@BackOfTheCAGE
In the last few years there has been a disturbing trend as HS coaches try and cash in on the for profit (or questionable non for profit) summer tournament teams. It started when some business minded coaches started open tryout teams, now the trend is HS coaches charging big fee's for summer teams that draw exclusively from there own school districts. How do public schools allow this type of quid pro quo to occur? Its one thing when you pay for a summer program and also pay to attend a private school which shares the same coach. Now it seems you have to pay the head coach of the public school boys/ girls teams to get on the field. The Conflicts of interest seem to run so deep yet it continues. Which program is the coach incentified to develop? The School district program or the one that pays him cash on top of their salary? How do they not play undeserving kids that have been paying them every summer? Are kids punished if they play for a competing club? This seams to be a hot topic issue in the towns these teams exist, i am interested to hear others experiences.
very interesting and insightful with any valid points. I know of HS coaches who have told players that if they play on certain travel teams they will never see the field. This lax world is crazy
My town has 2 high schools and one just formed a "travel team" last year. You are correct- one of the coaches has a tiny 9th grade kid that made varsity this year (even though he was rocked the few minutes he saw the field). There were a handful of better 9th grade kids that were clearly more qualified to make varsity but didnt. Politics at its best. I agree that its a huge conflict of interest but its been happening in our baseball travel program for years as well. Pay to play in off season.
Originally Posted by lax516
In the last few years there has been a disturbing trend as HS coaches try and cash in on the for profit (or questionable non for profit) summer tournament teams. It started when some business minded coaches started open tryout teams, now the trend is HS coaches charging big fee's for summer teams that draw exclusively from there own school districts. How do public schools allow this type of quid pro quo to occur? Its one thing when you pay for a summer program and also pay to attend a private school which shares the same coach. Now it seems you have to pay the head coach of the public school boys/ girls teams to get on the field. The Conflicts of interest seem to run so deep yet it continues. Which program is the coach incentified to develop? The School district program or the one that pays him cash on top of their salary? How do they not play undeserving kids that have been paying them every summer? Are kids punished if they play for a competing club? This seams to be a hot topic issue in the towns these teams exist, i am interested to hear others experiences.
Where have you been?? This has been going on for years - YJ's has it down to a science, CGI baseball, aau basketball. It's called pay to play. Try living in Northport and playing girls lax for liberty or top guns and see what happens. You're 100% correct none of these school coaches should be allowed to gauge their students in the summer travel circuuit, but that's just the way it is and has been for a long time.
what about a HS coach that wants his kids to play together in the summer to make the school team better and does it foe expense money? these school teams seem to be less money then the for profit teams and the HS team is the real benefactor, if done properly this could be a great trend
This subject was beat to death on the YJ thread. And your right, it is a crime that it is allowed to happen, huge conflict of intrests. I don't however think its against rules as they are now written. Someone should get on that!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what about a HS coach that wants his kids to play together in the summer to make the school team better and does it foe expense money? these school teams seem to be less money then the for profit teams and the HS team is the real benefactor, if done properly this could be a great trend

couldn't agree more when done properly to cover costs its a great idea. How does the school district or even the state for that matter allow coaches to make a profit off these kids by playing on the parents fears.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This subject was beat to death on the YJ thread. And your right, it is a crime that it is allowed to happen, huge conflict of intrests. I don't however think its against rules as they are now written. Someone should get on that!

does YJ just draw from one town or is it an open tryout? seeing current HS coaches pressure kids to play with the town during the summer then charging them as if they are these open tryout teams is insane. and if you don't play for them? what happens then.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what about a HS coach that wants his kids to play together in the summer to make the school team better and does it foe expense money? these school teams seem to be less money then the for profit teams and the HS team is the real benefactor, if done properly this could be a great trend

couldn't agree more when done properly to cover costs its a great idea. How does the school district or even the state for that matter allow coaches to make a profit off these kids by playing on the parents fears.

The HS coaches use these plattforms to make money as well. Don't be fooled!!
It should not be allowed.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This subject was beat to death on the YJ thread. And your right, it is a crime that it is allowed to happen, huge conflict of intrests. I don't however think its against rules as they are now written. Someone should get on that!

does YJ just draw from one town or is it an open tryout? seeing current HS coaches pressure kids to play with the town during the summer then charging them as if they are these open tryout teams is insane. and if you don't play for them? what happens then.


No, this club is massive. Pretty much every town team or school district team you can find some or many players that are on some sort of YJ team. But that's not where the problem is, the problem is the reverse. Again since it is such a massive club, they have massive amounts of coaches, many of whom are coaches for school teams. And the YJ's are not the only club with coaches guilty of this. You can say and think what you want about this, but there is no question it puts kids in very awkward situations (kids playing for other clubs). The most obvious case is to cite Northport, but it goes way beyond that. I actually like the idea of a school team forming a travel team to go play the summer tournaments with the school coach. It would make for some tough tournaments and there is no way the school team would pry away the top players from commitments to the summer club teams. It's near immpossible to put together a highly competitive team drawing from one town, so the model may work for strengthening a school program but will never yeild a competitive tournament team. What I would like to see come out of this is that the school districts prohibit coaches from "paid" involvement of any kind in the sport in which they are hired to coach.
I have stated this before on other threads, but I think it's worth repeating. My daughter plays for St John The Baptist, and the coach is involved with the L.I. Wave (in case you don't know girls they are second rate and non competitive) this woman treats all other club members poorly, berating them for every little mistake and screaming at them, while her club players are spoken to and treated with kid gloves. It is a very toxic situation if you don't play for the wave. I called the school administration and they did nothing siting it's at the coaches discretion. What makes this worse is I pay $8,000.00 a year for this.
I understand the YJ is a very competitive club like the Express on the boys side. I guess you can say what you want but they both field strong teams and offer a good product. What happens when the town team is not competitive and the pressure is there to stay? How and where do you challenge the best kids if they are stuck on a poor town team for summer and parents are getting charged like its a top level club? In philly the town summer teams rarely charge much over costs unlike the open tryout club teams
Have a hidden recorder and get it on record that if your son doesn't play for the school or town summer travel he will not see the field , then sue the school and the coach. It's getting out of hand. Happening in a lot of towns
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Have a hidden recorder and get it on record that if your son doesn't play for the school or town summer travel he will not see the field , then sue the school and the coach. It's getting out of hand. Happening in a lot of towns


That's attacking the problem from the bottom, better off attacking it from the top. Voice concerns and compllaints to sextion XI and get them to make this against the rules. Anyone can see the conflict of intrest here, if someone has the time and interest to persue it, I'm sure it would have an impact.
"The coach is involved with the L.I. Wave (in case you don't know girls they are second rate and non competitive)"

I have no idea of the situation at that school but to say the wave players are second rate and non-competitive obviously is coming from someone who does not know the program or the girls very well
I think half the problem is that the expectation of kids playing on certain teams "or else" is implicit. Maybe I'm wrong, and tell me if I am, but are coaches outright telling kids/parents that if they don't play on X team then they won't see playing time on the school team?

It's hard to attack something deniable. That just turns into he said/she said, with the coach claiming that Y kid doesn't play because he's/she's not as good as the player on the coach's club team.
The wave plays in b divisions. They are well known as a place for girls who can not make other clubs.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
"The coach is involved with the L.I. Wave (in case you don't know girls they are second rate and non competitive)"

I have no idea of the situation at that school but to say the wave players are second rate and non-competitive obviously is coming from someone who does not know the program or the girls very well
Unfortunately , I like the other parent know the Wave all too well . We pay big money to play with there players and coach and lost to teams we should have beat.
"The wave plays in B divisions. they are well known as a place for girls who can not make other clubs".I hope this quote is not from an adult
There is a clear conflict of interest and it is shameful that we allow it to happen.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
"The wave plays in B divisions. they are well known as a place for girls who can not make other clubs".I hope this quote is not from an adult
Why is it not true?
Originally Posted by Powderfinger
I think half the problem is that the expectation of kids playing on certain teams "or else" is implicit. Maybe I'm wrong, and tell me if I am, but are coaches outright telling kids/parents that if they don't play on X team then they won't see playing time on the school team?

It's hard to attack something deniable. That just turns into he said/she said, with the coach claiming that Y kid doesn't play because he's/she's not as good as the player on the coach's club team.


That fact that can even be a discussion about the motive tells you it is an improper situation. It puts the kids in a very uncomfortable position. I have seen similar situations in soccer where the school AD allowed school coach to coach/train for $ on the outside, but was prohbited training and coaching kids from that district. That was one districts solution to a bad problem. Maybe each AD should take a look at this as a solution, although I feel it should be enforced on an even higher level.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Powderfinger
I think half the problem is that the expectation of kids playing on certain teams "or else" is implicit. Maybe I'm wrong, and tell me if I am, but are coaches outright telling kids/parents that if they don't play on X team then they won't see playing time on the school team?

It's hard to attack something deniable. That just turns into he said/she said, with the coach claiming that Y kid doesn't play because he's/she's not as good as the player on the coach's club team.


That fact that can even be a discussion about the motive tells you it is an improper situation. It puts the kids in a very uncomfortable position. I have seen similar situations in soccer where the school AD allowed school coach to coach/train for $ on the outside, but was prohbited training and coaching kids from that district. That was one districts solution to a bad problem. Maybe each AD should take a look at this as a solution, although I feel it should be enforced on an even higher level.


I give credit for that AD on taking a stand. Most of these Coaches are well entrenched within the district and most AD and school administrators turn a blind eye to the situation. what is the higher level? local section as mentioned earlier or state.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Powderfinger
I think half the problem is that the expectation of kids playing on certain teams "or else" is implicit. Maybe I'm wrong, and tell me if I am, but are coaches outright telling kids/parents that if they don't play on X team then they won't see playing time on the school team?

It's hard to attack something deniable. That just turns into he said/she said, with the coach claiming that Y kid doesn't play because he's/she's not as good as the player on the coach's club team.


That fact that can even be a discussion about the motive tells you it is an improper situation. It puts the kids in a very uncomfortable position. I have seen similar situations in soccer where the school AD allowed school coach to coach/train for $ on the outside, but was prohbited training and coaching kids from that district. That was one districts solution to a bad problem. Maybe each AD should take a look at this as a solution, although I feel it should be enforced on an even higher level.


I give credit for that AD on taking a stand. Most of these Coaches are well entrenched within the district and most AD and school administrators turn a blind eye to the situation. what is the higher level? local section as mentioned earlier or state.


This instance was brought about internally where other coaches looking to get in or replace coach were squaking to the AD. It was an easy agreement between that coach and AD because the teams and players he was working with were from other towns anyway. So it was more of a don't take any from the school district, so it wasn't any really big stand by the AD. But at least it proves the point that this type of cross relationship is in conflict.
How can it be stopped?
Global Thermonuclear War
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How can it be stopped?
It can't, none of the powers that be have any interest in stopping it!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How can it be stopped?
It can't, none of the powers that be have any interest in stopping it!


What's worse is when a High School coach runs a camp and 7th grade kids who attend the camp are brought up to the 8th grade team over kids who didn't attend the camp even though they're better. Further, kids are brought up to JV based on being "evaluated" at camp, and kids who don't attend the for profit camp who are the better kids are black balled. This goes on in Syosset with the boys, Varsity coach makes big money on his camp and then runs a summer team for the high school and does it through his business, not the booster club and makes close to $15,000 off the kids. It's really gross!!
part with the benjamins if you want your "better" kid to see the field. and after paying for camp and travel dont forget to make a "donation" to the booster club.

its the same game in every town. at least your town has a good program.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What's worse is when a High School coach runs a camp and 7th grade kids who attend the camp are brought up to the 8th grade team over kids who didn't attend the camp even though they're better. Further, kids are brought up to JV based on being "evaluated" at camp, and kids who don't attend the for profit camp who are the better kids are black balled. This goes on in Syosset with the boys, Varsity coach makes big money on his camp and then runs a summer team for the high school and does it through his business, not the booster club and makes close to $15,000 off the kids. It's really gross!!


False, you need to check your facts, or bitterness

No 7th grader to date has played 8th grade
Several 8th graders have moved to JVA, some of these players have never attended the camp. Check roster for spring 2012
Varsity summer team has a separate fee payed by players for summer.
Camp is a business and open to many towns, yes it makes a profit.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What's worse is when a High School coach runs a camp and 7th grade kids who attend the camp are brought up to the 8th grade team over kids who didn't attend the camp even though they're better. Further, kids are brought up to JV based on being "evaluated" at camp, and kids who don't attend the for profit camp who are the better kids are black balled. This goes on in Syosset with the boys, Varsity coach makes big money on his camp and then runs a summer team for the high school and does it through his business, not the booster club and makes close to $15,000 off the kids. It's really gross!!


False, you need to check your facts, or bitterness

No 7th grader to date has played 8th grade
Several 8th graders have moved to JVA, some of these players have never attended the camp. Check roster for spring 2012
Varsity summer team has a separate fee payed by players for summer.
Camp is a business and open to many towns, yes it makes a profit.


I am not taking sides in this debate as I understand both sides but you can't go on here and post bombs and not get called on it. Syo has many many 7th graders that play up on 8th grade, I do not know about last year but the year before almost half the 8th grade team at SWMS were 7th graders. Maybe some of the kids that get moved up also happened go to this camp but were also better then other kids. this program has a long history of moving up kids at all grade levels and this was going on before the HC was even there and also before the camp go started. don't be hating because the staff doesn't think your kid has developed or matured enough to play up just tell your kid to work harder and his time will come. SYO has a kid starting at an Ivy who played 8th in 8th. JVB in 9th, JVA in 10th and made All American in 12th while another kid in the same grade got moved up to JVA in 9th and did not even play his senior year. Oliver Stone is not making a movie about the Syo lacrosse program, not every decision is a conspiracy sometimes kids just get moved up, maybe to fill a void on the older team or maybe he is just physically more mature. Syo girls consistently have 9th graders starting on varsity and the HC does not run a camp or a Summer team.
this is no different than parents taking their kids to YJ directors camps in the summer in hopes of currying favor on their YJ teams.

Fill the coaches pockets with "camp money" and then you move up in the team batting order.

Its FOR PROFIT PEOPLE!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
this is no different than parents taking their kids to YJ directors camps in the summer in hopes of currying favor on their YJ teams.

Fill the coaches pockets with "camp money" and then you move up in the team batting order.

Its FOR PROFIT PEOPLE!


Huge difference - YJ is a choice, particularly if you do not go to NP. A public school coach running a team exclusively for the town kids and putting pressure on the kids to only play with the town summer team that he or she is making a profit on is not the same as a kid paying to go to YJ camp to help the chances of getting on a better YJ team.
Just to clarify one thing, Kids are NOT moved up to JV when in 8th grade because they attended the Syosset HS coach's camp! This past year, not one kid that was moved up from 8th grade to JV, attended the camp. Many High School coaches across Long Island coach their own HS team during the summer and hold camps. Look at Wading River. Their coach has been coaching their HS team during the summer and has been holding camps for years. Look where they ended up! Playing in the State Championship. Why shouldn't HS coaches be any different then those who start or coach select teams for a fee. I believe this year the Express is charging $1500 for what? If you are not on their top team, you are just money to them. Personally, I feel select teams do nothing but hurt HS teams. Players tend to become individual players instead of team players. Why...because they think College coaches are watching. This carries over to the regular HS season. Want to be recruited by a college coach? Contact the Coach, send a clip of yourself playing AND tell the coaches where and when you are playing. 100s of college coaches come watch the County Finals. That's where you can prove yourself!

YELLOW JACKETS...its not just a club ...its a lifestyle !


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
this is no different than parents taking their kids to YJ directors camps in the summer in hopes of currying favor on their YJ teams.

Fill the coaches pockets with "camp money" and then you move up in the team batting order.

Its FOR PROFIT PEOPLE!


Huge difference - YJ is a choice, particularly if you do not go to NP. A public school coach running a team exclusively for the town kids and putting pressure on the kids to only play with the town summer team that he or she is making a profit on is not the same as a kid paying to go to YJ camp to help the chances of getting on a better YJ team.
Originally Posted by momlax
Just to clarify one thing, Kids are NOT moved up to JV when in 8th grade because they attended the Syosset HS coach's camp! This past year, not one kid that was moved up from 8th grade to JV, attended the camp. Many High School coaches across Long Island coach their own HS team during the summer and hold camps. Look at Wading River. Their coach has been coaching their HS team during the summer and has been holding camps for years. Look where they ended up! Playing in the State Championship. Why shouldn't HS coaches be any different then those who start or coach select teams for a fee. I believe this year the Express is charging $1500 for what? If you are not on their top team, you are just money to them. Personally, I feel select teams do nothing but hurt HS teams. Players tend to become individual players instead of team players. Why...because they think College coaches are watching. This carries over to the regular HS season. Want to be recruited by a college coach? Contact the Coach, send a clip of yourself playing AND tell the coaches where and when you are playing. 100s of college coaches come watch the County Finals. That's where you can prove yourself!


Mom - I think you might be missing the point, most would agree that keeping the high school team together is advantageous to the program but forcing kids (either directly or implied) to play on a for profit team owned by the coach and feeling that there are ramifications to not playing could be seen by some as a conflict of interest. interesting that you bring up express, please tell us if our kid is on fl$ is that OK with you? or express orange is OK but not express blue?
A summer travel team is just a lot more FUN then the pressure of playing for your varsity coach all summer. playing with kids from your rival towns, or kids that you played PAL with that are now going to parochial schools or playing games against your friends and current HS teammates, getting a different set of eyes on you and hearing a different coach's voice. this all adds to the entire "travel" experience. It is a little crazy that the only reason we are all doing this is the scholarship and entrance into the Ivy League school at some point it has to be fun or it eventually becomes a job for these kids.
Originally Posted by momlax
Just to clarify one thing, Kids are NOT moved up to JV when in 8th grade because they attended the Syosset HS coach's camp! This past year, not one kid that was moved up from 8th grade to JV, attended the camp. Many High School coaches across Long Island coach their own HS team during the summer and hold camps. Look at Wading River. Their coach has been coaching their HS team during the summer and has been holding camps for years. Look where they ended up! Playing in the State Championship. Why shouldn't HS coaches be any different then those who start or coach select teams for a fee. I believe this year the Express is charging $1500 for what? If you are not on their top team, you are just money to them. Personally, I feel select teams do nothing but hurt HS teams. Players tend to become individual players instead of team players. Why...because they think College coaches are watching. This carries over to the regular HS season. Want to be recruited by a college coach? Contact the Coach, send a clip of yourself playing AND tell the coaches where and when you are playing. 100s of college coaches come watch the County Finals. That's where you can prove yourself!

The towns that your are probably thinking of run their summer programs through their booster club, the price is enough to pay for tournaments, pay the coaches appropriately for coaching, and a summer uniform. NOT charging close to $900 and collecting through a private business and pressuring kids to play so the profit goes up! Most towns run their camp through the youth league,NOT Syosset, HC makes big money, town, booster club, sees nothing!
Momlax - i don't really think that a HS coach should profit off the kids, but I'm reading this because it's interesting to see people try to defend it, pretty pathetic. But what I really wanted to say was, if you think that you can send a clip of yourself to a college coach and he'll come watch you play, you're sadly mistaken about the process. College coaches go to big recruiting events, a few probably attend County Championship but vast majority of recruiting is done at showcase tourneys, and tryouts for things like Under Armour.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]What's worse is when a High
False, you need to check your facts, or bitterness
No 7th grader to date has played 8th grade
Several 8th graders have moved to JVA, some of these players have never attended the camp. Check roster for spring 2012
Varsity summer team has a separate fee payed by players for summer.
Camp is a business and open to many towns, yes it makes a profit.

I feel compelled to respond, which I never have at this site, I just read and laugh. You must not be from Syosset, every year a 7th Grader is moved up, some years 5 or more.

The kids who get moved up to JV-A all atteneded the camp at some point.
Of course the Summer Team has a seperate fee, and it's a check made out to the Head Coach's business not the booster club or Sylax, check other towns and you'll see it is run quite different.
Don't defend it, just accept it like everyone else does...
Funny you should say Under Armour, isn't true that one of the Express founders is in charge of picking who's on the team. And really, beside this past year, what percentage of the players selected did not attend a catholic school. It's amazing to me how you all respond Anonymously, what's there to hide.
Well, I'm sorry you feel that those who have been moved up at some point attended the camp. But face the facts, no one is forcing you to attend and if your kid is that good, he needs not to attend the camp. Get over it! And PS tell me what HS coach doesn't make money off their HS summer team.
In response to you, college coaches do look at clips and yes you're right, you must attend big recruiting tournaments, and camps. However, how else are they going to know who you are if you don't send them a clip of yourself and tell them what camps you are attending? As far as the Under Armour team goes, isn't it true that one of the founders of the Express is in charge of picking the team? Besides this year, what percentage of kids that are selected for the Under Armour team plays for the Express or attends Charminade or St. Anthonys? And how come no one is complaining about how much money the heads for the Express are making. Aren't they HS coaches in some capacity?
All I am saying is let's look at some of the HS teams that have played together over the summer...West Islip, Shoreham Wading River, Ward Melville, Smithtown West and Syosset. All these teams have made the County Playoffs. I believe Garden City doesn't have a HS team in the summer, but they do stay together on a travel team. You tell me what works??
You want to have the travel team experience then go to recruiting camps at the middle school high school level. At least there you are coached by College coaches. My experience with travel teams is that Coaches (organizations) want to win! I have seen organizations add players just to win so they can post it on their website. What does this do to the younger player's self-esteem? And just to let you know, if you play for a D-1 program it is a job! One that your kids will be working 12 hour days. Can your kid handle it?
It doesn't matter what travel team your kid plays on, college coaches are looking for kids entering HS. College coaches aren't stupid. They know all the BS that goes on with all summer teams. Ask any top 20 D-1 college coach what they are looking for in a player and they will all have different opinions. Why...because they all have different needs. We should all encourage our kids to do their best and hope that a college they are interested in has a need for them. For all players, go to recruiting camps and send a game tape to all colleges you are interested in. Please let me know how you make out!
Dont be fooled, playing sports on any level is like a job d1, 2 or 3!
There you go!!! It's a job wherever you go!
I think there are major conflicts of interest on both sides of the fence:
1. HS Coaches coaching travel teams
2. HS Coaches coaching "town" teams

1. Our HS coaches "recruit" kids for their travel programs. They make it abundantly clear that if you play for their club it will help you. Imagine if you were a HS teacher who ran a tutoring business on the side and said - "if you get tutored by me, you will have a much better chance of improving your grades in my class." It's such a conflict of interest and puts the kids and the families in a no win situation. Much more prevalent on the girls side.

2. Our HS has a rule about coaches not be ing able to use our HS facilities for training or coaching their own student athletes. This rule is broken on a daily basis by coaches who are training their own athletes in the off season. First of all, I thought it was a rule that summer teams were not allowed to be coached by existing coaches. This is happening at our school. Much more prevalent on the boys side.
Coercion ( /koʊˈɜrʃən/) is the practice of forcing another party to behave in an involuntary manner (whether through action or inaction) by use of threats or intimidation or some other form of pressure or force. In law, coercion is codified as the duress crime. Such actions are used as leverage, to force the victim to act in the desired way. Coercion may involve the actual infliction of physical pain/injury or psychological harm in order to enhance the credibility of a threat. The threat of further harm may lead to the cooperation or obedience of the person being coerced

Last I read this is a felony and punishable by imprisonment maybe the AD should get involved or school board.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Coercion ( /koʊˈɜrʃən/) is the practice of forcing another party to behave in an involuntary manner (whether through action or inaction) by use of threats or intimidation or some other form of pressure or force. In law, coercion is codified as the duress crime. Such actions are used as leverage, to force the victim to act in the desired way. Coercion may involve the actual infliction of physical pain/injury or psychological harm in order to enhance the credibility of a threat. The threat of further harm may lead to the cooperation or obedience of the person being coerced

Last I read this is a felony and punishable by imprisonment maybe the AD should get involved or school board.


Unfortunately the AD is involved and has been made aware of the situation on both the girls and boys side. He has done nothing and neither has the Superintendent of Schools. My fear is that the coaches who are also teachers are all part of the union and are "untouchable." This issue has effected both of my sons and my daughter.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think there are major conflicts of interest on both sides of the fence:
1. HS Coaches coaching travel teams
2. HS Coaches coaching "town" teams

1. Our HS coaches "recruit" kids for their travel programs. They make it abundantly clear that if you play for their club it will help you. Imagine if you were a HS teacher who ran a tutoring business on the side and said - "if you get tutored by me, you will have a much better chance of improving your grades in my class." It's such a conflict of interest and puts the kids and the families in a no win situation. Much more prevalent on the girls side.

2. Our HS has a rule about coaches not be ing able to use our HS facilities for training or coaching their own student athletes. This rule is broken on a daily basis by coaches who are training their own athletes in the off season. First of all, I thought it was a rule that summer teams were not allowed to be coached by existing coaches. This is happening at our school. Much more prevalent on the boys side.


THEY MADE A MOVIE ABOUT THIS ITS CALLED BAD TEACHER WITH CAMERON DIAZ!!! PAY FOR TUTORING which will go for her cosmetic surgery and then you will pass the class.... she guarentees it! Sounds like LI Lacrosse
As a travel coach I have made it a point to "stay out of the way" of HS or middle school "time", meaning all practices during the spring season were either late in the day or on Sundays and ALWAYS encouraged my players, when their was a conflict, to attend the school events...with that being said, the summer is OURS and while the athletes can/should/may play both, I would hope the HS coaches provide the same encouragement to their players who continuously get better playing with the elite teams and whose opportunities for recruitment exponentially increase DURING the summer when college coaches actually have time to visit these events.
Come on, the reality of being on two teams leads to undo pressure, the players at these ages are so torn as to which to do (when there is no right team to pick).

In some cass it hurts the player's development, for others they thrive.

You need to know which one your child is. God knows they have enough to deal with entering puberty.

Dear Judy bloom which team practcie shoudl I attend@@@.

At least when it is a school coach certain conflicts are taken out of the equation.
I have two Northport sons who play for Team Tiger. Our school summer tournament team is sooooo competitive that in UMass they took the championships in almost every age group including our Varsity team. In the Noreaster tournament our only team competing took the championship against some of the best select teams there are. It's funny that with twenty minutes into the game, one of our boys scored a hat strick (3 goals) against Express. We have a great program THAT WORKS and it's extremely competitive, local and virtually free!!! What could be better than that! LET'S GO TIGERS!!!!!!!!!!!
The school coaches have the kids almost all year. Can't the summer be the time they play with the other players from the select team?
There is clearly a conflict of interest and it should not be allowed.

Club Team Vs Town Team is a separate debate. The decision of what team to play for should be made by the players and their parents. The best interest of the child should be the driving force in the decision process and there should be no pressure from a high school coach.
I would hope that HS coaches would support the player knowing that he/she is committed to being the best they can be. Our HS team is priority, their practices and tournaments take precedence, but if a player has the opportunity to advance their level of play with a program that will allow them to do so, they should be able to do this without any ill feelings from coaches and HS team mates. Hard work and dedication is what should be recognized, as this is what builds character! The player obviously wants to learn and advance, trust me, they do not believe they are better than anyone else!
It is wrong for a high school coach to coerce a child to play for a high school / town team during the summer.

Restricting a players development is wrong.
Are you people saying that these H.S. coaches believe they can force a player to be on a summer team and then charge large sums of money for a mediocre lacrosse experience. These guys need to be exposed !
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have two Northport sons who play for Team Tiger. Our school summer tournament team is sooooo competitive that in UMass they took the championships in almost every age group including our Varsity team. In the Noreaster tournament our only team competing took the championship against some of the best select teams there are. It's funny that with twenty minutes into the game, one of our boys scored a hat strick (3 goals) against Express. We have a great program THAT WORKS and it's extremely competitive, local and virtually free!!! What could be better than that! LET'S GO TIGERS!!!!!!!!!!!


Does it work? When was the last time NP won a county championship? Are boys being recruited in mass to attend div I programs? I think this is the exact issue, town teams enter (with all due respect) weak tournaments finish strong in their brackets and are convinced that its working. Do your sons teams play the top express, 91, outlaws, etc teams in their age bracket? How does the program measure success?
It's rare when a town team can compete with the top tier travel teams. However that's not to say there isn't a place for the town programs. But if your son or daughter is fortunate enough to compete at a high level, then the town program is not for you. As far as HS coaches being paid to coach a town team, all it takes is one lawsuit and it will stop. That goes for the coach run camps as well.
No 7th grade Syo player was moved up this year
I hate to tell you but you don't have to play for a big select team to be recognized as a top lacrosse player and if you have a stand-out athlete he will shine on any field he is on. You could pay and pay but it your child doesn't have it, it doesn't matter. Let's face it, recruiting for a college is on an individual basis. You got it, you're invited, end of story.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I hate to tell you but you don't have to play for a big select team to be recognized as a top lacrosse player and if you have a stand-out athlete he will shine on any field he is on. You could pay and pay but it your child doesn't have it, it doesn't matter. Let's face it, recruiting for a college is on an individual basis. You got it, you're invited, end of story.


I concur. We are going through the recruiting process right now (2015). My son is considered very good at his position and plays for the top team at a high profile club. That said the recruiting process is still "every man for himself" even with the support of his club and school coaches. To find a combination of academics, location, coach, lax conferenoce, school size etc is a very personal and individualistic process. The worst mistake is to have your son give in to coordinating with and following his high school or club buddies to every prospect day. That is a recipe for making a huge mistake and a kid not discovering a fit that really works for him individually with the hope of continuing playing with his hs friends in college. He will be passing up great opportunities while trying to follow his friends and will regret it too late. Best advice I have to set your kid up for success is to be realistic about where your kid is academically and start from there. You dont want your kid to fail out of an ivy or NESCAC and in the process ruin his lax experience. Follow your own path and think differently from the herd and your kid will have a much easier process and a better end result.
My son plays on a 3 year old travel team coached by the dad of a teammate, he is a phys ed guy at a neighboring district and once in a while the varsity coach makes an appearance. The problem is we have over 25 boys and pay $750 for 4 local tournament and 1 away (NJ). The coach and his annoying chatterbox whiny wife are connstantly claiming they dont make any money from this when clearly they do. They also allow anyone on the team-two kids still cant run and catch. You get what you get and you dont get upset...
Did anyone else misread this statement at 1st:

"My son plays on a 3 year old travel team"
I got that the team was started three years ago
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I got that the team was started three years ago


I didn't get it until I re-read it. I first thought it was a team of 3yos, and assumed it was another spoof of lacrosse parents. wink
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son plays on a 3 year old travel team coached by the dad of a teammate, he is a phys ed guy at a neighboring district and once in a while the varsity coach makes an appearance. The problem is we have over 25 boys and pay $750 for 4 local tournament and 1 away (NJ). The coach and his annoying chatterbox whiny wife are connstantly claiming they dont make any money from this when clearly they do. They also allow anyone on the team-two kids still cant run and catch. You get what you get and you dont get upset...


yet you stayed for the 2nd and 3rd year - this may sound like a silly idea but consider finding another team, and good luck finding that $750 5 tournament team. Is your son having fun? making friends? getting better at lacrosse? those things seem a little more important then how much PE coach is pulling in off the $750 he is charging.
It is wrong and it should not be allowed. No player should be coerced into playing for a particular team.
I guess I look at this slightly different , I think it's great when the local coach puts in the effort to make the team better. It's a significant amount of work and for 750 , there's not much in making money there. Yeah maybe the coaches are getting paid, but they're not getting rich. Probably 1-2k for the whole season per coach. 2 practices a week and 4 weekend tournaments, probably getting 20 an hr.

Now these 25 kids, some who will never make another travel team get to play together. It's much better for the school program then the top 2 kids playing with a travel team with kids from 10 different towns.

What will be a bigger accomplishment , Li championship with all your high school buddies or winning the tristate with 20 different families ?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess I look at this slightly different , I think it's great when the local coach puts in the effort to make the team better. It's a significant amount of work and for 750 , there's not much in making money there. Yeah maybe the coaches are getting paid, but they're not getting rich. Probably 1-2k for the whole season per coach. 2 practices a week and 4 weekend tournaments, probably getting 20 an hr.

Now these 25 kids, some who will never make another travel team get to play together. It's much better for the school program then the top 2 kids playing with a travel team with kids from 10 different towns.

What will be a bigger accomplishment , Li championship with all your high school buddies or winning the tristate with 20 different families ?


They both serve a purpose, playing with and improving your HS team is very important but also playing with the same kids for 10 months a year and hearing the same coaches yelling for 3-4 years as well as playing against the same kids who may not be as good as your kid may not improve a "Better" player as much as playing with a summer select team with outstanding competition in both practices and games. The best scenario for these players would be to try and do both and balance it as best you can. if you can make it work
I agree, both teams serve their purpose. Not necessarily a bad thing when the coach tries to keep the town together and offers a travel team to all level of players.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess I look at this slightly different , I think it's great when the local coach puts in the effort to make the team better. It's a significant amount of work and for 750 , there's not much in making money there. Yeah maybe the coaches are getting paid, but they're not getting rich. Probably 1-2k for the whole season per coach. 2 practices a week and 4 weekend tournaments, probably getting 20 an hr.

Now these 25 kids, some who will never make another travel team get to play together. It's much better for the school program then the top 2 kids playing with a travel team with kids from 10 different towns.

What will be a bigger accomplishment , Li championship with all your high school buddies or winning the tristate with 20 different families ?


They both serve a purpose, playing with and improving your HS team is very important but also playing with the same kids for 10 months a year and hearing the same coaches yelling for 3-4 years as well as playing against the same kids who may not be as good as your kid may not improve a "Better" player as much as playing with a summer select team with outstanding competition in both practices and games. The best scenario for these players would be to try and do both and balance it as best you can. if you can make it work



If only we could all make this work.

How about this, since there is limited field space. Practice for town teams on certain days and travel on others. Play travel games on the 1st and 3rd weekend of a month and town on ONE of the other weekends. (or visa versa).

Play with your town friends and play with new boys. What a concept.

Here is the true reality. More lacrosse is GOOD for all players. If your coach is preventing your child from playing with other teams, it is time to find a new team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is the true reality. More lacrosse is GOOD for all players. If your coach is preventing your child from playing with other teams, it is time to find a new team.

Do you mean find a new high school? That's the issue here, school coaches leveraging their position to cash in on summer travel teams, camps etc. - it's called pay to play, whether it's CGI baseball and St. Anthony's school team or Northport HS and Yellow Jackets lax, it's everywhere and it puts unfair pressure (both financial and emotional)on far too many people and frighteningly enough it starts at 10 years old in some cases
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is the true reality. More lacrosse is GOOD for all players. If your coach is preventing your child from playing with other teams, it is time to find a new team.

Do you mean find a new high school? That's the issue here, school coaches leveraging their position to cash in on summer travel teams, camps etc. - it's called pay to play, whether it's CGI baseball and St. Anthony's school team or Northport HS and Yellow Jackets lax, it's everywhere and it puts unfair pressure (both financial and emotional)on far too many people and frighteningly enough it starts at 10 years old in some cases


Agreed , but is there a FREE option ! No matter where you play or who your child plays for, there is a cost involved. However if the H.S. Coach is running the program perhaps there might be some cost control. The coach may not be able to fleece your pocketbook in fear of being spoken about to the school district.
Hello. Both of my boys play Northport and we love it. The cost is 1/3 of the traditional travel teams. The are playing very competitively and my sons are growing as players by leaps and bounds. Sometimes the grass is not greener on the other side. Also, there is a wonderful feeling of community which cannot be surpassed. Both of my boys have made in the past the best travel "A" teams there are so I think as long as it is a positive experience and your sons are up to their fullest potential -- then you're a winner.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is the true reality. More lacrosse is GOOD for all players. If your coach is preventing your child from playing with other teams, it is time to find a new team.

Do you mean find a new high school? That's the issue here, school coaches leveraging their position to cash in on summer travel teams, camps etc. - it's called pay to play, whether it's CGI baseball and St. Anthony's school team or Northport HS and Yellow Jackets lax, it's everywhere and it puts unfair pressure (both financial and emotional)on far too many people and frighteningly enough it starts at 10 years old in some cases


Agreed , but is there a FREE option ! No matter where you play or who your child plays for, there is a cost involved. However if the H.S. Coach is running the program perhaps there might be some cost control. The coach may not be able to fleece your pocketbook in fear of being spoken about to the school district.

Hello, you are correct about the cost control in HS Lax, but is the coaching in a public school as qualified as any of the big clubs? Maybe so, in some cases, but if you have a widely acclaimed "high end" coach at your childs level, why play down? It sounds stuffy, but winning at a high level with the town kids just is not happening. The town kids ARE important to play with, however, as friendships and sense of community matter more than some realize. It is a tough call, but depends more upon your individual town/ pay for play situation.
I am sure that there are some folks who will cite St. Anthony's and Chaminade as opportunities for "the best of both worlds" status. This may be so to some, but many are also truly satisfied with their public school for many reasons, and seek the "looks" for their child through private competition. There is not one "correct" scenario, but each individual family must assess.
PS- This IS a family undertaking, not to be forgotten! Enjoy
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess I look at this slightly different , I think it's great when the local coach puts in the effort to make the team better. It's a significant amount of work and for 750 , there's not much in making money there. Yeah maybe the coaches are getting paid, but they're not getting rich. Probably 1-2k for the whole season per coach. 2 practices a week and 4 weekend tournaments, probably getting 20 an hr.

Now these 25 kids, some who will never make another travel team get to play together. It's much better for the school program then the top 2 kids playing with a travel team with kids from 10 different towns.

What will be a bigger accomplishment , Li championship with all your high school buddies or winning the tristate with 20 different families ?


Heres a thought - chew on this a bit!


21 players (2G 5A 9M 5D) @ $750 = $15,750 budget for a team.

For $750 you get.
4 tournaments @ avg $1,500 = $6,000.
$4,000 for coaches
(Divide that by 21 players = $475 a player.)
uni/swag another $75 a player
balls and stuff another $50 a player
Donation to school HS team $50 a player
6 dates of a faceoff clinic (max 10 players per team) $35 a player
6 dates of a goalie clinic (max 2 players) $35 a player

If your town has a competitive team why not (as long as there are not any dads coaches qualified or not)!!
Please explain the obsession with playing with a town. Why not encourage the kids to play at the highest level possible. Sounds like the town folk want to hold the best kids back.

Keep the high school coaches out of the summer. If they cant win with the time they have during the year so be it.

It is wrong for High School Coaches or Town Programs to coerce children into playing for them.

Just curious, are the Town Teams open to everyone or do they have Tryouts and cuts?? How about at the youth level?? do the town teams cut kids? do they have "A" ,"B" and "C" Teams?

There are more B, C, and D Players than there are "A" players.

The Parents of the B, C, and D players want their kids to play with the "A" players and the only way that can happen is if the "A" players stay at home.

An "A" player staying home helps the Town/HS Team but it does not help the Player.

The Bottom Line is: "Its wrong for a high school coaches and town programs to to coerce children into playing for his summer team".

If a high school coach thinks he has what it takes to compete against the club organizations then he should quit his Job "coaching job". He should go and compete on the open market. Without coercion, how many would be able to compete????


I was chewing until the "no dad" things surfaced. Why the hate for the guy whom loves the sport and has a son to enjoy it with? Why? Not ALL dad coaches may be the best, but not ALL cops are bad, not ALL banking execs are coke hounds, etc. Rationality went out the window. I hope i am misreading.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hello. Both of my boys play Northport and we love it. The cost is 1/3 of the traditional travel teams. The are playing very competitively and my sons are growing as players by leaps and bounds. Sometimes the grass is not greener on the other side. Also, there is a wonderful feeling of community which cannot be surpassed. Both of my boys have made in the past the best travel "A" teams there are so I think as long as it is a positive experience and your sons are up to their fullest potential -- then you're a winner.

Hello,
Exactly my point. Northport is a minority, meaning that not many towns can boast strong support of their lacrosse program, and true concern for keeping the kids playing in-town, for their high school as well. A valid point made by a prior post refers to the high school with a weaker team, or the school administration brushing off a lax program as unimportant. Your situation is great to hear about, but not the case in a great many districts with weaker programs, but having kids enthusiastic about furthering their involvement to higher levels.
Enjoy
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is the true reality. More lacrosse is GOOD for all players. If your coach is preventing your child from playing with other teams, it is time to find a new team.

This is a great idea, which hardly works in reality. Changing practice schedules spread among an entire roster can not work, considering the spread of seperate localities on one team. How many times have we seen a coach at the end of a practice,trying to align the next practice with 20 kids? First, the kids do not know the schedule for the next week. Next, the coach sets his schedule for a tentative date, then the email chain changes it all. You get it. Been there? It all seems to be about that "balance". We try to do what's best for the kid's perfomance, attempt to keep it enjoyable, consider that some college help is possible, maintain association with school peers, etc.
We HAVE seen kids and their parents simply DUMP the PAL for greener pastures, but they tend to teach the kid to jump ship in any situation. We have also seen what staying involved in your town can bring to aid in many other satisfying experiences as well. Balance... may be different for each family or district.
Please send your concept to Three Village.
What concept?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Please send your concept to Three Village.


there are many towns thinking your concept at 3v is working. Are you saying it isn't? No system is perfect, but please help. What is done there?

West Islip same thing?
Smith town
Garden City
Manias set
Farmingdale
Syosset

Everyone throws out:
Is it understood for grades below x, you do whatever you want then above x you do,what the school coaches "prefer". Unless of course you're going to send your children to catholic schools. Is this true?


I look to the left banner and see a bunch of towns with great history.

It can't all be the gene pool, there has to be a system.




The town/school teams that have great programs are dedicated to making it a program in which the student/athlete has committed coaching that provides an opportunity for them to thrive. These districts are notorious for having superb programs where the parents and athtletes are committed to backing the programs up!!!! Coaching + support = outstanding programs........Not every district has such a wonderful opportunity and I believe in these districts there isn't much time to play with a "travel team," and the athlete is committed to the school, but I also know that with a school team, there are times when an athlete advances further on the basis of who you know, not what you know.
3village has a great program for in-house and PAL. They nmade a decision that if a child wanted to play travel lax on the 3v team, the child could not also participate on one of the elite teams. Their slogan--one town one team.

That worked for many years, however, the last few years have seen large defections from some of the younger teams. The current 6th, 7th and 8th grade 3v travel teams have been decimated. Kids and coaches have left the program to participate in the elite world--gladiators, express, 91...

The result is that these 3v teams cannot compete in the A bracket of tournaments any longer. they are now plauying in B brackets or town team only tournaments.

For the older grades-9th, JV and varsity-those teams were able to keep most of their kids and are still playing at a very high level.

So what worked for a long time, is no longer working. change has come to this sport and the town teams must evolve or lose in every toutrnament...

that said, at the HS level for school ball, the best kids in 3v get to play regardless iof which travel team they are plauing for...
This is a problem across the board in all sports, not just lacrosse. Kids and their families feel tremendous pressure to play for the high school coach - but it doesn't matter. The coach wants to win and for the most part will play the better player. Now if there is a tie at the talent level then maybe the tiebreaker goes to the kid who played for the coach. On the other hand for recruiting purposes, maybe it is better to have two advocates for your child instead of just one.

High school coaches who want to keep their job as HS coaches play the best kids regardless of which jersey they wear in June and July at tournaments. Do you really think a lesser skilled player is going to play over a more skilled player because the more skilled player opted to play for an outside travel team? Not happening - coaches want to win championships and you do that with your best players on the field not on the bench.
Same thing happening in West Islip. Some grades are better than others as far as doing some tournaments, usually in the spring. Kids playing for clubs all over. They still must make committment to J.V./Varsity team first though.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
3village has a great program for in-house and PAL. They nmade a decision that if a child wanted to play travel lax on the 3v team, the child could not also participate on one of the elite teams. Their slogan--one town one team.

That worked for many years, however, the last few years have seen large defections from some of the younger teams. The current 6th, 7th and 8th grade 3v travel teams have been decimated. Kids and coaches have left the program to participate in the elite world--gladiators, express, 91...

The result is that these 3v teams cannot compete in the A bracket of tournaments any longer. they are now plauying in B brackets or town team only tournaments.

For the older grades-9th, JV and varsity-those teams were able to keep most of their kids and are still playing at a very high level.

So what worked for a long time, is no longer working. change has come to this sport and the town teams must evolve or lose in every toutrnament...

that said, at the HS level for school ball, the best kids in 3v get to play regardless iof which travel team they are plauing for...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
High school coaches who want to keep their job as HS coaches play the best kids regardless of which jersey they wear in June and July at tournaments. Do you really think a lesser skilled player is going to play over a more skilled player because the more skilled player opted to play for an outside travel team? Not happening - coaches want to win championships and you do that with your best players on the field not on the bench.

Unfortunately, parents and kids as young as 10 years old are being scared into playiung for a particular travel program (lax, baseball, whatever) or risk being alienated at a later age - trust me it happens all the time, I know of several instances first hand of this happening and that's the big problem
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess I look at this slightly different , I think it's great when the local coach puts in the effort to make the team better. It's a significant amount of work and for 750 , there's not much in making money there. Yeah maybe the coaches are getting paid, but they're not getting rich. Probably 1-2k for the whole season per coach. 2 practices a week and 4 weekend tournaments, probably getting 20 an hr.

Now these 25 kids, some who will never make another travel team get to play together. It's much better for the school program then the top 2 kids playing with a travel team with kids from 10 different towns.

What will be a bigger accomplishment , Li championship with all your high school buddies or winning the tristate with 20 different families ?


They both serve a purpose, playing with and improving your HS team is very important but also playing with the same kids for 10 months a year and hearing the same coaches yelling for 3-4 years as well as playing against the same kids who may not be as good as your kid may not improve a "Better" player as much as playing with a summer select team with outstanding competition in both practices and games. The best scenario for these players would be to try and do both and balance it as best you can. if you can make it work



If only we could all make this work.

How about this, since there is limited field space. Practice for town teams on certain days and travel on others. Play travel games on the 1st and 3rd weekend of a month and town on ONE of the other weekends. (or visa versa).

Play with your town friends and play with new boys. What a concept.



Good luck with that. The people at US Lax can't even organize a roster like PAL football has had for a decade. This would allow opposing coaches to see a photo ID of each player before a game. That would prevent clubs from borrowing players, or having nephews from out of state play on your team when the tourney brings you down that way!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess I look at this slightly different , I think it's great when the local coach puts in the effort to make the team better. It's a significant amount of work and for 750 , there's not much in making money there. Yeah maybe the coaches are getting paid, but they're not getting rich. Probably 1-2k for the whole season per coach. 2 practices a week and 4 weekend tournaments, probably getting 20 an hr.

Now these 25 kids, some who will never make another travel team get to play together. It's much better for the school program then the top 2 kids playing with a travel team with kids from 10 different towns.

What will be a bigger accomplishment , Li championship with all your high school buddies or winning the tristate with 20 different families ?


They both serve a purpose, playing with and improving your HS team is very important but also playing with the same kids for 10 months a year and hearing the same coaches yelling for 3-4 years as well as playing against the same kids who may not be as good as your kid may not improve a "Better" player as much as playing with a summer select team with outstanding competition in both practices and games. The best scenario for these players would be to try and do both and balance it as best you can. if you can make it work



If only we could all make this work.

How about this, since there is limited field space. Practice for town teams on certain days and travel on others. Play travel games on the 1st and 3rd weekend of a month and town on ONE of the other weekends. (or visa versa).

Play with your town friends and play with new boys. What a concept.



Good luck with that. The people at US Lax can't even organize a roster like PAL football has had for a decade. This would allow opposing coaches to see a photo ID of each player before a game. That would prevent clubs from borrowing players, or having nephews from out of state play on your team when the tourney brings you down that way!


Please tournaments are not leagues, rosters are not locked in stone in Sept. however, rosters do need to be submitted but whats to say they put the out of state player on the official roster, what then.

Is US Lacrosse going to say my child or nephew can only play on one team. No because becuase that would not be in the best interest of the child or the sport. Why stop a child who wants to play with their friends as well as with others every once in a while..

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess I look at this slightly different , I think it's great when the local coach puts in the effort to make the team better. It's a significant amount of work and for 750 , there's not much in making money there. Yeah maybe the coaches are getting paid, but they're not getting rich. Probably 1-2k for the whole season per coach. 2 practices a week and 4 weekend tournaments, probably getting 20 an hr.

Now these 25 kids, some who will never make another travel team get to play together. It's much better for the school program then the top 2 kids playing with a travel team with kids from 10 different towns.

What will be a bigger accomplishment , Li championship with all your high school buddies or winning the tristate with 20 different families ?


They both serve a purpose, playing with and improving your HS team is very important but also playing with the same kids for 10 months a year and hearing the same coaches yelling for 3-4 years as well as playing against the same kids who may not be as good as your kid may not improve a "Better" player as much as playing with a summer select team with outstanding competition in both practices and games. The best scenario for these players would be to try and do both and balance it as best you can. if you can make it work



If only we could all make this work.

How about this, since there is limited field space. Practice for town teams on certain days and travel on others. Play travel games on the 1st and 3rd weekend of a month and town on ONE of the other weekends. (or visa versa).

Play with your town friends and play with new boys. What a concept.



Good luck with that. The people at US Lax can't even organize a roster like PAL football has had for a decade. This would allow opposing coaches to see a photo ID of each player before a game. That would prevent clubs from borrowing players, or having nephews from out of state play on your team when the tourney brings you down that way!


Please tournaments are not leagues, rosters are not locked in stone in Sept. however, rosters do need to be submitted but whats to say they put the out of state player on the official roster, what then.

Is US Lacrosse going to say my child or nephew can only play on one team. No because becuase that would not be in the best interest of the child or the sport. Why stop a child who wants to play with their friends as well as with others every once in a while..

Long Island Junior Soccer League strictly prohibits a player from participating on more than one team, this I know first hand, having a child who plays up a year on a very competitive team and also wanted to play with his friends on a team his age and the answer from [lacrosse] was a simple "NO" and a follow up to them asking why was answered with a "because we said so"
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess I look at this slightly different , I think it's great when the local coach puts in the effort to make the team better. It's a significant amount of work and for 750 , there's not much in making money there. Yeah maybe the coaches are getting paid, but they're not getting rich. Probably 1-2k for the whole season per coach. 2 practices a week and 4 weekend tournaments, probably getting 20 an hr.

Now these 25 kids, some who will never make another travel team get to play together. It's much better for the school program then the top 2 kids playing with a travel team with kids from 10 different towns.

What will be a bigger accomplishment , Li championship with all your high school buddies or winning the tristate with 20 different families ?


They both serve a purpose, playing with and improving your HS team is very important but also playing with the same kids for 10 months a year and hearing the same coaches yelling for 3-4 years as well as playing against the same kids who may not be as good as your kid may not improve a "Better" player as much as playing with a summer select team with outstanding competition in both practices and games. The best scenario for these players would be to try and do both and balance it as best you can. if you can make it work



If only we could all make this work.

How about this, since there is limited field space. Practice for town teams on certain days and travel on others. Play travel games on the 1st and 3rd weekend of a month and town on ONE of the other weekends. (or visa versa).

Play with your town friends and play with new boys. What a concept.



Good luck with that. The people at US Lax can't even organize a roster like PAL football has had for a decade. This would allow opposing coaches to see a photo ID of each player before a game. That would prevent clubs from borrowing players, or having nephews from out of state play on your team when the tourney brings you down that way!


Please tournaments are not leagues, rosters are not locked in stone in Sept. however, rosters do need to be submitted but whats to say they put the out of state player on the official roster, what then.

Is US Lacrosse going to say my child or nephew can only play on one team. No because becuase that would not be in the best interest of the child or the sport. Why stop a child who wants to play with their friends as well as with others every once in a while..

Long Island Junior Soccer League strictly prohibits a player from participating on more than one team, this I know first hand, having a child who plays up a year on a very competitive team and also wanted to play with his friends on a team his age and the answer from [lacrosse] was a simple "NO" and a follow up to them asking why was answered with a "because we said so"


Yeah and in some parts of the country you cannot play soccer for your schools.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Long Island Junior Soccer League strictly prohibits a player from participating on more than one team, this I know first hand, having a child who plays up a year on a very competitive team and also wanted to play with his friends on a team his age and the answer from [lacrosse] was a simple "NO" and a follow up to them asking why was answered with a "because we said so"
The United States Youth Soccer Association (USYSA) is the Long Island Junior Soccer League's ([lacrosse]'s) sanctioning body from the US Soccer Federation (USSF).

USYSA is quite clear that player passes are allocated to a player for one seasonal year (August 1st to the following July 31st) and names a player to be part of one specific club/town and one specific team. Yes, a player pass ties that player to a given team - not to a given club, but to the specific team within the club.

For tournaments, players can play for another team but only with the proper paperwork filed for a player loan; that paperwork must be executed by both the sending and receiving clubs.

For league play, a player cannot participate for two different teams under the USYSA/[lacrosse] pass system.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess I look at this slightly different , I think it's great when the local coach puts in the effort to make the team better. It's a significant amount of work and for 750 , there's not much in making money there. Yeah maybe the coaches are getting paid, but they're not getting rich. Probably 1-2k for the whole season per coach. 2 practices a week and 4 weekend tournaments, probably getting 20 an hr.

Now these 25 kids, some who will never make another travel team get to play together. It's much better for the school program then the top 2 kids playing with a travel team with kids from 10 different towns.

What will be a bigger accomplishment , Li championship with all your high school buddies or winning the tristate with 20 different families ?


They both serve a purpose, playing with and improving your HS team is very important but also playing with the same kids for 10 months a year and hearing the same coaches yelling for 3-4 years as well as playing against the same kids who may not be as good as your kid may not improve a "Better" player as much as playing with a summer select team with outstanding competition in both practices and games. The best scenario for these players would be to try and do both and balance it as best you can. if you can make it work



If only we could all make this work.

How about this, since there is limited field space. Practice for town teams on certain days and travel on others. Play travel games on the 1st and 3rd weekend of a month and town on ONE of the other weekends. (or visa versa).

Play with your town friends and play with new boys. What a concept.



Good luck with that. The people at US Lax can't even organize a roster like PAL football has had for a decade. This would allow opposing coaches to see a photo ID of each player before a game. That would prevent clubs from borrowing players, or having nephews from out of state play on your team when the tourney brings you down that way!


Please tournaments are not leagues, rosters are not locked in stone in Sept. however, rosters do need to be submitted but whats to say they put the out of state player on the official roster, what then.

Is US Lacrosse going to say my child or nephew can only play on one team. No because becuase that would not be in the best interest of the child or the sport. Why stop a child who wants to play with their friends as well as with others every once in a while..


You seem to pooh pooh the idea. You DO cite an instance of good intent, which is fine by most, if not all. However, why allow teams to pick up heavy hitters because they know that a rival club is in the same bracket, etc.? How noble is it to select a team, practice it, and field it? I am thinking that the kid who is looking for some extra play time is a guise for holding off the eventual ID verification. The sme coaches who seem to show up with duplicate jersey numbers at tourneys, or new faces/ foreign helmets usually justify dodging ID checks using the same scenario stated in your post. I guess that it's too much to stick to a roster for commitments sake.
I am assuming you are bringing up the soccer analogy to show how you should only play for one lacrosse team and not play on a summer select team. However, LIJSoccer League DOES allow players to play on a summer select team-ODP. Serious soccer players can play during the summer with different teammates at a more competitive level. [lacrosse] is not trying to hold back players that love the game and want to improve their skills. This is no different for players that want to play summer lacrosse with a different coach and group of kids. It's a good life experience.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I guess I look at this slightly different , I think it's great when the local coach puts in the effort to make the team better. It's a significant amount of work and for 750 , there's not much in making money there. Yeah maybe the coaches are getting paid, but they're not getting rich. Probably 1-2k for the whole season per coach. 2 practices a week and 4 weekend tournaments, probably getting 20 an hr.

Now these 25 kids, some who will never make another travel team get to play together. It's much better for the school program then the top 2 kids playing with a travel team with kids from 10 different towns.

What will be a bigger accomplishment , Li championship with all your high school buddies or winning the tristate with 20 different families ?


They both serve a purpose, playing with and improving your HS team is very important but also playing with the same kids for 10 months a year and hearing the same coaches yelling for 3-4 years as well as playing against the same kids who may not be as good as your kid may not improve a "Better" player as much as playing with a summer select team with outstanding competition in both practices and games. The best scenario for these players would be to try and do both and balance it as best you can. if you can make it work



If only we could all make this work.

How about this, since there is limited field space. Practice for town teams on certain days and travel on others. Play travel games on the 1st and 3rd weekend of a month and town on ONE of the other weekends. (or visa versa).

Play with your town friends and play with new boys. What a concept.



Good luck with that. The people at US Lax can't even organize a roster like PAL football has had for a decade. This would allow opposing coaches to see a photo ID of each player before a game. That would prevent clubs from borrowing players, or having nephews from out of state play on your team when the tourney brings you down that way!


Please tournaments are not leagues, rosters are not locked in stone in Sept. however, rosters do need to be submitted but whats to say they put the out of state player on the official roster, what then.

Is US Lacrosse going to say my child or nephew can only play on one team. No because becuase that would not be in the best interest of the child or the sport. Why stop a child who wants to play with their friends as well as with others every once in a while..


You seem to pooh pooh the idea. You DO cite an instance of good intent, which is fine by most, if not all. However, why allow teams to pick up heavy hitters because they know that a rival club is in the same bracket, etc.? How noble is it to select a team, practice it, and field it? I am thinking that the kid who is looking for some extra play time is a guise for holding off the eventual ID verification. The sme coaches who seem to show up with duplicate jersey numbers at tourneys, or new faces/ foreign helmets usually justify dodging ID checks using the same scenario stated in your post. I guess that it's too much to stick to a roster for commitments sake.


I am good with an ID card. I never said my child or nephew were playing down, not at all. They just like playing with each other and each like playing with the others friends from home.

I would hope and see no reason for someone to take that away.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am assuming you are bringing up the soccer analogy to show how you should only play for one lacrosse team and not play on a summer select team. However, LIJSoccer League DOES allow players to play on a summer select team-ODP. Serious soccer players can play during the summer with different teammates at a more competitive level. [lacrosse] is not trying to hold back players that love the game and want to improve their skills. This is no different for players that want to play summer lacrosse with a different coach and group of kids. It's a good life experience.
Not to divert from Lacrosse to Soccer, but ... (yes, diversion coming) ...

Any players on the [lacrosse]/ODP teams use their club team passes from the [lacrosse] as a summer "loan" player. However, with more "premier" teams continuing play through the summer months, participation in [lacrosse]/ODP has taken a serious quality and participation level hit.

Diversion ended.
A couple of folks seem to be skirting the issue which I have brought up. Some teams grab heavy hitters,(hired guns, sharpshooters, etc.) to affect the outcome of tourneys. They are NOT bringing the kids along to ensure that they have more fun. When your team trains to compete against a team, a couple of these......
OH, I get it! Your team does this!?
Sometimes I don't catch on too quickly
Like everything in life, all coaches whether it be a travel coach or HS coach has their favorites. Do you think a travel team that we are playing with has two kids to put into Blue Chip and one will be my son or will it be his son and his son's best friend? There are politics in every situation. I think that as long as it works for your son and your family, it's an all around win!!

Hope you all have a great fall lax season.
You are right about the best players will play regardless of where they play in this summer. Every coach wants to win. But, I also think that some school teams are very competitive. Have you ever seen Smithtown West or Northport play in a tournament? They compete and win with the very best. There is no right or wrong answer.
Probably two is better than one.
We are also a soccer family and the rules are much more strict than lacrosse.
great topic. wish we had this problem. our district wont give the town league the time of day even when asked.the ad and the coaches do as little as possible to help their feeder program. no school gyms very limited field space and no preasence at games or practices. it is a shame because many boys play away from the district at a very high level. by the way we are a large district with 2 high schools
Hmmmmmmmmm, wonder what district you are speaking of, 2 high schools, we can elimate the fact that you are referring to Sachem they have 2 high schools, but their athletic programs are outstanding, what other district has 2 high schools in Suffolk County?????????????
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hmmmmmmmmm, wonder what district you are speaking of, 2 high schools, we can elimate the fact that you are referring to Sachem they have 2 high schools, but their athletic programs are outstanding, what other district has 2 high schools in Suffolk County?????????????


Who said it was Suffolk?
There is a conflict of interest.

In addition to the conflict of interest:

There will be negative consequences for Long Island Lacrosse Players if the HS Coaches and Town Team Proponents continue to coerce players into playing exclusively with their PAL / Town / HS Summer Teams.



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hmmmmmmmmm, wonder what district you are speaking of, 2 high schools, we can elimate the fact that you are referring to Sachem they have 2 high schools, but their athletic programs are outstanding, what other district has 2 high schools in Suffolk County?????????????


Who said it was Suffolk?

If it is Nassau it is Great Neck, Valley Stream or Levittown, those are the districts with two high schools, a few have more then two but which lacrosse town are you talking about, my guess is Great Neck
wow suprised to see so many 2 school districts in nassau. hope the problem isnt widespread. how about it does your hs do enough to keep your son or do you look at it as a 8 game season than go to bigger /better. by the way who said it was on long island?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hmmmmmmmmm, wonder what district you are speaking of, 2 high schools, we can elimate the fact that you are referring to Sachem they have 2 high schools, but their athletic programs are outstanding, what other district has 2 high schools in Suffolk County?????????????


Hills? Two high schools, one lax team...
I believe there are potential negatives and positives to having the HS coach run a summer program.

Poitives: Keeping the teams playing together makes the boys know exactly what thier teamates will do on the field. It can make an average team play at a much higher level. A team that plays selflessly and together can beat teams with higher caliber players. Also, it builds team unity and district pride. Further, if done right it can yeild serious results. We all know the HS teams that play together in the summer. They are the same ones that compete for Championships almost every year. SWR, WI, etc...

Negatives: The cost to the individual player is most likely going to be the middle tier kid on any given team. A kid like this may be constantly pidgeon holed into a back up role. If they never get the chance to play against the tough competition or get an opportunity to be the "guy", they never grow. This is especially true at the middle school and JV level. At least at an outside club they might have a chance to improve away from the microscope of the School coach. I have seen kids go off and play summer ball with a club, come back and really catch the School coaches eye.

Not sure what the ansewer is? Perhaps you try and do both. If your son is not getting playing time over the summer with his school coaches team, he surely will not get it in the spring!!! If this is the case, who cares if you [lacrosse] the school coach off. It won't matter anyway.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I believe there are potential negatives and positives to having the HS coach run a summer program.

Poitives: Keeping the teams playing together makes the boys know exactly what thier teamates will do on the field. It can make an average team play at a much higher level. A team that plays selflessly and together can beat teams with higher caliber players. Also, it builds team unity and district pride. Further, if done right it can yeild serious results. We all know the HS teams that play together in the summer. They are the same ones that compete for Championships almost every year. SWR, WI, etc...


Negatives: The cost to the individual player is most likely going to be the middle tier kid on any given team. A kid like this may be constantly pidgeon holed into a back up role. If they never get the chance to play against the tough competition or get an opportunity to be the "guy", they never grow. This is especially true at the middle school and JV level. At least at an outside club they might have a chance to improve away from the microscope of the School coach. I have seen kids go off and play summer ball with a club, come back and really catch the School coaches eye.

Not sure what the ansewer is? Perhaps you try and do both. If your son is not getting playing time over the summer with his school coaches team, he surely will not get it in the spring!!! If this is the case, who cares if you [lacrosse] the school coach off. It won't matter anyway.


Any truth to the rumors certain towns use certain clubs (or dads) to separate the talent levels In 4/5/6 grades before they go to up ms where the hs coach has some say?
Great topic...how do you handle the HS Coach who requests that kids play with the HS team thru the summer tournament schedule and if you do not, you are told it will impact your play time when school ball comes around ? I have had to address this with my son who plays at a high travel level with Express and as a 9th grader should not have to face this issue from the HS Coach. We do not come from a strong HS program, and the exposure with Express is much greater. Open to your comments
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Great topic...how do you handle the HS Coach who requests that kids play with the HS team thru the summer tournament schedule and if you do not, you are told it will impact your play time when school ball comes around ? I have had to address this with my son who plays at a high travel level with Express and as a 9th grader should not have to face this issue from the HS Coach. We do not come from a strong HS program, and the exposure with Express is much greater. Open to your comments


Unfortunately, this exact scenario is very common and will probably affect my son in another couple years...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Great topic...how do you handle the HS Coach who requests that kids play with the HS team thru the summer tournament schedule and if you do not, you are told it will impact your play time when school ball comes around ? I have had to address this with my son who plays at a high travel level with Express and as a 9th grader should not have to face this issue from the HS Coach. We do not come from a strong HS program, and the exposure with Express is much greater. Open to your comments


Unfortunately, this exact scenario is very common and will probably affect my son in another couple years...


Stay with the travel team and the coach that knows how to get the most for his players. If your son is that good- they will play him- because the HS wants to win- that is their bottom line. If he gets less playing time- their loss- he will still get his share on the travel team and then some fun with his town friends at the HS. Best of luck to your son.
Hills has a great progam, I think this post about the 2 high schools was referring to a weaker program....
I would have to say play with Express for the summer.
Thank you for the comment. That is the road i planned on taking, good to get some other feedback
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.

Excellent post. There are many other HS coaches trying to do the same thing. It is unfair for any kid or family to be strong armed into playing for their town team on their own FREE time. In addition, in most cases it borders on extortion. These coaches are profiting Big time! The coaches use the fear of not playing to line their pockets! There is also the issue that most of the town teams will not compete with the best travel teams. In those recruiting tournaments it is tough to be seen by college coaches when you are playing in the B bracket or consolation games on the back fields. If you are a true A player that can compete on a top travel team you may never get recruited because nobody will see you. The shame of it all is that there is another 10 months out of the year that these HS teams can build chemistry by doing clinics, leagues an tournaments! If these coaches truly have the kids best interest in mind they would want them to get as many opportunities as they can and by doing both they will have coaching diversity and their stick in their hand even more! Parents should not let their kids be bullied and make sure that they don't miss out on the opportunity for their child to play in college!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.



Talk to the coach and ask him point blank, if my son plays for you and not travel will he get meaningfull time? If he does not, how does he go about getting recruited ? AT least force the coach to sympathize with you so there are no hard feelings?
Whah...

Every town that has a program should do the same. Especially if you are in the same division as WM. didn't WI just do he same thing and let the 2018 boys know this is not a joke.


Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.


Ward Melville has been one of the best HS teams in the country for over 20 years so what ever they are doing works!
HS coaches will play the best players. Even if those kids aren't on their summer travel teams. Being on a club team gives a player another avenue to get college looks instead of being blackmailed by his HS coach.
Once you hit Varsity on WI thats it, no more travel teams outside of their own.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.

Excellent post. There are many other HS coaches trying to do the same thing. It is unfair for any kid or family to be strong armed into playing for their town team on their own FREE time. In addition, in most cases it borders on extortion. These coaches are profiting Big time! The coaches use the fear of not playing to line their pockets! There is also the issue that most of the town teams will not compete with the best travel teams. In those recruiting tournaments it is tough to be seen by college coaches when you are playing in the B bracket or consolation games on the back fields. If you are a true A player that can compete on a top travel team you may never get recruited because nobody will see you. The shame of it all is that there is another 10 months out of the year that these HS teams can build chemistry by doing clinics, leagues an tournaments! If these coaches truly have the kids best interest in mind they would want them to get as many opportunities as they can and by doing both they will have coaching diversity and their stick in their hand even more! Parents should not let their kids be bullied and make sure that they don't miss out on the opportunity for their child to play in college!


The Smithtown HS coaches have neglected the youth program for years. Now they want to reap the benefits of the Club teams. School is out in Summer and where your kid plays should be up to the consumer. If the HS coach convinces me my kid will get the best coaching, best training, best clinics, best teammates, best competition, and plenty of playing time, he might get my attention. Maybe he could throw a free helmet in too.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.


All this dam crying about fair and not fair. We have completely given in to the whining parent. If your kids not good enough he's not good enough that's it. Sorry if I am going to ruffle some feathers but its not PAL its not rec league where everyone get a trophy. A high school coaches career is measured on wins and losses. You win you keep your job as a coach you lose, bye bye. Thats it. Coaches,they coach and live, love the game but in the end its results. Let's put it in everyday terms for people to understand. You are in sales and work on commission you don't produce you don't have money to pay bills, and your out of a job. Do you guys get it or let's put it do you moms get it. It's not all rainbows and lollipops in the real world. Why do we think our kids are entitled it doesn't work that way.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.

Excellent post. There are many other HS coaches trying to do the same thing. It is unfair for any kid or family to be strong armed into playing for their town team on their own FREE time. In addition, in most cases it borders on extortion. These coaches are profiting Big time! The coaches use the fear of not playing to line their pockets! There is also the issue that most of the town teams will not compete with the best travel teams. In those recruiting tournaments it is tough to be seen by college coaches when you are playing in the B bracket or consolation games on the back fields. If you are a true A player that can compete on a top travel team you may never get recruited because nobody will see you. The shame of it all is that there is another 10 months out of the year that these HS teams can build chemistry by doing clinics, leagues an tournaments! If these coaches truly have the kids best interest in mind they would want them to get as many opportunities as they can and by doing both they will have coaching diversity and their stick in their hand even more! Parents should not let their kids be bullied and make sure that they don't miss out on the opportunity for their child to play in college!


The Smithtown HS coaches have neglected the youth program for years. Now they want to reap the benefits of the Club teams. School is out in Summer and where your kid plays should be up to the consumer. If the HS coach convinces me my kid will get the best coaching, best training, best clinics, best teammates, best competition, and plenty of playing time, he might get my attention. Maybe he could throw a free helmet in too.


"Free" Helemet.....that's funny
Originally Posted by Anonymous


All this dam crying about fair and not fair. We have completely given in to the whining parent. If your kids not good enough he's not good enough that's it. Sorry if I am going to ruffle some feathers but its not PAL its not rec league where everyone get a trophy. A high school coaches career is measured on wins and losses. You win you keep your job as a coach you lose, bye bye. Thats it. Coaches,they coach and live, love the game but in the end its results. Let's put it in everyday terms for people to understand. You are in sales and work on commission you don't produce you don't have money to pay bills, and your out of a job. Do you guys get it or let's put it do you moms get it. It's not all rainbows and lollipops in the real world. Why do we think our kids are entitled it doesn't work that way.


What school district do you live in??? In my district and many others I've read about here on BOTC a coach keeps his/her job until he/she steps down. It has little to do with wins and losses.

I think what the schools mentioned above is doing is wrong on a number of levels, but you assuming that the parents complaining are whining because their kid isn't good enough is missing the point. The point is about control by and making money for the HS coaches. Kids get recruited at summer tournaments by and large, not at HS games.
To the poster above with the comment about sales--

You miss the point completely. If you sell you get paid--we agree, but what if yoour boss said--you must give kickbacks to get the sale? You must take 50% of your commision check and give it to me every month after you pay your taxes otherwise you cant sell for my or my company?

You would go find another job or you would break the law and give the guy your money...

Kids cant change schools and I really dont care about the HS coach and his coaching record. I care about my kid getting a fair shake.

I will leave it to you to worry about the coach and his record and whether your HS won the state championship.

Are you still bragging about your greatest HS sports moment???

Wake up.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.


All this dam crying about fair and not fair. We have completely given in to the whining parent. If your kids not good enough he's not good enough that's it. Sorry if I am going to ruffle some feathers but its not PAL its not rec league where everyone get a trophy. A high school coaches career is measured on wins and losses. You win you keep your job as a coach you lose, bye bye. Thats it. Coaches,they coach and live, love the game but in the end its results. Let's put it in everyday terms for people to understand. You are in sales and work on commission you don't produce you don't have money to pay bills, and your out of a job. Do you guys get it or let's put it do you moms get it. It's not all rainbows and lollipops in the real world. Why do we think our kids are entitled it doesn't work that way.

You are way off! This has nothing to do with crying parents. It is about HS coaches putting their pocket books ahead of the best interest of the teams and kids individual growth and opportunity.
I do believe that the issues are very different for the larger schools as opposed to the small schools. The larger schools like Ward Melville and WI the issue is you can be a very good player who doesn't crack the starting line up or has very good upperclassmen in front of you and as a 9th, 10th or 11th grader will not see the field much, thus not get an opportunity to be recruited during the summer. If you played on a very good travel team in the summer you would get the opportunity. For the smaller schools it effects the BEST kids! They generally can not put a team on the field that will compete with the best travel teams or the best HS teams, so those teams end up in B brackets and don't have nearly the quantity or quality of college coaches at the games. So those top kids would be way better off on their travel teams for the summer and playing with the town team when they can, but the HS coaches tell them they can't play both! (all about the money)!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.

Excellent post. There are many other HS coaches trying to do the same thing. It is unfair for any kid or family to be strong armed into playing for their town team on their own FREE time. In addition, in most cases it borders on extortion. These coaches are profiting Big time! The coaches use the fear of not playing to line their pockets! There is also the issue that most of the town teams will not compete with the best travel teams. In those recruiting tournaments it is tough to be seen by college coaches when you are playing in the B bracket or consolation games on the back fields. If you are a true A player that can compete on a top travel team you may never get recruited because nobody will see you. The shame of it all is that there is another 10 months out of the year that these HS teams can build chemistry by doing clinics, leagues an tournaments! If these coaches truly have the kids best interest in mind they would want them to get as many opportunities as they can and by doing both they will have coaching diversity and their stick in their hand even more! Parents should not let their kids be bullied and make sure that they don't miss out on the opportunity for their child to play in college!


The Smithtown HS coaches have neglected the youth program for years. Now they want to reap the benefits of the Club teams. School is out in Summer and where your kid plays should be up to the consumer. If the HS coach convinces me my kid will get the best coaching, best training, best clinics, best teammates, best competition, and plenty of playing time, he might get my attention. Maybe he could throw a free helmet in too.


Interesting you say Smithtown. The West coach is listed on the LI Thunder website. So does he really push kids to Team Smithtown or can they play for Thunder?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.


All this dam crying about fair and not fair. We have completely given in to the whining parent. If your kids not good enough he's not good enough that's it. Sorry if I am going to ruffle some feathers but its not PAL its not rec league where everyone get a trophy. A high school coaches career is measured on wins and losses. You win you keep your job as a coach you lose, bye bye. Thats it. Coaches,they coach and live, love the game but in the end its results. Let's put it in everyday terms for people to understand. You are in sales and work on commission you don't produce you don't have money to pay bills, and your out of a job. Do you guys get it or let's put it do you moms get it. It's not all rainbows and lollipops in the real world. Why do we think our kids are entitled it doesn't work that way.


I think your arrogant and are not listening. The point is that if a kid is good enough to go D2 but cant get on the field on his HS team and then has to be play with them in summer or face retribution he will NEVER be looked at. My friends kid played at a powerhouse HS, he refused to play on their summer travel, in the end he actually sent his kid to a different HS where he started and received a big chunk of money from a D2 school. Not to mention, you thinkthe parent who lines the coaches pockets in the summer wont getter preferential treatment ?
Seems to me if you were truly being threatened or a HS coach were implying that this could effect your child's playing time, it should be brought to the attention of the school district administration and Board of Ed. I am sure this would solve any conflicts quickly.
Originally Posted by Anonymous

All this dam crying about fair and not fair. We have completely given in to the whining parent. If your kids not good enough he's not good enough that's it. Sorry if I am going to ruffle some feathers but its not PAL its not rec league where everyone get a trophy. A high school coaches career is measured on wins and losses. You win you keep your job as a coach you lose, bye bye. Thats it. Coaches,they coach and live, love the game but in the end its results. Let's put it in everyday terms for people to understand. You are in sales and work on commission you don't produce you don't have money to pay bills, and your out of a job. Do you guys get it or let's put it do you moms get it. It's not all rainbows and lollipops in the real world. Why do we think our kids are entitled it doesn't work that way.


I think the point might be that the kid IS good enough and the best situation for the kid might be to play on a select team and get better college looks then he might get on his HS team. and because WM amongst others have a very good team and the same kid might be starting as a soph on a lesser team and getting great college looks while at WM he may not play until his senior year where the best college opportunities may be gone. Chaminade might be the best example, 10th graders almost never play at Chaminade yet these boys play for various travel teams in the summer and get recruited the same kid at WM and is "encouraged" to play with the HS does not get those looks. so leaving pomposity out of it each parent must do what they think is best for their own kid and understand that there may be seen or unforeseen ramifications of that decision
Originally Posted by Powderfinger
Originally Posted by Anonymous


All this dam crying about fair and not fair. We have completely given in to the whining parent. If your kids not good enough he's not good enough that's it. Sorry if I am going to ruffle some feathers but its not PAL its not rec league where everyone get a trophy. A high school coaches career is measured on wins and losses. You win you keep your job as a coach you lose, bye bye. Thats it. Coaches,they coach and live, love the game but in the end its results. Let's put it in everyday terms for people to understand. You are in sales and work on commission you don't produce you don't have money to pay bills, and your out of a job. Do you guys get it or let's put it do you moms get it. It's not all rainbows and lollipops in the real world. Why do we think our kids are entitled it doesn't work that way.


What school district do you live in??? In my district and many others I've read about here on BOTC a coach keeps his/her job until he/she steps down. It has little to do with wins and losses.

I think what the schools mentioned above is doing is wrong on a number of levels, but you assuming that the parents complaining are whining because their kid isn't good enough is missing the point. The point is about control by and making money for the HS coaches. Kids get recruited at summer tournaments by and large, not at HS games.


Most under performing coaches are asked to step down. That has been what I have seen and been involved with. Rarely do you see changes at a succesful program. The high school coach isnt about individual play its about team play and having the players who will eventually being playing together from 9th-12th staying together in the off season. The more cohesive the team is, the better. Playing together all year is about that. The high school coach wants to win and is truly at a disadvantage because club teams are going year round and not just summer. To ensure success they are asking players and parents to commit to them. I wish my town would impliment this. Our problem is we are a smaller district and players are still deciding on baseball, soccer, and other sports so the player selection is limited. Look at Ward Melville and other High School programs that have implimented that type of strategy and the success they are having.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.


All this dam crying about fair and not fair. We have completely given in to the whining parent. If your kids not good enough he's not good enough that's it. Sorry if I am going to ruffle some feathers but its not PAL its not rec league where everyone get a trophy. A high school coaches career is measured on wins and losses. You win you keep your job as a coach you lose, bye bye. Thats it. Coaches,they coach and live, love the game but in the end its results. Let's put it in everyday terms for people to understand. You are in sales and work on commission you don't produce you don't have money to pay bills, and your out of a job. Do you guys get it or let's put it do you moms get it. It's not all rainbows and lollipops in the real world. Why do we think our kids are entitled it doesn't work that way.


I think your arrogant and are not listening. The point is that if a kid is good enough to go D2 but cant get on the field on his HS team and then has to be play with them in summer or face retribution he will NEVER be looked at. My friends kid played at a powerhouse HS, he refused to play on their summer travel, in the end he actually sent his kid to a different HS where he started and received a big chunk of money from a D2 school. Not to mention, you thinkthe parent who lines the coaches pockets in the summer wont getter preferential treatment ?


Thanks I am arrogant. Damm if your kid is good the coach will play them plain and simple. In real life you will face situations that you dont like like politics, nepotism etc but its how you teach your child to handle these situations. Good for your friend but most people dont have the means to do what he did. So what do you do? Work harder with Johnny and make him a better player so its impossible for the coach not to play him. Thats it. We have created a society of cry baby parents and kids that feel everyone is entitled. I feel bad for this generation of child should mom and dad go on their job interview with them because thats whats happening. If it doesent work mom and dad will fix it. Sad. You ever play D1 or Pro I have and its a dog eat dog world out there. All this A team B team even C teams at school, whats this crap about so we dont hurt anyones feelings. It teaches kids they dont have to work hard to make the varsity or JV because there will be a team for them. Please!!! parents writing town papers to complain about posting Deans list and honor roll listings because those not making it get upset. If my mom or dad ever said anything to my high school or travel coach I would be benched and my parents banned from coming to games. Thats the way it was. I feel bad for high school coaches. They are in a lose, lose situation and its only getting worse.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
To the poster above with the comment about sales--

You miss the point completely. If you sell you get paid--we agree, but what if yoour boss said--you must give kickbacks to get the sale? You must take 50% of your commision check and give it to me every month after you pay your taxes otherwise you cant sell for my or my company?

You would go find another job or you would break the law and give the guy your money...

Kids cant change schools and I really dont care about the HS coach and his coaching record. I care about my kid getting a fair shake.

I will leave it to you to worry about the coach and his record and whether your HS won the state championship.

Are you still bragging about your greatest HS sports moment???

Wake up.


Wake up and get out of sales find a differnt job. If your good your good and there are plenty of opportunities for good sales people. A fair shake is fine and I understand that. You live in NY and on Long Island you want the best for your child thats why you live here. You live in a town that has a long history of lacrosse so you have your kid play lacrosse. Hes good but cant crack the starting lineup and he wants to get better so an option is play travel to get better and more exposure. Well he gets better is in 9th grade and now the coach sees him and see hes better than all his attack but wont paly him. Isnt that counter productive to his goal of winning.

As for bragging about high school, where did that come from. Did I imply or say anyhthing in my post about where I palyed or who I played for. But since you brought it up I did play D1 and Pro ball. You superstar.
Can the statement about the 2018 west islip team be explained ?
To the D-1, Pro guy-

Good for you, happy you were a success not only in the field but in sales as well.

You are classic--

Either everyone agrees with you or they are whiny parents...

Not all about you my friend. And yes, I will do whatever it takes to give my kid the best possible shot. You agree dont you? It is a dog eat dog world, put yourself in the best possible situation to increase your odds of success. Is that not what you do in sales every day? Not about winning a county championship about getting into the best possible school with the best possible education.

I really dont disagree with much of what you say, I disagree with a HS coach telling any kid he cant play if he doesnt spend 9th 10th 11th grade summers on his town travel team as oppossed to a select travel team...

WM mommys crying again....you can go back 30 years & look at the WM varsity roster & look at the breakdown of classes...it hasnt changed...by the time your soft superstar is in 11th grade, his class is down to 12-15 kids, same goes for the 12th
graders, throw in 3-4 10th graders & there you go VARSITY lacrosse. i have been out of 3 village lax for awhile but it use to be about 70-80 kids per grade 3,4,5,6. Its a funnel.
eventually each class gets filtered down to 12-15. Most people would agree that the WM lax program is one of the eleite hs programs in the country, i believe they have a 90% winning %?
(maybe off a little)with that level of success there is a challenge....ultra competitive...a program cant be that consistant for so long without the coaches doing there jobs well & unfortunately too many mommy's & dadda's want to destry it because their soft superstar isnt getting playing time!
raising your soft superstar in a perfect world bubble is a big mistake...enjoy soft johhny when he is 30yrs. old & still on your nipple...great parenting
Originally Posted by Anonymous
WM mommys crying again....you can go back 30 years & look at the WM varsity roster & look at the breakdown of classes...it hasnt changed...by the time your soft superstar is in 11th grade, his class is down to 12-15 kids, same goes for the 12th
graders, throw in 3-4 10th graders & there you go VARSITY lacrosse. i have been out of 3 village lax for awhile but it use to be about 70-80 kids per grade 3,4,5,6. Its a funnel.
eventually each class gets filtered down to 12-15. Most people would agree that the WM lax program is one of the eleite hs programs in the country, i believe they have a 90% winning %?
(maybe off a little)with that level of success there is a challenge....ultra competitive...a program cant be that consistant for so long without the coaches doing there jobs well & unfortunately too many mommy's & dadda's want to destry it because their soft superstar isnt getting playing time!
raising your soft superstar in a perfect world bubble is a big mistake...enjoy soft johhny when he is 30yrs. old & still on your nipple...great parenting



Smithtown has similar issues, years ago the best players from Smithtown played for Smithtown youth. The talent was high and it was prestigious to make the team. The kids that didn't make it went to Express, etc. Over time many of the better players started to play exclusively for other clubs because the Smithtown Board caved to pressure and cut out many of the summer tourneys. Keeping the best town kids together is in the best interest of the overall program. Kids that don't make the cut should be free to explore their options elsewhere. Most of them don't make it for a reason and it's best to learn that early and move on to something else! This year a WM kid actually had the nerve to try to get onto team Smithtown and take a spot away from a Smithtown kid. Lasted for about 1 day!!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
To the D-1, Pro guy-

Good for you, happy you were a success not only in the field but in sales as well.

You are classic--

Either everyone agrees with you or they are whiny parents...

Not all about you my friend. And yes, I will do whatever it takes to give my kid the best possible shot. You agree dont you? It is a dog eat dog world, put yourself in the best possible situation to increase your odds of success. Is that not what you do in sales every day? Not about winning a county championship about getting into the best possible school with the best possible education.

I really dont disagree with much of what you say, I disagree with a HS coach telling any kid he cant play if he doesnt spend 9th 10th 11th grade summers on his town travel team as oppossed to a select travel team...


Again as I said before if the kid is good any coach will see that and play a player that increases his odds to win. I dont know by your posts but are you speaking from experience with this paticular issue. We all do whatever we can to provide the best of everything for our kids. A large percentage of time its a parent complaining Johnny isnt getting playing time but Johnny has not done a single iota of extra work to get better or they're the parent busy on the phone while Johnny is counting daisys in the field. They have no clue. If I am mistaken I am mistaken. The odds are slim that many kids will get a scholarship for lacrosse but lacrosse can give you the opportunity to go to a school you might not have been able to get in soley on grades. Love the game and understand that certain towns are trying to emulate what WM and WI have done over the years.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
WM mommys crying again....you can go back 30 years & look at the WM varsity roster & look at the breakdown of classes...it hasnt changed...by the time your soft superstar is in 11th grade, his class is down to 12-15 kids, same goes for the 12th
graders, throw in 3-4 10th graders & there you go VARSITY lacrosse. i have been out of 3 village lax for awhile but it use to be about 70-80 kids per grade 3,4,5,6. Its a funnel.
eventually each class gets filtered down to 12-15. Most people would agree that the WM lax program is one of the eleite hs programs in the country, i believe they have a 90% winning %?
(maybe off a little)with that level of success there is a challenge....ultra competitive...a program cant be that consistant for so long without the coaches doing there jobs well & unfortunately too many mommy's & dadda's want to destry it because their soft superstar isnt getting playing time!
raising your soft superstar in a perfect world bubble is a big mistake...enjoy soft johhny when he is 30yrs. old & still on your nipple...great parenting


Sarcasm aside, I agree with your funnel analog but back to the question at hand...If WM has 12-15 Seniors and 12-15 Juniors and 3-4 Sophomores (and I agree with your thought process) then how does Sophomores 5-6-7-8-9 and 10 get college looks if they stay with the high school team over the summer going into 10th grade, they will probably not be on the varsity summer team but the summer going into their sophomore year is now crucial to recruiting and I think that all the original poster was saying is if as a parent you think you have the best chance to get your son college looks playing with 91 the WM why shouldn't you be allowed without re-percussion, and how does the HS coach that has a financial interest in your son playing for the school team demand that he does?
You are a schmuck...You don't deserve a response, you deserve a smack.

Put on your big boy pants and your thinking cap.

Not about you silly little man, move into the future and away from your silly little meaningless past. The world has changed and silly people like you have moved on...sounds like life beat you up pretty good. Hope you recover and get to a place of peace!

for the last time, if you can focus, it is not about winning HS championships, except for people like you who continue to trade on them for 30 years??? wow, move on.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can the statement about the 2018 west islip team be explained ?


Yes, please explain. Are they still using out of town kids ? How is that helping the school program ?
I am fed up with arrogant over-zealous coaches,and their successful programs. My kid is the best, and I built a million dollar company, and me, my kid and my ten employees will roll on down to Ward Melville, and take on the Rotanzes and anyone else who cares to show up mano-a-mano on the field. But Tim R. has to play in flip flops. Fair is fair. Otherwise, I don't care. They can even play with Power Shafts. Except Tim, who has to use a whiffle ball bat. Who are these coaches and why do they think they can tell a bunch of kids what to do? I may be a nightmare, and I may be off my meds, but I'll get all MadLax on anyone who doesn't smile when speaking to the boys. I'm a parents dream, and this is my new ambition in life.
i think u need to be realistic with your sons ability & dont get caught up with all the soph. verbal commit. info you see on the internet.The Acc schols, Hop, ND, etc. they are scooping up very young talent at the lower age brackets. But these kids are heads & tails above others right now. Most recruiting classes are 10-12 kids thats it. so let all the bigtime schools take there 10-12. It still leaves A TON of excellent lacrosse schools to consider....and many of them follow players into jr. sr. year before offering a spot.Not to mention D2 & D3 dont get going until late jr. sr. year as well.
Look at the WM goalie this year, he didn't get looked at until spring of senior year. He did it right....kicked [lacrosse] in the classroom & was accepted to a few ivy's w/o lacrosse...he was given a spot at Cornell. Collge coaches are always communicating with hs coaches and asking, what do you have coming up? and again, if your kid has that potential, his hs coach will pass that along. i would also check out individual colleges that have one day clinics...some times called prospect days...usually resonable $$ the college coaching staff
puts the players through a typical team practice & they get to see what you have. Many do these in the fall on a Sunday...worth looking into. Last remember these hs coaches spend alot of time with your kid in season..6 days a week. They put the best players on the field based on what they see
6 days a week. You as a parent arent there to see how your kid is performing. Many parents just cant handle the reality...especially some of the parents who coached at the youth level & there kid is longer a star on the school team.bottom line is that if your kid plays on a LI hs team and is
recruit level, college coaches will find him. college coaches know where & how to find players.. there job depends on it. You as a parent have to be able to accept the truth of your kids ability...& that is a major problem when its not favorable.....but thats life!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
i think u need to be realistic with your sons ability & dont get caught up with all the soph. verbal commit. info you see on the internet.The Acc schols, Hop, ND, etc. they are scooping up very young talent at the lower age brackets. But these kids are heads & tails above others right now. Most recruiting classes are 10-12 kids thats it. so let all the bigtime schools take there 10-12. It still leaves A TON of excellent lacrosse schools to consider....and many of them follow players into jr. sr. year before offering a spot.Not to mention D2 & D3 dont get going until late jr. sr. year as well.
Look at the WM goalie this year, he didn't get looked at until spring of senior year. He did it right....kicked [lacrosse] in the classroom & was accepted to a few ivy's w/o lacrosse...he was given a spot at Cornell. Collge coaches are always communicating with hs coaches and asking, what do you have coming up? and again, if your kid has that potential, his hs coach will pass that along. i would also check out individual colleges that have one day clinics...some times called prospect days...usually resonable $$ the college coaching staff
puts the players through a typical team practice & they get to see what you have. Many do these in the fall on a Sunday...worth looking into. Last remember these hs coaches spend alot of time with your kid in season..6 days a week. They put the best players on the field based on what they see
6 days a week. You as a parent arent there to see how your kid is performing. Many parents just cant handle the reality...especially some of the parents who coached at the youth level & there kid is longer a star on the school team.bottom line is that if your kid plays on a LI hs team and is
recruit level, college coaches will find him. college coaches know where & how to find players.. there job depends on it. You as a parent have to be able to accept the truth of your kids ability...& that is a major problem when its not favorable.....but thats life!




bottom line, travel teams help kids find good fits at the college level that if they played only with their school team wold never ever of happened. Nobodys bitching that their kids dont get to play on the HS team, they are upset that these HS coaches are trying to STOP them from going someplace where they CAN play and get RECRUITED. Like I said, if my buddys kid did what some of these posters suggested he lax days would be over and he would be paying full freight. Instead he is playing d2 with a half scholarship. WHy is anyone here against that ?
Another person missing the point...not about one kid, about a system where HS coaches are strong arming all kids in their disctrict to either play (and Pay) for their travel team or forget about playing HS lax...

Come on people, you don't see this as a major conflict? HS coaches should be banned from running clinics and teams in the sprots they coach at the HS level.

Unlike college coaches, most LI public HS coaches are not professional coaches, they are teachers that coach for the extra cash. They teach bio and math and spanish and gym, they dont get their jobs because they are great coaches in any sport, they get their jobs because they can teach bio and math...

They are using their positions of power to force people to pay them. Plain and simple, conflict of interest.



Originally Posted by Anonymous
i think u need to be realistic with your sons ability & dont get caught up with all the soph. verbal commit. info you see on the internet.The Acc schols, Hop, ND, etc. they are scooping up very young talent at the lower age brackets. But these kids are heads & tails above others right now. Most recruiting classes are 10-12 kids thats it. so let all the bigtime schools take there 10-12. It still leaves A TON of excellent lacrosse schools to consider....and many of them follow players into jr. sr. year before offering a spot.Not to mention D2 & D3 dont get going until late jr. sr. year as well.
Look at the WM goalie this year, he didn't get looked at until spring of senior year. He did it right....kicked [lacrosse] in the classroom & was accepted to a few ivy's w/o lacrosse...he was given a spot at Cornell. Collge coaches are always communicating with hs coaches and asking, what do you have coming up? and again, if your kid has that potential, his hs coach will pass that along. i would also check out individual colleges that have one day clinics...some times called prospect days...usually resonable $$ the college coaching staff
puts the players through a typical team practice & they get to see what you have. Many do these in the fall on a Sunday...worth looking into. Last remember these hs coaches spend alot of time with your kid in season..6 days a week. They put the best players on the field based on what they see
6 days a week. You as a parent arent there to see how your kid is performing. Many parents just cant handle the reality...especially some of the parents who coached at the youth level & there kid is longer a star on the school team.bottom line is that if your kid plays on a LI hs team and is
recruit level, college coaches will find him. college coaches know where & how to find players.. there job depends on it. You as a parent have to be able to accept the truth of your kids ability...& that is a major problem when its not favorable.....but thats life!


That was a great post, thanks! All I can add is that your child (son or daughter) and the parents need to visit as many schools as possible so you can see what the campus, population and area are like. Are these schools the right fit for you all? Distance, price, competition level, etc... Contact the coaches by email or telephone... The one day clinics are a great way to visit campus, meet coaching staff and some players... Good luck!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
WM mommys crying again....you can go back 30 years & look at the WM varsity roster & look at the breakdown of classes...it hasnt changed...by the time your soft superstar is in 11th grade, his class is down to 12-15 kids, same goes for the 12th
graders, throw in 3-4 10th graders & there you go VARSITY lacrosse. i have been out of 3 village lax for awhile but it use to be about 70-80 kids per grade 3,4,5,6. Its a funnel.
eventually each class gets filtered down to 12-15. Most people would agree that the WM lax program is one of the eleite hs programs in the country, i believe they have a 90% winning %?
(maybe off a little)with that level of success there is a challenge....ultra competitive...a program cant be that consistant for so long without the coaches doing there jobs well & unfortunately too many mommy's & dadda's want to destry it because their soft superstar isnt getting playing time!
raising your soft superstar in a perfect world bubble is a big mistake...enjoy soft johhny when he is 30yrs. old & still on your nipple...great parenting


HA...you said nipple
There are 54 D1, 30 D2 men's college lacrosse teams that offer scholarships. I believe the number of scholarships per D1 team is 16.9. As a college coach you can chop up that 16.9 to full, half, quarter scholarships. Take away Ivy but they have creative financial aide. If on average there are 35 players per D1 program that's approximately 1800 D 1 players covering 4-5 graduation years out of the huge numbers playing in this country. If a coach were to get real creative with his scholarships and give out 1/2 to everyone on his team that's only 1728 scholarships per cycle of players. It's a number that is always in flux based on what he needs to do.

Odds are parents your child is not going to get a scholarship there are over 500,000 registered youth lacrosse players and the number is growing year to year. Don't get so caught up in this craziness. Let your kid have a great experience with his friends and teammates allowing him to just be a kid.
Well said for the most part. Lucky for the WM goalie to get seen late in the season of his senior year by Cornell. What if WM did not have the same kind of season? He would have ended up going to Bowdoin where he already committed. You then have to ask, why wasn't he seen earlier? How come he was missed? Did he play club or play with his HS team on a mixed grade level?

Originally Posted by Anonymous
i think u need to be realistic with your sons ability & dont get caught up with all the soph. verbal commit. info you see on the internet.The Acc schols, Hop, ND, etc. they are scooping up very young talent at the lower age brackets. But these kids are heads & tails above others right now. Most recruiting classes are 10-12 kids thats it. so let all the bigtime schools take there 10-12. It still leaves A TON of excellent lacrosse schools to consider....and many of them follow players into jr. sr. year before offering a spot.Not to mention D2 & D3 dont get going until late jr. sr. year as well.
Look at the WM goalie this year, he didn't get looked at until spring of senior year. He did it right....kicked [lacrosse] in the classroom & was accepted to a few ivy's w/o lacrosse...he was given a spot at Cornell. Collge coaches are always communicating with hs coaches and asking, what do you have coming up? and again, if your kid has that potential, his hs coach will pass that along. i would also check out individual colleges that have one day clinics...some times called prospect days...usually resonable $$ the college coaching staff
puts the players through a typical team practice & they get to see what you have. Many do these in the fall on a Sunday...worth looking into. Last remember these hs coaches spend alot of time with your kid in season..6 days a week. They put the best players on the field based on what they see
6 days a week. You as a parent arent there to see how your kid is performing. Many parents just cant handle the reality...especially some of the parents who coached at the youth level & there kid is longer a star on the school team.bottom line is that if your kid plays on a LI hs team and is
recruit level, college coaches will find him. college coaches know where & how to find players.. there job depends on it. You as a parent have to be able to accept the truth of your kids ability...& that is a major problem when its not favorable.....but thats life!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Another person missing the point...not about one kid, about a system where HS coaches are strong arming all kids in their disctrict to either play (and Pay) for their travel team or forget about playing HS lax...

Come on people, you don't see this as a major conflict? HS coaches should be banned from running clinics and teams in the sprots they coach at the HS level.

Unlike college coaches, most LI public HS coaches are not professional coaches, they are teachers that coach for the extra cash. They teach bio and math and spanish and gym, they dont get their jobs because they are great coaches in any sport, they get their jobs because they can teach bio and math...

They are using their positions of power to force people to pay them. Plain and simple, conflict of interest.





Really come on. The great programs make room for a good coach who happens to be a teacher. When a great coach who runs a great program decides to step down his predecessor is already picked from either a core of assistant coaches from within or a bug name coach. With the cost of living on Long Island getting more and more expensive teachers and coaches must supplement their income and if they are a name in the lacrosse world he will draw. Now we are going to tell teachers they can't tutor on the side.
what would have happened? Bowdoin would have been Nescac champs 4 straight yrs! are you kidding me? its life...this kid
rose to the occasion his sr year...for 22 straight games was brilliant. How was he missed? really? he wasnt missed, he didnt separate himself from the pack until sr. year. He played solid as a junior...not great. he should be an inspiration to many kids...keep working hard good things can happen...not guaranteed, but can happen.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are 54 D1, 30 D2 men's college lacrosse teams that offer scholarships. I believe the number of scholarships per D1 team is 16.9. As a college coach you can chop up that 16.9 to full, half, quarter scholarships. Take away Ivy but they have creative financial aide. If on average there are 35 players per D1 program that's approximately 1800 D 1 players covering 4-5 graduation years out of the huge numbers playing in this country. If a coach were to get real creative with his scholarships and give out 1/2 to everyone on his team that's only 1728 scholarships per cycle of players. It's a number that is always in flux based on what he needs to do.

Odds are parents your child is not going to get a scholarship there are over 500,000 registered youth lacrosse players and the number is growing year to year. Don't get so caught up in this craziness. Let your kid have a great experience with his friends and teammates allowing him to just be a kid.


I thought it was only 13 scholarships per D1 mens team?
It is a conflict and it should be stopped.

Do the HS coaches at WM also give private lessons for $$?

Does anyone know if any of the coaches have given private lessons to any of their players in the past?



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are 54 D1, 30 D2 men's college lacrosse teams that offer scholarships. I believe the number of scholarships per D1 team is 16.9. As a college coach you can chop up that 16.9 to full, half, quarter scholarships. Take away Ivy but they have creative financial aide. If on average there are 35 players per D1 program that's approximately 1800 D 1 players covering 4-5 graduation years out of the huge numbers playing in this country. If a coach were to get real creative with his scholarships and give out 1/2 to everyone on his team that's only 1728 scholarships per cycle of players. It's a number that is always in flux based on what he needs to do.

Odds are parents your child is not going to get a scholarship there are over 500,000 registered youth lacrosse players and the number is growing year to year. Don't get so caught up in this craziness. Let your kid have a great experience with his friends and teammates allowing him to just be a kid.


I thought it was only 13 scholarships per D1 mens team?

It's 12.6 scholarships for D1. Also they normally carry a roster of 40-45. Every player expects to get something because being a D1 athlete is like a full time job. Many of the kids on the roster won't even see the field. The best kids may get a little more than half. Full rides simply don't happen. Actually they can but it would be for an exceptional player going to an average school. A tradeoff. Most kids would not go for that. A really good player going to a really good school can expect a quarter to half (if they are really lucky). The money positions, where a little more money is offered are goalie, lefty attack and face off. Your kid can get a scholarship, don't let anyone tell them they can't! But, they need to want it, not you, and it takes talent, self-motivated hard work, and a little luck. Getting onto a good club team can help especially if your HS coach isn't plying you. The other problem is that great HS programs usually don't play even the good kids to much until they're juniors and seniors. This is a problem because the spots are scarce by then. One more thing, check out the roster of any good D1 program, you will see that about 80% of the kids are from prep schools. The rich spoiled brats are taking most of the spots from regular kids, even though public schools make up the bulk of youth lax players. Not that they don't deserve it, but they have been carefully groomed and manipulated from an early age, putting all the regular kids at an even bigger disadvantage when it comes recruting. This is partly because many of them are holdbacks, but also because they are at all the best camps/clinics/trainers/tournaments. Seems like a no-win situation where the rich get richer, and the poor.... but for the kids who make it, it's the best feeling in the world. Good luck to everyone on this journey!If the kid has talent, most likely, he will be noticed!
its not about winning championships? lax is a team sport, correct? are you saying its all about getting little johnny recruited? if so, your in the wrong sport. i think too many parents do not care how their hs team does during the season & if johnny gets his 4 goals a game he gunna get recruited...yea for jihnny!!! some teammate he is.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
its not about winning championships? lax is a team sport, correct? are you saying its all about getting little johnny recruited? if so, your in the wrong sport. i think too many parents do not care how their hs team does during the season & if johnny gets his 4 goals a game he gunna get recruited...yea for jihnny!!! some teammate he is.

For many parents, especially those whose kid excels, it does become about recruiting. That's just the way it is. Yes it is a team sport, later Johnny can thank his mediocre team mates for helping him get into/help pay for a great college, by making him stand out. Hopefully they will remain friends ! Everyone can't be a superstar, but it is nice to know you helped someone get there too!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
its not about winning championships? lax is a team sport, correct? are you saying its all about getting little johnny recruited? if so, your in the wrong sport. i think too many parents do not care how their hs team does during the season & if johnny gets his 4 goals a game he gunna get recruited...yea for jihnny!!! some teammate he is.


The off season should be about helping all players improve. The HS should be about winning but in the off season kids should not be restricted.

WM has been a dominant team for the better part of 40 years, what they do in a few summer tournaments has not been the reason for their dominance.

What takes place in three village is wrong.

The HS coaches and the three village board coerce and bully families into playing only for three v / WM even when it is not in the best interest of the player.

At a Town Hall Meeting the HS coaches and three village board members stood up and told the community "We have the best coaches here in three village, there is no need to go anywhere else".

Do you know how many three village board members send their kids to private lessons and clinics that they do not tell the rest of the team or league about?

If the best coaches are in three village why send them to an outside clinic?

I do not have an issue with the HS coach wanting to work with his players in the off season but the way it is being done at WM is wrong.

If money is changing hands it is a major conflict of interest.

If there is an implied threat it is wrong.

If it is not in the best interest of the player it is wrong.

Winning at the HS should be a priority for the HS coach but what they do in the off season could be altered in order to better prepare for the Varsity season.

Limited practice and five meaningless tournaments is not he best way to prepare for the Varsity Season.



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
its not about winning championships? lax is a team sport, correct? are you saying its all about getting little johnny recruited? if so, your in the wrong sport. i think too many parents do not care how their hs team does during the season & if johnny gets his 4 goals a game he gunna get recruited...yea for jihnny!!! some teammate he is.


The off season should be about helping all players improve. The HS should be about winning but in the off season kids should not be restricted.

WM has been a dominant team for the better part of 40 years, what they do in a few summer tournaments has not been the reason for their dominance.

What takes place in three village is wrong.

The HS coaches and the three village board coerce and bully families into playing only for three v / WM even when it is not in the best interest of the player.

At a Town Hall Meeting the HS coaches and three village board members stood up and told the community "We have the best coaches here in three village, there is no need to go anywhere else".

Do you know how many three village board members send their kids to private lessons and clinics that they do not tell the rest of the team or league about?

If the best coaches are in three village why send them to an outside clinic?

I do not have an issue with the HS coach wanting to work with his players in the off season but the way it is being done at WM is wrong.

If money is changing hands it is a major conflict of interest.

If there is an implied threat it is wrong.

If it is not in the best interest of the player it is wrong.

Winning at the HS should be a priority for the HS coach but what they do in the off season could be altered in order to better prepare for the Varsity season.

Limited practice and five meaningless tournaments is not he best way to prepare for the Varsity Season.





It seems this has been the growing trend in quite a few lax towns. I agree, it is a total conflict of interest.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
its not about winning championships? lax is a team sport, correct? are you saying its all about getting little johnny recruited? if so, your in the wrong sport. i think too many parents do not care how their hs team does during the season & if johnny gets his 4 goals a game he gunna get recruited...yea for jihnny!!! some teammate he is.


The off season should be about helping all players improve. The HS should be about winning but in the off season kids should not be restricted.

WM has been a dominant team for the better part of 40 years, what they do in a few summer tournaments has not been the reason for their dominance.

What takes place in three village is wrong.

The HS coaches and the three village board coerce and bully families into playing only for three v / WM even when it is not in the best interest of the player.

At a Town Hall Meeting the HS coaches and three village board members stood up and told the community "We have the best coaches here in three village, there is no need to go anywhere else".

Do you know how many three village board members send their kids to private lessons and clinics that they do not tell the rest of the team or league about?

If the best coaches are in three village why send them to an outside clinic?

I do not have an issue with the HS coach wanting to work with his players in the off season but the way it is being done at WM is wrong.

If money is changing hands it is a major conflict of interest.

If there is an implied threat it is wrong.

If it is not in the best interest of the player it is wrong.

Winning at the HS should be a priority for the HS coach but what they do in the off season could be altered in order to better prepare for the Varsity season.

Limited practice and five meaningless tournaments is not he best way to prepare for the Varsity Season.



what is the best way to prepare? not sure i understand your point. wm summer team plays in the same summer touraments that the top club teams play in, wm plays it the top level
of each tournament....so if you were to play for a club team, you are doing the same, no?
clubs pratcice a few times a week as well...ive never heard of a senario where a kid played outside 3 village & it was held against him....that is just bs...these coaches put the best players on the field. 2 maybe 3 yrs ago, wm goalie now at (tufts)? played outside the program
for many years & he started on the varsity ....best players will play..too many parents who's kids ARE NOT good enough will [lacrosse] until the cows come home, stop the whining
do you have a better way to improve in the off season? example?
how would you do it?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
its not about winning championships? lax is a team sport, correct? are you saying its all about getting little johnny recruited? if so, your in the wrong sport. i think too many parents do not care how their hs team does during the season & if johnny gets his 4 goals a game he gunna get recruited...yea for jihnny!!! some teammate he is.


The off season should be about helping all players improve. The HS should be about winning but in the off season kids should not be restricted.

WM has been a dominant team for the better part of 40 years, what they do in a few summer tournaments has not been the reason for their dominance.

What takes place in three village is wrong.

The HS coaches and the three village board coerce and bully families into playing only for three v / WM even when it is not in the best interest of the player.

At a Town Hall Meeting the HS coaches and three village board members stood up and told the community "We have the best coaches here in three village, there is no need to go anywhere else".

Do you know how many three village board members send their kids to private lessons and clinics that they do not tell the rest of the team or league about?

If the best coaches are in three village why send them to an outside clinic?

I do not have an issue with the HS coach wanting to work with his players in the off season but the way it is being done at WM is wrong.

If money is changing hands it is a major conflict of interest.

If there is an implied threat it is wrong.

If it is not in the best interest of the player it is wrong.

Winning at the HS should be a priority for the HS coach but what they do in the off season could be altered in order to better prepare for the Varsity season.

Limited practice and five meaningless tournaments is not he best way to prepare for the Varsity Season.

I think the fact that the school district is very large which means more kids to chose from has more to do with the success than the coaches who feel they are the "gold" standard. As with most sports the good coaches have the most talent to work with.



this post is a crock ....the wm summer teams only have 25 players...all the kids play. if you are a wm parent you would know this. you do get the exposure to recruiters...every kid played including goalies. the 12-15 kid senario is bogus.
agreed I actually thought they had 27 sound like sour grapes to a disgruntled parent .
Mine is on and made the team. Happy he did but understand that others will not be as happy...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
this post is a crock ....the wm summer teams only have 25 players...all the kids play. if you are a wm parent you would know this. you do get the exposure to recruiters...every kid played including goalies. the 12-15 kid senario is bogus.

Truly glad that your son had a great experience. No sarcasm here. As a 3V parent, this is helpful to know. A concern I have is that the WM Summer Teams ( both Green and Gold) play multi grade level which is not ideal for recruiting. I'm sure parents will come on and defend this, but its not Does the Green Team play in the top division? I know for a fact that the Gold team made up of rising 10 th and 11th graders did not play in the top division. So is this the best way to be seen if this was your goal? If thats not the goal for yiur son, then its fine Maybe it's a good way to help get playing time for your son on the school team. My dilemma brings me back to the original thread. What if my son wants to play in the most competitive tournaments to improve his game? What if he feels that club will help him reach his goal? Will a high school coach hold it against him because he felt he wasn't being loyal when school was not in session? If my sons not good enough to be the chosen 12-15 during the school season, I'm realistic and would get the lack of playing time. However, if he was deserving and wasn't given a chance because he didn't help contribute to the coach's summer salary, there's a definite conflict. I guess we'll have to roll the dice this year.
I think last year it was 28 or 29 players on the Green team.

Who cares, the question is:

Is it a conflict of interest for a High School Coach to coerce players into playing for a summer team when he has a financial interest in that team?

Be Honest...

To those of you who believe that (the coach will play the best players) I will challenge you by saying that (the coach will play who he believes to be the best players). They may or may not be the best players but it is his decision.

In a district the size of Ward Melville there are very good players who do not get on the field. The coach does not always select the best player. Take a look at this years team, many of their best players did not see much playing time as juniors. Were last years Seniors so much better??

I am not questioning the coaches, I am pointing out that they are blessed with depth and that not every kid can get quality playing time.

If you feel that your son would be better served by doing something different for the summer so be it. No player should be punished for trying to get better and help himself.

The question is: Is it a conflict of interest????





Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think last year it was 28 or 29 players on the Green team.

Who cares, the question is:

Is it a conflict of interest for a High School Coach to coerce players into playing for a summer team when he has a financial interest in that team?

Be Honest...

To those of you who believe that (the coach will play the best players) I will challenge you by saying that (the coach will play who he believes to be the best players). They may or may not be the best players but it is his decision.

In a district the size of Ward Melville there are very good players who do not get on the field. The coach does not always select the best player. Take a look at this years team, many of their best players did not see much playing time as juniors. Were last years Seniors so much better??

I am not questioning the coaches, I am pointing out that they are blessed with depth and that not every kid can get quality playing time.

If you feel that your son would be better served by doing something different for the summer so be it. No player should be punished for trying to get better and help himself.

The question is: Is it a conflict of interest????


It is if the coaches (town and school) advise them to not play club. They claim they are trying to build a program, but I need to be paid for their time. No problem with that or the hs coaches making money. However, there should be no pressure to play. That is ridiculous and that behavior/policy is unacceptable. The club vs town/school issue rages on.... These coaches should just form a club and embrace it. Imagine a club run by the wm, Smithtown, and sachem coaches.





are you kidding? the coaches only put who they think are the best players.... yea! who should pick then you? you are delusional. lets have mommy pick... did you read what you wrote or are you that clueless? this yrs sr class WAS & Is that much better. Hands down. Bottom line its a numbers game
hot everyone can get on the field. Move to a district that doesnt have as competitive of a program & your superstar will have a mailbox full of full schollys. as far as sm wm & sachem
putting a club together? another clueless statement...all great programs ...too many kids! same program again.
you parents ran the dads coaching the hs summer team out of town, that concept wasnt right because all the dad's kids were getting all the full rides so then you wanted the hs coaches involved...NOW thats not working...lets have MOMMMY coach!
another parent mis informed....playing multi level not
ideal for recruiting? com'on...lets see, petey only plays well against kids his own age....lol coaches know what grade a player is in. And if your playing on a team like WM, coaches
have a very high level of respect for the WM program & that goes a long way for your kid...more than you know...so the fact that a 9, 10th grader is playing on WM team gets you interest.they dont expect that kid to be dominating a raising senior...they are looking at lax iq, hustle, etc. maybe you should contact a college coach and ask, what do you look for
in a player? you may be surprised & certainly tell them you play in the WM program....your other comment, what if my son wants to play in a more competitive tournament? you REALLY me that YOU want him to play in a more competitive tournament! on other words your kid only plays his best when he is on a "stacked" team? one thing you will find out after the conversation with that college coach is that they look for kids that make the other players around them, BETTER! they want NOTHING to do with the prima donna that can only play with good players. Last ask that coach why they ALWAYS talk to the kids hs coach? because these club coaches are full of crap
when it comes to a kids talent level....follow the money...clubs will keep telling you are a cant miss D1 player...why? cause they want your $$$ next year & next year
etc. Dont forget the club scens has many levels...each club has a #1 team. if you're not on it, your tosing your money away
espcially if your a wm kid...talk about a drop off. you shouldnt lose sight of the value playing for the WM program.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
are you kidding? the coaches only put who they think are the best players.... yea! who should pick then you? you are delusional. lets have mommy pick... did you read what you wrote or are you that clueless? this yrs sr class WAS & Is that much better. Hands down. Bottom line its a numbers game
hot everyone can get on the field. Move to a district that doesnt have as competitive of a program & your superstar will have a mailbox full of full schollys. as far as sm wm & sachem
putting a club together? another clueless statement...all great programs ...too many kids! same program again.
you parents ran the dads coaching the hs summer team out of town, that concept wasnt right because all the dad's kids were getting all the full rides so then you wanted the hs coaches involved...NOW thats not working...lets have MOMMMY coach!


Go back and read it again. You have a bug up your a-- about something. No complaining about who plays and who does not. I said it is up to the coach. I said that there are very good kids that sometimes do not get to play (like when this years seniors were juniors) not all of them saw a lot of time. (were they not good as juniors?)

You either can't read or you can't comprehend.

Simple question, is it a conflict of interest?
where is the example of a player being punished? a lot of talk here about it...any example? find it hard to believe.
i heard 5 ninth graders are on green team. not right they should pay there dues on gold before going to green.
they didnt play as juniors because at that point in time, there were better players a head of them. Remember the coach plays who HE thinks is the best players. dont forget, players
improve, some stay the same, and some regress. the WM pole has an amazing senior year..took advatange of the opportunity & made the best of it. same thing for this year, which kids will step up ? there are a lot of 2014's that have the potential to have great senior years. wait & see.
i dont see a conflict. if its true that the melville summer team plays all 25-29 (whatever the #) players, how is this a problem? i assume making the summer team is tough, most spring varsity rosters are closer to 40 & they have a 2nd team gold, which is a jv team. There was a previous post about a funnel & how the numbers of players widdles down as the palyers get older. so its about 50 -55 players for the summer. if your NOT in the top 50 of your hs, are you recruit level? these coaches are not strong arming anyone, thats alot of nonsense. if you get get cut these teams (& this is why they have tryouts in Aug) so you can go to a club & find a home. get real with your kid, just because you or your kid wants to play college lacrosse are you really capable? odds are if your not making the cut now, chill out with being so obsessed with getting recruited. Tons of college club teams to play for & will give you a great lax experience etc.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
another parent mis informed....playing multi level not
ideal for recruiting? com'on...lets see, petey only plays well against kids his own age....lol coaches know what grade a player is in. And if your playing on a team like WM, coaches
have a very high level of respect for the WM program & that goes a long way for your kid...more than you know...so the fact that a 9, 10th grader is playing on WM team gets you interest.they dont expect that kid to be dominating a raising senior...they are looking at lax iq, hustle, etc. maybe you should contact a college coach and ask, what do you look for
in a player? you may be surprised & certainly tell them you play in the WM program....your other comment, what if my son wants to play in a more competitive tournament? you REALLY me that YOU want him to play in a more competitive tournament! on other words your kid only plays his best when he is on a "stacked" team? one thing you will find out after the conversation with that college coach is that they look for kids that make the other players around them, BETTER! they want NOTHING to do with the prima donna that can only play with good players. Last ask that coach why they ALWAYS talk to the kids hs coach? because these club coaches are full of crap
when it comes to a kids talent level....follow the money...clubs will keep telling you are a cant miss D1 player...why? cause they want your $$$ next year & next year
etc. Dont forget the club scens has many levels...each club has a #1 team. if you're not on it, your tosing your money away
espcially if your a wm kid...talk about a drop off. you shouldnt lose sight of the value playing for the WM program.




First of all, my post was trying to be positive. You have a lot of anger and clearly don't even want to see both point of views. Calling me misinformed demonstrates that. Please read objectively.

Let's start with your first argument about multi level. Maybe you should talk to some of the WM 2012 Summer Green Team parents about how when WM got on the field to play as rising seniors even though there were younger players, there were instances when coaches walked away assuming that if a senior was that good he would have been committed already. Some of these coaches were unaware that mixed grades were playing. This was a big disadvantage for rising juniors. This is a fact and a valid concern. Hopefully, this was rectified for the players this summer.

Of course, coaches look for hustle and lacrosse IQ. You offered no new insight there. Coaches also look at the behavior of the player on and off the field as well as their parents' behavior. This holds true for both WM and club.

Of course, playing for WM during the school season holds weight with college coaches. WM has a long history of great lacrosse. Not sure it holds as much weight during the summer. You should ask them that. Some coaches want to know if you can mesh well with players from other towns and not just the ones that you have played PAL with since 2nd grade. After all, you are not taking your entire HS team to college with you.

As far as your point of wanting my son to play on a "stacked" team, I never said that. I think it is a benefit for my son to play in more competitive tournaments as does he, so he can be amongst some of the most competitive players in his age group. This shows us where he falls and what he needs to work on. It helps raise his level of play. It's good for him to learn from players that he does not play with all the time and be inspired by them. This does not mean he doesn't look up to his school teammates because he has respect for them too. This also does not mean that he is a "prima donna" as you put it. If you knew my son at all, you would know that he is a very unselfish player. I guess name calling and insulting a young teen makes you feel better and somehow makes you think your point is valid.

As far as the "club scene" that you negatively refer too, he is on the #1 team since you brought it up. That doesn't mean that the B Teams do not have talent which I am sure you are aware of since they have beaten 3V's A team on many occasion including Patriots Elite's team as well.

Yes, playing club does cost more $, but probably not as much $ as you would think. You get what you pay for. It's probably comparable to all the $ WM kids pay for private lessons and the clinics they try to take discretely after the parents proclaim that we have the best coaches anywhere and no need to go anywhere else. In years to come if my son wants to play college lacrosse and if he has the talent and the grades, I have no doubt that my son's club coaches and school coaches will do whatever they can to help him get recruited whether it be D1, D2, or D3.

All these boys will be playing school lacrosse together. It's important that we respect each other and the different decisions parents made for their sons. In all situations, everyone has their child's best interest in mind. There are just different avenues for helping your child improve his lacrosse skills. We never lost sight of playing for a WM program. We live in the district first for it's reputation for a great education, it's a wonderful community to raise a family and it certainly helps that my children love lacrosse in a district that excels at the sport.

I have faith that our HS coach would never hold it against an athlete based on where he decided to play during the off season. Each player needs to be evaluated each season based on school tryouts. Because then surely it would be a conflict of interest if WM's coach cut or didn't play a deserving athlete due to that athlete not contributing to his summer salary.
I think your stirring the pot by making that statement teams haven't been emailed yet.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
are you kidding? the coaches only put who they think are the best players.... yea! who should pick then you? you are delusional. lets have mommy pick... did you read what you wrote or are you that clueless? this yrs sr class WAS & Is that much better. Hands down. Bottom line its a numbers game
hot everyone can get on the field. Move to a district that doesnt have as competitive of a program & your superstar will have a mailbox full of full schollys. as far as sm wm & sachem
putting a club together? another clueless statement...all great programs ...too many kids! same program again.
you parents ran the dads coaching the hs summer team out of town, that concept wasnt right because all the dad's kids were getting all the full rides so then you wanted the hs coaches involved...NOW thats not working...lets have MOMMMY coach!


did you make a point? i think i missed it. because it reads like complete jabberwockey...
Agreed -- no one has been informed who is on what team yet. A little early to say that there are 9th graders on a team....
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
another parent mis informed....playing multi level not
ideal for recruiting? com'on...lets see, petey only plays well against kids his own age....lol coaches know what grade a player is in. And if your playing on a team like WM, coaches
have a very high level of respect for the WM program & that goes a long way for your kid...more than you know...so the fact that a 9, 10th grader is playing on WM team gets you interest.they dont expect that kid to be dominating a raising senior...they are looking at lax iq, hustle, etc. maybe you should contact a college coach and ask, what do you look for
in a player? you may be surprised & certainly tell them you play in the WM program....your other comment, what if my son wants to play in a more competitive tournament? you REALLY me that YOU want him to play in a more competitive tournament! on other words your kid only plays his best when he is on a "stacked" team? one thing you will find out after the conversation with that college coach is that they look for kids that make the other players around them, BETTER! they want NOTHING to do with the prima donna that can only play with good players. Last ask that coach why they ALWAYS talk to the kids hs coach? because these club coaches are full of crap
when it comes to a kids talent level....follow the money...clubs will keep telling you are a cant miss D1 player...why? cause they want your $$$ next year & next year
etc. Dont forget the club scens has many levels...each club has a #1 team. if you're not on it, your tosing your money away
espcially if your a wm kid...talk about a drop off. you shouldnt lose sight of the value playing for the WM program.




First of all, my post was trying to be positive. You have a lot of anger and clearly don't even want to see both point of views. Calling me misinformed demonstrates that. Please read objectively.

Let's start with your first argument about multi level. Maybe you should talk to some of the WM 2012 Summer Green Team parents about how when WM got on the field to play as rising seniors even though there were younger players, there were instances when coaches walked away assuming that if a senior was that good he would have been committed already. Some of these coaches were unaware that mixed grades were playing. This was a big disadvantage for rising juniors. This is a fact and a valid concern. Hopefully, this was rectified for the players this summer.

Of course, coaches look for hustle and lacrosse IQ. You offered no new insight there. Coaches also look at the behavior of the player on and off the field as well as their parents' behavior. This holds true for both WM and club.

Of course, playing for WM during the school season holds weight with college coaches. WM has a long history of great lacrosse. Not sure it holds as much weight during the summer. You should ask them that. Some coaches want to know if you can mesh well with players from other towns and not just the ones that you have played PAL with since 2nd grade. After all, you are not taking your entire HS team to college with you.

As far as your point of wanting my son to play on a "stacked" team, I never said that. I think it is a benefit for my son to play in more competitive tournaments as does he, so he can be amongst some of the most competitive players in his age group. This shows us where he falls and what he needs to work on. It helps raise his level of play. It's good for him to learn from players that he does not play with all the time and be inspired by them. This does not mean he doesn't look up to his school teammates because he has respect for them too. This also does not mean that he is a "prima donna" as you put it. If you knew my son at all, you would know that he is a very unselfish player. I guess name calling and insulting a young teen makes you feel better and somehow makes you think your point is valid.

As far as the "club scene" that you negatively refer too, he is on the #1 team since you brought it up. That doesn't mean that the B Teams do not have talent which I am sure you are aware of since they have beaten 3V's A team on many occasion including Patriots Elite's team as well.

Yes, playing club does cost more $, but probably not as much $ as you would think. You get what you pay for. It's probably comparable to all the $ WM kids pay for private lessons and the clinics they try to take discretely after the parents proclaim that we have the best coaches anywhere and no need to go anywhere else. In years to come if my son wants to play college lacrosse and if he has the talent and the grades, I have no doubt that my son's club coaches and school coaches will do whatever they can to help him get recruited whether it be D1, D2, or D3.

All these boys will be playing school lacrosse together. It's important that we respect each other and the different decisions parents made for their sons. In all situations, everyone has their child's best interest in mind. There are just different avenues for helping your child improve his lacrosse skills. We never lost sight of playing for a WM program. We live in the district first for it's reputation for a great education, it's a wonderful community to raise a family and it certainly helps that my children love lacrosse in a district that excels at the sport.

I have faith that our HS coach would never hold it against an athlete based on where he decided to play during the off season. Each player needs to be evaluated each season based on school tryouts. Because then surely it would be a conflict of interest if WM's coach cut or didn't play a deserving athlete due to that athlete not contributing to his summer salary.


BRAVO! See you all at the club tryouts over the next few weeks...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
they didnt play as juniors because at that point in time, there were better players a head of them. Remember the coach plays who HE thinks is the best players. dont forget, players
improve, some stay the same, and some regress. the WM pole has an amazing senior year..took advatange of the opportunity & made the best of it. same thing for this year, which kids will step up ? there are a lot of 2014's that have the potential to have great senior years. wait & see.


Do you truly believe that the coaches get it right 100% of the time?

At WM there are very good players that do not get quality playing time and that is OK. But please do not insist that "the coaches play the best kids".

The coaches try their best and they play who they believe to be the best but every year there are very good players who do not see the field. Every kid they play is good but not every good player gets to play. That is reality, not a complaint.

If the WM coaches do not favor you son in the 9th or 10th grade does it make sense to play with WM in the summer if he could play for a strong club team?

I am not sure what to do.

But this is the situation that makes me ask the question.

Is it a conflict of interest for the HS Coach?

I think it is.


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
they didnt play as juniors because at that point in time, there were better players a head of them. Remember the coach plays who HE thinks is the best players. dont forget, players
improve, some stay the same, and some regress. the WM pole has an amazing senior year..took advatange of the opportunity & made the best of it. same thing for this year, which kids will step up ? there are a lot of 2014's that have the potential to have great senior years. wait & see.


Do you truly believe that the coaches get it right 100% of the time?

At WM there are very good players that do not get quality playing time and that is OK. But please do not insist that "the coaches play the best kids".

The coaches try their best and they play who they believe to be the best but every year there are very good players who do not see the field. Every kid they play is good but not every good player gets to play. That is reality, not a complaint.

If the WM coaches do not favor you son in the 9th or 10th grade does it make sense to play with WM in the summer if he could play for a strong club team?

I am not sure what to do.

But this is the situation that makes me ask the question.

Is it a conflict of interest for the HS Coach?

I think it is.




It amazing that the coaches just lead their team and community to a national ranking and state championship and are still being hammered by the parents in their community. What a shame. The truth is if your a parent you have an comment for everything, and if your an alumni of the greatest high school lacrosse program in the country you have a real clue about the truth and what it takes to play at the next level. Here's a big clue to play at the next level for the players, you go to college by yourself, mom and dad stay home. Here's another clue, if you think playing on express or 91 is better for your kid to get into college your wrong. As per every college coach they think its a joke that these kids play for another team other then their high school especially if they live in sachem, smith town, west I, ward Melville. This shows them lack of commitment, believe, trust, and most importantly to every coach, character! Which stems from their up bringing and beliefs. No coach will recruit a player who's parent is an issue as well. Believe what you want but this is the absolute truth.
Ward Melville lacrosse is back, be a part of it or don't! Either way the coaches and players will not care what any of you have to say and they will continue to do what's right for the program and community, and that's WIN!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
they didnt play as juniors because at that point in time, there were better players a head of them. Remember the coach plays who HE thinks is the best players. dont forget, players
improve, some stay the same, and some regress. the WM pole has an amazing senior year..took advatange of the opportunity & made the best of it. same thing for this year, which kids will step up ? there are a lot of 2014's that have the potential to have great senior years. wait & see.


Do you truly believe that the coaches get it right 100% of the time?

At WM there are very good players that do not get quality playing time and that is OK. But please do not insist that "the coaches play the best kids".

The coaches try their best and they play who they believe to be the best but every year there are very good players who do not see the field. Every kid they play is good but not every good player gets to play. That is reality, not a complaint.

If the WM coaches do not favor you son in the 9th or 10th grade does it make sense to play with WM in the summer if he could play for a strong club team?

I am not sure what to do.

But this is the situation that makes me ask the question.

Is it a conflict of interest for the HS Coach?

I think it is.




It amazing that the coaches just lead their team and community to a national ranking and state championship and are still being hammered by the parents in their community. What a shame. The truth is if your a parent you have an comment for everything, and if your an alumni of the greatest high school lacrosse program in the country you have a real clue about the truth and what it takes to play at the next level. Here's a big clue to play at the next level for the players, you go to college by yourself, mom and dad stay home. Here's another clue, if you think playing on express or 91 is better for your kid to get into college your wrong. As per every college coach they think its a joke that these kids play for another team other then their high school especially if they live in sachem, smith town, west I, ward Melville. This shows them lack of commitment, believe, trust, and most importantly to every coach, character! Which stems from their up bringing and beliefs. No coach will recruit a player who's parent is an issue as well. Believe what you want but this is the absolute truth.
Ward Melville lacrosse is back, be a part of it or don't! Either way the coaches and players will not care what any of you have to say and they will continue to do what's right for the program and community, and that's WIN!


who is hammering the coaches?

you are a very angry and arrogant person.

Absolute truth??

Ward Melville Lacrosse is back?? I did not know they left.







Kudos to the WM coaches. No one is saying that they didn't do a great job leading their players to a state championship. The previous poster even said that they try their best. You can honestly say that you talked to every college coach and they think 91 and Express are jokes? Really? If that's the case, then why do they have such a high rate of commitments to very impressive schools? Once again, the thread is about if it is a conflict. It doesn't mean that people do not think the coaches do a great job during the school season. It purely means, could there be a possible conflict and many many people believe there could be. Even some of the players/parents that play on the green and gold team believe it, but play on it just in case it is held against them. People are entitled to their humble opinion.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
they didnt play as juniors because at that point in time, there were better players a head of them. Remember the coach plays who HE thinks is the best players. dont forget, players
improve, some stay the same, and some regress. the WM pole has an amazing senior year..took advatange of the opportunity & made the best of it. same thing for this year, which kids will step up ? there are a lot of 2014's that have the potential to have great senior years. wait & see.


Do you truly believe that the coaches get it right 100% of the time?

At WM there are very good players that do not get quality playing time and that is OK. But please do not insist that "the coaches play the best kids".

The coaches try their best and they play who they believe to be the best but every year there are very good players who do not see the field. Every kid they play is good but not every good player gets to play. That is reality, not a complaint.

If the WM coaches do not favor you son in the 9th or 10th grade does it make sense to play with WM in the summer if he could play for a strong club team?

I am not sure what to do.

But this is the situation that makes me ask the question.

Is it a conflict of interest for the HS Coach?

I think it is.




It amazing that the coaches just lead their team and community to a national ranking and state championship and are still being hammered by the parents in their community. What a shame. The truth is if your a parent you have an comment for everything, and if your an alumni of the greatest high school lacrosse program in the country you have a real clue about the truth and what it takes to play at the next level. Here's a big clue to play at the next level for the players, you go to college by yourself, mom and dad stay home. Here's another clue, if you think playing on express or 91 is better for your kid to get into college your wrong. As per every college coach they think its a joke that these kids play for another team other then their high school especially if they live in sachem, smith town, west I, ward Melville. This shows them lack of commitment, believe, trust, and most importantly to every coach, character! Which stems from their up bringing and beliefs. No coach will recruit a player who's parent is an issue as well. Believe what you want but this is the absolute truth.
Ward Melville lacrosse is back, be a part of it or don't! Either way the coaches and players will not care what any of you have to say and they will continue to do what's right for the program and community, and that's WIN!


Did all of the past Ward Melville Players who (played for a club) have low character? were they not committed?

Army, Umass, Sacred heart, Brown, Penn State/North Carolina etc... must not have agreed with you.

People are trying to do what is best for the kid so they might have a chance to play for Ward Melville.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
they didnt play as juniors because at that point in time, there were better players a head of them. Remember the coach plays who HE thinks is the best players. dont forget, players
improve, some stay the same, and some regress. the WM pole has an amazing senior year..took advatange of the opportunity & made the best of it. same thing for this year, which kids will step up ? there are a lot of 2014's that have the potential to have great senior years. wait & see.


Do you truly believe that the coaches get it right 100% of the time?

At WM there are very good players that do not get quality playing time and that is OK. But please do not insist that "the coaches play the best kids".

The coaches try their best and they play who they believe to be the best but every year there are very good players who do not see the field. Every kid they play is good but not every good player gets to play. That is reality, not a complaint.

If the WM coaches do not favor you son in the 9th or 10th grade does it make sense to play with WM in the summer if he could play for a strong club team?

I am not sure what to do.

But this is the situation that makes me ask the question.

Is it a conflict of interest for the HS Coach?

I think it is.




It amazing that the coaches just lead their team and community to a national ranking and state championship and are still being hammered by the parents in their community. What a shame. The truth is if your a parent you have an comment for everything, and if your an alumni of the greatest high school lacrosse program in the country you have a real clue about the truth and what it takes to play at the next level. Here's a big clue to play at the next level for the players, you go to college by yourself, mom and dad stay home. Here's another clue, if you think playing on express or 91 is better for your kid to get into college your wrong. As per every college coach they think its a joke that these kids play for another team other then their high school especially if they live in sachem, smith town, west I, ward Melville. This shows them lack of commitment, believe, trust, and most importantly to every coach, character! Which stems from their up bringing and beliefs. No coach will recruit a player who's parent is an issue as well. Believe what you want but this is the absolute truth.
Ward Melville lacrosse is back, be a part of it or don't! Either way the coaches and players will not care what any of you have to say and they will continue to do what's right for the program and community, and that's WIN!



As per every coach? Who are you, you have the ear of every college coach? Go back to your glory days and leave the rest of us alone. you are a simply, stupid person, but its not your fault, your mommy didnt raise you to think for yourself...
Has a player ever been penalized for not playing with the ward Melville summer program? Has it been held against a player that they played somewhere else?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Kudos to the WM coaches. No one is saying that they didn't do a great job leading their players to a state championship. The previous poster even said that they try their best. You can honestly say that you talked to every college coach and they think 91 and Express are jokes? Really? If that's the case, then why do they have such a high rate of commitments to very impressive schools? Once again, the thread is about if it is a conflict. It doesn't mean that people do not think the coaches do a great job during the school season. It purely means, could there be a possible conflict and many many people believe there could be. Even some of the players/parents that play on the green and gold team believe it, but play on it just in case it is held against them. People are entitled to their humble opinion.


Right- that is the root of this issue the town/school vs club relationship is disfunctional. Sachem tells their kids no club after 6th grade... Club just makes kids better by raising the competition level - that is a fact. I wish all you policy makers can find a way to coexist, instead of placing an ultimatum on a kid. And those of you that do place ultimatums and twist the justification in your minds - should really reconsider and embrace all the opportunity that is available to our kids. Most kids play both now - and instead of parents feeling awkward by doing what's best for their child - work with us for those that want our kids playing club and give good advice. Maybe have a relationship with a club and find a win-win solution. Because this isn't going away and this is a good debate to have - since both sides have merits.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Has a player ever been penalized for not playing with the ward Melville summer program? Has it been held against a player that they played somewhere else?


To the best of my knowledge no. But the Green, Gold and White teams only started a couple of years ago.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Kudos to the WM coaches. No one is saying that they didn't do a great job leading their players to a state championship. The previous poster even said that they try their best. You can honestly say that you talked to every college coach and they think 91 and Express are jokes? Really? If that's the case, then why do they have such a high rate of commitments to very impressive schools? Once again, the thread is about if it is a conflict. It doesn't mean that people do not think the coaches do a great job during the school season. It purely means, could there be a possible conflict and many many people believe there could be. Even some of the players/parents that play on the green and gold team believe it, but play on it just in case it is held against them. People are entitled to their humble opinion.


Right- that is the root of this issue the town/school vs club relationship is disfunctional. Sachem tells their kids no club after 6th grade... Club just makes kids better by raising the competition level - that is a fact. I wish all you policy makers can find a way to coexist, instead of placing an ultimatum on a kid. And those of you that do place ultimatums and twist the justification in your minds - should really reconsider and embrace all the opportunity that is available to our kids. Most kids play both now - and instead of parents feeling awkward by doing what's best for their child - work with us for those that want our kids playing club and give good advice. Maybe have a relationship with a club and find a win-win solution. Because this isn't going away and this is a good debate to have - since both sides have merits.


Follow the money - that's what all this nonsense is about, too much money for clubs or school coaches with summer teams to leave behind
I feel it is a conflict...as a smithtown parent,hate it! Too many hands in the pot and everyone being pushed and in a sense threatened into playing.Summer is summer pay your money where you want.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
they didnt play as juniors because at that point in time, there were better players a head of them. Remember the coach plays who HE thinks is the best players. dont forget, players
improve, some stay the same, and some regress. the WM pole has an amazing senior year..took advatange of the opportunity & made the best of it. same thing for this year, which kids will step up ? there are a lot of 2014's that have the potential to have great senior years. wait & see.


Do you truly believe that the coaches get it right 100% of the time?

At WM there are very good players that do not get quality playing time and that is OK. But please do not insist that "the coaches play the best kids".

The coaches try their best and they play who they believe to be the best but every year there are very good players who do not see the field. Every kid they play is good but not every good player gets to play. That is reality, not a complaint.

If the WM coaches do not favor you son in the 9th or 10th grade does it make sense to play with WM in the summer if he could play for a strong club team?

I am not sure what to do.

But this is the situation that makes me ask the question.

Is it a conflict of interest for the HS Coach?

I think it is.




It amazing that the coaches just lead their team and community to a national ranking and state championship and are still being hammered by the parents in their community. What a shame. The truth is if your a parent you have an comment for everything, and if your an alumni of the greatest high school lacrosse program in the country you have a real clue about the truth and what it takes to play at the next level. Here's a big clue to play at the next level for the players, you go to college by yourself, mom and dad stay home. Here's another clue, if you think playing on express or 91 is better for your kid to get into college your wrong. As per every college coach they think its a joke that these kids play for another team other then their high school especially if they live in sachem, smith town, west I, ward Melville. This shows them lack of commitment, believe, trust, and most importantly to every coach, character! Which stems from their up bringing and beliefs. No coach will recruit a player who's parent is an issue as well. Believe what you want but this is the absolute truth.
Ward Melville lacrosse is back, be a part of it or don't! Either way the coaches and players will not care what any of you have to say and they will continue to do what's right for the program and community, and that's WIN!



As per every coach? Who are you, you have the ear of every college coach? Go back to your glory days and leave the rest of us alone. you are a simply, stupid person, but its not your fault, your mommy didnt raise you to think for yourself...


Why do you think they consider it a joke to play travel? There is travel in every sport. Other than a calling it a lack of commitment - what is the downside? Earlier this summer I was at 2014 committed club team practice and saw the best talent around on the field playing (a few aforementioned school helmets there as well) Isn't that a good thing for a player - not only preparing him/her for the upcoming school season - by increasing their skills and making others around them better. But preparing them to play on the next level. That is what is interesting and frustrating about this debate - people use words like no commitment - but all of us are committed to town and school ball. However, we want our kids in club as well.

And in my opinion there is no conflict for a HS coach to run a summer program. Just stop the nonsense of saying "you're with us or you're not" Just get the left side to work with the right side.

Keep the debate (minus the name calling) rolling - it is certainly interesting to hear everyone's opinion.
how does club raise the competition level? wm plays in top
summer tourneys, no?
also, no one has mentioned the individual showcase camps, jake reid, 205, 225 Mavrericke etc. these are important events to get into & wm kids do & the coaches tell you to. So for the 9 10th & 11th graders that havent gotten a lot of playing time you can get excellent exposure.
the coaches do play the best players. Yes it is true that there are very good players that do not get alot of playing time, but the coaches are playing the best of the best. not sure why you make such a comment. As far as being a 9th or 10the grader (not favored) what does that mean? he doesn't get playing time? because there are better players ahead of him?
1. the SUMMER wm program green/gold EVERYONE plays. You will get exposure at tourneys.
2. Play for a strong club team...are you already on this strong club team? if not, how do you know you would make it? what role/position would you play? my guess is that if you are not "favored" on your little town squad, how confident are you that things would be different on a strong club team that pulls from all of LI?
high rate of commitments? that is a joke....these club teams are money making machines plain & simple. how do you know how a player was really recruited? Expres will calim any kid that played in their program...whether it be 4th grade, 1 yr. 2 yrs. whatever...if the player was a St. A's kid....playing for St. A's team didn't get him recruited? i find it hard to believe that many of these impressive commitments werent do to the HS that a kid played at...look at the Chaminade & St. A's
alone, 2 super hs lax teams in the COUNTRY...they didnt have a
play on these kids recruiting? come'on open your eyes. Hats off to express 91 etc they are marketing themselves well.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
the coaches do play the best players. Yes it is true that there are very good players that do not get alot of playing time, but the coaches are playing the best of the best. not sure why you make such a comment. As far as being a 9th or 10the grader (not favored) what does that mean? he doesn't get playing time? because there are better players ahead of him?
1. the SUMMER wm program green/gold EVERYONE plays. You will get exposure at tourneys.
2. Play for a strong club team...are you already on this strong club team? if not, how do you know you would make it? what role/position would you play? my guess is that if you are not "favored" on your little town squad, how confident are you that things would be different on a strong club team that pulls from all of LI?


100% of the time the coaches identify the best??

100% of the time the coaches are right when they play 9th or 10th graders over upperclassmen??

The Gold team is the best place for a rising 10th grader to play??

The coaches do not favor certain kids??

The topic is, "is it a conflict of interest"?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
another parent mis informed....playing multi level not
ideal for recruiting? com'on...lets see, petey only plays well against kids his own age....lol coaches know what grade a player is in. And if your playing on a team like WM, coaches
have a very high level of respect for the WM program & that goes a long way for your kid...more than you know...so the fact that a 9, 10th grader is playing on WM team gets you interest.they dont expect that kid to be dominating a raising senior...they are looking at lax iq, hustle, etc. maybe you should contact a college coach and ask, what do you look for
in a player? you may be surprised & certainly tell them you play in the WM program....your other comment, what if my son wants to play in a more competitive tournament? you REALLY me that YOU want him to play in a more competitive tournament! on other words your kid only plays his best when he is on a "stacked" team? one thing you will find out after the conversation with that college coach is that they look for kids that make the other players around them, BETTER! they want NOTHING to do with the prima donna that can only play with good players. Last ask that coach why they ALWAYS talk to the kids hs coach? because these club coaches are full of crap
when it comes to a kids talent level....follow the money...clubs will keep telling you are a cant miss D1 player...why? cause they want your $$$ next year & next year
etc. Dont forget the club scens has many levels...each club has a #1 team. if you're not on it, your tosing your money away
espcially if your a wm kid...talk about a drop off. you shouldnt lose sight of the value playing for the WM program.




First of all, my post was trying to be positive. You have a lot of anger and clearly don't even want to see both point of views. Calling me misinformed demonstrates that. Please read objectively.

Let's start with your first argument about multi level. Maybe you should talk to some of the WM 2012 Summer Green Team parents about how when WM got on the field to play as rising seniors even though there were younger players, there were instances when coaches walked away assuming that if a senior was that good he would have been committed already. Some of these coaches were unaware that mixed grades were playing. This was a big disadvantage for rising juniors. This is a fact and a valid concern. Hopefully, this was rectified for the players this summer.

Of course, coaches look for hustle and lacrosse IQ. You offered no new insight there. Coaches also look at the behavior of the player on and off the field as well as their parents' behavior. This holds true for both WM and club.

Of course, playing for WM during the school season holds weight with college coaches. WM has a long history of great lacrosse. Not sure it holds as much weight during the summer. You should ask them that. Some coaches want to know if you can mesh well with players from other towns and not just the ones that you have played PAL with since 2nd grade. After all, you are not taking your entire HS team to college with you.

As far as your point of wanting my son to play on a "stacked" team, I never said that. I think it is a benefit for my son to play in more competitive tournaments as does he, so he can be amongst some of the most competitive players in his age group. This shows us where he falls and what he needs to work on. It helps raise his level of play. It's good for him to learn from players that he does not play with all the time and be inspired by them. This does not mean he doesn't look up to his school teammates because he has respect for them too. This also does not mean that he is a "prima donna" as you put it. If you knew my son at all, you would know that he is a very unselfish player. I guess name calling and insulting a young teen makes you feel better and somehow makes you think your point is valid.

As far as the "club scene" that you negatively refer too, he is on the #1 team since you brought it up. That doesn't mean that the B Teams do not have talent which I am sure you are aware of since they have beaten 3V's A team on many occasion including Patriots Elite's team as well.

Yes, playing club does cost more $, but probably not as much $ as you would think. You get what you pay for. It's probably comparable to all the $ WM kids pay for private lessons and the clinics they try to take discretely after the parents proclaim that we have the best coaches anywhere and no need to go anywhere else. In years to come if my son wants to play college lacrosse and if he has the talent and the grades, I have no doubt that my son's club coaches and school coaches will do whatever they can to help him get recruited whether it be D1, D2, or D3.

All these boys will be playing school lacrosse together. It's important that we respect each other and the different decisions parents made for their sons. In all situations, everyone has their child's best interest in mind. There are just different avenues for helping your child improve his lacrosse skills. We never lost sight of playing for a WM program. We live in the district first for it's reputation for a great education, it's a wonderful community to raise a family and it certainly helps that my children love lacrosse in a district that excels at the sport.

I have faith that our HS coach would never hold it against an athlete based on where he decided to play during the off season. Each player needs to be evaluated each season based on school tryouts. Because then surely it would be a conflict of interest if WM's coach cut or didn't play a deserving athlete due to that athlete not contributing to his summer salary.


You are not correct about the 2012 Green Team. College coaches have a detailed roster given to them at check in. They do know what grade a player is in. College coachs bounce from field to field depending on who they are looking at. Many go to a tourney with a specific list, others
are open to see anything & everthing. To make a statement that coaches left because they assumed the players were committed already is false. How do you know why a coach picks up his chair? LOL. I would really question the parent that you received that type of information from.
Another parent who thinks his kid is better than he really is? Also, do not forget that last year 2012, WM had 2 very good sophs. an attackman & defenseman that played spring varisty these 2 drew alot of attention from college coaches so if you were a raising jr. in 2012, you would have had the opportunity to show your stuff so to speak. Many times a collge coach will go to see player "A" & winds up discovering player "D". Bottom line at recruiting tourney's you have to bring your "A" game to every game...never know who is watching.
100% ????
Get real with that.
Upperclassmen playing behind 9th & 10th graders? I think you do not have a realistic view of your son's ability with respect to recruiting. If your 18 year old has a 14/15 year old playing ahead of him in Suffolk Division 1, not sure what college level lax your son has expectations of. This is not a knock of your son, but if your son played on the WM summer teams the past few years, he was given equal playing time & played with all the players from his position many college coaches watching....phones not ringing? He may just not be good enough. If he gave it his best, so be it, thats all you can ask...There are plenty of great schools that play lacrosse
and if you son plays WM varsity, there are spots for him, just do your homework & ask your HS coach is opinion.
This thread was for all LI and seems to be pointed towards WM.

The best point I see is a reoccurring one. Sure you may be a very good player, but there may be better on your town team in front of you. If this is the case why not go to a club team. But at the same time if you aren't the best in your town why would you think you would be best on an all LI type of club.

There are a few arguments here

1). If you have a strong town program (16+ A/B players)
a] if you are a top player you want to have the HS step up and create a system.
b] if you are a second tier player you don't want to be told you need to be on a team to play behind someone else, when another club team will get you playing.

2). if you have a weak town program, you want to get the best possible exposure and play the best possible competition for summer and not be told you have to be committed.

My question is if possible name the top 10 Suffolk towns and Nassau towns who can create this type of feeder system and at what age do you start. 6th grade to prep for MS and HS.


Ill start with Suffolk (in no particular order)
WM
WI
Smithtown (I know there are 2)
Sachem (I know there are 2)
Northport
Bayshore
Sayville
SWR
ESM
Harborfields
Riverhead
Originally Posted by Anonymous
100% ????
Get real with that.
Upperclassmen playing behind 9th & 10th graders? I think you do not have a realistic view of your son's ability with respect to recruiting. If your 18 year old has a 14/15 year old playing ahead of him in Suffolk Division 1, not sure what college level lax your son has expectations of. This is not a knock of your son, but if your son played on the WM summer teams the past few years, he was given equal playing time & played with all the players from his position many college coaches watching....phones not ringing? He may just not be good enough. If he gave it his best, so be it, thats all you can ask...There are plenty of great schools that play lacrosse
and if you son plays WM varsity, there are spots for him, just do your homework & ask your HS coach is opinion.


Get real?

you keep attacking parents and kids saying that their kid is not good enough. I have only questioned the logic of blindly following what a few people say we should do.

Are you a coach? did you coach your son? are you one of the coaches who knows every kids potential? did you always get it right?

I have heard the term "Step up" used by some, I will say that in order to "Step Up" a player needs to be given the opportunity.

At a place like WM, there are many good players, the coaches do their best but they do not get it right all of the time.

What makes you so sure that this new system is in the best interest of the players? In a previous post I said that I am unsure what to do. Why do you think that WM has the only way to hep a player become stronger.

Garden City, Chamidade and St Anthony's have all been very successful during the HS season and the kids do not all play together in the summer.

I am amazed at some who do not question what is being pushed upon them by a few.

By the way, If the HS coaches do not think your kid is one of the better players, don't you think that you should change what you have been doing in order to change the result?

If you can play with better players and have a different coach do you not think that you might be able to improve?

People keep talking about College Recruiting, how about trying to improve so you can be one of the top kid at WM.

Do you think the only way to become a stronger player is to follow what the WM people say you should do?






well said, But if all these superstars, that have left the 3v program , would have stayed, 3v lax would be dominant at the tourneys ,as was last years team, that was number 1 in the country, New [lacrosse] State Champs and undefeated.
If my kid was playing in a top tier district, makes sense to play with your school.
What if your child is not playing in a top tier district and the coach still demands “No summer teams other than your schools", what then?

Over the years my observation is if the kid for whatever reason; skill, size, political, etc… does not make a “A”/ “AA” type team why spend the 1k plus for a “B” or “C” team?
If your school maintains a program over the summer, stay with them , has already played with those kids over the spring and knows them, coaches, etc…

I observed a mid-tier school team at a few tournaments this past summer beat at times handily some of the “big name” summer programs at various tournaments.
Granted its “B” level, but that’s the point, why spend all that extra money?
Spend it on showcase camps…

1. Spend that extra money if school does not stay together after their spring season.
2. Spend that extra money if your child can make a “A” or “AA” team and their school team is not a top district.

Other than that stay together for the entire year…
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
100% ????
Get real with that.
Upperclassmen playing behind 9th & 10th graders? I think you do not have a realistic view of your son's ability with respect to recruiting. If your 18 year old has a 14/15 year old playing ahead of him in Suffolk Division 1, not sure what college level lax your son has expectations of. This is not a knock of your son, but if your son played on the WM summer teams the past few years, he was given equal playing time & played with all the players from his position many college coaches watching....phones not ringing? He may just not be good enough. If he gave it his best, so be it, thats all you can ask...There are plenty of great schools that play lacrosse
and if you son plays WM varsity, there are spots for him, just do your homework & ask your HS coach is opinion.


Get real?

you keep attacking parents and kids saying that their kid is not good enough. I have only questioned the logic of blindly following what a few people say we should do.

Are you a coach? did you coach your son? are you one of the coaches who knows every kids potential? did you always get it right?

I have heard the term "Step up" used by some, I will say that in order to "Step Up" a player needs to be given the opportunity.

At a place like WM, there are many good players, the coaches do their best but they do not get it right all of the time.

What makes you so sure that this new system is in the best interest of the players? In a previous post I said that I am unsure what to do. Why do you think that WM has the only way to hep a player become stronger.

Garden City, Chamidade and St Anthony's have all been very successful during the HS season and the kids do not all play together in the summer.

I am amazed at some who do not question what is being pushed upon them by a few.

By the way, If the HS coaches do not think your kid is one of the better players, don't you think that you should change what you have been doing in order to change the result?

If you can play with better players and have a different coach do you not think that you might be able to improve?

People keep talking about College Recruiting, how about trying to improve so you can be one of the top kid at WM.

Do you think the only way to become a stronger player is to follow what the WM people say you should do?


There is no 1 way to improve, there are many. No one is being "pushed" into this. It has been proven that this system is very successful here. Its about a program. That being said, you can't keep everyone happy. The more success a program has, the more kids it attracts. Still a #'s game, only so many can play. No program, HS or club gets it right all the time, but if you look at programs like WM, SW, WI. etc. they are consistantly strong. So their programs are doing things right. Can you always find a player(s) that feel that they got screwed? absolutely
but again, its about a program not an individual. As far as becoming a stronger player, I guess you need to know what your kid needs to improve on...is it size,speed,footwork etc.Will playing on a club team going to improve that? not sure. You should not be guessing as to why your kid is not getting the playing time that you desire...your kid should be asking his HS coach, what do I have to improve on? if you haven't done that... do it. Again, be prepared for the answer. Looking at your post, you wont be happy until you find a coach/team that will play your son. Last, like that has been posted earlier, if you are considering playing Summer WM or going to a club, everyone plays on the WM summer team. You mentioned, stepup...every kid gets looked at in detail over a long period of time...every kid has multiple chances to step-up, some take advantage some do not... as far as this summer program goes stop insinuating that kids get overlooked they ALL play.



Originally Posted by Anonymous
100% ????
Get real with that.
Upperclassmen playing behind 9th & 10th graders? I think you do not have a realistic view of your son's ability with respect to recruiting. If your 18 year old has a 14/15 year old playing ahead of him in Suffolk Division 1, not sure what college level lax your son has expectations of. This is not a knock of your son, but if your son played on the WM summer teams the past few years, he was given equal playing time & played with all the players from his position many college coaches watching....phones not ringing? He may just not be good enough. If he gave it his best, so be it, thats all you can ask...There are plenty of great schools that play lacrosse
and if you son plays WM varsity, there are spots for him, just do your homework & ask your HS coach is opinion.



Bottom line - NO school team coaches should be allowed to coach pay to play summer teams in any sport, it's an inherent conflict of interest by any standard! The AD's of these schools need to step up and end this practice asap
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
100% ????
Get real with that.
Upperclassmen playing behind 9th & 10th graders? I think you do not have a realistic view of your son's ability with respect to recruiting. If your 18 year old has a 14/15 year old playing ahead of him in Suffolk Division 1, not sure what college level lax your son has expectations of. This is not a knock of your son, but if your son played on the WM summer teams the past few years, he was given equal playing time & played with all the players from his position many college coaches watching....phones not ringing? He may just not be good enough. If he gave it his best, so be it, thats all you can ask...There are plenty of great schools that play lacrosse
and if you son plays WM varsity, there are spots for him, just do your homework & ask your HS coach is opinion.


Get real?

you keep attacking parents and kids saying that their kid is not good enough. I have only questioned the logic of blindly following what a few people say we should do.

Are you a coach? did you coach your son? are you one of the coaches who knows every kids potential? did you always get it right?

I have heard the term "Step up" used by some, I will say that in order to "Step Up" a player needs to be given the opportunity.

At a place like WM, there are many good players, the coaches do their best but they do not get it right all of the time.

What makes you so sure that this new system is in the best interest of the players? In a previous post I said that I am unsure what to do. Why do you think that WM has the only way to hep a player become stronger.

Garden City, Chamidade and St Anthony's have all been very successful during the HS season and the kids do not all play together in the summer.

I am amazed at some who do not question what is being pushed upon them by a few.

By the way, If the HS coaches do not think your kid is one of the better players, don't you think that you should change what you have been doing in order to change the result?

If you can play with better players and have a different coach do you not think that you might be able to improve?

People keep talking about College Recruiting, how about trying to improve so you can be one of the top kid at WM.

Do you think the only way to become a stronger player is to follow what the WM people say you should do?





Finally - somebody that gets it. There is no magic formula for success. But the point is these coaches should coach summer, for variety of reasons. And if money is one of those reasons - oh well - they have that right. The coaches can not use their influence to force march kids into the summer program. That's the conflict - saying you must play with me is wrong. There is a better way to manage the club/school/town player.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
100% ????
Get real with that.
Upperclassmen playing behind 9th & 10th graders? I think you do not have a realistic view of your son's ability with respect to recruiting. If your 18 year old has a 14/15 year old playing ahead of him in Suffolk Division 1, not sure what college level lax your son has expectations of. This is not a knock of your son, but if your son played on the WM summer teams the past few years, he was given equal playing time & played with all the players from his position many college coaches watching....phones not ringing? He may just not be good enough. If he gave it his best, so be it, thats all you can ask...There are plenty of great schools that play lacrosse
and if you son plays WM varsity, there are spots for him, just do your homework & ask your HS coach is opinion.



Bottom line - NO school team coaches should be allowed to coach pay to play summer teams in any sport, it's an inherent conflict of interest by any standard! The AD's of these schools need to step up and end this practice asap


Then they have these affiliated club teams, which falls under the guidance of the school program. And the club is doing the messaging. And they say why go to a travel team when we can offer that right here and cheaper.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
high rate of commitments? that is a joke....these club teams are money making machines plain & simple. how do you know how a player was really recruited? Expres will calim any kid that played in their program...whether it be 4th grade, 1 yr. 2 yrs. whatever...if the player was a St. A's kid....playing for St. A's team didn't get him recruited? i find it hard to believe that many of these impressive commitments werent do to the HS that a kid played at...look at the Chaminade & St. A's
alone, 2 super hs lax teams in the COUNTRY...they didnt have a
play on these kids recruiting? come'on open your eyes. Hats off to express 91 etc they are marketing themselves well.

That's why people want to play on those teams. Forget recruiting, it's raising the child's skills. With good coaching and playing with better players. Summer town/school teams don't have that fully. Some more than others, but not like a 91 or Express.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
high rate of commitments? that is a joke....these club teams are money making machines plain & simple. how do you know how a player was really recruited? Expres will calim any kid that played in their program...whether it be 4th grade, 1 yr. 2 yrs. whatever...if the player was a St. A's kid....playing for St. A's team didn't get him recruited? i find it hard to believe that many of these impressive commitments werent do to the HS that a kid played at...look at the Chaminade & St. A's
alone, 2 super hs lax teams in the COUNTRY...they didnt have a
play on these kids recruiting? come'on open your eyes. Hats off to express 91 etc they are marketing themselves well.

That's why people want to play on those teams. Forget recruiting, it's raising the child's skills. With good coaching and playing with better players. Summer town/school teams don't have that fully. Some more than others, but not like a 91 or Express.



The St Anthony's coaches have been "strong arming" their players into the Express club for years and they haven't taken any heat. Why is that ok? Hint: It's not ok...
The St Anthony's coaches have been "strong arming" their players into the Express club for years and they haven't taken any heat. Why is that ok? Hint: It's not ok...


Not public school
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The St Anthony's coaches have been "strong arming" their players into the Express club for years and they haven't taken any heat. Why is that ok? Hint: It's not ok...

Really.. That is not the truth at all. Those teams are well established before they even get to the HS level.


Not public school
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The St Anthony's coaches have been "strong arming" their players into the Express club for years and they haven't taken any heat. Why is that ok? Hint: It's not ok...


Not public school


Not true, I know several players that graduated last year that played for St. Anthony's that were on other travel teams instead of express.
Oh come on , I have known numerous Express parents who think the Express is a road INTO ST Anthony sand Chaminade's lax programs

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The St Anthony's coaches have been "strong arming" their players into the Express club for years and they haven't taken any heat. Why is that ok? Hint: It's not ok...

Really.. That is not the truth at all. Those teams are well established before they even get to the HS level.


Not public school
I am express parent on 2018 terps team. My son is a starter and has not once been told he should go to St A or Cham...

Maybe the pressure starts this year???

This entire chain is pretty well played out. The schools that strong arm kids are clearly wrong, whether or not they have a winning program, whether or not their coaches are strong, whether or not ever kid gets a fair shot to play, whether or not the kid is good enough to play...

Schools should not be in the business of dictating what kids do when the school sport season (lax, baseball, football, soccer...)is not in session. THis is just a cash grab by the school coaches and I am shocked that the school districts stand for it...

Not about whinny parents, and yes, there are many of those in the lax world.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am express parent on 2018 terps team. My son is a starter and has not once been told he should go to St A or Cham...

Maybe the pressure starts this year???

This entire chain is pretty well played out. The schools that strong arm kids are clearly wrong, whether or not they have a winning program, whether or not their coaches are strong, whether or not ever kid gets a fair shot to play, whether or not the kid is good enough to play...

Schools should not be in the business of dictating what kids do when the school sport season (lax, baseball, football, soccer...)is not in session. THis is just a cash grab by the school coaches and I am shocked that the school districts stand for it...

Not about whinny parents, and yes, there are many of those in the lax world.


They don't tell the kids to go to St ant's or Cham, they tell the kids that go to the schools to play certain clubs...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am express parent on 2018 terps team. My son is a starter and has not once been told he should go to St A or Cham...

Maybe the pressure starts this year???

This entire chain is pretty well played out. The schools that strong arm kids are clearly wrong, whether or not they have a winning program, whether or not their coaches are strong, whether or not ever kid gets a fair shot to play, whether or not the kid is good enough to play...

Schools should not be in the business of dictating what kids do when the school sport season (lax, baseball, football, soccer...)is not in session. THis is just a cash grab by the school coaches and I am shocked that the school districts stand for it...

Not about whinny parents, and yes, there are many of those in the lax world.


I would think the pressure comes when your child is in St. A or Cham to play with Express in the summer. I'm sure there are some who don't play with them but, most will.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The St Anthony's coaches have been "strong arming" their players into the Express club for years and they haven't taken any heat. Why is that ok? Hint: It's not ok...


Not public school


Not true, I know several players that graduated last year that played for St. Anthony's that were on other travel teams instead of express.


Bet they were non-starters. If they were starter please tell us what position they started at and what other club they played for.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The St Anthony's coaches have been "strong arming" their players into the Express club for years and they haven't taken any heat. Why is that ok? Hint: It's not ok...


Not public school


Makes absolutely no difference if its a private or public school. Pressure is pressure regardless of how a school is funded with tax dollars or private tuition. It's wrong both ways.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am express parent on 2018 terps team. My son is a starter and has not once been told he should go to St A or Cham...

Maybe the pressure starts this year???

This entire chain is pretty well played out. The schools that strong arm kids are clearly wrong, whether or not they have a winning program, whether or not their coaches are strong, whether or not ever kid gets a fair shot to play, whether or not the kid is good enough to play...

Schools should not be in the business of dictating what kids do when the school sport season (lax, baseball, football, soccer...)is not in session. THis is just a cash grab by the school coaches and I am shocked that the school districts stand for it...

Not about whinny parents, and yes, there are many of those in the lax world.


I would think the pressure comes when your child is in St. A or Cham to play with Express in the summer. I'm sure there are some who don't play with them but, most will.


Because their's pressure to do so.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am express parent on 2018 terps team. My son is a starter and has not once been told he should go to St A or Cham...

Maybe the pressure starts this year???

This entire chain is pretty well played out. The schools that strong arm kids are clearly wrong, whether or not they have a winning program, whether or not their coaches are strong, whether or not ever kid gets a fair shot to play, whether or not the kid is good enough to play...

Schools should not be in the business of dictating what kids do when the school sport season (lax, baseball, football, soccer...)is not in session. THis is just a cash grab by the school coaches and I am shocked that the school districts stand for it...

Not about whinny parents, and yes, there are many of those in the lax world.


I would think the pressure comes when your child is in St. A or Cham to play with Express in the summer. I'm sure there are some who don't play with them but, most will.


Because their's pressure to do so.


There is pressure to switch your faith as well.... Really?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am express parent on 2018 terps team. My son is a starter and has not once been told he should go to St A or Cham...

Maybe the pressure starts this year???

This entire chain is pretty well played out. The schools that strong arm kids are clearly wrong, whether or not they have a winning program, whether or not their coaches are strong, whether or not ever kid gets a fair shot to play, whether or not the kid is good enough to play...

Schools should not be in the business of dictating what kids do when the school sport season (lax, baseball, football, soccer...)is not in session. THis is just a cash grab by the school coaches and I am shocked that the school districts stand for it...

Not about whinny parents, and yes, there are many of those in the lax world.


I would think the pressure comes when your child is in St. A or Cham to play with Express in the summer. I'm sure there are some who don't play with them but, most will.


Because their's pressure to do so.


There is pressure to switch your faith as well.... Really?


No problem accepting the pressure to play on one the best club organizations around and pressure to be forced to play for a perennially nationally ranked HS. BTW - 100+ kids showed up for the freshman (not jv) tryouts at Chaminade this past spring. Don't think this mysterious pressure you all seem to know about exists. Enough, already. People can play where they want and when they want. Likewise for coaches. The policy makers just have to stop making parents and players feeling uncomfortable because they are playing club. These town PAL reps & school clubs really believe they are responsible for building the varsity program.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The St Anthony's coaches have been "strong arming" their players into the Express club for years and they haven't taken any heat. Why is that ok? Hint: It's not ok...


Not public school


Makes absolutely no difference if its a private or public school. Pressure is pressure regardless of how a school is funded with tax dollars or private tuition. It's wrong both ways.

The difference is you choose to attend a private school and can leave if you're not happy for whatever reason. Public school your only option is to move to a different district - publicly funded instututions have a set of different rules in all endeavors because of the taxpayer dollars asociated with them - thats why there's 50-60 kids on a middle school team and everyone gets equal playing time. If you look at the test scores of students in the USA versus the rest of the world it would seem that our focus is a tad out of whack
Here is a great example of how a coach works with a local club and produce a win-win. This is a recent quote from the Comsewogue Varsity coach "Mitchell said the success on the varsity level is due in great part to the strong youth program. "It's having a great youth league, which is where it all starts, and I'm definitely the recipient of a lot of people's hard work," Mitchell said. "A lot of my kids play in the summer league. Mike (Gongas) at Team Long Island does a great job and really prepares our kids. They get a lot of playing time over the summer and there's always a spot on the summer league roster regardless of the player's talent level." Imagine that... a club and school collaborating.
I just went through the town web sits on the left. GC states at the youth level they have a A/B/C tier system. For 5th and 6th grade. Love the concept. but I can see the B team in another town be stronger if the kids want to explore outside travel teams.

What does GC ask of its 7-11th graders?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I just went through the town web sits on the left. GC states at the youth level they have a A/B/C tier system. For 5th and 6th grade. Love the concept. but I can see the B team in another town be stronger if the kids want to explore outside travel teams.

What does GC ask of its 7-11th graders?


It is my understanding that over the last couple of years GC has been pressuring kids to play only with their Town.

In the past, many of GC's Top players played for Club Teams.

The HS Team did very well during the school year.

What would cause the HS Coach to change..?

not from GC but this is what i have been told. If it is not accurate please let us know.
imagine that...check mitchells pockets..... Open your eyes.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is a great example of how a coach works with a local club and produce a win-win. This is a recent quote from the Comsewogue Varsity coach "Mitchell said the success on the varsity level is due in great part to the strong youth program. "It's having a great youth league, which is where it all starts, and I'm definitely the recipient of a lot of people's hard work," Mitchell said. "A lot of my kids play in the summer league. Mike (Gongas) at Team Long Island does a great job and really prepares our kids. They get a lot of playing time over the summer and there's always a spot on the summer league roster regardless of the player's talent
level." Imagine that... a club and school collaborating.


True, and team LI welcomes kids from any program. They make minimal profit. Last year the cost was 800$ Their u17 team won three major tournaments and many boys have nice D1 commitments.
Keep hearing how TLI doesn't profit from their summer teams, but how much do they profit from tryouts at $75.00 per player when there are very few positions to fill each year, I would say they profit............and as far as a high schools working with TLI, their rosters are filled mostly by Rocky Point, Mt. Sinai and Comesewogue, very few players from other towns
I think that the majority of players on TLI's U-17 team were from Comesewuage.......wasn't Mike Gongas involved with coaching with the high school there? Must be nice, and you are correct, working with a club team benefits the high school, especially working with a club like TLI
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think that the majority of players on TLI's U-17 team were from Comesewuage.......wasn't Mike Gongas involved with coaching with the high school there? Must be nice, and you are correct, working with a club team benefits the high school, especially working with a club like TLI


My son is a Jr. from Mt. Sinai and plays on team LI U17. Anyone is welcome on that team. Last year a kid from Smithtown joined the team for the first time and he was a Freshman, Team LI helped him secure a DI scholarship. It's a great organization!
I didn't say that they don't have players from other towns, what I said is the majority of players are from the 3 towns previously mentioned, it is an organization that favors those 3 towns, enough said!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I didn't say that they don't have players from other towns, what I said is the majority of players are from the 3 towns previously mentioned, it is an organization that favors those 3 towns, enough said!


no they don't. they'll take the best players that show up. Go to the tryout and you'll count 10 town helmets.
My friend, I have seen their teams at tournaments and I observe what I observe, I'm good like that....Rocky Point, Comsewogue and Mt. Sinia/Miller Place a few West Hampton here and there and yes they do take players from other towns, but again very few......but through observing them over the years, I have to say TLI is very loyal to the players that they have as they seem to move up with a secure spot year after year, can't say that for many other organizations...........wish I was from one of those towns ^^
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My friend, I have seen their teams at tournaments and I observe what I observe, I'm good like that....Rocky Point, Comsewogue and Mt. Sinia/Miller Place a few West Hampton here and there and yes they do take players from other towns, but again very few......but through observing them over the years, I have to say TLI is very loyal to the players that they have as they seem to move up with a secure spot year after year, can't say that for many other organizations...........wish I was from one of those towns ^^

That maybe true for the older teams. but u-15 an under there is way more diversity. My son is on the U-14 A team. There is 2 Mt Sinai,1 Rocky point,1 Miller Place, 1 W. Hampton, NO Comsewogue! That is 5 kids from those towns. There are at least 10 towns represented on our team! The best kids make it. It doesn't matter where you are from! I agree that TLI is loyal to there kids. If you are on a team you really have to play yourself off the team to be replaced!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My friend, I have seen their teams at tournaments and I observe what I observe, I'm good like that....Rocky Point, Comsewogue and Mt. Sinia/Miller Place a few West Hampton here and there and yes they do take players from other towns, but again very few......but through observing them over the years, I have to say TLI is very loyal to the players that they have as they seem to move up with a secure spot year after year, can't say that for many other organizations...........wish I was from one of those towns ^^

That maybe true for the older teams. but u-15 an under there is way more diversity. My son is on the U-14 A team. There is 2 Mt Sinai,1 Rocky point,1 Miller Place, 1 W. Hampton, NO Comsewogue! That is 5 kids from those towns. There are at least 10 towns represented on our team! The best kids make it. It doesn't matter where you are from! I agree that TLI is loyal to there kids. If you are on a team you really have to play yourself off the team to be replaced!


Rather than call it Team Long Island, they should call it Team Suffolk. No Nassau kids at all?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My friend, I have seen their teams at tournaments and I observe what I observe, I'm good like that....Rocky Point, Comsewogue and Mt. Sinia/Miller Place a few West Hampton here and there and yes they do take players from other towns, but again very few......but through observing them over the years, I have to say TLI is very loyal to the players that they have as they seem to move up with a secure spot year after year, can't say that for many other organizations...........wish I was from one of those towns ^^

That maybe true for the older teams. but u-15 an under there is way more diversity. My son is on the U-14 A team. There is 2 Mt Sinai,1 Rocky point,1 Miller Place, 1 W. Hampton, NO Comsewogue! That is 5 kids from those towns. There are at least 10 towns represented on our team! The best kids make it. It doesn't matter where you are from! I agree that TLI is loyal to there kids. If you are on a team you really have to play yourself off the team to be replaced!


Rather than call it Team Long Island, they should call it Team Suffolk. No Nassau kids at all?


Probably because it's too far, they practice in Mt. Sinai.
and where do the j-e-t-s play and practice.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My friend, I have seen their teams at tournaments and I observe what I observe, I'm good like that....Rocky Point, Comsewogue and Mt. Sinia/Miller Place a few West Hampton here and there and yes they do take players from other towns, but again very few......but through observing them over the years, I have to say TLI is very loyal to the players that they have as they seem to move up with a secure spot year after year, can't say that for many other organizations...........wish I was from one of those towns ^^

That maybe true for the older teams. but u-15 an under there is way more diversity. My son is on the U-14 A team. There is 2 Mt Sinai,1 Rocky point,1 Miller Place, 1 W. Hampton, NO Comsewogue! That is 5 kids from those towns. There are at least 10 towns represented on our team! The best kids make it. It doesn't matter where you are from! I agree that TLI is loyal to there kids. If you are on a team you really have to play yourself off the team to be replaced!


Rather than call it Team Long Island, they should call it Team Suffolk. No Nassau kids at all?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
and where do the j-e-t-s play and practice.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My friend, I have seen their teams at tournaments and I observe what I observe, I'm good like that....Rocky Point, Comsewogue and Mt. Sinia/Miller Place a few West Hampton here and there and yes they do take players from other towns, but again very few......but through observing them over the years, I have to say TLI is very loyal to the players that they have as they seem to move up with a secure spot year after year, can't say that for many other organizations...........wish I was from one of those towns ^^

That maybe true for the older teams. but u-15 an under there is way more diversity. My son is on the U-14 A team. There is 2 Mt Sinai,1 Rocky point,1 Miller Place, 1 W. Hampton, NO Comsewogue! That is 5 kids from those towns. There are at least 10 towns represented on our team! The best kids make it. It doesn't matter where you are from! I agree that TLI is loyal to there kids. If you are on a team you really have to play yourself off the team to be replaced!


Rather than call it Team Long Island, they should call it Team Suffolk. No Nassau kids at all?



Everyone from Nassau knows that the Jets practice and play in East Meadow!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My friend, I have seen their teams at tournaments and I observe what I observe, I'm good like that....Rocky Point, Comsewogue and Mt. Sinia/Miller Place a few West Hampton here and there and yes they do take players from other towns, but again very few......but through observing them over the years, I have to say TLI is very loyal to the players that they have as they seem to move up with a secure spot year after year, can't say that for many other organizations...........wish I was from one of those towns ^^

That maybe true for the older teams. but u-15 an under there is way more diversity. My son is on the U-14 A team. There is 2 Mt Sinai,1 Rocky point,1 Miller Place, 1 W. Hampton, NO Comsewogue! That is 5 kids from those towns. There are at least 10 towns represented on our team! The best kids make it. It doesn't matter where you are from! I agree that TLI is loyal to there kids. If you are on a team you really have to play yourself off the team to be replaced!


Rather than call it Team Long Island, they should call it Team Suffolk. No Nassau kids at all?


Not Suprising, Check fl$, Mostly Nassau County, if not fully. Location is important.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
and where do the j-e-t-s play and practice.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My friend, I have seen their teams at tournaments and I observe what I observe, I'm good like that....Rocky Point, Comsewogue and Mt. Sinia/Miller Place a few West Hampton here and there and yes they do take players from other towns, but again very few......but through observing them over the years, I have to say TLI is very loyal to the players that they have as they seem to move up with a secure spot year after year, can't say that for many other organizations...........wish I was from one of those towns ^^

That maybe true for the older teams. but u-15 an under there is way more diversity. My son is on the U-14 A team. There is 2 Mt Sinai,1 Rocky point,1 Miller Place, 1 W. Hampton, NO Comsewogue! That is 5 kids from those towns. There are at least 10 towns represented on our team! The best kids make it. It doesn't matter where you are from! I agree that TLI is loyal to there kids. If you are on a team you really have to play yourself off the team to be replaced!


Rather than call it Team Long Island, they should call it Team Suffolk. No Nassau kids at all?



Everyone from Nassau knows that the Jets practice and play in East Meadow!


good one! illustrating the point further that some people are always 5 years behind where they should be.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
and where do the j-e-t-s play and practice.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My friend, I have seen their teams at tournaments and I observe what I observe, I'm good like that....Rocky Point, Comsewogue and Mt. Sinia/Miller Place a few West Hampton here and there and yes they do take players from other towns, but again very few......but through observing them over the years, I have to say TLI is very loyal to the players that they have as they seem to move up with a secure spot year after year, can't say that for many other organizations...........wish I was from one of those towns ^^

That maybe true for the older teams. but u-15 an under there is way more diversity. My son is on the U-14 A team. There is 2 Mt Sinai,1 Rocky point,1 Miller Place, 1 W. Hampton, NO Comsewogue! That is 5 kids from those towns. There are at least 10 towns represented on our team! The best kids make it. It doesn't matter where you are from! I agree that TLI is loyal to there kids. If you are on a team you really have to play yourself off the team to be replaced!


Rather than call it Team Long Island, they should call it Team Suffolk. No Nassau kids at all?



Everyone from Nassau knows that the Jets practice and play in East Meadow!


good one! illustrating the point further that some people are always 5 years behind where they should be.


Jokes on you bud...East Meadow HS mascot is JETS
I doubt Smithtown frowns on club teams. Some of their HS coaches coach for the LI Thunder.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I doubt Smithtown frowns on club teams. Some of their HS coaches coach for the LI Thunder.


does Team Smithtown take kids from both High Schools?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I doubt Smithtown frowns on club teams. Some of their HS coaches coach for the LI Thunder.


does Team Smithtown take kids from both High Schools?


Yes, Team Smithtown takes kids from both schools. If they have enough kids to create an East and West team, then they will. That is what they are going to try this year with U13 teams. However, they are also setting up these teams to play all year long like other clubs, so I doubt you will have a choice to play on another club at the same time!
Team smith town, what other towns can create a competitive team to pay you guys...


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I doubt Smithtown frowns on club teams. Some of their HS coaches coach for the LI Thunder.


does Team Smithtown take kids from both High Schools?


Yes, Team Smithtown takes kids from both schools. If they have enough kids to create an East and West team, then they will. That is what they are going to try this year with U13 teams. However, they are also setting up these teams to play all year long like other clubs, so I doubt you will have a choice to play on another club at the same time!
Who runs / owns Team Smithtown?

Who coaches the High School Teams, JV and Varsity?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Team smith town, what other towns can create a competitive team to pay you guys...


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I doubt Smithtown frowns on club teams. Some of their HS coaches coach for the LI Thunder.


does Team Smithtown take kids from both High Schools?


Yes, Team Smithtown takes kids from both schools. If they have enough kids to create an East and West team, then they will. That is what they are going to try this year with U13 teams. However, they are also setting up these teams to play all year long like other clubs, so I doubt you will have a choice to play on another club at the same time!


I wish Sachem would do that. They break up East and North starting in K. Instead of building an A super team. xwdem4
Getting back to the original concept of this thread, HS summer teams should be optional and or in addition to travel teams. Many HS teams in Western Suffolk play weekly in a local league. Thus, "keeping the boys together". The play and practice with the school duringthe week, and the do their recruiting tournaments and travel clubs on the weekend.
This seems to be a good complimentary situation.
In no way should a HS coach make his team play for him all summer. It all comes down to control and financial gain, wether actual or perceived. Having one man in control of your son's potential lacrosse aspirations is not what you want. The people who should be driving the recruiting process are the parents and the player. The HS coach should only be there to help the process along, not control it. Having the HS coach control what recruiting camps your son will go to or how much playing time he'll get over the summer in front of key coaches, is not a good situation. This is especially true for the average prospective college player, good enough for the next level, but maybe not a D1 kid. For the superstar it doesn't matter, the top schools will find him.
With regard to the financial piece: Any time a coach is making kids play for a team he runs and you pay for, always creates an underlying sentiment that there's a profit motive. Wether the coaches motives are pure or not this situation always wreaks of financial impropriety.
Let the kids and parents make their decisions for summer ball, and let the HS coaches worry about the spring. Very simple.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who runs / owns Team Smithtown?

Who coaches the High School Teams, JV and Varsity?


Rick Suris is the Director of Team Smithtown he also has two kids in program which is the first conflict of interest!

They did a poor job this year involving decisions to overhaul the program and create a single 6th-7th grade superteam. They say there may be two, but lets face it, then there would just be two mediocre teams, so what would be the point? Where does that leave the kids that don't make the team? They will play club! In fact, many have already turned to clubs to cover their backs!

As for coaching, Jason Lambert is the East coach and Moltisanti is west, Apparently they will coach the young kids too with all their free time!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Getting back to the original concept of this thread, HS summer teams should be optional and or in addition to travel teams. Many HS teams in Western Suffolk play weekly in a local league. Thus, "keeping the boys together". The play and practice with the school duringthe week, and the do their recruiting tournaments and travel clubs on the weekend.
This seems to be a good complimentary situation.
In no way should a HS coach make his team play for him all summer. It all comes down to control and financial gain, wether actual or perceived. Having one man in control of your son's potential lacrosse aspirations is not what you want. The people who should be driving the recruiting process are the parents and the player. The HS coach should only be there to help the process along, not control it. Having the HS coach control what recruiting camps your son will go to or how much playing time he'll get over the summer in front of key coaches, is not a good situation. This is especially true for the average prospective college player, good enough for the next level, but maybe not a D1 kid. For the superstar it doesn't matter, the top schools will find him.
With regard to the financial piece: Any time a coach is making kids play for a team he runs and you pay for, always creates an underlying sentiment that there's a profit motive. Wether the coaches motives are pure or not this situation always wreaks of financial impropriety.
Let the kids and parents make their decisions for summer ball, and let the HS coaches worry about the spring. Very simple.


This is one of the best posts on this subject!
If Team Smithtown takes kids from two different high schools doesn't that fly in the face of what all of the proponents of a (HS / town summer club) talk about?

I keep hearing the argument made that (playing together) helps build chemistry.

Back to the original topic.

Yes, it is a conflict of interest for a HS Coach to profit from a summer club team.
I hope the Manhasset girls varsity coach reads this post!!!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Getting back to the original concept of this thread, HS summer teams should be optional and or in addition to travel teams. Many HS teams in Western Suffolk play weekly in a local league. Thus, "keeping the boys together". The play and practice with the school duringthe week, and the do their recruiting tournaments and travel clubs on the weekend.
This seems to be a good complimentary situation.
In no way should a HS coach make his team play for him all summer. It all comes down to control and financial gain, wether actual or perceived. Having one man in control of your son's potential lacrosse aspirations is not what you want. The people who should be driving the recruiting process are the parents and the player. The HS coach should only be there to help the process along, not control it. Having the HS coach control what recruiting camps your son will go to or how much playing time he'll get over the summer in front of key coaches, is not a good situation. This is especially true for the average prospective college player, good enough for the next level, but maybe not a D1 kid. For the superstar it doesn't matter, the top schools will find him.
With regard to the financial piece: Any time a coach is making kids play for a team he runs and you pay for, always creates an underlying sentiment that there's a profit motive. Wether the coaches motives are pure or not this situation always wreaks of financial impropriety.
Let the kids and parents make their decisions for summer ball, and let the HS coaches worry about the spring. Very simple.


This is one of the best posts on this subject!


Totally agree great post- ESM boys coach should read this as well
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Getting back to the original concept of this thread, HS summer teams should be optional and or in addition to travel teams. Many HS teams in Western Suffolk play weekly in a local league. Thus, "keeping the boys together". The play and practice with the school duringthe week, and the do their recruiting tournaments and travel clubs on the weekend.
This seems to be a good complimentary situation.
In no way should a HS coach make his team play for him all summer. It all comes down to control and financial gain, wether actual or perceived. Having one man in control of your son's potential lacrosse aspirations is not what you want. The people who should be driving the recruiting process are the parents and the player. The HS coach should only be there to help the process along, not control it. Having the HS coach control what recruiting camps your son will go to or how much playing time he'll get over the summer in front of key coaches, is not a good situation. This is especially true for the average prospective college player, good enough for the next level, but maybe not a D1 kid. For the superstar it doesn't matter, the top schools will find him.
With regard to the financial piece: Any time a coach is making kids play for a team he runs and you pay for, always creates an underlying sentiment that there's a profit motive. Wether the coaches motives are pure or not this situation always wreaks of financial impropriety.
Let the kids and parents make their decisions for summer ball, and let the HS coaches worry about the spring. Very simple.


This is one of the best posts on this subject!


Totally agree great post- ESM boys coach should read this as well


Every town club that that using their position as a control should read this. The club school programs should collaborate - because honestly would this be a debate - if they worked together i.e. advising them. News Flash Town Club.... Parents will play both - they understand that playing with town kids is important, but they want travel as well. At least a lot of parents are smart enough to understand some of these town clubs are over stepping - as I saw a lot (WM, GC, Smithtown, Sachem, WI, etc) at these tryouts yesterday. And at the end of the day the school coaches will put the best kid on the field.
ESM Coach is the worst with this......From the talent I've seen over there, they should let the boys get outside coaching. ESM will not be a power going forward if we have to only in house....

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Getting back to the original concept of this thread, HS summer teams should be optional and or in addition to travel teams. Many HS teams in Western Suffolk play weekly in a local league. Thus, "keeping the boys together". The play and practice with the school duringthe week, and the do their recruiting tournaments and travel clubs on the weekend.
This seems to be a good complimentary situation.
In no way should a HS coach make his team play for him all summer. It all comes down to control and financial gain, wether actual or perceived. Having one man in control of your son's potential lacrosse aspirations is not what you want. The people who should be driving the recruiting process are the parents and the player. The HS coach should only be there to help the process along, not control it. Having the HS coach control what recruiting camps your son will go to or how much playing time he'll get over the summer in front of key coaches, is not a good situation. This is especially true for the average prospective college player, good enough for the next level, but maybe not a D1 kid. For the superstar it doesn't matter, the top schools will find him.
With regard to the financial piece: Any time a coach is making kids play for a team he runs and you pay for, always creates an underlying sentiment that there's a profit motive. Wether the coaches motives are pure or not this situation always wreaks of financial impropriety.
Let the kids and parents make their decisions for summer ball, and let the HS coaches worry about the spring. Very simple.


This is one of the best posts on this subject!


Totally agree great post- ESM boys coach should read this as well
Just curious, do the high school coaches want to control a players decision whether to play on a club team during the summer because said coach would like the opportunity to bring his players to a higher level within their system, and at the end of the journey, that same high school coach has the pride in knowing that he is the reason the player goes on to play college lacrosse. I would think that if a high school coach is dedicated enough to put together a team and keep it together during the summer, and this high school coach watches his team grow from year to year, this high school coach has invested a lot of time into his players, and he would like to see his players succeed knowing he had something to do with it. I do believe though, that a player should have a choice as to where he or she would like to play, but I feel that they should do all that is possible to represent their school team if given the opportunity.
Does anybody have any input regarding Massapequa H.S. coaches trying to get their middle schoolers to play summer travel for their town only based Team Chief ? I know a lot of those kids played for 91 and Jesters. Just curious if they are getting kids to commit to town program instead of club teams.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just curious, do the high school coaches want to control a players decision whether to play on a club team during the summer because said coach would like the opportunity to bring his players to a higher level within their system, and at the end of the journey, that same high school coach has the pride in knowing that he is the reason the player goes on to play college lacrosse. I would think that if a high school coach is dedicated enough to put together a team and keep it together during the summer, and this high school coach watches his team grow from year to year, this high school coach has invested a lot of time into his players, and he would like to see his players succeed knowing he had something to do with it. I do believe though, that a player should have a choice as to where he or she would like to play, but I feel that they should do all that is possible to represent their school team if given the opportunity.


And I think the parents feel that way. And I think we are all insane enough to do both and make it work. However, the coaches debate has been the ultimatum "us or them". And then use that ultimatum to run a club, i.e, the conflict. They already have the captive audience and people will support a school summer team. I have no problem with anybody making money (no matter their position) or what they charge. Just stop with anti-club nonsense.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just curious, do the high school coaches want to control a players decision whether to play on a club team during the summer because said coach would like the opportunity to bring his players to a higher level within their system, and at the end of the journey, that same high school coach has the pride in knowing that he is the reason the player goes on to play college lacrosse. I would think that if a high school coach is dedicated enough to put together a team and keep it together during the summer, and this high school coach watches his team grow from year to year, this high school coach has invested a lot of time into his players, and he would like to see his players succeed knowing he had something to do with it. I do believe though, that a player should have a choice as to where he or she would like to play, but I feel that they should do all that is possible to represent their school team if given the opportunity.


No
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.


Bueller, Bueller, Bueller
I can play for My High School team in the Shoreham tournament or I can go to the fall Jake Reed. But I cant do both because they are the same weekend. What would the people on this board advise?
Jake Reed
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Jake Reed


I guess if you ask some of the HS coaches, it would be the local tournament. Ya know, cause they're all about the "KIDS".

In many towns school ball is becoming glorified stick time. It means next to nothing. That's why club is so valuable...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.


Bueller, Bueller, Bueller


Agree with poster about WM summer program. If your kid is not in their view (which is clearly blurry at times) better off playing for travel programs at your grade level. This program does nothing for the above average player who is not the stud of the program. Kids who can clearly play for lower DI, DII or DIII programs this system does not help them at all. With over 25 kids on a roster and the mismanagement of how many positional players they have placed on the teams your kid may see only a few minutes in the game. It is a disgrace that such a powerhouse lacrosse town can not do more for these kids who fall between the cracks of the system. Having been through the system it is a shame, disgrace that they haven't figured out it is not the best possible system to help more kids play at the collegiate level than the starting guys on the field. When is anyone going to step up and question what is being done? Where are the board members of 3V lacrosse...oh yeh...they are all on the top team.

I am glad that I no longer have to have my kids going through this debacle but I feel for those kids and parents who are being pushed to the side when they should figure out a way to develop all the talent that is there not just the chosen few. The system is broken so fix it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.


Bueller, Bueller, Bueller


Will be interesting to see how many kids they lose from the current structured program. So much for staying as a "town team" only to be dumped by the next level. Don't buy into it in the early grades.
sour grapes...you're a whiner, glad you're gone.
mismanagement of positional players? can you elaborate?
not sure which wm team son played on but everyone got alot of playing time. You sound like another parent that cannot accept
your son's playing level? Funny thing is that all the boys had a great time playing and hanging out with their teammates & it was the parents with the frowns on their faces...interesting..
Originally Posted by Anonymous
sour grapes...you're a whiner, glad you're gone.

My guess is your kid is one of the few tht benefit. Read the guys post. Valid point. Just saying it is a program that is not optimal. You wouldn't see that though because your head is too far up the coaches a$$.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.


Bueller, Bueller, Bueller


Will be interesting to see how many kids they lose from the current structured program. So much for staying as a "town team" only to be dumped by the next level. Don't buy into it in the early grades.


Doubt it is from Smithtown. One of the varsity coaches - coaches for the Thunder.
Don't think there aren't issues with these town/school travel teams. In my town ...

1. There are players at younger grades currently on rosters, that have been taken only because their older siblings play JV or varsity.
2. There have been other players previously covered by item 1 above, who have subsequently been cut when their older siblings have graduated (what message does that send to a kid ?!?!).
3. There are players in private school, with no intention of going to the public middle school or public high school, which the summer program is intended to feed into. (Not the biggest issue, but this a roster spot taken up by a player who will someday play for the competition.)
4. There are players on rosters who are there only because their dad's were on varsity way back when.
5. There are non-lacrosse players on rosters because they are also football players, and there is a push to make them lacrosse players (taking a long view into high school, so they can play football in the fall and lax in the spring) -- some of these boys lack fundamental stick skills (of course, they could be great eventually, but maybe not).

And all of the foregoing results in a certain amount of good, motivated lacrosse players either not making a roster, or losing playing time, in many cases to boys who in all fairness did not legitimately earn their spot. And that makes the team weaker.

And potentially worse ... a number of elite players forgo the town travel team entirely, and play on private clubs. Perhaps to avoid the nonsense, or perhaps to play on a stronger team. So, oddly, the system can be counterproductive to the goal of keeping good players "in town". I suppose those players expect to glide onto the JV team when they reach high school, but that of course assumes the coaches don't hold it against them that they played elsewhere.

I am certain most or even all of this happens with every town that has a school-based travel team (assuming it is a team/program that most kids want to play on).

Indeed, conflicts a-plenty !!

The private clubs aren't much better. You pay more for less.

Wahh!
not sure what your problem is....both the green & gold teams played EVERYONE at each tourney....its not optimal? they mixed the line-ups as well....it would be the same as if you played on a club team...same tourneys, exposure is the same. If you are saying that the wm teams did not play everyone you are absolutely wrong. There were many games that the wm was winning
and they played everyone....and it cost them the game. Coaches didnt have a problem with the outcome because they wanted to get as many players game time experience. Thats what counts in the summer, so you can go into next spring with a lot depth & make a strong run for a championship. It sounds to me that you werent happy with the amount of interest you & your son received from college coachs...how much effort did you & your son put in on your own? how many showcase camps did your son go to?
any? if the interest was low on those & the wm team tourneys
open your eyes....go to a club pay your $$$ & your son will be in the same spot.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
not sure what your problem is....both the green & gold teams played EVERYONE at each tourney....its not optimal? they mixed the line-ups as well....it would be the same as if you played on a club team...same tourneys, exposure is the same. If you are saying that the wm teams did not play everyone you are absolutely wrong. There were many games that the wm was winning
and they played everyone....and it cost them the game. Coaches didnt have a problem with the outcome because they wanted to get as many players game time experience. Thats what counts in the summer, so you can go into next spring with a lot depth & make a strong run for a championship. It sounds to me that you werent happy with the amount of interest you & your son received from college coachs...how much effort did you & your son put in on your own? how many showcase camps did your son go to?
any? if the interest was low on those & the wm team tourneys
open your eyes....go to a club pay your $$$ & your son will be in the same spot.


And that is why some of your players played for both town and club and never said anything, because they got enough time on the field with the town with a roster of 30. You can really get a lot of PT with that size roster. Keep seeing everything through your rose colored glasses.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
not sure what your problem is....both the green & gold teams played EVERYONE at each tourney....its not optimal? they mixed the line-ups as well....it would be the same as if you played on a club team...same tourneys, exposure is the same. If you are saying that the wm teams did not play everyone you are absolutely wrong. There were many games that the wm was winning
and they played everyone....and it cost them the game. Coaches didnt have a problem with the outcome because they wanted to get as many players game time experience. Thats what counts in the summer, so you can go into next spring with a lot depth & make a strong run for a championship. It sounds to me that you werent happy with the amount of interest you & your son received from college coachs...how much effort did you & your son put in on your own? how many showcase camps did your son go to?
any? if the interest was low on those & the wm team tourneys
open your eyes....go to a club pay your $$$ & your son will be in the same spot.


And that is why some of your players played for both town and club and never said anything, because they got enough time on the field with the town with a roster of 30. You can really get a lot of PT with that size roster. Keep seeing everything through your rose colored glasses.


That is why you play club. To play more and play with better players. Hey HS coaches - those of you are guilty of this get down from the ivory tower and become part of the solution. Only you have the power. Because if collaborated - the kids will do both, play more and everyone will be happy.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This trend has reached a new level in Ward Melville. For years, the youth program has said if you play outside of our 3 village program you can’t play on the town travel team. That was fine and everyone understood their options. Some families stayed with the town program, but some also left for select teams like express, 91 team LI...The families that left generally have either really good players that wanted more competition than town team tournaments, or players that weren’t as strong that weren’t getting playing time on the town team. It was sad that the teams lost players and the boys lost the opportunity to practice and play with their friends, but generally it worked out ok for all.

Now, at the HS travel level they have two teams-Green and Gold (JV and Varsity) being coached by HS coaches. At the recent try-outs, there were approximately 100 boys for roughly 50 spots. There were several boys trying out that had previously played on select teams (all whom are now very strong players). Having talked to some of those families I learned that they were trying out to make sure the HS coaches knew their kid existed…

At the end of the try-out, the coaches thanked all for the boys for trying out and were pretty open about their expectations. They don’t want any Ward Melville boys playing outside of their reams. The threat is clear, play elsewhere and you have no shot at playing on the Varsity team ever. Now, for most of the boys, the threat is really nonsense as the HS varsity team rarely plays more than 12 or 13 boys during any game (except for last Q in a blowout, starters don’t leave the field). So unless you have a real shot to be one of those 12 or 13, you should tell the coach to jump off the local bridge. However, if you have a shot to be one of those, then you are in a ridiculous bind. The coaches want the boys together because they say it makes the HS team stronger and it is a fair point. But all the boys want the chance to play. So if you are one of the 12 or 13 you get looked at by colleges and have a shot to get recruited, but if your are not and only play at junk time, no one ever sees you.

The summer team plays 5 tournaments and so unless you are on of the 12 or 13, you need to get really lucky to get an opportunity for a college coach to see you do anything…It is left to each kid to figure out how to get himself recruited.

The net result in WM is that at any given time there are 10 kids that won’t see the field that would get a starting job at most other HS programs. They are giving up their shot to play and get looked at by colleges (remember D II and D III are really great options for most kids) –all to make the HS program stronger???

In my humble opinion this is a completely inappropriate use of power by a HS coach, by a school district and a complete shame. I have heard a rumor that Smithtown is making a similar threat and as a result I suspect Turtles team will also be impacted as some will choose HS team over Turtle team.


Bueller, Bueller, Bueller


Agree with poster about WM summer program. If your kid is not in their view (which is clearly blurry at times) better off playing for travel programs at your grade level. This program does nothing for the above average player who is not the stud of the program. Kids who can clearly play for lower DI, DII or DIII programs this system does not help them at all. With over 25 kids on a roster and the mismanagement of how many positional players they have placed on the teams your kid may see only a few minutes in the game. It is a disgrace that such a powerhouse lacrosse town can not do more for these kids who fall between the cracks of the system. Having been through the system it is a shame, disgrace that they haven't figured out it is not the best possible system to help more kids play at the collegiate level than the starting guys on the field. When is anyone going to step up and question what is being done? Where are the board members of 3V lacrosse...oh yeh...they are all on the top team.

I am glad that I no longer have to have my kids going through this debacle but I feel for those kids and parents who are being pushed to the side when they should figure out a way to develop all the talent that is there not just the chosen few. The system is broken so fix it.


How dare you question the coaches or the 3V Board? They are the best! If you do not believe that they are the best I suggest that you go and ask them.
30 players on each of green and gold??? Come on, there is no way everyone gets a decent amount of playing time? How can any of them get recruited if they never get a chance?????

All the other club team are running low 20s. WM summer is a crock, money grab, waste of time. Keep your one town one team noneseense.

I give it two years before the parents with nerve push hard enough that the district is forced to tell the HS coaches to stay out of summer. Two years tops, suck for the people there now. You probably have one or two loud mouth fathers that pushed for this rediculous plan. What is wrong with the rest of the WM people, the koolaid is spiked?

good one...and in 2 years you will have the same thing, people like you with kids that are at best average players who think they should be recruited to play lax in college wont have the phones ringing either...sounds like you're another wm parent with no clue about this game. keep crying, great eaxample for your super star son.
How can you say never get a chance? its not up to the hs to "get you recruited" has your spoiled kid gotten off his [lacrosse]
and contacted coaches? gone to individual "showcase events"?
HS coaches can help you, but its up to the player to help himself. Maybe your kid just isn't that good yet? this forum is loaded with clueless parents like yourself who drank the
" i live in stony brook, my kid bought a wm helmet & he will be a super star lax player" koolaid. keep crying.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How can you say never get a chance? its not up to the hs to "get you recruited" has your spoiled kid gotten off his [lacrosse]
and contacted coaches? gone to individual "showcase events"?
HS coaches can help you, but its up to the player to help himself. Maybe your kid just isn't that good yet? this forum is loaded with clueless parents like yourself who drank the
" i live in stony brook, my kid bought a wm helmet & he will be a super star lax player" koolaid. keep crying.
Teaching more parents about the recruiting cycles and process is one of the purposes of BOTC's Main Forums and College Forums. Parents and student-athletes that are better informed will be less subject to the exclusive direction provided by their lacrosse club in the recruiting process. Information is king in the college reruiting process.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
good one...and in 2 years you will have the same thing, people like you with kids that are at best average players who think they should be recruited to play lax in college wont have the phones ringing either...sounds like you're another wm parent with no clue about this game. keep crying, great eaxample for your super star son.


Would love to hear from cage or parents outside of WM regarding current structured program. As it stands they have 2 teams Green (considered A team) and Gold (considered B team) each with about 30 kids on roster. Grades are mixed so can have rising freshman to rising juniors on teams. They are not straight grade level. Is this the best way to get kids exposed....even those kids that are as above parent puts it "at best average players" on a WM team who can still play DII and DIII? Again, isn't that the crux of the program to get all kids playing at the next level????

Not just the kids of ignorant, selfish parents who live vicariously through their children and are so blinded by the a$@ kissing that they don't even realize it is not the best system !!

WM thinks they are better than everyone else-please guys, express, 91 and anyone of those teams are better than any of your best teams. At most you have two or three kids that could even start on one of those teams.

Wake up, your kids-other than top two or three arent getting recruited. You guys drank the koolaid big time-

Just as many kids from Comsewogue and SHoreham getting recruited as WM. Smithtown many more??? why because those kids are playing for clubs and your kids are stuck...

For the parents that dont have the kid getting recruited, wake up and join a club team before your kid losses his chance...

tell the overbearing parents to step off--you know the guys on here that are posting that everyone is a whinniy baby--plain old bully mentality.

Wake up, the world does not revolve around WM lax.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Would love to hear from cage or parents outside of WM regarding current structured program.
Honestly, no interest and no comment.
lISTEN I BELIEVE THE CLUB TEAMS HAVE BENEFITED NOT THE KIDS THESE KIDS THAT YOU TALK ABOUT WOULD HAVE BEEN RECRUITED WITHOUT YOUR CLUB TEAM THESE INDIVIDUALS PUT THE CLUBS ON THE MAP. IF ANYONE OF THOSE KIDS STAYED WITH THERE SCHOOL PROGRAM THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN RECRUITED. SO YES PLAYER S FROM mELVILLE ,wEST . sMITHTOWN WEST AND EAST, West Islip would have been recruited even if they played for there home teams. you at the clubs benefit. you blow alot of smoke up peoples butt and collect the money and many kids don't get recruited . all the players from your a programs would have been recuited no matter where they played i will be impressed when you b,c,d and e team kids get recruited.
Caps dont make it more important or true. Clubs have gotten many more kids recruited than any HS program. To say otherwise is simply not true. Please check your facts, and try and type without caps...

Originally Posted by Anonymous
lISTEN I BELIEVE THE CLUB TEAMS HAVE BENEFITED NOT THE KIDS THESE KIDS THAT YOU TALK ABOUT WOULD HAVE BEEN RECRUITED WITHOUT YOUR CLUB TEAM THESE INDIVIDUALS PUT THE CLUBS ON THE MAP. IF ANYONE OF THOSE KIDS STAYED WITH THERE SCHOOL PROGRAM THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN RECRUITED. SO YES PLAYER S FROM mELVILLE ,wEST . sMITHTOWN WEST AND EAST, West Islip would have been recruited even if they played for there home teams. you at the clubs benefit. you blow alot of smoke up peoples butt and collect the money and many kids don't get recruited . all the players from your a programs would have been recuited no matter where they played i will be impressed when you b,c,d and e team kids get recruited.


That is your opinion and you are entitled to it. Hopefully your child benefited from it. That is not the issue! The issue is that parents and kids should have the opportunity to choose their own path without it being held against them by their Varsity coach. Sure some kids will be seen playing for their HS team, some won't and would be better off with their travel team! When it comes down to it the coaches want to make MONEY and this is an easy way to do it!
I would think the elite clubs gets more exposure then the school teams unless the school is a top notch program. BUT what about the good players that arent quite superstars and dont play for a top ranked HS? Is there any recruiting benefit for these kids playing at the club level? Do Club "B" teams even get looks from recruiters?
you miss the point. Those kids would have been recruited anyway. Can you really say the club teams did it or maybe the individuals talent. If the boy or girl is a player they are going to get recruited. Guess what as I said before when your b,c,d,and e team players get recruited then we can talk but until then if you can't get an A player recruited shame on you. They would be recruited from anywhere so the club team sales pitch is a crook. Get out there and practice and improve your skills and you will end up somewhere. Fundamentals
I agree with play where you want but don't tell me taht the club teams are the second comming. It still comes down to the player and if you have the skills and the IQ you don't need the club ,you can play anywhere and the coaches will find you. I have seen many kids that have played the club circuit and went to camps and still have not landed anywhere. It comes down to your talent and wall ball ,practice and fundamentals all help you get better not the club circuit.
Please, the HS plays from Feb to June with 5 summer tournys...clubs are playing year round.

It means more pratice for those of you that still dont get it.

next, if your HS features the stud--which they all do--he is the one that the recruiters come to see. The better than average kid never gets a realistic chance to show his/her talent during school ball.

If you think all those coaches on the sidelines during summer are watching every kid in the summer tourny's you are nuts. Have you been to any of the events? I have, they are watching the 4 kids they are trying to recruit, a kid that wasnt on their radar is wasting his time.

So, drum roll, it is up to the kid and his parents to get the kid noticed. If your HS will not feature your son (remember the state champs at WM are sending like 4 kids to play at college, the rest are not playing at the next level) and one of those kids never set foot on the field until this year and so he got no looks until now. Cornell told him you can come to our school as a walk on.

so, for all but the three or four studs, and we know that on WM there are ten kids (same goes for east and west and sachem and lots of schools) that will be better off playing their summers at a club. Anyone that tells you different is drinking the HS koolaid.

Not every kid can play at top level D-1, but lots of kids can play at second level D-1 and D11 and D111.

Parents need to realize that no one will do this work for your kid except you, not the HS for sure. Club structure is hear to stay because the model works and they provide a helpful service and give more opportunity to shine. it is simple, more practice, more events, more opportunity.

How much playing time can any kid get, even the stud, with 30 kids on a team and a 40 minute game??? Math is math, wake up!
Wah, wah, wah...

Just go to travel teams if you don't like to see what's going on.
There are many travel teams willing to take your $$$.
Sorry your son did not make the WM team(s) but have some class!
Tell your son work hard so he will be ready for next Spring WM tryout.
Whining does not get you anywhere.
Hard work does!
3V and WM Eilte programs are doing great job.
Keep it up!
My son will be fortunate to play within a H.S. program that plays together in the summer. That program has put well over a hundred kids (probably closer to 200) into college programs in the last decade. Many of these kids didn't get much playing time during school season but do see time in the summer program. D2&3 coaches know they come from a quality program with great coaching and reputation. The kids and parents buy into this system because it has produced a nationally ranked power with numerous state, LI, and county titles. Many of the younger kids also play on travel teams. However, when they get to H.S., the school summer program comes first. My fear is this may change in the not too distant future because some of these younger kids are playing for the top club teams and may feel as many of you do that they should play with the best players. This H.S. has kids who have played at A.C.C, Big Ten, Ivy schools so it is not like the coaches don't recruit them. I don't believe the coaches at this program are in it for the money because the costs are fairly low and if they started their own club program , I think they would do very well due to their results and reputations. They simply want the kids to play together because that teamwork wins championships. The town program isn't perfect as you see the same nonsense you see everywhere else, but the H.S. program has been great and I hope it stays that way. Just look at the towns that have won multiple county championships, LI and state titles since 2000. They all have something in common.
Had something in common. Sorry to let you all in on the secret, the world changes every day and makes things that were once successful obsolete.

anyone remember blockbuster? great model for alot of years but technology and netflix put them down....

it happens in every facet of life, those that hang on to the past, eventually get trampled, those that accept change and embrace it move forward.

clubs are here to stay, but even their model will change over the next few years as they battle eachother...

So for all you parents hanging on the the HS model (west I WM...) hopefully your kid graduates before the change and hopefully he is the team stud.

for the rest, pick the best club team you can get on and get your kid in the best position he can be in to get noticed.

for the guy who is always saying wah, wah in his posts, grow up
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wah, wah, wah...

Just go to travel teams if you don't like to see what's going on.
There are many travel teams willing to take your $$$.
Sorry your son did not make the WM team(s) but have some class!
Tell your son work hard so he will be ready for next Spring WM tryout.
Whining does not get you anywhere.
Hard work does!
3V and WM Eilte programs are doing great job.
Keep it up!


The only one who is whining is you, are you the same guy who bashes the parent and the kid because they have a different point of view?

You sound very arrogant. But I guess if you kid plays for "WM Elite" you think you are better than the rest of us.

Who calls themselves "Elite"??

back to the original question, Is it a conflict of interest for a HS Coach to run a for profit summer club team?

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wah, wah, wah...

Just go to travel teams if you don't like to see what's going on.
There are many travel teams willing to take your $$$.
Sorry your son did not make the WM team(s) but have some class!
Tell your son work hard so he will be ready for next Spring WM tryout.
Whining does not get you anywhere.
Hard work does!
3V and WM Eilte programs are doing great job.
Keep it up!


The only one who is whining is you, are you the same guy who bashes the parent and the kid because they have a different point of view?

You sound very arrogant. But I guess if you kid plays for "WM Elite" you think you are better than the rest of us.

Who calls themselves "Elite"??

back to the original question, Is it a conflict of interest for a HS Coach to run a for profit summer club team?

Bottom line and the answer is simple although people don't want to admit it. YES, YES, YES..it is a conflict. Teachers can't tutor their own students..how is it not different when HS coaches are running the summer team? Total conflict of interest and should not be allowed by the athletic director.


Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son will be fortunate to play within a H.S. program that plays together in the summer. That program has put well over a hundred kids (probably closer to 200) into college programs in the last decade. Many of these kids didn't get much playing time during school season but do see time in the summer program. D2&3 coaches know they come from a quality program with great coaching and reputation. The kids and parents buy into this system because it has produced a nationally ranked power with numerous state, LI, and county titles. Many of the younger kids also play on travel teams. However, when they get to H.S., the school summer program comes first. My fear is this may change in the not too distant future because some of these younger kids are playing for the top club teams and may feel as many of you do that they should play with the best players. This H.S. has kids who have played at A.C.C, Big Ten, Ivy schools so it is not like the coaches don't recruit them. I don't believe the coaches at this program are in it for the money because the costs are fairly low and if they started their own club program , I think they would do very well due to their results and reputations. They simply want the kids to play together because that teamwork wins championships. The town program isn't perfect as you see the same nonsense you see everywhere else, but the H.S. program has been great and I hope it stays that way. Just look at the towns that have won multiple county championships, LI and state titles since 2000. They all have something in common.


You mean like Garden City?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son will be fortunate to play within a H.S. program that plays together in the summer. That program has put well over a hundred kids (probably closer to 200) into college programs in the last decade. Many of these kids didn't get much playing time during school season but do see time in the summer program. D2&3 coaches know they come from a quality program with great coaching and reputation. The kids and parents buy into this system because it has produced a nationally ranked power with numerous state, LI, and county titles. Many of the younger kids also play on travel teams. However, when they get to H.S., the school summer program comes first. My fear is this may change in the not too distant future because some of these younger kids are playing for the top club teams and may feel as many of you do that they should play with the best players. This H.S. has kids who have played at A.C.C, Big Ten, Ivy schools so it is not like the coaches don't recruit them. I don't believe the coaches at this program are in it for the money because the costs are fairly low and if they started their own club program , I think they would do very well due to their results and reputations. They simply want the kids to play together because that teamwork wins championships. The town program isn't perfect as you see the same nonsense you see everywhere else, but the H.S. program has been great and I hope it stays that way. Just look at the towns that have won multiple county championships, LI and state titles since 2000. They all have something in common.


You mean like Garden City?


I think up until recently, GC kids played where they wanted. fl$, Express etc..

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son will be fortunate to play within a H.S. program that plays together in the summer. That program has put well over a hundred kids (probably closer to 200) into college programs in the last decade. Many of these kids didn't get much playing time during school season but do see time in the summer program. D2&3 coaches know they come from a quality program with great coaching and reputation. The kids and parents buy into this system because it has produced a nationally ranked power with numerous state, LI, and county titles. Many of the younger kids also play on travel teams. However, when they get to H.S., the school summer program comes first. My fear is this may change in the not too distant future because some of these younger kids are playing for the top club teams and may feel as many of you do that they should play with the best players. This H.S. has kids who have played at A.C.C, Big Ten, Ivy schools so it is not like the coaches don't recruit them. I don't believe the coaches at this program are in it for the money because the costs are fairly low and if they started their own club program , I think they would do very well due to their results and reputations. They simply want the kids to play together because that teamwork wins championships. The town program isn't perfect as you see the same nonsense you see everywhere else, but the H.S. program has been great and I hope it stays that way. Just look at the towns that have won multiple county championships, LI and state titles since 2000. They all have something in common.


You mean like Garden City?


I think up until recently, GC kids played where they wanted. fl$, Express etc..

I guess you didn't pick up on my remark. That's the point, many Championships and the kids aren't "forced" to play for the coach. I hope they don't cave.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son will be fortunate to play within a H.S. program that plays together in the summer. That program has put well over a hundred kids (probably closer to 200) into college programs in the last decade. Many of these kids didn't get much playing time during school season but do see time in the summer program. D2&3 coaches know they come from a quality program with great coaching and reputation. The kids and parents buy into this system because it has produced a nationally ranked power with numerous state, LI, and county titles. Many of the younger kids also play on travel teams. However, when they get to H.S., the school summer program comes first. My fear is this may change in the not too distant future because some of these younger kids are playing for the top club teams and may feel as many of you do that they should play with the best players. This H.S. has kids who have played at A.C.C, Big Ten, Ivy schools so it is not like the coaches don't recruit them. I don't believe the coaches at this program are in it for the money because the costs are fairly low and if they started their own club program , I think they would do very well due to their results and reputations. They simply want the kids to play together because that teamwork wins championships. The town program isn't perfect as you see the same nonsense you see everywhere else, but the H.S. program has been great and I hope it stays that way. Just look at the towns that have won multiple county championships, LI and state titles since 2000. They all have something in common.


You mean like Garden City?


I think up until recently, GC kids played where they wanted. fl$, Express etc..

I guess you didn't pick up on my remark. That's the point, many Championships and the kids aren't "forced" to play for the coach. I hope they don't cave.



I think there is pressure in GC now. Not sure why they are changing.
WM summer gold team--

4 to 5 summer tourny, 2 will be recruiting types

28 kids, 12 long poles???

But we should stay in WM because it will help them win a championship? How much time can my kid get with 12 poles?????

At least the clubs pick the right amount of position players...

Let's here all the geniuses defend this please.

leave. Why didnt you ask this question at the meeting?
The skirt looks good on you.
Question was asked, they have no answers, only that they will get back to us as they work things out closer to summer.

There you go again, same tough guy with the same big mouth. Not worth responding to you, your one of those people in life we can all do without. Crawl back under that rock please.

12 seems like alot to get in. I would have preferred to keep
one of the 10th grade goalies too, Going with 2 very young 9th graders?? We will be facing some strong competition, big physical size jump 9 to 10th grade.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
leave. Why didnt you ask this question at the meeting?
The skirt looks good on you.


What devision will the gold team play in?

Are there 2016's on the gold roster?

Are there 2017's on the green roster?

What is the deal with the White Team?

What is the cost ?

Is it the same price for all teams?

If there were 80 - 90 kids at the tryouts and 57 were selected to be on either the green or the gold what happens to the other "25 or so" kids?

Is there a White team this year?

Will the rosters change before next summer or are you locked in to a team?

Who picked the teams?

Are the "wm elite" teams a part of 3VLax or is it separate?

Is "wm elite" a "for profit" business?

Why did 3V change the way they ran the summer teams?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
leave. Why didnt you ask this question at the meeting?
The skirt looks good on you.


What devision will the gold team play in?

Are there 2016's on the gold roster?

Are there 2017's on the green roster?

What is the deal with the White Team?

What is the cost ?

Is it the same price for all teams?

If there were 80 - 90 kids at the tryouts and 57 were selected to be on either the green or the gold what happens to the other "25 or so" kids?

Is there a White team this year?

Will the rosters change before next summer or are you locked in to a team?

Who picked the teams?

Are the "wm elite" teams a part of 3VLax or is it separate?

Is "wm elite" a "for profit" business?

Why did 3V change the way they ran the summer teams?




OMG run! Sounds like your son is getting the shaft. If he's not one of the 12 or 12 chosen ones he won't play in the regular season anyway. So many options, do what's best for your son. Great big lacrosse world out there. If he wants to play in college, play for another team over the summer. Most college coaches don't even speak to the HS coach anymore.
Why didn't you ask these q's at the meeting?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why didn't you ask these q's at the meeting?


I was not at the meeting. younger ones coming up in the program, trying to get all the info that I can.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why didn't you ask these q's at the meeting?


You know why he didn't ask the questions.... Because the HS coach controls everything. So people are intimidated. Ya know, cause the coach is all about the kids. Would never hold it against a kid for his parents asking such valid, pointed questions. Horrible situation except for a chosen few. Who's going to say anything? People, wake up! Don't give all this power to these HS coaches. Do what's best for your kids.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why didn't you ask these q's at the meeting?


You know why he didn't ask the questions.... Because the HS coach controls everything. So people are intimidated. Ya know, cause the coach is all about the kids. Would never hold it against a kid for his parents asking such valid, pointed questions. Horrible situation except for a chosen few. Who's going to say anything? People, wake up! Don't give all this power to these HS coaches. Do what's best for your kids.


Seriously, I am not from your town but people look to this model. Some agree it is not right and you should have an opinion to opt out of town ball, I disagree, you should be proud and want to play for your town with your buddy's and tell your kids aboaut it so,eday. this whole travel scene is not what it should be. It should be the best of the best only for a few tournaments. Playing the best elsewhere. Not just anyone who wants to play. Ad can Barry play. This whole thing is sickening.
[/quote]

Seriously, I am not from your town but people look to this model. Some agree it is not right and you should have an opinion to opt out of town ball, I disagree, you should be proud and want to play for your town with your buddy's and tell your kids aboaut it so,eday. this whole travel scene is not what it should be. It should be the best of the best only for a few tournaments. Playing the best elsewhere. Not just anyone who wants to play. Ad can Barry play. This whole thing is sickening. [/quote]


Seriously?

People look to this model??

What model??

The success of the Ward Melville Program has little to do with this model. Ward Melville has been a dominant program for something like 40 years. WM and 3V lax were successful long before anyone associated with the current programs were involved.

People look at the success of "Ward Melville" not at the model. The Model has changed and it has not been for the better.

Do you know what the model is?

I think the Ward Melville High School Program will be successful for many years to come but it will not be because of the current 3V Lax / Patriot Elite program. It will be because of the kids, coaches and families. (yes, the coaches, I think that they are good.) I just do not think that the current state of the 3V Lax / Patriot Elite is good for the kids or the HS program.

Parents in the community are trying to figure out what is best for their kids and they are being pushed from a very young age to follow what is being told to them by a small group of people. Is it not OK to question what is being told to them? Should a parent not question what the 3rd or 4th grade "Parent Coach" tells them regarding their son? Is it not OK to question the 3V Board?

I agree, the "club world" is out of control but until you know what goes on in this town don't say people look to the model. The people are looking to the success that 3V and WM have had over the long hall, not to the current model.

Ward Melville is a very competitive place when it comes to lacrosse, if you want your kid to play at WM I would not narrow the path by which you help him develop as a person, student, athlete or Lacrosse Player. But I would question the power structure in 3V.

The topic being discussed is, "Is it a conflict of interest for HS coaches to coach/own for profit summer club teams?"

Yes
Does anyone know how many 2013 boys got D1 scholarships to good schools last year from WM? Express had 20 plus according to their website.
5 plus add 2 who went from a PG year to D1 to the 2012 total. Seems low for the # 1 H.S. team in the nation. I think they have had years of as many as eight. I don't see how you can compare to a top Express team that draws kids from numerous school districts.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why didn't you ask these q's at the meeting?


You know why he didn't ask the questions.... Because the HS coach controls everything. So people are intimidated. Ya know, cause the coach is all about the kids. Would never hold it against a kid for his parents asking such valid, pointed questions. Horrible situation except for a chosen few. Who's going to say anything? People, wake up! Don't give all this power to these HS coaches. Do what's best for your kids.


Seriously, I am not from your town but people look to this model. Some agree it is not right and you should have an opinion to opt out of town ball, I disagree, you should be proud and want to play for your town with your buddy's and tell your kids aboaut it so,eday. this whole travel scene is not what it should be. It should be the best of the best only for a few tournaments. Playing the best elsewhere. Not just anyone who wants to play. Ad can Barry play. This whole thing is sickening.


What's sickening is you. The travel scene isn't just all about D1 recruits.
Be proud and tell your kids someday? What are you living in Mayberry? This whole discussion is about opportunity for the kids. Not about some made up loyalty to a town or coach. have you seen the cost of college lately? Upwards of $55,000 a year. The kid who's not the D1 player needs exposure over the summer to try and get a spot at a school that has a D2-D3 program. If the boy has decent grades he can get $15-$20k in merit money. He will be pushed through admissions by the coach. If the financial need is there he may get another $10k for that. It's the difference for many kids between a public or private school education. The kid will not get the exposure he needs if one man is controlling how much he plays over the summer. It's all about the individual players opportunities. Let the HS coach control the spring. Let the kids and parents control the summer. Way too much at stake.
I guess this might me too much for you to understand, cause only your future Rabil should be playing, right. Wait till he gets to college and all the kids are as good or better than him. What goes around, comes around. You'll see.
Bottom line, my friends kid went to a big lax HS, could not get on the field, was told he would not get on the field, went to travel and ended up with a D2 half ride. You going to look that kid in the eye and tell him he should have been happy never seeing the field and not getting to play in college ? How do you even justify that ?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why didn't you ask these q's at the meeting?


You know why he didn't ask the questions.... Because the HS coach controls everything. So people are intimidated. Ya know, cause the coach is all about the kids. Would never hold it against a kid for his parents asking such valid, pointed questions. Horrible situation except for a chosen few. Who's going to say anything? People, wake up! Don't give all this power to these HS coaches. Do what's best for your kids.


Seriously, I am not from your town but people look to this model. Some agree it is not right and you should have an opinion to opt out of town ball, I disagree, you should be proud and want to play for your town with your buddy's and tell your kids aboaut it so,eday. this whole travel scene is not what it should be. It should be the best of the best only for a few tournaments. Playing the best elsewhere. Not just anyone who wants to play. Ad can Barry play. This whole thing is sickening.


What's sickening is you. The travel scene isn't just all about D1 recruits.
Be proud and tell your kids someday? What are you living in Mayberry? This whole discussion is about opportunity for the kids. Not about some made up loyalty to a town or coach. have you seen the cost of college lately? Upwards of $55,000 a year. The kid who's not the D1 player needs exposure over the summer to try and get a spot at a school that has a D2-D3 program. If the boy has decent grades he can get $15-$20k in merit money. He will be pushed through admissions by the coach. If the financial need is there he may get another $10k for that. It's the difference for many kids between a public or private school education. The kid will not get the exposure he needs if one man is controlling how much he plays over the summer. It's all about the individual players opportunities. Let the HS coach control the spring. Let the kids and parents control the summer. Way too much at stake.
I guess this might me too much for you to understand, cause only your future Rabil should be playing, right. Wait till he gets to college and all the kids are as good or better than him. What goes around, comes around. You'll see.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bottom line, my friends kid went to a big lax HS, could not get on the field, was told he would not get on the field, went to travel and ended up with a D2 half ride. You going to look that kid in the eye and tell him he should have been happy never seeing the field and not getting to play in college ? How do you even justify that ?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why didn't you ask these q's at the meeting?


You know why he didn't ask the questions.... Because the HS coach controls everything. So people are intimidated. Ya know, cause the coach is all about the kids. Would never hold it against a kid for his parents asking such valid, pointed questions. Horrible situation except for a chosen few. Who's going to say anything? People, wake up! Don't give all this power to these HS coaches. Do what's best for your kids.


Seriously, I am not from your town but people look to this model. Some agree it is not right and you should have an opinion to opt out of town ball, I disagree, you should be proud and want to play for your town with your buddy's and tell your kids aboaut it so,eday. this whole travel scene is not what it should be. It should be the best of the best only for a few tournaments. Playing the best elsewhere. Not just anyone who wants to play. Ad can Barry play. This whole thing is sickening.


What's sickening is you. The travel scene isn't just all about D1 recruits.
Be proud and tell your kids someday? What are you living in Mayberry? This whole discussion is about opportunity for the kids. Not about some made up loyalty to a town or coach. have you seen the cost of college lately? Upwards of $55,000 a year. The kid who's not the D1 player needs exposure over the summer to try and get a spot at a school that has a D2-D3 program. If the boy has decent grades he can get $15-$20k in merit money. He will be pushed through admissions by the coach. If the financial need is there he may get another $10k for that. It's the difference for many kids between a public or private school education. The kid will not get the exposure he needs if one man is controlling how much he plays over the summer. It's all about the individual players opportunities. Let the HS coach control the spring. Let the kids and parents control the summer. Way too much at stake.
I guess this might me too much for you to understand, cause only your future Rabil should be playing, right. Wait till he gets to college and all the kids are as good or better than him. What goes around, comes around. You'll see.
WOW! Somebody speaking on the topic whom seems to have some actual knowledge. (Not just another bitter, mediocre player's disgruntled folks wishing ill will toward all successful club players and enthusiasts). Refreshing!
Don't tell me... I am the one who wrote the comment of "seriously"... I went to a competitive d1aa football program over a d1 program. I didn't play HS lax but played summers.. Not much has changed for those who were competitive... If you can't get on the field in HS... You think you deserve a spot in college... Oh wait you must have went to WM and politics prevented you playing... Still bitter.... Chillax

Depending on the grade concentrate on the grades....


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Bottom line, my friends kid went to a big lax HS, could not get on the field, was told he would not get on the field, went to travel and ended up with a D2 half ride. You going to look that kid in the eye and tell him he should have been happy never seeing the field and not getting to play in college ? How do you even justify that ?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why didn't you ask these q's at the meeting?


You know why he didn't ask the questions.... Because the HS coach controls everything. So people are intimidated. Ya know, cause the coach is all about the kids. Would never hold it against a kid for his parents asking such valid, pointed questions. Horrible situation except for a chosen few. Who's going to say anything? People, wake up! Don't give all this power to these HS coaches. Do what's best for your kids.


Seriously, I am not from your town but people look to this model. Some agree it is not right and you should have an opinion to opt out of town ball, I disagree, you should be proud and want to play for your town with your buddy's and tell your kids aboaut it so,eday. this whole travel scene is not what it should be. It should be the best of the best only for a few tournaments. Playing the best elsewhere. Not just anyone who wants to play. Ad can Barry play. This whole thing is sickening.


What's sickening is you. The travel scene isn't just all about D1 recruits.
Be proud and tell your kids someday? What are you living in Mayberry? This whole discussion is about opportunity for the kids. Not about some made up loyalty to a town or coach. have you seen the cost of college lately? Upwards of $55,000 a year. The kid who's not the D1 player needs exposure over the summer to try and get a spot at a school that has a D2-D3 program. If the boy has decent grades he can get $15-$20k in merit money. He will be pushed through admissions by the coach. If the financial need is there he may get another $10k for that. It's the difference for many kids between a public or private school education. The kid will not get the exposure he needs if one man is controlling how much he plays over the summer. It's all about the individual players opportunities. Let the HS coach control the spring. Let the kids and parents control the summer. Way too much at stake.
I guess this might me too much for you to understand, cause only your future Rabil should be playing, right. Wait till he gets to college and all the kids are as good or better than him. What goes around, comes around. You'll see.
WOW! Somebody speaking on the topic whom seems to have some actual knowledge. (Not just another bitter, mediocre player's disgruntled folks wishing ill will toward all successful club players and enthusiasts). Refreshing!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
5 plus add 2 who went from a PG year to D1 to the 2012 total. Seems low for the # 1 H.S. team in the nation. I think they have had years of as many as eight. I don't see how you can compare to a top Express team that draws kids from numerous school districts.


Not really comparing, just was wondering how the odds of receiving one of these coveted scholarships differ among a competitive district based program vs a premier travel club. It would seem to me that a kid that is not getting a lot of playing time in his own district that makes a good travel team would be much better off there, if playing in college is important. Numbers don't lie!!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
5 plus add 2 who went from a PG year to D1 to the 2012 total. Seems low for the # 1 H.S. team in the nation. I think they have had years of as many as eight. I don't see how you can compare to a top Express team that draws kids from numerous school districts.


Not really comparing, just was wondering how the odds of receiving one of these coveted scholarships differ among a competitive district based program vs a premier travel club. It would seem to me that a kid that is not getting a lot of playing time in his own district that makes a good travel team would be much better off there, if playing in college is important. Numbers don't lie!!
I was just giving D1 numbers. There are also D2 commits that get partial scholarships and many kids that wind up at D3 schools. I know of a top L.I. h.s. program where 2 yrs ago 19 seniors went to play college lacrosse at some level. Would be interesting to see how many actually play all through college, but that is probably subject of a new thread.
Don't tell me... I am the one who wrote the comment of "seriously"... I went to a competitive d1aa football program over a d1 program. I didn't play HS lax but played summers.. Not much has changed for those who were competitive... If you can't get on the field in HS... You think you deserve a spot in college... Oh wait you must have went to WM and politics prevented you playing... Still bitter.... Chillax

Depending on the grade concentrate on the grades...



Maybe, like I said, my friends kid couldn't get on the field in HS, lit it up on club ball and received a D2 half ride. Does that answer your question ?
Bottom line is WM/3V lax system is not ideal to help as many kids as they can get into next level. Whether it be DI, DII or DIII.
IL's latest addition list the top Sophmores. Most of the top 10 cedit thier club teams in thier profiles (3D,Crabs,Express,Leading Edge, Mesa Fresh). Most are in public schools. School Coaches should embrace this. It's a value that is not going away.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IL's latest addition list the top Sophmores. Most of the top 10 cedit thier club teams in thier profiles (3D,Crabs,Express,Leading Edge, Mesa Fresh). Most are in public schools. School Coaches should embrace this. It's a value that is not going away.


Actually, most of the top ten and others from list are in private prep schools, most are also a year older than the typical sophmore. Hardly any kids at all from LI. 2 from express one from team LI and and 2 from 91. 2 others I'm not sure about. Only one kid from LI in top 20. 60 boys featured in total. To make this list you need to be amazing AND be well connected. Playing school and club also seems to be part of the formula. All these kids are either commtted or about to be to great D1 programs.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IL's latest addition list the top Sophmores. Most of the top 10 cedit thier club teams in thier profiles (3D,Crabs,Express,Leading Edge, Mesa Fresh). Most are in public schools. School Coaches should embrace this. It's a value that is not going away.


Actually, most of the top ten and others from list are in private prep schools, most are also a year older than the typical sophmore. Hardly any kids at all from LI. 2 from express one from team LI and and 2 from 91. 2 others I'm not sure about. Only one kid from LI in top 20. 60 boys featured in total. To make this list you need to be amazing AND be well connected. Playing school and club also seems to be part of the formula. All these kids are either commtted or about to be to great D1 programs.


Not to open the dreaded age debate yet again, but prep school, year older, not from LI. See a trend here? What other evidence do we need to understand what's happening here. Our kids are getting the shaft big time. We need to start demanding that all tournaments and showcases start going by age, with birth certificate proof. That extra year, and in some cases 18 months, of physical maturity has nothing to do with anything right? Once again, take a look at your current average 16 yo sophomore, now drop that kid into 9th grade. That's all I'll say. Ridiculous advantage.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IL's latest addition list the top Sophmores. Most of the top 10 cedit thier club teams in thier profiles (3D,Crabs,Express,Leading Edge, Mesa Fresh). Most are in public schools. School Coaches should embrace this. It's a value that is not going away.


Actually, most of the top ten and others from list are in private prep schools, most are also a year older than the typical sophmore. Hardly any kids at all from LI. 2 from express one from team LI and and 2 from 91. 2 others I'm not sure about. Only one kid from LI in top 20. 60 boys featured in total. To make this list you need to be amazing AND be well connected. Playing school and club also seems to be part of the formula. All these kids are either commtted or about to be to great D1 programs.


Not to open the dreaded age debate yet again, but prep school, year older, not from LI. See a trend here? What other evidence do we need to understand what's happening here. Our kids are getting the shaft big time. We need to start demanding that all tournaments and showcases start going by age, with birth certificate proof. That extra year, and in some cases 18 months, of physical maturity has nothing to do with anything right? Once again, take a look at your current average 16 yo sophomore, now drop that kid into 9th grade. That's all I'll say. Ridiculous advantage.


Only problem is that recruiting goes by graduating year. So those who manipulate that (prep school brats) will always put the rest of us regulars folk at a disavantage. What is that saying, "the rich get richer"
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Only problem is that recruiting goes by graduating year. So those who manipulate that (prep school brats) will always put the rest of us regulars folk at a disavantage. What is that saying, "the rich get richer"
BOTC is tired of reading this "graduation year" recruiting argument which is always followed by the "we are at a disadvantage" discourse.

Stop with the recruiting by class and go to the age-based system as prescribed by US Lacrosse. Again, as BOTC shared several weeks back, US Lacrosse firmly stands behind their U-age system. Grade and class based tournaments will be on the decrease as US Lacrosse "grows a pair" and starts putting some teeth into their recommendations.
Originally Posted by CageSage
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Only problem is that recruiting goes by graduating year. So those who manipulate that (prep school brats) will always put the rest of us regulars folk at a disavantage. What is that saying, "the rich get richer"
BOTC is tired of reading this "graduation year" recruiting argument which is always followed by the "we are at a disadvantage" discourse.

Stop with the recruiting by class and go to the age-based system as prescribed by US Lacrosse. Again, as BOTC shared several weeks back, US Lacrosse firmly stands behind their U-age system. Grade and class based tournaments will be on the decrease as US Lacrosse "grows a pair" and starts putting some teeth into their recommendations.


just imagine ty xanders tweets if that ever happens - U15 attackman verbally committed to Virginia call of U23
Originally Posted by CageSage
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Only problem is that recruiting goes by graduating year. So those who manipulate that (prep school brats) will always put the rest of us regulars folk at a disavantage. What is that saying, "the rich get richer"
BOTC is tired of reading this "graduation year" recruiting argument which is always followed by the "we are at a disadvantage" discourse.

Stop with the recruiting by class and go to the age-based system as prescribed by US Lacrosse. Again, as BOTC shared several weeks back, US Lacrosse firmly stands behind their U-age system. Grade and class based tournaments will be on the decrease as US Lacrosse "grows a pair" and starts putting some teeth into their recommendations.


I for one would be thrilled if that actually happened! My son who is in tenth grade is just going through the recruiting process. All recruiting is going by graduating year. Thats how the colleges are telling us the determine the needs of the team. For example, they say if they pick one 2016 goalie they are not likely to pick another from that graduating year. They could care less weather the sophmore is 14 or 17. It is really not fair, but I guess that's life!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by CageSage
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Only problem is that recruiting goes by graduating year. So those who manipulate that (prep school brats) will always put the rest of us regulars folk at a disavantage. What is that saying, "the rich get richer"
BOTC is tired of reading this "graduation year" recruiting argument which is always followed by the "we are at a disadvantage" discourse.

Stop with the recruiting by class and go to the age-based system as prescribed by US Lacrosse. Again, as BOTC shared several weeks back, US Lacrosse firmly stands behind their U-age system. Grade and class based tournaments will be on the decrease as US Lacrosse "grows a pair" and starts putting some teeth into their recommendations.


I for one would be thrilled if that actually happened! My son who is in tenth grade is just going through the recruiting process. All recruiting is going by graduating year. Thats how the colleges are telling us the determine the needs of the team. For example, they say if they pick one 2016 goalie they are not likely to pick another from that graduating year. They could care less weather the sophmore is 14 or 17. It is really not fair, but I guess that's life!


The college coaches are all to happy to have 19 and 20 yo freshman coming into their programs. Whole deal is a sham.
Cage,

Do you know if US Lacrosse is considering going to a single year U system?

U9, U10, U11, U12 etc.. would make more sense to me. The Current U9, U11, U13 two year system is not healthy at the younger ages.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by CageSage
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Only problem is that recruiting goes by graduating year. So those who manipulate that (prep school brats) will always put the rest of us regulars folk at a disavantage. What is that saying, "the rich get richer"
BOTC is tired of reading this "graduation year" recruiting argument which is always followed by the "we are at a disadvantage" discourse.

Stop with the recruiting by class and go to the age-based system as prescribed by US Lacrosse. Again, as BOTC shared several weeks back, US Lacrosse firmly stands behind their U-age system. Grade and class based tournaments will be on the decrease as US Lacrosse "grows a pair" and starts putting some teeth into their recommendations.


just imagine ty xanders tweets if that ever happens - U15 attackman verbally committed to Virginia call of U23


Ty Xanders makes the list, he is from one of the hotbeds private schools in MD (St. Pauls), of course he favors the prep school elite
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Cage,

Do you know if US Lacrosse is considering going to a single year U system?

U9, U10, U11, U12 etc.. would make more sense to me. The Current U9, U11, U13 two year system is not healthy at the younger ages.
Funny that you should mention this topic as BOTC brought this very subject to the table in our discussions last month. US Lacrosse believes that single year age groups would certainly work on Long Island and across most of the East Coast. Unfortunately in areas where the game is still growing, there are many clubs that have an insufficient number of players to move to a single year structure.

The double year brackets are designed to cater to the National audience of Youth Lacrosse and will not be changing within the next 12 months. US Lacrosse did say however that the New [lacrosse] area should be proactive in moving to the single year U-age structure.
Originally Posted by CageSage
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Cage,

Do you know if US Lacrosse is considering going to a single year U system?

U9, U10, U11, U12 etc.. would make more sense to me. The Current U9, U11, U13 two year system is not healthy at the younger ages.
Funny that you should mention this topic as BOTC brought this very subject to the table in our discussions last month. US Lacrosse believes that single year age groups would certainly work on Long Island and across most of the East Coast. Unfortunately in areas where the game is still growing, there are many clubs that have an insufficient number of players to move to a single year structure.

The double year brackets are designed to cater to the National audience of Youth Lacrosse and will not be changing within the next 12 months. US Lacrosse did say however that the New [lacrosse] area should be proactive in moving to the single year U-age structure.


Will never happen! But in a perfect world.........
What is going on in Syosset?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


What do you mean?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


What do you mean?


he said some bad things about the other guy, the other guy said some bad things about him, everybody got all like oh no this is a bummer and then everybody wrote letters that nobody cares about then they had a board meeting that everybody went to but nobody said anything at an the team might not get 4th and 5th helmets this year
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


What is going on in Port Washington?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


My guess is that who ever you are, you know exactly what is going on and you are trying to start a public conversation about it, why don't you tell us what is going on in Syosset
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


What do you mean?


he said some bad things about the other guy, the other guy said some bad things about him, everybody got all like oh no this is a bummer and then everybody wrote letters that nobody cares about then they had a board meeting that everybody went to but nobody said anything at an the team might not get 4th and 5th helmets this year


Hahaha perfectly accurate recap and one of the funniest posts I've seen on here . Wish I knew who u were bc u made my day
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


My guess is that who ever you are, you know exactly what is going on and you are trying to start a public conversation about it, why don't you tell us what is going on in Syosset


Whats going on in Smithtown is they created a separate east and west "all-star" team for 6th and 7th graders. Only problem is, they are not all stars! Would have been better off with 1 combined all-star team if they plan on winning anything!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


My guess is that who ever you are, you know exactly what is going on and you are trying to start a public conversation about it, why don't you tell us what is going on in Syosset


Whats going on in Smithtown is they created a separate east and west "all-star" team for 6th and 7th graders. Only problem is, they are not all stars! Would have been better off with 1 combined all-star team if they plan on winning anything!


Ummmmmm what??? Guess it's all about u or else someone needs glasses.... Bizarre
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


My guess is that who ever you are, you know exactly what is going on and you are trying to start a public conversation about it, why don't you tell us what is going on in Syosset


Your guess is incorrect. I do not have any details, that is why I asked the question.
This thread is titled "Conflicts! When HS Coaches Incorporate Summer Tournament Teams in Town". I did not start the topic but it does concern me and my children. I believe there is a conflict and I do not think that it should be permitted.

It should be a "public" conversation, there should be transparency and if there is any impropriety it should be exposed and dealt with.

Since you are in the business of guessing, I will join you.

My guess is that if the HS coach did not profit from Summer / Club teams or camps there would be absolutely "no conflict'. Parents would still complain that their kid is getting a raw deal but at least there would be no conflict of interest to point at.

If there is an issue it should be made public, it should not be swept under the rug.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


My guess is that who ever you are, you know exactly what is going on and you are trying to start a public conversation about it, why don't you tell us what is going on in Syosset


Your guess is incorrect. I do not have any details, that is why I asked the question.
This thread is titled "Conflicts! When HS Coaches Incorporate Summer Tournament Teams in Town". I did not start the topic but it does concern me and my children. I believe there is a conflict and I do not think that it should be permitted.

It should be a "public" conversation, there should be transparency and if there is any impropriety it should be exposed and dealt with.

Since you are in the business of guessing, I will join you.

My guess is that if the HS coach did not profit from Summer / Club teams or camps there would be absolutely "no conflict'. Parents would still complain that their kid is getting a raw deal but at least there would be no conflict of interest to point at.

If there is an issue it should be made public, it should not be swept under the rug.



Man up and ask your question tonight in person 7pm A-1, this topic is about summer teams and conflicts, very weird that you claim to no nothing about the Syosset situation yet you bring up "camp" when it is supposed to be about summer "teams" and still claim to know nothing, you are a pot stirrer. kids need to become a quality player and it will all work out without mommy and daddy crying on BOTC and become a quality parent.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


My guess is that who ever you are, you know exactly what is going on and you are trying to start a public conversation about it, why don't you tell us what is going on in Syosset


Your guess is incorrect. I do not have any details, that is why I asked the question.
This thread is titled "Conflicts! When HS Coaches Incorporate Summer Tournament Teams in Town". I did not start the topic but it does concern me and my children. I believe there is a conflict and I do not think that it should be permitted.

It should be a "public" conversation, there should be transparency and if there is any impropriety it should be exposed and dealt with.

Since you are in the business of guessing, I will join you.

My guess is that if the HS coach did not profit from Summer / Club teams or camps there would be absolutely "no conflict'. Parents would still complain that their kid is getting a raw deal but at least there would be no conflict of interest to point at.

If there is an issue it should be made public, it should not be swept under the rug.



when the system works for you it is OK but when it does not work for you it must be getting swept under the rug. Imagine if you spent years paying an assistant varsity coach to coach your sons town travel team and then just when you need him to help your kids he leaves and goes to coach another school and all that money and all that brown nosing was totally wasted and you get no ROI,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


My guess is that who ever you are, you know exactly what is going on and you are trying to start a public conversation about it, why don't you tell us what is going on in Syosset


Your guess is incorrect. I do not have any details, that is why I asked the question.
This thread is titled "Conflicts! When HS Coaches Incorporate Summer Tournament Teams in Town". I did not start the topic but it does concern me and my children. I believe there is a conflict and I do not think that it should be permitted.

It should be a "public" conversation, there should be transparency and if there is any impropriety it should be exposed and dealt with.

Since you are in the business of guessing, I will join you.

My guess is that if the HS coach did not profit from Summer / Club teams or camps there would be absolutely "no conflict'. Parents would still complain that their kid is getting a raw deal but at least there would be no conflict of interest to point at.

If there is an issue it should be made public, it should not be swept under the rug.



when the system works for you it is OK but when it does not work for you it must be getting swept under the rug. Imagine if you spent years paying an assistant varsity coach to coach your sons town travel team and then just when you need him to help your kids he leaves and goes to coach another school and all that money and all that brown nosing was totally wasted and you get no ROI,


Thank you, at least someone else gets it!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


My guess is that who ever you are, you know exactly what is going on and you are trying to start a public conversation about it, why don't you tell us what is going on in Syosset


Your guess is incorrect. I do not have any details, that is why I asked the question.
This thread is titled "Conflicts! When HS Coaches Incorporate Summer Tournament Teams in Town". I did not start the topic but it does concern me and my children. I believe there is a conflict and I do not think that it should be permitted.

It should be a "public" conversation, there should be transparency and if there is any impropriety it should be exposed and dealt with.

Since you are in the business of guessing, I will join you.

My guess is that if the HS coach did not profit from Summer / Club teams or camps there would be absolutely "no conflict'. Parents would still complain that their kid is getting a raw deal but at least there would be no conflict of interest to point at.

If there is an issue it should be made public, it should not be swept under the rug.



Man up and ask your question tonight in person 7pm A-1, this topic is about summer teams and conflicts, very weird that you claim to no nothing about the Syosset situation yet you bring up "camp" when it is supposed to be about summer "teams" and still claim to know nothing, you are a pot stirrer. kids need to become a quality player and it will all work out without mommy and daddy crying on BOTC and become a quality parent.


I said I have no details. I know there is an issue. I do not live in Syosset but we also have a conflict in my town. I was told by two people that there was a situation in Syosset. Neither went into any detail other than to say that there was a problem. Why do you want to hide the situation?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


My guess is that who ever you are, you know exactly what is going on and you are trying to start a public conversation about it, why don't you tell us what is going on in Syosset

Legacy is claiming that the head coach for Syosset is an asst. coach for their 6th grade team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


My guess is that who ever you are, you know exactly what is going on and you are trying to start a public conversation about it, why don't you tell us what is going on in Syosset

Legacy is claiming that the head coach for Syosset is an asst. coach for their 6th grade team.


His son's in 6th grade and his pics are on their website, from the mini stick meet & greet!

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


My guess is that who ever you are, you know exactly what is going on and you are trying to start a public conversation about it, why don't you tell us what is going on in Syosset

Legacy is claiming that the head coach for Syosset is an asst. coach for their 6th grade team.


And what is the issue. Seems as if Legacy has tapped into many LI HS coaching staffs.

I think that gives their players an advantage being coached by a HS coach.

What is the issue? Are you going to claim impropriety/conflict of interest hence the title of this? get over yourself did your kid tryout if not why stir the pot. How many Syosett kids on that coaches team. Why are you limiting the man from earning some extra $$.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


My guess is that who ever you are, you know exactly what is going on and you are trying to start a public conversation about it, why don't you tell us what is going on in Syosset


Your guess is incorrect. I do not have any details, that is why I asked the question.
This thread is titled "Conflicts! When HS Coaches Incorporate Summer Tournament Teams in Town". I did not start the topic but it does concern me and my children. I believe there is a conflict and I do not think that it should be permitted.

It should be a "public" conversation, there should be transparency and if there is any impropriety it should be exposed and dealt with.

Since you are in the business of guessing, I will join you.

My guess is that if the HS coach did not profit from Summer / Club teams or camps there would be absolutely "no conflict'. Parents would still complain that their kid is getting a raw deal but at least there would be no conflict of interest to point at.

If there is an issue it should be made public, it should not be swept under the rug.


The only issue that should be made public is that the man works extremely hard , cares about all these kids and gives up so much of his personal time that it's mind boggling. Why shouldn't he be compensated for his work. Would any one of you ever work that hard and give up so much time for free?? What he makes off of the camp and summer teams is highly deserved and then some. If you are not high school level yet then you will see all the free time and energy that he gives to these kids between recruiting help, mentoring, getting involved in making sure their grades come first and just overall caring attitude he has toward his players and their families. Other varsity coaches DO NOT do this people , the weaker lacrosse towns in our area like Hicksville have coaches that show up when they are supposed to and do the bare minimum for their kids. This is what separates our strong successful Syosset program from the others. Our coach along with very involved parents contribute to the years of Syosset victories on the field as well as in the classroom. Our sons have attended his camp every year since they were eligible and have enjoyed it more than any camp they've ever attended bc of the hard work that coach and his wife put into making it successful and fun for the kids. They begin working on planning for the following years camp not long after July has ended. This is a year round commitment for them and they deserve every penny. As for the parents whining that since they don't attend that their kids don't get moved up, none of my sons were ever moved up earlier than their age allowed. The coach is who decides this for a variety of reasons and sometimes for something as simple as players size and maturity and not being able to handle it physically or mentally and for their own safety, not just based on lacrosse ability. I'd rather my kid not be in a position that he can't handle. My ego should be the least factored into this equation. Step back and think about your kid and not yourself, their time will come . Most kids who attended the camp all those years with my kids also weren't moved up and many who never attended were. It's not a conspiracy , be realistic and get over yourself and stop making excuses that can cost a hardworking man a portion of his well earned livelihood. And think of the disappointment of the kids who look forward to this great Syosset community's kick off to summer tradition of attending camp in their community surrounded by much of their friends , neighbors, family and the memories they take away as well as what they learn for the week. I know my kids have great memories of their many years spent here with never a thought of this being a power play for the future and what it will do for them.
One last thought, if this is to be considered a conflict of interest than the next step is to stop all Syosset teachers from tutoring within the district and making money off of their students on the side . Same argument , but by taking these two things away the people your hurting most is the kids and that's the biggest shame.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


My guess is that who ever you are, you know exactly what is going on and you are trying to start a public conversation about it, why don't you tell us what is going on in Syosset

Legacy is claiming that the head coach for Syosset is an asst. coach for their 6th grade team.


Not according to their website.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is going on in Syosset?


My guess is that who ever you are, you know exactly what is going on and you are trying to start a public conversation about it, why don't you tell us what is going on in Syosset


Your guess is incorrect. I do not have any details, that is why I asked the question.
This thread is titled "Conflicts! When HS Coaches Incorporate Summer Tournament Teams in Town". I did not start the topic but it does concern me and my children. I believe there is a conflict and I do not think that it should be permitted.

It should be a "public" conversation, there should be transparency and if there is any impropriety it should be exposed and dealt with.

Since you are in the business of guessing, I will join you.

My guess is that if the HS coach did not profit from Summer / Club teams or camps there would be absolutely "no conflict'. Parents would still complain that their kid is getting a raw deal but at least there would be no conflict of interest to point at.

If there is an issue it should be made public, it should not be swept under the rug.


The only issue that should be made public is that the man works extremely hard , cares about all these kids and gives up so much of his personal time that it's mind boggling. Why shouldn't he be compensated for his work. Would any one of you ever work that hard and give up so much time for free?? What he makes off of the camp and summer teams is highly deserved and then some. If you are not high school level yet then you will see all the free time and energy that he gives to these kids between recruiting help, mentoring, getting involved in making sure their grades come first and just overall caring attitude he has toward his players and their families. Other varsity coaches DO NOT do this people , the weaker lacrosse towns in our area like Hicksville have coaches that show up when they are supposed to and do the bare minimum for their kids. This is what separates our strong successful Syosset program from the others. Our coach along with very involved parents contribute to the years of Syosset victories on the field as well as in the classroom. Our sons have attended his camp every year since they were eligible and have enjoyed it more than any camp they've ever attended bc of the hard work that coach and his wife put into making it successful and fun for the kids. They begin working on planning for the following years camp not long after July has ended. This is a year round commitment for them and they deserve every penny. As for the parents whining that since they don't attend that their kids don't get moved up, none of my sons were ever moved up earlier than their age allowed. The coach is who decides this for a variety of reasons and sometimes for something as simple as players size and maturity and not being able to handle it physically or mentally and for their own safety, not just based on lacrosse ability. I'd rather my kid not be in a position that he can't handle. My ego should be the least factored into this equation. Step back and think about your kid and not yourself, their time will come . Most kids who attended the camp all those years with my kids also weren't moved up and many who never attended were. It's not a conspiracy , be realistic and get over yourself and stop making excuses that can cost a hardworking man a portion of his well earned livelihood. And think of the disappointment of the kids who look forward to this great Syosset community's kick off to summer tradition of attending camp in their community surrounded by much of their friends , neighbors, family and the memories they take away as well as what they learn for the week. I know my kids have great memories of their many years spent here with never a thought of this being a power play for the future and what it will do for them.
One last thought, if this is to be considered a conflict of interest than the next step is to stop all Syosset teachers from tutoring within the district and making money off of their students on the side . Same argument , but by taking these two things away the people your hurting most is the kids and that's the biggest shame.


JC has probably sacrificed more of his own time than anyone on here, and tons of it on a volunteer, or for-cost basis. Yes, he should be able to make some money, in return for some of the services he's providing, like the summer camps!
One last thought, if this is to be considered a conflict of interest than the next step is to stop all Syosset teachers from tutoring within the district and making money off of their students on the side . Same argument , but by taking these two things away the people your hurting most is the kids and that's the biggest shame.


When teacher finds a student is seeing a different tutor and bars the student from their class then it will be the same. When they hand out "playing time" inside of classrooms it will be the same. I dont know this guy from Adam but theres a conflict in these situations. Players feel unduly pressured to play for their HS coach in fear that their playing time or chances on teh school team will be hurt if they dont . but yes, teachers who tutor their own students often show favoritism to those students
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When teacher finds a student is seeing a different tutor and bars the student from their class then it will be the same. When they hand out "playing time" inside of classrooms it will be the same.
Teachers should never tutor their own students for a cash payment; such sessions are called extra help.

It is unethical for the same teacher to take cash from one of their own students for additional instruction. This is why you will find that most teachers will give a family a referral to another instructor for out-of-hours assistance.
Originally Posted by CageSage
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When teacher finds a student is seeing a different tutor and bars the student from their class then it will be the same. When they hand out "playing time" inside of classrooms it will be the same.
Teachers should never tutor their own students for a cash payment; such sessions are called extra help.

It is unethical for the same teacher to take cash from one of their own students for additional instruction. This is why you will find that most teachers will give a family a referral to another instructor for out-of-hours assistance.


Kind of like the lacrosse coach saying you have to pay to be on my summer team, and if you don't... same unethical situation.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by CageSage
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When teacher finds a student is seeing a different tutor and bars the student from their class then it will be the same. When they hand out "playing time" inside of classrooms it will be the same.
Teachers should never tutor their own students for a cash payment; such sessions are called extra help.

It is unethical for the same teacher to take cash from one of their own students for additional instruction. This is why you will find that most teachers will give a family a referral to another instructor for out-of-hours assistance.


Kind of like the lacrosse coach saying you have to pay to be on my summer team, and if you don't... same unethical situation.


Thank You!
What HS teams look to be dominate this fall? I cant wait for the Shoreham tournament!! WM will be fun to watch!!Northport,Smithtown East and West. Will West I reload this year?
My son only plays for Northport and it's a wonderful experience. Gelling together as a team, local practices, just a few hundred dollars instead of a few thousand for summer ball alone! When you have a program that works why change it. In UMASS they were undefeated against all of the elite travel teams and the state team of NH! Pretty impressive to say the least. We have remarkable college commitments from playing in your home town. Let's Go Tigers!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son only plays for Northport and it's a wonderful experience. Gelling together as a team, local practices, just a few hundred dollars instead of a few thousand for summer ball alone! When you have a program that works why change it. In UMASS they were undefeated against all of the elite travel teams and the state team of NH! Pretty impressive to say the least. We have remarkable college commitments from playing in your home town. Let's Go Tigers!


...and Northport has a lot of drama and politics as well. XYZ player trains with ABC coach so he is brought onto varsity.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son only plays for Northport and it's a wonderful experience. Gelling together as a team, local practices, just a few hundred dollars instead of a few thousand for summer ball alone! When you have a program that works why change it. In UMASS they were undefeated against all of the elite travel teams and the state team of NH! Pretty impressive to say the least. We have remarkable college commitments from playing in your home town. Let's Go Tigers!


That used to be the story at Smithtown as well, only now it's turned into a money grab like all the rest. 1,400 for season, outrageous!!!!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What HS teams look to be dominate this fall? I cant wait for the Shoreham tournament!! WM will be fun to watch!!Northport,Smithtown East and West. Will West I reload this year?


Preseason is out. Smithtown west ranked 1 followed by WM then Stown east.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son only plays for Northport and it's a wonderful experience. Gelling together as a team, local practices, just a few hundred dollars instead of a few thousand for summer ball alone! When you have a program that works why change it. In UMASS they were undefeated against all of the elite travel teams and the state team of NH! Pretty impressive to say the least. We have remarkable college commitments from playing in your home town. Let's Go Tigers!


...and Northport has a lot of drama and politics as well. XYZ player trains with ABC coach so he is brought onto varsity.


Same story over and over. Sure it works great for about 12-15 of the top players. The rest of the kids get passed over, limited play time in season an in the summer. Can't get looks from college's cause coaches keep playing the same kids even in summer. Blah blah blah... Surely there are 40 kids who play for NP. Many of those kids who are not in the top 15 could get plenty of play time and exposure from and outside club. Maybe earn a spot a great D3 program. But hey, then one of the parents of the top 15 kids wouldn't be able to come on here and crow about beating travel teams...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son only plays for Northport and it's a wonderful experience. Gelling together as a team, local practices, just a few hundred dollars instead of a few thousand for summer ball alone! When you have a program that works why change it. In UMASS they were undefeated against all of the elite travel teams and the state team of NH! Pretty impressive to say the least. We have remarkable college commitments from playing in your home town. Let's Go Tigers!


...and Northport has a lot of drama and politics as well. XYZ player trains with ABC coach so he is brought onto varsity.


Same story over and over. Sure it works great for about 12-15 of the top players. The rest of the kids get passed over, limited play time in season an in the summer. Can't get looks from college's cause coaches keep playing the same kids even in summer. Blah blah blah... Surely there are 40 kids who play for NP. Many of those kids who are not in the top 15 could get plenty of play time and exposure from and outside club. Maybe earn a spot a great D3 program. But hey, then one of the parents of the top 15 kids wouldn't be able to come on here and crow about beating travel teams...


How dare you not support the A-- H---s kid who happens to be a stud? You must be loyal, you must follow what they say, if you don't you will not play....

They don't want you to do anything their kid is not doing because your kid could improve. If they control everything and everyone does the same thing and has the same coaching there will be very little change to the depth chart.

Do what you can to kelp your son. Maybe it is playing on the town team maybe it is playing for a club team maybe it is going to clinics and private lessons to prepare for the Showcase events.

good luck to all.

And yes, it is a conflict of interest!



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What HS teams look to be dominate this fall? I cant wait for the Shoreham tournament!! WM will be fun to watch!!Northport,Smithtown East and West. Will West I reload this year?


Preseason is out. Smithtown west ranked 1 followed by WM then Stown east.


West Islip will be solid this year, but I think the Smithtown schools are the class of Class A in suffolk this year. Ward Melville graduated too many key players. kwurbh
Where can you see the pre-season ranking?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Where can you see the pre-season ranking?

Here you go:



2014 Pre-Season Seeds -



1. Smithtown West

2. Ward Melville

3. Smithtown East

4. Sachem North

5. Northport

6. West Islip

7. Bay Shore

8. Connetquot

9. Half Hollow Hills West

10. Sachem East

11. Riverhead

12. Middle Country

13. Pat-Med

14. Hauppague

15. Walt Whitman

16. Half Hollow Hills East

17. East Islip

18. Lindenhurst

19. William Floyd

20. Commack

21. Longwood

22. North Babylon

23. West Babylon

24. Copiague

25. Deer park

26. Brentwood
Has as much relevance as pre-season college football polls. Doesn't really affect schedule as top 12 teams play each other anyway. Can be relevant to team ranked 12-18 where they have easier path to the playoffs , but they usually are exposed against the better teams. So pretty much same as usual in Suffolk "A".
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son only plays for Northport and it's a wonderful experience. Gelling together as a team, local practices, just a few hundred dollars instead of a few thousand for summer ball alone! When you have a program that works why change it. In UMASS they were undefeated against all of the elite travel teams and the state team of NH! Pretty impressive to say the least. We have remarkable college commitments from playing in your home town. Let's Go Tigers!


...and Northport has a lot of drama and politics as well. XYZ player trains with ABC coach so he is brought onto varsity.


Same story over and over. Sure it works great for about 12-15 of the top players. The rest of the kids get passed over, limited play time in season an in the summer. Can't get looks from college's cause coaches keep playing the same kids even in summer. Blah blah blah... Surely there are 40 kids who play for NP. Many of those kids who are not in the top 15 could get plenty of play time and exposure from and outside club. Maybe earn a spot a great D3 program. But hey, then one of the parents of the top 15 kids wouldn't be able to come on here and crow about beating travel teams...


How dare you not support the A-- H---s kid who happens to be a stud? You must be loyal, you must follow what they say, if you don't you will not play....

They don't want you to do anything their kid is not doing because your kid could improve. If they control everything and everyone does the same thing and has the same coaching there will be very little change to the depth chart.

Do what you can to kelp your son. Maybe it is playing on the town team maybe it is playing for a club team maybe it is going to clinics and private lessons to prepare for the Showcase events.

good luck to all.

And yes, it is a conflict of interest!





An how about the HS coach who wear their Club Team's jacket and sweat pants to practice every day?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son only plays for Northport and it's a wonderful experience. Gelling together as a team, local practices, just a few hundred dollars instead of a few thousand for summer ball alone! When you have a program that works why change it. In UMASS they were undefeated against all of the elite travel teams and the state team of NH! Pretty impressive to say the least. We have remarkable college commitments from playing in your home town. Let's Go Tigers!


...and Northport has a lot of drama and politics as well. XYZ player trains with ABC coach so he is brought onto varsity.


Same story over and over. Sure it works great for about 12-15 of the top players. The rest of the kids get passed over, limited play time in season an in the summer. Can't get looks from college's cause coaches keep playing the same kids even in summer. Blah blah blah... Surely there are 40 kids who play for NP. Many of those kids who are not in the top 15 could get plenty of play time and exposure from and outside club. Maybe earn a spot a great D3 program. But hey, then one of the parents of the top 15 kids wouldn't be able to come on here and crow about beating travel teams...


How dare you not support the A-- H---s kid who happens to be a stud? You must be loyal, you must follow what they say, if you don't you will not play....

They don't want you to do anything their kid is not doing because your kid could improve. If they control everything and everyone does the same thing and has the same coaching there will be very little change to the depth chart.

Do what you can to kelp your son. Maybe it is playing on the town team maybe it is playing for a club team maybe it is going to clinics and private lessons to prepare for the Showcase events.

good luck to all.

And yes, it is a conflict of interest!





An how about the HS coach who wear their Club Team's jacket and sweat pants to practice every day?


No different...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son only plays for Northport and it's a wonderful experience. Gelling together as a team, local practices, just a few hundred dollars instead of a few thousand for summer ball alone! When you have a program that works why change it. In UMASS they were undefeated against all of the elite travel teams and the state team of NH! Pretty impressive to say the least. We have remarkable college commitments from playing in your home town. Let's Go Tigers!


...and Northport has a lot of drama and politics as well. XYZ player trains with ABC coach so he is brought onto varsity.


Same story over and over. Sure it works great for about 12-15 of the top players. The rest of the kids get passed over, limited play time in season an in the summer. Can't get looks from college's cause coaches keep playing the same kids even in summer. Blah blah blah... Surely there are 40 kids who play for NP. Many of those kids who are not in the top 15 could get plenty of play time and exposure from and outside club. Maybe earn a spot a great D3 program. But hey, then one of the parents of the top 15 kids wouldn't be able to come on here and crow about beating travel teams...


How dare you not support the A-- H---s kid who happens to be a stud? You must be loyal, you must follow what they say, if you don't you will not play....

They don't want you to do anything their kid is not doing because your kid could improve. If they control everything and everyone does the same thing and has the same coaching there will be very little change to the depth chart.

Do what you can to kelp your son. Maybe it is playing on the town team maybe it is playing for a club team maybe it is going to clinics and private lessons to prepare for the Showcase events.

good luck to all.

And yes, it is a conflict of interest!





An how about the HS coach who wear their Club Team's jacket and sweat pants to practice every day?


No different...


How do AD's and schools let them get away with this? Imagine if the math teacher came to school every day wearing a T-Shirt that advertised their Tutoring Company.
Cage, would like your opinion.

Yesterday at Hofstra there was a "Hofstra Committed Team" do you see this as the beginning of a trend?

Will or have other Schools entered Tournaments with their recruits?

What will the HS/Town Programs say ?

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Cage, would like your opinion.

Yesterday at Hofstra there was a "Hofstra Committed Team" do you see this as the beginning of a trend?

Will or have other Schools entered Tournaments with their recruits?

What will the HS/Town Programs say ?
BOTC does not have any information about the Hofstra event from November 10th aside from what we saw on their web site in preparing this response. We do not have any information about the teams or schedules that participated.

Given that we have never seen a collegiate recruiting event pull together their future individual recruits into a single team, it would be difficult to categorize such as a trend. Without NLIs in place, it is unclear where such teams would stand in the eyes of the NCAA - and without more information, we cannot draw any conclusions.
Originally Posted by CageSage
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Cage, would like your opinion.

Yesterday at Hofstra there was a "Hofstra Committed Team" do you see this as the beginning of a trend?

Will or have other Schools entered Tournaments with their recruits?

What will the HS/Town Programs say ?
BOTC does not have any information about the Hofstra event from November 10th aside from what we saw on their web site in preparing this response. We do not have any information about the teams or schedules that participated.

Given that we have never seen a collegiate recruiting event pull together their future individual recruits into a single team, it would be difficult to categorize such as a trend. Without NLIs in place, it is unclear where such teams would stand in the eyes of the NCAA - and without more information, we cannot draw any conclusions.



I was at Hoftsra and my son's team played "Be the Best" Most kids were from St. A and Chaminade. The face off kid was Hoftsra commtitted. Is this the team you are talking about? Also the trend of "Team Hopping" is becoming big. Many good players are doing it. There is a team going to the Mt. Sinai Tourney in a few weeks consisting of committed kids from several other teams. I think we will see this trend continue. I know some kids that currently play for 4+ teams. Even at the 6th grade level it is happening where some Crush players play for Dune Dawgs when they are available. Not sure if this is wise. Burns kids out running from game to game trying to get it all in.
"There is a team going to the Mt. Sinai Tourney in a few weeks consisting of committed kids from several other teams."

Do you know what the name of this team is?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
"There is a team going to the Mt. Sinai Tourney in a few weeks consisting of committed kids from several other teams."

Do you know what the name of this team is?


Heard they were going in as Jesters.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by CageSage
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Cage, would like your opinion.

Yesterday at Hofstra there was a "Hofstra Committed Team" do you see this as the beginning of a trend?

Will or have other Schools entered Tournaments with their recruits?

What will the HS/Town Programs say ?
BOTC does not have any information about the Hofstra event from November 10th aside from what we saw on their web site in preparing this response. We do not have any information about the teams or schedules that participated.

Given that we have never seen a collegiate recruiting event pull together their future individual recruits into a single team, it would be difficult to categorize such as a trend. Without NLIs in place, it is unclear where such teams would stand in the eyes of the NCAA - and without more information, we cannot draw any conclusions.



I was at Hoftsra and my son's team played "Be the Best" Most kids were from St. A and Chaminade. The face off kid was Hoftsra commtitted. Is this the team you are talking about? Also the trend of "Team Hopping" is becoming big. Many good players are doing it. There is a team going to the Mt. Sinai Tourney in a few weeks consisting of committed kids from several other teams. I think we will see this trend continue. I know some kids that currently play for 4+ teams. Even at the 6th grade level it is happening where some Crush players play for Dune Dawgs when they are available. Not sure if this is wise. Burns kids out running from game to game trying to get it all in.


We call them team whores. Adds an interesting dynamic cause you never know what you're going to get! Coaches get crazy, and think "If I only had a sick lefty attack for this Tourney" or " If we could win face offs, we could gain that edge" So they ask kids to do guest gigs at no or little coast. This hurts the kids who are actually on the team!
These are not leagues or even teams - they are group of kids playing under a name at a particular time, it is not like a Huntington kid showing up for a Plainview PAL game, they have rules against it and that is cheating. Or a kid from Oceanside playing a JV game for Long Beach, again, rules and cheating.

In the fall you play with whomever you can get and whomever shows up. you have school football and soccer to deal with as well as injuries,individual showcases, town teams and travel team conflicts. Everybody is scrambling to field a team and of course if you are short you are going to try and get the best player you can and also fill the positions that you need.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by CageSage
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Cage, would like your opinion.

Yesterday at Hofstra there was a "Hofstra Committed Team" do you see this as the beginning of a trend?

Will or have other Schools entered Tournaments with their recruits?

What will the HS/Town Programs say ?
BOTC does not have any information about the Hofstra event from November 10th aside from what we saw on their web site in preparing this response. We do not have any information about the teams or schedules that participated.

Given that we have never seen a collegiate recruiting event pull together their future individual recruits into a single team, it would be difficult to categorize such as a trend. Without NLIs in place, it is unclear where such teams would stand in the eyes of the NCAA - and without more information, we cannot draw any conclusions.



I was at Hoftsra and my son's team played "Be the Best" Most kids were from St. A and Chaminade. The face off kid was Hoftsra commtitted. Is this the team you are talking about? Also the trend of "Team Hopping" is becoming big. Many good players are doing it. There is a team going to the Mt. Sinai Tourney in a few weeks consisting of committed kids from several other teams. I think we will see this trend continue. I know some kids that currently play for 4+ teams. Even at the 6th grade level it is happening where some Crush players play for Dune Dawgs when they are available. Not sure if this is wise. Burns kids out running from game to game trying to get it all in.


"Be the Best" is mostly Chaminade
"Team Dutch" at Hofstra was a team of all Hofstra recruits/commits
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by CageSage
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Cage, would like your opinion.

Yesterday at Hofstra there was a "Hofstra Committed Team" do you see this as the beginning of a trend?

Will or have other Schools entered Tournaments with their recruits?

What will the HS/Town Programs say ?
BOTC does not have any information about the Hofstra event from November 10th aside from what we saw on their web site in preparing this response. We do not have any information about the teams or schedules that participated.

Given that we have never seen a collegiate recruiting event pull together their future individual recruits into a single team, it would be difficult to categorize such as a trend. Without NLIs in place, it is unclear where such teams would stand in the eyes of the NCAA - and without more information, we cannot draw any conclusions.



I was at Hoftsra and my son's team played "Be the Best" Most kids were from St. A and Chaminade. The face off kid was Hoftsra commtitted. Is this the team you are talking about? Also the trend of "Team Hopping" is becoming big. Many good players are doing it. There is a team going to the Mt. Sinai Tourney in a few weeks consisting of committed kids from several other teams. I think we will see this trend continue. I know some kids that currently play for 4+ teams. Even at the 6th grade level it is happening where some Crush players play for Dune Dawgs when they are available. Not sure if this is wise. Burns kids out running from game to game trying to get it all in.


"Be the Best" is mostly Chaminade
"Team Dutch" at Hofstra was a team of all Hofstra recruits/commits


Why was Be The Best face off kid who is committed to Hofstra on Team Dutch?
Same old story.
There is a new Lacrosse team every year - waiting for someone to start a team with an honest name like - DEAD PRESIDENTS !!!

Funny story.
I went out to get my paper this morning and found my neighbor Dalton instead.

He was slumped on my stoop, looking as though he'd slept under a marching band. His eyes sported five-pound bags, his right hand was bandaged and bloody, and his face was sunk like a bad soufflé.

"My God!" I said. "What happened to you? You look like a 20-car funeral!"

"Youth lacrosse happened to me," he grumbled. "The Competitive Elite Lacrosse League. My little Ashley made one of those 'travel teams.' Pray it never happens to you, dude."

He explained. "See, I really never thought Ashley was all that hot at lacrosse, and she's only 14. But when she made this competitive team, all the parents said it was a big honor. They said it's the only way to make your high school varsity, and it's the road to a scholarship, and it looks great on your résumé.

"I'm not even sure Ashley wanted to do it. But all of her friends made it, so she just had to do it.

What was I gonna do? Tell my little girl no?

"Next thing you know, I'm writing a check for $1,500. Then it turns out, they practice or play seven days a week on these things. And it's clear across town, so pretty soon I'm standing on the sidelines every day of the week.

"My wife can't do it 'cause she has to take Justin to hockey every day. Why an eight-year-old nearsighted kid needs a 42-game schedule is beyond me. What is he, Wayne Gretzky? Plus there's pylon camp and forecheck camp and backward-skating lessons with his personal coach, Hans.

"So pretty soon I got no life. Family dinners? Forget it. Every meal is in the car--righthanded Taco Bell. I almost never see my wife awake. When I do, I have to ask for I.D.

"Then this lunatic lacrosse coach schedules an extra 6 a.m. practice every day. It's like the old bottle-feeding days. I'd be like, 'I got her last time. You get her.' And Denise would moan, 'I had to stay up for Midnight Madness last night. Your turn.' Then, at night Ashley is so tired, we end up doing her dang homework! And we're gettin' C's!

"Anyway, Ashley and I started flying to all these stupid tournaments--Dallas and Baltimore and, my ez92r3God, Ottawa!--and every one is billed as 'the recruiting event of the year!' And do you know who we see at these tournaments? The same damn girls we used to play in our neighborhood league!

Essentially, we're flying across the country to get our [lacrosse] kicked by the same exact people!

"So I start talking to these girls' parents, and it turns out they don't really want to be there either, but their kids were saying we were going to do it, so they had to!

"But then my wife gets to talking to some other moms at Justin's slap shot workshop, and they say we're crazy if we don't have a 'performance-enhancement specialist' for our kids. So she signs them both up with one. Then she finds out most of these girls have 'recruiting consultants' who make highlight reels of kids and send them to college coaches.

I'm like, 'She's 14!' And my wife is like, 'You're gonna tell our little girl no?' Then we add a rating-service guy and a sports psychologist and a webmaster.

"Well, what with me working half time and all this crap I'm paying for and all these trips, I had to take out a second mortgage. Denise can't work because she's spending every waking moment in a freezing ice rink, which makes her joints stiffen up. Luckily, Hans knows some New Age massage technique that makes her feel better.

"So now I'm getting no sleep, turning my stomach into a Dumpster and having less sex than a dead monk. But before I can put my foot down, my boss does. He fires me! And as he's firing me, he adds, 'By the way, the average lacrosse scholarship is $1,000, you [lacrosse]!' So I punch him, and now I think my hand might be broken.

"I stomp out and go find Ashley to say, 'It's over.' And she goes, 'Whatever. I quit today anyway. My sports psychologist says you guys push me too hard.'

"Nice. So I go home to tell Denise, but she's not there. Three days go by. I figure she's at the Elite

Competitive Hockeypalooza in Cheyenne. Turns out she moved in with Hans. Says she wants to be with someone who 'knows' her. Oh, and she really likes massages.

"So now I get home and somebody changed the locks! Probably the mortgage company, since I'm way behind.

"And do you know what I learned from all this, man? I learned that the most viciously competitive sport in the world is parenting.

"Anyway, what I wanted to ask you is--you wanna buy some lacrosse sticks?"
So thats where my wife has been. Sleeping with Hans
Anyone have any insight into Tom Rotanz being shown the door out in Shoreham-Wading River ? Will this affect his H.S. showcase event at Farmingdale ? Seemed like a decent guy the few times I met him. Maybe he will wind up on Rocky Point or another school as assistant. SWR loss.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have any insight into Tom Rotanz being shown the door out in Shoreham-Wading River ? Will this affect his H.S. showcase event at Farmingdale ? Seemed like a decent guy the few times I met him. Maybe he will wind up on Rocky Point or another school as assistant. SWR loss.


He should cash in on his experience and do the club route. I would move my son off his current club to be coached by him. He'll draw in good talent because of where he is. Only real talent competition is from TLI. BTW - there is article on inside lax about it.
Would be even better if he was Head Coach of Rocky Point !

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have any insight into Tom Rotanz being shown the door out in Shoreham-Wading River ? Will this affect his H.S. showcase event at Farmingdale ? Seemed like a decent guy the few times I met him. Maybe he will wind up on Rocky Point or another school as assistant. SWR loss.


He should cash in on his experience and do the club route. I would move my son off his current club to be coached by him. He'll draw in good talent because of where he is. Only real talent competition is from TLI. BTW - there is article on inside lax about it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have any insight into Tom Rotanz being shown the door out in Shoreham-Wading River ? Will this affect his H.S. showcase event at Farmingdale ? Seemed like a decent guy the few times I met him. Maybe he will wind up on Rocky Point or another school as assistant. SWR loss.
Several articles have been posted in the last 72 hours regarding this move by the Shoreham-Wading River school district.

From the Riverhead News-Times

Article Link : Lacrosse Legend Out after 19 years as SWR Coach

For the first time in nearly 20 years, Tom Rotanz won’t be on the sidelines with the Shoreham-Wading River varsity boys lacrosse team this spring.

Superintendent Steven Cohen confirmed Tuesday night he will not recommend Mr. Rotanz to be reinstated as coach and said the district has posted the position and other coaching jobs in the district as available.
Welcome to the world of helicopter parents. Instead of teaching your kids valuable lessons like: commitment, hard work, dedication and loyalty, its easier to tell them they are better then they are, they deserve more than they should and if it is not working for them - mommy and daddy will fix it for you.

Tom Rotanz is a great guy and this is complete BS.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Welcome to the world of helicopter parents. Instead of teaching your kids valuable lessons like: commitment, hard work, dedication and loyalty, its easier to tell them they are better then they are, they deserve more than they should and if it is not working for them - mommy and daddy will fix it for you.

Tom Rotanz is a great guy and this is complete BS.


Should send that quote to the Three Village Board.
How about youth lacrosse program running fundraisers for the local HS lax program? The HS coach already runs the summer "committed" team program and now parents are urged to further support his HS team at a fundraiser ostensibly organized by the unaffiliated youth program. Sure the youth program "volunteer" organizers are hoping to get lots of brownie points with the coach for setting this up.
Any hints to what town you are refering to ?
which quote are you refering too.
Stop... it's not about the money. It's all about the kids.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Stop... it's not about the money. It's all about the kids.


Now that's a good one....
GC
Put your name to it and stop being a coward
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Put your name to it and stop being a coward


and the pot calls the kettle black...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How about youth lacrosse program running fundraisers for the local HS lax program? The HS coach already runs the summer "committed" team program and now parents are urged to further support his HS team at a fundraiser ostensibly organized by the unaffiliated youth program. Sure the youth program "volunteer" organizers are hoping to get lots of brownie points with the coach for setting this up.


That's the joke. They say they are not affiliated - but they are. And it's the HS staffers who are controlling the process by brainwashing the local youth programs. They say such stupid things like you are in the pipeline to becoming a varsity player - at kindergarten!!!!
Doesn't Three Village also do the same?? I am sure a bunch of towns do the same type of fund raising for their high school programs. What's the beef?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Doesn't Three Village also do the same?? I am sure a bunch of towns do the same type of fund raising for their high school programs. What's the beef?


The beef is that any fund raising that the youth program does should go to the youth program NOT the HS program which does it's own fund raising.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Doesn't Three Village also do the same?? I am sure a bunch of towns do the same type of fund raising for their high school programs. What's the beef?



The issue is conflict of interest. He HS coach not only controls summer options but now shakes down the parents as well. And the event is run and attended just to curry favor with the coach. Maybe if your kid is on the bubble to make the team he gets taken because you have (financially) supported the coach in various ways.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Doesn't Three Village also do the same?? I am sure a bunch of towns do the same type of fund raising for their high school programs. What's the beef?


The beef is that any fund raising that the youth program does should go to the youth program NOT the HS program which does it's own fund raising.


In Three Village I believe the HS Summer Program is a "for profit business". I do not believe the Three Village Youth Program does any fund raising for that program or for the School Varsity of Junior Varsity Lacrosse Teams.
Anyone see the [lacrosse]'s Lacrosse flyer (good thru 2/2). How does 3V or WM benefit from that? or the Players profiled/pictured?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone see the [lacrosse]'s Lacrosse flyer (good thru 2/2). How does 3V or WM benefit from that? or the Players profiled/pictured?


Not sure how any of that works.

But I am sure that the following is complete BS:

MISSION:

Three Village Lacrosse is a non-profit organization whose mission is to promote and develop youth lacrosse in the Three Village Community by providing activities and programs that inspire participation and fun for all participants while preserving the integrity of the game. Through proper guidance and exemplary leadership, Three Village Lacrosse assists youth in developing the qualities of citizenship, discipline, teamwork, and physical well-being. By espousing the virtues of character, courage, and loyalty, Three Village Lacrosse is designed to develop outstanding citizens as well as outstanding athletes.
Vision

We envision a future that provides the Three Village Community the opportunity to discover, learn, participate in, enjoy, and ultimately embrace the shared passion of the lacrosse experience.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Doesn't Three Village also do the same?? I am sure a bunch of towns do the same type of fund raising for their high school programs. What's the beef?


The beef is that any fund raising that the youth program does should go to the youth program NOT the HS program which does it's own fund raising.


In Three Village I believe the HS Summer Program is a "for profit business". I do not believe the Three Village Youth Program does any fund raising for that program or for the School Varsity of Junior Varsity Lacrosse Teams.


You should double check for facts....
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Doesn't Three Village also do the same?? I am sure a bunch of towns do the same type of fund raising for their high school programs. What's the beef?


The beef is that any fund raising that the youth program does should go to the youth program NOT the HS program which does it's own fund raising.


In Three Village I believe the HS Summer Program is a "for profit business". I do not believe the Three Village Youth Program does any fund raising for that program or for the School Varsity of Junior Varsity Lacrosse Teams.


You should double check for facts....


I did not state facts. I said I believe. Please tell us which part is not accurate.

Yes there is a conflict of interest. The situation is made far worse when the HS Coach and the parents who run the town youth program collaborate in for profit ventures and activities.
The Three Village Lacrosse Board should really take out the words "participate in" for their "vision for the future" considering a large amount of kids are not allowed to participate in their youth program.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Three Village Lacrosse Board should really take out the words "participate in" for their "vision for the future" considering a large amount of kids are not allowed to participate in their youth program.


Both the Mission Statement and the Vision are works of fiction so no need to remove anything.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Doesn't Three Village also do the same?? I am sure a bunch of towns do the same type of fund raising for their high school programs. What's the beef?


The beef is that any fund raising that the youth program does should go to the youth program NOT the HS program which does it's own fund raising.


In Three Village I believe the HS Summer Program is a "for profit business". I do not believe the Three Village Youth Program does any fund raising for that program or for the School Varsity of Junior Varsity Lacrosse Teams.


You should double check for facts....


I did not state facts. I said I believe. Please tell us which part is not accurate.



Pathetic to see all the chicks gathering around mother hen at the 3v fundraiser. Have a little respect for yourselves!!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone see the [lacrosse]'s Lacrosse flyer (good thru 2/2). How does 3V or WM benefit from that? or the Players profiled/pictured?


Not sure how any of that works.

But I am sure that the following is complete BS:

MISSION:

Three Village Lacrosse is a non-profit organization whose mission is to promote and develop youth lacrosse in the Three Village Community by providing activities and programs that inspire participation and fun for all participants while preserving the integrity of the game. Through proper guidance and exemplary leadership, Three Village Lacrosse assists youth in developing the qualities of citizenship, discipline, teamwork, and physical well-being. By espousing the virtues of character, courage, and loyalty, Three Village Lacrosse is designed to develop outstanding citizens as well as outstanding athletes.
Vision

We envision a future that provides the Three Village Community the opportunity to discover, learn, participate in, enjoy, and ultimately embrace the shared passion of the lacrosse experience.



Be careful 3 Village.........
In order to attain the goals of your mission statement there will be some kids who need to be disciplined and taught the values you have included. The problem is, some of today's parents can not accept that their child is not the most perfect thing on the planet. It only takes ONE nut job parent (As in SWR) to have a coach fired and investigated by the police, DA, FBI etc...all dismissed as complete rubbish mind you but the accused must still defend themselves.
For this reason I believe that kids are missing out on some quality instruction by some quality former players. Back in the day these self important cry babies would have been dealt with accordingly...now they steer the bus. Sad.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone see the [lacrosse]'s Lacrosse flyer (good thru 2/2). How does 3V or WM benefit from that? or the Players profiled/pictured?


Not sure how any of that works.

But I am sure that the following is complete BS:

MISSION:

Three Village Lacrosse is a non-profit organization whose mission is to promote and develop youth lacrosse in the Three Village Community by providing activities and programs that inspire participation and fun for all participants while preserving the integrity of the game. Through proper guidance and exemplary leadership, Three Village Lacrosse assists youth in developing the qualities of citizenship, discipline, teamwork, and physical well-being. By espousing the virtues of character, courage, and loyalty, Three Village Lacrosse is designed to develop outstanding citizens as well as outstanding athletes.
Vision

We envision a future that provides the Three Village Community the opportunity to discover, learn, participate in, enjoy, and ultimately embrace the shared passion of the lacrosse experience.



Be careful 3 Village.........
In order to attain the goals of your mission statement there will be some kids who need to be disciplined and taught the values you have included. The problem is, some of today's parents can not accept that their child is not the most perfect thing on the planet. It only takes ONE nut job parent (As in SWR) to have a coach fired and investigated by the police, DA, FBI etc...all dismissed as complete rubbish mind you but the accused must still defend themselves.
For this reason I believe that kids are missing out on some quality instruction by some quality former players. Back in the day these self important cry babies would have been dealt with accordingly...now they steer the bus. Sad.


In order to attain the goals of the Mission Statement the entire Board would have to be removed. The problem is the "self important / self appointed" members neglected to establish a procedure which would allow the community that they profess to serve to actually vote them out.
It is definitely a conflict of interest. Not sure how it can be viewed any other way.
PAL / Towns should run their own Summer youth programs. The Smart HS Coaches have branched out to extorting their entire community.
Agreed !


But what if the PAL town (SCGL girls) builds a self proclaimed empire (LAX MAFIA ) and is anti Varsity with program beliefs, Decides they will run their own travel team all the way through to High School with NOT allowing input from varsity coach because they feel he is not committed enough ?? How is that handled by the School coach? A parent coach with no game experience but a lot of willpower and dreams should NOT be able to brainwash the youth organization in thinking his commitment will supercede their success in future school ball.
So question what does a Varsity coach do with being able to control a youth program?




Originally Posted by Anonymous
PAL / Towns should run their own Summer youth programs. The Smart HS Coaches have branched out to extorting their entire community.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PAL / Towns should run their own Summer youth programs. The Smart HS Coaches have branched out to extorting their entire community.


In some towns you have extortion, coercion and collusion.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PAL / Towns should run their own Summer youth programs. The Smart HS Coaches have branched out to extorting their entire community.


In some towns you have extortion, coercion and collusion.


don't forget confusion!!!
You know , its a touchy topic. On one hand the Youth program wants to see the Varsity coach show interest. But its a slippery coach. Say the coach runs a travel program , but with just one age group. Has the Varsity coach said he will show loyalty to players who have been with him for years ? What happens if your son is a year older then that group? WHen they get to HS will he lose his spot to a younger player who may be of equal or less talent but has been on the HS coaches travel team for 4 years ? Should this be allowed ?
The risk is then the HS coach is literally the kingmaker in the town. To some extent he/she may be that to some extent anyway but allowing the summer piece creates problems. What if you're a good player but, for whatever reason, the coach just doesn't like you or your style of play? You might as well move. At least if you are playing on an unaffiliated club team you have other chances to show what you can do and it is not one person's view dictating your future. On the other hand, if the club team also doesn't like you maybe it's time for tuba lessons in pursuit of the college scholarship.....
This has Rocky Point written all over it !

But what if the PAL town (SCGL girls) builds a self proclaimed empire (LAX MAFIA ) and is anti Varsity with program beliefs, Decides they will run their own travel team all the way through to High School with NOT allowing input from varsity coach because they feel he is not committed enough ?? How is that handled by the School coach? A parent coach with no game experience but a lot of willpower and dreams should NOT be able to brainwash the youth organization in thinking his commitment will supercede their success in future school ball.
So question what does a Varsity coach do with being able to control a youth program?




Originally Posted by Anonymous
PAL / Towns should run their own Summer youth programs. The Smart HS Coaches have branched out to extorting their entire community.
[/quote]
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This has Rocky Point written all over it !

But what if the PAL town (SCGL girls) builds a self proclaimed empire (LAX MAFIA ) and is anti Varsity with program beliefs, Decides they will run their own travel team all the way through to High School with NOT allowing input from varsity coach because they feel he is not committed enough ?? How is that handled by the School coach? A parent coach with no game experience but a lot of willpower and dreams should NOT be able to brainwash the youth organization in thinking his commitment will supercede their success in future school ball.
So question what does a Varsity coach do with being able to control a youth program?




Originally Posted by Anonymous
PAL / Towns should run their own Summer youth programs. The Smart HS Coaches have branched out to extorting their entire community.
[/quote]

I heard Rocky Point is putting a 5th grade girls team into NCPAL. I would think they would have more than one girls team??
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You know , its a touchy topic. On one hand the Youth program wants to see the Varsity coach show interest. But its a slippery coach. Say the coach runs a travel program , but with just one age group. Has the Varsity coach said he will show loyalty to players who have been with him for years ? What happens if your son is a year older then that group? WHen they get to HS will he lose his spot to a younger player who may be of equal or less talent but has been on the HS coaches travel team for 4 years ? Should this be allowed ?


No it should not be allowed .
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PAL / Towns should run their own Summer youth programs. The Smart HS Coaches have branched out to extorting their entire community.


In some towns you have extortion, coercion and collusion.


Collusion, Coercion and Extortion. Are those the towns that make up the Three Villages?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PAL / Towns should run their own Summer youth programs. The Smart HS Coaches have branched out to extorting their entire community.


In some towns you have extortion, coercion and collusion.


Collusion, Coercion and Extortion. Are those the towns that make up the Three Villages?


What years are so fractured in three village. When will the rest of LI see if it impacts the HS. or are these boys headed to the privates anyway.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PAL / Towns should run their own Summer youth programs. The Smart HS Coaches have branched out to extorting their entire community.


In some towns you have extortion, coercion and collusion.


Collusion, Coercion and Extortion. Are those the towns that make up the Three Villages?


What years are so fractured in three village. When will the rest of LI see if it impacts the HS. or are these boys headed to the privates anyway.


fractured? Please explain.
RP youth girls LAX has become out of control , a total mess to say the least ! The whole organization has looked upto one individual as the messiah of LAX and it isn't the Varsity coach ! Total Revolution .



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This has Rocky Point written all over it !

But what if the PAL town (SCGL girls) builds a self proclaimed empire (LAX MAFIA ) and is anti Varsity with program beliefs, Decides they will run their own travel team all the way through to High School with NOT allowing input from varsity coach because they feel he is not committed enough ?? How is that handled by the School coach? A parent coach with no game experience but a lot of willpower and dreams should NOT be able to brainwash the youth organization in thinking his commitment will supercede their success in future school ball.
So question what does a Varsity coach do with being able to control a youth program?




Originally Posted by Anonymous
PAL / Towns should run their own Summer youth programs. The Smart HS Coaches have branched out to extorting their entire community.


I heard Rocky Point is putting a 5th grade girls team into NCPAL. I would think they would have more than one girls team?? [/quote]
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You know , its a touchy topic. On one hand the Youth program wants to see the Varsity coach show interest. But its a slippery coach. Say the coach runs a travel program , but with just one age group. Has the Varsity coach said he will show loyalty to players who have been with him for years ? What happens if your son is a year older then that group? WHen they get to HS will he lose his spot to a younger player who may be of equal or less talent but has been on the HS coaches travel team for 4 years ? Should this be allowed ?


In my town the boys play on PAL teams and they also play on summer tournament teams that play in tournaments year round. The kids pay for the tournament 's they attend and don't pay for the ones the miss. The varsity coaches keep there V & JV teams playing together year round as well . That's the way to do it and no profit is involved when it is done with volunteer's and when you divide the # of kids by the tournament registration fee.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PAL / Towns should run their own Summer youth programs. The Smart HS Coaches have branched out to extorting their entire community.


In some towns you have extortion, coercion and collusion.


Collusion, Coercion and Extortion. Are those the towns that make up the Three Villages?


What years are so fractured in three village. When will the rest of LI see if it impacts the HS. or are these boys headed to the privates anyway.


fractured? Please explain.


You are kidding yourself if you think it is not fractured. Even some of the board members have their kids playing for travel teams...express, dune dawgs, outlaws...now tell me it is not fractured if their own kids are not playing for 3village. Stop looking through rosie colored glasses
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
PAL / Towns should run their own Summer youth programs. The Smart HS Coaches have branched out to extorting their entire community.


In some towns you have extortion, coercion and collusion.


Collusion, Coercion and Extortion. Are those the towns that make up the Three Villages?


What years are so fractured in three village. When will the rest of LI see if it impacts the HS. or are these boys headed to the privates anyway.


fractured? Please explain.


You are kidding yourself if you think it is not fractured. Even some of the board members have their kids playing for travel teams...express, dune dawgs, outlaws...now tell me it is not fractured if their own kids are not playing for 3village. Stop looking through rosie colored glasses


And then there was silence.....
Three Village program and community were divided by the ideologues who took control of the league approximately ten years ago. There was a small group within the board who ruined the program with their policies and back room dealings.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Three Village program and community were divided by the ideologues who took control of the league approximately ten years ago. There was a small group within the board who ruined the program with their policies and back room dealings.


ten years ago? would 2004 be the year that the group that just graduated was in 3rd grade and starting out? if so I only wish my town had a ruined program like that.
I think they are talking about the youth program not the HS.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Three Village program and community were divided by the ideologues who took control of the league approximately ten years ago. There was a small group within the board who ruined the program with their policies and back room dealings.


ten years ago? would 2004 be the year that the group that just graduated was in 3rd grade and starting out? if so I only wish my town had a ruined program like that.


Let the HS Coaches coach them in the Spring, let parents and the kids decide where and how they play over the summer. Except for maybe ten programs on LI, what happens on the HS team has nearly zero impact on your son's college lacrosse aspirations. All about summer teams and individual events. If anyone suggests differently, all you need to do is follow the money trail. It will tell you everything you need to know.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Three Village program and community were divided by the ideologues who took control of the league approximately ten years ago. There was a small group within the board who ruined the program with their policies and back room dealings.


ten years ago? would 2004 be the year that the group that just graduated was in 3rd grade and starting out? if so I only wish my town had a ruined program like that.


Ward Melville High School has had a great lacrosse program for the past 30 or 40 years. Please do not attempt to tie last years success to the 3Vlax youth lacrosse board.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Three Village program and community were divided by the ideologues who took control of the league approximately ten years ago. There was a small group within the board who ruined the program with their policies and back room dealings.


ten years ago? would 2004 be the year that the group that just graduated was in 3rd grade and starting out? if so I only wish my town had a ruined program like that.




Ward Melville High School has had a great lacrosse program for the past 30 or 40 years. Please do not attempt to tie last years success to the 3Vlax youth lacrosse board.


true enough - but they had not won a county title in over ten years and according to the original post that is when the new youth board took over the youth program, and those kids, under the new board rose up and became the number one team in the nation - these are the facts not an opinion, so maybe these policies and back room dealings worked.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Three Village program and community were divided by the ideologues who took control of the league approximately ten years ago. There was a small group within the board who ruined the program with their policies and back room dealings.


ten years ago? would 2004 be the year that the group that just graduated was in 3rd grade and starting out? if so I only wish my town had a ruined program like that.




Ward Melville High School has had a great lacrosse program for the past 30 or 40 years. Please do not attempt to tie last years success to the 3Vlax youth lacrosse board.


true enough - but they had not won a county title in over ten years and according to the original post that is when the new youth board took over the youth program, and those kids, under the new board rose up and became the number one team in the nation - these are the facts not an opinion, so maybe these policies and back room dealings worked.


Ok..we'll give you that they won everything last year but let's give credit where credit is due. The talent and depth of the seniors last year was unmatchable. 3v and their changes had nothing to do with that so let's not overstate the obvious. Let's see if these amazing changes hold true in the next coming years, but for now here are the facts.

The original poster of this topic spoke of playing for elite travel teams in the summer. 3v does not allow any 3v travel player to play with an elite team....fact. 3v coaches do not get automatic bids to top showcase camps....fact. 3v program turns into the patriot elite program run by the high school coaches once you hit 9th grade...fact. Elite program, under the auspices of 3v run 2 or 3 teams in the summer, teams are mixed grades (not beneficial), teams have roster of 28+ (not beneficial), teams do not attend same tournaments and some tournaments are a waste of time and money (not beneficial), coaches do not respond to phone calls from college coaches (not beneficial)......these are all facts! The poster was simply implying that Elite travel teams will do a better job getting your sons to play at the next level than 3v and the patriot elite program will do....fact!
I am not a WM person and as an outsider they seem to run a great HS program as well as a great youth program - can any of the 3V- WM people out their tell us how many of the kids play outside travel teams and how many play town only?

last years class of 2013 had 8 D1's, 3D2's and a 2 D3's - did some, most or all of them play town only?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am not a WM person and as an outsider they seem to run a great HS program as well as a great youth program - can any of the 3V- WM people out their tell us how many of the kids play outside travel teams and how many play town only?

last years class of 2013 had 8 D1's, 3D2's and a 2 D3's - did some, most or all of them play town only?


If you do not think the world of lacrosse has changed since the Class of 2013 was in the 5th grade you must be a 3V board member with your head in the sand.

Stop equating the success of the WM High School Program with the way the 3V board has run the youth program for the past several years.

So you are okay with back room dealings? The board makes up the rules as they go. I think maybe they started with good intentions and now have no idea how to handle the changing world of lacrosse. My son plays club lacrosse and was told by the 3V board that he couldn't be a part of their organization. While he would have loved to continue playing with his friends, he really is so happy and it was the best decision we made. Interestingly, now 3V will let kids play both, but it was a secret. The boys that play club were never invited back to play with their town. While other boys are allowed to play both if they play on the B team. My son would have played on the B team and my guess is so would others. They never wanted to leave 3V, but were told they absolutely could not be a part of travel lacrosse and PAL if they play elsewhere. Yet now I hear that kids are allowed to guest play for the A team as well. Shouldn't it be a set rule made known to the residents? I am guessing it is a secret because of the flood of kids that would rejoin their program. These are the kind of self serving back room dealings that I am talking about. And you are ok with that? WM won last year for several reasons, none of it was due to the 3V lacrosse board's policies.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So you are okay with back room dealings? The board makes up the rules as they go. I think maybe they started with good intentions and now have no idea how to handle the changing world of lacrosse. My son plays club lacrosse and was told by the 3V board that he couldn't be a part of their organization. While he would have loved to continue playing with his friends, he really is so happy and it was the best decision we made. Interestingly, now 3V will let kids play both, but it was a secret. The boys that play club were never invited back to play with their town. While other boys are allowed to play both if they play on the B team. My son would have played on the B team and my guess is so would others. They never wanted to leave 3V, but were told they absolutely could not be a part of travel lacrosse and PAL if they play elsewhere. Yet now I hear that kids are allowed to guest play for the A team as well. Shouldn't it be a set rule made known to the residents? I am guessing it is a secret because of the flood of kids that would rejoin their program. These are the kind of self serving back room dealings that I am talking about. And you are ok with that? WM won last year for several reasons, none of it was due to the 3V lacrosse board's policies.


It sounds as if you and your child are in the flux of change at WM . the hard aches you are going through or went through; will pave the way for the future years. Stunk for those in the transition but if you don't try something you'll never know how it works out.

It is funny how they say the travel players can only play B since primarily they are the better players.? Didnt most go to travel to get a better level of competition and teammates. It would be funny that the B team is better than the A team. Why not call it something different as not to confuse the levels of play.

How many 2017 - 2019 players play on travel teams and are not or will not attend WM? I guess time will tell if these players stay at WM or go to the privates? Then you will all know if the right move was made.


Regardless of where they will play HS, I have a question, I thought the premise of PAL was no child was to be excluded if they wanted to sign up. How did 3V get away with that? Especially since they are a town in Suffolk bending the Nassau rules.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So you are okay with back room dealings? The board makes up the rules as they go. I think maybe they started with good intentions and now have no idea how to handle the changing world of lacrosse. My son plays club lacrosse and was told by the 3V board that he couldn't be a part of their organization. While he would have loved to continue playing with his friends, he really is so happy and it was the best decision we made. Interestingly, now 3V will let kids play both, but it was a secret. The boys that play club were never invited back to play with their town. While other boys are allowed to play both if they play on the B team. My son would have played on the B team and my guess is so would others. They never wanted to leave 3V, but were told they absolutely could not be a part of travel lacrosse and PAL if they play elsewhere. Yet now I hear that kids are allowed to guest play for the A team as well. Shouldn't it be a set rule made known to the residents? I am guessing it is a secret because of the flood of kids that would rejoin their program. These are the kind of self serving back room dealings that I am talking about. And you are ok with that? WM won last year for several reasons, none of it was due to the 3V lacrosse board's policies.


It sounds as if you and your child are in the flux of change at WM . the hard aches you are going through or went through; will pave the way for the future years. Stunk for those in the transition but if you don't try something you'll never know how it works out.

It is funny how they say the travel players can only play B since primarily they are the better players.? Didnt most go to travel to get a better level of competition and teammates. It would be funny that the B team is better than the A team. Why not call it something different as not to confuse the levels of play.

How many 2017 - 2019 players play on travel teams and are not or will not attend WM? I guess time will tell if these players stay at WM or go to the privates? Then you will all know if the right move was made.


Regardless of where they will play HS, I have a question, I thought the premise of PAL was no child was to be excluded if they wanted to sign up. How did 3V get away with that? Especially since they are a town in Suffolk bending the Nassau rules.


2017 – 1019 there are approximately 50 players playing on club teams.
I do not know of any who plan on attending private school.
you seem to have put a lot of work into this post with your numbers I would guess you are the mayor as well as the heart beat of the youth league.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
you seem to have put a lot of work into this post with your numbers I would guess you are the mayor as well as the heart beat of the youth league.


Not sure if you are responding to me or some of the other posters but I did not put much time into it at all.

I have a 2018 so i know the 2019 - 2017.

I estimated 50 kids. didn't take much time at all.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
you seem to have put a lot of work into this post with your numbers I would guess you are the mayor as well as the heart beat of the youth league.


Not sure if you are responding to me or some of the other posters but I did not put much time into it at all.

I have a 2018 so i know the 2019 - 2017.

I estimated 50 kids. didn't take much time at all.


Does your son play travel or in house? can you expand on the premise that the travel players are better than the in house players. and how that may cause an issue during the HS years. I have seen 2019 in house play and understand many others in the grade play on the top Express and 91, along with some on TLI and DD. Not sure where really but mixing those players back into the fold with older and younger grades in HS gives me the impression they will be a strong team. and not sure where that leaves those kids who played in house.

Unless the HS decides to sit those who didn't go through the inhouse program. but I cant see that happening.
Put Town politics away. If you do not believe that playing with stronger players is beneficial you are lying to yourself.

2014 Tewaaraton Award Watch List. The award is given to the Top Mens and Womens player in the country. One Male and one Female selected from a pool of D-1, D-2 and D-3 players.

Out of the Top 50 players on the "Watch List" here are former Express Players.

-Men-
Tommy Schreiber - Princeton
Brendon Fowler - DUKE,
Michael Chanenchuck - Maryland
Michael Ehrhardt - Maryland
Brandon Mangan - Yale
Dylan Levings - Yale
Zach Losco - Penn

Women
Kerrin Mauerer - Duke

I am sure if go down the list you will find that just about all of the players played for "Both" their Town / High School as well as a private club.





Originally Posted by Anonymous
Put Town politics away. If you do not believe that playing with stronger players is beneficial you are lying to yourself.

2014 Tewaaraton Award Watch List. The award is given to the Top Mens and Womens player in the country. One Male and one Female selected from a pool of D-1, D-2 and D-3 players.

Out of the Top 50 players on the "Watch List" here are former Express Players.

-Men-
Tommy Schreiber - Princeton
Brendon Fowler - DUKE,
Michael Chanenchuck - Maryland
Michael Ehrhardt - Maryland
Brandon Mangan - Yale
Dylan Levings - Yale
Zach Losco - Penn

Women
Kerrin Mauerer - Duke

I am sure if go down the list you will find that just about all of the players played for "Both" their Town / High School as well as a private club.


Express and the Chaim St A connection doesn't count... That is their summer team.

Any on that list from WM.




Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Put Town politics away. If you do not believe that playing with stronger players is beneficial you are lying to yourself.

2014 Tewaaraton Award Watch List. The award is given to the Top Mens and Womens player in the country. One Male and one Female selected from a pool of D-1, D-2 and D-3 players.

Out of the Top 50 players on the "Watch List" here are former Express Players.

-Men-
Tommy Schreiber - Princeton
Brendon Fowler - DUKE,
Michael Chanenchuck - Maryland
Michael Ehrhardt - Maryland
Brandon Mangan - Yale
Dylan Levings - Yale
Zach Losco - Penn

Women
Kerrin Mauerer - Duke

I am sure if go down the list you will find that just about all of the players played for "Both" their Town / High School as well as a private club.


Express and the Chaim St A connection doesn't count... That is their summer team.

Any on that list from WM.






-Men-
Tommy Schreiber – East Meadow – Chaminade - Princeton
Brendon Fowler – Wantagh – Chaminade - DUKE
Michael Chanenchuck – Poquott/Setauket - St Anthony's - Maryland
Michael Ehrhardt – Westbury – Chaminade - Maryland
Brandon Mangan – Wantagh - Yale
Dylan Levings – Massapequa – Plainedge - Yale
Zach Losco – Smithtown – Hauppauge - Penn

Women
Kerrin Mauerer – Setauket – St Anthony's - Duke


Men
3 from Chaminade
1 from St Anthony's
1 from Plainedge
1 From Wantagh
1 from Hauppauge

Women
1 from St Anthony's


No, none from WM but two from 3V.
5 different High Schools represented.
How many of the 50 boys are from Long Island? How many of the girls?

Here is my perspective, being an ex-college player, youth coach, high school coach, parent and not living in a community with a strong lacrosse tradition. "Elite" travel teams have merit. They bring together kids from different communities that are serious about playing lacrosse. These are the kids that attend camps, clinics and are most likely to play wall ball on their own. Do the high school elite "A" teams get extra exposure and looks by colleges? They do. Especially if these kids would have played in a town with a mediocre coach and program with kids that pick up their sticks once every spring. Having said that is the "elite" travel thing a major money maker? Absolutely! Are there multiple teams in an age bracket that will never compete on a high level nor get looks from colleges? Absolutely. The Three Villages and West Islips don't see the merit in travel teams. They don't have to. They have enough talent and enough parents with knowledge of the game to mandate loyalty to the local program. Some will balk at that. Especially if their child does not get adequate playing time. Those that stay with their town team and get playing time are thrilled they don't have to pay thousands of dollars per year to pad the retirement of some director from a team named after their jersey number. If you live in, for example, West Islip, 3V, Manhasset, Smithtown, SWR (with Rotanz), etc be grateful you have lacrosse people in your community (including parents). If you in a community more known for baseball, then you are most likely going to have to go the outside travel team route and deal with all the politics there, and pay $5k (with travel expenses) on top of it. There is no one answer to this craziness. The days of just playing in season and trying out for the Empire State team is over. We, as parents created this because we think our children should be offered more than they are. If my father was asked for thousands of dollars to play travel lacrosse, he would have told me, you need therapy, now go outside and play.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is my perspective, being an ex-college player, youth coach, high school coach, parent and not living in a community with a strong lacrosse tradition. "Elite" travel teams have merit. They bring together kids from different communities that are serious about playing lacrosse. These are the kids that attend camps, clinics and are most likely to play wall ball on their own. Do the high school elite "A" teams get extra exposure and looks by colleges? They do. Especially if these kids would have played in a town with a mediocre coach and program with kids that pick up their sticks once every spring. Having said that is the "elite" travel thing a major money maker? Absolutely! Are there multiple teams in an age bracket that will never compete on a high level nor get looks from colleges? Absolutely. The Three Villages and West Islips don't see the merit in travel teams. They don't have to. They have enough talent and enough parents with knowledge of the game to mandate loyalty to the local program. Some will balk at that. Especially if their child does not get adequate playing time. Those that stay with their town team and get playing time are thrilled they don't have to pay thousands of dollars per year to pad the retirement of some director from a team named after their jersey number. If you live in, for example, West Islip, 3V, Manhasset, Smithtown, SWR (with Rotanz), etc be grateful you have lacrosse people in your community (including parents). If you in a community more known for baseball, then you are most likely going to have to go the outside travel team route and deal with all the politics there, and pay $5k (with travel expenses) on top of it. There is no one answer to this craziness. The days of just playing in season and trying out for the Empire State team is over. We, as parents created this because we think our children should be offered more than they are. If my father was asked for thousands of dollars to play travel lacrosse, he would have told me, you need therapy, now go outside and play.



You say,

“The Three Villages and West Islips don't see the merit in travel teams.”

The Facts say otherwise.

Three of the five Directors of the LI Express live in 3V.
Three Village / Ward Melville kids have been playing for the express and other club teams for many years.
3V / Ward Melville kids who have already graduated from college played for club teams.
Many of the 3V / WM kids currently playing in college played for the express and other club teams.
Current 3V/WM Varsity Players have played for club teams.
Many of this years JV players currently play for club teams.
Many current 3V /JHS players play for club teams.
Current and past Board Members have their kids currently playing club lacrosse.

It is nothing new for 3V kids to play club lacrosse.

It is only a few of the board members who do not see the merit in it.
I love reading about these "programs." Let's not kid ourselves. The most successful programs have parents and coaches who know the game. They talk to their sons in the car, and know what they are talking about. They go in the back yard and work on throwing and catching. Catching with soft hands and throwing with their non-dominant hand. Moving without the ball. If you live in a town with many of these parents, you have a better shot of the program being reasonably successful for a long period of time. If the town you live in has parents who don't know the game, then you have mothers yelling at little Johnny to run through the entire defense and shoot. In those situations, more times than not the coaches kids are the best players and everyone else is wondering why roll dodging the entire opposing team which worked so well in 3rd grade, no longer works in 6th.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is my perspective, being an ex-college player, youth coach, high school coach, parent and not living in a community with a strong lacrosse tradition. "Elite" travel teams have merit. They bring together kids from different communities that are serious about playing lacrosse. These are the kids that attend camps, clinics and are most likely to play wall ball on their own. Do the high school elite "A" teams get extra exposure and looks by colleges? They do. Especially if these kids would have played in a town with a mediocre coach and program with kids that pick up their sticks once every spring. Having said that is the "elite" travel thing a major money maker? Absolutely! Are there multiple teams in an age bracket that will never compete on a high level nor get looks from colleges? Absolutely. The Three Villages and West Islips don't see the merit in travel teams. They don't have to. They have enough talent and enough parents with knowledge of the game to mandate loyalty to the local program. Some will balk at that. Especially if their child does not get adequate playing time. Those that stay with their town team and get playing time are thrilled they don't have to pay thousands of dollars per year to pad the retirement of some director from a team named after their jersey number. If you live in, for example, West Islip, 3V, Manhasset, Smithtown, SWR (with Rotanz), etc be grateful you have lacrosse people in your community (including parents). If you in a community more known for baseball, then you are most likely going to have to go the outside travel team route and deal with all the politics there, and pay $5k (with travel expenses) on top of it. There is no one answer to this craziness. The days of just playing in season and trying out for the Empire State team is over. We, as parents created this because we think our children should be offered more than they are. If my father was asked for thousands of dollars to play travel lacrosse, he would have told me, you need therapy, now go outside and play.



You say,

“The Three Villages and West Islips don't see the merit in travel teams.”

The Facts say otherwise.

Three of the five Directors of the LI Express live in 3V.
Three Village / Ward Melville kids have been playing for the express and other club teams for many years.
3V / Ward Melville kids who have already graduated from college played for club teams.
Many of the 3V / WM kids currently playing in college played for the express and other club teams.
Current 3V/WM Varsity Players have played for club teams.
Many of this years JV players currently play for club teams.
Many current 3V /JHS players play for club teams.
Current and past Board Members have their kids currently playing club lacrosse.

It is nothing new for 3V kids to play club lacrosse.

It is only a few of the board members who do not see the merit in it.


I dont know about 3 V.... But West Islip Boys mostly play in house travel outside of PAL. it usually cost 250-300 for 4 summer tournaments and its seems to translate well to the Varsity program. I hear the WI girls are doing the same.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is my perspective, being an ex-college player, youth coach, high school coach, parent and not living in a community with a strong lacrosse tradition. "Elite" travel teams have merit. They bring together kids from different communities that are serious about playing lacrosse. These are the kids that attend camps, clinics and are most likely to play wall ball on their own. Do the high school elite "A" teams get extra exposure and looks by colleges? They do. Especially if these kids would have played in a town with a mediocre coach and program with kids that pick up their sticks once every spring. Having said that is the "elite" travel thing a major money maker? Absolutely! Are there multiple teams in an age bracket that will never compete on a high level nor get looks from colleges? Absolutely. The Three Villages and West Islips don't see the merit in travel teams. They don't have to. They have enough talent and enough parents with knowledge of the game to mandate loyalty to the local program. Some will balk at that. Especially if their child does not get adequate playing time. Those that stay with their town team and get playing time are thrilled they don't have to pay thousands of dollars per year to pad the retirement of some director from a team named after their jersey number. If you live in, for example, West Islip, 3V, Manhasset, Smithtown, SWR (with Rotanz), etc be grateful you have lacrosse people in your community (including parents). If you in a community more known for baseball, then you are most likely going to have to go the outside travel team route and deal with all the politics there, and pay $5k (with travel expenses) on top of it. There is no one answer to this craziness. The days of just playing in season and trying out for the Empire State team is over. We, as parents created this because we think our children should be offered more than they are. If my father was asked for thousands of dollars to play travel lacrosse, he would have told me, you need therapy, now go outside and play.



You say,

“The Three Villages and West Islips don't see the merit in travel teams.”

The Facts say otherwise.

Three of the five Directors of the LI Express live in 3V.
Three Village / Ward Melville kids have been playing for the express and other club teams for many years.
3V / Ward Melville kids who have already graduated from college played for club teams.
Many of the 3V / WM kids currently playing in college played for the express and other club teams.
Current 3V/WM Varsity Players have played for club teams.
Many of this years JV players currently play for club teams.
Many current 3V /JHS players play for club teams.
Current and past Board Members have their kids currently playing club lacrosse.

It is nothing new for 3V kids to play club lacrosse.

It is only a few of the board members who do not see the merit in it.


I dont know about 3 V.... But West Islip Boys mostly play in house travel outside of PAL. it usually cost 250-300 for 4 summer tournaments and its seems to translate well to the Varsity program. I hear the WI girls are doing the same.


doesnt 2019 91 orange have a good amount if not the best WI players on that team.
Wow... Why go there?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is my perspective, being an ex-college player, youth coach, high school coach, parent and not living in a community with a strong lacrosse tradition. "Elite" travel teams have merit. They bring together kids from different communities that are serious about playing lacrosse. These are the kids that attend camps, clinics and are most likely to play wall ball on their own. Do the high school elite "A" teams get extra exposure and looks by colleges? They do. Especially if these kids would have played in a town with a mediocre coach and program with kids that pick up their sticks once every spring. Having said that is the "elite" travel thing a major money maker? Absolutely! Are there multiple teams in an age bracket that will never compete on a high level nor get looks from colleges? Absolutely. The Three Villages and West Islips don't see the merit in travel teams. They don't have to. They have enough talent and enough parents with knowledge of the game to mandate loyalty to the local program. Some will balk at that. Especially if their child does not get adequate playing time. Those that stay with their town team and get playing time are thrilled they don't have to pay thousands of dollars per year to pad the retirement of some director from a team named after their jersey number. If you live in, for example, West Islip, 3V, Manhasset, Smithtown, SWR (with Rotanz), etc be grateful you have lacrosse people in your community (including parents). If you in a community more known for baseball, then you are most likely going to have to go the outside travel team route and deal with all the politics there, and pay $5k (with travel expenses) on top of it. There is no one answer to this craziness. The days of just playing in season and trying out for the Empire State team is over. We, as parents created this because we think our children should be offered more than they are. If my father was asked for thousands of dollars to play travel lacrosse, he would have told me, you need therapy, now go outside and play.


great - great post, thank you.....
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I love reading about these "programs." Let's not kid ourselves. The most successful programs have parents and coaches who know the game. They talk to their sons in the car, and know what they are talking about. They go in the back yard and work on throwing and catching. Catching with soft hands and throwing with their non-dominant hand. Moving without the ball. If you live in a town with many of these parents, you have a better shot of the program being reasonably successful for a long period of time. If the town you live in has parents who don't know the game, then you have mothers yelling at little Johnny to run through the entire defense and shoot. In those situations, more times than not the coaches kids are the best players and everyone else is wondering why roll dodging the entire opposing team which worked so well in 3rd grade, no longer works in 6th.

Well said
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I love reading about these "programs." Let's not kid ourselves. The most successful programs have parents and coaches who know the game. They talk to their sons in the car, and know what they are talking about. They go in the back yard and work on throwing and catching. Catching with soft hands and throwing with their non-dominant hand. Moving without the ball. If you live in a town with many of these parents, you have a better shot of the program being reasonably successful for a long period of time. If the town you live in has parents who don't know the game, then you have mothers yelling at little Johnny to run through the entire defense and shoot. In those situations, more times than not the coaches kids are the best players and everyone else is wondering why roll dodging the entire opposing team which worked so well in 3rd grade, no longer works in 6th.


and it is a nightmare for those town teams when the son of the coach is not the best player and the daddy coach still thinks he is. We went 5 years with it Putting his son in all types of positions facing off when the best f/o is pushed to the wing. Long pole when others still sat the bench in PAL.

Now with middle school around the corner lets see if politics play a role or will reality stare them in their face

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I love reading about these "programs." Let's not kid ourselves. The most successful programs have parents and coaches who know the game. They talk to their sons in the car, and know what they are talking about. They go in the back yard and work on throwing and catching. Catching with soft hands and throwing with their non-dominant hand. Moving without the ball. If you live in a town with many of these parents, you have a better shot of the program being reasonably successful for a long period of time. If the town you live in has parents who don't know the game, then you have mothers yelling at little Johnny to run through the entire defense and shoot. In those situations, more times than not the coaches kids are the best players and everyone else is wondering why roll dodging the entire opposing team which worked so well in 3rd grade, no longer works in 6th.


and it is a nightmare for those town teams when the son of the coach is not the best player and the daddy coach still thinks he is. We went 5 years with it Putting his son in all types of positions facing off when the best f/o is pushed to the wing. Long pole when others still sat the bench in PAL.

Now with middle school around the corner lets see if politics play a role or will reality stare them in their face



Been there done that!! Middle school is an equalizer, for my son at least. Funny how now that the boys are in 10th grade, the coaches son, as well as the boys whos parents had their noses up coaches but are riding the bench, while several 2nd and 3rd stringers are D1 bound!
My son never made a travel "A" team. Now he is a freshman playing varsity. Funny what lack of politics and puberty can do.
Tryouts haven't even started yet for HS lacrosse. What HS does your son play for?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Tryouts haven't even started yet for HS lacrosse. What HS does your son play for?


Tryouts are a formality! Silly
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is my perspective, being an ex-college player, youth coach, high school coach, parent and not living in a community with a strong lacrosse tradition. "Elite" travel teams have merit. They bring together kids from different communities that are serious about playing lacrosse. These are the kids that attend camps, clinics and are most likely to play wall ball on their own. Do the high school elite "A" teams get extra exposure and looks by colleges? They do. Especially if these kids would have played in a town with a mediocre coach and program with kids that pick up their sticks once every spring. Having said that is the "elite" travel thing a major money maker? Absolutely! Are there multiple teams in an age bracket that will never compete on a high level nor get looks from colleges? Absolutely. The Three Villages and West Islips don't see the merit in travel teams. They don't have to. They have enough talent and enough parents with knowledge of the game to mandate loyalty to the local program. Some will balk at that. Especially if their child does not get adequate playing time. Those that stay with their town team and get playing time are thrilled they don't have to pay thousands of dollars per year to pad the retirement of some director from a team named after their jersey number. If you live in, for example, West Islip, 3V, Manhasset, Smithtown, SWR (with Rotanz), etc be grateful you have lacrosse people in your community (including parents). If you in a community more known for baseball, then you are most likely going to have to go the outside travel team route and deal with all the politics there, and pay $5k (with travel expenses) on top of it. There is no one answer to this craziness. The days of just playing in season and trying out for the Empire State team is over. We, as parents created this because we think our children should be offered more than they are. If my father was asked for thousands of dollars to play travel lacrosse, he would have told me, you need therapy, now go outside and play.


great - great post, thank you.....


The above is one persons perspective, its their point of view. Maybe their perspective will change when presented with factual information. Maybe your perspective will change as well. Sometimes the facts do not lend themselves to helping push a particular agenda or ideology.

Lets look at the facts.

“is the "elite" travel thing a major money maker? Absolutely!”

- fact: Many of the HS/Town Programs are now money makers.


“Are there multiple teams in an age bracket that will never compete on a high level nor get looks from colleges? Absolutely.”

- Fact: Some HS/Town Programs have multiple teams per grade. Some HS/Town Teams have 30 players per team.

“The Three Villages and West Islips don't see the merit in travel teams.”

- Fact: Many in 3V do see the merit. 3V kids have been playing on travel teams for years. They played for Ward Melville as well as for a travel team. Yes, they played for both.


“Those that stay with their town team and get playing time are thrilled they don't have to pay thousands of dollars per year to pad the retirement of some director from a team named after their jersey number.”

- Fact: As stated earlier, some Town/HS summer programs are now “for profit” businesses.
- At the youth level the cost difference between a Town Team and a Club team is not that great if the Town Team does all that a typical Club Team does. Especially if the Town hires a paid coach.
- Either way you will spend thousands of dollars.
- Town Teams are not free.
- Not all club teams charge the same amount of money to play for their team.

“If you in a community more known for baseball, then you are most likely going to have to go the outside travel team route and deal with all the politics there, and pay $5k (with travel expenses) on top of it.”

Fact: There are politics involved with Town Programs as well. Some people argue that the politics with town programs are worse than the politics associated with travel programs.
(travel expenses are the same for both Town and Travel Team
Really? Town teams charge upwards of $2k to be on the team? Town teams charge $150 for tryouts? Town teams mandate a new helmet, uniform and gloves every year? Town teams "suggest" you do the extra training and clinics, that are all an additional charge? Hmm. Please name the town. We would all be interested to know.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Really? Town teams charge upwards of $2k to be on the team? Town teams charge $150 for tryouts? Town teams mandate a new helmet, uniform and gloves every year? Town teams "suggest" you do the extra training and clinics, that are all an additional charge? Hmm. Please name the town. We would all be interested to know.


This sounds like Team Smithtown, except the tryout wasn't that expensive and I think the cost is under $2k (including all the "suggested" extras), but still not free and has town politics to deal with.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Really? Town teams charge upwards of $2k to be on the team? Town teams charge $150 for tryouts? Town teams mandate a new helmet, uniform and gloves every year? Town teams "suggest" you do the extra training and clinics, that are all an additional charge? Hmm. Please name the town. We would all be interested to know.


Did you read what was said? The post that you responded to pointed FACTS that did not support the original posters perspective or opinions.

You sound like another bitter person who does not want anyone to do what you do not want to do.

You seem to be focussed only on the cost. Some people choose to focus on value. The nice part about it is that you have a choice. You can choose to play for any of the following: Town Team, Less costly club, moderately priced club or one of the more expensive clubs or you can choose to not have your son play at all.

A town youth program that chooses to participate in all listed below will cost approximately $1,300 - $1,400 for the year. If they add a second payed coach that cost will go up another $100 - $200. The cost to travel to away tournaments is the same for both club and town teams.

-Fall League
-Fall Tournaments
-Winter indoor time
-Winter travel league
-Winter Tournament
-Winter Intramural (some towns)
-Spring League
-Spring Intramural (some towns)
-Spring / Summer Tournaments
-Paid Coaching

I did not put in suggest camps, clinics, training, private lessons etc... but many kids in the stronger lacrosse towns choose to participate in all.

Town only is not free.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I love reading about these "programs." Let's not kid ourselves. The most successful programs have parents and coaches who know the game. They talk to their sons in the car, and know what they are talking about. They go in the back yard and work on throwing and catching. Catching with soft hands and throwing with their non-dominant hand. Moving without the ball. If you live in a town with many of these parents, you have a better shot of the program being reasonably successful for a long period of time. If the town you live in has parents who don't know the game, then you have mothers yelling at little Johnny to run through the entire defense and shoot. In those situations, more times than not the coaches kids are the best players and everyone else is wondering why roll dodging the entire opposing team which worked so well in 3rd grade, no longer works in 6th.


and it is a nightmare for those town teams when the son of the coach is not the best player and the daddy coach still thinks he is. We went 5 years with it Putting his son in all types of positions facing off when the best f/o is pushed to the wing. Long pole when others still sat the bench in PAL.

Now with middle school around the corner lets see if politics play a role or will reality stare them in their face



Been there done that!! Middle school is an equalizer, for my son at least. Funny how now that the boys are in 10th grade, the coaches son, as well as the boys whos parents had their noses up coaches but are riding the bench, while several 2nd and 3rd stringers are D1 bound!


What kool aid are you drinking? Not really sure any 3rd stringers and only a few 2nd stringers are D1 bound. If that's the case sign me up for the program!
He means that that kids that didn't play much in PAL due to the coach dynamics now are starters in HS . I have seen this first hand in my town although NOT in lax. Soccer and Basketball do it a lot. Even in the sports my son does not play I look forward to dead panning when I see dad coaches and I get to say " YOur son didn't make the team ? Why isn't he getting any playing time? Im shocked "
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I love reading about these "programs." Let's not kid ourselves. The most successful programs have parents and coaches who know the game. They talk to their sons in the car, and know what they are talking about. They go in the back yard and work on throwing and catching. Catching with soft hands and throwing with their non-dominant hand. Moving without the ball. If you live in a town with many of these parents, you have a better shot of the program being reasonably successful for a long period of time. If the town you live in has parents who don't know the game, then you have mothers yelling at little Johnny to run through the entire defense and shoot. In those situations, more times than not the coaches kids are the best players and everyone else is wondering why roll dodging the entire opposing team which worked so well in 3rd grade, no longer works in 6th.


and it is a nightmare for those town teams when the son of the coach is not the best player and the daddy coach still thinks he is. We went 5 years with it Putting his son in all types of positions facing off when the best f/o is pushed to the wing. Long pole when others still sat the bench in PAL.

Now with middle school around the corner lets see if politics play a role or will reality stare them in their face



Been there done that!! Middle school is an equalizer, for my son at least. Funny how now that the boys are in 10th grade, the coaches son, as well as the boys whos parents had their noses up coaches but are riding the bench, while several 2nd and 3rd stringers are D1 bound!


What kool aid are you drinking? Not really sure any 3rd stringers and only a few 2nd stringers are D1 bound. If that's the case sign me up for the program!
I think what they are saying are those that were 2nd 3rd string in Youth are now flourishing in HS.

I can see that.


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I love reading about these "programs." Let's not kid ourselves. The most successful programs have parents and coaches who know the game. They talk to their sons in the car, and know what they are talking about. They go in the back yard and work on throwing and catching. Catching with soft hands and throwing with their non-dominant hand. Moving without the ball. If you live in a town with many of these parents, you have a better shot of the program being reasonably successful for a long period of time. If the town you live in has parents who don't know the game, then you have mothers yelling at little Johnny to run through the entire defense and shoot. In those situations, more times than not the coaches kids are the best players and everyone else is wondering why roll dodging the entire opposing team which worked so well in 3rd grade, no longer works in 6th.


and it is a nightmare for those town teams when the son of the coach is not the best player and the daddy coach still thinks he is. We went 5 years with it Putting his son in all types of positions facing off when the best f/o is pushed to the wing. Long pole when others still sat the bench in PAL.

Now with middle school around the corner lets see if politics play a role or will reality stare them in their face



Been there done that!! Middle school is an equalizer, for my son at least. Funny how now that the boys are in 10th grade, the coaches son, as well as the boys whos parents had their noses up coaches but are riding the bench, while several 2nd and 3rd stringers are D1 bound!


What kool aid are you drinking? Not really sure any 3rd stringers and only a few 2nd stringers are D1 bound. If that's the case sign me up for the program!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I love reading about these "programs." Let's not kid ourselves. The most successful programs have parents and coaches who know the game. They talk to their sons in the car, and know what they are talking about. They go in the back yard and work on throwing and catching. Catching with soft hands and throwing with their non-dominant hand. Moving without the ball. If you live in a town with many of these parents, you have a better shot of the program being reasonably successful for a long period of time. If the town you live in has parents who don't know the game, then you have mothers yelling at little Johnny to run through the entire defense and shoot. In those situations, more times than not the coaches kids are the best players and everyone else is wondering why roll dodging the entire opposing team which worked so well in 3rd grade, no longer works in 6th.


and it is a nightmare for those town teams when the son of the coach is not the best player and the daddy coach still thinks he is. We went 5 years with it Putting his son in all types of positions facing off when the best f/o is pushed to the wing. Long pole when others still sat the bench in PAL.

Now with middle school around the corner lets see if politics play a role or will reality stare them in their face



Been there done that!! Middle school is an equalizer, for my son at least. Funny how now that the boys are in 10th grade, the coaches son, as well as the boys whos parents had their noses up coaches but are riding the bench, while several 2nd and 3rd stringers are D1 bound!


What kool aid are you drinking? Not really sure any 3rd stringers and only a few 2nd stringers are D1 bound. If that's the case sign me up for the program!


FACT!! Happened on the town team where daddy was coach. His starters are not making varsity (10th grade) this year while 2 second stringers (one formerly 3rd) have been playing varsity since last year and are committed to top D1 programs. Sorry you don't want to accept the truth!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I love reading about these "programs." Let's not kid ourselves. The most successful programs have parents and coaches who know the game. They talk to their sons in the car, and know what they are talking about. They go in the back yard and work on throwing and catching. Catching with soft hands and throwing with their non-dominant hand. Moving without the ball. If you live in a town with many of these parents, you have a better shot of the program being reasonably successful for a long period of time. If the town you live in has parents who don't know the game, then you have mothers yelling at little Johnny to run through the entire defense and shoot. In those situations, more times than not the coaches kids are the best players and everyone else is wondering why roll dodging the entire opposing team which worked so well in 3rd grade, no longer works in 6th.


and it is a nightmare for those town teams when the son of the coach is not the best player and the daddy coach still thinks he is. We went 5 years with it Putting his son in all types of positions facing off when the best f/o is pushed to the wing. Long pole when others still sat the bench in PAL.

Now with middle school around the corner lets see if politics play a role or will reality stare them in their face



Been there done that!! Middle school is an equalizer, for my son at least. Funny how now that the boys are in 10th grade, the coaches son, as well as the boys whos parents had their noses up coaches but are riding the bench, while several 2nd and 3rd stringers are D1 bound!


What kool aid are you drinking? Not really sure any 3rd stringers and only a few 2nd stringers are D1 bound. If that's the case sign me up for the program!


FACT!! Happened on the town team where daddy was coach. His starters are not making varsity (10th grade) this year while 2 second stringers (one formerly 3rd) have been playing varsity since last year and are committed to top D1 programs. Sorry you don't want to accept the truth!


Many people on this site do not want to accept the truth.
Just don't play PAL. Tons of travel options from costly to affordable. Don't know why people feel they have to play town - especially before 7 grade and if the program stinks. I say 7th grade because middle school the real politics start. That said, a lot of towns do a good job - but they are usually anti club. But all-in-all PAL can be boring for skilled players and not fulfilling for those who want to learn the game.
And the above posts make clear that so much of this is about who gets showcased and when. When daddy is coaching, his kid (and the kids of his buddies) get showcased and are then seen as the better kids. If a kid is not on the field as much he cannot impress and, more importantly, isn't improving as fast. Take a kid put him as a first line middie and also on your man-up team. Then take the same kid off man-up and put him on the third middie line...and see what happens. That is the problem with daddy coaches...it too often becomes arbitrary nonsense based on politics and uninformed preferences which turn out to be wrong.


I have learned the hard way about PAL. I stuck through the town PAL program. I was fortunate enough to have one of the better players out of the grades my children were in. Each having 60+ players. But the turmoil and heart ache for both the developmental and Skilled players and families is unbelievable and that was for each grade and level boys and girls not just my children's teams or grade.

We stuck with PAL for all the right reason, so my children played with their friends, so we showed loyalty to the town, so we could be a part of helping the program grow. But looking back it was not a fun ride. Many sportsmanship ideals and values I tried to instill seem to be tested at each turn.

I wish PAL would figure out a smarter way to bridge the gap in player development and skill. No matter Suffolk or Nassau.

We are fortunate to have a positive experiences within the travel circuit on a top organization and team. Unfortunately for what I know now for a player like my son and some of his friends travel was a great outlet. I wished I had made the switch as early as 3rd grade.

For someone who has had a positive experience and would do travel earlier if I had to do all over again, I wished the HS coaches were more involved with the town youth programs, I wish and still think there is room for both town and travel youth through HS years.

I have witnessed some very good teams from the West, Maryland and Virgnia. Many of these teams are not typical travel teams but superstar travel teams. I wished LI would do that. Maybe for a week or 2. Pair up some of the better players and make 2 teams per grade and go compete with FCA and the rest. This allows our players to broaden their experiences.

Maybe some of the HS or even MS coaches can get together and try and set the stage to accomplish this. Similar to the Rising Sophs, Jrs Sr games between Nassau and Suffolk. I am not so sure how corrupt those games are as this will be our first experience within that but on its face it sounds like a great idea.

What do you think?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have learned the hard way about PAL. I stuck through the town PAL program. I was fortunate enough to have one of the better players out of the grades my children were in. Each having 60+ players. But the turmoil and heart ache for both the developmental and Skilled players and families is unbelievable and that was for each grade and level boys and girls not just my children's teams or grade.

We stuck with PAL for all the right reason, so my children played with their friends, so we showed loyalty to the town, so we could be a part of helping the program grow. But looking back it was not a fun ride. Many sportsmanship ideals and values I tried to instill seem to be tested at each turn.

I wish PAL would figure out a smarter way to bridge the gap in player development and skill. No matter Suffolk or Nassau.

We are fortunate to have a positive experiences within the travel circuit on a top organization and team. Unfortunately for what I know now for a player like my son and some of his friends travel was a great outlet. I wished I had made the switch as early as 3rd grade.

For someone who has had a positive experience and would do travel earlier if I had to do all over again, I wished the HS coaches were more involved with the town youth programs, I wish and still think there is room for both town and travel youth through HS years.

I have witnessed some very good teams from the West, Maryland and Virgnia. Many of these teams are not typical travel teams but superstar travel teams. I wished LI would do that. Maybe for a week or 2. Pair up some of the better players and make 2 teams per grade and go compete with FCA and the rest. This allows our players to broaden their experiences.

Maybe some of the HS or even MS coaches can get together and try and set the stage to accomplish this. Similar to the Rising Sophs, Jrs Sr games between Nassau and Suffolk. I am not so sure how corrupt those games are as this will be our first experience within that but on its face it sounds like a great idea.

What do you think?

Were you a PAL coach ?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have learned the hard way about PAL. I stuck through the town PAL program. I was fortunate enough to have one of the better players out of the grades my children were in. Each having 60+ players. But the turmoil and heart ache for both the developmental and Skilled players and families is unbelievable and that was for each grade and level boys and girls not just my children's teams or grade.

We stuck with PAL for all the right reason, so my children played with their friends, so we showed loyalty to the town, so we could be a part of helping the program grow. But looking back it was not a fun ride. Many sportsmanship ideals and values I tried to instill seem to be tested at each turn.

I wish PAL would figure out a smarter way to bridge the gap in player development and skill. No matter Suffolk or Nassau.

We are fortunate to have a positive experiences within the travel circuit on a top organization and team. Unfortunately for what I know now for a player like my son and some of his friends travel was a great outlet. I wished I had made the switch as early as 3rd grade.

For someone who has had a positive experience and would do travel earlier if I had to do all over again, I wished the HS coaches were more involved with the town youth programs, I wish and still think there is room for both town and travel youth through HS years.

I have witnessed some very good teams from the West, Maryland and Virgnia. Many of these teams are not typical travel teams but superstar travel teams. I wished LI would do that. Maybe for a week or 2. Pair up some of the better players and make 2 teams per grade and go compete with FCA and the rest. This allows our players to broaden their experiences.

Maybe some of the HS or even MS coaches can get together and try and set the stage to accomplish this. Similar to the Rising Sophs, Jrs Sr games between Nassau and Suffolk. I am not so sure how corrupt those games are as this will be our first experience within that but on its face it sounds like a great idea.

What do you think?

Were you a PAL coach ? Once upon a time; that is the last I answer of who I am.
Above is a very well positioned piece and from the way you write - an honest point of view. I agree with you and I too have seen the ups and downs that you reference. The one point you raise re more HS involvement in the town I strongly agree with. However, when they get involved they become anti-club and look to make the cash themselves, while hiding behind mission statement that they are building a program and you're with us or you're not (true statement actually said). Forget the building the program! Produce better players, keep kids involved in the sport, encourage elite travel play and act as an adviser to each family. The rest will work itself out. How about that for a crazy idea the school travel actually work with the travel teams. All of these tournaments and showcases are scheduled so far in advance that logistically it works to do both and successfully coexist.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Produce better players, keep kids involved in the sport, encourage elite travel play and act as an adviser to each family. The rest will work itself out. How about that for a crazy idea the school travel actually work with the travel teams. All of these tournaments and showcases are scheduled so far in advance that logistically it works to do both and successfully coexist.


This is a concept that I share a similar view with. Our child was "late to the PAL party". He did not show interest in lax until 5th grade. PAL was fundamentally valuable in exposure and learning the basics of the game. But that is where it stopped. He wasn't one of the sons of a coach, and did not have friends of sons of coaches. So his experience was limited even though his apptitude for the game was really high. He just wasn't getting a chance to be on the field. So we got him a coach to fill in the gaps. That was followed by immersion in club ball while the rest stayed "town" out of ?loyalty? (Or was it fear?). Word was that the HS coaches would start "town locals" on varsity.
Fast forward to middle school...PAL dads weren't the coaches anymore. Totally different kids became the starters (my son included) than had been the previous three years of PAL. The few kids who left to play club ball not only became starters but became impact players and leaders in their own part of the field; be it A,M or D. PAL loyalists were outraged. How could their kids not be the starters as per usual?

The point is that leaving the bubble of town PAL and exploring the vast experiences that are coupled with elite travel teams afforded these divergent kids the opportunity to grow; to be exposed to different coaches and develop stronger skill sets and to be more vastly challenged in the higher level of tournaments that they traveled to.

Why then wouldn't the HS coaches take advantage of this "farm league" concept of sending the kids out to play club ball; knowing that they would eventually return to the school fold in HS to bring these experiences of playing at a higher level back the the HS teams? This in turn would yield more experienced players lending their skills to the kids who stayed "town ball only". It would be a win-win situation.
Unless the Varsity coach is also running a youth travel team in that town he could care less where kids play. Also,once you get to Varsity you have 4 grades of kids in the mix, sometimes 5. Kids that are going to be D1 are often playing Varsity in 8th grade. Th truth is most kids play both travel and town. Sometimes when your kid is good and he enters lax a little later on he ends up being put on D. The better stick handlers usually , not always gravitate to offense. When a coach gets an athletic kid who hasnt handled a stick yet he usually giddy to put him on D, then the team starts to lean on him being and its hard to break out of that spot.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Produce better players, keep kids involved in the sport, encourage elite travel play and act as an adviser to each family. The rest will work itself out. How about that for a crazy idea the school travel actually work with the travel teams. All of these tournaments and showcases are scheduled so far in advance that logistically it works to do both and successfully coexist.


This is a concept that I share a similar view with. Our child was "late to the PAL party". He did not show interest in lax until 5th grade. PAL was fundamentally valuable in exposure and learning the basics of the game. But that is where it stopped. He wasn't one of the sons of a coach, and did not have friends of sons of coaches. So his experience was limited even though his apptitude for the game was really high. He just wasn't getting a chance to be on the field. So we got him a coach to fill in the gaps. That was followed by immersion in club ball while the rest stayed "town" out of ?loyalty? (Or was it fear?). Word was that the HS coaches would start "town locals" on varsity.
Fast forward to middle school...PAL dads weren't the coaches anymore. Totally different kids became the starters (my son included) than had been the previous three years of PAL. The few kids who left to play club ball not only became starters but became impact players and leaders in their own part of the field; be it A,M or D. PAL loyalists were outraged. How could their kids not be the starters as per usual?

The point is that leaving the bubble of town PAL and exploring the vast experiences that are coupled with elite travel teams afforded these divergent kids the opportunity to grow; to be exposed to different coaches and develop stronger skill sets and to be more vastly challenged in the higher level of tournaments that they traveled to.

Why then wouldn't the HS coaches take advantage of this "farm league" concept of sending the kids out to play club ball; knowing that they would eventually return to the school fold in HS to bring these experiences of playing at a higher level back the the HS teams? This in turn would yield more experienced players lending their skills to the kids who stayed "town ball only". It would be a win-win situation.
Exactly. Hopefully all the town die hards are listening. No need to choose one vs the other. Club ball enhances the players god given ability and in-turn helps the school program be a better program. And look to the right of this screen there are several club options and finding the right fit for a child's ability to grow their game isn't that hard.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Unless the Varsity coach is also running a youth travel team in that town he could care less where kids play. Also,once you get to Varsity you have 4 grades of kids in the mix, sometimes 5. Kids that are going to be D1 are often playing Varsity in 8th grade. Th truth is most kids play both travel and town. Sometimes when your kid is good and he enters lax a little later on he ends up being put on D. The better stick handlers usually , not always gravitate to offense. When a coach gets an athletic kid who hasnt handled a stick yet he usually giddy to put him on D, then the team starts to lean on him being and its hard to break out of that spot.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Produce better players, keep kids involved in the sport, encourage elite travel play and act as an adviser to each family. The rest will work itself out. How about that for a crazy idea the school travel actually work with the travel teams. All of these tournaments and showcases are scheduled so far in advance that logistically it works to do both and successfully coexist.


This is a concept that I share a similar view with. Our child was "late to the PAL party". He did not show interest in lax until 5th grade. PAL was fundamentally valuable in exposure and learning the basics of the game. But that is where it stopped. He wasn't one of the sons of a coach, and did not have friends of sons of coaches. So his experience was limited even though his apptitude for the game was really high. He just wasn't getting a chance to be on the field. So we got him a coach to fill in the gaps. That was followed by immersion in club ball while the rest stayed "town" out of ?loyalty? (Or was it fear?). Word was that the HS coaches would start "town locals" on varsity.
Fast forward to middle school...PAL dads weren't the coaches anymore. Totally different kids became the starters (my son included) than had been the previous three years of PAL. The few kids who left to play club ball not only became starters but became impact players and leaders in their own part of the field; be it A,M or D. PAL loyalists were outraged. How could their kids not be the starters as per usual?

The point is that leaving the bubble of town PAL and exploring the vast experiences that are coupled with elite travel teams afforded these divergent kids the opportunity to grow; to be exposed to different coaches and develop stronger skill sets and to be more vastly challenged in the higher level of tournaments that they traveled to.

Why then wouldn't the HS coaches take advantage of this "farm league" concept of sending the kids out to play club ball; knowing that they would eventually return to the school fold in HS to bring these experiences of playing at a higher level back the the HS teams? This in turn would yield more experienced players lending their skills to the kids who stayed "town ball only". It would be a win-win situation.
Good read - it touches on the debate here - in some areas. Full disclosure - I don't have a kid on 91 - but read Spallina's comments - I have to say I agree with his view.

http://www.uslacrosse.org/multimedi...racket-and-those-who-profit-from-it.aspx
Is it fair to say that in some towns the people who run the youth lacrosse league have preyed upon the uneducated consumer?

Is it fair to say that they have misled the community?

Is it fair to say that the people who control the youth league are the same people who have created a divide in the community that they profess to serve?

Is it fair to say that much animosity could have been avoided.

Is it fair to say that power corrupts and that absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Take a look at the situation in your community and think about what you have been told by the people who run your league. Now, compare what is said to what is actually done by the people who run the league. Think logically about the situation in your town. Don't think about "the feel good sounds good" things like staying together or being loyal, think about what is done. Do kids get cut? Are there "A" and "B" Teams at very young grades? Do they mix grades? Is winning more important than development? As the kids approach recruiting age is anyone there to help navigate the process? Are there different rules for different teams/kids? Is there coercion? is there collusion? Have kids been excluded?

Compare what has been said to what has been done in your town.

if you didn't take the time to read the article in the link that the previous poster provided see below.

Here are some exscipts from March 2014 Lacrosse Magazine Article titled "Beware the Recruiting Racket" by Justin Feil.


-“Make sure kids’ lacrosse IQ is being developed,” said Joe Spallina, the Stony Brook women’s coach, Team 91 coach for his sons’ youth teams and coach of the MLL’s New [lacrosse] Lizards. “Club lacrosse is similar to honors classes. I want my kids with the best teachers, the best students. I want the bar as high as possible. I don’t want a low bar and great results.”

-“Look out for manipulative practices,” Trevor Tierney said. “If a club team is hiring a high school coach and the high school coach is saying, ‘If you want to play for this high school, you have to play for this club team’ — if there’s a form of coercion — that’s when there are red flags.”

-Because of that conflict of interest, Shriver (Boys Latin Head Coach) has turned down opportunities to start a club program. “It’s ripe for potential problems,” he said.

-“No one ever said it, but when you go to your first tournament, it’s clearly where the college coaches are going,” Kathy Weeks said. “No one is going to your high school games.”

-With recruiting starting earlier, college coaches are coming to club coaches sooner, and players don’t want to get left behind.

-“The right club turnover happens between eighth and ninth grade,” Stagnitta said. “That’s when it goes from instructional/learning, to what team goes to exposure events, who has access to good tournaments.”

-The number of players in a club and on each team will factor into the attention your child will receive from coaches and colleges. Rosters should be in the low 20s.

-“You want the best kids with the best kids,” Spallina said. “It’s nice to see a kid playing with lesser kids and doing it all by himself or herself, but you want to see them with good players.”

This is what is happening out there in the lacrosse world. What has your town told you?
-“No one ever said it, but when you go to your first tournament, it’s clearly where the college coaches are going,” Kathy Weeks said. “No one is going to your high school games.”

Maybe yes , maybe no. I have seen top D1 coaches at HS games. PLUS, the best HS players get invited to showcases WITHOUT having to be on a club team. If your HS has a reputable coach and he calls a program and tell them " I have a kid your going to want to see" there going to look at him.
By the way, theres an article out in Lax magazine this month talking about how coaches are looking more for athletes then polished lacrosse players

- http://laxmag.us/1cz6fo1

Kind of the opposite of whats been written above.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
By the way, theres an article out in Lax magazine this month talking about how coaches are looking more for athletes then polished lacrosse players

- http://laxmag.us/1cz6fo1

Kind of the opposite of whats been written above.


That's because what was written above was done by an owner of one of the clubs to the right!!
It appears that many people still have your head in the sand.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
-“No one ever said it, but when you go to your first tournament, it’s clearly where the college coaches are going,” Kathy Weeks said. “No one is going to your high school games.”

Maybe yes , maybe no. I have seen top D1 coaches at HS games. PLUS, the best HS players get invited to showcases WITHOUT having to be on a club team. If your HS has a reputable coach and he calls a program and tell them " I have a kid your going to want to see" there going to look at him.


You are correct! My so got an offer to attend Maryland after being seen at the Suffolk County Coaches Showcase last year, without playing on a travel team!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
By the way, theres an article out in Lax magazine this month talking about how coaches are looking more for athletes then polished lacrosse players

- http://laxmag.us/1cz6fo1

Kind of the opposite of whats been written above.


I must have missed it. Where is it written above that kids should only play lacrosse?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
By the way, theres an article out in Lax magazine this month talking about how coaches are looking more for athletes then polished lacrosse players

- http://laxmag.us/1cz6fo1

Kind of the opposite of whats been written above.


The article is full of weak arguments! I would like to see the statistics to back up his opinions, oh, he has none!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
By the way, theres an article out in Lax magazine this month talking about how coaches are looking more for athletes then polished lacrosse players

- http://laxmag.us/1cz6fo1

Kind of the opposite of whats been written above.


The article is full of weak arguments! I would like to see the statistics to back up his opinions, oh, he has none!



I think kids should play what they like. If that's three sports great, if that's one sport, that's great too.
Also, I'd like to challenge the idea that playing football or basketball some how makes you better at Lacrosse? Or vice verse? It is the silliest thought with zero research to back up the notion. What I will say, is if you can play three sports in HS than it is the kids god given athletic ability to do that. Not the other way around. Playing one sport did not magically give you the ability to play the other.
Further, look at basketball kids from the cities. Do they play lacrosse or football to get better at basketball? No of course not. They play basketball year round everyday, and that how they become superstars. Is anyone telling them you should really play Lacrosse to be a better player? So silly.
Not looking for polished lacrosse players? So what are they looking for in ninth graders? Those that shave their peach fuzz?
They are looking for athletes. Not the first time I have heard this. Many college teams would rather take a kid with more athletic ability then a kid with less but better stick skills. They figure they can coach him up and at the end of the day his physical talent will be too much for the guy with good stick skills but a ceiling. This always upsets parents whose kids have put in a ton of time and developed skills, that a kid who did not put in as much time simply gets taken because he is bigger and faster sends them off the cliff,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not looking for polished lacrosse players? So what are they looking for in ninth graders? Those that shave their peach fuzz?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They are looking for athletes. Not the first time I have heard this. Many college teams would rather take a kid with more athletic ability then a kid with less but better stick skills. They figure they can coach him up and at the end of the day his physical talent will be too much for the guy with good stick skills but a ceiling. This always upsets parents whose kids have put in a ton of time and developed skills, that a kid who did not put in as much time simply gets taken because he is bigger and faster sends them off the cliff,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not looking for polished lacrosse players? So what are they looking for in ninth graders? Those that shave their peach fuzz?


That's why I think recruiting these kids now seems so odd. I know my son is going to be over 6 ft - but now as an 8th grader he is 5'4'' he'll be a way different player in few years.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They are looking for athletes. Not the first time I have heard this. Many college teams would rather take a kid with more athletic ability then a kid with less but better stick skills. They figure they can coach him up and at the end of the day his physical talent will be too much for the guy with good stick skills but a ceiling. This always upsets parents whose kids have put in a ton of time and developed skills, that a kid who did not put in as much time simply gets taken because he is bigger and faster sends them off the cliff,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not looking for polished lacrosse players? So what are they looking for in ninth graders? Those that shave their peach fuzz?


You can keep telling yourself this, but my son who is D1 recruited to a top program with a very good scholarship, only plays lax. We went on many visits. The coaches may admire a kid for being involved in other sports, but they are recruiting based on what they saw on the LACROSSE field! stop this nonsense. If playing another sport helps you kids get better at lax, kudos to your son! In the final analysis, coaches recruit based on what they observe on the lax field. Period!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They are looking for athletes. Not the first time I have heard this. Many college teams would rather take a kid with more athletic ability then a kid with less but better stick skills. They figure they can coach him up and at the end of the day his physical talent will be too much for the guy with good stick skills but a ceiling. This always upsets parents whose kids have put in a ton of time and developed skills, that a kid who did not put in as much time simply gets taken because he is bigger and faster sends them off the cliff,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not looking for polished lacrosse players? So what are they looking for in ninth graders? Those that shave their peach fuzz?


There is no checklist of things that they are looking for. It takes about a minute to decide, if that. It's not a process that can easily be put on paper or described - a top flight prospect is like porn, you know it when you see it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They are looking for athletes. Not the first time I have heard this. Many college teams would rather take a kid with more athletic ability then a kid with less but better stick skills. They figure they can coach him up and at the end of the day his physical talent will be too much for the guy with good stick skills but a ceiling. This always upsets parents whose kids have put in a ton of time and developed skills, that a kid who did not put in as much time simply gets taken because he is bigger and faster sends them off the cliff,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not looking for polished lacrosse players? So what are they looking for in ninth graders? Those that shave their peach fuzz?


There is no checklist of things that they are looking for. It takes about a minute to decide, if that. It's not a process that can easily be put on paper or described - a top flight prospect is like porn, you know it when you see it.


Way off base and CREEPY!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They are looking for athletes. Not the first time I have heard this. Many college teams would rather take a kid with more athletic ability then a kid with less but better stick skills. They figure they can coach him up and at the end of the day his physical talent will be too much for the guy with good stick skills but a ceiling. This always upsets parents whose kids have put in a ton of time and developed skills, that a kid who did not put in as much time simply gets taken because he is bigger and faster sends them off the cliff,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not looking for polished lacrosse players? So what are they looking for in ninth graders? Those that shave their peach fuzz?


You can keep telling yourself this, but my son who is D1 recruited to a top program with a very good scholarship, only plays lax. We went on many visits. The coaches may admire a kid for being involved in other sports, but they are recruiting based on what they saw on the LACROSSE field! stop this nonsense. If playing another sport helps you kids get better at lax, kudos to your son! In the final analysis, coaches recruit based on what they observe on the lax field. Period!


Agree completely. I think the whole "we love multisport athletes" bit is just a PC thing these coaches say to make themselves feel and sound more open minded. I have a hard time believing they are ever going to take anything other than the absolute best lacrosse players they can get their hands on. If the best player they can sign happens to play other sports then I think what they mean is that tis not held against the kid and may even be a positive....but that is very different from suggesting that they affirmatively look to recruit multisport athletes other non-multisport athletes.

If any of the coaches quoted in the article think it is more healthy, etc. for their own children to diversify into other sports that is a very reasonable choice for them to make as parents.....but stop peddling this fantasy to the larger lax community wherein less talented multisport athletes beat out better kids who only play lax. It is just silly.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They are looking for athletes. Not the first time I have heard this. Many college teams would rather take a kid with more athletic ability then a kid with less but better stick skills. They figure they can coach him up and at the end of the day his physical talent will be too much for the guy with good stick skills but a ceiling. This always upsets parents whose kids have put in a ton of time and developed skills, that a kid who did not put in as much time simply gets taken because he is bigger and faster sends them off the cliff,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not looking for polished lacrosse players? So what are they looking for in ninth graders? Those that shave their peach fuzz?


That's why I think recruiting these kids now seems so odd. I know my son is going to be over 6 ft - but now as an 8th grader he is 5'4'' he'll be a way different player in few years.


You keep telling yourself he will be over 6.
Of course INCLUDING SPEED AND SIZE. A less polished athlete will often be taken over a more polished athlete if he has better physical quality's. Why do you think the NFL has a combine ? How many lax players do strength and agility training ?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They are looking for athletes. Not the first time I have heard this. Many college teams would rather take a kid with more athletic ability then a kid with less but better stick skills. They figure they can coach him up and at the end of the day his physical talent will be too much for the guy with good stick skills but a ceiling. This always upsets parents whose kids have put in a ton of time and developed skills, that a kid who did not put in as much time simply gets taken because he is bigger and faster sends them off the cliff,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not looking for polished lacrosse players? So what are they looking for in ninth graders? Those that shave their peach fuzz?


You can keep telling yourself this, but my son who is D1 recruited to a top program with a very good scholarship, only plays lax. We went on many visits. The coaches may admire a kid for being involved in other sports, but they are recruiting based on what they saw on the LACROSSE field! stop this nonsense. If playing another sport helps you kids get better at lax, kudos to your son! In the final analysis, coaches recruit based on what they observe on the lax field. Period!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They are looking for athletes. Not the first time I have heard this. Many college teams would rather take a kid with more athletic ability then a kid with less but better stick skills. They figure they can coach him up and at the end of the day his physical talent will be too much for the guy with good stick skills but a ceiling. This always upsets parents whose kids have put in a ton of time and developed skills, that a kid who did not put in as much time simply gets taken because he is bigger and faster sends them off the cliff,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not looking for polished lacrosse players? So what are they looking for in ninth graders? Those that shave their peach fuzz?


That's why I think recruiting these kids now seems so odd. I know my son is going to be over 6 ft - but now as an 8th grader he is 5'4'' he'll be a way different player in few years.


You keep telling yourself he will be over 6.


As long as you keep telling yourself that 5'7'' is tall. lol. better get your commit now.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They are looking for athletes. Not the first time I have heard this. Many college teams would rather take a kid with more athletic ability then a kid with less but better stick skills. They figure they can coach him up and at the end of the day his physical talent will be too much for the guy with good stick skills but a ceiling. This always upsets parents whose kids have put in a ton of time and developed skills, that a kid who did not put in as much time simply gets taken because he is bigger and faster sends them off the cliff,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not looking for polished lacrosse players? So what are they looking for in ninth graders? Those that shave their peach fuzz?


That's why I think recruiting these kids now seems so odd. I know my son is going to be over 6 ft - but now as an 8th grader he is 5'4'' he'll be a way different player in few years.


You keep telling yourself he will be over 6.


#1 team in the nation, which plays at SB today has an average player height of 6'1''
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They are looking for athletes. Not the first time I have heard this. Many college teams would rather take a kid with more athletic ability then a kid with less but better stick skills. They figure they can coach him up and at the end of the day his physical talent will be too much for the guy with good stick skills but a ceiling. This always upsets parents whose kids have put in a ton of time and developed skills, that a kid who did not put in as much time simply gets taken because he is bigger and faster sends them off the cliff,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not looking for polished lacrosse players? So what are they looking for in ninth graders? Those that shave their peach fuzz?


That's why I think recruiting these kids now seems so odd. I know my son is going to be over 6 ft - but now as an 8th grader he is 5'4'' he'll be a way different player in few years.


You keep telling yourself he will be over 6.


#1 team in the nation, which plays at SB today has an average player height of 6'1''


Oh yeah, and the well known kid who scored 5 goals against Duke was a lax ONLY kid in HS..... One final note on this recruit athletes and not lacrosse players. Take a look at Syacuse. For years they recruited heavily upstate NY and LI. As a result they were able to tell recruits they would win a national championship during their time on the team. Which was true. Then they got the let's recruit football players from Texas and other atheletes mentality, instead of pure lax talent. Well not sure if that the reason for their lack luster performance lately, but they sure aren't what they used to be! Still a great program but way off from the glory years.
You guys are missing the point. Its not about playing other sports, or playing other sports making you better. Its about colleges prefer a kid who is bigger and faster with less lax skills. YOu can't teach speed.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They are looking for athletes. Not the first time I have heard this. Many college teams would rather take a kid with more athletic ability then a kid with less but better stick skills. They figure they can coach him up and at the end of the day his physical talent will be too much for the guy with good stick skills but a ceiling. This always upsets parents whose kids have put in a ton of time and developed skills, that a kid who did not put in as much time simply gets taken because he is bigger and faster sends them off the cliff,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not looking for polished lacrosse players? So what are they looking for in ninth graders? Those that shave their peach fuzz?


That's why I think recruiting these kids now seems so odd. I know my son is going to be over 6 ft - but now as an 8th grader he is 5'4'' he'll be a way different player in few years.


You keep telling yourself he will be over 6.


#1 team in the nation, which plays at SB today has an average player height of 6'1''


Oh yeah, and the well known kid who scored 5 goals against Duke was a lax ONLY kid in HS..... One final note on this recruit athletes and not lacrosse players. Take a look at Syacuse. For years they recruited heavily upstate NY and LI. As a result they were able to tell recruits they would win a national championship during their time on the team. Which was true. Then they got the let's recruit football players from Texas and other atheletes mentality, instead of pure lax talent. Well not sure if that the reason for their lack luster performance lately, but they sure aren't what they used to be! Still a great program but way off from the glory years.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You

Oh yeah, and the well known kid who scored 5 goals against Duke was a lax ONLY kid in HS..... One final note on this recruit athletes and not lacrosse players. Take a look at Syacuse. For years they recruited heavily upstate NY and LI. As a result they were able to tell recruits they would win a national championship during their time on the team. Which was true. Then they got the let's recruit football players from Texas and other atheletes mentality, instead of pure lax talent. Well not sure if that the reason for their lack luster performance lately, but they sure aren't what they used to be! Still a great program but way off from the glory years.
[/quote]

Or there is more competion and many more colleges fielding teams. Talent will no longer be just from LI and MD. Youth programs are starting all over the country. Pretty sure everyone reading this would be pretty happy if their kid was given an oppertunity to play on this "lack luster" program!
Have to agree. Not one of the better academic lax programs, now their performance is fading. Will be tough to attract great players which will escalate their downward momentum. Desko can keep blaming it on faceoffs, but he recruited these kids. He wasn't willing to shell over the big scholarship money for a good one, now his program will continue to suffer.
At the recruiting meeting held for parents and athletes at the Jake Reed tryouts in Florida, they specifically told the boys that the majority of D1 players are multi-sport athletes and when you send in a video of you playing lacrosse throw one in of you playing that other sport.
Last year the T award givin to the best player in college lax went to a guy who lettered in 3 sports .
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They are looking for athletes. Not the first time I have heard this. Many college teams would rather take a kid with more athletic ability then a kid with less but better stick skills. They figure they can coach him up and at the end of the day his physical talent will be too much for the guy with good stick skills but a ceiling. This always upsets parents whose kids have put in a ton of time and developed skills, that a kid who did not put in as much time simply gets taken because he is bigger and faster sends them off the cliff,
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not looking for polished lacrosse players? So what are they looking for in ninth graders? Those that shave their peach fuzz?


That's why I think recruiting these kids now seems so odd. I know my son is going to be over 6 ft - but now as an 8th grader he is 5'4'' he'll be a way different player in few years.


You keep telling yourself he will be over 6.


#1 team in the nation, which plays at SB today has an average player height of 6'1''


Oh yeah, and the well known kid who scored 5 goals against Duke was a lax ONLY kid in HS..... One final note on this recruit athletes and not lacrosse players. Take a look at Syacuse. For years they recruited heavily upstate NY and LI. As a result they were able to tell recruits they would win a national championship during their time on the team. Which was true. Then they got the let's recruit football players from Texas and other atheletes mentality, instead of pure lax talent. Well not sure if that the reason for their lack luster performance lately, but they sure aren't what they used to be! Still a great program but way off from the glory years.
Channy kid 5;9 maybe? 5 goals against # 1 Duke, end of story.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You

Oh yeah, and the well known kid who scored 5 goals against Duke was a lax ONLY kid in HS..... One final note on this recruit athletes and not lacrosse players. Take a look at Syacuse. For years they recruited heavily upstate NY and LI. As a result they were able to tell recruits they would win a national championship during their time on the team. Which was true. Then they got the let's recruit football players from Texas and other atheletes mentality, instead of pure lax talent. Well not sure if that the reason for their lack luster performance lately, but they sure aren't what they used to be! Still a great program but way off from the glory years.


Or there is more competion and many more colleges fielding teams. Talent will no longer be just from LI and MD. Youth programs are starting all over the country. Pretty sure everyone reading this would be pretty happy if their kid was given an oppertunity to play on this "lack luster" program! [/quote]

Nope, my son visited and thought it was a dump! And yes they did make a recruiting offer. He accepted a better offer at a better school. And nobody cared that he only played one sport!!8rn7p

Making it to the final game last year and winning the first half of that game is "way off" from their glory years? Really? Hate to be the kid that has to live up to your expectations. Please, Cuse is still one that gets circled on every schedule.
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Making it to the final game last year and winning the first half of that game is "way off" from their glory years? Really? Hate to be the kid that has to live up to your expectations. Please, Cuse is still one that gets circled on every schedule.


Gotta reach for the stars, and hope to land on the moon! Syracuse is not what it once was, and headed down!
Don't kid yourself, Syracuse is really good. Just shows how bad things can become when you lack a credible fogo. As we tell our kids, face offs and ground balls are crucial. Ask Hofstra what happens when you lose the ground ball battle.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Don't kid yourself, Syracuse is really good. Just shows how bad things can become when you lack a credible fogo. As we tell our kids, face offs and ground balls are crucial. Ask Hofstra what happens when you lose the ground ball battle.


Not kidding myself PAL super coach, Cuse is good. Just not the dominate team they once were. That's a fact.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Don't kid yourself, Syracuse is really good. Just shows how bad things can become when you lack a credible fogo. As we tell our kids, face offs and ground balls are crucial. Ask Hofstra what happens when you lose the ground ball battle.


Not kidding myself PAL super coach, Cuse is good. Just not the dominate team they once were. That's a fact.


You mean like going 16-4 in 2013 and losing three games by one goal? Yeah they aren't as good. You should be an analyst on ESPNU. Besides a 43% face off win percentage, would you care to give us your detailed analysis of where they are lacking? Can't wait to see this. Look out Quint, your job is in jeopardy. By the way, there is one football player from Texas and he plays defense, the 4th leading scorer happens to be from Oregon , and 25 players are from upstate and Long Island. Lelan Rogers, someone is looking to take over as recruiting coordinator.
Who cares if Syracuse is good?

The question is, "is there a conflict of interest when a HS coach runs a for profit Summer Team".

Yes, there is a conflict of interest.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who cares if Syracuse is good?

The question is, "is there a conflict of interest when a HS coach runs a for profit Summer Team".

Yes, there is a conflict of interest.


There is only a conflict of interest when your child doesn't get enough playing time. Most HS travel teams cost a fraction of the summer club teams.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who cares if Syracuse is good?

The question is, "is there a conflict of interest when a HS coach runs a for profit Summer Team".

Yes, there is a conflict of interest.


There is only a conflict of interest when your child doesn't get enough playing time. Most HS travel teams cost a fraction of the summer club teams.


You are a simpleton.
How in the world would be able to predict that your 5'4" 8th grade son is growing to 6'0" tall??
The trend of the 9th grade commit will be over very soon
1- most 9 grade recruits are a result of stage mom like parental behavior, parading their early polished and early peaked son from one recruiting camp to recruiting camp
2- teams like Carolina missing final four for decades
3- early recruiting colleges are wondering why those early recruits seem to ride the pine, transfer or simply hang it up as upper class man

The college coaches are being duped... In the end no one is happy because the talents, wants and desires of a 14 year old is certain to change in 4-5 years
Look at Coach Pietramala's quote below from a recent article in the Sun. Sort of sums it up.

"How all of this will serve us? None of us knows yet," Pietramala said. "I can't tell you if it's great, I can't tell you it is wrong, but I worry."

Originally Posted by Anonymous
The trend of the 9th grade commit will be over very soon
1- most 9 grade recruits are a result of stage mom like parental behavior, parading their early polished and early peaked son from one recruiting camp to recruiting camp
2- teams like Carolina missing final four for decades
3- early recruiting colleges are wondering why those early recruits seem to ride the pine, transfer or simply hang it up as upper class man

The college coaches are being duped... In the end no one is happy because the talents, wants and desires of a 14 year old is certain to change in 4-5 years


I take it your club coach's / HS coach's phone wasn't ringing off of the hook with the D1 coaches INITIATING contact regarding your son. ....not the other way around.
If you've not seen it first hand; then you're just speculating.

And what does this have to do with the OP? Nothing. Just a jealousy motivated non sequitir. Stay on topic.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Look at Coach Pietramala's quote below from a recent article in the Sun. Sort of sums it up.

"How all of this will serve us? None of us knows yet," Pietramala said. "I can't tell you if it's great, I can't tell you it is wrong, but I worry."



He is worried that he hasn't filled all of his 2017 spots yet. That's about it.
Talk about taking the effect and making it the cause. Hypocrisy at its finest.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The trend of the 9th grade commit will be over very soon
1- most 9 grade recruits are a result of stage mom like parental behavior, parading their early polished and early peaked son from one recruiting camp to recruiting camp
2- teams like Carolina missing final four for decades
3- early recruiting colleges are wondering why those early recruits seem to ride the pine, transfer or simply hang it up as upper class man

The college coaches are being duped... In the end no one is happy because the talents, wants and desires of a 14 year old is certain to change in 4-5 years


You have no idea what you're talking about! Early committing will continue because on average, the great kids in 8th/9th grade will be the great kids in 12th and beyond! Colleges will continue to attempt to secure these committments, because on average, these kids will perform. Of couse there will bw a few that don't produce, as well as some late bloomers, but that will be the exception. You make a lot of bold claims, with no actual data to back up what you're saying!
If college coaches shouldn't recruit 9th and 10th graders than High School coaches shouldn't bring 9th and 10th graders up to varsity either. I think both the HS and college coaches have a pretty good idea of who is going to develop into a good player.

Over the years there have been plenty of HS Junior and Senior recruits who did not become major contributors at the college level. Transfers are nothing new and kids hanging it up didn't start with early recruiting.

I saw COach D from Duke talk about this very subject. They all hate it, they wish the NCAA would stop it but they appear to be going in the opposite direction. AS long as these are the rules they have no choice in the matter
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The trend of the 9th grade commit will be over very soon
1- most 9 grade recruits are a result of stage mom like parental behavior, parading their early polished and early peaked son from one recruiting camp to recruiting camp
2- teams like Carolina missing final four for decades
3- early recruiting colleges are wondering why those early recruits seem to ride the pine, transfer or simply hang it up as upper class man

The college coaches are being duped... In the end no one is happy because the talents, wants and desires of a 14 year old is certain to change in 4-5 years


You have no idea what you're talking about! Early committing will continue because on average, the great kids in 8th/9th grade will be the great kids in 12th and beyond! Colleges will continue to attempt to secure these committments, because on average, these kids will perform. Of couse there will bw a few that don't produce, as well as some late bloomers, but that will be the exception. You make a lot of bold claims, with no actual data to back up what you're saying!


I don't know how you reach that conclusion.....but am also not sure anyone can say this accelerated recruitment is the wave of the future. It is a relatively new phenomenon to recruit this early and there is not enough data to demonstrate whether these early commits are good bets or not. Time will tell....
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I saw COach D from Duke talk about this very subject. They all hate it, they wish the NCAA would stop it but they appear to be going in the opposite direction. AS long as these are the rules they have no choice in the matter
. That's nonsense. Starsia, Petramala, Brescia, Danowski, they all cry how they don't want to recruit this early, but they are the worst offenders. Any one of them could take a stand and publicly declare that if you want to play at X university then you can't commit before summer of 12th grade. Not gonna happen. They will do what they want because the NCAA is a feckless organization. Please no more articles with these guys quoting the B.S. - we don't want to recruit early, we have to.
ABSOLUTELY there is a conflict but unless the schools do something it will continue as well. Unfortunately your son or daughter could be on the bubble with another player who happens to play for the coaches summer program. Since he makes money off one and not the other who do you think he is going to take. Coaches don't make a lot from coaching the school team but they sure do with their summer programs. Just think about a coach that is at a top private school and is a director of a summer program. You don' think it would be in your best interest to play for that coaches summer progtram. Some of these programs cost $3000 for spring and summer. Take freshmen / JV / Varsity teams at the school he coaches at and do the math. He could have $100,000 running around every year
It is the same in the big time sports...the difference is that in those sports, competing coaches are still recruiting kids that have given a verbal. the result is that over time, verbals mean nothing...not quite there in the lax world but as the sport grows so will the lengths that college coaches are willing to go.

Give it three or four years from now when a 2017 committed kid gets offered a better package (or god bless him) a 3/4 full ride at some other school. His parents and he will come to know that there they could use the extra dollars and avoid some loan debt and jump...
Based on reading most of the posts here, there are two kinds of parents. Those with so much pride because their little guy has been a superstar since second grade and don't want to hear that their child isn't going to grow to be 6 feet tall or that they may not be a superstar in college. The other parent, doesn't have a superstar player, and does want to hear that their child even if given enough playing time, clinics and quality "coaching", can't ever be a superstar. The rest of us, in the middle, read these posts with amusement, and could really care less about all of the egos involved. Because truthfully, is this really about their kids, or grown men standing under a tent at some God forsaken tournament discussing what D1 school their 8th grader is looking at?
thought this was about conflicts. Coaches of School teams that also run summer programs not early commits.

As for that nothing is done until papers are signed. if a kid commits in 8th, 9th, 10th and a better offer comes along they can walk away from that commitment no damage done. You just don't hear about it as much as the kid committing. It happens more than you think. Also you never hear about the kid that committed that could not get past the admission process.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The trend of the 9th grade commit will be over very soon
1- most 9 grade recruits are a result of stage mom like parental behavior, parading their early polished and early peaked son from one recruiting camp to recruiting camp
2- teams like Carolina missing final four for decades
3- early recruiting colleges are wondering why those early recruits seem to ride the pine, transfer or simply hang it up as upper class man

The college coaches are being duped... In the end no one is happy because the talents, wants and desires of a 14 year old is certain to change in 4-5 years


You have no idea what you're talking about! Early committing will continue because on average, the great kids in 8th/9th grade will be the great kids in 12th and beyond! Colleges will continue to attempt to secure these committments, because on average, these kids will perform. Of couse there will bw a few that don't produce, as well as some late bloomers, but that will be the exception. You make a lot of bold claims, with no actual data to back up what you're saying!


I don't know how you reach that conclusion.....but am also not sure anyone can say this accelerated recruitment is the wave of the future. It is a relatively new phenomenon to recruit this early and there is not enough data to demonstrate whether these early commits are good bets or not. Time will tell....

Its been going on for a long, long time in other sports... No end in sight unless rules are put in place. You will see an 8th grader commit in the next year or two. Just a few years ago it was considered crazy when a rising sophomore committed.
Publically announcing an early commit is a new phenomenon but early scouting and early recruiting have been going on in all sports for a very long time. Both pro and college coaches and scouts have been trying to identify young talent for many years. Baseball, Basketball Hockey etc. know who the talented kids are at a very young age.

High School coaches don’t like it because in some ways it makes them less relevant.
Parents of players who are not getting interest from college coaches don’t like it because they know that there are only so many “spots” available at the top Lacrosse Schools.

The reality is that college coaches are out there trying to identify young talent that the coach believes can help their program win. These coaches are not going to 99.9 percent of the High School Lacrosse games that are played each Spring. The coaches are not going to any middle school / JHS games. The College Coaches are going to specific recruiting events that may not be open to all players. The coaches are going to Summer and Fall Tournaments to watch the best club teams in their rising 9th and 10th grade year.

There are some exceptions to the rule. If you are a 9th or 10th grader who starts on a great HS Team that makes it deep into the playoffs in NY, MD, PA you will not be overlooked.

Does anyone know the percentage of 2017 and 2016 early commits who did not play for a Select Club Team? I think the large majority of the early commits developed their skill on a club team and were eventually identified and recruited. All of the kids will play for their HS Team but many will develop and get recruited as a result of their club experience.


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The trend of the 9th grade commit will be over very soon
1- most 9 grade recruits are a result of stage mom like parental behavior, parading their early polished and early peaked son from one recruiting camp to recruiting camp
2- teams like Carolina missing final four for decades
3- early recruiting colleges are wondering why those early recruits seem to ride the pine, transfer or simply hang it up as upper class man

The college coaches are being duped... In the end no one is happy because the talents, wants and desires of a 14 year old is certain to change in 4-5 years


You have no idea what you're talking about! Early committing will continue because on average, the great kids in 8th/9th grade will be the great kids in 12th and beyond! Colleges will continue to attempt to secure these committments, because on average, these kids will perform. Of couse there will bw a few that don't produce, as well as some late bloomers, but that will be the exception. You make a lot of bold claims, with no actual data to back up what you're saying!


I don't know how you reach that conclusion.....but am also not sure anyone can say this accelerated recruitment is the wave of the future. It is a relatively new phenomenon to recruit this early and there is not enough data to demonstrate whether these early commits are good bets or not. Time will tell....

Its been going on for a long, long time in other sports... No end in sight unless rules are put in place. You will see an 8th grader commit in the next year or two. Just a few years ago it was considered crazy when a rising sophomore committed.


Agreed. To borrow a market term "the trend is your friend". This trend won't change unless the rules change. The rules are unlikely to change because the NCAA is an organization with a conflict of interest. It acts as a governing body, but it's not independent, because it's represented by the colleges and universities it oversees. As has been said, if the coaches want it to stop they can make that happen, but they won't.
How many 14 year old kids know what they want to do and what college they want to attend? I really with they werent allowed to make offers till 11th grade, as long as its the same for every college its a batter system for the kids. If there was big money in laz after college I could see it. Guys that go free ride d1 in football are planning on playing in the NFL as a career. In some ways
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Publically announcing an early commit is a new phenomenon but early scouting and early recruiting have been going on in all sports for a very long time. Both pro and college coaches and scouts have been trying to identify young talent for many years. Baseball, Basketball Hockey etc. know who the talented kids are at a very young age.

High School coaches don’t like it because in some ways it makes them less relevant.
Parents of players who are not getting interest from college coaches don’t like it because they know that there are only so many “spots” available at the top Lacrosse Schools.

The reality is that college coaches are out there trying to identify young talent that the coach believes can help their program win. These coaches are not going to 99.9 percent of the High School Lacrosse games that are played each Spring. The coaches are not going to any middle school / JHS games. The College Coaches are going to specific recruiting events that may not be open to all players. The coaches are going to Summer and Fall Tournaments to watch the best club teams in their rising 9th and 10th grade year.

There are some exceptions to the rule. If you are a 9th or 10th grader who starts on a great HS Team that makes it deep into the playoffs in NY, MD, PA you will not be overlooked.

Does anyone know the percentage of 2017 and 2016 early commits who did not play for a Select Club Team? I think the large majority of the early commits developed their skill on a club team and were eventually identified and recruited. All of the kids will play for their HS Team but many will develop and get recruited as a result of their club experience.




In West Islip many or most of the boys play for the town travel team only and get recruited to some top D 1 schools
In Northport almost all only played for their high school team and we have UNC, Maryland, Navy, Stonybrook, etc.
As the post states, "there are exceptions to the rule."

Lets see if it continues in WI. Times have changed since NG was in grade school. The post also says that "early commits developed their skills on a club team and eventually were identified and recruited." We are talking about the kids that are committing before playing their sophomore year of HS Lacrosse.

From what I have seen, many of the West Islip kids play for Select Club Teams at the youth and ms/jhs level. From what I have been told SC has no problem with it.

Lacrosse is growing at a rapid pace and the people who advocate restricting players and limiting the players lacrosse experience are not helping the kids.

Please identify a sport or anything else where the most talented kids are told that if they want to be the best that they can be they must play only with other kids who live in their zip code.

And yes, If the HS Summer program is a for profit business I think there is a clear conflict of interest. If there is no profit not so much a conflict.
Love to see stats on early commits and transfer rates.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Love to see stats on early commits and transfer rates.


The early commits are still in HS. Kids transfer all the time it is nothing new.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Love to see stats on early commits and transfer rates.


The early commits are still in HS. Kids transfer all the time it is nothing new.


Obviously they are still in high school. I'm talking about transferring from the school they chose when they were 14 years old. Is the transfer rate much higher with early commits than those choosing schools as juniors? If so, then these college coaches need to review the cost/benefit of filling slots with kids that most likely won't make it past their freshman year in college.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Publically announcing an early commit is a new phenomenon but early scouting and early recruiting have been going on in all sports for a very long time. Both pro and college coaches and scouts have been trying to identify young talent for many years. Baseball, Basketball Hockey etc. know who the talented kids are at a very young age.

High School coaches don’t like it because in some ways it makes them less relevant.
Parents of players who are not getting interest from college coaches don’t like it because they know that there are only so many “spots” available at the top Lacrosse Schools.

The reality is that college coaches are out there trying to identify young talent that the coach believes can help their program win. These coaches are not going to 99.9 percent of the High School Lacrosse games that are played each Spring. The coaches are not going to any middle school / JHS games. The College Coaches are going to specific recruiting events that may not be open to all players. The coaches are going to Summer and Fall Tournaments to watch the best club teams in their rising 9th and 10th grade year.

There are some exceptions to the rule. If you are a 9th or 10th grader who starts on a great HS Team that makes it deep into the playoffs in NY, MD, PA you will not be overlooked.

Does anyone know the percentage of 2017 and 2016 early commits who did not play for a Select Club Team? I think the large majority of the early commits developed their skill on a club team and were eventually identified and recruited. All of the kids will play for their HS Team but many will develop and get recruited as a result of their club experience.




In West Islip many or most of the boys play for the town travel team only and get recruited to some top D 1 schools
I believe they only had 2 D-1 last year and this year have 3 seniors committed to lower level D-1 and a sophomore to Penn State, who played some as a freshman and whose dad was a college asst. coach if I'm not mistaken. There may be others committed who haven't been in the lax press. The way recruiting is now for the top schools it will be harder for these kids to get recruited. In the past, the H.S. staff did a great job getting kids recruited, but that was varsity kids who the coaches knew. With a push now for sophomores and freshman commits, I think the town only concept, while great for program consistency may wind up hurting some kids.
If your a D! player they will find you. I cantell you that my HS staff knows who the best kids in 7th grade are already and try to head them off from the Catholic schools. I think the travel programs have a better chance of helping d2 and d3 kids. Everyone knows who the D1 kids, cripes MSG Varisty lists them
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Publically announcing an early commit is a new phenomenon but early scouting and early recruiting have been going on in all sports for a very long time. Both pro and college coaches and scouts have been trying to identify young talent for many years. Baseball, Basketball Hockey etc. know who the talented kids are at a very young age.

High School coaches don’t like it because in some ways it makes them less relevant.
Parents of players who are not getting interest from college coaches don’t like it because they know that there are only so many “spots” available at the top Lacrosse Schools.

The reality is that college coaches are out there trying to identify young talent that the coach believes can help their program win. These coaches are not going to 99.9 percent of the High School Lacrosse games that are played each Spring. The coaches are not going to any middle school / JHS games. The College Coaches are going to specific recruiting events that may not be open to all players. The coaches are going to Summer and Fall Tournaments to watch the best club teams in their rising 9th and 10th grade year.

There are some exceptions to the rule. If you are a 9th or 10th grader who starts on a great HS Team that makes it deep into the playoffs in NY, MD, PA you will not be overlooked.

Does anyone know the percentage of 2017 and 2016 early commits who did not play for a Select Club Team? I think the large majority of the early commits developed their skill on a club team and were eventually identified and recruited. All of the kids will play for their HS Team but many will develop and get recruited as a result of their club experience.




In West Islip many or most of the boys play for the town travel team only and get recruited to some top D 1 schools
I believe they only had 2 D-1 last year and this year have 3 seniors committed to lower level D-1 and a sophomore to Penn State, who played some as a freshman and whose dad was a college asst. coach if I'm not mistaken. There may be others committed who haven't been in the lax press. The way recruiting is now for the top schools it will be harder for these kids to get recruited. In the past, the H.S. staff did a great job getting kids recruited, but that was varsity kids who the coaches knew. With a push now for sophomores and freshman commits, I think the town only concept, while great for program consistency may wind up hurting some kids.
MSG Varsity rates D-1 prospects ? I don't think so, they list verbal commitments. These kids have already been recruited. What I am talking about is the freshman and sophomores who haven't played on varsity yet. Is the JV staff actively guiding and advising these kids? I don't know maybe they are. My question is will the kid who stops playing club to play on the school summer team exclusively and doesn't have parents who are knowledgable about the recruiting scene get looked at ?
HS coaches--at least at WM--do not know players until they get older. They are not watching 7th grade or 8th grade lax except for one game at the end of the year--middle school gelinas vs middle school murphy...

Further, the HS coaches have been very clear that players are responsible for all recruiting efforts. I know they will take calls and help in any way possible, but they aren't going to be proactive and don't know the younger kids at all--they are are two years removed from where college coaches are looking. There is no one talking about Jake Reed or Maverick, either the players and parents know or they don't ...

We love the WM program, but there is much to be said for the select team programs (91, LIE, ...).

For anyone just starting out, do not just sit there and wait to be discovered. No matter what all of the numbskulls on this board think, there are only a few levels of players. It is the same at every age group, the very best kids, all the others that are in the middle and then the bottom group.

there are changes to the structure from one year to the next based upon growth spurts, but ultimately the groups look pretty similar from 4th grade through 12th. The stud athletes tend to remain studs (unless there advantage was size)

Many of the kids in the middle of the pack, assuming they work hard and really want it (not all kids do) can play at D-1.

But it is up to you, the parent and the player to put yourself in the best possible position. If you are the best one on your HS team, I agree, someone will find you, but if you are in the top 5-10, the only way you will get recruited is if you send tapes and show up at events that your desired college attends...

It is like anything else in life, you need to put yourself in a position to succeed. early bird gets the worm...

As for topic, of course it is a conflict, but everything is relative. Depending on where you are on the coach's depth chart, you are either happy of sad. let's face it, lots of politics, for those with good connections the system works, for those without connections, you need to work the system....
Originally Posted by Anonymous
HS coaches--at least at WM--do not know players until they get older. They are not watching 7th grade or 8th grade lax except for one game at the end of the year--middle school gelinas vs middle school murphy...

Further, the HS coaches have been very clear that players are responsible for all recruiting efforts. I know they will take calls and help in any way possible, but they aren't going to be proactive and don't know the younger kids at all--they are are two years removed from where college coaches are looking. There is no one talking about Jake Reed or Maverick, either the players and parents know or they don't ...

We love the WM program, but there is much to be said for the select team programs (91, LIE, ...).

For anyone just starting out, do not just sit there and wait to be discovered. No matter what all of the numbskulls on this board think, there are only a few levels of players. It is the same at every age group, the very best kids, all the others that are in the middle and then the bottom group.

there are changes to the structure from one year to the next based upon growth spurts, but ultimately the groups look pretty similar from 4th grade through 12th. The stud athletes tend to remain studs (unless there advantage was size)

Many of the kids in the middle of the pack, assuming they work hard and really want it (not all kids do) can play at D-1.

But it is up to you, the parent and the player to put yourself in the best possible position. If you are the best one on your HS team, I agree, someone will find you, but if you are in the top 5-10, the only way you will get recruited is if you send tapes and show up at events that your desired college attends...

It is like anything else in life, you need to put yourself in a position to succeed. early bird gets the worm...

As for topic, of course it is a conflict, but everything is relative. Depending on where you are on the coach's depth chart, you are either happy of sad. let's face it, lots of politics, for those with good connections the system works, for those without connections, you need to work the system....


Well said.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
HS coaches--at least at WM--do not know players until they get older. They are not watching 7th grade or 8th grade lax except for one game at the end of the year--middle school gelinas vs middle school murphy...

Further, the HS coaches have been very clear that players are responsible for all recruiting efforts. I know they will take calls and help in any way possible, but they aren't going to be proactive and don't know the younger kids at all--they are are two years removed from where college coaches are looking. There is no one talking about Jake Reed or Maverick, either the players and parents know or they don't ...

We love the WM program, but there is much to be said for the select team programs (91, LIE, ...).

For anyone just starting out, do not just sit there and wait to be discovered. No matter what all of the numbskulls on this board think, there are only a few levels of players. It is the same at every age group, the very best kids, all the others that are in the middle and then the bottom group.

there are changes to the structure from one year to the next based upon growth spurts, but ultimately the groups look pretty similar from 4th grade through 12th. The stud athletes tend to remain studs (unless there advantage was size)

Many of the kids in the middle of the pack, assuming they work hard and really want it (not all kids do) can play at D-1.

But it is up to you, the parent and the player to put yourself in the best possible position. If you are the best one on your HS team, I agree, someone will find you, but if you are in the top 5-10, the only way you will get recruited is if you send tapes and show up at events that your desired college attends...

It is like anything else in life, you need to put yourself in a position to succeed. early bird gets the worm...

As for topic, of course it is a conflict, but everything is relative. Depending on where you are on the coach's depth chart, you are either happy of sad. let's face it, lots of politics, for those with good connections the system works, for those without connections, you need to work the system....


Do you know how many 4th grade studs are no longer studs in forget 12th, how about 9th? I know I coached them. Many of these kids developed quicker than the others. Additionally, regardless of size, many had birthdays 6-9 months sooner than the less developed players. By 9th grade much of that advantage has disappeared. The most interesting part is that those 3rd, 4th, 5th graders who have been continually put on "A" travel teams might be in for a rude awakening when that good but not great player, surpasses them in HS. The rudest awakening is for their parents, when they cry politics, wondering why their meal ticket was sent to the "B" team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
HS coaches--at least at WM--do not know players until they get older. They are not watching 7th grade or 8th grade lax except for one game at the end of the year--middle school gelinas vs middle school murphy...

Further, the HS coaches have been very clear that players are responsible for all recruiting efforts. I know they will take calls and help in any way possible, but they aren't going to be proactive and don't know the younger kids at all--they are are two years removed from where college coaches are looking. There is no one talking about Jake Reed or Maverick, either the players and parents know or they don't ...

We love the WM program, but there is much to be said for the select team programs (91, LIE, ...).

For anyone just starting out, do not just sit there and wait to be discovered. No matter what all of the numbskulls on this board think, there are only a few levels of players. It is the same at every age group, the very best kids, all the others that are in the middle and then the bottom group.

there are changes to the structure from one year to the next based upon growth spurts, but ultimately the groups look pretty similar from 4th grade through 12th. The stud athletes tend to remain studs (unless there advantage was size)

Many of the kids in the middle of the pack, assuming they work hard and really want it (not all kids do) can play at D-1.

But it is up to you, the parent and the player to put yourself in the best possible position. If you are the best one on your HS team, I agree, someone will find you, but if you are in the top 5-10, the only way you will get recruited is if you send tapes and show up at events that your desired college attends...

It is like anything else in life, you need to put yourself in a position to succeed. early bird gets the worm...

As for topic, of course it is a conflict, but everything is relative. Depending on where you are on the coach's depth chart, you are either happy of sad. let's face it, lots of politics, for those with good connections the system works, for those without connections, you need to work the system....


Do you know how many 4th grade studs are no longer studs in forget 12th, how about 9th? I know I coached them. Many of these kids developed quicker than the others. Additionally, regardless of size, many had birthdays 6-9 months sooner than the less developed players. By 9th grade much of that advantage has disappeared. The most interesting part is that those 3rd, 4th, 5th graders who have been continually put on "A" travel teams might be in for a rude awakening when that good but not great player, surpasses them in HS. The rudest awakening is for their parents, when they cry politics, wondering why their meal ticket was sent to the "B" team.


Well said by both posters. Seen it happen!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
HS coaches--at least at WM--do not know players until they get older. They are not watching 7th grade or 8th grade lax except for one game at the end of the year--middle school gelinas vs middle school murphy...

Further, the HS coaches have been very clear that players are responsible for all recruiting efforts. I know they will take calls and help in any way possible, but they aren't going to be proactive and don't know the younger kids at all--they are are two years removed from where college coaches are looking. There is no one talking about Jake Reed or Maverick, either the players and parents know or they don't ...

We love the WM program, but there is much to be said for the select team programs (91, LIE, ...).

For anyone just starting out, do not just sit there and wait to be discovered. No matter what all of the numbskulls on this board think, there are only a few levels of players. It is the same at every age group, the very best kids, all the others that are in the middle and then the bottom group.

there are changes to the structure from one year to the next based upon growth spurts, but ultimately the groups look pretty similar from 4th grade through 12th. The stud athletes tend to remain studs (unless there advantage was size)

Many of the kids in the middle of the pack, assuming they work hard and really want it (not all kids do) can play at D-1.

But it is up to you, the parent and the player to put yourself in the best possible position. If you are the best one on your HS team, I agree, someone will find you, but if you are in the top 5-10, the only way you will get recruited is if you send tapes and show up at events that your desired college attends...

It is like anything else in life, you need to put yourself in a position to succeed. early bird gets the worm...

As for topic, of course it is a conflict, but everything is relative. Depending on where you are on the coach's depth chart, you are either happy of sad. let's face it, lots of politics, for those with good connections the system works, for those without connections, you need to work the system....


Do you know how many 4th grade studs are no longer studs in forget 12th, how about 9th? I know I coached them. Many of these kids developed quicker than the others. Additionally, regardless of size, many had birthdays 6-9 months sooner than the less developed players. By 9th grade much of that advantage has disappeared. The most interesting part is that those 3rd, 4th, 5th graders who have been continually put on "A" travel teams might be in for a rude awakening when that good but not great player, surpasses them in HS. The rudest awakening is for their parents, when they cry politics, wondering why their meal ticket was sent to the "B" team.


Well said by both posters. Seen it happen!


Seeing it also firsthand. Pal player in town grew 5 inches since last year.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
HS coaches--at least at WM--do not know players until they get older. They are not watching 7th grade or 8th grade lax except for one game at the end of the year--middle school gelinas vs middle school murphy...

Further, the HS coaches have been very clear that players are responsible for all recruiting efforts. I know they will take calls and help in any way possible, but they aren't going to be proactive and don't know the younger kids at all--they are are two years removed from where college coaches are looking. There is no one talking about Jake Reed or Maverick, either the players and parents know or they don't ...

We love the WM program, but there is much to be said for the select team programs (91, LIE, ...).

For anyone just starting out, do not just sit there and wait to be discovered. No matter what all of the numbskulls on this board think, there are only a few levels of players. It is the same at every age group, the very best kids, all the others that are in the middle and then the bottom group.

there are changes to the structure from one year to the next based upon growth spurts, but ultimately the groups look pretty similar from 4th grade through 12th. The stud athletes tend to remain studs (unless there advantage was size)

Many of the kids in the middle of the pack, assuming they work hard and really want it (not all kids do) can play at D-1.

But it is up to you, the parent and the player to put yourself in the best possible position. If you are the best one on your HS team, I agree, someone will find you, but if you are in the top 5-10, the only way you will get recruited is if you send tapes and show up at events that your desired college attends...

It is like anything else in life, you need to put yourself in a position to succeed. early bird gets the worm...

As for topic, of course it is a conflict, but everything is relative. Depending on where you are on the coach's depth chart, you are either happy of sad. let's face it, lots of politics, for those with good connections the system works, for those without connections, you need to work the system....


Wow that was a great post and I guess also the reason the players at WM are vey good. Examples like this!

WM and WI are a good comparison because they are similar traditional successful programs with the same philosophy- kids playing together bond better and the team first concept makes the difference come playoff time. From what I hear, WI doesn't frown on playing club in H.S. as long as the H.S. summer program comes first in conflicts. Does WM do the same ?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
HS coaches--at least at WM--do not know players until they get older. They are not watching 7th grade or 8th grade lax except for one game at the end of the year--middle school gelinas vs middle school murphy...

Further, the HS coaches have been very clear that players are responsible for all recruiting efforts. I know they will take calls and help in any way possible, but they aren't going to be proactive and don't know the younger kids at all--they are are two years removed from where college coaches are looking. There is no one talking about Jake Reed or Maverick, either the players and parents know or they don't ...

We love the WM program, but there is much to be said for the select team programs (91, LIE, ...).

For anyone just starting out, do not just sit there and wait to be discovered. No matter what all of the numbskulls on this board think, there are only a few levels of players. It is the same at every age group, the very best kids, all the others that are in the middle and then the bottom group.

there are changes to the structure from one year to the next based upon growth spurts, but ultimately the groups look pretty similar from 4th grade through 12th. The stud athletes tend to remain studs (unless there advantage was size)

Many of the kids in the middle of the pack, assuming they work hard and really want it (not all kids do) can play at D-1.

But it is up to you, the parent and the player to put yourself in the best possible position. If you are the best one on your HS team, I agree, someone will find you, but if you are in the top 5-10, the only way you will get recruited is if you send tapes and show up at events that your desired college attends...

It is like anything else in life, you need to put yourself in a position to succeed. early bird gets the worm...

As for topic, of course it is a conflict, but everything is relative. Depending on where you are on the coach's depth chart, you are either happy of sad. let's face it, lots of politics, for those with good connections the system works, for those without connections, you need to work the system....


Do you know how many 4th grade studs are no longer studs in forget 12th, how about 9th? I know I coached them. Many of these kids developed quicker than the others. Additionally, regardless of size, many had birthdays 6-9 months sooner than the less developed players. By 9th grade much of that advantage has disappeared. The most interesting part is that those 3rd, 4th, 5th graders who have been continually put on "A" travel teams might be in for a rude awakening when that good but not great player, surpasses them in HS. The rudest awakening is for their parents, when they cry politics, wondering why their meal ticket was sent to the "B" team.


Well said by both posters. Seen it happen!


Seeing it also firsthand. Pal player in town grew 5 inches since last year.


Saw it first hand, Chubby 4th grader now lean big 9th grader on Varsity.... It happens. Also saw skinny B team kid hit the gym and work hard. Now getting play time at Varsity.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
WM and WI are a good comparison because they are similar traditional successful programs with the same philosophy- kids playing together bond better and the team first concept makes the difference come playoff time. From what I hear, WI doesn't frown on playing club in H.S. as long as the H.S. summer program comes first in conflicts. Does WM do the same ?



Ward Melville Kids have been playing Club Lacrosse for many years. Many current and past college players that came out of Ward Melville played for Club Teams as well as the Ward Melville Summer HS Team. They all played for Ward Melville during the High School Season.
The 3V Youth Lacrosse Board implemented a policy that excluded kids in the community and did not let them play for 3V PAL / Travel program if that child played for a Club Team.
Some of the best players to come out of 3V over the past four to six years played for a “Club Team” at some point during their developmental years.
Hey we all forgot one aspect of the game. Keeping your kid back a year so he is a year older than everyone else with the thought he will have an edge. Heard it is turning into the norm in Maryland. Cheaper than prep school. lol If they posted birthdates you would be shocked. There are players a year and a half older than my son but in the same grade. The best edge a player can have is grades. Opens more doors than anything else
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hey we all forgot one aspect of the game. Keeping your kid back a year so he is a year older than everyone else with the thought he will have an edge. Heard it is turning into the norm in Maryland. Cheaper than prep school. lol If they posted birthdates you would be shocked. There are players a year and a half older than my son but in the same grade. The best edge a player can have is grades. Opens more doors than anything else


Took my son up to CT last week for 2017 Brine tryouts. many kids we hold backs. No shocker there however it really hit me when we were leaving when on of these so called 9th graders who parked next to my car walk up, took off his equiptment pulled his keys out, got in the drivers seat (sans parent) and drove off. Not sure what age you can drive unrestricted in CT is but that was an eye opener. My son will not be driving solo until Jan 2016
Maybe it is time to change ages groups from 2017.2018 etc. to 1999,2000. That's a big advantage when one kid is driving and sporting a mustache and the other doesn't have any hair on his legs.
Club Politics should not enter into HS but they do. On the girl's side it may be worse than the boys. Certain towns who have Club Coaches as HS coaches are ridiculously obvious in their bias, yet AD's do nothing about it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Making it to the final game last year and winning the first half of that game is "way off" from their glory years? Really? Hate to be the kid that has to live up to your expectations. Please, Cuse is still one that gets circled on every schedule.


Gotta reach for the stars, and hope to land on the moon! Syracuse is not what it once was, and headed down!


Any revised thoughts after today's win against the #3 team on enemy territory and without 2 of their starters?
Google this: Quint: The Delusions of Youth Club Ball
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Making it to the final game last year and winning the first half of that game is "way off" from their glory years? Really? Hate to be the kid that has to live up to your expectations. Please, Cuse is still one that gets circled on every schedule.


Gotta reach for the stars, and hope to land on the moon! Syracuse is not what it once was, and headed down!


Any revised thoughts after today's win against the #3 team on enemy territory and without 2 of their starters?

And don't forget they lost every face off!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Making it to the final game last year and winning the first half of that game is "way off" from their glory years? Really? Hate to be the kid that has to live up to your expectations. Please, Cuse is still one that gets circled on every schedule.


Gotta reach for the stars, and hope to land on the moon! Syracuse is not what it once was, and headed down!


Any revised thoughts after today's win against the #3 team on enemy territory and without 2 of their starters?


Hopkins was way overrated. They never should have been ranked so high without any high profile wins. Syracuse is a better lax school than Hopkins.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Google this: Quint: The Delusions of Youth Club Ball


Broad strokes with big brush. If you do not want to have your kid play club lacrosse don't. If you do not think that the the top club teams are getting better coaching than the majority of youth, middle school, JV and even varsity teams you are delusional.

To think that all club coaches are bad and that all town/school coaches are good is foolish. The top club teams that I am familiar with have High School, College and Pro coaches for their club teams.

Kids play Club Lacrosse in addition to Town / High School Ball. The article would have you think that Club Lacrosse is played in place of Town / HS Team. This article is not an accurate description of what I have experienced.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Google this: Quint: The Delusions of Youth Club Ball


Broad strokes with big brush. If you do not want to have your kid play club lacrosse don't. If you do not think that the the top club teams are getting better coaching than the majority of youth, middle school, JV and even varsity teams you are delusional.

To think that all club coaches are bad and that all town/school coaches are good is foolish. The top club teams that I am familiar with have High School, College and Pro coaches for their club teams.

Kids play Club Lacrosse in addition to Town / High School Ball. The article would have you think that Club Lacrosse is played in place of Town / HS Team. This article is not an accurate description of what I have experienced.

I have experienced plenty of "college kids" coaching, with the flip flops, warming up the goalies in bare feet and totally ignoring the fundamentals. They do not address situations in which some players only throw to their friends and moving without the ball is non-existent. Don't get me wrong, club programs have their merit. They can be great avenues to lacrosse success. But the teams should be coached by adults (not parents) with actual coaching experience. Not college kids just happy to make some extra $ to take back to school. And when the directors tell you they are on top of every team and every coach, they are just blowing smoke.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Google this: Quint: The Delusions of Youth Club Ball


Broad strokes with big brush. If you do not want to have your kid play club lacrosse don't. If you do not think that the the top club teams are getting better coaching than the majority of youth, middle school, JV and even varsity teams you are delusional.

To think that all club coaches are bad and that all town/school coaches are good is foolish. The top club teams that I am familiar with have High School, College and Pro coaches for their club teams.

Kids play Club Lacrosse in addition to Town / High School Ball. The article would have you think that Club Lacrosse is played in place of Town / HS Team. This article is not an accurate description of what I have experienced.



Quint is a little out of touch with the youth lacrosse scene. If he wants to make an impact, he should use his platform to call out the ncaa and put an end to early recruiting. If all recruiting stopped until the summer of 10th and 11th grade, most of this craziness goes away. He won't do that, because he's not about making a difference he's about keeping his job and reporting on stories. That's what he gets paid to do. Just another blow hard making money off lacrosse. Oh yeah, another of his favorite topics is diversity in lacrosse... As if someone is holding a group of people back from playing the sport. Such garbage, in our town PAL cost $150 a year. If it's a hardship the fee is waived and equipment is always available for free for any child of any back ground. Perhaps some kids just LIKE playing other sports and don't WANT to play lacrosse.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Making it to the final game last year and winning the first half of that game is "way off" from their glory years? Really? Hate to be the kid that has to live up to your expectations. Please, Cuse is still one that gets circled on every schedule.


Gotta reach for the stars, and hope to land on the moon! Syracuse is not what it once was, and headed down!


Any revised thoughts after today's win against the #3 team on enemy territory and without 2 of their starters?


Hopkins was way overrated. They never should have been ranked so high without any high profile wins. Syracuse is a better lax school than Hopkins.


The two most perennially overrated "biglax" schools are Maryland (1975) and UNC (1991). At least Hopkins and Cuse have won a few times in the last 10 years.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Making it to the final game last year and winning the first half of that game is "way off" from their glory years? Really? Hate to be the kid that has to live up to your expectations. Please, Cuse is still one that gets circled on every schedule.


Gotta reach for the stars, and hope to land on the moon! Syracuse is not what it once was, and headed down!


Any revised thoughts after today's win against the #3 team on enemy territory and without 2 of their starters?


Hopkins was way overrated. They never should have been ranked so high without any high profile wins. Syracuse is a better lax school than Hopkins.


The two most perennially overrated "biglax" schools are Maryland (1975) and UNC (1991). At least Hopkins and Cuse have won a few times in the last 10 years.


Talking about this year
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Google this: Quint: The Delusions of Youth Club Ball


Broad strokes with big brush. If you do not want to have your kid play club lacrosse don't. If you do not think that the the top club teams are getting better coaching than the majority of youth, middle school, JV and even varsity teams you are delusional.

To think that all club coaches are bad and that all town/school coaches are good is foolish. The top club teams that I am familiar with have High School, College and Pro coaches for their club teams.

Kids play Club Lacrosse in addition to Town / High School Ball. The article would have you think that Club Lacrosse is played in place of Town / HS Team. This article is not an accurate description of what I have experienced.



Quint is a little out of touch with the youth lacrosse scene. If he wants to make an impact, he should use his platform to call out the ncaa and put an end to early recruiting. If all recruiting stopped until the summer of 10th and 11th grade, most of this craziness goes away. He won't do that, because he's not about making a difference he's about keeping his job and reporting on stories. That's what he gets paid to do. Just another blow hard making money off lacrosse. Oh yeah, another of his favorite topics is diversity in lacrosse... As if someone is holding a group of people back from playing the sport. Such garbage, in our town PAL cost $150 a year. If it's a hardship the fee is waived and equipment is always available for free for any child of any back ground. Perhaps some kids just LIKE playing other sports and don't WANT to play lacrosse.


Why the hate against early recruiting? It's nauseating already. It happens in all major sports now. Why should lax be different? Why not stop school aged kids from competing in the olympics? Why not stop MLB from recruiting HS kids for the minor leagues? why not stop the "one and done" in NCAA basketball while you're at it. Who are you or any one for that matter to decide if a kid is ready and able to be recruited. If a 9th or 10th grade student athlete is good enough to be on varsity, he is good enough in many college coach's eyes to be recruited. Stop with this nonsense all ready. These coaches are paid to recognize talent. Else they wouldn't have a job. It's obvious you are not getting the return you hoped and prayed for on your lax investment for your son. Sorry. That's the way it goes. But don't try to stop others from capitalizing on their abilities and achievements. That's just plain jealousy and ignorance.
Why would any person think that a high school junior is qualified to make life decisions that will stick for very long? They DO do this, and sometimes it works, sometimes this does not. Quite possibly a nice agreement with a solid school with a time tested athletic program and balls-to-the-wall coaching would not be a bad move. Oh, wait, it wasn't offered to your child..... Nevermind, it's foolish.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Google this: Quint: The Delusions of Youth Club Ball


Broad strokes with big brush. If you do not want to have your kid play club lacrosse don't. If you do not think that the the top club teams are getting better coaching than the majority of youth, middle school, JV and even varsity teams you are delusional.

To think that all club coaches are bad and that all town/school coaches are good is foolish. The top club teams that I am familiar with have High School, College and Pro coaches for their club teams.

Kids play Club Lacrosse in addition to Town / High School Ball. The article would have you think that Club Lacrosse is played in place of Town / HS Team. This article is not an accurate description of what I have experienced.



Quint is a little out of touch with the youth lacrosse scene. If he wants to make an impact, he should use his platform to call out the ncaa and put an end to early recruiting. If all recruiting stopped until the summer of 10th and 11th grade, most of this craziness goes away. He won't do that, because he's not about making a difference he's about keeping his job and reporting on stories. That's what he gets paid to do. Just another blow hard making money off lacrosse. Oh yeah, another of his favorite topics is diversity in lacrosse... As if someone is holding a group of people back from playing the sport. Such garbage, in our town PAL cost $150 a year. If it's a hardship the fee is waived and equipment is always available for free for any child of any back ground. Perhaps some kids just LIKE playing other sports and don't WANT to play lacrosse.


Why the hate against early recruiting? It's nauseating already. It happens in all major sports now. Why should lax be different? Why not stop school aged kids from competing in the olympics? Why not stop MLB from recruiting HS kids for the minor leagues? why not stop the "one and done" in NCAA basketball while you're at it. Who are you or any one for that matter to decide if a kid is ready and able to be recruited. If a 9th or 10th grade student athlete is good enough to be on varsity, he is good enough in many college coach's eyes to be recruited. Stop with this nonsense all ready. These coaches are paid to recognize talent. Else they wouldn't have a job. It's obvious you are not getting the return you hoped and prayed for on your lax investment for your son. Sorry. That's the way it goes. But don't try to stop others from capitalizing on their abilities and achievements. That's just plain jealousy and ignorance.


It's not about talent. It's about kids making decisions earlier and earlier, that most juniors and seniors might not be 100% about. It's not that the freshman shouldn't be able to choose a D1 school. It's which D1 school do they ultimately fit in the best with? Which D1 school offers the area of study they will want by the time they are seniors? My 9th grader wants to go to UNC. You know why? He likes the colors. When juniors and seniors pick schools to attend, is that high on the priority list? Without regulation you know we are just a few years away from the recruiting of 8th graders.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Google this: Quint: The Delusions of Youth Club Ball


Broad strokes with big brush. If you do not want to have your kid play club lacrosse don't. If you do not think that the the top club teams are getting better coaching than the majority of youth, middle school, JV and even varsity teams you are delusional.

To think that all club coaches are bad and that all town/school coaches are good is foolish. The top club teams that I am familiar with have High School, College and Pro coaches for their club teams.

Kids play Club Lacrosse in addition to Town / High School Ball. The article would have you think that Club Lacrosse is played in place of Town / HS Team. This article is not an accurate description of what I have experienced.



Quint is a little out of touch with the youth lacrosse scene. If he wants to make an impact, he should use his platform to call out the ncaa and put an end to early recruiting. If all recruiting stopped until the summer of 10th and 11th grade, most of this craziness goes away. He won't do that, because he's not about making a difference he's about keeping his job and reporting on stories. That's what he gets paid to do. Just another blow hard making money off lacrosse. Oh yeah, another of his favorite topics is diversity in lacrosse... As if someone is holding a group of people back from playing the sport. Such garbage, in our town PAL cost $150 a year. If it's a hardship the fee is waived and equipment is always available for free for any child of any back ground. Perhaps some kids just LIKE playing other sports and don't WANT to play lacrosse.


Why the hate against early recruiting? It's nauseating already. It happens in all major sports now. Why should lax be different? Why not stop school aged kids from competing in the olympics? Why not stop MLB from recruiting HS kids for the minor leagues? why not stop the "one and done" in NCAA basketball while you're at it. Who are you or any one for that matter to decide if a kid is ready and able to be recruited. If a 9th or 10th grade student athlete is good enough to be on varsity, he is good enough in many college coach's eyes to be recruited. Stop with this nonsense all ready. These coaches are paid to recognize talent. Else they wouldn't have a job. It's obvious you are not getting the return you hoped and prayed for on your lax investment for your son. Sorry. That's the way it goes. But don't try to stop others from capitalizing on their abilities and achievements. That's just plain jealousy and ignorance.


It's not about talent. It's about kids making decisions earlier and earlier, that most juniors and seniors might not be 100% about. It's not that the freshman shouldn't be able to choose a D1 school. It's which D1 school do they ultimately fit in the best with? Which D1 school offers the area of study they will want by the time they are seniors? My 9th grader wants to go to UNC. You know why? He likes the colors. When juniors and seniors pick schools to attend, is that high on the priority list? Without regulation you know we are just a few years away from the recruiting of 8th graders.


Good point. We must realize that there is a broad spectrum of maturity at this level. Some are young adults with vision and some are still playing Pokemon and the like.

If a young man at this age group is asking the D 1 coach at an interview "how many of your players have gotten into your grad schools ?" Or how much study time will I need to balance lax and academics? ; then we are dealing with another type of kid. One that might actually have an interest in his future beyond liking the colors of the team uniform.

There are reasons colleges take "early acceptance" apps on special kids. Why can't a young student athlete also be a mature and academically inclined individual? We've all seen certain kids who strike us as being, "beyond their years". Maybe the coaches and families of some of these early recruits see the same qualities and potential. I don't think your average elite 9th grade lax player is a slouch at anything they put their mind to be it on the field or in the classroom.

Give them and their families an ounce more credit for the decisions they make.
This is brilliant!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX8TP0H3JPM
http://laxallstars.com/club-directo...urce=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

The great debate
Originally Posted by Anonymous

OMG so wrong, yet so true
I agree. I wish we had WAWA's on Long Island too. They are awesome.

Can't the directors of the top Long Island Travel Clubs use their resources collectively and help correct this injustice?
This was on the Top Guns site
DG has done with Liberty exactly what she wanted to do with Manhasset (Liberty)
1 Keep the Manhasset girls playing together year round
2 The top teams in each age (Black) have at least the best 10 girls from manhasset playing with a few girls from other towns
3 SET girls play fall ball ,winter conditioning and lacrosse together under the Liberty name.
4 Come March the girls are on the High school team well conditioned and Lacrosse ready after a winter of Black Diamond / Manhasset coaches
5 make $$$$$$of her home town girls
6 The Set parents are Happy because win win win.
YJ does this but the top teams are made up of the best girls from all over LI not just the home town girls from NP or Farm Well done SET and DG
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This was on the Top Guns site
DG has done with Liberty exactly what she wanted to do with Manhasset (Liberty)
1 Keep the Manhasset girls playing together year round
2 The top teams in each age (Black) have at least the best 10 girls from manhasset playing with a few girls from other towns
3 SET girls play fall ball ,winter conditioning and lacrosse together under the Liberty name.
4 Come March the girls are on the High school team well conditioned and Lacrosse ready after a winter of Black Diamond / Manhasset coaches
5 make $$$$$$of her home town girls
6 The Set parents are Happy because win win win.
YJ does this but the top teams are made up of the best girls from all over LI not just the home town girls from NP or Farm Well done SET and DG


Come on, it is only done to help the kids.
Yes, it is a conflict.
It is out of control and it must end.
Rocky Point Lady Eagles travel team or its "coach" who Runs the Varsity games from the Sidelines?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is out of control and it must end.
Can you say dysfunctional program from youth to varsity , no control wild wild west , with no sheriff to keep things in check
Time for serious change starting from the Top to new administration in youth !



uote=Anonymous]Rocky Point Lady Eagles travel team or its "coach" who Runs the Varsity games from the Sidelines?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is out of control and it must end.
[/quote]
It must be stopped.
As long as the Varsity coaches feel its acceptable to have the townspeople walk all over them by parents who feel they have more experience and knowledge on whats going in the LAX world Then maybe the Varsity coaches should step down because its very Obvious they have no clue or backbone to grab hold of their school program. What will be the next adventure to kick the community in the Gut?





Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can you say dysfunctional program from youth to varsity , no control wild wild west , with no sheriff to keep things in check
Time for serious change starting from the Top to new administration in youth !



uote=Anonymous]Rocky Point Lady Eagles travel team or its "coach" who Runs the Varsity games from the Sidelines?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is out of control and it must end.
[/quote]

Should start a separate Rocky Point Girls Thread , its a really juicy soap opera in a making .

Originally Posted by Anonymous
As long as the Varsity coaches feel its acceptable to have the townspeople walk all over them by parents who feel they have more experience and knowledge on whats going in the LAX world Then maybe the Varsity coaches should step down because its very Obvious they have no clue or backbone to grab hold of their school program. What will be the next adventure to kick the community in the Gut?





Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can you say dysfunctional program from youth to varsity , no control wild wild west , with no sheriff to keep things in check
Time for serious change starting from the Top to new administration in youth !



uote=Anonymous]Rocky Point Lady Eagles travel team or its "coach" who Runs the Varsity games from the Sidelines?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is out of control and it must end.
[/quote]
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Should start a separate Rocky Point Girls Thread , its a really juicy soap opera in a making .

Originally Posted by Anonymous
As long as the Varsity coaches feel its acceptable to have the townspeople walk all over them by parents who feel they have more experience and knowledge on whats going in the LAX world Then maybe the Varsity coaches should step down because its very Obvious they have no clue or backbone to grab hold of their school program. What will be the next adventure to kick the community in the Gut?





Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can you say dysfunctional program from youth to varsity , no control wild wild west , with no sheriff to keep things in check
Time for serious change starting from the Top to new administration in youth !



uote=Anonymous]Rocky Point Lady Eagles travel team or its "coach" who Runs the Varsity games from the Sidelines?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is out of control and it must end.
[/quote]

Are they talking about the boys or girls in RP
RP girls + self proclaimed lax gangster = delusional Mess - them all out !



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Should start a separate Rocky Point Girls Thread , its a really juicy soap opera in a making .

Originally Posted by Anonymous
As long as the Varsity coaches feel its acceptable to have the townspeople walk all over them by parents who feel they have more experience and knowledge on whats going in the LAX world Then maybe the Varsity coaches should step down because its very Obvious they have no clue or backbone to grab hold of their school program. What will be the next adventure to kick the community in the Gut?





Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can you say dysfunctional program from youth to varsity , no control wild wild west , with no sheriff to keep things in check
Time for serious change starting from the Top to new administration in youth !



uote=Anonymous]Rocky Point Lady Eagles travel team or its "coach" who Runs the Varsity games from the Sidelines?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is out of control and it must end.


Are they talking about the boys or girls in RP [/quote]
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Should start a separate Rocky Point Girls Thread , its a really juicy soap opera in a making .

Originally Posted by Anonymous
As long as the Varsity coaches feel its acceptable to have the townspeople walk all over them by parents who feel they have more experience and knowledge on whats going in the LAX world Then maybe the Varsity coaches should step down because its very Obvious they have no clue or backbone to grab hold of their school program. What will be the next adventure to kick the community in the Gut?





Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can you say dysfunctional program from youth to varsity , no control wild wild west , with no sheriff to keep things in check
Time for serious change starting from the Top to new administration in youth !



uote=Anonymous]Rocky Point Lady Eagles travel team or its "coach" who Runs the Varsity games from the Sidelines?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is out of control and it must end.


Are they talking about the boys or girls in RP [/quote]

Based on "Lady" Eagles and separate Rocky Point "Girls" thread, I'm going to go out on a limb and guess it's the girls. The boys are a 1-loss team playing in the County Championship next week - looks like they're doing something right.
That's correct they are doing something right and it starts with a plan of action from youth to varsity working on good communication and town solidary . Not exclusions and brainwashing in youth level by a replication monkey see monkey do parent with no lacrosse background and a personal agenda because he seen that drill in travel ball , then send his soldiers off to mix in a few into school ball to poison the upperclassman .
When will it end?
Lady eagles are only successful because all the girls with a few exceptions on that team play travel ball outside of rocky point , and the coach takes credit he built the town team from scratch , the only thing he's done is caused a serious rash that wont go away in the community .
Is there any way to stop it?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That's correct they are doing something right and it starts with a plan of action from youth to varsity working on good communication and town solidary . Not exclusions and brainwashing in youth level by a replication monkey see monkey do parent with no lacrosse background and a personal agenda because he seen that drill in travel ball , then send his soldiers off to mix in a few into school ball to poison the upperclassman .
When will it end?


Who are you referring to?

No names the guilty parties all know who this statement refers to ! No less he , himself a self proclaimed " LAX GANGSTER " already knows this statement is about him (because he knows everything !! )
Your a total cancer to the program and the worst part is you are well aware of that and you continue to promote your cause Go LE screw everyone else in town for not bowing down to your demands .



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That's correct they are doing something right and it starts with a plan of action from youth to varsity working on good communication and town solidary . Not exclusions and brainwashing in youth level by a replication monkey see monkey do parent with no lacrosse background and a personal agenda because he seen that drill in travel ball , then send his soldiers off to mix in a few into school ball to poison the upperclassman .
When will it end?


Who are you referring to?
Wow it looks like this Rocky Pount thing may take over the SWR thread !
It's all about the money.
The Rocky point boys lax team was ranked 8th on LI? That team stunk!!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Good read - it touches on the debate here - in some areas. Full disclosure - I don't have a kid on 91 - but read Spallina's comments - I have to say I agree with his view.

http://www.uslacrosse.org/multimedi...racket-and-those-who-profit-from-it.aspx




Is it fair to say that in some towns the people who run the youth lacrosse league have preyed upon the uneducated consumer?

Is it fair to say that they have misled the community?

Is it fair to say that the people who control the youth league are the same people who have created a divide in the community that they profess to serve?

Is it fair to say that much animosity could have been avoided.

Is it fair to say that power corrupts and that absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Take a look at the situation in your community and think about what you have been told by the people who run your league. Now, compare what is said to what is actually done by the people who run the league. Think logically about the situation in your town. Don't think about "the feel good sounds good" things like staying together or being loyal, think about what is done. Do kids get cut? Are there "A" and "B" Teams at very young grades? Do they mix grades? Is winning more important than development? As the kids approach recruiting age is anyone there to help navigate the process? Are there different rules for different teams/kids? Is there coercion? is there collusion? Have kids been excluded?

Compare what has been said to what has been done in your town.

if you didn't take the time to read the article in the link that the previous poster provided see below.

Here are some exscipts from March 2014 Lacrosse Magazine Article titled "Beware the Recruiting Racket" by Justin Feil.


-“Make sure kids’ lacrosse IQ is being developed,” said Joe Spallina, the Stony Brook women’s coach, Team 91 coach for his sons’ youth teams and coach of the MLL’s New [lacrosse] Lizards. “Club lacrosse is similar to honors classes. I want my kids with the best teachers, the best students. I want the bar as high as possible. I don’t want a low bar and great results.”

-“Look out for manipulative practices,” Trevor Tierney said. “If a club team is hiring a high school coach and the high school coach is saying, ‘If you want to play for this high school, you have to play for this club team’ — if there’s a form of coercion — that’s when there are red flags.”

-Because of that conflict of interest, Shriver (Boys Latin Head Coach) has turned down opportunities to start a club program. “It’s ripe for potential problems,” he said.

-“No one ever said it, but when you go to your first tournament, it’s clearly where the college coaches are going,” Kathy Weeks said. “No one is going to your high school games.”

-With recruiting starting earlier, college coaches are coming to club coaches sooner, and players don’t want to get left behind.

-“The right club turnover happens between eighth and ninth grade,” Stagnitta said. “That’s when it goes from instructional/learning, to what team goes to exposure events, who has access to good tournaments.”

-The number of players in a club and on each team will factor into the attention your child will receive from coaches and colleges. Rosters should be in the low 20s.

-“You want the best kids with the best kids,” Spallina said. “It’s nice to see a kid playing with lesser kids and doing it all by himself or herself, but you want to see them with good players.”

This is what is happening out there in the lacrosse world. What has your town told you?
The Rocky point boys lax team was ranked 8th on LI? That team stunk!! (lots of fat loud moms and dads to boot)!
Why so much time assessing the parents on the sideline?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Rocky point boys lax team was ranked 8th on LI? That team stunk!! (lots of fat loud moms and dads to boot)!


Ok, we get it - you lost to RP and you're jealous of their success. It was at least a month ago, time to get over it and enjoy your summer. I bet your son did a long time ago!
You mean certain "Rocky Point Swag" parents yelling at a particular player on the field to "PASS THE BALL" Very annoying people !! okay we get it , your son stood on the sideline why the rest of the bunch brought the team a county championship . Good luck next year. RP is officially in hibernation until the next breed of RP generation all Americans kids get of age and there dad coaches the team to another victorious season..
YA GET IT ?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Rocky point boys lax team was ranked 8th on LI? That team stunk!! (lots of fat loud moms and dads to boot)!


Ok, we get it - you lost to RP and you're jealous of their success. It was at least a month ago, time to get over it and enjoy your summer. I bet your son did a long time ago!
That Rocky Point Varsity Lax team stunk this year! It showed in LI Championship game. Very average team. Lots of fat dads and moms though!
"PASS THE BALLLLLL"


Originally Posted by Anonymous
That Rocky Point Varsity Lax team stunk this year! It showed in LI Championship game. Very average team. Lots of fat dads and moms though!
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Total conflict of interest. It should be stopped.
Is it legal for high school coaches to accept money from parent organizers to coach the school "travel team"? Not all kids are asked to play. The parent organizers select the roster, obviously leaving off the kids that will take time from their child. High school coaches are ok with it as long as they are getting paid.

This is NOT NCAA college , if your kid was up to par chances are he or she would be asked to play , like every single district its all about politics and the one who puts more time into certain criteria will benefit a bit more then those who stand around play the phony act and do NODDA !, This is perfectly "LEGAL" for the Coach ! If the coach himself decided to set this up , that would have to involve a tryout selection for a town travel team. I know many town teams who the parents manage the town pick up team and pay a varsity coach to strictly coach the team . The varsity coach has to eat too.. its extra money . Its not a bad thing.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is it legal for high school coaches to accept money from parent organizers to coach the school "travel team"? Not all kids are asked to play. The parent organizers select the roster, obviously leaving off the kids that will take time from their child. High school coaches are ok with it as long as they are getting paid.
Originally Posted by Anonymous

This is NOT NCAA college , if your kid was up to par chances are he or she would be asked to play , like every single district its all about politics and the one who puts more time into certain criteria will benefit a bit more then those who stand around play the phony act and do NODDA !, This is perfectly "LEGAL" for the Coach ! If the coach himself decided to set this up , that would have to involve a tryout selection for a town travel team. I know many town teams who the parents manage the town pick up team and pay a varsity coach to strictly coach the team . The varsity coach has to eat too.. its extra money . Its not a bad thing.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is it legal for high school coaches to accept money from parent organizers to coach the school "travel team"? Not all kids are asked to play. The parent organizers select the roster, obviously leaving off the kids that will take time from their child. High school coaches are ok with it as long as they are getting paid.


Yes, it is a very bad thing.
So is it a "very bad thing" for a High School coach to coach an outside travel team? to make money??? what's so bad ? Better keeping him or her occupied on the town program then wondering around with outside talent.
Its a bad thing if your kid is not up to par on his / her skills and knowledge of the game and more so delusional that he or she is as good as the rest of the players. ! , as most towns people who do not play outside travel ball there's an automatic feeling of relying on the town for there kids sport activities and much resentment towards those who play travel ball ! Its not a taxpayer program where you have a right to be on the team ! , this is not 4H. this is not girl scouts .
kids need to earn it by working hard. then when a parent creates a town pick-up team your kid is on that roster.
Unfortunately this is nature of the beast !

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

This is NOT NCAA college , if your kid was up to par chances are he or she would be asked to play , like every single district its all about politics and the one who puts more time into certain criteria will benefit a bit more then those who stand around play the phony act and do NODDA !, This is perfectly "LEGAL" for the Coach ! If the coach himself decided to set this up , that would have to involve a tryout selection for a town travel team. I know many town teams who the parents manage the town pick up team and pay a varsity coach to strictly coach the team . The varsity coach has to eat too.. its extra money . Its not a bad thing.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is it legal for high school coaches to accept money from parent organizers to coach the school "travel team"? Not all kids are asked to play. The parent organizers select the roster, obviously leaving off the kids that will take time from their child. High school coaches are ok with it as long as they are getting paid.


Yes, it is a very bad thing.
There is good and bad. It is good if your kid is on the most competive team in town and gets exposure to the HS coach and can benefit from his coaching expertise. However,it is bad in the sense that it discourages kids from expanding their horizons by playing with outside club teams. Because the coach "has to eat too", if you play outside club, instead of his program, the fear is that the kid later gets cut or relegated to a lesser role when he tries to make the HS team. I tend to think coaches want to win and will put the best players on the field whether you played his summer program or not. Even so, if your kid is a good but not stellar player and it comes down to him or another kid who lined the HS coaches' pockets by playing in his program, who do we think is getting that last spot on the HS team?
All good points, but the "has to eat too" comment is awful. I am sure the coach has enough money to eat. My concern is when there is NO tryout and one parent picks the team. My belief is that a quality and winning coach would step in and control who does or does not play.
Like everything else, if your kid is at the very top he can play whenever and wherever he wants. He can opt out of the HS coach's summer program and then jump right onto the varsity. The real danger is for those other kids who literally are just dreaming of being able to play high school lacrosse with their friends.....particularly if they live in a competitive town where many talented players never even make it onto the varsity team. No offense to most here, but 90% of the kids out there fall into this category. Those kids are the ones most at risk with this sort of thing.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Like everything else, if your kid is at the very top he can play whenever and wherever he wants. He can opt out of the HS coach's summer program and then jump right onto the varsity. The real danger is for those other kids who literally are just dreaming of being able to play high school lacrosse with their friends.....particularly if they live in a competitive town where many talented players never even make it onto the varsity team. No offense to most here, but 90% of the kids out there fall into this category. Those kids are the ones most at risk with this sort of thing.



Agreed, the young one's they deem special are not at risk at all and it doesn't matter if they play 91 or Express, but a kid on the cusp trying to get better by getting more playing time is at a huge disadvantage...
How about when your HS coach coaches for a different program then you play in and they don;t even say hello to you at tournaments because you don;t play for them?
How about it? lets just drag along this topic.. How about when a parent has a daughter on yellow jackets and he learns the ins and outs and becomes the most knowledgeable coach in your town including above and beyond the varsity coaches and leads the town team he coaches to championships at every tournament they play ..... and then rubs it in , He has the whole town club walk around with tee shirts made up with his name on it ....IN " "" WE TRUST ... That is very Bad for the varsity coach who always has an excuse on why he is never around but yet wants respect and total control .


Originally Posted by Anonymous
How about when your HS coach coaches for a different program then you play in and they don;t even say hello to you at tournaments because you don;t play for them?
Collusion, coercion, exclusion.

Bullying , extortion , delusion .



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Collusion, coercion, exclusion.

Very sad that it goes on.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How about it? lets just drag along this topic.. How about when a parent has a daughter on yellow jackets and he learns the ins and outs and becomes the most knowledgeable coach in your town including above and beyond the varsity coaches and leads the town team he coaches to championships at every tournament they play ..... and then rubs it in , He has the whole town club walk around with tee shirts made up with his name on it ....IN " "" WE TRUST ... That is very Bad for the varsity coach who always has an excuse on why he is never around but yet wants respect and total control .


Originally Posted by Anonymous
How about when your HS coach coaches for a different program then you play in and they don;t even say hello to you at tournaments because you don;t play for them?


I saw this firsthand at Lax for a Cure from on of the LI coaches. She should be ashamed of herself. To treat kids that live in the same town as you and who you coach in high school differently because they play on another club team is disgusting. I hope the parents let the AD know about your actions off the field because I am sure your actions on the field and in the locker room must be worse.
If you do not think there is a conflict of interest you are not being honest with yourself.
If a HS coach profits from a town only summer team there is clearly a conflict of interest.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If a HS coach profits from a town only summer team there is clearly a conflict of interest.


Especially if there is pressure to play on town team instead of a higher caliber club team.

Why would a coach want to stop a kid from playing with stronger players against higher competition and at better tournaments in front of more college coaches.?
How about when the coach is a guidance counselor / varsity coach/summer travel coach in the same high school and threatens kids varsity future if they don't play summer travel. Kids being bullied by a mentor.
Coaches shouldn't have anything to do with summer travel.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How about when the coach is a guidance counselor / varsity coach/summer travel coach in the same high school and threatens kids varsity future if they don't play summer travel. Kids being bullied by a mentor.
Coaches shouldn't have anything to do with summer travel.


I completely agree!! In my own if you don't play on the HS coaches summer team you are told you will never see the field for the school team. It's disgusting because boys have to skip travel tournaments where they would play a lot to sit on the sidelines for the school summer team that plays a very tight rotation.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How about when the coach is a guidance counselor / varsity coach/summer travel coach in the same high school and threatens kids varsity future if they don't play summer travel. Kids being bullied by a mentor.
Coaches shouldn't have anything to do with summer travel.


I completely agree!! In my own if you don't play on the HS coaches summer team you are told you will never see the field for the school team. It's disgusting because boys have to skip travel tournaments where they would play a lot to sit on the sidelines for the school summer team that plays a very tight rotation.




How is the ethically or morally ok to do to young men and women?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
How about when the coach is a guidance counselor / varsity coach/summer travel coach in the same high school and threatens kids varsity future if they don't play summer travel. Kids being bullied by a mentor.
Coaches shouldn't have anything to do with summer travel.


I completely agree!! In my own if you don't play on the HS coaches summer team you are told you will never see the field for the school team. It's disgusting because boys have to skip travel tournaments where they would play a lot to sit on the sidelines for the school summer team that plays a very tight rotation.




How is the ethically or morally ok to do to young men and women?


It is not ok.
And you are not even discussing the daddy "volunteers" falling over themselves to help the HS coach by handling administrative tasks related to his for profit summer program. Call it what it is: blatant sucking up in the hope that the coach will return the favor when daddy's little superstar shows up at the varsity tryout. So gross.....
$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$
it is wrong.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And you are not even discussing the daddy "volunteers" falling over themselves to help the HS coach by handling administrative tasks related to his for profit summer program. Call it what it is: blatant sucking up in the hope that the coach will return the favor when daddy's little superstar shows up at the varsity tryout. So gross.....


What ? That is outrageous. Nothing like that ever goes on. It is all above board.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And you are not even discussing the daddy "volunteers" falling over themselves to help the HS coach by handling administrative tasks related to his for profit summer program. Call it what it is: blatant sucking up in the hope that the coach will return the favor when daddy's little superstar shows up at the varsity tryout. So gross.....


What ? That is outrageous. Nothing like that ever goes on. It is all above board.


Good one!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And you are not even discussing the daddy "volunteers" falling over themselves to help the HS coach by handling administrative tasks related to his for profit summer program. Call it what it is: blatant sucking up in the hope that the coach will return the favor when daddy's little superstar shows up at the varsity tryout. So gross.....


This may be the biggest problem. When there are too many [lacrosse] kissing parents involved with the program they let the conflict of interest happen. These are people who like it the way it is, buddy buddy with the coaches and influence over the program. Why would these people want to change anything. In our town the money grab gets larger every year .

It is very sad that this has happened. I realize that you will never be able to take politics out of the equation but now that there is money involved it is 10X worse.

There is clearly a conflict of interest and it should stopped.
This may be the biggest problem. When there are too many [lacrosse] kissing parents involved with the program they let the conflict of interest happen. These are people who like it the way it is, buddy buddy with the coaches and influence over the program. Why would these people want to change anything. In our town the money grab gets larger every year .

It is very sad that this has happened. I realize that you will never be able to take politics out of the equation but now that there is money involved it is 10X worse.

There is clearly a conflict of interest and it should stopped.

What program are u referring to?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This may be the biggest problem. When there are too many [lacrosse] kissing parents involved with the program they let the conflict of interest happen. These are people who like it the way it is, buddy buddy with the coaches and influence over the program. Why would these people want to change anything. In our town the money grab gets larger every year .

It is very sad that this has happened. I realize that you will never be able to take politics out of the equation but now that there is money involved it is 10X worse.

There is clearly a conflict of interest and it should stopped.

What program are u referring to?


No need to name the town. Everyone in the town knows that it is wrong but most are afraid to say anything. I sure it goes on in more than one town but this our town is bad. You are very lucky if it does not happen in your town.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This may be the biggest problem. When there are too many [lacrosse] kissing parents involved with the program they let the conflict of interest happen. These are people who like it the way it is, buddy buddy with the coaches and influence over the program. Why would these people want to change anything. In our town the money grab gets larger every year .

It is very sad that this has happened. I realize that you will never be able to take politics out of the equation but now that there is money involved it is 10X worse.

There is clearly a conflict of interest and it should stopped.

What program are u referring to?


You know what program.
Happens all over long island. People allow power, money and hot air daddies to make the decision on which kid plays and doesn't play. Not always based on talent. Stop acting like it's not happening at your school....Three village, half hallow hills, cold spring harbors.. Same coaches doing school, travel, town teams.
Open your ears and your mouths .
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
This may be the biggest problem. When there are too many [lacrosse] kissing parents involved with the program they let the conflict of interest happen. These are people who like it the way it is, buddy buddy with the coaches and influence over the program. Why would these people want to change anything. In our town the money grab gets larger every year .

It is very sad that this has happened. I realize that you will never be able to take politics out of the equation but now that there is money involved it is 10X worse.

There is clearly a conflict of interest and it should stopped.

What program are u referring to?


You know what program.


Not only does our school have conflicts of interest (more on the girks side than the boys) but now we have our HS coaches running camps too at the school. So wrong in so many ways.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Happens all over long island. People allow power, money and hot air daddies to make the decision on which kid plays and doesn't play. Not always based on talent. Stop acting like it's not happening at your school....Three village, half hallow hills, cold spring harbors.. Same coaches doing school, travel, town teams.
Open your ears and your mouths .


What about the towns where they do play the best talent and the hot air daddys are saying the same as you.



Make a call to fix it or cry wolf
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Happens all over long island. People allow power, money and hot air daddies to make the decision on which kid plays and doesn't play. Not always based on talent. Stop acting like it's not happening at your school....Three village, half hallow hills, cold spring harbors.. Same coaches doing school, travel, town teams.
Open your ears and your mouths .


What about the towns where they do play the best talent and the hot air daddys are saying the same as you.





Clearly a conflict of interest for the HS Coach to run a for profit summer program. More of a conflict when the program is only open to kids from the coaches HS. The problem is also compounded when influential parents are involved with the program. Not a good situation.

I
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Happens all over long island. People allow power, money and hot air daddies to make the decision on which kid plays and doesn't play. Not always based on talent. Stop acting like it's not happening at your school....Three village, half hallow hills, cold spring harbors.. Same coaches doing school, travel, town teams.
Open your ears and your mouths .


What about the towns where they do play the best talent and the hot air daddys are saying the same as you.





Clearly a conflict of interest for the HS Coach to run a for profit summer program. More of a conflict when the program is only open to kids from the coaches HS. The problem is also compounded when influential parents are involved with the program. Not a good situation.

I


Sorry, I just do not see how anyone thinks that this is a good thing.
So true... Years ago parents would not dare to talk to the HS coach. To allow parents to get involved with HS athletics is contributing to the dimise of High School sports. This is the reason new travel programs are popping up every year. Parents are looking for a more even playing field for there kid. What ever happened to the days when kids were evaluated on the field.

If you feel your kid is good enough you need to do what is best for them. The truth of the matter is, that unless your school is one of the top programs, nobody is coming to recruit from your school. The coach is going to look out for their buddies are make recommendations for them and not necessarily the kids who deserve it.
Here is the thing. What if your kid is on one of the top powerhouse programs and plays on their summer team as well. Even if your kid could start at a mid level program, at the power house he is a second line player. Forget the whole work harder thing, doing that but the kids ahead of him are just better in all honestly. Well normally, except for the graduating seniors, the lineups from the spring varsity season roll right into the summer. So your spot on the depth chart, unless a senior graduates, stays the same. You don't get the looks you can get by playing for an independent club and being a starting player. It's that simple. No controversy, just trying to get your athlete the best looks you can. Great teams with deep rosters always have quality players shorted or even cut. Sometimes, and I use that word carefully, you are better off going to a club and being one of the top guys instead of being a very good player on a truly stacked team.Remember it's not one size fits all. Strike a balance and do what is best for your son.
I miss the days when a lacrosse coach also coaches football and wrestling and didn't think about lacrosse until March 1, then on June 1, he would put his stick away while he gets ready for his life guard gig in the summer. The old school coach never got involved in our personal lives by asking "where are you going to college"?" and any way I can help"?. The good old days when you had HS lacrosse coaches for 3 months a year and none of his "extra" coaching B.S. like summer leagues, camps and youth programs. Coaches today suck!!!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I miss the days when a lacrosse coach also coaches football and wrestling and didn't think about lacrosse until March 1, then on June 1, he would put his stick away while he gets ready for his life guard gig in the summer. The old school coach never got involved in our personal lives by asking "where are you going to college"?" and any way I can help"?. The good old days when you had HS lacrosse coaches for 3 months a year and none of his "extra" coaching B.S. like summer leagues, camps and youth programs. Coaches today suck!!!


Great post. We had different coaches for each sport in HS but the point is that they only really cared about their sport during its normal season. Now it starts in 3rd/4th grade - lacrosse in the winter, soccer in the spring, etc. The kids want to play all the time so they can be with their friends and the parents think they need to play to keep up with Johnny or Susie. It's no wonder the kids start dropping like flies by the time they get to HS - they're burned out from playing 2-3 sports per season all year round.
You can not have an rational discussion regarding this subject with anyone who will not admit that there is a conflict of interest. They know that it is wrong yet they refuse to admit it. They can not have an honest debate.


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Coercion ( /koʊˈɜrʃən/) is the practice of forcing another party to behave in an involuntary manner (whether through action or inaction) by use of threats or intimidation or some other form of pressure or force. In law, coercion is codified as the duress crime. Such actions are used as leverage, to force the victim to act in the desired way. Coercion may involve the actual infliction of physical pain/injury or psychological harm in order to enhance the credibility of a threat. The threat of further harm may lead to the cooperation or obedience of the person being coerced

Last I read this is a felony and punishable by imprisonment maybe the AD should get involved or school board.


agree
Jerry, just remember, it's not a lie if you believe it. – George Costanza cry
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You can not have an rational discussion regarding this subject with anyone who will not admit that there is a conflict of interest. They know that it is wrong yet they refuse to admit it. They can not have an honest debate.




sounds like you are saying you can not have a rational discussion with someone who does not agree with you.
Hi, my name is George, I'm unemployed and I live with my parents. –George Costanza cool
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You can not have an rational discussion regarding this subject with anyone who will not admit that there is a conflict of interest. They know that it is wrong yet they refuse to admit it. They can not have an honest debate.




sounds like you are saying you can not have a rational discussion with someone who does not agree with you.


You can't have a rational discussion with an ideologue.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You can not have an rational discussion regarding this subject with anyone who will not admit that there is a conflict of interest. They know that it is wrong yet they refuse to admit it. They can not have an honest debate.




sounds like you are saying you can not have a rational discussion with someone who does not agree with you.


You can't have a rational discussion with an ideologue.

I'm curious, can you admit that it might not be a conflict of interest?
I can see how it can be a conflict of interest or better yet perceived as a conflict of interest.

Here is my stance as a parent in the middle. Anyone who coaches my son should get paid. HS and Travel coaches do not get paid very much. I have no problem with a skilled coach trying to gain $$. If he is good the kids will want to play and the parents will want to pay.

My town school coaches do not interfere with the youth programs. I wish they did; they have been invited. Our town has a great core of boys in the odd Grad years and can be augmented with a handful of amazing players in the even grad years. My town also has dedicated and knowledgeable dads to help (that is at times also a problem - the reason the school coaches were asked to help). But the town school coaches keep a distance till HS.


How I see this as an issue is when the town does not have a good group to work with. When that happens the better players do not want to stay in town and the parents (doing as they should as parents) try to put their child in the best position possible so their child does not play down to the town level. (might be to harsh of a statement but you understand)

In this case, I believe the best way for the player to get better (and not get surpassed once puberty happens) is to train, play and work harder with players of or above their ability. In particularly with a vast array of players OUTSIDE OF THE TOWN.

Now I will say I wish my school coaches got involved, but I also think there is plenty of time/room/weekend to fit both travel and school in but I am sure there will be some who say be careful what you wish for.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
I can see how it can be a conflict of interest or better yet perceived as a conflict of interest.

Here is my stance as a parent in the middle. Anyone who coaches my son should get paid. HS and Travel coaches do not get paid very much. I have no problem with a skilled coach trying to gain $$. If he is good the kids will want to play and the parents will want to pay.

My town school coaches do not interfere with the youth programs. I wish they did; they have been invited. Our town has a great core of boys in the odd Grad years and can be augmented with a handful of amazing players in the even grad years. My town also has dedicated and knowledgeable dads to help (that is at times also a problem - the reason the school coaches were asked to help). But the town school coaches keep a distance till HS.


How I see this as an issue is when the town does not have a good group to work with. When that happens the better players do not want to stay in town and the parents (doing as they should as parents) try to put their child in the best position possible so their child does not play down to the town level. (might be to harsh of a statement but you understand)

In this case, I believe the best way for the player to get better (and not get surpassed once puberty happens) is to train, play and work harder with players of or above their ability. In particularly with a vast array of players OUTSIDE OF THE TOWN.

Now I will say I wish my school coaches got involved, but I also think there is plenty of time/room/weekend to fit both travel and school in but I am sure there will be some who say be careful what you wish for.


It's certainly nice to read a reasonable and intelligently written post.
Originally Posted by lax516
In the last few years there has been a disturbing trend as HS coaches try and cash in on the for profit (or questionable non for profit) summer tournament teams. It started when some business minded coaches started open tryout teams, now the trend is HS coaches charging big fee's for summer teams that draw exclusively from there own school districts. How do public schools allow this type of quid pro quo to occur? Its one thing when you pay for a summer program and also pay to attend a private school which shares the same coach. Now it seems you have to pay the head coach of the public school boys/ girls teams to get on the field. The Conflicts of interest seem to run so deep yet it continues. Which program is the coach incentified to develop? The School district program or the one that pays him cash on top of their salary? How do they not play undeserving kids that have been paying them every summer? Are kids punished if they play for a competing club? This seams to be a hot topic issue in the towns these teams exist, i am interested to hear others experiences.


Above is the original post.

I did not go and read all of posts so can someone please explain how it is not a conflict of interest for a HS Coach to run a for-profit team that has only players from the school that he or she coaches at?

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by lax516
In the last few years there has been a disturbing trend as HS coaches try and cash in on the for profit (or questionable non for profit) summer tournament teams. It started when some business minded coaches started open tryout teams, now the trend is HS coaches charging big fee's for summer teams that draw exclusively from there own school districts. How do public schools allow this type of quid pro quo to occur? Its one thing when you pay for a summer program and also pay to attend a private school which shares the same coach. Now it seems you have to pay the head coach of the public school boys/ girls teams to get on the field. The Conflicts of interest seem to run so deep yet it continues. Which program is the coach incentified to develop? The School district program or the one that pays him cash on top of their salary? How do they not play undeserving kids that have been paying them every summer? Are kids punished if they play for a competing club? This seams to be a hot topic issue in the towns these teams exist, i am interested to hear others experiences.


Above is the original post.

I did not go and read all of posts so can someone please explain how it is not a conflict of interest for a HS Coach to run a for-profit team that has only players from the school that he or she coaches at?



It is not a conflict of interest if kids have the option to play on the team or play on a private summer team or not play lacrosse over the summer without ramifications and in the spring the coach plays the best 10 players in the spring.

It is a perceived conflict of interest if kids/parents are afraid to not play for fear of losing playing time or not getting moved up ect. in the spring

It is a conflict of interest when it is made clear that if you do not play for the HS coaches for profit summer team you will lose playing time or other benefits that you would have gotten if you had played.

IMHO - I would rather live in a town with a high school coach that is dedicated to the program, involved in the youth programs and the summer team, makes a little money on the summer team rather then the guys that show up on March 1st.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by lax516
In the last few years there has been a disturbing trend as HS coaches try and cash in on the for profit (or questionable non for profit) summer tournament teams. It started when some business minded coaches started open tryout teams, now the trend is HS coaches charging big fee's for summer teams that draw exclusively from there own school districts. How do public schools allow this type of quid pro quo to occur? Its one thing when you pay for a summer program and also pay to attend a private school which shares the same coach. Now it seems you have to pay the head coach of the public school boys/ girls teams to get on the field. The Conflicts of interest seem to run so deep yet it continues. Which program is the coach incentified to develop? The School district program or the one that pays him cash on top of their salary? How do they not play undeserving kids that have been paying them every summer? Are kids punished if they play for a competing club? This seams to be a hot topic issue in the towns these teams exist, i am interested to hear others experiences.


Above is the original post.

I did not go and read all of posts so can someone please explain how it is not a conflict of interest for a HS Coach to run a for-profit team that has only players from the school that he or she coaches at?



It is not a conflict of interest if kids have the option to play on the team or play on a private summer team or not play lacrosse over the summer without ramifications and in the spring the coach plays the best 10 players in the spring.

It is a perceived conflict of interest if kids/parents are afraid to not play for fear of losing playing time or not getting moved up ect. in the spring

It is a conflict of interest when it is made clear that if you do not play for the HS coaches for profit summer team you will lose playing time or other benefits that you would have gotten if you had played.

IMHO - I would rather live in a town with a high school coach that is dedicated to the program, involved in the youth programs and the summer team, makes a little money on the summer team rather then the guys that show up on March 1st.


I agree with this post. Of course I am the one who wrote the other post who's school coaches keep a safe distance from the youth program.
I do not think that there is any correlation between success in the spring and where the kids play in the summer.

Massapequa and Smithtown East kids play for various clubs. Traditionally Garden City and Manhasset kids have played Club Ball in the summer. Syosset kids play Club and Town. West Islip kids play for West Islip. Ward Melville kids have done both.

I think the broader the experience the better. Playing with different players and playing for different coaches can help a player in their development. There can be no question that playing on one of the “Top” Club Teams has certain benefits.
Access to the top recruiting showcases, participation in the most competitive tournaments, excellent coaching, playing with the strongest players and an additional advocate for your son are all positive. These benefits are most important for the rising 9th and 10th graders and maybe the rising 11th graders as well.

If the HS Coach turns a profit off the “Town Club Team” and there is the slightest hint that there will be repercussions if you do not play for that team then there is a conflict of interest. If playing for a club team is held against a player there is a problem. They say that perception is reality so if the perception is that you have to play for the Town Team “or else” there is a problem.

In the end, I think there is a conflict of interest especially if the HS is involved at the younger grades.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I do not think that there is any correlation between success in the spring and where the kids play in the summer.

Massapequa and Smithtown East kids play for various clubs. Traditionally Garden City and Manhasset kids have played Club Ball in the summer. Syosset kids play Club and Town. West Islip kids play for West Islip. Ward Melville kids have done both.

I think the broader the experience the better. Playing with different players and playing for different coaches can help a player in their development. There can be no question that playing on one of the “Top” Club Teams has certain benefits.
Access to the top recruiting showcases, participation in the most competitive tournaments, excellent coaching, playing with the strongest players and an additional advocate for your son are all positive. These benefits are most important for the rising 9th and 10th graders and maybe the rising 11th graders as well.

If the HS Coach turns a profit off the “Town Club Team” and there is the slightest hint that there will be repercussions if you do not play for that team then there is a conflict of interest. If playing for a club team is held against a player there is a problem. They say that perception is reality so if the perception is that you have to play for the Town Team “or else” there is a problem.

In the end, I think there is a conflict of interest especially if the HS is involved at the younger grades.


Of course you will never get an admission from the HS coach if your club playing kid suddenly gets cut or rides the bench. None are stupid enough to tell you "it is because you didn't play for my summer program." There are 100 reasons the coach can come up with to justify his actions and how do you prove it was because your son opted out of the coach's summer for-profit program? Good luck with that one......and therein lies a major conflict. This is a fairly new development so time will tell how much is perception and paranoia vs. actual reality. If outside club kids continue to get major roles on the varsity and are not penalized in any way then perhaps it is a win-win for everyone. Not sure yet though.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I do not think that there is any correlation between success in the spring and where the kids play in the summer.

Massapequa and Smithtown East kids play for various clubs. Traditionally Garden City and Manhasset kids have played Club Ball in the summer. Syosset kids play Club and Town. West Islip kids play for West Islip. Ward Melville kids have done both.

I think the broader the experience the better. Playing with different players and playing for different coaches can help a player in their development. There can be no question that playing on one of the “Top” Club Teams has certain benefits.
Access to the top recruiting showcases, participation in the most competitive tournaments, excellent coaching, playing with the strongest players and an additional advocate for your son are all positive. These benefits are most important for the rising 9th and 10th graders and maybe the rising 11th graders as well.

If the HS Coach turns a profit off the “Town Club Team” and there is the slightest hint that there will be repercussions if you do not play for that team then there is a conflict of interest. If playing for a club team is held against a player there is a problem. They say that perception is reality so if the perception is that you have to play for the Town Team “or else” there is a problem.

In the end, I think there is a conflict of interest especially if the HS is involved at the younger grades.


Of course you will never get an admission from the HS coach if your club playing kid suddenly gets cut or rides the bench. None are stupid enough to tell you "it is because you didn't play for my summer program." There are 100 reasons the coach can come up with to justify his actions and how do you prove it was because your son opted out of the coach's summer for-profit program? Good luck with that one......and therein lies a major conflict. This is a fairly new development so time will tell how much is perception and paranoia vs. actual reality. If outside club kids continue to get major roles on the varsity and are not penalized in any way then perhaps it is a win-win for everyone. Not sure yet though.


It should be a win - win, more kids playing over the summer . If the three or four strongest players are off playing club it gives the HS coaches a chance to work with and develop some of the kids that are not as strong. Wouldn't that help the HS team? Maybe it would not help the summer team win but I think overall it would be a positive thing for the school team.
How about the HS coach removing a kid from his summer program once he learns the kid is going to one of the Catholic high schools?
Once PAL is over and the kids are going into HS if they choose to attend a private school why would you expect to be involved with the HS program?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Once PAL is over and the kids are going into HS if they choose to attend a private school why would you expect to be involved with the HS program?


Because maybe a kid wants to go to St. Anthony's but still play summer lacrosse with his friends from growing up on the same summer team they've all been on since 5th grade......
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Once PAL is over and the kids are going into HS if they choose to attend a private school why would you expect to be involved with the HS program?


If the summer program is not affiliated with the high school (except for it being a town program and run by HS coaches why can't a kid from that town still play even if they are going to private schhol??
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Once PAL is over and the kids are going into HS if they choose to attend a private school why would you expect to be involved with the HS program?


If the summer program is not affiliated with the high school (except for it being a town program and run by HS coaches why can't a kid from that town still play even if they are going to private schhol??


Town PAL programs are the feeder systems for Town HS Varsity. In my town the offseason training, winter & summer leagues are run by the Varsity Booster Club. If your kid chooses to go to Private School and is not going to be playing for the local school they are not invited to participate.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Once PAL is over and the kids are going into HS if they choose to attend a private school why would you expect to be involved with the HS program?


If the summer program is not affiliated with the high school (except for it being a town program and run by HS coaches why can't a kid from that town still play even if they are going to private schhol??


Town PAL programs are the feeder systems for Town HS Varsity. In my town the offseason training, winter & summer leagues are run by the Varsity Booster Club. If your kid chooses to go to Private School and is not going to be playing for the local school they are not invited to participate.


It's a town program, to say a kid can't play since he's not going to town HS is wrong. He lives in the town should be aloud to play.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Once PAL is over and the kids are going into HS if they choose to attend a private school why would you expect to be involved with the HS program?


If the summer program is not affiliated with the high school (except for it being a town program and run by HS coaches why can't a kid from that town still play even if they are going to private schhol??


Town PAL programs are the feeder systems for Town HS Varsity. In my town the offseason training, winter & summer leagues are run by the Varsity Booster Club. If your kid chooses to go to Private School and is not going to be playing for the local school they are not invited to participate.


It's a town program, to say a kid can't play since he's not going to town HS is wrong. He lives in the town should be aloud to play.


Once youth league finishes and the HS coach starts overseeing off season training why would they invite a kid that is not part of their program. Once you decide to leave you can't come back !
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Once PAL is over and the kids are going into HS if they choose to attend a private school why would you expect to be involved with the HS program?


If the summer program is not affiliated with the high school (except for it being a town program and run by HS coaches why can't a kid from that town still play even if they are going to private schhol??


Town PAL programs are the feeder systems for Town HS Varsity. In my town the offseason training, winter & summer leagues are run by the Varsity Booster Club. If your kid chooses to go to Private School and is not going to be playing for the local school they are not invited to participate.


It's a town program, to say a kid can't play since he's not going to town HS is wrong. He lives in the town should be aloud to play.


Once youth league finishes and the HS coach starts overseeing off season training why would they invite a kid that is not part of their program. Once you decide to leave you can't come back !


Again, it's a program that can't be affiliated with the school district, so anyone should be allowed to play. If HS coaches are in charge then it's a conflict of interest.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Once PAL is over and the kids are going into HS if they choose to attend a private school why would you expect to be involved with the HS program?


If the summer program is not affiliated with the high school (except for it being a town program and run by HS coaches why can't a kid from that town still play even if they are going to private schhol??


Town PAL programs are the feeder systems for Town HS Varsity. In my town the offseason training, winter & summer leagues are run by the Varsity Booster Club. If your kid chooses to go to Private School and is not going to be playing for the local school they are not invited to participate.


It's a town program, to say a kid can't play since he's not going to town HS is wrong. He lives in the town should be aloud to play.


Once youth league finishes and the HS coach starts overseeing off season training why would they invite a kid that is not part of their program. Once you decide to leave you can't come back !


Again, it's a program that can't be affiliated with the school district, so anyone should be allowed to play. If HS coaches are in charge then it's a conflict of interest.


My towns HS coach oversees the offseason program it is run in house and not for profit and it only for kids attending the public school

If the practices are on school grounds then as a tax paying member of the district he has a right to be there


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Once PAL is over and the kids are going into HS if they choose to attend a private school why would you expect to be involved with the HS program?


If the summer program is not affiliated with the high school (except for it being a town program and run by HS coaches why can't a kid from that town still play even if they are going to private schhol??


Town PAL programs are the feeder systems for Town HS Varsity. In my town the offseason training, winter & summer leagues are run by the Varsity Booster Club. If your kid chooses to go to Private School and is not going to be playing for the local school they are not invited to participate.


It's a town program, to say a kid can't play since he's not going to town HS is wrong. He lives in the town should be aloud to play.


Once youth league finishes and the HS coach starts overseeing off season training why would they invite a kid that is not part of their program. Once you decide to leave you can't come back !
Originally Posted by Anonymous

If the practices are on school grounds then as a tax paying member of the district he has a right to be there


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Once PAL is over and the kids are going into HS if they choose to attend a private school why would you expect to be involved with the HS program?


If the summer program is not affiliated with the high school (except for it being a town program and run by HS coaches why can't a kid from that town still play even if they are going to private schhol??


Town PAL programs are the feeder systems for Town HS Varsity. In my town the offseason training, winter & summer leagues are run by the Varsity Booster Club. If your kid chooses to go to Private School and is not going to be playing for the local school they are not invited to participate.


It's a town program, to say a kid can't play since he's not going to town HS is wrong. He lives in the town should be aloud to play.


Once youth league finishes and the HS coach starts overseeing off season training why would they invite a kid that is not part of their program. Once you decide to leave you can't come back !


He or she can come on down and watch.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Once PAL is over and the kids are going into HS if they choose to attend a private school why would you expect to be involved with the HS program?


If the summer program is not affiliated with the high school (except for it being a town program and run by HS coaches why can't a kid from that town still play even if they are going to private schhol??


Town PAL programs are the feeder systems for Town HS Varsity. In my town the offseason training, winter & summer leagues are run by the Varsity Booster Club. If your kid chooses to go to Private School and is not going to be playing for the local school they are not invited to participate.


It's a town program, to say a kid can't play since he's not going to town HS is wrong. He lives in the town should be aloud to play.


Once youth league finishes and the HS coach starts overseeing off season training why would they invite a kid that is not part of their program. Once you decide to leave you can't come back !


I guess that is the question: Is it a HS program (in which case sanctioned by the school district etc) or is it a private enterprise run by the HS coach? I think it is pretty clearly the latter. So if it is a private, stand alone organization why does he care where your kid goes to HS? I am sure someone will jump on here and say you cannot play Express unless you go to Chaminade or St. Anthony's...but that is not true. This is different.
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
If the practices are on school grounds then as a tax paying member of the district he has a right to be there

If you put a coach in a position that he has to take a kid on tHat kid is going to collect dust on the sidelines. In our district we did take on kids who wanted to play that went to a private school but we were always hurting for numbers. In a case like ESM they don't need you and shouldn't have to take you. The summer is something that coach does for no pay as a service to his kids and it's a good thing as they are trying to get the kids some looks from schools. I say as long as the coach isn't making a huge profit and he is giving everyone a decent amount of playing time it's all good
Which high school has the worst Administration? Worst Athletic Director?

Think about the concerns that you have. Where do the issues lie?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Which high school has the worst Administration? Worst Athletic Director?

Think about the concerns that you have. Where do the issues lie?


How many Ad's does a district have? Are there assistant Ad's? What is an Athletic Chair?
It smells.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
If the practices are on school grounds then as a tax paying member of the district he has a right to be there

If you put a coach in a position that he has to take a kid on tHat kid is going to collect dust on the sidelines. In our district we did take on kids who wanted to play that went to a private school but we were always hurting for numbers. In a case like ESM they don't need you and shouldn't have to take you. The summer is something that coach does for no pay as a service to his kids and it's a good thing as they are trying to get the kids some looks from schools. I say as long as the coach isn't making a huge profit and he is giving everyone a decent amount of playing time it's all good



First- the notion that paying your taxes entitles your kid to make or plan on a summer travel team that's not affiliated with your school district if a joke.

Second- go play for you private schools non affiliated summer travel team

Third- you'd be the same parent complaining if the summer team took kids from other towns bc they needed numbers and that took away from your kids playing time

Are coaches allowed to ask for money for school fall ball and claim it's for gas money and time away from their families? Wondering if this is school policy?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are coaches allowed to ask for money for school fall ball and claim it's for gas money and time away from their families? Wondering if this is school policy?


Who is going to stop them?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are coaches allowed to ask for money for school fall ball and claim it's for gas money and time away from their families? Wondering if this is school policy?


Who is going to stop them?


Administration. Soliciting funds from players is not allowed at public schools.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are coaches allowed to ask for money for school fall ball and claim it's for gas money and time away from their families? Wondering if this is school policy?


Who is going to stop them?


Administration. Soliciting funds from players is not allowed at public schools.


How about extorting funds from players, is that allowed at public schools?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Which high school has the worst Administration? Worst Athletic Director?

SWR by far has the worst BOE, super, AD and the absolute worst coach in the country.

Think about the concerns that you have. Where do the issues lie?


How many Ad's does a district have? Are there assistant Ad's? What is an Athletic Chair?
Paying for a coaches time for fall ball.

Don't bother doing it if ya can't ....

Some people are getting to big for their britches.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Paying for a coaches time for fall ball.

Don't bother doing it if ya can't ....

Some people are getting to big for their britches.


Please explain. Are HS coaches now charging to practice and play in the fall?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Paying for a coaches time for fall ball.

Don't bother doing it if ya can't ....

Some people are getting to big for their britches.


Coaches? Players? Parents? Who is out of line? Who is getting to big for their britches?
I have seen a lot of Ward Melville/3V helmets at tryouts, are they losing kids to the summer club teams. Are there any other schools that still have kids who play exclusively for the school team in the summer ? How about WI, are they losing kids too ?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have seen a lot of Ward Melville/3V helmets at tryouts, are they losing kids to the summer club teams. Are there any other schools that still have kids who play exclusively for the school team in the summer ? How about WI, are they losing kids too ?


Maybe it is those kids are no longer on the travel teams they were once on and looking for new homes and it is more visible to you.
Top GC athletes to Chaminade......What was once a trickle is now a stampede.
As you may know Coach Huff has had a long standing policy of wanting ESM player to play for Team ESM only and discouraged playing for outside travel teams. We recently had a meeting with Coach Huff to review the upcoming season and future of Team ESM. He has reluctantly recognized the benefit of allowing players to participate in outside travel teams. Believe me he would much rather have the boys just play Team ESM. As try outs for outside travel teams are currently underway I feel obligate to let you know of Coach Huffs change in heart. We must stress that Team ESM should come first when there are conflicts with an outside travel team. We have a formal board meeting to address this issue on 9/22 but I felt inclined to let our team know in advance.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have seen a lot of Ward Melville/3V helmets at tryouts, are they losing kids to the summer club teams. Are there any other schools that still have kids who play exclusively for the school team in the summer ? How about WI, are they losing kids too ?


Ward Melville kids have been playing on Travel Teams for years this is nothing new.

Going as far back as the WM Class of 2008. Some of the best kids played outside Club Ball. Ward Melville Class of 2011 had a bunch of kids who played for Outside Clubs. Many of the current college players from WM played for outside Club Teams while growing up. Class of 2017 has a lot of kids who play club lacrosse. Some of the current 2016 boys are now playing club as well and some of the 2015 have played club from time to time.

You use the term "losing" when referencing West Islip, as far as I know "All" of the boys from Ward Melville who have played Club Ball also played and contributed at Ward Melville. Ward Melville did not lose anyone. (unless you consider "losing" the kids who went to private school) But they did not go to private school as a result of playing club lacrosse)

Not sure what is currently happening at the younger grades but many current and past Ward Melville Players also played for Outside Club Teams.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Top GC athletes to Chaminade......What was once a trickle is now a stampede.


What grad year?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Top GC athletes to Chaminade......What was once a trickle is now a stampede.


What grad year?


2018....not all, but many more top players than in past years.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Top GC athletes to Chaminade......What was once a trickle is now a stampede.


What grad year?


2018....not all, but many more top players than in past years.


Is this a sign of things to come? How does it look for 2019 & 2020?
funny you mention esm as now the kids of the coaches and a school administrator double crossed there own friends parents and players tried out for travel teams and then told balance of players it was ok to do so after tryouts are pretty much closed
after they made money off others and had there kids play for free for several years
nice group of people
Originally Posted by Anonymous
funny you mention esm as now the kids of the coaches and a school administrator double crossed there own friends parents and players tried out for travel teams and then told balance of players it was ok to do so after tryouts are pretty much closed
after they made money off others and had there kids play for free for several years
nice group of people


Let me get this straight, "The coaches and school administrator told you it was OK to play for a Club Lacrosse Team". Was there a time that the same coaches and administrator told you that you (your son) could not play for a Club Team?
So section xi will become involved if schools are charging and making a profit for school travel?

Our school district will not even tell the community where all the lax money raised was spent on or who oversees the funds raised.

Puzzling. Public schools have so much freedom to do as they chose
Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee (Tom Cruise): I think I'm entitled to them.
Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee: I want the truth!
Jessep: You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls. And those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives...You don't want the truth. Because deep down, in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall. You need me on that wall.
We use words like honor, code, loyalty...we use these words as the backbone to a life spent defending something. You use 'em as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide, then questions the manner in which I provide it! I'd rather you just said thank you and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you're entitled to!
Kaffee: Did you order the code red?
Jessep: (quietly) I did the job you sent me to do.
Kaffee: Did you order the code red?
Jessep: You're goddamn right I did!!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee (Tom Cruise): I think I'm entitled to them.
Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee: I want the truth!
Jessep: You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls. And those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives...You don't want the truth. Because deep down, in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall. You need me on that wall.
We use words like honor, code, loyalty...we use these words as the backbone to a life spent defending something. You use 'em as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide, then questions the manner in which I provide it! I'd rather you just said thank you and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you're entitled to!
Kaffee: Did you order the code red?
Jessep: (quietly) I did the job you sent me to do.
Kaffee: Did you order the code red?
Jessep: You're goddamn right I did!!



Quoting movies. Someone hasn't much of a life lol
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
funny you mention esm as now the kids of the coaches and a school administrator double crossed there own friends parents and players tried out for travel teams and then told balance of players it was ok to do so after tryouts are pretty much closed
after they made money off others and had there kids play for free for several years
nice group of people


Let me get this straight, "The coaches and school administrator told you it was OK to play for a Club Lacrosse Team". Was there a time that the same coaches and administrator told you that you (your son) could not play for a Club Team?


I don't understand why your coach would not let the kids play for a travel team. This would only benefit his program when the kids reach varsity. There must be another reason and if there is he or she does not care about winning. Not Good. What does the administraton have to do with summer lacrosse? Kids should have a choice.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee (Tom Cruise): I think I'm entitled to them.
Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee: I want the truth!
Jessep: You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls. And those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives...You don't want the truth. Because deep down, in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall. You need me on that wall.
We use words like honor, code, loyalty...we use these words as the backbone to a life spent defending something. You use 'em as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide, then questions the manner in which I provide it! I'd rather you just said thank you and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you're entitled to!
Kaffee: Did you order the code red?
Jessep: (quietly) I did the job you sent me to do.
Kaffee: Did you order the code red?
Jessep: You're goddamn right I did!!



Quoting movies. Someone hasn't much of a life lol


Yes this person does, but it sounds strangely familiar.
The B--- S--- meters in 3v just exploded!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The B--- S--- meters in 3v just exploded!
Ur ok I'm intrigued, care to offer any more ?
three village, my sons team played them last year in stonybrook, they were poorly coached and it showed in how dirty they started to play towards the end of the game with one of the coaches yelling to "Take that kid out".
Originally Posted by Anonymous
three village, my sons team played them last year in stonybrook, they were poorly coached and it showed in how dirty they started to play towards the end of the game with one of the coaches yelling to "Take that kid out".


What grade?
aren't the JV years the biggest for recruiting these days and don't you want to play 2018, 2017 not a JV cluster on a random Travel team. If you are 2017 2016 you want to do showcases especially if you havnt had any interest. If you have interest why wouldn't you go to those School days and then play with your HS team so you can get the most out of your Jr Sr spring season. or find an "Uncommitted team".

your thoughts
What teams are going to the Stony Brook tournament on Nov 17th? I can't seem to find any link with teams or college coaches attending.
Heard good pool of teams
Care to elaborate? I know WM is not going or SW.
What college coaches are going?

I heard Faber College is in.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
Big changes coming with Rocky Point girls program, good for some terrible for others .

Good luck with that !!
That program just tanked !
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Big changes coming with Rocky Point girls program, good for some terrible for others .

Good luck with that !!


OK, I'll bite. Please enlighten us.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Big changes coming with Rocky Point girls program, good for some terrible for others .

Good luck with that !!


OK, I'll bite. Please enlighten us.


I heard this summer that one of the Varsity dads openly coaches the team from the stands? How does the Varsity coach allow that to happen?
Taken from the 2017 thread but it also happens at Public High Schools that have their own summer "Club Team". Coaches using player commits to further their own agenda.

- I've been around the DMV club scene as a parent and coach for a long time, and without shooting negatives at any one club or prep school, there is something important most people including Ty Xanders don't get. Some early verbals are outstanding players including many Turtles, but some are not. Those aren't diamonds in the rough, they are non-impact recruits. What is a non-impact recruit? Think Rudy in the Notre Dame movie. Here in the DMV you have clubs who need commits to survive and attract the next generation of competitive kids and parents. Some of the top lacrosse prep schools here have less than 100 kids per grade and 25 per grade who want to play D1 lacrosse and it is not too cynical to suggest enrollment would be hurt at these over $25K a year schools. College coaches are in a great position when pushy club or prep coach calls begging for him to take a player they think little of IF 1. It is made clear the family will pay full freight, 2. It is made clear the kid will be a walk-on and may even need to tryout to stay on the roster, 3. It is made clear the kid and family will be fulfilled to be a 4 year practice player with realistic hopes of getting into a blowout or two like Rudy, and 4. The kid plays for a club and goes to a prep school that will develop him into a good college practice player and maybe more as a pleasant surprise.

The DMV fills college roster benches with these kids by the bushel every year. For Dom Starsia and the rest it is like nothing down financing for what may be a useful player and they get a free option."

Wow
What is the DMV?
Heard that dad is making deals to take position and is keeping it on the hush because there will be a uproar , pitchfork linching if its announced before season starts , and is taking all his girls up to varsity with him . Its amazing the small town gossip that gets around so fast !



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Big changes coming with Rocky Point girls program, good for some terrible for others .

Good luck with that !!


OK, I'll bite. Please enlighten us.


I heard this summer that one of the Varsity dads openly coaches the team from the stands? How does the Varsity coach allow that to happen?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is the DMV?


Delaware/Maryland/Virginia
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is the DMV?


Delaware/Maryland/Virginia


Actually Dc/md/va. Another word for dc suburbs
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is the DMV?


Delaware/Maryland/Virginia


Actually Dc/md/va. Another word for dc suburbs


my bad... Delmarva is the peninsula...back to geography class for me.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Heard that dad is making deals to take position and is keeping it on the hush because there will be a uproar , pitchfork linching if its announced before season starts , and is taking all his girls up to varsity with him . Its amazing the small town gossip that gets around so fast !



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Big changes coming with Rocky Point girls program, good for some terrible for others .

Good luck with that !!


OK, I'll bite. Please enlighten us.


I heard this summer that one of the Varsity dads openly coaches the team from the stands? How does the Varsity coach allow that to happen?


WOW
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Heard that dad is making deals to take position and is keeping it on the hush because there will be a uproar , pitchfork linching if its announced before season starts , and is taking all his girls up to varsity with him . Its amazing the small town gossip that gets around so fast !



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Big changes coming with Rocky Point girls program, good for some terrible for others .

Good luck with that !!


OK, I'll bite. Please enlighten us.


I heard this summer that one of the Varsity dads openly coaches the team from the stands? How does the Varsity coach allow that to happen?


And now it's on the Internet so it must be true!
Just to bad the PAID head coach doesn't get his act together and show interest all year long , not when he hears smack talk about his commitment and tries to save face by showing interest for a week or two then disappears , I think many from the program would all agree as much as this parent is a nuisance he get things done ! It would be for the better for the community if this parent took the head coaching job without pay , as he already does the head coaches task with all the leg work of development and training in the program . Sort of like how all the top programs on long island do !
Don't expect a miracle with minimal effort !
sad part the paid coach will reek all the benefits from the upcoming class talent pool .



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Heard that dad is making deals to take position and is keeping it on the hush because there will be a uproar , pitchfork linching if its announced before season starts , and is taking all his girls up to varsity with him . Its amazing the small town gossip that gets around so fast !



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Big changes coming with Rocky Point girls program, good for some terrible for others .

Good luck with that !!


OK, I'll bite. Please enlighten us.


I heard this summer that one of the Varsity dads openly coaches the team from the stands? How does the Varsity coach allow that to happen?


And now it's on the Internet so it must be true!
More for the argument that school ball is becoming a joke. For many school districts the teacher coaches are? Let's just say teachers! Sad but true.. I hope this dad is able to get the kids into some good tournaments and showcase all his and his players hardworking


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Just to bad the PAID head coach doesn't get his act together and show interest all year long , not when he hears smack talk about his commitment and tries to save face by showing interest for a week or two then disappears , I think many from the program would all agree as much as this parent is a nuisance he get things done ! It would be for the better for the community if this parent took the head coaching job without pay , as he already does the head coaches task with all the leg work of development and training in the program . Sort of like how all the top programs on long island do !
Don't expect a miracle with minimal effort !
sad part the paid coach will reek all the benefits from the upcoming class talent pool .



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Heard that dad is making deals to take position and is keeping it on the hush because there will be a uproar , pitchfork linching if its announced before season starts , and is taking all his girls up to varsity with him . Its amazing the small town gossip that gets around so fast !



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Big changes coming with Rocky Point girls program, good for some terrible for others .

Good luck with that !!


OK, I'll bite. Please enlighten us.


I heard this summer that one of the Varsity dads openly coaches the team from the stands? How does the Varsity coach allow that to happen?


And now it's on the Internet so it must be true!
The only problem with this dad is he forgets to realize unlike his preaching's there are other players in the district who also train hard all year long , but he excludes them because they do not participate in his sessions so automatically your child will not be a CHAMPION !!! . Although his heart is there he needs to be more open about other players who do not choose to participate in his ideology . But he would get our vote if need be to replace the existing Varsity coach who technically is a teacher and a good coach when he needs to be and unfortunately the fact he utilizes this DAD to an extent of communicating on who should play where , shows how unorganized the school program really is .
In my town the Varsity coach is involved year round and it pays off on the field. What many people in town do not realize is when the couple of thousand the district pays him is spread out over the whole year it comes out to 25 cents an hour. Most of the teacher coaches do care but with family obligations and other sports that they coach in the offseason it is hard for them to do everything all year long.
Then Don't coach period ! ... many coaches in High School do it for the love of the game , and yes of course the glory ! If a school district has a huge sport following , you better be willing on making it a production !!! If your successful on what you do look at the big picture in the ever growing game of Women's Lacrosse , success in High School coaching Can open up other opportunities for them.. Its seems in this instance its about being spoiled and riding off the coattails of a last name.


Originally Posted by Anonymous
In my town the Varsity coach is involved year round and it pays off on the field. What many people in town do not realize is when the couple of thousand the district pays him is spread out over the whole year it comes out to 25 cents an hour. Most of the teacher coaches do care but with family obligations and other sports that they coach in the offseason it is hard for them to do everything all year long.
VII. Out of Season Practice Policy
On May 24, 2000, the Section XI Athletic Council eliminated the Section XI Out of Season Practice Policy (sometimes referred to as the 49% rule) entirely!

Understand, however, that this action does not necessarily make practicing out of season OK. Schools are still bound by the NYSPHSAA regulations. They are:

NYSPHSAA REGULATION - PRACTICE SESSIONS:
a. An organized practice in grades 7-12 is a session for the purpose of providing instruction and practice in physical conditioning activities, skills, team play, and game strategy designed expressly for that sport under the supervision of a qualified coach appointed by the Board of Education of the local school district. Such instruction and practice shall be held only during the season designated for that sport.
c. School sponsored activities conducted out of the sport season such as general conditioning, weight training, weight lifting, intramurals, recreation, open gyms, club activities and camps are permitted: 1. If such programs are not mandated by coaches or school personnel; 2. If such programs are available to all students.
d. Non-school sponsored activities are permitted if such programs are not mandated by coaches or school personnel. It is recommended that no school equipment be used for these programs as per State Comptroller Opinion 85-37.

Rev 5/11


VIII. Recruiting of Athletes
To maintain the educational standards and dignity of our academic and athletic programs, all member schools of Section XI must refrain from practices such as recruitments, enticements, inducements, or other pressures which encourage students for athletic purposes to leave or not to enter their schools of normal enrollment or schools in which they are enrolled.

Schools alleged to be in violation will be referred to the Ethics Committee.

Upon request, member schools that receive tuition must make available to Section XI all records of financial aid to athletes.
And now we come to that most special time of year.....a time when a lax coach shakes down parents to attend his annual fundraiser for the HS program which is, of course, perfectly timed for just when tryouts are about to begin. No attempt to even hide the appearance of pay to play. So gross.....and he gets suck up fathers to run it all for him to boot. Must be nice, just show up and people hand you $$$.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And now we come to that most special time of year.....a time when a lax coach shakes down parents to attend his annual fundraiser for the HS program which is, of course, perfectly timed for just when tryouts are about to begin. No attempt to even hide the appearance of pay to play. So gross.....and he gets suck up fathers to run it all for him to boot. Must be nice, just show up and people hand you $$$.


Are you implying the Coach keeps the money or does it get returned to the program? What district are you in?
Doubt he puts it in his pocket....but zero transparency on how it gets used.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Doubt he puts it in his pocket....but zero transparency on how it gets used.


What district are you in? Do you make your checks out to him personally or the booster club?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And now we come to that most special time of year.....a time when a lax coach shakes down parents to attend his annual fundraiser for the HS program which is, of course, perfectly timed for just when tryouts are about to begin. No attempt to even hide the appearance of pay to play. So gross.....and he gets suck up fathers to run it all for him to boot. Must be nice, just show up and people hand you $$$.


Same thing in my town. They have mentioned and sent home flyers for the "fund raiser" at least 10 times in the last month and put a lot of pressure on the kids by giving them admissions tickets with there names that they are supposed to sell at $60 a piece. The clown that is running it isn't even affiliated with the program and has had major issues in the past in dealing with both youth players and parents.

There is an extra fee for anything that the team does and any gear they wear so I have no idea what this fund raising money is used for. The parents are always being asked to reach into there pockets.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And now we come to that most special time of year.....a time when a lax coach shakes down parents to attend his annual fundraiser for the HS program which is, of course, perfectly timed for just when tryouts are about to begin. No attempt to even hide the appearance of pay to play. So gross.....and he gets suck up fathers to run it all for him to boot. Must be nice, just show up and people hand you $$$.


Same thing in my town. They have mentioned and sent home flyers for the "fund raiser" at least 10 times in the last month and put a lot of pressure on the kids by giving them admissions tickets with there names that they are supposed to sell at $60 a piece. The clown that is running it isn't even affiliated with the program and has had major issues in the past in dealing with both youth players and parents.

There is an extra fee for anything that the team does and any gear they wear so I have no idea what this fund raising money is used for. The parents are always being asked to reach into there pockets.


Every team does fundraisers to support their team and help offset costs of extra travel, clothing, events etc... I'm trying to understand the anger and accusations thrown at the coaches and volunteers. You called one volunteer a "clown".
Help us understand your complaints.
Originally Posted by The Hop
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And now we come to that most special time of year.....a time when a lax coach shakes down parents to attend his annual fundraiser for the HS program which is, of course, perfectly timed for just when tryouts are about to begin. No attempt to even hide the appearance of pay to play. So gross.....and he gets suck up fathers to run it all for him to boot. Must be nice, just show up and people hand you $$$.


Same thing in my town. They have mentioned and sent home flyers for the "fund raiser" at least 10 times in the last month and put a lot of pressure on the kids by giving them admissions tickets with there names that they are supposed to sell at $60 a piece. The clown that is running it isn't even affiliated with the program and has had major issues in the past in dealing with both youth players and parents.

There is an extra fee for anything that the team does and any gear they wear so I have no idea what this fund raising money is used for. The parents are always being asked to reach into there pockets.


Every team does fundraisers to support their team and help offset costs of extra travel, clothing, events etc... I'm trying to understand the anger and accusations thrown at the coaches and volunteers. You called one volunteer a "clown".
Help us understand your complaints.


I run our HS Booster club and at every meeting the bank statement is on the table for all to see. Our fundraisers go right back to the kids. As a booster club you can never pay for everything the kids order every year because if you did they would keep shopping. We pay for a portion of the gear that they want every year and make them pay a fair share to keep it under control. At the end of the season the balance in the account is given out to the seniors as scholarships. If your town is not doing this it is something you should look into.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What is the DMV?


Delaware/Maryland/Virginia


Actually Dc/md/va. Another word for dc suburbs


my bad... Delmarva is the peninsula...back to geography class for me.


This is why kids repeat the 8th grade
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by The Hop
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And now we come to that most special time of year.....a time when a lax coach shakes down parents to attend his annual fundraiser for the HS program which is, of course, perfectly timed for just when tryouts are about to begin. No attempt to even hide the appearance of pay to play. So gross.....and he gets suck up fathers to run it all for him to boot. Must be nice, just show up and people hand you $$$.


Same thing in my town. They have mentioned and sent home flyers for the "fund raiser" at least 10 times in the last month and put a lot of pressure on the kids by giving them admissions tickets with there names that they are supposed to sell at $60 a piece. The clown that is running it isn't even affiliated with the program and has had major issues in the past in dealing with both youth players and parents.

There is an extra fee for anything that the team does and any gear they wear so I have no idea what this fund raising money is used for. The parents are always being asked to reach into there pockets.


Every team does fundraisers to support their team and help offset costs of extra travel, clothing, events etc... I'm trying to understand the anger and accusations thrown at the coaches and volunteers. You called one volunteer a "clown".
Help us understand your complaints.


I run our HS Booster club and at every meeting the bank statement is on the table for all to see. Our fundraisers go right back to the kids. As a booster club you can never pay for everything the kids order every year because if you did they would keep shopping. We pay for a portion of the gear that they want every year and make them pay a fair share to keep it under control. At the end of the season the balance in the account is given out to the seniors as scholarships. If your town is not doing this it is something you should look into.


Booster clubs work very hard to help the coaches and players succeed through financial support and volunteer work. THANK YOU to all booster club volunteers!!!!
If parents have a question about appropriation of funds I would guess every club President or Treasurer will gladly disclose any financials.
RP is over-rated. Lots of teams will be better over next 4 years.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
RP is over-rated. Lots of teams will be better over next 4 years.


Your post belongs on the 2015 Boys Lacrosse thread. Re post there.
There are coaches that don't account for the money they collect. Fact
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are coaches that don't account for the money they collect. Fact


Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]There are coaches that don't account for the money they collect. Fact


Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are coaches that don't account for the money they collect. Fact


You should call your HS AD and discuss it .
Originally Posted by The Hop
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And now we come to that most special time of year.....a time when a lax coach shakes down parents to attend his annual fundraiser for the HS program which is, of course, perfectly timed for just when tryouts are about to begin. No attempt to even hide the appearance of pay to play. So gross.....and he gets suck up fathers to run it all for him to boot. Must be nice, just show up and people hand you $$$.


Same thing in my town. They have mentioned and sent home flyers for the "fund raiser" at least 10 times in the last month and put a lot of pressure on the kids by giving them admissions tickets with there names that they are supposed to sell at $60 a piece. The clown that is running it isn't even affiliated with the program and has had major issues in the past in dealing with both youth players and parents.

There is an extra fee for anything that the team does and any gear they wear so I have no idea what this fund raising money is used for. The parents are always being asked to reach into there pockets.


Every team does fundraisers to support their team and help offset costs of extra travel, clothing, events etc... I'm trying to understand the anger and accusations thrown at the coaches and volunteers. You called one volunteer a "clown".
Help us understand your complaints.


I'll say it again that ALL travel expenses, gear, and everything else is paid for by the parents so where does the fund raising money go?

The guy I referred to as a clown is a person that has no business being involved with the HS program and is only allowed to be involved because of the "fund raising".

There is nobody that you can ask either it is all top secret.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are coaches that don't account for the money they collect. Fact


You should call your HS AD and discuss it .


Most of the AD's have no clue what is going on. They don't realize that the coaches are strong arming the players into paying them hundreds of dollars to be on there summer teams or paying hundreds of dollars for off season illegal team practices.
We have coaches who run summer sports camps at our school, you don't show and then you are labeled. We also have booster club parents that are in it for the wrong reason to gain access and influence. Our program is in serious decline so coaches are allowing the parents to run the asylum just to keep the program alive.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are coaches that don't account for the money they collect. Fact


You should call your HS AD and discuss it .


Most of the AD's have no clue what is going on. They don't realize that the coaches are strong arming the players into paying them hundreds of dollars to be on there summer teams or paying hundreds of dollars for off season illegal team practices.


I understand your frustration. It is a simple matter to address. First call you should make is to the AD. Second thing you should do is attend a Board of Ed meeting in your town and ask the board what hey know about. Some Booster clubs use the money to pay for scouting services, stat services, and team parties like senior day and playoff tailgates. All remaining funds should be given to the athletes as scholarships.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are coaches that don't account for the money they collect. Fact


You should call your HS AD and discuss it .


Most of the AD's have no clue what is going on. They don't realize that the coaches are strong arming the players into paying them hundreds of dollars to be on there summer teams or paying hundreds of dollars for off season illegal team practices.

Off season practices are not illegal.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are coaches that don't account for the money they collect. Fact


You should call your HS AD and discuss it .


Most of the AD's have no clue what is going on. They don't realize that the coaches are strong arming the players into paying them hundreds of dollars to be on there summer teams or paying hundreds of dollars for off season illegal team practices.

Off season practices are not illegal.


Yes they are. Coaches can not hold an organized practice until March 9th when tryouts start. They hold open gym nights for the kids to scrimmage but that's it .
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are coaches that don't account for the money they collect. Fact


You should call your HS AD and discuss it .


Most of the AD's have no clue what is going on. They don't realize that the coaches are strong arming the players into paying them hundreds of dollars to be on there summer teams or paying hundreds of dollars for off season illegal team practices.

Off season practices are not illegal.


Yes they are. Coaches can not hold an organized practice until March 9th when tryouts start. They hold open gym nights for the kids to scrimmage but that's it .

Sorry, but you are wrong. That rule of no off-season practices was thrown out years ago. You just can't make it mandatory, or you can't call it mandatory.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are coaches that don't account for the money they collect. Fact


You should call your HS AD and discuss it .


Most of the AD's have no clue what is going on. They don't realize that the coaches are strong arming the players into paying them hundreds of dollars to be on there summer teams or paying hundreds of dollars for off season illegal team practices.

Off season practices are not illegal.


VII. Out of Season Practice Policy
On May 24, 2000, the Section XI Athletic Council eliminated the Section XI Out of Season Practice Policy (sometimes referred to as the 49% rule) entirely!

Understand, however, that this action does not necessarily make practicing out of season OK. Schools are still bound by the NYSPHSAA regulations. They are:

NYSPHSAA REGULATION - PRACTICE SESSIONS:
a. An organized practice in grades 7-12 is a session for the purpose of providing instruction and practice in physical conditioning activities, skills, team play, and game strategy designed expressly for that sport under the supervision of a qualified coach appointed by the Board of Education of the local school district. Such instruction and practice shall be held only during the season designated for that sport.
c. School sponsored activities conducted out of the sport season such as general conditioning, weight training, weight lifting, intramurals, recreation, open gyms, club activities and camps are permitted: 1. If such programs are not mandated by coaches or school personnel; 2. If such programs are available to all students.
d. Non-school sponsored activities are permitted if such programs are not mandated by coaches or school personnel. It is recommended that no school equipment be used for these programs as per State Comptroller Opinion 85-37.

Rev 5/11


VIII. Recruiting of Athletes
To maintain the educational standards and dignity of our academic and athletic programs, all member schools of Section XI must refrain from practices such as recruitments, enticements, inducements, or other pressures which encourage students for athletic purposes to leave or not to enter their schools of normal enrollment or schools in which they are enrolled.

Schools alleged to be in violation will be referred to the Ethics Committee.

Upon request, member schools that receive tuition must make available to Section XI all records of financial aid to athletes.
NYSPHSAA REGULATION - PRACTICE SESSIONS:
a. An organized practice in grades 7-12 is a session for the purpose of providing instruction and practice in physical conditioning activities, skills, team play, and game strategy designed expressly for that sport under the supervision of a qualified coach appointed by the Board of Education of the local school district. Such instruction and practice shall be held only during the season designated for that sport.

It clearly states that an organized practice ......shall only be held only during the season designated for that sport so a coach can only hold practices on or after March 9th for Lacrosse. Anything else is clearly not permitted.
what about "box" held every year in our school district
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NYSPHSAA REGULATION - PRACTICE SESSIONS:
a. An organized practice in grades 7-12 is a session for the purpose of providing instruction and practice in physical conditioning activities, skills, team play, and game strategy designed expressly for that sport under the supervision of a qualified coach appointed by the Board of Education of the local school district. Such instruction and practice shall be held only during the season designated for that sport.

It clearly states that an organized practice ......shall only be held only during the season designated for that sport so a coach can only hold practices on or after March 9th for Lacrosse. Anything else is clearly not permitted.


Most teams do fall tournaments and winter leagues. And most do "open gym" where the kids run "conditioning activities, skills, team play, and game strategy designed expressly for that sport under the supervision of a qualified coach" I think the rule stated above means that none of the practices count towards the mandated number of practices needed to play. If not, then 90% of the teams on LI are breaking the rules. I'm trying to understand if you do not want the kids to be doing any off-season work?? Is that so?
looks like the poster was just trying to articulate what the rule is for organized practice with h.s. coaches . the rule is antiquated (winter leagues etc.), and subject to interpretation .
Here is the rub. The Varsity coaches do not get paid for extra off season practices so they really don't want to do any of them especially when they have to invite everyone to participate. Parents want the travel lacrosse coach commitment from a coach that only gets paid for the 11 week season. Our coach does not want to coach winter league games because he doesn't get paid to. I really cant blame her.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is the rub. The Varsity coaches do not get paid for extra off season practices so they really don't want to do any of them especially when they have to invite everyone to participate. Parents want the travel lacrosse coach commitment from a coach that only gets paid for the 11 week season. Our coach does not want to coach winter league games because he doesn't get paid to. I really cant blame her.


That's the difference between a coach that wants to build a program and one who is just in it for the money.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is the rub. The Varsity coaches do not get paid for extra off season practices so they really don't want to do any of them especially when they have to invite everyone to participate. Parents want the travel lacrosse coach commitment from a coach that only gets paid for the 11 week season. Our coach does not want to coach winter league games because he doesn't get paid to. I really cant blame her.


That's the difference between a coach that wants to build a program and one who is just in it for the money.


BINGO! You hit the nail on the head.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Here is the rub. The Varsity coaches do not get paid for extra off season practices so they really don't want to do any of them especially when they have to invite everyone to participate. Parents want the travel lacrosse coach commitment from a coach that only gets paid for the 11 week season. Our coach does not want to coach winter league games because he doesn't get paid to. I really cant blame her.


That's the difference between a coach that wants to build a program and one who is just in it for the money.


BINGO! You hit the nail on the head.


Or you have the coach that "highly suggests" you attend all of her indoor training to give you a better chance of making varsity while she makes money off of all the parents.
There are potential pitfalls with any booster situation, but the optics are especially terrible when you go to parents to solicit money immediately before tryouts. It would be better if done after the team is selected.....but then of course you raise less money because the parents of the kids who didn't make the team are no longer going to contribute.
true. I think that the fundraisers are populated mostly by parents who want "face time" with coach.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
true. I think that the fundraisers are populated mostly by parents who want "face time" with coach.


In my town I am personal a friend of the head coach and I am at all of the fundraisers to run interference and box out the parents that get drunk and want to tell the coach how great their kid is.
Our booster club had its first meeting to order logo merchandise! We don't even know who is on the team yet but the booster parents need to stay in front of the coach.
I'LL BET YOU HAD TOM ACTUALLY PUT IN ORDERS ALREADY, RIGHT? ITS SUCH A SHAME . ITS ACTUALLY FUNNY WATCHING THE "TEAM MOMS" CLIMB OVER EACH OTHER TO ORGANIZE...OF COURSE KEEPING COACH IN THE LOOP WITH THEIR HEROIC EFFORTS...MAYBE JOHNNY OR JANEY WILL BE FAVORED. shocked
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I'LL BET YOU HAD TOM ACTUALLY PUT IN ORDERS ALREADY, RIGHT? ITS SUCH A SHAME . ITS ACTUALLY FUNNY WATCHING THE "TEAM MOMS" CLIMB OVER EACH OTHER TO ORGANIZE...OF COURSE KEEPING COACH IN THE LOOP WITH THEIR HEROIC EFFORTS...MAYBE JOHNNY OR JANEY WILL BE FAVORED. shocked


Sounds like Connetquot....what a joke !!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are coaches that don't account for the money they collect. Fact


You should call your HS AD and discuss it .


Most of the AD's have no clue what is going on. They don't realize that the coaches are strong arming the players into paying them hundreds of dollars to be on there summer teams or paying hundreds of dollars for off season illegal team practices.


Let us know how you make out with the AD or how the BOE meeting goes when you blow the whistle on them.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are coaches that don't account for the money they collect. Fact


You should call your HS AD and discuss it .


Most of the AD's have no clue what is going on. They don't realize that the coaches are strong arming the players into paying them hundreds of dollars to be on there summer teams or paying hundreds of dollars for off season illegal team practices.


Let us know how you make out with the AD or how the BOE meeting goes when you blow the whistle on them.


Is this what happened at Smithtown? bold
Our school just started a booster club. I am at a loss for what the funds go for? Seems like we did fine always winning without a club for many years. Is this a way for parents to influence the coach?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Our school just started a booster club. I am at a loss for what the funds go for? Seems like we did fine always winning without a club for many years. Is this a way for parents to influence the coach?


Same here. It's a joke. On top of that the program is horrible. Spending lots of money for nothing, yet parents go along with it because they are fearful that the Booster Club will influence the Coach to cut the kids from the HS Team that do not participate.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Our school just started a booster club. I am at a loss for what the funds go for? Seems like we did fine always winning without a club for many years. Is this a way for parents to influence the coach?


The booster club does important things for your program. It pays for senior day which includes dinner for all. It pays for the end of the year awards dinner. It will pay for a hired person to do the book for stats . It will pay for scouting tapes of opponents. It will also distribute the remaining balance at the end of the year back to the seniors as scholarships. If you make it to counties of states the booster club will pay for the tailgate party and any of the extra expenses that come up. All of this adds up to thousands of dollars. If your town is starting a booster club get involved and volunteer I am sure they would be happy to have your help. Ask questions. At our booster meetings there is a bank statement on the table for all to see and a annual spread sheet itemizing all expenses telling everyone where every dime went. If the booster club is not providing you with access to all of that then they are up to something.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Our school just started a booster club. I am at a loss for what the funds go for? Seems like we did fine always winning without a club for many years. Is this a way for parents to influence the coach?


The booster club does important things for your program. It pays for senior day which includes dinner for all. It pays for the end of the year awards dinner. It will pay for a hired person to do the book for stats . It will pay for scouting tapes of opponents. It will also distribute the remaining balance at the end of the year back to the seniors as scholarships. If you make it to counties of states the booster club will pay for the tailgate party and any of the extra expenses that come up. All of this adds up to thousands of dollars. If your town is starting a booster club get involved and volunteer I am sure they would be happy to have your help. Ask questions. At our booster meetings there is a bank statement on the table for all to see and a annual spread sheet itemizing all expenses telling everyone where every dime went. If the booster club is not providing you with access to all of that then they are up to something.


The booster club will also make sure that when outside contracts need to be handled they will be with booster club officials - wink, wink - so the officials can make money off of their neighbors.
What kind of contracts are you talking about?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What kind of contracts are you talking about?


Facility improvements.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What kind of contracts are you talking about?


Facility improvements.


at the very least they would/could know the most reasonable/lowest bid and have an upper hand on the process.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Our school just started a booster club. I am at a loss for what the funds go for? Seems like we did fine always winning without a club for many years. Is this a way for parents to influence the coach?


The booster club does important things for your program. It pays for senior day which includes dinner for all. It pays for the end of the year awards dinner. It will pay for a hired person to do the book for stats . It will pay for scouting tapes of opponents. It will also distribute the remaining balance at the end of the year back to the seniors as scholarships. If you make it to counties of states the booster club will pay for the tailgate party and any of the extra expenses that come up. All of this adds up to thousands of dollars. If your town is starting a booster club get involved and volunteer I am sure they would be happy to have your help. Ask questions. At our booster meetings there is a bank statement on the table for all to see and a annual spread sheet itemizing all expenses telling everyone where every dime went. If the booster club is not providing you with access to all of that then they are up to something.


Almost everything you mentioned the parents in my town pay for out of there pockets. There is no statement of where the fund raising money goes and not a penny has every been given to a senior for scholarship. My gut tells me way more of the towns operate closer to mine than to the above posters fantasy scenario.
Not a fantasy senerio I am the booster club president and I am the above poster. If there is no transparency in your BC then something is going on.
pretty sure my school doesn't give out any scholarship either....no way..
the so called Booster club (fund collected from each member of team) does however buy wonderful gifts for Head Coach and several assistants. these are paid school district employees, parents should not feel compelled to pay for a end of season bonus. http://www.backofthecage.com/images/icons/default_dark/cool.gif
"on behalf of my son and the rest of the team, please accept this cash gift"
Well, it's not like that at my school, gifts for coaches and so forth. Our booster club bought commerorative rings for any athlete who made it upstate for States, all sports. We bought a scoring table for soccer, field hockey and lacrosse to share. We but those items the athletic budget won't accommodate but that would improve the team's experience.

The booster club also has funded a sport-specific camp for a kid who was practically homeless, and I'm proud to say he did the school justice and it made a big difference in that kid's life. Money well spent.
Originally Posted by Powderfinger
Well, it's not like that at my school, gifts for coaches and so forth. Our booster club bought commerorative rings for any athlete who made it upstate for States, all sports. We bought a scoring table for soccer, field hockey and lacrosse to share. We but those items the athletic budget won't accommodate but that would improve the team's experience.

The booster club also has funded a sport-specific camp for a kid who was practically homeless, and I'm proud to say he did the school justice and it made a big difference in that kid's life. Money well spent.


Sounds like a great Booster Club!!
booster club pays for volunteer coaches who just happens to work for the HC with summer teams
There are rules for booster clubs and how they distribute and account for their funds. 501(c)(3) booster clubs report at public meetings required to be held throughout the year. Those meetings are the time to ask your specified board or President questions.

Most booster clubs work hard and help their schools student athletes. You should reach out to the Massapequa booster club to inform them of your concerns. If of course that's where your from...just a guess.
Originally Posted by The Hop
There are rules for booster clubs and how they distribute and account for their funds. 501(c)(3) booster clubs report at public meetings required to be held throughout the year. Those meetings are the time to ask your specified board or President questions.

Most booster clubs work hard and help their schools student athletes. You should reach out to the Massapequa booster club to inform them of your concerns. If of course that's where your from...just a guess.
Is it me or is the Hop the worst moderator. If the poster wanted to let people know what town they were from he/she would have stated it . For the Hop to state what town the poster was from is at least negligible. We all know he will try to white wash it by saying he just guessed where the poster was from, but through his own bragging about having the power to know where every post comes from, we can assume this to not be true. He also "stirred the pot" on a different thread about a story that had either run it''s course, or was resolved, Why? not enough drama on this site? The story started and ended before he was named moderator, why stir this up again?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by The Hop
There are rules for booster clubs and how they distribute and account for their funds. 501(c)(3) booster clubs report at public meetings required to be held throughout the year. Those meetings are the time to ask your specified board or President questions.

Most booster clubs work hard and help their schools student athletes. You should reach out to the Massapequa booster club to inform them of your concerns. If of course that's where your from...just a guess.
Is it me or is the Hop the worst moderator. If the poster wanted to let people know what town they were from he/she would have stated it . For the Hop to state what town the poster was from is at least negligible. We all know he will try to white wash it by saying he just guessed where the poster was from, but through his own bragging about having the power to know where every post comes from, we can assume this to not be true. He also "stirred the pot" on a different thread about a story that had either run it''s course, or was resolved, Why? not enough drama on this site? The story started and ended before he was named moderator, why stir this up again?


I'm glad he's paying attention. It stops you from trying to argue with yourselves and trying to start trouble by responding to your own posts.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by The Hop
There are rules for booster clubs and how they distribute and account for their funds. 501(c)(3) booster clubs report at public meetings required to be held throughout the year. Those meetings are the time to ask your specified board or President questions.

Most booster clubs work hard and help their schools student athletes. You should reach out to the Massapequa booster club to inform them of your concerns. If of course that's where your from...just a guess.
Is it me or is the Hop the worst moderator. If the poster wanted to let people know what town they were from he/she would have stated it . For the Hop to state what town the poster was from is at least negligible. We all know he will try to white wash it by saying he just guessed where the poster was from, but through his own bragging about having the power to know where every post comes from, we can assume this to not be true. He also "stirred the pot" on a different thread about a story that had either run it''s course, or was resolved, Why? not enough drama on this site? The story started and ended before he was named moderator, why stir this up again?



Oh I see. Your the only one with an opinion here? I applaud Hop for moderating and keeping things straight. Btw how do you know Hop is a HE? You presume to know so many things and post them as FACT. That's why the moderator calls people like you out. And so what if a topic was brought up! That's what this site is for...discussion. You should try it some day!
Anybody hear about Curt Shilling and the net with his family
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by The Hop
There are rules for booster clubs and how they distribute and account for their funds. 501(c)(3) booster clubs report at public meetings required to be held throughout the year. Those meetings are the time to ask your specified board or President questions.

Most booster clubs work hard and help their schools student athletes. You should reach out to the Massapequa booster club to inform them of your concerns. If of course that's where your from...just a guess.
Is it me or is the Hop the worst moderator. If the poster wanted to let people know what town they were from he/she would have stated it . For the Hop to state what town the poster was from is at least negligible. We all know he will try to white wash it by saying he just guessed where the poster was from, but through his own bragging about having the power to know where every post comes from, we can assume this to not be true. He also "stirred the pot" on a different thread about a story that had either run it''s course, or was resolved, Why? not enough drama on this site? The story started and ended before he was named moderator, why stir this up again?


This poster is still pissed at my comment that the Hofstra Womens team had a good showing against #1 Maryland. Not sure why but oh well.
Also, apparently this poster doesn't want a discussion to continue about Maryland based Madlax boys lax club in the Cabell Maddux thread. Just an opinionated person who has to try and create controversy with confrontation. That's ok. There are a lot of opinions on BOTC. Some fact based, some emotional and some completely fictional. We welcome them all and our team of moderators will call out the posters that deserve it.
Remember to register. It's free and opens some cool options to you. You will remain as anonymous as you choose. Same as you are now!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by The Hop
There are rules for booster clubs and how they distribute and account for their funds. 501(c)(3) booster clubs report at public meetings required to be held throughout the year. Those meetings are the time to ask your specified board or President questions.

Most booster clubs work hard and help their schools student athletes. You should reach out to the Massapequa booster club to inform them of your concerns. If of course that's where your from...just a guess.
Is it me or is the Hop the worst moderator. If the poster wanted to let people know what town they were from he/she would have stated it . For the Hop to state what town the poster was from is at least negligible. We all know he will try to white wash it by saying he just guessed where the poster was from, but through his own bragging about having the power to know where every post comes from, we can assume this to not be true. He also "stirred the pot" on a different thread about a story that had either run it''s course, or was resolved, Why? not enough drama on this site? The story started and ended before he was named moderator, why stir this up again?


"For the Hop to state what town the poster was from is at least negligible." What does that even mean?? I think the word you're searching for is negligent. Look it up.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
booster club pays for volunteer coaches who just happens to work for the HC with summer teams


I have heard it is not unheard of for volunteer assistants to be paid by the booster club. Who cares as long as the kids benefit from it.
Wake up. It is a major conflict of interest.
This conflict playing out as advertised. You need to pay the coach to play for the coach.
$950 SACHEM NORTH THIEVES!!!! That's $950 a player. and there's SSC underling coaches at the varsity coaches knees like minions making sure goes well. highway robbery. for a handful of tournaments definitely a conflict of interest. 950 kid times probably 17-20 kids. Lmfao. and people are dumb enough to pay that. those coaches will be high giving at the high stakes table in Atlantic city with your money or buying themselves a new car
You should see the $ paid for the Commack HS coaches travel team. It's more than ssc, and you get nothing for it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
$950 SACHEM NORTH THIEVES!!!! That's $950 a player. and there's SSC underling coaches at the varsity coaches knees like minions making sure goes well. highway robbery. for a handful of tournaments definitely a conflict of interest. 950 kid times probably 17-20 kids. Lmfao. and people are dumb enough to pay that. those coaches will be high giving at the high stakes table in Atlantic city with your money or buying themselves a new car


You have no idea what you are talking about.
Do you even know how much it costs per team to enter a tournament?
How much does insurance cost?
Uniforms?
Travel expenses for coaches to go to away tournaments?
If you think anyone is getting rich off of $ 950 a kid for 5 tournaments you dont have a clue.
If you think they are ripping you off go join the Express or 91 and pay $2500 plus.
I wish my town only charge $950...our school coaches charge another $600 with 3 goalies on one team and 4 on another...oh yeah they also have a tourn. Scheduled at our school this year...they have created some business for themselves
Originally Posted by Anonymous
$950 SACHEM NORTH THIEVES!!!! That's $950 a player. and there's SSC underling coaches at the varsity coaches knees like minions making sure goes well. highway robbery. for a handful of tournaments definitely a conflict of interest. 950 kid times probably 17-20 kids. Lmfao. and people are dumb enough to pay that. those coaches will be high giving at the high stakes table in Atlantic city with your money or buying themselves a new car


Do they get more playing time on varsity?
Originally Posted by Sachem North LAX
Originally Posted by Anonymous
$950 SACHEM NORTH THIEVES!!!! That's $950 a player. and there's SSC underling coaches at the varsity coaches knees like minions making sure goes well. highway robbery. for a handful of tournaments definitely a conflict of interest. 950 kid times probably 17-20 kids. Lmfao. and people are dumb enough to pay that. those coaches will be high giving at the high stakes table in Atlantic city with your money or buying themselves a new car


You have no idea what you are talking about.
Do you even know how much it costs per team to enter a tournament?
How much does insurance cost?
Uniforms?
Travel expenses for coaches to go to away tournaments?
If you think anyone is getting rich off of $ 950 a kid for 5 tournaments you dont have a clue.
If you think they are ripping you off go join the Express or 91 and pay $2500 plus.
tournament: max 1500x5= 7500 (and that's stretching it... ALOT! Insurance: $25.00/player = $250.00 uniforms: fully sublimated: $100.00/uniform: $2000.00. Travel expenses for coaches????? I guess around 10 grand. But again $1500/tourney is estimating high.... Please if I'm wrong let me know!!!! And if you paid higher for anything you got ripped off
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Sachem North LAX
Originally Posted by Anonymous
$950 SACHEM NORTH THIEVES!!!! That's $950 a player. and there's SSC underling coaches at the varsity coaches knees like minions making sure goes well. highway robbery. for a handful of tournaments definitely a conflict of interest. 950 kid times probably 17-20 kids. Lmfao. and people are dumb enough to pay that. those coaches will be high giving at the high stakes table in Atlantic city with your money or buying themselves a new car


You have no idea what you are talking about.
Do you even know how much it costs per team to enter a tournament?
How much does insurance cost?
Uniforms?
Travel expenses for coaches to go to away tournaments?
If you think anyone is getting rich off of $ 950 a kid for 5 tournaments you dont have a clue.
If you think they are ripping you off go join the Express or 91 and pay $2500 plus.
tournament: max 1500x5= 7500 (and that's stretching it... ALOT! Insurance: $25.00/player = $250.00 uniforms: fully sublimated: $100.00/uniform: $2000.00. Travel expenses for coaches????? I guess around 10 grand. But again $1500/tourney is estimating high.... Please if I'm wrong let me know!!!! And if you paid higher for anything you got ripped off


Cost is not the issue. It is a clear conflict of interest.
nah I'll just wait till my kid tries out for sachem's school team. do that math
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Sachem North LAX
Originally Posted by Anonymous
$950 SACHEM NORTH THIEVES!!!! That's $950 a player. and there's SSC underling coaches at the varsity coaches knees like minions making sure goes well. highway robbery. for a handful of tournaments definitely a conflict of interest. 950 kid times probably 17-20 kids. Lmfao. and people are dumb enough to pay that. those coaches will be high giving at the high stakes table in Atlantic city with your money or buying themselves a new car


You have no idea what you are talking about.
Do you even know how much it costs per team to enter a tournament?
How much does insurance cost?
Uniforms?
Travel expenses for coaches to go to away tournaments?
If you think anyone is getting rich off of $ 950 a kid for 5 tournaments you dont have a clue.
If you think they are ripping you off go join the Express or 91 and pay $2500 plus.
tournament: max 1500x5= 7500 (and that's stretching it... ALOT! Insurance: $25.00/player = $250.00 uniforms: fully sublimated: $100.00/uniform: $2000.00. Travel expenses for coaches????? I guess around 10 grand. But again $1500/tourney is estimating high.... Please if I'm wrong let me know!!!! And if you paid higher for anything you got ripped off


I am not going to debate number with you on a bulletin board.
You seem so bitter about something that I don't think it would make a difference what I showed you anyway.
Reading the other posts here it seems that many people think that $ 950 would be a bargain and I agree with them.
If you think you are being ripped off as you said there are many club teams you can go to and pay at least double that so go for it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Sachem North LAX
Originally Posted by Anonymous
$950 SACHEM NORTH THIEVES!!!! That's $950 a player. and there's SSC underling coaches at the varsity coaches knees like minions making sure goes well. highway robbery. for a handful of tournaments definitely a conflict of interest. 950 kid times probably 17-20 kids. Lmfao. and people are dumb enough to pay that. those coaches will be high giving at the high stakes table in Atlantic city with your money or buying themselves a new car


Only a conflict if they are telling ids they MUST play for them in summer or will not play varsity in spring. Which is not the case. They have a sophomore this year that started on varsity and does not play summer with them. The best kids will play in the spring. Doesn't matter where they play summer.

You have no idea what you are talking about.
Do you even know how much it costs per team to enter a tournament?
How much does insurance cost?
Uniforms?
Travel expenses for coaches to go to away tournaments?
If you think anyone is getting rich off of $ 950 a kid for 5 tournaments you dont have a clue.
If you think they are ripping you off go join the Express or 91 and pay $2500 plus.
tournament: max 1500x5= 7500 (and that's stretching it... ALOT! Insurance: $25.00/player = $250.00 uniforms: fully sublimated: $100.00/uniform: $2000.00. Travel expenses for coaches????? I guess around 10 grand. But again $1500/tourney is estimating high.... Please if I'm wrong let me know!!!! And if you paid higher for anything you got ripped off


Cost is not the issue. It is a clear conflict of interest.
Originally Posted by Sachem North LAX
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Sachem North LAX
Originally Posted by Anonymous
$950 SACHEM NORTH THIEVES!!!! That's $950 a player. and there's SSC underling coaches at the varsity coaches knees like minions making sure goes well. highway robbery. for a handful of tournaments definitely a conflict of interest. 950 kid times probably 17-20 kids. Lmfao. and people are dumb enough to pay that. those coaches will be high giving at the high stakes table in Atlantic city with your money or buying themselves a new car


Only a conflict if they are telling ids they MUST play for them in summer or will not play varsity in spring. Which is not the case. They have a sophomore this year that started on varsity and does not play summer with them. The best kids will play in the spring. Doesn't matter where they play summer.

You have no idea what you are talking about.
Do you even know how much it costs per team to enter a tournament?
How much does insurance cost?
Uniforms?
Travel expenses for coaches to go to away tournaments?
If you think anyone is getting rich off of $ 950 a kid for 5 tournaments you dont have a clue.
If you think they are ripping you off go join the Express or 91 and pay $2500 plus.
tournament: max 1500x5= 7500 (and that's stretching it... ALOT! Insurance: $25.00/player = $250.00 uniforms: fully sublimated: $100.00/uniform: $2000.00. Travel expenses for coaches????? I guess around 10 grand. But again $1500/tourney is estimating high.... Please if I'm wrong let me know!!!! And if you paid higher for anything you got ripped off


Cost is not the issue. It is a clear conflict of interest.


I am not involved with Sachem but I am a coach. I coach both at the high school level and the club level. I am qualified and certified. I do not see the conflict at these numbers.

The high school coach gets paid from march to may. After may his paid position is over. However if you want a successful program, there must be a continuation of playing together. Who should keep the kids together? Who should build the continuity to the HS program? A father who may or may not be a coach? A father who may or may not have a vested interest in his own son? or the HS staff who wants to keep the school program and the kids coming to his program in the future playing together?

Oh, I get it, because he wants to build a program he should do it for free? He just finished a varsity season with six days a week plus film study and planning. He scouted games that were coming up etc.... Now, he should leave his own kids and or wife or family or fishing or whatever else he may enjoy during his summer to coach your kid for free. He offers no value and should be so generous as to donate another couple of hundred hours to your son so there is no conflict of interest.

Maybe you would rather he took a position for Express or Fill in the blank club where he has no worries about parents or kids interfering with his actual livelihood because little johnny should be the starting attackman instead of # 4.

But then I bet there would be the accusation that if you dont pay to play for him at such and such club you will be punished. So I guess he is in a no win situation isnt he. How dare him want to coach in the community his team comes from!

If you are uncomfortable, don't play for him. Go play for Igloo and spend $3500.
conflict of interest for sure wake up sachem
Parents need to get lives
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Parents need to get lives


couldn't agree more! can you parents just stop trying to protect your children from being exploited! the coaches have worked very hard to put your children in this position, just pay up and don't you dare take them to a competing summer program or we won't help them get recruited and will def take varsity playing time away.
yup what a jerk off that's I needed to hear...because a kid doesn't play on the schools summer tournament team and dump money in your pockets then no matter how good the kid.is when he comes out for varsity you'll bench him!?!? you my man are a [lacrosse] jerk off!! that's all I wanted to hear. I knew it. punk coward high ache lacrosse coaches threatening 6th and 7th graders with varsity playing time if they don't sign up for your pay as you play rising 7th and 8th grade programs. coward!! what school do u coach at coward. criminal
wouldn't spend $3500 either bozo
no u need to get a job coach coward. robbing people. bet u get the kids on that team
nah coach I got one better if the community respects your program enough they'll play for u when they get to high school. or heres another I'm a coach I have a job with long hours just like you......guess what tough Tony I coach the same kids you do for free. and yeah we go to the same tournaments you do each summer. and I love it. I live for it. I can't wait to get outta work after getting up 3:30 am. the last thing on my my mind when I'm driving home is getting paid to coach you puttz. I wouldn't dream of it. we take 25 or 50 a player to pay for each tournament but that's it. I bought uniforms out of my pocket chief. and yeah here's another thing......I'm married too....three kids. we fish. go away. we do all that. coaching lacrosse never interferes. guess what else I do.....coach football .....no charge. so yeah the blow hard varsity coach that "wants to keep the kids in his community playing together ([lacrosse]) yeah do it cuz u love it not for money. tell your wife if she don't like what you're doing then pack up.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
yup what a jerk off that's I needed to hear...because a kid doesn't play on the schools summer tournament team and dump money in your pockets then no matter how good the kid.is when he comes out for varsity you'll bench him!?!? you my man are a [lacrosse] jerk off!! that's all I wanted to hear. I knew it. punk coward high ache lacrosse coaches threatening 6th and 7th graders with varsity playing time if they don't sign up for your pay as you play rising 7th and 8th grade programs. coward!! what school do u coach at coward. criminal


Hello.... You are responding to someone being sarcastic ( that means the previous post agrees with you!) can't you read?
Omg what is going on here? Almost every town HS that I know of has some sort of a summer program.Most have cut down the number of tournaments and added a night league because many players are on travel teams that are year round. Of course the HS coaches will coach the team, Why would anyone want someone else? they work on the plays continue to get to know the upcoming players and have a vested interest in them and care about them as student athletes. The team grows together and hopefully gets better! it's a no brainer! sorry but Rabil is working in the summer with the Thompson brothers.
Hooray Finally Well Said... Thank you ...for the love of the game and for the kids that is why coaches coach!!!
umm who's to say those coaches will still be there when the kid gets to hs nerdy lacrosse dad
Tourney costs increase almost every year - some tourneys are now running in the range between $2500-$5500 dependent upon "exposure"...........fl$ in 3D = $5500

that's why I coach cuz love to
it is a conflict.
You parents started this mess. Demanded Little Johnny get better coaching than the PAL could offer in order to get a scholarship LOL. The Travel teams formed and were more than happy to take your money, laughing all the way to the bank. If there was no demand there wouldn't be 35 travel teams. Then some towns pushed back demanding that you stay with the town program (HS) or not play on varsity. Boo Hoo. These travel teams are a joke. You know how many 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and even 5th grade prodigies are no longer playing lacrosse? More than the travel teams would like to admit. But they will fill a demand. If parents want a college coach to coach their kindergartener, for the right price it will be offered. Hopefully, in 20 years when we look back at all of this nonsence, (2nd grade travel teams,9th graders committing to Hopkins) we will ask what the [lacrosse] were we thinking and go back to some level of common sense!
Or your other option is attend a high school where they offer no summer play at all, the team never progresses, you cant' have it both ways. Try and compete against the schools that do offer it, let me tell you it isn't pretty.

Take it from someone who lives in a district that offers zilch. You are lucky you at least have an option to pay.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You parents started this mess. Demanded Little Johnny get better coaching than the PAL could offer in order to get a scholarship LOL. The Travel teams formed and were more than happy to take your money, laughing all the way to the bank. If there was no demand there wouldn't be 35 travel teams. Then some towns pushed back demanding that you stay with the town program (HS) or not play on varsity. Boo Hoo. These travel teams are a joke. You know how many 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and even 5th grade prodigies are no longer playing lacrosse? More than the travel teams would like to admit. But they will fill a demand. If parents want a college coach to coach their kindergartener, for the right price it will be offered. Hopefully, in 20 years when we look back at all of this nonsence, (2nd grade travel teams,9th graders committing to Hopkins) we will ask what the [lacrosse] were we thinking and go back to some level of common sense!


Hooray...someone who gets it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You parents started this mess. Demanded Little Johnny get better coaching than the PAL could offer in order to get a scholarship LOL. The Travel teams formed and were more than happy to take your money, laughing all the way to the bank. If there was no demand there wouldn't be 35 travel teams. Then some towns pushed back demanding that you stay with the town program (HS) or not play on varsity. Boo Hoo. These travel teams are a joke. You know how many 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and even 5th grade prodigies are no longer playing lacrosse? More than the travel teams would like to admit. But they will fill a demand. If parents want a college coach to coach their kindergartener, for the right price it will be offered. Hopefully, in 20 years when we look back at all of this nonsence, (2nd grade travel teams,9th graders committing to Hopkins) we will ask what the [lacrosse] were we thinking and go back to some level of common sense!


My son benefited from the current system. He became a much better player and was a very early recruit. He is doing well in school and is enjoying high school. I am the first to admit though, that the system does not do well for the vast majority of the kids. My sense is that the sport will begin a slow decline as many parents will come to their senses and stop funding the insanity. I also believe the college coaches will start coming to their senses in the next couple of years as well.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You parents started this mess. Demanded Little Johnny get better coaching than the PAL could offer in order to get a scholarship LOL. The Travel teams formed and were more than happy to take your money, laughing all the way to the bank. If there was no demand there wouldn't be 35 travel teams. Then some towns pushed back demanding that you stay with the town program (HS) or not play on varsity. Boo Hoo. These travel teams are a joke. You know how many 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and even 5th grade prodigies are no longer playing lacrosse? More than the travel teams would like to admit. But they will fill a demand. If parents want a college coach to coach their kindergartener, for the right price it will be offered. Hopefully, in 20 years when we look back at all of this nonsence, (2nd grade travel teams,9th graders committing to Hopkins) we will ask what the [lacrosse] were we thinking and go back to some level of common sense!


Hooray...someone who gets it.


Don't think so.

You parents?? Are you not a parent? Who then?

Yes, some parents want better coaching then what is offered by a handful of self appointed parents who control the local youth league. They also want their child to compete with the best.

Few if any parents on my sons team are fixated on an athletic scholarship.

Now, High School coaches are in the business of making money of the local kids. However, instead of competing in the free market coercion is used to force families to pay to play. Are the HS coaches who engage in this practice not laughing all the way to the bank?

You apparently believe this to be acceptable: "Then some towns pushed back demanding that that you stay with the town (HS) program or not play varsity." Really, that is acceptable? How about 4th graders being told they cant play on their town team if they also want to play for a club team? is that acceptable as well?

"These Travel Teams are a Joke." Really? Tell that to all of the kids that have played on them over the years. Go check and see who the top kids to come off the Island in recent years are. You will find that the large majority of them all played club ball growing up. They play club to help in their development as a player. Club lacrosse is played in addition to HS / Town lacrosse not in place of it.

There will be five times the amount of college coaches watching 2018 games between 91, Dukes, Crabs, Laxachusetts, Express, Madlax etc.. than their was watching the Long Island Championship Games. Tell the college coaches not to go because its a joke.

So, only 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th grade boys who play for Club Teams stop playing lacrosse as they get older? All of the little super stars who "only play town/PAL" go on to be HS and college players? None of the town/PAL only kids hang it up?

Is it a bad thing to have a good coach work with young kids? If I could have had a college coach work with my kids when they were young I would have been very happy.

I am happy for any 9th grader who has the opportunity to commit to Hopkins.

Lacrosse is not alone, just about every sport has travel / elite clubs. Wrestling, Baseball, Basketball, Swimming, Track, Tennis, Volleyball, Gymnastics etc...
It is the exception not the rule that an athlete will reach their full potential by playing only locally.

However, in most cases if you are not on one of the Top Travel Teams there is no advantage over Town/PAL.

Enjoy watching your child play wherever that may be. Do what is best for your child and do not let others dictate where your child can play.


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You parents started this mess. Demanded Little Johnny get better coaching than the PAL could offer in order to get a scholarship LOL. The Travel teams formed and were more than happy to take your money, laughing all the way to the bank. If there was no demand there wouldn't be 35 travel teams. Then some towns pushed back demanding that you stay with the town program (HS) or not play on varsity. Boo Hoo. These travel teams are a joke. You know how many 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and even 5th grade prodigies are no longer playing lacrosse? More than the travel teams would like to admit. But they will fill a demand. If parents want a college coach to coach their kindergartener, for the right price it will be offered. Hopefully, in 20 years when we look back at all of this nonsence, (2nd grade travel teams,9th graders committing to Hopkins) we will ask what the [lacrosse] were we thinking and go back to some level of common sense!


Hooray...someone who gets it.


Don't think so.

You parents?? Are you not a parent? Who then?

Yes, some parents want better coaching then what is offered by a handful of self appointed parents who control the local youth league. They also want their child to compete with the best.

Few if any parents on my sons team are fixated on an athletic scholarship.

Now, High School coaches are in the business of making money of the local kids. However, instead of competing in the free market coercion is used to force families to pay to play. Are the HS coaches who engage in this practice not laughing all the way to the bank?

You apparently believe this to be acceptable: "Then some towns pushed back demanding that that you stay with the town (HS) program or not play varsity." Really, that is acceptable? How about 4th graders being told they cant play on their town team if they also want to play for a club team? is that acceptable as well?

"These Travel Teams are a Joke." Really? Tell that to all of the kids that have played on them over the years. Go check and see who the top kids to come off the Island in recent years are. You will find that the large majority of them all played club ball growing up. They play club to help in their development as a player. Club lacrosse is played in addition to HS / Town lacrosse not in place of it.

There will be five times the amount of college coaches watching 2018 games between 91, Dukes, Crabs, Laxachusetts, Express, Madlax etc.. than their was watching the Long Island Championship Games. Tell the college coaches not to go because its a joke.

So, only 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th grade boys who play for Club Teams stop playing lacrosse as they get older? All of the little super stars who "only play town/PAL" go on to be HS and college players? None of the town/PAL only kids hang it up?

Is it a bad thing to have a good coach work with young kids? If I could have had a college coach work with my kids when they were young I would have been very happy.

I am happy for any 9th grader who has the opportunity to commit to Hopkins.

Lacrosse is not alone, just about every sport has travel / elite clubs. Wrestling, Baseball, Basketball, Swimming, Track, Tennis, Volleyball, Gymnastics etc...
It is the exception not the rule that an athlete will reach their full potential by playing only locally.

However, in most cases if you are not on one of the Top Travel Teams there is no advantage over Town/PAL.

Enjoy watching your child play wherever that may be. Do what is best for your child and do not let others dictate where your child can play.





Well said. I for one agree.
for $20,000+ dollars paid into travel if you think little Johnny playing at D3 Plattsburgh State is a good ROI then have at it. Good athletes and players will always have a place to play regardless of the kool aid being distributed
what a ****. are you a college rating service?
hey I played at plattsburgh state. what's wrong with their lax program. hey listen at the end of the day when I hung my lacrosse stick up after my last game my senior year....pssst here's a secret....NONE OF.IT MATTERED!! I had a nice lacrosse career won some lost some. was all conference once. but no one cares after that. main thing was a graduated with a bachelor's degree. that's what matters in the end. last time I checked pro lax players were just barely cracking the 30k a year mark. that bachelor's degree helps because you need a real job.
The whole system is a total joke. Paying upwards of $20k for a travel team chasing a dream. Sure, does it benefit about 15% who get D1 scholarships? How about the parents whose kids are on the B,C,D teams? Wouldn't that $$ be better served paying for the first year's college tuition. And hooray for the 9th grader that commits to Hopkins? No freakin way! It hurts everyone else. It forces parents to push their kids to mature quicker than is natural. And you wonder why there are parents screaming like maniacs on the sideline of a 4th grade Team 91 game? Read this month's Inside Lacrosse on the poaching of players. I applaud Kevin Corrigan of Notre Dame. He plainly states he will not recruit 9th and 10th graders. Thank God. And he will continue to recruit the early commits of other teams when they become upperclassmen (ie Brian Willets). And Pietramala says he hates the system and recruiting freshmen, yet continues to do it. I pray his early commits change their minds and go elsewhere. We are pushing our children to mature earlier and earlier, the coaches complain about the system, and then perpetuate the same nonsense. As a disclaimer, I'm not only a parent, but a varsity coach and also coached a travel team.
YJ's had an 8th grader commit because its good for the YJ business model and her multi million dollar operation.

They gladly take your money whether you are team one or team five.

I am all for getting good training and learning the game but some kids will never ever be a D1 player regardless of what bumper sticker is on the car and how many personal lessons they sign up for. Parents need to come to grips with that
Great post!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The whole system is a total joke. Paying upwards of $20k for a travel team chasing a dream. Sure, does it benefit about 15% who get D1 scholarships? How about the parents whose kids are on the B,C,D teams? Wouldn't that $$ be better served paying for the first year's college tuition. And hooray for the 9th grader that commits to Hopkins? No freakin way! It hurts everyone else. It forces parents to push their kids to mature quicker than is natural. And you wonder why there are parents screaming like maniacs on the sideline of a 4th grade Team 91 game? Read this month's Inside Lacrosse on the poaching of players. I applaud Kevin Corrigan of Notre Dame. He plainly states he will not recruit 9th and 10th graders. Thank God. And he will continue to recruit the early commits of other teams when they become upperclassmen (ie Brian Willets). And Pietramala says he hates the system and recruiting freshmen, yet continues to do it. I pray his early commits change their minds and go elsewhere. We are pushing our children to mature earlier and earlier, the coaches complain about the system, and then perpetuate the same nonsense. As a disclaimer, I'm not only a parent, but a varsity coach and also coached a travel team.
Now take into account one student rarely gets a full ride, Usuauly they are split into halves or often even quarters. Schools do get inventive and along with alumni often make large cuts in price viable. The thing is if you make in as an athlete, scholarship or not they find ways to save you money but more important you get free tutors and the better teachers. That being said, th emoney spent probably has a less than return.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The whole system is a total joke. Paying upwards of $20k for a travel team chasing a dream. Sure, does it benefit about 15% who get D1 scholarships? How about the parents whose kids are on the B,C,D teams? Wouldn't that $$ be better served paying for the first year's college tuition. And hooray for the 9th grader that commits to Hopkins? No freakin way! It hurts everyone else. It forces parents to push their kids to mature quicker than is natural. And you wonder why there are parents screaming like maniacs on the sideline of a 4th grade Team 91 game? Read this month's Inside Lacrosse on the poaching of players. I applaud Kevin Corrigan of Notre Dame. He plainly states he will not recruit 9th and 10th graders. Thank God. And he will continue to recruit the early commits of other teams when they become upperclassmen (ie Brian Willets). And Pietramala says he hates the system and recruiting freshmen, yet continues to do it. I pray his early commits change their minds and go elsewhere. We are pushing our children to mature earlier and earlier, the coaches complain about the system, and then perpetuate the same nonsense. As a disclaimer, I'm not only a parent, but a varsity coach and also coached a travel team.


The cost to play lacrosse in my town is very close to that of many travel teams. If you play year round , hire paid coaches, pay for indoor time, fall league winter league etc.. on top of that parents send their kids to camps at a young age and as they get older to recruiting events / showcases.

- Town Lacrosse is not free.

- you say "committing early hurts all kids, it forces parents to push their kid to mature quicker than natural. "

I disagree, parents push their kids to study and get good grades so they can get into a good college. They want their kid to work hard in the classroom so they will have options when it is time to select a college. Hopefully the best school will help lead to a good job and a great career. The work ethic and study habits developed along the way will help to ensure that the child is prepared to lead a productive life.

"If Hopkins, Penn, North Carolina, or Virginia are willing to commit a 9th or 10th grader so be it". All great schools and chances are that most of the lacrosse players would not be accepted on their academic merits alone.

If your kid has an offer from Penn or Hopkins in the 9th grade but you want to hold out for Notre Dame thats your choice.

- Parent have been screaming on the sideline for years. They have been doing it long before 91 came along. Travel lacrosse has nothing to do with crazy parents. I have seen many parents at our towns youth games go way over the edge.

-Who cares if ND recruits committed kids? its good for everyone. more options. Some kids develop early some late. Some schools recruit early some don't, its their choice.

Work hard in the classroom and on the field. Play as many sports as you want. Play for a travel team if you want, don't play if you don't want to. It is your choice.

If your child develops early and has an opportunity to commit to a great school that you believe will be a good fit congratulations to you and your kid.

If your child develops later and is a top player i'm sure they will find a great school that is a great fit.

If an early commit to UNC gets recruited away by ND guess what? UNC now has a spot for a someone else.

do 8&9 year olds play with action figures anymore?? or are they playing lacrosse all year round and not allowed to be 8&9 anymore? I certainly am happy my childhood wasn't rushed. played three sports. excelled at lacrosse. we didn't have Jack [lacrosse] club teams though. just PAL. when that was over we moved on to the next season. the next sport. if there was club lax back then my dad wouldn't have paid for it. as much as he pushed us in sports, he always said each sport has its season. he would be thought these club coaches were crooks as he'd put it. all that being said.....there was no rush to grow up when I was a kid. had thousands of action figures played video games road bikes with my friends. and guess what I was a three time all county lax and football player in high school and played compettive division 2 lax in college and was a three year starter. so the club and bs and rushing the kids to grow up means zero in the end. if your kid is made for it he's made for it. don't stuff it down his throat. when it's done and it goes fast....it's just memories. the sticks, the cleats, they go up in the attic. u don't bring your lax accolades on job interviews
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The whole system is a total joke. Paying upwards of $20k for a travel team chasing a dream. Sure, does it benefit about 15% who get D1 scholarships? How about the parents whose kids are on the B,C,D teams? Wouldn't that $$ be better served paying for the first year's college tuition. And hooray for the 9th grader that commits to Hopkins? No freakin way! It hurts everyone else. It forces parents to push their kids to mature quicker than is natural. And you wonder why there are parents screaming like maniacs on the sideline of a 4th grade Team 91 game? Read this month's Inside Lacrosse on the poaching of players. I applaud Kevin Corrigan of Notre Dame. He plainly states he will not recruit 9th and 10th graders. Thank God. And he will continue to recruit the early commits of other teams when they become upperclassmen (ie Brian Willets). And Pietramala says he hates the system and recruiting freshmen, yet continues to do it. I pray his early commits change their minds and go elsewhere. We are pushing our children to mature earlier and earlier, the coaches complain about the system, and then perpetuate the same nonsense. As a disclaimer, I'm not only a parent, but a varsity coach and also coached a travel team.


Great post. Now as a varsity coach and a travel coach can you add your thoughts to what makes a varsity program better. A kid playing within the town/school club during summer or playing with the best players possible at the club level. In my opinion the right club situation is far better because it makes the kid better i.e. a better varsity player and raises the level of other players.
What everyone is missing is the national number is still just around 2% of varsity athletes that will get athletic money in college and then even fewer will be going to a top program.

Most if they play will be at a low D1, D2 or D3 with a big athletic award of $2,500 - $5,000 if the are lucky on a huge team roster of 50 players.

So the parents paying $5k+ a year to play on some clubs "C" team really need to have the facts about the ROI. There is still a much better ROI if you put the $5k into tutors to raise your child's grades and SAT scores. Lax is a great game but the travel business model is OUT OF CONTROL!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The whole system is a total joke. Paying upwards of $20k for a travel team chasing a dream. Sure, does it benefit about 15% who get D1 scholarships? How about the parents whose kids are on the B,C,D teams? Wouldn't that $$ be better served paying for the first year's college tuition. And hooray for the 9th grader that commits to Hopkins? No freakin way! It hurts everyone else. It forces parents to push their kids to mature quicker than is natural. And you wonder why there are parents screaming like maniacs on the sideline of a 4th grade Team 91 game? Read this month's Inside Lacrosse on the poaching of players. I applaud Kevin Corrigan of Notre Dame. He plainly states he will not recruit 9th and 10th graders. Thank God. And he will continue to recruit the early commits of other teams when they become upperclassmen (ie Brian Willets). And Pietramala says he hates the system and recruiting freshmen, yet continues to do it. I pray his early commits change their minds and go elsewhere. We are pushing our children to mature earlier and earlier, the coaches complain about the system, and then perpetuate the same nonsense. As a disclaimer, I'm not only a parent, but a varsity coach and also coached a travel team.


Great post. Now as a varsity coach and a travel coach can you add your thoughts to what makes a varsity program better. A kid playing within the town/school club during summer or playing with the best players possible at the club level. In my opinion the right club situation is far better because it makes the kid better i.e. a better varsity player and raises the level of other players.


Travel teams should have one elite team.It's the only team college coaches are going to watch anyway. These 2,3,4 other teams are a waste. The coaching is usually sub par done by college kids in flip flops that would rather be at the beach anyway. Are they going to teach your kids fundamentals? Ask yourself why they aren't on the "A"team. Not athletic enough? Work on that. Can't catch and throw. Get them on a wall. Travel practice isn't going to help that anyway. Should there be town loyalty? Absolutely. Unless they are going to private school these are the kids they are going to play with. I'm about common sense. Can't you see these travel organizations only really care about the teams they can put on their website as winning tournaments. The others are a waste of time. If you really want your kid who is not on the "A" team to get better, seek out private lessons (in a small group is more cost effective). That is more beneficial than your son watching the travel team run man up from the sidelines with a coach that is getting paid no matter how pitiful the practice.
harsh look at the truth. this post is so spot on its scary.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
do 8&9 year olds play with action figures anymore?? or are they playing lacrosse all year round and not allowed to be 8&9 anymore? I certainly am happy my childhood wasn't rushed. played three sports. excelled at lacrosse. we didn't have Jack [lacrosse] club teams though. just PAL. when that was over we moved on to the next season. the next sport. if there was club lax back then my dad wouldn't have paid for it. as much as he pushed us in sports, he always said each sport has its season. he would be thought these club coaches were crooks as he'd put it. all that being said.....there was no rush to grow up when I was a kid. had thousands of action figures played video games road bikes with my friends. and guess what I was a three time all county lax and football player in high school and played compettive division 2 lax in college and was a three year starter. so the club and bs and rushing the kids to grow up means zero in the end. if your kid is made for it he's made for it. don't stuff it down his throat. when it's done and it goes fast....it's just memories. the sticks, the cleats, they go up in the attic. u don't bring your lax accolades on job interviews


My 8 year old is required to be 10.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What everyone is missing is the national number is still just around 2% of varsity athletes that will get athletic money in college and then even fewer will be going to a top program.

Most if they play will be at a low D1, D2 or D3 with a big athletic award of $2,500 - $5,000 if the are lucky on a huge team roster of 50 players.

So the parents paying $5k+ a year to play on some clubs "C" team really need to have the facts about the ROI. There is still a much better ROI if you put the $5k into tutors to raise your child's grades and SAT scores. Lax is a great game but the travel business model is OUT OF CONTROL!


What is the value of the fun they have?
Your 8 year old is required to be ten? Lmao I'm gonna go ahead and assume that's a joke
If the NCAA prohibited recruiting a kid (verbal commitments) until 11th grade a lot of this nonsense would stop. Parents (trying to compete with each other) wouldn't be compelled to put their kid on a 3rd grade travel team, nor would they be in a speed school before they enter elementary school. There is plenty of blame to go around, but there is no incentive to stop it. The parents are paying, the coaches are collecting and the colleges are competing for kids before they even have hair on their legs. What a mess.
Even look at the UA tryouts next week. See the "coaches?" Yup, Chanenechuk, Breres, and Brennan. (Express, 91, and Outlaws). The travel teams have even infiltrated this. Now I'm sure our kids will get a fair "evaluation." LOL!!!!!!!!
The topic of the post is HS coaches having travel teams. We were in the situation this year. Every starter played for the travel team (which is a national operation) and although it is a public school kids who are out of the area are recruited to play, and are rewarded as freshmen with varsity spots and play time. Upperclassmen who played on other well-regarded club teams with college commitments sat on the sidelines while club kids, including freshmen played. It hurt team morale, even among kids on the coach's travel team, who wanted to win, and wanted the best players to play. Players and parents at other schools even commented about it and it was mentioned by an opposing team's head coach at his team banquet. At the end of the day the favoritism and tunnel vision of the coach hurt the team's prospects for post season. Kids who don't play for his club won't ever be eligible for state recognition because they are seldom on the field.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If the NCAA prohibited recruiting a kid (verbal commitments) until 11th grade a lot of this nonsense would stop. Parents (trying to compete with each other) wouldn't be compelled to put their kid on a 3rd grade travel team, nor would they be in a speed school before they enter elementary school. There is plenty of blame to go around, but there is no incentive to stop it. The parents are paying, the coaches are collecting and the colleges are competing for kids before they even have hair on their legs. What a mess.


There were crazy parents, "A" and "B" teams, travel teams, manipulative [lacrosse] kissing parents, daddy coaches, good coaches, bad coaches, and self serving parents controlling youth programs long before the first 9th or 10th grader verbally committed to Virginia, Hopkins, UNC, Penn or Cornell.

YJ's want you to commit in 8th grade if you can. So to do that you need to be playing in Kindergarten. Used to be you joined a club team in middle school or later for a year a two to play summers and see some coaches.

Clubs are the big winners. You cant tell me any college coach wants to lock up a 8th or 9th grader with 4 or 5 years of uncertainty ahead of them.

Lacrosse is the only sport with a truly toxic sideline because of the race to verbally commit. IMO it has wrecked a GREAT team game
Your all crazy, every sport that offers money has early recruiting...The only difference is that other sports continue to recruit kids that have already verballed, thus making the verbal meaningless. That is exactly what will happen in lax over time.

If you don't like the club scene, don't try out and play PAL. Stop telling us the world of pain clubs have caused and don't tell me what a mistake I made by having my 9th grader commit verbally.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is the wrong choice for me. open your mind and think--different strokes for different folks--not exactly the black plague.

My kid plays 2 different sport, because he loves to play, and yes, he also gets great grades. Football in football season, lax is pretty much all year round.

Having a great time with club teamates--if I am willing to spend the time and $, why do you care?
I love it early recruiting. listen guys my son played in college and in the pro ranks for two years. in which he.lived at home while playing "pro." couldn't afford to take his girlfriend out. so he gave it up and got a real job. stop w the early recruiting. let me know when lax players Start making millions
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I love it early recruiting. listen guys my son played in college and in the pro ranks for two years. in which he.lived at home while playing "pro." couldn't afford to take his girlfriend out. so he gave it up and got a real job. stop w the early recruiting. let me know when lax players Start making millions


Lots of them do, but it's on Wall St>
Originally Posted by Anonymous
YJ's want you to commit in 8th grade if you can. So to do that you need to be playing in Kindergarten. Used to be you joined a club team in middle school or later for a year a two to play summers and see some coaches.

Clubs are the big winners. You cant tell me any college coach wants to lock up a 8th or 9th grader with 4 or 5 years of uncertainty ahead of them.

Lacrosse is the only sport with a truly toxic sideline because of the race to verbally commit. IMO it has wrecked a GREAT team game


They scout young kids in every sport.

"Lacrosse is the only sport with a toxic sideline" - I don't think so.

I can tell you that college coaches want to lock up (some) 9th graders because they do it. If they didn't want to do it they would not do it. In any event, it is a small number of 9th graders who commit. Just about all of the early commits at Top 20 programs were recruited by multiple schools. The top programs fight for the same players.

The top college coaches at the top college programs identify the top players and they absolutely want to commit the top players.

The problem this sport has is that many of the parents are used to getting their way. Many of the parents can't understand why another child is being recruited by Duke and their kid is not. Many of the parents can not accurately asses their kids ability. They parade their kid around to every camp, clinic, showcase and tournament and try to sell their kid to a college coach. They send countless letters and emails boasting of their kids abilities on the field and in the classroom. They send highlight films. They ask the club director and or HS coach to call the college coaches. They send their kid to go talk to the coach after a camp or clinic.

It is part of the college coaches job to identify and recruit talent. If a college coach likes what they see when they watch a kid play they will reach out and initiate contact. The coach will tell you if they want you to be a part of their program. Have you ever been to a recruiting clinic or camp at a top school? Coaches make it their business to open a dialog with the players they are interested in. Don't get me wrong, the coaches want the player to be interested in the school as well, they do not want to waste their time on a player who has no interest in their school.

Just because the parents run around trying to get a top program to commit their kid does not mean the coach will do it. There are a lot of parents who want their kid to commit to a top school. However there are only a few spots to be had. The coaches drive the process. The coaches commit the players they want. If they do not get the players they want maybe then they will settle for someone else.

After the dust settles and the top 9th and 10th graders commit then coaches will look to fill any remaining spots if they did not get the players they wanted.

If you are not interested in one of the schools that "actively recruits" then I guess all of the other stuff works. I guess you can market a player to those schools. I do not think you can market a player to Maryland or North Carolina. I believe the top programs go after and recruit the players that they want.



Go to any school game, the club parents are in one corner and everyone else is together. You don't see that in any other sport. Everyone is so concerned with this commiting stuff that only affects a few yet it infects entire teams.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Your all crazy, every sport that offers money has early recruiting...The only difference is that other sports continue to recruit kids that have already verballed, thus making the verbal meaningless. That is exactly what will happen in lax over time.

If you don't like the club scene, don't try out and play PAL. Stop telling us the world of pain clubs have caused and don't tell me what a mistake I made by having my 9th grader commit verbally.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is the wrong choice for me. open your mind and think--different strokes for different folks--not exactly the black plague.

My kid plays 2 different sport, because he loves to play, and yes, he also gets great grades. Football in football season, lax is pretty much all year round.

Having a great time with club teamates--if I am willing to spend the time and $, why do you care?


What he said. Excellent post. I agree.

Thank you.
that is a good point about families using these out of state tourneys as vacations
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Go to any school game, the club parents are in one corner and everyone else is together. You don't see that in any other sport. Everyone is so concerned with this commiting stuff that only affects a few yet it infects entire teams.


Do any of the top lacrosse players on Long Island not play club lacrosse? How many kids are there who are playing varsity lacrosse on Long Island that do not play club lacrosse? At least at the stronger programs just about every kid plays club ball as well as HS lacrosse.

"Everyone is so concerned with this commiting stuff that only affects a few yet it infects entire teams." ??

If it only affects a few why does it infect the entire team? Is it because there are a lot of bitter, jealous, hateful people out there?

On Long Island, Lacrosse is different than every other sport in that just about all of the top players get recruited. The Top College Programs come to Long Island and recruit the Top Talent.

When you start seeing football coaches from Alabama, Texas, Ohio State and Oregon recruiting the top 50 or so kids off Long Island you will see just how crazy, hateful, jealous and bitter the football parents become.
In response to those with negative comments about summer travel lacrosse I will add my opinion from personal experience.

Club travel participation is a choice made by families that have a love of the game and a player who has some talent. There are many clubs with many different talent levels with many different summer schedules to fit any families preference.
If your choice is to not participate that's fine but a general statement damning those that do is ridiculous.
Many families see the summer travel tournaments as a family experience and an opportunity to travel to several states and often combine vacations and trips to theme parks as part of the excursions.
If a player excels and is seen by college coaches and recruited as a result of playing club ball then that's great and it does happen...often. If college recruiting does not happen then so what, the experiences shared and lessons learned will last a lifetime.
Remember it's a families personal preference to participate in travel lax and if managed properly can be a great few years for the whole family.
Originally Posted by The Hop
In response to those with negative comments about summer travel lacrosse I will add my opinion from personal experience.

Club travel participation is a choice made by families that have a love of the game and a player who has some talent. There are many clubs with many different talent levels with many different summer schedules to fit any families preference.
If your choice is to not participate that's fine but a general statement damning those that do is ridiculous.
Many families see the summer travel tournaments as a family experience and an opportunity to travel to several states and often combine vacations and trips to theme parks as part of the excursions.
If a player excels and is seen by college coaches and recruited as a result of playing club ball then that's great and it does happen...often. If college recruiting does not happen then so what, the experiences shared and lessons learned will last a lifetime.
Remember it's a families personal preference to participate in travel lax and if managed properly can be a great few years for the whole family.



Great post. I would add that the decision to support your child's interest in playing more of anything in the end guarantees nothing. This goes for all sports. Statistically speaking, the numbers are not in ones favor for scholarships and success at the next level. Enjoy your time as a family, in the cars to practices and tournaments where you can mold and raise your kids to become outstanding adults.

Never forget youth sports is a business that gets bigger every day. The only guaranteed scholarships are going to the kids of the guys running them thanks to all of us participating in them.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Your all crazy, every sport that offers money has early recruiting...The only difference is that other sports continue to recruit kids that have already verballed, thus making the verbal meaningless. That is exactly what will happen in lax over time.

If you don't like the club scene, don't try out and play PAL. Stop telling us the world of pain clubs have caused and don't tell me what a mistake I made by having my 9th grader commit verbally.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is the wrong choice for me. open your mind and think--different strokes for different folks--not exactly the black plague.

My kid plays 2 different sport, because he loves to play, and yes, he also gets great grades. Football in football season, lax is pretty much all year round.

Having a great time with club teamates--if I am willing to spend the time and $, why do you care?


Sounds like a guilty conscience to me. Worrying did your child make an informed decision in 9th grade. Congrats you get to brag around the water cooler and on the summer circuit. Time will tell if you made the right choice. And speaking of "why do you care", why do you? Last I checked this board was anonymous.
Back to the topic.

Yes, it's a conflict of interest if there is pressure to play or if a player is punished for not playing.
listen to this guy.....back to the topic
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Your all crazy, every sport that offers money has early recruiting...The only difference is that other sports continue to recruit kids that have already verballed, thus making the verbal meaningless. That is exactly what will happen in lax over time.

If you don't like the club scene, don't try out and play PAL. Stop telling us the world of pain clubs have caused and don't tell me what a mistake I made by having my 9th grader commit verbally.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is the wrong choice for me. open your mind and think--different strokes for different folks--not exactly the black plague.

My kid plays 2 different sport, because he loves to play, and yes, he also gets great grades. Football in football season, lax is pretty much all year round.

Having a great time with club teamates--if I am willing to spend the time and $, why do you care?


Sounds like a guilty conscience to me. Worrying did your child make an informed decision in 9th grade. Congrats you get to brag around the water cooler and on the summer circuit. Time will tell if you made the right choice. And speaking of "why do you care", why do you? Last I checked this board was anonymous.


I don't want to hear the money argument for a moment, but I agree that money, along with time, are factors for not playing on a travel team. That aside, what's the downside if your child is on a team that practices a lot, the coaching is top notch, and your kid is playing with better players. If your kid loves it and doesn't see practice as a chore, but likes it, there is no downside. He/she will become a better player in every aspect.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Your all crazy, every sport that offers money has early recruiting...The only difference is that other sports continue to recruit kids that have already verballed, thus making the verbal meaningless. That is exactly what will happen in lax over time.

If you don't like the club scene, don't try out and play PAL. Stop telling us the world of pain clubs have caused and don't tell me what a mistake I made by having my 9th grader commit verbally.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is the wrong choice for me. open your mind and think--different strokes for different folks--not exactly the black plague.

My kid plays 2 different sport, because he loves to play, and yes, he also gets great grades. Football in football season, lax is pretty much all year round.

Having a great time with club teamates--if I am willing to spend the time and $, why do you care?


Sounds like a guilty conscience to me. Worrying did your child make an informed decision in 9th grade. Congrats you get to brag around the water cooler and on the summer circuit. Time will tell if you made the right choice. And speaking of "why do you care", why do you? Last I checked this board was anonymous.


Well, well well, good morning to you.

Nice comment to my post, not going to take the bait this morning and call you names, but perhaps later after my meetings...That said, I will share a few thoughts that might be helpful to others below.

For you specifically, I will say, no to the guilt part but yes, I have a little angst that my kid only got 50% scholarship for lax, we were praying for 75%. But on the bright side, if his grades stay where they are and he scores 1800 on sat, he will get 25% more for merit...

For all the other people thinking my poor 9th grade kid was forced to grow up too quickly and choose his college (top academic school), perhaps the economics of school haven't been properly analyzed in your mind? Do you guys all know what school costs? Unless you are staying in your State, you are looking at between $50k and $60k per year.

Of the roughly 65 D1 lax programs, about half offer little to no athletic money and little to no merit money. That also applies to some great D3 institutions like Amherst and Williams...

If you don't make too much money (in this one area of life not making money actually makes you money) the need based aid can help tremendously and is much better than lax money because you are likely to get the same award all four years.


However, if you are reading this board you are probably not going to qualify for need based aid, which means either, you can pay the $50k per year without concern (great for you!) or you and your kid are borrowing a ton of $.

So when someone says I made my kid grow up too quickly and choose a college too young, I say at least this way he has a much better chance of graduating without huge $$$ in debt hanging over his head or mine. Yes, I know the verbal is a verbal and anything can happen...

Would JH have been a better fit than Michigan or Ohio State or Penn State or syracuse or virginia? Should we have waited for the IVY or Duke? Ivy and Duke are not giving me any money otherwise we would have waited.

Who knows how this will all turnout, but if my kid stays healthy and works hard and graduates with little to no debt, I really don't care which one of the above...He doesn't know what he wants to do for a living but how many people knew what they wanted to do for a living when they were 18? How many people changed majors after getting experience in something that excited them? Isn't that what you are supposed to do in college? I tell mine, find something you are passionate about and you will be successful...

If you were all being 100% honest, you would be thrilled to have your kid attend anyone of the schools mentioned above.

So, no, I don't have guilt over this particular decision. I have made more than my share of mistakes, but after much careful thought and consideration, I really can't see any downside.

Perhaps the person that thinks I feel or should guilt can share with me the reason why I should be feeling guilty?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Your all crazy, every sport that offers money has early recruiting...The only difference is that other sports continue to recruit kids that have already verballed, thus making the verbal meaningless. That is exactly what will happen in lax over time.

If you don't like the club scene, don't try out and play PAL. Stop telling us the world of pain clubs have caused and don't tell me what a mistake I made by having my 9th grader commit verbally.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is the wrong choice for me. open your mind and think--different strokes for different folks--not exactly the black plague.

My kid plays 2 different sport, because he loves to play, and yes, he also gets great grades. Football in football season, lax is pretty much all year round.

Having a great time with club teamates--if I am willing to spend the time and $, why do you care?


Sounds like a guilty conscience to me. Worrying did your child make an informed decision in 9th grade. Congrats you get to brag around the water cooler and on the summer circuit. Time will tell if you made the right choice. And speaking of "why do you care", why do you? Last I checked this board was anonymous.


You sound like another jealous bitter person who sits around waiting for others to fail or to have misfortune. Good thing you have an anonymous board to post on because I am sure you would not display your ugly sentiment out in the open.

If a child is offered the opportunity to commit to UNC, Hopkins, Virginia, Princeton, Loyola, Penn, Maryland, Northwestern, Stanford or Georgetown you believe that they should not commit to any of these schools. Until when? When do you believe the perfect time to commit is? Just how much information do you need in order to make an informed decision?





Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Your all crazy, every sport that offers money has early recruiting...The only difference is that other sports continue to recruit kids that have already verballed, thus making the verbal meaningless. That is exactly what will happen in lax over time.

If you don't like the club scene, don't try out and play PAL. Stop telling us the world of pain clubs have caused and don't tell me what a mistake I made by having my 9th grader commit verbally.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is the wrong choice for me. open your mind and think--different strokes for different folks--not exactly the black plague.

My kid plays 2 different sport, because he loves to play, and yes, he also gets great grades. Football in football season, lax is pretty much all year round.

Having a great time with club teamates--if I am willing to spend the time and $, why do you care?


Sounds like a guilty conscience to me. Worrying did your child make an informed decision in 9th grade. Congrats you get to brag around the water cooler and on the summer circuit. Time will tell if you made the right choice. And speaking of "why do you care", why do you? Last I checked this board was anonymous.


Well, well well, good morning to you.

Nice comment to my post, not going to take the bait this morning and call you names, but perhaps later after my meetings...That said, I will share a few thoughts that might be helpful to others below.

For you specifically, I will say, no to the guilt part but yes, I have a little angst that my kid only got 50% scholarship for lax, we were praying for 75%. But on the bright side, if his grades stay where they are and he scores 1800 on sat, he will get 25% more for merit...

For all the other people thinking my poor 9th grade kid was forced to grow up too quickly and choose his college (top academic school), perhaps the economics of school haven't been properly analyzed in your mind? Do you guys all know what school costs? Unless you are staying in your State, you are looking at between $50k and $60k per year.

Of the roughly 65 D1 lax programs, about half offer little to no athletic money and little to no merit money. That also applies to some great D3 institutions like Amherst and Williams...

If you don't make too much money (in this one area of life not making money actually makes you money) the need based aid can help tremendously and is much better than lax money because you are likely to get the same award all four years.


However, if you are reading this board you are probably not going to qualify for need based aid, which means either, you can pay the $50k per year without concern (great for you!) or you and your kid are borrowing a ton of $.

So when someone says I made my kid grow up too quickly and choose a college too young, I say at least this way he has a much better chance of graduating without huge $$$ in debt hanging over his head or mine. Yes, I know the verbal is a verbal and anything can happen...

Would JH have been a better fit than Michigan or Ohio State or Penn State or syracuse or virginia? Should we have waited for the IVY or Duke? Ivy and Duke are not giving me any money otherwise we would have waited.

Who knows how this will all turnout, but if my kid stays healthy and works hard and graduates with little to no debt, I really don't care which one of the above...He doesn't know what he wants to do for a living but how many people knew what they wanted to do for a living when they were 18? How many people changed majors after getting experience in something that excited them? Isn't that what you are supposed to do in college? I tell mine, find something you are passionate about and you will be successful...

If you were all being 100% honest, you would be thrilled to have your kid attend anyone of the schools mentioned above.

So, no, I don't have guilt over this particular decision. I have made more than my share of mistakes, but after much careful thought and consideration, I really can't see any downside.

Perhaps the person that thinks I feel or should guilt can share with me the reason why I should be feeling guilty?


Excellent post. I am very happy for you and your son. All the best.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Your all crazy, every sport that offers money has early recruiting...The only difference is that other sports continue to recruit kids that have already verballed, thus making the verbal meaningless. That is exactly what will happen in lax over time.

If you don't like the club scene, don't try out and play PAL. Stop telling us the world of pain clubs have caused and don't tell me what a mistake I made by having my 9th grader commit verbally.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is the wrong choice for me. open your mind and think--different strokes for different folks--not exactly the black plague.

My kid plays 2 different sport, because he loves to play, and yes, he also gets great grades. Football in football season, lax is pretty much all year round.

Having a great time with club teamates--if I am willing to spend the time and $, why do you care?


Sounds like a guilty conscience to me. Worrying did your child make an informed decision in 9th grade. Congrats you get to brag around the water cooler and on the summer circuit. Time will tell if you made the right choice. And speaking of "why do you care", why do you? Last I checked this board was anonymous.


For you specifically, I will say, no to the guilt part but yes, I have a little angst that my kid only got 50% scholarship for lax, we were praying for 75%. But on the bright side, if his grades stay where they are and he scores 1800 on sat, he will get 25% more for merit...

If your kid got 50% scholarship to go to any D1 school you should happy as a pig in sh*t. You kid must also be one of the best players on the east coast because 50 to 75% scholarships in lax don't really come around much considering each team only gets 13 full's per year. To give 50% to a 9th grader is unheard of unless he is they next Miles Thompson. Your kid is either a stud or your post is BS. Carry on.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by The Hop
In response to those with negative comments about summer travel lacrosse I will add my opinion from personal experience.

Club travel participation is a choice made by families that have a love of the game and a player who has some talent. There are many clubs with many different talent levels with many different summer schedules to fit any families preference.
If your choice is to not participate that's fine but a general statement damning those that do is ridiculous.
Many families see the summer travel tournaments as a family experience and an opportunity to travel to several states and often combine vacations and trips to theme parks as part of the excursions.
If a player excels and is seen by college coaches and recruited as a result of playing club ball then that's great and it does happen...often. If college recruiting does not happen then so what, the experiences shared and lessons learned will last a lifetime.
Remember it's a families personal preference to participate in travel lax and if managed properly can be a great few years for the whole family.



Great post. I would add that the decision to support your child's interest in playing more of anything in the end guarantees nothing. This goes for all sports. Statistically speaking, the numbers are not in ones favor for scholarships and success at the next level. Enjoy your time as a family, in the cars to practices and tournaments where you can mold and raise your kids to become outstanding adults.

Never forget youth sports is a business that gets bigger every day. The only guaranteed scholarships are going to the kids of the guys running them thanks to all of us participating in them.


This all seems OK to me. The American way, if you want to participate, go ahead, if you don't then good luck to you as well. Freedom of choice. Should the coaches have to sit on their hands? I don't think so. Is there a conflict? Probably. So what, get over it.
Roster of 50, 13 scholarship spots, 9th grade

Say the top 35 players get something, then the bottom 15 are walk ons. That would mean a 37% scholarship offer if all 35 got the same amount.

Say top 10 players get a 50% offer, then #11-35 would get a 33% offer.

You can see how the math works If the school is fully funding their available scholarships which some don't
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Roster of 50, 13 scholarship spots, 9th grade

Say the top 35 players get something, then the bottom 15 are walk ons. That would mean a 37% scholarship offer if all 35 got the same amount.

Say top 10 players get a 50% offer, then #11-35 would get a 33% offer.

You can see how the math works If the school is fully funding their available scholarships which some don't


Interesting....but what does that have to do with whether HS coaches are conflicted by running summer travel programs?

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Your all crazy, every sport that offers money has early recruiting...The only difference is that other sports continue to recruit kids that have already verballed, thus making the verbal meaningless. That is exactly what will happen in lax over time.

If you don't like the club scene, don't try out and play PAL. Stop telling us the world of pain clubs have caused and don't tell me what a mistake I made by having my 9th grader commit verbally.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is the wrong choice for me. open your mind and think--different strokes for different folks--not exactly the black plague.

My kid plays 2 different sport, because he loves to play, and yes, he also gets great grades. Football in football season, lax is pretty much all year round.

Having a great time with club teamates--if I am willing to spend the time and $, why do you care?


Sounds like a guilty conscience to me. Worrying did your child make an informed decision in 9th grade. Congrats you get to brag around the water cooler and on the summer circuit. Time will tell if you made the right choice. And speaking of "why do you care", why do you? Last I checked this board was anonymous.


For you specifically, I will say, no to the guilt part but yes, I have a little angst that my kid only got 50% scholarship for lax, we were praying for 75%. But on the bright side, if his grades stay where they are and he scores 1800 on sat, he will get 25% more for merit...

If your kid got 50% scholarship to go to any D1 school you should happy as a pig in sh*t. You kid must also be one of the best players on the east coast because 50 to 75% scholarships in lax don't really come around much considering each team only gets 13 full's per year. To give 50% to a 9th grader is unheard of unless he is they next Miles Thompson. Your kid is either a stud or your post is BS. Carry on.


I vote for BS
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Your all crazy, every sport that offers money has early recruiting...The only difference is that other sports continue to recruit kids that have already verballed, thus making the verbal meaningless. That is exactly what will happen in lax over time.

If you don't like the club scene, don't try out and play PAL. Stop telling us the world of pain clubs have caused and don't tell me what a mistake I made by having my 9th grader commit verbally.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is the wrong choice for me. open your mind and think--different strokes for different folks--not exactly the black plague.

My kid plays 2 different sport, because he loves to play, and yes, he also gets great grades. Football in football season, lax is pretty much all year round.

Having a great time with club teamates--if I am willing to spend the time and $, why do you care?


Sounds like a guilty conscience to me. Worrying did your child make an informed decision in 9th grade. Congrats you get to brag around the water cooler and on the summer circuit. Time will tell if you made the right choice. And speaking of "why do you care", why do you? Last I checked this board was anonymous.


You sound like another jealous bitter person who sits around waiting for others to fail or to have misfortune. Good thing you have an anonymous board to post on because I am sure you would not display your ugly sentiment out in the open.

If a child is offered the opportunity to commit to UNC, Hopkins, Virginia, Princeton, Loyola, Penn, Maryland, Northwestern, Stanford or Georgetown you believe that they should not commit to any of these schools. Until when? When do you believe the perfect time to commit is? Just how much information do you need in order to make an informed decision?

Another moron misses the point. If my son received a 100% scholarship offer in 9th grade, does that make this good for everyone else or just my son? I am making the larger point that it is bad for everyone. It forces parents to buy into this travel team dream from the time they leave 1st grade. Who can afford to wait? Not get on an A team early and you risk never cracking the A team (seen plenty of Express/91 politics to last a lifetime). It pushes everything up, as D1 slots are taken early by players that may have not even played a varsity game yet. I say the system is broken and we have individuals who want to tell us how great it is for "Little Johnny." Kudos to you and Johnny, but to [lacrosse] with Little Bobby, Billy and Jake (there seem to be a lot of them those days) who are auditioning for travel and college coaches before they even have their first kiss let alone their first girlfriend. Something very wrong here. By the way, most college coaches agree with me. They abhor most travel programs and will tell you they hate recruiting 9th graders. But then they cop out and say, we have to do it in this current competitive environment and rules.




Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Your all crazy, every sport that offers money has early recruiting...The only difference is that other sports continue to recruit kids that have already verballed, thus making the verbal meaningless. That is exactly what will happen in lax over time.

If you don't like the club scene, don't try out and play PAL. Stop telling us the world of pain clubs have caused and don't tell me what a mistake I made by having my 9th grader commit verbally.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is the wrong choice for me. open your mind and think--different strokes for different folks--not exactly the black plague.

My kid plays 2 different sport, because he loves to play, and yes, he also gets great grades. Football in football season, lax is pretty much all year round.

Having a great time with club teamates--if I am willing to spend the time and $, why do you care?


Sounds like a guilty conscience to me. Worrying did your child make an informed decision in 9th grade. Congrats you get to brag around the water cooler and on the summer circuit. Time will tell if you made the right choice. And speaking of "why do you care", why do you? Last I checked this board was anonymous.


You sound like another jealous bitter person who sits around waiting for others to fail or to have misfortune. Good thing you have an anonymous board to post on because I am sure you would not display your ugly sentiment out in the open.

If a child is offered the opportunity to commit to UNC, Hopkins, Virginia, Princeton, Loyola, Penn, Maryland, Northwestern, Stanford or Georgetown you believe that they should not commit to any of these schools. Until when? When do you believe the perfect time to commit is? Just how much information do you need in order to make an informed decision?

Another moron misses the point. If my son received a 100% scholarship offer in 9th grade, does that make this good for everyone else or just my son? I am making the larger point that it is bad for everyone. It forces parents to buy into this travel team dream from the time they leave 1st grade. Who can afford to wait? Not get on an A team early and you risk never cracking the A team (seen plenty of Express/91 politics to last a lifetime). It pushes everything up, as D1 slots are taken early by players that may have not even played a varsity game yet. I say the system is broken and we have individuals who want to tell us how great it is for "Little Johnny." Kudos to you and Johnny, but to [lacrosse] with Little Bobby, Billy and Jake (there seem to be a lot of them those days) who are auditioning for travel and college coaches before they even have their first kiss let alone their first girlfriend. Something very wrong here. By the way, most college coaches agree with me. They abhor most travel programs and will tell you they hate recruiting 9th graders. But then they cop out and say, we have to do it in this current competitive environment and rules.






Why is it bad for everyone?

Nobody is forced into anything.

My Town Has “A” & “B” Teams at a very young age and the Town Politics are just as bad if not worse than that of the Club Teams.

Who cares if they haven’t played a varsity game yet? Obviously the College Coaches don’t care. The Majority of HS lacrosse games are not competitive. College coaches will be all over the 2017 and 2018 club games this summer. You might even see a few casually observing the Top 2019 games.

What difference does it make if they recruit early or late? They are going to recruit the same kids. If the recruiting timeline was pushed back would that open up more roster spots? No, it would not. Little Billy, Bobby and Jake would be in the same situation.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Your all crazy, every sport that offers money has early recruiting...The only difference is that other sports continue to recruit kids that have already verballed, thus making the verbal meaningless. That is exactly what will happen in lax over time.

If you don't like the club scene, don't try out and play PAL. Stop telling us the world of pain clubs have caused and don't tell me what a mistake I made by having my 9th grader commit verbally.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is the wrong choice for me. open your mind and think--different strokes for different folks--not exactly the black plague.

My kid plays 2 different sport, because he loves to play, and yes, he also gets great grades. Football in football season, lax is pretty much all year round.

Having a great time with club teamates--if I am willing to spend the time and $, why do you care?


Sounds like a guilty conscience to me. Worrying did your child make an informed decision in 9th grade. Congrats you get to brag around the water cooler and on the summer circuit. Time will tell if you made the right choice. And speaking of "why do you care", why do you? Last I checked this board was anonymous.


You sound like another jealous bitter person who sits around waiting for others to fail or to have misfortune. Good thing you have an anonymous board to post on because I am sure you would not display your ugly sentiment out in the open.

If a child is offered the opportunity to commit to UNC, Hopkins, Virginia, Princeton, Loyola, Penn, Maryland, Northwestern, Stanford or Georgetown you believe that they should not commit to any of these schools. Until when? When do you believe the perfect time to commit is? Just how much information do you need in order to make an informed decision?

Another moron misses the point. If my son received a 100% scholarship offer in 9th grade, does that make this good for everyone else or just my son? I am making the larger point that it is bad for everyone. It forces parents to buy into this travel team dream from the time they leave 1st grade. Who can afford to wait? Not get on an A team early and you risk never cracking the A team (seen plenty of Express/91 politics to last a lifetime). It pushes everything up, as D1 slots are taken early by players that may have not even played a varsity game yet. I say the system is broken and we have individuals who want to tell us how great it is for "Little Johnny." Kudos to you and Johnny, but to [lacrosse] with Little Bobby, Billy and Jake (there seem to be a lot of them those days) who are auditioning for travel and college coaches before they even have their first kiss let alone their first girlfriend. Something very wrong here. By the way, most college coaches agree with me. They abhor most travel programs and will tell you they hate recruiting 9th graders. But then they cop out and say, we have to do it in this current competitive environment and rules.






Why is it bad for everyone?

Nobody is forced into anything.

My Town Has “A” & “B” Teams at a very young age and the Town Politics are just as bad if not worse than that of the Club Teams.

Who cares if they haven’t played a varsity game yet? Obviously the College Coaches don’t care. The Majority of HS lacrosse games are not competitive. College coaches will be all over the 2017 and 2018 club games this summer. You might even see a few casually observing the Top 2019 games.

What difference does it make if they recruit early or late? They are going to recruit the same kids. If the recruiting timeline was pushed back would that open up more roster spots? No, it would not. Little Billy, Bobby and Jake would be in the same situation.


I don't think that really is the case. At my son's HS the standout Sr. attack man is going to a D3 school, because that was his only offer. He was far and away better than the top 20 "ranked" attack man who is a junior ( with poor grades and meh SAts) going to a top 10 school. In a normal world the senior, who has excellent grades and SATs would be going to some D1, and 10 years ago would have been considered a top prospect. D3 schools are cleaning up!

This is not sour grapes on my part, my 2017 is committed and had multiple offers, which is crazy, but we believe he made a good choice. Several other 2017s we know with commitments I expect to see switch schools before all is said and done.
LI Showcase tryouts are a joke. Did players forget to register? #'s look low compared to pass years.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Your all crazy, every sport that offers money has early recruiting...The only difference is that other sports continue to recruit kids that have already verballed, thus making the verbal meaningless. That is exactly what will happen in lax over time.

If you don't like the club scene, don't try out and play PAL. Stop telling us the world of pain clubs have caused and don't tell me what a mistake I made by having my 9th grader commit verbally.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is the wrong choice for me. open your mind and think--different strokes for different folks--not exactly the black plague.

My kid plays 2 different sport, because he loves to play, and yes, he also gets great grades. Football in football season, lax is pretty much all year round.

Having a great time with club teamates--if I am willing to spend the time and $, why do you care?


Sounds like a guilty conscience to me. Worrying did your child make an informed decision in 9th grade. Congrats you get to brag around the water cooler and on the summer circuit. Time will tell if you made the right choice. And speaking of "why do you care", why do you? Last I checked this board was anonymous.


For you specifically, I will say, no to the guilt part but yes, I have a little angst that my kid only got 50% scholarship for lax, we were praying for 75%. But on the bright side, if his grades stay where they are and he scores 1800 on sat, he will get 25% more for merit...

If your kid got 50% scholarship to go to any D1 school you should happy as a pig in sh*t. You kid must also be one of the best players on the east coast because 50 to 75% scholarships in lax don't really come around much considering each team only gets 13 full's per year. To give 50% to a 9th grader is unheard of unless he is they next Miles Thompson. Your kid is either a stud or your post is BS. Carry on.


I vote for BS


Another vote for BS ... 1800 at "top school" for academic merit HAHAHAHA ... So we have established that the scholarship amount is bogus and the "top school" is bogus and this poster is a fraud. No real problem with it, where's the harm EXCEPT ... Well-meaning parents who read this garbage end up with unrealistic expectations for their kids and the way scholarships/recruiting actually happens. So unless Mr/Mrs bragger wants to put a name to the school and more details to substantiate what sounds like a fairly tale, he/she should refrain from spewing such nonsense for the sake of the other kids and families ...
I tell you one other reason it might suck for Billy, Bobby or Jake. You parents that decided to hold your son back a year. So not only do we need our sons to mature quicker than they might have as they are competing for spots in 9th and 10th grade against kids that may be 9-10 months older. You know the kid, twice the size of everyone else in 8th grade with hair on his legs. If colleges recruited 11th and 12th graders the field would be leveled. It is amazing how much more we care as parents than our parents did. Will be interesting to see with all of this attention bestowed upon them, if our kids do the opposite with their own. With all the pressure they felt growing up, maybe they are the ones that restore sanity to this situation. Allowing their sons and daughters to just go outside and "play" and have a normal childhood without trying to chase their parent's dream.
1800 is not even getting into Delaware, let alone top academic. If you are getting 25% merit and hoping for an 1800 then the average SAT score at this top academic is about 1400-1500 out of 2400.
in reference to post # 118910, I also call B.S. I have a daughter that was offered 50% to a low D1 and she couldn't sign on the line fast enough, and that with 38 more schools, or 456 more full scholarships available. The poster might get away with that crap with his buddies at the water cooler, but here he sounds like a tool
All the big schools we are looking at only want the 2 part SAT so I call BS as well. Go to collegeboard to see the average SAT scores your kid isn't even close
Wow, sounds like a bunch of jealous parents to me. I say congratulations to the kid and his family.

The rest of you need to get a grip and focus on your own kid and his/her deal...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wow, sounds like a bunch of jealous parents to me. I say congratulations to the kid and his family.

The rest of you need to get a grip and focus on your own kid and his/her deal...



Exactly!
strange 1800 doesn't get in to Delaware? I scored 1120 when 1600 was highest you could score. I played football there though. I can't see the entrance policies changing that much in twenty years
Sounds like a selfish parent. No, there aren't any of those out there. LOL They system is broken, regardless of whether it's good for a select few. You'll see. We will all have the answer in 20 years. Does the madness continue or is some level of common sense brought back you youth lacrosse?
In regards to Delaware admissions, OOS kids have a higher bar to reach if they are in the NY/NJ/PA/MD group saturated with apps from this area. Plenty of kids get denied with below 1800 from those above areas. Delaware in state kids can get in with 1500-1600/2400 range.
This is the first year that we didn't attend the LI I Showcase. Did it 3 years with my older son and only one year with my younger one. I believe that it is kind of set before it starts.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wow, sounds like a bunch of jealous parents to me. I say congratulations to the kid and his family.

The rest of you need to get a grip and focus on your own kid and his/her deal...


Couldn't agree more. The problem is that many parents refuse to honestly evaluate their children. Many become bitter and jealous and spew venom and hate at other children. They do it on this site, they do it on the sideline and they do it around town. When another child is having more success than their child they look to tear that child down anyway they can. Its ugly.

If the kid scores a lot of goals the jealous parents will call the player a "Ball Hog".

If the kid makes an "All Star / Elite / Top Club" team the bitter parents will say its only because his/her Dad knows the coaches.

If the kid commits to a Top 5 or 10 college the jealous parent will say the player will never get on the field.

If the kid commits to Harvard the bitter jealous parent will say my son/daughter doesn't want to go to an Ivy League School.

If the kid commits to a Big D-I School the jealous parents will say we are focusing on academics and looking at D-III schools.

If a kid is being actively recruited by a number of top programs the bitter jealous parents will say we are looking at ABC and XYZ and we visited XXX even though their kid is not being recruited by those schools.

It's never ending, on our sideline this past spring we had parents counting out loud the number of turnovers a player had. We have parents chirping loudly "Pass The Ball" however I never heard those words when the Jealous bitter parents child had the ball. If it were not so sad it would be funny.

Couple all of the hate and venom spewed with all of the [lacrosse] Kissing many of these parents do and you have a cesspool of a sideline. Does not matter if it is school or club, the [lacrosse] kissers are there. They will kiss the [lacrosse] of the coach, Club Director, AD, Assistant Coach, Spouse of the coach, Sibling of the coach, friend of the coach, anyone who they think can help. Have you ever noticed how certain parents always have a reason to talk to or email the coach? Even the ones who are bitter on the sideline, they make sure they put on the happy face just before their nose hits the coaches [lacrosse]. Love it when I see a kid who does not get the hype from the club or school get recruited (by top college programs) over the favored ones. All the [lacrosse] kissing from parents and the misguided efforts of a bad coach will not stop the college coaches from identifying the top athletes.

It's a mess. Hope your club and or down is different.
best post ever
I don't think anyone really cares what other kids get as an offer from a school but to come on this site and brag about your son is getting 50%, and how disappointed you are it wasn't 75% than you open yourself up to ridicule. Any parent or player knows that with only 12.6 full scholarships per year, and a squad of 35 to40 kids, I would be surprised if any kid playing lacrosse in college gets anymore than 50% athletic. So don't come on this site and give young kids or parents an unrealistic outlook to what is the norm. If your kid DID actually get an offer that good in the 8th grade have some class don't brag about it, if your friends ask and you want to divulge that info than go ahead, but don't put it out on your own and then be offended with the comments that follow
I have been reading this and there are 2 schools of thought.

If it truly is an 8th grader who got a look or a verbal he/she must be one of the top players in the country not just East Coast. You are not getting verbal to the "just Good" players in 8th grade.

If you got a verbal @ 50% and are in 8th grade, you are seriously bitching on here. Some may think I am crazy for saying this but yes college coaches know about this site. Why would you write that? You are in a small pool and can be figured out. Many of the better players who get those higher % get them with a combo and you said you still have that opportunity. unless you've gone through this with your older child and have established yourself (and your mannerisms) as a college parent in the stands; don't bite your nose to spite your face.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Your all crazy, every sport that offers money has early recruiting...The only difference is that other sports continue to recruit kids that have already verballed, thus making the verbal meaningless. That is exactly what will happen in lax over time.

If you don't like the club scene, don't try out and play PAL. Stop telling us the world of pain clubs have caused and don't tell me what a mistake I made by having my 9th grader commit verbally.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it is the wrong choice for me. open your mind and think--different strokes for different folks--not exactly the black plague.

My kid plays 2 different sport, because he loves to play, and yes, he also gets great grades. Football in football season, lax is pretty much all year round.

Having a great time with club teamates--if I am willing to spend the time and $, why do you care?


Sounds like a guilty conscience to me. Worrying did your child make an informed decision in 9th grade. Congrats you get to brag around the water cooler and on the summer circuit. Time will tell if you made the right choice. And speaking of "why do you care", why do you? Last I checked this board was anonymous.


For you specifically, I will say, no to the guilt part but yes, I have a little angst that my kid only got 50% scholarship for lax, we were praying for 75%. But on the bright side, if his grades stay where they are and he scores 1800 on sat, he will get 25% more for merit...

If your kid got 50% scholarship to go to any D1 school you should happy as a pig in sh*t. You kid must also be one of the best players on the east coast because 50 to 75% scholarships in lax don't really come around much considering each team only gets 13 full's per year. To give 50% to a 9th grader is unheard of unless he is they next Miles Thompson. Your kid is either a stud or your post is BS. Carry on.


I vote for BS


Another vote for BS ... 1800 at "top school" for academic merit HAHAHAHA ... So we have established that the scholarship amount is bogus and the "top school" is bogus and this poster is a fraud. No real problem with it, where's the harm EXCEPT ... Well-meaning parents who read this garbage end up with unrealistic expectations for their kids and the way scholarships/recruiting actually happens. So unless Mr/Mrs bragger wants to put a name to the school and more details to substantiate what sounds like a fairly tale, he/she should refrain from spewing such nonsense for the sake of the other kids and families ...


First off they can only talk about how much they will be offering you kid but he will not get a real offer "written" until his junior year. So the 50% lax scholarship is only as good as the paper it is written on.
Ditto that...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I don't think anyone really cares what other kids get as an offer from a school but to come on this site and brag about your son is getting 50%, and how disappointed you are it wasn't 75% than you open yourself up to ridicule. Any parent or player knows that with only 12.6 full scholarships per year, and a squad of 35 to40 kids, I would be surprised if any kid playing lacrosse in college gets anymore than 50% athletic. So don't come on this site and give young kids or parents an unrealistic outlook to what is the norm. If your kid DID actually get an offer that good in the 8th grade have some class don't brag about it, if your friends ask and you want to divulge that info than go ahead, but don't put it out on your own and then be offended with the comments that follow


Please, you really have no clue how this works. I know several that got 50%-yes they are studs.

Also know several that are getting nothing but a spot.

Again, best of luck to that kid and his family. If they were lying, they would have said full ride as has been said on this site many times. The person sounded pretty truthful to me and if it was fluff, I really don't care. It is an anonymous site and I suspect the people that are screaming, like the one above, didn't get a good deal and therefore can't fathom how anyone else did...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have been reading this and there are 2 schools of thought.

If it truly is an 8th grader who got a look or a verbal he/she must be one of the top players in the country not just East Coast. You are not getting verbal to the "just Good" players in 8th grade.

If you got a verbal @ 50% and are in 8th grade, you are seriously bitching on here. Some may think I am crazy for saying this but yes college coaches know about this site. Why would you write that? You are in a small pool and can be figured out. Many of the better players who get those higher % get them with a combo and you said you still have that opportunity. unless you've gone through this with your older child and have established yourself (and your mannerisms) as a college parent in the stands; don't bite your nose to spite your face.




You really need to learn how to read...take the time to get your facts straight...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I don't think anyone really cares what other kids get as an offer from a school but to come on this site and brag about your son is getting 50%, and how disappointed you are it wasn't 75% than you open yourself up to ridicule. Any parent or player knows that with only 12.6 full scholarships per year, and a squad of 35 to40 kids, I would be surprised if any kid playing lacrosse in college gets anymore than 50% athletic. So don't come on this site and give young kids or parents an unrealistic outlook to what is the norm. If your kid DID actually get an offer that good in the 8th grade have some class don't brag about it, if your friends ask and you want to divulge that info than go ahead, but don't put it out on your own and then be offended with the comments that follow


Please, you really have no clue how this works. I know several that got 50%-yes they are studs.

Also know several that are getting nothing but a spot.

Again, best of luck to that kid and his family. If they were lying, they would have said full ride as has been said on this site many times. The person sounded pretty truthful to me and if it was fluff, I really don't care. It is an anonymous site and I suspect the people that are screaming, like the one above, didn't get a good deal and therefore can't fathom how anyone else did...


My kid just got offered full rides to several D1 schools. He did not even play till till 9th grade when the lax coach saw him working out with the track and field team as a pole vaulter. He asked him to come down and play and is revolutionizing the game, he plays a brand new position LSA. Yup. Long Stick Attackmen. He runs from X, poll vaults up and over cage, catches the ball as he go over and slams it it in before landing outside the crease. They even included a free meal plan. Dont be a hater
Does the Long Stick Attackman go to St Anthonys? If so, it's probably not too late for Chanenchuk to put him on the Long Island Under Armour team. LOL!!!!!
There's an idiot so wasted a post with his son being a long stick attackman. his son is probably king of Nintendo
Oh no! Not a wasted post! Call the lacrosse police. A serious crime has been committed. Oh and by the way, most of the nonsense posted here is a total waste.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Oh no! Not a wasted post! Call the lacrosse police. A serious crime has been committed. Oh and by the way, most of the nonsense posted here is a total waste.


Your post is a great example. Thanks for illustrating.

Also thanks for the total waste you post on other threads like the Outlaws thread. Your a waste master!
LOL
By the way Hop, it's you're not your.
I posted something positive about coach Lough and the outlaws and wished them luck because I like their program. I didn't think I said anything wrong.
what about when HS coaches use their school fields for their travel for profit programs? This isn't college where part of the coaches compensation is through the use of school facilities to run camps and clinics. This is HS coaches using tax payer funded fields for a private business
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what about when HS coaches use their school fields for their travel for profit programs? This isn't college where part of the coaches compensation is through the use of school facilities to run camps and clinics. This is HS coaches using tax payer funded fields for a private business


What about when a school district doesn't let a group of kids from the district use the fields. How bad is that one. id rather have someone use them.

I mentioned Sachem north once before does that..
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what about when HS coaches use their school fields for their travel for profit programs? This isn't college where part of the coaches compensation is through the use of school facilities to run camps and clinics. This is HS coaches using tax payer funded fields for a private business


thats actually against the law in NYS. Thats why many of these clubs incorporate as non-for profit
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I posted something positive about coach Lough and the outlaws and wished them luck because I like their program. I didn't think I said anything wrong.

Wasn't referring to you. Just the jack off that trolls the Outlaws thread.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
By the way Hop, it's you're not your.


By the way B woody. Good luck posting.
Oh ok sorry Hop. Tough to see who's talking to who on here sometimes. Lol
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Oh ok sorry Hop. Tough to see who's talking to who on here sometimes. Lol


No problem. When I refer to a specific post it will be in a box above like yours is.
You can do the same by clicking "quote" and scrolling to the bottom past the [quote]. Then begin your response.
Originally Posted by The Hop
[quote=Anonymous]Oh ok sorry Hop. Tough to see who's talking to who on here sometimes. Lol


No problem. When I refer to a specific post it will be in a box above like yours is.
You can do the same by clicking "quote" and scrolling to the bottom past the
Quote
. Then begin your response.
like this? lol.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by The Hop
[quote=Anonymous]Oh ok sorry Hop. Tough to see who's talking to who on here sometimes. Lol


No problem. When I refer to a specific post it will be in a box above like yours is.
You can do the same by clicking "quote" and scrolling to the bottom past the
Quote
. Then begin your response.
like this? lol.


Yep
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wow, sounds like a bunch of jealous parents to me. I say congratulations to the kid and his family.

The rest of you need to get a grip and focus on your own kid and his/her deal...


Couldn't agree more. The problem is that many parents refuse to honestly evaluate their children. Many become bitter and jealous and spew venom and hate at other children. They do it on this site, they do it on the sideline and they do it around town. When another child is having more success than their child they look to tear that child down anyway they can. Its ugly.

If the kid scores a lot of goals the jealous parents will call the player a "Ball Hog".

If the kid makes an "All Star / Elite / Top Club" team the bitter parents will say its only because his/her Dad knows the coaches.

If the kid commits to a Top 5 or 10 college the jealous parent will say the player will never get on the field.

If the kid commits to Harvard the bitter jealous parent will say my son/daughter doesn't want to go to an Ivy League School.

If the kid commits to a Big D-I School the jealous parents will say we are focusing on academics and looking at D-III schools.

If a kid is being actively recruited by a number of top programs the bitter jealous parents will say we are looking at ABC and XYZ and we visited XXX even though their kid is not being recruited by those schools.

It's never ending, on our sideline this past spring we had parents counting out loud the number of turnovers a player had. We have parents chirping loudly "Pass The Ball" however I never heard those words when the Jealous bitter parents child had the ball. If it were not so sad it would be funny.

Couple all of the hate and venom spewed with all of the [lacrosse] Kissing many of these parents do and you have a cesspool of a sideline. Does not matter if it is school or club, the [lacrosse] kissers are there. They will kiss the [lacrosse] of the coach, Club Director, AD, Assistant Coach, Spouse of the coach, Sibling of the coach, friend of the coach, anyone who they think can help. Have you ever noticed how certain parents always have a reason to talk to or email the coach? Even the ones who are bitter on the sideline, they make sure they put on the happy face just before their nose hits the coaches [lacrosse]. Love it when I see a kid who does not get the hype from the club or school get recruited (by top college programs) over the favored ones. All the [lacrosse] kissing from parents and the misguided efforts of a bad coach will not stop the college coaches from identifying the top athletes.

It's a mess. Hope your club and or down is different.


This is one of the best posts I have ever read on this site. All so true. Makes me sick to my stomach just thinking about it. Guess what it continues once your kid goes to the next level....:)
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wow, sounds like a bunch of jealous parents to me. I say congratulations to the kid and his family.

The rest of you need to get a grip and focus on your own kid and his/her deal...


Couldn't agree more. The problem is that many parents refuse to honestly evaluate their children. Many become bitter and jealous and spew venom and hate at other children. They do it on this site, they do it on the sideline and they do it around town. When another child is having more success than their child they look to tear that child down anyway they can. Its ugly.

If the kid scores a lot of goals the jealous parents will call the player a "Ball Hog".

If the kid makes an "All Star / Elite / Top Club" team the bitter parents will say its only because his/her Dad knows the coaches.

If the kid commits to a Top 5 or 10 college the jealous parent will say the player will never get on the field.

If the kid commits to Harvard the bitter jealous parent will say my son/daughter doesn't want to go to an Ivy League School.

If the kid commits to a Big D-I School the jealous parents will say we are focusing on academics and looking at D-III schools.

If a kid is being actively recruited by a number of top programs the bitter jealous parents will say we are looking at ABC and XYZ and we visited XXX even though their kid is not being recruited by those schools.

It's never ending, on our sideline this past spring we had parents counting out loud the number of turnovers a player had. We have parents chirping loudly "Pass The Ball" however I never heard those words when the Jealous bitter parents child had the ball. If it were not so sad it would be funny.

Couple all of the hate and venom spewed with all of the [lacrosse] Kissing many of these parents do and you have a cesspool of a sideline. Does not matter if it is school or club, the [lacrosse] kissers are there. They will kiss the [lacrosse] of the coach, Club Director, AD, Assistant Coach, Spouse of the coach, Sibling of the coach, friend of the coach, anyone who they think can help. Have you ever noticed how certain parents always have a reason to talk to or email the coach? Even the ones who are bitter on the sideline, they make sure they put on the happy face just before their nose hits the coaches [lacrosse]. Love it when I see a kid who does not get the hype from the club or school get recruited (by top college programs) over the favored ones. All the [lacrosse] kissing from parents and the misguided efforts of a bad coach will not stop the college coaches from identifying the top athletes.

It's a mess. Hope your club and or down is different.
Wow thank you so much for posting that. As a lacrosse and football coach I've recently within the last three years stepped back into the coaching ranks after a long hiatus and I am shocked to see how much it's changed. the parents these days are the absolute worst. I'm not going to repeat everything you said but the jealousy is huge in lacrosse amongst parents. it's horrible. and your ball hog remark is on point one hundred percent. where I came from the parents stuck together. they rooted for the team good bad or indifferent. they encouraged the players and allowed the coach to coach their boys without interfering. they rooted for the boy who scored a lot because he helped the team succeed. they'd turn to his parents in the stands and say "man, your son is some player." now you don't get that anymore. it's not about the team it's about my son or my daughter and the coach is terrible. and these club lacrosse teams are creating this poison because the amount of money involved. Sir, again I want to thank you for posting that. I don't even want to read the rebuttal I guarantee some parent is going to post.

This is one of the best posts I have ever read on this site. All so true. Makes me sick to my stomach just thinking about it. Guess what it continues once your kid goes to the next level....:)
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wow, sounds like a bunch of jealous parents to me. I say congratulations to the kid and his family.

The rest of you need to get a grip and focus on your own kid and his/her deal...


Couldn't agree more. The problem is that many parents refuse to honestly evaluate their children. Many become bitter and jealous and spew venom and hate at other children. They do it on this site, they do it on the sideline and they do it around town. When another child is having more success than their child they look to tear that child down anyway they can. Its ugly.

If the kid scores a lot of goals the jealous parents will call the player a "Ball Hog".

If the kid makes an "All Star / Elite / Top Club" team the bitter parents will say its only because his/her Dad knows the coaches.

If the kid commits to a Top 5 or 10 college the jealous parent will say the player will never get on the field.

If the kid commits to Harvard the bitter jealous parent will say my son/daughter doesn't want to go to an Ivy League School.

If the kid commits to a Big D-I School the jealous parents will say we are focusing on academics and looking at D-III schools.

If a kid is being actively recruited by a number of top programs the bitter jealous parents will say we are looking at ABC and XYZ and we visited XXX even though their kid is not being recruited by those schools.

It's never ending, on our sideline this past spring we had parents counting out loud the number of turnovers a player had. We have parents chirping loudly "Pass The Ball" however I never heard those words when the Jealous bitter parents child had the ball. If it were not so sad it would be funny.

Couple all of the hate and venom spewed with all of the [lacrosse] Kissing many of these parents do and you have a cesspool of a sideline. Does not matter if it is school or club, the [lacrosse] kissers are there. They will kiss the [lacrosse] of the coach, Club Director, AD, Assistant Coach, Spouse of the coach, Sibling of the coach, friend of the coach, anyone who they think can help. Have you ever noticed how certain parents always have a reason to talk to or email the coach? Even the ones who are bitter on the sideline, they make sure they put on the happy face just before their nose hits the coaches [lacrosse]. Love it when I see a kid who does not get the hype from the club or school get recruited (by top college programs) over the favored ones. All the [lacrosse] kissing from parents and the misguided efforts of a bad coach will not stop the college coaches from identifying the top athletes.

It's a mess. Hope your club and or down is different.


This is one of the best posts I have ever read on this site. All so true. Makes me sick to my stomach just thinking about it. Guess what it continues once your kid goes to the next level....:)


Forgot back stabbing malicious untrue rumor spreading to coach by vindictive manipulative kissing jealous parent.

Shame on any coach who does not see through all the kissing BS.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Wow, sounds like a bunch of jealous parents to me. I say congratulations to the kid and his family.

The rest of you need to get a grip and focus on your own kid and his/her deal...


Couldn't agree more. The problem is that many parents refuse to honestly evaluate their children. Many become bitter and jealous and spew venom and hate at other children. They do it on this site, they do it on the sideline and they do it around town. When another child is having more success than their child they look to tear that child down anyway they can. Its ugly.

If the kid scores a lot of goals the jealous parents will call the player a "Ball Hog".

If the kid makes an "All Star / Elite / Top Club" team the bitter parents will say its only because his/her Dad knows the coaches.

If the kid commits to a Top 5 or 10 college the jealous parent will say the player will never get on the field.

If the kid commits to Harvard the bitter jealous parent will say my son/daughter doesn't want to go to an Ivy League School.

If the kid commits to a Big D-I School the jealous parents will say we are focusing on academics and looking at D-III schools.

If a kid is being actively recruited by a number of top programs the bitter jealous parents will say we are looking at ABC and XYZ and we visited XXX even though their kid is not being recruited by those schools.

It's never ending, on our sideline this past spring we had parents counting out loud the number of turnovers a player had. We have parents chirping loudly "Pass The Ball" however I never heard those words when the Jealous bitter parents child had the ball. If it were not so sad it would be funny.

Couple all of the hate and venom spewed with all of the [lacrosse] Kissing many of these parents do and you have a cesspool of a sideline. Does not matter if it is school or club, the [lacrosse] kissers are there. They will kiss the [lacrosse] of the coach, Club Director, AD, Assistant Coach, Spouse of the coach, Sibling of the coach, friend of the coach, anyone who they think can help. Have you ever noticed how certain parents always have a reason to talk to or email the coach? Even the ones who are bitter on the sideline, they make sure they put on the happy face just before their nose hits the coaches [lacrosse]. Love it when I see a kid who does not get the hype from the club or school get recruited (by top college programs) over the favored ones. All the [lacrosse] kissing from parents and the misguided efforts of a bad coach will not stop the college coaches from identifying the top athletes.

It's a mess. Hope your club and or down is different.


This is one of the best posts I have ever read on this site. All so true. Makes me sick to my stomach just thinking about it. Guess what it continues once your kid goes to the next level....:)


Good post, you want to see drama? Have a kid show up with their summer travel gear AND NOT BE A STARTER for the HS while the coach starts some non travel but great lax athlete. Those parents are uncontrollable!
I have read here several times that HS coaches are prohibited from coaching a team with more than 4-5 players from their HS during the offseason (or something similar). Also reference was made just recently to the prohibition against HS coaches using HS/public fields for their club teams. I am in a situation where the coach has informed the HS players that they won't play on varsity unless they play in the HS Coach's club team or at least attend certain tournaments with the HS Coach's club team. Can anyone point to the specific regulations/laws or point me in the right direction? I have looked but have not been able to find anything. Thanks
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have read here several times that HS coaches are prohibited from coaching a team with more than 4-5 players from their HS during the offseason (or something similar). Also reference was made just recently to the prohibition against HS coaches using HS/public fields for their club teams. I am in a situation where the coach has informed the HS players that they won't play on varsity unless they play in the HS Coach's club team or at least attend certain tournaments with the HS Coach's club team. Can anyone point to the specific regulations/laws or point me in the right direction? I have looked but have not been able to find anything. Thanks


Many years ago a coach could not be with his kids during the off-season. A dad used to coach my summer and winter lax teams. That however, is not the case anymore. Also, with the use of fields, a coach simply has to fill out a form to use the fields of the high school or other district fields Anyone can fill out the form and then the AD approves it. Here are the section XI rules on off-season practices. Basically, you can't put it in writing that off-season is mandatory. You can just "highly suggest".

VII. Out of Season Practice Policy
On May 24, 2000, the Section XI Athletic Council eliminated the Section XI Out of Season Practice Policy (sometimes referred to as the 49% rule) entirely!

Understand, however, that this action does not necessarily make practicing out of season OK. Schools are still bound by the NYSPHSAA regulations. They are:

NYSPHSAA REGULATION - PRACTICE SESSIONS:
a. An organized practice in grades 7-12 is a session for the purpose of providing instruction and practice in physical conditioning activities, skills, team play, and game strategy designed expressly for that sport under the supervision of a qualified coach appointed by the Board of Education of the local school district. Such instruction and practice shall be held only during the season designated for that sport.
c. School sponsored activities conducted out of the sport season such as general conditioning, weight training, weight lifting, intramurals, recreation, open gyms, club activities and camps are permitted: 1. If such programs are not mandated by coaches or school personnel; 2. If such programs are available to all students.
d. Non-school sponsored activities are permitted if such programs are not mandated by coaches or school personnel. It is recommended that no school equipment be used for these programs as per State Comptroller Opinion 85-37.

Rev 5/11
Thank you! Seems pretty clear.
Thanks for the info (not quoting because it's so big). Did you delete item b. or was that a typo on their part?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thanks for the info (not quoting because it's so big). Did you delete item b. or was that a typo on their part?


Typo
All coaches hide behind "C". recreational, intramural etc etc...
Which suffolk county school does this!
why is the AD and super allowing this.....
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have read here several times that HS coaches are prohibited from coaching a team with more than 4-5 players from their HS during the offseason (or something similar). Also reference was made just recently to the prohibition against HS coaches using HS/public fields for their club teams. I am in a situation where the coach has informed the HS players that they won't play on varsity unless they play in the HS Coach's club team or at least attend certain tournaments with the HS Coach's club team. Can anyone point to the specific regulations/laws or point me in the right direction? I have looked but have not been able to find anything. Thanks


Many years ago a coach could not be with his kids during the off-season. A dad used to coach my summer and winter lax teams. That however, is not the case anymore. Also, with the use of fields, a coach simply has to fill out a form to use the fields of the high school or other district fields Anyone can fill out the form and then the AD approves it. Here are the section XI rules on off-season practices. Basically, you can't put it in writing that off-season is mandatory. You can just "highly suggest".

VII. Out of Season Practice Policy
On May 24, 2000, the Section XI Athletic Council eliminated the Section XI Out of Season Practice Policy (sometimes referred to as the 49% rule) entirely!

Understand, however, that this action does not necessarily make practicing out of season OK. Schools are still bound by the NYSPHSAA regulations. They are:

NYSPHSAA REGULATION - PRACTICE SESSIONS:
a. An organized practice in grades 7-12 is a session for the purpose of providing instruction and practice in physical conditioning activities, skills, team play, and game strategy designed expressly for that sport under the supervision of a qualified coach appointed by the Board of Education of the local school district. Such instruction and practice shall be held only during the season designated for that sport.
c. School sponsored activities conducted out of the sport season such as general conditioning, weight training, weight lifting, intramurals, recreation, open gyms, club activities and camps are permitted: 1. If such programs are not mandated by coaches or school personnel; 2. If such programs are available to all students.
d. Non-school sponsored activities are permitted if such programs are not mandated by coaches or school personnel. It is recommended that no school equipment be used for these programs as per State Comptroller Opinion 85-37.

Rev 5/11


This is very helpful and enlightening. What, then, is the difference between a math teacher not being able to tutor/give extra help to one of their students for money and a coach running a summer sports program (which is now all year) in which their players pay money for? I don't think their is a difference yet the coach is allowed to take money from their players and the math teacher can't do the same with his/her student. He conflicts are the same.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have read here several times that HS coaches are prohibited from coaching a team with more than 4-5 players from their HS during the offseason (or something similar). Also reference was made just recently to the prohibition against HS coaches using HS/public fields for their club teams. I am in a situation where the coach has informed the HS players that they won't play on varsity unless they play in the HS Coach's club team or at least attend certain tournaments with the HS Coach's club team. Can anyone point to the specific regulations/laws or point me in the right direction? I have looked but have not been able to find anything. Thanks




Many years ago a coach could not be with his kids during the off-season. A dad used to coach my summer and winter lax teams. That however, is not the case anymore. Also, with the use of fields, a coach simply has to fill out a form to use the fields of the high school or other district fields Anyone can fill out the form and then the AD approves it. Here are the section XI rules on off-season practices. Basically, you can't put it in writing that off-season is mandatory. You can just "highly suggest".

VII. Out of Season Practice Policy
On May 24, 2000, the Section XI Athletic Council eliminated the Section XI Out of Season Practice Policy (sometimes referred to as the 49% rule) entirely!

Understand, however, that this action does not necessarily make practicing out of season OK. Schools are still bound by the NYSPHSAA regulations. They are:

NYSPHSAA REGULATION - PRACTICE SESSIONS:
a. An organized practice in grades 7-12 is a session for the purpose of providing instruction and practice in physical conditioning activities, skills, team play, and game strategy designed expressly for that sport under the supervision of a qualified coach appointed by the Board of Education of the local school district. Such instruction and practice shall be held only during the season designated for that sport.
c. School sponsored activities conducted out of the sport season such as general conditioning, weight training, weight lifting, intramurals, recreation, open gyms, club activities and camps are permitted: 1. If such programs are not mandated by coaches or school personnel; 2. If such programs are available to all students.
d. Non-school sponsored activities are permitted if such programs are not mandated by coaches or school personnel. It is recommended that no school equipment be used for these programs as per State Comptroller Opinion 85-37.

Rev 5/11


This is very helpful and enlightening. What, then, is the difference between a math teacher not being able to tutor/give extra help to one of their students for money and a coach running a summer sports program (which is now all year) in which their players pay money for? I don't think their is a difference yet the coach is allowed to take money from their players and the math teacher can't do the same with his/her student. He conflicts are the same.


Start a math club. You can even run a for profit math competition at the high school in the summer. Have students from around the country come and pay $250 - $300 per student to compete in the Math Olympics. Maybe you could have professors and admissions officers from Harvard , Princeton, Stanford, MIT etc... come and recruit the math students.
Chaminade would probably dominate that as well.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Chaminade would probably dominate that as well.


You mean Regis would dominate, that's where the "really" smart kids go. Sorry, try again.
I would like to start the girls math club. We can get the best math students from LI and every weekend we can all get on the NJ Turnpike all summer to compete against the good math clubs from Maryland.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have read here several times that HS coaches are prohibited from coaching a team with more than 4-5 players from their HS during the offseason (or something similar). Also reference was made just recently to the prohibition against HS coaches using HS/public fields for their club teams. I am in a situation where the coach has informed the HS players that they won't play on varsity unless they play in the HS Coach's club team or at least attend certain tournaments with the HS Coach's club team. Can anyone point to the specific regulations/laws or point me in the right direction? I have looked but have not been able to find anything. Thanks




Many years ago a coach could not be with his kids during the off-season. A dad used to coach my summer and winter lax teams. That however, is not the case anymore. Also, with the use of fields, a coach simply has to fill out a form to use the fields of the high school or other district fields Anyone can fill out the form and then the AD approves it. Here are the section XI rules on off-season practices. Basically, you can't put it in writing that off-season is mandatory. You can just "highly suggest".

VII. Out of Season Practice Policy
On May 24, 2000, the Section XI Athletic Council eliminated the Section XI Out of Season Practice Policy (sometimes referred to as the 49% rule) entirely!

Understand, however, that this action does not necessarily make practicing out of season OK. Schools are still bound by the NYSPHSAA regulations. They are:

NYSPHSAA REGULATION - PRACTICE SESSIONS:
a. An organized practice in grades 7-12 is a session for the purpose of providing instruction and practice in physical conditioning activities, skills, team play, and game strategy designed expressly for that sport under the supervision of a qualified coach appointed by the Board of Education of the local school district. Such instruction and practice shall be held only during the season designated for that sport.
c. School sponsored activities conducted out of the sport season such as general conditioning, weight training, weight lifting, intramurals, recreation, open gyms, club activities and camps are permitted: 1. If such programs are not mandated by coaches or school personnel; 2. If such programs are available to all students.
d. Non-school sponsored activities are permitted if such programs are not mandated by coaches or school personnel. It is recommended that no school equipment be used for these programs as per State Comptroller Opinion 85-37.

Rev 5/11


This is very helpful and enlightening. What, then, is the difference between a math teacher not being able to tutor/give extra help to one of their students for money and a coach running a summer sports program (which is now all year) in which their players pay money for? I don't think their is a difference yet the coach is allowed to take money from their players and the math teacher can't do the same with his/her student. He conflicts are the same.


Start a math club. You can even run a for profit math competition at the high school in the summer. Have students from around the country come and pay $250 - $300 per student to compete in the Math Olympics. Maybe you could have professors and admissions officers from Harvard , Princeton, Stanford, MIT etc... come and recruit the math students.


You sound like a lawyer. For anyone who is trafficking on this website they're more likely to spend their last dollar forking it over to a lacrosse coach than setting up a math fair. The issue is that coaches, and teachers, already hold the cards vis-a-vis the students/athletes. When you introduce travel programs run by their coaches the kids, and their parents, lose any leverage they might have. The coaches dictate where the kid can play and where the money goes. Look at the travel programs run by high school coaches , everyone knows which ones they are, a kid can't go outside their coaches program or they're run out of town. Don't see any difference between a school coach and a school teacher.
It is a conflict and it is getting worse.
Sachem North Lacrosse is one of the biggest conflicts by forcing youth coaches to funneling players to the high school coaches to pay there salaries for the summer. A lot of people don't want to do it but feel they will be excommunicated if they don't.

Just let volunteers coach the kids and help when you can.
excommunicated for not playing for norths summer lax program?? Those coaches should be ashamed of themselves. but I know they're not because as the previous poster said those parents are paying their summer salary. dumb. I know some of the kids and parents on the rising 7/8 grade team. keep drinking the kool aid. those coaches could care less. they love your money. a total disrespect to north's hs football program because it's interfering with their summer workout program. lacrosse season for the hs level ended in May or June. let the next sports season practices begin. friggin selfish. I can't stand what this game of lacrosse has become.
and the north coaches will never come on here because they hide behind those big summer pay checks. point I was making in the previous post is give the boys a break. let em transition from one sport to another. Good Lord!!
I agree. They do this all the way down to first grade. They charge $950.00 for a 7/8 grade player for a couple of months and yet mock travel teams. That equates to roughly $4,000.00 per year. That would put them on top of the list as far as most expensive for the year. School district should stop it.
Yup a lot of money. and I'd also like to add that the coaches who's football season this summer lacrosse is interfering with need to start penciling these lax players coming late to or missing summer weight training or practice at the bottom of their depth charts and giving the serious dedicated football players the advantage. and the kids who play lax that also play football and there's a lot of them will make a choice. or the BS summer lax programs will disappear because they'll be missing players too. bunch of clowns.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yup a lot of money. and I'd also like to add that the coaches who's football season this summer lacrosse is interfering with need to start penciling these lax players coming late to or missing summer weight training or practice at the bottom of their depth charts and giving the serious dedicated football players the advantage. and the kids who play lax that also play football and there's a lot of them will make a choice. or the BS summer lax programs will disappear because they'll be missing players too. bunch of clowns.


Haha, on LI, lax will always come first over football if a kid wants to play D1 sports in college. Just the facts!!
Ha ha ha.. The lacrosse players ARE the football players. At least the best ones anyway. The summer training for football is for the kids that aren't motivated to do on their own. Wake up.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Ha ha ha.. The lacrosse players ARE the football players. At least the best ones anyway. The summer training for football is for the kids that aren't motivated to do on their own. Wake up.


Since the best football players are also lacrosse players the coach needs to treat them with kid gloves. He wouldn't want to lose his best players in traditionally mediocre LI football. Pencil in the kid late to meaningless football practice when he already has a full ride to Hopkins for lacrosse. That will teach him a lesson!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Ha ha ha.. The lacrosse players ARE the football players. At least the best ones anyway. The summer training for football is for the kids that aren't motivated to do on their own. Wake up.


Since the best football players are also lacrosse players the coach needs to treat them with kid gloves. He wouldn't want to lose his best players in traditionally mediocre LI football. Pencil in the kid late to meaningless football practice when he already has a full ride to Hopkins for lacrosse. That will teach him a lesson!


A "full ride to Hopkins"

Yep, there are a lot of those
full ride to Hopkins??? Lmao that's what those coaches running that summer lax program are telling you? keep dreaming. and as for the lax players being the best football players......NOT EVEN CLOSE! and summer training program is part of the program it's not to motivate lazy kids lmao
football and baseball will always be America's favorite games. keep thinking that will change. Lmao
Originally Posted by Anonymous
full ride to Hopkins??? Lmao that's what those coaches running that summer lax program are telling you? keep dreaming. and as for the lax players being the best football players......NOT EVEN CLOSE! and summer training program is part of the program it's not to motivate lazy kids lmao


Tell that to the best Football player to play on LI in years from Sayville. Gave up his lax scholarship to Notre Dame in favor of a Football scholarship. Oh and there is the standout Football player from Smithown East who is going to YALE to play lax.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
full ride to Hopkins??? Lmao that's what those coaches running that summer lax program are telling you? keep dreaming. and as for the lax players being the best football players......NOT EVEN CLOSE! and summer training program is part of the program it's not to motivate lazy kids lmao


Tell that to the best Football player to play on LI in years from Sayville. Gave up his lax scholarship to Notre Dame in favor of a Football scholarship. Oh and there is the standout Football player from Smithown East who is going to YALE to play lax.
Right re-read what you just wrote.....GAVE UP A LAX SCHOLARSHIP TO PLAY BIG TIME COLLEGE FOOTBALL. He'll play in front of big crowds on tv and in bowl games. heard he had Alabama and Michigan up here in one week. I'd go play football too. as for the kid from smithtown east....let's calm down the kid was a 5'11 QB with an average arm. sure he shined at QB in a.weak division. he's much better suited for lacrosse. FOOTBALL IS KING NATIONWIDE.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Ha ha ha.. The lacrosse players ARE the football players. At least the best ones anyway. The summer training for football is for the kids that aren't motivated to do on their own. Wake up.


Since the best football players are also lacrosse players the coach needs to treat them with kid gloves. He wouldn't want to lose his best players in traditionally mediocre LI football. Pencil in the kid late to meaningless football practice when he already has a full ride to Hopkins for lacrosse. That will teach him a lesson!
the summer practice isn't meaningless. in a few weeks two a days and live scrimmages will start. the post season summer lacrosse is meaningless. that season is over.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Ha ha ha.. The lacrosse players ARE the football players. At least the best ones anyway. The summer training for football is for the kids that aren't motivated to do on their own. Wake up.
you wake up Jack [lacrosse]. it's preseason training. two a days start soon. just like winter indoor lacrosse training applies to lacrosse....is that for unmotivated kids who don't play wall ball? the summer program is dumb. and trust me I'm not biased. I coach both sports. but once lacrosse ends I get ready for football season. just as when lacrosse season is rolling around I expect commitment from my lacrosse players...I expect the same commitment from my football players when they're instructed to be at practice.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yup a lot of money. and I'd also like to add that the coaches who's football season this summer lacrosse is interfering with need to start penciling these lax players coming late to or missing summer weight training or practice at the bottom of their depth charts and giving the serious dedicated football players the advantage. and the kids who play lax that also play football and there's a lot of them will make a choice. or the BS summer lax programs will disappear because they'll be missing players too. bunch of clowns.


Haha, on LI, lax will always come first over football if a kid wants to play D1 sports in college. Just the facts!!
hahahaha! here's the facts......football is king......and stop drinking the kool aid.....I'm coaching both sports a long time, in lacrosse as well the majority of kids on LI are playing D2 and D3 Lax in college. just like in football. very few and far between are going to duke or unc....let's all calm down. stop listening to the lies the summer lax coaches are telling you. like I said I'm coaching both sports for an eternity. the majority of lax players r still going to Dowling, post, and farmingdale. take a couple deep breaths parents.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
full ride to Hopkins??? Lmao that's what those coaches running that summer lax program are telling you? keep dreaming. and as for the lax players being the best football players......NOT EVEN CLOSE! and summer training program is part of the program it's not to motivate lazy kids lmao


Tell that to the best Football player to play on LI in years from Sayville. Gave up his lax scholarship to Notre Dame in favor of a Football scholarship. Oh and there is the standout Football player from Smithown East who is going to YALE to play lax.
Right re-read what you just wrote.....GAVE UP A LAX SCHOLARSHIP TO PLAY BIG TIME COLLEGE FOOTBALL. He'll play in front of big crowds on tv and in bowl games. heard he had Alabama and Michigan up here in one week. I'd go play football too. as for the kid from smithtown east....let's calm down the kid was a 5'11 QB with an average arm. sure he shined at QB in a.weak division. he's much better suited for lacrosse. FOOTBALL IS KING NATIONWIDE.


I know what I said, that it is EXTREMELY rare for a LI kid to be ranked highly nationally in football. Sayville boy is also STANDOUT lacrosse player, hence the scholarship offer. Makes sense that he would take the football scholarship, but remember, this kid is the EXCEPTION! FOOTBALL is not, and NEVER Will be a strong scholarship sport on long Island. Lacrosse is, and those players also play football for FUN! As for the SE kid, he is 6'1" and did get football offers but wanted Yale. Not to shabby! You need to understand that I pointed out two kids. My son's HS lacrosse team had 14 D1 commits last year. If your kid is athletic and hard working, and wants to play a D1 sport, evidence supports that on LI, it is most likely going to happen in lacrosse.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
full ride to Hopkins??? Lmao that's what those coaches running that summer lax program are telling you? keep dreaming. and as for the lax players being the best football players......NOT EVEN CLOSE! and summer training program is part of the program it's not to motivate lazy kids lmao


Tell that to the best Football player to play on LI in years from Sayville. Gave up his lax scholarship to Notre Dame in favor of a Football scholarship. Oh and there is the standout Football player from Smithown East who is going to YALE to play lax.
Right re-read what you just wrote.....GAVE UP A LAX SCHOLARSHIP TO PLAY BIG TIME COLLEGE FOOTBALL. He'll play in front of big crowds on tv and in bowl games. heard he had Alabama and Michigan up here in one week. I'd go play football too. as for the kid from smithtown east....let's calm down the kid was a 5'11 QB with an average arm. sure he shined at QB in a.weak division. he's much better suited for lacrosse. FOOTBALL IS KING NATIONWIDE.


I know what I said, that it is EXTREMELY rare for a LI kid to be ranked highly nationally in football. Sayville boy is also STANDOUT lacrosse player, hence the scholarship offer. Makes sense that he would take the football scholarship, but remember, this kid is the EXCEPTION! FOOTBALL is not, and NEVER Will be a strong scholarship sport on long Island. Lacrosse is, and those players also play football for FUN! As for the SE kid, he is 6'1" and did get football offers but wanted Yale. Not to shabby! You need to understand that I pointed out two kids. My son's HS lacrosse team had 14 D1 commits last year. If your kid is athletic and hard working, and wants to play a D1 sport, evidence supports that on LI, it is most likely going to happen in lacrosse.
14 D1 commitments.....nice! I'll watch that Alabama Georgia game before I watch Hopkins duke. and the kid from SE had non scholarship offers for football. and Yale was for his grades. I'm sure his lax prowess helped. listen really look back in history. do some research....there have been more than a few LI high school kids that went on to play d1 college football. yes lax wins that battle but at the end of the day after that college lax career is over what's next? the $10,000 a year gig playing pro lax. yes!! sign me up. lol. the original point was this....lacrosse and again I coach both sports.....is getting ridiculous. the season ended in June or may......there's a month off then football starts. I was absolutely appalled to see some of these schools doing summer programs and interfering with these school's summer football programs. and it's for a few extra bucks right? so yeah like I said just like I penalize my lax players for missing pre season programs.....I'll do the same to my football players who decide they're going to skip my pre season football program because they're playing summer lacrosse. it isn't lacrosse season. this really is getting annoying on this island. everyone is selfish. years back.....20 years that is....sports coaches in school would never do this to each other.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
full ride to Hopkins??? Lmao that's what those coaches running that summer lax program are telling you? keep dreaming. and as for the lax players being the best football players......NOT EVEN CLOSE! and summer training program is part of the program it's not to motivate lazy kids lmao


Tell that to the best Football player to play on LI in years from Sayville. Gave up his lax scholarship to Notre Dame in favor of a Football scholarship. Oh and there is the standout Football player from Smithown East who is going to YALE to play lax.
Right re-read what you just wrote.....GAVE UP A LAX SCHOLARSHIP TO PLAY BIG TIME COLLEGE FOOTBALL. He'll play in front of big crowds on tv and in bowl games. heard he had Alabama and Michigan up here in one week. I'd go play football too. as for the kid from smithtown east....let's calm down the kid was a 5'11 QB with an average arm. sure he shined at QB in a.weak division. he's much better suited for lacrosse. FOOTBALL IS KING NATIONWIDE.


I know what I said, that it is EXTREMELY rare for a LI kid to be ranked highly nationally in football. Sayville boy is also STANDOUT lacrosse player, hence the scholarship offer. Makes sense that he would take the football scholarship, but remember, this kid is the EXCEPTION! FOOTBALL is not, and NEVER Will be a strong scholarship sport on long Island. Lacrosse is, and those players also play football for FUN! As for the SE kid, he is 6'1" and did get football offers but wanted Yale. Not to shabby! You need to understand that I pointed out two kids. My son's HS lacrosse team had 14 D1 commits last year. If your kid is athletic and hard working, and wants to play a D1 sport, evidence supports that on LI, it is most likely going to happen in lacrosse.
14 D1 commitments.....nice! I'll watch that Alabama Georgia game before I watch Hopkins duke. and the kid from SE had non scholarship offers for football. and Yale was for his grades. I'm sure his lax prowess helped. listen really look back in history. do some research....there have been more than a few LI high school kids that went on to play d1 college football. yes lax wins that battle but at the end of the day after that college lax career is over what's next? the $10,000 a year gig playing pro lax. yes!! sign me up. lol. the original point was this....lacrosse and again I coach both sports.....is getting ridiculous. the season ended in June or may......there's a month off then football starts. I was absolutely appalled to see some of these schools doing summer programs and interfering with these school's summer football programs. and it's for a few extra bucks right? so yeah like I said just like I penalize my lax players for missing pre season programs.....I'll do the same to my football players who decide they're going to skip my pre season football program because they're playing summer lacrosse. it isn't lacrosse season. this really is getting annoying on this island. everyone is selfish. years back.....20 years that is....sports coaches in school would never do this to each other.


Clearly you are a football guy, I love football too, unfortunately LI kids are really playing for the fun of it, which is fine. Lax ,which will not pay the bills for the vast majority, will get a kid into his reach school if he is good. It will also get a part of the college bill paid for. Summer is recruiting season, so the boys must attend these events to be seen. That's when the college coaches are watching. So yes, summer ball is critical! Oh, and smart white boys don't get into Yale unless they can do something special, like play lacrosse!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
full ride to Hopkins??? Lmao that's what those coaches running that summer lax program are telling you? keep dreaming. and as for the lax players being the best football players......NOT EVEN CLOSE! and summer training program is part of the program it's not to motivate lazy kids lmao


Tell that to the best Football player to play on LI in years from Sayville. Gave up his lax scholarship to Notre Dame in favor of a Football scholarship. Oh and there is the standout Football player from Smithown East who is going to YALE to play lax.
Right re-read what you just wrote.....GAVE UP A LAX SCHOLARSHIP TO PLAY BIG TIME COLLEGE FOOTBALL. He'll play in front of big crowds on tv and in bowl games. heard he had Alabama and Michigan up here in one week. I'd go play football too. as for the kid from smithtown east....let's calm down the kid was a 5'11 QB with an average arm. sure he shined at QB in a.weak division. he's much better suited for lacrosse. FOOTBALL IS KING NATIONWIDE.


I know what I said, that it is EXTREMELY rare for a LI kid to be ranked highly nationally in football. Sayville boy is also STANDOUT lacrosse player, hence the scholarship offer. Makes sense that he would take the football scholarship, but remember, this kid is the EXCEPTION! FOOTBALL is not, and NEVER Will be a strong scholarship sport on long Island. Lacrosse is, and those players also play football for FUN! As for the SE kid, he is 6'1" and did get football offers but wanted Yale. Not to shabby! You need to understand that I pointed out two kids. My son's HS lacrosse team had 14 D1 commits last year. If your kid is athletic and hard working, and wants to play a D1 sport, evidence supports that on LI, it is most likely going to happen in lacrosse.
14 D1 commitments.....nice! I'll watch that Alabama Georgia game before I watch Hopkins duke. and the kid from SE had non scholarship offers for football. and Yale was for his grades. I'm sure his lax prowess helped. listen really look back in history. do some research....there have been more than a few LI high school kids that went on to play d1 college football. yes lax wins that battle but at the end of the day after that college lax career is over what's next? the $10,000 a year gig playing pro lax. yes!! sign me up. lol. the original point was this....lacrosse and again I coach both sports.....is getting ridiculous. the season ended in June or may......there's a month off then football starts. I was absolutely appalled to see some of these schools doing summer programs and interfering with these school's summer football programs. and it's for a few extra bucks right? so yeah like I said just like I penalize my lax players for missing pre season programs.....I'll do the same to my football players who decide they're going to skip my pre season football program because they're playing summer lacrosse. it isn't lacrosse season. this really is getting annoying on this island. everyone is selfish. years back.....20 years that is....sports coaches in school would never do this to each other.


Clearly you are a football guy, I love football too, unfortunately LI kids are really playing for the fun of it, which is fine. Lax ,which will not pay the bills for the vast majority, will get a kid into his reach school if he is good. It will also get a part of the college bill paid for. Summer is recruiting season, so the boys must attend these events to be seen. That's when the college coaches are watching. So yes, summer ball is critical! Oh, and smart white boys don't get into Yale unless they can do something special, like play lacrosse!
No sir. I coach both sports with equal passion. and I do not disagree with what you're saying about the popularity of lacrosse on LI. I just think there should be a separation of seasons. let's give each coach fair time to get their programs together. like I said I coach both programs. when football ends I don't interfere with the wrestling or basketball programs. and as lax ends I expect my lax players who are football players to be at my summer programs on time. jus ft like I said when hoops and wrestling is over....I expect my lax players who play those sports to be at my lax programs on time. period.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
full ride to Hopkins??? Lmao that's what those coaches running that summer lax program are telling you? keep dreaming. and as for the lax players being the best football players......NOT EVEN CLOSE! and summer training program is part of the program it's not to motivate lazy kids lmao


Tell that to the best Football player to play on LI in years from Sayville. Gave up his lax scholarship to Notre Dame in favor of a Football scholarship. Oh and there is the standout Football player from Smithown East who is going to YALE to play lax.
Right re-read what you just wrote.....GAVE UP A LAX SCHOLARSHIP TO PLAY BIG TIME COLLEGE FOOTBALL. He'll play in front of big crowds on tv and in bowl games. heard he had Alabama and Michigan up here in one week. I'd go play football too. as for the kid from smithtown east....let's calm down the kid was a 5'11 QB with an average arm. sure he shined at QB in a.weak division. he's much better suited for lacrosse. FOOTBALL IS KING NATIONWIDE.


I know what I said, that it is EXTREMELY rare for a LI kid to be ranked highly nationally in football. Sayville boy is also STANDOUT lacrosse player, hence the scholarship offer. Makes sense that he would take the football scholarship, but remember, this kid is the EXCEPTION! FOOTBALL is not, and NEVER Will be a strong scholarship sport on long Island. Lacrosse is, and those players also play football for FUN! As for the SE kid, he is 6'1" and did get football offers but wanted Yale. Not to shabby! You need to understand that I pointed out two kids. My son's HS lacrosse team had 14 D1 commits last year. If your kid is athletic and hard working, and wants to play a D1 sport, evidence supports that on LI, it is most likely going to happen in lacrosse.
14 D1 commitments.....nice! I'll watch that Alabama Georgia game before I watch Hopkins duke. and the kid from SE had non scholarship offers for football. and Yale was for his grades. I'm sure his lax prowess helped. listen really look back in history. do some research....there have been more than a few LI high school kids that went on to play d1 college football. yes lax wins that battle but at the end of the day after that college lax career is over what's next? the $10,000 a year gig playing pro lax. yes!! sign me up. lol. the original point was this....lacrosse and again I coach both sports.....is getting ridiculous. the season ended in June or may......there's a month off then football starts. I was absolutely appalled to see some of these schools doing summer programs and interfering with these school's summer football programs. and it's for a few extra bucks right? so yeah like I said just like I penalize my lax players for missing pre season programs.....I'll do the same to my football players who decide they're going to skip my pre season football program because they're playing summer lacrosse. it isn't lacrosse season. this really is getting annoying on this island. everyone is selfish. years back.....20 years that is....sports coaches in school would never do this to each other.


Clearly you are a football guy, I love football too, unfortunately LI kids are really playing for the fun of it, which is fine. Lax ,which will not pay the bills for the vast majority, will get a kid into his reach school if he is good. It will also get a part of the college bill paid for. Summer is recruiting season, so the boys must attend these events to be seen. That's when the college coaches are watching. So yes, summer ball is critical! Oh, and smart white boys don't get into Yale unless they can do something special, like play lacrosse!
oh and Lmfao great last sentence.
It seems the topic was lost a little. The School districts should stop allowing the kids pay $1,000.00 to play summer lacrosse with the coaches. it creates an atmosphere of pay and play or your child will suffer the consequences for not doing so. A family should be able to play anywhere without any consequences.

Plus most of the recruiting gets done a the showcases that travel teams go to. Not Medford Park.
My friends son played for WI and they charges 200 or 250 to play in 4 travel tournaments. The only need to charge 1000. is to line someone's pockets
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My friends son played for WI and they charges 200 or 250 to play in 4 travel tournaments. The only need to charge 1000. is to line someone's pockets


Let's hear it. Who's High School team has a summer travel program run by the high school coach and what do you pay to play?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My friends son played for WI and they charges 200 or 250 to play in 4 travel tournaments. The only need to charge 1000. is to line someone's pockets


Let's hear it. Who's High School team has a summer travel program run by the high school coach and what do you pay to play?


My town has a summer HS team and this year they aligned with a greedy clown to use his web site and email lists. The cost went up over $100 for the same amount of tournaments as last summer. It was $550 this year not including Hot Beds which was another $550. so it was $1100 for the summer.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My friends son played for WI and they charges 200 or 250 to play in 4 travel tournaments. The only need to charge 1000. is to line someone's pockets


Let's hear it. Who's High School team has a summer travel program run by the high school coach and what do you pay to play?
The idiots at Sachem north are charging $950 for the summer. and people are dumb enough to pay. they're afraid their kids will get black balled once they start playing in school. all of them are afraid. u gotta see the parents. there's a line of them trying to shake the coaches hands at tournaments and practices and kiss up. If their kids are good enough to play varsity lax when the season starts they'll get plenty of playing time. u don't have to play summer lax for $950. that's absurd. these coaches are getting greedy. lining their pockets and interfering with the start of football practice. that's how selfish they are. so if your kid plays football and is a starter on that football team he's forced to make a choice. play summer lax which means nothing or miss football practice and lose out to a kid who wants his position. it's just ridiculous. for all u football parents who's kids r playing summer lax.....don't complain when your kid isn't getting much football playing time in games come the fall. keep lining the lax coaches pockets. brilliant idea.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
full ride to Hopkins??? Lmao that's what those coaches running that summer lax program are telling you? keep dreaming. and as for the lax players being the best football players......NOT EVEN CLOSE! and summer training program is part of the program it's not to motivate lazy kids lmao


Tell that to the best Football player to play on LI in years from Sayville. Gave up his lax scholarship to Notre Dame in favor of a Football scholarship. Oh and there is the standout Football player from Smithown East who is going to YALE to play lax.
Right re-read what you just wrote.....GAVE UP A LAX SCHOLARSHIP TO PLAY BIG TIME COLLEGE FOOTBALL. He'll play in front of big crowds on tv and in bowl games. heard he had Alabama and Michigan up here in one week. I'd go play football too. as for the kid from smithtown east....let's calm down the kid was a 5'11 QB with an average arm. sure he shined at QB in a.weak division. he's much better suited for lacrosse. FOOTBALL IS KING NATIONWIDE.


I know what I said, that it is EXTREMELY rare for a LI kid to be ranked highly nationally in football. Sayville boy is also STANDOUT lacrosse player, hence the scholarship offer. Makes sense that he would take the football scholarship, but remember, this kid is the EXCEPTION! FOOTBALL is not, and NEVER Will be a strong scholarship sport on long Island. Lacrosse is, and those players also play football for FUN! As for the SE kid, he is 6'1" and did get football offers but wanted Yale. Not to shabby! You need to understand that I pointed out two kids. My son's HS lacrosse team had 14 D1 commits last year. If your kid is athletic and hard working, and wants to play a D1 sport, evidence supports that on LI, it is most likely going to happen in lacrosse.
14 D1 commitments.....nice! I'll watch that Alabama Georgia game before I watch Hopkins duke. and the kid from SE had non scholarship offers for football. and Yale was for his grades. I'm sure his lax prowess helped. listen really look back in history. do some research....there have been more than a few LI high school kids that went on to play d1 college football. yes lax wins that battle but at the end of the day after that college lax career is over what's next? the $10,000 a year gig playing pro lax. yes!! sign me up. lol. the original point was this....lacrosse and again I coach both sports.....is getting ridiculous. the season ended in June or may......there's a month off then football starts. I was absolutely appalled to see some of these schools doing summer programs and interfering with these school's summer football programs. and it's for a few extra bucks right? so yeah like I said just like I penalize my lax players for missing pre season programs.....I'll do the same to my football players who decide they're going to skip my pre season football program because they're playing summer lacrosse. it isn't lacrosse season. this really is getting annoying on this island. everyone is selfish. years back.....20 years that is....sports coaches in school would never do this to each other.
there are 1,644 pro football players there are 10625 D1 FSC players. To imply that any kid from long Island will move on to play pro football is at best a pipe dream. The self-vaulted football coach from above knows very little about college D! football and looks like a fool. Big time college football scholarships are known as "head count" scholarships, that means there are no partial or divided scholarships awarded, and every school gets 85 full rides. simply stated, every kid offered a spot is given a full ride in Football, ,mens and woman basketball, and I believe hockey.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
full ride to Hopkins??? Lmao that's what those coaches running that summer lax program are telling you? keep dreaming. and as for the lax players being the best football players......NOT EVEN CLOSE! and summer training program is part of the program it's not to motivate lazy kids lmao



Tell that to the best Football player to play on LI in years from Sayville. Gave up his lax scholarship to Notre Dame in favor of a Football scholarship. Oh and there is the standout Football player from Smithown East who is going to YALE to play lax.
Right re-read what you just wrote.....GAVE UP A LAX SCHOLARSHIP TO PLAY BIG TIME COLLEGE FOOTBALL. He'll play in front of big crowds on tv and in bowl games. heard he had Alabama and Michigan up here in one week. I'd go play football too. as for the kid from smithtown east....let's calm down the kid was a 5'11 QB with an average arm. sure he shined at QB in a.weak division. he's much better suited for lacrosse. FOOTBALL IS KING NATIONWIDE.


I know what I said, that it is EXTREMELY rare for a LI kid to be ranked highly nationally in football. Sayville boy is also STANDOUT lacrosse player, hence the scholarship offer. Makes sense that he would take the football scholarship, but remember, this kid is the EXCEPTION! FOOTBALL is not, and NEVER Will be a strong scholarship sport on long Island. Lacrosse is, and those players also play football for FUN! As for the SE kid, he is 6'1" and did get football offers but wanted Yale. Not to shabby! You need to understand that I pointed out two kids. My son's HS lacrosse team had 14 D1 commits last year. If your kid is athletic and hard working, and wants to play a D1 sport, evidence supports that on LI, it is most likely going to happen in lacrosse.
14 D1 commitments.....nice! I'll watch that Alabama Georgia game before I watch Hopkins duke. and the kid from SE had non scholarship offers for football. and Yale was for his grades. I'm sure his lax prowess helped. listen really look back in history. do some research....there have been more than a few LI high school kids that went on to play d1 college football. yes lax wins that battle but at the end of the day after that college lax career is over what's next? the $10,000 a year gig playing pro lax. yes!! sign me up. lol. the original point was this....lacrosse and again I coach both sports.....is getting ridiculous. the season ended in June or may......there's a month off then football starts. I was absolutely appalled to see some of these schools doing summer programs and interfering with these school's summer football programs. and it's for a few extra bucks right? so yeah like I said just like I penalize my lax players for missing pre season programs.....I'll do the same to my football players who decide they're going to skip my pre season football program because they're playing summer lacrosse. it isn't lacrosse season. this really is getting annoying on this island. everyone is selfish. years back.....20 years that is....sports coaches in school would never do this to each other.
there are 1,644 pro football players there are 10625 D1 FSC players. To imply that any kid from long Island will move on to play pro football is at best a pipe dream. The self-vaulted football coach from above knows very little about college D! football and looks like a fool. Big time college football scholarships are known as "head count" scholarships, that means there are no partial or divided scholarships awarded, and every school gets 85 full rides. simply stated, every kid offered a spot is given a full ride in Football, ,mens and woman basketball, and I believe hockey.
who said anything about playing pro football or that long island was a hot bed for football. all's I said was that football was much more popular nationwide than lacrosse ever will be. but thank you for coming on here and vomiting up stats and numbers professor. it was very enlightening.
what is enlightening is how someone like you can function with the rest of us with such a high opinion of themselves. I believe your quote was "but at the end of the day after that college lax career is over what's next? the $10,000 a year gig playing pro lax. yes!! sign me up." alluding that pro football is more lucrative, witch it is, for athletes that don't live on Long Island. What your deflecting is your ignorance to even the college football recruiting process, and what is real enlightening, is that you're a Long Island football coach. It's no wonder 99% of our kids can't go big D1, with fool coaches like you they don't stand a chance. If you're a lacrosse coach I wonder if you have ever sent a kid D1 lax, or are you just a one of those lunkhead coach from a bad lax school collecting an extra $5,000.00 in the spring. Maybe you should stop pushing a sport that very few of our kids reach any level of success in, and end up battered and crippled, and not even get a $10,000.00 a year pro career.
Hey moron! If a kid is interested in playing lacrosse in college , he has to play summer lax. That's when all the recruiting is done. Wake the f*** up!
there is a note in 2018 and 2017 asking what the future landscape for those kids that did travel in 5-9th grade is.

I can only presume some of us want to forego that "Club" experience in the later HS years and play together as a HS team with less of a commitment $$ and time so the kids can do showcases and such.

It asked does travel really stop in the spring leading up to their Jr summer. Is it, they play with their HS team in the summer TO GET BETTER AS A TEAM and attend Showcases to be seen.

I say this because to me (in this day and age) you play travel lax (at least on the competitive levels) in years 7/8/9 to establish that you can play on or at a higher level. This level the boys most likely want to play college lax. Sure young dreams, but they tend to be the ones at least 85% of them playing college lax.

So is their Sophomore summer their real last Club Summer. Or if they were lucky enough to get recruited do the colleges state they must play on such and such teams (maybe teams with other recruits their year).
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yup a lot of money. and I'd also like to add that the coaches who's football season this summer lacrosse is interfering with need to start penciling these lax players coming late to or missing summer weight training or practice at the bottom of their depth charts and giving the serious dedicated football players the advantage. and the kids who play lax that also play football and there's a lot of them will make a choice. or the BS summer lax programs will disappear because they'll be missing players too. bunch of clowns.


Haha, on LI, lax will always come first over football if a kid wants to play D1 sports in college. Just the facts!!
hahahaha! here's the facts......football is king......and stop drinking the kool aid.....I'm coaching both sports a long time, in lacrosse as well the majority of kids on LI are playing D2 and D3 Lax in college. just like in football. very few and far between are going to duke or unc....let's all calm down. stop listening to the lies the summer lax coaches are telling you. like I said I'm coaching both sports for an eternity. the majority of lax players r still going to Dowling, post, and farmingdale. take a couple deep breaths parents.


Fact is you would be an idiot to let your kid play football period.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yup a lot of money. and I'd also like to add that the coaches who's football season this summer lacrosse is interfering with need to start penciling these lax players coming late to or missing summer weight training or practice at the bottom of their depth charts and giving the serious dedicated football players the advantage. and the kids who play lax that also play football and there's a lot of them will make a choice. or the BS summer lax programs will disappear because they'll be missing players too. bunch of clowns.


Haha, on LI, lax will always come first over football if a kid wants to play D1 sports in college. Just the facts!!
hahahaha! here's the facts......football is king......and stop drinking the kool aid.....I'm coaching both sports a long time, in lacrosse as well the majority of kids on LI are playing D2 and D3 Lax in college. just like in football. very few and far between are going to duke or unc....let's all calm down. stop listening to the lies the summer lax coaches are telling you. like I said I'm coaching both sports for an eternity. the majority of lax players r still going to Dowling, post, and farmingdale. take a couple deep breaths parents.


Fact is you would be an idiot to let your kid play football period.
Yeah cuz there's no contact in lacrosse all of a sudden right. and I'm sure you played plenty of football growing up. Now the game of football has become criminalized by guys like the above poster.
ive recently had this dilemma. Should I push my son to play football. I would definitely like my son to play football. I know what it does for a young boy and how it gives life lessons and helps the boys bond. But really, why do I want him to play, because I did? Yep! (It helps my son has twice the talent and work ethic I had. not boasting or living vicariously - just facts). I know what it takes, and he has it but what he doesn't have is the love.

where has the love gone? Sports are different now, or is it. We didn't have instant access to the games or recaps and reruns. Some of us were lucky if we got to even watch football games. In this technological age information is immediate. You can see the good parts on redzone ticket or the ESPN highlights or DVR it. There is no want or desire. Why, desire something that can be found with their fingertips at a click of a button.

But that is not it, kids are also smarter; Kids see read and comprehend information instantaneously. They see some of the perils of football and it is not lost on this generation. The issues have them scared because they see us scared - and rightfully so. (wonder what the facts or desires of lacrosse will be when they are parents)

But the issue at hand is (lax vs football in/out of season) but is the issue really about committing to something and also understanding what your priorities should be. This is a valuable lesson our kids are learning at a young age.

I also think we all need to realistic. Back in the day summer football were captains practices or 7v7's w/no coaches. Maybe a bit lord of the flies, but you learned how to deal with things and people. If you had other summer sports AAU hoops, baseball, Lax you went to those and missed summer football. And during the football season you barley picked up your stick or glove. You threw around the football. But that has changed.

Soccer isn’t the only year around sport. All sports are now year around.

But the point again is about committing to something while still understanding your overall priorities. All throughout life you will need to break commitments some for good reasons some for ridiculously bad. These kids are learning at a younger age how to make those choices. that is an invaluable experience.
thanks sachem north coaches. way to let our boys play in 2019 division this weekend. some of them are just going into seventh grade. this is what I paid for I guess you'll tell us right? great lesson for the boys to spend the weekend getting embarrassed. it teaches them nothing.
Commack charges $1000+ to play travel. HS coach runs it. Dont really get anything out of it. Pootly run. BUT feel pressured to play
how does one feel pressured to play summer lax or spend $1000 doing so
Originally Posted by Anonymous
how does one feel pressured to play summer lax or spend $1000 doing so


Because they think the coach will remember years later when their kid is on the bubble of making varsity. The fiction is the coach will be loyal and reward those who have supported his summer program over the years. Conversely, if your kid doesn't support the coach's program he will be "blackballed" and unable to play varsity. Having been through this in a major lacrosse town, all I can say is we did not find that to be true. In our town the best kids play. Period. Nobody remembers all the checks you wrote when some other kid comes along, having never played in the summer program, and is just flat-out better. And as you might have guessed, I am in the category of someone who wrote lots of checks and then saw my son passed over for a new kid that was objectively better. It is what it is.....just be an educated consumer.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
how does one feel pressured to play summer lax or spend $1000 doing so


Because they think the coach will remember years later when their kid is on the bubble of making varsity. The fiction is the coach will be loyal and reward those who have supported his summer program over the years. Conversely, if your kid doesn't support the coach's program he will be "blackballed" and unable to play varsity. Having been through this in a major lacrosse town, all I can say is we did not find that to be true. In our town the best kids play. Period. Nobody remembers all the checks you wrote when some other kid comes along, having never played in the summer program, and is just flat-out better. And as you might have guessed, I am in the category of someone who wrote lots of checks and then saw my son passed over for a new kid that was objectively better. It is what it is.....just be an educated consumer.
Amen!!
The problem is getting worse.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My friends son played for WI and they charges 200 or 250 to play in 4 travel tournaments. The only need to charge 1000. is to line someone's pockets


Let's hear it. Who's High School team has a summer travel program run by the high school coach and what do you pay to play?
The idiots at Sachem north are charging $950 for the summer. and people are dumb enough to pay. they're afraid their kids will get black balled once they start playing in school. all of them are afraid. u gotta see the parents. there's a line of them trying to shake the coaches hands at tournaments and practices and kiss up. If their kids are good enough to play varsity lax when the season starts they'll get plenty of playing time. u don't have to play summer lax for $950. that's absurd. these coaches are getting greedy. lining their pockets and interfering with the start of football practice. that's how selfish they are. so if your kid plays football and is a starter on that football team he's forced to make a choice. play summer lax which means nothing or miss football practice and lose out to a kid who wants his position. it's just ridiculous. for all u football parents who's kids r playing summer lax.....don't complain when your kid isn't getting much football playing time in games come the fall. keep lining the lax coaches pockets. brilliant idea.


Please tell me what club team you can play on for the summer for less than $950? I would be very interested in having my son try out for that team and saving some money.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My friends son played for WI and they charges 200 or 250 to play in 4 travel tournaments. The only need to charge 1000. is to line someone's pockets


Let's hear it. Who's High School team has a summer travel program run by the high school coach and what do you pay to play?
The idiots at Sachem north are charging $950 for the summer. and people are dumb enough to pay. they're afraid their kids will get black balled once they start playing in school. all of them are afraid. u gotta see the parents. there's a line of them trying to shake the coaches hands at tournaments and practices and kiss up. If their kids are good enough to play varsity lax when the season starts they'll get plenty of playing time. u don't have to play summer lax for $950. that's absurd. these coaches are getting greedy. lining their pockets and interfering with the start of football practice. that's how selfish they are. so if your kid plays football and is a starter on that football team he's forced to make a choice. play summer lax which means nothing or miss football practice and lose out to a kid who wants his position. it's just ridiculous. for all u football parents who's kids r playing summer lax.....don't complain when your kid isn't getting much football playing time in games come the fall. keep lining the lax coaches pockets. brilliant idea.


Please tell me what club team you can play on for the summer for less than $950? I would be very interested in having my son try out for that team and saving some money.


For this poster and the person who responded with the 875 TLI fee after this....Curious if this is all inclusive? Tourney fees included?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My friends son played for WI and they charges 200 or 250 to play in 4 travel tournaments. The only need to charge 1000. is to line someone's pockets


Let's hear it. Who's High School team has a summer travel program run by the high school coach and what do you pay to play?
The idiots at Sachem north are charging $950 for the summer. and people are dumb enough to pay. they're afraid their kids will get black balled once they start playing in school. all of them are afraid. u gotta see the parents. there's a line of them trying to shake the coaches hands at tournaments and practices and kiss up. If their kids are good enough to play varsity lax when the season starts they'll get plenty of playing time. u don't have to play summer lax for $950. that's absurd. these coaches are getting greedy. lining their pockets and interfering with the start of football practice. that's how selfish they are. so if your kid plays football and is a starter on that football team he's forced to make a choice. play summer lax which means nothing or miss football practice and lose out to a kid who wants his position. it's just ridiculous. for all u football parents who's kids r playing summer lax.....don't complain when your kid isn't getting much football playing time in games come the fall. keep lining the lax coaches pockets. brilliant idea.


Please tell me what club team you can play on for the summer for less than $950? I would be very interested in having my son try out for that team and saving some money.


For this poster and the person who responded with the 875 TLI fee after this....Curious if this is all inclusive? Tourney fees included?

The Sachem North fee of $950 was all inclusive for 6 tournaments and two practices a week.
covers everthing but winter workouts. that's usually another $300. worth the price of admission.
Most people I spoke with were happy with the Sachem North Club. The issue with the 2020/21 team being forced up into the 2019 Division was more a MYLACROSSETOURNAMENT.COM issue, but I guess the organization takes the blame as they went along with it.
Team Long Island Lacrosse 6 tournaments, many practices with no hidden costs
yes
school in the middle of the county charges 650 4 practices 3 tournaments . all play(even if they cant)



coach does not play to win. wish my kid played for a school where the best played and you had to fight for your spot against a kid of equal or better talent.
The problem Sachem is having is that they make up their own prices and put pressure on these families to pay them. They try to justify the price compared to travel teams. They do not practice and compete year round as the travel teams do but want you to think its the same thing. Trust me, its not. They are looking to have their tuition cover for three months, not a year.

Some families can pay and others cant but they put the squeeze on the community as a whole. It should be regulated as they put hard working families in an unnecessary stressful situation.
It needs to end.
I am tired of seeing all of these town programs claim they are different than travel. They are all FOR PROFIT LACROSSE PROGRAMS just like all of the other TRAVEL programs including Sachem, Sachem East, Smithtown, etc. It seems some of these guys have got together at sachem and PRICE FIXED registration at $475.00 from 1st grade through 5th Grade for four tournaments and some practices with prices escalating from there. These kind of programs do not consider the family that can't afford that. The youth programs charges a little more that $100.00 for the PAL season but they want to charge $475.00 for a couple of months over the summer. What these coaches are doing is taking away opportunities for kids in their own community to play, not creating them.

They bully the parents and youth of the community to join or as the email says from the varsity coach they will get someone to take your place if you don't play with them. Although it has nothing to do with the schools OR DURING THE SCHOOL YEAR they want you to feel if you play outside of the community its bad and you will be punished OVER THE SUMMER.

This has nothing to do with youth organizations, this is about creating a second income for these coaches and their assistants. Don't believe me ASK YOUR TOWN FOR ITS NON-PROFIT STATUS. I bet you not one of them can do it. My problem is at least you know what you get with those guys. The hIgh school coaches bullying parents and kids want you to think they do this out of the kindness of there heart. lol.

If you play for travel during the school year and miss something that would be different but over the summer. Its over the top.

Do the Athletic Directors in these districts turn a blind eye to this?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am tired of seeing all of these town programs claim they are different than travel. They are all FOR PROFIT LACROSSE PROGRAMS just like all of the other TRAVEL programs including Sachem, Sachem East, Smithtown, etc. It seems some of these guys have got together at sachem and PRICE FIXED registration at $475.00 from 1st grade through 5th Grade for four tournaments and some practices with prices escalating from there. These kind of programs do not consider the family that can't afford that. The youth programs charges a little more that $100.00 for the PAL season but they want to charge $475.00 for a couple of months over the summer. What these coaches are doing is taking away opportunities for kids in their own community to play, not creating them.

They bully the parents and youth of the community to join or as the email says from the varsity coach they will get someone to take your place if you don't play with them. Although it has nothing to do with the schools OR DURING THE SCHOOL YEAR they want you to feel if you play outside of the community its bad and you will be punished OVER THE SUMMER.

This has nothing to do with youth organizations, this is about creating a second income for these coaches and their assistants. Don't believe me ASK YOUR TOWN FOR ITS NON-PROFIT STATUS. I bet you not one of them can do it. My problem is at least you know what you get with those guys. The hIgh school coaches bullying parents and kids want you to think they do this out of the kindness of there heart. lol.

If you play for travel during the school year and miss something that would be different but over the summer. Its over the top.
My school has you all beat. WM charges $1250 for 4 tourn.'s. 1 of those 4 is a tourn. they ran so just imagine how much money they walked away with. It is a shame the school board allows this and doesn't see it as a conflict.

There were barely any coaches at these tourn' s and the only thing worse then this summer season was watching the parents behavior with the coaches

On a side note, in the spring the kids have to sell $200 dollars worth of cards to help out with cost of coaches on the HS varsity and JV.



Originally Posted by Anonymous
My school has you all beat. WM charges $1250 for 4 tourn.'s. 1 of those 4 is a tourn. they ran so just imagine how much money they walked away with. It is a shame the school board allows this and doesn't see it as a conflict.

There were barely any coaches at these tourn' s and the only thing worse then this summer season was watching the parents behavior with the coaches

On a side note, in the spring the kids have to sell $200 dollars worth of cards to help out with cost of coaches on the HS varsity and JV.





Same thing happened at Smithtown, school board shut it down. Greed destroyed the youth program.
That is what is happening with all of our youth programs in Suffolk County.

I think I am sending notice to mine.
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Do the Athletic Directors in these districts turn a blind eye to this?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am tired of seeing all of these town programs claim they are different than travel. They are all FOR PROFIT LACROSSE PROGRAMS just like all of the other TRAVEL programs including Sachem, Sachem East, Smithtown, etc. It seems some of these guys have got together at sachem and PRICE FIXED registration at $475.00 from 1st grade through 5th Grade for four tournaments and some practices with prices escalating from there. These kind of programs do not consider the family that can't afford that. The youth programs charges a little more that $100.00 for the PAL season but they want to charge $475.00 for a couple of months over the summer. What these coaches are doing is taking away opportunities for kids in their own community to play, not creating them.

They bully the parents and youth of the community to join or as the email says from the varsity coach they will get someone to take your place if you don't play with them. Although it has nothing to do with the schools OR DURING THE SCHOOL YEAR they want you to feel if you play outside of the community its bad and you will be punished OVER THE SUMMER.

This has nothing to do with youth organizations, this is about creating a second income for these coaches and their assistants. Don't believe me ASK YOUR TOWN FOR ITS NON-PROFIT STATUS. I bet you not one of them can do it. My problem is at least you know what you get with those guys. The hIgh school coaches bullying parents and kids want you to think they do this out of the kindness of there heart. lol.

If you play for travel during the school year and miss something that would be different but over the summer. Its over the top.


I would say yes. If parents don't complain they will let it continue.



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Do the Athletic Directors in these districts turn a blind eye to this?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am tired of seeing all of these town programs claim they are different than travel. They are all FOR PROFIT LACROSSE PROGRAMS just like all of the other TRAVEL programs including Sachem, Sachem East, Smithtown, etc. It seems some of these guys have got together at sachem and PRICE FIXED registration at $475.00 from 1st grade through 5th Grade for four tournaments and some practices with prices escalating from there. These kind of programs do not consider the family that can't afford that. The youth programs charges a little more that $100.00 for the PAL season but they want to charge $475.00 for a couple of months over the summer. What these coaches are doing is taking away opportunities for kids in their own community to play, not creating them.

They bully the parents and youth of the community to join or as the email says from the varsity coach they will get someone to take your place if you don't play with them. Although it has nothing to do with the schools OR DURING THE SCHOOL YEAR they want you to feel if you play outside of the community its bad and you will be punished OVER THE SUMMER.

This has nothing to do with youth organizations, this is about creating a second income for these coaches and their assistants. Don't believe me ASK YOUR TOWN FOR ITS NON-PROFIT STATUS. I bet you not one of them can do it. My problem is at least you know what you get with those guys. The hIgh school coaches bullying parents and kids want you to think they do this out of the kindness of there heart. lol.

If you play for travel during the school year and miss something that would be different but over the summer. Its over the top.


I would say yes. If parents don't complain they will let it continue.




There were complaints in my town, AD didn't do a thing about it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Do the Athletic Directors in these districts turn a blind eye to this?


Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am tired of seeing all of these town programs claim they are different than travel. They are all FOR PROFIT LACROSSE PROGRAMS just like all of the other TRAVEL programs including Sachem, Sachem East, Smithtown, etc. It seems some of these guys have got together at sachem and PRICE FIXED registration at $475.00 from 1st grade through 5th Grade for four tournaments and some practices with prices escalating from there. These kind of programs do not consider the family that can't afford that. The youth programs charges a little more that $100.00 for the PAL season but they want to charge $475.00 for a couple of months over the summer. What these coaches are doing is taking away opportunities for kids in their own community to play, not creating them.

They bully the parents and youth of the community to join or as the email says from the varsity coach they will get someone to take your place if you don't play with them. Although it has nothing to do with the schools OR DURING THE SCHOOL YEAR they want you to feel if you play outside of the community its bad and you will be punished OVER THE SUMMER.

This has nothing to do with youth organizations, this is about creating a second income for these coaches and their assistants. Don't believe me ASK YOUR TOWN FOR ITS NON-PROFIT STATUS. I bet you not one of them can do it. My problem is at least you know what you get with those guys. The hIgh school coaches bullying parents and kids want you to think they do this out of the kindness of there heart. lol.

If you play for travel during the school year and miss something that would be different but over the summer. Its over the top.


I would say yes. If parents don't complain they will let it continue.




There were complaints in my town, AD didn't do a thing about it.


There is a very clear conflict of interest. It is hard to believe that if parent concerns were brought to the attention of the BOE and the superintendent that this would continue.
All of these coaches are taking advantage of their positions as EDUCATORS. If they did it the right way they wouldn't have to intimidate anyone with the idea of that if they don't pay these outrageous fees to pay for the school team over the summer they would be blackballed by the school. There is no regulation on any of this. Sachem you better get prepared because this is going to the the Board of Education, Superintendent as the AD may be involved too.
Stop your crying. If your kids good enough he will play. Its that plain and simple. No one seems to worry about the coaches and their commitment. The time and effort spent in putting a good product on the field is a difficult task. Having the kids play together from the same high school is a great thing for cohesiveness and seeing who is who in game situations. Should the coaches do it for free. Do you work for free. Don't think so.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Stop your crying. If your kids good enough he will play. Its that plain and simple. No one seems to worry about the coaches and their commitment. The time and effort spent in putting a good product on the field is a difficult task. Having the kids play together from the same high school is a great thing for cohesiveness and seeing who is who in game situations. Should the coaches do it for free. Do you work for free. Don't think so.


No they should not work for free, however charging $800 -$1200 per kid to to participate in a weak program is riducles. 100 kids sign up, do the math. Total money grab and depending on the coach, many feel threaten if they do not participate. It needs to stop. AD's and above need to stop this nonsense.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Stop your crying. If your kids good enough he will play. Its that plain and simple. No one seems to worry about the coaches and their commitment. The time and effort spent in putting a good product on the field is a difficult task. Having the kids play together from the same high school is a great thing for cohesiveness and seeing who is who in game situations. Should the coaches do it for free. Do you work for free. Don't think so.


OK coach. Do these kids not all play together on the HS Team? Do you not have enough time during the season to build cohesiveness? Give it a rest already, there is a definite conflict of interest and now an element of greed. There is also collusion with local youth programs and other HS coaches. Many HS coaches have been vocal about their distain for the clubs and their desire to regain control. Coercion also exists at the youth and HS levels in certain towns. Yes, in most cases the best player will play, that is why you see the top kids go play for the top clubs. The parents of the boy being recruited by Notre Dame, Duke and Virginia don't have a lot to worry about because they will play no matter what. The next tier players on the team who would like to play for a club feel tremendous pressure to play for the town. I my town parents don't even try to hide the fact that they play for the town because they think it will give the player an advantage. The [lacrosse] kissing by some is really out of control.

Are town youth coaches and HS coaches still trying to tell the "Stud" rising 9th and 10th graders not to play for a top club team? If so, it also needs to end. There are approximately 200 rising 10th grade college commits. Very few if any were recruited through their Town/HS Team. If you look at the top academic/athletic D1 programs they account for 170 or so commits. Just about every one of those kids plays for a top club. I'm sure it was the same way for the rising 11th graders and maybe even for the rising 12th graders. Maybe 5 years ago things were different but that is the reality of today.



First of all if your kid is the next tier down in your town, they aren't making the A or AA club teams. They are probably better off staying in town and getting playing time because the studs are playing outside on top clubs. Also, be careful what you wish for. 6 or 7 high school head coaches from top LI programs have just aligned themselves with the LI Outlaws by being appointed to their board. Let's hope this doesn't become the trend. If so, instead of paying 900-1000 to your coach, you can pay $2400 to the outlaws our another club so your son can play on a B or C team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
First of all if your kid is the next tier down in your town, they aren't making the A or AA club teams. They are probably better off staying in town and getting playing time because the studs are playing outside on top clubs. Also, be careful what you wish for. 6 or 7 high school head coaches from top LI programs have just aligned themselves with the LI Outlaws by being appointed to their board. Let's hope this doesn't become the trend. If so, instead of paying 900-1000 to your coach, you can pay $2400 to the outlaws our another club so your son can play on a B or C team.



Exact thing happened in my district. Didnt last long. Coach didnt last long either. Total load! For his good deeds this club made him a coach for one of their spin off money grabs. Hoping that he is not destroying the love of the game for some fifth graders too. Hhope no of you spent money to have your kid play club and got this bozo. Total dead fish!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I am tired of seeing all of these town programs claim they are different than travel. They are all FOR PROFIT LACROSSE PROGRAMS just like all of the other TRAVEL programs including Sachem, Sachem East, Smithtown, etc. It seems some of these guys have got together at sachem and PRICE FIXED registration at $475.00 from 1st grade through 5th Grade for four tournaments and some practices with prices escalating from there. These kind of programs do not consider the family that can't afford that. The youth programs charges a little more that $100.00 for the PAL season but they want to charge $475.00 for a couple of months over the summer. What these coaches are doing is taking away opportunities for kids in their own community to play, not creating them.

They bully the parents and youth of the community to join or as the email says from the varsity coach they will get someone to take your place if you don't play with them. Although it has nothing to do with the schools OR DURING THE SCHOOL YEAR they want you to feel if you play outside of the community its bad and you will be punished OVER THE SUMMER.

This has nothing to do with youth organizations, this is about creating a second income for these coaches and their assistants. Don't believe me ASK YOUR TOWN FOR ITS NON-PROFIT STATUS. I bet you not one of them can do it. My problem is at least you know what you get with those guys. The hIgh school coaches bullying parents and kids want you to think they do this out of the kindness of there heart. lol.

If you play for travel during the school year and miss something that would be different but over the summer. Its over the top.


Your are clearly misinformed and making assumptions in your post. These programs were born out of the community demand for a low cost affordable option to expensive club lacrosse. If you would like to see the cost sheets we will send them to you, please email us directly at sachemrising@gmail.com which you could have done before posting this. Facts-16 summer practices is not a "few". Have you looked at the price of entry fee's? Not cheap!! and this is where most of the cost go to. A decent uniform to show some town pride versus a beat up practice pinny again... not free. So after all that where is all the PROFIT you claim these coaches are making?? AVERAGE club cost range from $1800-2500. The tournament program starts at 3rd grade again not first as you mention. We do offer a K-2 instructional program for $75.00 Do we wish we could offer all of this for free? YES, but with 1k entry fees at some of these events that's not happening.

Look at the perennials on the top of the Suffolk County standings every year... The all have 1 thing in common TOWN PROGRAMS! Northport, Smithtown, 3 Village(WM). This is a direct quote from a newsday article "We grew up together. We've run that play since kindergarten," Bucaro said.

Sorry if you do not see the benefit of these programs, and you have zero town pride but if you have further questions our contact information is in the post.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
All of these coaches are taking advantage of their positions as EDUCATORS. If they did it the right way they wouldn't have to intimidate anyone with the idea of that if they don't pay these outrageous fees to pay for the school team over the summer they would be blackballed by the school. There is no regulation on any of this. Sachem you better get prepared because this is going to the the Board of Education, Superintendent as the AD may be involved too.


All Proper permits and field usage applications were submitted and approved. AD is aware of the program as it has been running at the HS level for a decade. HEAD COACH MAKES ZERO!! Not 1 penny. He coaches to coach... that's it. If you were around the program you would know not all kids play summer, it is not mandatory.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
First of all if your kid is the next tier down in your town, they aren't making the A or AA club teams. They are probably better off staying in town and getting playing time because the studs are playing outside on top clubs. Also, be careful what you wish for. 6 or 7 high school head coaches from top LI programs have just aligned themselves with the LI Outlaws by being appointed to their board. Let's hope this doesn't become the trend. If so, instead of paying 900-1000 to your coach, you can pay $2400 to the outlaws our another club so your son can play on a B or C team.


WELL SAID - Thank God someone on here states facts not fiction!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
First of all if your kid is the next tier down in your town, they aren't making the A or AA club teams. They are probably better off staying in town and getting playing time because the studs are playing outside on top clubs. Also, be careful what you wish for. 6 or 7 high school head coaches from top LI programs have just aligned themselves with the LI Outlaws by being appointed to their board. Let's hope this doesn't become the trend. If so, instead of paying 900-1000 to your coach, you can pay $2400 to the outlaws our another club so your son can play on a B or C team.


WELL SAID - Thank God someone on here states facts not fiction!


No, The fact is: There is a clear conflict of interest.

Players and their family should feel free to choose where they play in the off season without pressure from self serving youth coaches and league directors as well as High School Coaches who are profiting from a town HS summer team.

It's plain and simple these high school coaches are being put on boards of travel teams based on promises to bring their players to the team. So now a high school coach is obligated to bring players over or not get paid by the travel club. 100% conflict of interest and school AD'S should be made aware of the silent strong arm tactics of these coaches. You don't follow me to the club team you might not play in high school.
I am not misinformed. I can tell by your email you are either a sachem coach or one of his henchmen. Why email your cost sheets? Just post them on here. Reality is the people that post and read this thread would be cut them to shreds and the real truth would be exposed. I would dare any program to do that, especially you Mr. Sachem Rising. Truth is you guys don't do those $1,000.00 tournaments, Those are real travel tournaments. The ones your program are entering are closer to $500.00. A Sublimated uniform is $50.00 but a pinnie is probably more appropriate for summer to be honest. Uniforms are for PAL season.

Town pride has nothing to do with paying $500.00-$1,000.00 for a summer sport as you referenced. That mentality is the problem and conflict with these types of programs in town lacrosse throughout Suffolk county. If you don't play for us you have no town pride? Really. I can show you many athletes that play elsewhere in the summer that plenty of town pride.

Town pride is charging closer to $100.00 and letting parents run the program is it has been done in the past. Long Islanbd has produced many athletes doing it that way.

I am sure you can find a summer league under a $1,000.00 but it doesn't need to be in the range of $500.00 - $1,000.00. All Suffolk County programs weren't founded on some varsity coaches charging ridiculous amounts and demanding that they play for them or else. Don't try to dispute it. It is occurring right now all throughout the county.

It's not the idea that's bad, its the ridiculous amount of money that you are trying to charge for it. You don't need to dispute it. Put your cost sheet on the board or just stay quiet. I will say that to any program. Let the people decide. Good Luck.
I think you are crazy. There are travel programs charging $3500+ and several others in the $2800 range. Other "committed" town teams are $1800+ (e.g. GC). There are a lot of things you can say about conflicts in this area. However, you have s weak argument if you are trying to make the case that these Sachem frees are shockingly high.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think you are crazy. There are travel programs charging $3500+ and several others in the $2800 range. Other "committed" town teams are $1800+ (e.g. GC). There are a lot of things you can say about conflicts in this area. However, you have s weak argument if you are trying to make the case that these Sachem frees are shockingly high.


WHO IS 3500? YOU ARE MAKING THAT UP.
Again, my argument is very simple.

SHOW US THE COST SHEETS OR STOP POSTING TO THIS THREAD. ALL OF THESE HIGH SCHOOL STAFFS ARE PREYING ON THE YOUTH LACROSSE PROGRAMS INCLUDING SACHEM. WHO REGULATES COACHES SALARIES AND OR STAFFS/HELPERS. A LOT OF MONEY BEING MADE ON THE KIDS.

The coaches want you to believe something else and I love the line the community is demanding it. What community is demanding to pay these coaches? Not mine or yours, just the coaches. Remember this, All Americans were produced long a go before these coaches started getting involved in youth programs. Sachem Rising, how did they ever survive without you?
Igloo charges $3500 for their yearly programs.
With all the high school coaches being made directors at Outlaws there is definitely a conflict of interest. As a parents of kids attending those paticular schools that want their kids to be in good favor with their high school coach: they will be paying $2400 fees, $300 for indoor and extra fees for the inside lacrosse tournament if you play for Outlaws. You will also be paying for whatever your school team will be doing. Example Smithtown East and West doing 2 possibly 3 tournaments. So whatever that costs add that onto whatever your paying for Outlaws. That's a lot of money for summer lacrosse. Doesn't include hotels, food, and travel expenses. Good luck if you don't follow your high school coach to their travel program.
i am sure that tryout , membership fee, and cost per tournament (yes they pay per tournament on at least 2 or 3 teams) add up to quiet a number. that's not including hotels or those incidentals.
All the town summer travel teams are folding one after the other. Doesn't work. You can't put the "town" summer travels against a true summer travel team. The talent pool in anyone town just isn't deep enough to match up against a travel team pulling the best from multiple towns. Nice idea but once the town boys start getting smoked it all falls apart. No matter how much less expensive the program is.
Agreed. They should just have a Town league during the weekdays in the summer and leave the summer tournaments to the Travel teams.

As you can see all of these Town programs are folding one by one.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With all the high school coaches being made directors at Outlaws there is definitely a conflict of interest. As a parents of kids attending those paticular schools that want their kids to be in good favor with their high school coach: they will be paying $2400 fees, $300 for indoor and extra fees for the inside lacrosse tournament if you play for Outlaws. You will also be paying for whatever your school team will be doing. Example Smithtown East and West doing 2 possibly 3 tournaments. So whatever that costs add that onto whatever your paying for Outlaws. That's a lot of money for summer lacrosse. Doesn't include hotels, food, and travel expenses. Good luck if you don't follow your high school coach to their travel program.


there is definitely the slant you speak about; but there is also the side where the better players can play on a higher level (Select) with other players who can enhance their game. In many instances this is what the better players wanted, playing travel with the blessing of the HS coaches. Now they can do both all while still under the umbrella of the HS coaches while still being able to hear different voices and styles.

More importantly, having the coaches in your organizations eliminate any town/travel conflicts that arise.

Now if you don't make the top select team at least you still have a competitive outlet to play. know your level and work hard to make it to the next. Lets not lose site that this outlet can also give those players (not select - AA) the opportunity to shine and be the players a team needs to rely on. best of both worlds .

now for those complaining about the $$ I don't believe the price changed because of the HS coaches coming on. I believe the price was the price before the announcement and is in the range of other travel programs.

I also believe many players would have payed a little $$ to play for their HS and while paying more $$$ for travel.

I say good job trying to make it work.
Agreed. Except the problem is the coaches are starting the town travel much earlier than High School. They are starting it up at grade school and middle school level. They are pushing players to drop their summer travel teams and only do town Summer travel. All fine and good. Except when these kids leave their travel team, jump on board and the town teams fold right as they hit high school and recruiting years. Then becomes the scramble to get on a Travel Club team ( along with everyone else on their team) and fight for a place on a team that's been together a few years. Very limited amount of spots at that point.
Why do coaches or as a matter of fact why does anyone get added to a board? They get added because they bring something to the table. In the case of adding these head coaches it's because they will bring players to whatever club they are affiliated with. It's a little trickier at the older ages because many players have been playing with the historically stronger programs like Express, 91,Turtles etc. It's a conflict when players feel obligations to play for certain teams out of fear they may be black balled at the High School level. If you think this doesn't happen your head is buried in the sand. It's been happening for years at the private schools.
.
This just shows how misinformed you are. The Sachem rising is run by parents who want a more affordable option for their kids. So please stop your embarrassing yourself. PAL is spring only it ends at memorial day, for the kids who want to play past that they need to go pay 2K? NO THANKS! If you live there and don't like it just don't play, I have a 5th grader and we had a great time with north last year and excited east is now offering the same. We have friends who play for clubs, some are on their 2nd and 3rd one for various reasons and some are now done with it and only doing this.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Again, my argument is very simple.

SHOW US THE COST SHEETS OR STOP POSTING TO THIS THREAD. ALL OF THESE HIGH SCHOOL STAFFS ARE PREYING ON THE YOUTH LACROSSE PROGRAMS INCLUDING SACHEM. WHO REGULATES COACHES SALARIES AND OR STAFFS/HELPERS. A LOT OF MONEY BEING MADE ON THE KIDS.

The coaches want you to believe something else and I love the line the community is demanding it. What community is demanding to pay these coaches? Not mine or yours, just the coaches. Remember this, All Americans were produced long a go before these coaches started getting involved in youth programs. Sachem Rising, how did they ever survive without you?


Do the math if they charge $500 per kid where is the money being made? looks to me like you have an ax to grind here with someone. Why don't you just take it up with them? We pay $875 in Smithtown and we get winter, spring, and summer, I think its a great deal and look at our HS schools I think that speaks for itself but I'm a bit impartial.
I am glad you feel you are getting a good deal at $875.00 in Smithtown. I have no ax to grind with anyone but am bringing something to light for everyone to see.

You think that is a great deal in relation to what? Doesn't that seem high to play?

Does your program explain the costs? Maybe you should ask. You might be shocked by what you find if they would give it to you.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Again, my argument is very simple.

SHOW US THE COST SHEETS OR STOP POSTING TO THIS THREAD. ALL OF THESE HIGH SCHOOL STAFFS ARE PREYING ON THE YOUTH LACROSSE PROGRAMS INCLUDING SACHEM. WHO REGULATES COACHES SALARIES AND OR STAFFS/HELPERS. A LOT OF MONEY BEING MADE ON THE KIDS.

The coaches want you to believe something else and I love the line the community is demanding it. What community is demanding to pay these coaches? Not mine or yours, just the coaches. Remember this, All Americans were produced long a go before these coaches started getting involved in youth programs. Sachem Rising, how did they ever survive without you?


Do the math if they charge $500 per kid where is the money being made? looks to me like you have an ax to grind here with someone. Why don't you just take it up with them? We pay $875 in Smithtown and we get winter, spring, and summer, I think its a great deal and look at our HS schools I think that speaks for itself but I'm a bit impartial.


I think you mean biased.
With town travel teams...are there tryouts at all levels, Youth through Varsity? Or are teams a mix of all talent?
Mr. Smithtown. Here is question for you? I heard through the grapevine that the Board of Education at Smithtown shut down the high school summer program for lacrosse because of the conflict and that why both coaches signed with the Outlaws?
I think its more like the Smithtown coaches saw a greater opportunity to make money with Outlaws and cut the summer tournaments down for the Town program to 2 or 3. This way they can make some money from the town team and the club team. Any club would offer these guys money to be on their board. Think about it it's a direct feed into some great programs. The thing is if a player doesn't play on the travel team they coach is he going to be treated fairly on the high school team. Parents speak up. Make the board and AD aware of this.
A lot of people on here are very concerned about how others spend their money. If you do not want to pay to play on a high priced club that fine, you don't have to.

My issue is with people coercing others to play for a certain team. There is also the problem of misleading the community.

Yesterday I saw a list of "The Top Sophomores" in the country. It was a list of 100 players. It looked like every player on the list played for a club team. Just about all of the players were committed to D1 programs. Almost all of the top kids on the list were committed to great academic schools with excellent lacrosse programs.

Why would anyone try and convince a top player not to play for a top club team??????

If your kid is a strong player you should give serious thought to the motives of anyone who is trying to hold him back. Their motives are selfish and not in the best interest of your child.



You hit it right on the head. These town teams will say its for the good of the team. My opinion you should all you can for your town during the season. After the season ends, do what is in the best interest of your child.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A lot of people on here are very concerned about how others spend their money. If you do not want to pay to play on a high priced club that fine, you don't have to.

My issue is with people coercing others to play for a certain team. There is also the problem of misleading the community.

Yesterday I saw a list of "The Top Sophomores" in the country. It was a list of 100 players. It looked like every player on the list played for a club team. Just about all of the players were committed to D1 programs. Almost all of the top kids on the list were committed to great academic schools with excellent lacrosse programs.

Why would anyone try and convince a top player not to play for a top club team??????

If your kid is a strong player you should give serious thought to the motives of anyone who is trying to hold him back. Their motives are selfish and not in the best interest of your child.





You make valid points about people spending other peoples money. The choice is that of the consumer.

The list you refer to is put together by a person who sees kids play for their travel team. I can assure you that none of these kids is home schooled and they all attend a high school. I think its an injustice not to also list the hometown and high school these kids attend. So lets not overlook the high school teams completely.

Another point is the issue with coercing players to play for certain clubs. I don't think its an all out strong arm move but I do see how a player and their family may feel its obligatory they play for whatever team their high school coach is affiliated with. This can be deemed a bit awkward if you don't play for them. This has been a common practice for years in the privates and now seems to be occurring in the publics.
Good point Do what's best for your child, top talent should play with / against top talent. But lets face it for every 100 TOP players there are 5000 average players and they are the bulk of these conversations. This thread is 3 years old but has been kept alive by people who obviously don't like their high school coach. I am also a firm believer if you are one of the best "they" meaning the recruiters will find you whether you are with a club or your local high school team, that's their job. There were no private clubs 25 years ago and LI still produced the top talent. With the expansion and growth of the game lacrosse has become a lot like soccer and the local high school program is going to be for the average player where the elite kids will only be playing for clubs and academies.
Originally Posted by America's Game
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A lot of people on here are very concerned about how others spend their money. If you do not want to pay to play on a high priced club that fine, you don't have to.

My issue is with people coercing others to play for a certain team. There is also the problem of misleading the community.

Yesterday I saw a list of "The Top Sophomores" in the country. It was a list of 100 players. It looked like every player on the list played for a club team. Just about all of the players were committed to D1 programs. Almost all of the top kids on the list were committed to great academic schools with excellent lacrosse programs.

Why would anyone try and convince a top player not to play for a top club team??????

If your kid is a strong player you should give serious thought to the motives of anyone who is trying to hold him back. Their motives are selfish and not in the best interest of your child.





You make valid points about people spending other peoples money. The choice is that of the consumer.

The list you refer to is put together by a person who sees kids play for their travel team. I can assure you that non of these kids is home schooled and they all attend a high school. I think its an injustice not to also list the hometown and high school these kids attend. So lets not overlook the high school teams completely.

Another point is the issue with coercing players to play for certain clubs. I don't think its an all out strong arm move but I do see how a player and their family may feel its obligatory they play for whatever team their high school coach is affiliated with. This can be deemed a bit awkward if you don't play for them. This has been a common practice for years in the privates and now seems to be occurring in the publics.


The list did list the high schools. However the recruiting is done through the clubs. It is very rare to see a college coach at a high school game. The college coaches are all over the tournaments that the top club teams go to. Unfortunately, High School Lacrosse is no longer the most competitive lacrosse environment. Even on Long Island only the top few teams in each division are competitive. Many of the boys on the list were recruit before they ever played a varsity game.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by America's Game
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A lot of people on here are very concerned about how others spend their money. If you do not want to pay to play on a high priced club that fine, you don't have to.

My issue is with people coercing others to play for a certain team. There is also the problem of misleading the community.

Yesterday I saw a list of "The Top Sophomores" in the country. It was a list of 100 players. It looked like every player on the list played for a club team. Just about all of the players were committed to D1 programs. Almost all of the top kids on the list were committed to great academic schools with excellent lacrosse programs.

Why would anyone try and convince a top player not to play for a top club team??????

If your kid is a strong player you should give serious thought to the motives of anyone who is trying to hold him back. Their motives are selfish and not in the best interest of your child.





You make valid points about people spending other peoples money. The choice is that of the consumer.

The list you refer to is put together by a person who sees kids play for their travel team. I can assure you that non of these kids is home schooled and they all attend a high school. I think its an injustice not to also list the hometown and high school these kids attend. So lets not overlook the high school teams completely.

Another point is the issue with coercing players to play for certain clubs. I don't think its an all out strong arm move but I do see how a player and their family may feel its obligatory they play for whatever team their high school coach is affiliated with. This can be deemed a bit awkward if you don't play for them. This has been a common practice for years in the privates and now seems to be occurring in the publics.


The list did list the high schools. However the recruiting is done through the clubs. It is very rare to see a college coach at a high school game. The college coaches are all over the tournaments that the top club teams go to. Unfortunately, High School Lacrosse is no longer the most competitive lacrosse environment. Even on Long Island only the top few teams in each division are competitive. Many of the boys on the list were recruit before they ever played a varsity game.


True, there are some boys on that list that rarely step on the Varsity field because of the depth, yet they are considered top prospects in there grad class due to their club.
Don't you find it rediculous that these kids haven't even played a Varsity game and they are being ranked. Everything is just getting rushed. Let them play and mature. A lot changes between 9th and 12th grade. Don't let your kid get discouraged because they aren't on some list.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by America's Game
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A lot of people on here are very concerned about how others spend their money. If you do not want to pay to play on a high priced club that fine, you don't have to.

My issue is with people coercing others to play for a certain team. There is also the problem of misleading the community.

Yesterday I saw a list of "The Top Sophomores" in the country. It was a list of 100 players. It looked like every player on the list played for a club team. Just about all of the players were committed to D1 programs. Almost all of the top kids on the list were committed to great academic schools with excellent lacrosse programs.

Why would anyone try and convince a top player not to play for a top club team??????

If your kid is a strong player you should give serious thought to the motives of anyone who is trying to hold him back. Their motives are selfish and not in the best interest of your child.





You make valid points about people spending other peoples money. The choice is that of the consumer.

The list you refer to is put together by a person who sees kids play for their travel team. I can assure you that non of these kids is home schooled and they all attend a high school. I think its an injustice not to also list the hometown and high school these kids attend. So lets not overlook the high school teams completely.

Another point is the issue with coercing players to play for certain clubs. I don't think its an all out strong arm move but I do see how a player and their family may feel its obligatory they play for whatever team their high school coach is affiliated with. This can be deemed a bit awkward if you don't play for them. This has been a common practice for years in the privates and now seems to be occurring in the publics.


The list did list the high schools. However the recruiting is done through the clubs. It is very rare to see a college coach at a high school game. The college coaches are all over the tournaments that the top club teams go to. Unfortunately, High School Lacrosse is no longer the most competitive lacrosse environment. Even on Long Island only the top few teams in each division are competitive. Many of the boys on the list were recruit before they ever played a varsity game.


True, there are some boys on that list that rarely step on the Varsity field because of the depth, yet they are considered top prospects in there grad class due to their club.



I think they are considered top prospects due to their abilities. College coaches don't recruit kids based on the club they play for, they recruit based on the player.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Don't you find it rediculous that these kids haven't even played a Varsity game and they are being ranked. Everything is just getting rushed. Let them play and mature. A lot changes between 9th and 12th grade. Don't let your kid get discouraged because they aren't on some list.


My kid is not on the list but if Harvard, Princeton, Penn, Duke, Notre Dame or Virginia came calling I would not tell them "no thanks I am going to wait a couple of years".

The college coaches are driving this bus. It's not the evil club coaches or the parents, It is the coaches. They can stop the early recruiting any time they want.
It's very true about the college coaches. Sat down on a Sunday with a coach who said he wasn't a fan of early recruiting and then the next week he's signing two 9th graders.
Can someone with knowledge please give insight into the situation at Smithtown East.

Please let me know if the following is even close to being accurate.

-- A number of parents went to the district administration and expressed concern regarding HS coaches and the conflict of interest with their involvement in town only for profit summer lacrosse program. Either the administration told the coaches to stop or the coaches took it upon themselves to back off. The coaches then became Board members for The Outlaws.

Do the parents have the same concerns regarding the coaches involvement with The Outlaws? --

-- I am not from Smithtown but many parents in my district have concerns regarding the conflict of interest with the HS coaches for profit summer program.

Most of the parents are afraid to speak up because they believe doing so will have a negative impact on their children. Some parents don't care what the coaches think and they have their kids play Club Lacrosse . Whether they play for the town only or they play club only or they try and do both everybody agrees it is a bad situation. Just about everyone feels the pressure and very few if any are happy with the current situation.

I have not made any waves but I do believe there is a conflict of interest and that is should not be permitted. I do believe that speaking up would cause negative consequences for my kids.

Just curious if anyone can shed some light on what actually took place. (something close to the truth)

Thanks
Read some of the other pages. You will see conflicts with WM, Sachem, etc.

Its all over the place and all of these other programs should follow Smithtown East and not allow the coaches to make money off the kids in the community. As a Municipal employees coaches shouldn't be making money above what our tax dollars pay them unless it is approved by the board of education of their school district. They are free to pursue gainful employment over the summer but it shouldn't be in the district where they are provided a GOOD living coaching and teaching.

I would rather they go outside to a club than have what is going on with clubs like WM, Sachem and others through the County where they have the "compete with us or else attitude".
They don't make money in the town program that is why they left... Bottom line! I have heard rumors they were offered 10K and the source is very credible. Think about it and I will only use outlaws as an example because that is where the Smithtown coaches went. If they are charging between $2100 and $2500 a kid and lets say they have 200 kids in the club that's a gross somewhere between $425,000 and $450,000 going into the club just on tuition fee's alone. Then add another $75.00 a kid to try out there's another 20K. Some people are making a nice living off of LI's youth lacrosse players!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They don't make money in the town program that is why they left... Bottom line! I have heard rumors they were offered 10K and the source is very credible. Think about it and I will only use outlaws as an example because that is where the Smithtown coaches went. If they are charging between $2100 and $2500 a kid and lets say they have 200 kids in the club that's a gross somewhere between $425,000 and $450,000 going into the club just on tuition fee's alone. Then add another $75.00 a kid to try out there's another 20K. Some people are making a nice living off of LI's youth lacrosse players!


That's peanuts compared to the girls - YJ has over 800 kids rostered at $1,600+ per player and a $50 tryout fee and voluntary clinincs and camps. Not to mention they run half the tournaments that they participate in! 2+ million a year flowing through the YJ machine. Now you know why the rumours of Spallina buying them in a multi million dollar deal never go away
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can someone with knowledge please give insight into the situation at Smithtown East.

Please let me know if the following is even close to being accurate.

-- A number of parents went to the district administration and expressed concern regarding HS coaches and the conflict of interest with their involvement in town only for profit summer lacrosse program. Either the administration told the coaches to stop or the coaches took it upon themselves to back off. The coaches then became Board members for The Outlaws.

Do the parents have the same concerns regarding the coaches involvement with The Outlaws? --

-- I am not from Smithtown but many parents in my district have concerns regarding the conflict of interest with the HS coaches for profit summer program.

Most of the parents are afraid to speak up because they believe doing so will have a negative impact on their children. Some parents don't care what the coaches think and they have their kids play Club Lacrosse . Whether they play for the town only or they play club only or they try and do both everybody agrees it is a bad situation. Just about everyone feels the pressure and very few if any are happy with the current situation.

I have not made any waves but I do believe there is a conflict of interest and that is should not be permitted. I do believe that speaking up would cause negative consequences for my kids.

Just curious if anyone can shed some light on what actually took place. (something close to the truth)

Thanks


Smithtown West was the problem!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They don't make money in the town program that is why they left... Bottom line! I have heard rumors they were offered 10K and the source is very credible. Think about it and I will only use outlaws as an example because that is where the Smithtown coaches went. If they are charging between $2100 and $2500 a kid and lets say they have 200 kids in the club that's a gross somewhere between $425,000 and $450,000 going into the club just on tuition fee's alone. Then add another $75.00 a kid to try out there's another 20K. Some people are making a nice living off of LI's youth lacrosse players!


That's peanuts compared to the girls - YJ has over 800 kids rostered at $1,600+ per player and a $50 tryout fee and voluntary clinincs and camps. Not to mention they run half the tournaments that they participate in! 2+ million a year flowing through the YJ machine. Now you know why the rumours of Spallina buying them in a multi million dollar deal never go away

WOW!!
But it's the town programs that are the problem?!? Laughable
Smithtown East was the problem
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They don't make money in the town program that is why they left... Bottom line! I have heard rumors they were offered 10K and the source is very credible. Think about it and I will only use outlaws as an example because that is where the Smithtown coaches went. If they are charging between $2100 and $2500 a kid and lets say they have 200 kids in the club that's a gross somewhere between $425,000 and $450,000 going into the club just on tuition fee's alone. Then add another $75.00 a kid to try out there's another 20K. Some people are making a nice living off of LI's youth lacrosse players!


That's peanuts compared to the girls - YJ has over 800 kids rostered at $1,600+ per player and a $50 tryout fee and voluntary clinincs and camps. Not to mention they run half the tournaments that they participate in! 2+ million a year flowing through the YJ machine. Now you know why the rumours of Spallina buying them in a multi million dollar deal never go away

WOW!!
But it's the town programs that are the problem?!? Laughable


Exactly. People on here complaining about getting fleeced by varsity coaches charging $500-$1000 dollars for 5 summer tournaments but then they are willing to shell out $2500 to a club and don't see the hypocrisy.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Smithtown East was the problem


Everyone knows the truth in Smithtown. West program has been corupt for years and got called out for it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They don't make money in the town program that is why they left... Bottom line! I have heard rumors they were offered 10K and the source is very credible. Think about it and I will only use outlaws as an example because that is where the Smithtown coaches went. If they are charging between $2100 and $2500 a kid and lets say they have 200 kids in the club that's a gross somewhere between $425,000 and $450,000 going into the club just on tuition fee's alone. Then add another $75.00 a kid to try out there's another 20K. Some people are making a nice living off of LI's youth lacrosse players!


That's peanuts compared to the girls - YJ has over 800 kids rostered at $1,600+ per player and a $50 tryout fee and voluntary clinincs and camps. Not to mention they run half the tournaments that they participate in! 2+ million a year flowing through the YJ machine. Now you know why the rumours of Spallina buying them in a multi million dollar deal never go away

WOW!!
But it's the town programs that are the problem?!? Laughable


Exactly. People on here complaining about getting fleeced by varsity coaches charging $500-$1000 dollars for 5 summer tournaments but then they are willing to shell out $2500 to a club and don't see the hypocrisy.


I don't think the parents of these players are stupid. If they could just play for their town team for only $500-1000 they would. Now they have to pay the $2500 to a club because their high school coaches are now directors. You don't follow me and pay for my salary at this club let's see how much playing time you get on the high school team. Now that's called collusion.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They don't make money in the town program that is why they left... Bottom line! I have heard rumors they were offered 10K and the source is very credible. Think about it and I will only use outlaws as an example because that is where the Smithtown coaches went. If they are charging between $2100 and $2500 a kid and lets say they have 200 kids in the club that's a gross somewhere between $425,000 and $450,000 going into the club just on tuition fee's alone. Then add another $75.00 a kid to try out there's another 20K. Some people are making a nice living off of LI's youth lacrosse players!


That's peanuts compared to the girls - YJ has over 800 kids rostered at $1,600+ per player and a $50 tryout fee and voluntary clinincs and camps. Not to mention they run half the tournaments that they participate in! 2+ million a year flowing through the YJ machine. Now you know why the rumours of Spallina buying them in a multi million dollar deal never go away

WOW!!
But it's the town programs that are the problem?!? Laughable


Exactly. People on here complaining about getting fleeced by varsity coaches charging $500-$1000 dollars for 5 summer tournaments but then they are willing to shell out $2500 to a club and don't see the hypocrisy.


I don't think the parents of these players are stupid. If they could just play for their town team for only $500-1000 they would. Now they have to pay the $2500 to a club because their high school coaches are now directors. You don't follow me and pay for my salary at this club let's see how much playing time you get on the high school team. Now that's called collusion.


I agree. If the high school coaches do blackball kids for not playing for them in the summer that is an issue and they should be fired. Fired not only from the coaching position but also from teaching if they use their position of authority against the students. Doesn't matter if they are running their own summer program or coaching for an outside club using your position of authority against a student for any reason is unethical and should result in losing your job.

On the other hand as long as they do not punish kids on their spring teams for not playing with them in the summer I think the town team model is a better option personally for the majority of players.

The clubs should go back to being what they were 10-15 years ago, true elite teams for the upper tier of players.
Most players are average athletes and lacrosse players. Too many parents disillusion themselves into thinking their kid is the next Miles Jones and spend thousands of dollars chasing that "lacrosse free ride scholarship" that doesn't exist.

Spend that money on a tutor and it will have a much greater return on investment than the Lacrosse Club will.

All those people that were complaining about paying too much for their town summer program before now can pay double or triple and make the club owners wealthy. If you think the town teams were a rip off to line the pockets of the varsity coach you now can enjoy the results of your complaints.
Forget the money for a second, this chain is about conflict of interest-perceived or real. If parents or players feel pressure to play for any club or town-because the varsity coach is running that club or town team, there is a perceived conflict.

If that coach is vocal about his desire for kids to play on his team (again-doesn't matter if it is a club team or a town team), then there is a real conflict.

The threat of being blackballed or just not getting a fair shake at the varsity level is what this chain is about. How much money any family decides to pay is not relevant to the issue.

There is a conflict here plain and simple....

Most of these boys will never play lax at college level so the varsity game is what they are most worried about.

For the kids committed in 9 and 10 grade, the varsity coaches will play them, they are the studs. This issue is about two kids equal in terms of ability and athleticism. The kid that plays for the coach in the summer will get the nod over the kid that doesn't.

In more extreme cases-a kid that is in fact better and faster but does not play summer for the coach, get's shafted.

At the end of the day, because who the coaches pick to play on varsity games is completely subjective, there will never be any proof.

The parents that pay the summer tuition convince themselves that their kid is better and deserves the spot. They consider anyone complaining as a cry baby and say things like if you spent more time with little johny on wall ball...

The parents that don't pay summer tuition, scream that the AD should do something about this horrible coach...

Coaches themselves are in a no win situation but have the ability to make this entire situation go away. Just don't coach summer ball. Guess what happens then, people come on here and say our school coach sucks because he is not spending enough time with our boys...

No win situation. How you feel about it is determined purely on whether your kid is playing or not.

The above is why you have parents kissing coach a$$ all spring and summer.

Only 13-15 boys actually play on varsity even if another 30 make the team. Of those 13-15, only a small handful will play in college. Hard cold truth is that parents should just step back and realize that whether your kid play and starts on varsity is out of your control and doesn't make your kid any less worthy. Whether he/she starts on varsity also doesn't increase your self worth. it is a game and there are very limited scholarship $ and no income potential after college.

Tell your kids to play the game and have fun, this is all about having fun and building young men.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They don't make money in the town program that is why they left... Bottom line! I have heard rumors they were offered 10K and the source is very credible. Think about it and I will only use outlaws as an example because that is where the Smithtown coaches went. If they are charging between $2100 and $2500 a kid and lets say they have 200 kids in the club that's a gross somewhere between $425,000 and $450,000 going into the club just on tuition fee's alone. Then add another $75.00 a kid to try out there's another 20K. Some people are making a nice living off of LI's youth lacrosse players!


That's peanuts compared to the girls - YJ has over 800 kids rostered at $1,600+ per player and a $50 tryout fee and voluntary clinincs and camps. Not to mention they run half the tournaments that they participate in! 2+ million a year flowing through the YJ machine. Now you know why the rumours of Spallina buying them in a multi million dollar deal never go away

WOW!!
But it's the town programs that are the problem?!? Laughable


Exactly. People on here complaining about getting fleeced by varsity coaches charging $500-$1000 dollars for 5 summer tournaments but then they are willing to shell out $2500 to a club and don't see the hypocrisy.


I don't think the parents of these players are stupid. If they could just play for their town team for only $500-1000 they would. Now they have to pay the $2500 to a club because their high school coaches are now directors. You don't follow me and pay for my salary at this club let's see how much playing time you get on the high school team. Now that's called collusion.


I agree. If the high school coaches do blackball kids for not playing for them in the summer that is an issue and they should be fired. Fired not only from the coaching position but also from teaching if they use their position of authority against the students. Doesn't matter if they are running their own summer program or coaching for an outside club using your position of authority against a student for any reason is unethical and should result in losing your job.

On the other hand as long as they do not punish kids on their spring teams for not playing with them in the summer I think the town team model is a better option personally for the majority of players.

The clubs should go back to being what they were 10-15 years ago, true elite teams for the upper tier of players.
Most players are average athletes and lacrosse players. Too many parents disillusion themselves into thinking their kid is the next Miles Jones and spend thousands of dollars chasing that "lacrosse free ride scholarship" that doesn't exist.

Spend that money on a tutor and it will have a much greater return on investment than the Lacrosse Club will.

All those people that were complaining about paying too much for their town summer program before now can pay double or triple and make the club owners wealthy. If you think the town teams were a rip off to line the pockets of the varsity coach you now can enjoy the results of your complaints.


Very well said and this should be the last post in the thread and the thread locked. I could not agree more.
I agree with all except many town programs try to make it play for us or else. Just don't think someone inside the district should be doing that to the people of the community. Having the district regulate costs and salaries and think that would make it more appropriate.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I agree with all except many town programs try to make it play for us or else. Just don't think someone inside the district should be doing that to the people of the community. Having the district regulate costs and salaries and think that would make it more appropriate.


That's a different issue from how much the town programs charge.
I agree, if it is even implied from the town coach that a player should play for him, "or else", whether that be for the town program or a club program that the coach is working for, that is a huge ethical problem. If that is happening in your town I would get together with some other parents that have been told the same thing and go to the A.D. or the B.O.E. and file a complaint against the coach.

But make sure that others feel the same way and it is not just something you perceive because of some pre-existing feelings about the coach. If you are going to make accusations against anyone make sure you have the facts and proof to back up your accusations before you slander someone's reputation.
Its interesting when town/high school coaches want the players to play for the towns summer team. For years it was all about the success of the high school program and having the kids play together all year this usually translated into a very strong high school program. That even helps when there is not much talent. People please understand that there are up years and down years for talent. Every town doesn't have 5 to 10 D1 players. So by keeping the players together year round it creates a strong team concept where players gel together and do better. Historically the towns that had strong town teams had strong high school teams. In this day and age it gets twisted and spun when a coach asks players to play for the town team only. Its his job to put the best product on the field and if he doesn't that group of parents gets together and has him forced out. Every town has that group. Now here is the double edge sword where club teams come into play. In recent years we have seen a change in the formula where club teams are the main concentration and I feel this is due the fact that a college coach can now go to a few tournaments and see a lot of talent in one weekend rather than traveling the nation to see a few good players on any particular high school this excludes the Chaminades and Boys Latin type schools. This is a direct reflection of the me first mentality and the loss of the sense of community in the North East. Add the fact that most high school coaches have no ties to their town and are hired guns. They only want to pad their pocket and as a result they join forces with the travel teams and in turn work for and with the Club Teams.

What's better having a high school coach that is committed to putting the best team on the field and keeping the kids together and insists you play with your high school teammates year round for the betterment of the high school program or is it the pay for play travel teams that many are forced to play for and pay through the roof because your high school coach is now a director. For the purists the latter of the two programs works for the new bloods its all about the clubs.

These are just my opinions. I will give you some teams that historically have had strong high school programs and also strong town teams Ward Melville, Garden City, Smithtown East and West, Manhasset, Yorktown, and more in no particular order.
If a H.S Varsity Lacrosse coach only showed his face for the actuall spring season they would not be in the job for too long.
Garden City just developed its "stay in town" program a few years ago. Their best players went out of town to play club.
some still do.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Garden City just developed its "stay in town" program a few years ago. Their best players went out of town to play club.
some still do.


Many do go outside but they also had a very strong town program. It all starts at the ground level youth ball.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If a H.S Varsity Lacrosse coach only showed his face for the actuall spring season they would not be in the job for too long.


Massapequa???
I think what people forget is that in NYS, and more specifically Long Island a coach is not geting removed from the HC position if the team loses. The coaches at all HS programs are first and foremost teachers, most at the respective school they are coaching at. This is not Texas or Florida where the program runs the school. The teachers union and school boards run the respective schools. So a coach can lose and lose and lose and guess what, he'll still be coaching as long as the kids are graduating and not getting into trouble.
Originally Posted by America's Game
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Garden City just developed its "stay in town" program a few years ago. Their best players went out of town to play club.
some still do.


Many do go outside but they also had a very strong town program. It all starts at the ground level youth ball.


The strong HS Programs on Long Island have been that way for a long time. long before the club teams came to be. Times have changed and now the most competitive lacrosse is played at the club level. Youth through HS, Club is where the best players go to compete.

Shame on anyone who attempts to strong arm players into playing only for a town team at any level.

this thread is about h.s. teams being encouraged to stay in their town for summer lacrosse. not town youth programs.
It all starts at the youth level and builds all the way up to the High School level. In my opinion a team that plays together from youth through high school at any level is a strong team. With all the movement that is seen in the club travel programs you see less continuity. Players are bouncing from team to team. When you live in a town and play with the same town players for a long time the team is usually better at the high school level.
danger is that if you only play on exclusively a town team thru youth and into h.s. aren't roles and depth kind of set and difficult to break into? if kids play outside during summer or fall they may get more touches, play with a variety of players and develop skills that may be never seen as a backup or defined role player on team they began to play with at 8-9 yrs old.
Some of the greatest players to ever play only played town ball..the pay for travel phenomenon is relatively new. 15 years or so. Good players are good players regardless of where they play. These clubs love to sell the dream to anyone willing to pay.
no question the clubs are getting fat selling dreams.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
no question the clubs are getting fat selling dreams.


The Clubs would not exist if there wasn't a demand.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
no question the clubs are getting fat selling dreams.


The Clubs would not exist if there wasn't a demand.


There is a demand because there are so many parents today willing to pay anything to say there kid is better than the neighbors kid. They all buy into the hype and marketing of the clubs.
Good athletes are good athletes no matter where they play. It's 90% genetics. If your kid is going to be 5'6" and 200 lbs and run a 8.5 40 yard dash it doesn't matter how many thousands of dollars you shell out to a club team he still will never play D1 in college.
On the other hand if your kid is a great athlete, 6'1" 200 lbs and runs a 4.2 40 yard dash he can start playing a sport in 11th grade and the D1 programs will find him.
Open your eyes to reality.
Youth sports is supposed to be for fun. If your son is gifted the coaches will find him.
Parents have turned a fun youth sport into a grinding job for 7 & 8 year old boys. Half of them will burn out and not even play when they get to high school.
Is your son really playing year round because he loves the game? Or because he wants to please you? I bet if you asked, most of them would rather be in the school yard or in the pool playing with their friends and enjoying their childhood just like you did.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
no question the clubs are getting fat selling dreams.


The Clubs would not exist if there wasn't a demand.


Over saturation too many crap clubs out there that make false promises and as a result put a crap product on the field. How many really elite players on LI are there per grade. We have like 20 clubs with so called AA,A,and B teams per age group. How many new clubs have sprung up claiming to field elite teams. It's a disaster especially at the 8th 9th and 10th grade levels. So many flop and fold. How many put a good and I mean good product out. Each club has its strong years but for the most part it's always the same teams putting out the best product. A lot of these clubs see the wide eyed bushy tailed parents with visions of D1 commit in their eyes.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
no question the clubs are getting fat selling dreams.


The Clubs would not exist if there wasn't a demand.


Over saturation too many crap clubs out there that make false promises and as a result put a crap product on the field. How many really elite players on LI are there per grade. We have like 20 clubs with so called AA,A,and B teams per age group. How many new clubs have sprung up claiming to field elite teams. It's a disaster especially at the 8th 9th and 10th grade levels. So many flop and fold. How many put a good and I mean good product out. Each club has its strong years but for the most part it's always the same teams putting out the best product. A lot of these clubs see the wide eyed bushy tailed parents with visions of D1 commit in their eyes.



Sounds like you are describing the Town /HS Teams on Long Island.

There are over 100 High Schools playing lacrosse on the island. Most of the teams are not very good at all. Should they all just stop putting a team on the field simply because they are not competitive? Should kids not have an opportunity to play just because they do not have Devision 1 potential? Not every kid can be a star player in HS. These club teams are obviously providing an opportunity for kids to play lacrosse. I doubt very much that the parents of a 12 year old on the 3rd team at 91 thinks their kid is going to get a scholarship to Johns Hopkins.

The Clubs also provide an opportunity for the best kids from each town / HS to play with other kids of similar ability . There is a reason top college coaches fill the sideline when the top club teams play each other. When two top clubs teams play, there is a greater collection of talent by graduation year than you will find at any HS game.

Should a kid stop playing lacrosse when he/she is cut from the Town Team in the 3rd, 4th , 5th , 5th or even 10th or 11th grade? Should only the studs be allowed to play? Why do you people care how much money other people spend so that their kid can play lacrosse? Do you also complain about the cost to play Ice Hockey? How many kids from Long Island are going to make it to the NHL?
I can tell you that parents spend significantly more money for little johnny to play hockey than most people spend for their kid to play lacrosse. Very few of the kids playing youth or HS hockey on the island will get a scholarship.

Stop the BS. There is a definite conflict of interest.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
no question the clubs are getting fat selling dreams.


The Clubs would not exist if there wasn't a demand.


Over saturation too many crap clubs out there that make false promises and as a result put a crap product on the field. How many really elite players on LI are there per grade. We have like 20 clubs with so called AA,A,and B teams per age group. How many new clubs have sprung up claiming to field elite teams. It's a disaster especially at the 8th 9th and 10th grade levels. So many flop and fold. How many put a good and I mean good product out. Each club has its strong years but for the most part it's always the same teams putting out the best product. A lot of these clubs see the wide eyed bushy tailed parents with visions of D1 commit in their eyes.



Sounds like you are describing the Town /HS Teams on Long Island.

There are over 100 High Schools playing lacrosse on the island. Most of the teams are not very good at all. Should they all just stop putting a team on the field simply because they are not competitive? Should kids not have an opportunity to play just because they do not have Devision 1 potential? Not every kid can be a star player in HS. These club teams are obviously providing an opportunity for kids to play lacrosse. I doubt very much that the parents of a 12 year old on the 3rd team at 91 thinks their kid is going to get a scholarship to Johns Hopkins.

The Clubs also provide an opportunity for the best kids from each town / HS to play with other kids of similar ability . There is a reason top college coaches fill the sideline when the top club teams play each other. When two top clubs teams play, there is a greater collection of talent by graduation year than you will find at any HS game.

Should a kid stop playing lacrosse when he/she is cut from the Town Team in the 3rd, 4th , 5th , 5th or even 10th or 11th grade? Should only the studs be allowed to play? Why do you people care how much money other people spend so that their kid can play lacrosse? Do you also complain about the cost to play Ice Hockey? How many kids from Long Island are going to make it to the NHL?
I can tell you that parents spend significantly more money for little johnny to play hockey than most people spend for their kid to play lacrosse. Very few of the kids playing youth or HS hockey on the island will get a scholarship.

Stop the BS. There is a definite conflict of interest.

Thanks for the input.
Which club team pays your salary?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
no question the clubs are getting fat selling dreams.


The Clubs would not exist if there wasn't a demand.


Over saturation too many crap clubs out there that make false promises and as a result put a crap product on the field. How many really elite players on LI are there per grade. We have like 20 clubs with so called AA,A,and B teams per age group. How many new clubs have sprung up claiming to field elite teams. It's a disaster especially at the 8th 9th and 10th grade levels. So many flop and fold. How many put a good and I mean good product out. Each club has its strong years but for the most part it's always the same teams putting out the best product. A lot of these clubs see the wide eyed bushy tailed parents with visions of D1 commit in their eyes.



Sounds like you are describing the Town /HS Teams on Long Island.

There are over 100 High Schools playing lacrosse on the island. Most of the teams are not very good at all. Should they all just stop putting a team on the field simply because they are not competitive? Should kids not have an opportunity to play just because they do not have Devision 1 potential? Not every kid can be a star player in HS. These club teams are obviously providing an opportunity for kids to play lacrosse. I doubt very much that the parents of a 12 year old on the 3rd team at 91 thinks their kid is going to get a scholarship to Johns Hopkins.

The Clubs also provide an opportunity for the best kids from each town / HS to play with other kids of similar ability . There is a reason top college coaches fill the sideline when the top club teams play each other. When two top clubs teams play, there is a greater collection of talent by graduation year than you will find at any HS game.

Should a kid stop playing lacrosse when he/she is cut from the Town Team in the 3rd, 4th , 5th , 5th or even 10th or 11th grade? Should only the studs be allowed to play? Why do you people care how much money other people spend so that their kid can play lacrosse? Do you also complain about the cost to play Ice Hockey? How many kids from Long Island are going to make it to the NHL?
I can tell you that parents spend significantly more money for little johnny to play hockey than most people spend for their kid to play lacrosse. Very few of the kids playing youth or HS hockey on the island will get a scholarship.

Stop the BS. There is a definite conflict of interest.


Your post is a bit bizarre. You do understand that playing for your town at a young age is about introduction to sport and usually run by a town organization of volunteers. Playing a sport in school is an elective. Having a variety of different sports exposes children to opportunity they otherwise might not have had. This is based on the fact you live in a school district/zip code. The fact that a kid is exposed to a sport and given the opportunity to play it is called enrichment. So does that mean art should be removed or even music not everyone will become an artist or musician. No.

In regards to your statement "I doubt very much that the parents of a 12 year old on the 3rd team at 91 thinks their kid is going to get a scholarship to Johns Hopkins" Have you read the insanity on this board. I think too many people believe their child is the next coming. As a result they pour soon much money into these clubs who offer false promises. It's quality not quantity that should be searched out. So stop drinking the Kool Aid. High school coaches have a thankless job and do the best they can with what hand they are dealt when it comes to players. Clubs don't care about kids. They want the MONEY!!!! That's why we are seeing so many spring up that offer an inferior product. Your the perfect person to promote the club teams with your blinders on. Show me the money.
Originally Posted by America's Game


In regards to your statement "I doubt very much that the parents of a 12 year old on the 3rd team at 91 thinks their kid is going to get a scholarship to Johns Hopkins" Have you read the insanity on this board. I think too many people believe their child is the next coming. As a result they pour soon much money into these clubs who offer false promises. It's quality not quantity that should be searched out. So stop drinking the Kool Aid. High school coaches have a thankless job and do the best they can with what hand they are dealt when it comes to players. Clubs don't care about kids. They want the MONEY!!!! That's why we are seeing so many spring up that offer an inferior product. Your the perfect person to promote the club teams with your blinders on. Show me the money.


Sorry, I'm a parent of a kid on 91s 3rd team.. No delusion here, my kid is playing there because he's having fun and learning the game outside of typical town politics and over-the-top parent coaches. Plus, the 3rd team is cheaper. Your not paying as if your an A player on a new "fly by night organization". If my kid isn't having fun he will move on, but until then we are happy.
Originally Posted by America's Game
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
no question the clubs are getting fat selling dreams.


The Clubs would not exist if there wasn't a demand.


Over saturation too many crap clubs out there that make false promises and as a result put a crap product on the field. How many really elite players on LI are there per grade. We have like 20 clubs with so called AA,A,and B teams per age group. How many new clubs have sprung up claiming to field elite teams. It's a disaster especially at the 8th 9th and 10th grade levels. So many flop and fold. How many put a good and I mean good product out. Each club has its strong years but for the most part it's always the same teams putting out the best product. A lot of these clubs see the wide eyed bushy tailed parents with visions of D1 commit in their eyes.



Sounds like you are describing the Town /HS Teams on Long Island.

There are over 100 High Schools playing lacrosse on the island. Most of the teams are not very good at all. Should they all just stop putting a team on the field simply because they are not competitive? Should kids not have an opportunity to play just because they do not have Devision 1 potential? Not every kid can be a star player in HS. These club teams are obviously providing an opportunity for kids to play lacrosse. I doubt very much that the parents of a 12 year old on the 3rd team at 91 thinks their kid is going to get a scholarship to Johns Hopkins.

The Clubs also provide an opportunity for the best kids from each town / HS to play with other kids of similar ability . There is a reason top college coaches fill the sideline when the top club teams play each other. When two top clubs teams play, there is a greater collection of talent by graduation year than you will find at any HS game.

Should a kid stop playing lacrosse when he/she is cut from the Town Team in the 3rd, 4th , 5th , 5th or even 10th or 11th grade? Should only the studs be allowed to play? Why do you people care how much money other people spend so that their kid can play lacrosse? Do you also complain about the cost to play Ice Hockey? How many kids from Long Island are going to make it to the NHL?
I can tell you that parents spend significantly more money for little johnny to play hockey than most people spend for their kid to play lacrosse. Very few of the kids playing youth or HS hockey on the island will get a scholarship.

Stop the BS. There is a definite conflict of interest.


Your post is a bit bizarre. You do understand that playing for your town at a young age is about introduction to sport and usually run by a town organization of volunteers. Playing a sport in school is an elective. Having a variety of different sports exposes children to opportunity they otherwise might not have had. This is based on the fact you live in a school district/zip code. The fact that a kid is exposed to a sport and given the opportunity to play it is called enrichment. So does that mean art should be removed or even music not everyone will become an artist or musician. No.

In regards to your statement "I doubt very much that the parents of a 12 year old on the 3rd team at 91 thinks their kid is going to get a scholarship to Johns Hopkins" Have you read the insanity on this board. I think too many people believe their child is the next coming. As a result they pour soon much money into these clubs who offer false promises. It's quality not quantity that should be searched out. So stop drinking the Kool Aid. High school coaches have a thankless job and do the best they can with what hand they are dealt when it comes to players. Clubs don't care about kids. They want the MONEY!!!! That's why we are seeing so many spring up that offer an inferior product. Your the perfect person to promote the club teams with your blinders on. Show me the money.


I think you need to work on reading comprehension .

Also, who is the one drinking the Kool Aid?

I guess there is no need to let the truth or the facts get in the way of your opinion or your agenda.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
no question the clubs are getting fat selling dreams.


The Clubs would not exist if there wasn't a demand.


There is a demand because there are so many parents today willing to pay anything to say there kid is better than the neighbors kid. They all buy into the hype and marketing of the clubs.
Good athletes are good athletes no matter where they play. It's 90% genetics. If your kid is going to be 5'6" and 200 lbs and run a 8.5 40 yard dash it doesn't matter how many thousands of dollars you shell out to a club team he still will never play D1 in college.
On the other hand if your kid is a great athlete, 6'1" 200 lbs and runs a 4.2 40 yard dash he can start playing a sport in 11th grade and the D1 programs will find him.
Open your eyes to reality.
Youth sports is supposed to be for fun. If your son is gifted the coaches will find him.
Parents have turned a fun youth sport into a grinding job for 7 & 8 year old boys. Half of them will burn out and not even play when they get to high school.
Is your son really playing year round because he loves the game? Or because he wants to please you? I bet if you asked, most of them would rather be in the school yard or in the pool playing with their friends and enjoying their childhood just like you did.


you are using two extremes to make a point but lets take the third kid (my kid) who is 5' 9" weighs 175 and runs a 5.0 40, he plays on a good, established travel team with outstanding coaching and has become a pretty good player, he is ahead of a lot of similar kids (size, weight and athleticism) because he has put in the time and we have made the sacrifice that is travel lacrosse - we would not trade the experience for anything.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by America's Game
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
no question the clubs are getting fat selling dreams.


The Clubs would not exist if there wasn't a demand.


Over saturation too many crap clubs out there that make false promises and as a result put a crap product on the field. How many really elite players on LI are there per grade. We have like 20 clubs with so called AA,A,and B teams per age group. How many new clubs have sprung up claiming to field elite teams. It's a disaster especially at the 8th 9th and 10th grade levels. So many flop and fold. How many put a good and I mean good product out. Each club has its strong years but for the most part it's always the same teams putting out the best product. A lot of these clubs see the wide eyed bushy tailed parents with visions of D1 commit in their eyes.



Sounds like you are describing the Town /HS Teams on Long Island.

There are over 100 High Schools playing lacrosse on the island. Most of the teams are not very good at all. Should they all just stop putting a team on the field simply because they are not competitive? Should kids not have an opportunity to play just because they do not have Devision 1 potential? Not every kid can be a star player in HS. These club teams are obviously providing an opportunity for kids to play lacrosse. I doubt very much that the parents of a 12 year old on the 3rd team at 91 thinks their kid is going to get a scholarship to Johns Hopkins.

The Clubs also provide an opportunity for the best kids from each town / HS to play with other kids of similar ability . There is a reason top college coaches fill the sideline when the top club teams play each other. When two top clubs teams play, there is a greater collection of talent by graduation year than you will find at any HS game.

Should a kid stop playing lacrosse when he/she is cut from the Town Team in the 3rd, 4th , 5th , 5th or even 10th or 11th grade? Should only the studs be allowed to play? Why do you people care how much money other people spend so that their kid can play lacrosse? Do you also complain about the cost to play Ice Hockey? How many kids from Long Island are going to make it to the NHL?
I can tell you that parents spend significantly more money for little johnny to play hockey than most people spend for their kid to play lacrosse. Very few of the kids playing youth or HS hockey on the island will get a scholarship.

Stop the BS. There is a definite conflict of interest.


Your post is a bit bizarre. You do understand that playing for your town at a young age is about introduction to sport and usually run by a town organization of volunteers. Playing a sport in school is an elective. Having a variety of different sports exposes children to opportunity they otherwise might not have had. This is based on the fact you live in a school district/zip code. The fact that a kid is exposed to a sport and given the opportunity to play it is called enrichment. So does that mean art should be removed or even music not everyone will become an artist or musician. No.

In regards to your statement "I doubt very much that the parents of a 12 year old on the 3rd team at 91 thinks their kid is going to get a scholarship to Johns Hopkins" Have you read the insanity on this board. I think too many people believe their child is the next coming. As a result they pour soon much money into these clubs who offer false promises. It's quality not quantity that should be searched out. So stop drinking the Kool Aid. High school coaches have a thankless job and do the best they can with what hand they are dealt when it comes to players. Clubs don't care about kids. They want the MONEY!!!! That's why we are seeing so many spring up that offer an inferior product. Your the perfect person to promote the club teams with your blinders on. Show me the money.


I think you need to work on reading comprehension .

Also, who is the one drinking the Kool Aid?

I guess there is no need to let the truth or the facts get in the way of your opinion or your agenda.


Like I said your post was bizarre. You speak about clubs and schools as if they were one and that's why I started with that statement.

What agenda may that be. Please enlighten me.

Here is my interpretation of what you wrote. Most town teams/school suck but if you can't make the town team go to a club and pay to play.

Now for the most part PAL and house teams offer good beginning lacrosse. As kids develop the better players go onto club and other out of town programs. I understand and am totally supportive of this. I am in no way saying that clubs are not benificial to lacrosse and players. It's the over saturation and lack of quality product that many are providing. Have you heard the opening speeches these directors give. "Its about the kids and their development blah blah blah." Then when the checks are cashed you never see these guys again. A certain integrity to the game has been lost. It's my opinion that many clubs have just become about the money.

I also see the conflict when a player is strong armed to play with their town team. I don't approve of this either. There is a lot of crap going on in the lacrosse world.

My main interest is that of the parents and players. No agenda here other than that.
Originally Posted by acblax
Originally Posted by America's Game


In regards to your statement "I doubt very much that the parents of a 12 year old on the 3rd team at 91 thinks their kid is going to get a scholarship to Johns Hopkins" Have you read the insanity on this board. I think too many people believe their child is the next coming. As a result they pour soon much money into these clubs who offer false promises. It's quality not quantity that should be searched out. So stop drinking the Kool Aid. High school coaches have a thankless job and do the best they can with what hand they are dealt when it comes to players. Clubs don't care about kids. They want the MONEY!!!! That's why we are seeing so many spring up that offer an inferior product. Your the perfect person to promote the club teams with your blinders on. Show me the money.


Sorry, I'm a parent of a kid on 91s 3rd team.. No delusion here, my kid is playing there because he's having fun and learning the game outside of typical town politics and over-the-top parent coaches. Plus, the 3rd team is cheaper. Your not paying as if your an A player on a new "fly by night organization". If my kid isn't having fun he will move on, but until then we are happy.


I think what your missing is that I do agree certain clubs put out a good product. It's the new clubs popping up yearly. Look at all new ones on LI and also look at how many have folded. I just don't want parents to forget it's a game. It seems like you understand that. It has become a big business and people get caught up in it and forget to enjoy their kids.
There are plenty of kids on B and C teams who will get scholarships to good schools. they may not even play lacrosse in college.. will you be ok with that, what will you do? I may start a therapy group for parents of kids who stop playing sports, I can probably fill the freedom tower with my group.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are plenty of kids on B and C teams who will get scholarships to good schools. they may not even play lacrosse in college.. will you be ok with that, what will you do? I may start a therapy group for parents of kids who stop playing sports, I can probably fill the freedom tower with my group.


Who or what post are you responding to.
Looks like a response/comment to the above post about C team players. A little out of context and should read more of the post, but i get the point.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There are plenty of kids on B and C teams who will get scholarships to good schools. they may not even play lacrosse in college.. will you be ok with that, what will you do? I may start a therapy group for parents of kids who stop playing sports, I can probably fill the freedom tower with my group.


Hey I get you C player today A player tomorrow and A player today B player tomorrow are scenarios. There are those who are gifted and can just play any sport at any level and then there are those who work harder than anyone and become great at a sport. The facts are that the money in lacrosse for the players is nothing like the pro sports of baseball, football, basketball, hockey, etc. Playing the game for the love of it is all that matters. Being a business man on the other hand there is potential to make money. Go to school get a great education and if you end up playing D1 D2 D3 or club ball is an amazing thing when you love the game. Not everyone is a D1 athlete. The rigors of playing D1 are so extreme for any sport now. The programs own you on top of school you have spring ball, winter training and the season for lacrosse. That's an extra 30-40hrs a week. Even the cant miss athletes are having issues staying in school.

If you have the opportunity to play at any level in college remember this. If on the first day you had a career ending injury would you stay at the school you picked because of lacrosse.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
no question the clubs are getting fat selling dreams.


The Clubs would not exist if there wasn't a demand.


There is a demand because there are so many parents today willing to pay anything to say there kid is better than the neighbors kid. They all buy into the hype and marketing of the clubs.
Good athletes are good athletes no matter where they play. It's 90% genetics. If your kid is going to be 5'6" and 200 lbs and run a 8.5 40 yard dash it doesn't matter how many thousands of dollars you shell out to a club team he still will never play D1 in college.
On the other hand if your kid is a great athlete, 6'1" 200 lbs and runs a 4.2 40 yard dash he can start playing a sport in 11th grade and the D1 programs will find him.
Open your eyes to reality.
Youth sports is supposed to be for fun. If your son is gifted the coaches will find him.
Parents have turned a fun youth sport into a grinding job for 7 & 8 year old boys. Half of them will burn out and not even play when they get to high school.
Is your son really playing year round because he loves the game? Or because he wants to please you? I bet if you asked, most of them would rather be in the school yard or in the pool playing with their friends and enjoying their childhood just like you did.


you are using two extremes to make a point but lets take the third kid (my kid) who is 5' 9" weighs 175 and runs a 5.0 40, he plays on a good, established travel team with outstanding coaching and has become a pretty good player, he is ahead of a lot of similar kids (size, weight and athleticism) because he has put in the time and we have made the sacrifice that is travel lacrosse - we would not trade the experience for anything.


That's great that you are having a good experience and don't mind paying for it.
How old id your son? Everything changes when they hit puberty.
If he gets to varsity and doesn't get playing time because there are bigger and faster kids that the coach thinks can compete better even if they don't have as good a stick as your son are you going to be one of those parents that will go to the A.D. and the school board and complain because you paid thousands of dollars to make your kid a better lacrosse player and it did not work out because of genetics?
Everyone is aware of genetics. There is nothing that can be done for the most part. But if you have your child trained properly and all GENETICS are equal the kids that put the work in and played travel will shine. You can see it at every level in lacrosse from Youth on up. Plus, the competitiveness of competing for a spot will be nothing new for the travel player. Yes people invest a lot of money to play travel lacrosse but the product is much better than the town program because its decided on skill for the most part rather than residence, so the kids will play with better talent. Are there kids that play travel that shouldn't I am sure. But some of these town programs that try to compete with travel programs will just get beat bad and don't see how that is good for anyone. Town programs should just do Medford Park leagues and leave tournaments to the travel programs which would be good for all and let the town player prepare for their fall sport.
These town coaches should just end their season when HS and youth PAL seasons end and start in the winter. Therefore, there will be no conflict and that is plenty of time for training.
Perfectly said.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
These town coaches should just end their season when HS and youth PAL seasons end and start in the winter. Therefore, there will be no conflict and that is plenty of time for training.


In our town its all about power, control, greed and fear.
Unfortunately, you are right. I think that most of these guys look at the travel programs with the money generated and are looking to turn town programs it into a revenue stream for them and their assistants.

What happened to just paying $100.00 and learning the game? Towns like Smithtown, WM and Sachem are destroying that for the kids. Next it will be $1,000.00 to play PAL for kids. There is the conflict.
I thought lacrosse conflicts were bad with high school coaches and their club conflicts. However, now seeing field hockey, I think it might be worse.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Unfortunately, you are right. I think that most of these guys look at the travel programs with the money generated and are looking to turn town programs it into a revenue stream for them and their assistants.

What happened to just paying $100.00 and learning the game? Towns like Smithtown, WM and Sachem are destroying that for the kids. Next it will be $1,000.00 to play PAL for kids. There is the conflict.


I am not understanding something in all of these conflict posts.
People seem to be complaining if their high school coach charges $1000 to coach a summer team and play in 4 or 5 tournaments because they say it is a conflict and the high school coach should not be making money from the summer team.
But these same people have no issue with paying $2000-$3000 to a club team for the same product and most of the club teams are coached by these same high school coaches?
Am I missing something here?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Unfortunately, you are right. I think that most of these guys look at the travel programs with the money generated and are looking to turn town programs it into a revenue stream for them and their assistants.

What happened to just paying $100.00 and learning the game? Towns like Smithtown, WM and Sachem are destroying that for the kids. Next it will be $1,000.00 to play PAL for kids. There is the conflict.


I am not understanding something in all of these conflict posts.
People seem to be complaining if their high school coach charges $1000 to coach a summer team and play in 4 or 5 tournaments because they say it is a conflict and the high school coach should not be making money from the summer team.
But these same people have no issue with paying $2000-$3000 to a club team for the same product and most of the club teams are coached by these same high school coaches?
Am I missing something here?


Yes, you are missing the whole point.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Unfortunately, you are right. I think that most of these guys look at the travel programs with the money generated and are looking to turn town programs it into a revenue stream for them and their assistants.

What happened to just paying $100.00 and learning the game? Towns like Smithtown, WM and Sachem are destroying that for the kids. Next it will be $1,000.00 to play PAL for kids. There is the conflict.


I am not understanding something in all of these conflict posts.
People seem to be complaining if their high school coach charges $1000 to coach a summer team and play in 4 or 5 tournaments because they say it is a conflict and the high school coach should not be making money from the summer team.
But these same people have no issue with paying $2000-$3000 to a club team for the same product and most of the club teams are coached by these same high school coaches?
Am I missing something here?



Yes, you are missing something...while some here are complaining about the cost, that is not the issue. The conflict comes from a HS coach telling kids (either directly or through more subtle means) they must play on his travel team or they won't see time on the varsity team...that is the conflict.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Unfortunately, you are right. I think that most of these guys look at the travel programs with the money generated and are looking to turn town programs it into a revenue stream for them and their assistants.

What happened to just paying $100.00 and learning the game? Towns like Smithtown, WM and Sachem are destroying that for the kids. Next it will be $1,000.00 to play PAL for kids. There is the conflict.


I am not understanding something in all of these conflict posts.
People seem to be complaining if their high school coach charges $1000 to coach a summer team and play in 4 or 5 tournaments because they say it is a conflict and the high school coach should not be making money from the summer team.
But these same people have no issue with paying $2000-$3000 to a club team for the same product and most of the club teams are coached by these same high school coaches?
Am I missing something here?



Yes, you are missing something...while some here are complaining about the cost, that is not the issue. The conflict comes from a HS coach telling kids (either directly or through more subtle means) they must play on his travel team or they won't see time on the varsity team...that is the conflict.



I agree that would be a major conflict and any coach that does that should be reported to their school board and reprimanded in some way.
However, when I go back and skim through this thread I do see some complaints about that issue but it seems to me I see many more people complaining about the high school coach charging too much and making money from summer lacrosse.
Just my observation.
My son will be entering middle school next year and our high school does offer a summer program so I am investigating about the best option for us.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Unfortunately, you are right. I think that most of these guys look at the travel programs with the money generated and are looking to turn town programs it into a revenue stream for them and their assistants.

What happened to just paying $100.00 and learning the game? Towns like Smithtown, WM and Sachem are destroying that for the kids. Next it will be $1,000.00 to play PAL for kids. There is the conflict.


I am not understanding something in all of these conflict posts.
People seem to be complaining if their high school coach charges $1000 to coach a summer team and play in 4 or 5 tournaments because they say it is a conflict and the high school coach should not be making money from the summer team.
But these same people have no issue with paying $2000-$3000 to a club team for the same product and most of the club teams are coached by these same high school coaches?
Am I missing something here?



Yes, you are missing something...while some here are complaining about the cost, that is not the issue. The conflict comes from a HS coach telling kids (either directly or through more subtle means) they must play on his travel team or they won't see time on the varsity team...that is the conflict.



Correct, cost is not the issue.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Unfortunately, you are right. I think that most of these guys look at the travel programs with the money generated and are looking to turn town programs it into a revenue stream for them and their assistants.

What happened to just paying $100.00 and learning the game? Towns like Smithtown, WM and Sachem are destroying that for the kids. Next it will be $1,000.00 to play PAL for kids. There is the conflict.


I am not understanding something in all of these conflict posts.
People seem to be complaining if their high school coach charges $1000 to coach a summer team and play in 4 or 5 tournaments because they say it is a conflict and the high school coach should not be making money from the summer team.
But these same people have no issue with paying $2000-$3000 to a club team for the same product and most of the club teams are coached by these same high school coaches?
Am I missing something here?


It's not the same product and cost is not the issue.
So you are saying a coach wont play his better kids if they dont play for him on a club/travel team. You are such an IDIOT! Why wont the coach put his best players on the field to try and WIN.He does need the $5k coaching job. You people are out of your minds.If you think this is happening instead of coming on here B1tching just go to the school AD or tell the coach straight out that you are going to bring him down for not being nice to your little Joe Joe
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So you are saying a coach wont play his better kids if they dont play for him on a club/travel team. You are such an IDIOT! Why wont the coach put his best players on the field to try and WIN.He does need the $5k coaching job. You people are out of your minds.If you think this is happening instead of coming on here B1tching just go to the school AD or tell the coach straight out that you are going to bring him down for not being nice to your little Joe Joe


Good question. The varsity coach needs to win games if he wants to keep his position so why would he not play his best players regardless of who they play for during the summer?

A few of you have responded to my original question and say it is not about cost but again, go back and read this thread. The majority of the objections I see are about the cost.

It seems like many people feel the varsity coach should coach all summer for free? Why should he? If he is coaching the team he should get paid. The summer is his time.

I am sure all these high school coaches now coaching for club teams are being paid very well to coach for the summer. The clubs charge enough to pay their coaches well.

If the high school coach is willing to coach the summer at a discounted price for his community why is that a bad thing? I still am not understanding this reasoning and I would love for someone to explain it to me logically so I can make an informed decision next summer. I am new to all of this but it seems more polarized than national politics.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
So you are saying a coach wont play his better kids if they dont play for him on a club/travel team. You are such an IDIOT! Why wont the coach put his best players on the field to try and WIN.He does need the $5k coaching job. You people are out of your minds.If you think this is happening instead of coming on here B1tching just go to the school AD or tell the coach straight out that you are going to bring him down for not being nice to your little Joe Joe


So hostile, do you get out much? Perhaps try this--

breathe deeply and count to ten...

As for your comments, they don't move the conversation forward or merit a reply. You are dismissed, have a nice day.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So you are saying a coach wont play his better kids if they dont play for him on a club/travel team. You are such an IDIOT! Why wont the coach put his best players on the field to try and WIN.He does need the $5k coaching job. You people are out of your minds.If you think this is happening instead of coming on here B1tching just go to the school AD or tell the coach straight out that you are going to bring him down for not being nice to your little Joe Joe


Good question. The varsity coach needs to win games if he wants to keep his position so why would he not play his best players regardless of who they play for during the summer?

A few of you have responded to my original question and say it is not about cost but again, go back and read this thread. The majority of the objections I see are about the cost.

It seems like many people feel the varsity coach should coach all summer for free? Why should he? If he is coaching the team he should get paid. The summer is his time.

I am sure all these high school coaches now coaching for club teams are being paid very well to coach for the summer. The clubs charge enough to pay their coaches well.

If the high school coach is willing to coach the summer at a discounted price for his community why is that a bad thing? I still am not understanding this reasoning and I would love for someone to explain it to me logically so I can make an informed decision next summer. I am new to all of this but it seems more polarized than national politics.



Forget the thread and focus for a second. Not about cost -about the threat that kid won't play unless he pays HS travel instead of 91 or express or...

For all of you that think the best will play no matter what-I agree the two or three studs will play. those are the kids that were committed long before they ever played HS ball. They get committed prior to try outs in the spring. Of course the coach will play them.

The rest of the kids (the other 30 on every HS team) are pretty much equal and we all know it. So if You have two kids that are generally equal in all respects, height, weight, athletic ability, stick skills and lax IQ.

Who plays, the kid that stayed with the coach and played on coach's summer travel team or the kid that plays school ball during the school season but plays for 91 the rest of the year?

You are really missing it if you don't see a conflict here.

The coach can't win either. If he plays the kid that played on his team every summer, the other parents are pissed. If he plays the outside travel kid, the other parents are screaming "where is the loyalty".

It is a conflict and a no win situation. HS coaches should simply be HS coaches and get out of the summer travel and training business.

they add no value to the studs getting recruited, they can add value to the rest of the population by not putting themselves in this position to begin with...

easy tough guy...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So you are saying a coach wont play his better kids if they dont play for him on a club/travel team. You are such an IDIOT! Why wont the coach put his best players on the field to try and WIN.He does need the $5k coaching job. You people are out of your minds.If you think this is happening instead of coming on here B1tching just go to the school AD or tell the coach straight out that you are going to bring him down for not being nice to your little Joe Joe


Good question. The varsity coach needs to win games if he wants to keep his position so why would he not play his best players regardless of who they play for during the summer?

A few of you have responded to my original question and say it is not about cost but again, go back and read this thread. The majority of the objections I see are about the cost.

It seems like many people feel the varsity coach should coach all summer for free? Why should he? If he is coaching the team he should get paid. The summer is his time.

I am sure all these high school coaches now coaching for club teams are being paid very well to coach for the summer. The clubs charge enough to pay their coaches well.

If the high school coach is willing to coach the summer at a discounted price for his community why is that a bad thing? I still am not understanding this reasoning and I would love for someone to explain it to me logically so I can make an informed decision next summer. I am new to all of this but it seems more polarized than national politics.



Forget the thread and focus for a second. Not about cost -about the threat that kid won't play unless he pays HS travel instead of 91 or express or...

For all of you that think the best will play no matter what-I agree the two or three studs will play. those are the kids that were committed long before they ever played HS ball. They get committed prior to try outs in the spring. Of course the coach will play them.

The rest of the kids (the other 30 on every HS team) are pretty much equal and we all know it. So if You have two kids that are generally equal in all respects, height, weight, athletic ability, stick skills and lax IQ.

Who plays, the kid that stayed with the coach and played on coach's summer travel team or the kid that plays school ball during the school season but plays for 91 the rest of the year?

You are really missing it if you don't see a conflict here.

The coach can't win either. If he plays the kid that played on his team every summer, the other parents are pissed. If he plays the outside travel kid, the other parents are screaming "where is the loyalty".

It is a conflict and a no win situation. HS coaches should simply be HS coaches and get out of the summer travel and training business.

they add no value to the studs getting recruited, they can add value to the rest of the population by not putting themselves in this position to begin with...



Thank you for a well worded and reasonable explanation without the verbal abuse that seems to come so easy to anonymous posters here.

I can definitely see what you are saying now about a conflict.
It seems the high school coaches are in a no win situation. Either way someone complains.

But how can you keep them from working for a club during the summer? That is their time to do as they please and I am sure the clubs pay them very well for the time they give.

So if they coach for a club parents feel pressured to play for that club. If they try to do their own community based program parents feel pressured to play for the school team. Seems like a lose-lose all around.

Things were alot simpler 25 years ago when I played. You played in the spring and that was it. Summer was for fishing, fall was for football and winter was for wrestling. I am not looking forward to my son starting middle school and high school. Ugh.....
Its the sad truth. Things were a lot simpler when we grew up. Here is the problem as I see it. First, lets remember coaches are employees of our school districts and they are educators in our community. They are, for the most part, paid very well in Long Island. Their job is to teach in the school and they are paid extra to coach during their respective seasons.

Along come the travel programs and they have done well. They offer services for your kid to play lacrosse for a fee. Whether you think its right or not but they are PRIVATE entities.

The Town coach looks at them and says we can offer the same thing at a discounted price. That is where the conflict comes in. Who decided the prices?: They did. Who are you selling your services to? The people who pay taxes to the school district who employs the coach. If the School Districts ran the programs like they do the sports I personally wouldn't have a problem with it but that is not what is going on. There is no oversight and that is the conflict. There are budgets and oversight during the school year.

They are preying on the kids and parents of their community play for us or else and charging what they want. What's next let them dictate prices to play sports during regular season. I bet they would like to do that but reality is the schools have no business in the PRIVATE sector when you are a PUBLIC school employee. Want money go work for a PRIVATE lacrosse program.

just my thoughts.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Its the sad truth. Things were a lot simpler when we grew up. Here is the problem as I see it. First, lets remember coaches are employees of our school districts and they are educators in our community. They are, for the most part, paid very well in Long Island. Their job is to teach in the school and they are paid extra to coach during their respective seasons.

Along come the travel programs and they have done well. They offer services for your kid to play lacrosse for a fee. Whether you think its right or not but they are PRIVATE entities.

The Town coach looks at them and says we can offer the same thing at a discounted price. That is where the conflict comes in. Who decided the prices?: They did. Who are you selling your services to? The people who pay taxes to the school district who employs the coach. If the School Districts ran the programs like they do the sports I personally wouldn't have a problem with it but that is not what is going on. There is no oversight and that is the conflict. There are budgets and oversight during the school year.

They are preying on the kids and parents of their community play for us or else and charging what they want. What's next let them dictate prices to play sports during regular season. I bet they would like to do that but reality is the schools have no business in the PRIVATE sector when you are a PUBLIC school employee. Want money go work for a PRIVATE lacrosse program.

just my thoughts.


I understand what you are saying but I disagree. I have no problem with a coach working for a club or running his own communtiy based program for extra money as long as there is no coersion by the coach to play for him. And that can happen no matter which option the coach decides to pursue.

When the school coach offers a summer program it is also a private enterprise, just like a club, it is not run through the schools and has nothing to do with the school disctrict other than the name.

The coach is doing it on his own time as a side business to his teaching job just as other teachers have tutoring businesses or are electricians or carpenters on their own time.

For the most part from what I have seen, at least in my communtiy, the school coach offers this at a much less expensive price than the clubs do. Maybe he is trying to keep his future players playing for him to keep them together and learn his system. Maybe he feels that will benefit him in the long run to build a championship varsity team. As long as he is not telling players they MUST play for him what is the problem with that?

Other coaches go to work for the club teams and make a lot of money that way. I have no problem with that either as long as those coaches are not telling their players that the MUST come and play for the club he is coaching for.

To me, I would rather have my son play for his future varsity staff in the summer at a discounted price from what I would have to pay for a club team.

Either way, the coach is making money at a side job/business on his own time.

I have no problem with either option a parent chooses for there son as long as there is no coersion but I would personally prefer the less expensive option at the youth level.

It seems in these forums that everyone is trying to justify their own decisions by belittling what others have chosen for their own son.
Again, Its a fact the kids in my community are being coerced by the coach. They are making a side business in the same community that they have a municipal job.

They should have oversight and not allowed to have a private business by having the play for us or else mentality. There alleged business is founded on their position of authority designated by the school district. I personally think if it wasn't affiliated with the school district that is fine but when you attach the town label to it I feel it deserves more accountability than saying we are doing it for a little less money. If they are so right they can call themselves any team name and there players will come but the fact is they will use the school district name to bully kids to play for them.

The fact is the coaches become insulted when a kid doesn't play for them because they have calculated that the player would be their because of money and or talent. I have heard next man up but we all know they want their horses and will put unnecessary pressure for a kid to play in the OFFSEASON as opposed to looking out for there individual best interest in the OFFSEASON.

We must remember we are talking about a summer program, not the regular season.
good point
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Again, Its a fact the kids in my community are being coerced by the coach. They are making a side business in the same community that they have a municipal job.

They should have oversight and not allowed to have a private business by having the play for us or else mentality. There alleged business is founded on their position of authority designated by the school district. I personally think if it wasn't affiliated with the school district that is fine but when you attach the town label to it I feel it deserves more accountability than saying we are doing it for a little less money. If they are so right they can call themselves any team name and there players will come but the fact is they will use the school district name to bully kids to play for them.

The fact is the coaches become insulted when a kid doesn't play for them because they have calculated that the player would be their because of money and or talent. I have heard next man up but we all know they want their horses and will put unnecessary pressure for a kid to play in the OFFSEASON as opposed to looking out for there individual best interest in the OFFSEASON.

We must remember we are talking about a summer program, not the regular season.


I totally agree with you on that issue. If the coach is pressuring kids to play for him by using his position as the varsity coach to influence their decision then he should definately face some consequences.

My point was that he does not have to be running his own program to do that. He can be coaching for 91, or Express or Outlaws or any club and still use his position as varsity coach to pressure his kids to play for that program.

Either way it is not right and that coach should lose his job as varsity coach and maybe his teaching job as well. That is a form of harrassment if he uses his position of authority to pressure kids to play for him.

My position is that if the coach is running a town program to help bolster his varsity program, and not pressuring the kids to play for him but just offering the opportunity at a lesser cost than a club program then there should not be a problem even if he is making some money from it. If he is giving his time he should expect to be paid something.
Who's interests are being served?

Is this being done in the best interest of the children (players)?

Is there a conflict of interest?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who's interests are being served?

Is this being done in the best interest of the children (players)?

Is there a conflict of interest?


That is the issue and I think it needs to be evaluated on a case by case basis and not throw everyone into the same pot. Some coaches do have the best intentions and others are in it for the money. And that goes both ways, for the clubs and the high school coaches.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who's interests are being served?

Is this being done in the best interest of the children (players)?

Is there a conflict of interest?


That is the issue and I think it needs to be evaluated on a case by case basis and not throw everyone into the same pot. Some coaches do have the best intentions and others are in it for the money. And that goes both ways, for the clubs and the high school coaches.


Clubs do not hide the fact that they are "for profit". Parents and players are free to choose (without fear) what club if any they play for. Apples and Oranges.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who's interests are being served?

Is this being done in the best interest of the children (players)?

Is there a conflict of interest?


That is the issue and I think it needs to be evaluated on a case by case basis and not throw everyone into the same pot. Some coaches do have the best intentions and others are in it for the money. And that goes both ways, for the clubs and the high school coaches.


Clubs do not hide the fact that they are "for profit". Parents and players are free to choose (without fear) what club if any they play for. Apples and Oranges.


Again, don't throw everyone in the same pot. I can only speak for my district but the coaching staff here never said they are not making money from summer. They are offering an alternative to the clubs at less than half the price of the clubs. The varsity coach has also said everyone is welcome to play for him or for a club or for both. The only thing he asks is that if you play for both and there is a schedule conflict he wants the town team to come first.
I do not see an issue with this and neither do many other parents. I would say at least half the boys playing for the town team also play for club teams. Thats their option.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who's interests are being served?

Is this being done in the best interest of the children (players)?

Is there a conflict of interest?


That is the issue and I think it needs to be evaluated on a case by case basis and not throw everyone into the same pot. Some coaches do have the best intentions and others are in it for the money. And that goes both ways, for the clubs and the high school coaches.


Clubs do not hide the fact that they are "for profit". Parents and players are free to choose (without fear) what club if any they play for. Apples and Oranges.

Don't think this is true. When a high school coach is a director of a club program and he is hired to bring players from his town I think that's a conflict. More ayers he brings from his town the more he makes. So now players are obligated to play for the club team.
john jay youth lacrosse in cross river just placed Nick Daniello - director of primetime on the board, that is a major conflict of interest
It is and so is every other coach in Long Island that does this crap doing summer programs.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who's interests are being served?

Is this being done in the best interest of the children (players)?

Is there a conflict of interest?


That is the issue and I think it needs to be evaluated on a case by case basis and not throw everyone into the same pot. Some coaches do have the best intentions and others are in it for the money. And that goes both ways, for the clubs and the high school coaches.


Clubs do not hide the fact that they are "for profit". Parents and players are free to choose (without fear) what club if any they play for. Apples and Oranges.

Don't think this is true. When a high school coach is a director of a club program and he is hired to bring players from his town I think that's a conflict. More ayers he brings from his town the more he makes. So now players are obligated to play for the club team.


This is the point I broght up in an earlier post. It can be a conflict whether the high school coach runs his own program or if he coaches for a club. It all depends on the coach. No matter where he is coaching if he puts pressure on his players to play for him then that is a conflict. And most of the clubs now have high school coaches on their staff or their board of directors.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is and so is every other coach in Long Island that does this crap doing summer programs.


But you cannot stop coaches from doing something to earn money on their own time.
Again, it can be a conflict either way.
You can't just say that high school coaches should not run their own program because it is a conflict and not also say that it is also a conflict for them to work for a club.
It is only a conflict either way depending on the coach and the pressure he puts on kids and parents to play for him out side of the varsity team.
Every parent needs to evaluate their own situation and coach and see what the best option is for them and their child.
People should stop listening to all the bashing on here and make their own educated decisions.
Clubs are a great option for some but not for others.
Not every high school coach pressures his school players to play for him in the summer months, but every club is in it ONLY for the money. It is how they make a living and most club directors are doing very well because so many people have bought into their marketing.
If you doubt that then why does every club have two or three teams at every level? As long as a parent is willing to pay they are not going to turn anyone away.
Coaches should be allowed to earn extra money in the summer but not in the same town where they are the high school coach.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Coaches should be allowed to earn extra money in the summer but not in the same town where they are the high school coach.


That doesnt solve the conflict as stated above. Even if they are coaching for a club there is still conflict if people feel pressured to play for them.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Coaches should be allowed to earn extra money in the summer but not in the same town where they are the high school coach.


That doesnt solve the conflict as stated above. Even if they are coaching for a club there is still conflict if people feel pressured to play for them.


What is the difference between a school coach who runs a travel program and a math teacher who tutors on the side? A math teacher is allowed to tutor students for money as long as they are not that teachers student. The same rule should be applied to coaches. The coaches should be allowed to run/coach a travel team/program as long as the players are not on that coaches school team. Look at the travel programs on Long Island that are run by coaches - the conflicts are obvious and undeniable - and, this is secondary because if the coach wants to out time and effort into running a travel program they should, the money is enormous.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is and so is every other coach in Long Island that does this crap doing summer programs.


But you cannot stop coaches from doing something to earn money on their own time.
Again, it can be a conflict either way.
You can't just say that high school coaches should not run their own program because it is a conflict and not also say that it is also a conflict for them to work for a club.
It is only a conflict either way depending on the coach and the pressure he puts on kids and parents to play for him out side of the varsity team.
Every parent needs to evaluate their own situation and coach and see what the best option is for them and their child.
People should stop listening to all the bashing on here and make their own educated decisions.
Clubs are a great option for some but not for others.
Not every high school coach pressures his school players to play for him in the summer months, but every club is in it ONLY for the money. It is how they make a living and most club directors are doing very well because so many people have bought into their marketing.
If you doubt that then why does every club have two or three teams at every level? As long as a parent is willing to pay they are not going to turn anyone away.


Stop it, these guys are earning extra bucks doing what they know best. Experts in their field.

I am in the minority, I wished my town coaches got involved with a team so we had an avenue (to be steered into) to play, instead, I play with a team who's coach is involved and I am envious.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is and so is every other coach in Long Island that does this crap doing summer programs.


But you cannot stop coaches from doing something to earn money on their own time.
Again, it can be a conflict either way.
You can't just say that high school coaches should not run their own program because it is a conflict and not also say that it is also a conflict for them to work for a club.
It is only a conflict either way depending on the coach and the pressure he puts on kids and parents to play for him out side of the varsity team.
Every parent needs to evaluate their own situation and coach and see what the best option is for them and their child.
People should stop listening to all the bashing on here and make their own educated decisions.
Clubs are a great option for some but not for others.
Not every high school coach pressures his school players to play for him in the summer months, but every club is in it ONLY for the money. It is how they make a living and most club directors are doing very well because so many people have bought into their marketing.
If you doubt that then why does every club have two or three teams at every level? As long as a parent is willing to pay they are not going to turn anyone away.


Stop it, these guys are earning extra bucks doing what they know best. Experts in their field.

I am in the minority, I wished my town coaches got involved with a team so we had an avenue (to be steered into) to play, instead, I play with a team who's coach is involved and I am envious.



I agree with you.
I am trying to figure out why all these people consider it a conflict to run a travel program in their town but not a conflict to coach for a club team?
I have more respect for the coach that wants to coach in his own town. Either way he could put pressure on his kids to play for him if he is inclined to do so and there is definitely more money for him with a club unless he is also charging upwards of $2000 for his town team, so obviously he must be doing it for more than just the money.
I agree as well. But . . . isn't there always the fear of the coach that he will accused of keeping players on the school team because they play on the town travel team? I think the coach is in a can't win situation there. He wants to keep a subpar player on the travel team to let him develop, but how does he cut that same kid when tryouts come along? He might feel pressured to keep the kid because he plays on the travel team. Then again, some coaches keep all of the kids - don't cut any - but they just don't play. Guess that would work in a smaller school district where coaches don't need to cut.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I agree as well. But . . . isn't there always the fear of the coach that he will accused of keeping players on the school team because they play on the town travel team? I think the coach is in a can't win situation there. He wants to keep a subpar player on the travel team to let him develop, but how does he cut that same kid when tryouts come along? He might feel pressured to keep the kid because he plays on the travel team. Then again, some coaches keep all of the kids - don't cut any - but they just don't play. Guess that would work in a smaller school district where coaches don't need to cut.


You're right. It is a no win situation for the coach.
Lacrosse parents have become crazy chasing a pipe dream of D1 full ride scholarships that don't exist.
Lacrosse is growing in popularity but it is not football or basketball at the college level.
Do most of these Summer/Travel HS Programs (excluding Spring Lacrosse) consist of a tryout? Are there A and B teams? or if numbers are low - do they only accept A players and the B or lower players will play school ball only? OR..is it write a check and you are on the Travel Team? - So in short...tryouts or not for these HS Coach-run Travel teams?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Do most of these Summer/Travel HS Programs (excluding Spring Lacrosse) consist of a tryout? Are there A and B teams? or if numbers are low - do they only accept A players and the B or lower players will play school ball only? OR..is it write a check and you are on the Travel Team? - So in short...tryouts or not for these HS Coach-run Travel teams?


I can only speak for my district but here there are no cuts. If there are enough players at each grade level A and B teams are formed.
The focus of the summer program is developing players and teams, not on winning at the youth level.
The coaches philosophy is that by developing ALL of the younger players and not excluding anyone it will result in winning treams at the varsity level.
And here is the catch 22. If your child is excelling in Lacrosse or may have the opportunity to grow as a player outside of his district, why not go play for a club where all of the kids are at their skill level as opposed to playing for a town program where the skill levels vary.

The coaches will get mad at you if you elect to leave as if you did something wrong. At the youth level its not about winning but development of players is important and the HS coach will frown upon that parent going and playing elsewhere. Is it because of caring or money?

My district the kids are going outside and there is a clear difference between the ones that stay and the ones that go outside. Huge difference but the HS coaches aren't happy and they are using all of there bullying techniques to get the kids to stay. Conflict as I see it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And here is the catch 22. If your child is excelling in Lacrosse or may have the opportunity to grow as a player outside of his district, why not go play for a club where all of the kids are at their skill level as opposed to playing for a town program where the skill levels vary.

The coaches will get mad at you if you elect to leave as if you did something wrong. At the youth level its not about winning but development of players is important and the HS coach will frown upon that parent going and playing elsewhere. Is it because of caring or money?

My district the kids are going outside and there is a clear difference between the ones that stay and the ones that go outside. Huge difference but the HS coaches aren't happy and they are using all of there bullying techniques to get the kids to stay. Conflict as I see it.


Again I can only speak for my district. Some of the boys do play for outside clubs as well as the town club. The HS coach has no problem with this, he only asks that if there are schedule conflicts that they make the town team the priority or give him a heads up when they are not going to be available so he can plan for it.
The Coach in our district is not open to outside travel Clubs and is pretty clear -- if you choose your travel Club for any reason over the town team -- your off the team. I understand developing teams but there is a benefit to having a player be coached by different coaches and playing with different players. It makes them a better player all around. Unfortunate some coaches are short sighted and on power trips. They may be sorry as kids leave the weaker town programs.
I truly wonder if there are people from the same district on the opposite side of this argument.

I know my town had some great dads who developed players but wanted the district to step in. The district never did and many of those players went to club, now many of those players do not or do not plan on attending the district HS. Had the district coaches been involved, with allowing club participation, I would think many of the players would have stayed home grown.

Shocked at the numbers my town has lost that are top players.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Do most of these Summer/Travel HS Programs (excluding Spring Lacrosse) consist of a tryout? Are there A and B teams? or if numbers are low - do they only accept A players and the B or lower players will play school ball only? OR..is it write a check and you are on the Travel Team? - So in short...tryouts or not for these HS Coach-run Travel teams?


DEPENDS ON THE COACH, BUT I WOULD SAY IF THERE IS A CHECK THERE IS A SPOT IF EVEN ON THE SIDELINES. MANY OF THESE TEAMS DO HAVE FALL AND WINTER WORKOUTS THAT THEY HAVE TO ALLOW ANYONE INTERESTED TO JOIN IN ON THE FUN. IF USING THE SCHOOL PROPERTY. OR SO I THOUGHT.
I filed a complaint with Section XI. My HS coaches are trying to make summer lacrosse a mandatory thing. Who are these guys kidding? They have invaded the youth program.

News flash, a second grade kid or parents doesn't really care about HS. The concern is does the kid like the sport. Think about that greedy HS coaches.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And here is the catch 22. If your child is excelling in Lacrosse or may have the opportunity to grow as a player outside of his district, why not go play for a club where all of the kids are at their skill level as opposed to playing for a town program where the skill levels vary.

The coaches will get mad at you if you elect to leave as if you did something wrong. At the youth level its not about winning but development of players is important and the HS coach will frown upon that parent going and playing elsewhere. Is it because of caring or money?

My district the kids are going outside and there is a clear difference between the ones that stay and the ones that go outside. Huge difference but the HS coaches aren't happy and they are using all of there bullying techniques to get the kids to stay. Conflict as I see it.


Again I can only speak for my district. Some of the boys do play for outside clubs as well as the town club. The HS coach has no problem with this, he only asks that if there are schedule conflicts that they make the town team the priority or give him a heads up when they are not going to be available so he can plan for it.


Kudos to the coach for being flexible.

The real issue is the parents who need to recognize playing for any team guarantees their child nothing.

Instead of bitching about this stuff a better use of your time would be having a catch with your child. If you can't have a catch with your child, maybe consider spending some time learning how to.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And here is the catch 22. If your child is excelling in Lacrosse or may have the opportunity to grow as a player outside of his district, why not go play for a club where all of the kids are at their skill level as opposed to playing for a town program where the skill levels vary.

The coaches will get mad at you if you elect to leave as if you did something wrong. At the youth level its not about winning but development of players is important and the HS coach will frown upon that parent going and playing elsewhere. Is it because of caring or money?

My district the kids are going outside and there is a clear difference between the ones that stay and the ones that go outside. Huge difference but the HS coaches aren't happy and they are using all of there bullying techniques to get the kids to stay. Conflict as I see it.


Again I can only speak for my district. Some of the boys do play for outside clubs as well as the town club. The HS coach has no problem with this, he only asks that if there are schedule conflicts that they make the town team the priority or give him a heads up when they are not going to be available so he can plan for it.


This whole thread wouldn't exist if every district was like this, IMHO. In fact, the districts can act as a trusted resource for parents and advise them on travel and help families make the correct choices (objectivity is the key). Because we all can admit that there is a lot of benefit to being in the appropriate travel situation. No reason for this power struggle between district and travel, figure out a way to make it work and everybody wins.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And here is the catch 22. If your child is excelling in Lacrosse or may have the opportunity to grow as a player outside of his district, why not go play for a club where all of the kids are at their skill level as opposed to playing for a town program where the skill levels vary.

The coaches will get mad at you if you elect to leave as if you did something wrong. At the youth level its not about winning but development of players is important and the HS coach will frown upon that parent going and playing elsewhere. Is it because of caring or money?

My district the kids are going outside and there is a clear difference between the ones that stay and the ones that go outside. Huge difference but the HS coaches aren't happy and they are using all of there bullying techniques to get the kids to stay. Conflict as I see it.


Again I can only speak for my district. Some of the boys do play for outside clubs as well as the town club. The HS coach has no problem with this, he only asks that if there are schedule conflicts that they make the town team the priority or give him a heads up when they are not going to be available so he can plan for it.


This whole thread wouldn't exist if every district was like this, IMHO. In fact, the districts can act as a trusted resource for parents and advise them on travel and help families make the correct choices (objectivity is the key). Because we all can admit that there is a lot of benefit to being in the appropriate travel situation. No reason for this power struggle between district and travel, figure out a way to make it work and everybody wins.


"The District" has nothing to do with it in our town. It is the HS Coaches running a for profit business in the off season. The fact that it is "For Profit" takes the objectivity out of it. The coaches have a financial interest in their private business. The reason for the power struggle is due to more than one factor. Two of the factors are money and the ego of the coaches. Players and parents are afraid to say or do anything so it is allowed to continue.

There is most certainly a conflict of interest.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And here is the catch 22. If your child is excelling in Lacrosse or may have the opportunity to grow as a player outside of his district, why not go play for a club where all of the kids are at their skill level as opposed to playing for a town program where the skill levels vary.

The coaches will get mad at you if you elect to leave as if you did something wrong. At the youth level its not about winning but development of players is important and the HS coach will frown upon that parent going and playing elsewhere. Is it because of caring or money?

My district the kids are going outside and there is a clear difference between the ones that stay and the ones that go outside. Huge difference but the HS coaches aren't happy and they are using all of there bullying techniques to get the kids to stay. Conflict as I see it.


Again I can only speak for my district. Some of the boys do play for outside clubs as well as the town club. The HS coach has no problem with this, he only asks that if there are schedule conflicts that they make the town team the priority or give him a heads up when they are not going to be available so he can plan for it.


This whole thread wouldn't exist if every district was like this, IMHO. In fact, the districts can act as a trusted resource for parents and advise them on travel and help families make the correct choices (objectivity is the key). Because we all can admit that there is a lot of benefit to being in the appropriate travel situation. No reason for this power struggle between district and travel, figure out a way to make it work and everybody wins.


"The District" has nothing to do with it in our town. It is the HS Coaches running a for profit business in the off season. The fact that it is "For Profit" takes the objectivity out of it. The coaches have a financial interest in their private business. The reason for the power struggle is due to more than one factor. Two of the factors are money and the ego of the coaches. Players and parents are afraid to say or do anything so it is allowed to continue.

There is most certainly a conflict of interest.

If you really believe that then don't play for them. No one can make you do something you do not want to do.
Any high school coach who doesn't play his best players in the spring, no matter if they play for him in the summer or not, is out of his mind and will not have a job for very long.
Every community wants to win at the varsity level in every sport. It is a pride thing. If the coach would purposely not play his best players trust me the community would be up in arms and the coach would not be coaching for very long.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And here is the catch 22. If your child is excelling in Lacrosse or may have the opportunity to grow as a player outside of his district, why not go play for a club where all of the kids are at their skill level as opposed to playing for a town program where the skill levels vary.

The coaches will get mad at you if you elect to leave as if you did something wrong. At the youth level its not about winning but development of players is important and the HS coach will frown upon that parent going and playing elsewhere. Is it because of caring or money?

My district the kids are going outside and there is a clear difference between the ones that stay and the ones that go outside. Huge difference but the HS coaches aren't happy and they are using all of there bullying techniques to get the kids to stay. Conflict as I see it.


Again I can only speak for my district. Some of the boys do play for outside clubs as well as the town club. The HS coach has no problem with this, he only asks that if there are schedule conflicts that they make the town team the priority or give him a heads up when they are not going to be available so he can plan for it.


This whole thread wouldn't exist if every district was like this, IMHO. In fact, the districts can act as a trusted resource for parents and advise them on travel and help families make the correct choices (objectivity is the key). Because we all can admit that there is a lot of benefit to being in the appropriate travel situation. No reason for this power struggle between district and travel, figure out a way to make it work and everybody wins.


"The District" has nothing to do with it in our town. It is the HS Coaches running a for profit business in the off season. The fact that it is "For Profit" takes the objectivity out of it. The coaches have a financial interest in their private business. The reason for the power struggle is due to more than one factor. Two of the factors are money and the ego of the coaches. Players and parents are afraid to say or do anything so it is allowed to continue.

There is most certainly a conflict of interest.

If you really believe that then don't play for them. No one can make you do something you do not want to do.
Any high school coach who doesn't play his best players in the spring, no matter if they play for him in the summer or not, is out of his mind and will not have a job for very long.
Every community wants to win at the varsity level in every sport. It is a pride thing. If the coach would purposely not play his best players trust me the community would be up in arms and the coach would not be coaching for very long.


In large districts with competitive programs this is not true. The absolute best will play no matter where they play in the summer but there are only a few of them. The next tier of player is where the problem lies. It is all very subjective so the coaches can do what they want.

Coaches are not fired for under performing and they are not fired for not playing the better players.

Demise of youth sports starts and ends with the NCAA. Giving 7th/8th graders verbal commitments is such a joke and causing feeding frenzies, and helping to get the few travel club owners very, very wealthy because they purposely bait parents and string them along with misinformation. We hang on thinking that our kid will get what they promise. We are partially to blame because at some point, one has to know that one's child just doesn't have it. BTW, it's OK not to be a top player. Your kid probably has other talents that you never bothered to recognize and develop because you're so focused on your own inadequacies. And then, you have the parents that happen to have the physically gifted kids that elevated them to some special status in their minds. And, there are many of these parents. They're loud. They were bullies or were bullied as kids. They are rashes that just won't go away. They're kids are usually assholes. I feel bad for their kids. Gotta suck to have these moms and dads for parents...
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Demise of youth sports starts and ends with the NCAA. Giving 7th/8th graders verbal commitments is such a joke and causing feeding frenzies, and helping to get the few travel club owners very, very wealthy because they purposely bait parents and string them along with misinformation. We hang on thinking that our kid will get what they promise. We are partially to blame because at some point, one has to know that one's child just doesn't have it. BTW, it's OK not to be a top player. Your kid probably has other talents that you never bothered to recognize and develop because you're so focused on your own inadequacies. And then, you have the parents that happen to have the physically gifted kids that elevated them to some special status in their minds. And, there are many of these parents. They're loud. They were bullies or were bullied as kids. They are rashes that just won't go away. They're kids are usually assholes. I feel bad for their kids. Gotta suck to have these moms and dads for parents...


Dont hold back, tell us how you really feel
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
And here is the catch 22. If your child is excelling in Lacrosse or may have the opportunity to grow as a player outside of his district, why not go play for a club where all of the kids are at their skill level as opposed to playing for a town program where the skill levels vary.

The coaches will get mad at you if you elect to leave as if you did something wrong. At the youth level its not about winning but development of players is important and the HS coach will frown upon that parent going and playing elsewhere. Is it because of caring or money?

My district the kids are going outside and there is a clear difference between the ones that stay and the ones that go outside. Huge difference but the HS coaches aren't happy and they are using all of there bullying techniques to get the kids to stay. Conflict as I see it.


Again I can only speak for my district. Some of the boys do play for outside clubs as well as the town club. The HS coach has no problem with this, he only asks that if there are schedule conflicts that they make the town team the priority or give him a heads up when they are not going to be available so he can plan for it.


This whole thread wouldn't exist if every district was like this, IMHO. In fact, the districts can act as a trusted resource for parents and advise them on travel and help families make the correct choices (objectivity is the key). Because we all can admit that there is a lot of benefit to being in the appropriate travel situation. No reason for this power struggle between district and travel, figure out a way to make it work and everybody wins.


"The District" has nothing to do with it in our town. It is the HS Coaches running a for profit business in the off season. The fact that it is "For Profit" takes the objectivity out of it. The coaches have a financial interest in their private business. The reason for the power struggle is due to more than one factor. Two of the factors are money and the ego of the coaches. Players and parents are afraid to say or do anything so it is allowed to continue.

There is most certainly a conflict of interest.

If you really believe that then don't play for them. No one can make you do something you do not want to do.
Any high school coach who doesn't play his best players in the spring, no matter if they play for him in the summer or not, is out of his mind and will not have a job for very long.
Every community wants to win at the varsity level in every sport. It is a pride thing. If the coach would purposely not play his best players trust me the community would be up in arms and the coach would not be coaching for very long.


In large districts with competitive programs this is not true. The absolute best will play no matter where they play in the summer but there are only a few of them. The next tier of player is where the problem lies. It is all very subjective so the coaches can do what they want.

Coaches are not fired for under performing and they are not fired for not playing the better players.



Complete conflict of interest.
Coercion :

is the practice of forcing another party to behave in an involuntary manner (whether through action or inaction) by use of threats or intimidation or some other form of pressure or force. In law, coercion is codified as the duress crime. Such actions are used as leverage, to force the victim to act in the desired way. Coercion may involve the actual infliction of physical pain/injury or psychological harm in order to enhance the credibility of a threat. The threat of further harm may lead to the cooperation or obedience of the person being coerced

Common sense:

Do the right thing.
it is out of control in our district.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
it is out of control in our district.


GC?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
it is out of control in our district.


GC?


Bad there too.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
it is out of control in our district.


GC?


Bad there too.


Based on what? Please enlighten us.
let's create a hypothetical situation in HS Girls lacrosse on LI:

*the head coach of the HS varsity girls team is the owner of her own club team
*the head coach is NOT a teacher in the school district.
*the head coach hired an assistant coach for the varsity who is also a full time employee of her club
*a large majority of the HS players play on her club team
*a family member plays on her club team and the varsity HS team. Her mother is also a coach for the club team
*the varsity head coach did NOT take 2 freshman girls on the varsity team despite being receiving a commitment from DIV 1 programs. The 3-4 other freshman taken on varsity are on her club team (uncommitted). The 2 girls on JV do NOT play on her club team.


how would you feel if this was your school district? Note - this is not hypothetical. It currently exists.
Sounds like DG to me....
Originally Posted by Anonymous
let's create a hypothetical situation in HS Girls lacrosse on LI:

*the head coach of the HS varsity girls team is the owner of her own club team
*the head coach is NOT a teacher in the school district.
*the head coach hired an assistant coach for the varsity who is also a full time employee of her club
*a large majority of the HS players play on her club team
*a family member plays on her club team and the varsity HS team. Her mother is also a coach for the club team
*the varsity head coach did NOT take 2 freshman girls on the varsity team despite being receiving a commitment from DIV 1 programs. The 3-4 other freshman taken on varsity are on her club team (uncommitted). The 2 girls on JV do NOT play on her club team.


how would you feel if this was your school district? Note - this is not hypothetical. It currently exists.


Work it out with your AD it should be a school thing, NOT like what they did in CT where they made it impossible for a school coach to coach club with their school's players on the team.
If a family is paying a coach directly either through summer club or privates, that coach should be disqualified from coaching for the school. A coach should have to choose club or school to draw money from. It is a classic pay to play. We have a YJ coach at our HS that coaches a bunch of our girls in the summer (like many other schools) and its [ChillLaxin] for girls playing for other club teams or not playing club at all.

Still a good coach but the situation just smells. In our school the math teacher can't tutor their kids for cash but can supply free extra help.If a student needs a tutor they need to choose another teacher. Why? because if you paid the teacher it could look like you were getting more favorable grades. If you pay a coach it could look like you are getting more favorable minutes and positions
Originally Posted by Anonymous
let's create a hypothetical situation in HS Girls lacrosse on LI:

*the head coach of the HS varsity girls team is the owner of her own club team
*the head coach is NOT a teacher in the school district.
*the head coach hired an assistant coach for the varsity who is also a full time employee of her club
*a large majority of the HS players play on her club team
*a family member plays on her club team and the varsity HS team. Her mother is also a coach for the club team
*the varsity head coach did NOT take 2 freshman girls on the varsity team despite being receiving a commitment from DIV 1 programs. The 3-4 other freshman taken on varsity are on her club team (uncommitted). The 2 girls on JV do NOT play on her club team.


how would you feel if this was your school district? Note - this is not hypothetical. It currently exists.


I would feel completely unsurprised, because if it is the town I think it is, everyone and their mother knows exactly how things work there, and could have predicted exactly how it was going to go down way before it actually happened.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If a family is paying a coach directly either through summer club or privates, that coach should be disqualified from coaching for the school. A coach should have to choose club or school to draw money from. It is a classic pay to play. We have a YJ coach at our HS that coaches a bunch of our girls in the summer (like many other schools) and its [ChillLaxin] for girls playing for other club teams or not playing club at all.

Still a good coach but the situation just smells. In our school the math teacher can't tutor their kids for cash but can supply free extra help.If a student needs a tutor they need to choose another teacher. Why? because if you paid the teacher it could look like you were getting more favorable grades. If you pay a coach it could look like you are getting more favorable minutes and positions



= poor job by the AD. That's on of the things they get paid decent or better money to do! The amounts schools pay coaches makes it so that if it were school versus club, the school's will lose out on a lot of coaches who will choose club and the tangential moneys that go with it! Good luck with that.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
let's create a hypothetical situation in HS Girls lacrosse on LI:

*the head coach of the HS varsity girls team is the owner of her own club team
*the head coach is NOT a teacher in the school district.
*the head coach hired an assistant coach for the varsity who is also a full time employee of her club
*a large majority of the HS players play on her club team
*a family member plays on her club team and the varsity HS team. Her mother is also a coach for the club team
*the varsity head coach did NOT take 2 freshman girls on the varsity team despite being receiving a commitment from DIV 1 programs. The 3-4 other freshman taken on varsity are on her club team (uncommitted). The 2 girls on JV do NOT play on her club team.


how would you feel if this was your school district? Note - this is not hypothetical. It currently exists.


Quite frankly the two freshman you're saying were slighted just aren't that good, committing to the first school that pays attention to you doesn't make you a player, it makes you a marketing [ChillLaxin] for CR and the YJ's
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
let's create a hypothetical situation in HS Girls lacrosse on LI:

*the head coach of the HS varsity girls team is the owner of her own club team
*the head coach is NOT a teacher in the school district.
*the head coach hired an assistant coach for the varsity who is also a full time employee of her club
*a large majority of the HS players play on her club team
*a family member plays on her club team and the varsity HS team. Her mother is also a coach for the club team
*the varsity head coach did NOT take 2 freshman girls on the varsity team despite being receiving a commitment from DIV 1 programs. The 3-4 other freshman taken on varsity are on her club team (uncommitted). The 2 girls on JV do NOT play on her club team.


how would you feel if this was your school district? Note - this is not hypothetical. It currently exists.


Quite frankly the two freshman you're saying were slighted just aren't that good, committing to the first school that pays attention to you doesn't make you a player, it makes you a marketing [ChillLaxin] for CR and the YJ's


[ChillLaxin] wasn't meant to be a pejorative, but I guess that's the world we live in now
Originally Posted by Anonymous
let's create a hypothetical situation in HS Girls lacrosse on LI:

*the head coach of the HS varsity girls team is the owner of her own club team
*the head coach is NOT a teacher in the school district.
*the head coach hired an assistant coach for the varsity who is also a full time employee of her club
*a large majority of the HS players play on her club team
*a family member plays on her club team and the varsity HS team. Her mother is also a coach for the club team
*the varsity head coach did NOT take 2 freshman girls on the varsity team despite being receiving a commitment from DIV 1 programs. The 3-4 other freshman taken on varsity are on her club team (uncommitted). The 2 girls on JV do NOT play on her club team.


how would you feel if this was your school district? Note - this is not hypothetical. It currently exists.


If it is a Private School I see no problem (If you do not like their policies you do not have to send your child there) but if it is a public school.... there is a problem.

Good luck going to the AD, most are spineless political types who are way overpaid and will do nothing.

It is a conflict. The very fact that the situation gives the appearance of impropriety is enough to show that it should not be permitted. One parent pays the coach, the other parent does not... child of the parent who pays gets to play the other does not .... just eliminate the situation (I will never happen).

Know this, the majority of HS coaches suck. There will be problems no matter what... family, friends, teachers kids, coaches kids, booster clubs etc... The political parents who make it their business to be up the coaches [ChillLaxin] all play a role in most districts and it sucks.

The good news is... High School Lacrosse and 99% of the HS Coaches are irrelevant. The majority of teams are not competitive and it is very rare to see a college coach at a game. Although it sucks to have to deal with incompetent and corrupt HS coaches it can have less of a negative impact than you might think.

Most of the college coaches know that most of the HS suck and they don't pay any attention to HS Lacrosse.

Good luck.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
let's create a hypothetical situation in HS Girls lacrosse on LI:

*the head coach of the HS varsity girls team is the owner of her own club team
*the head coach is NOT a teacher in the school district.
*the head coach hired an assistant coach for the varsity who is also a full time employee of her club
*a large majority of the HS players play on her club team
*a family member plays on her club team and the varsity HS team. Her mother is also a coach for the club team
*the varsity head coach did NOT take 2 freshman girls on the varsity team despite being receiving a commitment from DIV 1 programs. The 3-4 other freshman taken on varsity are on her club team (uncommitted). The 2 girls on JV do NOT play on her club team.


how would you feel if this was your school district? Note - this is not hypothetical. It currently exists.


Quite frankly the two freshman you're saying were slighted just aren't that good, committing to the first school that pays attention to you doesn't make you a player, it makes you a marketing [ChillLaxin] for CR and the YJ's



I think you are missing the point on this - it not a commentary on the skills of the players not taken on her varsity team. It's reflective of the inability of the head coach to be fair and unbiased in her decision making. The head coach and the assistant coach full time jobs are with the club team. Look at it this way - who would you take on the varsity team? someone that is paying you or one that isn't? its obvious what this coach has done. I find it amusing that teachers cannot tutor their own students due to conflicts about grading and fairness yet the varsity head coach can accept money from players and their families. Something seems inherently wrong here and the policy of the school district is inconsistent. Obviously, grades have a direct effect of the college application and evaluation process. However, sports have an effect as well in the process, especially if you are being recruited. Colleges ask how many years played on varsity on their questionnaires. So, its obvious the college cares and it could impact their decision. The policy from the school district needs to be consistent - if a teacher cannot tutor (and get paid) by their own students then a coach cannot accept receive funds either. Both could have an impact on the college application process. The process NEEDS to be be fair and equitable for ALL not just a select few. If you really think about it, the process to choose which students take an AP or honors class is chosen based on performance. The same decision process should be used to choose which girls are selected for a varsity team by the school district. Owning the club and being the varsity head coach inherently results in relationships with those club players - real and monetarily. The process is egregious, unfair, biased and conflicted.
If these girls are already committed to a Division 1 school then why does it matter if they are on varsity or not? They are already committed as freshmen and you have gotten what you wanted out of your club choice. I would much rather have my daughter on JV playing as a freshmen than riding the bench just to say she is on Varsity. In many of the better lacrosse programs it is rare for freshmen to be pulled up and to get significant playing time because the talent pool is very large. Also being committed does not automatically mean that they are better than girls who aren't committed, just means they jumped at an opportunity.
No HS coach whether they run a club or not would purposely leave a player on JV bc of club allegiance if those girls would help the varsity team. It may seem like that is the case because you're directly affected by it and its an easy scapegoat, but if you think your daughter should be on the varsity team, maybe you should talk to the coach about it before bashing them on these message boards, I'm sure they have a plan in place.
some posts are missing the point. it has nothing to do with individual players. It's just a huge conflict of interest. Here's another one - play for me at club ABC we are the best yada yada yada. Now how does it look if the kid joins club ABC but kids from the competing club XYZ are actually better for the school team? Coach has to take the ABC players to save face and protect her club. And since we know evaluations are subjective, ABC wins every time.

In our town the YJ's are always the first kids called up even if they don't play on the blue team
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If these girls are already committed to a Division 1 school then why does it matter if they are on varsity or not? They are already committed as freshmen and you have gotten what you wanted out of your club choice. I would much rather have my daughter on JV playing as a freshmen than riding the bench just to say she is on Varsity. In many of the better lacrosse programs it is rare for freshmen to be pulled up and to get significant playing time because the talent pool is very large. Also being committed does not automatically mean that they are better than girls who aren't committed, just means they jumped at an opportunity.
No HS coach whether they run a club or not would purposely leave a player on JV bc of club allegiance if those girls would help the varsity team. It may seem like that is the case because you're directly affected by it and its an easy scapegoat, but if you think your daughter should be on the varsity team, maybe you should talk to the coach about it before bashing them on these message boards, I'm sure they have a plan in place.


it seems like you are completely missing the point - its not about what team the kid plays on. Rather, it seems to be concerned with the decision making process which is flawed. Decisions as to who plays on the varsity team are pre-determined due to club choice. How would you feel if a college made an admittance decision based on that criteria? Prob not so great.

This HS coach also selected her own niece to play on the varsity as a freshman and she was completely undeserving of that spot on the team - another demonstration of her inability to be impartial. the list could go on and on....bottom line - nothing will change unless the school district and board change it. The coach and her assistants continue to make money off the public school program since kinds are expected to play on her club team if the want to lay for the HS team. one hand feeds the other. Hard to believe the AD has not addressed this.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If these girls are already committed to a Division 1 school then why does it matter if they are on varsity or not? They are already committed as freshmen and you have gotten what you wanted out of your club choice. I would much rather have my daughter on JV playing as a freshmen than riding the bench just to say she is on Varsity. In many of the better lacrosse programs it is rare for freshmen to be pulled up and to get significant playing time because the talent pool is very large. Also being committed does not automatically mean that they are better than girls who aren't committed, just means they jumped at an opportunity.
No HS coach whether they run a club or not would purposely leave a player on JV bc of club allegiance if those girls would help the varsity team. It may seem like that is the case because you're directly affected by it and its an easy scapegoat, but if you think your daughter should be on the varsity team, maybe you should talk to the coach about it before bashing them on these message boards, I'm sure they have a plan in place.


it seems like you are completely missing the point - its not about what team the kid plays on. Rather, it seems to be concerned with the decision making process which is flawed. Decisions as to who plays on the varsity team are pre-determined due to club choice. How would you feel if a college made an admittance decision based on that criteria? Prob not so great.

This HS coach also selected her own niece to play on the varsity as a freshman and she was completely undeserving of that spot on the team - another demonstration of her inability to be impartial. the list could go on and on....bottom line - nothing will change unless the school district and board change it. The coach and her assistants continue to make money off the public school program since kinds are expected to play on her club team if the want to lay for the HS team. one hand feeds the other. Hard to believe the AD has not addressed this.


I guess the AD will have to address the issue with the boys team as well as it will be exactly the same situation in coming years. Varsity coach is a director of a club program and not affiliated with the school other than as the head coach of the boys team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
let's create a hypothetical situation in HS Girls lacrosse on LI:

*the head coach of the HS varsity girls team is the owner of her own club team
*the head coach is NOT a teacher in the school district.
*the head coach hired an assistant coach for the varsity who is also a full time employee of her club
*a large majority of the HS players play on her club team
*a family member plays on her club team and the varsity HS team. Her mother is also a coach for the club team
*the varsity head coach did NOT take 2 freshman girls on the varsity team despite being receiving a commitment from DIV 1 programs. The 3-4 other freshman taken on varsity are on her club team (uncommitted). The 2 girls on JV do NOT play on her club team.


how would you feel if this was your school district? Note - this is not hypothetical. It currently exists.


Work it out with your AD it should be a school thing, NOT like what they did in CT where they made it impossible for a school coach to coach club with their school's players on the team.


This sounds like Elevate and DK. He owns a club team. He is not a teacher in the district, his assistant coach works for Elevate they have a bunch of girls at Trinity that play on Elevate...... hmmmmmm Interesting. Did I get the question correct?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If these girls are already committed to a Division 1 school then why does it matter if they are on varsity or not? They are already committed as freshmen and you have gotten what you wanted out of your club choice. I would much rather have my daughter on JV playing as a freshmen than riding the bench just to say she is on Varsity. In many of the better lacrosse programs it is rare for freshmen to be pulled up and to get significant playing time because the talent pool is very large. Also being committed does not automatically mean that they are better than girls who aren't committed, just means they jumped at an opportunity.
No HS coach whether they run a club or not would purposely leave a player on JV bc of club allegiance if those girls would help the varsity team. It may seem like that is the case because you're directly affected by it and its an easy scapegoat, but if you think your daughter should be on the varsity team, maybe you should talk to the coach about it before bashing them on these message boards, I'm sure they have a plan in place.


it seems like you are completely missing the point - its not about what team the kid plays on. Rather, it seems to be concerned with the decision making process which is flawed. Decisions as to who plays on the varsity team are pre-determined due to club choice. How would you feel if a college made an admittance decision based on that criteria? Prob not so great.

This HS coach also selected her own niece to play on the varsity as a freshman and she was completely undeserving of that spot on the team - another demonstration of her inability to be impartial. the list could go on and on....bottom line - nothing will change unless the school district and board change it. The coach and her assistants continue to make money off the public school program since kinds are expected to play on her club team if the want to lay for the HS team. one hand feeds the other. Hard to believe the AD has not addressed this.


You're delusional if you don't think being a legacy has an advantage in the college recruiting process and for that matter the regular admissions process as well
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If these girls are already committed to a Division 1 school then why does it matter if they are on varsity or not? They are already committed as freshmen and you have gotten what you wanted out of your club choice. I would much rather have my daughter on JV playing as a freshmen than riding the bench just to say she is on Varsity. In many of the better lacrosse programs it is rare for freshmen to be pulled up and to get significant playing time because the talent pool is very large. Also being committed does not automatically mean that they are better than girls who aren't committed, just means they jumped at an opportunity.
No HS coach whether they run a club or not would purposely leave a player on JV bc of club allegiance if those girls would help the varsity team. It may seem like that is the case because you're directly affected by it and its an easy scapegoat, but if you think your daughter should be on the varsity team, maybe you should talk to the coach about it before bashing them on these message boards, I'm sure they have a plan in place.


Gibberish
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
let's create a hypothetical situation in HS Girls lacrosse on LI:

*the head coach of the HS varsity girls team is the owner of her own club team
*the head coach is NOT a teacher in the school district.
*the head coach hired an assistant coach for the varsity who is also a full time employee of her club
*a large majority of the HS players play on her club team
*a family member plays on her club team and the varsity HS team. Her mother is also a coach for the club team
*the varsity head coach did NOT take 2 freshman girls on the varsity team despite being receiving a commitment from DIV 1 programs. The 3-4 other freshman taken on varsity are on her club team (uncommitted). The 2 girls on JV do NOT play on her club team.


how would you feel if this was your school district? Note - this is not hypothetical. It currently exists.


Work it out with your AD it should be a school thing, NOT like what they did in CT where they made it impossible for a school coach to coach club with their school's players on the team.


This sounds like Elevate and DK. He owns a club team. He is not a teacher in the district, his assistant coach works for Elevate they have a bunch of girls at Trinity that play on Elevate...... hmmmmmm Interesting. Did I get the question correct?


No - Manhasset
Sounds like sour grapes to me. Your kid doesn’t get picked, typical millennial attitude! Blame everyone else and go to social media to whine about the made up injustice!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like sour grapes to me. Your kid doesn’t get picked, typical millennial attitude! Blame everyone else and go to social media to whine about the made up injustice!


There is a clear conflict of interest.
Take all the players out of it. The problem is very real and is really indefensible.

Human nature says if I pay someone lots of cash year round over many many years for club lax and privates that there would be a conflict if that person was also my high school coach. No family should feel pressure to pay and play for certain summer clubs. That is absolute bullcrap. School coaches should not be coaching any of their school players with outside organiszations
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Take all the players out of it. The problem is very real and is really indefensible.

Human nature says if I pay someone lots of cash year round over many many years for club lax and privates that there would be a conflict if that person was also my high school coach. No family should feel pressure to pay and play for certain summer clubs. That is absolute bullcrap. School coaches should not be coaching any of their school players with outside organiszations


Get ready to lose any quality coaching at the school level then . . .
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Take all the players out of it. The problem is very real and is really indefensible.

Human nature says if I pay someone lots of cash year round over many many years for club lax and privates that there would be a conflict if that person was also my high school coach. No family should feel pressure to pay and play for certain summer clubs. That is absolute bullcrap. School coaches should not be coaching any of their school players with outside organiszations


Get ready to lose any quality coaching at the school level then . . .


Lets stop saying that these are all quality coaches just because they played in college. Most of these summer coaches are average at best but they all have ties of paying in to the directors club for 10 years as former club players, then worked cheap as asst coaches while they were in college and now are underwhelming coaches after graduation. I would rather have a teacher that played in HS with ties to no one than the political [ChillLaxin] that comes with having a YJ coach.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like sour grapes to me. Your kid doesn’t get picked, typical millennial attitude! Blame everyone else and go to social media to whine about the made up injustice!


The next thing they will whine about is that the girls that did make it are older and were probably holdbacks.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
let's create a hypothetical situation in HS Girls lacrosse on LI:

*the head coach of the HS varsity girls team is the owner of her own club team
*the head coach is NOT a teacher in the school district.
*the head coach hired an assistant coach for the varsity who is also a full time employee of her club
*a large majority of the HS players play on her club team
*a family member plays on her club team and the varsity HS team. Her mother is also a coach for the club team
*the varsity head coach did NOT take 2 freshman girls on the varsity team despite being receiving a commitment from DIV 1 programs. The 3-4 other freshman taken on varsity are on her club team (uncommitted). The 2 girls on JV do NOT play on her club team.


how would you feel if this was your school district? Note - this is not hypothetical. It currently exists.


Work it out with your AD it should be a school thing, NOT like what they did in CT where they made it impossible for a school coach to coach club with their school's players on the team.


This sounds like Elevate and DK. He owns a club team. He is not a teacher in the district, his assistant coach works for Elevate they have a bunch of girls at Trinity that play on Elevate...... hmmmmmm Interesting. Did I get the question correct?



no. Its Manhasset and the Liberty program. DG
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Sounds like sour grapes to me. Your kid doesn’t get picked, typical millennial attitude! Blame everyone else and go to social media to whine about the made up injustice!


It has nothing to do with that at all. there are multiple examples of favoritism with the prime example being her own niece. watch her play and you will understand. another is when the coach did not take a former UA all american and Team USA player on the team so she left to go play at a power house catholic school. guess what club she played on? wasn't Liberty.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Take all the players out of it. The problem is very real and is really indefensible.

Human nature says if I pay someone lots of cash year round over many many years for club lax and privates that there would be a conflict if that person was also my high school coach. No family should feel pressure to pay and play for certain summer clubs. That is absolute bullcrap. School coaches should not be coaching any of their school players with outside organiszations


Get ready to lose any quality coaching at the school level then . . .


Give me a break with the quality coaching...how good was the quality coaching last year? uh, not so good. The Manhasset school district would receive a number of qualified applicants and the program would continue. It is a real problem as was mentioned in an earlier post. Either coach the HS team or coach the club team - not both. pathetic.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Take all the players out of it. The problem is very real and is really indefensible.

Human nature says if I pay someone lots of cash year round over many many years for club lax and privates that there would be a conflict if that person was also my high school coach. No family should feel pressure to pay and play for certain summer clubs. That is absolute bullcrap. School coaches should not be coaching any of their school players with outside organiszations


Get ready to lose any quality coaching at the school level then . . .


Give me a break with the quality coaching...how good was the quality coaching last year? uh, not so good. The Manhasset school district would receive a number of qualified applicants and the program would continue. It is a real problem as was mentioned in an earlier post. Either coach the HS team or coach the club team - not both. pathetic.


EVERY club business model is predicated on having as many HS coaches as possible in an effort to subtly or not so subtly coerce kids into playing for a particular club - YJ, Liberty, TG, etc ALL do it fully knowing what they're doing and also knowing that to a great degree it works very well for them
Best part is seeing all the Manhasset kiss-arse partents suck up to DG thru Liberty and then either don't get light on HS Varsity or get cut all together....very enjoyable
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Take all the players out of it. The problem is very real and is really indefensible.

Human nature says if I pay someone lots of cash year round over many many years for club lax and privates that there would be a conflict if that person was also my high school coach. No family should feel pressure to pay and play for certain summer clubs. That is absolute bullcrap. School coaches should not be coaching any of their school players with outside organiszations


Get ready to lose any quality coaching at the school level then . . .


Give me a break with the quality coaching...how good was the quality coaching last year? uh, not so good. The Manhasset school district would receive a number of qualified applicants and the program would continue. It is a real problem as was mentioned in an earlier post. Either coach the HS team or coach the club team - not both. pathetic.


[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Take all the players out of it. The problem is very real and is really indefensible.

Human nature says if I pay someone lots of cash year round over many many years for club lax and privates that there would be a conflict if that person was also my high school coach. No family should feel pressure to pay and play for certain summer clubs. That is absolute bullcrap. School coaches should not be coaching any of their school players with outside organiszations


Get ready to lose any quality coaching at the school level then . . .


Give me a break with the quality coaching...how good was the quality coaching last year? uh, not so good. The Manhasset school district would receive a number of qualified applicants and the program would continue. It is a real problem as was mentioned in an earlier post. Either coach the HS team or coach the club team - not both. pathetic.


[Linked Image]



—Why is it pathetic? First off, Coaching jobs open up every year and no one wants them because of parents like you. Nothing worse than a Whiney parent who’s kid isn’t allowed to have some conflict in their life. Why not coach both? Try out different drills, develop kids, and make some extra money? How about parents and kids just get on board with it, and remember that YOU chose to play lacrosse, the coaches aren’t making you. If you aren’t on Varsity, dominate on JV. If you made varsity, get some lessons and play club and dominate on that too. Otherwise, just go with the flow, enjoy high school and Be happy that you’ll get the chance to get away from your psycho mom and dad when you graduate.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Take all the players out of it. The problem is very real and is really indefensible.

Human nature says if I pay someone lots of cash year round over many many years for club lax and privates that there would be a conflict if that person was also my high school coach. No family should feel pressure to pay and play for certain summer clubs. That is absolute bullcrap. School coaches should not be coaching any of their school players with outside organiszations


Get ready to lose any quality coaching at the school level then . . .


Give me a break with the quality coaching...how good was the quality coaching last year? uh, not so good. The Manhasset school district would receive a number of qualified applicants and the program would continue. It is a real problem as was mentioned in an earlier post. Either coach the HS team or coach the club team - not both. pathetic.


EVERY club business model is predicated on having as many HS coaches as possible in an effort to subtly or not so subtly coerce kids into playing for a particular club - YJ, Liberty, TG, etc ALL do it fully knowing what they're doing and also knowing that to a great degree it works very well for them


I don't care about the CLUB, that's the problem with lacrosse in general and US lacrosse, everything revolves around the clubs! CR is more powerful than most college D1 coaches. This is a school district issue. My job says I cant have another job that might be viewed as a conflict of interest. Same should go for coaching HS. Coaching a club team for cash should eliminate you from coaching in HS if you have any players that play for the club you coach in
This is a problem at lots of schools not just Manhassett. Most of the problems are with YJ coaches because they have the most HS coaches. Elevate, Top Guns and Liberty (except for Manhassett) use mostly college kids to coach
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Take all the players out of it. The problem is very real and is really indefensible.

Human nature says if I pay someone lots of cash year round over many many years for club lax and privates that there would be a conflict if that person was also my high school coach. No family should feel pressure to pay and play for certain summer clubs. That is absolute bullcrap. School coaches should not be coaching any of their school players with outside organiszations


Get ready to lose any quality coaching at the school level then . . .


Give me a break with the quality coaching...how good was the quality coaching last year? uh, not so good. The Manhasset school district would receive a number of qualified applicants and the program would continue. It is a real problem as was mentioned in an earlier post. Either coach the HS team or coach the club team - not both. pathetic.


EVERY club business model is predicated on having as many HS coaches as possible in an effort to subtly or not so subtly coerce kids into playing for a particular club - YJ, Liberty, TG, etc ALL do it fully knowing what they're doing and also knowing that to a great degree it works very well for them


I don't care about the CLUB, that's the problem with lacrosse in general and US lacrosse, everything revolves around the clubs! CR is more powerful than most college D1 coaches. This is a school district issue. My job says I cant have another job that might be viewed as a conflict of interest. Same should go for coaching HS. Coaching a club team for cash should eliminate you from coaching in HS if you have any players that play for the club you coach in


-because clubs operate year round And give players many opportunities to develop. They’re good for the kids who have a passion for it or the parents who have no lives and make their kids do it. Your example of your job is sub-par, being that high school coaches get paid a max. Of $12,000 to coach high school-it’s not their full time job. Second it’s not “for cash,” being that coaches pay taxes on their club $$ just the same as their HS $. At the end of the day, the district picks who they think will best represent their school. Furthermore, it’s not a district issue. Let’s not forget, you chose to live in the district you’re in, #1, and if you’re there for lacrosse instead of school first, you’re a loser. On top of that, coaches should be able to coach wherever as whoever they please, as long as they are respectful, model citizens. They have to put up with little money, crazy parents, and kids who kind of want to be there......shut up.
You really don't think this is a conflict? If your kid didn't play for her HS coaches club yet some of the kids on her HS team did you don't think that's a problem? Don't you think the coach should be beyond reproach? Amazed you don't see any issue. No different than paying the math teacher for extra help all year. If my kid got a better grade after paying (whether earned or not) don't you think those who didn't pay would have questions?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You really don't think this is a conflict? If your kid didn't play for her HS coaches club yet some of the kids on her HS team did you don't think that's a problem? Don't you think the coach should be beyond reproach? Amazed you don't see any issue. No different than paying the math teacher for extra help all year. If my kid got a better grade after paying (whether earned or not) don't you think those who didn't pay would have questions?


This sort of situation is not just isolated to LI. If you look at the top high school teams down in the MD and DC area - all their coaches are affiliated with a club or run one. But, I have not seen any whining about it in the MD forum. How do they make it work down there or are people just more tolerant of it? Or is it because they really don't care much about the high school situations because they have been conditioned by their club affiliations.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You really don't think this is a conflict? If your kid didn't play for her HS coaches club yet some of the kids on her HS team did you don't think that's a problem? Don't you think the coach should be beyond reproach? Amazed you don't see any issue. No different than paying the math teacher for extra help all year. If my kid got a better grade after paying (whether earned or not) don't you think those who didn't pay would have questions?


If they were allowed to pay the math teacher they would.

There is a definite conflict of interest.

The parents who do not see it are the ones who have no problem paying and kissing [ChillLaxin]. The parents who come on here and tell you to suck it up and stop whining are the very same ones who are emailing, texting and making phone calls behind the scene to "advocate" for their kid. They are the very same parents who have been calling and emailing the teachers, principles, coaches and Athletic Directors on behalf of their kids for years. These parents do not expect their kid to be judged by the kids ability, they preemptively attempt to "develop a relationship" with all who might be able to help their kid. They know how to play the game and the coaches, teachers, AD's etc... eat it up.

It is a conflict.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Take all the players out of it. The problem is very real and is really indefensible.

Human nature says if I pay someone lots of cash year round over many many years for club lax and privates that there would be a conflict if that person was also my high school coach. No family should feel pressure to pay and play for certain summer clubs. That is absolute bullcrap. School coaches should not be coaching any of their school players with outside organiszations


Get ready to lose any quality coaching at the school level then . . .


Give me a break with the quality coaching...how good was the quality coaching last year? uh, not so good. The Manhasset school district would receive a number of qualified applicants and the program would continue. It is a real problem as was mentioned in an earlier post. Either coach the HS team or coach the club team - not both. pathetic.


EVERY club business model is predicated on having as many HS coaches as possible in an effort to subtly or not so subtly coerce kids into playing for a particular club - YJ, Liberty, TG, etc ALL do it fully knowing what they're doing and also knowing that to a great degree it works very well for them


I don't care about the CLUB, that's the problem with lacrosse in general and US lacrosse, everything revolves around the clubs! CR is more powerful than most college D1 coaches. This is a school district issue. My job says I cant have another job that might be viewed as a conflict of interest. Same should go for coaching HS. Coaching a club team for cash should eliminate you from coaching in HS if you have any players that play for the club you coach in


-because clubs operate year round And give players many opportunities to develop. They’re good for the kids who have a passion for it or the parents who have no lives and make their kids do it. Your example of your job is sub-par, being that high school coaches get paid a max. Of $12,000 to coach high school-it’s not their full time job. Second it’s not “for cash,” being that coaches pay taxes on their club $$ just the same as their HS $. At the end of the day, the district picks who they think will best represent their school. Furthermore, it’s not a district issue. Let’s not forget, you chose to live in the district you’re in, #1, and if you’re there for lacrosse instead of school first, you’re a loser. On top of that, coaches should be able to coach wherever as whoever they please, as long as they are respectful, model citizens. They have to put up with little money, crazy parents, and kids who kind of want to be there......shut up.


you really sound foolish and uninformed. first, the conflict of interest is obvious - you pay the club coach and club coach puts you in the varsity team. easy for the school district to determine that - go look at the rosters. It has happened not just once but multiple times. its a business to her that funnels kids from her HS team and Manhasset community to her almost automatically. you can do the math - figure $1,500 per kid with 20 kids per team. plus the private lessons, which occur frequently. pretty good life. so the HS "job" isn't used for the salary. obvious conflict of interest.

Second, if you had any dealings with her, you would realize she is anything but respectful - i think most ppl have started to realize it and that is the reason she can no longer support 2 teams per grade.

if a school district has a policy where a teacher cannot tutor one of their students for cash then it should be applied to every teacher or coach. if you are unwilling to abide by those stipulations then leave. It works for the teachers but not the coaches. needs to change ASAP. new superintendent and the AD should address it - they did for the boys lacrosse program 2 years ago. now they should address the girls program.
There's a good reason why the state of Connecticut instituted a ban on HS coaches involvement with any for profit organization that has players form their district on the roster. It reeks of impropriety and is a form of coercion that victimizes children and their parents. Perceived or actual.

Many LI school districts have followed CT's lead and frankly the state of NY should do the same.

Kids are not pawns for coaches monetary gain and most AD's don't want to make trouble for their coaches.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There's a good reason why the state of Connecticut instituted a ban on HS coaches involvement with any for profit organization that has players form their district on the roster. It reeks of impropriety and is a form of coercion that victimizes children and their parents. Perceived or actual.

Many LI school districts have followed CT's lead and frankly the state of NY should do the same.

Kids are not pawns for coaches monetary gain and most AD's don't want to make trouble for their coaches.


Comparing the CT situation to LI is like apples and oranges when you consider the numbers involved - were NY to institute a similar ban, the shakeup to the entire lacrosse community would be monumental and throw it into chaos for at least a few years! The sheer number of school coaches that are involved with clubs, both due to the number of schools AND the number of clubs, has no comparison in CT. I suspect the few districts that have self-implemented such bans had no such conflicts with their existing players and coaches, and they did so to prevent any in the future. Good for them as it was not disruptive - but many other districts would find that they have countless 'conflicts' and it would force either 1. players to change clubs for no other reason, or 2. coaches to leave current clubs they are affiliated with for no other reason, or 3.
coaches leaving their school's program for no other reason. 2 and 3 is the referred to chaos, with 3 being unacceptable to many schools where they have good coaching in place.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There's a good reason why the state of Connecticut instituted a ban on HS coaches involvement with any for profit organization that has players form their district on the roster. It reeks of impropriety and is a form of coercion that victimizes children and their parents. Perceived or actual.

Many LI school districts have followed CT's lead and frankly the state of NY should do the same.

Kids are not pawns for coaches monetary gain and most AD's don't want to make trouble for their coaches.



Comparing the CT situation to LI is like apples and oranges when you consider the numbers involved - were NY to institute a similar ban, the shakeup to the entire lacrosse community would be monumental and throw it into chaos for at least a few years! The sheer number of school coaches that are involved with clubs, both due to the number of schools AND the number of clubs, has no comparison in CT. I suspect the few districts that have self-implemented such bans had no such conflicts with their existing players and coaches, and they did so to prevent any in the future. Good for them as it was not disruptive - but many other districts would find that they have countless 'conflicts' and it would force either 1. players to change clubs for no other reason, or 2. coaches to leave current clubs they are affiliated with for no other reason, or 3.
coaches leaving their school's program for no other reason. 2 and 3 is the referred to chaos, with 3 being unacceptable to many schools where they have good coaching in place.


Thankfully it has not had a negative impact on any of my children but the is no question that there is a conflict of interest.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There's a good reason why the state of Connecticut instituted a ban on HS coaches involvement with any for profit organization that has players form their district on the roster. It reeks of impropriety and is a form of coercion that victimizes children and their parents. Perceived or actual.

Many LI school districts have followed CT's lead and frankly the state of NY should do the same.

Kids are not pawns for coaches monetary gain and most AD's don't want to make trouble for their coaches.



Comparing the CT situation to LI is like apples and oranges when you consider the numbers involved - were NY to institute a similar ban, the shakeup to the entire lacrosse community would be monumental and throw it into chaos for at least a few years! The sheer number of school coaches that are involved with clubs, both due to the number of schools AND the number of clubs, has no comparison in CT. I suspect the few districts that have self-implemented such bans had no such conflicts with their existing players and coaches, and they did so to prevent any in the future. Good for them as it was not disruptive - but many other districts would find that they have countless 'conflicts' and it would force either 1. players to change clubs for no other reason, or 2. coaches to leave current clubs they are affiliated with for no other reason, or 3.
coaches leaving their school's program for no other reason. 2 and 3 is the referred to chaos, with 3 being unacceptable to many schools where they have good coaching in place.


Thankfully it has not had a negative impact on any of my children but the is no question that there is a conflict of interest.


Potential for conflict of interest - just because a coach may be involved with SAs both in the school and with a club does not mean it translates into an actual issue.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There's a good reason why the state of Connecticut instituted a ban on HS coaches involvement with any for profit organization that has players form their district on the roster. It reeks of impropriety and is a form of coercion that victimizes children and their parents. Perceived or actual.

Many LI school districts have followed CT's lead and frankly the state of NY should do the same.

Kids are not pawns for coaches monetary gain and most AD's don't want to make trouble for their coaches.


Comparing the CT situation to LI is like apples and oranges when you consider the numbers involved - were NY to institute a similar ban, the shakeup to the entire lacrosse community would be monumental and throw it into chaos for at least a few years! The sheer number of school coaches that are involved with clubs, both due to the number of schools AND the number of clubs, has no comparison in CT. I suspect the few districts that have self-implemented such bans had no such conflicts with their existing players and coaches, and they did so to prevent any in the future. Good for them as it was not disruptive - but many other districts would find that they have countless 'conflicts' and it would force either 1. players to change clubs for no other reason, or 2. coaches to leave current clubs they are affiliated with for no other reason, or 3.
coaches leaving their school's program for no other reason. 2 and 3 is the referred to chaos, with 3 being unacceptable to many schools where they have good coaching in place.



I disagree. One simple solution is that HS coaches involved with the numerous club teams cannot coach HS age club players. There are many clubs with teams with player grades from 3rd grade to 7th grade that the HS coaches can coach. There is no doubt that the potential for conflict is there for HS aged players and enough examples/problems that the CT rule is one that NYS should look at.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There's a good reason why the state of Connecticut instituted a ban on HS coaches involvement with any for profit organization that has players form their district on the roster. It reeks of impropriety and is a form of coercion that victimizes children and their parents. Perceived or actual.

Many LI school districts have followed CT's lead and frankly the state of NY should do the same.

Kids are not pawns for coaches monetary gain and most AD's don't want to make trouble for their coaches.


Comparing the CT situation to LI is like apples and oranges when you consider the numbers involved - were NY to institute a similar ban, the shakeup to the entire lacrosse community would be monumental and throw it into chaos for at least a few years! The sheer number of school coaches that are involved with clubs, both due to the number of schools AND the number of clubs, has no comparison in CT. I suspect the few districts that have self-implemented such bans had no such conflicts with their existing players and coaches, and they did so to prevent any in the future. Good for them as it was not disruptive - but many other districts would find that they have countless 'conflicts' and it would force either 1. players to change clubs for no other reason, or 2. coaches to leave current clubs they are affiliated with for no other reason, or 3.
coaches leaving their school's program for no other reason. 2 and 3 is the referred to chaos, with 3 being unacceptable to many schools where they have good coaching in place.



I disagree. One simple solution is that HS coaches involved with the numerous club teams cannot coach HS age club players. There are many clubs with teams with player grades from 3rd grade to 7th grade that the HS coaches can coach. There is no doubt that the potential for conflict is there for HS aged players and enough examples/problems that the CT rule is one that NYS should look at.


You're missing the point - if any coach is already in place in both a HS school and a club, and you implement the rule, only two variables exist to change: the coach or the players. From the school's perspective, the players aren't/can't change schools, the coach can stop coaching the club that their HS players are part of and they continue to coach at the HS, or the coach can leave their HS coaching position and continue to coach in travel. I am not sure what clubs you are familiar with, but most clubs already have coaches that are already coaching certain age groups, either consistently or moving along with certain ages/grades (these are usually fathers/mothers, but not always). A coach cannot simply decide to no longer coach one age (HS) and move to another within that org - it may or may not work within that club. For that matter, there are coaches that prefer or may only be suited to coach HS-aged SAs. As a result, implementation will be volatile to the coaching ranks - it's not a question.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There's a good reason why the state of Connecticut instituted a ban on HS coaches involvement with any for profit organization that has players form their district on the roster. It reeks of impropriety and is a form of coercion that victimizes children and their parents. Perceived or actual.

Many LI school districts have followed CT's lead and frankly the state of NY should do the same.

Kids are not pawns for coaches monetary gain and most AD's don't want to make trouble for their coaches.



Comparing the CT situation to LI is like apples and oranges when you consider the numbers involved - were NY to institute a similar ban, the shakeup to the entire lacrosse community would be monumental and throw it into chaos for at least a few years! The sheer number of school coaches that are involved with clubs, both due to the number of schools AND the number of clubs, has no comparison in CT. I suspect the few districts that have self-implemented such bans had no such conflicts with their existing players and coaches, and they did so to prevent any in the future. Good for them as it was not disruptive - but many other districts would find that they have countless 'conflicts' and it would force either 1. players to change clubs for no other reason, or 2. coaches to leave current clubs they are affiliated with for no other reason, or 3.
coaches leaving their school's program for no other reason. 2 and 3 is the referred to chaos, with 3 being unacceptable to many schools where they have good coaching in place.


Thankfully it has not had a negative impact on any of my children but the is no question that there is a conflict of interest.


Potential for conflict of interest - just because a coach may be involved with SAs both in the school and with a club does not mean it translates into an actual issue.


How do you prove there is no conflict? If a conflict is perceived than a conflict exists.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There's a good reason why the state of Connecticut instituted a ban on HS coaches involvement with any for profit organization that has players form their district on the roster. It reeks of impropriety and is a form of coercion that victimizes children and their parents. Perceived or actual.

Many LI school districts have followed CT's lead and frankly the state of NY should do the same.

Kids are not pawns for coaches monetary gain and most AD's don't want to make trouble for their coaches.


Comparing the CT situation to LI is like apples and oranges when you consider the numbers involved - were NY to institute a similar ban, the shakeup to the entire lacrosse community would be monumental and throw it into chaos for at least a few years! The sheer number of school coaches that are involved with clubs, both due to the number of schools AND the number of clubs, has no comparison in CT. I suspect the few districts that have self-implemented such bans had no such conflicts with their existing players and coaches, and they did so to prevent any in the future. Good for them as it was not disruptive - but many other districts would find that they have countless 'conflicts' and it would force either 1. players to change clubs for no other reason, or 2. coaches to leave current clubs they are affiliated with for no other reason, or 3.
coaches leaving their school's program for no other reason. 2 and 3 is the referred to chaos, with 3 being unacceptable to many schools where they have good coaching in place.


I don't think you understand the Western CT club environment. Darien, Wilton, et al Big districts that had large club teams owned and or coached by the Varsity coach. If you don't play for the club team, good luck playing on Varsity. Can you prove this? Probably not, but the perception was pervasive so it impacted the decision making of parents. This is the perceived conflict and it needed to be stopped. Kudos to CT and the districts that have enforced it. Side note, I am 100% certain players were black balled but can't prove a thing except trust my eyes. I played upper level D1 lacrosse and have been coaching for almost 15 years. You know when you see it and its a darn shame. Altering a kids life for money.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There's a good reason why the state of Connecticut instituted a ban on HS coaches involvement with any for profit organization that has players form their district on the roster. It reeks of impropriety and is a form of coercion that victimizes children and their parents. Perceived or actual.

Many LI school districts have followed CT's lead and frankly the state of NY should do the same.

Kids are not pawns for coaches monetary gain and most AD's don't want to make trouble for their coaches.


Comparing the CT situation to LI is like apples and oranges when you consider the numbers involved - were NY to institute a similar ban, the shakeup to the entire lacrosse community would be monumental and throw it into chaos for at least a few years! The sheer number of school coaches that are involved with clubs, both due to the number of schools AND the number of clubs, has no comparison in CT. I suspect the few districts that have self-implemented such bans had no such conflicts with their existing players and coaches, and they did so to prevent any in the future. Good for them as it was not disruptive - but many other districts would find that they have countless 'conflicts' and it would force either 1. players to change clubs for no other reason, or 2. coaches to leave current clubs they are affiliated with for no other reason, or 3.
coaches leaving their school's program for no other reason. 2 and 3 is the referred to chaos, with 3 being unacceptable to many schools where they have good coaching in place.


I'm sure that when you add up all the various sports that CT has a significant amount of pay to play clubs. Curious as to what LI schools have banned this practice, I haven't heard of any
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There's a good reason why the state of Connecticut instituted a ban on HS coaches involvement with any for profit organization that has players form their district on the roster. It reeks of impropriety and is a form of coercion that victimizes children and their parents. Perceived or actual.

Many LI school districts have followed CT's lead and frankly the state of NY should do the same.

Kids are not pawns for coaches monetary gain and most AD's don't want to make trouble for their coaches.



Comparing the CT situation to LI is like apples and oranges when you consider the numbers involved - were NY to institute a similar ban, the shakeup to the entire lacrosse community would be monumental and throw it into chaos for at least a few years! The sheer number of school coaches that are involved with clubs, both due to the number of schools AND the number of clubs, has no comparison in CT. I suspect the few districts that have self-implemented such bans had no such conflicts with their existing players and coaches, and they did so to prevent any in the future. Good for them as it was not disruptive - but many other districts would find that they have countless 'conflicts' and it would force either 1. players to change clubs for no other reason, or 2. coaches to leave current clubs they are affiliated with for no other reason, or 3.
coaches leaving their school's program for no other reason. 2 and 3 is the referred to chaos, with 3 being unacceptable to many schools where they have good coaching in place.


Thankfully it has not had a negative impact on any of my children but the is no question that there is a conflict of interest.


Potential for conflict of interest - just because a coach may be involved with SAs both in the school and with a club does not mean it translates into an actual issue.


I don't think anyone can actually defend this practice, it's obscene at many levels. The truth of the matter is other than SA and a handful of schools most HS AD's could don't care about anything, especially winning, as long as it doesn't negatively impact them directly
Involvement with a club is a potential for conflict, agreed.Some HS coaches have a piece of the club. Most are employees. The bigger deal I think is the High school programs. Pay $800 for four tournaments and summer practices. Be a part of Varsity. Come to this special off season shooting clinic Only $30 a head. Hey freshmen want to have me see you and be considered to play varsity? Play with your HS team and pay Me. Or pay the booster club and they will pay me. If you want a serious HS team Pay Me
Our HS coach coaches some of our players over the summer at her club. How can it be anything but a conflict of interest? Some have paid tens of thousands of dollars to the coaches club and indirectly the coach and now people don't think it will affect HS playing time?
I think you're painting an ugly picture and making it as though every coach that works for a club team has the wrong Intentions, which is simply not true. You may of had a bad personal experience but don't make it as your experience is everyone's experience, and quite frankly I'd rather have my children play in summer for a coach who coaches high school lacrosse as opposed to young college players who aren't as experienced, or a father whose kid in on the team.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think you're painting an ugly picture and making it as though every coach that works for a club team has the wrong Intentions, which is simply not true. You may of had a bad personal experience but don't make it as your experience is everyone's experience, and quite frankly I'd rather have my children play in summer for a coach who coaches high school lacrosse as opposed to young college players who aren't as experienced, or a father whose kid in on the team.


Your assuming the club teams are well coached. Coercion is real and some HS coaches profit handsomely just by the implied threat. They don't need to say a word. When parents make decisions out of fear for repercussions, the practice needs to be restricted.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think you're painting an ugly picture and making it as though every coach that works for a club team has the wrong Intentions, which is simply not true. You may of had a bad personal experience but don't make it as your experience is everyone's experience, and quite frankly I'd rather have my children play in summer for a coach who coaches high school lacrosse as opposed to young college players who aren't as experienced, or a father whose kid in on the team.


Your not serious.....there is absolutely a potential conflict. I agree that most coaches do not have wrong/bad intentions. But there is no need for these conflicts to exist....and when it comes to money, playing time, playing position, A vs B team your head is buried in the sand if you don't think those potential conflicts become real ongoing conflicts.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think you're painting an ugly picture and making it as though every coach that works for a club team has the wrong Intentions, which is simply not true. You may of had a bad personal experience but don't make it as your experience is everyone's experience, and quite frankly I'd rather have my children play in summer for a coach who coaches high school lacrosse as opposed to young college players who aren't as experienced, or a father whose kid in on the team.


Your not serious.....there is absolutely a potential conflict. I agree that most coaches do not have wrong/bad intentions. But there is no need for these conflicts to exist....and when it comes to money, playing time, playing position, A vs B team your head is buried in the sand if you don't think those potential conflicts become real ongoing conflicts.


The involvement between HS coaches and clubs is so pervasive, you cannot expect to just declare it "done" - it will take a monumental effort to enact such a change and a lot of pain in the period thereafter. You are asking to basically totally turn the lax world lacrosse cart over on its side! I am not saying that it shouldn't be done - but don't be naive about what it will take to do it and the mess that will be left in its immediate wake! And don't be surprised when there are schools and or parents/players left hanging in the wind and very unhappy that their HS or club coach is no longer "their" coach anymore - this would force coaches to move in one way or the other. Once it all settles out, it will be the new norm, but there will be a shitstorm in the middle!
Most school districts forbid teachers from tutoring in their own districts and tutoring their own students is absolutely forbidden. Similar scenario isn't it?
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Most school districts forbid teachers from tutoring in their own districts and tutoring their own students is absolutely forbidden. Similar scenario isn't it?

Except that you don't have an existing situation where district teachers are already tutoring a fair number of district students, that you are now proposing to end. There are a lot of personal and monetary investments that are in place with lax.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think you're painting an ugly picture and making it as though every coach that works for a club team has the wrong Intentions, which is simply not true. You may of had a bad personal experience but don't make it as your experience is everyone's experience, and quite frankly I'd rather have my children play in summer for a coach who coaches high school lacrosse as opposed to young college players who aren't as experienced, or a father whose kid in on the team.


Your not serious.....there is absolutely a potential conflict. I agree that most coaches do not have wrong/bad intentions. But there is no need for these conflicts to exist....and when it comes to money, playing time, playing position, A vs B team your head is buried in the sand if you don't think those potential conflicts become real ongoing conflicts.


The involvement between HS coaches and clubs is so pervasive, you cannot expect to just declare it "done" - it will take a monumental effort to enact such a change and a lot of pain in the period thereafter. You are asking to basically totally turn the lax world lacrosse cart over on its side! I am not saying that it shouldn't be done - but don't be naive about what it will take to do it and the mess that will be left in its immediate wake! And don't be surprised when there are schools and or parents/players left hanging in the wind and very unhappy that their HS or club coach is no longer "their" coach anymore - this would force coaches to move in one way or the other. Once it all settles out, it will be the new norm, but there will be a shitstorm in the middle!



The HS coaches combining with clubs is mostly a new thing. The bigger clubs have been soliciting HS coaches as "board members", "advisors", "trainers", "club owners" in order to have those HS players sign up with that club. Its about MONEY. I do agree that the genie is out of the bottle and trying to turn this ship around may be monumental. But the bottom line is that there are kids/players/families being adversely affected.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think you're painting an ugly picture and making it as though every coach that works for a club team has the wrong Intentions, which is simply not true. You may of had a bad personal experience but don't make it as your experience is everyone's experience, and quite frankly I'd rather have my children play in summer for a coach who coaches high school lacrosse as opposed to young college players who aren't as experienced, or a father whose kid in on the team.


Your not serious.....there is absolutely a potential conflict. I agree that most coaches do not have wrong/bad intentions. But there is no need for these conflicts to exist....and when it comes to money, playing time, playing position, A vs B team your head is buried in the sand if you don't think those potential conflicts become real ongoing conflicts.


The involvement between HS coaches and clubs is so pervasive, you cannot expect to just declare it "done" - it will take a monumental effort to enact such a change and a lot of pain in the period thereafter. You are asking to basically totally turn the lax world lacrosse cart over on its side! I am not saying that it shouldn't be done - but don't be naive about what it will take to do it and the mess that will be left in its immediate wake! And don't be surprised when there are schools and or parents/players left hanging in the wind and very unhappy that their HS or club coach is no longer "their" coach anymore - this would force coaches to move in one way or the other. Once it all settles out, it will be the new norm, but there will be a shitstorm in the middle!



The HS coaches combining with clubs is mostly a new thing. The bigger clubs have been soliciting HS coaches as "board members", "advisors", "trainers", "club owners" in order to have those HS players sign up with that club. Its about MONEY. I do agree that the genie is out of the bottle and trying to turn this ship around may be monumental. But the bottom line is that there are kids/players/families being adversely affected.


When you say "combining with clubs" what do you mean? I am thinking more of a situation I have with my one son where a HS coach is also the coach for a travel team that has 7 - 8 of that school's players on it. That said, the coach the coach of the players on the club team prior to being their school coach.
See CT's eligibility rules: https://www.casciac.org/pdfs/eligibility_brochure.pdf essentially, you cannot participate with an outside club team AT ALL in season! I don't know about you, but travel club practice definitely starts before the school season ends, and even some tourneys may be scheduled before then! I realize this on the SA side, but CT appears to have worked both sides of this equation to kill club as best they can.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
See CT's eligibility rules: https://www.casciac.org/pdfs/eligibility_brochure.pdf essentially, you cannot participate with an outside club team AT ALL in season! I don't know about you, but travel club practice definitely starts before the school season ends, and even some tourneys may be scheduled before then! I realize this on the SA side, but CT appears to have worked both sides of this equation to kill club as best they can.


CT has restricted the number of players that a HS coach can have on his team and in his program from his HS. Why shouldn't NY do the same thing? I couldn't care less about the disruption this would cause, you have to protect the integrity of HS sports at all costs. I really can't believe school districts allow this conflict, I view it as coercion and extortion, to exist.
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.


If your good you play.....period.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified
coaches.


If your good you play.....period.


Stop.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.


If your good you play.....period.


I have posted thi sbefore, but if you think there are no politics involved in youth sports, you are naive. There are politics involved in mulit-million dollar pro sports, so it easily happens at every level below it.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.


If your good you play.....period.


100% incorrect
We were in a similar position also in northern Westchester, my son is in middle school and played for the town summer team last year, coached by several of the HS coaches. I have to say he had the best coaching he's ever had and he loved it ! However this year he decided to try out for one of the club teams and made it. It was a tough decision but he decided to give the club a try this summer mostly due to the fact that although the town /HS coaches are phenomenal the level of a lot of the kids he'd be playing with is sub par because anyone can play, there's no tryout. Most of the kids who are better players play for club teams. He's the kind of kid who is a great town player but just a decent club player and he needs to be challenged by playing with better kids. So my point is that the town summer programs have their pros and cons and you need to decide whats best for your son. Don't listen to other parents you never know their intentions. I know for a fact that many of the starting players in our high school played for club teams in the summer, so I agree with if you're good you'll play. Good for you not being pressured! All the politics are in the town youth programs where the daddies are still coaching!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.


If your good you play.....period.


100% incorrect


Just because it wasn’t your experience doesn’t mean it’s everyone else’s. So I agree with original and say 100% CORRECT
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.


If your good you play.....period.


I have posted thi sbefore, but if you think there are no politics involved in youth sports, you are naive. There are politics involved in mulit-million dollar pro sports, so it easily happens at every level below it.


Politics are everywhere including employment, promotions, sports etc. Players of equal talent you can make the case that favorites play a part. But....on a whole in sports the best players play. No coach is going to sit his/her best players.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.


If your good you play.....period.


I have posted thi sbefore, but if you think there are no politics involved in youth sports, you are naive. There are politics involved in mulit-million dollar pro sports, so it easily happens at every level below it.


Politics are everywhere including employment, promotions, sports etc. Players of equal talent you can make the case that favorites play a part. But....on a whole in sports the best players play. No coach is going to sit his/her best players.


Yes, some coaches absolutely do not always play their best players. Good coaches are few and far between at the HS level.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.


If your good you play.....period.


I have posted thi sbefore, but if you think there are no politics involved in youth sports, you are naive. There are politics involved in mulit-million dollar pro sports, so it easily happens at every level below it.


Politics are everywhere including employment, promotions, sports etc. Players of equal talent you can make the case that favorites play a part. But....on a whole in sports the best players play. No coach is going to sit his/her best players.


Remember this the next time you see the pro player making millions of dollars a year who is basically stinking it up for half a season but is still starting, while a player at a level below him could do better. I get it - that player has the skills and potential to be the better player, but sometimes they just aren't at that time. And that player has been invested in by the team - they have to justify that investment in playing time. In the pros, it's money invested; in college it's time and effort to recruit. Both will ride poorly performing players long after they should have let another player play.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.


If your good you play.....period.


I have posted thi sbefore, but if you think there are no politics involved in youth sports, you are naive. There are politics involved in mulit-million dollar pro sports, so it easily happens at every level below it.


Politics are everywhere including employment, promotions, sports etc. Players of equal talent you can make the case that favorites play a part. But....on a whole in sports the best players play. No coach is going to sit his/her best players.


Remember this the next time you see the pro player making millions of dollars a year who is basically [ChillLaxin] the bed for half a season but is still starting, while a player at a level below him could do better. I get it - that player has the skills and potential to be the better player, but sometimes they just aren't at that time. And that player has been invested in by the team - they have to justify that investment in playing time. In the pros, it's money invested; in college it's time and effort to recruit. Both will ride poorly performing players long after they should have let another player play.



Ok. Last comment.......are you really equating/comparing pro sports players making millions of dollars to college/HS/youth sports. Cmon man....read the thread.....question was about 5th grade lax. Also note the comment...."on a whole". Stop with all the excuses why average players are picked over other average players ie recruiting, politics, team mom, daddy coach, too small, not athletic blah, blah. Sorry.....the best players play.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.


If your good you play.....period.


I have posted thi sbefore, but if you think there are no politics involved in youth sports, you are naive. There are politics involved in mulit-million dollar pro sports, so it easily happens at every level below it.


Politics are everywhere including employment, promotions, sports etc. Players of equal talent you can make the case that favorites play a part. But....on a whole in sports the best players play. No coach is going to sit his/her best players.


Remember this the next time you see the pro player making millions of dollars a year who is basically [ChillLaxin] the bed for half a season but is still starting, while a player at a level below him could do better. I get it - that player has the skills and potential to be the better player, but sometimes they just aren't at that time. And that player has been invested in by the team - they have to justify that investment in playing time. In the pros, it's money invested; in college it's time and effort to recruit. Both will ride poorly performing players long after they should have let another player play.



Ok. Last comment.......are you really equating/comparing pro sports players making millions of dollars to college/HS/youth sports. Cmon man....read the thread.....question was about 5th grade lax. Also note the comment...."on a whole". Stop with all the excuses why average players are picked over other average players ie recruiting, politics, team mom, daddy coach, too small, not athletic blah, blah. Sorry.....the best players play.


You missed the point - politics come into play at ALL levels of sports. On the whole, yes the best players will play - but if you're the parent of the one kid who is affected by the politics, you really couldn't care less about the "whole". Considering I've seen it both from player and coach's perspective, that is my take. I witnessed it firsthand as a SA in college for the reasons mentioned - it didn't affect me personally, but everyone on the team knew about it, talked about it. Highly recruited freshman literally stunk up the place for better than a half a season before they finally gave up on him and gave the job that any one of half dozen guys could have done better, to another player. Comparably guys who hadn't been as highly recruited were quickly replaced when they didn't play up to par, even though they were still playing at a level higher than the touted recruit. Similar stories from SA friends playing at other colleges. If you don't think daddy ball or affiliation with a club coach or whatever don't come into play at youth, you're crazy and/or naive. maybe it's only one player, but it happens. heck, I've been a youth coach in different sports for years, and I occasionally catch myself almost making player decisions based upon kids (or even parents!) that are personally annoying, or, vice versa, kids (and parents!) that are likable. That term "coachable" can be applied very widely to just about any character trait that you want to, good or bad, and it happens. Note that i am not saying there should be anything done about it, but to pretend it doesn't exists is ignorance.
You want to talk youth town stuff, here's a good one.

Best player on LI barely played on town youth team because of nepotism. They'd rather have friends kids playing over the best kid.

That kinda backed fired on town but inturn may have helped the kid in the end.
I've always said, if you are shelling out Travel club money, you better do some research to find out if any daddy coaches are on the team your son is looking to join. I witnessed one team that carried 3 daddy coaches and one of the coaches had 2 kids on the team. Kids aren't stupid, they see the favoritism that sometimes goes on in this situation. And you can't tell me some of these coaches don't know what they are doing. The majority of them can't even look you in the face when they pass you by. Finally, as contained in one of the above post "coachable" can be applied widely to define what you want it to be. But the coaches who are mature enough and stand clear from this type of practice of doing a dis-service to kids are very much in the minority.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.


If your good you play.....period.


Not true at all at our HS. The girls coach has been playing games for years. There have been countless times when she does not play the best or even the good players. It has nothing to do with a conflict with a Club. It is a combination of nepotism, incompetence and who knows what.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.


If your good you play.....period.


Not true at all at our HS. The girls coach has been playing games for years. There have been countless times when she does not play the best or even the good players. It has nothing to do with a conflict with a Club. It is a combination of nepotism, incompetence and who knows what.


I know it's extremely frustrating. I find myself many times just standing alone watching my son play, I refuse to get involved in idle chit chat with many of the parents. It's sad, but, it is what it is. Many of us don't know what occurs behind the scenes between some parents, coaches, teachers and administrators. I've overheard parents talking to certain teachers who are friends with the lacrosse coach to send a message for their son's regarding playing time. Being that my son plays on one of the top travel teams, often times some parents will walk over, try to pin me down, questioning me about travel lacrosse and everything my son does outside of school. Just as that happens, I pull my cell phone out and say "excuse me, have to take this call." You never know, the parent you think is okay will cut your head off just for their kid to play more than yours.
YJ HS coaches play YJ kids more and call up YJ kids first. Everyone is afraid of the queen

It's pay to play. period
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.


If your good you play.....period.


Not true at all at our HS. The girls coach has been playing games for years. There have been countless times when she does not play the best or even the good players. It has nothing to do with a conflict with a Club. It is a combination of nepotism, incompetence and who knows what.


I want to make sure I understand....You are saying that there is a HS coach who is not playing the teams best player??? And not playing the teams 2nd, 3rd best players. Soooo then who is playing?? My next question then is what HS team are you speaking of. Since you are listed as anonymous you should inform us but only after speaking with the AD of the school.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.

What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.


If your good you play.....period.


Not true at all at our HS. The girls coach has been playing games for years. There have been countless times when she does not play the best or even the good players. It has nothing to do with a conflict with a Club. It is a combination of nepotism, incompetence and who knows what.


I want to make sure I understand....You are saying that there is a HS coach who is not playing the teams best player??? And not playing the teams 2nd, 3rd best players. Soooo then who is playing?? My next question then is what HS team are you speaking of. Since you are listed as anonymous you should inform us but only after speaking with the AD of the school.


Not sure if they are talking about the same school but I can tell you it absolutely goes on at our school. It has been going on for years. There have been many games lost with several girls on the sideline who were without question stronger than many of the girls who were on the field. I realize that it must sound crazy but it is true and it will happen again this year
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
My son is in the 5th grade, we are in a northern Westchester "hot bed" for lacrosse. I've been told by 3 or 4 different parents that my son "has to play for XYZ summer club or he'll never play in HS because the Varsity coach runs the club". I have refused to be pressured into registering him for the team in spite of being invited by the program director. He plays for a summer program that has no connection to our HS program and everyone knows this HS associated club is far inferior to the one he plays on now.


What is a parent to do? My son loves playing for this other club, has many friends on the team and is being coached by a few highly qualified coaches.


If your good you play.....period.


Not true at all at our HS. The girls coach has been playing games for years. There have been countless times when she does not play the best or even the good players. It has nothing to do with a conflict with a Club. It is a combination of nepotism, incompetence and who knows what.


I want to make sure I understand....You are saying that there is a HS coach who is not playing the teams best player??? And not playing the teams 2nd, 3rd best players. Soooo then who is playing?? My next question then is what HS team are you speaking of. Since you are listed as anonymous you should inform us but only after speaking with the AD of the school.


At our school I don't think that I have ever seen the best 12 girls on the field at the same time. If you have never experienced a really bad coach this must be very difficult to believe. But it happens.
Rainbows, unicorns and ice cream.

What a joke that you don't think a club coach who has collected tens of thousands of dollars won't give their summer players the leg up against others
Been coaching for a long time and have never seen a single coach that has sat their best players and lost games just to keep making money.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Been coaching for a long time and have never seen a single coach that has sat their best players and lost games just to keep making money.


you haven't coached girls lacrosse in Manhasset. Girls HS program has deteriorated primarily to the decision making of the head coach. Favoritism, nepotism and employing club coaches on her team has resulted in the current state of this once esteemed program. not any longer.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Been coaching for a long time and have never seen a single coach that has sat their best players and lost games just to keep making money.


you haven't coached girls lacrosse in Manhasset. Girls HS program has deteriorated primarily to the decision making of the head coach. Favoritism, nepotism and employing club coaches on her team has resulted in the current state of this once esteemed program. not any longer.


The boys coach is an Igloo coach, so what.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Been coaching for a long time and have never seen a single coach that has sat their best players and lost games just to keep making money.


you haven't coached girls lacrosse in Manhasset. Girls HS program has deteriorated primarily to the decision making of the head coach. Favoritism, nepotism and employing club coaches on her team has resulted in the current state of this once esteemed program. not any longer.


"Current state of once esteemed program"?.....um, pre-season top 5 or 10 in polls?....yeah, program is really scraping bottom....just because your little princess doesn't measure up and left Liberty travel program (or didn't get picked for a Liberty A team), and may not make the Manhasset team this year...get a life
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Been coaching for a long time and have never seen a single coach that has sat their best players and lost games just to keep making money.


Stop it. Nobody said the best players, but in lacrosse there are only a few of those and then everybody else is jumbled together. That's where the kids that pay are rewarded. Amazing how they seem to win all the tiebreakers on playing time and call ups
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Been coaching for a long time and have never seen a single coach that has sat their best players and lost games just to keep making money.


Really? Taking off your blinders!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Been coaching for a long time and have never seen a single coach that has sat their best players and lost games just to keep making money.


you haven't coached girls lacrosse in Manhasset. Girls HS program has deteriorated primarily to the decision making of the head coach. Favoritism, nepotism and employing club coaches on her team has resulted in the current state of this once esteemed program. not any longer.


"Current state of once esteemed program"?.....um, pre-season top 5 or 10 in polls?....yeah, program is really scraping bottom....just because your little princess doesn't measure up and left Liberty travel program (or didn't get picked for a Liberty A team), and may not make the Manhasset team this year...get a life


***Gibberish
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Been coaching for a long time and have never seen a single coach that has sat their best players and lost games just to keep making money.


Really? Taking off your blinders!


Really? Maybe you have blinders on in regard to the lack of talent your child has, therefore you state that the “best” players are not in the field. Kind of reinforces your child’s shortcomings on the field.! Maybe you should take off YOUR blinders!
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Been coaching for a long time and have never seen a single coach that has sat their best players and lost games just to keep making money.


Really? Taking off your blinders!


Really? Maybe you have blinders on in regard to the lack of talent your child has, therefore you state that the “best” players are not in the field. Kind of reinforces your child’s shortcomings on the field.! Maybe you should take off YOUR blinders!


You must be one of those God's gift to coaching. Just by your response, can tell you're a di$k head coach.
I will say coaches and parents see things differently. But I have seen my share of great coaches and those who play games.
No one is saying the best kids don't play but on those close roster decisions and n those close playing time decisions you cant tell me the kids that have paid tens of thousands of dollars to the coach and her club don't get some favorable treatment. I've seen it first hand. Its no different than the booster parent kids winning those same tiebreakers.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Been coaching for a long time and have never seen a single coach that has sat their best players and lost games just to keep making money.


Really? Taking off your blinders!


Really? Maybe you have blinders on in regard to the lack of talent your child has, therefore you state that the “best” players are not in the field. Kind of reinforces your child’s shortcomings on the field.! Maybe you should take off YOUR blinders!


You must be one of those God's gift to coaching. Just by your response, can tell you're a di$k head coach.


And your son must be Gods gift to the lacrosse program. By your response I can see that you feel your son belongs on the field at all times. Let me guess, you’re the “shoot the ball” guy even when your kid is triple covered. Just by your response I can see you are a typical despised overbearing helicopter dad who is the ONLY one who can’t see his sons inability to play high level lacrosse.
That bull. It's quite simple. The $12K does matter to these coaches. They looking at $3K-$3.5K they get for getting those multiple kids on the AAU team. Just an FYI. Watch what happens if you child is a super star that does play on their AAU team and high school. Leave the AAU team and watch your superstar become just an average player in their eye. That the real wake-up call to the AAU parents. They won't do it because they know that it is true and they are scared to death to know that the only reason their kid was considered good was because the were paying to hear it. Good luck AAU eventually come to an end. Your wondering where is the return on my 20,30,40K and then and only then you realize there is none except a AAU Trophy for regionals. Which wasn't a actual regional because AAU has multiple leagues and six other regionals where happening down the street from you. The only time you will realize that there is no benefit is when it is over and you see that your 17 year old is being replaced with an 8 year old just like you child replace someone when they finished at 17.
© US Lacrosse Community Forum