attended nationals they won easily. Stop making things up.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Both you dopey LI and MD parents do not get why UA was brought up. Prior to this past summer the players DOB was listed on the players bios . The percentage of players from the Baltimore Metro and Washington DC who would be considered hold backs using their respective States school age cutoffs was ridiculously high. It was also evident when the MD teams attended the nationals tournaments in the past they were not nearly as successful , why do you think that is.


Wrong. Very few girls at UA had birthdays prior to 9/1. And the last time either SW or M&D attended nationals they won easily. Stop making things up.


When, 2009?
Do you people have learning disabilities.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Both you dopey LI and MD parents do not get why UA was brought up. Prior to this past summer the players DOB was listed on the players bios . The percentage of players from the Baltimore Metro and Washington DC who would be considered hold backs using their respective States school age cutoffs was ridiculously high. It was also evident when the MD teams attended the nationals tournaments in the past they were not nearly as successful , why do you think that is.


Wrong. Very few girls at UA had birthdays prior to 9/1. And the last time either SW or M&D attended nationals they won easily. Stop making things up.


If you like I can give you the number of players for from 2 years ago who had birthdays prior to 9/1 on those teams, why do you think UA stopped putting birthdays on the bios. SW won the nationals once and M&D never won them ,feel free to look it up.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Do you people have learning disabilities.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Both you dopey LI and MD parents do not get why UA was brought up. Prior to this past summer the players DOB was listed on the players bios . The percentage of players from the Baltimore Metro and Washington DC who would be considered hold backs using their respective States school age cutoffs was ridiculously high. It was also evident when the MD teams attended the nationals tournaments in the past they were not nearly as successful , why do you think that is.


Wrong. Very few girls at UA had birthdays prior to 9/1. And the last time either SW or M&D attended nationals they won easily. Stop making things up.


If you like I can give you the number of players for from 2 years ago who had birthdays prior to 9/1 on those teams, why do you think UA stopped putting birthdays on the bios. SW won the nationals once and M&D never won them ,feel free to look it up.


on the Command team there were none
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Do you people have learning disabilities.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Both you dopey LI and MD parents do not get why UA was brought up. Prior to this past summer the players DOB was listed on the players bios . The percentage of players from the Baltimore Metro and Washington DC who would be considered hold backs using their respective States school age cutoffs was ridiculously high. It was also evident when the MD teams attended the nationals tournaments in the past they were not nearly as successful , why do you think that is.


Wrong. Very few girls at UA had birthdays prior to 9/1. And the last time either SW or M&D attended nationals they won easily. Stop making things up.


If you like I can give you the number of players for from 2 years ago who had birthdays prior to 9/1 on those teams, why do you think UA stopped putting birthdays on the bios. SW won the nationals once and M&D never won them ,feel free to look it up.


on the Command team there were none


What year are you talking about and what grades are the command team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Do you people have learning disabilities.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Both you dopey LI and MD parents do not get why UA was brought up. Prior to this past summer the players DOB was listed on the players bios . The percentage of players from the Baltimore Metro and Washington DC who would be considered hold backs using their respective States school age cutoffs was ridiculously high. It was also evident when the MD teams attended the nationals tournaments in the past they were not nearly as successful , why do you think that is.


Wrong. Very few girls at UA had birthdays prior to 9/1. And the last time either SW or M&D attended nationals they won easily. Stop making things up.


If you like I can give you the number of players for from 2 years ago who had birthdays prior to 9/1 on those teams, why do you think UA stopped putting birthdays on the bios. SW won the nationals once and M&D never won them ,feel free to look it up.


on the Command team there were none


What year are you talking about and what grades are the command team.


2016. The last year they published birthdates. Command is rising 9th and 10th graders
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Do you people have learning disabilities.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Both you dopey LI and MD parents do not get why UA was brought up. Prior to this past summer the players DOB was listed on the players bios . The percentage of players from the Baltimore Metro and Washington DC who would be considered hold backs using their respective States school age cutoffs was ridiculously high. It was also evident when the MD teams attended the nationals tournaments in the past they were not nearly as successful , why do you think that is.


Wrong. Very few girls at UA had birthdays prior to 9/1. And the last time either SW or M&D attended nationals they won easily. Stop making things up.


If you like I can give you the number of players for from 2 years ago who had birthdays prior to 9/1 on those teams, why do you think UA stopped putting birthdays on the bios. SW won the nationals once and M&D never won them ,feel free to look it up.


M&D hasn't gone before. And SW only went once and won easily. The command division teams for MD have had no overage girls for the last couple years. In fact, LI has had older girls with kids starting school late up there. This is all just a made up excuse by CR and other LI club directors on why LI teams now struggle so mightily against the top MD teams. It couldn't be that our teams are so much better coached than yours. Must be cheating right? You keep yelling go to goal to little susie. It may start to work.
This has been the best post yet. Finally there are more club programs popping up in LI and NJ, which dilutes the talent base. That happened in MD in 2010. While MD will continue to dominate the summer club scene, congrats to SB on the pre-season #2 ranking.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Do you people have learning disabilities.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Both you dopey LI and MD parents do not get why UA was brought up. Prior to this past summer the players DOB was listed on the players bios . The percentage of players from the Baltimore Metro and Washington DC who would be considered hold backs using their respective States school age cutoffs was ridiculously high. It was also evident when the MD teams attended the nationals tournaments in the past they were not nearly as successful , why do you think that is.


Wrong. Very few girls at UA had birthdays prior to 9/1. And the last time either SW or M&D attended nationals they won easily. Stop making things up.


If you like I can give you the number of players for from 2 years ago who had birthdays prior to 9/1 on those teams, why do you think UA stopped putting birthdays on the bios. SW won the nationals once and M&D never won them ,feel free to look it up.


M&D hasn't gone before. And SW only went once and won easily. The command division teams for MD have had no overage girls for the last couple years. In fact, LI has had older girls with kids starting school late up there. This is all just a made up excuse by CR and other LI club directors on why LI teams now struggle so mightily against the top MD teams. It couldn't be that our teams are so much better coached than yours. Must be cheating right? You keep yelling go to goal to little susie. It may start to work.


M&D has gone before and even combined with another Maryland team as they did not have enough on age girls one year calling themselves something like NeM&D. Baltimore metro had 10 girls on that command team in 2016 who are holdbacks by the sept1 Maryland birth dates ( some of them were 2020 players who should have been 2019 so not over age for that division but holdbacks regardless) .I can post their bdays if you like . SW went for multiple years winning it once , you can look up the brackets.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Do you people have learning disabilities.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Both you dopey LI and MD parents do not get why UA was brought up. Prior to this past summer the players DOB was listed on the players bios . The percentage of players from the Baltimore Metro and Washington DC who would be considered hold backs using their respective States school age cutoffs was ridiculously high. It was also evident when the MD teams attended the nationals tournaments in the past they were not nearly as successful , why do you think that is.


Wrong. Very few girls at UA had birthdays prior to 9/1. And the last time either SW or M&D attended nationals they won easily. Stop making things up.


If you like I can give you the number of players for from 2 years ago who had birthdays prior to 9/1 on those teams, why do you think UA stopped putting birthdays on the bios. SW won the nationals once and M&D never won them ,feel free to look it up.


M&D hasn't gone before. And SW only went once and won easily. The command division teams for MD have had no overage girls for the last couple years. In fact, LI has had older girls with kids starting school late up there. This is all just a made up excuse by CR and other LI club directors on why LI teams now struggle so mightily against the top MD teams. It couldn't be that our teams are so much better coached than yours. Must be cheating right? You keep yelling go to goal to little susie. It may start to work.


M&D has gone before and even combined with another Maryland team as they did not have enough on age girls one year calling themselves something like NeM&D. Baltimore metro had 10 girls on that command team in 2016 who are holdbacks by the sept1 Maryland birth dates ( some of them were 2020 players who should have been 2019 so not over age for that division but holdbacks regardless) .I can post their bdays if you like . SW went for multiple years winning it once , you can look up the brackets.


Interesting. New England won the Command Division. Not Baltimore or LI.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Do you people have learning disabilities.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Both you dopey LI and MD parents do not get why UA was brought up. Prior to this past summer the players DOB was listed on the players bios . The percentage of players from the Baltimore Metro and Washington DC who would be considered hold backs using their respective States school age cutoffs was ridiculously high. It was also evident when the MD teams attended the nationals tournaments in the past they were not nearly as successful , why do you think that is.


Wrong. Very few girls at UA had birthdays prior to 9/1. And the last time either SW or M&D attended nationals they won easily. Stop making things up.


If you like I can give you the number of players for from 2 years ago who had birthdays prior to 9/1 on those teams, why do you think UA stopped putting birthdays on the bios. SW won the nationals once and M&D never won them ,feel free to look it up.


M&D hasn't gone before. And SW only went once and won easily. The command division teams for MD have had no overage girls for the last couple years. In fact, LI has had older girls with kids starting school late up there. This is all just a made up excuse by CR and other LI club directors on why LI teams now struggle so mightily against the top MD teams. It couldn't be that our teams are so much better coached than yours. Must be cheating right? You keep yelling go to goal to little susie. It may start to work.


M&D has gone before and even combined with another Maryland team as they did not have enough on age girls one year calling themselves something like NeM&D. Baltimore metro had 10 girls on that command team in 2016 who are holdbacks by the sept1 Maryland birth dates ( some of them were 2020 players who should have been 2019 so not over age for that division but holdbacks regardless) .I can post their bdays if you like . SW went for multiple years winning it once , you can look up the brackets.


Interesting. New England won the Command Division. Not Baltimore or LI.



Nobody cares
Who cares...older, younger same age. Play who you play. Win or lose. In the end it doesn't matter except to a few who want to brag about a win. My mom always said.........say little when you lose.....say less when you win. Merry Christmas
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Do you people have learning disabilities.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Both you dopey LI and MD parents do not get why UA was brought up. Prior to this past summer the players DOB was listed on the players bios . The percentage of players from the Baltimore Metro and Washington DC who would be considered hold backs using their respective States school age cutoffs was ridiculously high. It was also evident when the MD teams attended the nationals tournaments in the past they were not nearly as successful , why do you think that is.


Wrong. Very few girls at UA had birthdays prior to 9/1. And the last time either SW or M&D attended nationals they won easily. Stop making things up.


If you like I can give you the number of players for from 2 years ago who had birthdays prior to 9/1 on those teams, why do you think UA stopped putting birthdays on the bios. SW won the nationals once and M&D never won them ,feel free to look it up.


M&D hasn't gone before. And SW only went once and won easily. The command division teams for MD have had no overage girls for the last couple years. In fact, LI has had older girls with kids starting school late up there. This is all just a made up excuse by CR and other LI club directors on why LI teams now struggle so mightily against the top MD teams. It couldn't be that our teams are so much better coached than yours. Must be cheating right? You keep yelling go to goal to little susie. It may start to work.


M&D has gone before and even combined with another Maryland team as they did not have enough on age girls one year calling themselves something like NeM&D. Baltimore metro had 10 girls on that command team in 2016 who are holdbacks by the sept1 Maryland birth dates ( some of them were 2020 players who should have been 2019 so not over age for that division but holdbacks regardless) .I can post their bdays if you like . SW went for multiple years winning it once , you can look up the brackets.


Interesting. New England won the Command Division. Not Baltimore or LI.


Interesting, nobody but you three [ChillLaxin] cares


M&D has gone before and even combined with another Maryland team as they did not have enough on age girls one year calling themselves something like NeM&D. Baltimore metro had 10 girls on that command team in 2016 who are holdbacks by the sept1 Maryland birth dates ( some of them were 2020 players who should have been 2019 so not over age for that division but holdbacks regardless) .I can post their bdays if you like . SW went for multiple years winning it once , you can look up the brackets.[/quote]

Interesting. New England won the Command Division. Not Baltimore or LI.
[/quote]

Interesting, nobody but you three [ChillLaxin] cares[/quote]

You did enough to take the time to respond. While u guys argue about who is too old and what region is better, little old non hot bed New England cleans your clocks. Funny.
Originally Posted by Anonymous


M&D has gone before and even combined with another Maryland team as they did not have enough on age girls one year calling themselves something like NeM&D. Baltimore metro had 10 girls on that command team in 2016 who are holdbacks by the sept1 Maryland birth dates ( some of them were 2020 players who should have been 2019 so not over age for that division but holdbacks regardless) .I can post their bdays if you like . SW went for multiple years winning it once , you can look up the brackets.




Interesting. New England won the Command Division. Not Baltimore or LI.
[/quote]

Interesting, nobody but you three [ChillLaxin] cares[/quote]

You did enough to take the time to respond. While u guys argue about who is too old and what region is better, little old non hot bed New England cleans your clocks. Funny.[/quote]

First clean your clocks is a bit dramatic in that they would have lost if not for a stick check ( perfectly legal and not an excuse just saying not exactly a beat down ) . This year NE did in fact lose convincingly no stick check necessary . To the people who keep posting no one cares , why are you in a lacrosse forum to begin with.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


M&D has gone before and even combined with another Maryland team as they did not have enough on age girls one year calling themselves something like NeM&D. Baltimore metro had 10 girls on that command team in 2016 who are holdbacks by the sept1 Maryland birth dates ( some of them were 2020 players who should have been 2019 so not over age for that division but holdbacks regardless) .I can post their bdays if you like . SW went for multiple years winning it once , you can look up the brackets.




Interesting. New England won the Command Division. Not Baltimore or LI.


Interesting, nobody but you three [ChillLaxin] cares[/quote]

You did enough to take the time to respond. While u guys argue about who is too old and what region is better, little old non hot bed New England cleans your clocks. Funny.[/quote]

First clean your clocks is a bit dramatic in that they would have lost if not for a stick check ( perfectly legal and not an excuse just saying not exactly a beat down ) . This year NE did in fact lose convincingly no stick check necessary . To the people who keep posting no one cares , why are you in a lacrosse forum to begin with.
[/quote]

Well this year New England beat LI in pool play in OT and then played a man down for 45 minutes in the semifinal on some pretty bad calls. Hard to really say. As far as stick check in OT 2 years ago u r correct, perfectly legal, but shouldn't have come to it. NE won on a last second goal in regulation that was disallowed incorrectly. So either way. And in pool play it was 12-6 NE not real close. I would say two very evenly matched teams both years. In fact the two best. Which is interesting given how much Maryland likes to brag. I think Maryland has more depth, but I would say in terms of top end talent, LI and New England hold their own pretty well. And yes I fully concede that NE in order to compete needs to draw from several states (Mainly Ma/RI/CT) vs LI which is smaller. Not debating LI's standing as one of the two best areas for lax. Just happy to see NE and some other areas starting to make a dent.
What an incredibly rediculous forum/thread. We are all dumber for having read it.
No .. it's just when you see girls that are physically developed playing against girls who obviously are not, people start to question things a little bit.. No one's knocking the talent of any MD kids. But the age discrepancy thing needs to be addressed.
[quote=Anonymous]No .. it's just when you see girls that are physically developed playing against girls who obviously are not, people start to question things a little bit.. No one's knocking the talent of any MD kids. But the age discrepancy thing needs to be addressed.

It used to be addressed on the field at the U15 Nationals. When the size wasn't as big of a factor as it is when they are younger. MD doesn't like losing so they stopped going. Age is a factor or else the MD teams would like to go to the Nationals and say they are the greatest.
Nationals is that like Elite, Bluechip, Nat. Championships, Summer Nat. Champ, Fall Nat. Champ, indoor Nat Champ, or any other buzz word they stick on the front end of there tournament....
[quote=Anonymous]Nationals is that like Elite, Bluechip, Nat. Championships, Summer Nat. Champ, Fall Nat. Champ, indoor Nat Champ, or any other buzz word they stick on the front end of there tournament....

Except Nationals goes by age not grade.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Nationals is that like Elite, Bluechip, Nat. Championships, Summer Nat. Champ, Fall Nat. Champ, indoor Nat Champ, or any other buzz word they stick on the front end of there tournament....


They are talking about the US lacrosse national championship, which does have the DOB cutoffs. But is a weak tournament. But the most prestigious event by far, UA, does not use the cut off and "used to " print DOB, which clearly showed what's going on. That event goes by region, and several years I saw many girls who didn't make the team in their own region, ended up trying out and playing for other regions. So you get to thinking, could my daughter go play down in age group next year in a different region so she stands out? Hmmm, she looks good playing her own age, she would look like a stud playing down. Of course if she tried to play age down in the Baltimore or D.C. Region, she would ultimately end up being the same age as the rest of the team, lol.
Ok just went and looked at it, actually never even heard of it and it doesn’t look that prestigious to me. Only see 2-3 good club teams represented in the tournament but yes they are from LI, same teams we play all year though. All most all MD/DC club teams are finished for the year by Aug they might want to think about moving the dates if they want other teams to participate... Anyway there are several other tournaments out there better then that one G8 being one of them which would give you more of a National title then any US lax one. But if you want to beat a dead horse and blame it on age have at it..
Nationals is a great tournament but it certainly does not crown a real champ, it’s realy a NY and Others tournament. Only tournament that gives a chance for all the NY teams to play each other and sort out who’s-who.

I also agree the timing stinks! Delaware in August you can barely breath. Great Tournament but glad it’s my daughters last year going.
Legacy picked up 2 good players from TG but they also picked up to crazy parents
[quote=Anonymous]Legacy picked up 2 good players from TG but they also picked up to crazy parents

That's an understatement.
Rumor has it a 21' out of Florida is now verbally committed to Syracuse. So much for early recruiting. What's the deal?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Legacy picked up 2 good players from TG but they also picked up to crazy parents


Somebody started their day off in a bad mood! What gives?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Legacy picked up 2 good players from TG but they also picked up to crazy parents


Somebody started their day off in a bad mood! What gives?



More likely..........they were overheard saying something negative about another kid.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Legacy picked up 2 good players from TG but they also picked up to crazy parents


Somebody started their day off in a bad mood! What gives?



More likely..........they were overheard saying something negative about another kid.

That's why TG parents jumped for joy when they left TG, always had an opinion on someone else's kid.
Typical non athletic parents
Anybody know where the new girl on Bert's team is from?
[quote=Anonymous]Anybody know where the new girl on Bert's team is from?

Legacy
Didn't the girl from Legacy go to YJ?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Anybody know where the new girl on Bert's team is from?

Legacy


I thought that was the girl on A, she came from Legacy. The new defender on Bert's is from Legacy too? Legacy A, B or C???
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Anybody know where the new girl on Bert's team is from?

Legacy


I thought that was the girl on A, she came from Legacy. The new defender on Bert's is from Legacy too? Legacy A, B or C???


I think Legacy only has one team at this age
If it's the new girl listed on the Bert's roster I think she's from Brookhaven Bandits if not then Blue Devils.
25 on the A roster is a joke
Was this weekend suppose to bring the A team together or separate the "chosen ones" from the rest?
[quote=Anonymous]Was this weekend suppose to bring the A team together or separate the "chosen ones" from the rest?

The chosen ones.
OK I'll bite. What was this weekend?

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Was this weekend suppose to bring the A team together or separate the "chosen ones" from the rest?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Was this weekend suppose to bring the A team together or separate the "chosen ones" from the rest?


Do you actually have a kid on the team or are you just a concerned bystander?
Um what A team? This is a generic 2021 thread. Self absorbed much?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Was this weekend suppose to bring the A team together or separate the "chosen ones" from the rest?



Ohhh boy, what happened? Please share....
Crickets
Ok let's rejuvenate the thread then. What is everyone seeing/hearing/doing re: recruiting. Is anyone getting legit looks and contact this past fall ?
[quote=Anonymous]Ok let's rejuvenate the thread then. What is everyone seeing/hearing/doing re: recruiting. Is anyone getting legit looks and contact this past fall ?

It'll be interesting to see what happens with the recruiting rule change vote in April then this can be a very big year for this age group.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Ok let's rejuvenate the thread then. What is everyone seeing/hearing/doing re: recruiting. Is anyone getting legit looks and contact this past fall ?


Yes. Half my D's team is pretty well set. They did their visits in the fall and have "agreements" in place. The other half should be done before the summer schedule starts up. Coaches are waiting to see how they do this spring with their high school teams. This recruiting thing was easier and smoother than we had thought it would be. Our club coach and club director was so helpful through the whole process, now, we just sit back and enjoy the rest of the ride.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Ok let's rejuvenate the thread then. What is everyone seeing/hearing/doing re: recruiting. Is anyone getting legit looks and contact this past fall ?


Yes. Half my D's team is pretty well set. They did their visits in the fall and have "agreements" in place. The other half should be done before the summer schedule starts up. Coaches are waiting to see how they do this spring with their high school teams. This recruiting thing was easier and smoother than we had thought it would be. Our club coach and club director was so helpful through the whole process, now, we just sit back and enjoy the rest of the ride.


And then you woke up...
Deals in place, that’s hysterical. No 2021 deals r done. 20s are not even close to being finished
What is the "recruiting rule change vote in April" all about?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Ok let's rejuvenate the thread then. What is everyone seeing/hearing/doing re: recruiting. Is anyone getting legit looks and contact this past fall ?


Yes. Half my D's team is pretty well set. They did their visits in the fall and have "agreements" in place. The other half should be done before the summer schedule starts up. Coaches are waiting to see how they do this spring with their high school teams. This recruiting thing was easier and smoother than we had thought it would be. Our club coach and club director was so helpful through the whole process, now, we just sit back and enjoy the rest of the ride.


And then you woke up...



They are all committed to top 5 lax schools with 3/4 or full rides. Coaches want to keep it on the down-low.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Ok let's rejuvenate the thread then. What is everyone seeing/hearing/doing re: recruiting. Is anyone getting legit looks and contact this past fall ?


Yes. Half my D's team is pretty well set. They did their visits in the fall and have "agreements" in place. The other half should be done before the summer schedule starts up. Coaches are waiting to see how they do this spring with their high school teams. This recruiting thing was easier and smoother than we had thought it would be. Our club coach and club director was so helpful through the whole process, now, we just sit back and enjoy the rest of the ride.


And then you woke up...



They are all committed to top 5 lax schools with 3/4 or full rides. Coaches want to keep it on the down-low.


Why stop there, all full rides to top 2 schools
[quote=Anonymous]What is the "recruiting rule change vote in April" all about?

Recruiting goes from September 1 of your junior year to September 1 of your sophomore year if it gets approved April 1.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Deals in place, that’s hysterical. No 2021 deals r done. 20s are not even close to being finished

Doesn't TG have a few girls committed to Stony Brook at this age?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Ok let's rejuvenate the thread then. What is everyone seeing/hearing/doing re: recruiting. Is anyone getting legit looks and contact this past fall ?


Yes. Half my D's team is pretty well set. They did their visits in the fall and have "agreements" in place. The other half should be done before the summer schedule starts up. Coaches are waiting to see how they do this spring with their high school teams. This recruiting thing was easier and smoother than we had thought it would be. Our club coach and club director was so helpful through the whole process, now, we just sit back and enjoy the rest of the ride.


And then you woke up...



They are all committed to top 5 lax schools with 3/4 or full rides. Coaches want to keep it on the down-low.


If this were true, which I don't think it is, I'm sure your kids teammates and the coaches they are supposedly "wink wink"ed to would love you telling people. I can't imagine (or name frankly) anyone in this grade being so good that any coach would put their NCAA status on the line. but nice try
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Deals in place, that’s hysterical. No 2021 deals r done. 20s are not even close to being finished

Doesn't TG have a few girls committed to Stony Brook at this age?

no, do you really think JS would soil what is going to be a great season by breaking NCAA rules?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Deals in place, that’s hysterical. No 2021 deals r done. 20s are not even close to being finished

Doesn't TG have a few girls committed to Stony Brook at this age?

no, do you really think JS would soil what is going to be a great season by breaking NCAA rules?
lol not tg anymore and wink wink ask their dads
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Deals in place, that’s hysterical. No 2021 deals r done. 20s are not even close to being finished

Doesn't TG have a few girls committed to Stony Brook at this age?

no, do you really think JS would soil what is going to be a great season by breaking NCAA rules?

It appears he doesn’t care. At his clinics the parents of those TG girls can easily be overheard talking to him about their girls. It’s actually crazy how blatant it is.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Deals in place, that’s hysterical. No 2021 deals r done. 20s are not even close to being finished

Doesn't TG have a few girls committed to Stony Brook at this age?

no, do you really think JS would soil what is going to be a great season by breaking NCAA rules?
lol not tg anymore and wink wink ask their dads


wink wink Im good thanks... I hope they don't sink their girls chances of being recruited at SB or anywhere with their mouths
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Deals in place, that’s hysterical. No 2021 deals r done. 20s are not even close to being finished

Doesn't TG have a few girls committed to Stony Brook at this age?

no, do you really think JS would soil what is going to be a great season by breaking NCAA rules?

It appears he doesn’t care. At his clinics the parents of those TG girls can easily be overheard talking to him about their girls. It’s actually crazy how blatant it is.


agreed, the rule is as flexible as the coaches want it to be - some won't talk at all and others have not missed a beat since the rule change
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Deals in place, that’s hysterical. No 2021 deals r done. 20s are not even close to being finished

Doesn't TG have a few girls committed to Stony Brook at this age?

no, do you really think JS would soil what is going to be a great season by breaking NCAA rules?

It appears he doesn’t care. At his clinics the parents of those TG girls can easily be overheard talking to him about their girls. It’s actually crazy how blatant it is.

Those TG girls are now at Legacy
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Deals in place, that’s hysterical. No 2021 deals r done. 20s are not even close to being finished

Doesn't TG have a few girls committed to Stony Brook at this age?

no, do you really think JS would soil what is going to be a great season by breaking NCAA rules?

It appears he doesn’t care. At his clinics the parents of those TG girls can easily be overheard talking to him about their girls. It’s actually crazy how blatant it is.


Those TG girls are now at Legacy

They must be pretty good if everyone knows where they are playing what club they switched to. Seems they get mentioned quite a bit here. They must be getting plenty of attention, and/or people are jealous of them.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Deals in place, that’s hysterical. No 2021 deals r done. 20s are not even close to being finished

Doesn't TG have a few girls committed to Stony Brook at this age?

no, do you really think JS would soil what is going to be a great season by breaking NCAA rules?

It appears he doesn’t care. At his clinics the parents of those TG girls can easily be overheard talking to him about their girls. It’s actually crazy how blatant it is.


Those TG girls are now at Legacy

They must be pretty good if everyone knows where they are playing what club they switched to. Seems they get mentioned quite a bit here. They must be getting plenty of attention, and/or people are jealous of them.


Thanks mom
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Deals in place, that’s hysterical. No 2021 deals r done. 20s are not even close to being finished

Doesn't TG have a few girls committed to Stony Brook at this age?

no, do you really think JS would soil what is going to be a great season by breaking NCAA rules?

It appears he doesn’t care. At his clinics the parents of those TG girls can easily be overheard talking to him about their girls. It’s actually crazy how blatant it is.


Those TG girls are now at Legacy

They must be pretty good if everyone knows where they are playing what club they switched to. Seems they get mentioned quite a bit here. They must be getting plenty of attention, and/or people are jealous of them.

Just everyone is relieved those Dads are now somebody elses headache
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Deals in place, that’s hysterical. No 2021 deals r done. 20s are not even close to being finished

Doesn't TG have a few girls committed to Stony Brook at this age?

no, do you really think JS would soil what is going to be a great season by breaking NCAA rules?

It appears he doesn’t care. At his clinics the parents of those TG girls can easily be overheard talking to him about their girls. It’s actually crazy how blatant it is.


Those TG girls are now at Legacy

They must be pretty good if everyone knows where they are playing what club they switched to. Seems they get mentioned quite a bit here. They must be getting plenty of attention, and/or people are jealous of them.

Just everyone is relieved those Dads are now somebody elses headache


The girls are very good. Let’s give credit where it’s due.


Just everyone is relieved those Dads are now somebody elses headache
[/quote]

The girls are very good. Let’s give credit where it’s due.
[/quote]

The girls are good, but the father's detract from the girls. If they would let the girls do their thing the girls would be much better off.
If everyone put the same amount of worrying and concern as they do for OTHER players to their own lives can you imagine how great this world would be?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If everyone put the same amount of worrying and concern as they do for OTHER players to their own lives can you imagine how great this world would be?


And if other players didn't cheat and break the NCAA rules wouldn't the world be grand???
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If everyone put the same amount of worrying and concern as they do for OTHER players to their own lives can you imagine how great this world would be?


And if other players didn't cheat and break the NCAA rules wouldn't the world be grand???

Even though these two girls’ families have had illegal (Ncaa) contact at an off campus/sight clinic regarding attending SB, I wouldn’t call it the girls cheating. It is the coach who is breaking the rules. The girls aren’t cheating.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Deals in place, that’s hysterical. No 2021 deals r done. 20s are not even close to being finished

Doesn't TG have a few girls committed to Stony Brook at this age?

no, do you really think JS would soil what is going to be a great season by breaking NCAA rules?

It appears he doesn’t care. At his clinics the parents of those TG girls can easily be overheard talking to him about their girls. It’s actually crazy how blatant it is.

Those TG girls are now at Legacy



Makes no sense, why leave a better team for a lesser team? To stand out maybe???
Originally Posted by Anonymous
25 on the A roster is a joke


It really is and everyone is being told it's going to play out but keeping 25 players on our YJ roster is not good
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
25 on the A roster is a joke


It really is and everyone is being told it's going to play out but keeping 25 players on our YJ roster is not good


The team has carried 24-25 players since 4th grade.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Deals in place, that’s hysterical. No 2021 deals r done. 20s are not even close to being finished

Doesn't TG have a few girls committed to Stony Brook at this age?

no, do you really think JS would soil what is going to be a great season by breaking NCAA rules?

It appears he doesn’t care. At his clinics the parents of those TG girls can easily be overheard talking to him about their girls. It’s actually crazy how blatant it is.

Those TG girls are now at Legacy



Makes no sense, why leave a better team for a lesser team? To stand out maybe???


They were sold a bill of goods by a friend who then abondoned ship. Hysterical!! Neither team is very good. B level teams.
Good luck with her and daddy!!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
25 on the A roster is a joke


It really is and everyone is being told it's going to play out but keeping 25 players on our YJ roster is not good


Complain to the coach, thats the problem.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]25 on the A roster is a joke


It really is and everyone is being told it's going to play out but keeping 25 players on our YJ roster is not good



Mod ... They are singling out a girl and making it obvious who it is. This should not be happening on here. What is wrong with you people?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]25 on the A roster is a joke


It really is and everyone is being told it's going to play out but keeping 25 players on our YJ roster is not good


Mod ... They are singling out a girl and making it obvious who it is. This should not be happening on here. What is wrong with you people?


I don't know who it is
Have no idea who it is that you people are talking about but will say you are all disgusting. Instead od being such a bunch of cowards you should speak u to the coaches or CR but your too much of a bunch of cowards to do that. I would personally love for any of you to express your opinion to the young girls dad but as you know and your daughters know you are too much of a coward to speak you when you feel something unfair is going on.
Are many 2021 players up on varsity
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are many 2021 players up on varsity


Tryouts haven't started yet (he said sarcastically).
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are many 2021 players up on varsity

Only in the towns with weak youth programs
It is clearly getting personal for a number of individuals being singled out and is quite pathetic. Plenty of opinions from adults who should be setting a better example for their daughters. I would imagine the majority of those making comments don't have older daughters so have no idea how little all this matters in the context of the big picture of life. Appreciate that you have healthy kids that are lucky enough to play at this level. Appreciate that you have been lucky enough to meet nice families that will remain your friends way past this time in your life. If the only reason you have your kids playing or on these teams is to brag about what D1 college team they make it is quite sad. It will all be over before you know it. Enjoy the ride and hug your kids before they leave the nest.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is clearly getting personal for a number of individuals being singled out and is quite pathetic. Plenty of opinions from adults who should be setting a better example for their daughters. I would imagine the majority of those making comments don't have older daughters so have no idea how little all this matters in the context of the big picture of life. Appreciate that you have healthy kids that are lucky enough to play at this level. Appreciate that you have been lucky enough to meet nice families that will remain your friends way past this time in your life. If the only reason you have your kids playing or on these teams is to brag about what D1 college team they make it is quite sad. It will all be over before you know it. Enjoy the ride and hug your kids before they leave the nest.


Amen
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are many 2021 players up on varsity


There will be plenty of 9th grade kids on most Varsity rosters. how much playing time is debatable, as is whether they would be better off on JV
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are many 2021 players up on varsity


There will be plenty of 9th grade kids on most Varsity rosters. how much playing time is debatable, as is whether they would be better off on JV


There were a number of 2021's who played varsity in 7th grade, a fair amount in 8th grade. This year you should see a much larger influx of 2021's as 9th graders.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are many 2021 players up on varsity


There will be plenty of 9th grade kids on most Varsity rosters. how much playing time is debatable, as is whether they would be better off on JV


There were a number of 2021's who played varsity in 7th grade, a fair amount in 8th grade. This year you should see a much larger influx of 2021's as 9th graders.


Stop
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are many 2021 players up on varsity


There will be plenty of 9th grade kids on most Varsity rosters. how much playing time is debatable, as is whether they would be better off on JV


That's the dilemma. Is a 9th grader better off on Varsity, practicing with Varsity players, but getting limited playing time? Or, is she better off being a big shot, with a lot of playing time on JV? This is my first time through this rodeo as my oldest is now in 9th. She was asked to play with Varsity for the indoor KK winter league, and was told to attend winter practices as well (only a handful of 9th graders were). But I'm assuming this, by no means, assures that she will be on Varsity in the spring. Any thoughts from those who have had older daughters go through both scenarios? She has her heart set on making Varsity but I'm not sure it is the best for her development. Thanks in advance for your opinions.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are many 2021 players up on varsity


There will be plenty of 9th grade kids on most Varsity rosters. how much playing time is debatable, as is whether they would be better off on JV


That's the dilemma. Is a 9th grader better off on Varsity, practicing with Varsity players, but getting limited playing time? Or, is she better off being a big shot, with a lot of playing time on JV? This is my first time through this rodeo as my oldest is now in 9th. She was asked to play with Varsity for the indoor KK winter league, and was told to attend winter practices as well (only a handful of 9th graders were). But I'm assuming this, by no means, assures that she will be on Varsity in the spring. Any thoughts from those who have had older daughters go through both scenarios? She has her heart set on making Varsity but I'm not sure it is the best for her development. Thanks in advance for your opinions.


Totally depends on who will be coaching the JV team and the level of competition she is playing with and against. If she is a stud on JV without much help around her and playing bad competition she isn't getting anything out of it. Especially if the coaching isn't good.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are many 2021 players up on varsity


There will be plenty of 9th grade kids on most Varsity rosters. how much playing time is debatable, as is whether they would be better off on JV


That's the dilemma. Is a 9th grader better off on Varsity, practicing with Varsity players, but getting limited playing time? Or, is she better off being a big shot, with a lot of playing time on JV? This is my first time through this rodeo as my oldest is now in 9th. She was asked to play with Varsity for the indoor KK winter league, and was told to attend winter practices as well (only a handful of 9th graders were). But I'm assuming this, by no means, assures that she will be on Varsity in the spring. Any thoughts from those who have had older daughters go through both scenarios? She has her heart set on making Varsity but I'm not sure it is the best for her development. Thanks in advance for your opinions.


If the JV team plays in a competitive league it may not hurt her to develop. However even if she doesn't play as much on varsity the practice with them may be beneficial.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are many 2021 players up on varsity


There will be plenty of 9th grade kids on most Varsity rosters. how much playing time is debatable, as is whether they would be better off on JV


That's the dilemma. Is a 9th grader better off on Varsity, practicing with Varsity players, but getting limited playing time? Or, is she better off being a big shot, with a lot of playing time on JV? This is my first time through this rodeo as my oldest is now in 9th. She was asked to play with Varsity for the indoor KK winter league, and was told to attend winter practices as well (only a handful of 9th graders were). But I'm assuming this, by no means, assures that she will be on Varsity in the spring. Any thoughts from those who have had older daughters go through both scenarios? She has her heart set on making Varsity but I'm not sure it is the best for her development. Thanks in advance for your opinions.


If the JV team plays in a competitive league it may not hurt her to develop. However even if she doesn't play as much on varsity the practice with them may be beneficial.


Getting daily reps in with Varsity in my estimation would be better. Competing against better players everyday will push her to get better.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are many 2021 players up on varsity


There will be plenty of 9th grade kids on most Varsity rosters. how much playing time is debatable, as is whether they would be better off on JV


That's the dilemma. Is a 9th grader better off on Varsity, practicing with Varsity players, but getting limited playing time? Or, is she better off being a big shot, with a lot of playing time on JV? This is my first time through this rodeo as my oldest is now in 9th. She was asked to play with Varsity for the indoor KK winter league, and was told to attend winter practices as well (only a handful of 9th graders were). But I'm assuming this, by no means, assures that she will be on Varsity in the spring. Any thoughts from those who have had older daughters go through both scenarios? She has her heart set on making Varsity but I'm not sure it is the best for her development. Thanks in advance for your opinions.


If the JV team plays in a competitive league it may not hurt her to develop. However even if she doesn't play as much on varsity the practice with them may be beneficial.


Getting daily reps in with Varsity in my estimation would be better. Competing against better players everyday will push her to get better.


Not many reps for non starters on Varsity half the practice is 7v7 settled in critical scoring area with offense going over plays and defense working on their different zones and situations. One or two attack rotate in and one or two defenders rotate in with second middle line switching from offense to defense.
Most underclassmen on varsity are because of low numbers Any strong program will have more than enough skilled upperclassmen to fill a roster
It's a fact. Look at west bab. Barely has a pal program. Maybe 60 kids and is pulling up 7/8 graders because of lack of bodies. Then you have wi who probably had 500 kids in their youth league and rarely takes any underclassmen unless they're good
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It's a fact. Look at west bab. Barely has a pal program. Maybe 60 kids and is pulling up 7/8 graders because of lack of bodies. Then you have wi who probably had 500 kids in their youth league and rarely takes any underclassmen unless they're good

ESM had 8th graders last year and will have a few more freshmen this year, they have a great youth program. So has Massapequa and Garden City. So that argument doesn't hold water. Even WI have taken 8th graders in the past as well as freshman, now playing/played college lax at top 10 schools. But they were good players. The top girls will play up even in big programs, the lesser developed player will have to wait. Look at the bio's of these good college players playing at good schools and getting playing time, they all are 4-5 year varsity letterman. The 2 year varsity girls are unheard of in good college programs.
One 8th grader. And one freshman for the last two years
Originally Posted by Anonymous
One 8th grader. And one freshman for the last two years

Which school? ESM had more than one 8th grader last year. And many freshman played varsity in the last 6-7 years
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It's a fact. Look at west bab. Barely has a pal program. Maybe 60 kids and is pulling up 7/8 graders because of lack of bodies. Then you have wi who probably had 500 kids in their youth league and rarely takes any underclassmen unless they're good

ESM had 8th graders last year and will have a few more freshmen this year, they have a great youth program. So has Massapequa and Garden City. So that argument doesn't hold water. Even WI have taken 8th graders in the past as well as freshman, now playing/played college lax at top 10 schools. But they were good players. The top girls will play up even in big programs, the lesser developed player will have to wait. Look at the bio's of these good college players playing at good schools and getting playing time, they all are 4-5 year varsity letterman. The 2 year varsity girls are unheard of in good college programs.


Garden City never has 8th graders and barely have freshman on the team and if they are do not play significant minutes.
Many of the best programs have pulled up out of middle school, many of the worst have too. You also have horrible programs that still refuse to bring up kids who would no doubt help, to each their own. Even still it is a tiny, tiny percentage of girls who get pulled up 7-8th, and even 9th. But as poster stated earlier, it's usually not random players, usually this is done for kids you will see go on to excel in college. But to be brought up to not play may be a waste of time. But it is hard to know that when the kid d gets pulled up how it is going to play out.
[quote=Anonymous]Many of the best programs have pulled up out of middle school, many of the worst have too. You also have horrible programs that still refuse to bring up kids who would no doubt help, to each their own. Even still it is a tiny, tiny percentage of girls who get pulled up 7-8th, and even 9th. But as poster stated earlier, it's usually not random players, usually this is done for kids you will see go on to excel in college. But to be brought up to not play may be a waste of time. But it is hard to know that when the kid d gets pulled up how it is going to play out.

The schools that don't pull up younger girls that they know can play up don't do to the pressure they receive from the parents who believe that their daughter is entitled because she's older.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are many 2021 players up on varsity


There will be plenty of 9th grade kids on most Varsity rosters. how much playing time is debatable, as is whether they would be better off on JV


That's the dilemma. Is a 9th grader better off on Varsity, practicing with Varsity players, but getting limited playing time? Or, is she better off being a big shot, with a lot of playing time on JV? This is my first time through this rodeo as my oldest is now in 9th. She was asked to play with Varsity for the indoor KK winter league, and was told to attend winter practices as well (only a handful of 9th graders were). But I'm assuming this, by no means, assures that she will be on Varsity in the spring. Any thoughts from those who have had older daughters go through both scenarios? She has her heart set on making Varsity but I'm not sure it is the best for her development. Thanks in advance for your opinions.


If you haven't already, I would start by asking her why she wants to play varsity so badly. As others have said, there are plusses and minuses to both options and every situation is different (strength of each team, coaches, teammates, playing time, etc.). My daughter never had any plans to play beyond HS, so she was happy to play on age and get more playing time while she could. Others could be future top recruits and playing with and against better competition could help them develop. It's a personal decision you need to make with your daughter based on what's best for her.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Many of the best programs have pulled up out of middle school, many of the worst have too. You also have horrible programs that still refuse to bring up kids who would no doubt help, to each their own. Even still it is a tiny, tiny percentage of girls who get pulled up 7-8th, and even 9th. But as poster stated earlier, it's usually not random players, usually this is done for kids you will see go on to excel in college. But to be brought up to not play may be a waste of time. But it is hard to know that when the kid d gets pulled up how it is going to play out.

The schools that don't pull up younger girls that they know can play up don't do to the pressure they receive from the parents who believe that their daughter is entitled because she's older.


Plus they don't want to deal with the parents of the other younger girls who think their daughter should be pulled up too. Easier to just say it's their policy than to have to justify which ones are pulled up. Maybe short-sighted, but it's the easy way out.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
One 8th grader. And one freshman for the last two years

Which school? ESM had more than one 8th grader last year. And many freshman played varsity in the last 6-7 years


Here we go, its like clockwork...every time this topic starts, esm is right there...take a breath...good program in a terrible conf...got off the island once in the last 20yrs.
Many Top Programs do not need younger players to sit on bench. If the program has a solid JV coach leave the kids down. UNFORTUNATELY parents think their kid is the best and begs the differ. Its the coaches job to coach and parents job to cheer their kid on please don't get confused.
Thoughts on Under Armour 150? Did anyone participate last year?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thoughts on Under Armour 150? Did anyone participate last year?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thoughts on Under Armour 150? Did anyone participate last year?


Did invited go out yet?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thoughts on Under Armour 150? Did anyone participate last year?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thoughts on Under Armour 150? Did anyone participate last year?


Did invited go out yet?


Waste of time. Try out for your regional All American UA team, that’s the real deal. Invitational events are a joke.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thoughts on Under Armour 150? Did anyone participate last year?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thoughts on Under Armour 150? Did anyone participate last year?


Did invited go out yet?



Were sent already. It was well run, very few top 25 DI lacrosse schools in attendance so if that is your focus I would stay away. If you are looking out side of that and considering DII and DIII might be a good fit.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thoughts on Under Armour 150? Did anyone participate last year?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thoughts on Under Armour 150? Did anyone participate last year?


Did invited go out yet?



Were sent already. It was well run, very few top 25 DI lacrosse schools in attendance so if that is your focus I would stay away. If you are looking out side of that and considering DII and DIII might be a good fit.


There was only 16 coaches there last year. It is a complete waste of time.
Invites go out tomorrow - maybe someone is special
Everyone got invited last year. Correct on lack of coaches. Nice school where games were played but no way was this a recruiting event. ASU and Towson only D1 coaches that were there.
No invites went out yet. Troublemaker.
And how many coaches were at Nike 120? This event was right after the rule change but coaches were definitely watching games this fall...
Notre Dame was at UA150 so was Hopkins
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Everyone got invited last year. Correct on lack of coaches. Nice school where games were played but no way was this a recruiting event. ASU and Towson only D1 coaches that were there.


Not everyone was invited. My daughter knew a number of girls, some were teammates and some from other clubs, who weren't selected.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Everyone got invited last year. Correct on lack of coaches. Nice school where games were played but no way was this a recruiting event. ASU and Towson only D1 coaches that were there.


Not everyone was invited. My daughter knew a number of girls, some were teammates and some from other clubs, who weren't selected.


The invite process is a joke. They start off with entire rosters of the top clubs top teams, then fan out from there, then send deadlines and more and more rounds of invitations until the thing is sold out. What you should be looking at instead is.... who is not going, that was invited, that says a lot about the events like this. Of all these events the only one I know that the top players from the top clubs show up to is the Nike 120. And that event may have crapped itself last year with the rule change and the college coaches taking a bye-year (or 2?).
Waste of money this year. Technically a waste of money for next year too. If you are interested in a school that will be in attendance, go to their camp. UA150 is a joke with the new recruiting rules.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Everyone got invited last year. Correct on lack of coaches. Nice school where games were played but no way was this a recruiting event. ASU and Towson only D1 coaches that were there.


Not everyone was invited. My daughter knew a number of girls, some were teammates and some from other clubs, who weren't selected.


The invite process is a joke. They start off with entire rosters of the top clubs top teams, then fan out from there, then send deadlines and more and more rounds of invitations until the thing is sold out. What you should be looking at instead is.... who is not going, that was invited, that says a lot about the events like this. Of all these events the only one I know that the top players from the top clubs show up to is the Nike 120. And that event may have crapped itself last year with the rule change and the college coaches taking a bye-year (or 2?).


I was told in an email from the Nike Elite 120 director that they only sent out first wave invitations to girls that participated last summer. No new invites. Frustrating for those that didn't go last year.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Everyone got invited last year. Correct on lack of coaches. Nice school where games were played but no way was this a recruiting event. ASU and Towson only D1 coaches that were there.


Not everyone was invited. My daughter knew a number of girls, some were teammates and some from other clubs, who weren't selected.


The invite process is a joke. They start off with entire rosters of the top clubs top teams, then fan out from there, then send deadlines and more and more rounds of invitations until the thing is sold out. What you should be looking at instead is.... who is not going, that was invited, that says a lot about the events like this. Of all these events the only one I know that the top players from the top clubs show up to is the Nike 120. And that event may have crapped itself last year with the rule change and the college coaches taking a bye-year (or 2?).


I was told in an email from the Nike Elite 120 director that they only sent out first wave invitations to girls that participated last summer. No new invites. Frustrating for those that didn't go last year.


Depending on the vote for new NCAA guidelines in April, This may be the big year for 21's at Nike 120. If they move the communication to Soph year, it will be. They run the event for two age groups, the first eligible year is the most competitive girls showing up. By the second year, most highly recruited players are committed, but it is still a good opportunity for the girls because the coaches will be there, or at least should be there.
Nike 120 and UA150 were in same boat last year. UA acceptances rolling out now.
Both are a waste of $. Your kid will get noticed in tournaments if they are good enough. Save the thousand bucks.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Nike 120 and UA150 were in same boat last year. UA acceptances rolling out now.


The 8 or so players we knew from last year all did not apply again this year, zero.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Everyone got invited last year. Correct on lack of coaches. Nice school where games were played but no way was this a recruiting event. ASU and Towson only D1 coaches that were there.


Not everyone was invited. My daughter knew a number of girls, some were teammates and some from other clubs, who weren't selected.


The invite process is a joke. They start off with entire rosters of the top clubs top teams, then fan out from there, then send deadlines and more and more rounds of invitations until the thing is sold out. What you should be looking at instead is.... who is not going, that was invited, that says a lot about the events like this. Of all these events the only one I know that the top players from the top clubs show up to is the Nike 120. And that event may have crapped itself last year with the rule change and the college coaches taking a bye-year (or 2?).


I was told in an email from the Nike Elite 120 director that they only sent out first wave invitations to girls that participated last summer. No new invites. Frustrating for those that didn't go last year.

That's not the case, girls who didn't go last year received invites.
Well for those not lucky enough to be invited to Nike 120, is UA150 a viable option ? are people who did it last year doing it again ? It's very expensive.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well for those not lucky enough to be invited to Nike 120, is UA150 a viable option ? are people who did it last year doing it again ? It's very expensive.



Both Nike and UA were a waste last year. The girls that attended Nike last year were invited back automatically this year. Many are not going. The UA invites went out yesterday. Many not going to that this year either. They are both very expensive. I certainly am not paying for either this year. If coaches actually come this year maybe I will reconsider for next year. That money is much better spent taking your daughter to camps, 7v7s, 5v5s, etc at schools she is interested in. The coaches will see them play all summer in tournaments. There is no coaching going on at the Nike and UA event. They are just playing games for 2 days. It's a good concept and made sense when girls were being recruited in 8th and 9th grade. But it's just not worth it now that you have til Junior year to figure things out.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well for those not lucky enough to be invited to Nike 120, is UA150 a viable option ? are people who did it last year doing it again ? It's very expensive.



Both Nike and UA were a waste last year. The girls that attended Nike last year were invited back automatically this year. Many are not going. The UA invites went out yesterday. Many not going to that this year either. They are both very expensive. I certainly am not paying for either this year. If coaches actually come this year maybe I will reconsider for next year. That money is much better spent taking your daughter to camps, 7v7s, 5v5s, etc at schools she is interested in. The coaches will see them play all summer in tournaments. There is no coaching going on at the Nike and UA event. They are just playing games for 2 days. It's a good concept and made sense when girls were being recruited in 8th and 9th grade. But it's just not worth it now that you have til Junior year to figure things out.


Exactly.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well for those not lucky enough to be invited to Nike 120, is UA150 a viable option ? are people who did it last year doing it again ? It's very expensive.



Both Nike and UA were a waste last year. The girls that attended Nike last year were invited back automatically this year. Many are not going. The UA invites went out yesterday. Many not going to that this year either. They are both very expensive. I certainly am not paying for either this year. If coaches actually come this year maybe I will reconsider for next year. That money is much better spent taking your daughter to camps, 7v7s, 5v5s, etc at schools she is interested in. The coaches will see them play all summer in tournaments. There is no coaching going on at the Nike and UA event. They are just playing games for 2 days. It's a good concept and made sense when girls were being recruited in 8th and 9th grade. But it's just not worth it now that you have til Junior year to figure things out.


Flat out wrong on that. With the new contact rule most likely going into effect, this summer will be the prime opportunity for 2021’s at the 120. The following year most of the top 2021s will be off the table.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well for those not lucky enough to be invited to Nike 120, is UA150 a viable option ? are people who did it last year doing it again ? It's very expensive.



Both Nike and UA were a waste last year. The girls that attended Nike last year were invited back automatically this year. Many are not going. The UA invites went out yesterday. Many not going to that this year either. They are both very expensive. I certainly am not paying for either this year. If coaches actually come this year maybe I will reconsider for next year. That money is much better spent taking your daughter to camps, 7v7s, 5v5s, etc at schools she is interested in. The coaches will see them play all summer in tournaments. There is no coaching going on at the Nike and UA event. They are just playing games for 2 days. It's a good concept and made sense when girls were being recruited in 8th and 9th grade. But it's just not worth it now that you have til Junior year to figure things out.


Flat out wrong on that. With the new contact rule most likely going into effect, this summer will be the prime opportunity for 2021’s at the 120. The following year most of the top 2021s will be off the table.


Not if the same number of coaches show up. They are asking you to pay a lot of money for an event and cannot tell you what coaches will be there. So few coches last year compared to prior years.
I say its worth a roll of the dice, the Coaches plan to vote again in April to move first contact to September of Sophomore year, if that's the case I think you can expect a larger turn out of coaches on the sidelines.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I say its worth a roll of the dice, the Coaches plan to vote again in April to move first contact to September of Sophomore year, if that's the case I think you can expect a larger turn out of coaches on the sidelines.


So many of the colleges coaches have set off on their own in terms of the camps/clinics that they don't need to attend UA or Nike anymore. We are constantly being bombarded with emails advertising camps with a half dozen to a dozen coaches attending. Why spend $600 dollars for two days when you can focus your attention on 1 day camps/clinics/5v5 tournaments for a school your daughter is interested in like a previous poster said?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I say its worth a roll of the dice, the Coaches plan to vote again in April to move first contact to September of Sophomore year, if that's the case I think you can expect a larger turn out of coaches on the sidelines.


The top girls will be playing at the Under Armour Underclass games 10 days prior to UA 150. That's where the top programs will be going and then to G8 and then to the Mid-Atlantic Tournament. Some coaches will come up early for the 150 but don't count on it. The 150 is probably more beneficial for second tier girls at this point that may not have a lot of coaches watching their summer tournament games and won't make their respective UA Underclass teams. There's no reason to spend $600 to play a few games in front of coaches when you do so all summer already. Especially when you have no idea who is coming when you have to pay the registration fee.
The coaches have NO vote on this. This is an NCAA issue and vote. Both men's and women's lacrosse have lobbied to maintain their rules as they stand now. Given their success, they are NOT likely to be reversed or changed based on new 'overall' proposal for other 'olympic' and 'non-revenue' sports.

And as an FYI, softball has lobbied the NCAA to do exactly what lacrosse has done. Baseball has significant interest as well.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The coaches have NO vote on this. This is an NCAA issue and vote. Both men's and women's lacrosse have lobbied to maintain their rules as they stand now. Given their success, they are NOT likely to be reversed or changed based on new 'overall' proposal for other 'olympic' and 'non-revenue' sports.

And as an FYI, softball has lobbied the NCAA to do exactly what lacrosse has done. Baseball has significant interest as well.


Correct. Lacrosse rules aren't changing. No way. No how. They didn't go through all that to change the rules a year later.
The Division 1 Council met on 1/16-1/17 and published their report 2 weeks ago. At this meeting they modified the proposal for all sports other than football and basketball to match the lacrosse model. The proposal is now for official visits, unofficial visits and recruiting conversations at camps/clinics to begin September 1st of the Junior Year. The proposal originally allowed the unofficial visits and camp recruiting to start September 1 of sophomore year but that was modified at the meeting.

Link to decisions:
http://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/Jan2018DICouncil_Report_20180202.pdf

Sorry to bust ILD's bubble.

So I stand by my stance that UA 150 and Nike 120 are total wastes of money this year. Travel to campuses. Attend prospect days and 7v7s. Allow your daughters to be coached by the college coaches. Let your daughter learn from them and get to know them a little. You don't have to have recruiting conversations to build relationships. Prospect Days, 7v7s, etc cost $50-$150 typically. Camps are less expensive than the combines as well. You can do a lot of those for the $600 each you'd pay for UA or Nike. All of this is much better than the previous model. Take your time and enjoy the process. If the coaches are interested in your daughter they can still let your club or high school coach know. Not sure why the rush. The whole point was to slow things down.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The coaches have NO vote on this. This is an NCAA issue and vote. Both men's and women's lacrosse have lobbied to maintain their rules as they stand now. Given their success, they are NOT likely to be reversed or changed based on new 'overall' proposal for other 'olympic' and 'non-revenue' sports.

And as an FYI, softball has lobbied the NCAA to do exactly what lacrosse has done. Baseball has significant interest as well.


Correct. Lacrosse rules aren't changing. No way. No how. They didn't go through all that to change the rules a year later.

The NCAA is going to unify all the dates for all sports. Sept. 1 soph year.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The coaches have NO vote on this. This is an NCAA issue and vote. Both men's and women's lacrosse have lobbied to maintain their rules as they stand now. Given their success, they are NOT likely to be reversed or changed based on new 'overall' proposal for other 'olympic' and 'non-revenue' sports.

And as an FYI, softball has lobbied the NCAA to do exactly what lacrosse has done. Baseball has significant interest as well.


Correct. Lacrosse rules aren't changing. No way. No how. They didn't go through all that to change the rules a year later.

The NCAA is going to unify all the dates for all sports. Sept. 1 soph year.


Wrong. They changed the dates for everyone to junior year. See the link I posted. Decision was made a month ago.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]The coaches have NO vote on this. This is an NCAA issue and vote. Both men's and women's lacrosse have lobbied to maintain their rules as they stand now. Given their success, they are NOT likely to be reversed or changed based on new 'overall' proposal for other 'olympic' and 'non-revenue' sports.

And as an FYI, softball has lobbied the NCAA to do exactly what lacrosse has done. Baseball has significant interest as well.

Correct. Lacrosse rules aren't changing. No way. No how. They didn't go through all that to change the rules a year later.

The NCAA is going to unify all the dates for all sports. Sept. 1 soph year.


Wrong. They changed the dates for everyone to junior year. See the link I posted. Decision was made a month ago.

The following is directly from that report that you posted, so it is not in stone, and will be evaluated. The current rumor is that communication will be allowed sept 1 of Soph year, and verbal offers/commitments cannot be made until Sept 1 of Junior year. This way students will know which schools are interested and have a chance to unofficially visit campuses, thus eliminating the Fall rush and students forgoing their junior year of fall sports. This will be taken up at the April meeting as does most new legislation that go into effect for the next year (August 1 is usually the effective date of new legislation). January meeting is used for clarification and tweaks of changes made in previous April meeting.

Do you even know what phase II is? Get off your high horse, no one likes a know it all, especially when they don't fully read the literature they are quoting.

3) The Student-Athlete Experience Committee will continue its review of
early recruiting issues during the next two years. Phase IB of the review
will include the topics of recruiting communications and offers of aid.
Legislative concepts from Phase IB are expected to be introduced into the
2018-19 legislative cycle. Phase II of the review will include contacts,
evaluations, recruiting calendars, tryouts and camps and clinics. Phase II
legislative concepts will be introduced into the 2019-20 legislative cycle.
also the section after that:

3. The Student-Athlete Experience Committee will continue its review of
early recruiting issues during the next two years. Phase IB of the review
will include the topics of recruiting communications and offers of aid.
Legislative concepts from Phase IB are expected to be introduced into the
2018-19 legislative cycle. Phase II of the review will include contacts,
evaluations, recruiting calendars, tryouts and camps and clinics. Phase II
legislative concepts will be introduced into the 2019-20 legislative cycle

So it looks like they are open to changes in dates and how and when offers are made.
None of what you posted has anything to do with what is being proposed at the upcoming meeting. Those proposals 2017-112 and 2017-113 were changed to match the lacrosse dates. Those are the proposals going up for vote. No one is saying it can't be reconsidered in the future. But at that point 2021 girls will be juniors anyway.

I know that's the rumor. That's because of the proposal that was made last fall. Those have now been changed and won't have any effect on the class of 2021.
That rumor would surprise me, the NCAA has only ever concerned itself with NLOIs and does not even acknowledge that verbals exist. Verbals are just things made up between coaches and recruits and have no NCAA significance at all. Do they really want to start regulating these things?
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.
Went last year. Not going back. Decided it wasn't worth 600 plus travel.
OP re UA 150. No invite to Nike. Will of course try out for UA underclass but no way to know NOW what is status of Underclass into June. We DID attend last year - leaning toward going again. Enjoyed event last year and based on number of coaches seen at fall games for both 2020 and 2021, feel that there will be exposure.
Of the showcase events, elite 120 is the best then UA150 and northstar. Girls at this age should still focus on playing as much as possible against good competition and getting better. All of these allow this to happen
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.

The UA regional teams at that age? a waste of time...barely any coaches..and the NIke Elite ...there were 80+ coaches there when my first kid did it...2019...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.

The UA regional teams at that age? a waste of time...barely any coaches..and the NIke Elite ...there were 80+ coaches there when my first kid did it...2019...


OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.

The UA regional teams at that age? a waste of time...barely any coaches..and the NIke Elite ...there were 80+ coaches there when my first kid did it...2019...


Nike 120 was empty of coaches last year, the owners of the tournament even apologized in the summary of the event e-mail they sent. UA Underclass was great last year, there were 10-15 coaches at most games.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.

The UA regional teams at that age? a waste of time...barely any coaches..and the NIke Elite ...there were 80+ coaches there when my first kid did it...2019...


OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.

The UA regional teams at that age? a waste of time...barely any coaches..and the NIke Elite ...there were 80+ coaches there when my first kid did it...2019...


OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....


There was a time when Nike was super premier, UA 150 not so much. Today the coaches are doing their own thing. Your daughter has a much better chance of being seen at the coaches' camps. Every kid I know got into ua this year, most aren't going. The regional teams are not as good as they used to be for resume bec everyone, including coaches, know they are a political farce. Keep one thing in mind...all of these events were set up to make money first. Go to the camps at the schools she wants to go to.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.

The UA regional teams at that age? a waste of time...barely any coaches..and the NIke Elite ...there were 80+ coaches there when my first kid did it...2019...


OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.

The UA regional teams at that age? a waste of time...barely any coaches..and the NIke Elite ...there were 80+ coaches there when my first kid did it...2019...


OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....


There was a time when Nike was super premier, UA 150 not so much. Today the coaches are doing their own thing. Your daughter has a much better chance of being seen at the coaches' camps. Every kid I know got into ua this year, most aren't going. The regional teams are not as good as they used to be for resume bec everyone, including coaches, know they are a political farce. Keep one thing in mind...all of these events were set up to make money first. Go to the camps at the schools she wants to go to.


I agree that these cattle call camps are a waste of money such as UA 150 and Max Exposure. The only money I am spending in the next 2 years are on the camps and clinics specifically run by the school and coaches she is interested in attending. Much more cost effective, fewer participants, and the coach knows you are interested in their school.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.

The UA regional teams at that age? a waste of time...barely any coaches..and the NIke Elite ...there were 80+ coaches there when my first kid did it...2019...


OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.

The UA regional teams at that age? a waste of time...barely any coaches..and the NIke Elite ...there were 80+ coaches there when my first kid did it...2019...


OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....


There was a time when Nike was super premier, UA 150 not so much. Today the coaches are doing their own thing. Your daughter has a much better chance of being seen at the coaches' camps. Every kid I know got into ua this year, most aren't going. The regional teams are not as good as they used to be for resume bec everyone, including coaches, know they are a political farce. Keep one thing in mind...all of these events were set up to make money first. Go to the camps at the schools she wants to go to.



Spin it however you like, there is a selective nature to these things. Starting at the top 99.something% of the kids who would like to try out and make UA regional (espesically Dc, Md and LI teams) , won’t make it. 95% of the kids who would like to go to Nike120 are not on the invite list. 75% of the kids who would like to go to UA150 can’t. And so on....... 100% of the kids who want to go to a college camp or clinic can. When the college coaches run a camp or clinic they are looking at 2-5 kids, hoping they showed up among the masses. Not trying to offend anyone, but it is what it is........
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.

The UA regional teams at that age? a waste of time...barely any coaches..and the NIke Elite ...there were 80+ coaches there when my first kid did it...2019...


OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we go back to the Under Armour 150? Deadline is this week. Is anyone GOING that went last year ? There are no camps that week that are running at the same time at schools my daughter is interested in so that is not an issue for us. Calibre of player is the issue.


If it is a matter of choosing between UA150 and Nike 120, and if she has an invite to Nike, go to that instead all day long. Try out for the UA US regional tournament team, that is 10x better than either 120 or 150.

The UA regional teams at that age? a waste of time...barely any coaches..and the NIke Elite ...there were 80+ coaches there when my first kid did it...2019...


OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....


There was a time when Nike was super premier, UA 150 not so much. Today the coaches are doing their own thing. Your daughter has a much better chance of being seen at the coaches' camps. Every kid I know got into ua this year, most aren't going. The regional teams are not as good as they used to be for resume bec everyone, including coaches, know they are a political farce. Keep one thing in mind...all of these events were set up to make money first. Go to the camps at the schools she wants to go to.



Spin it however you like, there is a selective nature to these things. Starting at the top 99.something% of the kids who would like to try out and make UA regional (espesically Dc, Md and LI teams) , won’t make it. 95% of the kids who would like to go to Nike120 are not on the invite list. 75% of the kids who would like to go to UA150 can’t. And so on....... 100% of the kids who want to go to a college camp or clinic can. When the college coaches run a camp or clinic they are looking at 2-5 kids, hoping they showed up among the masses. Not trying to offend anyone, but it is what it is........


Very selective?! There were girls from YJ C and D last year.
Both Nike and UA are sending out emails looking for girls. Most of the top talent isn't going this year after the debacle last year. Times have changed. There's no urgency for the college coaches to find these girls. The coaches will see them at the 4 or 5 major tournaments this summer. No reason to come spend 2 days midweek at St. Pauls.
Who is receiving emails - club teams or individuals ?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who is receiving emails - club teams or individuals ?


Individuals
Prospect supreme has some great coaches and is being held the same day at ua150. A lot less money too.
No its not. UA 150 is the 10th and 11th of July. Prospect supreme is the 12th. So it's perfect if you are there and want to do both for your daughter.

OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....
[/quote]

There was a time when Nike was super premier, UA 150 not so much. Today the coaches are doing their own thing. Your daughter has a much better chance of being seen at the coaches' camps. Every kid I know got into ua this year, most aren't going. The regional teams are not as good as they used to be for resume bec everyone, including coaches, know they are a political farce. Keep one thing in mind...all of these events were set up to make money first. Go to the camps at the schools she wants to go to.[/quote]


Spin it however you like, there is a selective nature to these things. Starting at the top 99.something% of the kids who would like to try out and make UA regional (espesically Dc, Md and LI teams) , won’t make it. 95% of the kids who would like to go to Nike120 are not on the invite list. 75% of the kids who would like to go to UA150 can’t. And so on....... 100% of the kids who want to go to a college camp or clinic can. When the college coaches run a camp or clinic they are looking at 2-5 kids, hoping they showed up among the masses. Not trying to offend anyone, but it is what it is........[/quote]

Very selective?! There were girls from YJ C and D last year.
[/quote]

YJ C would beat YJ B at this age so there must have been some talent there? Bert doesn't bring his team anywhere near C, just look at tryouts. He doesn't want to see what he already knows, but you know, F&F (and Mt Sinai and coaches daughters) plan in full effect.
Originally Posted by Anonymous

OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....


There was a time when Nike was super premier, UA 150 not so much. Today the coaches are doing their own thing. Your daughter has a much better chance of being seen at the coaches' camps. Every kid I know got into ua this year, most aren't going. The regional teams are not as good as they used to be for resume bec everyone, including coaches, know they are a political farce. Keep one thing in mind...all of these events were set up to make money first. Go to the camps at the schools she wants to go to.[/quote]


Spin it however you like, there is a selective nature to these things. Starting at the top 99.something% of the kids who would like to try out and make UA regional (espesically Dc, Md and LI teams) , won’t make it. 95% of the kids who would like to go to Nike120 are not on the invite list. 75% of the kids who would like to go to UA150 can’t. And so on....... 100% of the kids who want to go to a college camp or clinic can. When the college coaches run a camp or clinic they are looking at 2-5 kids, hoping they showed up among the masses. Not trying to offend anyone, but it is what it is........[/quote]

Very selective?! There were girls from YJ C and D last year.
[/quote]

YJ C would beat YJ B at this age so there must have been some talent there? Bert doesn't bring his team anywhere near C, just look at tryouts. He doesn't want to see what he already knows, but you know, F&F (and Mt Sinai and coaches daughters) plan in full effect.[/quote]

YJ C = Talent ... Wow, the delusion runs deep in this one, Obi Wan.
Originally Posted by Anonymous

OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....


There was a time when Nike was super premier, UA 150 not so much. Today the coaches are doing their own thing. Your daughter has a much better chance of being seen at the coaches' camps. Every kid I know got into ua this year, most aren't going. The regional teams are not as good as they used to be for resume bec everyone, including coaches, know they are a political farce. Keep one thing in mind...all of these events were set up to make money first. Go to the camps at the schools she wants to go to.[/quote]


Spin it however you like, there is a selective nature to these things. Starting at the top 99.something% of the kids who would like to try out and make UA regional (espesically Dc, Md and LI teams) , won’t make it. 95% of the kids who would like to go to Nike120 are not on the invite list. 75% of the kids who would like to go to UA150 can’t. And so on....... 100% of the kids who want to go to a college camp or clinic can. When the college coaches run a camp or clinic they are looking at 2-5 kids, hoping they showed up among the masses. Not trying to offend anyone, but it is what it is........[/quote]

Very selective?! There were girls from YJ C and D last year.
[/quote]

YJ C would beat YJ B at this age so there must have been some talent there? Bert doesn't bring his team anywhere near C, just look at tryouts. He doesn't want to see what he already knows, but you know, F&F (and Mt Sinai and coaches daughters) plan in full effect.[/quote]

You do realize that YJ B and C teams are both terrible. Playing a little loose with the term "talent".
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....


There was a time when Nike was super premier, UA 150 not so much. Today the coaches are doing their own thing. Your daughter has a much better chance of being seen at the coaches' camps. Every kid I know got into ua this year, most aren't going. The regional teams are not as good as they used to be for resume bec everyone, including coaches, know they are a political farce. Keep one thing in mind...all of these events were set up to make money first. Go to the camps at the schools she wants to go to.



Spin it however you like, there is a selective nature to these things. Starting at the top 99.something% of the kids who would like to try out and make UA regional (espesically Dc, Md and LI teams) , won’t make it. 95% of the kids who would like to go to Nike120 are not on the invite list. 75% of the kids who would like to go to UA150 can’t. And so on....... 100% of the kids who want to go to a college camp or clinic can. When the college coaches run a camp or clinic they are looking at 2-5 kids, hoping they showed up among the masses. Not trying to offend anyone, but it is what it is........[/quote]

Very selective?! There were girls from YJ C and D last year.
[/quote]

YJ C would beat YJ B at this age so there must have been some talent there? Bert doesn't bring his team anywhere near C, just look at tryouts. He doesn't want to see what he already knows, but you know, F&F (and Mt Sinai and coaches daughters) plan in full effect.[/quote]

You do realize that YJ B and C teams are both terrible. Playing a little loose with the term "talent".[/quote]

And where exactly did these 2021 YJ B and C players attend? Certainly were not at AU regionals, none at Nike. Maybe UA150???? which shows you where that event stands.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....


There was a time when Nike was super premier, UA 150 not so much. Today the coaches are doing their own thing. Your daughter has a much better chance of being seen at the coaches' camps. Every kid I know got into ua this year, most aren't going. The regional teams are not as good as they used to be for resume bec everyone, including coaches, know they are a political farce. Keep one thing in mind...all of these events were set up to make money first. Go to the camps at the schools she wants to go to.



Spin it however you like, there is a selective nature to these things. Starting at the top 99.something% of the kids who would like to try out and make UA regional (espesically Dc, Md and LI teams) , won’t make it. 95% of the kids who would like to go to Nike120 are not on the invite list. 75% of the kids who would like to go to UA150 can’t. And so on....... 100% of the kids who want to go to a college camp or clinic can. When the college coaches run a camp or clinic they are looking at 2-5 kids, hoping they showed up among the masses. Not trying to offend anyone, but it is what it is........[/quote]

Very selective?! There were girls from YJ C and D last year.
[/quote]

YJ C would beat YJ B at this age so there must have been some talent there? Bert doesn't bring his team anywhere near C, just look at tryouts. He doesn't want to see what he already knows, but you know, F&F (and Mt Sinai and coaches daughters) plan in full effect.[/quote]

YJ C = Talent ... Wow, the delusion runs deep in this one, Obi Wan. [/quote]

Nike120 and UA150 both had YJ C. Why would you play for a club you have so much despise for? If your C daughter is good, let her play for another club. YJ C isn't going to get you into college so unless you're in it for fun move on.
There were also girls at UA150 from M&D BLACK and YJ BLUE and SKYWALKERS - the rosters are online and you can see for yourself. Maybe there were others but the rosters were very blended and the level of play quite high. Do what works best for you.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....


There was a time when Nike was super premier, UA 150 not so much. Today the coaches are doing their own thing. Your daughter has a much better chance of being seen at the coaches' camps. Every kid I know got into ua this year, most aren't going. The regional teams are not as good as they used to be for resume bec everyone, including coaches, know they are a political farce. Keep one thing in mind...all of these events were set up to make money first. Go to the camps at the schools she wants to go to.



Spin it however you like, there is a selective nature to these things. Starting at the top 99.something% of the kids who would like to try out and make UA regional (espesically Dc, Md and LI teams) , won’t make it. 95% of the kids who would like to go to Nike120 are not on the invite list. 75% of the kids who would like to go to UA150 can’t. And so on....... 100% of the kids who want to go to a college camp or clinic can. When the college coaches run a camp or clinic they are looking at 2-5 kids, hoping they showed up among the masses. Not trying to offend anyone, but it is what it is........[/quote]

Very selective?! There were girls from YJ C and D last year.
[/quote]

YJ C would beat YJ B at this age so there must have been some talent there? Bert doesn't bring his team anywhere near C, just look at tryouts. He doesn't want to see what he already knows, but you know, F&F (and Mt Sinai and coaches daughters) plan in full effect.[/quote]

You do realize that YJ B and C teams are both terrible. Playing a little loose with the term "talent".

YJ have become a one team per age group club, only their A team is solid. They used to be a deep club not the case anymore.
Originally Posted by Anonymous


YJ have become a one team per age group club, only their A team is solid. They used to be a deep club not the case anymore.


All clubs have. There was a time that M&D Red and Skywakers White were very good teams and a majority of those girls played D1 lacrosse. This isn't the case anymore. There are certainly places for those girls to play in college but the days of clubs with multiple top teams are over. Too many options.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

OMG. Waste of time, if your daughter could put one thing and one thing only on her entire lacrosse resume, this waste of time event would trump all else. And it is not even close. And 95% of the kids that are selected to go are already committed, so not really a college coach recruiting event. Although with the 2021’s coming in this year, and the NCAA contact shutdown, this year may show different than usual. But you certainly showed how clueless you are....


There was a time when Nike was super premier, UA 150 not so much. Today the coaches are doing their own thing. Your daughter has a much better chance of being seen at the coaches' camps. Every kid I know got into ua this year, most aren't going. The regional teams are not as good as they used to be for resume bec everyone, including coaches, know they are a political farce. Keep one thing in mind...all of these events were set up to make money first. Go to the camps at the schools she wants to go to.



Spin it however you like, there is a selective nature to these things. Starting at the top 99.something% of the kids who would like to try out and make UA regional (espesically Dc, Md and LI teams) , won’t make it. 95% of the kids who would like to go to Nike120 are not on the invite list. 75% of the kids who would like to go to UA150 can’t. And so on....... 100% of the kids who want to go to a college camp or clinic can. When the college coaches run a camp or clinic they are looking at 2-5 kids, hoping they showed up among the masses. Not trying to offend anyone, but it is what it is........


Very selective?! There were girls from YJ C and D last year.
[/quote]

YJ C would beat YJ B at this age so there must have been some talent there? Bert doesn't bring his team anywhere near C, just look at tryouts. He doesn't want to see what he already knows, but you know, F&F (and Mt Sinai and coaches daughters) plan in full effect.[/quote]

You do realize that YJ B and C teams are both terrible. Playing a little loose with the term "talent".

YJ have become a one team per age group club, only their A team is solid. They used to be a deep club not the case anymore.
[/quote]

Ummm, the "C" and "D" teams you mock are 50% TG girls that came over from Black and Purple, with some Legacy and 91 girls thrown in. So yea, they are both very good teams that only one or two teams from LI could beat.
Spin it however you like, there is a selective nature to these things. Starting at the top 99.something% of the kids who would like to try out and make UA regional (espesically Dc, Md and LI teams) , won’t make it. 95% of the kids who would like to go to Nike120 are not on the invite list. 75% of the kids who would like to go to UA150 can’t. And so on....... 100% of the kids who want to go to a college camp or clinic can. When the college coaches run a camp or clinic they are looking at 2-5 kids, hoping they showed up among the masses. Not trying to offend anyone, but it is what it is........[/quote]

Very selective?! There were girls from YJ C and D last year.
[/quote]

YJ C would beat YJ B at this age so there must have been some talent there? Bert doesn't bring his team anywhere near C, just look at tryouts. He doesn't want to see what he already knows, but you know, F&F (and Mt Sinai and coaches daughters) plan in full effect.[/quote]

You do realize that YJ B and C teams are both terrible. Playing a little loose with the term "talent".

YJ have become a one team per age group club, only their A team is solid. They used to be a deep club not the case anymore.
[/quote]

Ummm, the "C" and "D" teams you mock are 50% TG girls that came over from Black and Purple, with some Legacy and 91 girls thrown in. So yea, they are both very good teams that only one or two teams from LI could beat.[/quote]


Let's be honest, YJ "A" would destroy them, just like they would any other LI team. YJ "A" is on a whole different level. I think "C" would give Liberty a pretty good game, but Liberty probably beats them. Other than that, YJ "C" beats every other LI team, including YJ "B" and both TGs.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Spin it however you like, there is a selective nature to these things. Starting at the top 99.something% of the kids who would like to try out and make UA regional (espesically Dc, Md and LI teams) , won’t make it. 95% of the kids who would like to go to Nike120 are not on the invite list. 75% of the kids who would like to go to UA150 can’t. And so on....... 100% of the kids who want to go to a college camp or clinic can. When the college coaches run a camp or clinic they are looking at 2-5 kids, hoping they showed up among the masses. Not trying to offend anyone, but it is what it is........


Very selective?! There were girls from YJ C and D last year.
[/quote]

YJ C would beat YJ B at this age so there must have been some talent there? Bert doesn't bring his team anywhere near C, just look at tryouts. He doesn't want to see what he already knows, but you know, F&F (and Mt Sinai and coaches daughters) plan in full effect.[/quote]

You do realize that YJ B and C teams are both terrible. Playing a little loose with the term "talent".

YJ have become a one team per age group club, only their A team is solid. They used to be a deep club not the case anymore.
[/quote]

Ummm, the "C" and "D" teams you mock are 50% TG girls that came over from Black and Purple, with some Legacy and 91 girls thrown in. So yea, they are both very good teams that only one or two teams from LI could beat.[/quote]


Let's be honest, YJ "A" would destroy them, just like they would any other LI team. YJ "A" is on a whole different level. I think "C" would give Liberty a pretty good game, but Liberty probably beats them. Other than that, YJ "C" beats every other LI team, including YJ "B" and both TGs.

Didn't Liberty beat YJ A last summer? Didn't TG and YJ A play in the Nationals in a close game? I guess using your math YJ C would give YJ A a good game.


Let's be honest, YJ "A" would destroy them, just like they would any other LI team. YJ "A" is on a whole different level. I think "C" would give Liberty a pretty good game, but Liberty probably beats them. Other than that, YJ "C" beats every other LI team, including YJ "B" and both TGs.

Didn't Liberty beat YJ A last summer? Didn't TG and YJ A play in the Nationals in a close game? I guess using your math YJ C would give YJ A a good game.
[/quote]

This entire debate is just silly. YJA is a solid team with a collection of talented girls. They are by no means lights out better than TG or Liberty. When YJA has the ball they typically will score. No way would anyone on LIberty A or TG black consider taking a spot on YJB or C. There is no comparison and the gap between A and B/C is huge and typically starts with the athletism of the players. There’s some dillusional C team parent that keeps stirring things up and bashing the B team. My guess he’s sorry he walked away from TG and probably burnt a few bridges. At this age, being on the C team is what it is and just enjoy the time with your daughter
And none of the teams can beat M&D or Skywalkers. You guys should stay on the island and save your money. Play against each other so you can figure out who the best LI team is.
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Let's be honest, YJ "A" would destroy them, just like they would any other LI team. YJ "A" is on a whole different level. I think "C" would give Liberty a pretty good game, but Liberty probably beats them. Other than that, YJ "C" beats every other LI team, including YJ "B" and both TGs.

Didn't Liberty beat YJ A last summer? Didn't TG and YJ A play in the Nationals in a close game? I guess using your math YJ C would give YJ A a good game.


This entire debate is just silly. YJA is a solid team with a collection of talented girls. They are by no means lights out better than TG or Liberty. When YJA has the ball they typically will score. No way would anyone on LIberty A or TG black consider taking a spot on YJB or C. There is no comparison and the gap between A and B/C is huge and typically starts with the athletism of the players. There’s some dillusional C team parent that keeps stirring things up and bashing the B team. My guess he’s sorry he walked away from TG and probably burnt a few bridges. At this age, being on the C team is what it is and just enjoy the time with your daughter
[/quote]

Where does Legacy fall in this conversation?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Let's be honest, YJ "A" would destroy them, just like they would any other LI team. YJ "A" is on a whole different level. I think "C" would give Liberty a pretty good game, but Liberty probably beats them. Other than that, YJ "C" beats every other LI team, including YJ "B" and both TGs.

Didn't Liberty beat YJ A last summer? Didn't TG and YJ A play in the Nationals in a close game? I guess using your math YJ C would give YJ A a good game.


This entire debate is just silly. YJA is a solid team with a collection of talented girls. They are by no means lights out better than TG or Liberty. When YJA has the ball they typically will score. No way would anyone on LIberty A or TG black consider taking a spot on YJB or C. There is no comparison and the gap between A and B/C is huge and typically starts with the athletism of the players. There’s some dillusional C team parent that keeps stirring things up and bashing the B team. My guess he’s sorry he walked away from TG and probably burnt a few bridges. At this age, being on the C team is what it is and just enjoy the time with your daughter


Where does Legacy fall in this conversation?[/quote]

Probably up there with Igloo, Elevate, Beach Bums, Express, Wave and the other 20 or so programs. Full disclosure never saw them play though
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Let's be honest, YJ "A" would destroy them, just like they would any other LI team. YJ "A" is on a whole different level. I think "C" would give Liberty a pretty good game, but Liberty probably beats them. Other than that, YJ "C" beats every other LI team, including YJ "B" and both TGs.

Didn't Liberty beat YJ A last summer? Didn't TG and YJ A play in the Nationals in a close game? I guess using your math YJ C would give YJ A a good game.


This entire debate is just silly. YJA is a solid team with a collection of talented girls. They are by no means lights out better than TG or Liberty. When YJA has the ball they typically will score. No way would anyone on LIberty A or TG black consider taking a spot on YJB or C. There is no comparison and the gap between A and B/C is huge and typically starts with the athletism of the players. There’s some dillusional C team parent that keeps stirring things up and bashing the B team. My guess he’s sorry he walked away from TG and probably burnt a few bridges. At this age, being on the C team is what it is and just enjoy the time with your daughter


Where does Legacy fall in this conversation?[/quote]
Solid 3-4 new players joined this team this year. Likely to fall in somewhere between TG a and b (can't beat a, probably beat b), and YJ A and C (Couldn't beat A, but would match up with B and C).
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Let's be honest, YJ "A" would destroy them, just like they would any other LI team. YJ "A" is on a whole different level. I think "C" would give Liberty a pretty good game, but Liberty probably beats them. Other than that, YJ "C" beats every other LI team, including YJ "B" and both TGs.

Didn't Liberty beat YJ A last summer? Didn't TG and YJ A play in the Nationals in a close game? I guess using your math YJ C would give YJ A a good game.


This entire debate is just silly. YJA is a solid team with a collection of talented girls. They are by no means lights out better than TG or Liberty. When YJA has the ball they typically will score. No way would anyone on LIberty A or TG black consider taking a spot on YJB or C. There is no comparison and the gap between A and B/C is huge and typically starts with the athletism of the players. There’s some dillusional C team parent that keeps stirring things up and bashing the B team. My guess he’s sorry he walked away from TG and probably burnt a few bridges. At this age, being on the C team is what it is and just enjoy the time with your daughter
[/quote]


YJ A............Go to goal.........or....value the ball!!!! Please stop with your rose colored evaluations. Nobody cares. And by this time you should realize that if your good your good. Doesn't matter which team you play on. Must be your first kid through the process.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Let's be honest, YJ "A" would destroy them, just like they would any other LI team. YJ "A" is on a whole different level. I think "C" would give Liberty a pretty good game, but Liberty probably beats them. Other than that, YJ "C" beats every other LI team, including YJ "B" and both TGs.

Didn't Liberty beat YJ A last summer? Didn't TG and YJ A play in the Nationals in a close game? I guess using your math YJ C would give YJ A a good game.


This entire debate is just silly. YJA is a solid team with a collection of talented girls. They are by no means lights out better than TG or Liberty. When YJA has the ball they typically will score. No way would anyone on LIberty A or TG black consider taking a spot on YJB or C. There is no comparison and the gap between A and B/C is huge and typically starts with the athletism of the players. There’s some dillusional C team parent that keeps stirring things up and bashing the B team. My guess he’s sorry he walked away from TG and probably burnt a few bridges. At this age, being on the C team is what it is and just enjoy the time with your daughter



YJ A............Go to goal.........or....value the ball!!!! Please stop with your rose colored evaluations. Nobody cares. And by this time you should realize that if your good your good. Doesn't matter which team you play on. Must be your first kid through the process. [/quote]

No rose colored evaluations and no YJ chest thumping in the above post but you do seem to have some pent-up hostility towards this program? Theres lots of great great talent out there and sometimes it’s better to be a big fish in a small pound then a small fish in a big pond. At the end of the day everybody has choices and if you’re happy great if not look for other options. I have seen many top kids from other programs come to YJ end up riding the bench and vice versa .
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Let's be honest, YJ "A" would destroy them, just like they would any other LI team. YJ "A" is on a whole different level. I think "C" would give Liberty a pretty good game, but Liberty probably beats them. Other than that, YJ "C" beats every other LI team, including YJ "B" and both TGs.

Didn't Liberty beat YJ A last summer? Didn't TG and YJ A play in the Nationals in a close game? I guess using your math YJ C would give YJ A a good game.


This entire debate is just silly. YJA is a solid team with a collection of talented girls. They are by no means lights out better than TG or Liberty. When YJA has the ball they typically will score. No way would anyone on LIberty A or TG black consider taking a spot on YJB or C. There is no comparison and the gap between A and B/C is huge and typically starts with the athletism of the players. There’s some dillusional C team parent that keeps stirring things up and bashing the B team. My guess he’s sorry he walked away from TG and probably burnt a few bridges. At this age, being on the C team is what it is and just enjoy the time with your daughter



YJ A............Go to goal.........or....value the ball!!!! Please stop with your rose colored evaluations. Nobody cares. And by this time you should realize that if your good your good. Doesn't matter which team you play on. Must be your first kid through the process.


No rose colored evaluations and no YJ chest thumping in the above post but you do seem to have some pent-up hostility towards this program? Theres lots of great great talent out there and sometimes it’s better to be a big fish in a small pound then a small fish in a big pond. At the end of the day everybody has choices and if you’re happy great if not look for other options. I have seen many top kids from other programs come to YJ end up riding the bench and vice versa .
[/quote]

There is no way YJ C will beat liberty or TG A teams. But we will never know because YJC plays in the bottom brackets while liberty and TG play in the top. So you go on being a big fish in your little pond playing in front of no one. Good luck.
This entire debate is just silly. YJA is a solid team with a collection of talented girls. They are by no means lights out better than TG or Liberty. When YJA has the ball they typically will score. No way would anyone on LIberty A or TG black consider taking a spot on YJB or C. There is no comparison and the gap between A and B/C is huge and typically starts with the athletism of the players. There’s some dillusional C team parent that keeps stirring things up and bashing the B team. My guess he’s sorry he walked away from TG and probably burnt a few bridges. At this age, being on the C team is what it is and just enjoy the time with your daughter
[/quote]


YJ A............Go to goal.........or....value the ball!!!! Please stop with your rose colored evaluations. Nobody cares. And by this time you should realize that if your good your good. Doesn't matter which team you play on. Must be your first kid through the process. [/quote]

No rose colored evaluations and no YJ chest thumping in the above post but you do seem to have some pent-up hostility towards this program? Theres lots of great great talent out there and sometimes it’s better to be a big fish in a small pound then a small fish in a big pond. At the end of the day everybody has choices and if you’re happy great if not look for other options. I have seen many top kids from other programs come to YJ end up riding the bench and vice versa .
[/quote]

There is no way YJ C will beat liberty or TG A teams. But we will never know because YJC plays in the bottom brackets while liberty and TG play in the top. So you go on being a big fish in your little pond playing in front of no one. Good luck. [/quote]

We left TG Black and were "placed on" YJ C. At first we were pissed, but to be honest, YJ C has girls that can play. Comparable to what we had at TG. You are right about one thing, we don't play in the top bracket and only had one or two coaches check us out this Fall. That's fine, these girls aren't going to get recruited by Maryland, Hopkins, etc. They'll get recruited in another year or two by mid to lower D1 or a D3 school that has a good lacrosse program with EXCELLENT academics. And that's what it's all about. So go ahead and keep beating your chest to all the guys at work about the coaches on the sidelines, while the cutthroat and competition eats at every parent (there's a reason you look at those sidelines and see all the parents spread out, you can't sit too close to people if all you do is criticize the other players). We'll enjoy watching our girls play good lacrosse while we talk about which Green Turlte to have the team dinner at, the one we all look forward to. To each his own.
The girls play on teams together and against each other. Most are friends. Some will play together/against each other in college. Unfortunately some parents cant sit back and enjoy all the positives these young women have gained through their participation on these club teams. We all know who the knuckleheads are because they act on the sidelines the same as they post on this site.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This entire debate is just silly. YJA is a solid team with a collection of talented girls. They are by no means lights out better than TG or Liberty. When YJA has the ball they typically will score. No way would anyone on LIberty A or TG black consider taking a spot on YJB or C. There is no comparison and the gap between A and B/C is huge and typically starts with the athletism of the players. There’s some dillusional C team parent that keeps stirring things up and bashing the B team. My guess he’s sorry he walked away from TG and probably burnt a few bridges. At this age, being on the C team is what it is and just enjoy the time with your daughter



YJ A............Go to goal.........or....value the ball!!!! Please stop with your rose colored evaluations. Nobody cares. And by this time you should realize that if your good your good. Doesn't matter which team you play on. Must be your first kid through the process. [/quote]

No rose colored evaluations and no YJ chest thumping in the above post but you do seem to have some pent-up hostility towards this program? Theres lots of great great talent out there and sometimes it’s better to be a big fish in a small pound then a small fish in a big pond. At the end of the day everybody has choices and if you’re happy great if not look for other options. I have seen many top kids from other programs come to YJ end up riding the bench and vice versa .
[/quote]

There is no way YJ C will beat liberty or TG A teams. But we will never know because YJC plays in the bottom brackets while liberty and TG play in the top. So you go on being a big fish in your little pond playing in front of no one. Good luck. [/quote]

We left TG Black and were "placed on" YJ C. At first we were pissed, but to be honest, YJ C has girls that can play. Comparable to what we had at TG. You are right about one thing, we don't play in the top bracket and only had one or two coaches check us out this Fall. That's fine, these girls aren't going to get recruited by Maryland, Hopkins, etc. They'll get recruited in another year or two by mid to lower D1 or a D3 school that has a good lacrosse program with EXCELLENT academics. And that's what it's all about. So go ahead and keep beating your chest to all the guys at work about the coaches on the sidelines, while the cutthroat and competition eats at every parent (there's a reason you look at those sidelines and see all the parents spread out, you can't sit too close to people if all you do is criticize the other players). We'll enjoy watching our girls play good lacrosse while we talk about which Green Turlte to have the team dinner at, the one we all look forward to. To each his own.[/quote]

Correct, girls that can play. They can catch and throw ok and have so-so stick skills. They will play low level D1 or D3 lax, nothing wrong with that.They do not belong on B and aren't beating any legit A team. You sound logical and happy in the above post, but then why does the C team people on here go on complaining about how they belong on B.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This entire debate is just silly. YJA is a solid team with a collection of talented girls. They are by no means lights out better than TG or Liberty. When YJA has the ball they typically will score. No way would anyone on LIberty A or TG black consider taking a spot on YJB or C. There is no comparison and the gap between A and B/C is huge and typically starts with the athletism of the players. There’s some dillusional C team parent that keeps stirring things up and bashing the B team. My guess he’s sorry he walked away from TG and probably burnt a few bridges. At this age, being on the C team is what it is and just enjoy the time with your daughter



YJ A............Go to goal.........or....value the ball!!!! Please stop with your rose colored evaluations. Nobody cares. And by this time you should realize that if your good your good. Doesn't matter which team you play on. Must be your first kid through the process. [/quote]

No rose colored evaluations and no YJ chest thumping in the above post but you do seem to have some pent-up hostility towards this program? Theres lots of great great talent out there and sometimes it’s better to be a big fish in a small pound then a small fish in a big pond. At the end of the day everybody has choices and if you’re happy great if not look for other options. I have seen many top kids from other programs come to YJ end up riding the bench and vice versa .
[/quote]

There is no way YJ C will beat liberty or TG A teams. But we will never know because YJC plays in the bottom brackets while liberty and TG play in the top. So you go on being a big fish in your little pond playing in front of no one. Good luck. [/quote]

We left TG Black and were "placed on" YJ C. At first we were pissed, but to be honest, YJ C has girls that can play. Comparable to what we had at TG. You are right about one thing, we don't play in the top bracket and only had one or two coaches check us out this Fall. That's fine, these girls aren't going to get recruited by Maryland, Hopkins, etc. They'll get recruited in another year or two by mid to lower D1 or a D3 school that has a good lacrosse program with EXCELLENT academics. And that's what it's all about. So go ahead and keep beating your chest to all the guys at work about the coaches on the sidelines, while the cutthroat and competition eats at every parent (there's a reason you look at those sidelines and see all the parents spread out, you can't sit too close to people if all you do is criticize the other players). We'll enjoy watching our girls play good lacrosse while we talk about which Green Turlte to have the team dinner at, the one we all look forward to. To each his own.

Ouch. You can sugar coat anyway you want but leaving any A team for a C team is terrible for exposure. No way is YJ C comparable to TG black but to each his own. Enjoy Green Turtle.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


YJ have become a one team per age group club, only their A team is solid. They used to be a deep club not the case anymore.


All clubs have. There was a time that M&D Red and Skywakers White were very good teams and a majority of those girls played D1 lacrosse. This isn't the case anymore. There are certainly places for those girls to play in college but the days of clubs with multiple top teams are over. Too many options.



You are sadly mistaken about "those girls played D1 lacrosse." Skywalkers 2017 White has quite a large number of D1 players. It is a fact that SW 2019 White has 12 D1 verbally committed players.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


YJ have become a one team per age group club, only their A team is solid. They used to be a deep club not the case anymore.


All clubs have. There was a time that M&D Red and Skywakers White were very good teams and a majority of those girls played D1 lacrosse. This isn't the case anymore. There are certainly places for those girls to play in college but the days of clubs with multiple top teams are over. Too many options.



You are sadly mistaken about "those girls played D1 lacrosse." Skywalkers 2017 White has quite a large number of D1 players. It is a fact that SW 2019 White has 12 D1 verbally committed players.


Ok. There are almost 120 D1 women's lacrosse teams. How about I clarify that "a lot of those girls played high level D1 lacrosse".
I would go with "high level academic schools who play D1 lacrosse." Recent SW White teams have girls committed to Army West Point, Dartmouth, William and Mary in addition to some excellent D3 schools including National Champion Gettysburg. Perhaps, some of these girls have different expectations when it comes to their college lacrosse careers and completely satisfied not committing to a "high level D1 lacrosse team."
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I would go with "high level academic schools who play D1 lacrosse." Recent SW White teams have girls committed to Army West Point, Dartmouth, William and Mary in addition to some excellent D3 schools including National Champion Gettysburg. Perhaps, some of these girls have different expectations when it comes to their college lacrosse careers and completely satisfied not committing to a "high level D1 lacrosse team."



I totally agree, but that wasn't the point. The point was that the top club B teams are not as competitive as they once were due to the abundance of other options. I doubt that you want to argue that SW 2019 White can compete with the top clubs. Not long ago, SW White, M&D Red, YJ Gold, Heros White, etc could all compete and in many cases beat other very good teams. This just isn't the case anymore.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I would go with "high level academic schools who play D1 lacrosse." Recent SW White teams have girls committed to Army West Point, Dartmouth, William and Mary in addition to some excellent D3 schools including National Champion Gettysburg. Perhaps, some of these girls have different expectations when it comes to their college lacrosse careers and completely satisfied not committing to a "high level D1 lacrosse team."



I totally agree, but that wasn't the point. The point was that the top club B teams are not as competitive as they once were due to the abundance of other options. I doubt that you want to argue that SW 2019 White can compete with the top clubs. Not long ago, SW White, M&D Red, YJ Gold, Heros White, etc could all compete and in many cases beat other very good teams. This just isn't the case anymore.


This is a very correct statement. SW White against a top 2019 team (pick any one of them ... YJ, M&D, Heros, Mass Elite, Capital, SW Blue etc.) would not even be a game. I'm talking name your score type of game. Is what it is. 2nd teams have become depleted in talent as more clubs have opened shop. Forget about 3rd teams.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This entire debate is just silly. YJA is a solid team with a collection of talented girls. They are by no means lights out better than TG or Liberty. When YJA has the ball they typically will score. No way would anyone on LIberty A or TG black consider taking a spot on YJB or C. There is no comparison and the gap between A and B/C is huge and typically starts with the athletism of the players. There’s some dillusional C team parent that keeps stirring things up and bashing the B team. My guess he’s sorry he walked away from TG and probably burnt a few bridges. At this age, being on the C team is what it is and just enjoy the time with your daughter



YJ A............Go to goal.........or....value the ball!!!! Please stop with your rose colored evaluations. Nobody cares. And by this time you should realize that if your good your good. Doesn't matter which team you play on. Must be your first kid through the process.


No rose colored evaluations and no YJ chest thumping in the above post but you do seem to have some pent-up hostility towards this program? Theres lots of great great talent out there and sometimes it’s better to be a big fish in a small pound then a small fish in a big pond. At the end of the day everybody has choices and if you’re happy great if not look for other options. I have seen many top kids from other programs come to YJ end up riding the bench and vice versa .
[/quote]

There is no way YJ C will beat liberty or TG A teams. But we will never know because YJC plays in the bottom brackets while liberty and TG play in the top. So you go on being a big fish in your little pond playing in front of no one. Good luck. [/quote]

We left TG Black and were "placed on" YJ C. At first we were pissed, but to be honest, YJ C has girls that can play. Comparable to what we had at TG. You are right about one thing, we don't play in the top bracket and only had one or two coaches check us out this Fall. That's fine, these girls aren't going to get recruited by Maryland, Hopkins, etc. They'll get recruited in another year or two by mid to lower D1 or a D3 school that has a good lacrosse program with EXCELLENT academics. And that's what it's all about. So go ahead and keep beating your chest to all the guys at work about the coaches on the sidelines, while the cutthroat and competition eats at every parent (there's a reason you look at those sidelines and see all the parents spread out, you can't sit too close to people if all you do is criticize the other players). We'll enjoy watching our girls play good lacrosse while we talk about which Green Turlte to have the team dinner at, the one we all look forward to. To each his own.

Ouch. You can sugar coat anyway you want but leaving any A team for a C team is terrible for exposure. No way is YJ C comparable to TG black but to each his own. Enjoy Green Turtle.
[/quote]

TG Black is decimated, and is on par with YJ B & C. Still good lacrosse though, just not YJ A level.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This entire debate is just silly. YJA is a solid team with a collection of talented girls. They are by no means lights out better than TG or Liberty. When YJA has the ball they typically will score. No way would anyone on LIberty A or TG black consider taking a spot on YJB or C. There is no comparison and the gap between A and B/C is huge and typically starts with the athletism of the players. There’s some dillusional C team parent that keeps stirring things up and bashing the B team. My guess he’s sorry he walked away from TG and probably burnt a few bridges. At this age, being on the C team is what it is and just enjoy the time with your daughter



YJ A............Go to goal.........or....value the ball!!!! Please stop with your rose colored evaluations. Nobody cares. And by this time you should realize that if your good your good. Doesn't matter which team you play on. Must be your first kid through the process.


No rose colored evaluations and no YJ chest thumping in the above post but you do seem to have some pent-up hostility towards this program? Theres lots of great great talent out there and sometimes it’s better to be a big fish in a small pound then a small fish in a big pond. At the end of the day everybody has choices and if you’re happy great if not look for other options. I have seen many top kids from other programs come to YJ end up riding the bench and vice versa .


There is no way YJ C will beat liberty or TG A teams. But we will never know because YJC plays in the bottom brackets while liberty and TG play in the top. So you go on being a big fish in your little pond playing in front of no one. Good luck. [/quote]

We left TG Black and were "placed on" YJ C. At first we were pissed, but to be honest, YJ C has girls that can play. Comparable to what we had at TG. You are right about one thing, we don't play in the top bracket and only had one or two coaches check us out this Fall. That's fine, these girls aren't going to get recruited by Maryland, Hopkins, etc. They'll get recruited in another year or two by mid to lower D1 or a D3 school that has a good lacrosse program with EXCELLENT academics. And that's what it's all about. So go ahead and keep beating your chest to all the guys at work about the coaches on the sidelines, while the cutthroat and competition eats at every parent (there's a reason you look at those sidelines and see all the parents spread out, you can't sit too close to people if all you do is criticize the other players). We'll enjoy watching our girls play good lacrosse while we talk about which Green Turlte to have the team dinner at, the one we all look forward to. To each his own.

Ouch. You can sugar coat anyway you want but leaving any A team for a C team is terrible for exposure. No way is YJ C comparable to TG black but to each his own. Enjoy Green Turtle.
[/quote]

TG Black is decimated, and is on par with YJ B & C. Still good lacrosse though, just not YJ A level

YJ B & C are both weak.


I totally agree, but that wasn't the point. The point was that the top club B teams are not as competitive as they once were due to the abundance of other options. I doubt that you want to argue that SW 2019 White can compete with the top clubs. Not long ago, SW White, M&D Red, YJ Gold, Heros White, etc could all compete and in many cases beat other very good teams. This just isn't the case anymore.[/quote]

This is a very correct statement. SW White against a top 2019 team (pick any one of them ... YJ, M&D, Heros, Mass Elite, Capital, SW Blue etc.) would not even be a game. I'm talking name your score type of game. Is what it is. 2nd teams have become depleted in talent as more clubs have opened shop. Forget about 3rd teams. [/quote]

Not sure how 2019 got on 2021 thread. At any rate, 2019 SW White and YJ C play close games.They traded wins last year. Not sure how deep 2021 is but the 2019 very deep. Not suggesting either team belongs in the top division, but both teams are way better than any other club's B team.
“‘TG Black is decimated, and is on par with YJ B & C. Still good lacrosse though, just not YJ A level”


For every player that leaves there’s a replacement of equal or better caliber that takes the spot.
Saying they got decimated is silly and sounds like sour grapes.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This entire debate is just silly. YJA is a solid team with a collection of talented girls. They are by no means lights out better than TG or Liberty. When YJA has the ball they typically will score. No way would anyone on LIberty A or TG black consider taking a spot on YJB or C. There is no comparison and the gap between A and B/C is huge and typically starts with the athletism of the players. There’s some dillusional C team parent that keeps stirring things up and bashing the B team. My guess he’s sorry he walked away from TG and probably burnt a few bridges. At this age, being on the C team is what it is and just enjoy the time with your daughter



YJ A............Go to goal.........or....value the ball!!!! Please stop with your rose colored evaluations. Nobody cares. And by this time you should realize that if your good your good. Doesn't matter which team you play on. Must be your first kid through the process.


No rose colored evaluations and no YJ chest thumping in the above post but you do seem to have some pent-up hostility towards this program? Theres lots of great great talent out there and sometimes it’s better to be a big fish in a small pound then a small fish in a big pond. At the end of the day everybody has choices and if you’re happy great if not look for other options. I have seen many top kids from other programs come to YJ end up riding the bench and vice versa .


There is no way YJ C will beat liberty or TG A teams. But we will never know because YJC plays in the bottom brackets while liberty and TG play in the top. So you go on being a big fish in your little pond playing in front of no one. Good luck.


We left TG Black and were "placed on" YJ C. At first we were pissed, but to be honest, YJ C has girls that can play. Comparable to what we had at TG. You are right about one thing, we don't play in the top bracket and only had one or two coaches check us out this Fall. That's fine, these girls aren't going to get recruited by Maryland, Hopkins, etc. They'll get recruited in another year or two by mid to lower D1 or a D3 school that has a good lacrosse program with EXCELLENT academics. And that's what it's all about. So go ahead and keep beating your chest to all the guys at work about the coaches on the sidelines, while the cutthroat and competition eats at every parent (there's a reason you look at those sidelines and see all the parents spread out, you can't sit too close to people if all you do is criticize the other players). We'll enjoy watching our girls play good lacrosse while we talk about which Green Turlte to have the team dinner at, the one we all look forward to. To each his own.

Ouch. You can sugar coat anyway you want but leaving any A team for a C team is terrible for exposure. No way is YJ C comparable to TG black but to each his own. Enjoy Green Turtle.
[/quote]

TG Black is decimated, and is on par with YJ B & C. Still good lacrosse though, just not YJ A level

YJ B & C are both weak.
[/quote]

Nice try, nobody's biting
Originally Posted by Anonymous
“‘TG Black is decimated, and is on par with YJ B & C. Still good lacrosse though, just not YJ A level”


For every player that leaves there’s a replacement of equal or better caliber that takes the spot.
Saying they got decimated is silly and sounds like sour grapes.


NO way replacement players are ever better than kids who leave, the bottom 2/3 of the roster on any TG black team is full of dead wood
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
“‘TG Black is decimated, and is on par with YJ B & C. Still good lacrosse though, just not YJ A level”


For every player that leaves there’s a replacement of equal or better caliber that takes the spot.
Saying they got decimated is silly and sounds like sour grapes.


NO way replacement players are ever better than kids who leave, the bottom 2/3 of the roster on any TG black team is full of dead wood

The replacement players this season are much better than the girls lost from last season. The team will be better without the ones who left. The atmosphere and play of the team was already better this fall. 2Wi4jV
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
“‘TG Black is decimated, and is on par with YJ B & C. Still good lacrosse though, just not YJ A level”


For every player that leaves there’s a replacement of equal or better caliber that takes the spot.
Saying they got decimated is silly and sounds like sour grapes.


NO way replacement players are ever better than kids who leave, the bottom 2/3 of the roster on any TG black team is full of dead wood

The replacement players this season are much better than the girls lost from last season. The team will be better without the ones who left. The atmosphere and play of the team was already better this fall. 2Wi4jV


They got 1 good player. The others came from YJ B and C.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
“‘TG Black is decimated, and is on par with YJ B & C. Still good lacrosse though, just not YJ A level”


For every player that leaves there’s a replacement of equal or better caliber that takes the spot.
Saying they got decimated is silly and sounds like sour grapes.


NO way replacement players are ever better than kids who leave, the bottom 2/3 of the roster on any TG black team is full of dead wood

The replacement players this season are much better than the girls lost from last season. The team will be better without the ones who left. The atmosphere and play of the team was already better this fall. 2Wi4jV


They got 1 good player. The others came from YJ B and C.


You need to let it go, as painful as it may feel the team will be just fine without your daughter.
It must be difficult living ur life every day and having so much hateful jealous energy inside and directed at a couple of 14 year old girls.
We all feel truly sorry that u can’t seem to shake them and I’d even suggest therapy.
Funny thing is, I know who those girls are that u constantly slander and I’ve seen their videos on instagram

. Truth be told...They are AMAZING.

Oh and let me save u the trouble of typing in ur next post.
“OK dad (mom)...”.

Have an AMAZING day 😎.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It must be difficult living ur life every day and having so much hateful jealous energy inside and directed at a couple of 14 year old girls.
We all feel truly sorry that u can’t seem to shake them and I’d even suggest therapy.
Funny thing is, I know who those girls are that u constantly slander and I’ve seen their videos on instagram

. Truth be told...They are AMAZING.

Oh and let me save u the trouble of typing in ur next post.
“OK dad (mom)...”.

Have an AMAZING day 😎.

Use the quote button. What are you referencing, didn't see any slander or hate. Paranoid much?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I would go with "high level academic schools who play D1 lacrosse." Recent SW White teams have girls committed to Army West Point, Dartmouth, William and Mary in addition to some excellent D3 schools including National Champion Gettysburg. Perhaps, some of these girls have different expectations when it comes to their college lacrosse careers and completely satisfied not committing to a "high level D1 lacrosse team."



I totally agree, but that wasn't the point. The point was that the top club B teams are not as competitive as they once were due to the abundance of other options. I doubt that you want to argue that SW 2019 White can compete with the top clubs. Not long ago, SW White, M&D Red, YJ Gold, Heros White, etc could all compete and in many cases beat other very good teams. This just isn't the case anymore.


This is a very correct statement. SW White against a top 2019 team (pick any one of them ... YJ, M&D, Heros, Mass Elite, Capital, SW Blue etc.) would not even be a game. I'm talking name your score type of game. Is what it is. 2nd teams have become depleted in talent as more clubs have opened shop. Forget about 3rd teams.



Listen, the original post stated that "B" level teams were not what they used to be and then went on to name SW and M&D specifically. This is not true. Yes, there are "B" level teams that are struggling due to more clubs opening shop. Look at MD United, Integrity, Bay Area, and who knows how many of your LI teams that have had "B" teams fold or become defunct, Top Guns, Legacy, Elevate, etc.

While this is a 2021 post, it was the original poster that brought this up. SW, Hero's, and LI YJ have strong "B" teams that consistently beat top level talent. No, not M&D Black, Heros Green, TG Black, Mass Elite, Capital (These are the top teams in the country) etc., but they definitely beat some top A level contending teams. When you bring up information that is not "grounded in evidence", then don't bring it up. If you need scores, results, etc. hit me up. You have no clue what you are talking about.
Originally Posted by Anonymous


I totally agree, but that wasn't the point. The point was that the top club B teams are not as competitive as they once were due to the abundance of other options. I doubt that you want to argue that SW 2019 White can compete with the top clubs. Not long ago, SW White, M&D Red, YJ Gold, Heros White, etc could all compete and in many cases beat other very good teams. This just isn't the case anymore.


This is a very correct statement. SW White against a top 2019 team (pick any one of them ... YJ, M&D, Heros, Mass Elite, Capital, SW Blue etc.) would not even be a game. I'm talking name your score type of game. Is what it is. 2nd teams have become depleted in talent as more clubs have opened shop. Forget about 3rd teams. [/quote]

Not sure how 2019 got on 2021 thread. At any rate, 2019 SW White and YJ C play close games.They traded wins last year. Not sure how deep 2021 is but the 2019 very deep. Not suggesting either team belongs in the top division, but both teams are way better than any other club's B team. [/quote]

Um ... SW white 2021 lost to Steps White (B team) and SW White 2019 lost to SJS Black (B team) at G8 alone last year. Soooo, I guess you lie? exaggerate?? hmmmm
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I would go with "high level academic schools who play D1 lacrosse." Recent SW White teams have girls committed to Army West Point, Dartmouth, William and Mary in addition to some excellent D3 schools including National Champion Gettysburg. Perhaps, some of these girls have different expectations when it comes to their college lacrosse careers and completely satisfied not committing to a "high level D1 lacrosse team."



I totally agree, but that wasn't the point. The point was that the top club B teams are not as competitive as they once were due to the abundance of other options. I doubt that you want to argue that SW 2019 White can compete with the top clubs. Not long ago, SW White, M&D Red, YJ Gold, Heros White, etc could all compete and in many cases beat other very good teams. This just isn't the case anymore.


This is a very correct statement. SW White against a top 2019 team (pick any one of them ... YJ, M&D, Heros, Mass Elite, Capital, SW Blue etc.) would not even be a game. I'm talking name your score type of game. Is what it is. 2nd teams have become depleted in talent as more clubs have opened shop. Forget about 3rd teams.



Listen, the original post stated that "B" level teams were not what they used to be and then went on to name SW and M&D specifically. This is not true. Yes, there are "B" level teams that are struggling due to more clubs opening shop. Look at MD United, Integrity, Bay Area, and who knows how many of your LI teams that have had "B" teams fold or become defunct, Top Guns, Legacy, Elevate, etc.

While this is a 2021 post, it was the original poster that brought this up. SW, Hero's, and LI YJ have strong "B" teams that consistently beat top level talent. No, not M&D Black, Heros Green, TG Black, Mass Elite, Capital (These are the top teams in the country) etc., but they definitely beat some top A level contending teams. When you bring up information that is not "grounded in evidence", then don't bring it up. If you need scores, results, etc. hit me up. You have no clue what you are talking about.


Sure. Give us scores of SW White beating "top A level contending teams". You just said (and are correct) that they can't beat the top A level contending teams that you named so I'm a bit confused. Because those are the top A level contending teams, see what I mean?
SW.....please go away. Go to the Maryland thread.
How does spring lacrosse work in various states? In Maryland is there any community lacrosse left or does everyone play club year round? How about Long Island? I believe that Westchester and Connecticut still play for their town in the spring and then play club the rest of the year. Would be interested to know how much town lacrosse is left.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How does spring lacrosse work in various states? In Maryland is there any community lacrosse left or does everyone play club year round? How about Long Island? I believe that Westchester and Connecticut still play for their town in the spring and then play club the rest of the year. Would be interested to know how much town lacrosse is left.


2021's are in High School. No spring club lacrosse anywhere that I know of.
How many 2021 are playing varsity and where?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How many 2021 are playing varsity and where?


Who cares, team game...its about winning...go work on your kids highlight reel...loser
The few committed ones (and the one that claims to be)
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The few committed ones (and the one that claims to be)



They are killing it on JV.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The few committed ones (and the one that claims to be)



They are killing it on JV.
thats really not hard to do lmao
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]The few committed ones (and the one that claims to be)



They are killing it on JV.
thats really not hard to do lmao
[/quote

I hear a bunch of the 2021s are really lighting it up this year.
oh please do share, what towns?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
oh please do share, what towns?

ESM and Mt Sinai starting goalies are both 2021's, two top teams with Freshman in the cage.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
oh please do share, what towns?

ESM and Mt Sinai starting goalies are both 2021's, two top teams with Freshman in the cage.


That didnt take long...
Thanks dad
Is there a better team then the Skywalkers?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is there a better team then the Skywalkers?


After the first week, not yet
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is there a better team then the Skywalkers?


Who are the skywalkers. Go back to your star wars movie dad.
Yes there are multiple better teams and “then” the Skywalkers😉
Long Island UA Command team has:
11 YJ 2021 girls
2 YJ 2022 girl

Pretty sure that shuts up the other LI clubs as to who is the best.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Long Island UA Command team has:
11 YJ 2021 girls
2 YJ 2022 girl

Pretty sure that shuts up the other LI clubs as to who is the best.



This post is so stupid I can’t even understand who they are trying to
incite
Who was evaluating?
[quote=Anonymous]Long Island UA Command team has:
11 YJ 2021 girls
2 YJ 2022 girl

Pretty sure that shuts up the other LI clubs as to who is the best.

Skywalkers are from Maryland. What do the inferior Long Island teams have to do with this discussion? Skywalkers schooled YJ last time they played 11-4.
rosters aren't posted yet?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Long Island UA Command team has:
11 YJ 2021 girls
2 YJ 2022 girl

Pretty sure that shuts up the other LI clubs as to who is the best.



This post is so stupid I can’t even understand who they are trying to
incite



MAYBE NOT EVERYONE WAS AT THE TRYOUTS
How many YJ b players made it
Originally Posted by Anonymous
rosters aren't posted yet?


Not yet. This is link for rosters when they do.
https://events.r2it.com/lacrosse/UnderArmour/Roster/Division/Underclass
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
rosters aren't posted yet?


Not yet. This is link for rosters when they do.
https://events.r2it.com/lacrosse/UnderArmour/Roster/Division/Underclass


People that are already registered can see the roster. More than half the team is YJ
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Long Island UA Command team has:
11 YJ 2021 girls
2 YJ 2022 girl

Pretty sure that shuts up the other LI clubs as to who is the best.

Skywalkers are from Maryland. What do the inferior Long Island teams have to do with this discussion? Skywalkers schooled YJ last time they played 11-4.


Can’t post anonymously in the mid Atlantic forum anymore so you come north to spew your crap? Go back to your own forum, oh wait you can’t!!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is there a better team then the Skywalkers?


After the first week, not yet


After week two, yes.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is there a better team then the Skywalkers?


After the first week, not yet


After week two, yes.


I saw a tweet, YJB beat skywalkers. True?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is there a better team then the Skywalkers?


After the first week, not yet


After week two, yes.

It's a long season stay healthy travel safe and enjoy the great competition
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is there a better team then the Skywalkers?


After the first week, not yet


After week two, yes.


SW, M&D and YJ all have great players at this age. They can beat each other week to week. It is what made it so amazing the M&D went so long without losing. It's stupid to argue over who is the better team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is there a better team then the Skywalkers?


After the first week, not yet


After week two, yes.


SW, M&D and YJ all have great players at this age. They can beat each other week to week. It is what made it so amazing the M&D went so long without losing. It's stupid to argue over who is the better team.

Agreed. Trading wins and losses week to week, one can't definitively claim top team honors (they all can claim one of the top teams though) and that is becoming less and less important as they get older. What was really important was the 15 college coaches that were watching the game.

Good luck the rest of the season.
Hi
Not sure where or how to post this-
When do you think it’s time to move on from a club?
Been with the club for three years. About a 40-50% win percentage. I know it’s not about the wins. We play in a major club league against the hardest competition out there.
The thing is - it’s become stagnant. The club offers goalie training and draw training on the first day of practice of each spring/ fall season only.
Suffered thru four hard games this weekend that would have been different if we would have won the draw. Same girls has been doing the draw for three years. Can’t win it worth crap and they insist on staying middies. Same middies for last three years who barely break 5’ and 90 lbs wet.
My daughter isn’t learning anything new.
Other teams chewed up our defense like bubblegum with aggressive moves that just were not in our playbook.
Our attack can’t move the ball past the 8meter. They have to stop the momentum to regroup every time.
I know I sound like a Monday morning QB but club takes up so much time for The whole family.
Sadly, and I say this as a 'veteran" of the travel lax circuit, the grass more than likely wont be greener elsewhere--just a different shade....if your daughter has stagnated and the coaching/playing is not teaching her anything new or improving her game, then it is definitely time to seek a new program.
But as our experience has taught us/my daughter, its just more of the same eventually--in a diff color uniform.
The travel machine is basically a cookie-cutter idea that has run its course. If you really look at it, there are fewer programs with more than a team or two at any one age group. My take (and just my take) is that folks don't want to shell out the ever increasing fees to have their daughters spin there collective wheels.
Club lacrosse was never meant to be what it has become in terms of every girl plays. The number of teams is staggering. If your daughter's ceiling is a 3rd or 4th tier D1, or D2/D3, you really are wasting your time and money spending the thousands and thousands of dollars as well as your actual time running around the country all summer. There are so many women's college lacrosse programs there are hardly enough high school seniors each year to fill them. Take your daughter to some camps at schools she's interested in that are realistic for her. Get good grades and be prepared for the SAT. There's a lot more money in that anyway. The problem is, even the girls on these crappy club teams(more likely their parents) think they are going to play for Maryland or UNC.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hi
Not sure where or how to post this-
When do you think it’s time to move on from a club?
Been with the club for three years. About a 40-50% win percentage. I know it’s not about the wins. We play in a major club league against the hardest competition out there.
The thing is - it’s become stagnant. The club offers goalie training and draw training on the first day of practice of each spring/ fall season only.
Suffered thru four hard games this weekend that would have been different if we would have won the draw. Same girls has been doing the draw for three years. Can’t win it worth crap and they insist on staying middies. Same middies for last three years who barely break 5’ and 90 lbs wet.
My daughter isn’t learning anything new.
Other teams chewed up our defense like bubblegum with aggressive moves that just were not in our playbook.
Our attack can’t move the ball past the 8meter. They have to stop the momentum to regroup every time.
I know I sound like a Monday morning QB but club takes up so much time for The whole family.


Can you share your club name or location so others can avoid it?
What's happened to Heros Green? 0-4 this weekend and not all losses were against top level teams.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What's happened to Heros Green? 0-4 this weekend and not all losses were against top level teams.


Must've been a showcase format like last time where all players had to play 50% of the time (tee hee)
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What's happened to Heros Green? 0-4 this weekend and not all losses were against top level teams.


Must've been a showcase format like last time where all players had to play 50% of the time (tee hee)


It doesn't necessarily mean Heros has slipped, but rather other teams are catching up and there's more parity.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Long Island UA Command team has:
11 YJ 2021 girls
2 YJ 2022 girl

Pretty sure that shuts up the other LI clubs as to who is the best.



Why would we want to play in farminVille and go to terrible school districts and end up at stony brook, Florida, JMU when we could go to academic powehouses CSH, GC, Manhasset and go to the Ivies. Seems silly to trek out to the willies for club lax. Get your grades up kids...
Re Heros Green

YJ and SW lost this weekend too. Parity is good for the sport.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Re Heros Green

YJ and SW lost this weekend too. Parity is good for the sport.


YJ and SW lost in 20 minute playoff games, not in pool play to an upstate NY team no one has heard of, some version of Dewlax, and an average MD United bunch. Spin it however you want, but the drop between this year and last year is pretty noticeable.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Long Island UA Command team has:
11 YJ 2021 girls
2 YJ 2022 girl

Pretty sure that shuts up the other LI clubs as to who is the best.



Why would we want to play in farminVille and go to terrible school districts and end up at stony brook, Florida, JMU when we could go to academic powehouses CSH, GC, Manhasset and go to the Ivies. Seems silly to trek out to the willies for club lax. Get your grades up kids...


Sorry, but some actual facts for you, top 25 universities in the United States according to US News & World Report. Also, Garden City has a number of girls that play YJ and some of them went Catholic private but live in the town. Also see some Cold Spring Harbor their as well. Lastly, going ivy is more about your bank account than your kid's abilities...

YJ 2021- Yale
YJ 2020- Yale, Princeton, USC, Notre Dame, Johns Hopkins, Virginia
YJ 2019- Duke (3), Notre Dame, Yale, Virginia (2), USC, Brown
YJ 2018- Notre Dame (3), Penn, Brown
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Re Heros Green

YJ and SW lost this weekend too. Parity is good for the sport.


Respectfully, their is a different with not winning a game and going 4-0 in full time games and losing once in a shortened 20 minute game.

Congrats to STEPS Blue!!!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Long Island UA Command team has:
11 YJ 2021 girls
2 YJ 2022 girl

Pretty sure that shuts up the other LI clubs as to who is the best.



Why would we want to play in farminVille and go to terrible school districts and end up at stony brook, Florida, JMU when we could go to academic powehouses CSH, GC, Manhasset and go to the Ivies. Seems silly to trek out to the willies for club lax. Get your grades up kids...


Sorry, but some actual facts for you, top 25 universities in the United States according to US News & World Report. Also, Garden City has a number of girls that play YJ and some of them went Catholic private but live in the town. Also see some Cold Spring Harbor their as well. Lastly, going ivy is more about your bank account than your kid's abilities...

YJ 2021- Yale
YJ 2020- Yale, Princeton, USC, Notre Dame, Johns Hopkins, Virginia
YJ 2019- Duke (3), Notre Dame, Yale, Virginia (2), USC, Brown
YJ 2018- Notre Dame (3), Penn, Brown


Other than Yale and Princeton.. the other schools are garbage... might as well play for PAL...again.. no need to go out to the sticks for travel for Duke, USC, ND.. in the real work these schools are mediocre
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Long Island UA Command team has:
11 YJ 2021 girls
2 YJ 2022 girl

Pretty sure that shuts up the other LI clubs as to who is the best.



Why would we want to play in farminVille and go to terrible school districts and end up at stony brook, Florida, JMU when we could go to academic powehouses CSH, GC, Manhasset and go to the Ivies. Seems silly to trek out to the willies for club lax. Get your grades up kids...


Sorry, but some actual facts for you, top 25 universities in the United States according to US News & World Report. Also, Garden City has a number of girls that play YJ and some of them went Catholic private but live in the town. Also see some Cold Spring Harbor their as well. Lastly, going ivy is more about your bank account than your kid's abilities...

YJ 2021- Yale
YJ 2020- Yale, Princeton, USC, Notre Dame, Johns Hopkins, Virginia
YJ 2019- Duke (3), Notre Dame, Yale, Virginia (2), USC, Brown
YJ 2018- Notre Dame (3), Penn, Brown

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Long Island UA Command team has:
11 YJ 2021 girls
2 YJ 2022 girl

Pretty sure that shuts up the other LI clubs as to who is the best.



Why would we want to play in farminVille and go to terrible school districts and end up at stony brook, Florida, JMU when we could go to academic powehouses CSH, GC, Manhasset and go to the Ivies. Seems silly to trek out to the willies for club lax. Get your grades up kids...


Sorry, but some actual facts for you, top 25 universities in the United States according to US News & World Report. Also, Garden City has a number of girls that play YJ and some of them went Catholic private but live in the town. Also see some Cold Spring Harbor their as well. Lastly, going ivy is more about your bank account than your kid's abilities...

YJ 2021- Yale
YJ 2020- Yale, Princeton, USC, Notre Dame, Johns Hopkins, Virginia
YJ 2019- Duke (3), Notre Dame, Yale, Virginia (2), USC, Brown
YJ 2018- Notre Dame (3), Penn, Brown


Why the the heck would you pay all of that $$$ taxes in Nassau and send your girl to Private.. I would consider these schools semi-private given the entry price of homes and property taxes in CSh, manhassett, GC... borderline silly
Yale
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Long Island UA Command team has:
11 YJ 2021 girls
2 YJ 2022 girl

Pretty sure that shuts up the other LI clubs as to who is the best.



Why would we want to play in farminVille and go to terrible school districts and end up at stony brook, Florida, JMU when we could go to academic powehouses CSH, GC, Manhasset and go to the Ivies. Seems silly to trek out to the willies for club lax. Get your grades up kids...


Sorry, but some actual facts for you, top 25 universities in the United States according to US News & World Report. Also, Garden City has a number of girls that play YJ and some of them went Catholic private but live in the town. Also see some Cold Spring Harbor their as well. Lastly, going ivy is more about your bank account than your kid's abilities...

YJ 2021- Yale
YJ 2020- Yale, Princeton, USC, Notre Dame, Johns Hopkins, Virginia
YJ 2019- Duke (3), Notre Dame, Yale, Virginia (2), USC, Brown
YJ 2018- Notre Dame (3), Penn, Brown


Other than Yale and Princeton.. the other schools are garbage... might as well play for PAL...again.. no need to go out to the sticks for travel for Duke, USC, ND.. in the real work these schools are mediocre


And I have heard a big donation gets you committed to Yale. Is that true?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Re Heros Green

YJ and SW lost this weekend too. Parity is good for the sport.


Respectfully, their is a different with not winning a game and going 4-0 in full time games and losing once in a shortened 20 minute game.

Congrats to STEPS Blue!!!


Yes. Have been on the winning end of these 20 min finals and it doesn’t feel right. 5-10 mins in and go to stall, doesn’t really feel like the the best team wins. Congrats to steps but if you really think they are better than YJ or skywalkers, that’s silly. How many full length games have these teams gone done 2-0 quickly only to end in a 20-3 blow/out. These super short playoff games, that this one particular tournament runs, always seems to create upsets that you never see otherwise. Credit to Steps as they knew how to capitalize on this shortened format.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Re Heros Green

YJ and SW lost this weekend too. Parity is good for the sport.


Respectfully, their is a different with not winning a game and going 4-0 in full time games and losing once in a shortened 20 minute game.

Congrats to STEPS Blue!!!


Yes. Have been on the winning end of these 20 min finals and it doesn’t feel right. 5-10 mins in and go to stall, doesn’t really feel like the the best team wins. Congrats to steps but if you really think they are better than YJ or skywalkers, that’s silly. How many full length games have these teams gone done 2-0 quickly only to end in a 20-3 blow/out. These super short playoff games, that this one particular tournament runs, always seems to create upsets that you never see otherwise. Credit to Steps as they knew how to capitalize on this shortened format.

I guess you should really say credit to STEPS White (B team) because that is who beat YJ's A team in the playoffs. STEPS Blue (A team) beat Skywalkers and then NEMS to win the title.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Re Heros Green

YJ and SW lost this weekend too. Parity is good for the sport.


Respectfully, their is a different with not winning a game and going 4-0 in full time games and losing once in a shortened 20 minute game.

Congrats to STEPS Blue!!!


Yes. Have been on the winning end of these 20 min finals and it doesn’t feel right. 5-10 mins in and go to stall, doesn’t really feel like the the best team wins. Congrats to steps but if you really think they are better than YJ or skywalkers, that’s silly. How many full length games have these teams gone done 2-0 quickly only to end in a 20-3 blow/out. These super short playoff games, that this one particular tournament runs, always seems to create upsets that you never see otherwise. Credit to Steps as they knew how to capitalize on this shortened format.

Regardless of the length of the game no way YJ A should ever lose to Steps B. You can fill in any excuse why it happened but it should never happen. Very embarrassing to the YJ program
What are your thoughts on players who have completed their sophomore year playing in the UA command division against rising freshmen. Something fishy on the Upstate roster.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What are your thoughts on players who have completed their sophomore year playing in the UA command division against rising freshmen. Something fishy on the Upstate roster.


Upstate went 1-3. Guess it wasn’t much help if true
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What are your thoughts on players who have completed their sophomore year playing in the UA command division against rising freshmen. Something fishy on the Upstate roster.


Where are the rosters posted?
Rosters
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What are your thoughts on players who have completed their sophomore year playing in the UA command division against rising freshmen. Something fishy on the Upstate roster.



All Command rosters had 2021’s playing with 2022’s, not just Upstate. How is it fishy?
Did any of the L I kids that went to the Connecticut tryout make the team?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Long Island UA Command team has:
11 YJ 2021 girls
2 YJ 2022 girl

Pretty sure that shuts up the other LI clubs as to who is the best.



Why would we want to play in farminVille and go to terrible school districts and end up at stony brook, Florida, JMU when we could go to academic powehouses CSH, GC, Manhasset and go to the Ivies. Seems silly to trek out to the willies for club lax. Get your grades up kids...


Sorry, but some actual facts for you, top 25 universities in the United States according to US News & World Report. Also, Garden City has a number of girls that play YJ and some of them went Catholic private but live in the town. Also see some Cold Spring Harbor their as well. Lastly, going ivy is more about your bank account than your kid's abilities...

YJ 2021- Yale
YJ 2020- Yale, Princeton, USC, Notre Dame, Johns Hopkins, Virginia
YJ 2019- Duke (3), Notre Dame, Yale, Virginia (2), USC, Brown
YJ 2018- Notre Dame (3), Penn, Brown


Other than Yale and Princeton.. the other schools are garbage... might as well play for PAL...again.. no need to go out to the sticks for travel for Duke, USC, ND.. in the real work these schools are mediocre


So first argument was YJ does not get kids into top schools including the ivies like Liberty does and now some of the absolute best schools in the country are garbage in the real word? Brown, Penn and Duke are garbage? laughable. Just simple say I hate all things YJ and at least you maintain a shred of credibility.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What are your thoughts on players who have completed their sophomore year playing in the UA command division against rising freshmen. Something fishy on the Upstate roster.



All Command rosters had 2021’s playing with 2022’s, not just Upstate. How is it fishy?


Because if you look at the kids that are not actually from upstate NY, they just finished there Soph year in high school making them 2020s unless they are going to re-class as Soph again. Really not fair to two other kids from Upstate NY that would have made the team if they are not re-classing.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What are your thoughts on players who have completed their sophomore year playing in the UA command division against rising freshmen. Something fishy on the Upstate roster.



All Command rosters had 2021’s playing with 2022’s, not just Upstate. How is it fishy?


Because if you look at the kids that are not actually from upstate NY, they just finished there Soph year in high school making them 2020s unless they are going to re-class as Soph again. Really not fair to two other kids from Upstate NY that would have made the team if they are not re-classing.


The two NC girls plus one 2020 NC girl also listed as 2021 on south Command team. Very odd.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Did any of the L I kids that went to the Connecticut tryout make the team?


Looks like 1 on Command and 1 on Highlight. It does not violate any of the UAAA rules to tryout in a different region.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What are your thoughts on players who have completed their sophomore year playing in the UA command division against rising freshmen. Something fishy on the Upstate roster.



All Command rosters had 2021’s playing with 2022’s, not just Upstate. How is it fishy?


Because if you look at the kids that are not actually from upstate NY, they just finished there Soph year in high school making them 2020s unless they are going to re-class as Soph again. Really not fair to two other kids from Upstate NY that would have made the team if they are not re-classing.


The two NC girls plus one 2020 NC girl also listed as 2021 on south Command team. Very odd.

there are no 2020's on the south team and the NC was part of the south region
How do you define 2020? Already completed sophomore year and planning to PG does not make you a 2021. Command South and Command Upstate both had 2020s on their rosters.

Takes away from real 2021 and 2022s when girls play down.

Club coach condones it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What are your thoughts on players who have completed their sophomore year playing in the UA command division against rising freshmen. Something fishy on the Upstate roster.



All Command rosters had 2021’s playing with 2022’s, not just Upstate. How is it fishy?


Because if you look at the kids that are not actually from upstate NY, they just finished there Soph year in high school making them 2020s unless they are going to re-class as Soph again. Really not fair to two other kids from Upstate NY that would have made the team if they are not re-classing.


The two NC girls plus one 2020 NC girl also listed as 2021 on south Command team. Very odd.

there are no 2020's on the south team and the NC was part of the south region


I think we are all smart enough to figure out NC is part of the south region, and no one is listed as 2020 on a Command roster since the division is defined by UA as 2021/22 grad years. No one is disputing players are allowed to try out in different regions. The UA site says the NC players are 2021s but they are, or at least used to be, 2020s. All were listed as 2020s last year for Brine, and one was even named a 2018 All American with grad year 2020 listed. No idea what the story is, and it didn't impact my 2020 daughter who made the Highlight team where we live, but seems unusual.

https://toplaxrecruits.com/north-carolina-girls-rosters-hs-2020-middle-school-announced-nlclacrosse
Legacy playing Skywalkers at the Mid Atlantic next week it will be a good test to see how far Legacy progressed this season.
Originally Posted by Anonymous


I think we are all smart enough to figure out NC is part of the south region, and no one is listed as 2020 on a Command roster since the division is defined by UA as 2021/22 grad years. No one is disputing players are allowed to try out in different regions. The UA site says the NC players are 2021s but they are, or at least used to be, 2020s. All were listed as 2020s last year for Brine, and one was even named a 2018 All American with grad year 2020 listed. No idea what the story is, and it didn't impact my 2020 daughter who made the Highlight team where we live, but seems unusual.

https://toplaxrecruits.com/north-carolina-girls-rosters-hs-2020-middle-school-announced-nlclacrosse


Maybe they played up last year.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Legacy playing Skywalkers at the Mid Atlantic next week it will be a good test to see how far Legacy progressed this season.



oofa… saw Legacy play against TLC Red @ LLL and they couldn't win a draw or clear the ball. Not many offensive possessions.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Legacy playing Skywalkers at the Mid Atlantic next week it will be a good test to see how far Legacy progressed this season.


Lol. 15-3 SW
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Legacy playing Skywalkers at the Mid Atlantic next week it will be a good test to see how far Legacy progressed this season.


Lol. 15-3 SW


Could still be considered progress. May have been a 15-1 game a year ago. These two teams are in different stratospheres.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Legacy playing Skywalkers at the Mid Atlantic next week it will be a good test to see how far Legacy progressed this season.



oofa… saw Legacy play against TLC Red @ LLL and they couldn't win a draw or clear the ball. Not many offensive possessions.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Legacy playing Skywalkers at the Mid Atlantic next week it will be a good test to see how far Legacy progressed this season.



oofa… saw Legacy play against TLC Red @ LLL and they couldn't win a draw or clear the ball. Not many offensive possessions.

One of Legacy’s top players re-injured her knee in the first tourn of the summer. There is some talent on the team, but they are hardly on the field at the same time. Coaches struggle with coaching during games, probably need to be replaced.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


I think we are all smart enough to figure out NC is part of the south region, and no one is listed as 2020 on a Command roster since the division is defined by UA as 2021/22 grad years. No one is disputing players are allowed to try out in different regions. The UA site says the NC players are 2021s but they are, or at least used to be, 2020s. All were listed as 2020s last year for Brine, and one was even named a 2018 All American with grad year 2020 listed. No idea what the story is, and it didn't impact my 2020 daughter who made the Highlight team where we live, but seems unusual.

https://toplaxrecruits.com/north-carolina-girls-rosters-hs-2020-middle-school-announced-nlclacrosse


Maybe they played up last year.


Nope, all three have 2 years of H.S. completed and are 2020s. I don't really understand how UA allows this. Half the command rosters are true 2022 born in 2004 who have never played in a H.S. game.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


I think we are all smart enough to figure out NC is part of the south region, and no one is listed as 2020 on a Command roster since the division is defined by UA as 2021/22 grad years. No one is disputing players are allowed to try out in different regions. The UA site says the NC players are 2021s but they are, or at least used to be, 2020s. All were listed as 2020s last year for Brine, and one was even named a 2018 All American with grad year 2020 listed. No idea what the story is, and it didn't impact my 2020 daughter who made the Highlight team where we live, but seems unusual.

https://toplaxrecruits.com/north-carolina-girls-rosters-hs-2020-middle-school-announced-nlclacrosse


Maybe they played up last year.


Nope, all three have 2 years of H.S. completed and are 2020s. I don't really understand how UA allows this. Half the command rosters are true 2022 born in 2004 who have never played in a H.S. game.


Your main point is spot on, this should not be allowed. However, not a single Command roster even approached 50% 2022s. Your argument was just fine without the dramatics on age. The South Command team had just TWO 2022s. The age difference is not the problem, unless they re-class as Soph this year, they all took spots from other kids which is the real injustice.
Who would've thought just a year or two ago that M&D Black would sport a 1-2 record after the first day of a tournament?
Can anyone provide some feedback on how UA150 was? Considering this next year. Was there good talent? Was the coach list posted accurate?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who would've thought just a year or two ago that M&D Black would sport a 1-2 record after the first day of a tournament?


My daughter plays for one of the 2021 G8 teams. Give me one goal games - win or loss - vs a blowout any day. The games should only get more competitive as the girls get older. In close games, the coaches watching get to see the goalie, defense, mids and attack all work. Parity is a good thing.
Agree 100%
isn't G8 a showcase tourney, isn't the object for all of the girls to get an opportunity to showcase their talents. Records don't matter, its about getting the girls exposure.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who would've thought just a year or two ago that M&D Black would sport a 1-2 record after the first day of a tournament?


My daughter plays for one of the 2021 G8 teams. Give me one goal games - win or loss - vs a blowout any day. The games should only get more competitive as the girls get older. In close games, the coaches watching get to see the goalie, defense, mids and attack all work. Parity is a good thing.


The change I've noticed over the last year is that now the top tier teams no longer strike fear into the hearts of the "lesser" teams. Two or three years ago a game between an M&D Black/YJ/Heros and non dominant team was over before the opening draw just on a psychological basis. That's no longer the case. The talent has evened out somewhat, creating a level of parity mentioned above. I agree it's a good thing.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can anyone provide some feedback on how UA150 was? Considering this next year. Was there good talent? Was the coach list posted accurate?


Complete waste of time. only coaches there were coaching the teams last year.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can anyone provide some feedback on how UA150 was? Considering this next year. Was there good talent? Was the coach list posted accurate?


Complete waste of time. only coaches there were coaching the teams last year.


We were there this year. Thought it was good ,competition was ok
,Lots of coaches but mostly at the 2020s which makes sense but there were a bunch at the 21 games.
UA 150 was well run and the swag pretty good. Players were from all over the county including a number from Canada. I saw only a few coaches watching but no more than at G8 (daughter is a 2021). Some games did not have any coaches watching. My daughter had fun and said she would play again if given the opportunity - we live in MD so not a big travel commit in terms of time/expense. Competition was slightly better last year but overall some really good athletes on the field. I think most coaches are focused on the 2020 class. The Nike Elite 120 announced an impressive coach list for 2018 but again they are probably watching the 2020 class (daughter not going but am curious how many coaches actually show up.)
The above begs the question; what are the events to do this fall and next summer if your daughter is a '21? Tournaments with their respective teams, prospect days at the schools they are interested in, UA tryouts if logistically convenient, what else? My daughter did the Nike event last year and it felt like a waste of time. There were no more/less coaches than there were at her tournaments. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who would've thought just a year or two ago that M&D Black would sport a 1-2 record after the first day of a tournament?


My daughter plays for one of the 2021 G8 teams. Give me one goal games - win or loss - vs a blowout any day. The games should only get more competitive as the girls get older. In close games, the coaches watching get to see the goalie, defense, mids and attack all work. Parity is a good thing.


The change I've noticed over the last year is that now the top tier teams no longer strike fear into the hearts of the "lesser" teams. Two or three years ago a game between an M&D Black/YJ/Heros and non dominant team was over before the opening draw just on a psychological basis. That's no longer the case. The talent has evened out somewhat, creating a level of parity mentioned above. I agree it's a good thing.


Another reason for parity is that many of the girls are concerned with being noticed by college coaches and as a result play an individual game rather than a team game. That may have worked in middle school, but not at the HS level where defenses have improved. This mentality is creating cracks among teammates and parents. It's sad to watch the competition to be recruited divide teams.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
isn't G8 a showcase tourney, isn't the object for all of the girls to get an opportunity to showcase their talents. Records don't matter, its about getting the girls exposure.


Exactly.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
isn't G8 a showcase tourney, isn't the object for all of the girls to get an opportunity to showcase their talents. Records don't matter, its about getting the girls exposure.


Exactly.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can anyone provide some feedback on how UA150 was? Considering this next year. Was there good talent? Was the coach list posted accurate?


Complete waste of time. only coaches there were coaching the teams last year.


Partially true. For 2021 it was a complete waste of time. For 2020’s, there were college coaches on the sidelines of their games on the first day. Lot’s of them. Maybe not all top D1 programs, but not everyone is going to a top D1 program. So if your 2021 wants to do it next year, I say go for it. Next year it will be a waste of money for the 2022s
Originally Posted by Anonymous
UA 150 was well run and the swag pretty good. Players were from all over the county including a number from Canada. I saw only a few coaches watching but no more than at G8 (daughter is a 2021). Some games did not have any coaches watching. My daughter had fun and said she would play again if given the opportunity - we live in MD so not a big travel commit in terms of time/expense. Competition was slightly better last year but overall some really good athletes on the field. I think most coaches are focused on the 2020 class. The Nike Elite 120 announced an impressive coach list for 2018 but again they are probably watching the 2020 class (daughter not going but am curious how many coaches actually show up.)


The issue with UA 150 and Nike 120 is that they cost $600. The girls don't get any instruction at these events. They just play games. So what you are paying for is to have coaches watch your daughter play. Since there are hardly any coaches attending what exactly are you paying for? It's no surprise that they gave all the girls free sticks this year. They aren't really free considering what you paid. You are much better off going to prospect days where you know who is watching your daughter. They always actually get coached and instructed by the attending coaches and usually play games at the end. And cost a fraction of UA and Nike so you can do quite a few of them for the same expenditure.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
UA 150 was well run and the swag pretty good. Players were from all over the county including a number from Canada. I saw only a few coaches watching but no more than at G8 (daughter is a 2021). Some games did not have any coaches watching. My daughter had fun and said she would play again if given the opportunity - we live in MD so not a big travel commit in terms of time/expense. Competition was slightly better last year but overall some really good athletes on the field. I think most coaches are focused on the 2020 class. The Nike Elite 120 announced an impressive coach list for 2018 but again they are probably watching the 2020 class (daughter not going but am curious how many coaches actually show up.)


It depends who your daughter plays for. On field 1 at the G8 where SW, YJ, M&D, Mass Elite, etc were playing there were more than 20 top D1 coaches at most of the games. I'm sure there we less at the other 3 fields as the divisions were built the way the were for a reason and each division had their own field.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
isn't G8 a showcase tourney, isn't the object for all of the girls to get an opportunity to showcase their talents. Records don't matter, its about getting the girls exposure.


Exactly.

Yes it is a showcase but girls and teams still want to win. It's not they they say oh this is just a showcase so lets not play hard.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who would've thought just a year or two ago that M&D Black would sport a 1-2 record after the first day of a tournament?


My daughter plays for one of the 2021 G8 teams. Give me one goal games - win or loss - vs a blowout any day. The games should only get more competitive as the girls get older. In close games, the coaches watching get to see the goalie, defense, mids and attack all work. Parity is a good thing.


The change I've noticed over the last year is that now the top tier teams no longer strike fear into the hearts of the "lesser" teams. Two or three years ago a game between an M&D Black/YJ/Heros and non dominant team was over before the opening draw just on a psychological basis. That's no longer the case. The talent has evened out somewhat, creating a level of parity mentioned above. I agree it's a good thing.


Another reason for parity is that many of the girls are concerned with being noticed by college coaches and as a result play an individual game rather than a team game. That may have worked in middle school, but not at the HS level where defenses have improved. This mentality is creating cracks among teammates and parents. It's sad to watch the competition to be recruited divide teams.


Spot on. My older daughter went through this a few years ago and now my middle daughter is going through the same thing. You can clearly see it's becoming a "me first" game.
Originally Posted by laxnovice
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
isn't G8 a showcase tourney, isn't the object for all of the girls to get an opportunity to showcase their talents. Records don't matter, its about getting the girls exposure.


Exactly.

Yes it is a showcase but girls and teams still want to win. It's not they they say oh this is just a showcase so lets not play hard.


Think you are missing the point. Each of these teams, even the top teams have different levels of players on the team. There are usually 6-8 great players, 6-8 above average player that could start for most teams, and then there are 6-8 fillers that are replaceable and don't make much of a difference when they are on the field. With the showcases all the girls have to play at least half the game. (At least they are supposed to). It evens the playing field.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
UA 150 was well run and the swag pretty good. Players were from all over the county including a number from Canada. I saw only a few coaches watching but no more than at G8 (daughter is a 2021). Some games did not have any coaches watching. My daughter had fun and said she would play again if given the opportunity - we live in MD so not a big travel commit in terms of time/expense. Competition was slightly better last year but overall some really good athletes on the field. I think most coaches are focused on the 2020 class. The Nike Elite 120 announced an impressive coach list for 2018 but again they are probably watching the 2020 class (daughter not going but am curious how many coaches actually show up.)


The issue with UA 150 and Nike 120 is that they cost $600. The girls don't get any instruction at these events. They just play games. So what you are paying for is to have coaches watch your daughter play. Since there are hardly any coaches attending what exactly are you paying for? It's no surprise that they gave all the girls free sticks this year. They aren't really free considering what you paid. You are much better off going to prospect days where you know who is watching your daughter. They always actually get coached and instructed by the attending coaches and usually play games at the end. And cost a fraction of UA and Nike so you can do quite a few of them for the same expenditure.


Elite 120 is run partly by YJ. Look at the roster. They want you to believe that no other clubs had any worthy players apply? The entire club circuit has become either your on an "in" club (all the coaches watching) or you are not. Even within clubs there is disparity. The YJB team plays in all good tournaments but agains bad teams on fields no coaches are going to. There are plenty of good players on other teams and on B teams! Where do these players get looks?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Legacy playing Skywalkers at the Mid Atlantic next week it will be a good test to see how far Legacy progressed this season.


Lol. 15-3 SW


Could still be considered progress. May have been a 15-1 game a year ago. These two teams are in different stratospheres.



Legacy played in the A bracket and now realize they have a lot of work to do. Last place 0-4 and only scored 11 goals against the bottom of the bracket.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by laxnovice
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
isn't G8 a showcase tourney, isn't the object for all of the girls to get an opportunity to showcase their talents. Records don't matter, its about getting the girls exposure.


Exactly.

Yes it is a showcase but girls and teams still want to win. It's not they they say oh this is just a showcase so lets not play hard.


Think you are missing the point. Each of these teams, even the top teams have different levels of players on the team. There are usually 6-8 great players, 6-8 above average player that could start for most teams, and then there are 6-8 fillers that are replaceable and don't make much of a difference when they are on the field. With the showcases all the girls have to play at least half the game. (At least they are supposed to). It evens the playing field.


Championship format, now what excuse do you have?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Legacy playing Skywalkers at the Mid Atlantic next week it will be a good test to see how far Legacy progressed this season.


Lol. 15-3 SW


Could still be considered progress. May have been a 15-1 game a year ago. These two teams are in different stratospheres.



Legacy played in the A bracket and now realize they have a lot of work to do. Last place 0-4 and only scored 11 goals against the bottom of the bracket.

Not even the Stony Brook pre commits could help this team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Legacy playing Skywalkers at the Mid Atlantic next week it will be a good test to see how far Legacy progressed this season.


Lol. 15-3 SW


Could still be considered progress. May have been a 15-1 game a year ago. These two teams are in different stratospheres.



Legacy played in the A bracket and now realize they have a lot of work to do. Last place 0-4 and only scored 11 goals against the bottom of the bracket.


I sure miss the good old days when M&D won all the tournaments.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Legacy playing Skywalkers at the Mid Atlantic next week it will be a good test to see how far Legacy progressed this season.


Lol. 15-3 SW


Could still be considered progress. May have been a 15-1 game a year ago. These two teams are in different stratospheres.



Legacy played in the A bracket and now realize they have a lot of work to do. Last place 0-4 and only scored 11 goals against the bottom of the bracket.


I sure miss the good old days when M&D won all the tournaments.


Except they never did win all the tournaments. They used to trade tournament wins a couple years ago with YJ and Skywalkers, now they seem to have lost their way.
What happened to mnd in such a short period of time?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened to mnd in such a short period of time?


Nothing happened to M&D other than girls catching
Up to them talent-wise. They’re standouts in middle school but at some point it levels off.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened to mnd in such a short period of time?


Nothing happened to M&D other than girls catching
Up to them talent-wise. They’re standouts in middle school but at some point it levels off.


They won 5 of the 8 divisions at LFTC, including 2019 and 2020. That doesn't sound like "it levels off." It just sounds like they don't win every single time, just most of the time.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened to mnd in such a short period of time?


Nothing happened to M&D other than girls catching
Up to them talent-wise. They’re standouts in middle school but at some point it levels off.


They won 5 of the 8 divisions at LFTC, including 2019 and 2020. That doesn't sound like "it levels off." It just sounds like they don't win every single time, just most of the time.


How many tournaments did M&D Black 2021 win out of the total amount they were entered in this summer?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What happened to mnd in such a short period of time?


They lost games to YJ and SW this summer. Not like they are losing to any average teams. All 3 of those teams can beat each other on any given day.
Any coaches watching 2021s at Elite 120?
There were a few coaches who watched the first games of the 2021’s both days. Probably less than 5 per side then they would switch. The teams were small and there were many injuries, few subs (each team started with 12-13 girls). The refs didn’t control the games well and there was a lot of slashing and fouls that wasn’t called. The facility is small and they would of been better off playing on outside full size fields. Will likely not return. Didn’t like UA 150, but it was actually a much better event than this one.
Legacy 2021 just not that good and the coaching needs help
© US Lacrosse Community Forum